Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10 (Vol. 1) by Anonymous

About this eBook

Author

Various

Title

Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I

Credits

Produced by Larry Harrison, Cindy Beyer, and the online Project Gutenberg team at www.pgdpcanada.net with images provided by The Internet Archives-US.

Language

English

LoC Class

KZ: Law in general, Comparative and uniform law, Jurisprudence: Law of nations

Subject

War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg

Category

Text

eBook-No.

54899

Project Gutenberg

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/54899

Release Date

June 13, 2017

Copyright

Public domain in the USA.

Contents

1. 1.Untitled
2. 2.PREFACE — CONTENTS — TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS BEFORE NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNALS — DECLARATION ON GERMAN ATROCITIES — EXECUTIVE ORDER 9547 — LONDON AGREEMENT OF 8 AUGUST 1945 — CHARTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL — I. CONSTITUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL — II. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES — III. COMMITTEE FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF MAJOR WAR CRIMINALS — IV. FAIR TRIAL FOR DEFENDANTS — V. POWERS OF THE TRIBUNAL AND CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL — VI. JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE — VII. EXPENSES — PROTOCOL — CONTROL COUNCIL LAW NO. 10 — PUNISHMENT OF PERSONS GUILTY OF WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST PEACE AND AGAINST HUMANITY — Article I — Article II — Article III — Article IV — Article V — EXECUTIVE ORDER 9679 — HEADQUARTERS — MILITARY GOVERNMENT—GERMANY UNITED STATES ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 7 — Article I — Article II — Article III — Article IV — Article V — Article VI — Article VII — Article VIII — Article IX — Article X — Article XI — Article XII — Article XIII — Article XIV — Article XV — Article XVI — Article XVII — Article XVIII — Article XIX — Article XX — Article XXI — Article XXII — Article XXIII — MILITARY GOVERNMENT—GERMANY ORDINANCE NO. 11 — Article I — Article II — Article III — OFFICIALS OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL — INTRODUCTION — ORDER CONSTITUTING TRIBUNAL I — MEMBERS OF THE TRIBUNAL — PROSECUTION COUNSEL — DEFENSE COUNSEL — I. INDICTMENT — COUNT ONE—THE COMMON DESIGN OR CONSPIRACY — COUNT TWO—WAR CRIMES — COUNT THREE—CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY — COUNT FOUR—MEMBERSHIP IN CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION — II. ARRAIGNMENT — III. STATEMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL ON THE ORDER OF TRIAL AND RULES OF PROCEDURE, 9 DECEMBER 1946 [6] — IV. OPENING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION BY BRIGADIER GENERAL TELFORD TAYLOR, 9 DECEMBER 1946. [7] — STATE MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE THIRD REICH — CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE GUISE OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH — A. High-Altitude Experiments — B. Freezing Experiments — C. Malaria Experiments — D. Mustard Gas Experiments — E. and F. Ravensbrueck Experiments Concerning Sulfanilamide and Other Drugs; Bone, Muscle, and Nerve Regeneration and Bone Transplantation — G. Sea-Water Experiments — H. Epidemic Jaundice — I. Sterilization Experiments — J. Typhus (Fleckfieber) and Related Experiments — K. Poison Experiments — L. Incendiary Bomb Experiments — M. Jewish Skeleton Collection — GERMAN MEDICAL ORGANIZATION Before 1933 — Immediate Impact of Nazism on German Medicine — Prostitution of German Medicine Under National Socialism — Medical School and Medical Training Under the Nazis — Summary — CRIMES OF MASS EXTERMINATION; MURDER OF POLISH NATIONALS — EUTHANASIA — SUMMARY — V. INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT ON THE PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE MADE BY THE PROSECUTION, 10 DECEMBER 1946 [13] — VI. ORGANIZATION OF THE GERMAN MEDICAL SERVICES — a. Introduction — b. Evidence — FUEHRER DECREE, 28 JULY 1942, CONCERNING THE MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES — 1942 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 515 — Fuehrer Decree of 28 July 1942, Concerning the Medical and Health Services — SECOND FUEHRER DECREE, 5 SEPTEMBER 1943, CONCERNING THE MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES — 1943 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 533 — Second Fuehrer Decree of 5 September 1943, Concerning the Medical and Health Services — FUEHRER DECREE, 25 AUGUST 1944, CONCERNING THE APPOINTMENT OF A REICH COMMISSIONER FOR MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES — 1944 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 185 — Fuehrer Decree of 25 August 1944, Concerning the Appointment of a Reich Commissioner for Medical and Health Services — FUEHRER DECREE OF 7 AUGUST 1944, CONCERNING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE WEHRMACHT — I Subordination and Powers — II Duties — III Special Powers — TABLE OF ORGANIZATION OF THE “AHNENERBE” FROM THE FILES OF THE AHNENERBE SOCIETY — “THE AHNENERBE” — LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO SIEVERS, 7 JULY 1942, CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN “INSTITUTE FOR MILITARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH” WITHIN THE AHNENERBE SOCIETY — FUEHRER DECREE, 9 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING THE REICH RESEARCH COUNCIL — 1942 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART 1, PAGE 389 — Fuehrer Decree of 9 June 1942 Concerning the Reich Research Council — VII. EXTRACTS FROM ARGUMENTATION AND EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE
3. 3.A. Medical Experiments — 1. HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection From the Argumentation of the Prosecution — c. Selections From the Argumentation of the Defense — d. Evidence — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 15 MAY 1941, CONCERNING HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS — LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO RASCHER, UNDATED, INFORMING HIM THAT PRISONERS WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR HIGH-ALTITUDE RESEARCH — LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO SIEVERS, 21 MARCH 1942, CONCERNING RASCHER’S PARTICIPATION IN HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 5 APRIL 1942, AND REPORT, UNDATED, ON HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS — FIRST INTERIM REPORT ON THE LOW-PRESSURE CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMP OF DACHAU — LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO RASCHER, 13 APRIL 1942, REGARDING HIS SUCCESS WITH HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER, 13 APRIL 1942, REQUESTING A REPETITION OF HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS ON PRISONERS CONDEMNED TO DEATH — TELETYPE FROM RASCHER TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 20 OCTOBER 1942, REQUESTING CLARIFICATION ON THE PARDON GRANTED BY HIMMLER — TELETYPE FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO SCHNITZLER, 21 OCTOBER 1942, CONCERNING THE PARDON GRANTED BY HIMMLER — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 16 APRIL 1942, REPORTING ON HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS WITH FATAL RESULTS AND ON EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED TOGETHER WITH ROMBERG — FILE NOTE FOR SS OBERSTURMFUEHRER SCHNITZLER, 28 APRIL 1942 — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 11 MAY 1942, AND SECRET REPORT CONCERNING HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS — LETTER, 29 SEPTEMBER 1942, AND REPORT, 28 JULY 1942, FROM ROMBERG AND RUFF TO HIMMLER CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON RESCUE FROM HIGH ALTITUDES — I. Introduction and Statement of the Problem — II. Procedure of the Experiment — III. Results of the Experiments — IV. Discussion of the Results — V. Conclusions from the Results — VI. Summary — Bibliography — LETTER FROM MILCH TO WOLFF, 20 MAY 1942, REGARDING CONTINUATION OF EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM MILCH TO HIMMLER, 31 AUGUST 1942, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF REPORTS BY RASCHER AND ROMBERG ON HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM HIPPKE TO HIMMLER, 8 OCTOBER 1942, THANKING THE LATTER FOR HIS ASSISTANCE IN HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU — NOTE BY ROMBERG ON SHOWING OF FILM IN OFFICE OF STATE SECRETARY MILCH, AND PROPOSED REPORT TO MILCH, 11 SEPTEMBER 1942 — LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO RASCHER, 13 DECEMBER 1942, AND HIMMLER’S ORDER ASSIGNING RASCHER TO HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF TRIBUNAL WITNESS WALTER NEFF [25] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT [26] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROMBERG [27] — 2. FREEZING EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — d. Evidence — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 10 SEPTEMBER 1942, TRANSMITTING INTERMEDIATE REPORT ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS (1618-PS) — INTERMEDIATE REPORT, 10 SEPTEMBER 1942, ON INTENSE CHILLING EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU CONCENTRATION CAMP — LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER AND SIEVERS, 22 SEPTEMBER 1942, ORDERING REWARMING IN FREEZING EXPERIMENTS THROUGH PHYSICAL WARMTH — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 3 OCTOBER 1942, STATING THAT SIEVERS WOULD OBTAIN FOUR GYPSY WOMEN FOR REWARMING THROUGH BODY WARMTH — TELETYPE FROM COMMANDANT OF DACHAU CONCENTRATION CAMP TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 7 OCTOBER 1942, STATING THAT FOUR WOMEN WOULD BE AVAILABLE FROM RAVENSBRUECK CONCENTRATION CAMP FOR RASCHER’S EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM GOERING’S OFFICE TO HIMMLER, 8 OCTOBER 1942, WITH ATTACHED INVITATION TO THE CONFERENCE ON “MEDICAL PROBLEMS ARISING FROM HARDSHIPS OF SEA AND WINTER” — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 16 OCTOBER 1942, TRANSMITTING REPORT ON COOLING EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS (NO-428) — REPORT OF 10 OCTOBER 1942, ON COOLING EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS — Behavior of the heart action under the influence of medication — LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER, 24 OCTOBER 1942, AND NOTE BY RUDOLF BRANDT — MEMORANDUM OF RASCHER ON WOMEN USED FOR REWARMING IN FREEZING EXPERIMENTS, 5 NOVEMBER 1942 — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO BRANDT, 28 JANUARY 1943, AND RASCHER’S REPORT ON HIS DISCUSSIONS WITH GRAWITZ AND POPPENDICK — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO HIMMLER, 17 FEBRUARY 1943, AND SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTS FOR REWARMING OF CHILLED HUMAN BEINGS BY ANIMAL WARMTH, 12 FEBRUARY 1943 — Experiments for rewarming of intensely chilled human beings by animal warmth — LETTER FROM HIPPKE TO HIMMLER, 19 FEBRUARY 1943, ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU — LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO RASCHER, 26 FEBRUARY 1943, ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS AUSCHWITZ AND LUBLIN — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 4 APRIL 1943, REPORTING ON DRY-FREEZING EXPERIMENTS IN DACHAU — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO KEINDL, 28 APRIL 1943, ABOUT PREVIOUS FREEZING EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED AT SACHSENHAUSEN — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO SIEVERS, 17 MAY 1943, CONCERNING, A CONFERENCE WITH GEBHARDT ON FREEZING EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM RASCHER TO NEFF, 21 OCTOBER 1943, CONCERNING DRY-FREEZING EXPERIMENTS — LIST OF RESEARCH PROJECTS FROM THE FILES OF THE REICH RESEARCH COUNCIL — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF TRIBUNAL WITNESS WALTER NEFF [30] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT HANDLOSER [31] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT SCHROEDER [32] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT SIEVERS [33] — 3. MALARIA EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT ROSE — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SIEVERS — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT SIEVERS — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT ROSE — d. Evidence — EXTRACTS FROM THE REVIEW OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE GENERAL MILITARY COURT IN THE CASE OF THE UNITED STATES VS. WEISS, RUPPERT, ET AL., HELD AT DACHAU, GERMANY — MILITARY GOVERNMENT COURT ORDER ON REVIEW — EXTRACTS FROM REPORT OF PROFESSOR DR. E. GILDEMEISTER CONCERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ROBERT KOCH INSTITUTE—REICH INSTITUTE FOR THE FIGHT AGAINST INFECTIOUS DISEASES — AFFIDAVIT OF PROFESSOR DR. HANS LUXENBURGER, 24 MARCH 1947, CONCERNING ROSE’S INTEREST IN THERAPEUTICAL MALARIA TREATMENTS — EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF PROFESSOR DR. ERNST GEORG NAUCK, M. D., HAMBURG 4, BERNHARD-NOCHT-INSTITUTE FOR NAUTICAL AND TROPICAL DISEASES — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS AUGUST H. VIEWEG [37] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE [38] — 4. LOST (MUSTARD) GAS EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SIEVERS — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT SIEVERS — d. Evidence — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 27 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING MUSTARD GAS AND ITS EFFECT ON HUMAN BEINGS — MEMORANDUM FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 3 NOVEMBER 1942, CONCERNING RESEARCH IN THE NATZWEILER CONCENTRATION CAMP — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 22 APRIL 1943, REGARDING PREVENTION OF DR. WIMMER’S TRANSFER TO ACTIVE DUTY WITH THE AIR FORCE — REPORT BY HIRT AND WIMMER ON THE PROPOSED TREATMENT OF POISONING CAUSED BY LOST GAS — LETTER FROM GRAWITZ TO HIMMLER, 22 NOVEMBER 1944, REQUESTING PRISONERS FOR EXPERIMENTS — EXTRACT FROM REPORT ON MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS ADDRESSED TO KARL BRANDT — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO GLUECKS, 11 SEPTEMBER 1942, CONCERNING MILITARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH WORK TO BE CONDUCTED AT NATZWEILER CONCENTRATION CAMP — AFFIDAVIT OF DR. WALTHER SCHIEBER ON HIS EFFORTS TO PURCHASE EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS IN SPAIN AND BRING THEM TO GERMANY — AFFIDAVIT OF DR. OTTO AMBROS, [39] 21 APRIL 1947, CONCERNING THE URGENCY OF EXPERIMENTS IN THE FIELD OF CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND THEIR COUNTERMEASURES — AFFIDAVIT OF DR. WALTER MIELENZ, 21 APRIL 1947, CONCERNING THE ASSIGNMENT OF KARL BRANDT IN CONNECTION WITH CHEMICAL WARFARE — 5. SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT GEBHARDT — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT — d. Evidence — AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT FISCHER, 19 NOVEMBER 1946, CONCERNING SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED IN THE CONCENTRATION CAMP RAVENSBRUECK — AFFIDAVIT OF THE DEFENDANT FISCHER, 21 OCTOBER 1946, SUPPLEMENTING HIS AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS — EXTRACT FROM AFFIDAVIT OF DR. KARL FRIEDRICH BRUNNER, 14 MARCH 1947 — EXTRACT FROM REPORT ON THE FIRST CONFERENCE EAST OF CONSULTING SPECIALISTS ON 18 AND 19 MAY 1942 AT THE MILITARY MEDICAL ACADEMY, BERLIN — EXTRACTS FROM REPORT ON THE THIRD CONFERENCE EAST OF CONSULTING SPECIALISTS ON 24 TO 26 MAY 1943 AT THE MILITARY MEDICAL ACADEMY, BERLIN — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS JADWIGA DZIDO [40] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF THE PROSECUTION EXPERT WITNESS DR. LEO ALEXANDER [41] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT GEBHARDT [42] — 6. BONE, MUSCLE AND NERVE REGENERATION AND BONE TRANSPLANTATION EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT GEBHARDT — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT [43] — d. Evidence — AFFIDAVIT OF MRS. ZDENKA NEDVEDOVA-NEJEDLA, M. D., OF PRAGUE, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON FELLOW INMATES AT RAVENSBRUECK CONCENTRATION CAMP — AFFIDAVIT OF SOFIA MACZKA [44] , 16 APRIL 1946, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL OPERATIONS ON INMATES OF THE RAVENSBRUECK CONCENTRATION CAMP — EXTRACT FROM “CLINIC AND PRACTICE”, WEEKLY JOURNAL FOR THE PRACTICING PHYSICIAN, REGARDING BONE TRANSPLANTATION — EXTRACTS FROM AFFIDAVIT OF DR. KARL FRIEDRICH BRUNNER, 14 MARCH 1943, CONCERNING SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED AT THE CLINIC OF HOHENLYCHEN — EXTRACT FROM AFFIDAVIT OF DR. JOSE KOESTLER, 27 FEBRUARY 1947, CONCERNING DR. GEBHARDT’S ACTIVITIES — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS MISS KAROLEWSKA [45] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF THE PROSECUTION EXPERT WITNESS DR. LEO ALEXANDER [46] — 7. SEA-WATER EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SCHROEDER — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT SCHROEDER [47] — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT BEIGLBOECK — d. Evidence — LETTER FROM THE TECHNICAL OFFICE OF THE REICH MINISTER OF AVIATION (GOERING) TO HIMMLER’S OFFICE, 15 MAY 1944, CONCERNING METHODS TO RENDER SEA WATER POTABLE — MINUTES OF CONFERENCE AT THE REICH MINISTRY OF AVIATION, 20 MAY 1944, CONCERNING METHODS FOR MAKING SEA WATER POTABLE — LETTER FROM SCHROEDER TO HIMMLER AND GRAWITZ, 7 JUNE 1944, REQUESTING SUBJECTS FOR SEA-WATER EXPERIMENTS — TELETYPE FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO GRAWITZ, UNDATED, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO GRAWITZ, 24 JULY 1944, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON THE POTABILITY OF SEA WATER — PARTIAL TRANSLATION OF BECKER-FREYSENG DOCUMENT 42 BECKER-FREYSENG DEFENSE EXHIBIT 29 — AFFIDAVIT OF DR. LUDWIG HARRIEHAUSEN, 9 JANUARY 1947, REGARDING USE OF PATIENTS IN SEA-WATER EXPERIMENTS — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS KARL HOELLENRAINER [51] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BEIGLBOECK [52] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE EXPERT WITNESS DR. FRANZ VOLLHARDT [53] — 8. EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT HANDLOSER — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SCHROEDER — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT HANDLOSER [54] — d. Evidence — AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT, 14 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE — NOTE FROM HIMMLER TO GRAWITZ, 16 JUNE 1943, CONCERNING EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS AT CONCENTRATION CAMP SACHSENHAUSEN — LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO SCHREIBER, 12 JUNE 1944, CONCERNING EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS — COPY OF LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO GUTZEIT, 27 JUNE 1944, CONCERNING EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS ON HUMAN BEINGS — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT [56] — 9. TYPHUS AND OTHER VACCINE EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SCHROEDER — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT ROSE — EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY [59] — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY — d. Evidence — EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT HOVEN, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING TYPHUS AND VIRUS EXPERIMENTS — DIARY OF THE DIVISION FOR TYPHUS AND VIRUS RESEARCH AT THE INSTITUTE OF HYGIENE OF THE WAFFEN SS, 1941 TO 1945 (DING DIARY) — EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. ERWIN SCHULER, 20 JULY 1945, CONCERNING TYPHUS EXPERIMENTS — 1943 WORK REPORT FOR DEPARTMENT FOR TYPHUS AND VIRUS RESEARCH — LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO HIRT, 15 NOVEMBER 1943, CONCERNING PRISONERS TO BE USED AS EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS FOR TESTS WITH TYPHUS VACCINE — LETTER DICTATED BY ROSE, ADDRESSED TO HAAGEN, 13 DECEMBER 1943, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS FOR VACCINE EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM HAAGEN TO HIRT, 9 MARCH 1944, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED WITH TYPHUS VACCINE AND REQUESTING EXPERIMENTAL SUBJECTS — LETTER FROM DR. GRUNSKE TO HAAGEN, 7 MARCH 1944, CONCERNING REPORTS ON YELLOW FEVER VIRUS EXPERIMENTS REQUESTED BY A JAPANESE MEDICAL OFFICER — EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF PROFESSOR OTTO LENZ, DIRECTOR OF THE ROBERT KOCH INSTITUTE IN BERLIN — EXTRACT FROM A CERTIFIED STATEMENT, 4 MARCH 1947, OF J. OERSKOV, M. D., DIRECTOR OF THE STATE SERUM INSTITUTE IN COPENHAGEN — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS EUGEN KOGON [63] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE [64] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY [65] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESS DR. EUGEN HAAGEN [66] — 10. EXPERIMENTS WITH POISON — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY [68] — d. Evidence — REPORT FROM MRUGOWSKY TO THE CRIMINOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, 12 SEPTEMBER 1944, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS WITH ACONITINE NITRATE PROJECTILES — Poison Projectile of a Russian 7.65 Caliber Pistol Cartridge — Russian 7.65 mm. Caliber Pistol Cartridge with Poison Projectile — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS DR. EUGEN KOGON [70] — 11. INCENDIARY BOMB EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection From the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT POPPENDICK — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT POPPENDICK — d. Evidence — EXTRACTS FROM A REPORT ON THE FINDINGS OF 2 JANUARY 1944, ON A SKIN OINTMENT—R 17—FOR PHOSPHORUS BURNS — EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF UDO VON WOYRSCH, 3 MAY 1947, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON COMBATING INJURIES DUE TO PHOSPHORUS INCENDIARY BOMBS — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS EUGEN KOGON [72] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY [73] — 12. PHLEGMON EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT GEBHARDT — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT [74] — d. Evidence — REPORT FROM GRAWITZ TO HIMMLER, 29 AUGUST 1942, CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL REMEDIES CONDUCTED AT THE DACHAU AND AUSCHWITZ CONCENTRATION CAMPS — EXTRACTS OF LETTER FROM GRAWITZ TO HIMMLER, 7 SEPTEMBER 1942, AND REPORT ON GAS GANGRENE EXPERIMENTS — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS HEINRICH W. STOEHR [75] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT GEBHARDT [76] — 13. POLYGAL EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT BLOME — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT BLOME — d. Evidence — AFFIDAVIT OF FRITZ FRIEDRICH KARL RASCHER, M. D., 31 DECEMBER 1946, CONCERNING THE LIFE AND ACTIVITIES OF DR. SIGMUND RASCHER — REPORT FROM THE INSTITUTE FOR MILITARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, (DEPARTMENT DR. RASCHER) ON “POLYGAL 10” — MEMORANDUM BY SS OBERSTURMBANNFUEHRER WOLFF, 8 MAY 1944; LETTERS FROM DR. KAHR TO RASCHER, 10 AND 16 DECEMBER 1943 — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT SIEVERS [79] — 14. GAS OEDEMA (PHENOL) EXPERIMENTS — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY — d. Evidence — EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF WALDEMAR HOVEN, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING THE KILLING OF INMATES BY PHENOL AND OTHER MEANS — EXTRACT FROM A SWORN STATEMENT BY DR. ERWIN SCHULER (DING), 20 JULY 1945, CONCERNING EUTHANASIA WITH PHENOL INJECTION — EXTRACTS FROM TESTIMONY OF THE DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY [80] — 15. EXPERIMENTS FOR MASS STERILIZATION — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT [83] — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT POKORNY — d. Evidence — EXTRACTS FROM AFFIDAVIT OF KARL WILHELM FRIEDRICH TAUBOECK, 18 JUNE 1947, CONCERNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF, AND EXPERIMENTS WITH STERILIZATION DRUGS — LETTER FROM POKORNY TO HIMMLER, OCTOBER 1941, CONCERNING A STERILIZATION DRUG TO BE USED AGAINST GERMANY’S ENEMIES — LETTER FROM HIMMLER, 10 MARCH 1942, TO POHL (INITIALED BY RUDOLF BRANDT) CONCERNING A STERILIZATION DRUG AND SUGGESTING FURTHER RESEARCH ON CRIMINALS — LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO POHL, JUNE 1942, TRANSMITTING AN INQUIRY BY HIMMLER AS TO THE PROGRESS MADE WITH EXPERIMENTS FOR MEDICAL STERILIZATION — LETTER FROM POHL TO HIMMLER, 3 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STERILIZATION DRUG BY THE FIRM OF DR. MADAUS AND CO. — LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO POHL, 11 JUNE 1942, ASKING HIM ON BEHALF OF HIMMLER TO SET UP A LARGE HOTHOUSE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STERILIZATION DRUG — LETTER FROM GUND TO HIMMLER, 24 AUGUST 1942, CONCERNING RESEARCH IN MEDICAL STERILIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF STERILIZATION DRUGS — COVERING LETTER FROM BRACK TO HIMMLER, 28 MARCH 1941, WITH REPORT ON EXPERIMENTS CONCERNING STERILIZATION AND CASTRATION BY X-RAYS — LETTER FROM BRACK TO HIMMLER, 23 JUNE 1942, PROPOSING STERILIZATION OF TWO TO THREE MILLION JEWS — LETTER FROM HIMMLER (COUNTERSIGNED BY RUDOLF BRANDT), 11 AUGUST 1942, ADDRESSED TO BRACK, CONCERNING HIMMLER’S INTEREST IN STERILIZATION EXPERIMENTS — LETTER FROM BLANKENBURG TO HIMMLER, 29 APRIL 1944, REGARDING EMPLOYMENT OF DR. HORST SCHUMANN ON EXPERIMENTS CONCERNING THE INFLUENCE OF X-RAYS ON HUMAN GENITAL GLANDS IN CONNECTION WITH SIMILAR EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED AT CONCENTRATION CAMP AUSCHWITZ — LETTER FROM PROFESSOR CLAUBERG TO HIMMLER, 30 MAY 1942 (REFERRING TO A LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT), CONCERNING THE URGENCY OF RESEARCH INTO BIOLOGICAL PROPAGATION AND STERILIZATION WITHOUT OPERATION, AND DRAFT OF A “RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL PROPAGATION” — MEMORANDUM OF RUDOLF BRANDT, JULY 1942, ON A DISCUSSION BETWEEN HIMMLER, GEBHARDT, GLUECKS, AND CLAUBERG CONCERNING STERILIZATION EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED ON JEWESSES — LETTER FROM RUDOLF BRANDT TO CLAUBERG, 10 JULY 1942, TRANSMITTING INSTRUCTIONS OF HIMMLER TO PERFORM STERILIZATIONS ON JEWESSES AT CONCENTRATION CAMP RAVENSBRUECK — LETTER FROM PROFESSOR CLAUBERG TO HIMMLER, 7 JUNE 1943, REPORTING ON RESEARCH IN CONNECTION WITH THE STERILIZATION OF WOMEN — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF THE DEFENDANT VIKTOR BRACK [84]
4. 4.B. Jewish Skeleton Collection — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SIEVERS — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT SIEVERS — d. Evidence — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 9 FEBRUARY 1942, AND REPORT BY HIRT CONCERNING THE ACQUISITION OF SKULLS OF JEWISH-BOLSHEVIK COMMISSARS — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 2 NOVEMBER 1942, REQUESTING WITH HIMMLER’S APPROVAL, 150 SKELETONS — LETTER FROM SIEVERS TO EICHMANN (COPY TO RUDOLF BRANDT), 21 JUNE 1943, CONCERNING SELECTION OF SUBJECTS FOR A SKELETON COLLECTION — EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. GISELA SCHMITZ, 27 MARCH 1947, ON SIEVERS’ POSITION IN THE AHNENERBE SOCIETY AND HIS CONNECTION WITH THE SKELETON COLLECTION — REGULATIONS FOR THE COMMANDOS (EINSATZKOMMANDOS) [87] OF THE SECURITY POLICE AND THE SECURITY SERVICE TO BE ACTIVATED IN STALAGS — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT [88]
5. 5.C. Project To Kill Tubercular Polish Nationals — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT BLOME — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR THE DEFENDANT BLOME [90] — d. Evidence — LETTER FROM KOPPE TO RUDOLF BRANDT, 3 MAY 1942, CONCERNINGTHE KILLING OF TUBERCULAR POLES — LETTER FROM HIMMLER (SIGNED BY RUDOLF BRANDT) TO GREISER, 27 JUNE 1942, CONCERNING THE EXTERMINATION OF TUBERCULAR POLES — LETTER FROM BLOME TO GREISER, 18 NOVEMBER 1942, CONCERNING THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF TUBERCULAR POLES — AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RUDOLF BRANDT, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING THE PLAN TO EXTERMINATE TUBERCULAR POLISH NATIONALS — LETTER FROM GREISER TO HIMMLER, 1 MAY 1942, CONCERNING THE PLAN FOR MASS EXTERMINATION OF TUBERCULAR POLES — EXTRACTS FROM A REPORT ON THE GERMAN TUBERCULOSIS CONFERENCE OF 18 TO 20 MARCH 1937, AT WIESBADEN — EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. OSKAR GUNDERMANN, 28 DECEMBER 1946, STATING THAT BLOME OPPOSED THE PLAN TO EXTERMINATE TUBERCULAR POLES AND THAT THE PLAN WAS NEVER CARRIED OUT — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BLOME [91]
6. 6.D. Euthanasia — a. Introduction — b. Selections from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST THE DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT BRACK — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT — EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR THE DEFENDANT BRACK [108] — d. Evidence — EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT BRACK, 14 OCTOBER 1946, DESCRIBING ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS AND PROCEDURE OF THE EUTHANASIA PROGRAM — LETTER FROM DR. HILFRICH, BISHOP OF LIMBURG, TO THE REICH MINISTER OF JUSTICE, 13 AUGUST 1941, PROTESTING AGAINST THE KILLING OF MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE — EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT HOVEN, 24 OCTOBER 1946, CONCERNING THE TRANSFER OF CONCENTRATION CAMP INMATES TO EUTHANASIA STATIONS FOR EXTERMINATION — LETTER FROM HITLER TO KARL BRANDT AND BOUHLER, 1 SEPTEMBER 1939, CHARGING THEM WITH THE EXECUTION OF EUTHANASIA — CONFIRMATION, 30 AUGUST 1940, OF THE TRANSFER OF MENTAL PATIENTS WITH LIST OF TRANSFERRED PATIENTS ATTACHED — LETTER FROM DR. CONTI TO THE MENTAL HOSPITAL IN KAUFBEUREN, 16 NOVEMBER 1939, REQUESTING THAT QUESTIONNAIRES (ATTACHED) BE FILLED OUT FOR INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS; LETTER FROM THE GENERAL SICK TRANSPORT COMPANY TO THE MENTAL HOSPITAL IN KAUFBEUREN, 12 MAY 1941, STATING THAT THE COMPANY WOULD REMOVE MENTAL PATIENTS; REPORT FROM THE PROVINCIAL ASSOCIATION FOR SOCIAL WELFARE IN SWABIA, 6 MAY 1941, THAT ALL TRANSFERRED PATIENTS HAD DIED; LETTER FROM GAUM, 24 NOVEMBER 1942, TO DR. LEINISCH STATING THAT EPILEPTICS WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH — EXTRACT FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. LUDWIG SPRAUER, 23 APRIL 1946, CONCERNING THE ORGANIZATION OF THE EUTHANASIA PROGRAM — LETTER FROM THE CHIEF OF THE INSTITUTION FOR FEEBLE-MINDED IN STETTEN TO DR. FRANK, 6 SEPTEMBER 1940, REQUESTING THAT EUTHANASIA BE CARRIED OUT ONLY AFTER LEGAL BASIS WAS CREATED — NOTE BY SELLMER, 6 DECEMBER 1940, DESCRIBING THE METHOD OF SELECTION FOR EUTHANASIA — LETTER FROM HIMMLER TO BRACK, 19 DECEMBER 1940, REQUESTING THAT EUTHANASIA STATION GRAFENECK BE DISCONTINUED AND THAT MOTION PICTURES BE SHOWN TO DISPEL RUMORS — LETTER FROM BRACK TO DR. SCHLEGELBERGER [112] , 18 APRIL 1941, FORWARDING FORMS FOR EUTHANASIA AND SUGGESTING THAT DEATH NOTIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT FOLLOW A STEREOTYPED FORM — LETTER FROM HIRCHE, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE MENTAL INSTITUTION BERNBURG, TO CAMP COMMANDANT OF THE GROSS-ROSEN CONCENTRATION CAMP, 19 MARCH 1942, WITH LIST OF INMATES TRANSFERRED FROM THE CONCENTRATION CAMP TO BERNBURG — EXTRACT FROM LETTER FROM DR. FRITZ MENNECKE TO HIS WIFE, 25 NOVEMBER 1941, CONCERNING HIS ACTIVITIES AS PHYSICIAN SELECTING INMATES OF CONCENTRATION CAMP BUCHENWALD FOR EUTHANASIA — CIRCULAR FROM GLUECKS TO CONCENTRATION CAMP COMMANDANTS, 27 APRIL 1943, STATING THAT IN THE FUTURE ONLY INSANE PRISONERS SHOULD BE USED FOR ACTION “14 F 13” (EUTHANASIA) — DIRECTIVE OF THE REICH MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR, 6 SEPTEMBER 1944, ORDERING EUTHANASIA EXTENDED TO INSANE EASTERN WORKERS — EXTRACT FROM THE FIELD INTERROGATION OF KURT GERSTEIN, 26 APRIL 1945, DESCRIBING THE MASS GASSING OF JEWS AND OTHER “UNDESIRABLES” — UNSIGNED DRAFT LETTER FROM DR. WETZEL TO ROSENBERG, 25 OCTOBER 1941, DEALING WITH BRACK’S COLLABORATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF GAS CHAMBERS FOR THE EXTERMINATION OF JEWS — EXTRACTS FROM THE AFFIDAVIT OF DR. WERNER KIRCHERT, 29 JANUARY 1947, STATING THAT KARL BRANDT WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE EUTHANASIA PROGRAM — AFFIDAVIT OF ALFRED RUEGGEBERG, 23 JANUARY 1947, CONCERNING RADIO DISCUSSIONS ON EUTHANASIA — AFFIDAVIT OF EDUARD WOERMANN, 18 JANUARY 1947. CONCERNING DISCUSSIONS OF KARL BRANDT AND PASTOR BODELSCHWINGH ON EUTHANASIA — AFFIDAVIT OF DR. HELMUTH WEESE, 19 MARCH 1947, CONCERNING USE OF CALADIUM SEGUINUM FOR STERILIZATION — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS DR. MENNECKE [114] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT BRACK [115] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS WALTER E. SCHMIDT [117] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT [118]
7. 7.E. Selections From Photographic Evidence of the Prosecution — VIII. EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS ON IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THE CASE
8. 8.A. Applicability of Control Council Law No. 10 to Offenses Against Germans During the War — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION [121] — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT
9. 9.B. Responsibility of Superiors for Acts of Subordinates — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION [139] — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT [144] — EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT SCHROEDER [145] — EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT ROSTOCK [146] — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT HANDLOSER — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT GENZKEN — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT BLOME
10. 10.C. Responsibility of Subordinates for Acts Carried Out Under Superior Orders — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION [149] — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT BRACK [151] — EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT FISCHER [154] — d. Evidence — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT [156] — EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE [157]
11. 11.D. Status of Occupied Poland Under International Law — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION [158] — c. Selection from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACT FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT GEBHARDT [161]
12. 12.E. Voluntary Participation of Experimental Subjects — a. Introduction — b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution — EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION [162] — c. Selections from the Argumentation of the Defense — EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT — EXTRACTS FROM THE FINAL PLEA FOR DEFENDANT RUFF [164] — d. Evidence — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS EUGEN KOGON [165] — EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION EXPERT WITNESS DR. ANDREW C. IVY [166]

Community reviews

Sign in to write a review.

No reviews yet.