EDITOR’S AND PUBLISHER’S NOTES — ANNOUNCEMENT BY MR. WYCHE
With this issue a new magazine under the title of The
Story Hour begs leave to enter the arena of Journalism.
It is published in the cause of story-telling in the home,
school, Sunday School, playground and social gathering.
Although the art of story-telling is old, its general recognition
as an educational agency is new. Many teachers are
already making good use of it and we do not hesitate in
saying that its usefulness will increase and will henceforth
occupy a permanent place in teaching.
The Story Hour owes its origin to an editorial in
The World’s Work of last July, giving a brief account of the
Story Tellers’ League movement. The attention of the publisher
was called to that editorial as something in which he
would be especially interested. Having been a teacher, and
also a newspaper man and a publisher, he at once saw the field
for a magazine to give a definiteness and coherence to the
story-telling movement that could hardly obtain without a
periodical representative.
The plan of such a publication was at once outlined, and
after some indirect correspondence he got in communication
with Mr. Richard T. Wyche, president of the National Story
Tellers’ League. Mr. Wyche came to Washington and
after several interviews the magazine was launched with
William C. Ruediger, of George Washington University, as
Editor, and Mr. Wyche as consulting editor.
The detailed labor required to start a new magazine is
greater than may appear on the surface. But it is a work in
which all three of the staff are earnestly interested, and the
labor is cheerfully done. No salaries are attached, and the
subscription price barely covers the cost of publication. Our
reward is in the satisfaction of furthering a good cause,
until such time as later developments may bring something
more.
The co-operation of all League people is confidently anticipated.
A high standard will be maintained throughout.
There may be some delays incident to the starting of a new
project, but when an ample supply of material is in hand, as
there soon will be, the magazine will go out promptly.
The informational feature of this issue has trespassed on the
space belonging to stories and to special articles, but this will
not be the case in the future. Particular attention will be
given to the classic stories from all times and places, but new
or modern stories suitable for telling will not be neglected.
So far as we can, we shall concentrate the stories of each
number about single topics. The next number will contain
several Christmas stories, one being from the pen of Mr.
Wyche. Other numbers will be devoted respectively to
Bible stories, Japanese stories, nature myths, star myths, Norse
tales, history stories, Indian legends, etc.
Readers of The Story Hour will appreciate the
statement that Mr. Richard T. Wyche, President of the National
Story Tellers’ League, will present a series of articles to
run through the year, on “Stories and How to Use Them,”
of which the first installment appears in this number. Mr.
Wyche is an acknowledged leader in the new story-telling
movement. His ability and experience insure a series of articles
of prime importance to the cause, and of rare interest
and value to all who are engaged in story-telling in any of
its forms.
This initial number of The Story Hour, as announced
in advance, is designed for special informational use. People
in all parts of the country are learning of the new educational
story-telling movement and are making inquiry regarding
details. This number of the magazine answers many of the
questions, and further information will appear in succeeding
numbers.
The importance of story-telling as a factor in the uplift of
the young is recognized by the leaders in the great playground
movement. At the Second Annual Congress of the
Playground Association of America, held in New York City,
September 8-12, this year, some prominence was given to the
story-telling feature of playground work. A special joint
committee composed of members of the National Playground
Association and the National Story Tellers’ League had the
consideration of this topic. Of this committee Miss Maude
Summers was chairman, and Dr. Grant Karr was secretary.
It was one of the most enthusiastic committees of the Congress.
So interested were its members, that long after the hour
for adjournment it continued in session. An extra meeting
was held one evening for story-telling.
Miss Summers gave an address before a general meeting of
the Congress. Several of her remarks made a noticeable impression,
and the press of the country has since then been
quoting and commenting on certain things she said, particularly
wherein she scored the Sunday comic supplements and
urged the telling of good stories instead.
Through the courtesy of Miss Summers, The Story
Hour is enabled, in this number, to present the text of her
paper read before the playground congress.
The article on “The Traveling Story Tellers of the Northland,”
by Anna Bogenholm Sloane, is the forerunner of
several contributions promised from her pen. Her familiarity
with the lore of the Northland is first-hand.
In our next number there will be an article on the origin
and growth of Junior Leagues that will be helpful in suggestions
to those who wish to establish such leagues among
the children.
During the past year, a number of letters of inquiry have
come to me in response to articles that have appeared in
magazines and newspapers, asking for information in regard
to the National Story Tellers’ League. So numerous have
been the letters asking for information and circulars that it
has been impossible to supply the demand, and the issuing of
a booklet or publication of some kind by the League has
become a necessity.
Among the letters that came to me in August was one from
Mersene E. Sloane of Washington, D. C., offering to publish
in the interest of the League movement, a little magazine.
I immediately took up the matter with him and after several
visits to Washington we secured in William C. Ruediger, of
the Division of Education, George Washington University,
an editor for the proposed magazine.
When we think of the thousands of teachers, kindergartners,
children’s librarians, Sunday School teachers, playground
workers and parents, whose high privilege it is to tell stories
to children, surely there seems a field for such a magazine as
is here proposed. Since the beginning of the National
League, we have felt the need of just such a medium of
communication.
I shall do all I can for the magazine and assist in keeping it
up to the highest and best in life and literature. I commend
to League members, local and national, and all interested,
the efforts of editor and publisher. Their work in behalf of
the magazine is, and will be for some time, largely a labor of
love. I ask that you send in not only your subscriptions, but
reports from your Leagues, items of interest, stories and papers
on story-telling. What you are doing will be suggestive and
inspiring to others, especially those just beginning the work.
In merging the booklet that the National League was to
issue into the magazine, I trust it will have the hearty support
of all the Leagues and further the cause of The Story Hour.
Richard Thomas Wyche,
President, National Story Tellers’ League.
STORIES AND HOW TO USE THEM BY RICHARD THOMAS WYCHE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL STORY TELLERS’ LEAGUE — ARTICLE NUMBER ONE — THE STORY IN FORMAL WORK
Once upon a time the writer undertook to teach a little
school in a far-off seacoast town in the South. The little
village was on a sandy bluff overlooking the sound and the
sea. Cut off from the main land by an impossible swamp in
the rear, yet shut out from the great Atlantic by an ever-shifting
sand bar that lay for leagues along the sea coast, it
gave the little town an ideal harbor of shallow water, the
home of fishermen and oystermen whose cottages were scattered
for miles along the sea coast.
Being isolated the inhabitants were compelled to rely upon
themselves and in doing this had developed a solidarity of
community life and a manhood and womanhood of purity
and simplicity that was as refreshing as the breezes that ever
swept its shores.
Amid such surroundings I began to teach, and it was my
first experience. Not having libraries or lectures to help me,
I too must depend on self.
I had never studied pedagogy and knew nothing of teaching
except that which I had seen in the university lecture
rooms. The teacher who preceded me “heard” lessons and
the children “said” lessons. That seemed an easy proposition,
for the questions were in the book and the children
could memorize and say the answers.
But I soon discovered that the children found no interest
in the fact that one word was a verb and another a noun.
They memorized the rules and repeated the lessons, but they
were not at all interested in the subject. They were bored
by this mechanical process, and so was the teacher. Something
must be done. One day I told the class the story of
“Hiawatha’s Fishing.” Every child listened with rapt attention.
I had found something that they were interested in.
I requested the children to write the story out for their lessons
the next day. The majority of them did so, and read the
story as they had understood and written it down. One
little fellow said, “I ain’t got no pencil,”—which meant that
he didn’t write it. “Tell it then,” I said. He told it in such
a vivid and realistic way that the class applauded. I had
found something that the child liked. The second day I
told the story of “Hiawatha’s Fasting,” then “Hiawatha’s
Friends,” and so on, two stories a week, until we had told
the whole story of Hiawatha.
But you ask “What did that have to do with grammar?”
From the story we got the nouns and verbs we studied and
the sentences that the advanced classes analyzed and studied.
(The whole school heard the story, it being an ungraded
school with classes ranging from primary to high school.)
What else did we do with the story? Let us see. When
the children told the story orally or on paper it was creative
work, and better for expression than memorizing “Mary had
a little lamb.” The child received a mental picture. He
heard the story, and retelling it in his own words he created
afresh the picture, thereby becoming a creator and an artist
himself. In reciting “Mary had a little lamb” he was
dealing with words. In telling the story he was dealing with
mental images.
One day I saw the children playing out on the campus,
and on making inquiries they said, “We are playing Hiawatha
and Mondamin and Old Nokomis.” They were
dramatizing the story. It was taking effect. Had I been a
trained teacher I would have let them do it in class as a
part of their work. Twice a week we got the words for our
spelling lesson from the story. The children were so much
interested in Hiawatha that they wanted to make pictures of
Hiawatha. Then I let them illustrate the story, writing in
their composition books the story, and illustrating it. As we
studied geography, the upper Mississippi Valley and the
Lake Regions all took on new meaning because Hiawatha
had once lived, toiled, and suffered there.
But what had I done for those children most of all? I
had fed their souls,—given them a masterpiece of literature.
Starting with the childhood of Hiawatha we had followed
him and admired him. We had roamed through that fairy
land of dark green forest; heard the whispering pines, saw
Hiawatha when he caught the King of Fishers, “Slew the
Pearl Feather,” prayed and fasted for his people, punished
“Pau-puk-kee-wis,” wooed and won Minnehaha, and when
his task was done, sailed away into the fiery sunset.
That something inexpressibly sweet and beautiful that I
felt in the vision hour, and longed to impart to the children
and heretofore had not been able to, I had at last found incarnate
in a hero, while the music, meter, and imagery of
poetry had awakened the sense of the beautiful and revealed
a new world to the children. New life had come into the
school. It had been born again and born from above.
Two months had passed. I had tried an experiment.
It had succeeded. Grammar, language, composition, spelling,
drawing, story-telling had been taught by that method.
Formal language had become linked to literature and
thereby to life. The formal had become an expression of
the spiritual.
Where could I find another such story? The little goody-goody
sissy-prissy stories could not interest us. They all
seemed tame in comparison to the sustained effort of a story
like Hiawatha. I had discovered that the children could
fully appreciate a great story told to them in a living, creative
way, and that interest grew each day as we told the long
story in sections to the end. The only other hero in literature
that I knew in these first years of my experience in
teaching was revealed in the story of King Arthur which I
had recently studied in a university; but, were the Idyls of
the King suited to the children? That was the only source
of the story available to me at that time and it was more
modern, more complicated in every way, and far more difficult
to tell than the one we had just finished. After hearing
a number of the Hiawatha stories the children could and
did read Longfellow’s versions, but not so with the Idyls of
the King. While the children fully enjoyed the stories of
the Idyl, the style of Tennyson was not suited nor intended
for children. All the imagery, heroic deeds and idealism of
Hiawatha were there, but in telling this story much must be
omitted. Involved plots must be made direct, and the story
simplified. This required much more preparation on the
part of the teacher, but we must have another story. It
would not do to let the school fall back into the dead rut of
lesson hearing, and though I feared they could not appreciate
the Arthurian story yet I would try. I began with the
finding of a naked babe on the beach, the childhood of
Arthur, Merlin’s work, the sword Excalibur, and Arthur’s
coronation.
At first the children were not so much interested. Their
minds were still on Hiawatha and his deeds; they were loath
to leave him. But gradually as I told of Arthur and his
deeds, Gareth and Lynette, Geraint and Enid, Lancelot and
Elaine, the Quest of the Holy Grail, The Flight of Guinevere,
the Passing of Arthur, the interest grew, and at times
became intense, especially among the larger boys and girls.
The story was coming home to them. King Arthur was a
man like ourselves, of our own race. The whole story had
brought the children face to face with a great ideal, Arthur,
the blameless man. Pure himself, he demanded it in his
knights, and bound them by vows of obedience to their
conscience and their king. He defended the weak against
the wicked; broke up the robbers’ dens and cleansed the
land; led his knights in brave deeds, for it is said that when
the fire of God filled him none could stand against him in
battle. He enjoyed the athletic sports and the tourneys, yet
was so gentle, they said his ways were sweet.
As with Hiawatha the story was reproduced, illustrated,
correlated with English history and geography, and at the
same time it furnished the most excellent material for ethical
and æsthetic culture. After the last story was told, the Passing
of Arthur, and the children saw with Sir Bedivere, the King
pass with the three tall queens in a barge over the sea, they
stood in wonder gazing on the splendor of his passing. Defeated
in the last weird battle in the West, yet he was victorious
in his ideals for he became the spiritual king of his race.
“From the great deep to the great deep he goes,” the
children heard but did not quite understand. It was the
better for that because it awakened in the child something of
the mystery of life and death. In that it served the highest
purpose. It helped the child to realize that there are things
in life that eye has not seen nor ear heard. Let it not be
forgotten that while we use these great stories for formal
work, the formal was always the result of the creative.
“The letter killeth; the spirit giveth life.” Thus it was that
children and teacher left the low plains of the “lesson hearer”
and hand in hand walked the upland pastures of the soul.
This is not offered as a model method for teaching, but it
is given to reveal the writer’s view-point and the source of
his inspiration for these chapters.
The formal must be an expression of the spiritual else it is
not art. This is true whether the idea is expressed in words,
wood or iron. To do formal work whether it be oral retelling,
composition, illustrating or dramatization of a story apart
from the spirit is deadening to the child. The letter killeth,
the spirit giveth life is true in language and literature as
well as religion. Herein is the great possibility for the
development of individuality,—letting the child’s life develop
after the laws of its nature and not after arbitrary laws forced
upon him from above. This is the pivotal point in all our work.
No poet, painter, sculptor, builder, musician, writer or
worker of any kind has ever done abiding work who did it
apart from the spirit. It is a child’s nature to sing, play,
dance or reproduce in some way that which impresses him.
Impressions must be expressed in order to become a part of
us. If the deeds of Siegfried, King Alfred or George Washington
impressed the child he will tell about the hero that
he admires. Here the wise teacher finds a basis for his
formal work. The interest the child has in the deeds of his
hero will tide him over the otherwise drudgery of spelling,
composition and language forms. The heroic spirit of the
hero has become his and he is not afraid of the task. Furthermore,
the love he has for the hero makes the story he tells,
writes, or the picture he makes of him a sacred task. He
must do justice to the ideal hero. The teacher who telling
a story has not gotten so near to the hero that he feels the
sacredness of his life has not reached the heart of his story.
There is no pattern process or method by which this may be
done. Day after day as he tells the life story of a great hero
he will catch something of the spirit of the man.
To retell a story is not to reproduce the language word for
word, just as it was first told, but to recreate it from your
view point. When the child tells a story therefore do not
stop him and say, “you did not mention so and so,” breaking
up the mental picture process and confusing the child with
non-essential facts such as pronunciation, incorrect grammar
and so on. Nothing could be more deleterious and destructive
to the creative spirit. Put yourself in the child’s place.
Could you tell a story if in your presence there was a superior
to criticise your words and pronunciation?
No, let the child have the floor. It is his audience. He
is responsible for their attention. Stand with head uncovered
in the presence of this child artist and orator. Through the
story he is giving back to you the world as he sees it and
understands it, creating it afresh and telling what it means to
him. When you told the story to him it was your message
to him; now it is his message to you and to the class. Gradually,
as he retells and reproduces stories, the artistic sense
grows upon him,—unity, essential points, climax, finish and
so on. Naturally as the child gives back his story he will
leave out some points originally in the story, they are not
essential to his purpose, he is giving his interpretation, and
enlarging upon others and actually bringing in new points
not originally in the story, but essential to his view point.
The teacher who with rude hands stops the child and says
“That is not the way it is in the book or the way I told it,”
makes of the child an imitator and not a creator; thwarts at
the very outset one of the greatest educational advantages of
story reproduction. We do not want to make the child tell
a story as the teacher would, but in his own way thereby
giving to his work individuality. He is a separate ego and
through his personality is giving a new relation of the Divine.
Day by day as he hears the teacher and the children of his
class tell stories he will get standards of comparison by which
he may measure his own work and improve it. Correct
grammar and pronunciation? yes, but not here. The speaker,
preacher or orator makes mistakes, but he would despise
you, and the audience would be disgusted, if you stopped
him in his speech to correct grammar. His message and the
atmosphere he brings are the essentials. All else should be
forgotten for the time. So it should be with the child before
the class. He is the orator to reveal to you and the class
the world as he sees it. For the time being sit at his feet
and help him produce the atmosphere necessary for the telling
of the story.
Art comes from within, not from without. Do not force,
do not fuss; be quiet; wait for the child to hear the still small
voice within. At first he may be timid; it is an untried world
for him. He, it is true, has caught glimpses of storyland,
seen its beauty and felt its enchantment, but others were
leading him. Now he must lead others. As he tries he
discovers that he and storyland are somehow very near to
each other. As he spreads the wings of his imagination, to
his delight, he can fly like Peter Pan, leap and run in this
storyland. And soon he will be in the wigwam with Hiawatha
or sailing the high seas with Ulysses or slaying the
dragon with Siegfried. Such work comes both to child and
teacher like a benediction. And the teacher remembers and
sees new meaning in the words of the Hebrew prophet “And
a little child shall lead them.”