[A.D. 1066.] BATTLE OF HASTINGS.
Normans and English, incited by different motives, have
written of king William: the former have praised him to
excess; extolling to the utmost both his good and his
bad actions: while the latter, out of national hatred, have
laden their conqueror with undeserved reproach. For my
part, as the blood of either people flows in my veins, I shall
steer a middle course: where I am certified of his good
deeds, I shall openly proclaim them; his bad conduct I
shall touch upon lightly and sparingly, though not so as to
conceal it; so that neither shall my narrative be condemned
as false, nor will I brand that man with ignominious censure,
almost the whole of whose actions may reasonably be
excused, if not commended. Wherefore I shall willingly
and carefully relate such anecdotes of him, as may be matter
of incitement to the indolent, or of example to the enterprising;
useful to the present age, and pleasing to posterity.
But I shall spend little time in relating such things as are of
service to no one, and which produce disgust in the reader,
as well as ill-will to the author. There are always people,
more than sufficient, ready to detract from the actions of the
noble: my course of proceeding will be, to extenuate evil, as
much as can be consistently with truth, and not to bestow
excessive commendation even on good actions. For this
moderation, as I imagine, all true judges will esteem me
neither timid, nor unskilful. And this rule too, my history
will regard equally, with respect both to William and his
two sons; that nothing shall be dwelt on too fondly; nothing
untrue shall be admitted. The elder of these did little worthy
of praise, if we except the early part of his reign; gaining,
throughout the whole of his life, the favour of the
military at the expense of the people. The second, more
obsequious to his father than to his brother, possessed his
spirit, unsubdued either by prosperity or adversity: on regarding
his warlike expeditions, it is matter of doubt,
whether he was more cautious or more bold; on contemplating
their event, whether he was more fortunate, or unsuccessful.
There will be a time, however, when the reader
may judge for himself. I am now about to begin my third
volume; and I think I have said enough to make him attentive,
and disposed to receive instruction: his own feelings
will persuade him to be candid.
[A.D. 1066.] WILLIAM THE FIRST.
Robert, second son of Richard the Second, after he had,
with great glory, held the duchy of Normandy for seven
years, resolved on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. He had, at
that time, a son seven years of age, born of a concubine,
whose beauty he had accidentally beheld, as she was dancing,
and had become so smitten with it, as to form a connexion
with her: after which, he loved her exclusively, and,
for some time, regarded her as his wife. He had by her
this boy, named, after his great-great-grandfather, William,
whose future glory was portended to his mother by a dream;
wherein she imagined her intestines were stretched out, and
extended over the whole of Normandy and England: and,
at the very moment, also, when the infant burst into life and
touched the ground, he filled both hands with the rushes
strewed upon the floor, firmly grasping what he had taken
up. This prodigy was joyfully witnessed by the women,
gossipping on the occasion; and the midwife hailed the propitious
omen, declaring that the boy would be a king.
Every provision being made for the expedition to Jerusalem,290
the chiefs were summoned to a council at Feschamp,
where, at his father’s command, all swore fidelity to William:
earl Gilbert was appointed his guardian; and the
protection of the earl was assigned to Henry, king of
France. While Robert was prosecuting his journey, the
Normans, each in his several station, united in common for
the defence of their country, and regarded their infant lord
with great affection. This fidelity continued till the report
was spread of Robert’s death, upon which their affection
changed with his fortune; and then they began severally to
fortify their towns, to build castles, to carry in provisions,
and to seek the earliest opportunities of revolting from the
child. In the meantime, however, doubtlessly by the special
aid of God who had destined him to the sovereignty of such
an extended empire, he grew up uninjured; while Gilbert,
almost alone, defended by arms what was just and right:
the rest being occupied by the designs of their respective
parties. But Gilbert being at this time killed by his cousin
Rodulph, fire and slaughter raged on all sides. The country,
formerly most flourishing, was now torn with intestine
broils, and divided at the pleasure of the plunderers; so that
it was justly entitled to proclaim, “Woe to the land whose
sovereign is a child.”291
William, however, as soon as his age permitted, receiving
the badge of knighthood from the king of France, inspirited
the inhabitants to hope for quiet. The sower of dissension
was one Guy, a Burgundian on his father’s side, and grandson
to Richard the Second by his daughter. William and
Guy had been children together, and at that time were
equally approaching to manhood. Mutual intercourse had
produced an intimacy between them which had ripened
into friendship. Moreover, thinking, as they were related,
that he ought to deny him nothing, he had given him the
castles of Briony and Vernon. The Burgundian, unmindful
of this, estranged himself from the earl, feigning sufficient
cause of offence to colour his conduct. It would be tedious,
and useless, to relate what actions were performed on either
side, what castles were taken; for his perfidy had found
abettors in Nigel, viscount of Coutances, Ralph, viscount
of Bayeux, and Haimo Dentatus, grandfather of Robert,
who was the occupier of many estates in England in our
time. With these persons, this most daring plunderer, allured
by vain expectation of succeeding to the earldom,
was devastating the whole of Normandy. A sense of duty,
however, compelled the guardian-king to succour the desperate
circumstances of his ward. Remembering, therefore,
the kindness of his father, and that he had, by his influence,
exalted him to the kingdom, he rushed on the revolters at
Walesdun. Many thousands of them were there slain;
many drowned in the river Orne, by its rapidity, while,
being hard-pressed, they spurred their horses to ford the
current. Guy, escaping with difficulty, betook himself to
Briony; but was driven thence by William, and unable to
endure this disgrace, he retired, of his own accord, to Burgundy,
his native soil. Here too his unquiet spirit found no
rest; for being expelled thence by his brother, William, earl
of that province, against whom he had conceived designs, it
appears not what fate befell him. Nigel and Ralph were
admitted to fealty: Haimo fell in the field of battle; after
having become celebrated by his remarkable daring for
having unhorsed the king himself; in consequence of which
he was despatched by the surrounding guards, and, in admiration
of his valour, honourably buried at the king’s command.
King Henry received a compensation for this favour,
when the Norman lord actively assisted him against Geoffrey
Martel at Herle-Mill, which is a fortress in the country
of Anjou. For William had now attained his manly vigour;
an object of dread even to his elders, and though alone, a
match for numbers. Unattended he would rush on danger;
and when unaccompanied, or with only a few followers, dart
into the thickest ranks of the enemy. By this expedition
he gained the reputation of admirable bravery, as well as
the sincerest regard of the king; so that, with parental
affection, he would often admonish him not to hold life in
contempt by encountering danger so precipitately; a life,
which was the ornament of the French, the safeguard of
the Normans, and an example to both.
[A.D. 1047.] GEOFFREY, EARL OF ANJOU.
At that time Geoffrey292 was earl of Anjou, who had boastingly
taken the surname of Martel, as he seemed, by a
certain kind of good fortune, to beat down all his opponents.
Finally, he had made captive, in open battle, his liege lord,
the earl of Poitou; and, loading him with chains, had compelled
him to dishonourable terms of peace; namely, that he
should yield up Bourdeaux and the neighbouring cities, and
pay an annual tribute for the rest. But he, as it is thought,
through the injuries of his confinement and want of food,
was, after three days, released from eternal ignominy by a
timely death. Martel then, that his effrontery might be
complete, married the stepmother of the deceased; taking
his brothers under his protection until they should be capable
of governing the principality. Next entering the territories
of Theobald, earl of Blois, he laid siege to the city of
Tours; and while he was hastening to the succour of his
subjects, made him participate in their afflictions; for being
taken, and shut up in prison, he ceded the city from himself
and his heirs for ever. Who shall dare cry shame on this
man’s cowardice, who, for the enjoyment of a little longer
life, defrauded his successors for ever of the dominion of
so great a city? for although we are too apt to be severe
judges of others, yet we must know, that we should consult
our own safety, if we were ever to be placed in similar circumstances.
In this manner Martel, insolent from the accession
of so much power, obtained possession of the castle
of Alençon, even from the earl of Normandy; its inhabitants
being faithlessly disposed. Irritated at this outrage, William
retaliated, and invested Danfrunt, which at that time belonged
to the earl of Anjou. Geoffrey, immediately, excited
by the complaints of the besieged, hastily rushed forward
with a countless force. Hearing of his approach, William
sends Roger Montgomery293 and William Fitz-Osberne to
reconnoitre. They, from the activity of youth, proceeding
many miles in a short time, espied Martel on horseback, and
apprized him of the dauntless boldness of their lord. Martel
immediately began to rage, to threaten mightily what he
would do; and said that he would come thither the next
day, and show to the world at large how much an Angevin
could excel a Norman in battle: at the same time, with unparalleled
insolence, describing the colour of his horse, and
the devices on the arms he meant to use. The Norman
nobles, with equal vanity, relating the same of William,
return and stimulate their party to the conflict. I have
described these things minutely, for the purpose of displaying
the arrogance of Martel. On this occasion, however, he
manifested none of his usual magnanimity, for he retreated
without coming to battle; on hearing which, the inhabitants
of Alençon surrendered, covenanting for personal safety;
and, afterwards, those of Danfrunt also, listed under the
more fortunate standard.
[A.D. 1047.] WILLIAM OF ARCHES.
In succeeding years William, earl of Arches, his illegitimate
uncle, who had always been faithless and fluctuating
from his first entrance on the duchy, rebelled against him;
for, even during the siege of Danfrunt, he had unexpectedly
stolen away, and had communicated to many persons the
secrets of his soul. In consequence of this, William had
committed the keeping of his castle to some men, whom he
had erroneously deemed faithful; but the earl, with his
usual skill in deception, had seduced even these people to his
party, by giving them many things, and promising them
more. Thus possessed of the fortress, he declared war
against his lord. William, with his customary alacrity, contrary
to the advice of his friends, laid siege to Arches,
declaring publicly, that the miscreants would not dare attempt
any thing, if they came into his sight. Nor was his
assertion false: for more than three hundred soldiers, who
had gone out to plunder and forage, the instant they beheld
him, though almost unattended, fled back into their fortifications.
Being inclined to settle this business without bloodshed,
he fortified a castle in front of Arches, and turned to
matters of hostile operation which required deeper attention,
because he was aware that the king of France, who had
already become adverse to him from some unknown cause,
was hastening to the succour of the besieged. He here gave
an instance of very laudable forbearance; for though he certainly
appeared to have the juster cause, yet he was reluctant
to engage with that person, to whom he was bound both by
oath and by obligation. He left some of his nobility, however,
to repress the impetuosity of the king; who, falling
into an ambush laid by their contrivance, had most deservedly
to lament Isembard, earl of Ponthieu, who was
killed in his sight, and Hugh Bardulf, who was taken
prisoner. Not long after, in consequence of his miscarriage,
retiring to his beloved France, the earl of Arches, wasted
with hunger, and worn to a skeleton, consented to surrender,
and was preserved, life and limb, an example of clemency,
and a proof of perseverance. During the interval of this
siege, the people of the fortress called Moulin, becoming disaffected,
at the instigation of one Walter, went over to the
king’s side. An active party of soldiers was placed there,
under the command of Guy, brother of the earl of Poitou,
who diligently attended for some time to his military duties:
but on hearing the report of the victory at Arches, he stole
away into France, and contributed, by these means, considerably
to the glory of the duke.
King Henry, however, did not give indulgence to inactivity;
but, muttering that his armies had been a laughing-stock
to William, immediately collected all his forces, and,
dividing them into two bodies, he over-ran the whole of
Normandy. He himself headed all the military power which
came from that part of Celtic Gaul which lies between the
rivers Garonne and Seine; and gave his brother Odo the
command over such as came from that part of Belgic Gaul
which is situated between the Rhine and the Seine. In like
manner William divided his army, with all the skill he possessed;
approaching by degrees the camp of the king, which
was pitched in the country of Briony, in such a manner, as
neither to come to close engagement, nor yet suffer the province
to be devastated in his presence. His generals were
Robert, earl of Aux; Hugo de Gournay, Hugo de Montfort,
and William Crispin, who opposed Odo at a town called
Mortemar. Nor did he, relying on the numerous army
which he commanded, at all delay coming to action; yet
making only slight resistance at the beginning, and afterwards
being unable to withstand the attack of the Normans,
he retreated, and was himself the first to fly. And here,
while Guy, earl of Ponthieu, was anxiously endeavouring to
revenge his brother, he was made captive, and felt, together
with many others surpassing in affluence and rank, the
weight of that hand which was so fatal to his family. When
William was informed of this success by messengers, he took
care that it should be proclaimed in the dead of night, near
the king’s tent. On hearing which he retired, after some
days spent in Normandy, into France; and, soon after, ambassadors
passing between them, it was concluded, by treaty,
that the king’s partizans should be set at liberty, and that
the earl should become legally possessed of all that had been,
or should hereafter be, taken from Martel.
It would be both tedious and useless, to relate their perpetual
contentions, or how William always came off conqueror.
What shall we say besides, when, magnanimously
despising the custom of modern times, he never condescended
to attack him suddenly, or without acquainting him
of the day. Moreover, I pass by the circumstance of king
Henry’s again violating his friendship; his entering Normandy,
and proceeding through the district of Hiesmes to
the river Dive, boasting that the sea was the sole obstacle
to his farther progress. But William now perceiving himself
reduced to extremities by the king’s perfidy, at length
brandished the arms of conscious valour, and worsted the
royal forces which were beyond the river—for part of them,
hearing of his arrival, had passed over some little time before—with
such entire loss, that henceforth France had no
such object of dread as that of irritating the ferocity of the
Normans. The death of Henry soon following, and, shortly
after, that of Martel, put an end to these broils. The dying
king delegated the care of his son Philip, at that time extremely
young, to Baldwin earl of Flanders. He was a
man equally celebrated for fidelity and wisdom; in the full
possession of bodily strength, and also ennobled by a marriage
with the king’s sister. His daughter, Matilda, a woman
who was a singular mirror of prudence in our time,
and the perfection of virtue, had been already married to
William. Hence it arose, that being mediator between his
ward, and his son-in-law, Baldwin restrained, by his wholesome
counsels, the feuds of the chiefs, and of the people.
[A.D. 1058.] FULK, EARL OF ANJOU.
But since the mention of Martel has so often presented
itself, I shall briefly trace the genealogy of the earls of
Anjou,294 as far as the knowledge of my informant reaches.
Fulk the elder, presiding over that county for many years,
until he became advanced in years, performed many great
and prudent actions. There is only one thing for which I
have heard him branded: for, having induced Herbert earl
of Maine to come to Saintes, under the promise of yielding
him that city, he caused him, in the midst of their conversation,
to be surrounded by his attendants, and compelled him
to submit to his own conditions: in other respects he was
a man of irreproachable integrity. In his latter days, he
ceded his principality to Geoffrey his son so often mentioned.
Geoffrey conducted himself with excessive barbarity to the
inhabitants, and with equal haughtiness even to the person
who had conferred this honour upon him: on which, being
ordered by his father to lay down the government and ensigns
of authority, he was arrogant enough to take up arms
against him. The blood of the old man, though grown cold
and languid, yet boiled with indignation; and in the course
of a few days, by adopting wiser counsels, he so brought
down the proud spirit of his son, that after carrying his
saddle295 on his back for some miles, he cast himself with
his burden at his father’s feet. He, fired once more with
his ancient courage, rising up and spurning the prostrate
youth with his foot, exclaimed, “You are conquered at last!
you are conquered!” repeating his words several times.
The suppliant had still spirit enough to make this admirable
reply, “I am conquered by you alone, because you are my
father; by others I am utterly invincible.” With this
speech his irritated mind was mollified, and having consoled
the mortification of his son by paternal affection, he
restored him to the principality, with admonitions to conduct
himself more wisely: telling him that the prosperity and
tranquillity of the people were creditable to him abroad, as
well as advantageous at home. In the same year the old
man, having discharged all secular concerns, made provision
for his soul, by proceeding to Jerusalem; where compelling
two servants by an oath to do whatever he commanded,
he was by them publicly dragged naked, in the
sight of the Turks, to the holy sepulchre. One of them
had twisted a withe about his neck, the other with a rod
scourged his bare back, whilst he cried out, “Lord, receive
the wretched Fulk, thy perfidious, thy runagate; regard my
repentant soul, O Lord Jesu Christ.” At this time he obtained
not his request; but, peacefully returning home, he
died some few years after. The precipitate boldness of his
son Geoffrey has been amply displayed in my preceding history.
He dying, bequeathed to Geoffrey, his sister’s son, his
inheritance, but his worldly industry he could not leave him.
For being a youth of simple manners, and more accustomed
to pray in church, than to handle arms, he excited the contempt
of the people of that country, who knew not how to
live in quiet. In consequence, the whole district becoming
exposed to plunderers, Fulk, his brother, of his own accord,
seized on the duchy. Fulk was called Rhechin, from
his perpetual growling at the simplicity of his brother, whom
he finally despoiled of his dignity, and kept in continual custody.
He had a wife, who, being enticed by the desire of
enjoying a higher title, deserted him and married Philip king
of France; who so desperately loved her, regardless of the
adage,
“Majesty and love
But ill accord, nor share the self-same seat,”
that he patiently suffered himself to be completely governed
by her, though he was at the same time desirous of ruling
over every other person. Lastly, for several years, merely
through regard for her, he suffered himself to be pointed at
like an idiot, and to be excommunicated from the whole
Christian world. The sons of Fulk were Geoffrey and
Fulk. Geoffrey obtaining the hereditary surname of Martel,
ennobled it by his exertions: for he procured such peace
and tranquillity in those parts, as no one ever had seen, or
will see in future. On this account being killed by the
treachery of his people, he forfeited the credit of his consummate
worth. Fulk succeeding to the government, is yet
living;296 of whom as I shall perhaps have occasion to speak
in the times of king Henry, I will now proceed to relate
what remains concerning William.
[A.D. 1058.] GEOFFREY MARTEL.
When, after much labour, he had quelled all civil dissension,
he meditated an exploit of greater fame, and determined
to recover those countries anciently attached to Normandy,
though now disunited by long custom. I allude to
the counties of Maine and Brittany; of which Mans, long
since burnt by Martel and deprived of its sovereign Hugo,
had lately experienced some little respite under Herbert the
son of Hugo; who, with a view to greater security against
the earl of Anjou, had submitted, and sworn fidelity to William:
besides, he had solicited his daughter in marriage,
and had been betrothed to her, though he died by disease
ere she was marriageable. He left William his heir, adjuring
his subjects to admit no other; telling them, they
might have, if they chose, a mild and honourable lord;
but, should they not, a most determined assertor of his
right. On his decease, the inhabitants of Maine rather inclined
to Walter of Mantes, who had married Hugo’s sister:
but at length, being brought to their senses by many heavy
losses, they acknowledged William. This was the time,
when Harold was unwillingly carried to Normandy by an
unpropitious gale; whom, as is before mentioned, William
took with him in his expedition to Brittany, to make proof
of his prowess, and, at the same time, with the deeper design
of showing to him his military equipment, that he
might perceive how far preferable was the Norman sword
to the English battle-axe. Alan, at that time, earl of Brittany,
flourishing in youth, and of transcendent strength, had
overcome his uncle Eudo, and performed many famous actions;
and so far from fearing William, had even voluntarily
irritated him. But he, laying claim to Brittany as his
hereditary territory, because Charles had given it with his
daughter, Gisla, to Rollo, shortly acted in such wise, that
Alan came suppliantly to him, and surrendered himself and
his possessions. And since I shall have but little to say of
Brittany hereafter, I will here briefly insert an extraordinary
occurrence, which happened about that time in the city of
Nantes.
[A.D. 1065.] STORY OF TWO CLERKS.
There were in that city two clerks, who though not yet of
legal age, had obtained the priesthood from the bishop of
that place, more by entreaty than desert: the pitiable death
of one of whom, at length taught the survivor, how near
they had before been to the brink of hell. As to the knowledge
of literature, they were so instructed, that they wanted
little of perfection. From their earliest infancy, they had in
such wise vied in offices of friendship, that according to the
expression of the comic writer,297 “To serve each other they
would not only stir hand and foot, but even risk the loss of
life itself.” Wherefore, one day, when they found their
minds more than usually free from outward cares, they spoke
their sentiments, in a secret place, to the following effect:
“That for many years they had given their attention sometimes
to literature, and sometimes to secular cares; nor had
they satisfied their minds, which had been occupied rather in
wrong than proper pursuits; that in the meanwhile, the
bitter day was insensibly approaching, which would burst
the bond of union which was indissoluble while life remained:
wherefore they should provide in time, that the friendship
which united them while living should accompany him who
died first to the place of the dead.” They agreed, therefore,
that whichever should first depart, should certainly appear to
the survivor, either waking or sleeping, if possible within
thirty days, to inform him, that, according to the Platonic tenet,
death does not extinguish the spirit, but sends it back again,
as it were from prison, to God its author. If this did not
take place, then they must yield to the sect of the Epicureans,
who hold, that the soul, liberated from the body, vanishes
into air, or mingles with the wind. Mutually plighting their
faith, they repeated this oath in their daily conversation.
A short time elapsed, and behold a violent death suddenly
deprived one of them of life. The other remained, and
seriously revolving the promise of his friend, and constantly
expecting his presence, during thirty days, found his hopes
disappointed. At the expiration of this time, when, despairing
of seeing him, he had occupied his leisure in other business,
the deceased, with that pale countenance which dying
persons assume, suddenly stood before him, when awake, and
busied on some matter. The dead first addressing the living
man, who was silent: “Do you know me?” said he; “I
do,” replied the other; “nor am I so much disturbed at
your unusual presence, as I wonder at your prolonged absence.”
But when he had accounted for the tardiness of his
appearance; “At length,” said he, “at length, having overcome
every impediment, I am present; which presence, if
you please, my friend, will be advantageous to you, but to
me totally unprofitable; for I am doomed, by a sentence
which has been pronounced and approved, to eternal punishment.”
When the living man promised to give all his property
to monasteries, and to the poor, and to spend days and
nights in fasting and prayer, for the release of the defunct;
he replied, “What I have said is fixed; for the judgments
of God, by which I am plunged in the sulphureous whirlpool
of hell, are without repentance. There I shall be tossed
for my crimes, as long as the pole whirls round the stars, or
ocean beats the shores. The rigour of this irreversible sentence
remains for ever, devising lasting and innumerable
kinds of punishment: now, therefore, let the whole world
seek for availing remedies! And that you may experience
some little of my numberless pains, behold,” said he, stretching
out his hand, dripping with a corrupted ulcer, “one of
the very smallest of them; does it appear trifling to you?”
When the other replied, that it did appear so; he bent his
fingers into the palm, and threw three drops of the purulent
matter upon him; two of which touching his temples, and
one his forehead, penetrated the skin and flesh, as if with a
burning cautery, and made holes of the size of a nut. When
his friend acknowledged the acuteness of the pain, by the
cry he uttered, “This,” said the dead man, “will be a strong
proof to you, as long as you live, of my pains; and, unless
you neglect it, a singular token for your salvation. Wherefore,
while you have the power; while indignation is suspended
over your head; while God’s lingering mercy waits
for you; change your habit, change your disposition; become
a monk at Rennes, in the monastery of St. Melanius.”
When the living man was unwilling to agree to these words,
the other, sternly glancing at him, “If you doubt, wretched
man,” said he, “turn and read these letters;” and with these
words, he stretched out his hand, inscribed with black characters,
in which, Satan, and all the company of infernals sent
their thanks, from hell, to the whole ecclesiastical body; as
well for denying themselves no single pleasure, as for sending,
through neglect of their preaching, so many of their subject-souls
to hell, as no former age had ever witnessed. With
these words the speaker vanished; and the hearer distributing
his whole property to the church and to the poor,
went to the monastery; admonishing all, who heard or saw
him, of his sudden conversion, and extraordinary interview,
so that they exclaimed, “It is the right hand of the Almighty
that has done this.”
[A.D. 1065.] NEGOTIATION OF WILLIAM I.
I feel no regret at having inserted this for the benefit of
my readers: now I shall return to William. For since I
have briefly, but I hope not uselessly, gone over the transactions
in which he was engaged, when only earl of Normandy,
for thirty years, the order of time now requires a new series
of relation; that I may, as far as my inquiries have discovered,
detect fallacy, and declare the truth relating to his
regal government.
When king Edward had yielded to fate, England, fluctuating
with doubtful favour, was uncertain to which ruler
she should commit herself: to Harold, William, or Edgar:
for the king had recommended him also to the nobility, as
nearest to the sovereignty in point of birth; concealing his
better judgment from the tenderness of his disposition.
Wherefore, as I have said above, the English were distracted
in their choice, although all of them openly wished well to
Harold. He, indeed, once dignified with the diadem, thought
nothing of the covenant between himself and William: he
said, that he was absolved from his oath, because his daughter,
to whom he had been betrothed, had died before she was
marriageable. For this man, though possessing numberless
good qualities, is reported to have been careless about abstaining
from perfidy, so that he could, by any device, elude
the reasonings of men on this matter. Moreover, supposing
that the threats of William would never be put into execution,
because he was occupied in wars with neighbouring princes,
he had, with his subjects, given full indulgence to security.
For indeed, had he not heard that the king of Norway was
approaching, he would neither have condescended to collect
troops, nor to array them. William, in the meantime, began
mildly to address him by messengers; to expostulate on the
broken covenant; to mingle threats with entreaties; and to
warn him, that ere a year expired, he would claim his due
by the sword, and that he would come to that place, where
Harold supposed he had firmer footing than himself. Harold
again rejoined what I have related, concerning the nuptials
of his daughter, and added, that he had been precipitate on
the subject of the kingdom, in having confirmed to him by
oath another’s right, without the universal consent and edict
of the general meeting, and of the people: again, that a rash
oath ought to be broken; for if the oath, or vow, which a
maiden, under her father’s roof, made concerning her person,
without the knowledge of her parents, was adjudged invalid;
how much more invalid must that oath be, which he had
made concerning the whole kingdom, when under the king’s
authority, compelled by the necessity of the time, and without
the knowledge of the nation.298 Besides it was an unjust
request, to ask him to resign a government which he had
assumed by the universal kindness of his fellow subjects,
and which would neither be agreeable to the people, nor safe
for the military.
[A.D. 1066.] PREPARATIONS FOR WAR.
In this way, confounded either by true, or plausible, arguments,
the messengers returned without success. The earl,
however, made every necessary preparation for war during
the whole of that year; retained his own soldiers with increased
pay, and invited those of others: ordered his ranks
and battalions in such wise, that the soldiers should be tall
and stout; that the commanders and standard-bearers, in
addition to their military science, should be looked up to for
their wisdom and age; insomuch, that each of them, whether
seen in the field or elsewhere, might be taken for a prince,
rather than a leader. The bishops and abbats of those days
vied so much in religion, and the nobility in princely liberality,
that it is wonderful,299 within a period of less than
sixty300 years, how either order should have become so unfruitful
in goodness, as to take up a confederate war against
justice: the former, through desire of ecclesiastical promotion,
embracing wrong in preference to right and equity;
and the latter, casting off shame, and seeking every occasion
for begging money as for their daily pay. But at that time
the prudence of William, seconded by the providence of God,
already anticipated the invasion of England; and that no
rashness might stain his just cause, he sent to the pope, formerly
Anselm, bishop of Lucca, who had assumed the name
of Alexander, alleging the justice of the war which he meditated
with all the eloquence he was master of. Harold
omitted to do this, either because he was proud by nature,
or else distrusted his cause; or because he feared that his
messengers would be obstructed by William and his partisans,
who beset every port. The pope, duly examining the
pretensions of both parties, delivered a standard to William,
as an auspicious presage of the kingdom: on receiving
which, he summoned an assembly of his nobles, at Lillebourne,
for the purpose of ascertaining their sentiments on this
attempt. And when he had confirmed, by splendid promises,
all who approved his design, he appointed them to
prepare shipping, in proportion to the extent of their possessions.
Thus they departed at that time; and, in the
month of August, re-assembled in a body at St. Vallery,301
for so that port is called by its new name. Collecting,
therefore, ships from every quarter, they awaited the propitious
gale which was to carry them to their destination.
When this delayed blowing for several days, the common
soldiers, as is generally the case, began to mutter in their
tents, “that the man must be mad, who wished to subjugate
a foreign country; that God opposed him, who withheld the
wind; that his father purposed a similar attempt, and was
in like manner frustrated; that it was the fate of that family
to aspire to things beyond their reach, and find God for their
adversary.” In consequence of these things, which were
enough to enervate the force of the brave, being publicly
noised abroad, the duke held a council with his chiefs, and
ordered the body of St. Vallery to be brought forth, and to
be exposed to the open air, for the purpose of imploring a
wind. No delay now interposed, but the wished-for gale
filled their sails. A joyful clamour then arising, summoned
every one to the ships. The earl himself first launching
from the continent into the deep, awaited the rest, at anchor,
nearly in mid-channel. All then assembled round the crimson
sail of the admiral’s ship; and, having first dined, they
arrived, after a favourable passage, at Hastings. As he disembarked
he slipped down, but turned the accident to his
advantage; a soldier who stood near calling out to him,
“you hold England,302 my lord, its future king.” He then
restrained his whole army from plundering; warning them,
that they should now abstain from what must hereafter be
their own;303 and for fifteen successive days he remained so
perfectly quiet, that he seemed to think of nothing less than
of war.
[A.D. 1066.] HAROLD’S SPIES TAKEN.
In the meantime Harold returned from the battle with
the Norwegians; happy, in his own estimation, at having
conquered; but not so in mine, as he had secured the victory
by parricide. When the news of the Norman’s arrival
reached him, reeking as he was from battle, he proceeded to
Hastings, though accompanied by very few forces. No
doubt the fates urged him on, as he neither summoned his
troops, nor, had he been willing to do so, would he have
found many ready to obey his call; so hostile were all to
him, as I have before observed, from his having appropriated
the northern spoils entirely to himself. He sent out some
persons, however, to reconnoitre the number and strength of
the enemy: these, being taken within the camp, William
ordered to be led amongst the tents, and, after feasting
them plentifully, to be sent back uninjured to their lord.
On their return, Harold inquired what news they brought:
when, after relating at full, the noble confidence of the
general, they gravely added, that almost all his army had the
appearance of priests, as they had the whole face, with both
lips, shaven. For the English leave the upper lip unshorn,
suffering the hair continually to increase; which Julius
Cæsar, in his treatise on the Gallic War,304 affirms to have
been a national custom with the ancient inhabitants of
Britain. The king smiled at the simplicity of the relators,
observing, with a pleasant laugh, that they were not priests,
but soldiers, strong in arms, and invincible in spirit. His
brother, Girth, a youth, on the verge of manhood, and of
knowledge and valour surpassing his years, caught up his
words: “Since,” said he, “you extol so much the valour of
the Norman, I think it ill-advised for you, who are his
inferior in strength and desert, to contend with him. Nor
can you deny being bound to him, by oath, either willingly,
or by compulsion. Wherefore you will act wisely, if, yourself
withdrawing from this pressing emergency, you allow us
to try the issue of a battle. We, who are free from all obligation,
shall justly draw the sword in defence of our country.
It is to be apprehended, if you engage, that you will be
either subjected to flight or to death: whereas, if we only
fight, your cause will be safe at all events: for you will be
able both to rally the fugitives, and to avenge the dead.”
His unbridled rashness yielded no placid ear to the words
of his adviser, thinking it base, and a reproach to his past
life, to turn his back on danger of any kind; and, with
similar impudence, or to speak more favourably, imprudence,
he drove away a monk, the messenger of William, not deigning
him even a complacent look; imprecating only, that God
would decide between him and the earl. He was the bearer
of three propositions: either that Harold should relinquish
the kingdom, according to his agreement, or hold it of
William; or decide the matter by single combat in the sight
of either army. For William305 claimed the kingdom, on the
ground that king Edward, by the advice of Stigand, the
archbishop, and of the earls Godwin and Siward, had
granted it to him, and had sent the son and nephew of Godwin
to Normandy, as sureties of the grant. If Harold
should deny this, he would abide by the judgment of the
pope, or by battle: on all which propositions, the messenger
being frustrated by the single answer I have related, returned,
and communicated to his party fresh spirit for the
conflict.
[A.D. 1066.] BATTLE OF HASTINGS.
The courageous leaders mutually prepared for battle, each
according to his national custom. The English, as we have
heard, passed the night without sleep, in drinking and singing,
and, in the morning, proceeded without delay towards
the enemy; all were on foot, armed with battle-axes, and
covering themselves in front by the junction of their shields,
they formed an impenetrable body, which would have secured
their safety that day, had not the Normans, by a
feigned flight, induced them to open their ranks, which till
that time, according to their custom, were closely compacted.
The king himself on foot, stood, with his brother, near the
standard; in order that, while all shared equal danger, none
might think of retreating. This standard William sent,
after the victory, to the pope; it was sumptuously embroidered,
with gold and precious stones, in the form of a man
fighting.
On the other side, the Normans passed the whole night
in confessing their sins, and received the sacrament in the
morning: their infantry, with bows and arrows, formed the
vanguard, while their cavalry, divided into wings, were
thrown back. The earl, with serene countenance, declaring
aloud, that God would favour his, as being the righteous
side, called for his arms; and presently, when, through the
hurry of his attendants, he had put on his hauberk the hind
part before,306 he corrected the mistake with a laugh; saying,
“My dukedom shall be turned into a kingdom.” Then beginning
the song of Roland,307 that the warlike example of
that man might stimulate the soldiers, and calling on God
for assistance, the battle commenced on both sides. They
fought with ardour, neither giving ground, for great part
of the day. Finding this, William gave a signal to his party,
that, by a feigned flight, they should retreat. Through this
device, the close body of the English, opening for the purpose
of cutting down the straggling enemy, brought upon
itself swift destruction; for the Normans, facing about, attacked
them thus disordered, and compelled them to fly. In
this manner, deceived by a stratagem, they met an honourable
death in avenging their country; nor indeed were they
at all wanting to their own revenge, as, by frequently making
a stand, they slaughtered their pursuers in heaps: for, getting
possession of an eminence, they drove down the Normans,
when roused with indignation and anxiously striving
to gain the higher ground, into the valley beneath, where,
easily hurling their javelins and rolling down stones on them
as they stood below, they destroyed them to a man. Besides,
by a short passage, with which they were acquainted,
avoiding a deep ditch, they trod under foot such a multitude
of their enemies in that place, that they made the hollow
level with the plain, by the heaps of carcasses. This vicissitude
of first one party conquering, and then the other, prevailed
as long as the life of Harold continued; but when he
fell, from having his brain pierced with an arrow, the flight
of the English ceased not until night. The valour of both
leaders was here eminently conspicuous.
Harold, not merely content with the duty of a general in
exhorting others, diligently entered into every soldier-like
office; often would he strike the enemy when coming to
close quarters, so that none could approach him with impunity;
for immediately the same blow levelled both horse
and rider. Wherefore, as I have related, receiving the fatal
arrow from a distance, he yielded to death. One of the
soldiers with a sword gashed his thigh, as he lay prostrate;
for which shameful and cowardly action, he was branded
with ignominy by William, and dismissed the service.
William too was equally ready to encourage by his voice
and by his presence; to be the first to rush forward; to
attack the thickest of the foe. Thus everywhere raging,
everywhere furious, he lost three choice horses, which were
that day pierced under him. The dauntless spirit and
vigour of the intrepid general, however, still persisted,
though often called back by the kind remonstrance of his
body-guard; he still persisted, I say, till approaching night
crowned him with complete victory. And no doubt, the
hand of God so protected him, that the enemy should draw
no blood from his person, though they aimed so many javelins
at him.
[A.D. 1066.] CUSTOMS OF THE ENGLISH.
This was a fatal day to England, a melancholy havoc of
our dear country, through its change of masters. For it
had long since adopted the manners of the Angles, which
had been very various according to the times: for in the
first years of their arrival, they were barbarians in their
look and manners, warlike in their usages, heathens in their
rites; but, after embracing the faith of Christ, by degrees,
and in process of time, from the peace they enjoyed, regarding
arms only in a secondary light, they gave their whole
attention to religion. I say nothing of the poor, the meanness
of whose fortune often restrains them from overstepping
the bounds of justice: I omit men of ecclesiastical rank,
whom sometimes respect to their profession, and sometimes
the fear of shame, suffer not to deviate from the truth: I
speak of princes, who from the greatness of their power
might have full liberty to indulge in pleasure; some of
whom, in their own country, and others at Rome, changing
their habit, obtained a heavenly kingdom, and a saintly
intercourse. Many during their whole lives in outward
appearance only embraced the present world, in order that
they might exhaust their treasures on the poor, or divide
them amongst monasteries. What shall I say of the multitudes
of bishops, hermits, and abbats? Does not the whole
island blaze with such numerous relics of its natives, that
you can scarcely pass a village of any consequence but you
hear the name of some new saint, besides the numbers of
whom all notices have perished through the want of records?
Nevertheless, in process of time, the desire after literature
and religion had decayed, for several years before the arrival
of the Normans. The clergy, contented with a very slight
degree of learning, could scarcely stammer out the words of
the sacraments; and a person who understood grammar, was
an object of wonder and astonishment. The monks mocked
the rule of their order by fine vestments, and the use of
every kind of food. The nobility, given up to luxury and
wantonness, went not to church in the morning after the
manner of Christians, but merely, in a careless manner,
heard matins and masses from a hurrying priest in their
chambers, amid the blandishments of their wives. The
commonalty, left unprotected, became a prey to the most
powerful, who amassed fortunes, by either seizing on their
property, or by selling their persons into foreign countries;
although it be an innate quality of this people, to be more
inclined to revelling, than to the accumulation of wealth.
There was one custom, repugnant to nature, which they
adopted; namely, to sell their female servants, when pregnant
by them and after they had satisfied their lust, either
to public prostitution, or foreign slavery. Drinking in parties
was a universal practice, in which occupation they
passed entire nights as well as days. They consumed their
whole substance in mean and despicable houses; unlike the
Normans and French, who, in noble and splendid mansions,
lived with frugality. The vices attendant on drunkenness,
which enervate the human mind, followed; hence it arose
that engaging William, more with rashness, and precipitate
fury, than military skill, they doomed themselves, and their
country to slavery, by one, and that an easy, victory. “For
nothing is less effective than rashness; and what begins with
violence, quickly ceases, or is repelled.” In fine, the English
at that time, wore short garments reaching to the mid-knee;
they had their hair cropped; their beards shaven; their arms
laden with golden bracelets; their skin adorned with punctured
designs. They were accustomed to eat till they became
surfeited, and to drink till they were sick. These
latter qualities they imparted to their conquerors; as to the
rest, they adopted their manners. I would not, however,
have these bad propensities universally ascribed to the English.
I know that many of the clergy, at that day, trod the
path of sanctity, by a blameless life; I know that many of
the laity, of all ranks and conditions, in this nation, were
well-pleasing to God. Be injustice far from this account;
the accusation does not involve the whole indiscriminately.
“But, as in peace, the mercy of God often cherishes the
bad and the good together; so, equally, does his severity,
sometimes, include them both in captivity.”
Moreover, the Normans, that I may speak of them also,
were at that time, and are even now, proudly apparelled,
delicate in their food, but not excessive. They are a race
inured to war, and can hardly live without it; fierce in rushing
against the enemy; and where strength fails of success,
ready to use stratagem, or to corrupt by bribery. As I have
related, they live in large edifices with economy; envy their
equals; wish to excel their superiors; and plunder their
subjects, though they defend them from others; they are
faithful to their lords, though a slight offence renders them
perfidious. They weigh treachery by its chance of success,
and change their sentiments with money. They are, however,
the kindest of nations, and they esteem strangers worthy of
equal honour with themselves. They also intermarry with
their vassals. They revived, by their arrival, the observances
of religion, which were everywhere grown lifeless in
England. You might see churches rise in every village, and
monasteries in the towns and cities, built after a style unknown
before; you might behold the country flourishing
with renovated rites; so that each wealthy man accounted
that day lost to him, which he had neglected to signalize by
some magnificent action. But having enlarged sufficiently
on these points, let us pursue the transactions of William.
[A.D. 1066.] WILLIAM’S CORONATION.
When his victory was complete, he caused his dead to be
interred with great pomp; granting the enemy the liberty of
doing the like, if they thought proper. He sent the body of
Harold308 to his mother, who begged it, unransomed; though
she proffered large sums by her messengers. She buried it,
when thus obtained, at Waltham; a church which he had
built at his own expense, in honour of the Holy Cross, and
had endowed for canons. William then, by degrees proceeding,
as became a conqueror, with his army, not after an hostile,
but a royal manner, journeyed towards London, the
principal city of the kingdom; and shortly after, all the
citizens came out to meet him with gratulations. Crowds
poured out of every gate to greet him, instigated by the
nobility, and principally by Stigand, archbishop of Canterbury,
and Aldred, of York. For, shortly before, Edwin and
Morcar, two brothers of great expectation, hearing, at London,
the news of Harold’s death, solicited the citizens to
exalt one of them to the throne: failing, however, in the
attempt, they had departed for Northumberland, conjecturing,
from their own feelings, that William would never come
thither. The other chiefs would have chosen Edgar, had the
bishops supported them; but, danger and domestic broils
closely impending, neither did this take effect. Thus the
English, who, had they united in one opinion, might have
repaired the ruin of their country, introduced a stranger,
while they were unwilling to choose a native, to govern them.
Being now decidedly hailed king, he was crowned on Christmas-day
by archbishop Aldred; for he was careful not to
accept this office from Stigand, as he was not canonically an
archbishop.
Of the various wars which he carried on, this is a summary.
Favoured by God’s assistance, he easily reduced the
city of Exeter,309 when it had rebelled; for part of the wall
fell down accidentally, and made an opening for him. Indeed
he had attacked it with the more ferocity, asserting
that those irreverent men would be deserted by God’s favour,
because one of them, standing upon the wall, had bared his
posteriors, and had broken wind, in contempt of the Normans.
He almost annihilated the city of York, that sole remaining
shelter for rebellion, and destroyed its citizens with
sword and famine. For there Malcolm, king of the Scots,
with his party; there Edgar, and Morcar, and Waltheof,
with the English and Danes, often brooded over the nest of
tyranny; there they frequently killed his generals; whose
deaths, were I severally to commemorate, perhaps I should
not be superfluous, though I might risk the peril of creating
disgust; while I should be not easily pardoned as an historian,
if I were led astray by the falsities of my authorities.
Malcolm willingly received all the English fugitives, affording
to each every protection in his power, but more especially
to Edgar, whose sister he had married, out of regard
to her noble descent. On his behalf he burnt and plundered
the adjacent provinces of England; not that he supposed, by
so doing, he could be of any service to him, with respect to
the kingdom; but merely to distress the mind of William,
who was incensed at his territories being subject to Scottish
incursions. In consequence, William, collecting a body of
foot and horse, repaired to the northern parts of the island,
and first of all received into subjection the metropolitan city,
which English, Danes, and Scots obstinately defended; its
citizens being wasted with continued want. He destroyed
also in a great and severe battle, a considerable number of
the enemy, who had come to the succour of the besieged;
though the victory was not bloodless on his side, as he lost
many of his people. He then ordered both the towns and
fields of the whole district to be laid waste; the fruits and
grain to be destroyed by fire or by water, more especially on
the coast, as well on account of his recent displeasure, as because
a rumour had gone abroad, that Canute, king of Denmark,
the son of Sweyn, was approaching with his forces.
The reason of such a command, was, that the plundering
pirate should find no booty on the coast to take with him, if
he designed to depart again directly; or should be compelled
to provide against want, if he thought proper to stay. Thus
the resources of a province,310 once flourishing, and the nurse
of tyrants, were cut off by fire, slaughter, and devastation;
the ground, for more than sixty miles, totally uncultivated
and unproductive, remains bare to the present day. Should
any stranger now see it, he laments over the once-magnificent
cities; the towers threatening heaven itself with their
loftiness; the fields abundant in pasturage, and watered with
rivers: and, if any ancient inhabitant remains, he knows it
no longer.
[A.D. 1068.] SURRENDER OF MALCOLM.
Malcolm surrendered himself, without coming to an engagement,
and for the whole of William’s time passed his
life under treaties, uncertain, and frequently broken. But
when in the reign of William, the son of William, he was
attacked in a similar manner, he diverted the king from pursuing
him by a false oath. He was slain soon after, together
with his son, by Robert Mowbray, earl of Northumberland,
while, regardless of his faith, he was devastating the province
with more than usual insolence. For many years, he
lay buried at Tynemouth: lately he was conveyed by Alexander
his son, to Dunfermlin, in Scotland.
Edgar, having submitted to the king with Stigand and Aldred
the archbishops, violated his oath the following year, by going
over to the Scot: but after living there some years, and acquiring
no present advantage, no future prospects, but merely his daily
sustenance, being willing to try the liberality of the Norman,
who was at that time beyond the sea, he sailed over to him.
They say this was extremely agreeable to the king, that England
should be thus rid of a fomenter of dissension. Indeed
it was his constant practice, under colour of high honour, to
carry over to Normandy all the English he suspected, lest
any disorders should arise in the kingdom during his absence.
Edgar, therefore, was well received, and presented with a
considerable largess: and remaining at court for many years,
silently sunk into contempt through his indolence, or more
mildly speaking, his simplicity. For how great must his
simplicity be, who would yield up to the king, for a single
horse, the pound of silver, which he received as his daily stipend?
In succeeding times he went to Jerusalem with
Robert, the son of Godwin,311 a most valiant knight. This
was the time when the Turks besieged king Baldwin, at
Rama; who, unable to endure the difficulties of a siege, rushed
through the midst of the enemy, by the assistance of Robert
alone, who preceded him, and hewed down the Turks, on
either hand, with his drawn sword; but, while excited to
greater ferocity by his success, he was pressing on with too
much eagerness, his sword dropped from his hand, and when
stooping down to recover it, he was surrounded by a multitude,
and cast into chains. Taken thence to Babylon, as they
report, when he refused to deny Christ, he was placed as a
mark in the middle of the market-place, and being transfixed
with darts, died a martyr. Edgar, having lost his companion,
returned, and received many gifts from the Greek
and German emperors; who, from respect to his noble descent,
would also have endeavoured to retain him with them;
but he gave up every thing, through regard to his native
soil. “For, truly, the love of their country deceives some
men to such a degree, that nothing seems pleasant to them,
unless they can breathe their native air.” Edgar, therefore,
deluded by this silly desire, returned to England; where, as
I have before said, after various revolutions of fortune, he
now grows old in the country in privacy and quiet.
[A.D. 1103.] OF EDWIN AND MORCAR.
Edwin and Morcar were brothers; the sons of Elfgar, the
son of Leofric. They had received charge of the county of
Northumberland, and jointly preserved it in tranquillity.
For, as I have before observed, a few days previous to the
death of St. Edward the king, the inhabitants of the north
had risen in rebellion and expelled Tosty, their governor;
and, with Harold’s approbation, had requested, and received,
one of these brothers, as their lord. These circumstances,
as we have heard from persons acquainted with the affair,
took place against the inclination of the king, who was
attached to Tosty; but being languid through disease, and
worn down with age, he become so universally disregarded,
that he could not assist his favourite. In consequence, his
bodily ailments increasing from the anxiety of his mind, he
died shortly after. Harold persisted in his resolution of
banishing his brother: wherefore, first tarnishing the
triumphs of his family by piratical excursions, he was, as I
have above written, afterwards killed with the king of
Norway. His body being known by a wart between the
shoulders, obtained burial at York. Edwin and Morcar, by
Harold’s command, then conveyed the spoils of war to
London, for he himself was proceeding rapidly to the battle
of Hastings; where, falsely presaging, he looked upon the
victory as already gained. But, when he was there killed,
the brothers, flying to the territories they possessed, disturbed
the peace of William for several years; infesting the woods
with secret robberies, and never coming to close or open
engagement. Often were they taken captive, and as often
surrendered themselves, but were again dismissed with
impunity, from pity to their youthful elegance, or respect to
their nobility. At last, murdered, neither by the force nor
craft of their enemies, but by the treachery of their
partisans, their fate drew tears from the king, who would
even long since have granted them matches with his
relations, and the honour of his friendship, would they have
acceded to terms of peace.
Waltheof, an earl of high descent, had become extremely
intimate with the new king, who had forgotten his former
offences, and attributed them rather to courage, than to
disloyalty. For Waltheof, singly, had killed many of the
Normans in the battle of York; cutting off their heads, one
by one, as they entered the gate. He was muscular in the
arms, brawny in the chest, tall and robust in his whole
person; the son of Siward, a most celebrated earl, whom, by
a Danish term, they called “Digera,” which implies Strong.
But after the fall of his party, he voluntarily surrendered
himself, and was honoured by a marriage with Judith, the
king’s niece, as well as with his personal friendship. Unable
however to restrain his evil inclinations, he could not
preserve his fidelity. For all his countrymen, who had
thought proper to resist, being either slain, or subdued, he
became a party even in the perfidy of Ralph de Waher; but
the conspiracy being detected,312 he was taken; kept in chains
for some time, and at last, being beheaded, was buried at
Croyland: though some assert, that he joined the league of
treachery, more through circumvention than inclination.
This is the excuse the English make for him, and those, of
the greater credit, for the Normans affirm the contrary, to
whose decision the Divinity itself appears to assent, showing
many and very great miracles at his tomb: for they declare,
that during his captivity, he wiped away his transgressions
by his daily penitence.
On this account perhaps the conduct of the king may
reasonably be excused, if he was at any time rather severe
against the English; for he scarcely found any one of them
faithful. This circumstance so exasperated his ferocious
mind, that he deprived the more powerful, first of their
wealth, next of their estates, and finally, some of them of
their lives. Moreover, he followed the device of Cæsar, who
drove out the Germans, concealed in the vast forest of
Ardennes, whence they harassed his army with perpetual
irruptions, not by means of his own countrymen, but by the
confederate Gauls; that, while strangers destroyed each
other, he might gain a bloodless victory. Thus, I say,
William acted towards the English. For, allowing the
Normans to be unemployed, he opposed an English army,
and an English commander, to those, who, after the first
unsuccessful battle, had fled to Denmark and Ireland, and
had returned at the end of three years with considerable
force: foreseeing that whichever side might conquer, it must
be a great advantage to himself. Nor did this device fail him;
for both parties of the English, after some conflicts between
themselves, without any exertion on his part, left a victory
for the king; the invaders being driven to Ireland, and the
royalists purchasing the empty title of conquest, at their own
special loss, and that of their general. His name was
Ednoth,313 equally celebrated, before the arrival of the
Normans, both at home and abroad. He was the father of
Harding, who yet survives: a man more accustomed to
kindle strife by his malignant tongue, than to brandish arms
in the field of battle. Thus having overturned the power of
the laity, he made an ordinance, that no monk, or clergyman,
of that nation, should be suffered to aspire to any dignity
whatever; excessively differing from the gentleness of
Canute the former king, who restored their honours,
unimpaired, to the conquered: whence it came to pass, that
at his decease, the natives easily expelled the foreigners, and
reclaimed their original right. But William, from certain
causes, canonically deposed some persons, and in the place of
such as might die, appointed diligent men of any nation,
except English. Unless I am deceived, their inveterate
frowardness towards the king, required such a measure;
since, as I have said before, the Normans are by nature
kindly disposed to strangers who live amongst them.
[A.D. 1074.] RALPH DE WALER.
Ralph, whom I mentioned before, was, by the king’s gift,
earl of Norfolk and Suffolk; a Breton on his father’s side;
of a disposition foreign to every thing good. This man, in
consequence of being betrothed to the king’s relation, the
daughter of William Fitz-Osberne, conceived a most unjust
design, and meditated attack on the sovereignty. Wherefore,
on the very day of his nuptials, whilst splendidly banqueting,
for the luxury of the English had now been adopted by
the Normans, and when the guests had become intoxicated
and heated with wine, he disclosed his intention in a copious
harangue. As their reason was entirely clouded by drunkenness,
they loudly applauded the orator. Here Roger earl of
Hereford, brother to the wife of Ralph, and here Waltheof,
together with many others, conspired the death of the king.
Next day, however, when the fumes of the wine had evaporated,
and cooler thoughts influenced the minds of some of
the party, the larger portion, repenting of their conduct,
retired from the meeting. Among these is said to have been
Waltheof, who, at the recommendation of archbishop Lanfranc,
sailing to Normandy, related the matter to the king;
concealing merely his own share of the business. The earls,
however, persisted in their design, and each incited his dependents
to rebel. But God opposed them, and brought all
their machinations to nought. For immediately the king’s
officers, who were left in charge, on discovering the affair,
reduced Ralph to such distress, that seizing a vessel at Norwich,
he committed himself to the sea. His wife, covenanting
for personal safety, and delivering up the castle, followed her
husband. Roger being thrown into chains by the king,
visited, or rather inhabited, a prison, during the remainder
of his life; a young man of abominable treachery, and by
no means imitating his father’s conduct.
[A.D. 1074.] WILLIAM FITZ-OSBERNE.
His father, indeed, William Fitz-Osberne,314 might have
been compared, nay, I know not if he might not even have
been preferred, to the very best princes. By his advice,
William had first been inspirited to invade, and next, assisted
by his valour, to keep possession of England. The energy
of his mind was seconded by the almost boundless liberality
of his hand. Hence it arose, that by the multitude of soldiers,
to whom he gave extravagant pay, he repelled the rapacity
of the enemy, and ensured the favour of the people. In consequence,
by this boundless profusion, he incurred the king’s
severe displeasure; because he had improvidently exhausted
his treasures. The regulations which he established in his
county of Hereford, remain in full force at the present day;
that is to say, that no knight315 should be fined more than
seven shillings for whatever offence: whereas, in other provinces,
for a very small fault in transgressing the commands
of their lord, they pay twenty or twenty-five. Fortune,
however, closed these happy successes by a dishonourable
termination, when the supporter of so great a government,
the counsellor of England and Normandy, went into Flanders,
through fond regard for a woman, and there died by
the hands of his enemies. For the elder Baldwin, of whom
I have before spoken, the father of Matilda, had two sons;
Robert, who marrying the countess of Frisia, while his
father yet lived, took the surname of Friso: Baldwin, who,
after his father, presided some years over Flanders, and died
prematurely. His two children by his wife Richelda surviving
he had entrusted the guardianship of them to Philip
king of France, whose aunt was his mother, and to William
Fitz-Osberne. William readily undertook this office, that he
might increase his dignity by an union with Richelda. But
she, through female pride, aspiring to things beyond her sex,
and exacting fresh tributes from the people, excited them to
rebellion. Wherefore despatching a messenger to Robert
Friso, they entreat him to accept the government of the
country; and abjure all fidelity to Arnulph, who was already
called earl. Nor indeed were there wanting persons to
espouse the party of the minor: so that for a long time,
Flanders was disturbed by intestine commotion. This, Fitz-Osberne,
who was desperately in love with the lady, could
not endure, but entered Flanders with a body of troops;
and, being immediately well received by the persons he came
to defend, after some days, he rode securely from castle to
castle, in a hasty manner with few attendants. On the other
hand, Friso, who was acquainted with this piece of folly, entrapped
him unawares by a secret ambush, and killed him,
fighting bravely but to no purpose, together with his nephew
Arnulph.
Thus possessed of Flanders, he often irritated king William,
by plundering Normandy. His daughter married Canute
king of the Danes, of whom was born Charles,316 who now
rules in Flanders. He made peace with king Philip, giving
him his daughter-in-law in marriage, by whom he had Lewis,
who at present reigns in France; but not long after, being
heartily tired of the match, because his queen was extremely
corpulent, he removed her from his bed, and in defiance of
law and equity, married the wife of the earl of Anjou.
Robert, safe by his affinity with these princes, encountered
nothing to distress him during his government; though Baldwin,
the brother of Arnulph, who had an earldom in the province
of Hainault and in the castle of Valenciennes, by William’s
assistance made many attempts for that purpose.
Three years before his death, when he was now hoary-headed,
he went to Jerusalem, for the mitigation of his transgressions.
After his return he renounced the world, calmly
awaiting his dissolution with Christian earnestness. His son
was that Robert so universally famed in the expedition into
Asia, which, in our times, Europe undertook against the
Turks; but through some mischance, after his return home,
he tarnished that noble exploit, being mortally wounded in a
tournament, as they call it. Nor did a happier fate attend
his son Baldwin, who, voluntarily harassing the forces of
Henry king of England, in Normandy, paid dearly for his
youthful temerity: for, being struck on the head with a pole,
and deceived by the professions of several physicians, he lost
his life; the principality devolving on Charles, of whom we
have spoken before.
[A.D. 1073.] DEFEAT OF THE DANES.
Now, king William conducting himself with mildness
towards the obedient but with severity to the rebellious, possessed
the whole of England in tranquillity, holding all the
Welsh tributary to him. At this time too, beyond sea, being
never unemployed, he nearly annihilated the county of Maine,
leading thither an expedition composed of English; who,
though they had been easily conquered in their own, yet
always appeared invincible in a foreign country. He lost
multitudes of his men at Dol,317 a town of Brittany, whither,
irritated by some broil, he had led a military force. He constantly
found Philip king of France, the daughter of whose
aunt he had married, unfaithful to him; because he was envious
of the great glory of a man who was vassal both to his
father and to himself. But William did not the less actively
resist his attempts, although his first-born son Robert,
through evil counsel, assisted him in opposition to his father.
Whence it happened, that in an attack at Gerborai, the son
became personally engaged with his father; wounded him
and killed his horse: William, the second son, departed with
a hurt also, and many of the king’s party were slain. In all
other respects, during the whole of his life, he was so fortunate,
that foreign and distant nations feared nothing more
than his name. He had subdued the inhabitants so completely
to his will, that without any opposition, he first caused
an account to be taken of every person; compiled a register
of the rent of every estate throughout England;318 and made
all free men, of every description, take the oath of fidelity to
him. Canute, king of the Danes, who was most highly elevated
both by his affinity to Robert Friso and by his own
power, alone menaced his dignity; a rumour being generally
prevalent, that he would invade England, a country due to
him from his relationship to the ancient Canute: and indeed
he would have effected it, had not God counteracted his
boldness by an unfavourable wind. But this circumstance
reminds me briefly to trace the genealogy of the Danish
kings, who succeeded after our Canute; adding at the same
time, somewhat concerning the Norwegians.
As it has been before observed, Harold succeeded in England;
Hardecanute, and his sons, in Denmark: for Magnus
the son of Olave, whom I have mentioned in the history of
our Canute, as having been killed by his subjects, had recovered
Norway, which Canute had subdued. Harold dying
in England, Hardecanute held both kingdoms for a short
time. On his decease, Edward the Simple succeeded, who,
satisfied with his paternal kingdom, despised his foreign dominions
as burdensome and barbarous. One Sweyn, doubtlessly
a most exalted character, was then made king of the
Danes.319 When his government had prospered for several
years, Magnus, king of the Norwegians, with the consent of
some of the Danes, expelled him by force, and subjected the
land to his own will. Sweyn, thus expelled, went to the
king of Sweden, and collecting, by his assistance, Swedes,
Vandals, and Goths, he returned, to regain the kingdom:
but, through the exertions of the Danes, who were attached
to the government of Magnus, he experienced a repetition
of his former ill-fortune. This was a great and memorable
battle among those barbarous people: on no other occasion
did the Danes ever experience severer conflict, or happier
success. Indeed, to this very time, they keep unbroken the
vow, by which they had bound themselves, before the contest,
that they would consecrate to future ages the vigil of
St. Lawrence, for on that day the battle was fought, by fasting
and alms; and then also Sweyn fled, but soon after, on
the death of Magnus, he received his kingdom entire.
[A.D. 1069.] DENMARK AND NORWAY.
To Magnus, in Norway, succeeded one Sweyn, surnamed
Hardhand; not elevated by royal descent, but by boldness
and cunning: to him Olave, the uncle of Magnus, whom
they call a saint; to Olave, Harold Harvagre, the brother
of Olave, who had formerly, when a young man, served
under the emperor of Constantinople. Being, at his command,
exposed to a lion, for having debauched a woman of
quality, he strangled the huge beast by the bare vigour of
his arms. He was slain in England by Harold, the son of
Godwin. His sons, Olave and Magnus, divided the kingdom
of their father; but Magnus dying prematurely, Olave
seized the whole. To him succeeded his son Magnus, who
was lately miserably slain in Ireland, on which he had rashly
made a descent. They relate, that Magnus, the elder son of
Harold, was, after the death of his father, compassionately
sent home by Harold, king of England; and that in return
for this kindness, he humanely treated Harold, the son of
Harold, when he came to him after William’s victory: that
he took him with him, in an expedition he made to England,
in the time of William the younger, when he conquered the
Orkney and Mevanian Isles,320 and meeting with Hugo, earl
of Chester, and Hugo, earl of Shrewsbury, put the first to
flight, and the second to death. The sons of the last Magnus,
Hasten and Siward, yet reign conjointly, having divided
the empire: the latter, a seemly and spirited youth, shortly
since went to Jerusalem, passing through England, and performed
many famous exploits against the Saracens; more
especially in the siege of Sidon, whose inhabitants raged
furiously against the Christians through their connection
with the Turks.
But Sweyn, as I have related, on his restoration to the
sovereignty of the Danes, being impatient of quiet, sent his
son Canute twice into England; first with three hundred,
and then with two hundred, ships. His associate in the
former expedition was Osbern, the brother of Sweyn; in
the latter, Hacco: but, being each of them bribed, they frustrated
the young man’s designs, and returned home without
effecting their purpose. In consequence, becoming highly
disgraced by king Sweyn for bartering their fidelity for
money, they were driven into banishment. Sweyn, when
near his end, bound all the inhabitants by oath, that, as he
had fourteen sons, they should confer the kingdom on each
of them in succession, as long as his issue remained. On
his decease, his son Harold succeeded for three years: to
him Canute, whom his father had formerly sent into England.
Remembering his original failure, he prepared, as we
have heard, more than a thousand vessels against England:
his father-in-law, Robert Friso, the possessor of six hundred
more, supporting him. But being detained, for almost two
years, by the adverseness of the wind, he changed his design,
affirming, that it must be by the determination of God,
that he could not put to sea: but afterwards, misled by the
suggestions of some persons, who attributed the failure of
their passage to the conjurations of certain old women, he
sentenced the chiefs, whose wives were accused of this transgression,
to an intolerable fine; cast his brother, Olave, the
principal of the suspected faction into chains, and sent him
into exile to his father-in-law. The barbarians, in consequence,
resenting this attack upon their liberty, killed him
while in church, clinging to the altar, and promising reparation.
They say that many miracles were shown from heaven
at that place; because he was a man strictly observant of
fasting and almsgiving, and pursued the transgressors of the
divine laws more rigorously than those who offended against
himself; from which circumstance, he was consecrated a
martyr by the pope of Rome. After him, the murderers,
that they might atone for their crime by some degree of
good, redeemed Olave from captivity, for ten thousand
marks. After ignobly reigning during eight years, he left
the government to his brother Henry: who living virtuously
for twenty-nine years, went to Jerusalem, and breathed his
last at sea. Nicholas, the fifth in the sovereignty, still
survives.321
[A.D. 1085.] ROBERT GUISCARD.
The king of Denmark then, as I have said, was the only
obstacle to William’s uninterrupted enjoyment: on whose
account he enlisted such an immense multitude of stipendiary
soldiers out of every province on this side the mountains,
that their numbers oppressed the kingdom. But he,
with his usual magnanimity, not regarding the expense,
had engaged even Hugo the Great, brother to the king of
France, with his bands to serve in his army. He was accustomed
to stimulate and incite his own valour, by the
remembrance of Robert Guiscard; saying it was disgraceful
to yield, in courage, to him whom he surpassed in rank.
For Robert, born of middling parentage in Normandy, that
is, neither very low nor very high, had gone, a few years
before William’s arrival in England, with fifteen knights,
into Apulia, to remedy the narrowness of his own circumstances,
by entering into the service of that inactive race of
people. Not many years elapsed, ere, by the stupendous
assistance of God, he reduced the whole country under his
power. For where his strength failed, his ingenuity was
alert: first receiving the towns, and after, the cities into
confederacy with him. Thus he became so successful, as
to make himself duke of Apulia and Calabria; his brother
Richard, prince of Capua; and his other brother, Roger,
earl of Sicily. At last, giving Apulia to his son Roger, he
crossed the Adriatic with his other son Boamund, and taking
Durazzo, was immediately proceeding against Alexius, emperor
of Constantinople, when a messenger from pope Hildebrand
stopped him in the heat of his career. For Henry,
emperor of Germany, son of that Henry we have before
mentioned, being incensed against the pope, for having excommunicated
him on account of the ecclesiastical investitures,
led an army against Rome; besieged it; expelled
Hildebrand, and introduced Guibert of Ravenna. Guiscard
learning this by the letter of the expelled pope, left his son
Boamund, with the army, to follow up his designs, and
returned to Apulia; where quickly getting together a body
of Apulians and Normans, he proceeded to Rome. Nor did
Henry wait for a messenger to announce his approach; but,
affrighted at the bare report, fled with his pretended pope.
Rome, freed from intruders, received its lawful sovereign;
but soon after again lost him by similar violence. Then too,
Alexius, learning that Robert was called home by the urgency
of his affairs, and hoping to put a finishing hand to
the war, rushed against Boamund, who commanded the
troops which had been left. The Norman youth, however,
observant of his native spirit, though far inferior in number,
turned to flight, by dint of military skill, the undisciplined
Greeks and the other collected nations. At the same time,
too, the Venetians, a people habituated to the sea, attacking
Guiscard, who having settled the object of his voyage was
now sailing back, met with a similar calamity: part were
drowned or killed, the rest put to flight. He, continuing
his intended expedition, induced many cities, subject to
Alexius, to second his views. The emperor took off, by
crime, the man he was unable to subdue by arms: falsely
promising his wife an imperial match. By her artifices, he
drank poison,322 which she had prepared, and died; deserving,
had God so pleased, a nobler death: for he was unconquerable
by the sword of an enemy, but fell a victim to domestic
treachery. He was buried at Venusium in Apulia, having
the following epitaph:
Here Guiscard lies, the terror of the world,
Who from the Capitol Rome’s sovereign hurl’d.
No band collected could Alexis free,
Flight only; Venice, neither flight nor sea.
And since mention has been made of Hildebrand, I shall relate
some anecdotes of him, which I have not heard trivially,
but from the sober relation of a person who would swear
that he had learned them from the mouth of Hugo abbat of
Clugny; whom I admire and commend to notice, from the
consideration, that he used to declare the secret thoughts of
others by the prophetic intuition of his mind. Pope Alexander,
seeing the energetic bent of his disposition, had made
him chancellor323 of the holy see. In consequence, by virtue
of his office, he used to go through the provinces to correct
abuses. All ranks of people flocked to him, requiring judgment
on various affairs; all secular power was subject to
him, as well out of regard to his sanctity as his office.
Whence it happened, one day, when there was a greater concourse
on horseback than usual, that the abbat aforesaid,
with his monks, was gently proceeding in the last rank; and
beholding at a distance the distinguished honour of this
man, that so many earthly rulers awaited his nod, he was
revolving in his mind sentiments to the following effect:
“By what dispensation of God was this fellow, of diminutive
stature and obscure parentage, surrounded by a retinue
of so many rich men? Doubtless, from having such a crowd
of attendants, he was vain-glorious, and conceived loftier notions
than were becoming.” Scarcely, as I have said, had
he imagined this in his heart, when the archdeacon, turning
back his horse, and spurring him, cried out from a distance,
beckoning the abbat, “You,” said he, “you have imagined
falsely, wrongly deeming me guilty of a thing of which I am
innocent altogether; for I neither impute this as glory to
myself, if glory that can be called which vanishes quickly,
nor do I wish it to be so imputed by others, but to the
blessed apostles, to whose servant it is exhibited.” Reddening
with shame, and not daring to deny a tittle, he replied
only, “My lord, I pray thee, how couldst thou know the
secret thought of my heart which I have communicated to
no one?” “All that inward sentiment of yours,” said he,
“was brought from your mouth to my ears, as though by
a pipe.”
Again, entering a country church, in the same province,
they prostrated themselves before the altar, side by side.
When they had continued their supplications for a long
period, the archdeacon looked on the abbat with an angry
countenance. After they had prayed some time longer, he
went out, and asking the reason of his displeasure, received
this answer, “If you love me, do not again attack me with
an injury of this kind; my Lord Jesus Christ, beautiful
beyond the sons of men, was visibly present to my entreaties,
listening to what I said and kindly looking assent; but, attracted
by the earnestness of your prayer, he left me and
turned to you. I think you will not deny it to be a species
of injury to take from a friend the author of his salvation.
Moreover, you are to know that mortality of mankind and
destruction hang over this place; and the token by which I
formed such a conclusion was my seeing the angel of the
Lord standing upon the altar with a naked sword, and waving
it to and fro: I possess a more manifest proof of the
impending ruin, from the thick, cloudy air which, as you see,
already envelopes that province. Let us make haste to
escape, then, lest we perish with the rest.” Having said
this, they entered an inn for refreshment; but, as soon as
food was placed before them, the lamentations of the household
took away their famished appetites: for first one, and
then another, and presently many of the family suddenly
lost their lives by some unseen disaster. The contagion
then spreading to the adjoining houses, they mounted their
mules, and departed, fear adding wings to their flight.
[A.D. 1085.] OF POPE GREGORY VII.
Hildebrand had presided for the pope at a council in Gaul,
where many bishops being degraded, for having formerly
acquired their churches by simony, gave place to better men.
There was one, to whom a suspicion of this apostacy attached,
but he could neither be convicted by any witnesses,
nor confuted by any argument. When it was supposed he
must be completely foiled, still like the slippery snake he
eluded detection; so skilled was he in speaking, that he baffled
all. Then said the archdeacon, “Let the oracle of God
be resorted to, let man’s eloquence cease; we know for certain
that episcopal grace is the gift of the Holy Spirit, and that
whosoever purchases a bishopric, supposes the gift of the
Holy Ghost may be procured by money. Before you then,
who are assembled by the will of the Holy Ghost, let him
say, ‘Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the
Holy Ghost,’ and if he shall speak it articulately, and without
hesitation, it will be manifest to me that he has obtained
his office, not by purchase, but legally.” He willingly accepted
the condition, supposing nothing less than any difficulty
in these words; and indeed he perfectly uttered,
“Glory be to the Father, and to the Son,” but he hesitated
at the “Holy Ghost.” A clamour arose on all sides, but he
was never able, by any exertion, either at that time or for
the remainder of his life, to name the Holy Spirit. The
abbat so often mentioned was a witness of this miracle; who
taking the deprived bishop with him into different places,
often laughed at the issue of the experiment. Any person
doubting the certainty of this relation, must be confuted by
all Europe, which is aware that the numbers of the Clugniac
order were increased by this abbat.
[A.D. 1085.] DESIDERIUS—VICTOR—ODO.
On the death of Alexander, therefore, Hildebrand, called
Gregory the Seventh, succeeded.324 He openly asserted what
others had whispered, excommunicating those persons who,
having been elected, should receive the investiture325 of their
churches, by the ring and staff, through the hands of the
laity. On this account Henry, emperor of Germany, being
incensed that he should so far presume without his concurrence,
expelled him from Rome, as I observed, after the expiration
of eleven years, and brought in Guibert. Not long
after, the pope, being seized with that fatal disease which he
had no doubt would be mortal, was requested by the cardinals
to appoint his successor; referring him to the example of St.
Peter, who, in the church’s earliest infancy, had, while yet
living, nominated Clement. He refused to follow this example,
because it had anciently been forbidden by councils:
he would advise, however, that if they wished a person powerful
in worldly matters, they should choose Desiderius, abbat
of Cassino, who would quell the violence of Guibert successfully
and opportunely by a military force; but if they wanted a
religious and eloquent man, they should elect Odo bishop of Ostia.
Thus died a man, highly acceptable to God, though perhaps
rather too austere towards men. Indeed it is affirmed, that in
the beginning of the first commotion between him and the emperor,
he would not admit him within his doors, though barefooted,
and carrying shears326 and scourges, despising a man
guilty of sacrilege, and of incest with his own sister. The
emperor, thus excluded, departed, vowing that this repulse
should be the death of many a man. And immediately doing
all the injury he was able to the Roman see, he excited
thereby the favourers of the pope, on every side, to throw off
their allegiance to himself; for one Rodulph, revolting at the
command of the pope, who had sent him a crown in the
name of the apostles, he was immersed on all sides in the
tumult of war. But Henry, ever superior to ill fortune, at
length subdued him and all others faithlessly rebelling. At
last, driven from his power, not by a foreign attack, but the
domestic hatred of his son, he died miserably. To Hildebrand
succeeded Desiderius, called Victor, who at his first
mass fell down dead, though from what mischance is unknown;
the cup, if it be possible to credit such a thing, being
poisoned. The election then fell upon Odo, a Frenchman
by birth, first archdeacon of Rheims, then prior of
Clugny, afterwards bishop of Ostia, lastly pope by the name
of Urban.
Thus far I shall be pardoned, for having digressed, as
from the mention of William’s transactions, some things
occurred which I thought it improper to omit: now, the
reader, who is so inclined, shall learn the more common
habits of his life, and his domestic manners. Above all
then, he was humble to the servants of God; affable to the
obedient; inexorable to the rebellious. He attended the
offices of the Christian religion, as much as a secular was
able; so that he daily was present at mass, and heard
vespers and matins. He built one monastery in England,
and another in Normandy; that at Caen327 first, which he
dedicated to St. Stephen, and endowed with suitable estates,
and most magnificent presents. There he appointed Lanfranc,
afterwards archbishop of Canterbury, abbat: a man
worthy to be compared to the ancients, in knowledge, and in
religion: of whom it may be truly said, “Cato the third is
descended from heaven;” so much had an heavenly savour
tinctured his heart and tongue; so much was the whole
Western world excited to the knowledge of the liberal arts,
by his learning; and so earnestly did the monastic profession
labour in the work of religion, either from his example, or
authority. No sinister means profited a bishop in those
days; nor could an abbat procure advancement by purchase.
He who had the best report for undeviating sanctity, was
most honoured, and most esteemed both by the king and by
the archbishop. William built another monastery near
Hastings, dedicated to St. Martin, which was also called
Battle, because there the principal church stands on the very
spot, where, as they report, Harold was found in the thickest
heaps of the slain. When little more than a boy, yet gifted
with the wisdom of age, he removed his uncle Malger, from
the archbishopric of Rouen. He was a man not ordinarily
learned, but, through his high rank, forgetful of his profession,
he gave too much attention to hunting and hawking;
and consumed the treasures of the church in riotous living.
The fame of this getting abroad, he never, during his whole
life-time, obtained the pall, because the holy see refused the
distinction of that honour, to a man who neglected his
sacred office. Wherefore being frequently cited, his nephew
reprehending his offences, and still conducting himself in
the same manner, he was, from the urgency of the case,
ultimately degraded. Some report that there was a secret
reason for his being deprived: that Matilda, whom William
had married, was very nearly related to him: that Malger,
in consequence, through zeal for the Christian faith, could
not endure that they should riot in the bed of consanguinity;
and that he hurled the weapon of excommunication against
his nephew, and his consort: that, when the anger of the
young man was roused by the complaints of his wife, an
occasion was sought out, through which the persecutor of
their crime might be driven from his see: but that
afterwards, in riper years, for the expiation of their offence,
he built the monastery to St. Stephen at Caen; and she also
one, in the same town, to the Holy Trinity;328 each of them
choosing the inmates according to their own sex.
[A.D. 1085.] MAURILIUS RETURNS FROM THE DEAD.
To Malger succeeded Maurilius of Feschamp; a monk
commendable for many virtues, but principally for his
abstinence. After a holy and well-spent life, when he
came, by the call of God, to his end, bereft of vital breath,
he lay, as it were, dead for almost half a day. Nevertheless,
when preparation was made to carry him into the church,
recovering his breath, he bathed the by-standers in tears of
joy, and comforted them, when lost in amazement, with this
address: “Let your minds be attentive while you hear the
last words of your pastor. I have died a natural death, but
I am come back, to relate to you what I have seen; yet shall
I not continue with you long, because it delights me to sleep
in the Lord. The conductors of my spirit were adorned with
every elegance both of countenance and attire; the gentleness
of their speech accorded with the splendour of their garments;
so much so, that I could wish for nothing more than the
attentions of such men. Delighted therefore with their
soothing approbation, I went, as it appeared to me, towards
the east. A seat in paradise was promised me, which I was
shortly to enter. In a moment, passing over Europe and
entering Asia, we came to Jerusalem; where, having
worshipped the saints, we proceeded to Jordan. The
residents on the hither bank joining company with my
conductors, made a joyful party. I was now hastening to pass
over the river, through longing desire to see what was
beyond it, when my companions informed me, that God had
commanded, that I must first be terrified by the sight of the
demons; in order that the venial sins, which I had not
wiped out by confession, might be expiated, by the dread of
terrific forms. As soon as this was said, there came opposite
to me, such a multitude of devils, brandishing pointed
weapons, and breathing out fire, that the plain appeared like
steel, and the air like flame. I was so dreadfully alarmed at
them, that had the earth clave asunder, or the heaven
opened, I should not have known whither to have betaken
myself for safety. Thus panic-struck, and doubting whither
to go, I suddenly recovered my life, though instantaneously
about to lose it again, that by this relation I might be
serviceable to your salvation, unless you neglect it:” and
almost as soon as he had so said, he breathed out his soul.
His body, then buried under ground, in the church of St.
Mary, is now, by divine miracle, as they report, raised up
more than three feet above the earth.
Moreover, William, following up the design he had
formerly begun in Normandy, permitted Stigand, the
pretended and false archbishop, to be deposed by the Roman
cardinals and by Ermenfred bishop of Sion. Walkelin
succeeded him at Winchester, whose good works, surpassing
fame, will resist the power of oblivion, as long as the
episcopal see shall there continue: in Kent succeeded
Lanfranc, of whom I have before spoken, who was, by the
gift of God, as resplendent in England,
As Lucifer, who bids the stars retire,
Day’s rosy harbinger with purple fire;
so much did the monastic germ sprout by his care, so
strongly grew the pontifical power while he survived. The
king was observant of his advice in such wise, that he
deemed it proper to concede whatever Lanfranc asserted
ought to be done. At his instigation also was abolished the
infamous custom of those ill-disposed people who used to sell
their slaves into Ireland. The credit of this action, I know
not exactly whether to attribute to Lanfranc, or to Wulstan
bishop of Worcester; who would scarcely have induced the
king, reluctant from the profit it produced him, to this
measure, had not Lanfranc commended it, and Wulstan,
powerful from his sanctity of character, commanded it by
episcopal authority: Wulstan, than whom none could be
more just; nor could any in our time equal him in the power
of miracles, or the gift of prophecy: of which I propose
hereafter to relate some particulars, should it meet his most
holy approbation.
But since the die of fortune is subject to uncertain casts,
many adverse circumstances happened during those times.
There was a disgraceful contention329 between the abbat of
Glastonbury and his monks; so that after altercation they
came to blows. The monks being driven into the church,
bewailed their miseries at the holy altar. The soldiers, rushing
in, slew two of them, wounded fourteen, and drove away
the rest. Nay the rage of the military had even bristled
the crucifix with arrows. The abbat, rendered infamous by
such a criminal outrage, was driven into exile during the
whole of the king’s life; but, upon his decease, he was restored
to his honours, a sum of money being paid to such as
interceded for him, for the expiation of his transgression.
[A.D. 1080.] BISHOP WALKER MURDERED.
Again, a cruel and ignominious end overtook Walker
bishop of Durham, whom the Northumbrians, a people ever
ripe for rebellion, throwing off all respect for his holy orders,
put to death, after having severely insulted him. A considerable
number of Lorrainers were killed there also, for the
bishop was of that country. The cause of the murder was
this. The bishop, independently of his see, was warder330 of
the whole county: over public business he had set his relation
Gilbert, and over domestic, the canon Leobin; both men
of diligence in their respective employments, but rash. The
bishop endured their want of moderation in this respect, out
of regard to their activity; and, as he had placed them in office,
treated them with great kindness. “For our nature ever
indulges itself, and favourably regards its own kind works.”
This Leobin caused Liwulph, a servant so dearly beloved by
St. Cuthbert that the saint himself used to appear to him,
even when waking, and prescribe his decisions; him, I say,
he caused to be killed by Gilbert; smitten with envy at his
holding the higher place in the prelate’s esteem for his knowledge
and equity in legal determinations. Walker, terrified
with this intelligence, offered the furious family of the deceased
the result of a legal inquiry,331 affirming that Leobin
would be the cause of his death and of that of his friends.
When the matter came to a trial, this ferocious race of people
were not to be soothed by reasons of any kind; on the
contrary, they threw the whole blame on the bishop, because
they had seen both the murderers familiarly entertained in
his court after the death of Liwulph. Hence arose clamour
and indignation, and Gilbert, as he was of his own accord,
going out of the church, where he had been sitting with the
bishop, that he might, at his personal peril, save the life of
his master, was impiously slain. The bishop, while making
overtures of peace before the gates, next glutted the rage of
the people with his blood; the fomenter of the crime, too,
Leobin, was half-burnt, as he would not quit the church till
it was set on fire, and when he rushed out he was received
on a thousand spears. This had been predicted by Edgitha,
relict of king Edward; for when she had formerly seen
Walker, with his milk-white hair, rosy countenance, and extraordinary
stature, conducted to Winchester to be consecrated;
“We have here,” said she, “a noble martyr:” being
led to form such a presage by reflecting on the mutinous
disposition of that people. To him succeeded William,
abbat of St. Carilef, who established monks at Durham.
Moreover, the year before the king’s death, there was a
mortality both among men and cattle, and severe tempests,
accompanied with such thunder and lightning, as no person
before had ever seen or heard. And in the year he died, a
contagious fever destroyed more than half the people; indeed
the attack of the disease killed many, and then, from
the unseasonableness of the weather, a famine following, it
spread universally and cut off those whom the fever had
spared.
In addition to his other virtues he, more especially in early
youth, was observant of chastity; insomuch that it was very
commonly reported that he was impotent. Marrying, however,
at the recommendation of the nobility, he conducted
himself, during many years, in such wise, as never to be suspected
of any criminal intercourse. He had many children
by Matilda, whose obedience to her husband and fruitfulness
in children excited in his mind the tenderest regard for her,
although there are not wanting persons who prate about his
having renounced his former chastity; and that, after he had
acceded to the royal dignity, he was connected with the
daughter of a certain priest, whom the queen caused to be
removed, by being hamstrung by one of her servants; on
which account he was exiled, and Matilda was scourged to
death with a bridle. But I esteem it folly to believe this of
so great a king; though I decidedly assert that a slight disagreement
arose between them, in latter times, on account of
their son Robert, whom his mother was said to supply with
a military force out of her revenues. Nevertheless, he
proved that his conjugal affection was not in the least diminished
by this circumstance, as he buried her with great
magnificence, on her death, four years before his own; and
weeping most profusely for many days showed how keenly
he felt her loss: moreover, from that time, if we give credit
to report, he refrained from every gratification. The queen332
was buried at Caen, in the monastery of the Holy Trinity.
The same proof of regard was evident in the care he took
of the funeral of queen Edgitha; who, placed by his attention
near her husband at Westminster, has a tomb richly
wrought with gold and silver.
[A.D. 1083.] OF KING WILLIAM’S CHILDREN.
His sons were Robert, Richard, William, and Henry,
The two last reigned after him successively in England:
Robert, irritated that Normandy was refused him during his
father’s life-time, went indignantly to Italy, that by marrying
the daughter of Boniface the marquis, he might procure
assistance in those parts, to oppose the king: but failing of
this connexion, he excited Philip king of France against his
father. Wherefore, disappointed of his paternal blessing
and inheritance, at his death, he missed England, retaining
with difficulty the duchy of Normandy: and pawning even
this, at the expiration of nine years, to his brother William,
he joined the expedition into Asia, with the other Christians.
From thence, at the end of four years, he returned with
credit for his military exploits; and without difficulty sat
himself down in Normandy, because his brother William being
recently dead, king Henry, unsettled on account of his
fresh-acquired power, deemed it enough to retain England
under his command: but as I must speak of this in another
place, I will here pursue the relation I had begun concerning
the sons of William the Great.
Richard afforded his noble father hopes of his future
greatness; a fine youth and of aspiring disposition, considering
his age: but an untimely death quickly withered the bud
of this promising flower. They relate that while hunting
deer in the New-forest, he contracted a disorder from a
stream of infected air. This is the place which William his
father, desolating the towns and destroying the churches for
more than thirty miles, had appropriated for the nurture and
refuge of wild beasts;333 a dreadful spectacle, indeed, that
where before had existed human intercourse and the worship
of God, there deer, and goats, and other animals of that
kind, should now range unrestrained, and these not subjected
to the general service of mankind. Hence it is truly
asserted that, in this very forest, William his son, and his
grandson Richard, son of Robert, earl of Normandy, by the
severe judgment of God, met their deaths, one by a wound
in the breast by an arrow, the other by a wound in the neck,
or as some say, from being suspended by the jaws on the
branch of a tree, as his horse passed beneath it.
[A.D. 1087.] DAUGHTERS OF WILLIAM I.
His daughters were five; first, Cecilia, abbess of Caen,
who still survives: the second, Constantia, married to Alan
Fergant, earl of Brittany, excited the inhabitants, by the
severity of her justice, to administer a poisonous potion to
her: the third, Adela, the wife of Stephen, earl of Blois, a
lady celebrated for secular industry, lately took the veil at
Marcigny. The names of the two others have escaped me.334
One of these, as we have said, was betrothed to Harold, and
died ere she was marriageable: the other was affianced, by
messengers, to Alphonso, king of Gallicia, but obtained,
from God, a virgin death. A hard substance, which proved
the frequency of her prayers, was found upon her knees after
her decease.
Honouring the memory of his father, by every practicable
method, in the latter part of his life, he caused his bones,
formerly interred at Nicea, to be taken up by means of a
person sent for that purpose, in order to convey them elsewhere;
who, successfully returning, stopped in Apulia, on
hearing of the death of William, and there buried this illustrious
man’s remains. He treated his mother, who, before
the death of his father, had married one Herlewin de Conteville,
a man of moderate wealth, with singular indulgence
as long as she lived. William’s brothers, by this match,
were Robert, a man of heavy, sluggish disposition, whom he
made earl of Moreton; and Odo, whom, while he was earl,
he made bishop of Bayeux; and when king, created him earl
of Kent. Being of quicker talents than the other, he was
governor of all England, under the king, after the death of
William Fitz-Osberne. He had wonderful skill in accumulating
treasure; possessed extreme craft in dissembling: so
that, though absent, yet, stuffing the scrips of the pilgrims
with letters and money, he had nearly purchased the Roman
papacy from the citizens. But when, through the rumour of
his intended journey, soldiers eagerly flocked to him from all
parts of the kingdom, the king, taking offence, threw him
into confinement; saying, that he did not seize the bishop of
Bayeux, but the earl of Kent. His partisans being intimidated
by threats, discovered such quantities of gold, that the
heap of precious metal would surpass the belief of the present
age; and, at last, many sackfuls of wrought gold were also
taken out of the rivers, which he had secretly buried in certain
places. When released, at the death of his brother, he
joined Robert’s party, as he was averse to his nephew
William: but then too matters turning out unfavourably, he
was banished England, and went over to his nephew and his
bishopric in Normandy. Afterwards, proceeding with him
on his enterprize to Jerusalem, he died at Antioch while it
was besieged by the Christians.
King William kindly admitted foreigners to his friendship;
bestowed honours on them without distinction, and
was attentive to almsgiving; he gave many possessions in
England to foreign churches, and scarcely did his own
munificence, or that of his nobility, leave any monastery unnoticed,
more especially in Normandy, so that their poverty
was mitigated by the riches of England. Thus, in his time,
the monastic flock increased on every side; monasteries
arose, ancient in their rule, but modern in building: but
here I perceive the muttering of those who say, it would
have been better that the old should have been preserved in
their original state, than that new ones should have been
erected from their plunder.
He was of just stature, extraordinary corpulence, fierce
countenance; his forehead bare of hair: of such great
strength of arm, that it was often matter of surprise, that no
one was able to draw his bow, which himself could bend
when his horse was on full gallop: he was majestic, whether
sitting or standing, although the protuberance of his belly
deformed his royal person: of excellent health, so that he
was never confined with any dangerous disorder, except at
the last: so given to the pleasures of the chase, that, as I
have before said, ejecting the inhabitants, he let a space of
many miles grow desolate, that, when at liberty from other
avocations, he might there pursue his pleasures. He gave
sumptuous and splendid entertainments, at the principal
festivals; passing, during the years he could conveniently
remain in England, Christmas at Gloucester; Easter at
Winchester; Pentecost at Westminster. At these times a
royal edict summoned thither all the principal persons of
every order, that the ambassadors from foreign nations might
admire the splendour of the assemblage, and the costliness
of the banquets. Nor was he at any time more affable or
indulgent; in order that the visitants might proclaim universally,
that his generosity kept pace with his riches. This
mode of banqueting was constantly observed by his first
successor; the second omitted it.
[A.D. 1087.] WILLIAM’S LOVE OF MONEY.
His anxiety for money is the only thing for which he can
deservedly be blamed.335 This he sought all opportunities of
scraping together, he cared not how; he would say and do
some things, and, indeed, almost any thing, unbecoming such
great majesty, where the hope of money allured him. I have
here no excuse whatever to offer, unless it be, as one has
said, that, “Of necessity, he must fear many, whom many
fear.” For, through dread of his enemies, he used to drain
the country of money, with which he might retard or repel
their attacks; very often, as it happens in human affairs,
where strength failed, purchasing the forbearance of his enemies
with gold. This disgraceful calamity is still prevalent,
and every day increases; so that both towns and churches
are subjected to contributions: nor is this done with firm-kept
faith on the part of the imposers, but whoever offers
more, carries the prize; all former agreements being disregarded.
Residing in his latter days in Normandy, when enmity
had arisen between him and the king of France, he, for a
short period, was confined to the house: Philip, scoffing at
this forbearance, is reported to have said, “The king of
England is lying-in at Rouen, and keeps his bed, like a
woman after her delivery;” jesting on his belly, which he
had been reducing by medicine. Cruelly hurt at this sarcasm,
he replied, “When I go to mass, after my confinement,
I will make him an offering of a hundred thousand
candles.”336 He swore this, “by the Resurrection and Glory
of God:” for he was wont purposely to swear such oaths as,
by the very form of his mouth, would strike terror into the
minds of his hearers.
Not long after, in the end of the month of August, when
the corn was ripe on the ground, the clusters on the vines,
and the orchards laden with fruit in full abundance, collecting
an army, he entered France in a hostile manner, trampling
down, and laying every thing waste: nothing could
assuage his irritated mind, so determined was he to revenge
this injurious taunt at the expense of multitudes. At last
he set fire to the city of Mantes, where the church of St.
Mary was burnt, together with a recluse who did not think
it justifiable to quit her cell even under such an emergency;
and the whole property of the citizens was destroyed. Exhilarated
by this success, while furiously commanding his
people to add fuel to the conflagration, he approached too
near the flames, and contracted a disorder from the violence
of the fire and the intenseness of the autumnal heat. Some
say, that his horse leaping over a dangerous ditch, ruptured
his rider, where his belly projected over the front of the
saddle. Injured by this accident, he sounded a retreat, and
returning to Rouen, as the malady increased he took to his
bed. His physicians, when consulted, affirmed, from an inspection
of his urine, that death was inevitable. On hearing
this, he filled the house with his lamentations, because death
had suddenly seized him, before he could effect that reformation
of life which he had long since meditated. Recovering
his fortitude, however, he performed the duties of a Christian
in confession and receiving the communion. Reluctantly,
and by compulsion, he bestowed Normandy on Robert; to
William he gave England; while Henry received his maternal
possessions. He ordered all his prisoners to be released
and pardoned: his treasures to be brought forth, and distributed
to the churches: he gave also a certain sum of
money to repair the church which had been burnt. Thus
rightly ordering all things, he departed on the eighth of the
ides of September, [Sept. 6,] in the fifty-ninth year of his
age: the twenty-second of his reign: the fifty-second of his
duchy: and in the year of our Lord 1087. This was the
same year, in which Canute, king of Denmark, as we have
before related, was killed; and in which the Spanish Saracens
raging against the Christians, were shortly compelled
to retire to their own territories by Alphonso, king of Gallicia;
unwillingly evacuating even the cities they had formerly
occupied.
The body, embalmed after royal custom, was brought down
the river Seine to Caen, and there consigned to the earth, a
large assembly of the clergy attending, but few of the laity.
Here might be seen the wretchedness of earthly vicissitude;
for that man who was formerly the glory of all Europe, and more
powerful than any of his predecessors, could not find a place
of everlasting rest, without contention. For a certain knight,
to whose patrimony the place pertained, loudly exclaiming at
the robbery, forbade his burial: saying, that the ground belonged
to himself by paternal right; and that the king had
no claim to rest in a place which he had forcibly invaded.
Whereupon, at the desire of Henry, the only one of his sons
who was present, a hundred pounds of silver337 were paid to
this brawler, and quieted his audacious claim: for at that
time, Robert his elder born was in France, carrying on a
war against his own country: William had sailed for England,
ere the king had well breathed his last; thinking it
more advantageous to look to his future benefit, than to be
present at the funeral of his father. Moreover, in the dispersion
of money, neither slow, nor sparing, he brought forth from
its secret hoard, all that treasure which had been accumulated
at Winchester, during a reign of so many years: to the
monasteries he gave a piece of gold; to each parish church
five shillings in silver: to every county a hundred pounds
to be divided to each poor man severally. He also very
splendidly adorned the tomb of his father, with a large mass
of gold and silver and the refulgence of precious stones.
[A.D. 1087.] BERENGAR OF TOURS].
At this time lived Berengar, the heresiarch of Tours, who
denied, that the bread and wine, when placed on the altar
and consecrated by the priest, were, as the holy church
affirms, the real and substantial body of the Lord. Already
was the whole of Gaul infected with this his doctrine, disseminated
by means of poor scholars, whom he allured by
daily hire. On this account pope Leo, of holiest memory,
alarmed for the catholic faith, calling a council against him
at Vercelli, dispersed the darkness of this misty error, by the
effulgence of evangelical testimony. But when, after his
death, the poison of heresy again burst forth from the bosoms
of some worthless people where it had long been nurtured,
Hildebrand, in councils, when he was archdeacon, at Tours,
and after, when pope, at Rome, compelled him, after being
convicted, to the abjuration of his opinion; which matters,
any person desirous of seeing will find recorded in their proper
place. Archbishop Lanfranc and Guimund, the most
eloquent man of our times, first monk of St. Leofrid, in Normandy,
afterwards bishop of Aversa in Apulia, confuted
him; but principally and most forcibly the latter. And,
indeed, though Berengar disgraced the earlier part of his life
by defending certain heresies, yet he came so much to his
senses in riper age, that without hesitation, he was by some
esteemed a saint; admired for innumerable good qualities,
but especially for his humility and almsgiving: showing
himself master of his large possessions, by dispersing, not
their slave by hoarding and worshipping them. He was so
guarded with respect to female beauty, that he would never
suffer a woman to appear before him, lest he should seem to
enjoy that beauty with his eye, which he did not desire in
his heart. He was used neither to despise the poor nor flatter
the rich: to live by nature’s rule, “and having food and
raiment,” in the language of the apostle, “therewith to be
content.” In consequence, Hildebert, bishop of Mans, a
first-rate poet, highly commends him; whose words I have
purposely inserted, that I may show this celebrated bishop’s
regard to his master; and at the same time his opinion will
serve for an example to posterity, how he thought a man
ought to live: although, perhaps, from the strength of his
affection, he may have exceeded the bounds of just commendation.
[A.D. 1087.] PANEGYRIC ON BERENGAR.
Fame, which the world allows his due,
Shall Berengar, when dead, pursue:
Whom, plac’d on faith’s exalted height
The fifth day ravish’d with fell spite:
Sad was that day, and fatal too,
Where grief and loss united grew,
Wherein the church’s hope and pride,
The law, with its supporter, died.
What sages taught, or poets sung
Bow’d to his wit, and honey’d tongue.
Then holier wisdom’s path he trod,
And fill’d his heart and lips with God.
His soul, his voice, his action prov’d
The great Creator’s praise he lov’d,
So good, so wise, his growing fame
Shall soar above the greatest name:
Whose rank preserv’d his honours gain’d,
Preferr’d the poor to rich: maintain’d
The sternest justice. Wealth’s wide power
Ne’er gave to sloth, or waste, an hour,
Nor could repeated honours, high,
Seduce him from humility;
Who ne’er on money set his mind,
But griev’d he could no object find
Where he might give: and help’d the poor
Till poverty assail’d his door.
His life by nature’s laws to guide,
His mind from vice, his lips from pride,
Still was his care: to false, the true
Prefer, and nothing senseless do:
Evil to none, but good impart,
And banish lucre, hand and heart.
Whose dress was coarse, and temperance just
Awaited appetite’s keen gust:
Was chastity’s perpetual guest,
Nor let rank lust disturb his rest.
When nature form’d him, “See,” said she,
“While others fade, one born for me.”
Ere justice sought her place of rest
On high, he lock’d her in his breast.
A saint from boyhood, whose great name
Surpasses his exceeding fame,
Which, though the wide world it may fill,
Shall never reach his merit still.
Pious and grave, so humble yet,
That envy ne’er could him beset;
For envy weeps, whom still before
She hated, prone now to adore;
First for his life, but now his fate
She moans, laments his frail estate.
Man truly wise and truly blest!
Thy soul and body both at rest,
May I, when dead, abide with you,
And share the self-same portion too.
You may perceive in these verses, that the bishop exceeded
the just measure of praise; but eloquence is apt to
recommend itself in such wise; thus a brilliant style proceeds
in graceful strain; thus
“Bewitching eloquence sheds purple flowers.”
But though Berengar himself changed his sentiments, yet
was he unable to convert all whom he had infected throughout
the world; “so dreadful a thing it is to seduce others
from what is right, either by example or by word; as, perhaps,
in consequence, you must bear the sins of others after
having atoned for your own.” Fulbert, bishop of Chartres,
whom Mary, the mother of our Lord, was seen to cure when
sick, by the milk of her breasts, is said to have predicted
this; for, when lying in the last extremity, he was visited
by many persons, and the house was scarcely large enough
to hold the company, he darted his eye through the throng,
and endeavoured to drive away Berengar, with all the force
he had remaining; protesting that an immense devil stood
near him, and attempted to seduce many persons to follow
him, by beckoning with his hand, and whispering some
enticement. Moreover, Berengar himself, when about to
expire on the day of the Epiphany, sadly sighing, at the
recollection of the wretched people whom, when a very
young man, in the heat of error, he had infected with his
opinions, exclaimed, “To-day, in the day of his manifestation,
my Lord Jesus Christ will appear to me, either to
glorify me, as I hope, for my repentance; or to punish me,
as I fear, for the heresy I have propagated on others.”
We indeed believe, that after ecclesiastical benediction,
those mysteries are the very body and blood of the Saviour;
induced to such an opinion, by the authority of the ancient
church, and by many miracles recently manifested. Such as
that which St. Gregory exhibited at Rome; and such as
Paschasius relates to have taken place in Germany; that the
priest Plegild visibly touched the form of a boy, upon the
altar, and that after kissing him he partook of him, turned
into the similitude of bread, after the custom of the church:
which, they relate, Berengar used arrogantly to cavil at, and
to say, that “it was the treacherous covenant of a scoundrel,
to destroy with his teeth, him whom he had kissed with
his mouth.” Such, too, is that concerning the Jewish boy,
who by chance running playfully into a church, with a
Christian of the same age, saw a child torn to pieces on the
altar, and severally divided to the people; which when, with
childish innocence, he related as truth to his parents, they
placed him in a furnace, where the fire was burning and the
door closed: whence, after many hours, he was snatched by
the Christians, without injury to his person, clothes, or hair;
and being asked how he could escape the devouring flames,
he replied, “That beautiful woman whom I saw sitting in
the chair, whose son was divided among the people, always
stood at my right hand in the furnace, keeping off the
threatening flames and fiery volumes with her garments.”
[A.D. 1087.] THE TOMB OF WALWIN.
At that time, in a province of Wales, called Ros, was
found the sepulchre of Walwin, the noble nephew of Arthur;
he reigned, a most renowned knight, in that part of Britain
which is still named Walwerth; but was driven from his
kingdom by the brother and nephew of Hengist, (of whom I
have spoken in my first book,) though not without first
making them pay dearly for his expulsion. He deservedly
shared, with his uncle, the praise of retarding, for many
years, the calamity of his falling country. The sepulchre of
Arthur is no where to be seen, whence ancient ballads fable
that he is still to come. But the tomb of the other, as I
have suggested, was found in the time of king William, on
the sea-coast, fourteen feet long: there, as some relate, he
was wounded by his enemies, and suffered shipwreck; others
say, he was killed by his subjects at a public entertainment.
The truth consequently is doubtful; though neither of these
men was inferior to the reputation they have acquired.
This, too, was the period in which Germany, for fifty
years, bewailed the pitiable, and almost fatal government of
Henry, of whom I have spoken in the history of William.
He was neither unlearned nor indolent; but so singled out
by fate for every person to attack, that whoever took up
arms against him seemed, to himself, to be acting for the
good of religion. He had two sons, Conrad and Henry: the
first, not violating the rights of nature towards his father,
having subjugated Italy, died at Arezzo, a city of Tuscany:
the other, in his early age, attacking his parent when he was
somewhat at rest from external molestation, compelled him
to retire from the empire, and when he died shortly after,
honoured him with an imperial funeral. He still survives,
obstinately adhering to those very sentiments, on account of
which he thought himself justified in persecuting his father;
for he grants the investiture of churches by the staff and
ring; and looks upon the pope as not legally elected without
his concurrence; although Calixtus, who now presides over
the papal see, has greatly restrained this man’s inordinate
ambition: but let the reader wait my farther relation of
these matters in their proper order.
Moreover, pope Hildebrand dying, as I have said, and
Urban being elected by the cardinals, the emperor persisted
in his intention of preferring Guibert, of proclaiming him
pope, and of bringing him to Rome, by the expulsion of the
other. The army, however, of the marchioness Matilda, a
woman, who, forgetful of her sex, and comparable to the
ancient Amazons, used to lead forth her hardy troops to
battle, espoused the juster cause, as it seemed, by her assistance,
in succeeding time, Urban obtaining the papal throne,
held quiet possession of it for eleven years. After him
Paschal was appointed by the Romans, who held Henry’s
concurrence in contempt. Guibert yet burdened the earth
with his existence, the only sower of sedition, who never,
during his whole life, laid aside his obstinacy, nor conformed
to justice; saying, that the decision of the emperor ought
to be observed; not that of the assassins, or parchment-mongers
of Rome.338 In consequence, both of them being
excommunicated in several councils, they treated the sentence
with ridicule. Notwithstanding these circumstances,
there were many things praiseworthy in the emperor: he
was eloquent, of great abilities, well read, actively charitable;
had many good qualities, both of mind and person: was ever
prepared for war, insomuch that he was sixty-two times
engaged in battle; was equitable in adjusting differences;
and when matters were unsuccessful, he would prefer his
griefs to heaven, and wait for redress from thence. Many of
his enemies perished by untimely deaths.
I have heard a person of the utmost veracity relate, that
one of his adversaries, a weak and factious man, while
reclining at a banquet, was, on a sudden, so completely surrounded
by mice, as to be unable to escape. So great was
the number of these little animals, that there could scarcely
be imagined more in a whole province. It was in vain, that
they were attacked with clubs and fragments of the benches
which were at hand: and though they were for a long time
assailed by all, yet they wreaked their deputed curse on no
one else; pursuing him only with their teeth, and with a
kind of dreadful squeaking. And although he was carried
out to sea about a javelin’s cast by the servants, yet he could
not by these means escape their violence; for immediately
so great a multitude of mice took to the water, that you
would have sworn the sea was strewed with chaff. But
when they began to gnaw the planks of the ship, and the
water, rushing through the chinks, threatened inevitable
shipwreck, the servants turned the vessel to the shore. The
animals, then also swimming close to the ship, landed first.
Thus the wretch, set on shore, and soon after entirely
gnawed in pieces, satiated the dreadful hunger of the mice.
I deem this the less wonderful, because it is well known,
that in Asia, if a leopard bite any person, a party of mice
approach directly, to discharge their urine on the wounded
man; and that a filthy deluge of their water attends his
death; but if, by the care of servants driving them off, the
destruction can be avoided during nine days; then medical
assistance, if called in, may be of service. My informant
had seen a person wounded after this manner, who, despairing
of safety on shore, proceeded to sea, and lay at anchor;
when immediately more than a thousand mice swam
out, wonderful to relate, in the rinds of pomegranates, the
insides of which they had eaten; but they were drowned
through the loud shouting of the sailors. “For the Creator
of all things has made nothing destitute of sagacity; nor any
pest without its remedy.”
[A.D. 1087.] OF MARIANUS SCOTUS.
During this emperor’s reign flourished Marianus Scotus,339
first a monk of Fulda, afterwards a recluse at Mentz, who,
by renouncing the present life, secured the happiness of that
which is to come. During his long continued leisure, he
examined the writers on Chronology, and discovered the
disagreement of the cycles of Dionysius the Little with
the evangelical computation. Wherefore reckoning every
year from the beginning of the world, he added twenty-two,
which were wanting, to the above mentioned cycles;
but he had few, or no followers of his opinion. Wherefore
I am often led to wonder, why such unhappiness should
attach to the learned of our time, that in so great a number
of scholars and students, pale with watching, scarcely one
can obtain unqualified commendation for knowledge. So
much does ancient custom please, and so little encouragement,
though deserved, is given to new discoveries, however
consistent with truth. All are anxious to grovel in the old
track, and everything modern is contemned; and therefore,
as patronage alone can foster genius, when that is withheld,
every exertion languishes.
But as I have mentioned the monastery of Fulda, I will
relate what a reverend man, Walker, prior of Malvern,
whose words if any disbelieve he offends against holiness,
told me had happened there. “Not more than fifteen years
have elapsed,” said he, “since a contagious disease attacked
the abbat of that place, and afterwards destroyed many of
the monks. The survivors, at first, began each to fear for
himself, and to pray, and give alms more abundantly than
usual. In process of time, however, for such is the nature
of man, their fear gradually subsiding, they began to omit
them; the cellarer more especially: who publicly and absurdly
exclaimed, that the stock of provision was not adequate
to such a consumption; that he had lately hoped for
some reduction of expense from so many funerals, but that
his hopes were at an end, if the dead consumed what the
living could not. It happened on a certain night, when,
from some urgent business, he had deferred going to rest
for a long time, that having at length despatched every
concern, he went towards the dormitory. And now you
shall hear a strange circumstance: he saw in the chapter-house,
the abbat, and all who had died that year, sitting
in the order they had departed: when affrighted and endeavouring
to escape, he was detained by force. Being
reproved and corrected, after the monastic manner, with a
scourge, he heard the abbat speak precisely to the following
effect: that it was foolish to look for advantage by another’s
death, when all were subject to one common fate; that it
was an impious thing, that a monk who had passed his
whole life in the service of the church should be grudged
the pittance of a single year after his death; that he himself
should die very shortly, but that whatever others might
do for him, should redound only to the advantage of those
whom he had defrauded; that he might now go and correct,
by his example, those whom he had corrupted by his expressions.”
He departed, and demonstrated that he had
seen nothing imaginary, as well by his recent stripes, as
by his death, which shortly followed.
[A.D. 1087.] CANTERBURY AND YORK.
In the meantime, while employed on other subjects, both
matter and inclination have occurred for the relation of
what was determined in William’s time, concerning the
controversy still existing between the archbishops of Canterbury
and York. And that posterity may be fully informed
of this business, I will subjoin the opinions of the
ancient fathers.
“Let your jurisdiction not only extend over the bishops
you shall have ordained, or such as have been ordained by
the bishop of York, but also over all the priests of Britain,
by the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
“Far be it from every Christian, that anything concerning
the city of Canterbury be diminished or changed, in
present or future times, which was appointed by our predecessor
pope Gregory, however human circumstances may
be changed: but more especially, by the authority of St.
Peter the prince of apostles, we command and ordain, that
the city of Canterbury shall ever hereafter be esteemed the
metropolitan see of all Britain; and we decree and appoint,
immutably, that all the provinces of the kingdom of England
shall be subject to the metropolitan church of the aforesaid
see. And if any one attempt to injure this church,
which is more especially under the power and protection
of the holy Roman church, or to lessen the jurisdiction conceded
to it, may God expunge him from the book of life; and
let him know, that he is bound by the sentence of a curse.”
“The cause of Alric, formerly called bishop of Chichester,
we have entrusted to our brother bishop, Lanfranc, to
be by him diligently reconsidered and determined. We
have also commended to him the labour of deciding the
dispute which has arisen between the archbishop of York,
and the bishop of Dorchester, on matters belonging to their
dioceses; strictly ordering him to examine this cause most
diligently and bring it to a just termination. Besides, we
have so fully committed to him the authority of our personal
and pontifical power in considering and settling causes,
that whatever he shall, according to justice, have determined,
shall be regarded as firm and indissoluble hereafter, as though
it had been adjudged in our presence.”
[A.D. 1072] CANTERBURY AND YORK.
“In the year of our Lord Jesus Christ’s incarnation 1072,
of the pontificate of pope Alexander the eleventh, and of
the reign of William, glorious king of England, and duke
of Normandy, the sixth; by the command of the said pope
Alexander, and permission of the same king, in presence of
himself, his bishops, and abbats, the question was agitated
concerning the primacy which Lanfranc,340 archbishop of
Canterbury, claimed in right of his church, over that of
York; and concerning the ordination of certain bishops, of
which it was not clearly evident, to whom they especially
pertained; and at length, after some time it was proved and
shown by the distinct authority of various writings, that the
church of York ought to be subject to that of Canterbury,
and to be obedient to the appointments of its archbishop, as
primate of all England, in all such matters as pertained to
the Christian religion. But the homage of the bishop of
Durham, that is of Lindisfarne, and of all the countries beyond
the limits of the bishop of Lichfield, and the great
river Humber, to the farthest boundaries of Scotland, and
whatever on this side of the aforesaid river justly pertains
to the diocese of the church of York, the metropolitan of
Canterbury allowed for ever to belong to the archbishop of
York and his successors: in such sort, that if the archbishop
of Canterbury chose to call a council, wherever he deemed
fit, the archbishop of York was bound to be present at his
command, with all his suffragan bishops, and be obedient to
his canonical injunctions. And Lanfranc the archbishop
proved from the ancient custom of his predecessors, that
the archbishop of York was bound to make profession, even
with an oath, to the archbishop of Canterbury; but through
regard to the king, he dispensed with the oath from Thomas,
archbishop of York; and received his written profession
only: but not forming a precedent for his successors who
might choose to exact the oath, together with the profession,
from Thomas’s successors. If the archbishop of Canterbury
should die, the archbishop of York shall come to
Canterbury; and, with the other bishops of the church
aforesaid, duly consecrate the person elect as his lawful
primate. But if the archbishop of York shall die, his successor,
accepting the gift of the archbishopric from the king,
shall come to Canterbury, or where the archbishop of Canterbury
shall appoint, and shall from him receive canonical
ordination. To this ordinance consented the king aforesaid,
and the archbishops, Lanfranc of Canterbury, and Thomas
of York; and Hubert subdeacon of the holy Roman church,
and legate of the aforesaid pope Alexander; and the other
bishops and abbats present. This cause was first agitated at
the festival of Easter in the city of Winchester, in the royal
chapel, situated in the castle; afterwards in the royal town
called Windsor, where it received its termination, in the
presence of the king, the bishops, and abbats of different
orders, who were assembled at the king’s court on the festival
of Pentecost.
“The signature of William the king: the signature of Matilda
the queen.
“I Hubert, subdeacon of the holy Roman church, and legate
from pope Alexander, have signed.
“I Lanfranc, archbishop of Canterbury, have signed.
“I Thomas, archbishop of York, have signed.
“I William, bishop of London, have assented.
“I Herman, bishop of Sherborne, have signed.
“I Wulstan, bishop of Worcester, have signed.
“I Walter, bishop of Hereford, have assented.
“I Giso, bishop of Wells, have assented.
“I Remigius, bishop of Dorchester, have signed.
“I Walkelin, bishop of Winchester, have signed.
“I Herefast, bishop of Helmham, have signed.
“I Stigand, bishop of Chichester, have assented.
“I Siward, bishop of Rochester, have assented.
“I Osberne, bishop of Exeter, have assented.
“I Odo, bishop of Bayeux and earl of Kent, have assented.
“I Gosfrith, bishop of Coutances and one of the nobles of
England, have assented.
“I Scotland, abbat of St. Augustine’s monastery, have assented.
“I Thurstan, abbat of the monastery which is situated in
the isle of Ely, have assented.
“I Ailnoth, abbat of Glastonbury, have assented.
“I Elfwin, abbat of the monastery of Ramsey, have assented.
“I Wulnoth, abbat of Chertsey, have assented.
“I Ailwyn, abbat of Evesham, have assented.
“I Frederic, abbat of St. Alban’s, have assented.
“I Goffrid, abbat of the monastery of St. Peter, near London,
have assented.
“I Baldwin, abbat of St. Edmund’s monastery, have assented.
“I Turald, abbat of Burgh, have assented.
“I Adelelm, abbat of Abingdon, have assented.
“I Ruald, abbat of the New minster at Winchester, have
assented.
“It becomes every Christian to be subject to Christian
laws, and by no means to run counter to those things which
have been wholesomely enacted by the holy fathers. For
hence arise strifes, dissensions, envyings, contentions, and
other things, which plunge the lovers of them into eternal
punishment. And the more exalted the rank of any person
is, so much the more exact should be his obedience to divine
commands: wherefore I Thomas, now ordained metropolitan
bishop of the church of York, hearing and knowing your
authorities, make unlimited profession of canonical obedience
to you, Lanfranc, archbishop of Canterbury, and your
successors; and I promise to observe whatever shall be
canonically enjoined me, either by you or them. Of this
matter I was doubtful, while I was yet about to be ordained
by you: wherefore I promised obedience unconditionally to
you, but conditionally to your successors.”
The archbishop of Canterbury, as I remember to have observed
in my first book, originally had subject to him, these
bishops: London, Winchester, Rochester, Sherborne, Worcester,
Hereford, Lichfield, Selsey, Leicester, Helmham,
Sidnacester, Dunwich; in the time of king Edward the
Elder were added, Cornwall, Crediton, Wells in West Saxony,
and Dorchester in Mercia, as I noticed in my second book.
[A.D. 1072.] PRIVILEGES OF THE ARCHBISHOP OF YORK.
The archbishop of York had all the bishops on the farther
side of the Humber subject to him, as Ripon, Hexham, Lindisfarne,
Candida Casa, which is now called Whitherne; and
all the bishops of Scotland and the Orkneys; as the archbishop
of Canterbury had those of Ireland and Wales. The
bishoprics of Ripon and Hexham have long since perished
by hostile ravages; Leicester, Sidnacester, and Dunwich, by
means that I cannot account for; and, in the time of king
Edward the Simple, Cornwall and Crediton were united,
and the bishopric translated to Exeter. In king William’s
time, at this council, it was determined that, according to the
decrees of the canons, the bishops should quit the villages,
and fix their abode in the cities of their dioceses; Lichfield
therefore migrated to Chester, which was anciently called
the City of Legions; Selsey to Chichester; Helmham first to
Thetford, and now, by bishop Herbert, to Norwich; Sherborne
to Salisbury; Dorchester to Lincoln. For Lindisfarne
had long before passed to Durham, and lately Wells to Bath.
In this assembly Lanfranc, who was yet uninstructed in
English matters, inquired of the elder bishops, what was the
order of sitting in council, as originally appointed. They,
alleging the difficulty of the question, deferred their answer
till the next day; when, carefully calling circumstances to
mind, they asserted that they had seen the arrangement as
follows: that the archbishop of Canterbury, presiding at the
council, should have, on the right hand, the archbishop of
York, and next him the bishop of Winchester; and on his
left, the bishop of London. But should it ever happen,
through necessity, that the primate of Canterbury should be
absent, or should he be dead, the archbishop of York, presiding
at the council, should have the bishops of London on his
right hand, and of Winchester on his left; and the rest
should take their seats according to the time of their ordination.
At that time, too, the claim of the archbishop of York on
the see of Worcester and Dorchester was decided and set at
rest. For he said that they ought to be subject to his jurisdiction;
which, after having pondered for some time in
secret, when he proceeded to Rome with Lanfranc to receive
their palls from the pope, he brought publicly before the
Roman court. Lanfranc, though for the most part unmoved
by injury, could not help betraying, by his countenance, his
emotion at such a wanton and unheard-of attack, though he
for some time refrained from speaking. But pope Alexander,
who felt much for Lanfranc’s distress, for he had even
condescendingly risen from his seat when he approached,
professing that he paid him this mark of respect, not from
honour to the archbishop but regard to his learning, removed
from himself the unpleasant task of deciding, and referred the
adjudication of it to an English council. In consequence, as
I have related, the matter, after deep investigation, came to
this termination in the present council; that, as these bishops
were on this side of the Humber, they should belong to
Canterbury, but all beyond that river to York.
Here the pious simplicity of St. Wulstan, bishop of Worcester,
and his noble confidence in God, demand praise and
approbation. For when called in question as well concerning
this business, as on his slender attainments in learning,
he had retired to consider more carefully what answer he
should make, his mind undisturbed by tumult: “Believe
me,” said he, “we have not yet sung the service for the sixth
hour: let us sing the service therefore.” And, on his companions
suggesting the necessity of first expediting the business
they had met upon; that there was ample time for singing,
and that the king and the nobility would laugh at them,
if they heard of it: “Truly,” said he, “let us first do our
duty towards God, and afterwards settle the disputes of
men.” Having sung the service, he directly proceeded
towards the council-chamber, without devising any subterfuge,
or any attempt to disguise the truth. To his dependents,
who were desirous of withholding him, and who could
not be persuaded but their cause was in danger, he said,
“Know for certain, that I here visibly perceive those holy
archbishops, Dunstan of Canterbury, and Oswald of York;
who, defending me this day with their prayers, will darken
the understandings of my gainsayers.” Then giving his
benediction to a monk, a man of little eloquence, but somewhat
acquainted with the Norman language, on summing up
his cause, he obtained that he, who was before thought unworthy
of the management of his own diocese, should be humbly
entreated by the archbishop of York, to condescend to visit
those parts of his province, which himself, through dread of
enemies, or ignorance of the language, had refrained from
approaching. But I will no longer torture the patience of
my readers, who perhaps do not regard this matter with
pleasure, as they are in expectation of the history of William’s
successors; though, if I am not too partial to myself,
a variety of anecdote can be displeasing to no one, unless he
be morose enough to rival the superciliousness of Cato. But
whoever is so inclined, will find such other matters in the
fourth and fifth book, for here the third shall terminate.341