remarkable
showers—showers of sand—of mud—showers of
sulphur, or yellow rain—luminous rain—red rain, or
showers of blood—superstitions connected
therewith—explanation of the cause—showers of
fish—showers of rats—showers of frogs—insect
shower—showers of vegetable
substances—manna—wheat—showers of
stones—meteoric stones, or aerolites—meteoric
iron—suppositions respecting them—fossil
rain.
Water, in the state of rain, hail, snow, or dew, is generally
the only substance which falls from the atmosphere upon the
earth. There are, however, many well authenticated
instances of various substances being showered down upon the
land, to the great alarm of persons who were ignorant that the
powerful action of the wind was, perhaps, the chief cause of the
strange visitations to which we allude.
We read of showers of sand, mud, sulphur, blood, fishes,
frogs, insects, and stones; and it may be useful,
as well as interesting, to quote a few examples of each
description of shower.
On the west coast of Africa, between Cape Bojador and Cape
Verd, and thence outwards, the land, during the dry season,
consists of little else but dust or sand, which, on account of
its extreme fineness, is raised into the atmosphere by the
slightest current of air; while a moderate wind will convey it to
so considerable a distance as even to annoy ships crossing the
Atlantic. On the 14th and 15th January, 1839, the Prussian
ship, Princess Louisa, being in N. lat. 24° 20′,
and W. long. 26° 42′, had her sails made quite yellow
by the fine sand which covered them. This effect was
produced when the distance from land was as much as from 12°
to 20°. About a fortnight after the time when this ship
crossed these parts of the Atlantic, a similar effect was
produced on board the English ship Roxburgh. One of
the passengers, the Rev. W. B. Clarke, says:—“The sky
was overcast, and the weather thick and insufferably oppressive,
though the thermometer was only 72°. At 3 p.m. Feb. 4, the wind suddenly lulled into a
calm; then rose from the SW. accompanied by rain, and the air
appeared to be filled with dust, which affected the eyes
of the passengers and crew. The weather was clear and fine,
and the powder which covered the sails was of a reddish-brown
colour, resembling the ashes ejected from Vesuvius; and Mr.
Clarke thinks that this dust may have proceeded from the volcanic
island of Fogo, one of the Cape de Verds, about forty-five miles
from the place where the ship then was.
In countries which are subject to long-continued droughts the
soil is frequently converted into dust, which, being carried away
by the winds, leaves the land barren. The climate of Buenos
Ayres, in South America, has of late years been subject to such
droughts, as to disappoint the hopes of the husbandman and the
breeder of cattle. In the early part of 1832, the drought
had reached to such a height as to convert the whole province
into one continued bleak and dreary desert. The clouds of
dust raised by the winds were so dense as completely to obscure
the sun at mid-day, and envelope the inhabitants in almost total
darkness. When the rains at length commenced, in March, the
water, in its passage through the air, intermingled so completely
with the dust suspended in it, as to descend in the form of
showers of mud; and, on some occasions, gave to the whole
exterior of the houses the appearance of having been plastered
over with earth. Many flocks of sheep were smothered on
these occasions, in a similar manner as in the snow-storms which
occur in the mountainous districts of Scotland.
Showers of sulphur, or yellow rain, have fallen at different
times in various parts of Europe; and sometimes, when falling by
night, they have appeared luminous, to the great alarm of the
observers. Yellow rain has been accounted for in the
following way:—The pollen, or impregnating seed-dust of the
flowers of the fir, birch, juniper, and other trees, is of a
yellow colour, and this pollen, by the action of the wind, is
carried to a considerable distance, and descends with falling
rain. This yellow rain has also been found impregnated with
sulphur; and during a shower of this kind which once fell in
Germany, matches were made by being dipped in it.
Many examples of luminous rain are recorded on good
authority. One of the latest instances is mentioned by Dr.
Morel Deville, of Paris, who on the 1st of November, 1844, at
half-past eight o’clock in the evening, during a heavy fall
of rain, noticed, as he was crossing the
court of the College Louis-le-Grand, that the drops, on coming in
contact with the ground, emitted sparks and tufts
(aigrettes) of light, accompanied by a rustling and
crackling noise; a smell of phosphorus having been immediately
after perceptible. The phenomenon was seen three
times. At the same hour a remarkable brightness was seen in
the northern sky.
An officer of the Algerian army states, that during a violent
storm on the 20th September, 1840, the drops of rain that fell on
the beards and mustachios of the men were luminous. When
the hair was wiped the appearance ceased; but was renewed the
moment any fresh drops fell on it.
But of all these remarkable showers, the greatest alarm has
been occasioned by red rain, or showers of blood as they
have been ignorantly called. In the year 1608, considerable
alarm was excited in the city of Aix and its vicinity by the
appearance of large red drops upon the walls of the cemetery of
the greater church, which is near the walls of the city, upon the
walls of the city itself, and also upon the walls of villas,
hamlets, and towns, for some miles round the city. The
husbandmen are said to have been so alarmed, that
they left their labour in the fields and fled for safety into the
neighbouring houses; and a report was set on foot, that the
appearance was produced by demons or witches shedding the blood
of innocent babes. M. Peiresc, thinking this story of a
bloody shower to be scarcely reconcileable with the goodness and
providence of God, accidentally discovered, as he thought, the
true cause of the phenomenon. He had found, some months
before, a chrysalis of remarkable size and form, which he had
enclosed in a box; he thought no more of it, until hearing a buzz
within the box, he opened it, and perceived that the chrysalis
had been changed into a beautiful butterfly, which immediately
flew away, leaving at the bottom of the box a red drop of the
size of a shilling. As this happened about the time when
the shower was supposed to have fallen, and when multitudes of
those insects were observed fluttering through the air in every
direction, he concluded that the drops in question were emitted
by them when they alighted upon the walls. He, therefore,
examined the drops again, and remarked that they were not upon
the upper surfaces of stones and buildings, as they
would have been if a shower of blood had fallen from the sky, but
rather in cavities and holes where insects might nestle. He
also noticed that they were to be seen upon the walls of those
houses only which were near the fields; and not upon the more
elevated parts of them, but only up to the same moderate height
at which butterflies were accustomed to flutter. This was,
no doubt, the correct explanation of the phenomenon in question;
for it is a curious and well-ascertained fact, that when insects
are evolved from the pupa state, they always discharge some
substance, which, in many butterflies, is of a red colour,
resembling blood, while in several moths it is orange or
whitish.
It appears, however, from the researches of M. Ehrenberg, a
distinguished microscopic observer, that the appearances of blood
which have at different times been observed in Arabia, Siberia,
and other places, are not to be attributed to one, but to various
causes. From his account, it appears that rivers have
flowed suddenly with red or bloody water, without any previous
rain of that colour having fallen; that lakes or stagnant-waters
were suddenly or gradually coloured without previous
blood-rain; that dew, rain, snow, hail, and shot-stars,
occasionally fall from the air red-coloured, as blood-dew,
blood-rain, and clotted blood; and, lastly, that the atmosphere
is occasionally loaded with red dust, by which the rain
accidentally assumes the appearance of blood-rain, in consequence
of which rivers and stagnant waters assume a red colour.
The blood-red colour sometimes exhibited by pools, was first
satisfactorily explained at the close of the last century.
Girod Chantran, observing the water of a pond to be of a
brilliant red colour, examined it with the microscope, and found
that the sanguine hue resulted from the presence of innumerable
animalculæ, not visible to the naked eye. But, before
this investigation, Linnæus and other naturalists had shown
that red infusoria were capable of giving that colour to water
which, in early times, and still, we fear, in remote districts,
was supposed to forebode great calamities. In the year 1815
an instance of this superstitious dread occurred in the south of
Prussia. A number of red, violet, or grass-green spots were
observed in a lake near Lubotin, about the end of harvest.
In winter the ice was coloured in the same manner at the surface,
while beneath it was colourless. The inhabitants,
in great dismay, anticipated a variety of disasters from the
appearance; but it fortunately happened that the celebrated
chemist Klaproth, hearing of the circumstance, undertook an
examination of the waters of the lake. He found them to
contain an albuminous vegetable matter, with a particular
colouring matter similar to indigo, produced, probably, by the
decomposition of vegetables in harvest; while the change of
colour from green to violet and red, he explained by the
absorption of more or less oxygen. A few years ago the
blood-red waters of a Siberian lake were carefully examined by M.
Ehrenberg, and found to contain multitudes of infusoria, by the
presence of which this remarkable appearance was accounted
for. Thus it appears that both animals and vegetables are
concerned in giving a peculiar tint to water. It has also
been ascertained that red snow is chiefly occasioned by the
presence of red animalculæ.
Showers of fish and frogs are by no means uncommon, especially
in India. One of these showers, which fell about twenty
miles south of Calcutta, is thus noticed by an
observer:—“About two o’clock, p.m., of the
20th inst., (Sept. 1839,) we had a very smart shower of rain, and
with it descended a quantity of live fish, about three inches in
length, and all of one kind only. They fell in a straight
line on the road from my house to the tank which is about forty
or fifty yards distant. Those which fell on the hard ground
were, as a matter of course, killed from the fall, but those
which fell where there was grass sustained no injury; and I
picked up a large quantity of them, ‘alive and
kicking,’ and let them go into my tank. The most
strange thing that ever struck me in connexion with this event,
was, that the fish did not fall helter skelter, everywhere, or
‘here and there;’ but they fell in a straight line,
not more than a cubit in breadth.” Another shower is
said to have taken place at a village near Allahabad, in the
month of May. About noon, the wind being in the west, and a
few distant clouds visible, a blast of high wind came on,
accompanied with so much dust as to change the tint of the
atmosphere to a reddish hue. The blast appeared to extend
in breadth four hundred yards, and was so violent that many large
trees were blown down. When the storm had passed over, the ground, south of the village, was found to be
covered with fish, not less than three or four thousand in
number. They all belonged to a species well known in India,
and were about a span in length. They were all dead and
dry.
It would be easy to multiply these examples to almost any
extent, although they are not so frequent in Great Britain.
It is related in Hasted’s History of Kent, that about
Easter, 1666, in the parish of Stanstead, which is a considerable
distance from the sea, and a place where there are no fishponds,
and rather a scarcity of water, a pasture field was scattered all
over with small fish, supposed to have been rained down during a
thunder-storm. Several of these fish were sold publicly at
Maidstone and Dartford. In the year 1830, the inhabitants
of the island of Ula, in Argyleshire, after a day of very hard
rain, which occurred on the 9th March, were surprised to find
numbers of small herrings strewed over the fields, perfectly
fresh and some of them alive. Some years ago, during a
strong gale, herrings and other fish were carried from the Frith
of Forth so far as Loch-Leven.
In some countries rats migrate in vast numbers from the high
to the low countries; and it is recorded in
the history of Norway, that a shower of these, transported by the
wind, fell in an adjacent valley.
Several notices have, from time to time, been brought before
the French Academy, of showers of frogs having fallen in
different parts of France. Professor Pontus, of Cahors,
states, that in August, 1804, while distant three leagues from
Toulouse, the sky being clear, suddenly a very thick cloud
covered the horizon, and thunder and lightning came on. The
cloud burst over the road about sixty toises (383 feet) from the
place where M. Pontus was. Two gentlemen, returning from
Toulouse, were surprised by being exposed not only to a storm,
but to a shower of frogs. Pontus states that he saw the
young frogs on their cloaks. When the diligence in which he
was travelling, arrived at the place where the storm burst, the
road, and the fields alongside of it, were observed full of
frogs, in three or four layers placed one above the other.
The feet of the horses and the wheels of the carriage killed
thousands. The diligence travelled for a quarter of an
hour, at least, along this living road, the horses being at a
trot.
In the “Journal de St. Petersburg,” is
given an account of the fall of a shower of insects during a
snow-storm in Russia. “On the 17th October, 1827,
there fell in the district of Rjev, in the government of Tver, a
heavy shower of snow, in the space of about ten versts (nearly
seven English miles), which contained the village of Pakroff and
its environs. It was accompanied in its fall by a
prodigious quantity of worms of a black colour, ringed, and in
length about an inch and a quarter. The head of these
insects was flat and shining, furnished with antennæ, and
the hair in the form of whiskers; while the body, from the head
to about one-third of their length, resembled a band of black
velvet. They had on each side three feet, by means of which
they appeared to crawl very fast upon the snow, and assembled in
groups about the plants and the holes in trees and
buildings. Several having been exposed to the air in a
vessel filled with snow, lived there till the 26th October;
although, in that interval, the thermometer had fallen to eight
degrees below zero. Some others which had been frozen
continued alive equally long; for they were not found exactly
encrusted with the ice, but they had formed round their
bodies a space similar to the hollow of a tree. When they
were plunged into water they swam about as if they had received
no injury; but those which were carried into a warm place
perished in a few minutes.”
All these remarkable showers may be accounted for, when we
consider the mighty power of the wind; especially that form of it
which is popularly called the whirlwind. It is now pretty
well ascertained, that in all, or most of the great storms which
agitate the atmosphere, the wind has a circular or rotatory
movement; and the same is probably the case in many of the lesser
storms, in which the air is whirled upwards in a spiral curve
with great velocity, carrying up any small bodies which may come
within the circuit. When such a storm happens at sea, the
water-spout is produced. In the deserts of Arabia, pillars
of sand are formed; and, in other places various light bodies are
caught up; fishponds have been entirely emptied in an instant,
and the moving column, whether of water, sand, or air, travels
with the wind with great swiftness. When, however, the
storm has subsided, the various substances thus caught up and
sustained in the air, are deposited at great
distances from the place where they were first found, and thus
produce these remarkable showers. In some cases, however,
the direct force of the wind has actually blown small fish out of
the water, and conveyed them several miles inland.
Showers of nutritious substances have been recorded on good
authority. We do not here refer to the manna which fell in
such abundance about the Hebrew camp, for that was a miracle
specially wrought by the Almighty for the preservation of his
chosen people; but, it may be noticed here, that in Arabia, a
substance, called “manna,” is found in great
abundance on the leaves of many trees and herbs, and may be
gathered and removed by the wind to a distance. A shower of
this kind occurred in 1824. In 1828, a substance was
exhibited at the French Academy, which fell in the plains of
Persia. It was eaten, and afforded nourishment to cattle,
and many other animals; and, on examination, proved to be a
vegetable,—the Lichen esculentus,—which had
been conveyed thither by the winds.
In the Minutes of the proceedings of the Royal Society, 26th
June, 1661, we find the following curious narration:—
“Col. Tuke brought, in
writing, the following brief account of the supposed rain of
wheat, which was registered:—
“On the 30th of May, 1661, Mr. Henry Puckering, son to
Sir Henry Puckering, of Warwick, brought some papers of seeds,
resembling wheat, to the king, with a letter written by Mr.
William Halyburton, dated the 27th May, from Warwick; out of
which letter I have made this extract:
“‘Instead of news I send you some papers of
wonders. On Saturday last, it was rumoured in this town,
that it rained wheat at Tuchbrooke, a village about two miles
from Warwick. Whereupon some of the inhabitants of this
town went thither; where they saw great quantities on the way, in
the fields, and on the leads of the church, castle, and priory,
and upon the hearths of the chimneys in the chambers. And
Arthur Mason, coming out of Shropshire, reports, that it hath
rained the like in many places of that county. God make us
thankful for this miraculous blessing, &.’”
“I brought some papers of these seeds, with this letter,
to the Society of Gresham College; who would not enter into any
consideration of it, till they were better informed of
the matter of fact. Hereupon, I entreated Mr. Henry
Puckering to write to the bailiff of the town of Warwick, to the
ministers and physicians, to send us an account of the matter of
fact, and their opinions of it. In the bailiff’s
letter, dated the 3rd of June, I find this report verified;
affirming that himself, with the inhabitants of the town, were in
a great astonishment at this wonder. But, before the next
day of our meeting, I sent for some ivy-berries, and brought them
to Gresham College with some of these seeds resembling wheat; and
taking off the outward pulp of the ivy-berries, we found in each
of the berries four seeds; which were generally concluded by the
Society to be the same with those that were supposed and believed
by the common people to have been wheat that had been rained;
and, that they were brought to those places, where they were
found, by starlings; who, of all the birds that we know, do
assemble in the greatest numbers; and do, at this time of the
year, feed upon these berries; and digesting the outward pulp,
they render these seeds by casting, as hawks do feathers and
bones.”
The remarkable showers already noticed, have excited much interest and inquiry among learned men,
and many superstitious fears among the ignorant; but, there is
another description of shower which affords a singular instance
of popular observation, being greatly in advance of scientific
knowledge. We allude to the showers of stones, called
“aërolites,” (from two Greek words, signifying
the atmosphere, and a stone); they are also called
Meteorolites, or Meteoric stones.
Writers in all ages have mentioned instances of stony bodies
having been seen to fall from the sky. The Chinese and
Japanese carefully note down the most striking and remarkable
phenomena of nature, believing them to have some connexion with
public affairs; and the chronicles of these people are said to
contain many notices of the fall of stony bodies from the
sky. Until within the last fifty years, however, these
accounts have been treated in Europe as idle superstitions;
scientific men denying even the probability of such an
occurrence. The first scientific man who was bold enough to
support the popular opinion, that stones actually do fall from
the sky, was Chladni, a German philosopher, who published a
pamphlet on the subject in 1794. This did not excite much attention, until, two years afterwards, a stone
weighing fifty-six pounds was exhibited in London, which was said
to have fallen in Yorkshire in the December of the preceding
year; but, although the fact was attested by several respectable
persons, the possibility of such an occurrence was still
doubted. It was remarked, however, by Sir Joseph Banks,
that this stone was very similar in appearance to one which had
been sent to him from Italy, with an account of its having fallen
from the clouds. In the year 1799, a number of stones were
received by the Royal Society, from Benares, in the East Indies,
which were also said to have fallen from the atmosphere, with a
minute account of the circumstances attending the fall, which
will be presently noticed; and, as these stones appeared to be
precisely similar to the Yorkshire stone already noticed,
attention was fairly drawn to the subject. In 1802, Mr.
Howard published an analysis of a variety of these stones
collected from different places; and his researches led to the
important conclusion, that they are all composed of the same
substances, and in nearly the same proportions. In 1803, a
notice was received at Paris, of a shower of stones at
L’Aigle in Normandy; and the
Institute of France deputed M. Biot, a well-known and excellent
natural philosopher, to examine, on the spot, all the
circumstances attending this remarkable event. His account
will be noticed presently; but it may here be stated, that the
stones he collected, on being analysed, gave results similar to
those obtained by Mr. Howard.
The circumstances attending the fall of stones at Krakhut, a
village about fourteen miles from the city of Benares, are
briefly as follow:—On the 19th December, 1798, a very
luminous meteor was observed in the heavens, about eight
o’clock in the evening, in the form of a large ball of
fire; it was accompanied by a loud noise, resembling that of
thunder, which was immediately followed by the sound of the fall
of heavy bodies. On examining the ground, it was observed
to have been newly torn up in many places; and in these were
found stones of a peculiar appearance, most of which had buried
themselves to the depth of six inches. At the time the
meteor appeared, the sky was perfectly serene, not the smallest
vestige of a cloud had been seen since the 11th of the month; nor
were any observed for many days after. It was seen in the western part of the
hemisphere, and was visible only a short time. The light
from it was so great, as to cast a strong shadow from the bars of
a window upon a dark carpet. Mr. Davis, the judge and
magistrate of the district, affirmed, that in brilliancy it
equalled the brightest moonlight. Both he and Mr. Erskine
were induced to send persons in whom they could confide to the
spot where this shower of stones is reported to have taken place,
and thus obtained additional evidence of the phenomena, together
with several of the stones which had penetrated about six inches
into fields recently watered. Mr. Maclane, a gentleman who
resided near Krakhut, presented Mr. Howard with a portion of a
stone which had been brought to him the morning after its fall by
the person who was on duty at his house, and through the roof of
whose hut it had passed, and buried itself several inches in the
floor, which was of consolidated earth. Before it was
broken it must have weighed upwards of two pounds.
M. Biot’s summary of the evidence collected by him
respecting the great shower of stones which fell at Aigle, in
Normandy, is as follows:—
“On Tuesday, 26th April, 1803,
about one o’clock, p.m., the
weather being serene, there was observed from Caen, Pont
d’Audemer, and the environs of Alençon, Falaise, and
Verneuil, a fiery globe, of a very brilliant splendour, and which
moved in the atmosphere with great rapidity. Some moments
after, there was heard at Aigle, and in the environs of that
town, in the extent of more than thirty leagues in every
direction, a violent explosion, which lasted five or six
minutes. At first there were three or four reports like
those of a cannon, followed by a kind of discharge which
resembled the firing of musketry; after which, there was heard a
dreadful rumbling, like the beating of a drum. The air was
calm and the sky serene, except a few clouds, such as are
frequently observed. This noise proceeded from a small
cloud which had a rectangular form; the largest side being in a
direction from east to west. It appeared motionless all the
time that the phenomenon lasted; but the vapours of which it was
composed, were projected momentarily from different sides, by the
effect of successive explosions. This cloud was about half
a league to the north-north-west of the town of Aigle. It was at a great elevation in the atmosphere; for, the
inhabitants of two hamlets, a league distant from each other, saw
it at the same time above their heads. In the whole canton
over which this cloud was suspended, there was a hissing noise,
like that of a stone discharged from a sling; and a great many
mineral masses, exactly similar to those distinguished by the
name of ‘meteor-stones,’ were seen to fall. The
district in which these masses were projected, forms an
elliptical extent of about two leagues and a half in length, and
nearly one in breadth, the greatest dimension being in a
direction from south-east to north-west; forming a declination of
about 22 degrees. This direction, which the meteor must
have followed, is exactly that of the magnetic meridian, which is
a remarkable result. The greatest of these stones fell at
the south-eastern extremity of the large axis of the ellipse, the
middle-sized in the centre, and the smaller at the other
extremity. Hence it appears, that the largest fell first,
as might naturally be supposed. The largest of all those
that fell, weighs seventeen pounds and a half. The smallest
which I have seen, weighs about two gros, (a thousandth
part of the last.) The number of all
those which fell, is certainly above two or three
thousand.”
Meteoric stones have been known to commit great injury in
their fall. In July, 1790, a very bright fire-ball,
luminous as the sun, of the size of an ordinary balloon, appeared
near Bourdeaux, which, after filling the inhabitants with alarm,
burst, and disappeared. A few days after, some peasants
brought stones into the town, which they said had fallen from the
meteor; but, the philosophers to whom they offered them laughed
at their statements. One of these stones, fifteen inches in
diameter, broke through the roof of a cottage, and killed a
herdsman and a bullock. In 1810, a great stone fell at
Shahabad, in India. It burnt a village, and killed several
people.
The fall of meteoric stones is more frequent than would be
supposed. Chaldni has compiled a Catalogue of all recorded
instances from the earliest times. Of these, twenty-seven
are previous to the Christian era; thirty-five from the beginning
of the first to the end of the fourteenth century; eighty-nine
from the beginning of the fifteenth to the beginning of the
present century; from which time, since the attention of
scientific men has been directed to the subject, above
sixty cases have been recorded. These are, doubtless, but a
small proportion of the whole amount of meteoric showers which
have fallen, when the small extent of surface occupied by those
capable of recording the event is compared with the wide expanse
of the ocean, the vast uninhabited deserts, mountains, and
forests, and the countries occupied by savage nations.
Meteoric stones have generally a broken, irregular surface,
coated with a thin black crust, like varnish. When broken,
they appear to have been made up of a number of small spherical
bodies of a grey colour, imbedded in a gritty substance, and
often interspersed with yellow spots. A considerable
proportion of iron is found in all of them, partly in a malleable
state, partly in that of an oxide, and always in combination with
a rather scarce metal called nickel; [181] the earths silica,
and magnesia, and sulphur, form the
other chief ingredients; but, the earths alumina and lime, the
metals manganese, chrome, and cobalt, together with carbon, soda,
and water, have also been found in small quantities, but not in
the same specimens. No substance with which chemists were
previously unacquainted, has ever been found in them; but no
combination, similar to that in meteoric stones, has ever been
met with in geological formations, or among the products of any
volcano. They are sometimes very friable, sometimes very
hard; and some that are friable when they first fall, become hard
afterwards. When taken up soon after their fall they are
extremely hot. They vary in weight from two drams to
several hundred pounds. Meteoric stones have fallen in all
climates, in every part of the earth, at all seasons, in the
night and in the day.
The meteoric stones already noticed, are not the only metallic
bodies which are supposed to fall from the sky. In many
parts of the earth masses of malleable iron, often of vast size,
have been found. An immense mass seen by Pallas, in
Siberia, was discovered at a great height on a mountain of slate,
near the river Jenesei. The Tartars held it in great
veneration, as having fallen from heaven. It was removed in
the year 1749, to the town of Krasnojarsk, by the inspector of
iron mines. The mass, which weighed about 1,400 pounds, was
irregular in form, and cellular, like a sponge. The iron
was tough and malleable, and was found to contain nickel, silica,
magnesia, sulphur, and chrome. Another enormous mass of
meteoric iron was found in South America, about the year
1788. It lay in a vast plain, half sunk in the ground, and
was supposed, from its size and the known weight of iron, to
contain upwards of thirteen tons. Specimens of this mass
are now in the British Museum, and have been found to contain 90
per cent. of iron and 10 of nickel. Many other masses of
iron might be mentioned, which, from the places in which they are
found, and from their composition, leave no doubt as to their
being of meteoric origin. The only instance, on record, of
iron having been actually seen to fall from the atmosphere, is
that which took place at Agram in Croatia, on the 26th May,
1751. About six o’clock in the evening, the sky being
quite clear, a ball of fire was seen, which shot along, with a
hollow noise, from west to east, and, after a loud explosion
accompanied by a great smoke, two
masses of iron fell from it in the form of chains welded
together.
It is, perhaps, impossible, in the present state of our
knowledge, to account for the origin of these remarkable
bodies. Some have supposed them to have been shot out from
volcanoes belonging to our earth; but this theory is opposed by
the fact that no substance, resembling aërolites, has ever
been found in or near any volcano; and they fall from a height to
which no volcano can be supposed to have projected them, and
still less to have given them the horizontal direction in which
they usually move. Another supposition is, that these
masses are formed in the atmosphere; but it is almost ridiculous
to imagine a body, weighing many tons, to be produced by any
chemical or electrical forces in the upper regions of the
air. A third explanation is, that they are bodies thrown
out by the volcanoes, which are known to exist in the moon, with
such force as to bring them within the sphere of the
earth’s attraction. This notion was supported by the
celebrated astronomer and mathematician La Place. He
calculated that a body projected from the moon with the velocity
of 7771 feet in the first second, would reach our earth in about two days and a half. But other astronomers
are of opinion, that the known velocity of some meteors is too
great to admit of the possibility of their having come from the
moon. The theory which agrees best with known facts and the
laws of nature, is that proposed by Chladni, namely, that the
meteors are bodies moving in space, either masses of matter as
originally created, or fragments separated from a larger mass of
a similar nature. This view has also been supported by Sir
Humphrey Davy, who says, “The luminous appearances of
shooting-stars and meteors cannot be owing to any inflammation of
elastic fluids, but must depend upon the ignition of solid
bodies. Dr. Halley calculated the height of a meteor at
ninety miles; and the great American meteor, which threw down
showers of stones, was estimated at seventeen miles high.
The velocity of motion of these bodies must, in all cases, be
immensely great, and the heat produced by the compression of the
most rarefied air from the velocity of motion, must be, probably,
sufficient to ignite the mass; and all the phenomena may be
explained, if falling stars be supposed to be small bodies
moving round the earth in very eccentric orbits, which become
ignited only when they pass with immense velocity
through the upper region of the atmosphere; and if the meteoric
bodies which throw down stones with explosions, be supposed to be
similar bodies which contain either combustible or elastic
matter.”
This chapter ought not to be concluded without a short notice
of that remarkable rain known to geologists as “fossil
rain.” In the new red-sandstone of the Storeton
quarries, impressions of the foot-prints of ancient animals have
been discovered; and in examining some of the slabs of stone
extracted at the depth of above thirty feet, Mr. Cunningham
observed “that their under surface was thickly covered with
minute hemispherical projections, or casts in relief of circular
pits, in the immediately subjacent layers of clay. The
origin of these marks, he is of opinion, must be ascribed to
showers of rain which fell upon an argillaceous beach exposed by
the retiring tide, and their preservation to the filling up of
the indentations by sand. On the same slabs are impressions
of the feet of small reptiles, which appear to have passed over
the clay previously to the shower, since the foot-marks are also
indented with circular pits, but to a less degree; and the
difference Mr. Cunningham explains by
the pressure of the animal having rendered these portions less
easily acted upon.” The preservation of these marks
has been explained by supposing dry sand, drifted by the wind, to
have swept over and filled up the footprints, rain-pits, and
hollows of every kind, which the soft argillaceous surface had
received.
The frontispiece to the present chapter (p. 156),
represents a slab of sandstone containing impressions of the foot
of a bird and of rain drops. This slab is from a sandstone
basin near Turner’s Falls, a fine cataract of the
Connecticut river in the State of Massachusetts, and is described
by Dr. Deane in a recent number of the American Journal of
Science. “It is rare,” says that gentleman, to
“find a stratum containing these footprints exactly as they
were made by the animal, without having suffered change.
They are usually more or less disturbed or obliterated by the too
soft nature of the mud, the coarseness of the materials, and by
many other circumstances which we may easily see would deface
them, so that although the general form of the foot may be
apparent, the minute traces of its appendages are almost
invariably lost. In general, except in thick-toed species,
we cannot discover the distinct evidences of the structure
of the toes, each toe appearing to be formed of a single joint,
and seldom terminated by a claw. But, a few specimens
hitherto discovered at this locality completely developed the
true characters of the foot, its ranks of joints, its claws and
integuments. So far as I have seen, the faultless
impressions are upon shales of the finest texture with a smooth
glossy surface, such as would retain the beautiful impressions of
rain drops. This kind of surface containing footmarks is
exceedingly rare: I have seen but few detached examples; recently
it has been my good fortune to recover a stratum, containing in
all more than one hundred most beautiful impressions of the feet
of four or five varieties of birds, the entire surface being also
pitted by a shower of fossil rain-drops. The slabs are
perfectly smooth on the inferior surface, and are about two
inches in thickness.
“The impression of a medallion is not more sharp and
clear than are most of these imprints, and it may be proper to
observe, that this remarkable preservation may be ascribed to the
circumstance, that the entire surface of the stratum was
incrusted with a layer of micaceous sandstone, adhering so
firmly that it would not cleave off, thereby requiring the
laborious and skilful application of the chisel. The
appearance of this shining layer which is of a gray colour, while
the fossil slab is a dark red, seems to carry the probability
that it was washed or blown over the latter while in a state of
loose sand, thus filling up the foot-prints and rain-drops, and
preserving them unchanged until the present day—unchanged
in the smallest particular, so far as relates merely to
configuration, nothing being obliterated; the precise form of the
nails, or claws, and joints, and in the deep impressions of the
heel bone, being exquisitely preserved.”
The small slab figured at p. 156 is described as being an
incomparable specimen. “For purity of impression it
is unsurpassed, and the living reality of the rain-drops, the
beautiful colour of the stone, its sound texture and lightness,
renders it a fit member for any collection of organic
remains.”