MISCELLANEOUS MILITARY OBSERVATIONS MADE BY
THE AUTHOR DURING THE SEVEN MONTHS
RECORDED IN THIS BOOK
The best maps with which to follow and study the war in France,
Flanders, and Belgium are those of the French Automobile Club, called
“Cartes Routières pour Automobiles,” published by A. Taride, 18
Boulevard Saint-Denis, Paris. The war has been largely fought and
directed by the use of these maps, which are on the scale prescribed
by the French General Staff—about three and one-half miles to the
inch. They show every road and lane, every town and village in France.
The war areas are contained in numbers 1, ibis, 2, 3, 6, and 7. Those
most referred to in this book are 3 and 7.
The total losses of the various belligerents in killed, wounded, and
captured for the first six months of the war, from August 1st to
February 1st, are as follows:
| British |
140,000 |
| French |
1,450,000 |
| Russians |
2,050,000 |
| Austro-Hungarians |
950,000 |
| Germans |
1,500,000 |
The approximate ratio of deaths to total casualties is as follows:
| German, |
2 deaths to 9 casualties. |
| French, |
2 deaths to 7 casualties. |
(The large proportion of French deaths was due:
First, to the fact that in the early part of the war most actions were
German victories, and the Germans could not care for French wounded as
well as they did for their own;
Secondly to lack of sanitary skill on the part of the French in taking
care of their wounded.)
| Austrian, |
2 deaths to 7 casualties. |
| British, |
2 deaths to 11 casualties. |
(The low rate of mortality among the British is due to the great
number of motor ambulances which they possess, to the smallness of
their army, to the efficiency with which they care for their wounded,
and to the short distance which separates their forces from their home
country.)
The numbers of prisoners held on February 1st:
| IN GERMANY: |
British |
18,000 |
| |
Belgian |
39,000 |
| |
Russian |
350,000 |
| |
French |
245,000 |
| IN AUSTRIA: |
Russian |
250,000 |
| IN ENGLAND: |
German |
15,000 |
| IN FRANCE: |
German, approximately |
50,000 |
The battle practice in the French army in handling wounded is as
follows:
When a man is wounded he is carried to a dressing station in some
partly protected neighborhood within the battle area. He is generally
taken there by the stretcher-bearers attached to his company. After
field dressing, he is removed to a field hospital one to three miles
toward the rear. The means of transportation are varied, and made to
suit the particular battle conditions, the principal means being
stretcher-bearers, motor ambulances, and horse ambulances. In case of
heavy casualties, all the men who can possibly stagger are obliged to
go to the rear by themselves and are sent in small parties so that
they may assist one another en route.
The field hospitals are nearly always established in village churches
with overflow into neighboring houses in case of heavy casualties. All
the furniture is removed from the church and the floor is covered
thick with straw, upon which the wounded are laid out in long rows.
The altar is made the pharmacist’s headquarters, the vestry is
converted into an operating room, and a Red Cross flag is hung from
the tower or steeple. These field hospitals are generally well within
the zone of artillery fire, and are frequently struck by shells.
The men are evacuated from the field hospital to a base hospital in
motor ambulances or by a combination of motor ambulances and railway
trains. Theoretically, this should be done within a day or two with
all cases except the very gravest. In practice, the men frequently lie
in field hospitals for weeks before the opportunity of evacuation is
found. The base hospitals are in cities or large towns, and serve as
clearing-houses. They are well out of the military zone, being from
five to fifteen miles behind the zone of artillery fire. I will give a
definite example. In October, I saw the front at Albert. There were
dressing stations just behind the battle-line. There was a field
hospital at Hénencourt. From Hénencourt the wounded were evacuated
upon Amiens, which contained the base hospitals for a front extending
from a point north of Sus St. Léger to the neighborhood of Guerbigny.
Here the railway station had been converted into a receiving center to
which all the wounded were brought for examination and classification.
Those who could bear travel were immediately placed upon trains and
shipped to the south of France. There were four other hospitals in
Amiens, and all cases considered too grave for transportation to the
south were sent to one of these. They were divided and classified so
that cases of a kind were grouped together, each hospital and the
various floors of each hospital having a different class of patient.
Some of the classifications were: head cases, amputation cases,
gangrene cases, cases in which the patient could not refrain from
screaming, either because of delirium or for other reasons. It is on
leaving the base hospital that wounded are first classified as to
nationality.
For the railway transportation of the wounded, luggage vans are used.
I estimate the interior length of a French luggage-van or freight-car
to be about twenty-five feet, the doors being placed, as in America,
in the middle of each side. Wooden racks are built to the right and
left of the door in the ends of the car. These racks are arranged to
hold two layers of three stretchers each, so that each end of the
freight car contains six lying cases. The men who are able to sit or
stand and the orderlies in charge are placed in the aisle between the
doors, a space about six feet wide between the stretcher handles. On
their way to the south of France these trains stop about every
twenty-four hours, the first stop being Aubervilliers, a station some
two miles outside the gates of Paris. Here a large storage warehouse
has been converted into a hospital. Food and water are distributed to
the train on its arrival, the dead taken out, and the delirious or
very grave cases are removed to the Paris hospitals. The others are
allowed twelve hours’ rest before continuing on the next stage of
their journey.
The trains are usually made up of from 30 to 50 vans, and each train
carries from 500 to 800 wounded. No particular effort seems to be made
to isolate gangrene cases from the others, and the wounded invariably
remain in the uniforms in which they fought until they reach the home
hospital in the south of France. Their dressings, until they reach
these home hospitals, are superficial ones. I have seen numerous cases
with grave wounds, such as shattered thighs, which have remained in
this condition for four and five weeks before finally being undressed
and washed at the home hospital.
The whole system of handling the wounded seems to be theoretically
well conceived. In practice among the French it worked thus poorly
during the early months of the war. The wounded suffered from lack of
food, water, attention, and bathing, and the resulting number of
mortalities and amputations was exceedingly high. The effect on the
morale of those who recovered is very serious, and is in singular
contrast to the eagerness to return to the front often shown by
British and German convalescents. The care given to the wounded by
these two nations is very excellent indeed.
The same stretcher is used throughout the French army, and its
universal use is compulsory on all organizations, whether volunteer or
regular. It is not unusual for a grave case to be picked up on the
battlefield and placed upon a stretcher and to travel on it all the
way to the south of France without once being removed. The company
stretcher-bearers turn him over to the dressing station with the
stretcher upon which they have borne him. Since these stretchers are
identical in size and construction they fit all ambulances and all
railway equipments. They may be said to be current, like money, and
whenever one organization turns over a grave case to the succeeding
organization, the stretcher goes with the case, and an empty one is
received in return. The number at any one point is thus maintained at
a constant figure, and there is a general tendency for battered and
infected stretchers to gravitate toward the south of France, and for
new stretchers to gravitate toward the front.
There has been much typhoid in the armies in France, and it is on the
increase. The wounded men develop it more often than any other class.
Inoculation against typhoid is theoretically compulsory in the French
army. I have no personal knowledge as to the thoroughness or
effectiveness of inoculation in practice.
Lockjaw seems to develop late. Most of the cases occur after the men
have reached the south of France. The new French anti-lockjaw
inoculation of Doctor Doyen has produced most remarkable results. I
have heard, on reliable authority, that with it 80% of the cases
treated make a complete recovery. Three of my personal friends have
had lockjaw and recovered. This is, in part, due to the fact that in
all the hospitals the diagnosis is quick and sure, and the serum
always in stock. The injection is made into the spinal cord at the
small of the back. The patient is kept on his back on a slightly
sloping table, his feet being at the higher end, while his head is
allowed to hang unsupported over the end of the table.
A considerable proportion of the French and British troops in France,
the Russian, Austrian, and Hungarian troops in the eastern fields, and
the prisoners in Germany suffer from lice. Fleas seem to be a
comparative rarity in the zones of operation.
The physique and condition of the French troops have greatly improved
since the beginning of the war. War conditions seem to have caused a
marked change. Many of the men have gained twenty and even thirty
pounds, and the younger men have grown inches in height.
The French have well-defined regulations in the matter of sanitation,
but these rules are not generally well-observed or strictly enforced.
In the French trenches, however, where discipline is best, this matter
is very well regulated. The Germans are particularly orderly in this
regard. I have never observed that the French mark wells or water
supplies in any manner.
I have no observations to offer on the subject of cremation of refuse,
but have seen several attempts at cremation of bodies in the French
army, all of which were glaring failures.
The German aëroplanes are generally conceded to be the most effective
in the war, and the Germans seem to possess more of them than any
other nation. None of their machines are slow and their fastest ones
are faster than any in the other armies. Aëroplanes have been
singularly ineffective in attacking as their shooting is extremely
bad. They usually miss their target by at least two hundred yards,
and, so far as my personal knowledge goes, the only damage that they
have ever done has been when they have had a whole city to shoot at.
Something like forty bombs were thrown on Paris while I was in that
city, and although some thirty or forty non-combatants were killed or
wounded, a target of any military importance was hit on only one
occasion, when a bomb was dropped through the roof of the Gare St.
Lazare. In the field, the principal targets aimed at by the aëroplanes
are supply and ammunition convoys. The method is for the aëroplane to
fly above the road and to drop a bomb as it passes over the convoy. It
then makes a circle and repeats the operation. I know personally of
some fifty bombs thus dropped, not one of which struck anywhere near
the target. The effect of the bombs is of small consequence and damage
is seldom done except to the people who happen to be standing in the
immediate neighborhood.
The crater of the bombs thrown by German aëroplanes, when striking
macadam or similar surfaces, is about fifteen inches in diameter and
four inches deep. I have seen three such craters. The shrapnel bullets
from the exploding bombs fly with a killing force to a distance of
about fifty yards, and at the latter range the lowest bullets fly at a
height of about twelve or fifteen feet. These bombs weigh about
fourteen pounds.
Aëroplanes have proved to be almost invulnerable in war. They are
extremely difficult to hit, because one must calculate for three
dimensions and for the speed of the aëroplane; when hit they seldom
suffer serious damage. I know of a case where first and last nearly
200 bullets passed through a machine without its ever being put out of
action. Indeed, it seems impossible to bring down an aëroplane except
by a freak shot. The gasoline tank is high and narrow and is protected
by a thin metal plate underneath, while struts and steering wires are
usually double. Wounding the aviator does not usually bring down a
machine, because he is sitting and is strapped in, and on calm days
needs to employ only a slight muscular effort to steer. Moreover,
there are usually two officers in an aëroplane and the systems of
double control enable the aëroplane to return to its base even if one
of them is killed outright.
Anti-aircraft guns are not greatly feared by aviators, and they
consider it merely an extraordinary piece of bad luck to be hit by
one. The aviators fear most of all the fire of large bodies of
infantry, and in flying over a regiment at an altitude of 1000 yards
they realize that they run serious risk of being brought down.
Rifle bullets are effective against aëroplanes up to a height of
about 5000 feet. Observers fly just above this altitude, at about 5500
feet, since they wish to fly as low as possible and yet be reasonably
safe. Aviators have told me that this height is so well recognized
that they nearly always encounter other observers in the same plane.
Aëroplanes, flying at a height of 5500 feet, can observe the movement
or presence of large bodies of troops and the flashes of artillery.
They cannot observe very much else at that height. They seem to be
able to descend suddenly for a short time to a very low altitude when
it is necessary and, in a large percentage of cases, to escape.
British aëroplanes have made reconnoissances at an altitude of only
one hundred yards.
Aëroplanes have made surprises in war nearly impossible, since in
modern warfare it would be necessary to shift at least a division to
produce any effect, and the movement of such a number of men would
certainly be visible to aëroplanes during the daytime. If such a
movement were performed at night, the presence of the division in a
new spot would almost certainly be detected by the aëroplanes in the
morning. The possession of a large and efficient aëroplane corps
reduces the surprises of war very nearly to nil, and proportionately
increases the importance of preparedness and of tactics.
The German aviators (and in fact all German observers, such as
infantry and cavalry patrols) make it a principle to avoid, if
possible, any combat; this is, of course, interpreted as cowardice by
the Allies, who seem eager for a fight on any terms. There is a
distinct reluctance among aviators for engaging in aërial duels. As
one French aviator said to me: “You are both killed and that does no
one any good.” This reluctance is fairly universal, except with
British flyers.
The German aëroplanes signal their observations by means of a code
expressed in smoke balls. I never was able to obtain any theory as to
how this code works. This method of communication seems to be very
effective, as German shells sometimes arrive with singular accuracy
and immediateness. It is commonly reported that Germans also signal
with a suspended disc, but I have no personal knowledge of this
system. The French had no definite means of signaling from the air in
the early months of the war, and I believe this is still the case.
They make their observation and return to their base to report,
usually taking notes while aloft on maps and in note-books. I have no
personal knowledge of the British methods. The Austrian system of
signaling is by means of evolutions of the aëroplanes themselves. When
they observe a target they fly over it, and when directly above make
a sudden dip. They are observed during their evolutions with
instruments, so that the exact angle and hypothenuse at the moment of
this dip is known. They then make a circuit and come up from the rear
and again fly over the objective. As they reach a point where they can
see the target or objective their artillery opens fire and is
corrected by the graphic evolutions of the aëroplane. If the shells
drop too far to the left, the aëroplane turns to the right and the
distance in profile that it travels before straightening out is the
correction. They say, “Shoot short” by dipping and “Shoot farther” by
rising.
I have no knowledge of aëroplanes being used at night, although they
sometimes return from daylight operations after night has fallen and
make their landing with the assistance of beacons. It is commonly
reported both by Germans and French that the steel darts used by the
French aviators are the most effective offensive weapon so far used by
aëroplanes. I have no personal knowledge on this subject. I have been
several times informed upon reliable authority that the French have no
particular instruments of precision for use in the dropping of bombs.
At the commencement of hostilities the French aviators feared their
own armies much more than they did the Germans, because the French had
neglected to familiarize their troops with the designs of hostile
aircraft.
It was proved to be nearly impossible to force a fight with your
enemy’s aëroplane, even if he is far within your own territory. If
your own aëroplanes are on the ground it takes them entirely too long
to get to his altitude, and if he wishes to stay in the same
neighborhood he himself keeps going higher as your aëroplanes mount
toward him. There seems to be no difficulty encountered in avoiding
aëroplanes already in the air, since they are usually visible at great
distances.
Anti-aircraft guns are generally mounted on automobile trucks, and are
usually of small calibre. I have never seen any German aëroplanes
other than monoplanes; these I have seen on ten or more occasions.
I saw no aëroplanes which carried other arms than rifles and automatic
pistols.
In practice I have nowhere observed machine-guns mounted on
aëroplanes, although they are much advertised and talked about.
I have frequently heard, upon what I consider reliable authority, that
the Germans use captive balloons for observations.
I have at all times been tremendously impressed with the dominant
importance in this war of artillery. My personal observations lead me
to estimate that the percentage of casualties from artillery wounds
has been nearly 50% of the total.
There are very distinct differences in the methods of the French and
German field artilleries. The French field artillery is always used
in indirect fire and the positions are usually a long distance behind
the infantry—from fifteen to twenty-five hundred yards. The
emplacements are often in deep wooded valleys. Too close proximity to
the infantry is avoided.
In contrast to this, the German field artillery is nearly always
very close to the infantry and is frequently in position for direct
fire. In the most typical German arrangement the infantry trenches are
on the front face of a hill along the “military crest” with the
artillery two or three hundred yards behind over the natural crest.
One often sees German field guns in such a position that it is
difficult to say whether they are in “direct” or “indirect” fire.
In battles where there are no rapid retreats and rapid advances it
seems to be the custom for batteries to be silent for one or two days
while the battery commander, by means of observers, aëroplanes, and
spies, endeavors to locate an objective. The point to be made is that
the main forces of artillery do not seem to fire very continuously.
Oftentimes in the middle of a very tense battle where heavy forces
are opposed to each other there will be periods of half an hour or
even longer when no firing whatsoever is to be heard. The importance
of observers has become tremendous. On some occasions it seems as
though the main object of an army were to get a single man into a
location from which he can accurately observe the enemy’s position,
and as if until this is accomplished the whole battle is at a
standstill. Both sides try continuously in all sorts of original ways
to get information. The German tendency is toward the use of spies,
while the French more often employ daring volunteer observers who
sacrifice their lives in order successfully to direct fire for even
five or ten minutes. Aëroplanes are used for the same purpose by all
nations, but with less and less success as the war progresses, because
hostile infantry and artillery are better and better hidden. It has
now become almost impossible for an aëroplane to locate hostile
artillery except by the flashes. Battery positions are either placed
in forests, or artificial woods are built around them. It is almost
axiomatic that artillery shall give no signs of life while an enemy’s
aëroplane is above, and as the result of this, one well-recognized
method of temporarily silencing an enemy’s battery is to keep an
aëroplane flying over its neighborhood. Volunteer observers are
frequently disguised and sent forward to hunt for a place from which
they can observe the hostile trenches of artillery and thus direct and
correct the fire of their own batteries. Observers who thus volunteer
to go forward are virtually always decorated and made officers, if, by
some fortunate chance, they both succeed and survive. The French
artillery officers take advantage of every “assist”; for instance, I
saw a case where a shell made a groove on the reverse side of a hill
and glanced off. The shell exploded, but its fuse was recovered by the
French, the setting of the fuse determined, and by means of this and
the direction of the groove made in the hill the German battery was
located. The French reported that they had destroyed the battery. One
of their aëroplanes was sent up before firing was begun and later
observed the battery’s efforts to escape.
The French batteries are usually so far behind the infantry that when
they have come under heavy artillery fire there is no danger of
capture. The custom with the French seems to be, in a case like this,
for the personnel to run and take cover during the bombardment. I saw
this happen twice, and I learned of numerous other cases. Cover
underground is constructed for all the personnel of the batteries. One
enters these subterranean quarters through entrances which look very
much like enlarged woodchuck holes. With no artillery of any
nationality did I see any gun entrenchment other than a slight mound
of earth coming up to the bottom of the shield. All guns that I have
seen were in a line, except in cases where there was some peculiar
rising of terrain. I have several times seen a “group” together in one
line, at intervals of about twenty yards. In practice, the French tend
to extend the intervals to about twenty-five yards, while the Germans
either decrease them to about fifteen yards, or have the guns quite
isolated, seventy-five or one hundred yards apart.
Telephones are the only instruments of which I have observed the use
in the immediate neighborhood of French batteries. The battery
commander controls the fire by word of mouth.
The French 75-mm. gun is the only field-piece which under practical
field conditions does not “jump.” This gives a tremendous advantage to
the French artillery in such duels as frequently take place in battles
where there is rapid movement. I have been on battlefields after
action had finished and observed positions where two batteries had
shot at each other, both being in “direct fire” position. The French
pieces can fire at a rate of twenty-five shots a minute and in such
duels seem to be able to fire accurately with nearly twice the
rapidity of the Germans.
The most unpleasant experience that I ever underwent occurred one day
when I was directly in front of and under a French battery and it
suddenly and unexpectedly fired about forty rounds in thirty seconds
over my head. These discharges produced a great psychological effect
and were much more disconcerting than any arrival of enemy’s shells.
I have never observed any “short burst,” or shells bursting in guns. I
should judge that this accident happens very rarely, with the French,
at least.
At the beginning of the war, the French carried shells and shrapnel in
about equal numbers. The shells explode with the time-fuse exactly as
do shrapnel. From several sources I was told that they were loaded
with the new explosive which had been introduced only about three
months before the beginning of hostilities. As the war progresses the
French tend to use more and more of these explosive shells, which are
used against infantry in the same way as are shrapnel. The only
difference seems to be that they are made to burst a little lower.
Their effect is very terrible. A heavy bursting charge is employed,
and although the fragments are small they fly with such force that
they make fatal wounds and even cut into the wood of rifle stocks. I
observed the body of one German whose back had been pierced with about
forty small particles of a shell which had burst close to him. These
particles were as evenly spread as the charge of a shotgun. German
wounded and captured Germans have told me that this French shell-fire
was so hellish that no man escaped except by a miracle. The French
infantry have a great affection for their “75,” and their confidence
is always very greatly increased by its presence. Their spirits
immediately rise when they hear it behind them. The French field
artillery seem to have no favorite range but readily fire at any
range. On the one hand a gun is sometimes taken into the trenches, and
on the other hand I once observed a battery begin firing at 5300
meters and go to 5600 meters. One frequently sees French batteries of
two and three guns and groups of eight or nine guns, lost guns not
having been promptly replaced. I once saw a battery of two guns, the
other two having been completely destroyed by direct fire the previous
week. The heaviest piece that I saw at the front with the French was a
6-in. howitzer. The Germans use all sizes up to 12-in. in field
operations, the latter being of Austrian construction. I have never
discovered any conclusive evidence that Germany possesses
42-centimeter guns.
In my observations, when infantry charge infantry in battle movement,
the majority of the casualties are caused by artillery. I have several
times observed fields of dead infantrymen killed in an advance against
infantry, where 90% of the dead had been killed by shrapnel. In my
experience the Germans never use anything except shrapnel against
infantry in the open. Shrapnel wounds are very ugly, being big ragged
holes which usually become infected.
On the battlefields I have observed, very few German shrapnel have
failed to burst in the air. In one field about a half mile square,
where shrapnel cases were strewn about [I counted about forty or
fifty], I observed only four craters. The French often say that the
German shrapnel burst too high.
The German field artillery frequently place their caissons at a
distance of two hundred yards behind the guns, there being no limbers
or caissons with the guns. The ammunition is brought up by hand, each
man carrying six shells in baskets holding three each. The caissons
are usually in less numbers than the guns, there being two caissons
behind four guns, or one caisson behind two guns.
In examining abandoned German ammunition, I have found shells bearing
all dates from 1903 to 1914.
On no occasion have I seen observation ladders used by the French
field artillery. This is probably due to the fact that, in general,
their artillery is at so great a distance behind the scene of
operations.
Shells bigger than 3-in. when used in field operations seldom do any
damage, but have a tremendous moral effect even on veteran troops. The
disconcerting effect of heavy shells exploding in the ground is very
widely recognized at the front. The fire of big howitzers is, as a
rule, very inaccurate. When one of these shells hits a building or a
paved street its effect is considerable; when they burst in soft
ground they are not dangerous. Most of the battlefields of France are
on muddy fields, in which the 6-in. shells make a crater about forty
feet in circumference and five or six feet deep. Their effect is
chiefly upward and casualties are so rare as to be considered freaks.
Mud is, however, thrown over the whole neighborhood. The bursting of
the 12-in. shells is a very impressive sight—I saw two burst. (My
authority for their caliber was a major of French artillery with whom
I was standing at the time.) They burst at a distance of about 600
yards from us, one in an open field and the other in a small French
village. The concussion was very heavy and even at 600 yards was felt
in the feet. In the first case the air was filled with flying mud to a
height of several hundred feet and there was a cloud of greasy black
smoke about as large as a city block. The resultant crater was about
one hundred feet in circumference, the ground being particularly soft.
The second shell produced the same sensations, made the same sort of
crater, and destroyed four or five small French brick and stone
houses.
The largest German howitzers which are in the field were, in my
personal experience, used only to bombard towns and villages.
My observations lead me to think that the most important
qualifications for the infantry soldier are three, viz: to be able to
dig, to be able to hide, and to be able to shoot. At the beginning of
the war the French had paid very little attention to any of these
things. Their men were dressed in a uniform so conspicuous that hiding
was impossible. The only shooting that they had ever done was gallery
shooting at a range of about forty yards and they were singularly poor
even at this. Judging by practical results, they had very few theories
and no practice in the matter of digging trenches. The trenches which
they made in the early weeks of the war were straight grooves in the
ground with the earth thrown up in a haphazard manner on either or
both sides. Their early defeats were due to the unexpected invasion
through Belgium, and to their unpreparedness in the three essentials
mentioned above.
The German infantry also shoot poorly from an American standpoint, but
do better than the French. Their uniform is the most nearly perfect of
any of the armies in the war, and the Germans are virtually invisible
at short range if they are not moving. Their helmet is easily the best
headgear in the matter of invisibility. It sets tightly on the head,
and owing to its shape virtually never casts a shadow. The Germans
have been from the beginning very accomplished trench diggers and have
had elaborate theories as to the construction of trenches and much
practice in making them.
The British are the only troops in the war who shoot with any degree
of excellence. Their shooting does not approach in accuracy that of
our own army, but is so superior to the Germans that a British
battalion of 1100 men usually has a firing effect equal to that of a
German regiment of nearly 3000. On the gray-green backgrounds of
Europe the British khaki is not conspicuous, but at the same time it
is certainly visible. The British hat is the most conspicuous headgear
in the war, since its rim casts a heavy black shadow, and its flat top
shows white in sunlight. The heads of the British in the trenches
stand out very distinctly.
In my experience the machine-gun is the most effective infantry
weapon. Personally, I should interpret this not as praise for
machine-guns, but as a criticism of the poor shooting of all the
infantry engaged. The French have comparatively few machine-guns.
Since November, the French have had troops of all categories on the
firing-line, and I should judge by this that since November, if not
earlier, the French have had all their available men in service. Among
my personal acquaintances in France, I know no man liable for service
who has not been in the army from that date onward. The men who for
physical reasons were earlier refused are now being quite generally
accepted as volunteers and are put to office work or similar
occupations. I have seen great numbers of wounded Territorials in
France, and many Territorial prisoners in the prison camps in Germany.
When I visited the prison camp at Zossen (near Berlin) where there are
said to be 20,000 French prisoners, a large percentage (perhaps as
much as 50 per cent.) of the prisoners I saw were Territorials.
The Germans have very well-developed and well-organized systems of
relays for their men at the front. The infantry stay in the trenches
for about a month at a time and are then given a vacation, usually
being sent home to their garrison town. Their cavalry serve ten days
at the front and are then sent a day’s march to the rear for a
ten-days’ rest. Their artillerymen get no vacation, their lives being
considered easy enough.
I saw no evidence of any well-organized system of vacations among
either the French or British and I knew many isolated cases where
personal friends of mine, both officers and enlisted men, have been at
the front continuously since the beginning of the war. I am fairly
certain that the British enlisted man has had no vacation since the
beginning of the war, other than relaying near the front.
I would mention again, in order to emphasize the statement, that all
my observations have led me to believe that the essentials of military
preparedness are, first of all, a rapid mobilization, without this
everything else is useless. By “rapid” I mean a mobilization of at
least half a million men or upward in not more than ten days. After
this in importance comes the ability to hide, to dig, and to shoot. To
hide is impossible when wearing a uniform as conspicuous as the
French, which might be called maximum, and has, I should estimate,
been the cause of from three to four hundred thousand extra
casualties.
The bayonet has been much used in this war and I have viewed
personally a number of battlefields on which the action was decided
with cold steel. It is my impression that European officers have
maintained their faith in the bayonet as a weapon and some of them may
even have become more than ever convinced of its worth. This is very
distinctly the case with the French and the Austrians. The Germans are
the only people whom I have observed to show any preference for
shooting as against cutting when in close action. There is no doubt
that the French commander’s idea is to win the ultimate decision with
the bayonet. Europeans in general seem to prefer cutting and stabbing
to shooting. For them, “fight” seems to mean stabbing somebody. Their
psychology is directly opposed to ours, for I think most American
soldiers prefer shooting to cutting. The Europeans do not seem to have
the taste for shooting, or the ability or wish to shoot well. It is
difficult or even impossible to teach many of them to shoot with any
degree of effectiveness.
In spite of the degree to which the bayonet has been used in Europe
and the number of actions which I have seen won by its use, I am
strongly convinced that the bayonet is not a practical weapon, and
that the only just grounds for its employment are to be found in
psychological reasons. I have not actually seen bayonet combats but
have studied the battlefields soon after the conflicts and have talked
with troops who had taken part in them, both French wounded and German
prisoners. I remember particularly the scenes of three bayonet fights
on a considerable scale. The first took place near Fère Champenoise on
September 8th; the second near Sézanne on September 9th; the third
near Lassigny about October 15th. In each case the men had thrown all
science to the wind and fought wildly and savagely hand to hand. They
were probably less effective than a Philippine boloman. Most of the
casualties had been bayoneted through the neck, face, and skull, the
men having lunged savagely for the face just like a boxer who has lost
his temper. In the first-mentioned place I saw a Frenchman and a
German lying side by side, both dead, and each transfixed by the
other’s bayonet, showing that they had rushed upon each other madly
without the least thought of science or defense. It would seem to me
that an infantryman with a short and handy rifle like our new
Springfield could fill his magazine just before the enemy’s charge
arrived and “stop” four or five men armed with bayonets or any other
edged weapon. I see no more reason for opposing bayonet with bayonet
than for opposing a bolo with a bolo. The same reasoning would apply
to lances and sabers, which are universally carried and certainly have
been used to some extent. It is an interesting fact that in fights
between cavalry patrols, every such affair which came to my personal
knowledge had been decided by shooting and by nothing else, although
the teaching of the men is to close in and use the lance and saber.
The Germans alone when in close action have shown a tendency to do
more or less shooting. In the first mentioned of the above fights, the
Germans were virtually all killed by bayonet wounds, whereas perhaps
50 per cent. of the French dead whom I examined showed gunshot wounds.
The French tactical unit is the battalion of 1000 men, divided into
four companies, nominally of 250 men each but with an effective battle
strength of slightly over 200. These companies are commanded by a
captain with four or five lieutenants under him. Two of these
lieutenants are regular officers and the other two or three are
reserve officers. Each platoon is commanded by a lieutenant and a
sergeant. An infantry brigade in the French army is made up of six
battalions. In case of heavy casualties the number of battalions is
reduced, the idea being to keep battalions as near normal strength as
possible. Thus if the regiment loses 30 per cent. it is reduced from a
regiment of three battalions to a regiment of two battalions, and if
it loses 60 or 70 per cent. it is reduced to a regiment of one
battalion.
The French, German, Russian, Austrian, and Hungarian infantry are all
armed with long, heavy, and ill-balanced rifles carrying detachable
bayonets. These rifles are very poorly sighted in comparison with our
new Springfield. It would be very difficult or impossible to do good
shooting with them, as measured from an American standpoint. In my
personal experience there have been numberless cases where dispatch
bearers, automobiles, scouts, pickets, and patrols were exposed at
very short range to the fire of bodies of French or German troops
without any casualties whatsoever occurring.
The one idea of the German infantry seems to be to shoot as much and
as rapidly as possible. I have several times observed where German
infantry have taken up a position in the open, and fired 120 rounds a
man, more or less, as a matter of course.
I have nowhere observed the use of any semi-automatic rifles, nor of
either silencers or special sights for sharpshooters.
In October I was in the neighborhood of Lassigny and Roye where heavy
fighting was and had been going on. There was a little village called
Erches to the northwest of these places. Here were the French advance
trenches. I was in this village during the height of operations and
was told that we were then only 150 or 200 yards from the German
trenches. Standing behind a house corner in this village of Erches, I
could see nothing unusual in any direction. I could see no signs of
French or German activity nor of life of any kind, although the French
infantry trenches extended to our right and left and the Germans were
directly in front of us. The landscape which spread away in all
directions looked perfectly normal and unbroken except for a few shell
craters. The only manifestations of activity were the distant rumbling
of guns, and the shrapnel bursting over our heads. Although I stayed
there for more than an hour, the only Frenchmen I saw were a few who
joined me behind the house; they came from trenches hidden within it,
or from an underground trench, the opening of which was behind the
house. I recount this to accent the concealment of all troops in this
war. Trenches are made to resemble the landscape in which they are
placed. If they are in a brown mowed field, hay is scattered over all
fresh earth, and if they are made in pasture land all the earth is
carefully carried away or is spread out and sodded over.
The Austrian cavalry unit is the division, which is accompanied by the
horse artillery in considerable strength. They are not accompanied by
cyclists or armored automobiles.
During the first six months of the war, at least, in the Austrian,
Hungarian, British, and French armies no newspaper or war
correspondents were allowed to view the actual operations on any
condition whatsoever. No press representative saw any battle with the
Austrian, Hungarian, British, or French armies, with one single
exception which took place in France, when one day during September
certain press representatives managed to see the bombardment along the
Aisne. I make this statement with the full knowledge that many
correspondents state they have seen battle actions. I have been able
to investigate such statements on numerous occasions, and invariably
found them to be fabrications, usually without even a foundation of
truth. Reporters frequently left the intrenched camp at Paris, were
arrested before traveling any great distance, and confined for days
and weeks. They then returned to the city and told hair-raising
stories of their experiences at the front.
The only war news published in France, England, Austria, and Hungary,
is that of the official communiqués, which usually suppress all
essentials, minimize or omit all reverses, and convert all drawn
actions or slight gains into victories.
The Austrian and Hungarian horse artillery were in such close relation
with the cavalry that their support was very good. In fact, the
artillery get into position as quickly as the cavalry. The chief
function which cavalry have performed successfully in this war has
been that of reconnoissance. The French and German armies use
aëroplanes and cavalry patrols as their principal means of
reconnoissance; the latter scout in parties of from six to fifteen men
commanded by an officer. The British do the same work with two
motor-cycle riders. The transmission of dispatches by cavalry has
become virtually nil in France because of the extensive use for this
purpose of telephones, automobiles, and motor-cycles. It is very
doubtful, however, if automobiles and motor-cycles could successfully
be used for dispatch-bearing and reconnoissance in any country except
France. On the Russian frontier the poorness and scarcity of roads
make the use of automobiles difficult and the use of wheels and
motor-cycles impossible. It would, therefore, seem that for
reconnoissance and dispatch-bearing, cavalry will usually be the means
employed.
Cavalry have to a certain extent been used as reserves. They were thus
first used by the British. In recent months I have often seen large
French cavalry reserves. At such times they are, in effect, mounted
infantry, so that reinforcements may be transferred a greater distance
in a shorter time. My personal observations have led me to believe
that aside from their uses in reconnoissance, the principal value of
cavalry is as mounted infantry held in reserve. When fighting, cavalry
must dismount. Early in the war there were occasions when cavalry
fought while mounted, and whether against artillery, infantry, or
other cavalry, the chief result was the killing of nearly all the
horses.
In the Austrian, Hungarian, and French armies many cavalry regiments
have been converted into infantry. I do not think that this is chiefly
due to lack of horses but to the fact that the opportunity for
fighting while mounted no longer exists.
The only work which I observed to be done entirely and solely by
engineers was the construction of bridges, of which they have had to
build a great number. I was impressed by the fact that many of these
bridges were quite original in conception. They are nearly always
intelligent makeshifts which might truly be called inventions.
At Pont-Ste.-Maxence, a bridge capable of supporting the heaviest
traffic was constructed in a few hours. Big canal boats which were
lying idle in the neighborhood were requisitioned and anchored side by
side, touching each other. Their decks were made flush, each with the
other, by the shifting of ballast, and when this had been accomplished
a roadway was laid across them. This bridge was so satisfactory that
it has not yet been replaced by a permanent structure. Road building
was largely carried on among the French by infantry, and it was my
experience that trench building was exclusively done by the infantry
as it was found necessary. The positions and traces of trenches were
laid out by infantry officers. This latter conclusion is, however,
based on three or four observations only.
In the French army the reserve small arms ammunition is kept behind
the battle-line just out of reach of shell-fire. There are ammunition
train regiments just as there are infantry or cavalry regiments. Each
such regiment is composed of eighty odd ammunition wagons and some
forage wagons. Two regiments generally move together, thus forming an
ammunition brigade. These wagons are parked parallel to the line of
battle. Supply columns are always parked vertically to the line of
battle. In the Battle of the Marne I observed an ammunition brigade
about every twenty kilometers. Thus on September 11th, there were
brigades at Rebais (7th and 10th Regiments), at Montmirail (17th and
29th), and at Champaubert. The supplies, chiefly beef and bread, are
brought up from the rear and advance directly toward the battle-line
in long horse-drawn wagon trains, or in Paris auto-busses. When near
the front, small numbers of wagons go up as far as they dare and
supplies are distributed directly to the troops, often while they are
under long-range shell-fire.
In the matter of motor transport, the practice with the French and
British has become well defined. The best type of truck is one of
medium weight, and of the best construction obtainable. It should be
emphasized that medium-priced or inexpensive trucks are undesirable.
It is very distinctly the opinion of French and British transport
officers that it is better to have too few trucks, all of which are
reliable, than to take “any old truck” and have it break down at
critical moments during operation. Inferior trucks break down
frequently, and break down at critical moments with singular
regularity.
In the British army, trucks work in units of about ten, each such unit
being commanded by an officer who travels in a fast automobile.
Protection, when necessary, is temporarily assigned to the unit,
nearly always in the shape of armored motor cars. The trucks are
heavily manned, having from three to six men per truck. Every man is
armed with a rifle, but no other arms are carried as an integral part
of the unit. Such motor transport units are not often captured or
destroyed since they seldom come in touch with anything but the
enemy’s cavalry which, as a rule, prefers to leave them strictly
alone, as a train of motor trucks has good defensive ability and none
of the vulnerability of horse-drawn wagons. In the rare cases when
actions have taken place, motor trucks have become moving forts, which
continue on their way at a rate of twenty or twenty-five miles an
hour, while from each one three or four well-protected riflemen keep
up a steady fire.
The type of automobile most desirable for army use has become
well-defined. The practice in this regard is the same in the French,
British, German, Austrian, and Hungarian armies. On a powerful
chassis, with an engine of at least 50-horse-power, is mounted a very
light body, of the “pony tonneau” type, with room for two men in front
and two behind. The equipment consists of a folding top, leather or
isinglass wind-shield, powerful head-lights, the noisiest horn
obtainable, and racks to carry as much extra gasoline as possible. In
service these automobiles have big racks full of gasoline-cans carried
on the running boards and at the rear and, in addition, there are
often necklaces of two-gallon cans strung wherever possible. In
virtually all the armies gasoline is served out in small cans
containing about two gallons each, which are easily handled and
quickly stored. One or two may be put in any odd space which is not
otherwise in use. This method is very effective and is one of the most
important developments in military automobile practice. In none of the
armies are cars used which vary greatly from the type above mentioned,
except through necessity. In general, heavy cars and runabouts give
very inferior service. It is the general custom for the chauffeur and
an orderly to ride on the front seat, and one or two officers behind.
The more speed the machine develops the better. It is not uncommon to
see staff officers or generals traveling over the French roads at a
speed of one hundred kilometers an hour. There is quite a well-defined
tendency to have as drivers men who are well above the average. In the
French army these men are usually sergeants or lieutenants; in the
Austrian army many of them are lieutenants.
Corps and army commanders usually have big, heavy limousines, with
electric lighting, which they can, when necessary, use as offices, or
as headquarters.
The Germans use telephones very extensively and apparently in
connection with all arms of the service. Their wires are very thin
and are similar to small piano wires. I saw no copper wire used by
them. The wire is strung on poles about nine feet high. These poles
are very carefully made of wood and are only about an inch in
diameter. Every second pole is guyed with a wire and braced with a
pole. The poles are painted in black and white stripes to make them
conspicuous and to prevent people from running over them. The German
practice is to lay these wires and abandon them when they are no
longer needed. The British, on the contrary, make it a point of honor
to recover all their poles and wire. In the retreat from Mons their
signal corps had such heavy losses in attempting to do this that they
were seriously hampered by lack of personnel.
The German soldiers and officers have a physique unapproached by any
troops which I saw, except the Swiss. Their average height and weight
is very much above all the others, except the Russians. The Russians
are as large as the Germans but do not approach them in activity and
quality. The French, although small and light, are wiry and have very
good stamina, especially in the matter of marching. The Austrians are
of medium size, most of them being stockily built. The Hungarians are
of medium height, well-knit, possessed of good stamina, and are in
every way physically fitted to be fine soldiers. Their infantry have
very high physical qualities, probably being as effective in modern
warfare as the heavy Germans.
I found intelligent people in Germany very broad-minded about military
matters. They were pretty well agreed that General Joffre is the only
general produced so far by the war who would rank in history as a
great captain, and while they maintained that the German officers as a
class were superior to all others, they conceded that the best troops
which have so far taken part in the war were the British regulars who
represented England in the early weeks of the war and retreated from
Charleroi through Mons, St. Quentin, and Compiègne to the southeast of
Paris.
On many different occasions I saw Russian prisoners in Germany and
Austria-Hungary. They impressed me as being of a low order of
intelligence. They fight well on the defense. When they are put in a
position and told to stay there, they are very difficult to drive back
and show the highest order of courage. When they move or advance they
become less reliable.
The Hungarians have a very keen fighting instinct and are excellent
infantrymen.
The Germans have a dogged courage and expose themselves with bravery
and enthusiasm in any undertaking. When they are once started, they
are difficult to stop. On an advance, I should say that a 50 per cent.
loss is necessary to make them hesitate, and on the defense I saw at
least one case where they were put out of action to the last man
without giving ground.
The French are brave in a more spectacular way. They are better
winners than the Germans and worse losers. Their temperament leads
them to push home a success with more enthusiasm than the Germans;
whereas, in defeat, they are less reliable.
The fighting qualities of the British are much higher than those of
any other nation, when, as in the case of the British regulars, they
have had sufficient training to teach them the technique of war. They
are calm and usually cheerful under the most adverse circumstances.
They do not lose control of themselves either in victory or defeat.
The Germans say they fight best of all when they are hopelessly
defeated or surrounded.
I have seen no body of officers which can compare in quality with
those of our army who are graduates of West Point. However, we have
fewer of these than Germany has generals.
It is just as strongly my opinion that the American infantryman as a
type is correspondingly superior. I believe he can undoubtedly
out-shoot, out-think, out-“hike,” and out-game the line soldier of any
other country I have seen. Here again, we have so few of him that,
whereas there are more than six hundred well-trained army-corps
engaged in this war, we have less than one.
I have received a letter from Mr. Herrick in which he expresses the
opinion that I was too severe on the diplomatic corps for leaving
Paris when the Germans threatened the city and the French government
moved to Bordeaux. He states that it was the duty of the diplomatic
corps to go with the government and that it was according to
diplomatic precedent. His own decision to remain in Paris was the
result of a special permission from the United States government,
authorizing him to use his own discretion. Under the circumstances he
thought it best to remain in Paris, and to be represented at Bordeaux
by Mr. Garret, with whom he was able to communicate daily. With Mr.
Garret he sent a number of army officers and secretaries.
Popular Copyright Novels
AT MODERATE PRICES
Ask your dealer for a complete list of
A. L. Burt Company’s Popular Copyright Fiction
Abner Daniel
Adventures of Gerard
Adventures of a Modest Man
Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
After House, The
Ailsa Paige
Alternative, The
Alton of Somasco
Amateur Gentleman, The
Andrew The Glad
Ann Boyd
Annals of Ann, The
Anna the Adventuress
Armchair at the Inn, The
Ariadne of Allan Water
At the Age of Eve
At the Mercy of Tiberius
Auction Block, The
Aunt Jane of Kentucky
Awakening of Helena Ritchie |
Will N. Harben
A. Conan Doyle
R. W. Chambers
A. Conan Doyle
Mary Roberts Rinehart
Robert W. Chambers
George Barr McCutcheon
Harold Bindloss
Jeffery Farnol
Maria Thompson Daviess
Will N. Harben
Kate T. Sharber
E. Phillips Oppenheim
F. Hopkinson Smith
Sidney McCall
Kate T. Sharber
Augusta Evans Wilson
Rex Beach
Eliza C. Hall
Margaret Deland |
| |
Bambi
Bandbox, The
Barbara of the Snows
Bar 20
Bar 20 Days
Barrier, The
Beasts of Tarzan, The
Beechy
Bella Donna
Beloved Vagabond, The
Ben Blair
Beth Norvell
Betrayal, The
Better Man, The
Beulah (Ill. Ed)
Black Is White
Blaze Derringer
Bob Hampton of Placer
Bob, Son of Battle
Brass Bowl, The
Britton of the Seventh
Broad Highway, The
Bronze Bell, The
Buck Peters, Ranchman
Business of Life, The
Butterfly Man, The
By Right of Purchase |
Marjorie Benton Cooke
Louis Joseph Vance
Harry Irving Green
Clarence E. Mulford
Clarence E. Mulford
Rex Beach
Edgar Rice Burroughs
Bettina Von Hutten
Robert Hichens
Wm. J. Locke
Will Lillibridge
Randall Parrish
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Cyrus Townsend Brady
Augusta J. Evans
George Barr McCutcheon
Eugene P. Lyle, Jr.
Randall Parrish
Alfred Ollivant
Louis Joseph Vance
Cyrus Townsend Brady
Jeffery Farnol
Louis Joseph Vance
Clarence E. Mulford
Robert W. Chambers
George Barr McCutcheon
Harold Bindloss
|
| |
Cabbages and Kings
Cab No. 44
Calling of Dan Matthews, The
Cape Cod Stories
Cap’n Eri
Cap’n Warren’s Wards
Caravaners
Cardigan
Carmen
Carpet From Bagdad, The
Cash Intrigue, The
Castle by the Sea, The
Claw, The
C. O. D.
Colonial Free Lance, A
Coming of the Law, The
Conquest of Canaan, The
Conspirators, The
Counsel for the Defense
Crime Doctor, The
Cry in the Wilderness, A
Cynthia of the Minute |
O. Henry
R. F. Foster
Harold Bell Wright
Joseph C. Lincoln
Joseph C. Lincoln
Joseph C. Lincoln
Author of Elizabeth and Her German Garden
Robert W. Chambers
(Geraldine Farrar Edition)
Harold MacGrath
George Randolph Chester
H. B. M. Watson
Cynthia Stockley
Natalie Sumner Lincoln
Chauncey O. Hotchkiss
Chas. A. Seltzer
Booth Tarkington
Robert W. Chambers
Leroy Scott
E. W. Hornung
Mary E. Waller
Louis Joseph Vance
|
| |
Dark Hollow, The
Dave’s Daughter
Day of Days, The
Day of the Dog, The
Depot Master, The
Desired Woman, The
Destroying Angel, The
Diamond Master, The
Dixie Hart |
Anna Katharine Green
Patience Bevier Cole
Louis Joseph Vance
George Barr McCutcheon
Joseph C. Lincoln
Will N. Harben
Louis Joseph Vance
Jacques Futrelle
Will N. Harben |
| |
El Dorado
Elusive Isabel
Empty Pockets
Enchanted Hat, The
Eye of Dread, The
Eyes of the World, The |
Baroness Orczy
Jacques Futrelle
Rupert Hughes
Harold MacGrath
Payne Erskine
Harold Bell Wright |
| |
Far Horizon, The
54-40 or Fight
Fighting Chance, The
Financier, The
Flamsted Quarries
Flying Mercury, The
For a Maiden Brave
Four Million, The
Four Pool’s Mystery, The
Fruitful Vine, The |
Lucas Malet
Emerson Hough
Robert W. Chambers
Theodore Dreiser
Mary E. Waller
Eleanor M. Ingram
Chauncey C. Hotchkiss
O. Henry
Jean Webster
Robert Hichens |
| |
Get-Rich-Quick Wallingford
Gilbert Neal
Girl From His Town, The
Girl of the Blue Ridge, A
Girl Who Lived in the Woods, The
Girl Who Won, The
Glory of Clementina, The
Glory of the Conquered, The
God’s Country and the Woman
God’s Good Man
Going Some
Gold Bag, The
Golden Web, The
Gordon Craig
Greyfriars Bobby
Guests of Hercules |
G. R. Chester
Will N. Harben
Marie Van Vorst
Payne Erskine
M. B. Cooke
Beth Ellis
Wm. J. Locke
Susan Glaspell
J. O. Curwood
Marie Corelli
Rex Beach
Carolyn Wells
Anthony Partridge
Randall Parrish
Eleanor Atkinson
C. N. and A. M. Williamson |
| |
Halcyone
Happy Island (Sequel to Uncle William)
Havoc
Heart of the Desert, The
Heart of the Hills, The
Heart of Philura
Heather-Moon, The
Her Infinite Variety
Her Weight in Gold
Herb of Grace
Hidden Children, The
Highway of Fate, The
Homesteaders, The
Hoosier Volunteer, The
Hopalong Cassidy
House of Happiness, The
House of the Whispering Pines
Hugh Wynne, Free Quaker
Husbands of Edith, The |
Elinor Glyn
J. Lee
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Honore Willsie
John Fox, Jr.
Florence Morse Kingsley
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
Brand Whitlock
George Barr McCutcheon
Rosa Nouchette Carey
Robert W. Chambers
Rosa N. Carey
Kate and Virgil D. Boyles
Kate and Virgil D. Boyles
Clarence E. Mulford
Kate Langley Bosher
A. K. Green
S. W. Mitchell, M.D.
George Barr McCutcheon |
| |
Illustrious Prince, The
Imposter, The
In Defiance of the King
Indifference of Juliet, The
Inez (Ill. Ed.)
Infelice
Initials Only
Innocent
Intriguers, The
Iron Trail, The
Iron Woman, The
Ishmael (Ill.)
Island of Regeneration, The
Island of the Stairs, The |
E. Phillips Oppenheim
John Reed Scott
Chauncey C. Hotchkiss
Grace S. Richmond
Augusta J. Evans
Augusta Evans Wilson
Anna Katharine Green
Marie Corelli
Harold Bindloss
Rex Beach
Margaret Deland
Mrs. Southworth
Cyrus Townsend Brady
Cyrus Townsend Brady |
| |
Japonette
Jane Cable
Jeanne of the Marshes
Jennie Gerhardt
Joyful Heatherby
Jude the Obscure
Judgment House, The |
Robert W. Chambers
George Barr McCutcheon
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Theodore Dreiser
Payne Erskine
Thomas Hardy
Gilbert Parker |
| |
Keith of the Border
Kent Knowles: “Quahaug”
Kingsmead
Knave of Diamonds, The |
Randall Parrish
Joseph C. Lincoln
Bettina Von Hutten
Ethel M. Dell |
| |
Ladder of Swords, A
Lady and the Pirate, The
Lady Betty Across the Water
Lady Merton, Colonist
Land of Long Ago, The
Last Shot, The
Last Trail, The (new edition)
Last Voyage of the Donna Isabel
Laughing Cavalier, The
Life Mask, The
Lighted Way, The
Lin McLean
Little Brown Jug at Kildare
Lone Wolf, The
Lonesome Land
Lord Loveland Discovers America
Lorraine
Lost Ambassador
Lost Road, The
Lost World, The
Loves of Lady Arabella
Loves of Miss Anne, The
Love Under Fire |
Gilbert Parker
Emerson Hough
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
Mrs. Humphry Ward
Eliza Calvert Hall
Frederick N. Palmer
Zane Grey
Randall Parrish
Baroness Orczy
Author of “To M. L. G.”
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Owen Wister
Meredith Nicholson
Louis Joseph Vance
B. M. Bower
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
Robert W. Chambers
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Richard Harding Davis
A. Conan Doyle
Mollie Elliott Seawell
S. R. Crockett
Randall Parrish |
| |
Macaria (Ill. Ed.)
Mademoiselle Celeste
Maids of Paradise, The
Maid of the Forest, The
Maid of the Whispering Hills
Mam’ Linda
Man Outside, The
Marriage
Marriage a la Mode
Marriage of Theodora, The
Mary Moreland
Master Mummer, The
Max
Maxwell Mystery, The
Mediator, The
Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes
Mischief Maker, The
Miss Gibbie Gault
Miss Philura’s Wedding Gown
Miss Selina Lue
Molly McDonald
Money Moon, The
Motor Maid, The
Moth, The
Mountain Girl, The
Mr. Bingle
Mr. Grex of Monte Carlo
Mr. Pratt
Mr. Pratt’s Patients
Mrs. Red Pepper
My Demon Motor Boat
My Friend the Chauffeur
My Lady Caprice
My Lady of Doubt
My Lady of the North
My Lady of the South
Mystery Tales |
Augusta J. Evans
Adele F. Knight
Robert W. Chambers
Randall Parrish
Vingie E. Roe
Will N. Harben
Wyndham Martyn
H. G. Wells
Mrs. Humphry Ward
Mollie Elliott Seawell
Marie Van Vorst
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Katherine Cecil Thurston
Carolyn Wells
Roy Norton
A. Conan Doyle
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Kate Langley Bosher
F. M. Kingsley
Maria Thompson Daviess
Randall Parrish
Jeffery Farnol
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
William Dana Orcutt
Payne Erskine
George Barr McCutcheon
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Joseph C. Lincoln
Joseph C. Lincoln
Grace S. Richmond
George Fitch
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
Jeffrey Farnol
Randall Parrish
Randall Parrish
Randall Parrish
Edgar Allan Poe |
| |
Ne’er-Do-Well, The
Net, The
New Clarion, The
Night Riders, The
Night Watches |
Rex Beach
Rex Beach
Will N. Harben
Ridgwell Cullum
W. W. Jacobs |
| |
Officer 666
Once Upon a Time
One Braver Thing
One Way Trail, The
Otherwise Phyllis
Out of the Primitive |
B. W. Currie and A. McHugh
Richard Harding Davis
Richard Dehan
Ridgwell Cullum
Meredith Nicholson
Robert Ames Bennet |
| |
Pair of Silk Stockings
Palace of Darkened Windows
Pardners
Parrot & Co.
Partners of the Tide
Passionate Friends, The
Patience of John Moreland, The
Patrol of the Sun Dance Trail
Paul Anthony, Christian
People’s Man, A
Perch of the Devil
Peter Ruff
Phillip Steele
Phra the Phoenician
Pidgin Island
Place of Honeymoons, The
Plunderer, The
Pole Baker
Pool of Flame, The
Polly of the Circus
Poppy
Port of Adventure
Postmaster, The
Power and the Glory, The
Price of Love, The
Price of the Prairie, The
Prince of Sinners, A
Princess Dehra, The
Princess Passes, The
Princess Virginia, The
Prisoners of Chance
Purple Parasol, The |
Cyril Harcourt
M. H. Bradley
Rex Beach
Harold MacGrath
Joseph C. Lincoln
H. G. Wells
Mary Dillon
Ralph Connor
Hiram W. Hayes
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Gertrude Atherton
E. Phillips Oppenheim
James Oliver Curwood
Edwin L. Arnold
Harold MacGrath
Harold MacGrath
Roy Norton
Will N. Harben
Louis Joseph Vance
Margaret Mayo
Cynthia Stockley
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
Joseph C. Lincoln
Grace McGowan Cooke
Arnold Bennett
Margaret Hill McCarter
E. Phillips Oppenheim
John Reed Scott
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
Randall Parrish
George Barr McCutcheon |
| |
Ranch at the Wolverine, The
Ranching for Sylvia
Reason Why, The
Red Cross Girl, The
Redemption of Kenneth Galt
Red Lane, The
Red Mist, The
Red Mouse, The
Red Pepper Burns
Red Republic, The
Return of Tarzan, The
Rejuvenation of Aunt Mary, The
Rim of the Desert, The
Rise of Roscoe Paine, The
Road to Providence
Robinetta
Romance of a Plain Man, The
Rocks of Valpré, The
Rose in the Ring, The
Rose of the World
Rose of Old Harpeth
Round the Corner in Gay Street
Routledge Rides Alone |
B. M. Bower
Harold Bindloss
Elinor Glyn
Richard Harding Davis
Will N. Harben
Holman Day
Randall Parrish
Wm. Hamilton Osborne
Grace S. Richmond
Robert W. Chambers
Edgar Rice Burroughs
Anne Warner
Ada Woodruff Anderson
Joseph C. Lincoln
Maria Thompson Daviess
Kate Douglas Wiggin
Ellen Glasgow
Ethel M. Dell
George Barr McCutcheon
Agnes and Egerton Castle
Maria Thompson Daviess
G. S. Richmond
Will L. Comfort |
| |
St. Elmo (Ill. Ed.)
Salamander, The
Second Violin, The
Secret of the Reef
Secrets of the German War Office
Seffy
Self-Raised (Ill.)
Septimus
Set in Silver
Sharrow
Shea of the Irish Brigade
Shepherd of the Hills, The
Sheriff of Dyke Hole, The
Ship’s Company
Silver Horde, The
Simon the Jester
Siren of the Snows, A
Sir Richard Calmady
Sixty-First Second, The
Speckled Bird, A
Slim Princess, The
Spirit in Prison, A
Spirit of the Border, The (new edition)
Spoilers, The
Still Jim
Stolen Singer, The
Stooping Lady, The
Story of Marco, The
Strange Disappearance, A
Strawberry Acres
Strawberry Handkerchief, The
Streets of Ascalon, The
Sunshine Jane
Susan Clegg and Her Friend Mrs. Lathrop
Sword of the Old Frontier, A |
Augusta J. Evans
Owen Johnson
Grace S. Richmond
Harold Bindloss
Dr. A. K. Graves
John Luther Long
Mrs. Southworth
William J. Locke
C. N. and A. M. Williamson
Bettina Von Hutten
Randall Parrish
Harold Bell Wright
Ridgwell Cullum
W. W Jacobs
Rex Beach
William J. Locke
Stanley Shaw
Lucas Malet
Owen Johnson
Augusta Evans Wilson
George Ade
Robert Hichens
Zane Grey
Rex Beach
Honore Willsie
Martha Bellinger
Maurice Hewlitt
Eleanor H. Porter
Anna Katharine Green
Grace S. Richmond
Amelia E. Barr
Robert W. Chambers
Anne Warner
A. Warner
Randall Parrish |
| |
Tales of Sherlock Holmes
Tarzan of the Apes
Taste of Apples, The
Tempting of Tavernake, The
Tess of the D’Urbervilles
That Affair Next Door
That Printer of Udell’s
Their Yesterdays
Three Brothers, The
Throwback, The
Thurston of Orchard Valley
Title Market, The
To M. L. G.; or, He Who Passed
Torn Sails: A Tale of a Welsh Village
Trail of the Axe, The
Trail to Yesterday, The
Treasure of Heaven, The
Trevor Case, The
Truth Dexter
T. Tembarom
Turbulent Duchess
Twenty-fourth of June, The
Twins of Suffering Creek, The
Two-Gun Man, The |
A. Conan Doyle
Edgar R. Burroughs
Jennette Lee
E. P. Oppenheim
Thos. Hardy
Anna Katharine Green
Harold Bell Wright
Harold Bell Wright
Eden Phillpots
Alfred Henry Lewis
Harold Bindloss
Emily Post
Anon.
Allen Raine
Ridgwell Cullum
Chas. A. Seltzer
Marie Corelli
Natalie Sumner Lincoln
Sidney McCall
Frances Hodgson Burnett
Percy J. Brebner
Grace S. Richmond
Ridgwell Cullum
Chas. A. Seltzer |
| |
Uncle William
“Unto Caesar”
Up From Slavery |
Jennette Lee
Baroness Orczy
Booker T. Washington |
| |
Valiants of Virginia, The
Valley of Fear, The
Vanished Messenger, The
Vane of the Timberlands
Vashti
Village of Vagabonds, A
Visioning, The |
Hallie Erminie Rives
Sir A. Conan Doyle
E. Phillips Oppenheim
Harold Bindloss
Augusta Evans Wilson
F. Berkeley Smith
Susan Glaspell |
| |
Wall of Men, A
Wallingford in His Prime
Wanted—A Chaperon
Wanted—A Matchmaker
Watchers of the Plains, The
Way Home, The
Way of an Eagle, The
Way of a Man, The
Way of the Strong, The
Wayfarers, The
Weavers, The
West Wind, The
When Wilderness Was King
Where the Trail Divides
Where There’s a Will
White Sister, The
Who Goes There
Window at the White Cat
Winning of Barbara Worth
Winning the Wilderness
With Juliet in England
Witness for the Defense, The
Woman in Question, The
Woman Haters, The
Woman Thou Gavest Me, The
Woodcarver of ’Lympus, The
Woodfire in No. 3, The
Wooing of Rosamond Fayre
Wrecker, The |
Margaret H. McCarter
Geo. Randolph Chester
Paul Leicester Ford
Paul Leicester Ford
Ridgwell Cullum
Basil King
E. M. Dell
Emerson Hough
Ridgwell Cullum
Mary Stewart Cutting
Gilbert Parker
Cyrus T. Brady
Randall Parrish
Will Lillibridge
Mary Roberts Rinehart
Marion Crawford
Robert W. Chambers
Mary Roberts Rinehart
Harold Bell Wright
Margaret Hill McCarter
Grace S. Richmond
A. E. W. Mason
John Reed Scott
Joseph C. Lincoln
Hall Caine
Mary E. Waller
F. Hopkinson Smith
Berta Ruck
Robert Louis Stevenson |
| |
Yellow Letter, The
You Never Know Your Luck
Younger Set, The |
William Johnston
Gilbert Parker
Robert W. Chambers |
Minor changes have been made to corret typesetters’ errors; otherwise,
every effort has been made to remain true to the author’s words and
intent.