Welsh pedigree of queen Victoria—A
poet’s flattery—Castles of
Monmouthshire—Geoffrey of Monmouth—Henry of
Monmouth—The Kymin—Subsidiary tour—Sir David
Gam—White Castle—Scenfrith—The Castle
spectres—Grosmont—Lanthony Abbey.
“Monmouthshire,” as has been well observed,
“though now an English county, may be justly considered the
connecting link between England and Wales, as it unites the
scenery, manners, and language of both.” In ancient
times, it was a debatable land of another kind, when Romans,
Saxons, and Normans, strove by turns against the aboriginal
Britons. During the Roman invasion it was a part of the
territory of the Silures, who inhabited the eastern division of
South Wales, and were one of the three great Welsh
tribes; but in the conflict of the Saxons, Gwent (its British
name) played the most distinguished part of all, under its
sovereign Utha Pendragon and the renowned king Arthur. To
Gwent, moreover, if chronicles say true, we are indebted for our
present sovereign lady, who is descended collaterally from its
princes. Merrich, the son of Ithel, king or prince of
Gwent, died without issue male, leaving one daughter, Morvyth,
who espoused Gwno, great grandson to Rees ap Theodore, prince of
South Wales, and lineal ancestor of Sir Owen Tudor, grandfather
of Henry VII. “So that it appears,” say the
Secret Memoirs of Monmouthshire, “that the kings of
Scotland and England are originally descended from Morvyth, this
Gwentonian prince’s daughter, and heir to Meyrick, last
king of Gwent, who, according to several authentic British
pedigrees, was lineally descended from Cadwalladar, the last king
of Britain, and as our historians do testify, did prognosticate,
fifteen hundred years past, that the heirs descended of his loins
should be restored again to the kingdom of Britain, which was
partly accomplished in king Henry VII., and more by the accession
of James
I. to the British throne, but wholly fulfilled in the happy union
of all Britain by the glorious queen Anne; whom God long
preserved of his great goodness, and the succession of the
Protestant line.”
We know not what value may be attached to this illustrious
ancestry by Queen Victoria; but her predecessor, Queen Elizabeth,
was fond of tracing her descent from the ancient kings of her
country—a predilection which the courtly Spenser does not
omit to flatter in his Faerie Queene.
“Thy name, O soveraine Queene, thy realme
and race,
From this renowned prince derived arre,
Who mightily upheld that royal mace
Which thou now bear’st, to thee descended farre
From mighty kings and couquerors in warre,
Thy fathers and thy grandfathers of old,
Whose noble deeds above the northern starre,
Immortall fame for ever hath enrold;
As in that old man’s booke they were in order
told.”
The old man have referred to is Geoffrey of Monmouth,
of whom more anon.
It is to the Norman invasion that Monmouthshire owes its
castles; for the great barons were not employed by the state, as
had been the case with the Saxons, to conquer the territory, but
were invited to enter upon adventures at their own cost, and for
their own gain. The lands they subdued became their own;
they were created lords-barons over them; and castles speedily
bristled up all over the territory to maintain the authority so
acquired. Pennant states the number for Wales at a hundred
and forty-three, of which Monmouthshire, as the frontier region
between the belligerents, had of course the greatest proportion,
amounting, it is said, to at least twenty-five. In these
baronial lands, the writs of ordinary justices of the royal
courts were not current. The barons marchers, as they were
called, had recourse to their feudal lord the king in person; and
the same abuses and confusion were the result which we have
noticed in Herefordshire, till Henry VIII. abolished this
anomalous government, divided Wales into twelve shires, and
withdrew Monmouthshire into the list of the English
counties. It is interesting to trace the chain of
fortresses thus destined to become, still earlier than in the natural
course of time, a series of ruins. They extend, in this
county, along the banks of the Monnow, the Wye, and the Severn,
and from Grosmont, diagonally, to the banks of the Rumney; while
castellated mansions, such as Raglan, which we shall notice
presently (at first only a rude fortress), arose in all quarters
to keep the natives in due respect.
King Arthur, mentioned above as prince of Gwent, did not reign
at Monmouth, but at Caerleon; although he is closely associated
with the former place, inasmuch as the gothic room in the priory
which we have pointed out, on the authority of tradition, as the
study of Geoffrey of Monmouth, was in all probability the
birthplace of his most heroic achievements. Geoffrey, in
fact, for it is needless to attempt to conceal the fact from our
readers, was an historical romancer rather than an
historian. The groundwork of his celebrated performance was
Brut y Breninodd, or the Chronicle of the Kings of Britain,
written by Tyssilio, or St. Telian, bishop of St. Asaph, in the
seventh century; but Geoffrey owns himself, that he made various
additions to his original, particularly of Merlin’s
prophecies. After all, however, if we may venture to express our
private opinion on so recondite a subject, it seems to us that a
monkish history, of the seventh century, must have been
reasonably fertile in itself in wonderful incidents and legendary
tales, and that in all probability Geoffrey of Monmouth deserves
less credit as a romancer than he has received from one party, as
well as less credit as an historian than he has received from the
other.
However this may be, the work has served as a valuable
storehouse for our poets and romancers. It has even
supplied the story of King Lear to Shakspeare, who deepened the
pathos by making Cordelia die before her father; whereas, in the
original story, Lear is restored to his kingdom, and Cordelia to
life. Milton drew from it his fiction of Sabrina in the
Mask of Comus; and in early life he had formed the design of
writing an epic poem on the subject taken up from Geoffrey by
Spenser, in the second book of the Faerie Queene—
“A chronicle of Briton kings,
From Brute to Arthur’s reign.”
Dryden, also, intended to produce an epic poem on the
subject of king Arthur, but he contented himself with an opera,
in which he has sublimely described the British worthy
“in
battle brave,
But still serene in all the stormy war,
Like heaven above the clouds; and after fight
As merciful and kind to vanquished foe
As a forgiving God.”
Pope followed, in like manner, with plentiful materials for
the pavement of a certain place—good intentions; but after
all, our national history has been left to the muse of Blackmore.
[106]
Geoffrey was born in Monmouth, and is supposed to have been
educated in the monastery, although the room pointed out as his
study is evidently of a more modern date. He became
archdeacon of his native town, and in 1152 was consecrated bishop
of St. Asaph. This is all that is known of his history; and
his works, with the exception of his great romance adverted to
above, are confined to a treatise on the Holy Sacraments, and
some verses on the enchanter Merlin.
Perhaps a word may not be amiss on the other worthy connected
by birth with the fame and the ruins of Monmouth. Henry V.
passed some of his earliest years in this county; but in his
youth was transferred to Oxford, where he studied under his uncle
Cardinal Beaufort, then chancellor of the university, and where,
as Stowe relates, he “delighted in songs, meeters, and
musical instruments.” He is thus described by the
chronicler, on the authority of John of Elmham:
“This prince exceeded the meane stature of
men, he was beautiful of visage, his necke long, body long and
leane, and his bones small; neverthelesse he was of great
marvellous strength, and passing swift in running, insomuch that
he with two other of his lords, without hounds, bow, or other
engine, would take a wild buck or doe in a large
parke.”
Henry is usually treated as a mere warrior; and it is
the custom to sneer at him as such, by those who are unable to
judge of the minds of men by the spirit of the age in which they
live. He was remarkable, however, for more than his
military prowess, and exhibited many traits of a truly great
character. Some of these are very agreeably detailed by Mr.
Coxe, who relates also, from Speed, that “every day after
dinner, for the space of an hour, his custom was to lean on a
cushion set by his cupboard, and there he himselfe received
petitions of the oppressed, which with great equitie he did
redresse.” His sudden change from the wild
licentiousness of his youth is described by his contemporary,
Thomas de Elmham, as having taken place at the bedside of his
dying father; and we need not remark that in that age, the
religious feeling he exhibited on the occasion was not
inconsistent with the ferocity of the hero.
“The courses of his youth promis’d it
not;
The breath no sooner left his father’s body,
But that his wildness, mortified in him,
Seem’d to die too: yea, at that very moment,
Consideration like an angel came,
And whipped the offending Adam out of him;
Leaving
his body as a paradise,
To envellop, and contain celestial spirits.
Never was such a sudden scholar made;
Never came reformation in a flood,
With such a heady current, scouring faults;
Nor ever hydra-headed wilfulness,
So soon did lose his seat, and all at once,
As in this king.”
Monmouth, as the half-way station between Ross and Chepstow
for the tourists of the Wye, usually claims a large portion of
their attention; and, independently of its historical
associations, the delightful walks in the neighbourhood
abundantly repay it. The views from numerous points are
very beautiful; and one more especially, independently of the
nearer parts of the picture, commands on all sides an expanse of
country which seems absolutely unlimited.
“If among these views,” says the historical
tourist, “one can be selected surpassing the rest, it is
perhaps that from the summit of the Kymin, which rises from the
left bank of the Wye, and is situated partly in Monmouthshire,
and partly in Gloucestershire. On the centre of this
eminence overhanging the river and town, a pavilion has been
lately erected by subscription, to which is carried a walk, gently
winding up the acclivity. . . .
“I shall not attempt to describe the unbounded expanse
of country around and beneath, which embraces an extent of nearly
three hundred miles. The eye, satiated with the distant
prospect, reposes at length on the near views, dwells on the
country immediately beneath and around, is attracted with the
pleasing position of Monmouth, here seen to singular advantage,
admires the elegant bend and silvery current of the Monnow,
glistening through meads, in its way to the Wye, and the junction
of the two rivers, which forms an assemblage of beautiful
objects.
“The level summit of the Kymin is crowned with a
beautiful wood, called Beaulieu Grove, through which walks are
made, terminating in seats, placed at the edge of abrupt
declivities, and presenting in perspective, through openings in
the trees, portions of the unbounded expanse seen from the
pavilion. There are six of these openings, three of which
comprehend perspective views of Monmouth, stretching between the
Wye and the Monnow, in different positions. At one of these
seats, placed on a ledge of impending rocks, I looked down on a
hanging wood, clothing the sides of the declivities, and sloping
gradually to the Wye, which sweeps in a beautiful curve, from
Dixon Church to the mouth of the Monnow; the town appears seated
on its banks, and beyond the luxuriant and undulating swells of
Monmouthshire, terminated by the Great and Little Skyrrid, the
Black Mountains, and the Sugar Loaf, in all the variety of
sublime and contrasted forms.”
It is not our intention to notice any of the numerous seats
and mansions with which this delightful region abounds; but,
leaving the tourist to make such easy discoveries for himself, we
would hint to him that, while at Monmouth, he has an opportunity,
without great expense of time or labour, of making himself
acquainted with many interesting objects which ought to be
considered as adjuncts of the tour of the Wye. Between this
place and the Hay the river describes an irregular semicircle, of
which the Monnow, for about half way, may be said to be the cord;
and this latter stream, as the most important and beautiful
tributary of the Wye, has a claim upon the pilgrim which
should not be set aside.
This minor excursion, however, will not be complete without
diverging a little to the left at the outset for the purpose of
visiting White Castle; for this ruin is inseparably associated
with the other reliques of baronial power presented by the
route. It is within a short distance of Landeilo Cresseney
on the Abergavenny road, where a farm will be pointed out to the
traveller, called the Park, belonging to the duke of Beaufort, as
the site of Old Court, formerly the residence of the valiant Sir
David Gam, who, before the battle of Agincourt, reported to Henry
V. that there were “enough of the enemy to be killed,
enough to run away, and enough to be taken
prisoners.” It is said that the children of this
Welsh worthy were so numerous as to form a line extending from
his house to the church. From Gladys, one of these
children, the dukes of Beaufort and earls of Pembroke are
descended. The farm alluded to was formerly the red deer
park of Raglan Castle.
White Castle must have been constructed in the earliest period
of the Norman era, if not before the conquest; and the massive ruins
that still remain attest that it must have kept the country side
in awe, as the abode of one of those fierce barons who were the
prototypes of the giants and dragons of the romancers. This
fortress, with those of Scenfrith and Grosmont on the banks of
the Monnow, belonged to Brien Fitz Count, the Norman conqueror of
the tract called Overwent, stretching from the Wye to
Abergavenny; and they were afterwards seized by Henry III., and
given by him to the celebrated Herbert de Burgh. Herbert
resigned them anew to the crown, after being imprisoned and
almost famished to death. Henry granted them to his son
Edward Crouchback, and they afterwards fell to John of Gaunt, in
the way we have related of Monmouth Castle, and became parcel of
the duchy of Lancaster.
The ruins stand on the ridge of an eminence, surrounded by a
moat. The walls, which are very massive, describe nearly an
oval, and are defended by six round towers, not dividing the
courtine in the usual way, but altogether extramural, and
capable, therefore, of acting as independent fortresses, even
after the inner court had been taken. The principal
entrance was protected by a portcullis and drawbridge, and by an
immense barbican, greatly disproportioned to the size of the
castle, on the opposite site of the moat. The name of the
place was Castell Gwyn, White Castle, or Castell Blanch, all
which mean the same thing in British, Saxon, and Norman.
In the time of James I., it is presented as “ruinous and
in decay time out of mind,” and yet, during the reign of
his immediate predecessor Elizabeth, it is described in the
Worthines of Wales as “a loftie princely place.”
“Three castles fayre are in a goodly
ground,
Grosmont is one, on hill it builded was;
Skenfrith the next, in valley it is found,
The soyle about for pleasure there doth passe;
Whit Castle is the third of worthy fame,
The county there doth bear Whit Castle’s name,
A stately seate, a loftie princely place,
Whose beauties give the simple soyle some grace.”
Scenfrith is not more than five miles from White Castle, but
the access to it is only fit for pedestrians. The ruin
stands on a secluded spot in the midst of hills, and overlooks
the placid Monnow, the passage of which it was no doubt its duty
to guard. It is a small fortress severely simple, and
exhibiting all the marks of high antiquity. There are no
traces of outworks; but the walls are flanked by five circular
towers. About the middle of the area is a round tower,
which was the keep or citadel. Scenfrith seems to have no
history peculiarly its own; it was one of “the three
castles,” changing hands with them apparently as a matter
of course, and that was enough for its ambition.
The road from Scenfrith to Grosmont leads through Newcastle;
but the remains of the fortress, from which this place derived
its name, are barely discernible, and its history has for ever
perished. In the absence of human associations, however, it
is well provided with those of another kind. The mount, or
barrow, under which its fragments are hidden, is the haunt of
spirits; and an oak tree in the neighbourhood is so completely
protected by such means, that an attempt even to lop a branch is
sure to be punished by supernatural power.
The ruins of Grosmont Castle stand on an eminence near the
Monnow, surrounded by a dry moat, with barbican and other
outworks. Its pointed arches declare it by far the youngest
of the three sisters. The remains now left enclose only a
small area; but walls and foundations may be traced, which show
that its original size was really considerable, and this is
confirmed by the presence of a spacious apartment, which no doubt
formed the great baronial hall. In the reign of Henry III.
it was invested by Llewellin, and the siege raised by the king;
and, on another occasion, Henry retreated to Grosmont, where his
troops were surprised by the Welsh as they slept in the trenches,
and lost five hundred horses, besides baggage and treasure.
The banks of the Monnow, from which the ruins rise, are
precipitous, and tufted with oaks, and the whole scene is
singularly picturesque. The hero of the village tradition
is here John of Kent, or Guent, who built a bridge over the
Monnow in a single night, by means of one of his familiar
spirits. Many other stories as wonderful are related of him
by the inhabitants; some say he was a monk, versed in the black
art; others that he was a disciple of Owen Glendowr; and others
that he was the great magician himself.
At
Grosmont the line of the Monnow turns away to the west, towards
its source among the Black Mountains; but the traveller who
eschews more fatigue than is necessary will take the route by
Craig-gate and Crickhowell, and so get into a road which will
lead him along the Honddy, a tributary of the Monnow, to the
magnificent ruins of Lanthony Abbey, the furthest object we
propose to him in this subsidiary tour.
“Here it was, stranger, that the patron
saint
Of Cambria passed his age of penitence—
A solitary man; and here he made
His hermitage; the roots his food, his drink
Of Honddy’s mountain-stream. Perchance thy youth
Has read with eager wonder how the knight
Of Wales, in Ormandine’s enchanted bowers,
Slept the long sleep: and if that in thy veins
Flows the pure blood of Britain, sure that blood
Has flowed with quicker impulse at the tale
Of Dafydd’s deeds, when through the press of war
His gallant comrades followed his green crest
To conquests. Stranger! Hatterel’s mountain
heights,
And this fair vale of Cwias, and the stream
Of Honddy, to thine after thoughts will rise
More grateful, thus associate with the name
Of Dafydd and the deeds of other days.”
“After catching a transient view of the Honddy,”
says archdeacon Coxe, “winding through a deep glen, at the
foot of hills overspread with wood and sprinkled with white
cottages, we proceeded along a hollow way, which deepened as we
advanced, and was scarcely broad enough to admit the
carriage. In this road, which, with more propriety might be
termed a ditch, we heard the roar of the torrent beneath, but
seldom enjoyed a view of the circumjacent scenery. We
passed under a bridge thrown across the chasm, to preserve the
communication with the fields on each side: this bridge was
framed of the trunks of trees, and secured with side rails, to
prevent the tottering passenger from falling in the abyss
beneath. It brought to my recollection several bridges of
similar construction, which I observed in Norway, which are
likewise occasionally used as aqueducts, for the purposes of
irrigation. Emerging from this gloomy way, we were struck
with the romantic village of Cwnyoy, on the opposite bank of the
Honddy, hanging on the sides of the abrupt cliff, under a
perpendicular rock, broken into enormous fissures. We
continued for some way between the torrent and the Gaer, and
again plunged into a hollow road, where we were enclosed, and saw
nothing but the overhanging hedgerows. . . . The abbey
was built like a cathedral, in the shape of Roman crosses, and
though of small dimensions, was well proportioned. The
length, from the western door to the eastern extremity, is 210
feet; and the breadth, including two aisles, 50; the length of
the transept, from north to south, 100. It was constructed
soon after the introduction of the Gothic architecture, and
before the disuse of the Norman, and is a regular composition of
both styles. The whole roof, excepting a small fragment of
the north aisle, is fallen down, and the building is extremely
dilapidated. The nave alone exhibits a complete specimen of
the original plan, and is separated on each side by the two
aisles, by eight pointed arches, resting on piers of the simplest
construction, which are divided from the upper tier of Norman
arches by a straight band of fascia. From the small
fragment in the northern aisle, the roofs seem to have been
vaulted and engroined, and the springing columns, by which it was
supported, are still visible on the wall. Four bold arches,
in the centre of the church, supported a square tower, two sides
of which only remain. The ornamental arch in the
eastern window, which appears in the engraving of Mr.
Wyndham’s Tour, and in that published by Hearne, has now
fallen. The only vestiges of the choir are a part of the
south wall, with a Norman door, that led into the side aisle, and
the east end of the south wall; a bold Norman arch, leading from
the transept into the southern aisle of the choir, still
exists. The walls of the southern aisle are wholly
dilapidated; and the side view of the two ranges of Gothic
arches, stretching along the nave, is singularly picturesque; the
outside wall of the northern aisle is entire, excepting a small
portion of the western extremity; the windows of this part are
wholly Norman, and make a grand appearance. In a word, the
western side is most elegant; the northern side is most entire;
the southern the most picturesque; the eastern the most
magnificent.”
The abbey originated in a small chapel, built here as a
hermitage by St. David, the titular saint of Wales; but for the
account of its foundation and history, we must refer the reader
to Mr. Coxe’s Tour, Dugdale’s Monasticon, or the
History of Gloucestershire.
Raglan Castle—Description of the
ruins—History of the Castle—The old lord of
Raglan—Surrender of the fortress—Charles I. and his
host—Royal weakness—The pigeons of Raglan—Death
of the old lord—Origin of the steam Engine.
That magnificent specimen of what is called a castellated
mansion, Raglan castle, is so interesting in itself, and at so
convenient a distance from the river, that it forms an
indispensable part of the tour of the Wye. The ruins stand
upon an eminence, near the village of the same name, eight miles
from Monmouth, and cover, with their massive forms, an area of
one-third part of a mile in circumference. This includes
the citadel, which was not contained within the fortress as
usual, but formed a separate building, connected with it by
a drawbridge. It was called Melyn y Gwent, or the Yellow
Tower of Gwent. It was of a hexagon form, five stories
high, defended by bastions and a moat, and surrounded with raised
walks or terraces. The building was faced with hewn stone,
of a greyish colour, and from its smoothness resembling polished
marble.
The earliest style of this edifice dates only from the reign
of Henry V.; but the greater part was probably added afterwards,
when, by the marriage of Sir Charles Somerset into the house of
Herbert, and the acquisition then of the lordships of Raglan,
Chepstow, and Gower, the house of Beaufort became one of the
greatest in the county. The building is of a description
peculiar to that period in the history of Monmouthshire, when the
barons had superadded to their warlike habits those of modern
luxury and magnificence. Externally, the place has
evidently been a strong fortress; internally a splendid
mansion. The ascent to the state apartment is both noble
and well contrived; while the circular staircase in the hexagon
citadel, the windows of the great hall, and the chimney-pieces,
with their light and elegant cornices, are in the
style of modern edifices. The kitchen and butlery were
connected with the hall, and indicate, by their construction, the
princely hospitality of the lords of Raglan. All the rooms
had chimneys, those of each floor distinct from the rest.
The cellars were extensive—so were the subterranean
passages and dungeons. The architecture is various, some
parts of the most elegant gothic, some heavy and unwieldy,
representing at once the two distinct characters of luxury and
war. The southern declivity, towards the village, was laid
out in fish-ponds; three parks of considerable extent supplied
game and recreation; and the proprietor of this unique mansion
was able, through the fertility of his surrounding estates, to
maintain a garrison of eight hundred men.
“Of these noble ruins,” says Mr. Coxe,
“the grand entrance is the most magnificent; it is formed
by a gothic portal, flanked with two massive towers: the one
beautifully tufted with ivy, the second so entirely covered, that
not a single stone is visible. At a small distance, on the
right, appears a third tower, lower in height, almost wholly
ivyless, and with its machicolated summit, presenting a highly
picturesque appearance. The porch, which still contains the
grooves for two portcullises, leads into the first court, once
paved, but now covered with turf, and sprinkled with
shrubs. The eastern and northern sides contained a range of
culinary offices, of which the kitchen is remarkable for the size
of the fire-place; the southern side seems to have formed a grand
suite of apartments, and the great bow window of the hall, at the
south-western extremity of the court, is finely canopied with
ivy. The stately hall which divides the two courts, and
seems to have been built in the days of queen Elizabeth, contains
the vestiges of ancient hospitality and splendour: the ceiling is
fallen down, but the walls still remain; it is sixty feet in
length, twenty-seven in breadth, and was the great
banqueting-room of the castle. At the extremity are placed
the arms of the first marquis of Worcester, sculptured in stone,
and surrounded with the garter: underneath is the family motto,
which fully marks the character of the noble proprietor, who
defended the castle with such spirit from the parliamentary army:
‘Mutare vel timere sperno;’ ‘I scorn either to
change or to fear.’ The fire-place deserves to be
noticed for its remarkable size, and the singular structure of
the chimney. The hall is occasionally used as a fives
court.
“To the north of the hall are ranges of offices, which
appear to have been butteries; beyond are the traces of splendid
apartments. In the walls above I observed two
chimney-pieces, in high preservation, neatly ornamented with a
light frieze and cornice: the stone frames of the windows are
likewise in many parts, particularly in the south front,
distinguished with mouldings and other decorations, which Mr.
Windham justly observes, would not be considered inelegant, even
at present.
“The western door of the hall led into the chapel, which
is now dilapidated; but its situation is marked by some of the
flying columns, rising from grotesque heads, which supported the
roof. At the upper end are two rude whole-length figures,
in stone, several yards above the ground, recently discovered by
Mr. Heath, under the thick clusters of ivy. Beyond the
foundations of the chapel is the area of the second court,
skirted with a range of buildings, which, at the time of the
siege, formed the barracks of the garrison. Not the
smallest traces remain of the marble fountain, which once
occupied the centre of the area, and was ornamented with the
statue of a white horse.
“Most of the apartments of this splendid abode were of
grand dimensions, and the communications easy and
convenient. The strength of the walls is still so great,
that if the parts still standing were roofed and floored, it
might even now be formed into a magnificent and commodious
habitation.”
The fountain mentioned above was called the White Horse, from
the figure from which the water played. In a note supplied
by Dr. Griffin to Williams’s History of Monmouthshire, it
is said that the people who showed the ruins used to exhibit part
of the body of a black horse which stood in the middle of
the water which supplied the castle. The cause of the
change of colour was that during the siege the parliamentarians
poisoned the fountain! The horse, it seems, absorbed the
fatal drug, and not only became black, but when struck by any
hard substance, emitted a fetid smell. It is
difficult to trace the early history of the castle, from the
contradictory accounts given of it by Dugdale; but in the time of
Henry V. the proprietor was Sir William ap Thomas, second son of
Sir Thomas ap Guillim, from whom the earls of Pembroke, Powis,
and Caernarvon are descended in the male, and the dukes of
Beaufort in the female line. William, the eldest son of
this Sir William, was created by Edward IV. lord of Raglan,
Chepstow, and Gower; and, in obedience to the royal command, he
discontinued the Welsh custom of changing the surname at every
descent, and took Herbert as his family name, in honour of his
ancestor Herbert Fitzhenry, chamberlain to Henry I. Richard
was for some time detained at Raglan in the custody of lord
Herbert, who was a distinguished partisan of the house of York,
and who at length died on the scaffold, at Banbury, in this
cause, having previously been created earl of Pembroke. His
son, by the desire of Edward IV., yielded this title to the
Prince of Wales; and, dying without male issue, the castle of
Raglan, and many other noble possessions devolved upon his
daughter Elizabeth. The heiress married Sir Charles
Somerset, natural son of the duke of Somerset, who lost his head
in 1463 for his devotion to the house of Lancaster; and he, a
brave soldier, a prudent statesman, and an accomplished courtier,
was created by Henry VIII., for his services, earl of
Worcester.
It is probable that the castle of Raglan, owed a great part of
its magnificence to him. In the following reign, it is thus
mentioned in the Worthines of Wales.
“Not far from thence, a famous castle
fine,
That Raggland hight, stands moted almost round,
Made of freestone, upright, straight as line,
Whose workmanship in beauty doth abound.
“The curious knots, wrought all with edged toole,
The stately tower that looks ore pond and poole,
The fountain trim, that runs both day and night,
Doth yield in showe a rare and noble sight.”
Four earls of Worcester held almost royal state in this
princely abode; but the fifth earl and first marquis was destined
to witness its fall. He was one of the most devoted friends
of Charles I.; and may be said to have defended not only
his own mansion but all Monmouthshire from the parliamentary
arms.
The defeat of the royal army at Marston Moor was the signal
for the fall of Monmouth and of Raglan Castle. Prince
Rupert immediately directed his attention to the marches of
Wales, and ordered colonel Gerard to force his way through
Gloucestershire by the Aust passage: but the latter was opposed
by Massey, and defeated. Monmouth soon after fell into the
hands of Massey by the treachery of Kirle, lieutenant-colonel to
Holtby, governor of the town for Charles; and lord Worcester at
Raglan, in great alarm, demanded the assistance of prince
Rupert’s cavalry.
Throgmorton, on whom the command of Monmouth devolved, set out
with a party of three hundred horse to surprise the castle of
Chepstow, and in his absence the following brilliant exploit was
performed by the royalists, which we give in the words of
Sanderson. “The cavaliers from Ragland and Godridg,
about break of day, lodg themselves undiscovered behind a rising
ground near Monmouth, and viewing all advantages, fourty of
them come up to the higher side of the town towards Hereford,
having a sloping bank cast up of good height, with a ditch, over
which they pass, mount the bank, and climbed over, and so got to
the next part, fell upon the guard, some killed, other fled, and
with an iron bar break the post chain, force the gate, and open
it to the horse, who ride up with full career to the main guard,
seized them, and took the rest in their beds, with colonel
Broughton, four captains, as many lieutenants and ensigns, the
committee, all the common souldiers, two hundred prisoners, two
sakers, a drake, nine hammerguns, ammunition and provision, and
five hundred muskets.”
But the fate of the war was now determined, and after the
battle of Naseby Charles was unable to meet the parliamentarians
in a general engagement, and retired to the castle of
Raglan. Thence he secretly departed to commit himself to
the Scottish army; and the marquis of Worcester was besieged at
Raglan for six months. The old lord, who was then
eighty-four years of age, on hearing of the landing of his son
lord Glamorgan with some Irish forces, sent the following bold letter
to the parliamentarian committee at Chepstow.
“Having notice that you are not ignorant of
my son’s landing with the Irish forces, I am so much of a
father, and tender of the whole country’s ruin, that if
this coming to this place be hasted by the occasion of your
answer, you and not I will be the occasion of the country’s
curse. You have taken from me my rents and livelihood, for
which if you give unbelied reparations, I shall be glad to live a
quiet neighbour amongst you; if otherwise, you will force me to
what my own nature hath no liking of, and yet justifiable by the
word of God, and law of nature. I expect your answer by the
messenger, as you give occasion.
“H.
Worcester.
“Raglan, May 29, 1646.”
This brought on a long and fruitless negotiation. The
old lord saw that even the master of Raglan was not the master of
circumstances; and, at length, it was agreed that the castle
should be delivered up. “Nobly done,” says
Sanderson, “to hold out the last garrison for the king in
England or Wales.” In the articles of surrender,
however, the soldierly honour of the marquis was spared as much
as possible, it being agreed “that all the officers,
gentlemen, and soldiers, with all other persons there, should
march out with their horses and arms, colours flying, drums
beating, trumpets sounding, matches lighted at both ends, bullets
in mouth, each soldier twelve charges of powder, matches and
bullets proportionable, bag and baggage, to any place within two
miles of any garrison where the marquis shall mention.”
Soon after this surrender, the castle was demolished, and the
timber cut down in the parks, the loss to the family, in personal
property, without including the forfeiture and an estate of
twenty thousand pounds a year, being estimated at upwards of a
hundred thousand pounds. The Chase of Wentwood, including
Chepstow Castle and Park, was immediately bestowed upon Oliver
Cromwell; who appears also to refer, in the settlements upon his
family to other estates in Monmouthshire, parcels of the noble
property of the marquis of Worcester.
In a publication of that day, entitled “Witty Apothegms
delivered at several times, and on several occasions, by king
James I., king Charles I., and the marquis of Worcester,”
several anecdotes are given which throw a strong light upon the
character of this fine old lord of Raglan.
“In the midst of the civil commotions, Charles I. made
several visits to Raglan Castle, and was entertained with
becoming magnificence. The marquis not only declined all
offers of remuneration, but also advanced large sums; and when
the king thanked him for the loans, replied, Sir, I had your word
for the money, but I never thought I should be so soon repayed;
for now you have given me thanks, I have all I looked
for.” At another time, the king, apprehensive lest
the stores of the garrison should be consumed by his suite,
empowered him to exact from the country such provisions as were
necessary for his maintainance and recruit, “I humbly thank
your majesty,” he said, “but my castle will not stand
long if it leans on the country; I had rather be brought to a
morsel of bread, than any morsels of bread should be brought me
to entertain your majesty.”
The
following conversation shows the amiable weakness of
Charles’s humanity.
Sir Trevor Williams, and four other principal gentlemen of
Monmouthshire, being arrested for disloyalty, and conducted to
Abergavenny, the king was advised to order them to an immediate
trial, which must have ended in their conviction; but Charles,
moved by the tears and protestations of Trevor Williams, suffered
him to be released, on bail, and committed the others only to a
temporary confinement. “The king told the marquess
what he had done, and that when he saw them speak so honestly, he
could not but give some credit to their words, so seconded by
tears, and withal told the marquess that he had onely sent them
to prison; whereupon the marquess said, what to do? to poyson
that garrison? Sir, you should have done well to have heard
their accusations, and then to have shewn what mercy you
pleased. The king told him, that he heard that they were
accused by some contrary faction, as to themselves, who, out of
distaste they bore to one another on old grudges, would be apt to
charge them more home than the nature of their offences had
deserved; to whom the marquess made this return, Well, Sir, you may
chance to gain the kingdom of heaven by such doings as these, but
if you ever get the kingdom of England by such ways, I will be
your bondman.”
Another conversation between the marquis and Sir Thomas
Fairfax is worth relating.
“After much conference between the marquess and General
Fairfax, wherein many things were requested of the general by the
marquess, and being, as he thought himself, happy in the
attainment, his lordship was pleased to make a merry petition to
the general as he was taking his leave, viz. in behalf of a
couple of pigeons, who were wont to come to his hand, and feed
out of it constantly, in whose behalf he desired the general that
he would be pleased to give him his protection for them, fearing
the little command that he should have over his soldiers in that
behalf. To which the general said, I am glad to see your
lordship so merry. Oh, said the marquess, you have given me
no other cause, and hasty as you are, you shall not go untill I
have told you a story.
“There were two men going up Holborn in a cart to be
hanged; one of them being very merry and jocund, gave offence to
the other who was sad and dejected, insomuch that the downcast
man said unto the other, I wonder, brother, that you can be so
frolic, considering the business we are going about. Tush,
answered the other, thou art a fool; thou wentest a thieving, and
never thought what would become of thee, wherefore being on a
sudden surprised, thou fallest into such a shaking fit, that I am
ashamed to see thee in that condition: whereas I was resolved to
be hanged, before ever I fell to stealing, which is the reason
nothing happenning strange or unexpected, I go so composed unto
my death. So, said the marquess, I resolved to undergo
whatsoever, even the worst of evils that you are able to lay upon
me, before I took up arms for my sovereign, and therefore wonder
not that I am so merry.”
“In the correspondence with Fairfax,” says the
author of the Historical Tour, “which preceded the
capitulation, the marquis of Worcester seems to have strongly
suspected that the parliament would not adhere to the
conditions. His apprehensions were not groundless, for on
his arrival in London he was committed to the custody of the
Black Rod. He bitterly complained of this cruel usage, and
deeply regretted that he had trusted himself to the mercy of the
parliament. A few hours before his death, he said to Dr.
Bayley, If to seize upon all my goods, to pull down my house, to
fell my estate, and send up for such a weak body as mine was, so
enfeebled by disease, in the dead of winter, in the winter of
mine age, be merciful, what are they whose mercies are so
cruel? Neither do I expect that they should stop at all
this, for I fear they will persecute me after death.
“Being informed, however, that parliament would permit
him to be buried in his family vault, in Windsor Chapel; he cried
out, with great sprightliness of manner, Why, God bless us all,
why then I shall have a better castle when I am dead, than they
took from me whilst I was alive. With so much cheerfulness
and resignation did this hero expire, in the eighty-fifth year of
his age.”
The second marquis was the author of that puzzling
“Century of the Names and Scantlings of such Inventions as
I can at present call to mind to have tried and
perfected.”
“It appears,” we are told, “from a
passage in the Experimental Philosophy of Dr. Desaguliers, that
Captain Savary derived his invention of the fire engine, since
called the steam engine, from the 68th article in the Century of
Scantlings; and that to conceal his original he bought up all the
marquis’s books, and burnt them.” The following
is the “scantling.”
“An admirable and most forcible way to drive
up water by fire, not by drawing or sucking it upwards, for that
must be, as the philosopher calleth it, intra sphæram
activitatis, which is at but such a distance. But this
way hath no bounder, if the vessels be strong enough; for I have
taken a piece of a whole cannon, whereof the end was burst, and
filled it three quarters full of water, stopping and screwing up
the broken end, as also the touch-hole, and making a constant
fire under it, within twenty-four hours it burst, and made a
great crack; so that having a way to make my vessels that they
are strengthened by the force within them, and the one to fill
after the other, I have seen the water run like a constant
fountain stream forty feet high; one vessel of water, rarified by
fire, drives up forty feet of cold water. And a man that
attends the work has but to turn two cocks, that one vessel of
water being consumed, another begins to force and refit with cold
water, and so successfully, the fire being tended and kept
constant, with the self-same person may likewise abundantly
perform in the interim between the necessity of turning the said
cocks.”
We now renew our onward course, but with many a lingering look
at “delightsome Monmouth.”