It cannot be said of Toronto, as it can
be of some other cities, that whole districts
are in such a condition as to be aptly
designated slums. Portions of streets are
inhabited by people whose manner of
living is so degraded, and whose homes
are so comfortless and filthy, as to merit
such a term, but this cannot be said of
any one whole district or street. Even
Lombard street, which has rather an unenviable
notoriety, has homes in it where
the peace and satisfaction which crown
industry and sobriety are to be found.
St. John’s ward, which is often alluded
to slightingly, contains within its borders
some of the handsomest streets in the
city. Our merchant princes dwell there.
Hundreds of mechanics make their happy
homes in the Noble Ward. The slum portion
is very small compared with the acres
and acres where the domestic virtues go
hand in hand with industry and plenty. Our
city is of such a composite character that
next door neighbors are often as far apart
in their manner of living as is the east from
the west. Strangers who read about the
doings of the denizens of York street two
years ago were surprised to find on visiting
the city that there were many bright, busy
stores, two fine hotels and plenty of respectable
houses on the street. Any remarks
in the following interviews regarding
localities will therefore be understood
to mean only certain portions of those
localities.
For the purpose of getting the views of
a class of gentlemen whose profession
brings them frequently in contact
with the vicious classes of our city, News
reporters waited on several clergymen.
Those selected were men who were known
not to be shirkers from this unpleasant
portion of a pastor’s duties. The result
will be found below.
An evangelist and city missionary of
some years experience in Toronto was interviewed.
“You cannot,” he said “tell
what the Toronto slums are like, seeing
them by day light. You enter a tenement
house on Duchess or Lombard
streets in the forenoon or at noon. All
looks quiet enough. The women, generally
of middle age, are standing at the
door exchanging gossip with their neighbors.
Some appearance of household
work has been going on, and as noon approaches
there is an odor of onion stew or
fried pork. We enter. You are always safe
in these regions when accompanied by a
policeman or a reporter or a city missionary,
but your visit would be much more
favorably received if your escort be of
either of the two latter classes. The furniture
of the living room is of the cheapest
and simplest description of second-hand
ware, the tables are battered and
sodden with the smear of innumerable
drinking bouts. The chairs are evidently
more often used as missiles propelled
through the air by hostile hands than for
the peaceful purpose of resting the human
body. The crazy old windows are grimy
with dirt; grimy are the floors, the ceilings,
the ricketty stairways leading to unknown
dens above. Almost all of these tenement
houses are a perfect baby-burrow of
children, untaught, unwashed, unkempt,
enfants perdus of the gutter, the protoplasm
out of which the great Sin and the
yet greater Misery of our city is certain
to shape itself in the future! Presently,
three or four able-bodied young men come
in from what they call work. A sinister-looking
young woman in frowsy dress,
the cut across her whisky-sodden face
telling its tale of last night’s revel, joins
the group. The eldest child is sent with a
cracked jug for beer to the corner saloon.
As a rule, these people fare considerably
better than the poorer ones among the respectable
sober working people; they live
from hand to mouth; the only text in the
gospel which they obey implicitly being
“Let the morrow take thought for itself.”
When they are not starving they are generally
well supplied with bread, meat,
tea and vegetables; nor are such luxuries
as pies and cake unknown to them, to say
nothing of malt or spirituous liquor,
though, as a rule, the drinking sets in
most heavily at night. At about 10 p.m.
on Saturday or Sunday to see one of these
establishments at full blast! Then
Of other immorality there is comparatively
little; the scorching breath of the
rum king will tolerate no rival! Money
has been procured, if in no other way by
pawning dress or tools to the people of
the house, for every one of these tenement
dens is, as a rule, an unlicensed groggery
and pawnbroker’s shop! The debauch
which ensues nearly always ends in a free
fight, in which the most furious combatants
are often the women.”
“Have you ever recognized in the night
life of the city slums any man or woman
you have known in better circumstances
in this city?”
“Yes unquestionably, and in more
cases than people would think who do
not look below the surface for the three sorriest
sins that enter hell, drunkenness, laziness
and dishonesty, have the same effect on
the educated and the uneducated. Take
a recent case. Early last month I was
called on to visit, not for the first time, a
young married woman whom I had
known in days when she had every right
to the title of lady. I found her occupying
a room on the rear ground floor of a
house on Teraulay street. Her only baby,
fortunately for herself and for it, lay dead.
The father had more than once thrown it
at the mother in a fit of drunken passion.
I gave her money enough to provide decently
for the funeral and promised to return
two days afterwards, in order to
conduct some simple sort of funeral ceremony.
“When I first knew this woman, then a
girl years ago, her father was still living
a prosperous hotel-keeper on Yonge
street, a prominent church member, and
an affectionate father who spared no pains
on his daughter’s education. Aggie grew
up to be a bright engaging girl, with a
charming figure, expressive hazel eyes,
and long curling dark brown hair that
reached to her waist. She was especially
clever at ciphering, and acted for
some time as book-keeper for a well known
Toronto firm. She became an accomplished
pianist, and sang for some years
in one of our best church choirs.
Her next misfortune after her birth in
this evil world eighteen years before was
her father’s death. Her mother was left
in fairly good circumstances, and the owner
of a respectable house on George street.
She was a good-natured but weak minded
woman, the instincts of hotel-life were
strong upon her, and as a matter of course,
she took to keeping boarders. She kept a
good house, and good table, for little Aggie
was smart and looked after all that,
and there were gay times when
and play for the young gentlemen in the
evenings! But one set after another of
young men came and went, and Aggie
was unmarried at twenty-six, for bless you
Sir, you know boarding-house flirts, as a
rule, don’t marry. Meanwhile drinking
habits had grown on the mother, an inferior
class of boarders came to the house.
In an evil hour for herself Aggie became
engaged to marry a handsome well-bred
and well educated cadet of a rich Lancashire
family, cotton manufacturers, whose
trade brand is known through the world.
Horace B⸺ had been at Oxford for a few
terms. A subaltern in a militia regiment
which he had to leave, a clerk in the
Civil Service, finally he was shipped off to
Canada. He married Aggie and was
a shiftless, reckless, drunken husband!
Through him Aggie became addicted to
drink, and her mother lost house and
home. After many migrations they sought
refuge in the Teraulay street tenement,
where I found the dead baby. Two days
later I renewed my visit. All trace of
Aggie and her husband was lost, on a
pine table the sole article of furniture in
the room, lay the dead baby, purple
with decomposition partly covered by a
scanty rag! I learned from the people
of the next house that a drinking debauch
had taken place, the participants in which
after hurling the furniture at each others’
heads, threw the baby out of the rear
window into the yard! I at once procured
decent christian sepulture for this
child of sin and misery.
The Rev. William H. Laird, pastor of
Elm street Methodist church, stated that
but a small part of his congregation, so
small as to be inappreciable, came from
the poorest part of St. John’s ward, on
whose northern verge this church is situated.
Still he had visited among this
very class a good deal, being led to do so
by having particular cases brought under
his notice by a young people’s association
in connection with his church, who had
undertaken this duty. He was very frequently
appealed to for monetary aid
and to visit the sick and distressed.
When asked if he had seen many cases in
which reform had been effected through
the influence of religious agencies, Mr.
Laird said: “Yes, but only in isolated
cases.” He considered that the two great
causes of pauperism were shiftless idleness
and drink. The cases in which
pauperism was the result of inevitable
misfortune were, in his opinion, very few.
The tramp, the beggar, the slum-dweller,
owed his unhappy condition to one, generally
to both, of the above causes.
Among other clergyman of this city the
writer was able to obtain the opinion of
one who had been for some time acting
chaplain of the Provincial penitentiary at
Kingston. In reply to my question,
“Have you seen anything of the Toronto
ex-members of your convict congregation
since your residence in Toronto?” this
gentleman made the following statement:
“I am glad to tell you that to my certain
knowledge there are now living in Toronto
no small number of reformed criminals
whom I have known in the Provincial
penitentiary during my term of office as
chaplain. One of them is a tradesman in
a small way living in St. John’s ward.
He has married happily, and is the father
of several children. He is a most steady,
sober, industrious man. I think great influence
for good was exerted over this
man by the introduction of church music
into the penitentiary chapel, which, previously
to my term of office, was not permitted
by the authorities. The man referred
to had a good voice, and was much
interested in our singing classes, and since
his release he has been a steady attendant
at a Toronto church, of whose choir he
is a valued member. Another one is that
of a Scotch young lady, who had been decoyed
to Canada by a faithless lover, and,
as too often happens to girls not naturally
vicious, had found her only refuge in a
“fast house,” having quarreled with the
mistress of which, she was accused of larceny
and sent for a short term to Kingston.
Since her release benevolent ladies
in Toronto received her and provided for
her return home. She is the daughter of
a missionary on the west coast of Africa,
I also knew of several young men in quite
respectable positions who have accomplished
the difficult task of retrieving
character and habits, even after touching
the lowest depths of a convict prison.
Certain forms of crime seem to me to be
acute, like the most dangerous fevers
which may kill, but recovered from do not
recur. It is the smaller chronic types of
crime, lying, thieving, drinking, which
once contracted, hardly ever are eradicated.
“Do you ever recognize members of
your former convict congregation who
have not reformed?”
“But too frequently. Under the glare
of Toronto lamps I see but too many
faces once familiar to me in that unhappy
flock of black sheep. I have
recognized them among the loafers at the
street corners, among
half-thief and wholly drunkard, whom I
have met when summoned to visit some
case of illness or destitution in the city
slums, I have seen the faces of women far
more imbruted than when I had known
them as convicts, and these not amongst
the ranks of fallen women, strange to say,
but chiefly as wives or housekeepers in
rooms or tenement dwellings, in Duchess
street or St. John’s ward.
Once, shortly after I had ceased to act
as chaplain at Kingston, I had left behind
me still a convict, but under a
promise of release for her good conduct,
a Toronto girl named Annie ⸺. Annie
had been for some years a nurse in the
prison hospital. She was singularly neat,
good-humored, and devoted to her duties,
and I was glad to hear she had been released.
One evening in the July of that
year, returning home with my wife to our
house on G⸺ avenue, what was my
astonishment to see what appeared to be
a bundle of rags huddled together on the
porch by the door. With the dress of
a scarecrow, with every appearance
of exposure to wind and weather,
with unkempt hair and all the
appearance of a human wild beast,
was the once comely and gentle Annie.
We gave her a trifle to get a bed, and
told her to come again next morning for
breakfast and help, but she wandered
away in the night and we saw her no
more. There are many such women and
men in this city who are never so happy
as when in prison; the prison is to such a
monastery, with its three-fold rule of
poverty, obedience and temperance.
Of the criminal class in Toronto there
are two grades; the first of these consists
of those who commit the great crimes,
such as murder, forgery and the like;
such crimes result in many cases from
motives which may occur but once in a lifetime;
such cases of reform as I have
seen have come mainly from these classes.
But the crimes which depend on lying,
dishonest, laziness, and unchastity are
ineradicable, humanly speaking. The
intenser forms of crime are like the deadliest
diseases which attack but once in a
lifetime; the other class of crime clings to
the character like itch or leprosy.
Among the more famous Toronto criminals
under my care was the famous
She was a singularly beautiful girl, fourteen,
with dark eyes, graceful figure, and
a transparent olive complexion, when she
and her paramour committed the
crime, for which he was hanged.
Grace had pleasing manners and
though considerably past forty when under
my care, still retained the remains of
her girlish beauty. She told me that for
many years she never slept without seeing
the face of the murdered man in her
dreams. She has been for some years a
free woman, and is now a respectably settled
married woman in an American city.
There is one class of women who trade in
human life, who are but too seldom
brought within the grasp of the law, and
when the guilt of murder is most clearly
proven, are too often allowed to escape
with comparative impunity. Perhaps the
worst case of this class known in Toronto
was that of the wife of an American quack
doctor, to whom, and to her husband, was
clearly brought home the death, by malpractice
in their den, of a young girl,
daughter of a minister of the gospel. I
saw this woman-fiend in the workroom at
penitentiary, pert, cheerful, and confident
of the speedy relief she afterwards
obtained.
The Rev. Mr. Taylor, rector of St. Bartholemew’s
church, at the east end of Wilton
avenue gave much interesting information
with regard to the condition of
the poorer classes at the east end of the
city. “With us,” he said, “there is more
poverty than pauperism. What pauperism
there is, unlike that screened from
public view by the alleys of St. John’s
ward, can be seen from the public
thoroughfares. The lowest district,
Regent street, can be seen from Wilton
avenue. It is wide and well-drained, but
the humble hovels which line its sides
make a hideous comment on its ambitious
title. Little better than this is St. David’s
street, which crosses Regent street, east
and west. Sumach street was poverty-stricken
a few years ago, but is now improving,
but Sackville, Sydenham, Parliament,
and all the streets in this region
are to a great degree peopled by the poorer
classes of our citizens.” As far as many
years intimate acquaintance with the poor
of this district has entitled him to form an
opinion, there is little or no public immorality
among those people, who thus
form an entirely different class from the
inhabitants of the St. John’s ward slums.
The great evil is a certain shiftlessness, a
tendency to hope for support anywhere or
from any one rather than to their own exertions.
This I have noticed especially
among immigrants from London and other
parts of England. Mr. A. called on me
several years ago with an introduction
from one of the best known and most
hardworking clergymen in a well-known
London parish. He was respectably
dressed, and though he lived in one of the
poorest shanties in a lane off Sackville
street, the place when I called there was
clean, even neat, and decorated with a few
good engravings and other survivals of
his former English home. He had a wife,
a neat, well-dressed person, three fine
girls, and two as nice boys as I have ever
seen. The girls had already found employment
as dressmakers, a business to
which they had been apprenticed at
Camberwell, London. The father
sought a genteel situation, something
in the line of a clerk,
bookkeeper or secretary; he could
write a good hand, and was a competent
arithmetician. But as you know, our city
is already overstocked with applicants for
such positions. I soon found that Mr. A.
looked to the church for some slight
monetary assistance, which, as our poor
fund, small enough for legitimate uses,
was already over-drained, I was obliged
to withhold. The result was that Mr. A.
for about a year. But the evil righted
itself, as the boys grew up and found employment.
They and their sisters supported
the family by their earnings, an
act of self-denial which, I have no doubt,
was of the greatest possible moral benefit
to themselves. After a time Mr. A. found
occupation not wholly incompatible with
his dignity, as caretaker in a furniture
factory, became a most regular attendant
at church and a communicant. This is the
history of many of these English arrivals
in Toronto, more especially of those who
come from London. They are generally
fairly well-educated, are respectably connected,
and in most cases, I believe, are
“assisted” to this country by relations
anxious to shift from their shoulders the
burdens of directing or aiding their course.
The parents are people trained to earn
money, if at all, in a single groove, seldom
in one available in Canada. They cannot,
like our people, turn their hand to anything
that presents itself. But for all
that they form a valuable element in our
city population, for their children soon get
Canadianized, imbibe the Canadian idea
of being self-dependent and form the best
possible addition to our vastly increasing
numbers. One of the greatest evils I have
to contend against in dealing with this
class is an absurd and bastard pride and
love of keeping up appearances. A woman
living in a rented room on Sackville
street lost a child by death. I provided
her out of the poor fund with a plain black
coffin as the means of conveyance to the
place of interment. Soon afterwards another
woman lodging in the same house
lost a child. I offered to do the same for
her that I had done in the former case.
The woman indignantly refused, but
begged me to give her money to get a
more expensive coffin. Now, I had in my
pocket a small sum of money from the
poor fund, which I had intended to give
her, but which I felt compelled to withhold
when I found it would but be spent
superfluously on “the trappings and the
suits of woe.” Still I felt sorry for the poor
mother, in her desire to give a handsome
funeral to her dead darling, though I
could not conscientiously gratify her at
the expense of those of my poor who
needed food, not sentimental gratification.
But when I came to officiate at the funeral
I found she had provided a rosewood
casket with white metal plate, a hearse
and a carriage. Among my saddest experiences
here are my visits to
which drive a more or less thriving trade
in this part of the city. Some of them are
situate on St. David street, several of
them in a healthier position north of the
General hospital. I have frequently visited
these places; each dwelling will accommodate
from three or four to as many as
eight or ten infants, who are in almost all
cases the children of shame, for whom
their mothers, often persons in respectable
positions, pay a small sum monthly. I
do not think that they are neglected by
the women who undertake the charge of
them; in fact it is, of course, their interest
that the babies should thrive, as on
their living depends the monthly pay;
but the circumstances of the birth and rearing
of these poor infants, and, above all,
the deprivation of the mother’s milk,
the often sour milk in the feeding-bottle,
and the unavoidable crowding together,
make these places nothing less than
nurseries of death—the babies all die!”