BLACK ART. — WITCHCRAFT. — COMPACTS WITH THE DEVIL. — HOPKINS, THE WITCH-FINDER, AND HIS VICTIMS. — APPARITION OF A LIVING MAN. — PROVIDENTIAL FOREBODINGS. — LOTTERY PRIZES WON BY DREAMS.
Next to sorcery we may recollect the case of witchcraft,
which occurs oftener, particularly in modern times, than
any other alleged mode of changing by supernatural
means the future course of events. The sorcerer, was frequently
a man of learning and intellectual abilities, sometimes
of comparative opulence and respectable situation
in society. But the witch or wizard was almost uniformly
old, decrepid, and nearly or altogether in a state of
penury. The functions, however, of the witch and the
sorcerer were in a great degree the same. The earliest
account of a witch, attended with any degree of detail,
is that of the witch of Endor in the Bible, who among
other things, professed the power of calling up the dead
upon occasion from the peace of the sepulcher, it appears
clear, that the witch of Ender was not a being such as
those believed in by our ancestors, who could transform
themselves and others into the appearance of the lower
animals, raise and allay tempests, frequent the company
and join the revels of evil spirits, and, by their counsel
and assistance, destroy human lives, and waste the fruits
of the earth, or perform feats of such magnitude as to alter
the face of nature. The witch of Endor was a mere
fortune-teller, to whom, in despair of all aid or answer
from the Almighty, the unfortunate King of Israel had
recourse in his despair, and by whom, in some way or
other, he obtained the awful certainty of his own defeat
and death. She was liable, indeed, deservedly, to the
punishment of death, for intruding herself upon the task
of the real prophets, by whom the will of God was, in
that time, regularly made known. But her existence and
her crimes can go no length to prove the possibility that
another class of witches, not otherwise resembling her
than as called by the same name, either existed at a more
recent period, or were liable to the same capital punishment,
for a very different and much more doubtful class
of offences, which, however odious, are nevertheless to be
proved possible before they can be received as a criminal
charge.
Witches also claimed the faculty of raising storms, and
in various ways disturbing the course of nature. They
appear in most cases to have been brought into action
by the impulse of private malice. They occasioned mortality
of greater or less extent in man and beast. They
blighted the opening prospect of a plentiful harvest.
They covered the heavens with clouds, and sent abroad
withering and malignant blasts. They undermined the
health of those who were so unfortunate as to incur their
animosity, and caused them to waste away gradually with
incurable disease. They were notorious two or three centuries
ago for the power of the “evil eye.” The vulgar,
both great and small, dreaded their displeasure, and sought
by small gifts, and fair speeches, but insincere, and the
offspring of terror only, to avert the pernicous consequences
of their malice. They were famed for fabricating
small images of wax, to represent the objects of their persecution;
and, as these by gradual and often studiously
protracted degrees wasted before the fire, so the unfortunate
butts of their resentment perished with a lingering,
but inevitable death.
This faith in extraordinary events, and superstitious
fear of what is supernatural, has diffused itself through
every climate of the world, in a certain stage of human
intellect, and while refinement had not yet got the better
of barbarism. The Celts of antiquity had their Druids, a
branch of whose special profession was the exercise of
magic. The Chaldeans and Egyptians had their wise
men, their magicians, and their sorcerers. The Negroes
have their fore-tellers of events, their amulets, and their
reporters and believers of miraculous occurrences. A
similar race of men was found by Columbus and the other
discoverers of the New World in America; and facts of a
parallel nature are attested to us in the islands of the
South Seas. And, as phenomena of this sort were universal
in their nature, without distinction of climate, whether
torrid or frozen, and independantly of the discordant
manners and customs of different countries, so have they
been very slow and recent in their disappearing. Queen
Elizabeth sent to consult Dr. John Dee, the astrologer,
respecting a lucky day for her coronation; King James
the First employed much of his learned leasure upon questions
of witchcraft and demonology, in which he fully believed;
and Sir Matthew Hale in the year 1664 caused two
old women to be hanged upon a charge of unlawful communion
with infernal agents.
The power of these witches as we find in their earliest
records originated in their intercourse with “familiar
spirits,” invisible beings who must be supposed to be
enlisted in the armies of the prince of darkness. We
do not read in these ancient memorials of any league
of mutual benefit entered into between the merely
human party, and his or her supernatural assistant.
But modern times have amply supplied this defect.
The witch or sorcerer could not secure the assistance of
the demon but by a sure and faithful compact, by which
the human party obtained the industrious and vigilant
service of his familiar for a certain term of years, only on
condition that, when the term was expired, the demon of
undoubted right was to obtain possession of the indentured
party, and to convey him irremissibly and forever
to the regions of the damned. The contract was drawn
out in authentic form, signed by the sorcerer, and attested
with his blood, and was then carried away by the
demon, to be produced again at the appointed time.
“To deny the possibility, nay actual exsitence of
Witchcraft and Sorcery, is at once flatly to contradict the
revealed Word of God, in various passages both of the
Old and New Testament; and the thing itself is a truth to
which every Nation in the World hath in its turn borne
testimony, either by examples seemingly well attested, or
by prohibitory laws, which at least suppose the possibility
of commerce with evil spirits.”—Blackstone’s “Commentaries,”
book iv. chapter 4, p. 61.
An anonymous seventeenth-century writer reasons as
follows:—“To know things aright and perfectly is to
know the causes thereof. A definition doth consist of
those causes which give the whole essence, and contain
the perfect nature of the thing defined; where that is
therefore found out, there appears the very clear light. If
it be perfect, it is much the greater; though if it be not
fully perfect, yet it giveth some good light. For which
respect, though I dare not say I can give a perfect definition
in this matter, which is hard to do even in known
things, because the essential form is hard to be found, yet
I do give a definition which may at the least give notice
and make known what manner of persons they be of
whom I am to speak:—A witch is one that worketh by the
the Devil, or by some devilish or curious art, either hurting
or healing, revealing things secret, or foretelling
things to come, which the Devil hath devised to entangle
and snare men’s souls withal unto damnation. The Conjuror,
the Enchanter, the Sorcerer, the Diviner, and whatsoever
other sort there is, are indeed encompassed within
this circle. The Devil doth (no doubt) after divers forms,
deal in these. But no man is able to show an essential
difference in each of them from the rest. I hold it no
wisdom or labor well spent to travel much therein. One
artificer had devised them all.”
“Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”—Exodus xxii.
18. “Neither shall ye use enchantment.”—Levit. xix. 26.
“Regard not them which have familiar spirits, neither
seek after wizards, to be defiled by them.”—Ibid. ver. 31.
“When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy
God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the
abominations of those nations. There shall not be found
among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter
to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an
observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a
charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a necromancer.
For all that do these things are an abomination
unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the
Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.”—Deut.
xviii. 9-12. Of Manasseh is recorded, that “He
caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley
of the son of Himon: also he observed times, and used
enchantments, and used witchcraft, and dealt with a
familiar spirit, and with wizards.”—2 Chron. xxxiii. 6.
Lastly, St. Paul mentions “witchcraft” amongst such
“works of the flesh” as “adultery, fornication, heresies,
drunkenness, and murders.”—Galat. v. 19-21.
Many of the heathens cordially defended magic and
necromancy. For example, Asclepiades, who lived in the
time of Pompey the Great, cured diseases by magic, enjoining
upon his patient, in the case of falling sickness, to
bind upon his arm a Cross with a Nail driven into it.
Julianus, the magician, is reported to have driven the
plague out of Rome by magical power. Apuleius, a deciple
of Plato, wrote at length on magic. To him may be
added Marcellus and Alexander Trallian. Pliny asserts
in very plain language that necromancy was so prevalent
in his day, but was condemned by the wisest, that it was
classed with treason and poisoning. And it is notorious
that magic was long used as a convenient though inefficient
weapon against Christianity.—Vide, likewise, Livy
i. 20, and Strabo, lib. vi.
It is impossible to point to any period when the belief
in witchcraft and necromancy was perfectly obliterated,
or to any nation which altogether repudiated it. If one
particular phase was removed, or discountenanced, some
other form, substantially and inherently similar, eventually
took its place.
Touching the antiquity of Witchcraft, we must needs
confess that it hath been of very ancient time, because
the Scriptures do testify so much, for in the time of Moses it
was very rife in Egypt. Neither was it then newly sprung
up, being common, and grown into such ripeness among
the nations, that the Lord, reckoning by divers kinds,
saith that the Gentiles did commit such abominations, for
which He would cast them out before the children of
Israel.—“What a Witch is, and the Antiquities of Witchcraft,”
A. D. 1612.
The following passage, from a sermon by the late Canon
Melville, is interesting: “It is unnecessary for us to inquire
what those arts may have been in which the Ephesians
are said to have greatly excelled. There seems no
reason for doubting that, as we have already stated, they
were of the nature of magic, sorcery, or witchcraft;
though we cannot profess accurately to define what such
terms might import. The Ephesians, as some in all ages
have done, probably laid claim to the intercourse with
invisible beings, and professed to derive from that intercourse
acquaintance with, and power over, future events.
And though the very name of witchcraft be now held
in contempt, and the supposition of communion with evil
spirits scouted as a fable of what are called the dark ages,
we own that we have difficulty in believing that all which
has passed by the names of magic and sorcery may be resolved
into sleight of hand, deception, and trick. The
visible world and the invisible are in very close contact:
there is, indeed, a veil on our eyes, preventing our gazing
on spiritual beings and things, but we doubt not that
whatever passes upon the earth is open to the view of
higher and immaterial creatures. And as we are sure
that a man of piety and prayer enlists good angels on his
side and engages them to perform towards him the ministrations
of kindness, we know not why there cannot be
such a thing as a man whose wickedness has caused his
being abandoned by the Spirit of God, and who, in this
his desertion, has thrown open to evil angels the chambers
of his soul, and made himself so completely their instrument,
that they may use him in the uttering or working
strange things, which shall have all the air of prophecy
or miracle.”
The oldest and most authentic record from which we
can derive our ideas on the subject of witchcraft, unquestionably
is the Bible. The Egyptians and Chaldeans
were early distinguished for their supposed proficiency in
magic, in the production of supernatural phenomena, and
in penetrating into the secrets of future time. The first
appearance of men thus extraordinarily gifted, or advancing
pretensions of this sort, recorded in Scripture, is
on occasion of Pharoah’s dream of the seven years of
plenty, and seven years of famine. At that period the
king “sent and called for all the magicians of Egypt and
all the wise men; but they could not interpret the dream,”
which Joseph afterwards expounded.
Their second appearance was upon a most memorable
occasion, when Moses and Aaron, armed with miraculous
powers, came to a subsequent king of Egypt, to demand
from him that their countrymen might be permitted to
depart to another tract of the world. They produced a
miracle as the evidence of their divine mission: and the
king, who was also named Pharoah, “called before him
the wise men and the sorcerers of Egypt, who with their
enchantments did in like manner” as Moses had done; till,
after some experiments in which they were apparently
successful, they at length were compelled to allow themselves
overcome, and fairly to confess to their master,
“This is the finger of God”!
The spirit of the Jewish history loudly affirms, that the
Creator of heaven and earth had adopted this nation for
his chosen people, and therefore demanded their exclusive
homage, and that they should acknowledge no other God.
It is on this principle that it is made one of his early commands
to them, “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”
And elsewhere the meaning of this prohibition is more
fully explained: “There shall not be found among you
any one that useth divination, or an observer of
times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a
consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer;
these shall surely be put to death; they shall stone
them with stones.”
As a matter of fact, it is computed that in the year 1515,
no less than five hundred witches were burnt in Geneva
alone, and the same was the case in other parts of Christendom,—a
proof at once of the craft and power of Satan,
and of the demorilization of those who had deliberately
elected to become his servants and slaves. The earliest
statute against witchcraft enacted in England, was passed
in the reign of King Henry VI.; and additional laws
of great stringency and severity, sorely needed, were enacted
under the Tudors, by Henry VIII., Queen Elizabeth,
and James I. In the year 1604, the great Act of Parliament
against witchcraft, drawn up by Coke and Bacon,
was passed; and it is asserted that no less than twelve
bishops attended the committee of the House of Lords
when the bill was under discussion. Sir Matthew Hale
and Sir Thomas Browne, men of high legal and literary
rank and mark, each gave evidence at the trials which
speedily followed. In this particular, as in some others,
England followed Geneva. Between the years 1565 and
1700, eleven wizards or sorcerers were burnt at the stake
in the Carrefour du Bordage, in Guernsey, the square devoted
by the city authorities of that island to this kind of
punishment. The last case of death for Witchcraft there
took place in 1747.
It may here be put on record that at the period of the
Reformation, and during the succeeding century, the
power of casting out devils was claimed exclusively by
those who remained in visible communion with the See
of Rome, and many Roman Catholic writers of those
periods maintained that no such power belonged either
to any teacher of heresy or to schismatics.
FROM AN OLD RECORD.
In the spring of 1645 several witches were seized at
Manningtree in England and were subsequently condemned
and hanged. One of these was an old woman
named Elizabeth Clarke, and the most important witness
against her was “Matthew Hopkins, of Manningtree,
gent.” It appears that Hopkins had watched with her
several nights in a room in the house of a Mr. Edwards
in which she was confined, to keep her from sleeping until
she made a confession, and to see if she was visited by
her familiars. He declared, among other things, that on
the night of the 24th of March, which appears to have
been the third night of watching, after he had refused to
let her call one of her imps or familiars, she confessed
that six or seven years before, she had surrendered herself
to the devil, who came to her in the form of “a proper
gentleman, with a laced band.” Soon after this a little
dog appeared, fat and short in the legs, in color white,
with sandy spots, which when he hindered it from approaching
her, vanished from his sight. She confessed
that it was one of her imps named Janiara. Immediately
after this had disappeared, another came in the form of
a greyhound, which she called Vinegar Tom; and it was
followed by another in the form of a polecat. “And this
informant further saith, that going from the house of the
said Mr. Edwards to his own house, about nine or ten
o’clock of the night with his greyhound with him, he saw
the greyhound suddenly give a jump, and run as if she
had been in full course after a hare; and that when the
informant made haste to see what his greyhound so eagerly
pursued, he espied a white thing about the size of a
kitten, and the greyhound standing aloof from it; and
that, by-and-by, the said white imp or kitten danced
about the said greyhound and by all likelihood bit a piece
of the flesh of her shoulder, for the greyhound came shrieking
and crying to this informant with a piece of the flesh
torn from her shoulder. And this informant further saith
that coming into his own yard that night, he espied a
black thing porportioned like a cat, only it was thrice as
big, sitting on a strawberry bed, and fixing its eyes on
this informant; and when he went toward it, it leaped
over the pale toward this informant, as he thought, but
ran quite through the yard with his greyhound after it to
a great gate which was underset with a pair of turnbull-strings,
and did throw the said gate wide open, and then
vanished; and the said greyhound returned again to this
informant shaking and trembling exceedingly.” Hopkins
had not ventured to remain alone with the witch, but had
with him John Stern, who also added “gentleman” to his
name, and who confirmed all that Hopkins had said, deposed
to the coming of imps and added that the third imp
was called Sack-and-Sugar. They watched at night with
another woman, named Rebecca West, and saw her imps
in the same manner. She stated that the first time she
saw Satan he came to her at night, and told her he must
be her husband, and married her. The severe treatment
to which the accused were exposed, forced confessions
from them all, and they avowed being guilty of every
species of mischief, from the taking away of human life to
the spoiling of milk. The names and forms of their imps
were equally fantastic. Rebecca Jones, a witch from St.
Osythe’s, said that she had met a man in a ragged suit
with great eyes, that terrified her exceedingly, and that
he gave her three things like moles but without tails,
which she fed with milk. Another had an imp in the
form of a white dog, which she called Elimanzer, and
which she fed on milk pottage. One had three imps,
which she called Prick-ear, Jack and Frog. Several witnesses,
poor and ignorant people, were brought to testify
to the mischief which had been done by these means. A
countryman gravely related how, passing at day by the
house of one of the women, named Anne West, he was
surprised to find her door open at that early hour, and
looking in he saw three or four things like black rabbits,
one of which ran after him. He seized upon it, and tried
to kill it, but it seemed in his hands like a piece of wool,
and stretched out in length as he pulled it without any
apparent injury. Then recollecting that there was a
spring near at hand, he hurried thither and attempted to
drown it, but it vanished from his sight as soon as he put
it in the water. He then returned toward the house and
seeing Anne West standing outside the door in her smock,
he asked why she sent her imps to torment him. This
seems to have been the first appearance of Matthew Hopkins
as a witch-finder, for which he afterwards became
notorious, and which he now assumed as a legal profession.
He proceeded in a regular circuit through Suffolk,
Norfolk, Cambrigeshire, and Huntingdon, accompanied
by John Sterne and a woman whose business it was to examine
the bodies of the females in search of their marks.
In August 1645, we find them at Bury, in Suffolk, where,
on the 27th of that month, no less than eighteen witches
were executed at once, and a hundred and twenty more
were to have been tried, but a sudden movement of the
king’s troops in that direction obliged the judges to adjourn
the session. Some of the imps here appeared in
the shape of snakes, wasps and hornets, and even of
snails. They were mostly employed in petty offences;
one man and his wife were guilty only of having bewitched
the beer in a brewhouse and making it stink. Others
however, confessed to have caused mischief of a more serious
character.
The most remarkable victim of this inquisition, was an
aged clergyman named Lowes, who had been vicar of
Brandeston, near Framlingham, in that county fifty years,
a well known opponent of the new church government.
This man, we are told by Sterne, one of the inquisitors,
had been indicted for a common imbanatator, and for
witchcraft above thirty years before, and the grand jury
found the bill for a common imbanator, who now, after
he was found with the marks, confessed that in pride of
heart to be equal with, or rather above God, the devil
took advantage of him, and he covenanted with the devil
and sealed it with his blood, and had those familiars or
spirits, which sucked on the marks found on his body,
and did much harm both by sea and land, especially by
sea, for he confessed he being at Lungarfort, in Suffolk,
where he preached, as he walked upon the wall there, he
saw a great sail of ships pass by, and that, as they were
sailing by, one of the three imps, namely, his yellow one,
forthwith appeared to him and asked him what he
should do, and he bade it go and sink such a ship, one
that belonged to Ipswich, so he confessed that the imp
went forthwith away, and he stood still and viewed the
ships, and perceived that the ship to be immediately in
more trouble and danger than the rest; for he said the
water was more boisterous near that than the rest, tumbling
up and down with waves, and soon after it sunk
directly down into the sea, when all the rest sailed on in
safety; then he confessed, he made fourteen widows in
one quarter of an hour. When asked if it did not grieve
him to see so many men cast away in a short time, he
swore by his Maker, “No; he was joyful to see what power
his imps had.” He was hanged, in 1645, at Bury St.
Edmund’s.
About sixty or seventy years ago, a man of piety and integrity
arrived in Germany from Philadelphia, to visit his
poor old parents, and, with his well-earned wealth, to
place them beyond the reach of care. He went out to
America while he was still young, and had succeeded so
far as to become overlooker of various mills on the Delaware
river, in which situation he had honorably laid up a
considerable sum.
In the neighborhood of Philadelphia, not far from the
mills above-mentioned, there dwelt a solitary man in a
lonely house. He was very benevolent, but extremely
retired and reserved, and strange things were related of
him, among which was his being able to tell a person
things that were unknown to every one else. Now it
happened, that the captain of a vessel belonging to Philadelphia,
was about to sail to Africa and Europe. He
promised his wife that he would return in a certain time,
and also that he would write to her frequently. She
waited long, but no letters arrived: the time appointed
passed over, but her beloved husband did not return.
She was now deeply distressed and knew not where to
look for counsel or consolation. At length, a friend
advised her for once to go to the pious solitary and tell
her griefs. The woman followed his advice, and went to
him. After she had told him all her troubles, he desired
her to wait a while there, until he returned and brought
her an answer. She sat down to wait, and the man opening
a door, went into his closet. But the woman thinking
he stayed a long, long time, rose up, went to the
window in the door, lifted up the little curtain, and looking
in, saw him lying on the couch or sofa like a corpse;
she then immediately went back to her place. At length
he came and told her that her husband was in London, in
a coffee-house which he named, and that he would return
very soon: he then told her also the reason why he had
been unable to write. The woman went home pretty
much at ease.
What the solitary had told her was minutely fulfilled,
her husband returned, and the reasons of his delay and
his not writing were just the same as the man had stated.
The woman was now curious to know what would be the
result, if she visited the friendly solitary in company with
her husband. The visit was arranged, but when the captain
saw the man, he was struck with amazement; he afterwards
told his wife that he had seen this very man, on
such a day (it was the very day that the woman had been
with him), in a coffee-house in London; and that he had
told him that his wife was much distressed about him;
that he had then stated the reason why his return was
delayed, and of his not writing, and that he would shortly
come back, on which he lost sight of the man among
the company.
In the “Museum of Wonders,” vol. 2, chap. ii., page
152, there is a striking instance of a presentiment, related
by Madame de Beaumont, in the eigth volume of the
“Universal Magazine for Art and Nature.” She says,
“My whole family still remembers an accident, from
which my father was preserved by a presentiment of danger.
Sailing upon the river is one of the common amusements
of the city of Rouen, in France. My father also
took great pleasure in these water-parties, and he seldom
suffered many weeks to pass over without enjoying it.
On one occasion he agreed with a party to sail to Port St.
Omer, about ten miles from Rouen. Dinner and musical
instruments had been sent on board the vessel, and every
preparation made for a pleasant excursion. When it was
time to go on board, an aunt of my father’s, who was
deaf and dumb, uttered a kind of howl, placed herself at
the door, blocked up the way with her arms, struck her
arms together, and gave by signs to understand that she
conjured him to remain at home. My father who had
promised himself much pleasure from this excursion, only
laughed at her entreaties: but the lady fell at his feet,
and manifested such poignant signs of grief, that he at
length determined to yield to her entreaties, and postpone
his excursion to another day. He therefore endeavored
to detain the rest also; but they laughed at him
for being so easily persuaded, and set sail. Scarcely had
the vessel proceeded half the distance, before those on
board had the greatest reason to repent that they had
not followed his advice. The vessel went to pieces,
several lost their lives, and those that saved themselves
by swimming were so much terrified at their narrow
escape, that they with difficulty got the better of it.”
No mechanical explanation can apply to this remarkable
presentiment. The warning angel found he could
work on no one better than the person who was deaf
and dumb, he therefore selected her for the execution of
his commission.
In the same volume of the “Museum of Wonders,”
page 153, there is an equally striking presentiment related,
which the editor had from the lips of a credible person.
This individual had a friend who had a responsible situation
in the country. Being unmarried, he committed his
domestic concerns to the care of a housekeeper, who had
been with him many years. His birthday arrived, he
made many preparations for celebrating it; and told his
housekeeper early in the morning, that as the day was
fine, she should clean out a certain arbor in the garden,
which he named, because he intended to pass the day in
it with his guests. Scarcely had she received this commission,
than she seemed quite in a maze, and she delayed
the fulfillment of it. At length she entreated him rather
to receive his guests in one of the rooms of the house, for
she had a presentiment that the arbor would that day be
struck by lightning. He laughed at her assertion, as
there was no appearance of a storm coming on that day,
and on her renewing her entreaties, he was only the more
urgent that the arbor he had pointed out should be made
ready, that it might not appear that he gave way to her
superstitious feelings. At length she went, and did as her
master ordered her. The day continued fine, the company
that had been invited arrived, they went into the
arbor and made themselves merry. In the meantime,
however, clouds had gathered in the distant horizon, and
were at length powerfully driven toward the place by the
wind. The company were so intent upon their entertainment,
that they did not in the least observe it; but scarcely
was the housekeeper aware that the storm was approaching,
than she begged her master to leave the arbor with
his company, for she could not divest herself at all of the
idea of the lightning striking it. At first they would not
listen to her, but she continued her entreaties unremittingly;
and, at length, as the storm approached with
great violence, they suffered themselves to be induced to
leave the arbor. They had not been in the room more
than a few minutes when the lightning struck the arbor,
and dashed everything that had been left in it to pieces.
FROM A LETTER IN MORITZ’S EXPERIMENTAL
PSYCHOLOGY.
“You desire me to give you a written account of what
I lately verbally related to you regarding the soul’s
faculty of prescience. As my experience rests solely upon
dreams, I have certainly reason to apprehend that many
will take me for a fantastic dreamer; but if I can contribute
anything to the very useful object of your work,
it is no matter—let people think what they will. Be that
as it may, I vouch for the truth and veracity of what I
shall now more particularly relate.
“In the year 1768, while learning the business of an
apothecary in the royal medical establishment at Berlin,
I played in the seventy-second drawing of the Prussian
numerical lottery, which took place on the 30th of May of
the same year, and fixed upon the numbers 22 and 60.
“In the night preceeding the day of drawing, I dreamed
that toward twelve o’clock at noon, which is the time
when the lottery is generally drawn, the master-apothecary
sent down to me to tell me that I must come up to
him. On going up stairs, he told me to go immediately
to Mr. Mylius, the auctioneer, on the other side of the
castle, and ask him if he had disposed of the books which
had been left with him for sale; but that I must return
speedily, because he waited for his answer.
“‘That’s just the thing,’ thought I, still dreaming; ‘the
lottery will just be drawing, and as I have executed my
commission, I will run quickly to the general lottery-office,
and see if my numbers come out’ (the lottery was drawn
at that time in the open street); ‘if I only walk quick, I
shall be at home again soon enough.’
“I went therefore immediately, (still in my dream.) in
compliance with the orders I had received, to Mr. Mylius,
the auctioneer, executed my commission, and, after receiving
his answer, ran hastily to the general lottery-office,
on the ‘Hunters’ Bridge.’ Here I found the customary
preparations, and a considerable number of spectators.
They had already begun to put the numbers into
the wheel—and the moment I came up, No. 60 was exhibited
and called out. ‘Oh,’ thought I, ‘it is a good omen,
that just one of my own numbers should be called out the
moment I arrive.’
“As I had not much time, I now wished for nothing so
much as that they would hasten as much as possible with
telling in the remaining numbers. At length they were
all counted in, and now I saw them bind the eyes of the
boy belonging to the orphan-school, and the numbers
afterward drawn in the customary manner.
“When the first number was exhibited and called out,
it was No. 22. ‘A good omen again!’ thought I; ‘No. 60
will also certainly come out.’ The second number was
drawn—and behold, it was No. 60!
“Now they may draw what they will, said I to some
one who stood near me; ‘my numbers are out—I have no
more time to spare.’ With that, I turned myself about
and ran directly home.
“Here I awoke, and was as clearly conscious of my
dream as I am now relating it. If its natural connection
and the very particular perspicuity, had not been so striking,
I should have regarded it as nothing else than a common
dream, in the general sense of the term. But this
made me pay attention to it, and excited my curiosity so
much that I could scarcely wait till noon.
“At length it struck eleven, but still there was no
appearance of my dream being fulfilled. It struck a quarter—it
struck half-past eleven—and still there was no probability
of it. I had already given up all hope, when one of
the work-people unexpectedly came to me, and told me
to go up stairs immediately to the master-apothecary. I
went up full of expectation, and heard with the greatest
astonishment that I must go directly to Mr. Mylius, the
auctioneer, on the other side of the castle, and ask him if
he had disposed of the books at auction which had been
entrusted to him. He told me also, at the same time, to
return quickly, because he waited for an answer.
“Who could have made more despatch than I? I went
in haste to Mr. Mylius, the auctioneer, executed my commission,
and, then after receiving his answer, ran as
quickly as possible to the general lottery-office, on the
‘Hunters’ Bidge’; and, full of astonishment, I saw that
No. 60 was exhibited and called out the moment I arrived.
As my dream had been thus far so punctually fulfilled,
I was now willing to wait the end of it, although I had so
little time; I therefore wished for nothing so much as that
they would hasten with counting in the remaining numbers.
At length they finished. The eyes of the orphan-boy
were bound, as customary, and it is easy to conceive
the eagerness with which I awaited the final accomplishment
of my dream.
“The first number was drawn and called out, and behold,
it was No. 22! The second was drawn, and this was
also as I had dreamed, No. 60!
“It now occurred to me that I had already stayed
longer than my errand allowed; I therefore requested the
person who was next to me in the crowd to let me pass.
‘What,’ said one of them to me, ‘will you not wait till the
numbers are all out?’ ‘No,’ said I, ‘my numbers are
already out, and they may now draw what they please,
for ought I care.’ With that, I turned about, pushed
through the crowd, and ran hastily and joyfully home.
Thus was the whole of my dream fulfilled, not only in
substance, but literally and verbatim.
“It will perhaps not be disagreeable to you, if I relate
two other occurences of a similar nature:—
“On the 18th of August, 1776, I dreamed I was walking
in the vicinity of the ‘Silesian Gate,’ and intended to go
home thence, directly across the field, by the Ricksdorf or
Dresden road.
“I found the field full of stubble, and it seemed as if
the corn that had stood there had only been reaped and
housed a short time before. This was really the case, although
I had not previously seen it. On entering the
Ricksdorf road, I perceived that some persons had collected
before one of the first houses, and were looking up
at it. I consequently supposed that something new had
occurred in or before the house, and for this reason, on
coming up, I asked the first person I met—‘What is the
matter here?’ He answered with great indifference, ‘The
lottery is drawn.’—‘So,’ said I, ‘is it drawn already? What
numbers are out?’ ‘There they stand,’ replied he, and
pointed with his finger to the door of a shop that was in
the house, which I now perceived for the first time.
“I looked at the door, and found that the numbers
were written up, on a black border round the door, as is
frequently the case. In order to ascertain if there was
really a shop, with a receiving house for the lottery, at
the commencement of the Ricksdorf road, I did not think
it too much trouble to go there, and found that this was
really the case. To my great vexation, I found that only
one of my numbers had come out. I looked over the numbers
once more, in order not to forget them, and then
went home disappointed.
“On awaking, I was hindered, by an accidental noise,
from immediately recollecting my dream, but shortly afterward
it again occurred to me; and, after a little reflection,
I remembered it as clearly as I have now related it,
but found it difficult to recollect all the five numbers.
“That No. 47 was the first, and No. 21 the second of the
numbers, I remembered perfectly well; that the third
which followed was a 6, I was also certain, only I was not
confident whether the 0 which I had seen hereabouts belonged
to the 6 or the following number 4, which I also
remembered very distinctly to have seen; and I was not
certain of this, it might have been just as well 6 and 4
alone as 60 and 40.
“I was the least confident as to the fifth number: that
it was between 50 and 60 I was certain, but which I could
not precisely determine. I had already laid money upon
No. 21, and this was the number which, according to my
dream, should come out.
“As remarkable as my dream appeared to be in other
respects, yet I was diffident of it, from being unable to
remember all the five numbers. Although I was quite
certain that among the sixteen numbers mentioned—that
is, those between 50 and 60, and the six previously indicated—all
the five which I had seen in my dream were
contained; and although there was still time to secure the
numbers, yet it did not suit me on account of the considerable
sum it would require to stake upon all the sixteen
numbers, I therefore contented myself with a few AMBS
and TERNES, and had, besides this, the disappointment of
selecting a bad conjunction of numbers.
“The third day afterward (the 21st of August, 1776) the
lottery was drawn. It was the two hundred and fifteenth
drawing, and all the five numbers which I had seen in my
dream came out exactly—namely, 60, 4, 21, 52, 42; and I
now remembered that No. 52 was the fifth of those which
I had seen in my dream, and which I could not previously
recollect with certainty.
“Instead of some thousand dollars, I was now compelled
to be contented with about twenty!
“The third, and, for the present, the last occurrence of
this kind, which I shall relate, was as follows:—
“On the 21st of September, 1777, I dreamed that a good
friend of mine visited me, and after the conversation had
turned upon the lottery, he desired that he might draw
some numbers out of my little wheel of fortune which I
had at that time.
“He drew several numbers, with the intention of staking
money upon them. When he had done drawing, I
took all the numbers out of the wheel, laid them before
me upon the table, and said to him, ‘The number which
I now take up will certainly come out at the next drawing.’
I put my hand into the heap and drew out a number,
unfolded it, and looked at it: it was very plainly 25.
I was going to fold it up and put it again into the wheel,
but that very moment I awoke.
“Having so clear a recollection of my dream, as I have
now related it, I had much confidence in the number, and
therefore staked so much upon it as to be satisfied with
the winnings; but two hours before the lottery was drawn,
I received my money back from the lottery-agent, with
the news that my number was completely filled up. The
lottery was drawn on the 24th of September, and the
number really came out.
“Although I very willingly allow, and am well aware
that many and perhaps the generality of dreams arise
from causes which are founded merely in the body, and
therefore can have no further significance—yet I believe
I have been convinced by repeated experience that there
are not unfrequently dreams, in the origin and existence
of which the body, as such, has no part; and to these, in
my opinion, belong the three instances above mentioned.
“I do not think that the contents of these dreams ought
to give occasion to any one to judge wrongfully; for
otherwise, I could just as well have selected others: but I
have placed them together precisely because of their
similarity.
“Christ Knape,
“Doc. of Philosophy, Medicine, and Surgery.”
EXTRAORDINARY FOREWARNING, — THE “WHITE LADY.” — OF MEDICAL HERBS. — THE FAMOUS ELIXIR OF LIFE. — FOLK-LORE OF PINS. — SEEING WITH THE EYES CLOSED. — PREVOYANT VISION OF JOHN KNOX. — THE DIVINING ROD. — DIVINING ROD.
AS IT REALLY OCCURRED IN LORD TYRONE’S
FAMILY, IN IRELAND.
Lord Tyrone and Lady Beresford were born in Ireland;
they were both left orphans in their infancy, to the care
of the same person, by whom they were both educated in
the principles of Deism. When they were each of them
about fourteen years of age they fell into very different
hands. The persons on whom the care of them now devolved,
used every possible endeavor to eradicate the erroneous
principles they had imbibed, and to persuade
them to embrace the revealed religion, but in vain; their
arguments were insuffient to convince them, but they
were powerful enough to stagger their former faith.
Though now separated from each other, their friendship
continued unalterable, and they seemed to regard each
other with a sincere and fraternal affection. After some
years had elapsed, and they were each of them grown up,
they made a solemn promise to each other, that whoever
should first die, would, if permitted, appear to the other
to declare what religion was most approved of by the Supreme
Being. Lady Beresford was shortly after addressed
by Sir Marcus Beresford, to whom, after a few years; she
was married; but no change in condition had power to
alter her friendship; the families frequently visited each
other, and often spent more than a fortnight together. A
short time after one of those visits, Sir Marcus Beresford
remarked when his lady came down to breakfast in the
morning, that her countenance was unusually pale, and
bore evident marks of terror and confusion; he inquired
anxiously after her health, she assured him she was well,
perfectly well; he repeated his inquiries, and begged to
know if anything had disordered her; she replied no, she
was as well as usual. “Have you hurt your wrist, have
you sprained it?” said he, observing a black ribbon bound
round it. She replied no, she had not; but added, “let
me conjure you, Sir M. never to inquire the cause of my
wearing this ribbon, you will never more see me without
it; if it concerned you as a husband to know it, I would
not for a moment conceal it from you. I never in my life
denied a request, but of this I must entreat you to forgive
my refusal, and never to urge me further on the subject.”
“Very well, my lady, (said he, smiling) since you
so earnestly desire me, I will inquire no further.” The
conversation here ended; but breakfast was scarcely over
when Lady B. inquired if the post was come in? she was
told it was not. In a few minutes she again rang the bell
for her servant, and repeated the inquiry, “Is not the
post yet come?” she was told it was not. “Do you expect
any letter, (said Sir M.) that you are so anxious concerning
the coming of the post?” “I do, (she answered) I expect
to hear that Lord Tyrone is dead: he died last Tuesday,
at four o’clock.” “I never in my life, (said Sir M.)
believed you superstitious, but you must have had some
idle dream which has thus alarmed you.”
At that instant a servant opened the door, and delivered
to them a letter, sealed with black. “It is as I expected,
(exclaimed Lady B.) he is dead.” Sir M. opened the
letter, it came from Lord Tyrone’s stewart, and contained
the melancholy intelligence that his master died the
Tuesday preceding, at the very time that Lady B. had
specified. Sir M. entreated her to compose her spirits,
and to endeavor as much as lay in her power not to make
herself unhappy. She assured him that she felt much
easier than she had for some time past; and added, “I
can inform you of something which I know will prove
welcome. I can assure you beyond the possibility of a
doubt, that I am with child of a son.” Sir M. received the
intelligence with that pleasure that might be expected,
and expressed in the strongest terms, the felicity he
should experience from such an event, which he had so
long ardently desired.
After a period of some months, Lady B. was delivered
of a son; she had before been the mother of two daughters
only. Sir Marcus survived the birth of his son little more
than four years. After his decease his lady went but little
from home; she visited no family but that of a clergyman,
who resided in the same village, with whom she frequently
passed a few hours, the rest of her time was entirely devoted
to solitude, and she appeared forever determined to
banish all other society. The clergyman’s family consisted
of himself, his wife, and one son, who at Sir M’s. death
was quite a youth; to this son, however, she was afterwards
married, in the space of a few years, notwithstanding
the disparity of his years, and the manifest imprudence
of such a connection, so unequal in every respect.
The event justified the expectation of every one. Lady
B. was treated by her young husband with neglect and
cruelty, and the whole of his conduct evinced him the
most abandoned libertine, utterly destitute of every
principle of virtue and humanity. To this her second
husband, Lady B. brought two daughters; afterwards,
such was the profligacy of his conduct, that she insisted
upon a separation. They parted for sometime, when so
great was the sorrow he expressed for his former ill conduct,
that, won over by his supplication and promises, she
was induced to pardon, and once more reside with him;
and was, after sometime made the mother of a son.
The day on which she had him in a month, being the
anniversary of her birthday, she sent for Lady ——, of
whose friendship she had long been possessed, and a few
friends, to request them to spend the day with her. About
noon the clergyman by whom she had been baptised, and
with whom she had all her life maintained an intimacy,
came into the room to inquire after her health; she told
him she felt perfectly well, and requested him to spend
the day with her, it being her birthday. “For, (said she)
I am forty-eight this day.” “No, my lady, (answered the
clergyman) you are mistaken, your mother and myself
have had many disputes concerning your age, and I have
at length discovered I am right; happening to go last
week to the parish where you were born, I was resolved
to put an end to my doubt by searching the register, and
find that you are forty-seven this day.”
“You have signed my death warrant, (said she) I have
not much longer to live. I must, therefore entreat you
to leave me immediately, as I have something of importance
to settle before I die.”
When the clergyman had left Lady B. she sent to forbid
her company coming; and at the same time to request
Lady ——, and her son, of whom Sir M. Beresford was
father, and who then was about twelve years of age, to
come to her apartment. Immediatly upon their arrival,
having ordered her attendants to quit the room, “I have
(said she) something to communicate to you both before
I die, a period which is not far distant. You, lady are no
stranger to the friendship that always existed between
Lord Tyrone and myself; we were educated under the
same roof, in the same principles, those of Deism. When
the friends into whose hands we afterwards fell, endeavored
to persuade us to embrace the revealed religion,
their arguments, though insufficient to convince us, were
powerful enough to stagger our former faith, and to leave
us wavering between two opinions. In this perplexing
state of doubt and uncertainty, we made a solemn promise
to each other, that whichever should happen to die first,
would, if permitted by the Almighty, appear to the other
to declare what religion was acceptable to him. Accordingly
one night, when Sir M. and myself were in bed, I
awoke, and discovered Lord Tyrone sitting by my bedside;
I screamed out, and endeavored, but in vain, to
awake Sir M. ‘For heaven’s sake, Lord Tyrone, (said I)
by what means, or for what purpose came you this time
of night?’ ‘Have you forgot our promise? (said he) I died
last Tuesday, at four o’clock, and have been permitted
by the Supreme Being to appear to you, to assure you
that the revealed religion is the true and only religion by
which we can be saved. I am further suffered to inform
you, that you are with child of a son, who is decreed to
marry my daughter; not many years after his birth, Sir
M. will die, and you will marry again, and to a man
whose ill treatment you will be rendered miserable by;
you will bring him two daughters, and afterwards a son,
in child-bed of whom you will die, in the forty-seventh
year of your age.’
“Just heaven, (exclaimed I) and cannot I prevent
this?’ ‘Undoubtly you may, (returned he); you have a
free assent, and may prevent all by resisting every temptation
to a second marriage; but your passions are strong,
you know not their power; hitherto you have had no
trial, nor am I allowed to tell you, but if after this warning
you persist in your infidelity, your lot in another
world will be miserable indeed.’ ‘May I ask, (said I) if
you are happy?’ ‘Had I been otherwise, (said he) I
should not have been thus permitted to appear to you.’
‘I may thence infer that you are happy?’ He smiled,
but did not answer.
“But how, said I, when the morning comes, shall I be
convinced that your appearance to me thus has been real,
and not the mere phantom of my imagination.’ ‘Will
not the news of my death, (said he) be sufficient to convince
you?’ ‘No (returned I,) I might have had such a
dream, and that dream might accidentally come to pass;
I must have stronger proofs of its reality.’ ‘You shall,’
said he; then waving his hand, the bed curtains, which
were of crimson velvet, were instantly drawn through a
large iron hoop, by which the tester of the bed, which
was of an oval form, was suspended: ‘In that (said he)
you cannot be mistaken; no mortal could have performed
this.’ ‘True, (said I) but sleeping we are often possessed
of far greater strength than awake; though awake I could
not have done it, asleep I might. I shall still doubt.’ He
then said, ‘You have a pocket-book, on the leaves of
which I will write: you know my handwriting.’ I replied
‘Yes.’ He wrote with a pencil on one side of the leaves.
‘Still, (said I) in the morning, I doubt, though awake I
may not imitate your hand, asleep I might.’
‘You are born of belief, I must not touch you, it would
injure you irreparably, it is not for spirits to touch mortal
flesh.’ I do not mind a small blemish,’ said I. ‘You are
a woman of spirit, (said he) hold out your hand.’ I did;
he touched my wrist; his hand was as cold as marble; in
a moment the sinews shrunk up, every nerve withered.
‘Now (said he) while you live, let no mortal eye behold
that wrist, to see it will be sacrilege.’ He stopped; I
turned to him again—he was gone. During the time in
which I had conversed with him, my thoughts were perfectly
calm and collected, but the moment he was gone I
felt chilled with horror, and a cold sweat came over me;
every limb and joint shook under me; I endeavored to
awake Sir M. but in vain; all my efforts were ineffectual.
In this state of agitation I lay some time, when a shower
of tears came to my relief, and I droped asleep. In the
morning Sir Marcus arose and dressed himself as usual,
without perceiving the state in which the curtains remained.
When I awoke, I found Sir Marcus was gone down.
I arose, and having put on my clothes, went into the
gallery adjoining our apartment, and took from thence a
long broom, such a one as in a large house is frequently
used to sweep the cornices, with the help of which, though
not without difficulty, I took down the curtains, as I
imagined their extraordinary position would excite
wonder among the servants, and occasion inquiries I
wished to avoid. I then went to my bureau, locked up
the pocket-book and took out a piece of black ribbon
which I bound round my wrist. When I came down, the
agitation of my mind on my countenance, was too visible
to pass long unobserved by Sir Marcus; he instantly remarked
my confusion, and inquired the cause. I told
him I was well, perfectly well, but informed him Lord
Tyrone was no more, that he died on the preceding Tuesday
at the hour of four, and at the same time entreated
him to drop all inquiries concerning the black ribbon he
noticed on my wrist. He kindly desisted any further
importunity, nor did he ever after imagine the cause. You,
my son, as had been foretold, I brought into the world
with much rejoicing, and in little more than four years
after your birth your father died in my arms. After the
melancholy event, I determined, as the, only probable
means by which to avoid the dreadful sequel of the prediction,
to give up every pleasure, and to pass the remainder
of my days in solitude. But few can endure to
remain in a state of superstition. I commenced an intercourse
with one family, and only one; nor could I then
see the fatal consequences which afterwards resulted
from it. Little did I imagine that their son, their only
son, then a mere youth, would prove the person alloted
by fate to prove my undoing. In a few years I ceased to
regard him with indifference; I endeavored by every
possible means to repel a passion, the fatal consequences
of which, if ever I should be weak enough to yield to its
impulse, I too well knew, and fondly imagined I should
overcome its influence; when in the evening of one fatal
day ended my fortitude, and plunged me in a moment
down that abyss I had been so long meditating how to
shun. He had frequently been soliciting his parents to go
into the army, and at length obtained their permission,
and came to bid me farewell before his departure.
The moment he entered the room he fell down on his
knees at my feet and, told me he was miserable, that I
alone was the cause of it. That instant my fortitude forsook
me, I gave myself up for lost; and considering my
fate as inevitable, without further hesitation consented to
an union, the immediate result of which I knew to be
misery, and its end death. The conduct of my husband,
after a few years were passed, amply warranted my demand
for a separation; I hoped by this means to avoid
the fatal sequel to the prophecy; but, won over by his
repeated entreaties, I was prevailed on to pardon and once
more to reside with him, though not until I had, as I
supposed, passed my forty-seventh year; but, I have
heard this day from indisputable authority that I have
hitherto laid under a mistake with regard to my age, that
I am but forty-seven this day. Of the near approach of
my death, I entertain not the least doubt, but I do not
dread it; armed with the sacred precepts of Christianity,
I can meet the King of Terrors without dismay; and,
without a tear, bid adieu to the regions of mortality for
ever.
“When I am dead, as the necessity of its concealment
closes with my life, I wish that you, my lady, would unbind
my wrist, take from hence the ribbon, and let my
son with yourself behold it.” Lady B. here paused for
some time, but resuming her conversation, she entreated
her son to behave so as to merit the high honor he would
in future receive from an union with lord Tyrone’s
daughter. Lady B. then expressed a wish to lie down on
a bed to compose herself asleep. Lady ——, and her son
immediately called her attendants, and quitted the room,
after having first desired them attentively to watch their
mistress, and should they observe any change in her, to
call instantly. An hour passed, and all was silent in the
room, they listened at the door and every thing was still;
but in half an hour more a bell rung violently, they flew
to her apartment, but before they reached the door of it
they heard the servants exclaim, “my mistress is dead.”
Lady ——, then desiring the servants to quit the room.
Lady B’s son with herself then approached the bed of his
mother, they knelt down by the side of it. Lady ——,
they lifted up her hand, unbound the black ribbon, and
found the wrist exactly in the same state Lady B. had
described, every nerve withered, every sinew shrunk up.
Lady B’s son, as has been predicted, is now married to
Lord Tyrone’s daughter; the black ribbon and pocket-book
are now in the possession of Lady ——, by whom the
above narrative is stated, in Ireland; who together with
the Tyrone family, will be found to attest its truth.
One of the most attractive, blood-curdling, hair-raising
and goose-flesh causing legends in the whole history of
superstition is that of the appearance of the “White
Lady” as the precursor of death in the royal family of
Prussia. In the first place the “White Lady” is duplex;
there are two of her. One is the unhappy ghost of the
Countess Agnes of Orlamunde, who is alleged to have departed
this life after the procrastinating fashion peculiar
to the middle ages, by being walled up alive in a vault
in the palace at Berlin. The occasion for this incarceration
is said to have been her poisoning of the two sons of
the then Margrave of Brandenburgh (incidentally her
own, by the way), who stood in the road to her promised
marriage to the Margrave. The other personality of the
“White Lady” was, while in the flesh, the Princess
Bertha von Rosenberg, who lived in the fifteenth century
died in the odor of sanctity, bequeathed a gift to the poor
and this gift having been falsely discontinued, “walks”
at periods inconvenient to the Hohenzollern family, to
remind them of the impropriety of their course. Once in
1628, the “White Lady” made her appearance at the palace
in Berlin and made the remark, in Latin, “I wait for
judgment.” Pending the incident for which she waited,
a Hohenzollern departed this life. Again, some hundred
or so of years later, she was seen at the Castle of Neuhaus,
in Bohemia, when she casually observed to the
princess who encountered her, “It is ten o’clock.” This
chronological information so affected the princess that
she died in a few weeks. The latest appearance of La
Dame Blanche was in 1879, again in the palace in Berlin;
immediately there occured the death of Prince Wald[emar].
We are informed that this persistent and long-lived
spectre was seen not long since by the night sentinels
on guard at the royal castle at Berlin—and now Berlin
society is all agog with a delicious fear and wonderment,
waiting for grim Death to cry.—Telegram.
One of the most singular freaks of nature ever falling
under our observation is the fungus growth in the possession
of Mr. Simon Snyder, keeper of the hotel at Conville,
Iowa. In May, 1882, Mr. Snyder lost a hand while
working in a planing mill at Portsmouth, Ohio, and the
amputated member was buried in his garden. Two
weeks after there grew out of the mound covering the
cairn a fungus plant of the exact form of the hand. It
was visited by hundreds of people many of whom thought
it was a portent of evil. On his removal to Conville, Mr.
Snyder brought the fungus preserved in alcohol. They
are of a dark brown color, and what is as remarkable as
the growth itself, the fore-finger in its shortened length is
a reproduction of the original which had been amputated
two years before. It will pay visitors to Conville to see
this wonderful duplication.
How did it get there?—We saw on Tuesday afternoon
a perfectly formed, apparently human hand, that
of an infant, taken from the centre of a new-grown potato,
in a field near town. The formation is so perfect that
the smallest fibres and ligaments are quite apparent, and
by touching the thumb or wrist the motion is felt
throughout the whole hand.—From the Cape Breton Advocate.
The old writers on Astrology and Magic give voluminous
directions for gathering herbs and plants at certain
periods during the waxing and waning of the Moon; but
the more modern professors of the art, for the most part
reject these formulas and rely rather upon the nature of
the plants themselves, and upon the predominating stellar
influences at the time their juices are expressed and
prepared for use, for the efficacy of the various vegetable
medicines used in Astrological Pharmacy.
An English Astrologer who published a work on Chiromancy
in 1671, insists in his preface thereto, that any
plant bearing a resemblance to a portion of the human
frame, is a specific for the diseases of the member which
it is assimilated to. He gives several illustrations of his
opinion, a few of which, modernized from the quaint and
somewhat coarse language of the book, are cited below.
How far facts will bear out the doctrine of affinities
laid down by the author, the reader can ascertain by
experiment.
Maiden Hair and the Moss of Quinces resemble the
fibres of the head. Hence a decoction thereof is good for
baldness.
Plants resembling the figure of the heart are comforting
thereto. Therefore the Citron-apple, Fuller’s Thistle,
Spikenard, Balm, Mint, White-beet, parsley, and Motherwort,
which bear in leaves and roots a heart-like form
are congenial to that organ.
Herbs that simulate the shape of the lungs, as Sage,
Lungwort, Hounds-tongue and Camphrey, are good for
pulmonary complaints,
Vegetable productions like in figure to the ears, as the
leaves of Folefoot or wild Spikenard rightly prepared as
a conserve and eaten, improve the hearing and memory.
Oil extracted from the shells of sea-snails, which have the
turnings and curvature of the ears, also tends wonderfully
to the cure of deafness.
When plants resemble the nose in their configuration,
as the leaves of the Wild Water Mint; they are beneficial
in restoring the sense of smell.
Certain plants having a semblance of the womb—as
Birthwort or Heartwort, Ladies’ Seal or Briony, etc.,
conduce much to a safe accouchement.
Shrubs and Herbs like unto the bladder and gall are excellent
for those parts; as Night-shade, Alkakenge and
Nux Visicaria. These relieve the gravel and stone.
Herbs formed like the milt, as Miltwort, Spleenwort,
and Lupins, are recommended for the strengtheing of that
part of the human viscera.
Plants that are liver-shaped, as the herb Trinity, Liverwort,
Agarick, Fermitory and Figs, are efficacious in
bilious diseases.
Walnuts, Indian Nuts, Leeks and the root of Ragwort,
because of their form, are said when duly prepared to
further generation and prevent sterility.
Herbs and Seeds, in shape like the teeth, as Toothwort,
Pine Kernel, etc., preserve the dental organization.
Plants of knobbed form, like the knuckles or joints, as
Galingale and the Knotty Odoriferous rush (Calamus,)
are good for spinal complaints, renal diseases, foot gout,
knee swellings, and all joint pains whatsoever.
Oily vegetable products, as the Filbert, Walnut,
Almond, etc., tend to fatness of body. Plants naturally
lean emaciate those who take them; as Sarsaparilla or
long-leaved Rosa Solie.
Fleshy plants make flesh for the eaters; for instance the
Onion, Leek and Colewort. Certain plants fortify and
brace the nerves; for example, the Sensitive plant, Nettles,
the roots of Mallorus, the herb Neuras, etc. The
same are to be used as outward applications.
Herbs milky in their substance propagate milk; as Lettuce
and the fruit of the Almond and Fig trees.
Plants of a serous nature purge the noxious humors
between the flesh and the skin, as Spurge and Scamony.
Herbs whose acidity turns milk to curd, are said to
lead to procreation. Such are Gallium, and the seeds of
Spurge.
Those semples that obstruct the coagulation of milk, as
Rue mixed with Cummin, will relieve a sore breast when
the milk is knotted in it, if applied thereto.
Plants that are hollow, as the stalks of Grain, Reeds,
Leeks, Garlick, etc., are good to purge, open and soothe
the hollow parts of the body.
The following from “Hermeppus Redivivus,” a work
now out of print, prescribes the method of preparing the
famous Elixir of Life. This supposed specific for the
renewal and perpetuation of youth and beauty, was
sought for during the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth
centuries with as much avidity as the philosopher’s stone,
which the alchemists believed would, like the touch of
Midas, change all meaner substances into the regal metal—Gold.
PREPARED FROM BALM.
“In the proper season of the year, when the herb is at
its full growth, and, consequently, its juices in their whole
vigor, gather at the fittest time of the day a sufficient
quantity of balm, wipe it clean, and pick it; then put it in
a stone mortar, and, by laborious beating, reduce it into
a thin pap.
“Take this glutinous and odoriferous substance and
put it into a bolt-head, which is to be hermetically sealed,
and then place it in a dunghill, or some gentle heat equivalent
thereto, where it must digest for forty days.
“When it is taken out, the matter will appear clearer
than ever, and have a quicker scent. Then separate the
grosser parts, which, however, are, not to be thrown
away. Put this liquid into a gentle bath, that the remaining
gross particles may perfectly subside. In the
meantime, dry calcine, and extract the fixed salt of the
grosser parts, separated as before mentioned, which fixed
salt is to be joined to the liquor when filtrated.
“Next take sea salt, well purified, melt it, and, by
setting it in a cold place, it will run, and become clear
and limpid. Take equal parts of both liquors, mix thoroughly,
and having hermetically sealed them in a proper
glass, let them be carefully exposed to the sun, in the
warmest season of the year, for about six weeks. At the
end of this space, the prim muens of the balm will appear
swimming on the top like a bright green oil, which is to
be carefully separated and preserved. Of this oil, a few
drops taken in a glass of wine for several days together,
will bring to pass those wonders that are reported of the
Countess of Desmond and others; for it will entirely
change the juices of the human body, reviving the decaying
frame of life, and restoring the spirits of long lost
youth.”
The author who records this curious and wonderful
discovery, remarks, “If after the medicine is thus prepared,
any doubt be had of its efficacy, or of its manner
of operation, let a few drops be given every day on raw
meat to any old dog or cat, and in less than a fortnight,
by the changing of their coats and other incontestable
changes, the virtue of this preparation will sufficiently
appear.”
This is the preparation of balm which Mr. Boyle (the
celebrated chemist) mentions in his works; and in which
he tells us that “Dr. Le Fevre” gave him an account of
it, “in the presence of a famous physician, and another
virtuoso, to whom he applied, as knowing the truth of
what he said, that an intimate friend of his, whom,” says
Mr. Boyle, “he named to me, having prepared the primums
ens of balm, to satisfy himself the better of its effects,
made a trial upon himself, and took of it according
to the prescription, for above a fortnight; long before
which, his nails, both of his hands and feet, began to
loosen themselves from the skin, (but without pain,)
which, at length, falling off of their own accord, this gentleman
keeps yet by him in a box for a rarity; but would
not pursue the trial any farther, being satisfied with what
he had found, and being in no need of such physic; but
having given of the same medicated wine, for ten
or twelve days, to a woman that served in his house, and
who was near seventy years of age, without letting her
know what he expected, the peculiar signs of youth in females
became so apparent that she was alarmed, and he
did not prosecute the experiment any farther. And when
I asked,” says Mr. Boyle, “why he made no trial on beasts,
it was answered, that though he had but little of the medicine,
yet he put apart an old hen, and moistening her
food with some drops of it for a week, about the sixth day
she began to moult her feathers by degrees till she became
naked; but before a fortnight was passed, she began to regain
others, which, when they were come to their full
growth, appeared fair and better colored than at first.”
And he added, “that besides that her crest was raised
she also laid more eggs than she was wont to do before.”
In our childhood, our mothers’ maids have so terrified
us with an ugly devil having horns on his head, fire in his
mouth, and a tail at his breech; eyes like a basin, fangs
like a dog, claws like a bear, a skin like a negro, and a
voice roaring like a lion, whereby we start and are afraid
when we hear one cry Boh! and they have so frayed us
with bull-beggars, spirits, witches, unchins, elves, hags,
faries, satyrs, pans, fauhes, sylvans, kitt-with-the-candlestick,
tritrons, centaurs, dwarfs, giants, imps, calcars, conjureres,
nymphs, changelings, incubus, Robin Goodfellow,
the spoorn, the man-in-the-oak, the hellwain, the firedrake,
the puckle, Tom Thum, Hobgoblin, Tom Tumbler,
Boneless, and such other bugbears, that we are afrad
of our own shadows, insomuch that some never fear the
devil but on a dark night; and then a polled sheep is a
perilous beast, and many times is taken for our father’s
soul, especially in a churchyard, where a right hardy man
hitherto durst not to have passed by night but his hair
would stand upright.
It is asserted by several authorities that no less than
three thousand persons were executed for Witchcraft during
that dark period of heretical pravity, the Great Rebellion.
Now, as “Rebellion,” according to the express assurance
of the Prophet Samuel (1 Sam. xv. 23) “is as the
sin of Witchcraft,” no hearty believer in God’s revelation
can be at all surprised to find that both Witchcraft and
Rebellion in an atmosphere of heresy flourished together,
under that odious tyrant and hypocritical fanatic, Oliver
Cromwell: when the altar was thrown down and both
King and Archbishop were murdered.
In 1488, the country four leagues around Constance was
laid waste by lightning and tempest; and two women being,
by fair means or foul, made to confess themselves
guilty as the cause of the devastation, suffered death.
About 1515, five hundred persons were executed at Geneva,
under the character of “Protestant witches;” from
which we may suppose many suffered for heresy. Forty-eight
witches were burnt at Ravensburgh within four
years, as Hutchison reports, on the authority of Mengho,
the author of the Malleus Maleficarum. In Lorraine, the
learned inquisitor, Remigius, boasts that he put to death
nine hundred people in fifteen years. As many were banished
from that country; so that whole towns were on the
point of becoming desolate. In 1524, a thousand persons
were put to death in one year at Coma, in Italy, and
about one hundred every year for several years.
In the beginning of the next century, the persecution
of witches broke out in France with a fury which was
hardly conceivable, and multitudes were burnt amid that
gay and lively people.
The dream of the so-called “Swaffham Tinker” is
singular, and may well be here reproduced, because it
represents an example of the practical results of dreaming,
which is quite worthy of consideration:—
“This Tinker, a hard-working, industrious man, one
night dreamed that if he took a journey to London, and
placed himself at a certain spot on London Bridge, he
should meet one who would tell him something of great
importance to his future prospects. The Tinker, on whom
the dream made a deep impression, related it fully to
his wife in the morning; who, however, half-laughed at
him and half-scolded him for his folly in heeding such idle
fancies. Next night he is said to have re-dreamed the
dream; and again on the third night, when the impression
was so powerful on his mind that he determined, in
spite of the remonstrances of his wife and the ridicule of
his neighbors, to go to London and see the upshot of it.
Accordingly he set off for the metropolis on foot, reached
it late on the third day (the distance was ninety miles),
and after the refreshment of a night’s rest, took his
station next day on a part of the Bridge answering to the
description in his dream. There he stood all day, and all
the next, and all the third, without any communication
as to the purpose of his journey; so that towards night,
on the third day he began to lose patience and confidence
in his dream, inwardly cursed his folly in disregarding his
wife’s counsel, and resolved next day to make the best of
his way home. He still kept his station, till late in the
evening, when just as he was about to depart, a stranger
who had noticed him standing steadfastly and with
anxious look on the same spot for some days, accosted
him, and asked him what he waited there for. After a
little hesitation, the Tinker told him his errand, though
without acquainting him with the name of the place
whence he came. The stranger enjoyed a smile at the
rustic’s simplicity, and advised him to go home and for
the future pay no attention to dreams. ‘I myself,’ said
he, ‘if I were disposed to put faith in such things, might
now go a hundred miles into the country upon a similar
errand. I dreamed three nights this week that if I went
to a place called Swaffham in Norfolk, and dug under an
apple tree in a certain garden on the north side of the
town I should find a box of money; but I have something
else to do than run after such idle fancies! No, no, my
friend; go home, and work well at your calling, and you
will find there the riches you are seeking here.’ The astonished
Tinker did not doubt that this was the communication
he had been sent to London to receive, but
he merely thanked the stranger for his advice, and went
away avowing his intention to follow it up. Next day
he set for home, and on his arrival there said little to his
wife touching his journey; but next morning he rose betimes
and began to dig on the spot he supposed to be
pointed out by the stranger. When he had got a few feet
down, the spade struck upon something hard, which
turned out to be an iron chest. This he quickly carried
to his house, and when he had with difficuly wrenched
open the lid, found it, to his great joy, to be full of
money. After securing his treasure, he observed on the
lid of the box an inscription, which, unlearned as he was,
he could not decipher. But by a stratagem he got the
incription read without any suspicion on the part of his
neighbors by some of the Grammar School lads, and
found it to be—
‘Where this stood
Is another twice as good.’
And in truth on digging again the lucky Tinker disinterred,
below the place where the first chest had lain, a
second twice as large, also full of gold and silver coin. It
is stated that, become thus a wealthy man, the Tinker
showed his thankfulness to Providence by building a new
chancel to the church, the old one being out of repair.
And whatever fiction the marvellous taste of those ages
may have mixed up with the tale, certain it is that there
is shown to this day a monument in Swaffham Church,
having an effigy in marble, said to be that of the Tinker
with his Dog at his side and his tools and implements of
trade lying about him.”
Among the various histories of singular dreams and corresponding
events, the following, which occurred in the
early part of the eighteenth century, seems to merit being
here placed on record. Its authenticity will appear
from the relation; and it may surely be maintained that a
more extraordinary concurrence of fortuitous and accidental
circumstances can scarcely be produced or paralleld:—
Cassius of Parma, who had espoused the cause of Marc
Anthony, fled to Athens after the battle of Actium. While
sleeping in his apartments there, he saw a man enter his
chamber, an individual with dark complexion and dishevelled
hair, very tall and stout. Cassius demanded who
he was; to which the phantom replied, “I am your evil
genius.” The dreamer arose in a fright, and seeing no
one present, summoned his slaves, inquiring if any among
them had seen a stranger enter the appartment. An examination
showed the doors of the house to have been
firmly closed, so that it was impossible for any one to
enter. Cassius persuaded that he had been the victim of
some chemical illusion, again went to sleep, but the same
vision presented itself a second time, addressing him with
the same words. Cassius, troubled, arose from his couch
and summoned lights. At early day-break he was assassinated
by order of the Emperor Augustus.
Two Arcedian friends, journeying together, arrived at
Megara, at which place the one took lodgings at the
house of a friend, while his companion put up at a public
tavern. The traveler lodging at his friend’s, was visited
in a dream by his comrade, who supplicated him to come
and extricate him from a trap set for him by the innkeeper.
He awoke suddenly, arose, dressed and hastened
himself towards the tavern, when an afterthought impelled
him to return, and he again undressed and went to
sleep. Again his comrade presented himself, but this
time covered with blood, and beseeching him to avenge
his murder. The phantom informed his fellow traveler
that he had been treacherously assassinated by the tavern
keeper, and his body concealed beneath a dunghill outside
the city gates. Terrified at this second appiration, the
Arcadian hesitated no longer, but going to the place designated,
he discovered his friend’s corpse, and was therefore
enabled to bring the murderer to justice.
A tradesman of Paris, sleeping in bed with his wife,
dreamed that he heard the voice exclaiming to him: “I
have now finished forty years, seven months, and twenty-nine
days of labor, and I am happy.” The wife, sleeping
by her husband’s side, had the same dream and upon
awakening in the morning went forth, and without mentioning
the occurrence, procured a lottery-ticket bearing
the numbers 40-7-29. The same day the numbers came
out, and the tradesman lamented his indiscretion in not
taking the advice of his nocturnal visitor. His sorrow
was turned into joy when he learned that his wife, profiting
by her dream, had drawn the grand prize in the Royal
Lottery.
An old lady of Paris was in the habit of encouraging
her niece by promises of wealth, which she never fulfilled;
extenuating her procrastination from year to year, by recourse
of ingenious expedients, and she finally died.
Shortly afer her decease, the aunt appeared during the
night-time and instructed her niece to remove the centre
tile of their hearth, where she would discover the oft promised
treasure. The young girl obeyed the injunction,
but discovered in the cavity nothing save a heap of
cinders. In vexation of spirit, the niece railled vehemently
against the duplicity of a relative deceiving her after
death. On the following night, however, the phantom
again appeared, and without saying a word, designated
four numbers apparently on the wall. Although placing
little reliance upon the injunction which she conceived to
relate to a lottery (then the town talk), the niece resolved
to try her luck, especially as the ticket offered for her
purchase by the dealer bore the same numbers designated
by the apparition. Subsequently, these numbers came
out in the order indicated, and the girl came into possession
of four hundred thousand francs.
Popular Superstitions.—Why, however, north country
people are so persistent in their refusal to give one
another a pin it is not easy to discover, as even they
themselves cannot give the origin and reason of this superstition.
When asked for a pin they invariably say,
“You may take one, but mind, I do not give it.” It may,
perhaps, have some connection with the vulgar prejudice
against giving a knife or other sharp instrument, as mentioned
by Gay in his “Shepherd’s Week.”
But woe is me! such presents luckless prove,
For knives, they tell me, always sever love.
—a supposition as popular now as in days gone by. Another
fact associated with pins will doubtless interest those
of the fair sex about to enter on the happy state of matrimony.
Thus it is still a prevalent belief in certain places
that a bride in removing her bridal robe and chaplet at
the completion of the marriage ceremonies, must take
special care to throw away every pin worn on this eventful
day. Woe to the bride who keeps even one pin used
in the marriage toilet. Woe also to the bridesmaids if
they retain any of them, as their chances of marriage will
thereby be materially lessened, and anyhow they must
give up all hope of being wedded before the following
Whitsuntide. On the other hand, in Sussex on her return
home from church is often robbed of all the pins
about her dress by her single friends present, from the belief
that whoever possesses one of them will be married
in the course of a year. Much excitement and amusement
are occasionally caused by the youthful competitors
for this supposed charm, and the bride herself is not unfrequently
the victim of rather rough treatment.
A poor peasant dwelling in the vicinity of Rheims, in
Champagne, saw, one night, during his slumbers, a young
man, who taking him by the hand, conducted him to the
base of an old wall, where, after designating a huge stone
recommended him to raise it up on the morrow, he suddenly
vanished. The peasant followed his advice, and
found the stone indicated in his dream, which upon being
displaced, revealing a vase filled with golden coins—enriching
the dreamer and his family.
The following account of a remarkable case of somnambulism
contributed to the American Journal of Medical
Science by Dr. Belden, an able practitioner, who attended
the lady afflicted with these somnambulic paroxysms:
* * * “After several attempts to keep her in bed, it was
determined to suffer her to take her own course. Released
from restraint, she dressed herself, went down stairs
and proceeded to make preparations for breakfast. She
set the table, arranged the various articles with the utmost
precision, went into a dark room to a closet at the
most remote corner of it, from which she took the coffee
cups, placed them on a tray, turned it sideways to pass
through the door, avoided all intervening obstacles, and
deposited the whole safely on the table. She then went
into the pantry, the blinds of which were shut and the
doors closed after her. She then skimmed the milk,
poured the cream into one cup and the milk into another
without spilling a drop. She then cut the bread, placed
it regularly on the plate, and divided the slices in the
middle. In fine, she went through the whole operation
of preparing breakfast with as much precision as she
could in open day, and this with her eyes closed, and
without any light except that of one lamp which was
standing in the room to enable the family to observe her
operations. She finally returned voluntarily to bed, and
on finding the table arranged for breakfast when she
made her appearance in the morning inquired why she
had been suffered to sleep while another performed her
duty. None of the transactions of the preceding night
had left the slightest impression on her mind. In one
instance she not only arranged the table for a meal, but
actually prepared a dinner with her eyes closed.”
John Knox, the great Scottish Reformer, when upon
his death bed, experienced a most remarkable presentiment
as to the fate of his friend Kirkaldy of Grange, who,
during the civil war of that period, was holding the Castle
of Edinburgh in the cause of Mary Queen of Scots and of
the Anti-Protestant party. The particulars are in this
wise related by Calderwood, the historian, whose testimony
is unimpeachable:
“John Knox, being on his death bed, sent for his colleague
and successor, Mr. Lawson, Mr. Lindsay, Minister
of Leith, and the elders and deacons of Edinburgh, all of
whom he addressed in a farewell speech.
“They were departing, when Knox called back Lindsay
and Lawson, and desired to speak with them in private.
‘Weel, brother,’ said he addressing Lindsay, ‘I have desired
all this day to have had you, that I may send you
to yon man in the Castle, whom you know I have loved
so dearly. Go, I pray you, to him, and tell him I have
sent you to him yet once to warn him and bid him in the
name of God, leave the evil cause and give over the
Castle. If not, he shall be brought down over the walls
of it with shame, and hang against the sun. So hath God
assured me.’ Lindsay went to the Castle accordingly and
delivered Knox’s message; but Kirkaldy, after conferring
with Secretary Letington, said, ‘Go, tell Mr. Knox he is
but a drything prophet.’ Mr. Lindsay returned to Mr.
Knox and reported how he had discharged his commission.
‘Well!’ said Knox, ‘I have been earnest with my
God anent these two men. For the one, I am sorry so
shall befall him; yet, God assureth me that there is mercy
for his soul. For the other I have no warrant that it shall
be well with him.’
“Kirkaldy maintained the Castle for some months after
Knox’s death, but was at last forced to surrender, whereupon
he was condemed to death as a traitor and hanged
at Edinburgh on the 3d of August, 1572, at four o’clock in
the afternoon, the sun being west.”
The Prince of Navarre, afterwards King Henry the IV.,
of France, while playing at dice with a company at the
court of Charles IX., on the eve of St. Bartholomew,
observed several drops of blood to fall upon the cloth,
which spread consternation among the players.
On the day upon which Gen. Arnold died in Nova
Scotia, the tree under which Major Andre was captured,
near Tarrytown, fell, although there was no storm.
On the eve of the assassination of Julius Cæsar, the
temple of Jupiter Stabor trembled to its foundation, and
an enormous piece of rock fell from the height of the
capitol, and carried with it a Roman standard bearer,
who was on guard, at the opening of the road.
FACTS VERSUS THE DICTUM OF SCIENCE—WHAT
A TENNESSEAN CAN DO.
A New York Paper publishes the following item of Interest:
I have seen several articles in regard to the divining
rod. I know that science does not recognize such a thing,
but were not all the sciences tested and proved by practical
experiment before they were recognized by the scientific
world? There is a man in this country who believes
as strongly in the divining rod as the navigator does in
the mariner’s compass. He is not an illiterate, superstitious
man, but is as well informed on all subjects as any
laboring man you ever met. He does not claim that he
is enabled to locate a stream of water or a vein of mineral
beneath the surface of the earth by any virtue contained
in the rod, nor is it by the art of hocus pocus, but it is
in and through the influence of electricity, with which
his system is abundantly charged.
You will say: “If this be true why does he not go to
some mining country and make himself and others rich
by locating mineral veins?” He is a man that has had
to labor very hard all his life. Now he is old and infirm,
and unable to travel. This discovery with him dates only
a few years back. His field for practice and experiment
is limited consequently he gains knowledge on the subject
slowly.
I will mention a few of the things that he claims he can
do with the rod; He can locate a stream of water, and
where the ground is perfectly level, measure its depth below
the surface as accurately as you can measure it after
the well is dug. He does not claim the depth within less
than a foot, because the surface is so seldom perfectly
level. There are hundreds of men in East Tennessee that
will testify to this fact from actual experience. Some of
them are as responsible men as there are in the State.
He has never failed to convert any man who would go
with him, no matter how sceptical, and he has certificates
from a number of as intelligent men as there are in Tennessee.
I cannot give you, in this communication, any
idea of the various means by which he is enabled to demonstrate
these things, but if you have any curiosity on
the subject, and will answer this communication, like you
do all others, you will elicit something from him that may
be of interest to you.
Another writer says: “The divining rod is only another
exemplification of a power not yet recognized. With a
piece of witch hazel I discovered the Witch Hazel Coal
Mines. I told the number of feet a shaft would have to
be sunk to reach the coal, and even gave the thickness of
the vein. I got $5,000 for locating the Witch Hazel mines
and am also paid 12½ cents a ton for every ton of coal
taken out of them.” John R. Whitelaw, Superintendent
of the Cleveland Water Works, says: “At Geauga Lake,
Mr. Latimer showed the power of the divining rod.
After he had cut one I asked him to go over a little stream
that we saw running from the bank. We knew that the
water was there, and we wanted to see whether the rod
would work over it. It was surprising. He held the
prongs so firmly in his hands that the green bark twisted
off in his palms.”
Water witches are highly regarded in the far West.
One man in particular has the reputation in Colorado, of
being a trustworthy diviner, and he is always in request.
By trade he is a well-digger, but to this commonplace
occupation he has added the profession of water finder.
And he is not exclusively employed by silly people, but
by practical men of business. Thus he is designating for
a railroad company all the wells along the new line which
they are constructing. The instrument of divination is a
forked twig, by preference a mulberry.
In the manuscript Discourse on Witchcraft, 1705, written
by John Bell, p. 41, I find the following account from
Theophylact on the subject of rabdomanteia, or rod divination:
“They set up two staffs, and having whispered
some verses and incantations, the staffs fell by the operation
of dæmons. Then they considered which way each
of them fell, forward or backward, to the right or left
hand, and are agreeably given responses, having made
use of the fall of their staffs for their signs.”
With the divining rod seems connected a lusus nature
of ash tree bough, resembling the litui of the Roman
augurs and the Christian pastoral staff, which still obtains
a place, if not on this account I know not why, in the
catalogue of popular superstitions. Seven or eight years
ago I remember to have seen one of these, which I
thought extremely beautiful and curious, in the house of
an old woman in Beeralston, Devonshire, of whom I
would most gladly have purchased it; but she declined
parting with it on any account, thinking it would be unlucky
to do so.
Divination by the rod or wand is mentioned in the prophecy
of Ezekiel. Hosea, too, reproaches the Jews as
being infected with the like superstition: “My people ask
counsel at their stocks, and their staff declareth unto
them.” Chap. iv. 12. Not only the Chaldeans used rods
for divination, but almost every nation which has pretended
to that science has practiced the same method.
Herodotus mentions it as a custom of the Alani, and Tacitus
of the old Germans.
The earliest means made use of by the miners for the
discovery of the lode was the divining rod. The method
of procedure was to cut the twig of twelve months’
growth, into a forked shape, and to hold this by both
hands in a peculiar way, walking across the land until
the twig bent, which was taken as an indication of the
locality of a lode. The person who generally practices
this divination boasts himself to be the seventh son of a
seventh son. The twig of hazel bends in his hands to the
conviction of the miners that ore is present; but then the
peculiar manner in which the twig is held, bringing muscular
action to bear upon it, accounts for its gradual deflection,
and the circumstances of the strata walked over
always containing ore gives a further credit to the process
of divination.
The vulgar notion, still prevalent in the north of England,
of the hazel’s tendency to a vein of lead ore, seam
or stratum of coal, &c., seems to be a vestige of this rod
divination.
The virgula divina, or bocalns divinatorius, is a forked
branch in the form of a Y, cut off an hazel stick, by
means whereof people have pretended to discover mines,
springs, &c., underground. The method of using it is
this: the person who breaks it, walking very slowly over
the places where he suspects mines or springs may be,
the effluvia exhaling from the metals, or vapor from the
water impregnating the wood, makes it dip, or incline,
which is the sign of a discovery.
We read, in the same work for Nov. 1751, xxi. 507:
“So early as Agricola, the divining rod was in much request,
and has obtained great credit for its discovery
where to dig for metals and springs of water: for some
years past its reputation has been on the decline, but
lately it has been revived with great success by an ingenious
gentleman, who, from numerous experiments, hath
good reason to believe its effects to be more than imagination.
He says, that hazel and willow rods, he has by
experience found, will actually answer with all persons in
a good state of health, if they are used with moderation
and at some distance of time, and after meals, when the
operator is in good spirits. The hazel, willow, and elm,
are all attracted by springs of water; some perhaps have
the virtue intermittently; the rod, in their hands, will attract
one half hour, and repel the next. The rod is attracted
by all metals, coals, amber, and lime-stone, but
with different degrees of strength. The best rods are
those from the hazel, or nut tree, as they are pliant and
tough, and cut in the winter months. A shoot that terminates
equally forked is to be met with, two single ones,
of a length and size, may be tied together with a thread,
and will answer as well as the other.”
The Demonstration of Metallic Transmutation,
Affinity, and the Secret of Philosophers; or, How
to Change Lead into Quicksilver.—Let there be one
pound of lead melted in an earthen vessel, and then put
into it also one pound of that tinny metal which is usually
called by the name of marcasite; and when they are
both melted together you must stir them up and down,
and temper them to a pefect medley with a wooden ladle.
In the mean space you must have four pounds of quicksilver
warmed in another vessel standing by, to cast in
upon that compounded metal, for unless your quicksilver
be warm it will not close nor agree with your metals; then
temper your quicksilver and your metal together for a
while, and presently after cast it into cold water; so shall
it not congeal in any hard lump, but float on the top of
the water, and be very quick and lively.
To Tincture Silver into Gold.—Make first a tart lye,
put quicklime into a pot, whose bottom is full of many
small holes, put a piece of wood or tile-shard upon it,
then by degrees pour in the powder and hot water, and
by the narrow holes at the bottom let it drain into a
clean earthen vessel under it; do this again, to make it
exceeding tart. Powder filbium and put into this, that
it may evaporate into the thin air; let it boil at an easy
fire, for when it boils the water will be of a purple color;
then strain it into a clean vessel through a linen cloth;
again, pour on the lye on the powders that remain, and
let it boil so long at the fire, till the water seems of a
bloody color, no more. Then boil the lye that is colored,
putting fire under, till the water be all exhaled; but the
powder that remains being dry, with the oil of tartar
dried and dissolved, must be cast again upon plates made
equal of parts of gold and silver, within an earthen crucible;
cover it so long with coals, and renew your work,
till it be perfectly like to gold.
Iron changed into Brass.—It is reported that in the
Mountain Carpatusan, Hill of Pannonia, at a certain town
called Smolinitum, there is a lake, in which are three
channels, the waters of which are so impregnated with
copper and gold, that upon adding absolute vitriol portions
of pure gold become deposited.
The Sympathetic and Occult Virtues of Plants,
Animals, Metals, &c.—In these few remarks on the
sympathetic influences I have ventured to turn the light
of a great central and positive science upon the mysteries,
which all men, who dare think, are anxious to penetrate—for
illustration:
If we bury a crab for three months in horse-dung, he
will turn to a scorpion. But if you thus bury a scorpion
or lizard, he will die instantly. Some, by the use of eels
and brandy, cure a person of drunkenness. But how?
Why, simply by the power of sympathy. But once for
all, let me here say, that this knowledge I cheerfully impart
for the good of mankind. And every wise person
will see in a moment that great care must be exerted
where knowledge might be used for a bad purpose. But
to proceed. A black cat drops dead at the sight of a Bengal
tiger; a cat of any other color is not affected in the
least. A snake will kill a bird by looking at it for the
space of fifteen minutes; but a snake can produce no effect
on men or animals. Why? Because the proper sympathies
are not brought into action. A rat will die by
being compelled to look at or be near an English ferret.
If an ox is killed, and let lie in a tight house with plenty
of glass windows to admit the light, he will in a short
time be converted into millions of bees. If he is killed
and let lie upon an open field, he will soon be converted
into millions of maggots.
Behold the beautiful doctrine of universal affinity or
sympathy! If a lady, with a fresh breast of milk, shall
milk a portion of it into a bag of corks, very soon thereafter
her milk will all dry away. Any person who will
wear an eelskin around his body will never have a cramp.
But there is the gut of the ourang-outang, if worn around
the body, will cause a cramp as long as the person shall
wear it. Persons might be killed in this way, and they
would be ignorant of the true cause. If one have a severe
colic, and hold a live duck to the belly, the colic will immediately
remove, but the duck dies. If a chicken, or
any other living thing, is thus held to the belly, it produces
no visible effect, either one way or the other.
The head of a hare being burned, will bring serpents
together; but a fume of peacock feathers being made,
will disperse the serpents. If a piece of meat is thrown
to the dogs, they will seize it with great avidity; but if a
jasper stone be thrown out with the meat, the dogs will
instantly run away, with very great fright. Fenelon says
that if we wear the clothing of the dead, that it does
wonderfully shorten our lives.
The Cure of Diseases by Magical, Celestial, and
Sympathetic Means.—Among a variety of examples, the
loadstone is one most remarkable proof of the sympathy
we speak of. However to hasten to the point. Among
stones, those which resemble the rays of the sun by their
golden sparkling prevent the falling-sickness and poisons,
if worn on the finger. The stone which is called oculis
folis, being in figure like the apple of the eye, from which
shines forth a ray, comforts the brain and strengthens
sight. The carbuncle, which shines by night, has a virtue
against all airy and vaporous poisons. The chrysolite
stone, of a light green color, when held against the
sun, there shines in it a ray like a star of gold; this is singularly
good for the lungs, and cures asthmatical complaints;
and if it be bored through, and the hollow filled
with the mane of an ass, and bound to the left arm, it
chases away all foolish and idle imaginations and melancholy
fears, and drives away folly. The stone called iris,
which is like crystal in color, being found with six corners,
when held in the shade, and the sun suffered to shine
through it, represents a natural rainbow in the air. The
stone heliotropium, green, like a jasper or emerald, beset
with red specks, makes the wearer constant, renowned,
and famous, and conduces to long life; there is likewise
another wonderful property in this stone, and that is,
that it so dazzles the eyes of men that it causes the bearer
to be invisible; but there must be applied to it the herb
bearing the same name, viz., heliotropium, or the sunflower;
and these kind of virtues Albertus Magnus and
William of Paris mention in their writings. The jacinth
also possesses virtue from the sun against poisons, pestilences,
and pestiferous vapors; likewise it renders the
bearer pleasant and acceptable; conduces also to gain
money; being simply held in the mouth, it wonderfully
cheers the heart and strengthens the mind. Then there
is the pyrophi, of a red mixture, which Albertus Magnus
reports that Æsculapius makes mention of in one of his
epistles to Octavious Cæsar, saying: “There is a certain
poison, so intensely cold, which preserves the heart of
man” being taken out from burning; so that if it be put
into the fire for any time, it is turned into a stone, which
stone is called hyrophilus. It possesses a wonderful virtue
against poison, and it infallibly renders the wearer
thereof renowned and dreadful to his enemies. Apollonius
is reported to have found a stone (which will attract
other stones, as the loadstone does iron) most powerful against
all poisons; it is spotted like the panther, and therefor
some naturalists have given this stone the name of
pantherur; Aaron calls it evanthum; and some, on accunt
of its variety, call it pantochras. It is by such and similar
methods the magicians, prophets, and seers of the
Middle Ages and biblical times, and many of the magi or
wise men of ancient ages, succeeded in curing numbers
of diseases, without any medicine whatever; these men
were the true magicians, or ancient physicians, and of the
race of Hindoos, Israelites, Jews, Arabians, Chinese, Assyrians,
Egyptians, Chaldeans, and many of our own
times. They were usually named Signa Magna, to distinguish
them from the jugglers and sleight-of-hand tricksters,
who exhibited themselves for money, and whose
performances of Legerdemain consisted of a blustering
volubility of words, thus diverting the attention of their
audiences while they, or their accomplices, of which they
traveled with one or more, made the necessary changes
in their paraphernalia to deceive the sense of vision, and
apparently reverse the order of things. No uncommon
part of their programme was to obtain the loan of large
sums of money from the wealthy and moneyed classes,
thus getting a knowledge of the fact of such a sum being
in their possession, and afterward by fraud, violence, or
digital dexterity, securing it to themselves. The modern
conjurer is, however, usually a gentleman of the highest
principle, and always prefaces his exhibitions by the statement,
that by dexterity he proposes to deceive. Most of
the apparatus employed is double, or contains two partitions,
which by simple turning, the contents are apparently
changed.
Allumina Changed to Silver—Late Process.—Put
it into a crucible, first breaking it into small fragments,
bring it to a white heat for five or six hours, until the
metal will stand firm on a red-hot plate of iron; then
sprinkle it with a mixture of vinegar and sal ammoniac
(parts equal), when it is cold, put it again into the furnace,
and keep at a white heat for three days and three
nights, the last three or four hours adding a little pure
lead to make it ductile; you now break it once more into
small fragments and replace it in the furnace, adding to
it little pills made of lime, saltpetre, and brimstone, and
by this means our mixture becomes incorporated into a
pretty good silver.
To Cause Letters, Papers, &c., to Disappear.—Valivoni,
an old magician, of the time of Agrippa, says: “If
you take uphorbium, bdellium, gum armoniac, the roots
of both hellebores, the loadstone, and a little sulphur,
and incorporate them altogether with the blood of a hart,
the blood of an elephant, and the blood of a black cat,
and sprinkle it near the papers to be removed, that it unseals
them and brings them to your presence, or just
where you desire.”
To Strike Fear and Terror into the Heart of an
Enemy.—Pythagoras says: “That if a flame be put into
the skull of a murderer, and the flame of your enemy
written therein, it will strike the person whose name is
so written with fear and trembling, and he will speedily
seek your forgiveness and become a steadfast friend.”
By what means Magicians and Necromancers call
forth the souls of the dead.
It is manifest that the souls after death do as yet love
their bodies which they left, as those souls do whose
bodies want due burial, or have left their bodies by violent
death, and yet wander about their carcasses in a
troubled and moist spirit, beings as it were, allured by
something that has an affinity with them, the means being
known, by which, in time past, they were joined to
their bodies, they be called forth and allured by the like
vapors, liquors and certain artificial lights, songs, sounds,
&c., which move the imaginative and spiritual harmony
of the soul, and sacred invocations, &c.
Necromancy has its name because it works on the
bodies of the dead, and gives answers by apparitions of
the dead, and subterraneous spirits, alluring them into
the carcasses of the dead by charms and infernal invocations,
and by deadly sacrifices and wicked oblations.
There are two kinds of necromancy: raising the carcasses,
which is not done without blood; the other in
which the calling up of the shadow only suffices. To conclude,
it works all its experiments by the carcasses of the
slain, and their bones and members, and what is from
them.
The Magic Crystal is a ball of pure virgin glass,
somewhat in the shape of an egg; the method of using it,
is to hold it in the palm of the right hand, retain it there
from eleven to twelve o’clock at night, in a dark room,
all the time concentrating your thoughts upon the object
you desire to see; about twelve o’clock, the crystal becomes
quite hot—now look steadily into it, and picture
of scenes that appear are transpiring with friends far
distant; in fact, it is asserted that the movements of any
one can be known, whether husband, wife, lover or friend.
SALEM WITCHES,
THE CORRECT ACCOUNT
OF THE
MASSACHUSETTS, U. S.
We now commence some detail of the witch persecution
from 1645 to the 2d charter, 1692, there stood upon the
statute book the old Cottonian law of 1645, against witchcraft,
a false recognition, by the highest authority of the
devil’s power to appear in the colony; nay, by strange
construction it was made an act of conjuration, a summons
to come forth, and which he was well pleased to
obey. Within one year after the statute recognition of
witchcraft, in the jurisdiction, a case occurred. It was in
Springfield upon the Connecticut river, and in the family
of the Rev. Mr. Moxam. Two of his children betook
themselves to extreme oddities in speech and behavior,
and it was readily supposed they were bewitched, but
there was no proof to fix the sorcery upon any one, until
three or four years afterwards, when an old woman of
settled witch reputation, upon close examination was said
to have confessed her guilt, and here the matter rested.
The case of Mrs. Margaret Jones of Charlestown was fatal.
She was reputed a witch of such extraordinary malignity,
that her touch would produce blindness, sickness at the
stomach and violent pains, and in 1648 she was tried and
executed. In disgust and distress, her husband went on
board a vessel to leave the country, and then the vessel
began to rock as if it would upset, and so continued for
twelve hours. Upon this the enemies of Jones procured
a warrant of arrest from the Governor and assistants, then
sitting at Boston; and when he was imprisoned, the vessel
became quiet. There were on board this vessel at the
time as she lay in Charles River, eighty horses, shipped
for Barbadoes, and this was the witchcraft that rocked
the vessel; and as we hear no more of Jones, no doubt
the assistants saw the error and released him. In 1652,
the year that old Massasoit and the Rev. John Cotton
died there was another case at Springfield. Hugh Parsons
was indicted for witchcraft. The jury found him guilty;
but the magistrates who tried the cause would not agree
to it and under a law of 1651, it was carried to the general
court, where the man was discharged.
The next, was the case of the widow Hibbins, whom
Gov. Endicot and the assistants hung for witchcraft May
27, 1656. Her husband was a rich Boston merchant, and
an assistant when the law against witchcraft was passed,
and thus he qualified his enemies in the devil’s name, to
put a halter about his wife’s neck. She was a haughty
dame and was not, they thought, sufficiently humbled by
her husband’s great loss of property in later life, and she
came under church discipline and censure. But this only
inflamed her hot temper, and a witch prosecution could
alone reduce her to reason. At her trial it was proved,
that having once seen two persons in the street talking,
she said she knew it was about her, and unhappily she
guessed right. This turned the case against her, and she
thus lost her life. At her trial they searched her body for
the devil’s mark as they did the Quaker maidens, Mary
Fisher and her friends in less than two months after; but
none were found. Before execution Mrs. Hibbons made
her will, and therein begged her friends to respect her
body, and give it a Christian burial. But the whole
colony rang with her story. It was exceedingly alarming
to the rulers that Satan should presume so high as an assistant’s
widow, and for more than thirty years there
were no witch executions here, although there were many
supposed cases of the offence.
In 1662 witchcraft passed over to Connecticut. In
Hartford at that time, there was imprisoned as a witch,
a Mrs. Greensmith and the peculiar art that was used to
entrap and convict her deserves our notice. In the same
place there lived a girl whom they called Ann Cole, and
much admired for her beauty and ingenuity. She understood
the Dutch and French languages, rare attainments
then, but which of themselves would hardly excite suspicion
to her prejudice, even in the realm of blue laws. But
she possessed in addition to these, the power of ventriloquism
in a high degree, and all combined, came very near
to her own undoing; indeed they quite undid old Mrs.
Greensmith. Ann Cole at first only amused herself with
the little ones of her own family, and when she practiced
the deceptive art in the Dutch language, the unearthly
jargon seeming to came from no visible object, it afforded
her great amusement to see the terrified urchins gather
round the very cause of their alarm for protection. Success
tempted her on, and she began to amuse herself with
her neighbors. When they came in and were seated perhaps
the chair would seem to compliment them with
“how do you do?” and if they started up in surprise,
“pray keep your seat,” would follow in a low coaxing
tone; and then the house cat seated in Ann’s lap would
sing melodiously. But although the facetious maiden
never suffered these pastimes to pass without explanation,
yet some doubted, and eyed her with jealousy and circulated
strange stories, and before she had thought of consequences,
rumor had declared her a sort of Magdalene,
and that her demons talked to each other, in a strange
variety of languages. These reports excited the attention
of two clergymen of the place and they obtained Miss
Ann’s consent to approach her so near when a conference
of her spirits took place, as to hear and write down the
particulars; and herein commenced the only veritable
witchcraft of the case; for Ann Cole’s ventriloquism or
the listening ministers, feigned the supposed demons to
converse with Mrs. Greensmith as one in league with
them to do mischief, a foul slander in either case, and
which cost the poor woman her life. The clergyman then
repaired to prison, they said the accused was much
agitated upon learning the discovery they had made,
and by sharp interrogatories was made to confess her
familiarity with the devil. She had not signed his book,
or made a covenant with him, but at the then coming
Christmas, she was to be ready for a high frolic and then
all was to have been finished. Strange hymenials for a
woman of seventy-five and the mother of ten sons and
daughters and abundance of grandchildren; and it does
not even appear that she was a widow. However the
poor woman was hung without scruple, or space for repentance,
and without apparent pity for her future state;
or whether in her execution they were doing the devil a
good or ill service.
In October 1671 a demon, it was said entered into Elizabeth
Knapp, an unmarried girl of Groton, and he caused
her alternately to weep and laugh, and then in great agitation
to call out money, money, like a modern paper
banker.—On the 17th of December following, this demon
began again to speak in the young woman and to utter
horrid railings against the minister of the town, but without
harm to his character, as the people would not believe
him. He next made Elizabeth accuse the minister’s
wife as the cause of all her woes; but in this also he obtained
no credit; for the pious woman, after prayers with
her accuser made her confess the slander; and the devil
had to shift his quarters, for he can never do his business
unless he can maintain some reputation. In 1679 a demon
probably the same infested a house in Newbury.
Sticks and stones were thrown at the family, by an invisible
hand: and a staff which hung against the wall, began
to swing of its own accord; and then leaped down and
danced on the hearth, and when they seized it to burn,
it could hardly be held on the fire.—So a dish, when the
owner of the house was writing, leaped into the pail and
threw water on his work. At length the terrified family
cried to God for help; and then the demons were heard
to say mournfully that they had no more power, and
soon departed.
In 1682 one Desborough of Hartford was possessed of a
chest of clothes, claimed by his neighbor, but which he
would not give up. Soon after many stones, and corn
cobs, were thrown at him by an invisible hand. They
came in at the doors of the house, and through the windows
and sometimes even down the chimney. At length
fires were set on his lands which did him much damage.
Whereupon he gave up the clothes and his vexations
ceased.
So about the same time, a Quaker at Portsmouth, withheld
from an old woman of his town, a lot of land which
she claimed as her own; and stones soon began to be
thrown at his house by an invisible hand. When they
were picked up, it was said they were found hot, and
smelt of brimstone, by which it was readily known from
whence they came. Upon this the subdued and terrified
Quaker settled with the woman and his troubles ceased.
Both these cases are recorded as examples of witchcraft.
Yet to us they seem to be those where claimants of property,
seek other remedies than courts of law. But among
these examples there is recorded one tale of horror. It
appears that at Hartford, and about the time of Ann
Cole’s case, one Mary Johnson a young girl in her minority,
was indicted and tried by the supreme court for familiarity
with the devil! The jury returned her guilty;
and that mainly upon her alleged confessions. I will
transcribe a portion of Cotton Mather’s history of this
case. “The girl said that her first familiarity with the
devil began in her discontent, and by her often saying
the devil take this and that, and sometimes wishing the
devil would do this or that for her, until at last the devil
did appear and tendered her what services might best
content her. Then if her master blamed her for not carrying
out the ashes, the devil would come and clear the
hearth for her. So when she was sent to drive the hogs
out of the corn field, the devil would so chase and frighten
them as to make her laugh most merrily. She further
confessed that she had murdered a child and committed
uncleanness with both men and devils;” and it was for
an illicit intercourse with the latter, that the Connecticut
govenor hung this young woman.
After her sentence the Rev. Mr. Stone of Hartford,
visited her in prison and as he verily thought was successful
in turning her heart towards the true God. So
that when led out to execution she expressed a humble
hope in the mercies of redemption; and died much to the
satisfaction of those gathered round the gallows. In this
black transaction who does not see the full success of
some vile seducer of female virtue, in an apparent legalized
destruction of his victim. Yet it is called a case of
lamentable witchcraft. So it was with those who slew
the innocent. In 1685 or 6 a book was published at Boston
with the approbation of the ministers and magistrates.
It recited the cases I have named with many
others and contained various arguments to fortify their
credulity. The Rev. Cotton Mather of Boston, a man of
great influence in church and state was the author;
though he at the time withheld his name. He was then
a young minister of about five and twenty, the son of
Mr. Increase Mather then president of Cambridge college,—a
position then of greater civil and church power
than any other in the land; he was also the grandson of
the great John Cotton. Mather’s opinions and turn of
thought were in harmony with those who then ruled in
Massachusetts, and we thus consider him.
This book produced the notorious witch case of the
Godwins, of which he also published an account commencing
thus. “Haec ipse miserima vidi.” John Godwin
was a Boston merchant, a character of the first respectability,
and he sat under the teachings of Mather
himself. A poor Irish woman called Glover, with her
daughter lived near him. The young Glover often served
in Godwin’s family, and on a certain time being accused
by his eldest daughter of some little theft, she cast back
a denial and abuse for the accusation. The mother came
up also and defended her child, and her passion and wild
Irish accent, so terified the little Godwin that she was
thrown into hystericks, and they were kept up from day
to day. Her case excited great commiseration in the
neighborhood and the physicians who were called in, being
puzzled, pronounced it a “preternatural visitation;”
a very significant phrase, by which all understood that
the little maid was bewitched. Next her little sister, and
two brothers seeing what was going on, had fits also and
were afflicted by the invisibles. They declared they
were pinched and pricked by some one whom they knew
not, and then at times they would seem deaf, dumb and
blind; and sometimes their mouths would be forced wide
open and then suddenly brought together with great
violence, to the great hazard of their tongues.
Stoughton and Dudley, both first charter rulers, were
now also supreme judges, lately commissioned by Sir Edmund;
and these at the solicitation of Mather and others,
ventured to arraign and to try Mistress Glover for witch
practices on the Godwin family. But she was a stranger
to the language and too ignorant to understand legal
proceedings, and when asked to plead to her indictment,
her answer was unintelligible. The court then swore an
interpreter, and he soon confessed himself puzzled declaring
that he believed some other witch, or the devil himself
had confounded her language, lest she should tell
tales. Then they searched Glover’s house and some rag
babies were found stuffed with goats hair. We must
know that the woman was a Catholic and sold toys.
When one of these images or puppets was brought into
court, the witch swiftly and oddly started up and seized
it, and immediately one of the children had a sad fit before
the court and assembly. The judges noted the fact,
and repeated the experiment and with the same result, as
it was said, the children saw not when Glover laid her
hand on the baby images. In the end the court was satisfied
that she used these dolls mysteriously in her work
of torment. She owned also that there was one who was
her prince, but did not say whether he were the pope or
the devil. It was suggested that she might be crazed;
but a jury of doctors returned, that she was compos mentis.
She was finally sentenced to death and executed in
Boston; yet the afflicted children did not recover but rather
grew worse, or they improved by practice, for they
would now bark at each other like dogs and then they
would purr like cats. They would pretend to be in a red
hot oven, and pant and sweat accordingly; and then that
they were cast into cold water and appeared very chilly.
Sometimes the devil would bring Miss Godwin a horse,
and then she had all the graceful motions of an equestrian.
One day she rode up stairs into the minister’s study,
where upon she cried out as if surprised, “they are gone.
God won’t let them come here;” and she was at once
cured, and sat reading the Bible and other good books
for a long time. But when she left the study the demons
returned, with her horse, and she frolicked as before.—This
experiment of the charmed study, was tried before
many visitors and with the like success. Mather’s experiments
further satisfied him that Miss Godwin’s demons
understood Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, but none of the
Indian languages.
This tragedy also began in a minister’s family. The
Rev. Samuel Parris, was educated at Cambridge. He
first engaged in trade, but being unsuccessful he turned
to the ministry and was settled at Salem village. At the
time now in view, his parish was in a high quarrel of
which his arts to obtain the fee instead of the improvement
for life only of the parsonage farm, was the cause.
And whilst thus warm with mutual malevolence, pastor
and flock, the current notions of witchcraft suddenly
placed in their power the means of mutual revenge; and
they were at once fully delivered over to the effects of
their own excited wrath. A very mutual but terrible
punishment. It was a horrid policy in the charter government
to ever use the devil to overawe the people. A
boundless power of evil, which a child, as well as a minister,
or a charter ruler, could set in motion; and then
whoever could might lay him. In the latter part of February,
1692, two children in the Parris family, both about
ten years old, Elizabeth his daughter, and Abagail Williams
his niece, began to behave in a strange manner;
they would creep under chairs, sit in uncommon attitudes
and utter language which none could understand;
and as they were pitied and indulged; their freaks increased
until it was thought they were very like the
Godwins, and must be bewitched; and the physicians
when called in confirmed the opinion. Mr. Parris only
increased their malady by holding a day of solemn
prayer at his house with the neighboring ministers.
But he had in his family two slaves, John and Tituba
his wife. The squaw was from New Spain, and once a
subject of the old Montezumian empire, and probably
was imbued with some of its gloomy and unfathomable
superstitions. Her thoughts too seemed as busy as her
master’s, and she told him that although no witch herself,
she once served a mistress who was, and who
taught her how to find them out; and she would try
upon the children without hurting them. Parris greedily
took with her scheme, and he saw her while she took
rye meal and kneaded a cake, which she salted in a
peculiar manner, and which she said, when baked in
green cabbage leaves in the embers and eaten by the
two girls, would make them see their tormentors; and
she continued the experiment. But although both she
and her master affected to act and talk myteriously, yet
the children as they crept about shrewdly under the
chairs, eyed the cookery with a very jealous interest, and
when they became conscious that the unsavory morsel
was for their mouths they grew restive; for no necromancy
could satisfy them that Tituba’s briny bread was
like gingerbread, or anything good, and they began to
show a rational opposition. But Tituba said they must
eat, and Mr. Parris began to use authority. “I’ll smell
on’t,” said little Elizabeth, “now won’t that do? say yes,
say yes, good Titty.” But she shook her head. Bless
me, said the father, how natural they seem; and about
the same time the slave pulled the rank cake from the
embers, and as the hot scent filled the room, Abagail
cried out, there! there! I see them, I see them as plain as
day, and so do I, said little Elizabeth. O how many! and
there’s old Titt, too, she torments us, old Titt torments
us, said they both.
It was now all over with the Mexican. In vain she
frowned and coaxed by turns; or denied that the girls
could see witch spectres by the smell of her cake only.
She discredited her own magic, and which they would
sustain for self-defense, and the more she labored thus,
the more they professed to be tormented, until Parris
himself took their part and threatened Tituba with punishment
unless she confessed and disclosed her confederate
witches. And John, too, her husband, when he
saw her in distress meanly deserted her. He told master
Parris that the girls no doubt spoke the truth; that she
had for a long time tormented him, and was an old hand
at it. But discouraged and deserted as she was, her
master’s whip alone, as she afterwards affirmed, brought
her to lie, and to confess that the devil engaged her to
sign his book, and to afflict the children. And thus was
acquired the spectral vision by the afflicted so much used
and so fatally for the peace of the country, as we shall
hereafter see. Tituba was imprisoned and so continued,
until sold to pay her prison fees! And Mr. Parris fasted
and prayed at his house a whole day. His family now
excited a general sympathy and consideration, which
others were willing to share. Their persecutions, Satan
being the author, were somewhat honorable, and Ann
Putnam, an older girl of the neighborhood, instigated by
her mother no doubt, pretended to be afflicted also.
Thus fortified, they now complained of Sarah Good and a
Mrs. Osborn. It was supposed that the equivocal character
of these caused the accusation; and it was the
more readily credited. They were committed by two
Salem magistrates the first week in March. Of Osborn
we hear no more; but Mrs. Good was finally executed.
It is almost incredible, and yet it is sober history, that
a little daughter of Sarah Good, five years old only, was
accused by the afflicted of tormenting them; and they
showed what they pretended were the prints of the
child’s little teeth on their arms! The Salem magistrates
committed this mere infant for witchcraft, but as we hear
no more of her, she was probably liberated without further
harm.
About this time there was a great fast at Salem, and
another proclaimed by the government throughout the
colony, “that the Lord would effectually rebuke Satan
and save his people.” And the afflicted accusers multiplied
daily, and there was added to the number Ann
Putnam’s mother, goodwives, Pope, Bibber and Goodall,
maidens, Mary Walcott and Mary Lewis; also, Tituba’s
husband John; he turning accuser to save himself from
being accused. About the same time a society was formed
in Salem for the detection of witches, and these procured
the accusation and commitment of many. This
formidable band of accusers now cried out against two
aged females who were church members, by the names
of Corey and Nurse. Mrs. Nurse belonged to the church
in Salem under the Rev. Mr. Noyes, and Mrs. Corey was
of Mr. Parris’ flock. This was a dark business. It was
supposed Parris instigated the accusation. For when
made he gave it publicity and strength; and on the following
Lord’s day he preached in his pulpit from this
text: “Have I not chosen twelve, and one of you is a
devil.”
A Mrs. Cloyes, sister to Nurse, was at the meeting,
and during the furious and uncharitable sermon which
followed her distress for her sister’s life, which it much
endangered, constrained her to leave the meeting. A
high wind closed the door suddenly after her, and it was
said that she showed temper; and on the following Monday
an accusation for witchcraft by the Parris family,
and those under its control, went after her, upon which
she was carried before Hathorn and Currier for examination.
This charge, we know, must have been both malicious
and false, as it was sustained by perjury.
A further knowledge of the temper and insolence of
those, in whose power the lives and liberties of the citizens
were now placed, may be gathered from this incident.
On the 9th of March a Mr. Lawson, minister of
Scituate, preached for Mr. Parris, it being the Sabbath
day, and the bewitched band were present. After the
psalm had been sung, Abagail Williams called out to him
to stand up and name his text, and when he did so, she
said it was very long indeed. In the discourse, he explained
some point of doctrine at considerable length,
when Mrs. Pope said loudly, “now take up some other
point, the people have had enough of that.” In his improvement
he made reference to doctrines which he said
he had established. “Pray,” said Abagail again, “what
doctrines do you mean?” And then Ann Putnam suddenly
cried out, there! there! I see a little yellow bird
sitting on the minister’s cocked up hat; there where it
hangs on the peg in the pulpit. This was spectral vision;
nobody else saw it and it seemed to be considered that
the devil thus scoffed and jeered the congregation through
the mouths of the afflicted.
The six commitments now made of the females—Tituba,
Osborn, Good, Corey, Nurse, and Sarah Good’s little
daughter, were upon the assumed authority of the two
Salem magistrates alone, instigated by Parris. On the
11th of April, Danforth the Deputy Governor, with the
council came down from Boston and sat formally with
Hathorn and Curwin in the place of power.—The Governor
Bradstreet the old patentee, who hung the Quakers,
was now almost ninety; and ill qualified for the new service.
Many of the neighboring ministers were also present.
This terrible witch inquisition gave a sanction to
the delusive and malicious prosecutions, and sealed the
doom of many innocent victims. The inquisitors, the accused
and a cloud of spectators, met in a large meeting
house, Mr. Samuel Parris being employed as clerk, and
assuming also a leading part in the production and examination
of witnesses. The Rev. Mr. Noyes of Salem, an
enthuiast in witch hunting opened the business with
prayer. After which one of the accused begged that she
might go to prayer also; but Danforth told her, they had
come there to examine into her witchcrafts, and not to
hear her pray! and she gave it up. Mr. Parris then began
business by calling up as a witness Tituba’s husband
John. That cunning treacherous slave knew well how to
please his master and save his own neck: and living in the
Parris family he knew also the views and wishes of those
who now controlled the witch accusations.
Question.—John; who hurt you? A.—Goody Proctor
first, and then Goody Cloyes. Q.—What did she do to
you? A.—She (who?) brought the book to me, and choked
me. Q.—John, tell the truth now, who hurts you;
have you been hurt? A.—The first I saw was a gentlewoman.—(This
was no doubt, a dark hint at Mrs. Mary
English, the wife of one of the first merchants in Salem, and
who was afterwards arrested and committed.) This was
the woman, who, when the constables were at the door
to seize and carry her to prison, called her little ones
round her, gave them her parting blessing and advice,
prayed with them, and wept over them, as she supposed
for the last time, and then gave herself up quietly to her
fate. Q.—John, who did you see next? A.—Goody Cloyes.
Q.—How often did she torment you? A.—A good
many times. Q.—Do the women come to you mostly in
the daytime or in the night? A.—They come most in
the daytime. Q.—John, do you know Cloyes and Proctor?
A.—Yes, there is Goody Cloyes. Upon this Mrs.
Cloyes looked sharply at him and said;—tell me when did
I ever come to, or hurt thee? John.—(a little abashed,)
O, a great many times. O, said Cloyes you are a grievous
liar! Upon this Parris grew warm. Now, John, said he,
tell us what did this Cloyes do to you? A.—She did
pinch me and bite me till the blood came. She came and
hurt me yesterday at meeting.
This was the woman whose only crime was leaving Mr.
P.’s sermon. The malice of the master, the perjury of
the slave, and the despotism of Danforth and his assistants
were too hard for her. John, too, seems to have had
the spectral vision in a high degree, though he never
even smelt of his wife’s cake. He learnt it, no doubt, of
the little girls her pupils, as did Ann Putnam and others.
Parris then called Mary Walcot, and asked who hurt her.
A.—Goody Cloyes. Q.—What did she do? A.—She hurt
me. Q.—Did she bring the book? A.—Yes. Q.—What
were you to do with it? A.—Sign it, and be well. Then
she fell into a fit, in affected horror at the devil’s book.
Abagail Williams, who so successfully outwitted Tituba
in the matter of the salted cake, was next called by her
uncle Parris. Abagail, said he, did you, by your spectral
vision, once see a company near this meeting house
eat and drink? A.—Yes sir;—it was their witch sacrament.
It was on the day of the great fast. They had
bread like raw flesh; and they had red drink, which they
said was our blood; and they had it twice that day. Q.—How
many were there? A.—About forty; they came
together by the sound of a trumpet. They had a minister
who preached, and Goody Cloyes and Goody Good
were their deacons.
Mrs. Cloyes was of rather delicate health, and when
she heard this strange tissue of falsehood, so great was
her surprise and terror, that she sickened and asked for
water, but as no one would assist her, she fainted and fell
upon the floor. Upon which Abagail cried out, there,
there, I see her spirit fly to her sister Nurse in prison for
council; and she was believed; and as soon as the woman
revived, she was forthwith imprisoned.
Parris then asked Mary Walcot if she had ever seen a
white man. And she answered yes; often. Q.—What
sort of man is he? A.—A fine, grave man, and when he
comes he makes all the witches tremble, and he tells us
when our fits will come on and when they will go off.
This was supposed to be Jesus Christ come down to
pity and to talk with bewitched children and save the
charter churches. A horrid blasphemous fiction, but yet
credited by the government of the colony before whom
it was uttered. The justices then proceeded and said,
Elizabeth Proctor, you understand, that you are here
charged with sundry acts of witchcraft, what say you to
it? I take God in heaven to be my witness, that I know
no more of witchcraft than a child unborn. This woman
was of excellent character, the mother of a fine family
of children, all then dependent on her for nurture and
protection. It is very difficult to account for her selection
and accusation as a witch. Some accident, or that
she was obnoxious to the Parris or Putnam family, who
fabricated all the early accusations, must have been the
cause. But when her unhappy husband saw his wife
rudely seized like a felon in her once peaceful home, he
resolved to accompany her to the examination; and his
conjugal fidelity cost him his life.
Her examination began thus: Question.—Mary Walcot
doth this woman hurt you?—Answer.—I never saw her
to be hurt by her. Q.—Mary Lewis, does she hurt you?
No answer. Q.—Ann Putnam, does she hurt you? She
could not speak; and Abagail Williams thrust her hand
into her own mouth lest she should speak. A pause, and
almost a failure. John, said Mr. Parris, who hurts you?
This is the woman, said the Indian, who came in
her shift to me and choked me. And now the girls were
ready to say she hurt them, and brought the devil’s
book for them to sign, and the crafty Abagail, with
affected simplicity and sincerity, said to Mrs. Proctor,
did not you tell me that your maid had signed? Dear
child, said Mrs. Proctor, it is not so; remember, dear
child, that there is another judgment. Then Abagail
and Ann seemed to have fits; by and by they cried out,
look you, there is Proctor on the beam; and her husband,
too; Proctor is a wizard! Proctor is a wizard!
The man was confounded. There, said Ann, Proctor is
going to take up Mrs. Pope’s feet; and her feet flew up;
and now, said Abagail, he is going to Goody Bibber; and
Bibber fell into a fit! The Deputy Governor and Council
seemed surprised, and said to Proctor, you see the devil
will deceive you, the poor children could see what you
were about before the women were hurt. “Repent, for
the devil is bringing you out.”
The Hon. Court then suffered some experiments to be
tried on Mrs. Proctor. It was affirmed that the afflicted
could not strike a witch; and Ann Putnam approached
and attempted to strike Mrs. P. on the head with her
fist, but as the blow descended her fist opened, and her
fingers’ ends but lightly tapped the woman’s hood, and
then Ann cried out with consummate art, they burn!
they burn!—her fingers burned, and she fell upon the
floor apparently overcome with pain. All were strongly
moved by this incident, so wonderful and yet so sudden.
Some fancied they saw a blue flame play around Mrs.
Proctor, and others were quite sure they smelt brimstone.
The Court then suddenly turned the experiments upon
Proctor himself, and ordered him forthwith to repeat the
Lord’s Prayer, without slip or hesitation, to show his innocence.
It was a hard case in his present dismay, but
he made the effort; and he did very well until he came
to the petition “deliver us from all evil;” and this was
adjudged to be a perversion of the Lord’s Prayer; for to
be delivered from all evil was to be delivered from that
under which he then suffered, and of course opposing
the Divine decrees. But to be fair with him they put
him upon the prayer again, but he had no better
luck than at first. For when he came to “hallowed be
Thy name,” he said “hollowed be Thy name.” Here they
again stopped him and held that this was a depraving of
the words. To make the name of the Deity hollow, said
they, is to make it vain, light and void, and is blasphemy
and cursing, rather than a prayer. In fine it was
decided that they could not say it, and that he was a
guilty man.
And thus the unfortunate Proctor, although he came
before the magistrates a free and innocent citizen to console
and sustain his afflicted and terrified wife, by a
strange fatality was sent from their presence a prisoner
charged with a capital offence, upon the exhibition of
the foolery and malice I have named; and what is equally
strange, his wife in the end by a mere accident was
saved, but poor Proctor they hung.
On the 19th of April, only eight days after, the imposing
witch inquisition before Judge Danforth and the
council, Hathorn and Curwin called up for examination
Giles Corey, the husband of Martha Corey, already committed.
And thus the wrong done to the wife was soon
visited upon the husband in wanton passion merely, and
without shadow of truth or justice.
They thus began with him: Giles Corey, you are now
brought before authority upon high suspicion of witchcraft,
now tell us the truth of the matter. I hope, said
Giles, with the blessing of God I shall, for I never had
any hand in that matter in my life. Parris, who was still
clerk and chief manager, now said to the afflicted girls,
which of you have seen this man hurt you? I, said Abagail
Williams; I, said Ann Putnam; I, I, I, said the
whole band but one. Hasn’t he hurt you, too, said Parris
coaxingly to Elizabeth Hubbard, but she attempting
to answer seemed to be taken with a fit. Have you
never seen him hurt you, said the same to Benjamin
Gould. I have often seen Giles Corey and been hurt
after it, but cannot say he did it. All the girls also said
that he brought the devil’s book for them to subscribe.
The justices then said, Corey, you hear what these testify;
why do you hurt them? I never did hurt them. Then
it is your spectre that hurts them, tell us what you have
done? I have done nothing to them. Have you never,
said Parris, entered into a compact with the devil? No, I
never did. (But he had then recently joined himself to
the village church under Mr. Parris.) What temptations
have you had? I never had any. But what frightened
you in the cow-house, Giles Corey, said the court, tell us
that? Nothing, nothing. Why, here are three witnesses,
who have heard you to-day say, that you was frightened
in the cow-house. I do not remember it.
Note by Mr. Parris—“There was evidence by several
that Corey said, he would make away with himself and
charge his death upon his son!” And Goody Bibber also
testified that he called her husband, a damned devilish
rogue; and other vile expressions were sworn to in open
court.
The residue of Giles Corey’s fate was most hideous.
From the date of this fraudulent, perjured and senseless
inquest, he lay helpless and almost forgotten in prison
for five months. There he was found on the 9th of the
following September, and with many others brought
before the court of trials. But the jury seemed entirely
under the court, and as, of course, returned all guilty
who put themselves on trial. Corey noticed this, and
when his turn came he refused to plead, saying it was
useless, and that they might do as they pleased with
him. But the court seemed resolved to signalize his obstinacy,
in terror to all others, and gave judgment against
him of pem forte et dure for standing mute, by virtue of
which he was taken to prison, placed on his back, with
his arms and legs extended and fastened in that position.
Heavy weights were placed upon him, and to be allowed
a quantity of poor bread and the nearest standing water
that could be found to the prison door, and thus to remain
until he died. His sufferings were horrible, and on
the 17th of the month he was evidently in death’s agonies,
his eyes seemed bursting and his tongue swollen
greatly out of his mouth. The marshall, the agent of
the people’s government, stood over him, and without
compassion, thrust back the dying man’s tongue with
the point of his staff! And this is the only instance of
that horrible judgment, and its execution in our Massachusetts
history.
In the meantime Martha Corey, the wife of Giles, lay
bound in the same prison under sentence, and with
eleven days only to prepare for death; this is Mr. Parris’
account of the mission.
“We found her (Mrs. Corey) very obdurate, justifying
ourselves and condemning all who had done anything to
her just discovery and condemnation. Whereupon, after
a little discourse, for her imperiousness would not suffer
much, and after prayer! which she was willing to decline,
the dreadful sentence of excommunication was pronounced
against her.” By which excommunication
the woman was in form consigned to the devil’s use forever.
How could the Rev. gentleman pray to God for a
blessing on such a work in her prison; and what more
secular tyranny ever invented such exquisite cruelty
towards a hapless female. It first compassed her death,
and then by clerical necromancy sought to destroy her
soul! But her courage arose above the necromancy.
She was sustained. She made no terms with her destroyers,
or with falseness or meanness. Even on the
gallows ladder she had strength to still proclaim her
innocence in solemn prayer to God, and the gallows rope
swung her into eternity as acceptable to Him, as if she
had died in the bosom of her village church.
So wonderfully had witch accusations now multiplied,
that Hathorn and Curwin held regular sittings; and the
bewitched band of the Parris and Putnam family and
others associated with them, were sure to find them subjects.
For the convenience of the accusers these sessions
were holden at Salem village, which had now become
a point of great public observation and terror.
Thus on the 22d of April, they committed for further
proceedings William Hobbs and his wife, Mary Esty and
Sara Wild, all of Topsfield; also, Edward Bishop and
his wife, and Philip English and his wife, of Salem. And
all these were taken on the complaint of Thomas Putnam,
who thus hunted and secured the victims for his
wife and daughter Ann with the Parris family to destroy.
We know the charges of witchcraft against these persons
were fictitious and foul; and ofttimes hidden causes
led to their selection from the mass of the citizens.
The first accusation of the Salem girls out of their own
county was that of Mrs. Cary of Charlestown. This, no
doubt, like most others, emanated from the neighborhood
of the woman, the afflicted in Essex being used as mere
instruments to destroy her. It was a startling movement,
as the public recalled at once the fatal case of Margaret
Jones and the vessel rocked by horses. The account
of Mr. Cary, her husband, remains to this day, and
being an eye-witness his record is very interesting. About
the 20th of May, the rumor reached him that his wife
had been named as a witch, at Salem village, and by the
advice of his friends he resolved to go down and present
her, a stranger to the afflicted, and see if they would recognize
her. It was a dangerous experiment and cost him
dear.
On the 14th he arrived at the inn, as Hathorn and Curwin,
with a great crowd, were entering the meetinghouse
for their daily work, and he and his wife took a
convenient stand where they might note all that passed.
A minister opened the business with prayer, and he saw
that the afflicted then present were two girls of about ten
or eleven years, and three others who appeared to be
about eighteen. One of the younger girls could discern
most spectres, and talked most (this was the shrewd Abagail
Williams no doubt). When a prisoner was brought
in, he or she was placed at some distance from the justices,
with the eyes fixed directly on them, and the officers held
each hand lest they should pinch the afflicted. The girls
were placed between the prisoner and the magistrates, and
if at any time the accused looked on them they were sure
to be struck down in fits, or they screamed out they were
hurt. Sometimes when they came out of their fits and
stared round in peoples’ faces, the court would say they
were struck dumb, and were then to go and touch the
prisoner at the bar, to be restored to speech. This they
would attempt with well dissembled hesitation, but would
usually fall down in a fit. They would then be taken up
and carried to the prisoner, that he might lay hands on
them, and when this was done the justices would say
that they were well, though Cary observed, that he could
see no alteration, though he plainly saw that the justices
understood the matter, and the girls were well disciplined.
Whilst all this was passing, Cary and his wife stood in
sight of the afflicted, unnoticed, except a person came in
the crowd and asked her name, and it would seem that
quite unguardly she gave it. Soon after the examination
broke up and Cary and his wife began to hope that their
experiment was successful. They then repaired to the
tavern, where they found the Indian John. They gave
him some cider and he showed them his witch scars, but
to Cary they seemed to be of long standing, and were
more probably the work of his former Spanish master.
John was supposed to have been stolen and brought
away by the bucaniers, who then infested the American
coast. Shortly the bewitched girls came in and began
their fits and to tumble about the floor, and the company
looked on in amazement and terror, no one knowing who
might be cried out upon. As soon as they spoke they
cried out Cary! Cary! and almost immediately, as if prepared,
a warrant of arrest came from the justices then
sitting in the house ready to try her. Her accusers were
two girls, of whom she declared to the court, she had not
the least knowledge before that day. She, too, now had
to stand with her hands outstretched, like the others in
the meeting house. Her husband begged that he might
hold one of her hands, but it was denied him. And so
Mrs. Cary stood condemned, her husband, at her request,
wiped the sweat from her face and the tears from her
eyes. As the examination proceeded and the girls testified
as usual, she became faint and begged that she might
lean on her husband, but Hathorn replied sharply, that
so long as she had strength to torment those before them,
she had strength enough to stand. John now came in
and fell upon the floor also, and pretended to have a
dumb fit. The justices then asked the girls who afflicted
him. They replied that it was she (the prisoner), and
that they could see that she now lay heavily upon
him, though to all other eyes she was standing up and
her hands held out. Upon this Cary, in his distress, said,
that God would take vengeance on them for such conduct.
But this seemed to prejudice the justices, for without
more words her mittimus was written. No bail
could be taken, and she was sent to Boston prison,
from thence she was removed to Campton prison, where
they put irons upon her of about eight pounds weight.
And although her distress brought a severe sickness yet
the irons were not taken off.
When the final trials came on at Salem, Cary went
down, but when he saw the children’s spectre evidence
admitted together with absurd and malicious stories
against peoples’ lives, he became satisfied that there was
but little chance for his wife’s life, and especially as all
his efforts and those of his friends could not procure her
a trial in Middlesex County. There was now only one
remedy, and he embraced it. With some secret assistance
he rescued her from prison and fled to Rhode Island,
the common refuge of those persecuted in Massachusetts.
But they were pursued, and he passed on to New York.
Here Gov. Fletcher received them kindly, and sheltered
them until the danger was passed.
A few days after this John Alden was brought before
the Salem justices, upon accusation of witchcraft. He
was a man of great consideration in the colony, being
employed by the government to supply the fortress on
the coast with warlike stores and provisions. His own
account of the transaction has been perpetuated in the
form of a deposition.
He states that he was arrested in Boston and sent
down to Salem village, and when all were in presence of
the magistrates, the girls were asked who of all the people
in the room afflicted them; and one of them pointed
to another man then present by the name of Hill, but she
spake nothing. This girl had a man standing behind
her to hold her up when necessary; and Alden saw him
stoop down and place his mouth to her ear, and she cried
out Alden! Alden! that it was Alden who afflicted her.
Hathorn then asked her if she had ever seen Alden, and
she said no, but the man near her said it was he. All
were then ordered into the street and a ring was formed,
the children and the justices in the centre; his accuser
then cried out, pointing to him, “there stands John Alden,
a bold fellow, with his hat on before the judges; he
sells powder and shot to the French Indians.”
They bid Alden to look at the bewitched, and when
he did they seemed to be struck down. He then asked
the court why they themselves were not struck down
also by his eyes. But no reason was given.
Alden spoke of God’s providence in suffering such creatures
to accuse innocent persons, but the Rev. Mr. Noyes,
minister of Salem, answered him, that God’s providence
governed the world in peace, and with a long discourse
prevented his further difficult questions. Alden was then
committed to the prison in Boston, where he lay over
three months, and when the final trials came on he saw
how many were executed, he also made his escape and
saved his life.
Deliverance Hobbs of Hopsfield, having been cried out
upon and imprisoned, seems to have framed her confession
in the terms of the accusation. She said she had,
indeed, signed the devil’s book after many threatenings
and great torment from him and his emissaries;
and that so soon as she had done it, he used her spectre
to afflict persons. That whilst her spectre was so employed
on a certain time, one of the bewitched maids
cried out, there stands Deliverance Hobbs, strike her?
Upon which the marshal, a man of courage, standng
by, made a pass at the spot pointed out, with his rapier,
and the girl said there! you have given her a small prick
about the eye, and Deliverance showed the wound to the
justices, who seemed highly gratified to have the maid’s
outcry so well authenticated, and to learn that a wound
given to the spectre of a witch, would reach the original,
although at home and about her business.
After this, says Calef, it was quite common for the
afflicted to tell of the black man, or a spectre being on
the table before the magistrates; and then the by-standers
would strike at the places with their sticks and
swords. Justice Curwin once broke his cane at this exercise.
This penitent also confessed that she was at the great
witch sacrament at Salem village. That George Burroughs
was there, that he called all the witches together
by the sound of a trumpet; that he preached to them
and urged them to pull down Christ’s kingdom and
build up that of Satan in its stead, and that Salem village
should be destroyed, beginning at Mr. Parris’ house.
Among her confederates, Deliverance accused old Candy,
a negress, and who was thereupon brought before Justice
Hathorn. Candy said, he, you are a witch? Ans.
Candy witch!—no, no—Candy no witch in her country—Candy’s
mother no witch; Candy no witch Barbadoes—this
country—mistress Hawks give Candy witch—(indeed!)
yes, this country mistress give Candy witch.
Well, Candy, said Hathorn, with unusual mildness,
how do you hurt these young folks, show us the poppets
you do it with, Candy. Candy was quite happy, and
asked to go out of the room, and said she would show
all. When she returned she held in her hand two rags,
with knots tied in them. At sight of these Deliverance
Hobbs, who had now joined the afflicted band, went into
a strong fit; and the other girls declared they could now
plainly see Goody Hawks, Candy and the devil, standing
together pinching the poppets, and then they (the
afflicted) were sorely pinched, though no one actually
touched them, but it was done in spectre. The Court
then directed Candy to untie the knots, and when she
did so, Deliverance came out of her fit, and all were well.
A bit of rag was then put in the fire, and the girls cried
out that they burned dreadfully. To quench it they
dipped it in some water, and Deliverance started like a
deer for the river, but was caught by a swift youth before
she plunged in.
The cunning Candy exulted in the efficacy of her
charms, and all beholders thought her mistress had practised
upon her ignorance, and Goody Hawks had to confess
to save her life.
About this time commeced the Andover tragedy; where
as Cotton Mather says, was discovered the most horrid
crew of witches that ever disgraced a New England town
The wife of Joseph Ballard of Andover fell sick, and the
town doctor finding her disease too stubborn for his art,
advised her husband that she was bewitched. This practice
was too common among the early Massachusetts
physicians. The hint took with Ballard; and he forthwith
sent men and horses to Salem village, and to the
house of Mr. Parris, and brought to Andover old Tituba’s
pupils Abagail Williams and Mary Walcot. When these
came into the sick woman’s room, they said they could
well enough see witch spectres hovering round her bed
and person, but not being acquainted with any Andover
people, they could not name the originals. Describe
them says the husband; and they did so in language sufficiently
vague to embrace half the women in the town;—and
still fancy or malignity might select at pleasure; and
fancy or malignity did select at pleasure and that most
fatally, as the event will show.
Dudley Bradstreet, son of the old patentee, was then
the acting magistrate in Andover, and he granted a warrant
against a number of women on this occasion and
held the examination in the meeting house. After prayers
by the Rev. Mr. Barnard, minister of the town, the
women were brought in, and Abagail and Mary fell down
in fits at the sight, as in time past at Salem; and when
the prisoners laid hands on them, they rose up and said
they were well. All the old experiments were tried with
the old success; and Bradstreet committed a number of
his towns-women to Salem prison, to answer there, and
Abagail and Mary returned home with increased credit.
Yet Goody Ballard died soon after of a fever; and Dudley
Bradstreet repented of the step he had taken. Some of
these in their weakness were made to confess the wildest
witch pranks on record, and to implicate others as associates,
by which more than forty Andover women were
ensnared by witch prosecutions and some lost their lives.
Here follow some of the recorded confessions of these
Andover witches, long after drawn up, with death’s terrors
before them. Ann Foster was one of these. She
had been brought to acknowledge, in Salem prison, that
she was a witch, and had attended a great witch sacrament
at Salem village; that she rode thither on a pole,
behind Martha Carrier, high through the air; that on
their way the pole broke, and that she holding fast by
Martha, came to the ground and was sorely bruised by
the fall, but they mounted again and went on. Being
asked what they eat, she said they carried their bread
and cheese in their pockets, and ate it before the meeting
began, sitting under a large tree, with the Andover
company, and they drank water from a brook near by.
On the 21st of July, Hathorn, Curwin, Gidney and Higginson,
assistants, sat upon her confession in public, and
they began thus: Goody Foster, you know we have
spoken with you before; you have committed great wickedness,
but it seems that God will give you more favor
than others, since you relent, but you did not tell us all;
your daughter has confessed that she sat with you and
Goody Carrier when you did ride upon the pole? F.—I
did not know. How long has your daughter been a
witch? F.—I have no knowledge of it—I cannot tell.
Did you see her at the witch meeting? F.—No. But
you said she was there, and that you stood off and did
not partake; gve us a full account? F.—I know none
who were there but Goody Carrier. Were there not two
companies in the field? F.—I know no more. Here
Mary Warren, one of the afflicted, interposed a new lie,
and said that Carrier’s spectre told her, that Foster had
made her daughter a witch! and the court then said to
F., will you now confess you did so, about three years
ago? F.—I know no more about my daughter being a
witch, than upon what day I shall die. Are you willing
that she should make a free confession? F.—Yes. Will
you confess? F.—Yes; if I knew anything more I would
speak. The magistrate now directed to have Goody
Lacy, the daughter, called in, and as she entered she began.
O, mother, how do you do? O, mother, we have
left Christ and the devil hath got hold of us; O, how
shall I get rid of this evil one! I pray God to break my
rocky heart that I may get the victory this time. This
witchcraft of the daughter was a surprise upon Goody
Foster, she came to the confession prepared to accuse
herself and Goody Carrier, but the danger of her child
distressed and confounded her, and when urged to
speak she answered incoherently. I did not see the devil,
I was praying to the Lord. To what Lord, said the court.
F.—To God. To what God do witches pray? F.—I cannot
tell. The Lord help me! and she sat down overpowered,
as the justice concluded guilty of witchcraft, but
in truth with her own fictions. Lacy.—They were
some of the higher powers; they were—Goody Lacy,
said the court, let your daughter come in; we will examine
her a little, and when Mary Lacy the younger, and
granddaughter of Foster entered, she stood before the
magistrates with downcast looks, an interesting girl of
seventeen; yet at sight of her Mary Warren fell down in a
violent fit. Whereupon Hathorn said to Mary sternly,
why dare you come here, and bring the devil with you,
to afflict these poor creatures; now look upon these
maids in a mild and friendly way, said he, and then she
turned upon the afflicted a look so kind and gentle that
the bystanders smiled in sympathy, and yet the bewitched
band were struck down,—pity, thought the beholders,
that eyes so mild and blue should bear the
devil’s spite in them.
And now said Hathorn, do you confess yourself a witch,—she
hung her head—tears flowed down and she sobbed
out,—ye-s, sir.
Well maiden, said the justice, you are accused of tormenting
Goody Ballard, how do you do it? I don’t know.
How long have you been a witch? Not above a week.
Have you ever seen the devil? Yes sir. Did he bid you
worship him? Yes sir. And to afflict people? Yes sir.
I see, said Major Gidney, one of the magistrates, that you
are in a fair way to obtain mercy. Do you desire to be
saved by Christ? Yes sir, I do. Then said he, you must
tell all you know.—The Lord help me so to do, said Mary.
I was in bed when the devil came to me; in bed! said
the Major—the devil came to your bed! how did he look?
Like a great black dog. O, very well, you may go on,—what
did he say? He bade me, said Mary, obey him and
that I should want for nothing, and he promised he
would not betray me, but he’s an old liar. How long ago
was this, said Hathorn. About a year. Richard Carrier
now comes often a’nights, and has me to afflict people.—He’s
a rogue, cried the Major, and is making a very bad
use of you! but where do you go? To Goody Ballard’s
sometimes, and my mother and grandmother and Richard
Carrier and his mother go there to.
Did you attend the great meeting at Salem village?
Yes. Who went with you? My mother, and grandmother
and Goody Carrier rode upon a long pole through
the air; and I rode behind Richard Carrier upon another
pole! Did you see any men at the meeting? None but
the devil. How did he appear?—Like a black man with
a high crowned hat on.—But did you see no other man?
Your mother and grandmother say they saw a minister
there. I believe I did see a minister. Was not Mr. Burroughs
there? Yes he was. Thus was she made, by
leading questions to accuse an absent and innocent minister
of the gospel. These confessions in the end produced
a sentence of death against Goody Foster and the
elder Mary Lacy; but they were reprieved by Sir William
Phipps and finally pardoned.
Mary Osgood, was one of the Andover witches accused
by Abigail Williams of afflicting Goody Ballard, and
after long imprisonment she was induced to give her
confession in the form of a deposition; and she stated
‘that about eleven years before as she one day walked
in an orchard near her house in great distress of mind,
she attempted to pray; at this moment what seemed a
cat crossed her path, and by its strange movements so
fixed her attention that she ceased to pray. Soon a
strange influence came over her and she prayed again
and as she presumed to the devil for presently a black
man appeared, and offered her a large book to sign; she
wrote her name in it and where her finger touched the
paper, it left a red spot. The apparrition told her that
she was his, and that he was her God, and that she must
worship him! and she believed she consented so to do.
Nine years after, the same personage appeared and
carried her with others, upon a pole through the air to
Five-mile-pond, and there making her renounce her former
baptism, baptized her, amen, since which she afflicted
people, and frolicked with the devil upon Sabbath
days, and other holy festivals.
Hathorn, before whom this was also taken, always
ready to hunt witches, no sooner heard that Mrs. Osgood
and the devil had company upon the pole; than he asked
her who they were. She replied they were Goody Tyler,
Mistress Baker, and Dea, Fry’s wife. These were then
arrested, and constrained to make further witch fictions
to save their lives. And thus was the business driven on.
There were sceptics even at this season of the delusion,
who denied the validity of spectral evidence. It appears,
said they, that the devil can use the spectre of one person
to afflict another; why may he not take the spectre of an
innocent person in that business, and then as things now
are, every man’s life is at the mercy of the devil; for between
him and the afflicted he is sure to suffer. Hathorn
on this occasion asked Mrs. Osgood whether the devil, or
his witches could use the shape of an innocent person to
afflict people.—She replied that it could not be; for said
she, last Monday night we witches had a meeting to afflict
people, and Goody Dean and myself tried to carry
the shape of the Rev. Mr. Dean of Andover between us
to make it believed that he afflicted persons; but we
could not. And why could you not do it, said the justice.
Because, said Mrs. O., the Lord would not suffer so good
a man, to be so used! This answer saved the worthy
minister, who had often been hinted at by the bewitched.
He was not a sound convert to witchcraft.
But on the 14th of May 1692, Sir William Phipps arrived
with the Provincial Charter, and immediately took
upon himself the government.
On the second day of June five magistrates sat, and
selected for trial Bridget Bishop, the wife of Edward
Bishop of Salem. This poor woman had for many years
been reputed a witch; and this by the accusations of one
Samuel Gray, and although on his death-bed he confessed
his sorrow for the wrong he had done her, yet the imputation
still rested upon her, and now enabled the afflicted,
with their managers, to destroy her. And above all, as
an excrescence supposed to be a witch teat was found on
her body. To give currency and popularity to her execution
a story was fabricated, and most industriously
circulated by the witchcraft party, that as Bishop was
led out to execution under a strong guard, she gave a
look at the then newly erected meeting house in Salem,
so blasting and spiteful, that an invisible demon forthwith
entered in and tore down a portion of the holy edifice.
And this is from Cotton Mather’s account of the
Salem witch trials, drawn up for inspection, and by the
request of Sir William, himself. The commissioners then
adjourned to the 30th of June following.
Aside from the manifest fallacy of her supposed crime,
and the illegality of Sir William’s commission to try
witches, the woman had violated no existing law,
statute or common. On the eighth of June, and two or
three days after her trial and condemnation, the general
court of the province was convened, and their only act
was to revive the whole colonial code laws including the
old Cottonian laws against witchcraft; and this upon the
ground that the authority of these laws, ceased with the
first charter. The law then upon which Mrs. Bishop was
tried was a dead letter; it was revived, and in two days
after she was hung. A strange and startling mistake by
men who had charge of the lives and fortunes of the
people. So difficult is the art of just government.
No wonder then that Sir William, five days after this
witch execution, asked council of the leading ministers of
the colony in form. And the response drawn up by
Cotton Mather is as follows: “The afflicted state of our
poor neighbors, now suffering by molestations from the
invisible world, we apprehend, is so deplorable that we
think their condition calls for the utmost help of all persons
in their several capacities. Yet we acknowledge
with thankfulness the success, which the merciful God
has given to the sedulous endeavors of our honorable
rulers, to defeat the abominable witchcrafts which have
been committed in the country. We judge that in the
prosecution of these, and all such witchcrafts, there is
need of exquisite caution, lest too much credulity for
things, resting only on the devil’s authority, should enable
him to get an advantage over us; for we should not be
ignorant of his devices. All things should be managed
with exceeding tenderness towards those complained of,
especially if they be persons heretofore of unblemished
reputation. Nor is the circumstance of the accused being
represented by spectre to the afflicted a sufficient ground
for conviction; for it is an undoubted thing, that a demon
may, by God’s permission, appear for ill purposes
in the shape of an innocent, yea and a virtuous man.”
“We know not, however, but some remarkable affronts
given to devils, by our disbelieving their testimonies,
may not put a period to the progress of the dreadful
calamity now among us in the accusation of so many persons
for witchcraft.”
But lastly say the ministers to Sir William: “We cannot
but humbly recommend unto the government the
speedy and vigorous prosecutions of such as have rendered
themselves obnoxious to the laws of God and the
wholesome statutes of the English nation in the detection
of witchcraft.” This document was dated Boston, June
16th, 1692, and signed by the principal ministers of the
province, and unfortunately for the country the government
seemed to heed only the last clause of the device, as
will be seen hereafter.
A quorum of Sir William’s commissioners again sat at
Salem on the 30th of June, for the trial of witches; Lieut.
Gov. Stoughton, and Messrs. Winthrop, Sewall, and
Gidney being present, and on that day they commenced
the trial of Susanna Martin of Amesbury.
She was a woman of uncommon ingenuity and enterprise;
and was now a widow, with the care of a considerable
estate, and a large family thrown upon her. She,
like Bishop, had long been reputed a witch, and an unsuccessful
attempt had once been made to convict her.
Mather in his account of her case, drawn up by order of
the government, declares, “that she was one of the most
impudent, scurrilous, wicked creatures in the world,” and
the court treated her with great severity. But she repelled
all false charges with invincible spirit; as will be
seen by the following dialogue which took place at her
primary examination, and which was now detailed in
evidence against her.
Justice.—Pray Goody Martin, what ails these young
people? Martin.—I don’t know. J.—But what do you
think ails them? M.—I do not desire to think upon the
subject. J.—Do you not think they are bewitched? M.—No,
I do not think they are. J.—Tell us your thoughts
about them then. M.—My thoughts are my own when
they are in; but when they are out they are another’s—their
master! J.—Their master! Who do you think is
their master? M.—If they be dealing in witchcraft, Sir,
you may know as well as I. J.—Well, mistress Martin,
what have you done towards these girls? M.—I have
done nothing at all. J.—Why it is either you or your
spectre. M.—I cannot help what my spectre does. J.—It
is either you or your master. How comes it that your
spectre should hurt these people? M.—How do I know
how it comes? Samuel was a glorified saint; but he that
appeared to Saul, in Samuel’s shape may now appear in
any one’s shape. A very pertinent reply and puzzled the
justice. Martin was indicted for witchcraft and sorceries
upon the body of Mary Walcott on the second day of
May, 1692, and also for divers other acts of witchcraft
before and after that time, without specification of time
or place. John Allen testified, that the widow Martin
once requested him to cart some staves for her, but he
refused because his cattle were weak and poor; at which
she was displeased and said he would be sorry for it; and
before he could reach home his oxen tired and fell down.
This was supposed to be by witchcraft, though Allen said
the oxen were too weak to draw staves. After this he
turned them upon Salisbury beach to fatten, but they
became so wild that no one could approach them, and
when it was attempted to drive them home they ran
furiously into the sea and were drowned. Another witness
purchased a cow of Martin’s son; she opposed the
bargain, and soon the animal became furious and unmanageable.
And these were considered cases of witchcraft.
Bernard Peach testified, that once being in bed on a
Sabbath night, the widow Martin came into his room
through the window, and seizing him, drew up his body
into a heap and she then lay upon him about two hours,
but at last after a severe struggle he got two of her
fingers between his teeth and bit them until she cried out
with the pain and vanished. At another time when she
was after him he struck her or her spectre with his quarter-staff
and it was reported that she was wounded on
the head. So it was sworn that she once travelled from
Amesbury to Newbury on a rainy day without wetting
even the soles of her feet, and boasted that she scorned
to be drabbed. It was concluded in court that the devil
helped her on.
But the most wonderful story told on this occasion was
that of Joseph Ring; the man seems to have been a good
fiddler, whom the old charter witches and demons selected
for their peculiar use and amusement. He testified
that for two years past he had been strangely carried
about through the air to witch revels and dances; that
for a long time they had kept him dumb, but since they
began to be prosecuted he had in a measure recovered
his speech. His knowledge of them and their power over
him, began thus:
As he sat in his house one day, a stranger of suspicious
mien applied to him to give music to a company
of dancers on a certain evening; and whilst the timid
and distrustful fiddler hesitated, the proffer of a large
sum of money by the stranger, and which he too readily
accepted, induced him to make the desired promise and
immediately the man vanished so suddenly that Ring was
exceedingly startled and repented of what he had done;
but it was too late. At the appointed hour he found a
horse, well caparisoned, standing at his door; he took
the hint, but no sooner had he mounted into the saddle,
than the animal leaped into the air and pushed forward
with a velocity which deprived him of all consciousness
of time or distance and almost of existence itself. He
next found himself in front of a splendid building, with
lights from every part streaming out upon night’s darkness,
but from whence issued no sound of mirth or festivity.
Presently Goodman Ring was introduced into a
spacious hall, he screwed up his fiddle, began to play,
and then the dancing began in good earnest. At once a
preternatural influence came over him, and he was
amazed at the power of his own instrument, which
seemed to fill that ample hall to its very roof, and to
inspire dancing which he now plainly saw was superhuman.
It was here that he saw the widow Martin, the
prisoner at the bar, swinging and dancing among the
revellers, like a nimble maiden of eighteen; and he was
willing to swear to her identity.
When the dancing ceased, the personage who first
engaged him came with a book for him to sign, and an
ink horn containing something like blood. But the
fiddler refused his name, and casting his eyes downward
he saw that cloven foot which had been the terror of all
New England for half a century, and in his distress he
called upon God for help. At once a horrid hysteric
laugh burst upon his ears, and then suddenly all was
darkness, and he found himself in the crotch of a great
pine tree, cold and comfortless, in a lonely plain, and the
stars of midnight winking down upon him. He descended
as well as he could, wandered about in the woods until
morning light, and then found his way home; but he
could never again find that pine tree that made the witch
palace.
From that time forth the witches and demons had
power over him and used him as they pleased. And
Mather says “that whenever he was brought unto their
hellish meetings, and showed any disobedience one of the
first thing they did unto him was, to give him a knock on
the back, whereupon he was ever as if bound with chains,
incapable of stirring out of the place till they should release
him.”
After this strange testimony was in, the court asked
Martin what she had to say for herself. She replied that
she had always led a virtuous and holy life, that she knew
nothing of the crime whereof she was accused, and she
protested against the proceedings and the evidence against
her. Yet the jury soon returned a verdict of guilty, and
the court pronounced sentence of death. On the following
day Elizabeth Howe was tried. The evidence against
her was very similar to that against Martin. She was of
Ipswich, and first became noted as a witch by an abortive
attempt to join the church in that place, which led to an
investigation of her character, and brought out her witchcrafts.
This woman it was thought had a burning witch
bridle, which tortured any horse that wore it to efforts
beyond its strength; it would also turn to a horse any
man or beast on whom it was placed. Isaac Cammins
swore that he had a very spirited mare, which he believed
Howe used freely in her witch frolics. The mare
grew sick and weak without apparent cause, and upon
examination she seemed bruised and lamed as if rapidly
ridden over rocks and rough places, and the marks of the
burning witch bridle were visible upon her; nay, she was
found so sulphurious that, the owner passing near her
one night in the stable with his lantern, she took fire, and
emitted a blue brimstone blaze, fine as a knitting needle,
and which singed her own hair and endangered the barn.
The beast died soon after in strange spasms. It further
appeared by the confessing witches that Goody Howe
was one of those who had been baptized by the devil at
Newbury Falls, and before which baptism he made them
all kneel down by the river’s brink and worship him.
Elizabeth Howe was indicted for witchcraft upon Mary
Walcott and Mary Lewis; the jury returned her guilty
and the court sentenced her to death.
At this same session were also tried Sarah Good,
Rebecca Nurse and Sarah Wilde, and found guilty.
On the 19th of July these five were executed. At the
gallows Noyes urged Sarah Good to confess, and told her
she was a witch and she knew it; to which she replied:
“Sir, you are a liar; I am no more a witch than you are
a wizard, and if you take my life God will give you blood
to drink.”
Stoughton and his associates were now the terror and
scourge of the country. On the fifth of August they sat
at Salem. Six unresisting and helpless females they had
already hung without law or crime; and whose terror-stricken
kindred dare not raise even a murmur of discontent.
Indeed so subdued appeared the public mind, that
they now adventured upon the trial of the Rev. George
Burroughs, the only gospel teacher ever hung for witchcraft
in this or any other Christian country. He had
formerly been the settled minister of Salem village, and
now an avowed infidel in the current notions of witchcraft.
The Rev. Mr. Lawson, also once a teacher in the
same place, was more pliant, and wrote a book flattering
to the afflicted and their managers; had Burrows followed
his example he might have escaped hanging.
Warily indeed did the prosecutors cast their entanglements
about this devoted man. We first see a fictitious
witch sacrament, with appropriate deacons;—next a
clergyman, black-haired, short and thick set, with the
devil to administer. All knew that this aimed at Burroughs.
Then eight confessing witches affirmed that so
great was his fidelity and zeal, that he was to be a king
in Satan’s kingdom about to be established in Massachusetts.
They multiplied his indictments to four; for afflicting
those four bloody impostors, Mary Walcott,
Elizabeth Hobart, Mary Lewis and Ann Putnam. And
he stood before a prejudiced court and jury without hope
of justice, or even of compassion.
The afflicted began their evidence with fits and outcries.
They said Burroughs bit them, and showed what
they alleged were the prints of his teeth on their flesh;
and Ann Putnam said that even now his spectre presented
her the devil’s book, boasting that he was above the
ordinary rank of witches. Again they were cast into
convulsions and could not proceed. Stoughton asked
Burroughs, who he thought hindered those witnesses
from testifying. He replied, perhaps it was the devil.
“How comes the devil,” said his Honor, “so loth to have
any testimony borne against you?” A foul response, but
in keeping with his general conduct.
One of the afflicted declared that she was once in a
trance, and that Burroughs carried her into a very high
mountain and showed her all the kingdoms of the earth,
and said that he would give her all these, if she would
write her name in his book. She did not bid him get
behind her, but told him that the kingdoms were not his
to give, and refused to sign. This was a girl of eleven
years, how could she distinguish between a trance and a
dream? Yet her story went as evidence into the case.
Burrougs had been twice married, and it was reported
that he had ill-treated his wives. But he asked the court
very pertinently how this could go to sustain an indictment
for afflicting Mary Walcott and for which he was
then on trial. But the witnesses were not checked, and
they testified that they had seen the apparition of two
women, who said they were Burrough’s wives; and that
he had caused their deaths; and that the Judges must be
told of it; and that they did not know (strange language
for ghosts) but they should appear in court at the trial.
Presently Abagail Williams cried out in great apparent
horror that the ghosts of those two wives had just now
come in and were standing before Burrougs and crying
for vengeance upon him. Yet Burroughs declared he
saw them not, nor were the sound of their voices heard
by the court or jury. At this the prisoner was said to be
much appalled. No doubt he was so, at the depravity of
the witnesses and their evidence.
But the girls went yet further, and affirmed that the
spectre of Burroughs had often threatened to kill them,
as he had many others who refused to obey him; and he
named among his murdered victims Mrs. Lawson and
her daughter Ann. The story was credited, as they presumed
he might well entertain hatred towards the virtuous
wife and daughter of a man like Deodat Lawson, his
predecessor at Salem village. And it was now called to
mind, says Mather, that the peculiar circumstances of
their deaths, excited suspicion of witchcraft; yet no one
then suspected from whence it came.
It was further testified that Burroughs, notwithstanding
his holy orders, hated prayer and the ordinances of
religion. His zeal only burned in the devil’s cause. The
confessing witches also attributed their seduction to his
wiles; he led them on to witch meetings, or to sorceries,
by the promise of fine clothes and other unhallowed
pleasures; he brought the poppets, or rag babies to them
for afflicting people, and taught them where to stick the
pins the most effectually; he even exhorted them to bewitch
all Salem village, but with caution to prevent discovery;
and now, they affirmed, for their penitence and
confessions, Burroughs and the devils tortured them
continually.
After Burroughs was hung, these confessors recanted,
and confessed again the utter falsehood of all they had
said respecting him. But they could not quicken the
dead, or heal the wounds of bereaved friends, nor soften
the hearts of such men as Stoughton, Mather, Parris, and
the like.
The evidence was then turned to show that Burroughs
was endowed with preternatural strength. He had been
known to hold out in one hand, by the breech, a gun of
seven feet barrel as if it had been a pocket pistol, and
then to reverse it, and sticking his forefinger in the
muzzle, to hold it out at arm’s length that way. So he
would carry a full barrel of cider or molasses without
staggering. But he offered to show that whatever he
did in this way was to try his strength with an Indian
who did the like, and even more than he could. But
they who gave the testimony, says Mather, saw no Indian
and it was at once concluded it must have been the devil,
as Ann Putnam said he often appeared like an Indian!
How did this testimony refute Burroughs? Did the
witnesses see the devil in the shape of an Indian at the
time? One Ruck, a brother-in-law to Burroughs testified
to his preternatural walking. On a certain occasion a
party in his company went to a distant field to gather
strawberries. When they returned, a thunder shower
was advancing, and all but the prisoner rode upon horses
and at a quick pace; yet he suddenly slipped out of sight,
and to their astonishment was at the house, with his
basket of strawberries, before them. But he offered
to show that another man was with him and walked as
fast as he did, but Stoughton and his associates concluded
that this pretended companion must have been
the devil also and would not hear the evidence.
After this manner was the unfortunate man overwhelmed
with false and absurd testimony, and the prejudice
of those who held his life at will; and it was
sneeringly said that he used many twistings and evasions
to get off, but without effect; for the jury without hesitation
returned a verdict of guilty, and the court pronounced
his death sentence.
At his execution Mather and other ministers took care
to be present. Burroughs, with the rest, was carted
through the streets of Salem on his way to the gallows.
Being on the ladder and the rope about his neck, in
solemn and decided tones he proclaimed his innocence
before the multitude. He then made his dying prayer
with a deliberation and fervency that won the admiration
of all present, and drew tears from many eyes. In conclusion
he pronounced the Lord’s prayer without hesitancy,
and the “amen” served the hangman for his
death signal, and he was swung off. After it was over a
strong murmur of discontent ran through the crowd, a
popular uproar was feared, and a rescue of the other
prisoners; but Mather, as he sat on his horse in the
midst, addressed the people to dissuade them from violence.
Burroughs, he said, should not be regarded as a
minister after his league with the devil; and both his
prayers and address, however earnest, were still deceptive,
for the devil himself, he continued, when he will,
can assume the guise of an angel of light.
At the same time, and to assist Mather, a story was circulated
in the assembly that the bewitched girls could
plainly see the black man standing near Burroughs,
and assisting him in this his last effort. After this the
executions went on in peace. At this session also was
tried and condemned old Martha Carrier. She was regarded
as one of the most decided and active witches in
the country. This was the woman, of whom it was repeatedly
testified, that the devil had promised her that
she should be Queen of Hell; an elevation to which her
enemies readily awarded her a title. Her true character
was untiring industry, ceaseless vigilance and extraordinary
exactitude in the discharge of all duties, and so
she never sought excuses for remissness or neglect she
would grant none to others, and as a majority of the
world are ever on the other side, she first became the
terror and then the hatred of her delinquent neighbors.
In spite to her family, it was said that she ruled her
husband, and that Goodman Carrier would never stick to
any bargain of goods or chattels, lands or tenement, unsanctioned
by her. Her children too she kept in strange
obedience to her will; but her’s was a well-ordered and
a thrifty household. Yet they called her a witch until
the foul stain became deep and fixed.
Mather declares that when the poor tortured witnesses
were brought forward against her in court every one
expected their death on the very spot. Her malignant
look would strike them down, and then her touch, her
eyes being averted, would raise them up; and when they
could speak, and testified that her shape had twisted
their necks almost round; she said that they were miserable
wretches and no matter if their necks had been
quite twisted off.
She was indicted for afflicting Mary Walcott and Elizabeth
Hubbard; and to make sure of her they terrified
and tortured two of her own sons into confession, by
tying them neck and heels together, until they said she
was a witch, and had also given them over to the devil,
and they particularized the time and place.
So old Goody Foster, and her daughter and granddaughter,
the two Lacys, were brought up again to renew
the old story of the witch sacrament, and riding on
a pole; a recital of which wonderful adventure deeply
interested Stoughton and his associates. Even in open
court during the trial Susanna Shelden’s hands were
tied so inexplicably with a wheel band, which they were
obliged to cut, like the Gordian knot.
Most of the testimony on her trial, was similar to that
given in against Bishop, How, and Martin; being of various
injuries to the cattle and health of the people of
Andover. But to every accusation she opposed a decided
denial; threats could not weaken her, nor promises seduce
her resolution to abide by the truth. Invitations to
repent, confess and be saved and which others accepted
so readily, she treated with contempt; her conscience was
too sensitive for such falsehood and her courage remained
unshaken through all the terrors of a public prosecution,
trial and execution.
And who will deny to Martha Carrier’s name a place
among those of recorded martyrs for the love of truth.
The boldness and even ultraism of the Andover witcher
in covenanting with the devil, and renouncing infant
baptism, and receiving an adult baptism at his hands by
plunging in rivers and ponds, (a hit by the standing
order at the Anabaptists,) and in riding on poles with
him, startled and terrified the country. Some of these
practices were peculiar to that company, and brought
out by spectral discoveries of Abagail Williams and other
pupils of old Tituba. Under this excitement the General
Court met at Boston in October, 1695, and then passed a
law of death against those who should feed, consult, employ
or covenant with no evil or wicked spirit.
John Proctor and his wife, with John Willard, were
also tried at the August session of the commissioners.
Willard had for some time been used by the prosecutors
as a witch hunter, and to bring in the victims for
examination; a most odious and unpopular office. But
the many cases of individual and family distress and
despair, which he daily witnessed in this employment, at
last so excited his compassion, that he refused to act.
Immediately upon which, and to punish signally the supposed
affront and rebellion, he was cried out upon as
being himself in league and covenant with the devil, and
well knowing his danger he at once turned and fled
northwardly into the wilderness towards Canada. But
swift runners were sent on foot in the same direction
who soon came up with him. And it was given out by
his enemies, that the bewitched girls at Salem were conscious
of the exact moment of his arrest, though many
miles distant; and that one of them cried out in open
court, “now Willard is taken!” which proved to be correct.
He was brought back, and hung in terror to all
offenders against the then dominant bloody influences.
Proctor and his wife were those whose primary examination
of the 11th of April has been already detailed.
Some of the same magistrates who then advised their
commitment, now sat on their final trial, and they found
no favor. Both were returned guilty by the jury and
both received sentence of death from the commissioners,
and with only ten days space to prepare for eternity.
Goody Proctor turned out to be in delicate health and
circumstances, and her execution was deferred until the
fury of persecution was past, and she was saved.
But for Proctor himself, although he became ensnared
by his conjugal fidelity, there was no commiseration or
hope; and as death nearly approached, he showed more
fear than any of his suffering companions. Indeed, in
all these terrors it was notorious that females suffered
with the most patience and fortitude.
His letter to five of the principal clergymen in and
about Boston shows their supposed influence with the
government, and in the witch prosecutions.
It was written in prison a little before his trial, and is
addressed Messrs. Mather, Allen, Moody, Willard and
Bailey.
Up to his last moments, Proctor begged hard for his
life, or for only a little space to prepare, or for repentance,
often saying he was not fit to die; but all to no
purpose.
After he went up the ladder he begged Mr. Noyes, his
own pastor, to pray with him; but he refused, because
Proctor would not confess himself guilty of witchcraft,
and thus give the strongest possible sanction to the
bloody measures then in progress. As he was at last
forcibly pushed off, begging for his life and protesting
that he was an innocent man.
On the 9th and 17th of September the witch commissioners
sat and sentenced to death fifteen more; and on
the 22nd of the same month, eighth of these, viz.: Martha
Corey already mentioned, Mary Easty, of Topfield, Alice
Parker and Ann Pudater of Salem, Margaret Scott of
Rawley, Mary Parker and Samuel Wardwell of Andover,
and William Reed of Marblehead, were hung; and as the
cart with these ascended witch hill to the place of execution,
it proceeded with difficulty, and at last came to a
stand; whereupon the afflicted declared that the devil
himself blocked the wheels. Why should he hinder a
witch execution? It was doctrine then, that at their
death, he had the immediate possession of their souls.
It was on this occasion that the Rev. Mr. Noyes, turning
to the eight bodies hanging on the tree, said aloud to
the by-standers, “how sad it is to see those eight fire
brands of hell, hanging there!”
Wardwell was one of those who had confessed himself
guilty of witchcraft; but afterwards denied his confession.
When he was on trial his former confession, and
the spectre evidence of the afflicted, were given in against
him, and this was all the evidence.
Calef says that at his execution, whilst addressing the
people and protesting his innocence, the hangman
smoked tobacco, and the smoke blowing in his face
interrupted his discourse; but the accusers said that it
was the devil who smoked him.
Here it seems according to the afflicted, the devil did
not wish his man to escape; contrary to his allged conduct
in the cases of Burroughs and Proctor.
Mrs. Mary Easty, hung on this occasion, was also the
sister of Rebecca Nurse, and no doubt but that her connection
with that ill-fated woman who was herself a
victim to sisterly love, was the cause of her persecution
and death. The three sisters were noted for their mutual
love. Her’s was a hard case and excited great public
commiseration. It was hoped that her spotless character
and example would prove too strong on her trial, for the
fictions and fits of the afflicted and their partizans. But
they employed a jury of eight women, and a doctor to
search her body for the devil’s marks, and an excresence
was found which was pronounced to be a witch teat; and
it turned the case against her.
Shortly before her execution, she called her husband,
children and friends about her in prison, and gave them
her last farewell, with such affectionate and pious exhortation,
as drew tears from the eyes of all present. She
also sent to the court the following petition, which presents
a vivid picture of her case, and of the unhallowed
times on which she had fallen.
“To the Honorable Judge and Bench, now sitting in
Salem, and the Rev. Ministers; This petition humbly
sheweth; That whereas your poor petitioner being condemned
to die, doth humbly beg of you to take into your
judicious and pious consideration, that your poor and
humble petitioner knowing my own innocency (blessed
be the Lord for it) and seeing plainly the subtility and
wiles of my accusers towards myself, cannot but judge
charitably of others, who are going the same way to
death with me, if the Lord step not mightily in.
“I was confined a whole month, on accusation of witchcraft,
and then cleared by the afflicted persons, as some
of your Honors know, and in two days time I was cried
out upon by them again, and have been since confined,
and now am condemned to die. The Lord above knows
my innocence, and it will be known at the great day by
men and angels. I petition to your Honors, not for my
own life, for I know I must die, and my appointed time
is set. I question not but your Honors do to the utmost
of your powers in the discovery and detecting of witches,
and would not for the world be guilty of innocent blood;
but by my own innocency I know you are in the wrong
way. May the Lord in mercy, direct you in this great
work.
“I would humbly beg that your Honors would be
pleased to examine some of those confessing witches; I
being confident that there are some of them who have
belied themselves and others, as will appear, if not in
this world, I am sure it will in the world to come, whither
I am going.
“They say that myself and others have made a league
with the devil; we cannot confess. The Lord knows
they belie me, as I question not they do others; the Lord
alone who is the searcher of all hearts knows, as I shall
answer at his judgment seat, that I know not the least
thing of witchcraft, therefore I cannot, I durst not, belie
my own soul.
“I beg your Honors not to deny this my humble petition,
from a poor dying innocent person, and I question
not but the Lord will give a blessing to your endeavors.
“Mary Easty.”
This touching and modest declaration Mary Easty
sealed with her blood. Her husband, Captain Isaac
Easty, was a soldier, and then stood in arms against the
French and Indians, and to defend the country and the
same power which forced away his wife from her once
happy home and family, and without regard to her
known piety and virtue, carted her up Witch Hill and
hung her on the limb of a tree.
Of the other persons hung on the 22d of September
1692, few particulars have come down to us, either in history
or by tradition. It was the last execution and its
atrocity manifestly weakened the authority of Phipps’
bloody witch court, and the credit of the Parris afflicted
band. It swelled the number of victims to twenty, nineteen
of whom had now been hung on that fatal gallows-tree,
in after ages an object of peculiar superstitious
dread; and their bodies, unhonored even by funeral
decencies, though not unwept by private affection, were
cast with public ignominy into untimely graves about its
roots. But the tree withered, as was supposed, thunder-smitten,
and stood for years with leafless, outstretched
branches and shattered trunk, until burned to the
ground by the descendants in the third and fourth generation
of those who suffered on it. In superstitious
minds tempests and torrents could not wash away the
blood from the unhallowed hill whereon it grew, and the
soil was cursed and barren of all wholesome vegetation.
But all were not executed who were tried and sentenced.
Besides Elizabeth Proctor, Abigail Falkner of
Andover was saved by her delicate family condition. At
her trial the court took the confession of her little daughter,
ten years old, against her. But Dorcas Hoar of Beverly,
Rebecca Eams of Boxford, Abigail Hobbs of Topsfield,
Mary Bradbury of Salisbury, and Ann Foster and
Mary Lacy of Andover, all flattered their persecutors by
a confession of the charges against them, and thus escaped
death.
This whole slaughter of the innocent under the similitude
of legal forms, was the work of little more than
three short months. A sudden bereavement, indeed, of
near and loved friends. When, however, a lawful court
was established, this sham tribunal, happily for the
country, came to an end. And it is some consolation to
know that it was entirely discontinued with the regular
jurisprudence of the country.
The last witch trials ever holden in Massachusetts were
those five at Ipswich about the middle of May, 1693, and
to which I have already referred.
By this time the spectre evidence, or the devil’s testimony
through the mouths of the afflicted, had become so
unpopular that none of the judges dared to sustain it,
and the juries also disregarded it; and from this time
forth it was manifest that there could be no more convictions
for alleged witchcrafts.
And thus public opinion, operating through the jury
and the only part of the government at that time through
which it could operate, in effect annulled the bloody witch
law, passed by false agents of the people, against common
justice and in favor of the then ruling political interests
and influences; or the old charter church and state aristocracy.
And history rarely reveals to us a more bloody
despotism. And shall it not stand forever as a warning
against any interference by a people’s self-government
with the religion or business of the community?
Early in the year of 1727 the last witch-fire was kindled
with which the air of bonnie Scotland was polluted.
Two poor Highland women, a mother and daughter,
were brought before Captain David Ross of Littledean,
deputy-sheriff of Sutherland, charged with witchcraft
and consorting with the devil. The mother was accused
of having used her daughter as her “horse and hattock,”
causing her to be shod by the devil, so that she was ever
after lame in both hands and feet. The fact being satisfactorily
proved, and Captain David Ross being well assured
of the same, the poor old woman was put into a
tar-barrel and burned at Dornoch in the bright month of
June. “And it is said that after being brought out to execution,
the weather proving very severe, she sat composedly
warming herself by the fire prepared to consume
her, while the other instruments of death were getting
ready.” The daughter escaped. Afterward she married
and had a son who was as lame as herself, and in the
same manner; though it does not appear that he was ever
shod by the devil and witch-ridden. “And this son,” says
Sir Walter Scott, in 1830 “was living so lately as to receive
the charity of the present Marchioness of Stafford,
Countess of Sutherland in her own right.”
This then, is the last execution for witchcraft in Scotland;
and in June, 1736, the Acts Anents Witchcraft were
formerly repealed. Henceforth to the dread of the timid,
and the anger of the pious, the English Parliament distinctly
opposed the express Law of God: “Thou shalt not
suffer a witch to live;” and declared the text upon which
so much critical absurdity had been talked, and in support
of which so much innocent blood had been shed,
vain, superstitious, impossible and contrary to that
human reason which is the highest Law of God hitherto
revealed unto men. But if Parliament could stay executions
it could not remove beliefs nor give rationality in
place of folly.
Not more than sixty years ago an old woman named
Elizabeth M’Whirter was “scratched” by one Eaglesham
in the parish of Colmonel, Ayrshire, because his son had
fallen sick, and the neighbors said he was bewitched.
Poor old Bessie M’Whirter was forced over the hills to
the young man’s house, a distance of three miles, and
there made to kneel by his bedside and repeat the Lord’s
Prayer.
In offering this collection of witch stories to the public,
I do not profess to have exhausted the subject, or to
have made so complete a summary as I might have done,
had I the space, but I do not think that I have left much
untold.
Neither have I attempted to enter into the philosophy
of the subject. It is far too wide and deep to be discussed
in a few hasty words; and to sift such evidence
as is left us—to determine what was fraud, what self-deception,
what disease and what the exaggeration of
the narrator—would have swelled my book into a more
important and bulky work than I intended or wished.
As a general rule, I think we may apply all four conditions
to every case reported; in what proportion, each
reader must judge for himself. Those who believe in
direct and personal intercourse between the spirit-world
and man will probably accept every account with the
unquestioning belief of the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries; those who have faith in the uniform operations
of nature, will hold chiefly to the doctrine of fraud;
those who have seen much of disease and that strange
condition called “mesmerism,” or “sensitiveness,” will
detect the presence of nervous derangement, mixed up
with a vast amount of conscious deception, which the
credulity and ignorance of the time rendered easy to
practice; and those who have been accustomed to sift
evidence and examine witnesses will be dissatisfied with
the loose statements and wild distortion of every instance
on record.
The whole world was overrun with witches. From
every town came crowds of those lost and damned souls;
from every hovel peered out the cursing witch, or cried
aloud for help the stricken victim. These poor and old
and wretched beings, on whose heads lighted the wrath
of a world, and against whom every idle lad or moping
maid had a stone to fling at will, were held capable of all
but omnipotence. They could destroy the babe in the
womb and make the “mother of many children childless
among women;” they could kill with a look and disable
with a curse; bring storms or sunshine as they listed; by
their “witch-ropes,” artfully woven, draw to themselves
all the profit of their neighbor’s barns and breweries; yet
ever remain poor and miserable, glad to beg a mouthful
of meat or a can of sour milk from the hands of those
whom they could ruin by half a dozen muttered words.
They could take on themselves what shapes they would,
and transport themselves whither they would. No bolt
nor bar could keep them out; no distance by land or
sea was too great for them to accomplish; a straw—a
broomstick—the serviceable imp ever at hand—was
enough for them; and with a pot of magic ointment, and
a charm of spoken gibberish, they might visit the king
on his throne or the lady in her bower, to do what ill
was in their hearts against them or to gather to themselves
what gain and store they would. Yet with all this
power the superstitious world saw nothing doubtful or
illogical in the fact of their own exceeding poverty, and
never stayed to think that if witches and wizards could
transport themselves through the air to any distance
they chose, they would be but slippery holding in prison,
and not very likely to remain there for the pleasure of
being tortured and burned at the end. But neither reason
nor logic had anything to do with the matter. The
whole thing rested on fear, and that practical atheism of
fear, which denies the power of God and the wholesome
beauty of Nature, to exalt in their stead the supremacy
of the devil.
This belief in the devil’s material presence and power
over men was the dark chain that bound them all. Even
the boldest opponent of the Witchcraft Delusion dared
not fling it off. The bravest man, the freest thinker,
could not clear his mind of this terrible bugbear, this
phantasm of human fear and ignorance, this ghastly lie
and morbid delusion, or abandon the slavish belief in
Satan for the glad freedom of God and Nature.
Superstition dies hard; or rather, so far as we have
yet gone, it does not die at all, but only changes its form
and removes its locality. If educated people do not now
believe in witches and Satanic compacts, as in the ignorant
old times of which these stories treat, they do still
believe in other things which are as much against reason
and as incapable of proof. And perhaps it may give
some cause to think that assertion does not necessarily
include truth, and that skepticism may be at times a
wiser attitude of mind than credulity, when they remember
that the best brains in the world were once firmly
convinced of the truth of Possession and the diabolical
art of witchcraft, and realize how many innocent men
and women were murdered on the strength of these
beliefs and to vindicate the honor and glory of God. So
long as one shred of superstition remains in the world, by
which human charity is sacrificed to an unprovable faith,
so long will it be necessary to insist on the dead errors of
the past as a gauge for the living follies of the present.
But the snake is scotched, not killed. So far are we in
advance of the men of the ruder past, inasmuch as our
superstitions, though quite as silly, are less cruel than
theirs, and hurt no one but ourselves. Yet still we have
our wizards and witches lurking round area gates and
prowling through the lanes and yards of the remoter
country districts; still we have our mediums, who call up
the dead from their graves to talk to us more trivial
nonsense than ever they talked while living, and who
reconcile us with humanity by showing us how infinitely
inferior is spirituality; still we have the unknown
mapped out in clear lines sharp and firm; and still the
impossible is asserted as existing, and men are ready to
give their lives in attestation of what contravenes every
law of reason and of nature; still we are not content to
watch and wait and collect and fathom before deciding,
but for every new group of facts or appearances must at
once draw up a code of laws and reasons, and prove, to a
mathematical certainty, the properties of a chimera, and
the divine life and beauty of a lie. Even the mere
vulgar belief in witchcraft remains among the lower
classes. And indeed so long as conviction without examination,
and belief without proof, pass as the righteous
operations of faith, so long will superstition and credulity
reign supreme over the mind, and the functions of critical
reason be abandoned and foresworn. And as it seems to
me that credulity is a less desirable frame of mind than
skepticism, I have set forth this collection of witch stories
as landmarks of the excesses to which a blind belief may
hurry and impel humanity, and perhaps as some slight
aids to that much misused common sense which the
holders of impossible theories generally consider it well
to tread under foot, and loftily ignore.