1. This is the plain, unaggravated matter of
fact. Such is the manner wherein our African slaves
are procured: such the manner wherein they are removed
from their native land, and wherein they are
treated in our plantations. I would now enquire,
whether these things can be defended, on the principles
of even heathen honesty? Whether they can be
reconciled (setting the Bible out of the question) with
any degree of either justice or mercy?
2. The grand plea is, “They are authorized by law.”
But can law, Human Law, change the nature of things?
Can it turn darkness into light, or evil into good?
By no means. Notwithstanding ten thousand laws,
right is right, and wrong is wrong still. There must
still remain an essential difference between justice and
injustice, cruelty and mercy. So that I still ask, who
can reconcile this treatment of the negroes, first and
last, with either mercy or justice?
Where is the justice of inflicting the severest evils,
on those that have done us no wrong? Of depriving
those that never injured us in word or deed, of every
comfort of life? Of tearing them from their native
country, and depriving them of liberty itself? To
which an Angolan, has the same natural right as an
Englishman, and on which he sets as high a value?
Yea, where is the justice of taking away the lives of
innocent, inoffensive men? Murdering thousands of
them in their own land, by the hands of their own
countrymen: many thousands, year after year, on
shipboard, and then casting them like dung into the sea!
And tens of thousands in that cruel slavery, to which
they are so unjustly reduced?
3. But waving, for the present, all other considerations,
I strike at the root of this complicated villany.
I absolutely deny all slave-holding to be consistent with
any degree of natural justice.
I cannot place this in a clearer light, than that
great ornament of his profession, Judge Blackstone
has already done. Part of his words are as follows:
“The three origins of the right of slavery assigned by
Justinian, are all built upon false foundations. 1. Slavery
is said to arise from captivity in war. The conqueror
having a right to the life of his captive, if he
spares that, has then a right to deal with them as he
speaks. But this is untrue, if taken generally, That
by the laws of nations, a man has a right to kill his
enemy. He has only a right to kill him in particular
cases, in cases of absolute necessity for self-defence.
And it is plain, this absolute necessity did not subsist,
since he did not kill him, but made him prisoner. War
itself is justifiable only on principles of self-preservation.
Therefore it gives us no right over prisoners, but to
hinder their hurting us by confining them. Much less
can it give a right to torture, or kill, or even enslave
an enemy when the war is over. Since therefore the
right of making our prisoners slaves, depends on a
supposed right of slaughter, that foundation failing,
the consequence which is drawn from it must fail likewise.”
“It is said secondly, Slavery may begin, by one
man’s selling himself to another. And it is true, a
man may sell himself to work for another; but he can
not sell himself to be a slave, as above defined. Every
sale implies an equivalent given to the seller, in lieu
of what he transfers to the buyer. But what equivalent
can be given for life or liberty? His property likewise,
with the very price which he seems to receive,
devolves ipso facto to his master, the instant he becomes
his slave: in this case therefore the buyer gives nothing.
Of what validity then can a sale be, which destroys
the very principle upon which all sales are founded?”
“We are told, Thirdly, that men may be born slaves,
by being the children of slaves. But this being built
upon the two former rights must fall together with
them, if neither captivity, nor contract can by the
plain law of nature and reason, reduce the parent
to a state of slavery, much less can they reduce the offspring.”
It clearly follows, that all slavery is as irreconcileable
to justice as to mercy.
4. That slave-holding is utterly inconsistent with
mercy, is almost too plain to need a proof. Indeed
it is said, “That these negroes being prisoners of war,
our captains and factors buy them, merely to save them
from being put to death. And is not this mercy?”
I answer, 1. Did Sir John Hawkins, and many others,
seize upon men, women and children, who were at
peace in their own fields and houses, merely to save
them from death? 2. Was it to save them from death,
that they knock’d out the brains of those they could
not bring away? 3. Who occasioned and fomented
those wars, wherein these poor creatures were taken
prisoners? Who excited them by money, by drink,
by every possible means, to fall upon one another?
Was it not themselves? They know in their own conscience
it was, if they have any conscience left. But
4. To bring the matter to a short issue. Can they say
before God, That they ever took a single voyage, or
bought a single negro from this motive? They cannot,
they well know, to get money, not to save lives,
was the whole and sole spring of their motions.
5. But if this manner of procuring and tearing negroes
is not consistent either with mercy or justice, yet
there is a plea for it which every man of business will
acknowledge to be quite sufficient. Fifty years ago,
one meeting an eminent statesman in the lobby of the
House of Commons, said, “You have been long
talking about justice and equity, Pray which is this
bill? Equity or justice?” He answered, very short,
and plain, “D—n justice: it is necessity.” Here also
the slave-holder fixes his foot: here he rests the strength
of his cause. “If it is not quite right, yet it must be
so: there is an absolute necessity for it. It is necessary
we should procure slaves: and when we have procured
them, it is necessary to use them with severity, considering
their stupidity, stubbornness and wickedness.”
I answer, You stumble at the threshold: I deny
that villany is ever necessary. It is impossible that it
should ever be necessary, for any reasonable creature
to violate all the laws of justice, mercy, and truth.
No circumstances can make it necessary for a man to
burst in sunder all the ties of humanity. It can
never be necessary for a rational being to sink himself
below a brute. A man can be under no necessity, of
degrading himself into a wolf. The absurdity of the
supposition is so glaring, that one would wonder any
one could help seeing it.
6. This in general. But to be more particular, I
ask, 1. What is necessary? And secondly, To what
end? It may be answered, “The whole method now
used by the original purchasers of negroes, is necessary
to the furnishing our colonies yearly with a hundred
thousand slaves.” I grant this is necessary to that end.
But how is that end necessary? How will you prove
it necessary that one hundred, that one of those slaves
should be procured? “Why, it is necessary to my
gaining an hundred thousand pounds.” Perhaps so:
but how is this necessary? It is very possible you
might be both a better and a happier man, if you had
not a quarter of it. I deny that your gaining one
thousand is necessary, either to your present or eternal
happiness. “But however you must allow, these
slaves are necessary for the cultivation of our Islands:
inasmuch as white men are not able to labour in hot
climates.” I answer, 1. It were better that all those
Islands should remain uncultivated for ever, yea, it
were more desirable that they were altogether sunk in
the depth of the sea, than that they should be cultivated
at so high a price, as the violation of justice,
mercy and truth. But, secondly, the supposition on
which you ground your argument is false. For white
men, even English men, are well able to labour in hot
climates: provided they are temperate both in meat
and drink, and that they inure themselves to it by degrees.
I speak no more than I know by experience.
It appears from the thermometer, that the summer
heat in Georgia, is frequently equal to that in Barbadoes,
yea to that under the line. And yet I and my
family (eight in number) did employ all our spare time
there, in felling of trees and clearing of ground, as
hard labour as any negro need be employed in. The
German family likewise, forty in number, were employed
in all manner of labour. And this was so far
from impairing our health, that we all continued perfectly
well, while the idle ones round about us, were
swept away as with a pestilence. It is not true therefore
that white men are not able to labour, even in hot
climates, full as well as black. But if they were not,
it would be better that none should labour there,
that the work should be left undone, than that
myriads of innocent men should be murdered, and myriads
more dragged into the basest slavery.
7. “But the furnishing us with slaves is necessary,
for the trade, and wealth, and glory of our nation:”
here are several mistakes. For 1. Wealth is not
necessary to the glory of any nation; but wisdom, virtue,
justice, mercy, generosity, public spirit, love of
our country. These are necessary to the real glory of
a nation; but abundance of wealth is not. Men of
understanding allow, that the glory of England was
full as high, in Queen Elizabeth’s time as it is now:
although our riches and trade were then as much
smaller, as our virtue was greater. But, secondly, it
is not clear, that we should have either less money or
trade, (only less of that detestable trade of man-stealing)
if there was not a negro in all our Islands, or in all
English America. It is demonstrable, white men, inured
to it by degrees can work as well as them: and they
would do it, were negroes out of the way, and proper
encouragement given them. However, thirdly, I come
back to the same point: better no trade, than trade
procured by villany. It is far better to have no wealth,
than to gain wealth at the expence of virtue. Better
is honest poverty, than all the riches bought by
the tears, and sweat and blood of our fellow-creatures.
8. “However this be; it is necessary when we have
slaves, to use them with severity.” What, to whip
them for every petty offence, till they are all in gore
blood? To take that opportunity, of rubbing pepper
and salt into their raw flesh? To drop burning sealing-wax
upon their skin? To castrate them? To cut off
half their foot with an axe? To hang them on gibbets,
that they may die by inches, with heat, and hunger,
and thirst? To pin them down to the ground, and
then burn them by degrees, from the feet, to the
head? To roast them alive?—When did a Turk or
a Heathen find it necessary to use a fellow-creature
thus?
I pray, to what end is this usage necessary? “Why,
to prevent their running away: and to keep them constantly
to their labour, that they may not idle away
their time. So miserably stupid is this race of men,
yea, so stubborn and so wicked.” Allowing them to
be as stupid as you say, to whom is that stupidity
owing? Without question it lies altogether at the
door of their inhuman masters: who give them no
means, no opportunity of improving their understanding:
and indeed leave them no motive, either from
hope or fear, to attempt any such thing. They were
no way remarkable for stupidity, while they remained
in their own country: the inhabitants of Africa where
they have equal motives and equal means of improvement,
are not inferior to the inhabitants of Europe: to
some of them they are greatly superior. Impartially
survey in their own country, the natives of Benin, and
the natives of Lapland. Compare, (setting prejudice
aside) the Samoeids and the Angolans. And on which
side does the advantage lie, in point of understanding?
Certainly the African is in no respect inferior to the
European. Their stupidity therefore in our plantations
is not natural; otherwise than it is the natural effect of
their condition. Consequently it is not their fault,
but your’s: you must answer for it, before God and
man.
9. “But their stupidity is not the only reason of our
treating them with severity. For it is hard to say,
which is the greatest, this or their stubbornness and
wickedness.”——It may be so: But do not these as
well as the other, lie at your door; are not stubbornness,
cunning, pilfering, and divers other vices, the
natural, necessary fruits of slavery? Is not this an observation
which has been made, in every age and nation?——And
what means have you used to remove
this stubbornness? Have you tried what mildness and
gentleness would do? I knew one that did: that had
prudence and patience to make the experiment: Mr.
Hugh Bryan, who then lived on the borders of South-Carolina.
And what was the effect? Why, that all
his negroes (and he had no small number of them)
loved and reverenced him as a father, and chearfully
obeyed him out of love. Yea, they were more afraid
of a frown from him, than of many blows from an overseer.
And what pains have you taken, what method
have you used, to reclaim them from their wickedness?
Have you carefully taught them,
“That there is a God, a wise, powerful, merciful
being, the Creator and Governor of heaven and earth?
That he has appointed a day wherein he will judge the
world, will take an account of all our thoughts, words
and actions? That in that day he will reward every
child of man according to his works: that “then the
righteous shall inherit the kingdom prepared for them
from the foundation of the world: and the wicked
shall be cast into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil
and his angels.” If you have not done this, if you
have taken no pains or thought about the matter, can
you wonder at their wickedness? What wonder, if
they should cut your throat? And if they did, whom
could you thank for it but yourself? You first acted
the villain in making them slaves, (whether you stole
them or bought them.) You kept them stupid and
wicked, by cutting them off from all opportunities of
improving either in knowledge or virtue: and now
you assign their want of wisdom and goodness as
the reason for using them worse than brute beasts!