Something of the general character of
Stoneground and its people has been indicated
by stray allusions in the preceding narratives.
We must here add that of its present population
only a small part is native, the remainder
having been attracted during the recent prosperous
days of brickmaking, from the nearer
parts of East Anglia and the Midlands. The
visitor to Stoneground now finds little more
than the signs of an unlovely industry, and of
the hasty and inadequate housing of the people
it has drawn together. Nothing in the place
pleases him more than the excellent train-service
which makes it easy to get away. He
seldom desires a long acquaintance either with
Stoneground or its people.
The impression so made upon the average
visitor is, however, unjust, as first impressions
often are. The few who have made further
acquaintance with Stoneground have soon
learned to distinguish between the permanent
and the accidental features of the place, and
have been astonished by nothing so much as by
the unexpected evidence of French influence.
Amongst the household treasures of the old
inhabitants are invariably found French knick-knacks:
there are pieces of French furniture in
what is called “the room” of many houses. A
certain ten-acre field is called the “Frenchman’s
meadow.” Upon the voters’ lists hanging at the
church door are to be found French names,
often corrupted; and boys who run about the
streets can be heard shrieking to each other
such names as Bunnum, Dangibow, Planchey,
and so on.
Mr. Batchel himself is possessed of many
curious little articles of French handiwork—boxes
deftly covered with split straws, arranged
ingeniously in patterns; models of the guillotine,
built of carved meat-bones, and various
other pieces of handiwork, amongst them an
accurate road-map of the country between
Stoneground and Yarmouth, drawn upon a fly-leaf
torn from some book, and bearing upon the
other side the name of Jules Richepin. The
latter had been picked up, according to a
pencilled-note written across one corner, by a
shepherd, in the year 1811.
The explanation of this French influence is
simple enough. Within five miles of Stoneground
a large barracks had been erected for
the custody of French prisoners during the war
with Bonaparte. Many thousands were confined
there during the years 1808-14. The prisoners
were allowed to sell what articles they could
make in the barracks; and many of them, upon
their release, settled in the neighbourhood,
where their descendants remain. There is little
curiosity amongst these descendants about their
origin. The events of a century ago seem to
them as remote as the Deluge, and as immaterial.
To Thomas Richpin, a weakly man
who blew the organ in church, Mr. Batchel
shewed the map. Richpin, with a broad, black-haired
skull and a narrow chin which grew a
little pointed beard, had always a foreign look
about him: Mr. Batchel thought it more than
possible that he might be descended from the
owner of the book, and told him as much upon
shewing him the fly-leaf. Thomas, however,
was content to observe that “his name hadn’t
got no E,” and shewed no further interest in the
matter. His interest in it, before we have done
with him, will have become very large.
For the growing boys of Stoneground, with
whom he was on generally friendly terms, Mr.
Batchel formed certain clubs to provide them
with occupation on winter evenings; and in
these clubs, in the interests of peace and good-order,
he spent a great deal of time. Sitting
one December evening, in a large circle of boys
who preferred the warmth of the fire to the
more temperate atmosphere of the tables, he
found Thomas Richpin the sole topic of conversation.
“We seen Mr. Richpin in Frenchman’s
Meadow last night,” said one.
“What time?” said Mr. Batchel, whose
function it was to act as a sort of fly-wheel, and
to carry the conversation over dead points. He
had received the information with some little
surprise, because Frenchman’s Meadow was an
unusual place for Richpin to have been in, but
his question had no further object than to
encourage talk.
“Half-past nine,” was the reply.
This made the question much more interesting.
Mr. Batchel, on the preceding evening,
had taken advantage of a warmed church to
practise upon the organ. He had played it from
nine o’clock until ten, and Richpin had been all
that time at the bellows.
“Are you sure it was half-past nine?” he
asked.
“Yes,” (we reproduce the answer exactly),
“we come out o’ night-school at quarter-past,
and we was all goin’ to the Wash to look if it
was friz.”
“And you saw Mr. Richpin in Frenchman’s
Meadow?” said Mr. Batchel.
“Yes. He was looking for something on the
ground,” added another boy.
“And his trousers was tore,” said a third.
The story was clearly destined to stand in
no need of corroboration.
“Did Mr. Richpin speak to you?” enquired
Mr. Batchel.
“No, we run away afore he come to us,” was
the answer.
“Why?”
“Because we was frit.”
“What frightened you?”
“Jim Lallement hauled a flint at him and
hit him in the face, and he didn’t take no notice,
so we run away.”
“Why?” repeated Mr. Batchel.
“Because he never hollered nor looked at us,
and it made us feel so funny.”
“Did you go straight down to the Wash?”
They had all done so.
“What time was it when you reached
home?”
They had all been at home by ten, before
Richpin had left the church.
“Why do they call it Frenchman’s
Meadow?” asked another boy, evidently
anxious to change the subject.
Mr. Batchel replied that the meadow had
probably belonged to a Frenchman whose name
was not easy to say, and the conversation after
this was soon in another channel. But, furnished
as he was with an unmistakeable alibi,
the story about Richpin and the torn trousers,
and the flint, greatly puzzled him.
“Go straight home,” he said, as the boys at
last bade him good-night, “and let us have no
more stone-throwing.” They were reckless
boys, and Richpin, who used little discretion
in reporting their misdemeanours about the
church, seemed to Mr. Batchel to stand in real
danger.
Frenchman’s Meadow provided ten acres of
excellent pasture, and the owners of two or
three hard-worked horses were glad to pay three
shillings a week for the privilege of turning
them into it. One of these men came to Mr.
Batchel on the morning which followed the
conversation at the club.
“I’m in a bit of a quandary about Tom
Richpin,” he began.
This was an opening that did not fail to
command Mr. Batchel’s attention. “What is
it?” he said.
“I had my mare in Frenchman’s Meadow,”
replied the man, “and Sam Bower come and
told me last night as he heard her gallopin’
about when he was walking this side the
hedge.”
“But what about Richpin?” said Mr.
Batchel.
“Let me come to it,” said the other. “My
mare hasn’t got no wind to gallop, so I up and
went to see to her, and there she was sure
enough, like a wild thing, and Tom Richpin
walking across the meadow.”
“Was he chasing her?” asked Mr. Batchel,
who felt the absurdity of the question as he
put it.
“He was not,” said the man, “but what he
could have been doin’ to put the mare into that
state, I can’t think.”
“What was he doing when you saw him?”
asked Mr. Batchel.
“He was walking along looking for something
he’d dropped, with his trousers all tore to
ribbons, and while I was catchin’ the mare, he
made off.”
“He was easy enough to find, I suppose?”
said Mr. Batchel.
“That’s the quandary I was put in,” said
the man. “I took the mare home and gave her
to my lad, and straight I went to Richpin’s, and
found Tom havin’ his supper, with his trousers
as good as new.”
“You’d made a mistake,” said Mr. Batchel.
“But how come the mare to make it too?”
said the other.
“What did you say to Richpin?” asked Mr.
Batchel.
“Tom,” I says, “when did you come in?
‘Six o’clock,’ he says, ‘I bin mendin’ my boots’;
and there, sure enough, was the hobbin’ iron by
his chair, and him in his stockin’-feet. I don’t
know what to do.”
“Give the mare a rest,” said Mr. Batchel,
“and say no more about it.”
“I don’t want to harm a pore creature like
Richpin,” said the man, “but a mare’s a mare,
especially where there’s a family to bring up.”
The man consented, however, to abide by Mr.
Batchel’s advice, and the interview ended. The
evenings just then were light, and both the
man and his mare had seen something for
which Mr. Batchel could not, at present,
account. The worst way, however, of arriving
at an explanation is to guess it. He was far too
wise to let himself wander into the pleasant
fields of conjecture, and had determined, even
before the story of the mare had finished, upon
the more prosaic path of investigation.
Mr. Batchel, either from strength or
indolence of mind, as the reader may be pleased
to determine, did not allow matters even of this
exciting kind, to disturb his daily round of duty.
He was beginning to fear, after what he had
heard of the Frenchman’s Meadow, that he
might find it necessary to preach a plain
sermon upon the Witch of Endor, for he
foresaw that there would soon be some ghostly
talk in circulation. In small communities, like
that of Stoneground, such talk arises upon very
slight provocation, and here was nothing at all
to check it. Richpin was a weak and timid
man, whom no one would suspect, whilst an
alternative remained open, of wandering about
in the dark; and Mr. Batchel knew that the
alternative of an apparition, if once suggested,
would meet with general acceptance, and this he
wished, at all costs, to avoid. His own view of
the matter he held in reserve, for the reasons
already stated, but he could not help suspecting
that there might be a better explanation of the
name “Frenchman’s Meadow” than he had
given to the boys at their club.
Afternoons, with Mr. Batchel, were always
spent in making pastoral visits, and upon the
day our story has reached he determined to
include amongst them a call upon Richpin, and
to submit him to a cautious cross-examination.
It was evident that at least four persons, all
perfectly familiar with his appearance, were
under the impression that they had seen him in
the meadow, and his own statement upon the
matter would be at least worth hearing.
Richpin’s home, however, was not the first
one visited by Mr. Batchel on that afternoon.
His friendly relations with the boys has already
been mentioned, and it may now be added that
this friendship was but part of a generally keen
sympathy with young people of all ages, and of
both sexes. Parents knew much less than he
did of the love affairs of their young people;
and if he was not actually guilty of match-making,
he was at least a very sympathetic
observer of the process. When lovers had their
little differences, or even their greater ones, it
was Mr. Batchel, in most cases, who adjusted
them, and who suffered, if he failed, hardly less
than the lovers themselves.
It was a negotiation of this kind which, on
this particular day, had given precedence to
another visit, and left Richpin until the later
part of the afternoon. But the matter of the
Frenchman’s Meadow had, after all, not to wait
for Richpin. Mr. Batchel was calculating how
long he should be in reaching it, when he found
himself unexpectedly there. Selina Broughton
had been a favourite of his from her childhood;
she had been sufficiently good to please him, and
naughty enough to attract and challenge him;
and when at length she began to walk out with
Bob Rockfort, who was another favourite, Mr.
Batchel rubbed his hands in satisfaction. Their
present difference, which now brought him to
the Broughtons’ cottage, gave him but little
anxiety. He had brought Bob half-way towards
reconciliation, and had no doubt of his ability
to lead Selina to the same place. They would
finish the journey, happily enough, together.
But what has this to do with the Frenchman’s
Meadow? Much every way. The meadow
was apt to be the rendezvous of such young
people as desired a higher degree of privacy than
that afforded by the public paths; and these two
had gone there separately the night before, each
to nurse a grievance against the other. They
had been at opposite ends, as it chanced, of the
field; and Bob, who believed himself to be alone
there, had been awakened from his reverie by a
sudden scream. He had at once run across the
field, and found Selina sorely in need of him.
Mr. Batchel’s work of reconciliation had been
there and then anticipated, and Bob had taken
the girl home in a condition of great excitement
to her mother. All this was explained, in
breathless sentences, by Mrs. Broughton, by
way of accounting for the fact that Selina was
then lying down in “the room.”
There was no reason why Mr. Batchel should
not see her, of course, and he went in. His
original errand had lapsed, but it was now replaced
by one of greater interest. Evidently
there was Selina’s testimony to add to that of
the other four; she was not a girl who would
scream without good cause, and Mr. Batchel felt
that he knew how his question about the cause
would be answered, when he came to the point
of asking it.
He was not quite prepared for the form of
her answer, which she gave without any hesitation.
She had seen Mr. Richpin “looking for
his eyes.” Mr. Batchel saved for another occasion
the amusement to be derived from the
curiously illogical answer. He saw at once
what had suggested it. Richpin had until
recently had an atrocious squint, which an
operation in London had completely cured.
This operation, of which, of course, he knew
nothing, he had described, in his own way,
to anyone who would listen, and it was
commonly believed that his eyes had ceased
to be fixtures. It was plain, however, that
Selina had seen very much what had been
seen by the other four. Her information
was precise, and her story perfectly coherent.
She preserved a maidenly reticence about
his trousers, if she had noticed them; but
added a new fact, and a terrible one, in her
description of the eyeless sockets. No wonder
she had screamed. It will be observed that Mr.
Richpin was still searching, if not looking, for
something upon the ground.
Mr. Batchel now proceeded to make his remaining
visit. Richpin lived in a little cottage
by the church, of which cottage the Vicar was
the indulgent landlord. Richpin’s creditors
were obliged to shew some indulgence, because
his income was never regular and seldom sufficient.
He got on in life by what is called
“rubbing along,” and appeared to do it with
surprisingly little friction. The small duties
about the church, assigned to him out of charity,
were overpaid. He succeeded in attracting to
himself all the available gifts of masculine
clothing, of which he probably received enough
and to sell, and he had somehow wooed and won
a capable, if not very comely, wife, who supplemented
his income by her own labour, and
managed her house and husband to admiration.
Richpin, however, was not by any means
a mere dependent upon charity. He was, in his
way, a man of parts. All plants, for instance,
were his friends, and he had inherited, or
acquired, great skill with fruit-trees, which never
failed to reward his treatment with abundant
crops. The two or three vines, too, of the
neighbourhood, he kept in fine order by methods
of his own, whose merit was proved by their
success. He had other skill, though of a less
remunerative kind, in fashioning toys out of
wood, cardboard, or paper; and every correctly-behaving
child in the parish had some such
product of his handiwork. And besides all this,
Richpin had a remarkable aptitude for making
music. He could do something upon every
musical instrument that came in his way, and,
but for his voice, which was like that of the peahen,
would have been a singer. It was his voice
that had secured him the situation of organ-blower,
as one remote from all incitement to
join in the singing in church.
Like all men who have not wit enough to
defend themselves by argument, Richpin had
a plaintive manner. His way of resenting
injury was to complain of it to the next person
he met, and such complaints as he found no
other means of discharging, he carried home
to his wife, who treated his conversation just as
she treated the singing of the canary, and other
domestic sounds, being hardly conscious of it
until it ceased.
The entrance of Mr. Batchel, soon after his
interview with Selina, found Richpin engaged
in a loud and fluent oration. The fluency was
achieved mainly by repetition, for the man had
but small command of words, but it served
none the less to shew the depth of his indignation.
“I aren’t bin in Frenchman’s Meadow, am
I?” he was saying in appeal to his wife—this is
the Stoneground way with auxiliary verbs—“What
am I got to go there for?” He acknowledged
Mr. Batchel’s entrance in no other way
than by changing to the third person in his
discourse, and he continued without pause—“if
she’d let me out o’ nights, I’m got better
places to go to than Frenchman’s Meadow.
Let policeman stick to where I am bin, or else
keep his mouth shut. What call is he got to
say I’m bin where I aren’t bin?”
From this, and much more to the same
effect, it was clear that the matter of the
meadow was being noised abroad, and even
receiving official attention. Mr. Batchel was
well aware that no question he could put to
Richpin, in his present state, would change the
flow of his eloquence, and that he had already
learned as much as he was likely to learn. He
was content, therefore, to ascertain from Mrs.
Richpin that her husband had indeed spent all
his evenings at home, with the single exception
of the one hour during which Mr. Batchel had
employed him at the organ. Having ascertained
this, he retired, and left Richpin to talk himself
out.
No further doubt about the story was now
possible. It was not twenty-four hours since
Mr. Batchel had heard it from the boys at the
club, and it had already been confirmed by at
least two unimpeachable witnesses. He thought
the matter over, as he took his tea, and was
chiefly concerned in Richpin’s curious connexion
with it. On his account, more than on
any other, it had become necessary to make
whatever investigation might be feasible, and
Mr. Batchel determined, of course, to make the
next stage of it in the meadow itself.
The situation of “Frenchman’s Meadow”
made it more conspicuous than any other enclosure
in the neighbourhood. It was upon the
edge of what is locally known as “high land”;
and though its elevation was not great, one
could stand in the meadow and look sea-wards
over many miles of flat country, once a waste
of brackish water, now a great chess-board of
fertile fields bounded by straight dykes of
glistening water. The point of view derived
another interest from looking down upon a
long straight bank which disappeared into the
horizon many miles away, and might have been
taken for a great railway embankment of which
no use had been made. It was, in fact, one of
the great works of the Dutch Engineers in the
time of Charles I., and it separated the river
basin from a large drained area called the
“Middle Level,” some six feet below it. In this
embankment, not two hundred yards below
“Frenchman’s Meadow,” was one of the huge
water gates which admitted traffic through a
sluice, into the lower level, and the picturesque
thatched cottage of the sluice-keeper formed a
pleasing addition to the landscape. It was a
view with which Mr. Batchel was naturally
very familiar. Few of his surroundings were
pleasant to the eye, and this was about the only
place to which he could take a visitor whom he
desired to impress favourably. The way to the
meadow lay through a short lane, and he could
reach it in five minutes: he was frequently
there.
It was, of course, his intention to be there
again that evening: to spend the night there, if
need be, rather than let anything escape him.
He only hoped he should not find half the
parish there also. His best hope of privacy lay
in the inclemency of the weather; the day was
growing colder, and there was a north-east
wind, of which Frenchman’s Meadow would
receive the fine edge.
Mr. Batchel spent the next three hours in
dealing with some arrears of correspondence,
and at nine o’clock put on his thickest coat and
boots, and made his way to the meadow. It
became evident, as he walked up the lane, that
he was to have company. He heard many
voices, and soon recognised the loudest amongst
them. Jim Lallement was boasting of the
accuracy of his aim: the others were not disputing
it, but were asserting their own merits
in discordant chorus. This was a nuisance, and
to make matters worse, Mr. Batchel heard steps
behind him.
A voice soon bade him “Good evening.” To
Mr. Batchel’s great relief it proved to be the
policeman, who soon overtook him. The conversation
began on his side.
“Curious tricks, sir, these of Richpin’s.”
“What tricks?” asked Mr. Batchel, with an
air of innocence.
“Why, he’s been walking about Frenchman’s
Meadow these three nights, frightening
folk and what all.”
“Richpin has been at home every night, and
all night long,” said Mr. Batchel.
“I’m talking about where he was, not where
he says he was,” said the policeman. “You
can’t go behind the evidence.”
“But Richpin has evidence too. I asked his
wife.”
“You know, sir, and none better, that wives
have got to obey. Richpin wants to be took for
a ghost, and we know that sort of ghost. Whenever
we hear there’s a ghost, we always know
there’s going to be turkeys missing.”
“But there are real ghosts sometimes,
surely?” said Mr. Batchel.
“No,” said the policeman, “me and my
wife have both looked, and there’s no such
thing.”
“Looked where?” enquired Mr. Batchel.
“In the ‘Police Duty’ Catechism. There’s
lunatics, and deserters, and dead bodies, but no
ghosts.”
Mr. Batchel accepted this as final. He had
devised a way of ridding himself of all his
company, and proceeded at once to carry it into
effect. The two had by this time reached the
group of boys.
“These are all stone-throwers,” said he,
loudly.
There was a clatter of stones as they
dropped from the hands of the boys.
“These boys ought all to be in the club
instead of roaming about here damaging property.
Will you take them there, and see them
safely in? If Richpin comes here, I will bring
him to the station.”
The policeman seemed well pleased with
the suggestion. No doubt he had overstated his
confidence in the definition of the “Police
Duty.” Mr. Batchel, on his part, knew the boys
well enough to be assured that they would keep
the policeman occupied for the next half-hour,
and as the party moved slowly away, felt proud
of his diplomacy.
There was no sign of any other person
about the field gate, which he climbed readily
enough, and he was soon standing in the
highest part of the meadow and peering into
the darkness on every side.
It was possible to see a distance of about
thirty yards; beyond that it was too dark to distinguish
anything. Mr. Batchel designed a zig-zag
course about the meadow, which would
allow of his examining it systematically and as
rapidly as possible, and along this course he
began to walk briskly, looking straight before
him as he went, and pausing to look well about
him when he came to a turn. There were no
beasts in the meadow—their owners had taken
the precaution of removing them; their absence
was, of course, of great advantage to Mr.
Batchel.
In about ten minutes he had finished his
zig-zag path and arrived at the other corner of
the meadow; he had seen nothing resembling a
man. He then retraced his steps, and examined
the field again, but arrived at his starting
point, knowing no more than when he had left
it. He began to fear the return of the policeman
as he faced the wind and set upon a third
journey.
The third journey, however, rewarded him.
He had reached the end of his second traverse,
and was looking about him at the angle
between that and the next, when he distinctly
saw what looked like Richpin crossing his circle
of vision, and making straight for the sluice.
There was no gate on that side of the field; the
hedge, which seemed to present no obstacle to
the other, delayed Mr. Batchel considerably, and
still retains some of his clothing, but he was not
long through before he had again marked his
man. It had every appearance of being Richpin.
It went down the slope, crossed the plank
that bridged the lock, and disappeared round
the corner of the cottage, where the entrance
lay.
Mr. Batchel had had no opportunity of confirming
the gruesome observation of Selina
Broughton, but had seen enough to prove that
the others had not been romancing. He was not
a half-minute behind the figure as it crossed the
plank over the lock—it was slow going in the
darkness—and he followed it immediately round
the corner of the house. As he expected, it
had then disappeared.
Mr. Batchel knocked at the door, and admitted
himself, as his custom was. The sluice-keeper
was in his kitchen, charring a gate post.
He was surprised to see Mr. Batchel at that
hour, and his greeting took the form of a
remark to that effect.
“I have been taking an evening walk,” said
Mr. Batchel. “Have you seen Richpin lately?”
“I see him last Saturday week,” replied the
sluice-keeper, “not since.”
“Do you feel lonely here at night?”
“No,” replied the sluice-keeper, “people
drop in at times. There was a man in on
Monday, and another yesterday.”
“Have you had no one to-day?” said Mr.
Batchel, coming to the point.
The answer showed that Mr. Batchel had
been the first to enter the door that day, and
after a little general conversation he brought
his visit to an end.
It was now ten o’clock. He looked in at
Richpin’s cottage, where he saw a light
burning, as he passed. Richpin had tired himself
early, and had been in bed since half-past
eight. His wife was visibly annoyed at the
rumours which had upset him, and Mr. Batchel
said such soothing words as he could command,
before he left for home.
He congratulated himself, prematurely, as
he sat before the fire in his study, that the day
was at an end. It had been cold out of doors,
and it was pleasant to think things over in the
warmth of the cheerful fire his housekeeper
never failed to leave for him. The reader will
have no more difficulty than Mr. Batchel
had in accounting for the resemblance between
Richpin and the man in the meadow. It was a
mere question of family likeness. That the
ancestor had been seen in the meadow at some
former time might perhaps be inferred from its
traditional name. The reason for his return,
then and now, was a matter of mere conjecture,
and Mr. Batchel let it alone.
The next incident has, to some, appeared
incredible, which only means, after all, that it
has made demands upon their powers of
imagination and found them bankrupt.
Critics of story-telling have used severe
language about authors who avail themselves
of the short-cut of coincidence. “That must be
reserved, I suppose,” said Mr. Batchel, when he
came to tell of Richpin, “for what really
happens; and that fiction is a game which must
be played according to the rules.”
“I know,” he went on to say, “that the
chances were some millions to one against
what happened that night, but if that makes it
incredible, what is there left to believe?”
It was thereupon remarked by someone in
the company, that the credible material would
not be exhausted.
“I doubt whether anything happens,”
replied Mr. Batchel in his dogmatic way,
“without the chances being a million to one
against it. Why did they choose such a word?
What does ‘happen’ mean?”
There was no reply: it was clearly a
rhetorical question.
“Is it incredible,” he went on, “that I put
into the plate last Sunday the very half-crown
my uncle tipped me with in 1881, and that I
spent next day?”
“Was that the one you put in?” was asked
by several.
“How do I know?” replied Mr. Batchel,
“but if I knew the history of the half-crown I
did put in, I know it would furnish still more
remarkable coincidences.”
All this talk arose out of the fact that at
midnight on the eventful day, whilst Mr.
Batchel was still sitting by his study fire, he
had news that the cottage at the sluice had
been burnt down. The thatch had been dry;
there was, as we know, a stiff east-wind, and an
hour had sufficed to destroy all that was
inflammable. The fire is still spoken of in
Stoneground with great regret. There remains
only one building in the place of sufficient
merit to find its way on to a postcard.
It was just at midnight that the sluice-keeper
rung at Mr. Batchel’s door. His errand
required no apology. The man had found a
night-fisherman to help him as soon as the fire
began, and with two long sprits from a lighter
they had made haste to tear down the thatch,
and upon this had brought down, from under
the ridge at the South end, the bones and some
of the clothing of a man. Would Mr. Batchel
come down and see?
Mr. Batchel put on his coat and returned
to the place. The people whom the fire had
collected had been kept on the further side of
the water, and the space about the cottage was
vacant. Near to the smouldering heap of ruin
were the remains found under the thatch. The
fingers of the right hand still firmly clutched a
sheep bone which had been gnawed as a dog
would gnaw it.
“Starved to death,” said the sluice-keeper,
“I see a tramp like that ten years ago.”
They laid the bones decently in an outhouse,
and turned the key, Mr. Batchel
carried home in his hand a metal cross, threaded
upon a cord. He found an engraved figure of
Our Lord on the face of it, and the name of
Pierre Richepin upon the back. He went next
day to make the matter known to the nearest
Priest of the Roman Faith, with whom he left
the cross. The remains, after a brief inquest,
were interred in the cemetery, with the rites of
the Church to which the man had evidently
belonged.
Mr. Batchel’s deductions from the whole
circumstances were curious, and left a great
deal to be explained. It seemed as if Pierre
Richepin had been disturbed by some premonition
of the fire, but had not foreseen that
his mortal remains would escape; that he could
not return to his own people without the aid of
his map, but had no perception of the interval
that had elapsed since he had lost it. This map
Mr. Batchel put into his pocket-book next day
when he went to Thomas Richpin for certain
other information about his surviving relatives.
Richpin had a father, it appeared, living a
few miles away in Jakesley Fen, and Mr.
Batchel concluded that he was worth a visit.
He mounted his bicycle, therefore, and made his
way to Jakesley that same afternoon.
Mr. Richpin was working not far from
home, and was soon brought in. He and his
wife shewed great courtesy to their visitor,
whom they knew well by repute. They had
a well-ordered house, and with a natural and
dignified hospitality, asked him to take tea with
them. It was evident to Mr. Batchel that there
was a great gulf between the elder Richpin and
his son; the former was the last of an old race,
and the latter the first of a new. In spite of
the Board of Education, the latter was vastly
the worse.
The cottage contained some French kickshaws
which greatly facilitated the enquiries
Mr. Batchel had come to make. They proved
to be family relics.
“My grandfather,” said Mr. Richpin, as they
sat at tea, “was a prisoner—he and his brother.”
“Your grandfather was Pierre Richepin?”
asked Mr. Batchel.
“No! Jules,” was the reply. “Pierre got
away.”
“Shew Mr. Batchel the book,” said his wife.
The book was produced. It was a Book of
Meditations, with the name of Jules Richepin
upon the title-page. The fly-leaf was missing.
Mr. Batchel produced the map from his pocket-book.
It fitted exactly. The slight indentures
along the torn edge fell into their place, and
Mr. Batchel left the leaf in the book, to the
great delight of the old couple, to whom he
told no more of the story than he thought fit.