The Trial of Jesus, Vol. I

About this eBook

Author

Chandler, Walter M. (Walter Marion), 1867-1935

Title

The Trial of Jesus from a Lawyer's Standpoint, Vol. 1 (of 2) The Hebrew Trial

Credits

Produced by Jeff G., Eleni Christofaki and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at www.pgdp.net

Language

English

LoC Class

BT: Philosophy, Psychology, Religion: Christianity: Doctrinal theology, God, Christology

Subject

Trials (Treason) -- Jerusalem

Category

Text

eBook-No.

40966

Project Gutenberg

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/40966

Release Date

October 7, 2012

Copyright

Public domain in the USA.

Contents

1. 1.Transcriber's notes — THE TRIAL OF JESUS
2. 2.LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
3. 3.CONTENTS OF VOLUME ONE
4. 4.PREFACE TO VOLUME ONE
5. 5.THE GOSPEL NARRATIVES
6. 6.PART I THE RECORD OF FACT
7. 7.CHAPTER I — THE RECORD OF FACT
8. 8.PART II HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW
9. 9.CHAPTER I — HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—MOSAIC AND TALMUDIC
10. 10.CHAPTER II — HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
11. 11.CHAPTER III — HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—COURTS AND JUDGES
12. 12.CHAPTER IV — HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE
13. 13.CHAPTER V — HEBREW CRIMINAL LAW—MODE OF TRIAL AND EXECUTION IN CAPITAL CASES
14. 14.PART III THE BRIEF
15. 15.THE BRIEF — POINT I — THE ARREST OF JESUS WAS ILLEGAL — POINT II — THE PRIVATE EXAMINATION OF JESUS BEFORE ANNAS (OR CAIAPHAS) WAS ILLEGAL — POINT III — THE INDICTMENT AGAINST JESUS WAS, IN FORM, ILLEGAL — POINT IV — THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SANHEDRIN AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY WERE CONDUCTED AT NIGHT — POINT V — THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SANHEDRIN AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THE COURT CONVENED BEFORE THE OFFERING OF THE MORNING SACRIFICE — POINT VI — THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY WERE CONDUCTED ON THE DAY PRECEDING A JEWISH SABBATH; ALSO ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE FEAST OF UNLEAVENED BREAD AND THE EVE OF THE PASSOVER — POINT VII — THE TRIAL OF JESUS WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE IT WAS CONCLUDED WITHIN ONE DAY — POINT VIII — THE SENTENCE OF CONDEMNATION PRONOUNCED AGAINST JESUS BY THE SANHEDRIN WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE IT WAS FOUNDED UPON HIS UNCORROBORATED CONFESSION — POINT IX — THE CONDEMNATION OF JESUS WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE THE VERDICT OF THE SANHEDRIN WAS UNANIMOUS — POINT X — THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JESUS WERE ILLEGAL IN THAT: (1) THE SENTENCE OF CONDEMNATION WAS PRONOUNCED IN A PLACE FORBIDDEN BY LAW; (2) THE HIGH PRIEST RENT HIS CLOTHES; (3) THE BALLOTING WAS IRREGULAR — POINT XI — THE MEMBERS OF THE GREAT SANHEDRIN WERE LEGALLY DISQUALIFIED TO TRY JESUS — POINT XII — THE CONDEMNATION OF JESUS WAS ILLEGAL BECAUSE THE MERITS OF THE DEFENSE WERE NOT CONSIDERED — FOOTNOTES:
16. 16.INDEX — Corrections

Community reviews

Sign in to write a review.

No reviews yet.