Fishes which have a stone in the head; those which keep themselves
concealed during winter; and those which are not taken in winter, except upon stated days
Birds which take their departure from us, and whither they go;
the thrush, the blackbird, and the starling—birds which lose
their feathers during their retirement—the turtle-dove and the
ring-dove—the flight of starlings and swallows
Animals which are born of beings that have not been born themselves—animals
which are born themselves, but are not reproductive—animals
which are of neither sex
The senses of animals—that all have the senses of touch and taste—those
which are more remarkable for their sight, smell, or
hearing—moles—whether oysters have the sense of hearing
BOOK VI. AN ACCOUNT OF COUNTRIES, NATIONS, SEAS, TOWNS, HAVENS, MOUNTAINS, RIVERS, DISTANCES, AND PEOPLES WHO NOW EXIST, OR FORMERLY EXISTED. — CHAP. 1. (1.)—THE EUXINE AND THE MARYANDINI. — CHAP. 2. (2.)—PAPHLAGONIA. — CHAP. 3. (3.)—CAPPADOCIA. — CHAP. 4.—THE REGION OF THEMISCYRA, AND THE NATIONS THEREIN. — CHAP. 5. (5.)—THE REGION OF COLICA, THE NATIONS OF THE ACHÆI, AND OTHER NATIONS IN THE SAME PARTS. — CHAP. 6.—THE CIMMERIAN BOSPORUS. — CHAP. 7.—LAKE MÆOTIS AND THE ADJOINING NATIONS. — CHAP. 8. (8.)—THE SITUATION OF CAPPADOCIA. — CHAP. 9. (9.)—THE LESSER AND THE GREATER ARMENIA. — CHAP. 10.—THE RIVERS CYRUS AND ARAXES. — CHAP. 11. (10.)—ALBANIA, IBERIA, AND THE ADJOINING NATIONS. — CHAP. 12. (11.)—THE PASSES OF THE CAUCASUS. — CHAP. 13. (12.)—THE ISLANDS OF THE EUXINE. — CHAP. 14. (13.)—NATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF THE SCYTHIAN OCEAN. — CHAP. 15.—THE CASPIAN AND HYRCANIAN SEA. — CHAP. 16.—ADIABENE. — CHAP. 17. (14.)—MEDIA AND THE CASPIAN GATES. — CHAP. 18. (16.)—NATIONS SITUATE AROUND THE HYRCANIAN SEA. — CHAP. 19. (17.)—THE NATIONS OF SCYTHIA AND THE COUNTRIES ON THE EASTERN OCEAN. — CHAP. 20.—THE SERES. — CHAP. 21.—THE NATIONS OF INDIA. — CHAP. 22. (18.)—THE GANGES. — CHAP. 23. (20.)—THE INDUS. — CHAP. 24. (22.)—TAPROBANE. — CHAP. 25.—THE ARIANI AND THE ADJOINING NATIONS. — CHAP. 26.—VOYAGES TO INDIA. — 27.—CARMANIA. — CHAP. 28.—THE PERSIAN AND THE ARABIAN GULFS. — CHAP. 29.—THE PARTHIAN EMPIRE. — CHAP. 30.—MESOPOTAMIA. — CHAP. 31.—THE TIGRIS. — CHAP. 32. (28.)—ARABIA. — CHAP. 33.—THE GULFS OF THE RED SEA. — CHAP. 34.—TROGLODYTICE. — CHAP. 35.—ÆTHIOPIA. — CHAP. 36. (31.)—ISLANDS OF THE ÆTHIOPIAN SEA. — CHAP. 37. (32.)—THE FORTUNATE ISLANDS. — CHAP. 38.—THE COMPARATIVE DISTANCES OF PLACES ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH. — CHAP. 39.—DIVISION OF THE EARTH INTO PARALLELS AND SHADOWS OF EQUAL LENGTH.
NATURAL HISTORY OF PLINY.
THE Euxine1 Sea, which in former times had the name of Axenus,2
from the savage and inhospitable character of the nations living on
its borders, by a peculiar whim of nature, which is continually giving
way before the greedy inroads of the sea, lies between Europe and
Asia. It was not enough for the ocean to have surrounded the earth,
and then deprived us of a considerable portion of it, thus rendering
still greater its uninhabitable proportion; it was not enough for it to
have forced a passage through the mountains, to have torn away Calpe
from Africa, and to have swallowed up a much larger space than it left
untouched; it was not enough for it to have poured its tide into the
Propontis through the Hellespont, after swallowing up still more of the
dry land—for beyond the Bosporus, as well, it opens with its insatiate
appetite upon another space of immense extent, until the Mæotian
lakes3 unite their ravening waters with it as it ranges far and wide.
That all this has taken place in spite, as it were, of the earth,
is manifested by the existence of so many straits and such numbers
of narrow passages formed against the will of nature—that of the
Hellespont,4 being only eight hundred and seventy-five paces in
width, while at the two Bospori5 the passage across may be effected
by oxen6 swimming, a fact from which they have both derived their
name. And then besides,7 although they are thus severed, there
are certain points on which these coasts stand in the relation of
brotherhood towards each other—the singing of birds and the barking
of dogs on the one side can be heard on the other, and an intercourse
can be maintained between these two worlds by the medium even of the
human voice,8 if the winds should not happen to carry away the sound
thereof.
The length of the borders of the Euxine from the Bosporus to the Lake
Mæotis has been reckoned by some writers at fourteen hundred and
thirty-eight miles; Eratosthenes, however, says that it is one hundred
less. According to Agrippa, the distance from Chalcedon to the Phasis
is one thousand miles, and from that river to the Cimmerian Bosporus
three hundred and sixty. We will here give in a general form the
distances as they have been ascertained in our own times; for our arms
have even penetrated to the very mouth of the Cimmerian Straits.
After passing the mouth of the Bosporus we come to the river Rhebas,9
by some writers called the Rhesus. We next come to Psillis,10 the
port of Calpas,11 and the Sagaris,12 a famous river, which rises
in Phrygia and receives the waters of other rivers of vast magnitude,
among which are the Tembrogius13 and the Gallus,14 the last of
which is by many called the Sangarius. After leaving the Sagaris
the Gulf of the Mariandyni15 begins, and we come to the town of
Heraclea,16 on the river Lycus;17 this place is distant from the
mouth of the Euxine two hundred miles. The sea-port of Acone18 comes
next, which has a fearful notoriety for its aconite or wolf’s-bane,
a deadly poison, and then the cavern of Acherusia,19 the rivers
Pædopides, Callichorus, and Sonautes, the town of Tium,20 distant
from Heraclea thirty-eight miles, and the river Billis.
Beyond this river begins the nation of Paphlagonia,21 by some writers
called Pylæmenia;22 it is closed in behind by the country of Galatia.
In it are Mastya,23 a town founded by the Milesians, and then
Cromna,24 at which spot Cornelius Nepos also places the Heneti,25
from whom he would have us believe that the Veneti of Italy, who
have a similar name, are descended. The city also of Sesamon, now
called Amastris,26 Mount Cytorus,27 distant sixty-three miles
from Tium, the towns of Cimolis28 and Stephane,29 and the river
Parthenius.30 The promontory of Carambis,31 which extends a great
distance into the sea, is distant from the mouth of the Euxine three
hundred and twenty-five miles, or, according to some writers, three
hundred and fifty, being the same distance from the Cimmerian Bosporus,
or, as some persons think, only three hundred and twelve miles. There
was formerly also a town of the same name, and another near it called
Armene; we now find there the colony of Sinope,32 distant from Mount
Cytorus one hundred and sixty-four miles. We then come to the river
Evarchus,33 and after that a people of the Cappadocians, the towns
of Gaziura34 and Gazelum,35 the river Halys,36 which runs from
the foot of Mount Taurus through Cataonia and Cappadocia, the towns of
Gangre37 and Carusa,38 the free town of Amisus,39 distant from
Sinope one hundred and thirty miles, and a gulf of the same name, of
such vast extent40 as to make Asia assume the form of a peninsula,
the isthmus of which is only some two hundred41 miles in breadth,
or a little more, across to the gulf of Issus in Cilicia. In all this
district there are, it is said, only three races that can rightly be
termed Greeks, the Dorians, the Ionians, and the Æolians, all the
rest being of barbarian origin.42 To Amisus was joined the town of
Eupatoria,43 founded by Mithridates: after his defeat they were both
included under the name of Pompeiopolis.
Cappadocia44 has in the interior Archelais,45 a colony founded by
Claudius Cæsar, and past which the river Halys flows; also the towns
of Comana,46 watered by the Sarus, Neocæsarea,47 by the Lycus,48
and Amasia,49 in the region of Gazacene, washed by the Iris. In
Colopene it has Sebastia and Sebastopolis;50 these are insignificant
places, but still equal in importance to those just mentioned. In its
remaining districts there is Melita,51 founded by Semiramis, and
not far from the Euphrates, Diocæsarea,52 Tyana,53 Castabala,54
Magnopolis,55 Zela,56 and at the foot of Mount Argæus57 Mazaca,
now called Cæsarea.58 That part of Cappadocia which lies stretched
out before the Greater Armenia is called Melitene, before Commagene
Cataonia, before Phrygia Garsauritis, Sargarausene,59 and Cammanene,
before Galatia Morimene, where their territories are divided by the
river Cappadox,60 from which this people have taken their name;
they were formerly known as the Leucosyri.61 From Neocæsarea above
mentioned, the lesser Armenia is separated by the river Lycus. In the
interior also there is the famous river Ceraunus,62 and on the coast
beyond the town of Amisus, the town and river of Chadisia,63 and the
town of Lycastum,64 after which the region of Themiscyra65 begins.
The river Iris brings down to the sea the waters of the Lycus. In
the interior is the city of Ziela,66 famous for the defeat of
Triarius67 and the victory of C. Cæsar.68 Upon the coast there
is the river Thermodon, which rises at the fortified place called
Phanarœa,69 and flows past the foot of Mount Amazonius.70 There
was formerly a town of the same name as the river, and five others
in all, Amazonium, Themiscyra, Sotira, Amasia, and Comana,71 now
only a Manteium. (4.) We find here the nations of the Genetæ,72
the Chalybes,73 the town of Cotyorum,74 the nations of the
Tibareni and the Mossyni, who make marks upon their bodies,75 the
people called Macrocephali,76 the town of Cerasus,77 the port
of Chordule, the nations called the Bechires78 and the Buzeri, the
river Melas,79 the people called the Macrones, and Sidene with its
river Sidenus,80 by which the town of Polemonium81 is washed, at
a distance from Amisus of one hundred and twenty miles. We next come
to the rivers Iasonius82 and Melanthius,83 and, at a distance of
eighty miles from Amisus, the town of Pharnacea,84 the fortress
and river of Tripolis;85 the fortress and river of Philocalia, the
fortress of Liviopolis, but not upon a river, and, at a distance of
one hundred miles from Pharnacea, the free city of Trapezus,86 shut
in by a mountain of vast size. Beyond this town is the nation of the
Armenochalybes87 and the Greater Armenia, at a distance of thirty
miles. On the coast, before Trapezus, flows the river Pyxites, and
beyond it is the nation of the Sanni88 Heniochi. Next comes the river
Absarus,89 with a fortress of the same name at its mouth, distant
from Trapezus one hundred and forty miles.
At the back of the mountains of this district is Iberia, while on
the coast are the Heniochi, the Ampreutæ,90 the Lazi, the rivers
Acampsis,91 Isis,92 Mogrus, and Bathys,93 the nations of the
Colchi, the town of Matium,94 the river Heracleum and the promontory
of the same name,95 and the Phasis,96 the most celebrated river of
Pontus. This river rises among the Moschi, and is navigable for the
largest vessels a distance of thirty-eight miles and a half, and for
small ones very much higher up; it is crossed by one hundred and twenty
bridges. It formerly had many cities of note on its banks, the more
famous of which were Tyndaris, Circæum, Cygnus, and Phasis97 at its
mouth. But the most celebrated of them all was Æa, fifteen miles98
distant from the sea, where the Hippos and the Cyaneos,99 rivers of
vast size, flow into it from opposite directions. At the present day
its only place of note is Surium, which derives its name from the
river which flows at that spot into the Phasis, and up to which place
the Phasis is navigable for large vessels, as we have already100
mentioned. It receives also some other rivers, wonderful for their
number and magnitude, and among them the Glaucus.101 At the mouth
of the Phasis, at a distance of seventy miles from Absarus, are some
islands, which, however, have no name. After passing this, we come
to another river, the Charieis,102 and the nation of the Salæ, by
the ancients called Phthirophagi,103 as also Suani.104 The river
Chobus105 flows from the Caucasus through the country of the Suani.
The river Rhoas comes next, then the region of Ecrectice, the rivers
Singames,106 Tarsuras,107 Astelephus,108 Chrysorrhoas, the
nation of the Absilæ, the castle of Sebastopolis,109 one hundred
miles distant from Phasis, the nation of the Sannigæ, the town of
Cygnus,110 and the river and town of Penius.111 We then come to the
tribes of the Heniochi,112 who are distinguished by numerous names.
Below this lies the region of Pontus known as Colica,113 in
which the mountain chain of Caucasus bends away towards the Riphæan
mountains, as we have previously114 mentioned; one side running down
towards the Euxine and the Lake Mæotis, the other towards the Caspian
and the Hyrcanian sea. The remaining portion of these shores is peopled
by savage nations, the Melanchlæni,115 and the Coraxi, who formerly
dwelt in Dioscurias,116 near the river Anthemus, now deserted, but
once a famous city; so much so, indeed, that we learn from Timosthenes,
that three hundred nations, all of different languages, were in the
habit of resorting to it, and in later times we had there one hundred
and thirty interpreters for the purpose of transacting business. There
are some authors who are of opinion that this place was built by
Amphitus and Telchius, the charioteers117 of Castor and Pollux, from
whom it is generally understood that the nation of the Heniochi sprang.
After passing Dioscurias we come to the town of Heracleium,118
seventy miles distant from Sebastopolis, and then the Achæi,119 the
Mardi,120 and the Cercetæ,121 and, behind them, the Cerri and the
Cephalotomi.122 In the innermost part123 of this district there
was Pityus,124 a city of very considerable opulence, but destroyed
by the Heniochi: behind it are the Epageritæ, a people of Sarmatian
origin, dwelling upon the range of the Caucasus, and beyond them, the
Sauromatæ. It was with these people that Mithridates125 took refuge
in the reign of the Emperor Claudius: and from him we learn that the
Thalli126 join up to them, a people who border on the eastern side
upon the mouth127 of the Caspian sea: he tells us also that at the
reflux the channel is dry there. Upon the coast of the Euxine, near the
country of the Cercetæ, is the river Icarusa,128 with the town and
river of Hierus, distant from Heracleium one hundred and thirty-six
miles. Next to this, is the promontory of Cruni, after passing which,
we find the Toretæ upon a lofty ridge of mountains. The city of
Sindos129 is distant from Hierus sixty-seven miles and a half; after
passing which, we come to the river Setheries. (6.) From thence to the
entrance of the Cimmerian Bosporus the distance is eighty-eight miles
and a half.
The length of the peninsula130 which projects between the Euxine
and Lake Mæotis, is not more than sixty-seven miles and a half, and
the width across never less than two jugera:131 it has the name of
Eion.132 The shores of the Bosporus then take a curve both on the
side of Europe and of Asia, thus forming the Mæotis. The towns at the
entrance of the Bosporus are, first Hermonassa,133 next Cepi,134
founded by the Milesians, and then Stratoclia and Phanagoria,135 and
the almost deserted town of Apaturos,136 and, at the extremity of the
mouth, Cimmerium,137 which was formerly called Cerberion. (7.) We
then come to Lake Mæotis, which has been already mentioned138 in the
description of Europe.
After passing Cimmerium, the coast139 is inhabited by the Mæotici,
the Vali, the Serbi,140 the Arrechi, the Zingi, and the Psessi. We
then come to the river Tanais,141 which discharges itself into the
sea by two mouths, and the banks of which are inhabited by the Sarmatæ,
the descendants of the Medi, it is said, a people divided into numerous
tribes. The first of these are the Sauromatæ Gynæcocratumeni,142
the husbands of the Amazons. Next to them are the Ævazæ,143 the
Coitæ,144 the Cicimeni, the Messeniani, the Costobocci, the Choatræ,
the Zigæ,145 the Dandarii, the Thyssagetæ, and the Iyrcæ,146 as
far as certain rugged deserts and densely wooded vallies, beyond
which again are the Arimphæi,147 who extend as far as the Riphæan
Mountains.148 The Scythians call the river Tanais by the name of
Silis, and the Mæotis the Temarunda, meaning the “mother of the sea.”
There is149 a city also at the mouth of the Tanais.
The neighbouring
country was inhabited first by the Carians, then by the Clazomenii and
Mæones, and after them by the Panticapenses.150
There are some writers who state that there are the following nations
dwelling around the Mæotis, as far as the Ceraunian mountains;151
at a short distance from the shore, the Napitæ, and beyond them, the
Essedones, who join up to the Colchians, and dwell upon the summits of
the mountains: after these again, the Camacæ, the Orani, the Autacæ,
the Mazacasi, the Cantiocæ, the Agamathæ, the Pici, the Rimosoli, the
Acascomarci, and, upon the ridges of the Caucasus, the Itacalæ, the
Imadochi, the Rami, the Anclacæ, the Tydii, the Carastasei, and the
Anthiandæ. The river Lagoüs runs from the Cathæan152 mountains, and
into it flows the Opharus. Upon it are the tribes of the Cauthadæ, and
the Opharitæ. Next to these are the rivers Menotharus and Imityes,
which flow from the Cissian mountains, among the peoples called the
Acdei, the Carnæ, the Oscardei, the Accisi, the Gabri, the Gogari, and,
around the source of the Imityes, the Imityi, and the Apatræi. Some
writers say that the Auchetæ, the Athernei, and the Asampatæ, Scythian
tribes, have made inroads upon this territory, and have destroyed the
Tanaitæ and the Inapæi to a man. Others again represent the Ocharius
as running through the Cantici and the Sapæi, and the Tanais as
passing through the territories of the Sarcharcei, the Herticei, the
Spondolici, the Synhietæ, the Anasi, the Issi, the Catetæ, the Tagoræ,
the Caroni, the Neripi, the Agandei, the Mandarei, the Satarchei, and
the Spalei.
We have now gone over the coast which borders upon the Inner153 Sea,
and have enumerated the various nations that dwell thereon; let us now
turn to those vast tracts of land which lie further in the interior.
I do not deny that in my description I shall differ very materially
from the ancient writers, but still it is one that has been compiled
with the most anxious research, from a full examination into the events
which have transpired of late in these countries under the command of
Domitius Corbulo,154 and from information received either from kings
who have been sent thence to Rome, as suppliants for our mercy, or else
the sons of kings who have visited us in the character of hostages.
We will begin then with the nation of the Cappadocians.
Of all the countries of Pontus, this155 extends the greatest distance
into the interior.156 On the left157 it leaves behind the Lesser
and the Greater Armenia, as well as Commagene, and on the right all the
nations of the province of Asia which we have previously described.
Spreading over numerous peoples, it rises rapidly in elevation in an
easterly direction towards the range of Taurus. Then passing Lycaonia,
Pisidia, and Cilicia, it advances above the district of Antiochia, the
portion of it known as Cataonia extending as far as Cyrrhestica, which
forms part of that district. The length of Asia158 here is twelve
hundred and fifty miles, its breadth six hundred and forty.159
Greater Armenia,160 beginning at the mountains known as the
Paryadres,161 is separated, as we have already stated,162 from
Cappadocia by the river Euphrates, and, where that river turns off163
in its course, from Mesopotamia, by the no less famous river Tigris.
Both of these rivers take their rise in Armenia, which also forms the
commencement of Mesopotamia, a tract of country which lies between
these streams; the intervening space between them being occupied by the
Arabian Orei.164 It thus extends its frontier as far as Adiabene, at
which point it is stopped short by a chain of mountains which takes a
cross direction; whereupon the province extends in width to the left,
crossing the course of the Araxes,165 as far as the river Cyrus;166
while in length it reaches as far as the Lesser Armenia,167 from
which it is separated by the river Absarus, which flows into the
Euxine, and by the mountains known as the Paryadres, in which the
Absarus takes its rise.
The river Cyrus168 takes its rise in the mountains of the Heniochi,
by some writers called the Coraxici; the Araxes rises in the same
mountains as the river Euphrates, at a distance from it of six miles
only;169 and after being increased by the waters of the Usis, falls
itself, as many authors have supposed, into the Cyrus, by which it is
carried into the Caspian Sea.
The more famous towns in Lesser Armenia are Cæsarea,170 Aza,171
and Nicopolis;172 in the Greater Arsamosata,173 which lies near
the Euphrates, Carcathiocerta174 upon the Tigris, Tigranocerta175
which stands on an elevated site, and, on a plain adjoining the river
Araxes, Artaxata.176 According to Aufidius, the circumference of
the whole of Armenia is five thousand miles, while Claudius Cæsar
makes the length, from Dascusa177 to the borders of the Caspian Sea,
thirteen178 hundred miles, and the breadth, from Tigranocerta to
Iberia,179 half that distance. It is a well-known fact, that this
country is divided into prefectures, called “Strategies,” some of which
singly formed a kingdom in former times; they are one hundred and
twenty in number, with barbarous and uncouth names.180 On the east,
it is bounded, though not immediately, by the Ceraunian Mountains and
the district of Adiabene. The space that intervenes is occupied by the
Sopheni, beyond whom is the chain of mountains,181 and then beyond
them the inhabitants of Adiabene. Dwelling in the valleys adjoining to
Armenia are the Menobardi and the Moscheni. The Tigris and inaccessible
mountains surround Adiabene. To the left182 of it is the territory
of the Medi, and in the distance is seen the Caspian Sea; which, as
we shall state in the proper place, receives its waters from the
ocean,183 and is wholly surrounded by the Caucasian Mountains. The
inhabitants upon the confines of Armenia shall now be treated of.
The whole plain which extends away from the river Cyrus is inhabited
by the nation of the Albani,184 and, after them,185 by that of the
Iberi,186 who are separated from them by the river Alazon,187 which
flows into the Cyrus from the Caucasian chain. The chief cities are
Cabalaca,188 in Albania, Harmastis,189 near a river190 of Iberia,
and Neoris; there is the region also of Thasie, and that of Triare,
extending as far as the mountains known as the Paryadres. Beyond
these191 are the deserts of Colchios, on the side of which that
looks towards the Ceraunian Mountains dwell the Armenochalybes;192
and there is the country of the Moschi, extending to the river Iberus,
which flows into the Cyrus; below them are the Sacassani, and after
them the Macrones, upon the river Absarus. Such is the manner in which
the plains and low country are parcelled out. Again, after passing the
confines of Albania, the wild tribes of the Silvi inhabit the face of
the mountains, below them those of the Lubieni, and after them the
Diduri and the Sodii.
After passing the last, we come to the Gates of Caucasus,193 by many
persons most erroneously called the Caspian Passes; a vast work of
nature, which has suddenly wrenched asunder in this place a chain of
mountains. At this spot are gates barred up with beams shod with iron,
while beneath the middle there runs a stream which emits a most fetid
odour; on this side of it is a rock, defended by a fortress, the name
of which is Cumania,194 erected for the purpose of preventing the
passage of the innumerable tribes that lie beyond. Here, then, we may
see the habitable world severed into two parts by a pair of gates;
they are just opposite to Harmastis, a town of the Iberi.
Beyond the Gates of Caucasus, in the Gordyæan Mountains, the Valli and
the Suani, uncivilized tribes, are found; still, however, they work the
mines of gold there. Beyond these nations, and extending as far away as
Pontus, are numerous nations of the Heniochi, and, after them, of the
Achæi. Such is the present state of one of the most famous tracts upon
the face of the earth.
Some writers have stated that the distance between the Euxine and the
Caspian Sea is not more than three hundred and seventy-five miles;
Cornelius Nepos makes it only two hundred and fifty. Within such
straits is Asia pent up in this second instance195 by the agency
of the sea! Claudius Cæsar has informed us that from the Cimmerian
Bosporus to the Caspian Sea is a distance of only one hundred and
fifty196 miles, and that Nicator Seleucus197 contemplated cutting
through this isthmus just at the time when he was slain by Ptolemy
Ceraunus. It is a well-known fact that the distance from the Gates of
Caucasus to the shores of the Euxine is two hundred miles.
The islands of the Euxine are the Planctæ or Cyaneæ,198 otherwise
called Symplegades, and Apollonia, surnamed Thynias,199 to
distinguish it from the island of that name200 in Europe; it is
four miles in circumference, and one mile distant from the mainland.
Opposite to Pharnacea201 is Chalceritis, to which the Greeks have
given the name of Aria,202 and consecrated it to Mars; here, they
say, there were birds that used to attack strangers with blows of their
wings.
Having now stated all that bears reference to the interior of Asia,
let us cross in imagination the Riphæan203 Mountains, and traverse
the shores of the ocean to the right. On three sides does this ocean
wash the coasts of Asia, as the Scythian Ocean on the north, the
Eastern Ocean on the east, and the Indian Ocean on the south; and it
is again divided into various names, derived from the numerous gulfs
which it forms, and the nations which dwell upon its shores. A great
part of Asia, however, which lies exposed to the north, through the
noxious effects of those freezing climates, consists of nothing but
vast deserts. From the extreme north north-east to the point204 where
the sun rises in the summer, it is the country of the Scythians. Still
further than them, and beyond205 the point where north north-east
begins, some writers have placed the Hyperborei, who are said,
indeed, by the majority to be a people of Europe.206 After passing
this point,207 the first place that is known is Lytarmis,208 a
promontory of Celtica, and next to it the river Carambucis,209 where
the chain of the Riphæan Mountains terminates, and with it the extreme
rigour of the climate; here, too, we have heard of a certain people
being situate, called the Arimphæi,210 a race not much unlike the
Hyperborei.211 Their habitations are the groves, and the berries
their diet; long hair is held to be disgraceful by the women as well
as the men, and they are mild in their manners. Hence it is that they
are reported to be a sacred212 race, and are never molested even by
the savage tribes which border upon them, and not only they, but such
other persons as well as may have fled to them for refuge. Beyond these
we come straight to the Scythians, the Cimmerii, the Cisianthi, the
Georgi, and a nation of Amazons.213 These last extend to the Caspian
and Hyrcanian Sea.214
Bursting through, this sea makes a passage from the Scythian Ocean into
the back of Asia,215 receiving various names from the nations which
dwell upon its banks, the two most famous of which are the Caspian and
the Hyrcanian races. Clitarchus is of opinion that the Caspian Sea is
not less in area than the Euxine. Eratosthenes gives the measure of
it on the south-east, along the coast of Cadusia216 and Albania, as
five thousand four hundred stadia; thence, through the territories of
the Anariaci, the Amardi, and the Hyrcani, to the mouth of the river
Zonus he makes four thousand eight hundred stadia, and thence to the
mouth of the Jaxartes217 two thousand four hundred; which makes in
all a distance of one thousand five hundred and seventy-five miles.
Artemidorus, however, makes this sum smaller by twenty-five miles.
Agrippa bounds the Caspian Sea and the nations around it, including
Armenia, on the east by the Ocean of the Seres,218 on the west by
the chain of the Caucasus, on the south by that of Taurus, and on the
north by the Scythian Ocean; and he states it, so far as its extent is
known, to be four hundred and eighty miles in length, and two hundred
and ninety in breadth. There are not wanting, however, some authors
who state that its whole circumference, from the Straits,219 is two
thousand five hundred miles.
Its waters make their way into this sea by a very narrow mouth,220
but of considerable length; and where it begins to enlarge, it curves
obliquely with horns in the form of a crescent, just as though it would
make a descent from its mouth into Lake Mæotis, resembling a sickle
in shape, as M. Varro says. The first221 of its gulfs is called the
Scythian Gulf; it is inhabited on both sides, by the Scythians, who
hold communication with each other across the Straits,222 the Nomades
being on one side, together with the Sauromatæ, divided into tribes
with numerous names, and on the other, the Abzoæ, who are also divided
into an equal number. At the entrance, on the right hand side,223
dwell the Udini, a Scythian tribe, at the very angle of the mouth. Then
along224 the coast there are the Albani, the descendants of Jason,
it is said; that part of the sea which lies in front of them, bears
the name of ‘Albanian.’ This nation, which lies along the Caucasian
chain, comes down, as we have previously stated,225 as far as the
river Cyrus, which forms the boundary of Armenia and Iberia. Above the
maritime coast of Albania and the nation of the Udini, the Sarmatæ, the
Utidorsi, and the Aroteres stretch along its shores, and in their rear
the Sauromatian Amazons, already spoken of.226
The rivers which run through Albania in their course to the sea are the
Casius227 and the Albanus,228 and then the Cambyses,229 which
rises in the Caucasian mountains, and next to it the Cyrus, rising in
those of the Coraxici, as already mentioned.230 Agrippa states that
the whole of this coast, inaccessible from rocks of an immense height,
is four hundred and twenty-five miles in length, beginning from the
river Casius. After we pass the mouth of the Cyrus, it begins to be
called the ‘Caspian Sea;’ the Caspii being a people who dwell upon its
shores.
In this place it may be as well to correct an error into which many
persons have fallen, and even those who lately took part with Corbulo
in the Armenian war. The Gates of Iberia, which we have mentioned231
as the Caucasian, they have spoken of as being called the ‘Caspian,’
and the coloured plans which have been sent from those parts to Rome
have that name written upon them. The menaced expedition, too, that was
contemplated by the Emperor Nero, was said to be designed to extend as
far as the Caspian Gates, whereas it was really intended for those
which lead through Iberia into the territory of the Sarmatæ; there
being hardly any possibility of approach to the Caspian Sea, by reason
of the close juxtaposition of the mountains there. There are, however,
other Caspian Gates, which join up to the Caspian tribes; but these can
only be distinguished from a perusal of the narrative of those who took
part in the expedition of Alexander the Great.
The kingdom of the Persians, by which we now understand that of
Parthia, is elevated upon the Caucasian chain between two seas, the
Persian and the Hyrcanian. To the Greater Armenia, which in the front
slopes towards Commagene, is joined Sophene, which lies upon the
descent232 on both sides thereof, and next to it is Adiabene, the
most advanced frontier of Assyria; a part of which is Arbelitis,233
where Alexander conquered Darius, and which joins up to Syria. The
whole of this country was called Mygdonia by the Macedonians, on
account of the resemblance it bore to Mygdonia234 in Europe. Its
cities are Alexandria,235 and Antiochia, also called Nisibis;236
this last place is distant from Artaxata seven hundred and fifty miles.
There was also in former times Ninus,237 a most renowned city, on the
banks of the Tigris, with an aspect towards the west. Adjoining the
other front of Greater Armenia, which runs down towards the Caspian
Sea, we find Atropatene,238 which is separated from Otene, a region
of Armenia, by the river Araxes; Gazæ239 is its chief city, distant
from Artaxata four hundred and fifty miles, and the same from Ecbatana
in Media, to which country Atropatene belongs.
Ecbatana,240 the capital of Media, was built241 by king Seleucus,
at a distance from Great Seleucia of seven hundred and fifty miles, and
twenty miles from the Caspian Gates. The remaining towns of the Medians
are Phazaca, Aganzaga, and Apamea,242 surnamed Rhagiane. The reason
of these passes receiving the name of “Gates,” is the same that has
been stated above.243 The chain of mountains is suddenly broken by a
passage of such extreme narrowness that, for a distance of eight miles,
a single chariot can barely find room to move along: the whole of this
pass has been formed by artificial means. Both on the right hand and
the left are overhanging rocks, which look as though they had been
exposed to the action of fire; and there is a tract of country, quite
destitute of water, twenty-eight miles in extent. This narrow pass,
too, is rendered still more difficult by a liquid salt which oozes from
the rocks, and uniting in a single stream, makes its way along the
pass. Besides this, it is frequented by such multitudes of serpents,
that the passage is quite impracticable except in winter.
(15.) Joining up to Adiabene are the people formerly known as the
‘Carduchi,’ now the Cordueni,244 in front of whom the river Tigris
flows: and next to them are the Pratitæ, entitled the Par Odon,245
who hold possession of the Caspian Gates.246 On the other side247
of these gates we come to the deserts248 of Parthia and the mountain
chain of Cithenus; and after that, the most pleasant locality of all
Parthia, Choara249 by name. Here were two cities of the Parthians,
built in former times for their protection against the people of Media,
Calliope,250 and Issatis, the last of which stood formerly251 on a
rock. Hecatompylos,252 the capital of Parthia, is distant from the
Caspian Gates one hundred and thirty-three miles. In such an effectual
manner is the kingdom of Parthia shut out by these passes. After
leaving these gates we find the nation of the Caspii, extending as
far as the shores of the Caspian, a race which has given its name to
these gates as well as to the sea: on the left there is a mountainous
district. Turning back253 from this nation to the river Cyrus, the
distance is said to be two hundred and twenty miles; but if we go from
that river as far down as the Caspian Gates, the distance is seven
hundred254 miles. In the itineraries of Alexander the Great these
gates were made the central or turning point in his expeditions; the
distance from the Caspian Gates to the frontier of India being there
set down as fifteen thousand six hundred and eighty255 stadia, to the
city of Bactra,256 commonly called Zariaspa, three thousand seven
hundred, and thence to the river Jaxartes257 five thousand stadia.
Lying to the east of the Caspii is the region known as Apavortene,258
in which there is a place noted for its singular fertility, called
Dareium.259 We then come to the nations of the Tapyri,260 the
Anariaci, the Staures, and the Hyrcani, past whose shores and beyond
the river Sideris261 the Caspian begins to take the name of the
‘Hyrcanian’ Sea: on this side of that stream are also the rivers
Maxeras and Strato; all of them take their rise in the Caucasian chain.
Next comes the district of Margiane,262 so remarkable for its sunny
climate. It is the only spot in all these regions that produces the
vine, being shut in on every side by verdant and refreshing hills.
This district is fifteen hundred stadia in circumference, but is
rendered remarkably difficult of access by sandy deserts, which extend
a distance of one hundred and twenty miles: it lies opposite to the
country of Parthia, and in it Alexander founded the city of Alexandria.
This place having been destroyed by the barbarians, Antiochus,263 the
son of Seleucus, rebuilt it on the same site as a Syrian city.264
For, seeing that it was watered by the Margus,265 which passes
through it, and is afterwards divided into a number of streams for the
irrigation of the district of Zothale, he restored it, but preferred
giving it the name of Antiochia.266 The circumference of this city
is seventy stadia: it was to this place that Orodes conducted such of
the Romans as had survived the defeat of Crassus. From the mountain
heights of this district, along the range of Caucasus, the savage race
of the Mardi, a free people, extends as far as the Bactri.267 Below
the district inhabited by them, we find the nations of the Orciani,
the Commori, the Berdrigæ, the Harmatotropi,268 the Citomaræ, the
Comani, the Marucæi, and the Mandruani. The rivers here are the Mandrus
and the Chindrus.269 Beyond the nations already mentioned, are the
Chorasmii,270 the Candari,271 the Attasini, the Paricani, the
Sarangæ, the Marotiani, the Aorsi,272 the Gaëli, by the Greek writers
called Cadusii,273 the Matiani, the city of Heraclea,274 which was
founded by Alexander, but was afterwards destroyed, and rebuilt by
Antiochus, and by him called Achaïs; the Derbices also,275 through
the middle of whose territory the river Oxus276 runs, after rising in
Lake Oxus,277 the Syrmatæ, the Oxydracæ, the Heniochi, the Bateni,
the Saraparæ, and the Bactri, whose chief city is Zariaspe, which
afterwards received the name of Bactra, from the river278 there.
This last nation lies at the back of Mount Paropanisus,279 over
against the sources of the river Indus, and is bounded by the river
Ochus.280 Beyond it are the Sogdiani,281 the town of Panda, and,
at the very extremity of their territory, Alexandria,282 founded by
Alexander the Great. At this spot are the altars which were raised by
Hercules and Father Liber, as also by Cyrus, Semiramis, and Alexander;
for the expeditions of all these conquerors stopped short at this
region, bounded as it is by the river Jaxartes, by the Scythians known
as the Silis, and by Alexander and his officers supposed to have been
the Tanais. This river was crossed by Demodamas, a general of kings
Seleucus and Antiochus, and whose account more particularly we have
here followed. He also consecrated certain altars here to Apollo
Didymæus.283
Beyond this river are the peoples of Scythia. The Persians have called
them by the general name of Sacæ,284 which properly belongs to only
the nearest nation of them. The more ancient writers give them the
name of Aramii. The Scythians themselves give the name of “Chorsari”
to the Persians, and they call Mount Caucasus Graucasis, which means
“white with snow.” The multitude of these Scythian nations is quite
innumerable: in their life and habits they much resemble the people of
Parthia. The tribes among them that are better known are the Sacæ, the
Massagetæ,285 the Dahæ,286 the Essedones,287 the Ariacæ,288
the Rhymmici, the Pæsici, the Amardi,289 the Histi, the Edones, the
Camæ, the Camacæ, the Euchatæ,290 the Cotieri, the Anthusiani, the
Psacæ, the Arimaspi,291 the Antacati, the Chroasai, and the Œtei;
among them the Napæi292 are said to have been destroyed by the
Palæi. The rivers in their country that are the best known, are the
Mandragæus and the Carpasus. Indeed upon no subject that I know of
are there greater discrepancies among writers, from the circumstance,
I suppose, of these nations being so extremely numerous, and of such
migratory habits. Alexander the Great has left it stated that the
water of this sea293 is fresh, and M. Varro informs us, that some of
it, of a similar character, was brought to Pompey, when holding the
chief command in the Mithridatic war in its vicinity; the salt,294
no doubt, being overpowered by the volume of water discharged by the
rivers which flow into it. He adds also, that under the direction of
Pompey, it was ascertained that it is seven days’ journey from India to
the river Icarus,295 in the country of the Bactri, which discharges
itself into the Oxus, and that the merchandize of India being conveyed
from it296 through the Caspian Sea into the Cyrus, may be brought
by land to Phasis in Pontus, in five days at most. There are numerous
islands throughout the whole of the Caspian sea: the only one that is
well known is that of Tazata.297
After we have passed the Caspian Sea and the Scythian Ocean, our course
takes an easterly direction, such being the turn here taken by the
line of the coast. The first portion298 of these shores, after we
pass the Scythian Promontory, is totally uninhabitable, owing to the
snow, and the regions adjoining are uncultivated, in consequence of the
savage state of the nations which dwell there. Here are the abodes of
the Scythian Anthropophagi,299 who feed on human flesh. Hence it is
that all around them consists of vast deserts, inhabited by multitudes
of wild beasts, which are continually lying in wait, ready to fall
upon human beings just as savage as themselves. After leaving these,
we again come to a nation of the Scythians, and then again to desert
tracts tenanted by wild beasts, until we reach a chain of mountains
which runs up to the sea, and bears the name of Tabis.300 It is
not, however, before we have traversed very nearly one half of the
coast that looks towards the north-east, that we find it occupied by
inhabitants.
The first people that are known of here are the Seres,301 so famous
for the wool that is found in their forests.302 After steeping it in
water, they comb off a white down that adheres to the leaves; and then
to the females of our part of the world they give the twofold task303
of unravelling their textures, and of weaving the threads afresh. So
manifold is the labour, and so distant are the regions which are thus
ransacked to supply a dress through which our ladies may in public
display304 their charms. The Seres are of inoffensive manners, but,
bearing a strong resemblance therein to all savage nations, they shun
all intercourse with the rest of mankind, and await the approach305
of those who wish to traffic with them. The first river that is known
in their territory is the Psitharas,306 next to that the Cambari,
and the third the Laros; after which we come to the Promontory of
Chryse,307 the Gulf of Cynaba, the river Atianos, and the nation of
the Attacori on the gulf of that name, a people protected by their
sunny hills from all noxious blasts, and living in a climate of the
same temperature as that of the Hyperborei. Amometus has written a work
entirely devoted to the history of these people, just as Hecatæus has
done in his treatise on the Hyperborei. After the Attacori, we find
the nations of the Phruri and the Tochari, and, in the interior, the
Casiri, a people of India, who look toward the Scythians, and feed on
human flesh. Here are also numerous wandering Nomad tribes of India.
There are some authors who state that in a north-easterly direction
these nations touch upon the Cicones308 and the Brysari.
But we come now to nations as to which there is a more general
agreement among writers. Where the chain of Emodus309 rises, the
nations of India begin, which borders not only on the Eastern sea,
but on the Southern as well, which we have already mentioned310 as
being called the Indian Ocean. That part which faces the east runs in
a straight line a distance of eighteen hundred and seventy-five miles
until it comes to a bend, at which the Indian Ocean begins. Here it
takes a turn to the south, and continues to run in that direction a
distance of two thousand four hundred and seventy-five miles, according
to Eratosthenes, as far as the river Indus, the boundary of India on
the west.311 Many authors have represented the entire length of the
Indian coast as being forty days’ and nights’ sail, and as being,
from north to south, two thousand eight hundred and fifty miles.
Agrippa states its length to be three thousand three hundred miles,
and its breadth, two thousand three hundred. Posidonius has given its
measurement as lying from north-east to south-east, placing it opposite
to Gaul, of which country he has given the measurement as lying from
north-west to south-west; making the whole of India to lie due west of
Gaul. Hence, as he has shewn by undoubted proofs, India lying opposite
to Gaul must be refreshed by the blowing of that wind,312 and derive
its salubrity therefrom.
In this region, the appearance of the heavens is totally changed, and
quite different is the rising of the stars; there are two summers in
the year, and two harvests, while the winter intervenes between them
during the time that the Etesian313 winds are blowing: during our
winter too, they enjoy light breezes, and their seas are navigable. In
this country there are nations and cities which would be found to be
quite innumerable, if a person should attempt to enumerate them. For
it has been explored not only by the arms of Alexander the Great and
of the kings who succeeded him, by Seleucus and Antiochus, who sailed
round even to the Caspian and Hyrcanian Sea, and by Patrocles,314
the admiral of their fleet, but has been treated of by several other
Greek writers who resided at the courts of Indian kings, such, for
instance, as Megasthenes, and by Dionysius, who was sent thither by
Philadelphus, expressly for the purpose: all of whom have enlarged upon
the power and vast resources of these nations. Still, however, there is
no possibility of being rigorously exact, so different are the accounts
given, and often of a nature so incredible. The followers of Alexander
the Great have stated in their writings, that there were no less than
five thousand cities in that portion of India which they vanquished by
force of arms, not one of which was smaller than that of Cos;315 that
its nations were eight in number, that India forms one-third of the
whole earth, and that its populations are innumerable—a thing which is
certainly far from improbable, seeing that the Indians are nearly the
only race of people who have never migrated from their own territories.
From the time of Father Liber316 to that of Alexander the Great,
one hundred and fifty-three kings of India are reckoned, extending
over a period of six thousand four hundred and fifty-one years and
three months. The vast extent of their rivers is quite marvellous; it
is stated that on no one day did Alexander the Great sail less than
six hundred stadia317 on the Indus, and still was unable to reach
its mouth in less than five months and some few days: and yet it is a
well-known fact that this river is not so large as the Ganges.318
Seneca, one of our fellow-countrymen, who has written a treatise319
upon the subject of India, has given its rivers as sixty-five in
number, and its nations as one hundred and eighteen. The difficulty
too would be quite as great, if we were to attempt to enumerate its
mountains. The chains of Emaüs, of Emodus, of Paropanisus, and of
Caucasus, are all connected, the one with the other; and from their
foot, the country of India runs down in the form of a vast plain,
bearing a very considerable resemblance to that of Egypt.
However, that we may come to a better understanding relative to the
description of these regions, we will follow in the track of Alexander
the Great. Diognetus and Bæton, whose duty it was to ascertain the
distances and length of his expeditions, have written that from the
Caspian Gates to Hecatompylon, the city of the Parthians, the distance
is the number of miles which we have already320 stated; and that
from thence to Alexandria,321 of the Arii, which city was founded by
the same king, the distance is five hundred and seventy-five miles;
from thence to Prophthasia,322 the city of the Drangæ, one hundred
and ninety-nine; from thence to the city of the Arachosii,323 five
hundred and sixty-five; from thence to Ortospanum,324 one hundred
and seventy-five; and from thence to the city built by Alexander,325
fifty, miles. In some copies, however, the numbers are found
differently stated; and we find this last city even placed at the very
foot of Mount Caucasus! From this place to the river Cophes326 and
Peucolaitis, a city of India, is two hundred and thirty-seven miles;
from thence to the river Indus and the city of Taxilla327 sixty; from
thence to the famous river Hydaspes328 one hundred and twenty; and
from thence to the Hypasis,329 a river no less famous, two hundred
and ninety miles, and three hundred and ninety paces. This last was
the extreme limit of the expedition of Alexander, though he crossed
the river and dedicated certain altars330 on the opposite side. The
dispatches written by order of that king fully agree with the distances
above stated.
The remaining distances beyond the above point were ascertained on the
expedition of Seleucus Nicator. They are, to the river Sydrus,331
one hundred and sixty-eight miles; to the river Jomanes, the same;
some copies, however, add to this last distance five miles; thence
to the Ganges, one hundred and twelve miles; to Rhodapha, five
hundred and sixty-nine—though, according to some writers, this last
distance is only three hundred and twenty-five miles; to the town
of Calinipaxa,332 one hundred and sixty-seven, according to some,
two hundred and sixty-five; thence to the confluence of the river
Jomanes333 and Ganges, six hundred and twenty-five; most writers,
however, add thirteen miles to this last distance; thence to the city
of Palibothra,334 four hundred and twenty-five—and thence to the
mouth of the Ganges, six hundred and thirty-seven miles and a half.
The nations whom it may be not altogether inopportune to mention,
after passing the Emodian Mountains, a cross range of which is called
“Imaus,” a word which, in the language of the natives, signifies
“snowy,”335 are the Isari, the Cosyri, the Izi, and, upon the chain
of mountains, the Chisiotosagi, with numerous peoples, which have the
surname of Brachmanæ,336 among whom are the Maccocalingæ. There are
also the rivers Prinas and Cainas,337 which last flows into the
Ganges, both of them navigable streams. The nation of the Calingæ338
comes nearest to the sea, and above them are the Mandei and the
Malli.339 In the territory of the last-named people is a mountain
called Mallus: the boundary of this region is the river Ganges.
Some writers have stated that this river, like the Nile, takes its
rise from unknown sources,340 and, in a similar manner, waters
the neighbouring territory; others, again, say that it rises in the
mountains of Scythia. They state also that nineteen rivers discharge
their waters into it; those among them that are navigable, besides
the rivers already mentioned,341 are the Condochates,342 the
Erannoboas,343 the Cosoagus,344 and the Sonus. Other writers again
say that it bursts forth at its very source with a loud noise, hurling
itself over rocks and precipices; and that after it has reached the
plains, its waters become more tranquil, and it pauses for a time in
a certain lake, after which it flows gently on. They say also that it
is eight miles in breadth, where it is the very narrowest, and one
hundred stadia where it is but moderately wide, and that it is nowhere
less than twenty paces in depth. The last nation situate on the banks
of the Ganges is that of the Gangarides345 Calingæ; the city where
their king dwells has the name of Protalis.346
(19.) This king has sixty thousand foot-soldiers, one thousand horse,
and seven hundred elephants, always caparisoned ready for battle. The
people of the more civilized nations of India are divided into several
classes.347 One of these classes till the earth, another attends to
military affairs, others again are occupied in mercantile pursuits,
while the wisest and the most wealthy among them have the management
of the affairs of state—act as judges, and give counsel to the king.
The fifth class,348 entirely devoting themselves to the pursuit of
wisdom, which in these countries is almost held in the same veneration
as religion, always349 end their life by a voluntary death upon
the lighted pile. In addition to these, there is a class350 in a
half-savage state, and doomed to endless labour; by means of their
exertions, all the classes previously mentioned are supported. It is
their duty to hunt351 the elephant, and to tame him when captured;
for it is by the aid of these animals that they plough; by these
animals they are conveyed from place to place; these in especial they
look upon as constituting their flocks and herds; by their aid they
wage their wars, and fight in defence of their territories. Strength,
age, and size, are the points usually considered in making choice of
these animals.
In the Ganges there is an island of very considerable size, inhabited
by a single nation; it is called Modogalinga.352 Beyond the Ganges
are situate the Modubæ, the Molindæ, the Uberæ, with a magnificent
city of the same name, the Modresi, the Preti, the Caloæ, the Sasuri,
the Passalæ, the Colobæ, the Orumcolæ, the Abali, and the Thalutæ. The
king of the last-named people has fifty thousand foot-soldiers, four
thousand horse, and four hundred armed elephants. We next come to a
still more powerful nation, the Andaræ,353 who dwell in numerous
villages, as well as thirty cities fortified with walls and towers.
They furnish for their king one hundred thousand foot, two thousand
horse, and a thousand elephants. The country of the Dardæ354 is the
most productive of gold, that of the Setæ of silver.
But more famous and more powerful than any nation, not only in these
regions, but throughout almost the whole of India, are the Prasii,
who dwell in a city of vast extent and of remarkable opulence, called
Palibothra;355 from which circumstance some writers have given to the
people themselves the name of Palibothri, and, indeed, to the whole
tract of country between the Ganges and the Indus. These people keep on
daily pay in their king’s service an army, consisting of six hundred
thousand foot, thirty thousand horse, and nine thousand elephants,
from which we may easily form a conjecture as to the vast extent of
their resources. Behind these people, and lying still more in the
interior, are the Monedes, and the Suari,356 among whom is a mountain
known as Maleus, upon which the shadow falls to the north in winter,
and to the south in summer, six months alternately. In this district
the Constellation of the Greater Bear357 is seen at only one period
in the year, and then but for fifteen days, according to what Bæton
states. Megasthenes, however, informs us that the same is the case also
in many other localities of India. The South Pole is by the Indians
called Diamasa.
The river Jomanes runs into the Ganges through the territory of the
Palibothri, between the cities of Methora358 and Chrysobora.359
In the regions which lie to the south360 of the Ganges, the people
are tinted by the heat of the sun, so much so as to be quite coloured,
but yet not burnt black, like the Æthiopians. The nearer361 they
approach the Indus, the deeper their colour, a proof of the heat of the
climate. After leaving the nation of the Prasii, we immediately come
to the Indus; in the mountains of the Prasii a race of Pygmies is said
to exist. Artemidorus says that between these two rivers there is a
distance of two thousand one hundred miles.
The Indus, called Sindis by the natives, rises in that branch of the
Caucasian range which bears the name of Paropanisus,362 and runs in
an easterly direction, receiving in its course the waters of nineteen
rivers. The most famous of these are the Hydaspes,363 into which four
other rivers have already discharged themselves, the Cantaba,364
which receives three other rivers, the Acesinus, and the Hypasis,365
which last two are navigable themselves. Still however, so moderate, as
it were, do the waters of this river show themselves in their course,
that it is never more than fifty stadia in width, nor does it ever
exceed fifteen paces in depth. Of two islands, which it forms in its
course, the one, which is known as Prasiane, is of very considerable
size; the other, which is smaller, is called Patale. According to the
accounts given by the most moderate writers, this river is navigable
for a distance of twelve hundred and fifty miles, and after following
the sun’s course to the west, in some degree, discharges itself into
the ocean. I will here give the distances of various places situate on
the coast to the mouth of this river, in a general way, just as I find
them stated, although they none of them tally with each other.
From the mouth of the Ganges to the Promontory of the Calingi and the
town of Dandaguda,366 is six hundred and twenty-five miles; from
thence to Tropina twelve hundred and twenty-five; from thence to the
promontory of Perimula, where is held the most celebrated mart in all
India, seven hundred and fifty, and from thence to the city of Patala,
in the island just mentioned, six hundred and twenty miles.
The mountain races between the Indus and the Jomanes are the Cesi,367
the Cetriboni, who dwell in the woods, and after them the Megallæ,
whose king possesses five hundred elephants, and an army of horse
and foot, the numbers of which are unknown; then the Chrysei, the
Parasangæ, and the Asmagi,368 whose territory is infested by wild
tigers; these people keep in arms thirty thousand foot, three
hundred elephants, and eight hundred horse. They are bounded by the
river Indus, and encircled by a range of mountains and deserts for a
distance of six hundred and twenty-five miles. Below these deserts
are the Dari and the Suræ, and then deserts again for one hundred and
eighty-seven miles, sands in general encircling these spots just as
islands are surrounded by the sea. Below these deserts, again, are
the Maltecoræ, the Singæ, the Marohæ, the Rarungæ, and the Morontes.
These last peoples, who possess the mountains throughout the whole
range of country as far as the shores of the ocean, are free, and
independent of all kings, and hold numerous cities upon the declivities
of the mountains. After them come the Nareæ,369 who are bounded by
Capitalia, the most lofty of all the Indian peaks: the inhabitants
who dwell on the other side of it have extensive mines of gold and
silver. After these again are the Oratæ, whose king possesses only
ten elephants, but a large army of foot; next come the Suarataratæ,
who live under the rule of a king as well, but breed no elephants, as
they depend solely on their horse and foot; then the Odonbeores, the
Arabastræ, and the Horacæ, which last inhabit a fine city fortified by
trenches cut in the marshes. It is quite impossible to approach the
city, except by the bridge, as the water in the trenches is full of
crocodiles, an animal most insatiate for human flesh. There is another
city also in their territory, which has been greatly extolled, Automula
by name, situate on the sea-shore, a famous mart, lying at the point
of confluence of five rivers: their king possesses sixteen hundred
elephants, one hundred and fifty thousand foot, and five thousand
horse. The king of the Charmæ is a less opulent potentate; he has
only sixty elephants and some small remains of his former strength.
After these we come to the nation of the Pandæ,370 the only one
throughout all India which is ruled by women. It is said that Hercules
had but one child of the female sex, for which reason she was his
especial favourite, and he bestowed upon her the principal one of these
kingdoms. The sovereigns who derive their origin from this female,
rule over three hundred towns, and have an army of one hundred and
fifty thousand foot, and five hundred elephants. After passing through
this list of three hundred cities, we come to the Darangæ,371 the
Posingæ, the Butæ, the Gogaræi, the Umbræ, the Nereæ, the Brancosi, the
Nobundæ, the Cocondæ, the Nesei, the Palatitæ, the Salobriasæ, and the
Olostræ, who reach up to the island of Patala, from the extremity of
whose shores to the Caspian Gates it is a distance of nineteen hundred
and twenty-five miles.
After passing this island, the other side of the Indus is occupied, as
we know by clear and undoubted proofs, by the Athoæ, the Bolingæ, the
Gallitalutæ, the Dimuri, the Megari, the Ardabæ, the Mesæ, and after
them, the Uri and the Silæ; beyond which last there are desert tracts,
extending a distance of two hundred and fifty miles. After passing
these nations, we come to the Organagæ, the Abortæ, the Bassuertæ, and,
after these last, deserts similar to those previously mentioned. We
then come to the peoples of the Sorofages, the Arbæ, the Marogomatræ,
the Umbrittæ, of whom there are twelve nations, each with two cities,
and the Asini, a people who dwell in three cities, their capital
being Bucephala,372 which was founded around the tomb of the horse
belonging to king Alexander, which bore that name. Above these peoples
there are some mountain tribes, which lie at the foot of Caucasus, the
Soseadæ and the Sondræ, and, after passing the Indus and going down
its stream, the Samarabriæ, the Sambraceni, the Bisambritæ, the Orsi,
the Anixeni, and the Taxilæ, with a famous city,373 which lies on a
low but level plain, the general name of the district being Amenda:
there are four nations here, the Peucolaitæ,374 the Arsagalitæ, the
Geretæ, and the Assoï.
The greater part of the geographers, in fact, do not look upon India
as bounded by the river Indus, but add to it the four Satrapies
of the Gedrosi,375 the Arachotæ,376 the Arii,377 and the
Paropanisidæ,378 the river Cophes379 thus forming the extreme
boundary of India. All these territories, however, according to other
writers, are reckoned as belonging to the country of the Arii. (21.)
Many writers, too, place in India the city of Nysa,380 and the
mountain of Merus, sacred to Father Bacchus; in which circumstance381
originated the story that he sprang from the thigh of Jupiter. They
also place here the nation of the Astacani, whose country abounds
in the vine, the laurel, the box-tree, and all the fruits which are
produced in Greece. As to those wonderful and almost fabulous stories
which are related about the fertility of the soil, and the various
kinds of fruits and trees, as well as wild beasts, and birds, and other
sorts of animals, they shall be mentioned each in its proper place, in
a future portion of this work. I shall also very shortly have to make
some further mention of the four Satrapies, it being at present my wish
to hasten to a description of the island of Taprobane.
But first there are some other islands of which we must make mention.
Patala,382 as we have already stated, lies at the mouth of the Indus:
it is of a triangular figure, and is two hundred and twenty miles
in breadth. Beyond the mouth of the Indus are the islands of Chryse
and Argyre,383 abounding in metals, I believe; but as to what some
persons have stated, that their soil consists of gold and silver, I am
not so willing to give a ready credence to that. After passing these
islands we come to Crocala,384 twenty miles in breadth, and then,
at twelve miles’ distance from it, Bibraga,385 abounding in oysters
and other shell-fish. At eight miles’ distance from Bibraga we find
Toralliba, and many others of no note.
Taprobane,386 under the name of the “land of the Antichthones,”387
was long looked upon as another world: the age and the arms of
Alexander the Great were the first to give satisfactory proof that it
is an island. Onesicritus, the commander of his fleet, has informed
us that the elephants of this island are larger, and better adapted
for warfare than those of India; and from Megasthenes we learn that
it is divided by a river, that the inhabitants have the name of
Palæogoni,388 and that their country is more productive of gold and
pearls of great size than even India. Eratosthenes has also given the
dimensions of this island, as being seven thousand stadia in length,
and five thousand in breadth: he states also that there are no cities,
but villages to the number of seven hundred.389 It begins at the
Eastern sea, and lies extended opposite to India, east and west. This
island was in former times supposed to be twenty days’ sail from the
country of the Prasii,390 but in later times, whereas the navigation
was formerly confined to vessels constructed of papyrus with the tackle
peculiar to the Nile, the distance has been estimated at no more
than seven days’391 sail, in reference to the speed which can be
attained by vessels of our construction. The sea that lies between the
island and the mainland is full of shallows, not more than six paces
in depth; but in certain channels it is of such extraordinary depth,
that no anchor has ever found a bottom. For this reason it is that the
vessels are constructed with prows at either end; so that there may
be no necessity for tacking while navigating these channels, which
are extremely narrow. The tonnage of these vessels is three thousand
amphoræ.392 In traversing their seas, the people of Taprobane take
no observations of the stars, and indeed the Greater Bear393 is not
visible to them; but they carry birds out to sea, which they let go
from time to time, and so follow their course as they make for the
land. They devote only four months in the year to the pursuits of
navigation, and are particularly careful not to trust themselves on
the sea during the next hundred days after our summer solstice, for in
those seas it is at that time the middle of winter.
Thus much we learn from the ancient writers; it has fallen to our lot,
however, to obtain a still more accurate knowledge of these people; for
during the reign of the Emperor Claudius, an embassy came from even
this distant island to Rome. The circumstances under which this took
place were as follow: Annius Plocamus had farmed from the treasury the
revenues arising from the Red Sea. A certain freedman of his, while
sailing around Arabia, was carried away by a gale from the north beyond
the coast of Carmania. In the course of fifteen days he had drifted to
Hippuros, a port of Taprobane, where he was most kindly and hospitably
received by the king; and having, after a study of six months, become
well acquainted with the language, was enabled to answer all his
enquiries relative to the Romans and their emperor. But of all that he
heard, the king was more particularly struck with surprise at our rigid
notions of justice, on ascertaining that among the money found on the
captive, the denarii were all of equal weight, although the different
figures on them plainly showed that they had been struck in the reigns
of several emperors. By this circumstance in especial, the king was
prompted to form an alliance with the Romans, and accordingly sent to
Rome an embassy, consisting of four persons, the chief of whom was
Rachias.394
From these persons we learned that in Taprobane there are five hundred
towns, and that there is a harbour that lies facing the south, and
adjoining the city of Palæsimundus,395 the most famous city in the
isle, the king’s place of residence, and containing a population of
two hundred thousand. They also informed us that in the interior there
is a lake called Megisba, three hundred and seventy-five miles in
circumference, and containing islands which are fertile, though for
pasturage only. In this lake they informed us two rivers take their
rise, one of which, called Palæsimundus, flows into the harbour near
the city of that name, by three channels, the narrowest of which is
five stadia in width, the largest fifteen; while the other, Cydara by
name, takes a direction northward, towards the Indian coast. We learned
also that the nearest point of the Indian coast is a promontory
known as Coliacum,396 distant from the island four days’ sail, and
that midway between them lies the island of the Sun. They stated also
that those seas are of a deep green tint; besides which, there are
numerous trees growing at the bottom, so much so, that the rudders of
the vessels frequently break off portions of their foliage.397 They
were much astonished at the constellations which are visible to us,
the Greater Bear and the Pleiades,398 as though they had now beheld
a new expanse of the heavens; and they declared that in their country
the moon can only be seen above the horizon399 from the eighth to
its sixteenth day. They also stated that Canopus, a large bright
star, gives light to them by night. But what surprised them more than
anything, was that the shadow of their bodies was thrown towards our
hemisphere400 and not theirs, and that the sun arose on the left hand
and set on the right, and not in the opposite direction.401 They
also informed us that the side of their island which lies opposite to
India is ten thousand stadia in length, and runs in a south-easterly
direction—that beyond the Emodian Mountains they look towards402
the Seræ, whose acquaintance they had also made in the pursuits of
commerce; that the father of Rachias had frequently visited their
country, and that the Seræ always came to meet them on their arrival.
These people, they said, exceeded the ordinary human height, had
flaxen hair, and blue eyes, and made an uncouth sort of noise by
way of talking, having no language of their own for the purpose of
communicating their thoughts. The rest of their information403 was of
a similar nature to that communicated by our merchants. It was to the
effect that the merchandize on sale was left by them upon the opposite
bank of a river on their coast, and it was then removed by the natives,
if they thought proper to deal on terms of exchange. On no grounds
ought luxury with greater reason to be detested by us, than if we only
transport our thoughts to these scenes, and then reflect, what are its
demands, to what distant spots it sends in order to satisfy them, and
for how mean and how unworthy an end!
But yet Taprobane even, isolated as it is by nature from the rest of
the world, is not exempt from our vices. Gold and silver are held in
esteem even there. They have a marble which resembles tortoise-shell
in appearance; this, as well as their pearls and precious stones,
is highly valued; all our luxuries in fact, those even of the most
exquisite nature, are there carried to the very highest pitch. They
asserted that their wealth is much greater than ours, but admitted that
we know better than they how to obtain real enjoyment from opulence.
In this island no slavery exists; they do not prolong their sleep to
day-break, nor indeed during any part of the day; their buildings are
only of a moderate height from the ground; the price of corn is always
the same; they have no courts of law and no litigation. Hercules is the
deity whom they worship; and their king is chosen by the people, an
aged man always, distinguished for his mild and clement disposition,
and without children. If after he has been elected king, he happens to
become the father of children, his abdication is the consequence; this
is done that there may be no danger of the sovereign power becoming
hereditary. Thirty advisers are provided for him by the people, and it
is only by the advice of the majority of them that any man is condemned
to capital punishment. Even then, the person so condemned has a right
of appealing to the people, in which case a jury consisting of seventy
persons is appointed. Should these acquit the accused, the thirty
counsellors are no longer held in any estimation, but are visited with
the greatest disgrace. The king wears the costume of Father Liber,404
while the rest of the people dress like the natives of Arabia. The
king, if he is found guilty of any offence, is condemned to death;
but no one slays him; all turn their backs upon him, and refuse to
hold any communication or even discourse with him. Their festivals
are celebrated405 with the chase, the most valued sports being the
pursuit of the tiger and the elephant. The lands are carefully tilled;
the vine is not cultivated there, but of other fruits there is great
abundance. They take great delight in fishing, and especially in
catching turtles; beneath the shells406 of which whole families find
an abode, of such vast size are they to be found. These people look
upon a hundred years as a comparatively short life. Thus much have we
learned respecting Taprobane.
We will now proceed to give some further particulars relative to the
four Satrapies, of which we have postponed further mention407 till
the present occasion.
(23). After passing the nations in the vicinity of the Indus, we
come to the mountain districts. The territory of Capisene formerly
had a city, called Capisa,408 which was destroyed by Cyrus.
Arachosia409 has a river and a city of the same name; the city
was built by Semiramis; by some writers it is called Cophen. The
river Erymanthus410 flows past Parabeste,411 which belongs to
the Arachosii. Writers make the Dexendrusi come next, forming the
boundary of the Arachotæ on the southern side, and of the Paropanisadæ
on the north. The city of Cartana412 lies at the foot of Caucasus;
in later times it has been called Tetragonis.413 This region lies
over against that of the Bactri, who come next, and whose chief city
is Alexandria,414 so called from the name of its founder. We then
come to the Syndraci,415 the Dangalæ,416 the Parapinæ,417
the Catuces, and the Mazi: and then at the foot of Caucasus, to the
Cadrusi, whose town418 was built by Alexander.
Below all these countries, is the line of coast which we come to
after leaving the Indus. Ariana419 is a region parched by the
sun and surrounded by deserts; still, however, as the face of the
country is every here and there diversified with well-shaded spots,
it finds communities grouped together to cultivate it, and more
especially around the two rivers, known as the Tonberos420 and the
Arosapes.421 There is also the town of Artacoana,422 and the
river Arius,423 which flows past Alexandria,424 a city founded by
Alexander; this place is thirty stadia in extent. Much more beautiful
than it, as well as of much greater antiquity, is Artacabane,425
fortified a second time by Antiochus, and fifty stadia in breadth.
We then come to the nation of the Dorisdorsigi, and the rivers
Pharnaracotis,426 and Ophradus; and then to Prophthasia,427 a city
of the Zaraspades, the Drangæ,428 the Evergetæ,429 the Zarangæ,
and the Gedrusi;430 the towns of Pucolis, Lyphorta, the desert of
the Methorgi,431 the river Manais,432 the nation of the Acutri,
the river Eorum, the nation of the Orbi, the Pomanus, a navigable
river in the territories of the Pandares, the Apirus in the country of
the Suari, with a good harbour at its mouth, the city of Condigramma,
and the river Cophes;433 into which last flow the navigable streams
of the Saddaros,434 the Parospus, and the Sodanus. Some writers
will also have it that Daritis435 forms part of Ariana, and give
the length of them both as nineteen hundred and fifty miles, and the
breadth one half of that436 of India. Others again have spread the
Gedrusi and the Pasires over an extent of one hundred and thirty-eight
miles, and place next to them the Ichthyophagi Oritæ,437 a people who
speak a language peculiar to themselves, and not the Indian dialect,
extending over a space of two hundred miles. Alexander forbade the
whole of the Ichthyophagi438 to live any longer on fish. Next after
these the writers have placed extensive deserts, and then Carmania,
Persia, and Arabia.
But before we enter into any details respecting these countries, it
will be as well to mention what Onesicritus439 has stated, who
commanded the fleet of Alexander, and sailed from India440 into the
heart of Persia, and what has been more recently related by Juba;
after which I shall speak of the route along these seas which has been
discovered in later years and is followed at the present day. The
journal of the voyage of Onesicritus and Nearchus has neither the names
of the stations, nor yet the distances set down in it; and, first of
all, it is not sufficiently explained where Xylenepolis was, and near
what river, a place founded by Alexander, and from which, upon setting
out, they took their departure. Still, however, the following places
are mentioned by them, which are worthy of our notice. The town of
Arbis, founded by Nearchus on the occasion of this voyage; the river
Nabrus,441 navigable for vessels, and opposite to it an island, at
a distance of seventy stadia; Alexandria, built by Leonnatus442 by
order of Alexander in the territories of this people; Argenus, with a
very convenient harbour; the river Tonberos,443 a navigable stream,
around whose banks are the Pasiræ; then come the Ichthyophagi, who
extend over so large a tract of coast that it took thirty days444
to sail past their territory; and an island known by the names of the
“Island of the Sun”445 and the “Bed of the Nymphs,” the earth of
which is red, and in which every animal instantly dies; the cause of
which, however, has not been ascertained.446 Next to these is the
nation of the Ori, and then the Hyctanis,447 a river of Carmania,
with an excellent harbour at its mouth, and producing gold; at this
spot the writers state that for the first time they caught sight of the
Great Bear.448 The star Arcturus too, they tell us, was not to be
seen here every night, and never, when it was seen, during the whole of
it. Up to this spot extended the empire of the Achæmenidæ,449 and in
these districts are to be found mines of copper, iron, arsenic, and red
lead.
They next came to the Promontory of Carmania,450 from which the
distance across to the opposite coast, where the Macæ, a nation of
Arabia, dwell, is fifty miles; and then to three islands, of which that
of Oracla451 is alone inhabited, being the only one supplied with
fresh water; it is distant from the mainland twenty-five miles; quite
in the Gulf, and facing Persia, there are four other islands. About
these islands sea-serpents452 were seen swimming towards them, twenty
cubits in length, which struck the fleet with great alarm. They then
came to the island of Athothradus, and those called the Gauratæ, upon
which dwells the nation of the Gyani; the river Hyperis,453 which
discharges itself midway into the Persian Gulf, and is navigable for
merchant ships; the river Sitiogagus, from which to Pasargadæ454 is
seven days’ sail; a navigable river known as the Phristimus, and an
island without a name; and then the river Granis,455 navigable for
vessels of small burden, and flowing through Susiane; the Deximontani,
a people who manufacture bitumen, dwell on its right bank. The river
Zarotis comes next, difficult of entrance at its mouth, except by those
who are well acquainted with it; and then two small islands; after
which the fleet sailed through shallows which looked very much like a
marsh, but were rendered navigable by certain channels which had been
cut there. They then arrived at the mouth of the Euphrates, and from
thence passed into a lake which is formed by the rivers Eulæus456 and
Tigris, in the vicinity of Charax,457 after which they arrived at
Susa,458 on the river Tigris. Here, after a voyage of three months,
they found Alexander celebrating a festival, seven months after he had
left them at Patale.459 Such was the voyage performed by the fleet of
Alexander.
In later times it has been considered a well-ascertained fact that the
voyage from Syagrus,460 the Promontory of Arabia, to Patale, reckoned
at thirteen hundred and thirty-five miles, can be performed most
advantageously with the aid of a westerly wind, which is there known
by the name of Hippalus.
The age that followed pointed out a shorter route, and a safer one, to
those who might happen to sail from the same promontory for Sigerus, a
port of India; and for a long time this route was followed, until at
last a still shorter cut was discovered by a merchant, and the thirst
for gain brought India even still nearer to us. At the present day
voyages are made to India every year: and companies of archers are
carried on board the vessels, as those seas are greatly infested with
pirates.
It will not be amiss too, on the present occasion, to set forth the
whole of the route from Egypt, which has been stated to us of late,
upon information on which reliance may be placed, and is here published
for the first time. The subject is one well worthy of our notice,
seeing that in no year does India drain our empire of less than five
hundred and fifty millions461 of sesterces, giving back her own wares
in exchange, which are sold among us at fully one hundred times their
prime cost.
Two miles distant from Alexandria is the town of Juliopolis.462 The
distance thence to Coptos, up the Nile, is three hundred and eight
miles; the voyage is performed, when the Etesian winds are blowing, in
twelve days. From Coptos the journey is made with the aid of camels,
stations being arranged at intervals for the supply of fresh water. The
first of these stations is called Hydreuma,463 and is distant464
twenty-two miles; the second is situate on a mountain, at a distance of
one day’s journey from the last; the third is at a second Hydreuma,
distant from Coptos ninety-five miles; the fourth is on a mountain; the
next to that is at another Hydreuma, that of Apollo, and is distant
from Coptos one hundred and eighty-four miles; after which, there is
another on a mountain. There is then another station at a place called
the New Hydreuma, distant from Coptos two hundred and thirty miles:
and next to it there is another, called the Old Hydreuma, or the
Troglodytic, where a detachment is always on guard, with a caravansary
that affords lodging for two thousand persons. This last is distant
from the New Hydreuma seven miles. After leaving it we come to the city
of Berenice,465 situate upon a harbour of the Red Sea, and distant
from Coptos two hundred and fifty-seven miles. The greater part of this
distance is generally travelled by night, on account of the extreme
heat, the day being spent at the stations; in consequence of which it
takes twelve days to perform the whole journey from Coptos to Berenice.
Passengers generally set sail at midsummer, before the rising of the
Dog-star, or else immediately after, and in about thirty days arrive
at Ocelis466 in Arabia, or else at Cane,467 in the region which
bears frankincense. There is also a third port of Arabia, Muza468 by
name; it is not, however, used by persons on their passage to India,
as only those touch at it who deal in incense and the perfumes of
Arabia. More in the interior there is a city; the residence of the king
there is called Sapphar,469 and there is another city known by the
name of Save. To those who are bound for India, Ocelis is the best
place for embarcation. If the wind, called Hippalus,470 happens to
be blowing, it is possible to arrive in forty days at the nearest mart
of India, Muziris471 by name. This, however, is not a very desirable
place for disembarcation, on account of the pirates which frequent its
vicinity, where they occupy a place called Nitrias; nor, in fact, is
it very rich in articles of merchandize. Besides, the road-stead for
shipping is a considerable distance from the shore, and the cargoes
have to be conveyed in boats, either for loading or discharging. At
the moment that I am writing these pages, the name of the king of this
place is Cælobothras. Another port, and a much more convenient one, is
that which lies in the territory of the people called Neacyndi, Barace
by name. Here king Pandion used to reign, dwelling at a considerable
distance from the mart in the interior, at a city known as Modiera.
The district from which pepper is carried down to Barace in boats
hollowed out of a single tree,472 is known as Cottonara.473 None
of these names of nations, ports, and cities are to be found in any of
the former writers, from which circumstance it would appear that the
localities have since changed their names. Travellers set sail from
India on their return to Europe, at the beginning of the Egyptian month
Tybis, which is our December, or at all events before the sixth day of
the Egyptian month Mechir, the same as474 our ides of January: if
they do this, they can go and return in the same year. They set sail
from India with a south-east wind, and upon entering the Red Sea, catch
the south-west or south. We will now return to our main subject.
CHAP.
Nearchus states in his writings that the coast of Carmania475 extends
a distance of twelve hundred and fifty miles. From its frontier to
the river Sabis476 is one hundred miles. At this spot begins the
cultivation of the vine; which with the tillage of the fields, extends
as far as the river Ananis,477 a distance of twenty-five miles. This
region is known by the name of Armuzia. The cities of Carmania are
Zetis and Alexandria.478
The sea then makes a two-fold indentation479 in the land upon
these coasts, under the name of Rubrum480 or “Red,” given to it by
our countrymen; while the Greeks have called it Erythrum, from king
Erythras,481 or, according to some writers, from its red colour,
which they think is produced by the reflection of the sun’s rays;
others again are of opinion that it arises from the sand and the
complexion of the soil, others from some peculiarity in the nature of
the water. (24.) Be this as it may, this body of water is divided into
two gulfs. The one which lies to the east is called the Persian Gulf,
and is two thousand five hundred miles in circumference, according
to Eratosthenes. Opposite to it lies Arabia, the length of which is
fifteen hundred miles. On the other side again, Arabia is bounded
by the Arabian Gulf. The sea as it enters this gulf is called the
Azanian482 Sea. The Persian Gulf, at the entrance, is only five483
miles wide; some writers make it four. From the entrance to the very
bottom of the gulf, in a straight line, has been ascertained to be
nearly eleven hundred and twenty-five miles: in outline it strongly
resembles484 the human head. Onesicritus and Nearchus have stated
in their works that from the river Indus to the Persian Gulf, and
from thence to Babylon, situate in the marshes of the Euphrates, is a
distance of seventeen hundred miles.
In the angle of Carmania are the Chelonophagi,485 who cover their
cabins with the shells of turtles, and live upon their flesh; these
people inhabit the next promontory that is seen after leaving the river
Arbis;486 with the exception of the head, they are covered all over
with long hair, and are clothed in the skins of fishes.
(25.) Beyond their district, in the direction of India, is said to
be the desert island of Caicandrus, fifty miles out at sea; near to
which, with a strait flowing between them, is Stoidis, celebrated
for its valuable pearls. After passing the promontory487 are the
Armozei,488 joining up to the Carmani; some writers, however, place
between them the Arbii,489 extending along the shore a distance
of four hundred and twenty-one miles. Here is a place called Portus
Macedonum,490 and the Altars of Alexander, situate on a promontory,
besides the rivers Saganos, Daras, and Salsa. Beyond the last river we
come to the promontory of Themisteas, and the island of Aphrodisias,
which is peopled. Here Persis begins, at the river Oratis,491 which
separates it from Elymais.492 Opposite to the coast of Persis, are
the islands of Psilos, Cassandra, and Aracia, the last sacred to
Neptune,493 and containing a mountain of great height. Persis494
itself, looking towards the west, has a line of coast five hundred and
fifty miles in length; it is a country opulent even to luxury, but has
long since changed its name for that of “Parthia.”495 I shall now
devote a few words to the Parthian empire.
The kingdoms496 of Parthia are eighteen in all: such being the
divisions of its provinces, which lie, as we have already stated,
along the Red Sea to the south, and the Hyrcanian to the north. Of
this number the eleven, called the Higher provinces, begin at the
frontiers of Armenia and the shores of the Caspian, and extend to the
Scythians, whose mode of life is similar in every respect. The other
seven kingdoms of Parthia bear the name of the Lower provinces. As
to the Parthi themselves, Parthia497 always lay at the foot of the
mountains498 so often mentioned, which overhang all these nations.
On the east it is bounded by the Arii, on the south by Carmania and
the Ariani, on the west by the Pratitæ, a people of the Medi, and on
the north by the Hyrcani: it is surrounded by deserts on every side.
The more distant of the Parthi are called Nomades;499 on this side
of them there are deserts. On the west are the cities of Issatis and
Calliope, already mentioned,500 on the north-east Europus,501
on the south-east Maria; in the middle there are Hecatompylos,502
Arsace, and Nisiæa, a fine district of Parthiene, in which is
Alexandropolis, so called from its founder.
(26.) It is requisite in this place to trace the localities of the
Medi also, and to describe in succession the features of the country
as far as the Persian Sea, in order that the account which follows
may be the better understood. Media503 lies crosswise to the west,
and so presenting itself obliquely to Parthia, closes the entrance
of both kingdoms504 into which it is divided. It has, then, on the
east, the Caspii and the Parthi; on the south, Sittacene, Susiane, and
Persis; on the west, Adsiabene; and on the north, Armenia. The Persæ
have always inhabited the shores of the Red Sea, for which reason it
has received the name of the Persian Gulf. This maritime region of
Persis has the name of Ciribo;505 on the side on which it runs up
to that of the Medi, there is a place known by the name of Climax
Megale,506 where the mountains are ascended by a steep flight of
stairs, and so afford a narrow passage which leads to Persepolis,507
the former capital of the kingdom, destroyed by Alexander. It has
also, at its extreme frontier, Laodicea,508 founded by Antiochus.
To the east of this place is the fortress of Passagarda,509 held by
the Magi, at which spot is the tomb of Cyrus; also Ecbatana,510 a
city of theirs, the inhabitants of which were removed by Darius to the
mountains. Between the Parthi and the Ariani projects the territory
of the Parætaceni.511 By these nations and the river Euphrates are
the Lower kingdoms of Parthia bounded; of the others we shall speak
after Mesopotamia, which we shall now describe, with the exception of
that angle of it and the peoples of Arabia, which have been already
mentioned in a former book.512
The whole of Mesopotamia formerly belonged to the Assyrians, being
covered with nothing but villages, with the exception of Babylonia513
and Ninus.514 The Macedonians formed these communities into
cities, being prompted thereto by the extraordinary fertility of
the soil. Besides the cities already mentioned, it contains those
of Seleucia,515 Laodicea,516 Artemita;517 and in Arabia, the
peoples known as the Orei518 and the Mardani, besides Antiochia,519
founded by Nicanor, the governor of Mesopotamia, and called Arabis.
Joining up to these in the interior is an Arabian people, called the
Eldamani, and above them, upon the river Pallaconta, the town of Bura,
and the Arabian peoples known as the Salmani and the Masei. Up to the
Gordyæi520 join the Aloni, through whose territory runs the river
Zerbis, which falls into the Tigris; next are the Azones, the Silici,
a mountain tribe, and the Orontes, to the west of whom lies the town
of Gaugamela,521 as also Suë, situate upon the rocks. Beyond these
are the Silici, surnamed Classitæ, through whose district runs the
river Lycus on its passage from Armenia, the Absithris522 running
south-east, the town of Accobis, and then in the plains the towns
of Diospage, Polytelia,523 Stratonice, and Anthermis.524 In the
vicinity of the Euphrates is Nicephorion, of which we have525 already
stated that Alexander, struck with the favourable situation of the
spot, ordered it to be built. We have also similarly made mention526
of Apamea on the Zeugma. Leaving that city and going eastward, we come
to Caphrena, a fortified town, formerly seventy stadia in extent,
and called the “Court of the Satraps.” It was to this place that the
tribute was conveyed; now it is reduced to a mere fortress. Thæbata is
still in the same state as formerly: after which comes Oruros, which
under Pompeius Magnus formed the extreme limit of the Roman Empire,
distant from Zeugma two hundred and fifty miles. There are writers
who say that the Euphrates was drawn off by an artificial channel by
the governor Gobares, at the point where we have stated527 that it
branches off,528 in order that it might not commit damage in the city
of Babylonia, in consequence of the extreme rapidity of its course. The
Assyrians universally call this river by the name of Narmalcha,529
which signifies the “royal river.” At the point where its waters
divide, there was in former times a very large city, called Agranis,
which the Persæ have destroyed.
Babylon, the capital of the nations of Chaldæa, long enjoyed the
greatest celebrity of all cities throughout the whole world: and it is
from this place that the remaining parts of Mesopotamia and Assyria
received the name of Babylonia. The circuit of its walls, which were
two hundred feet in height, was sixty miles. These walls were also
fifty feet in breadth, reckoning to every foot three fingers’ breadth
beyond the ordinary measure of our foot. The river Euphrates flowed
through the city, with quays of marvellous workmanship erected on
either side. The temple there530 of Jupiter Belus531 is still in
existence; he was the first inventor of the science of Astronomy. In
all other respects it has been reduced to a desert, having been drained
of its population in consequence of its vicinity to Seleucia,532
founded for that purpose by Nicator, at a distance of ninety miles,
on the confluence of the Tigris and the canal that leads from the
Euphrates. Seleucia, however, still bears the surname of Babylonia:
it is a free and independent city, and retains the features of the
Macedonian manners. It is said that the population of this city amounts
to six hundred thousand, and that the outline of its walls resembles an
eagle with expanded wings: its territory, they say, is the most fertile
in all the East. The Parthi again, in its turn, founded Ctesiphon,533
for the purpose of drawing away the population of Seleucia, at a
distance of nearly three miles, and in the district of Chalonitis;
Ctesiphon is now the capital of all the Parthian kingdoms. Finding,
however, that this city did not answer the intended purpose, king
Vologesus534 has of late years founded another city in its vicinity,
Vologesocerta535 by name. Besides the above, there are still the
following towns in Mesopotamia: Hipparenum,536 rendered famous,
like Babylon, by the learning of the Chaldæi, and situate near the
river Narraga,537 which falls into the Narroga, from which a city so
called has taken its name. The Persæ destroyed the walls of Hipparenum.
Orchenus also, a third place of learning of the Chaldæi, is situate in
the same district, towards the south; after which come the Notitæ, the
Orothophanitæ, and the Grecichartæ.538 From Nearchus and Onesicritus
we learn that the distance by water from the Persian Sea to Babylon,
up the Euphrates, is four hundred and twelve miles; other authors,
however, who have written since their time, say that the distance
to Seleucia is four hundred and forty miles: and Juba says that the
distance from Babylon to Charax is one hundred and seventy-five. Some
writers state that the Euphrates continues to flow with an undivided
channel for a distance of eighty-seven miles beyond Babylon, before its
waters are diverted from their channel for the purposes of irrigation;
and that the whole length of its course is not less than twelve hundred
miles. The circumstance that so many different authors have treated
of this subject, accounts for all these variations, seeing that even
the Persian writers themselves do not agree as to what is the length
of their schæni and parasangæ, each assigning to them a different
length.
When the Euphrates ceases, by running in its channel, to afford
protection539 to those who dwell on its banks, which it does when it
approaches the confines of Charax, the country is immediately infested
by the Attali, a predatory people of Arabia, beyond whom are found the
Scenitæ.540 The banks along this river are occupied by the Nomades of
Arabia, as far as the deserts of Syria, from which, as we have already
stated,541 it takes a turn to the south,542 and leaves the solitary
deserts of Palmyra. Seleucia is distant, by way of the Euphrates, from
the beginning of Mesopotamia, eleven hundred and twenty-five; from
the Red Sea, by way of the Tigris, two hundred and twenty; and from
Zeugma, seven hundred and twenty-three, miles. Zeugma is distant from
Seleucia543 in Syria, on the shores of our sea, one hundred and
seventy-five544 miles. Such is the extent of the land that lies in
these parts between the two seas.545 The length of the kingdom of
Parthia is nine hundred and eighteen miles.
There is, besides the above, another town in Mesopotamia, on the
banks of the Tigris and near its confluence with the Euphrates, the
name of which is Digba.546 (27.) But it will be as well now to give
some particulars respecting the Tigris itself. This river rises in
the region of Greater Armenia,547 from a very remarkable source,
situate on a plain. The name of the spot is Elegosine,548 and the
stream, as soon as it begins to flow, though with a slow current,
has the name of Diglito.549 When its course becomes more rapid,
it assumes the name of Tigris,550 given to it on account of its
swiftness, that word signifying an arrow in the Median language. It
then flows into Lake Arethusa,551 the waters of which are able to
support all weighty substances thrown into them, and exhale nitrous
vapours. This lake produces only one kind of fish, which, however,
never enter the current of the river in its passage through the lake:
and in a similar manner, the fish of the Tigris will never swim out
of its stream into the waters of the lake. Distinguishable from the
lake, both by the rapidity and the colour of its waters, the tide of
the river is hurried along; after it has passed through and arrived
at Mount Taurus, it disappears552 in a cavern of that mountain, and
passing beneath it, bursts forth on the other side; the spot bears
the name of Zoroande.553 That the waters on either side of the
mountain are the same, is evident from the fact, that bodies thrown
in on the one side will reappear on the other. It then passes through
another lake, called Thospites, and once more burying itself in the
earth, reappears, after running a distance of twenty-two miles, in
the vicinity of Nymphæum.554 Claudius Cæsar informs us that, in the
district of Arrene555 it flows so near to the river Arsanias,556
that when their waters swell they meet and flow together, but without,
however, intermingling. For those of the Arsani, as he says, being
lighter, float on the surface of the Tigris for a distance of nearly
four miles, after which they separate, and the Arsanias flows into the
Euphrates. The Tigris, after flowing through Armenia and receiving
the well-known rivers Parthenias and Nicephorion, separates the
Arabian Orei557 from the Adiabeni, and then forms by its course, as
previously mentioned, the country of Mesopotamia. After traversing the
mountains of the Gordyæi,558 it passes round Apamea,559 a town of
Mesene, one hundred and twenty-five miles on this side of Babylonian
Seleucia, and then divides into two channels, one560 of which runs
southward, and flowing through Mesene, runs towards Seleucia, while the
other takes a turn to the north and passes through the plains of the
Cauchæ,561 at the back of the district of Mesene. When the waters
have reunited, the river assumes the name of Pasitigris. After this,
it receives the Choaspes,562 which comes from Media; and then, as
we have already stated,563 flowing between Seleucia and Ctesiphon,
discharges itself into the Chaldæan Lakes, which it supplies for a
distance of seventy miles. Escaping from them by a vast channel, it
passes the city of Charax to the right, and empties itself into the
Persian Sea, being ten miles in width at the mouth. Between the mouths
of the two rivers Tigris and the Euphrates, the distance was formerly
twenty-five, or, according to some writers, seven miles only, both of
them being navigable to the sea. But the Orcheni and others who dwell
on its banks, have long since dammed up the waters of the Euphrates for
the purposes of irrigation, and it can only discharge itself into the
sea by the aid of the Tigris.
The country on the banks of the Tigris is called Parapotamia;564
we have already made mention of Mesene, one of its districts.
Dabithac565 is a town there, adjoining to which is the district
of Chalonitis, with the city of Ctesiphon,566 famous, not only for
its palm-groves, but for its olives, fruits, and other shrubs. Mount
Zagrus567 reaches as far as this district, and extends from Armenia
between the Medi and the Adiabeni; above Parætacene and Persis.
Chalonitis568 is distant from Persis three hundred and eighty miles;
some writers say that by the shortest route it is the same distance
from Assyria and the Caspian Sea.
Between these peoples and Mesene is Sittacene, which is also called
Arbelitis569 and Palæstine. Its city of Sittace570 is of Greek
origin; this and Sabdata571 lie to the east, and on the west is
Antiochia,572 between the two rivers Tigris and Tornadotus,573 as
also Apamea,574 to which Antiochus575 gave this name, being that
of his mother. The Tigris surrounds this city, which is also traversed
by the waters of the Archoüs. Below576 this district is Susiane,
in which is the city of Susa,577 the ancient residence of the kings
of Persia, built by Darius, the son of Hystaspes; it is distant from
Seleucia Babylonia four hundred and fifty miles, and the same from
Ecbatana of the Medi, by way of Mount Carbantus.578 Upon the northern
channel of the river Tigris is the town of Babytace,579 distant from
Susa one hundred and thirty-five miles. Here, for the only place in all
the world, is gold held in abhorrence; the people collect it together
and bury it in the earth, that it may be of use to no one.580 On the
east of Susiane are the Oxii, a predatory people, and forty independent
savage tribes of the Mizæi. Above these are the Mardi and the Saitæ,
subject to Parthia: they extend above the district of Elymais, which
we have already mentioned581 as joining up to the coast of Persis.
Susa is distant two hundred and fifty miles from the Persian Sea. Near
the spot where the fleet of Alexander came up582 the Pasitigris to
Susa, there is a village situate on the Chaldæan Lake, Aple by name,
from which to Susa is a distance of sixty miles and a half. Adjoining
to the people of Susiane, on the east, are the Cossiæi;583 and
above them, to the north, is Mesabatene, lying at the foot of Mount
Cambalidus,584 a branch of the Caucasian chain: from this point the
country of the Bactri is most accessible.
Susiane is separated from Elymais by the river Eulæus, which rises in
Media, and, after concealing itself in the earth for a short distance,
rises again and flows through Mesabatene. It then flows round the
citadel of Susa585 and the temple of Diana, which is held in the
highest veneration by all these nations; the river itself being the
object of many pompous ceremonials; the kings, indeed, will drink of
no other water,586 and for that reason carry it with them on their
journies to any considerable distance. This river receives the waters
of the Hedypnos,587 which passes Asylus, in Persis, and those of the
Aduna, which rises in Susiane. Magoa588 is a town situate near it,
and distant from Charax fifteen miles; some writers place this town at
the very extremity of Susiane, and close to the deserts.
Below the Eulæus is Elymais,589 upon the coast adjoining to Persis,
and extending from the river Orates590 to Charax, a distance of two
hundred and forty miles. Its towns are Seleucia591 and Socrate,592
upon Mount Casyrus. The shore which lies in front of this district
is, as we have already stated, rendered inaccessible by mud,593 the
rivers Brixa and Ortacea bringing down vast quantities of slime from
the interior,—Elymais itself being so marshy that it is impossible to
reach Persis that way, unless by going completely round: it is also
greatly infested with serpents, which are brought down by the waters
of these rivers. That part of it which is the most inaccessible of
all, bears the name of Characene, from Charax,594 the frontier city
of the kingdoms of Arabia. Of this place we will now make mention,
after first stating the opinions of M. Agrippa in relation to this
subject. That author informs us that Media, Parthia, and Persis, are
bounded on the east by the Indus, on the west by the Tigris, on the
north by Taurus and Caucasus, and on the south by the Red Sea; that the
length of these countries is thirteen hundred and twenty miles, and
the breadth eight hundred and forty; and that, in addition to these,
there is Mesopotamia, which, taken by itself, is bounded on the east by
the Tigris, on the west by the Euphrates, on the north by the chain of
Taurus, and on the south by the Persian Sea, being eight hundred miles
in length, and three hundred and sixty in breadth.
Charax is a city situate at the furthest extremity of the Arabian
Gulf, at which begins the more prominent portion of Arabia Felix:595
it is built on an artificial elevation, having the Tigris on the
right, and the Eulæus on the left, and lies on a piece of ground three
miles in extent, just between the confluence of those streams. It was
first founded by Alexander the Great, with colonists from the royal
city of Durine, which was then destroyed, and such of his soldiers
as were invalided and left behind. By his order it was to be called
Alexandria, and a borough called Pella, from his native place, was to
be peopled solely by Macedonians; the city, however, was destroyed by
inundations of the rivers. Antiochus,596 the fifth king of Syria,
afterwards rebuilt this place and called it by his own name; and on
its being again destroyed, Pasines, the son of Saggonadacus, and king
of the neighbouring Arabians, whom Juba has incorrectly described as
a satrap of king Antiochus, restored it, and raised embankments for
its protection, calling it after himself. These embankments extended
in length a distance of nearly three miles, in breadth a little less.
It stood at first at a distance of ten stadia from the shore, and even
had a harbour597 of its own. But according to Juba, it is fifty miles
from the sea; and at the present day, the ambassadors from Arabia, and
our own merchants who have visited the place, say that it stands at a
distance of one hundred and twenty miles from the sea-shore. Indeed,
in no part of the world have alluvial deposits been formed more
rapidly by the rivers, and to a greater extent than here; and it is
only a matter of surprise that the tides, which run to a considerable
distance beyond this city, do not carry them back again. At this place
was born Dionysius,598 the most recent author of a description of the
world; he was sent by the late emperor Augustus to gather all necessary
information in the East, when his eldest599 son was about to set out
for Armenia to take the command against the Parthians and Arabians.
The fact has not escaped me, nor indeed have I forgotten, that at the
beginning of this work600 I have remarked that each author appeared
to be most accurate in the description of his own country; still,
while I am speaking of these parts of the world, I prefer to follow
the discoveries made by the Roman arms, and the description given by
king Juba, in his work dedicated to Caius Cæsar above-mentioned, on the
subject of the same expedition against Arabia.
Arabia, inferior to no country throughout the whole world, is of
immense extent, running downwards, as we have previously stated,601
from Mount Amanus, over against Cilicia and Commagene; many of the
Arabian nations having been removed to those countries by Tigranes the
Great,602 while others again have migrated of their own accord to
the shores of our sea603 and the coast of Egypt, as we have already
mentioned.604 The Nubei605 have even penetrated as far as Mount
Libanus in the middle of Syria; in their turn they are bounded by the
Ramisi, these by the Taranei, and these again by the Patami.
As for Arabia itself, it is a peninsula, running out between the Red
and the Persian Seas; and it is by a kind of design, apparently on
the part of nature, that it is surrounded by the sea in such a manner
as to resemble very much the form and size606 of Italy, there being
no difference either in the climate of the two countries, as they lie
in the same latitudes.607 This, too, renders it equally fertile with
the countries of Italy. We have already mentioned608 its peoples,
which extend from our sea as far as the deserts of Palmyrene, and we
shall now proceed to a description of the remainder. The Scenitæ, as
we have already stated,609 border upon the Nomades and the tribes
that ravage the territories of Chaldæa, being themselves of wandering
habits, and receiving their name from the tents which constitute their
dwellings; these are made of goats’ hair, and they pitch them wherever
they please. Next after them are the Nabatæi, who have a city called
Petra,610 which lies in a deep valley, somewhat less than two miles
in width, and surrounded by inaccessible mountains, between which a
river flows: it is distant from the city of Gaza, on our shores, six
hundred miles, and from the Persian Gulf one hundred and thirty-five.
At this place two roads meet, the one leading from Syria to Palmyra,
and the other from Gaza. On leaving Petra we come to the Omani,611
who dwell as far as Charax, with their once famous cities which were
built by Semiramis, Besannisa and Soractia by name; at the present day
they are wildernesses. We next come to a city situate on the banks of
the Pasitigris, Fora by name, and subject to the king of Charax: to
this place people resort on their road from Petra, and sail thence to
Charax, twelve miles distant, with the tide. If you are proceeding by
water from the Parthian territories, you come to a village known as
Teredon; and below the confluence of the Euphrates and Tigris, you have
the Chaldæi dwelling on the left side of the river, and the Nomadic
tribes of the Scenitæ on the right. Some writers also make mention
of two other cities situate at long intervals, as you sail along the
Tigris, Barbatia, and then Thumata, distant from Petra, they say, ten
days’ sail; our merchants report that these places are subject to
the king of Charax. The same writers also state, that Apamea612 is
situate where the overflow of the Euphrates unites with the Tigris; and
that when the Parthians meditate an incursion, the inhabitants dam up
the river by embankments, and so inundate their country.
We will now proceed to describe the coast after leaving Charax,613
which was first explored by order of king Epiphanes. We first come
to the place where the mouth of the Euphrates formerly existed, the
river Salsus,614 and the Promontory of Chaldone,615 from which
spot, the sea along the coast, for an extent of fifty miles,616
bears more the aspect of a series of whirlpools than of ordinary sea;
the river Achenus, and then a desert tract for a space of one hundred
miles, until we come to the island of Ichara; the gulf of Capeus, on
the shores of which dwell the Gaulopes and the Chateni, and then the
gulf of Gerra.617 Here we find the city of Gerra, five miles in
circumference, with towers built of square blocks of salt. Fifty miles
from the coast, lying in the interior, is the region of Attene, and
opposite to Gerra is the island of Tylos,618 as many miles distant
from the shore; it is famous for the vast number of its pearls, and
has a town of the same name; in its vicinity there is a smaller
island,619 distant from a promontory on the larger one twelve miles
and a half. They say that beyond this large islands may be seen, upon
which no one has ever landed: the circumference of the smaller island
is one hundred and twelve miles and a half, and it is more than that
distance from the Persian coast, being accessible by only one narrow
channel. We then come to the island of Asclie, and the nations of the
Nocheti, the Zurazi, the Borgodi, the Catharrei, the Nomades, and then
the river Cynos.620 Beyond this, the navigation is impracticable on
that side,621 according to Juba, on account of the rocks; and he has
omitted all mention of Batrasave,622 a town of the Omani, and of the
city of Omana,623 which former writers have made out to be a famous
port of Carmania;624 as also of Homna and Attana, towns which at the
present day, our merchants say, are by far the most famous ones in the
Persian Sea. Passing the river Cynos,625 there is a mountain, Juba
says, that bears marks of the action of fire; also, the nation of the
Epimaranitæ, then a nation of Ichthyophagi, and then a desert island,
and the nation of the Bathymi. We then come to the Eblitæan Mountains,
the island of Omoënus, the port of Mochorbe, the islands of Etaxalos
and Inchobrice, and the nation of the Cadæi. There are many islands
also that have no name, but the better known ones are Isura, Rhinnea,
and another still nearer the shore, upon which there are some stone
pillars with an inscription in unknown characters. There are also the
port of Gobœa, the desert islands called Bragæ, the nation of the
Thaludæi, the region of Dabanegoris, Mount Orsa, with a harbour, the
gulf of Duatus, with numerous islands, Mount Tricoryphos,626 the
region of Cardaleon, and the islands called Solanades, Cachinna, and
that of the Ichthyophagi. We then find the Clari, the shore of Mamæum,
on which there are gold mines, the region of Canauna, the nations of
the Apitami and the Casani, the island of Devade, the fountain of
Coralis, the Carphati, the islands of Calaëu and Amnamethus, and the
nation of the Darræ. Also, the island of Chelonitis,627 numerous
islands of Ichthyophagi, the deserts of Odanda, Basa, many islands of
the Sabæi, the rivers Thanar and Amnume, the islands of Dorice, and the
fountains of Daulotos and Dora. We find also the islands of Pteros,
Labatanis, Coboris, and Sambrachate, with a town of the same name628
on the mainland. Lying to the south are a great number of islands,
the largest of which is Camari; also the river Musecros, and the port
of Laupas. We then come to the Sabæi, a nation of Scenitæ,629 with
numerous islands, and the city of Acila,630 which is their mart, and
from which persons embark for India. We next come to the region of
Amithoscutta, Damnia, the Greater and the Lesser Mizi, and the Drimati.
The promontory of the Naumachæi, over against Carmania, is distant
from it fifty miles. A wonderful circumstance is said to have happened
here; Numenius, who was made governor of Mesena by king Antiochus,
while fighting against the Persians, defeated them at sea, and at low
water, by land, with an army of cavalry, on the same day; in memory of
which event he erected a twofold trophy on the same spot, in honour of
Jupiter and Neptune.631
Opposite to this place, in the main sea, lies the island of
Ogyris,632 famous for being the burial-place of king Erythras;633
it is distant from the mainland one hundred and twenty miles, being
one hundred and twelve in circumference. No less famous is another
island, called Dioscoridu,634 and lying in the Azanian Sea;635 it
is distant two hundred and eighty miles from the extreme point of the
Promontory of Syagrus.636
The remaining places and nations on the mainland, lying still to the
south, are the Ausaritæ, to whose country it is seven days’ journey
among the mountains, the nations of the Larendani and the Catabani,
and the Gebanitæ, who occupy a great number of towns, the largest of
which are Nagia, and Thomna with sixty-five temples, a number which
fully bespeaks its size. We then come to a promontory, from which
to the mainland of the Troglodytæ it is fifty miles, and then the
Thoani, the Actæi, the Chatramotitæ, the Tonabei, the Antidalei, the
Lexianæ, the Agræi, the Cerbani, and the Sabæi,637 the best known
of all the tribes of Arabia, on account of their frankincense; these
nations extend from sea to sea.638 The towns which belong to them
on the Red Sea are Marane, Marma, Corolia, and Sabatha; and in the
interior, Nascus, Cardava, Carnus, and Thomala, from which they bring
down their spices for exportation. One portion of this nation is the
Atramitæ,639 whose capital, Sabota, has sixty temples within its
walls. But the royal city of all these nations is Mariaba;640 it
lies upon a bay, ninety-four miles in extent, and filled with islands
that produce perfumes. Lying in the interior, and joining up to the
Atramitæ, are the Minæi; the Elamitæ641 dwell on the sea-shore, in a
city from which they take their name. Next to these are the Chaculatæ;
then the town of Sibi, by the Greeks called Apate;642 the Arsi,
the Codani, the Vadei, who dwell in a large town, the Barasasæi, the
Lechieni, and the island of Sygaros,643 into the interior of which no
dogs are admitted, and so being exposed on the sea-shore, they wander
about there and are left to die. We then come to a gulf which runs far
into the interior, upon which are situate the Læenitæ, who have given
to it their name; also their royal city of Agra,644 and upon the gulf
that of Læana, or as some call it Ælana;645 indeed, by some of our
writers this has been called the Ælanitic Gulf, and by others again,
the Ælenitic; Artemidorus calls it the Alenitic, and Juba the Lænitic.
The circumference of Arabia, measured from Charax to Læana, is said
to be four thousand six hundred and sixty-six miles, but Juba thinks
that it is somewhat less than four thousand. Its widest part is at the
north, between the cities of Heroopolis and Charax. We will now mention
the remaining places and peoples of the interior of Arabia.
Up to the Nabatæi646 the ancients joined the Thimanei; at present
they have next to them the Taveni, and then the Suelleni, the
Arraceni,647 and the Areni,648 whose town is the centre of all the
commerce of these parts. Next come the Hemnatæ, the Aualitæ, the towns
of Domata and Hegra, the Tamudæi,649 with the town of Badanatha,
the Carrei, with the town of Cariati,650 the Achoali, with the town
of Foth, and the Minæi, who derive their origin, it is supposed,651
from Minos, king of Crete, and of whom the Carmæi are a tribe. Next
comes a town, fourteen miles distant, called Marippa, and belonging to
the Palamaces, a place by no means to be overlooked, and then Carnon.
The Rhadamæi also—these too are supposed to derive their origin652
from Rhadamanthus, the brother of Minos—the Homeritæ,653 with their
city of Masala,654 the Hamirei, the Gedranitæ, the Amphyræ, the
Ilisanitæ, the Bachilitæ, the Samnæi, the Amitæi, with the towns of
Nessa655 and Cennesseris, the Zamareni, with the towns of Sagiatta
and Canthace, the Bacascami, the town of Riphearma, the name by which
they call barley, the Autei, the Ethravi, the Cyrei and the Mathatæi,
the Helmodenes, with the town of Ebode, the Agacturi, dwelling in the
mountains, with a town twenty miles distant, in which is a fountain
called Ænuscabales,656 which signifies “the town of the camels.”
Ampelome657 also, a Milesian colony, the town of Athrida, the
Calingii, whose city is called Mariva,658 and signifies “the lord
of all men;” the towns of Palon and Murannimal, near a river by which
it is thought that the Euphrates discharges itself, the nations of
the Agrei and the Ammonii, the town of Athenæ, the Caunaravi, a name
which signifies “most rich in herds,” the Coranitæ, the Œsani, and
the Choani.659 Here were also formerly the Greek towns of Arethusa,
Larisa, and Chalcis, which have been destroyed in various wars.
Ælius Gallus,660 a member of the Equestrian order, is the sole person
who has hitherto carried the Roman arms into these lands, for Caius
Cæsar, the son661 of Augustus, only had a distant view of Arabia.
In his expedition, Gallus destroyed the following towns, the names of
which are not given by the authors who had written before his time,
Negrana, Nestum, Nesca, Masugum, Caminacum, Labecia, and Mariva662
above-mentioned, six miles in circumference, as also Caripeta, the
furthest point of his expedition. He brought back with him the
following discoveries—that the Nomades663 live upon milk and the
flesh of wild beasts, and that the other nations, like the Indians,
extract a sort of wine from the palm-tree, and oil from sesame.664
He says that the most numerous of these tribes are the Homeritæ and
the Minæi, that their lands are fruitful in palms and shrubs, and that
their chief wealth is centred in their flocks. We also learn from the
same source that the Cerbani and the Agræi excel in arms, but more
particularly the Chatramotitæ;665 that the territories of the Carrei
are the most extensive and most fertile; but that the Sabæi are the
richest of all in the great abundance of their spice-bearing groves,
their mines of gold,666 their streams for irrigation, and their
ample produce of honey and wax. Of their perfumes we shall have to
treat more at large in the Book devoted to that subject.667 The Arabs
either wear the mitra,668 or else go with their hair unshorn, while
the beard is shaved, except upon the upper lip: some tribes, however,
leave even the beard unshaved. A singular thing too, one half of these
almost innumerable tribes live by the pursuits of commerce, the other
half by rapine: take them all in all, they are the richest nations in
the world, seeing that such vast wealth flows in upon them from both
the Roman and the Parthian Empires; for they sell the produce of the
sea or of their forests, while they purchase nothing whatever in return.
We will now trace the rest of the coast that lies opposite to that
of Arabia. Timosthenes has estimated the length of the whole gulf at
four days’ sail, and the breadth at two, making the Straits669 to
be seven miles and a half in width. Eratosthenes says that the length
of the shore from the mouth of the gulf is thirteen hundred miles on
each side, while Artemidorus states that the length on the Arabian
side is seventeen hundred and fifty miles, (29.) and that along the
Troglodytic coast, to Ptolemais, the distance is eleven hundred and
thirty-seven and a half. Agrippa, however, maintains that there is
no difference whatever in the length of the two sides, and makes it
seventeen hundred and twenty-two miles. Most writers mention the length
as being four hundred and seventy-five miles, and make the Straits to
face the south-east, being twelve miles wide according to some, fifteen
according to others.
The localities of this region are as follow: On passing the Ælanitic
Gulf there is another gulf, by the Arabians called Sœa, upon which
is situate the city of Heroön.670 The town of Cambysu671 also
stood here formerly, between the Neli and the Marchades, Cambyses
having established there the invalids of his army. We then come to
the nation of the Tyri, and the port of the Danei, from which place
an attempt has been made to form a navigable canal to the river Nile,
at the spot where it enters the Delta previously mentioned,672 the
distance between the river and the Red Sea being sixty-two miles.
This was contemplated first of all by Sesostris,673 king of Egypt,
afterwards by Darius, king of the Persians, and still later by Ptolemy
II.,674 who also made a canal, one hundred feet in width and forty
deep, extending a distance of thirty-seven miles and a half, as far as
the Bitter Springs.675 He was deterred from proceeding any further
with this work by apprehensions of an inundation, upon finding that
the Red Sea was three cubits higher than the land in the interior of
Egypt. Some writers, however, do not allege this as the cause, but say
that his reason was, a fear lest, in consequence of introducing the
sea, the water of the Nile might be spoilt, that being the only source
from which the Egyptians obtain water for drinking. Be this as it may,
the whole of the journey from the Egyptian Sea is usually performed by
land one of the three following ways:—Either from Pelusium across the
sands, in doing which the only method of finding the way is by means of
reeds fixed in the earth, the wind immediately effacing all traces of
footsteps: by the route which begins two miles beyond Mount Casius, and
at a distance of sixty miles enters the road from Pelusium, adjoining
to which road the Arabian tribe of the Autei dwell; or else by a third
route, which leads from Gerrum, and which they call Adipsos,676
passing through the same Arabians, and shorter by nearly sixty miles,
but running over rugged mountains and through a district destitute
of water. All these roads lead to Arsinoë,677 a city founded in
honour of his sister’s name, upon the Gulf of Carandra, by Ptolemy
Philadelphus, who was the first to explore Troglodytice, and called the
river which flows before Arsinoë by the name of Ptolemæus. After this
comes the little town of Enum, by some writers mentioned as Philotera;
next to which are the Abasæi, a nation sprung from intermarriages with
the Troglodytæ, then some wild Arabian tribes, the islands of Sapirine
and Scytala, and after these, deserts as far as Myoshormon, where
we find the fountain of Tatnos, Mount Æas, the island of Iambe, and
numerous harbours. Berenice also, is here situate, so called after the
name of the mother of Philadelphus, and to which there is a road from
Coptos, as we have previously stated;678 then the Arabian Autei, and
the Zebadei.
Troglodytice comes next, by the ancients called Midoë, and by some
Michoë; here is Mount Pentedactylos, some islands called Stenæ
Deiræ,679 the Halonnesi,680 a group of islands not less in number,
Cardamine, and Topazos,681 which last has given its name to the
precious stone so called. The gulf is full of islands; those known as
Mareu are supplied with fresh water, those called Erenos, are without
it; these were ruled by governors682 appointed by the kings. In the
interior are the Candei, also called Ophiophagi, a people in the habit
of eating serpents; there is no region in existence more productive of
them.
Juba, who appears to have investigated all these matters with
the greatest diligence, has omitted, in his description of these
regions—unless, indeed, it be an error in the copying—another place
called Berenice and surnamed Panchrysos,683 as also a third surnamed
Epidires,684 and remarkable for the peculiarity of its site; for it
lies on a long projecting neck of land, at the spot where the Straits
at the mouth of the Red Sea separate the coast of Africa from Arabia by
a distance of seven miles only: here too is the island of Cytis,685
which also produces the topaz.
Beyond this are forests, in which is Ptolemais,686 built by
Philadelphus for the chase of the elephant, and thence called
Epitheras,687 situate near Lake Monoleus. This is the same region
that has been already mentioned by us in the Second Book,688 and
in which, during forty-five days before the summer solstice and for
as many after, there is no shadow at the sixth hour, and during the
other hours of the day it falls to the south; while at other times it
falls to the north; whereas at the Berenice of which we first689
made mention, on the day of the summer solstice the shadow totally
disappears at the sixth hour, but no other unusual phænomenon is
observed. That place is situate at a distance of six hundred and
two miles from Ptolemais, which has thus become the subject of a
remarkable theory, and has promoted the exercise of a spirit of the
most profound investigation; for it was at this spot that the extent of
the earth was first ascertained, it being the fact that Erastosthenes,
beginning at this place by the accurate calculation of the length of
the shadow, was enabled to determine with exactness the dimensions of
the earth.
After passing this place we come to the Azanian690 Sea, a promontory
by some writers called Hispalus, Lake Mandalum, and the island of
Colocasitis, with many others lying out in the main sea, upon which
multitudes of turtles are found. We then come to the town of Suche,
the island of Daphnidis,691 and the town of the Adulitæ,692 a
place founded by Egyptian runaway slaves. This is the principal mart
for the Troglodytæ, as also for the people of Æthiopia: it is distant
from Ptolemais five days’ sail. To this place they bring ivory in
large quantities, horns of the rhinoceros, hides of the hippopotamus,
tortoise-shell, sphingiæ,693 and slaves. Beyond the Æthiopian Aroteræ
are the islands known by the name of Aliæu,694 as also those of
Bacchias, Antibacchias, and Stratioton. After passing these, on the
coast of Æthiopia, there is a gulf which remains unexplored still; a
circumstance the more to be wondered at, seeing that merchants have
pursued their investigations to a greater distance than this. We then
come to a promontory, upon which there is a spring called Cucios,695
much resorted to by mariners. Beyond it is the Port of Isis, distant
ten days’ rowing from the town of the Adulitæ: myrrh is brought to
this port by the Troglodytæ. The two islands before the harbour are
called Pseudepylæ,696 and those in it, the same in number, are known
as Pylæ;697 upon one of these there are some stone columns inscribed
with unknown characters. Beyond these is the Gulf of Abalites, the
island of Diodorus,698 and other desert islands; also, on the
mainland, a succession of deserts, and then the town of Gaza, and the
promontory and port of Mossylum,699 to the latter of which cinnamon
is brought for exportation: it was thus far that Sesostris led700 his
army.
Some writers place even beyond this, upon the shore, one town of
Æthiopia, called Baricaza. Juba will have it that at the Promontory
of Mossylum701 the Atlantic Sea begins, and that with a north-west
wind702 we may sail past his native country, the Mauritanias, and
arrive at Gades. We ought not on this occasion to curtail any portion
of the opinions so expressed by him. He says that after we pass the
promontory of the Indians,703 known as Lepteacra, and by others
called Drepanum, the distance, in a straight line, beyond the island
of Exusta and Malichu, is fifteen hundred miles; from thence to a
place called Sceneos two hundred and twenty-five; and from thence
to the island of Adanu one hundred and fifty miles; so that the
distance to the open sea704 is altogether eighteen hundred and
seventy-five miles. All the other writers, however, are of opinion
that, in consequence of the intensity of the sun’s heat, this sea is
not navigable; added to which, commerce is greatly exposed to the
depredations of a piratical tribe of Arabians called Ascitæ,705 who
dwell upon the islands: placing two inflated skins of oxen beneath
a raft of wood, they ply their piratical vocation with the aid of
poisoned arrows. We learn also from the same author that some nations
of the Troglodytæ have the name of Therothoæ,706 being so called from
their skill in hunting. They are remarkable for their swiftness, he
says, just as the Ichthyophagi are, who can swim like the animals whose
element is the sea. He speaks also of the Bangeni, the Gangoræ, the
Chalybes, the Xoxinæ, the Sirechæ, the Daremæ, and the Domazames. Juba
states, too, that the inhabitants who dwell on the banks of the Nile
from Syene as far as Meroë, are not a people of Æthiopia, but Arabians;
and that the city of the Sun, which we have mentioned707 as situate
not far from Memphis, in our description of Egypt, was founded by
Arabians. There are some writers who take away the further bank of the
Nile from Æthiopia,708 and unite it to Africa;709 and they people
its sides with tribes attracted thither by its water. We shall leave
these matters, however, to the option of each, to form his opinion on
them, and shall now proceed to mention the towns on each side710 in
the order in which they are given.
On leaving Syene,711 and taking first the Arabian side, we find
the nation of the Catadupi, then the Syenitæ, and the town of
Tacompsos,712 by some called Thatice, as also Aramasos, Sesamos,
Sanduma, Masindomacam, Arabeta and Boggia, Leupitorga, Tantarene,
Mecindita, Noa, Gloploa, Gystate, Megada, Lea, Renni, Nups, Direa,
Patiga, Bacata, Dumana, Rhadata, at which place a golden cat was
worshipped as a god, Boron, in the interior, and Mallos, near Meroë;
this is the account given by Bion.
Juba, however, gives another account; he says that there is a city on
Mount Megatichos,713 which lies between Egypt and Æthiopia, by the
Arabians known as Myrson, after which come Tacompsos, Aramus, Sesamos,
Pide, Mamuda, Orambis, situate near a stream of bitumen, Amodita,
Prosda, Parenta, Mama, Tesatta, Gallas, Zoton, Graucome, Emeus, the
Pidibotæ, the Hebdomecontacometæ,714 Nomades, who dwell in tents,
Cyste, Macadagale, Proaprimis, Nups, Detrelis, Patis, the Ganbreves,
the Magasnei, Segasmala, Crandala, Denna, Cadeuma, Thena, Batta,
Alana, Mascoa, the Scammi, Hora, situate on an island, and then Abala,
Androgalis, Sesecre, the Malli, and Agole.
On the African side715 we find mentioned, either what is another
place with the same name of Tacompsos, or else a part of the one
before-mentioned, and after it Moggore, Sæa, Edos, Plenariæ, Pinnis,
Magassa, Buma, Linthuma, Spintum, Sydop, the Censi, Pindicitora,
Acug, Orsum, Sansa, Maumarum, Urbim, the town of Molum, by the Greeks
called Hypaton,716 Pagoarca, Zmanes, at which point elephants begin
to be found, the Mambli, Berressa, and Acetuma; there was formerly a
town also called Epis, over against Meroë, which had, however, been
destroyed before Bion wrote.
These are the names of places given as far as Meroë; but at the present
day hardly any of them on either side of the river are in existence;
at all events, the prætorian troops that were sent by the Emperor
Nero717 under the command of a tribune, for the purposes of enquiry,
when, among his other wars, he was contemplating an expedition against
Æthiopia, brought back word that they had met with nothing but deserts
on their route. The Roman arms also penetrated into these regions
in the time of the late Emperor Augustus, under the command of P.
Petronius,718 a man of Equestrian rank, and prefect of Egypt. That
general took the following cities, the only ones we now find mentioned
there, in the following order; Pselcis,719 Primis, Abuncis, Phthuris,
Cambusis, Atteva, and Stadasis, where the river Nile, as it thunders
down the precipices, has quite deprived the inhabitants of the power of
hearing: he also sacked the town of Napata.720 The extreme distance
to which he penetrated beyond Syene was nine hundred and seventy miles;
but still, it was not the Roman arms that rendered these regions a
desert. Æthiopia, in its turn gaining the mastery, and then again
reduced to servitude, was at last worn out by its continual wars with
Egypt, having been a famous and powerful country even at the time of
the Trojan war, when Memnon721 was its king; it is also very evident
from the fabulous stories about Andromeda,722 that it ruled over
Syria in the time of king Cepheus, and that its sway extended as far as
the shores of our sea.
In a similar manner, also, there have been conflicting accounts as
to the extent of this country: first by Dalion, who travelled a
considerable distance beyond Meroë, and after him by Aristocreon
and Basilis, as well as the younger Simonides, who made a stay of
five years at Meroë,723 when he wrote his account of Æthiopia.
Timosthenes, however, the commander of the fleets of Philadelphus,
without giving any other estimate as to the distance, says that Meroë
is sixty days’ journey from Syene; while Eratosthenes states that
the distance is six hundred and twenty-five miles, and Artemidorus
six hundred. Sebosus says that from the extreme point of Egypt, the
distance to Meroë is sixteen hundred and seventy-five miles, while the
other writers last mentioned make it twelve hundred and fifty. All
these differences, however, have since been settled; for the persons
sent by Nero for the purposes of discovery have reported that the
distance from Syene to Meroë is eight hundred and seventy-one miles,
the following being the items. From Syene to Hiera Sycaminos724
they make to be fifty-four miles, from thence to Tama seventy-two,
to the country of the Evonymitæ,725 the first region of Æthiopia,
one hundred and twenty, to Acina fifty-four, to Pittara twenty-five,
and to Tergedus one hundred and six. They state also that the island
of Gagaudes lies at an equal distance from Syene and Meroë, and
that it is at this place that the bird called the parrot was first
seen; while at another island called Articula, the animal known as
the sphingium726 was first discovered by them, and after passing
Tergedus, the cynocephalus.727 The distance from thence to Napata is
eighty miles, that little town being the only one of all of them that
now survives. From thence to the island of Meroë the distance is three
hundred and sixty miles. They also state that the grass in the vicinity
of Meroë becomes of a greener and fresher colour, and that there is
some slight appearance of forests, as also traces of the rhinoceros
and elephant. They reported also that the city of Meroë stands at a
distance of seventy miles from the first entrance of the island of
Meroë, and that close to it is another island, Tadu by name, which
forms a harbour facing those who enter the right hand channel of the
river. The buildings in the city, they said, were but few in number,
and they stated that a female, whose name was Candace, ruled over the
district, that name having passed from queen to queen for many years.
They related also that there was a temple of Jupiter Hammon there,
held in great veneration, besides smaller shrines erected in honour of
him throughout all the country. In addition to these particulars, they
were informed that in the days of the Æthiopian dominion, the island of
Meroë enjoyed great renown, and that, according to tradition, it was
in the habit of maintaining two hundred thousand armed men, and four
thousand artisans. The kings of Æthiopia are said even at the present
day to be forty-five in number.
(30.) The whole of this country has successively had the names of
Ætheria,728 Atlantia, and last of all, Æthiopia, from Æthiops, the
son of Vulcan. It is not at all surprising that towards the extremity
of this region the men and animals assume a monstrous form, when we
consider the changeableness and volubility of fire, the heat of which
is the great agent in imparting various forms and shapes to bodies.
Indeed, it is reported that in the interior, on the eastern side, there
is a people that have no noses, the whole face presenting a plane
surface; that others again are destitute of the upper lip, and others
are without tongues. Others again, have the mouth grown together, and
being destitute of nostrils, breathe through one passage only, imbibing
their drink through it by means of the hollow stalk of the oat, which
there grows spontaneously and supplies them with its grain for food.
Some of these nations have to employ gestures by nodding the head and
moving the limbs, instead of speech. Others again were unacquainted
with the use of fire before the time of Ptolemy Lathyrus, king of
Egypt. Some writers have also stated that there is a nation of Pygmies,
which dwells among the marshes in which the river Nile takes its rise;
while on the coast of Æthiopia, where we paused,729 there is a range
of mountains, of a red colour, which have the appearance of being
always burning.
All the country, after we pass Meroë, is bounded by the Troglodytæ and
the Red Sea, it being three days’ journey from Napata to the shores
of that sea; throughout the whole of this district the rain water is
carefully preserved at several places, while the country that lies
between is extremely productive of gold. The parts beyond this are
inhabited by the Adabuli, a nation of Æthiopia; and here, over against
Meroë, are the Megabarri,730 by some writers called the Adiabari;
they occupy the city of Apollo; some of them, however, are Nomades,
living on the flesh of elephants. Opposite to them, on the African
side, dwell the Macrobii,731 and then again, beyond the Megabarri,
there are the Memnones and the Dabeli, and, at a distance of twenty
days’ journey, the Critensi. Beyond these are the Dochi, and then the
Gymnetes, who always go naked; and after them the Andetæ, the Mothitæ,
the Mesaches, and the Ipsodoræ, who are of a black tint, but stain the
body all over with a kind of red earth. On the African side again there
are the Medimni, and then a nation of Nomades, who live on the milk of
the cynocephalus, and then the Aladi and the Syrbotæ,732 which last
are said to be eight cubits in height.
Aristocreon informs us that on the Libyan side, at a distance of five
days’ journey from Meroë, is the town of Tolles, and then at a further
distance of twelve days’ journey, Esar, a town founded by the Egyptians
who fled from Psammetichus;733 he states also that they dwelt there
for a period of three hundred years, and that opposite, on the Arabian
side, there is a town of theirs called Daron.734 The town, however,
which he calls Esar, is by Bion called Sape, who says that the name
means “the strangers:” their capital being Sembobitis, situate on an
island, and a third place of theirs, Sinat in Arabia. Between the
mountains and the river Nile are the Simbarri, the Palugges, and, on
the mountains themselves, the Asachæ, who are divided into numerous
peoples; they are said to be distant five days’ journey from the sea,
and to procure their subsistence by the chase of the elephant. An
island in the Nile, which belongs to the Semberritæ, is governed by a
queen; beyond it are the Æthiopian Nubei,735 at a distance of eight
days’ journey: their town is Tenupsis, situate on the Nile. There are
the Sesambri also, a people among whom all the quadrupeds are without
ears, the very elephants even. On the African side are the Tonobari,
the Ptoenphæ, a people who have a dog for their king, and divine from
his movements what are his commands; the Auruspi, who have a town at
a considerable distance from the Nile, and then the Archisarmi, the
Phaliges, the Marigerri, and the Casmari.
Bion makes mention also of some other towns situate on islands, the
whole distance being twenty days’ journey from Sembobitis to Meroë;
a town in an adjoining island, under the queen of the Semberritæ,
with another called Asara, and another, in a second island, called
Darde. The name of a third island is Medoë, upon which is the town of
Asel, and a fourth is called Garodes, with a town upon it of the same
name. Passing thence along the banks of the Nile, are the towns of
Navi, Modunda, Andatis, Secundum, Colligat, Secande, Navectabe, Cumi,
Agrospi, Ægipa, Candrogari, Araba, and Summara.736
Beyond is the region of Sirbitum, at which the mountains
terminate,737 and which by some writers is said to contain the
maritime Æthiopians, the Nisacæthæ, and the Nisyti, a word which
signifies “men with three or four eyes,”—not that the people really
have that conformation, but because they are remarkable for the
unerring aim of their arrows. On that side of the Nile which extends
along the borders of the Southern Ocean beyond the Greater Syrtes,738
Dalion says that the people, who use rain-water only, are called the
Cisori, and that the other nations are the Longompori, distant five
days’ journey from the Œcalices, the Usibalci, the Isbeli, the Perusii,
the Ballii, and the Cispii, the rest being deserts, and inhabited
by the tribes of fable only. In a more westerly direction are the
Nigroæ, whose king has only one eye, and that in the forehead, the
Agriophagi,739 who live principally on the flesh of panthers and
lions, the Pamphagi,740 who will eat anything, the Anthropophagi, who
live on human flesh, the Cynamolgi,741 a people with the heads of
dogs, the Artabatitæ, who have four feet, and wander about after the
manner of wild beasts; and, after them, the Hesperiæ and the Perorsi,
whom we have already spoken742 of as dwelling on the confines of
Mauritania. Some tribes, too, of the Æthiopians subsist on nothing but
locusts,743 which are smoke-dried and salted as their provision for
the year; these people do not live beyond their fortieth year.
M. Agrippa was of opinion that the length744 of the whole country of
the Æthiopians, including the Red Sea, was two thousand one hundred
and seventy miles, and its breadth, including Upper Egypt, twelve
hundred and ninety-seven. Some authors again have made the following
divisions of its length; from Meroë to Sirbitum eleven days’ sail,
from Sirbitum to the Dabelli fifteen days’, and from them to the
Æthiopian Ocean six days’ journey. It is agreed by most authors,
that the distance altogether, from the ocean745 to Meroë, is six
hundred and twenty-five miles, and from Meroë to Syene, that which we
have already mentioned. Æthiopia lies from south-east to south-west.
Situate as it is, in a southern hemisphere, forests of ebony are to
be seen of the brightest verdure; and in the midst of these regions
there is a mountain of immense height, which overhangs the sea, and
emits a perpetual flame. By the Greeks this mountain is called Theon
Ochema,746 and at a distance of four days’ sail from it is a
promontory, known as Hesperu Ceras,747 upon the confines of Africa,
and close to the Hesperiæ, an Æthiopian nation. There are some writers
who affirm that in these regions there are hills of a moderate height,
which afford a pleasant shade from the groves with which they are clad,
and are the haunts of Ægipans748 and Satyrs.
We learn from Ephorus, as well as Eudoxus and Timosthenes, that there
are great numbers of islands scattered all over this sea; Clitarchus
says that king Alexander was informed of an island so rich that the
inhabitants gave a talent of gold for a horse, and of another749
upon which there was found a sacred mountain, shaded with a grove, the
trees of which emitted odours of wondrous sweetness; this last was
situate over against the Persian Gulf. Cerne750 is the name of an
island situate opposite to Æthiopia, the size of which has not been
ascertained, nor yet its distance from the main land: it is said that
its inhabitants are exclusively Æthiopians. Ephorus states that those
who sail from the Red Sea into the Æthiopian Ocean cannot get beyond
the Columnæ751 there, some little islands so called. Polybius says
that Cerne is situate at the extremity of Mauritania, over against
Mount Atlas, and at a distance of eight stadia from the land; while
Cornelius Nepos states that it lies very nearly in the same meridian
as Carthage, at a distance from the mainland of ten miles, and that
it is not more than two miles in circumference. It is said also that
there is another island situate over against Mount Atlas, being itself
known by the name of Atlantis.752 Five days’ sail beyond it there are
deserts, as far as the Æthiopian Hesperiæ and the promontory, which
we have mentioned as being called Hesperu Ceras, a point at which the
face of the land first takes a turn towards the west and the Atlantic
Sea. Facing this promontory are also said to be the islands called the
Gorgades,753 the former abodes of the Gorgons, two days’ sail from
the mainland, according to Xenophon of Lampsacus. Hanno, a general of
the Carthaginians, penetrated as far as these regions, and brought
back an account that the bodies of the women were covered with hair,
but that the men, through their swiftness of foot, made their escape;
in proof of which singularity in their skin, and as evidence of a
fact so miraculous, he placed the skins754 of two of these females
in the temple of Juno, which were to be seen there until the capture
of Carthage. Beyond these even, are said to be the two islands of the
Hesperides; but so uncertain are all the accounts relative to this
subject, that Statius Sebosus says that it is forty days’ sail, past
the coast of the Atlas range, from the islands of the Gorgons to those
of the Hesperides, and one day’s sail from these to the Hesperu Ceras.
Nor have we any more certain information relative to the islands of
Mauritania. We only know, as a fact well-ascertained, that some few
were discovered by Juba over against the country of the Autololes, upon
which he established a manufactory of Gætulian purple.755
There are some authors who think that beyond these are the Fortunate
Islands,756 and some others; the number of which Sebosus gives, as
well as the distances, informing us that Junonia757 is an island
seven hundred and fifty miles distant from Gades. He states also
that Pluvialia758 and Capraria759 are the same distance from
Junonia, to the west; and that in Pluvialia the only fresh water to
be obtained is rain water. He then states that at a distance of two
hundred and fifty miles from these, opposite the left of Mauritania,
and situate in the direction of the sun at the eighth hour, are the
Fortunate Islands,760 one of which, from its undulating surface,
has the name of Invallis,761 and another that of Planasia,762
from the peculiarity763 of its appearance. He states also that the
circumference of Invallis is three hundred miles, and that trees grow
to a height of one hundred and fourteen feet.
Relative to the Fortunate Islands, Juba has ascertained the following
facts: that they are situate to the south in nearly a due westerly
direction, and at a distance from the Purple Islands of six hundred
and twenty-five miles, the sailing being made for two hundred and
fifty miles due west, and then three hundred and seventy-five towards
the east.764 He states that the first is called Ombrios,765 and
that it presents no traces of buildings whatever; that among the
mountains there is a lake, and some trees,766 which bear a strong
resemblance to giant fennel, and from which water is extracted; that
drawn from those that are black is of a bitter taste, but that produced
by the white ones is agreeable and good for drinking. He states also
that a second island has the name of Junonia, but that it contains
nothing beyond a small temple of stone: also that in its vicinity
there is another, but smaller, island767 of the same name, and then
another called Capraria, which is infested by multitudes of huge
lizards. According to the same author, in sight of these islands is
Ninguaria,768 which has received that name from its perpetual snows;
this island abounds also in fogs. The one next to it is Canaria;769
it contains vast multitudes of dogs of very large size, two of which
were brought home to Juba: there are some traces of buildings to be
seen here. While all these islands abound in fruit and birds of every
kind, this one produces in great numbers the date palm which bears the
caryota, also pine nuts. Honey too abounds here, and in the rivers
papyrus, and the fish called silurus,770 are found. These islands,
however, are greatly annoyed by the putrefying bodies of monsters,
which are constantly thrown up by the sea.
Having now fully described the earth, both without771 as well as
within, it seems only proper that we should succinctly state the length
and breadth of its various seas.
(33.) Polybius has stated, that in a straight line from the Straits of
Gades to the mouth of the Mæotis, it is a distance of three thousand
four hundred and thirty-seven miles and a half, and that, starting
from the same point,772 the distance in a straight line to Sicily
is twelve hundred and fifty miles, from thence to Crete three hundred
and seventy-five, to Rhodes one hundred and eighty-seven and a half,
to the Chelidonian Islands the same distance, to Cyprus two hundred
and twenty-five, and from thence to Seleucia Pieria, in Syria, one
hundred and fifteen miles: the sum of all which distances amounts to
two thousand three hundred and forty miles. Agrippa estimates this
same distance, in a straight line from the Straits of Gades to the
Gulf of Issus, at three thousand three hundred and forty miles; in
which computation, however, I am not certain that there is not some
error in the figures, seeing that the same author has stated that the
distance from the Straits of Sicily to Alexandria is thirteen hundred
and fifty miles. Taking the whole length of the sea-line throughout the
gulfs above-mentioned, and beginning at the same point,773 he makes
it ten thousand and fifty-eight miles; to which number Artemidorus
has added seven hundred and fifty-six: the same author, including in
his calculation the shores of the Mæotis, makes the whole distance
seventeen thousand three hundred and ninety miles. Such is the
measurement given by men who have penetrated into distant countries,
unaided by force of arms, and have, with a boldness that exhibits
itself in the times of peace even, challenged, as it were, Fortune
herself.
I shall now proceed to compare the dimensions of the various parts
of the earth, however great the difficulties which may arise from
the discrepancy of the accounts given by various authors: the most
convenient method, however, will be that of adding the breadth to the
length.774 Following this mode of reckoning, the dimensions of Europe
will be eight thousand two hundred and ninety-four miles; of Africa,
to adopt a mean between all the various accounts given by authors, the
length is three thousand seven hundred and ninety-four miles, while the
breadth, so far as it is inhabited, in no part exceeds two hundred
and fifty miles.775 But, as Agrippa, including its deserts, makes
it from Cyrenaica, a part of it, to the country of the Garamantes,
so far as was then known, a further distance of nine hundred and ten
miles, the entire length, added together, will make a distance of four
thousand six hundred and eight miles. The length of Asia is generally
admitted776 to be six thousand three hundred and seventy-five
miles, and the breadth, which ought, properly, to be reckoned from
the Æthiopian Sea to Alexandria,777 near the river Nile, so as to
run through Meroë and Syene, is eighteen hundred and seventy-five. It
appears then that Europe is greater than Asia, by a little less than
one half of Asia, and greater than Africa by as much again of Africa
and one-sixth. If all these sums are added together, it will be clearly
seen that Europe is one-third, and a little more than one-eighth part
of one-third, Asia one-fourth and one-fourteenth part of one-fourth,
and Africa, one-fifth and one-sixtieth part of one-fifth of the whole
earth.778
To the above we shall add even another instance of ingenious discovery
by the Greeks, and indeed of the most minute skilfulness; that so
nothing may be wanting to our investigation of the geographical
divisions of the earth, and the various countries thereof which have
been pointed out; that it may be the better understood, too, what
affinity, or relationship as it were, exists between one region and
another, in respect to the length of their days and nights, and in
which of them the shadows are of equal length, and the distance from
the pole is the same. I shall therefore give these particulars as well,
and shall state the divisions of the whole earth in accordance with the
various sections of the heavens. The lines or segments which divide
the world are many in number; by our people they are known as “circuli”
or circles, by the Greeks they are called “paralleli” or parallels.
(34.) The first begins at that part of India which looks towards the
south, and extends to Arabia and those who dwell upon the borders
of the Red Sea. It embraces the Gedrosi, the Carmanii, the Persæ,
the Elymæi, Parthyene, Aria, Susiane, Mesopotamia, Seleucia surnamed
Babylonia, Arabia as far as Petra, Cœle Syria, Pelusium, the lower
parts of Egypt called the Chora of Alexandria, the maritime parts
of Africa, all the cities of Cyrenaica, Thapsus, Adrumetum, Clupea,
Carthage, Utica, the two Hippo’s, Numidia, the two Mauritanias, the
Atlantic Sea, and the Pillars of Hercules. Within the meridian of
this parallel, on the middle day of the equinox, the pin of the dial,
usually called the gnomon, if seven feet in length, throws a shadow
at mid-day no more than four feet long: the longest day and night are
fourteen equinoctial hours respectively, the shortest being only ten.
The next circle or parallel begins with the western parts of India,
and runs through the middle of Parthia, through Persepolis, the nearer
parts of Persis, the nearer Arabia, Judæa, and the people who live near
Mount Libanus, and it embraces Babylon, Idumæa, Samaria, Hierosolyma,
Ascalon, Joppa, Cæsarea in Phœnicia, Ptolemais, Sidon, Tyre, Berytus,
Botrys, Tripolis, Byblus, Antiochia, Laodicea, Seleucia, the maritime
parts of Cilicia, the southern parts of Cyprus, Crete, Lilybæum in
Sicily, and the northern parts of Africa and Numidia. In these regions,
at the time of the equinox, a gnomon of thirty-five feet in length
gives only a shadow twenty-four feet long; and the longest day and
night are respectively fourteen equinoctial hours, and one-fifth of an
hour, in length.
The third circle or parallel begins at the part of India which lies in
the vicinity of Mount Imaüs, and runs through the Caspian Gates and the
nearer parts of Media, Cataonia, Cappadocia, Taurus, Amanus, Issus, the
Passes of Cilicia, Soli, Tarsus, Cyprus, Pisidia, Side in Pamphylia,
Lycaonia, Patara in Lycia, Xanthus, Caunus, Rhodes, Cos, Halicarnassus,
Cnidos, Doris, Chios, Delos, the middle of the Cyclades, Gythium,
Malea, Argos, Laconia, Elis, Olympia, Messenia in Peloponnesus,
Syracuse, Catina, the middle of Sicily, the southern parts of Sardinia,
Carteia, and Gades. A gnomon, one hundred inches in length, throws
a shadow seventy-seven inches long; the length of the longest day is
fourteen equinoctial hours and a half, plus one thirtieth of an hour.
Under the fourth circle or parallel lie those parts of India which
are on the other side of the Imaüs, the southern parts of Cappadocia,
Galatia, Mysia, Sardis, Smyrna, Sipylus, Mount Tmolus, Lydia, Caria,
Ionia, Tralles, Colophon, Ephesus, Miletus, Chios, Samos, the Icarian
Sea, the northern part of the Cyclades, Athens, Megara, Corinth,
Sicyon, Achaia, Patræ, the Isthmus, Epirus, the northern parts of
Sicily, the eastern parts of Gallia Narbonensis, and the sea-coast
of Spain, from New Carthage westward. In these districts a gnomon of
twenty-one feet throws a shadow of sixteen feet in length; the longest
day contains fourteen equinoctial hours and two-thirds of an hour.
Under the fifth zone are included, from the entrance to the Caspian
Sea, the Bactri, Iberia, Armenia, Mysia, Phrygia, the Hellespont,
Troas, Tenedos, Abydos, Scepsis, Ilium, Mount Ida, Cyzicus, Lampsacus,
Sinope, Amisus, Heraclea in Pontus, Paphlagonia, Lemnos, Imbros,
Thasos, Cassandria, Thessaly, Macedonia, Larissa, Amphipolis,
Thessalonica, Pella, Edessa, Berœa, Pharsalia, Carystus, Eubœa in
Bœotia, Chalcis, Delphi, Acarnania, Ætolia, Apollonia, Brudisium,
Tarentum, Thurii, Locri, Rhegium, the Lucani, Neapolis, Puteoli, the
Tuscan Sea, Corsica, the Balearic Islands, and the middle of Spain. A
gnomon, seven feet in length, in these countries gives a shadow of six
feet, and the length of the day is fifteen equinoctial hours.
The sixth division, in which Rome is included, embraces the Caspian
nations, Caucasus, the northern parts of Armenia, Apollonia on the
Rhyndacus, Nicomedia, Nicæa, Chalcedon, Byzantium, Lysimachia, the
Chersonnesus, the Gulf of Melas, Abdera, Samothracia, Maronea, Ænus,
Bessica, Thracia, Mædica, Pæonia, the Illyrii, Dyrrhachium, Canusium,
the extreme parts of Apulia, Campania, Etruria, Pisæ, Luna, Luca,
Genua, Liguria, Antipolis, Massilia, Narbo, Tarraco, the middle parts
of Hispania Tarraconensis, and thence through Lusitania. A gnomon of
nine feet here throws a shadow eight feet long; the greatest length of
the day is fifteen equinoctial hours, plus one-ninth part of an hour,
or, according to Nigidius, one-fifth.
The seventh division begins on the other side of the Caspian Sea,
and the line runs above Callatis, and through the Bosporus, the
Borysthenes, Tomi, the back part of Thrace, the Triballi, the remainder
of Illyricum, the Adriatic Sea, Aquileia, Altinum, Venetia, Vicetia,
Patavium, Verona, Cremona, Ravenna, Ancona, Picenum, the Marsi, the
Peligni, the Sabini, Umbria, Ariminum, Bononia, Placentia, Mediolanum,
all the districts at the foot of the Apennines, and, beyond the Alps,
Gallia Aquitanica, Vienna, the Pyrenæan range, and Celtiberia. A gnomon
thirty-five feet in length here throws a shadow of thirty-six feet,
except in some parts of Venetia, where the shadow just equals the
length of the gnomon; the longest day is fifteen equinoctial hours,
plus three-fifths of an hour.
Thus far we have set forth the results of observations made by the
ancients. The remaining part of the earth has been divided, through the
careful researches of those of more recent times, by three additional
parallels. The first runs from the Tanais through the Mæotis and the
country of the Sarmatæ, as far as the Borysthenes, and so through the
Daci and part of Germany, and the Gallic provinces, as far as the
shores of the ocean, the longest day being sixteen hours.
The second parallel runs through the country of the Hyperborei and the
island of Britannia, the longest day being seventeen hours in length.
The last of all is the Scythian parallel, which runs from the Riphæan
range to Thule, in which, as we have already stated,779 the year is
divided into days and nights alternately, of six months’ duration. The
same authors have also placed before the first parallel, which we have
here given,780 two other parallels or circles; the first running
through the island of Meroë and the city of Ptolemais which was built
on the Red Sea for the chase of the elephant; where the longest day
is twelve hours and a half in length; and the second passing through
Syene in Egypt, in which the longest day is thirteen hours in length.
The same authors have also added half an hour to each of the parallels,
till they come to the last.
Thus far on the Geography of the earth.
Summary.—Towns mentioned, eleven hundred and ninety-four.
Nations, five hundred and seventy-six. Noted rivers, one hundred and
fifteen. Famous mountains, thirty-eight. Islands, one hundred and
eight. Peoples or towns no longer in existence, ninety-five. Remarkable
events, narratives, and observations, two thousand two hundred and
fourteen.
Roman authors quoted.—M. Agrippa,781 M. Varro,782 Varro
Atacinus,783 Cornelius Nepos,784 Hyginus,785 L. Vetus,786 Mela
Pomponius,787 Domitius Corbulo,788 Licinius Mucianus,789 Claudius
Cæsar,790 Arruntius,791 Sebosus,792 Fabricius Tuscus,793 T.
Livius,794 Seneca,795 Nigidius.796
Foreign authors quoted.—King Juba,797 Hecatæus,798
Hellenicus,799 Damastes,800 Eudoxus,801 Dicæarchus,802
Bæton,803 Timosthenes,804 Patrocles,805 Demodamas,806
Clitarchus,807 Eratosthenes,808 Alexander the Great,809
Ephorus,810 Hipparchus,811 Panætius,812 Callimachus,813
Artemidorus,814 Apollodorus,815 Agathocles,816 Polybius,817
Eumachus,818 Timæus Siculus,819 Alexander Polyhistor,820
Isidorus,821 Amometus,822 Metrodorus,823 Posidonius,824
Onesicritus,825 Nearchus,826 Megasthenes,827 Diognetus,828
Aristocreon,829 Bion,830 Dalion,831 the Younger Simonides,832
Basilis,833 Xenophon834 of Lampsacus.
BOOK VII. 835 MAN, HIS BIRTH, HIS ORGANIZATION, AND THE INVENTION OF THE ARTS. — CHAP. 1.—MAN. — CHAP. 2.—THE WONDERFUL FORMS OF DIFFERENT NATIONS. — CHAP. 3.—MARVELLOUS BIRTHS. — CHAP. 4. (5.)—THE GENERATION OF MAN; UNUSUAL DURATION OF PREGNANCY; INSTANCES OF IT FROM SEVEN TO TWELVE MONTHS. — CHAP. 5. (6.)—INDICATIONS OF THE SEX OF THE CHILD DURING THE PREGNANCY OF THE MOTHER. 970 — CHAP. 6. (8.)—MONSTROUS BIRTHS. — CHAP. 7. (9.)—OF THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN CUT OUT OF THE WOMB. — CHAP. 8. (10.)—WHO WERE CALLED VOPISCI. — CHAP. 9. (11.)—THE CONCEPTION AND GENERATION OF MAN. — CHAP. 10.—STRIKING INSTANCES OF RESEMBLANCE. — CHAP. 11. (13.)—WHAT MEN ARE SUITED FOR GENERATION. INSTANCES OF VERY NUMEROUS OFFSPRING. — CHAP. 12. (14.)—AT WHAT AGE GENERATION CEASES. — CHAP. 13. (15.)—REMARKABLE CIRCUMSTANCES CONNECTED WITH THE MENSTRUAL DISCHARGE. — CHAP. 14.—THE THEORY OF GENERATION. — CHAP. 15.—SOME ACCOUNT OF THE TEETH, AND SOME FACTS CONCERNING INFANTS. — CHAP. 16.—EXAMPLES OF UNUSUAL SIZE. — CHAP. 17.—CHILDREN REMARKABLE FOR THEIR PRECOCITY. — CHAP. 18.—SOME REMARKABLE PROPERTIES OF THE BODY. — CHAP. 19. (20.)—INSTANCES OF EXTRAORDINARY STRENGTH. — CHAP. 20.—INSTANCES OF REMARKABLE AGILITY. — CHAP. 21. (21.)—INSTANCES OF ACUTENESS OF SIGHT. — CHAP. 22. (22.)—INSTANCES OF REMARKABLE ACUTENESS OF HEARING. — CHAP. 23. (23.)—INSTANCES OF ENDURANCE OF PAIN. — CHAP. 24. (24.)—MEMORY. — CHAP. 25. (25.)—VIGOR OF MIND. — CHAP. 26.—CLEMENCY AND GREATNESS OF MIND. — CHAP. 27. (26.)—HEROIC EXPLOITS. — CHAP. 28. (27.)—UNION IN THE SAME PERSON OF THREE OF THE HIGHEST QUALITIES WITH THE GREATEST PURITY. — CHAP. 29. (28.)—INSTANCES OF EXTREME COURAGE. — CHAP. 30. (29.)—MEN OF REMARKABLE GENIUS. — CHAP. 31. (30.)—MEN WHO HAVE BEEN REMARKABLE FOR WISDOM. — CHAP. 32. (32.)—PRECEPTS THE MOST USEFUL IN LIFE. — CHAP. 33. (33.)—DIVINATION. — CHAP. 34. (34.)—THE MAN WHO WAS PRONOUNCED TO BE THE MOST EXCELLENT. — CHAP. 35. (35.)—THE MOST CHASTE MATRONS. — CHAP. 36. (36.)—INSTANCES OF THE HIGHEST DEGREE OF AFFECTION. — CHAP. 37. (37.)—NAMES OF MEN WHO HAVE EXCELLED IN THE ARTS, ASTROLOGY, GRAMMAR, AND MEDICINE. — CHAP. 38.—GEOMETRY AND ARCHITECTURE. — CHAP. 39. (38.)—OF PAINTING; ENGRAVING ON BRONZE, MARBLE, AND IVORY; OF CARVING. — CHAP. 40. (39.)—SLAVES FOR WHICH A HIGH PRICE HAS BEEN GIVEN. — CHAP. 41. (40.)—SUPREME HAPPINESS. — CHAP. 42. (41.)—RARE INSTANCES OF GOOD FORTUNE CONTINUING IN THE SAME FAMILY. — CHAP. 43. (42.)—REMARKABLE EXAMPLE OF VICISSITUDES. — CHAP. 44.—REMARKABLE EXAMPLES OF HONOURS. — CHAP. 45.—TEN VERY FORTUNATE CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH HAVE HAPPENED TO THE SAME PERSON. — CHAP. 46.—THE MISFORTUNES OF AUGUSTUS. — CHAP. 47. (46.)—MEN WHOM THE GODS HAVE PRONOUNCED TO BE THE MOST HAPPY. — CHAP. 48. (47.)—THE MAN WHOM THE GODS ORDERED TO BE WORSHIPPED DURING HIS LIFE-TIME; A REMARKABLE FLASH OF LIGHTNING. — CHAP. 49. (48.)—THE GREATEST LENGTH OF LIFE. — CHAP. 50. (49.)—THE VARIETY OF DESTINIES AT THE BIRTH OF MAN. — CHAP. 51. (50.)—VARIOUS INSTANCES OF DISEASES. — CHAP. 52. (51.)—DEATH. — CHAP. 53. (52.)—PERSONS WHO HAVE COME TO LIFE AGAIN AFTER BEING LAID OUT FOR BURIAL. — CHAP. 54. (53.)—INSTANCES OF SUDDEN DEATH. — CHAP. 55. (54.)—BURIAL. — CHAP. 56. (55.)—THE MANES, OR DEPARTED SPIRITS OF THE SOUL. — CHAP. 57. (56.)—THE INVENTORS OF VARIOUS THINGS. — CHAP. 58. (57.)—THE THINGS ABOUT WHICH MANKIND FIRST OF ALL AGREED. THE ANCIENT LETTERS. — CHAP. 59. (59.)—WHEN BARBERS WERE FIRST EMPLOYED. 1482 — CHAP. 60.—WHEN THE FIRST TIME-PIECES WERE MADE.
Such then is the present state of the world, and of the countries,
nations, more remarkable seas, islands, and cities which it
contains.836 The nature of the animated beings which exist upon it,
is hardly in any degree less worthy of our contemplation than its other
features; if, indeed, the human mind is able to embrace the whole of so
diversified a subject. Our first attention is justly due to Man, for
whose sake all other things appear to have been produced by Nature;
though, on the other hand, with so great and so severe penalties for
the enjoyment of her bounteous gifts, that it is far from easy to
determine, whether she has proved to him a kind parent, or a merciless
step-mother.
In the first place, she obliges him alone, of all animated beings, to
clothe himself with the spoils of the others; while, to all the rest,
she has given various kinds of coverings, such as shells, crusts,
spines, hides, furs, bristles, hair, down, feathers, scales, and
fleeces.837 The very trunks of the trees even, she has protected
against the effects of heat and cold by a bark, which is, in some
cases, twofold.838 Man alone, at the very moment of his birth
cast naked upon the naked earth,839 does she abandon to cries, to
lamentations, and, a thing that is the case with no other animal
whatever, to tears: this, too, from the very moment that he enters
upon existence.840 But as for laughter, why, by Hercules!—to laugh,
if but for an instant only, has never been granted to man before the
fortieth day841 from his birth, and then it is looked upon as a
miracle of precocity. Introduced thus to the light, man has fetters and
swathings instantly put upon all his limbs,842 a thing that falls to
the lot of none of the brutes even that are born among us. Born to such
singular good fortune,843 there lies the animal, which is destined
to command all the others, lies, fast bound hand and foot, and weeping
aloud! such being the penalty which he has to pay on beginning life,
and that for the sole fault of having been born. Alas! for the folly of
those who can think after such a beginning as this, that they have been
born for the display of vanity!
The earliest presage of future strength, the earliest bounty of time,
confers upon him nought but the resemblance to a quadruped.844 How
soon does man gain the power of walking? How soon does he gain the
faculty of speech? How soon is his mouth fitted for mastication? How
long are the pulsations of the crown of his head to proclaim him
the weakest of all animated beings?845 And then, the diseases to
which he is subject, the numerous remedies which he is obliged to
devise against his maladies, and those thwarted every now and then by
new forms and features of disease.846 While other animals have an
instinctive knowledge of their natural powers; some, of their swiftness
of pace, some of their rapidity of flight, and some again of their
power of swimming; man is the only one that knows nothing, that can
learn nothing without being taught; he can neither speak, nor walk,
nor eat,847 and, in short, he can do nothing, at the prompting of
nature only, but weep. For this it is, that many have been of opinion,
that it were better not to have been born, or if born, to have been
annihilated848 at the earliest possible moment.
To man alone, of all animated beings, has it been given, to
grieve,849 to him alone to be guilty of luxury and excess; and
that in modes innumerable, and in every part of his body. Man is the
only being that is a prey to ambition, to avarice, to an immoderate
desire of life,850 to superstition,851—he is the only one that
troubles himself about his burial, and even what is to become of him
after death.852 By none is life held on a tenure more frail;853
none are more influenced by unbridled desires for all things; none are
sensible of fears more bewildering; none are actuated by rage more
frantic and violent. Other animals, in fine, live at peace with those
of their own kind; we only see them unite to make a stand against those
of a different species. The fierceness of the lion is not expended in
fighting with its own kind; the sting of the serpent is not aimed at
the serpent;854 and the monsters of the sea even, and the fishes,
vent their rage only on those of a different species. But with man,—by
Hercules! most of his misfortunes are occasioned by man.855
(1.) We have already given856 a general description of the human race
in our account of the different nations. Nor, indeed, do I now propose
to treat of their manners and customs, which are of infinite variety
and almost as numerous as the various groups themselves, into which
mankind is divided; but yet there are some things, which, I think,
ought not to be omitted; and more particularly, in relation to those
peoples which dwell at a considerable distance from the sea;857 among
which, I have no doubt, that some facts will appear of an astounding
nature, and, indeed, incredible to many. Who, for instance, could ever
believe in the existence of the Æthiopians, who had not first seen
them? Indeed what is there that does not appear marvellous, when it
comes to our knowledge for the first time?858 How many things, too,
are looked upon as quite impossible, until they have been actually
effected?859 But it is the fact, that every moment of our existence
we are distrusting the power and the majesty of Nature, if the mind,
instead of grasping her in her entirety, considers her only in detail.
Not to speak of peacocks, the spotted skins of tigers and panthers,
and the rich colours of so many animals, a trifling thing apparently
to speak of, but of inestimable importance, when we give it due
consideration, is the existence of so many languages among the various
nations, so many modes of speech, so great a variety of expressions;
that to another, a man who is of a different country, is almost the
same as no man at all.860 And then, too, the human features and
countenance, although composed of but some ten parts or little more,
are so fashioned, that among so many thousands of men, there are no two
in existence who cannot be distinguished from one another, a result
which no art could possibly have produced, when confined to so limited
a number of combinations. In most points, however, of this nature, I
shall not be content to pledge my own credit only, but shall confirm it
in preference by referring to my authorities, which shall be given on
all subjects of a nature to inspire doubt. My readers, however, must
make no objection to following the Greeks, who have proved themselves
the most careful observers, as well as of the longest standing.861
We have already stated, that there are certain tribes of the Scythians,
and, indeed, many other nations, which feed upon human flesh.862 This
fact itself might, perhaps, appear incredible, did we not recollect,
that in the very centre of the earth, in Italy and Sicily, nations
formerly existed with these monstrous propensities, the Cyclopes,863
and the Læstrygones, for example; and that, very recently, on the other
side of the Alps, it was the custom to offer human sacrifices, after
the manner of those nations;864 and the difference is but small
between sacrificing human beings and eating them.865
In the vicinity also of those who dwell in the northern regions,
and not far from the spot from which the north wind arises, and the
place which is called its cave,866 and is known by the name of
Geskleithron, the Arimaspi are said to exist, whom I have previously
mentioned,867 a nation remarkable for having but one eye, and that
placed in the middle of the forehead. This race is said to carry on a
perpetual warfare with the Griffins, a kind of monster, with wings, as
they are commonly868 represented, for the gold which they dig out of
the mines, and which these wild beasts retain and keep watch over with
a singular degree of cupidity, while the Arimaspi are equally desirous
to get possession of it.869 Many authors have stated to this effect,
among the most illustrious of whom are Herodotus and Aristeas of
Proconnesus.870
Beyond the other Scythian Anthropophagi, there is a country called
Abarimon, situate in a certain great valley of Mount Imaus,871
the inhabitants of which are a savage race, whose feet are turned
backwards,872 relatively to their legs: they possess wonderful
velocity, and wander about indiscriminately with the wild beasts. We
learn from Beeton, whose duty it was to take the measurements of the
routes of Alexander the Great, that this people cannot breathe in any
climate except their own, for which reason it is impossible to take
them before any of the neighbouring kings; nor could any of them be
brought before Alexander himself.
The Anthropophagi, whom we have previously mentioned873 as dwelling
ten days’ journey beyond the Borysthenes, according to the account
of Isigonus of Nicæa, were in the habit of drinking out of human
skulls,874 and placing the scalps, with the hair attached, upon their
breasts, like so many napkins. The same author relates, that there
is, in Albania, a certain race of men, whose eyes are of a sea-green
colour, and who have white hair from their earliest childhood,875
and that these people see better in the night than in the day. He
states also that the Sauromatæ, who dwell ten days’ journey beyond the
Borysthenes, only take food every other day.876
Crates of Pergamus relates, that there formerly existed in the vicinity
of Parium, in the Hellespont, a race of men whom he calls Ophiogenes,
and that by their touch they were able to cure those who had been
stung by serpents, extracting the poison by the mere imposition of the
hand.877 Varro tells us, that there are still a few individuals in
that district, whose saliva effectually cures the stings of serpents.
The same, too, was the case with the tribe of the Psylli,878 in
Africa, according to the account of Agatharchides; these people
received their name from Psyllus, one of their kings, whose tomb is
in existence, in the district of the Greater Syrtes. In the bodies of
these people there was by nature a certain kind of poison, which was
fatal to serpents, and the odour of which overpowered them with torpor:
with them it was a custom to expose children immediately after their
birth to the fiercest serpents, and in this manner to make proof of
the fidelity of their wives, the serpents not being repelled by such
children as were the offspring of adultery.879 This nation, however,
was almost entirely extirpated by the slaughter made of them by the
Nasamones, who now occupy their territory.880 This race, however,
still survives in a few persons who are descendants of those who either
took to flight or else were absent on the occasion of the battle. The
Marsi, in Italy, are still in possession of the same power, for which,
it is said, they are indebted to their origin from the son of Circe,
from whom they acquired it as a natural quality. But the fact is, that
all men possess in their bodies a poison which acts upon serpents, and
the human saliva, it is said, makes them take to flight, as though they
had been touched with boiling water. The same substance, it is said,
destroys them the moment it enters their throat, and more particularly
so, if it should happen to be the saliva of a man who is fasting.881
Above the Nasamones,882 and the Machlyæ, who border upon them, are
found, as we learn from Calliphanes, the nation of the Androgyni, a
people who unite the two sexes in the same individual, and alternately
perform the functions of each. Aristotle also states, that their right
breast is that of a male, the left that of a female.883
Isigonus and Nymphodorus inform us that there are in Africa certain
families of enchanters,884 who, by means of their charms, in the
form, of commendations, can cause cattle to perish, trees to wither,
and infants to die. Isigonus adds, that there are among the Triballi
and the Illyrii, some persons of this description, who also have the
power of fascination with the eyes, and can even kill those on whom
they fix their gaze for any length of time, more especially if their
look denotes anger; the age of puberty is said to be particularly
obnoxious to the malign influence of such persons.885
A still more remarkable circumstance is, the fact that these persons
have two pupils in each eye.886 Apollonides says, that there are
certain females of this description in Scythia, who are known as
Bythiæ, and Phylarchus states that a tribe of the Thibii in Pontus,
and many other persons as well, have a double pupil in one eye, and in
the other the figure of a horse.887 He also remarks, that the bodies
of these persons will not sink in water,888 even though weighed down
by their garments. Damon gives an account of a race of people, not
very much unlike them, the Pharnaces of Æthiopia, whose perspiration
is productive of consumption889 to the body of every person that it
touches. Cicero also, one of our own writers, makes the remark, that
the glances of all women who have a double pupil is noxious.890
To this extent, then, has nature, when she produced in man, in common
with the wild beasts, a taste for human flesh, thought fit to produce
poisons as well in every part of his body, and in the eyes even of
some persons, taking care that there should be no evil influence in
existence, which was not to be found in the human body. Not far from
the city of Rome, in the territory of the Falisci, a few families are
found, who are known by the name of Hirpi. These people perform a
yearly sacrifice to Apollo, on Mount Soracte, on which occasion they
walk over a burning pile of wood, without being scorched even. On this
account, by virtue of a decree of the senate, they are always exempted
from military service, and from all other public duties.891
Some individuals, again, are born with certain parts of the body
endowed with properties of a marvellous nature. Such was the case with
King Pyrrhus, the great toe of whose right foot cured diseases of the
spleen, merely by touching the patient.892 We are also informed,
that this toe could not be reduced to ashes together with the other
portions of his body; upon which it was placed in a coffer, and
preserved in a temple.
India, and the region of Æthiopia more especially, abounds in
wonders.893 In India the largest of animals are produced; their
dogs,894 for example, are much bigger than those of any other
country.895 The trees, too, are said to be of such vast height,
that it is impossible to send an arrow over them. This is the result
of the singular fertility of the soil, the equable temperature of the
atmosphere, and the abundance of water; which, if we are to believe
what is said, are such, that a single fig-tree896 is capable of
affording shelter to a whole troop of horse. The reeds here are also of
such enormous length, that each portion of them, between the joints,
forms a tube, of which a boat is made that is capable of holding three
men.897 It is a well-known fact, that many of the people here are
more than five cubits in height.898 These people never expectorate,
are subject to no pains, either in the head, the teeth, or the eyes,
and rarely in any other parts of the body; so well is the heat of the
sun calculated to strengthen the constitution. Their philosophers,
who are called Gymnosophists, remain in one posture, with their eyes
immovably fixed upon the sun, from its rising to its setting, and,
during the whole of the day, they are accustomed to stand in the
burning sands on one foot, first one and then the other.899 According
to the account of Megasthenes, dwelling upon a mountain called Nulo,
there is a race of men who have their feet turned backwards,900 with
eight toes on each foot.901
On many of the mountains again, there is a tribe of men who have the
heads of dogs,902 and clothe themselves with the skins of wild
beasts. Instead of speaking, they bark; and, furnished with claws,
they live by hunting and catching birds. According to the story, as
given by Ctesias, the number of these people is more than a hundred
and twenty thousand: and the same author tells us, that there is a
certain race in India, of which the females are pregnant once only in
the course of their lives, and that the hair of the children becomes
white the instant they are born. He speaks also of another race of men,
who are known as Monocoli,903 who have only one leg, but are able
to leap with surprising agility.904 The same people are also called
Sciapodæ,905 because they are in the habit of lying on their backs,
during the time of the extreme heat, and protect themselves from the
sun by the shade of their feet. These people, he says, dwell not very
far from the Troglodytæ;906 to the west of whom again there is a
tribe who are without necks, and have eyes in their shoulders.907
Among the mountainous districts of the eastern parts of India, in what
is called the country of the Catharcludi, we find the Satyr,908 an
animal of extraordinary swiftness. These go sometimes on four feet,
and sometimes walk erect; they have also the features of a human
being. On account of their swiftness, these creatures are never to
be caught, except when they are either aged or sickly. Tauron gives
the name of Choromandæ to a nation which dwell in the woods and have
no proper voice. These people screech in a frightful manner; their
bodies are covered with hair, their eyes are of a sea-green colour,
and their teeth like those of the dog.909 Eudoxus tells us, that
in the southern parts of India, the men have feet a cubit in length;
while those of the women are so remarkably small, that they are called
Struthopodes.910
Megasthenes places among the Nomades911 of India, a people who are
called Scyritæ. These have merely holes in their faces instead of
nostrils, and flexible feet, like the body of the serpent. At the very
extremity of India, on the eastern side, near the source of the river
Ganges, there is the nation of the Astomi, a people who have no mouths;
their bodies are rough and hairy, and they cover themselves with a
down912 plucked from the leaves of trees. These people subsist only
by breathing and by the odours which they inhale through the nostrils.
They support themselves upon neither meat nor drink; when they go upon
a long journey they only carry with them various odoriferous roots and
flowers, and wild apples,913 that they may not be without something
to smell at. But an odour, which is a little more powerful than usual,
easily destroys them.914
Beyond these people, and at the very extremity of the mountains, the
Trispithami915 and the Pygmies are said to exist; two races which
are but three spans in height, that is to say, twenty-seven inches
only. They enjoy a salubrious atmosphere, and a perpetual spring, being
sheltered by the mountains from the northern blasts; it is these people
that Homer916 has mentioned as being waged war upon by cranes. It
is said, that they are in the habit of going down every spring to the
sea-shore, in a large body, seated on the backs of rams and goats,
and armed with arrows, and there destroy the eggs and the young of
those birds; that this expedition occupies them for the space of three
months, and that otherwise it would be impossible for them to withstand
the increasing multitudes of the cranes. Their cabins, it is said, are
built of mud, mixed with feathers and egg-shells. Aristotle, indeed,
says, that they dwell in caves; but, in all other respects, he gives
the same details as other writers.917
Isigonus informs us, that the Cyrni, a people of India, live to their
four hundredth year; and he is of opinion that the same is the case
also with the Æthiopian Macrobii,918 the Seræ, and the inhabitants
of Mount Athos.919 In the case of these last, it is supposed to
be owing to the flesh of vipers, which they use as food;920 in
consequence of which, they are free also from all noxious animals, both
in their hair and their garments.
According to Onesicritus, in those parts of India where there is
no shadow,921 the bodies of men attain a height of five cubits
and two palms,922 and their life is prolonged to one hundred and
thirty years; they die without any symptoms of old age, and just as
if they were in the middle period of life. Crates of Pergamus calls
the Indians, whose age exceeds one hundred years, by the name of
Gymnetæ;923 but not a few authors style them Macrobii. Ctesias
mentions a tribe of them, known by the name of Pandore, whose locality
is in the valleys, and who live to their two hundredth year; their
hair is white in youth, and becomes black in old age.924 On the
other hand, there are some people joining up to the country of the
Macrobii, who never live beyond their fortieth year, and their females
have children once only during their lives. This circumstance is
also mentioned by Agatharchides, who states, in addition, that they
live925 on locusts,926 and are very swift of foot. Clitarchus and
Megasthenes give these people the name of Mandi, and enumerate as many
as three hundred villages which belong to them. Their women are capable
of bearing children in the seventh year of their age, and become old at
forty.927
Artemidorus states that in the island of Taprobane,928 life is
prolonged to an extreme length, while, at the same time, the body is
exempt from weakness. According to Durisis, some of the Indians have
connection with beasts, and from this union a mixture of half man, half
beast, is produced.929 Among the Calingæ, a nation also of India,
the women conceive at five years of age, and do not live beyond their
eighth year.930 In other places again, there are men born with long
hairy tails,931 and of remarkable swiftness of foot; while there are
others that have ears so large as to cover the whole body.932
The Oritæ are divided from the Indians by the river Arabis;933 they
are acquainted with no food whatever except fish, which they are in
the habit of tearing to pieces with their nails, and drying in the
sun.934 Crates of Pergamus states, that the Troglodytæ, who dwell
beyond Æthiopia, are able to outrun the horse; and that a tribe of the
Æthiopians, who are known as the Syrbotæ, exceed eight cubits in height.
There is a tribe of Æthiopian Nomades dwelling on the banks of the
river Astragus, towards the north, and about twenty days’ journey from
the ocean. These people are called Menismini; they live on the milk of
the animal which we call cynocephalus,935 and rear large flocks of
these creatures, taking care to kill the males, except such as they may
preserve for the purpose of breeding. In the deserts of Africa, men are
frequently seen to all appearance, and then vanish in an instant.936
Nature, in her ingenuity, has created all these marvels in the human
race, with others of a similar nature, as so many amusements to
herself, though they appear miraculous to us. But who is there that
can enumerate all the things that she brings to pass each day, I may
almost say each hour? As a striking evidence of her power, let it
be sufficient for me to have cited whole nations in the list of her
prodigies.
Let us now proceed to mention some other particulars connected with
Man, the truth of which is universally admitted.
(3.) That three children are sometimes produced at one birth, is
a well-known fact; the case, for instance, of the Horatii and the
Curiatii. Where a greater number of children than this is produced
at one birth, it is looked upon as portentous, except, indeed, in
Egypt, where the water of the river Nile, which is used for drink, is
a promoter of fecundity.937 Very recently, towards the close of the
reign of the Emperor Augustus, now deified, a certain woman of the
lower orders, at Ostia, whose name was Fausta, brought into the world,
at one birth, two male children and two females, a presage, no doubt,
of the famine which shortly after took place. We find it stated, also,
that in Peloponnesus, a woman was delivered of five938 children at
a birth four successive times, and that the greater part of all these
children survived. Trogus informs us, that in Egypt,939 as many as
seven children are occasionally produced at one birth.940
Individuals are occasionally born, who belong to both sexes; such
persons we call by the name of hermaphrodites;941 they were formerly
called Androgyni, and were looked upon as monsters,942 but at the
present day they are employed for sensual purposes.943
Pompeius Magnus, among the decorations of his theatre,944 erected
certain statues of remarkable persons, which had been executed with the
greatest care by artists of the very highest reputation. Among others,
we here read an inscription to the following effect: “Eutychis,945 of
Tralles,946 was borne to the funeral pile by twenty of her children,
having had thirty in all.”947 Also, Alcippe948 was delivered of
an elephant949—but then that must be looked upon as a prodigy; as
in the case, too, where, at the commencement of the Marsian war,950
a female slave was delivered of a serpent.951 Among these monstrous
births, also, there are beings produced which unite in one body the
forms of several creatures. For instance, Claudius Cæsar informs us, in
his writings, that a Hippocentaur was born in Thessaly, but died on the
same day: and indeed I have seen one myself, which in the reign of that
emperor was brought to him from Egypt, preserved in honey.952 We have
a case, also, of a child at Saguntum, which returned immediately into
its mother’s womb, the same year in which that place was destroyed by
Hannibal.
(4.) The change of females into males is undoubtedly no fable. We find
it stated in the Annals, that, in the consulship of P. Licinius Crassus
and C. Cassius Longinus,953 a girl, who was living at Casinum954
with her parents, was changed into a boy; and that, by the command
of the Aruspices, he was conveyed away to a desert island. Licinius
Mucianus informs us, that he once saw at Argos a person whose name was
then Arescon, though he had been formerly called Arescusa: that this
person had been married to a man, but that, shortly after, a beard and
marks of virility made their appearance, upon which he took to himself
a wife. He had also seen a boy at Smyrna,955 to whom the very same
thing had happened. I myself saw in Africa one L. Cossicius, a citizen
of Thysdris,956 who had been changed into a man the very day on which
he was married to a husband.957 When women are delivered of twins, it
rarely happens but that either the mother herself, or one, at least,
of the twins perishes.958 If, however, the twins should happen to be
of different sexes, it is less probable that both of them will survive.
Female children are matured more quickly than males,959 and become
old sooner. Of the two, male children most frequently are known to
move in the womb;960 they mostly lie on the right side of the body,
females on the left.961
In other animals the period of gestation and of birth is fixed and
definite, while man, on the other hand, is born at all seasons of the
year,962 and without any certain period of gestation;963 for one
child is born at the seventh month, another at the eighth, and so on,
even to the beginning of the tenth and eleventh. Those children which
are born before the seventh month are never known to survive;964
unless, indeed, they happen to have been conceived the day before or
the day after the full moon, or at the change of the moon. In Egypt
it is not an uncommon thing for children to be born at the eighth
month; and in Italy, too, children that are born at this period live
just as long as others, notwithstanding the opinions of the ancients
to the contrary. There are great variations in this respect, which
occur in numerous ways. Vestilia, for instance, who was the wife of
C. Herdicius, and was afterwards married, first, to Pomponius,965
and then to Orfitus, very eminent citizens, after having brought forth
four children, always at the seventh month, had Suillius Rufus at the
eleventh month, and then Corbulo at the seventh, both of whom became
consuls; after which, at the eighth month, she had Cæsonia, who became
the wife of the Emperor Caius.966 As for children who are born at the
eighth month, the greatest difficulty with them is to get them over the
first forty days.967 Pregnant women, on the other hand, are in the
greatest danger during the fourth and the eighth month, and abortions
during these periods are fatal. Masurius informs us, that L. Papirius,
the prætor, on one occasion, when the next but one in succession
was urging his suit at law, decided against him, in favour of the
heir,968 although his mother declared that her period of gestation
had lasted thirteen months—upon the ground that it did not appear that
there was any fixed and definite period of gestation.969
On the tenth day after conception, pains are felt in the head, vertigo,
and dimness of the sight; these signs, together with loathing of food
and rising of the stomach, indicate the formation of the future human
being. If it is a male that is conceived, the colour of the pregnant
woman is more healthy,971 and the birth less painful: the child
moves in the womb upon the fortieth day. In the conception of a child
of the other sex, all the symptoms are totally different: the mother
experiences an almost insupportable weight, there is a slight swelling
of the legs and the groin, and the first movement of the child is not
felt until the ninetieth day. But, whatever the sex of the child, the
mother is sensible of the greatest languor at the time when the hair
of the fœtus first begins to grow, and at the full moon; at which
latter time it is that children newly born are exposed to the greatest
danger. In addition to this, the mode of walking, and indeed everything
that can be mentioned, is of consequence in the case of a woman who
is pregnant. Thus, for instance, women who have used too much salted
meat will bring forth children without nails: parturition, too, is more
difficult, if they do not hold their breath. It is fatal, too, to yawn
during labour;972 and abortion ensues, if the female should happen to
sneeze just after the sexual congress.
(7.) It is a subject for pity, and even for a feeling of shame, when
one reflects that the origin of the most vain of all animated beings
is thus frail: so much so, indeed, that very often the smell even
of a lamp just extinguished is a cause of abortion.973 From such
beginnings as these springs the tyrant, from such the murderous
dispositions of men. Thou man, who placest thy confidence in the
strength of thy body, thou, who dost embrace the gifts of Fortune, and
look upon thyself, not only as her fosterling, but even as her own born
child, thou, whose mind is ever thirsting for blood,974 thou who,
puffed up with some success or other, dost think thyself a god—by how
trifling a thing might thy life have been cut short! Even this very
day, something still less even may have the same effect, the puncture,
for instance, of the tiny sting of the serpent; or even, as befell the
poet Anacreon,975 the swallowing of the stone of a raisin, or of a
single hair in a draught of milk, by which the prætor and senator,
Fabius, was choked, and so met his death. He only, in fact, will be
able to form a just estimate of the value of life, who will always bear
in mind the extreme frailty of its tenure.
It is contrary to nature for children to come into the world with
the feet first, for which reason such children are called Agrippæ,
meaning that they are born with difficulty.976 In this manner, M.
Agrippa977 is said to have been born; the only instance, almost, of
good fortune, out of the number of all those who have come into the
world under these circumstances. And yet, even he may be considered
to have paid the penalty of the unfavourable omen produced by the
unnatural mode of his birth, in the unfortunate weakness of his legs,
the misfortunes of his youth, a life spent in the very midst of arms
and slaughter, and ever exposed to the approaches of death; in his
children, too, who have all proved a very curse to the earth, and more
especially, the two Agrippinas, who were the mothers respectively of
Caius and of Domitius Nero,978 so many firebrands hurled among the
human race. In addition to all this, we may add the shortness of his
life, he being cut off in his fifty-first year, the distress which he
experienced from the adulteries of his wife,979 and the grievous
tyranny to which he was subjected by his father-in-law. Agrippina, too,
the mother of Nero, who was lately Emperor, and who proved himself,
throughout the whole of his reign, the enemy of the human race, has
left it recorded in writing, that he was born with his feet first. It
is in the due order of nature that man should enter the world with the
head first, and be carried to the tomb in a contrary fashion.
Those children, whose birth has cost the mother her life, are evidently
born under more favourable auspices; for such was the case with the
first Scipio Africanus; the first, too, of the Cæsars was so named,
from his having been removed by an incision in his mother’s womb. For
a similar reason, too, the Cæsones were called by that name.980
Manilius, also, who entered Carthage with his army, was born in a
similar manner.
A child used to be called Vopiscus,981 who, when twins had been
conceived, had been retained in the womb and born alive, the other
having perished by abortion. There are, too, some very remarkable
instances of this kind, although they are singularly rare and uncommon.
Few animals, except the female of the human species, receive the
male when pregnant. In only one or two species, and no more, does
superfœtation ever take place.982 Cases are to be found stated in
the journals of physicians, and of others who have paid particular
attention to the subject, in which twelve embryos983 have been
removed at a single abortion. When, however, but a very short time has
intervened between two conceptions, the embryos both of them proceed
to maturity; as was seen to be the case with Hercules and his brother
Iphicles.984 This was the case also with the woman who brought
forth two children at a birth, one of whom bore a resemblance to her
husband, and the other to her paramour. So too, with a female slave in
Proconnesus,985 who was delivered of two children at one birth, one
of whom bore a strong resemblance to her master, and the other to her
master’s steward, with both of whom she had had connection on the same
day; with another woman who was delivered of two children at a birth,
the one after the usual period of gestation, the other an embryo only
five months old: and again, with another female, who, having been
delivered of one child at the end of seven months, in due course, two
months afterwards, brought forth twins.986
It is universally known that well-formed parents often produce
defective children; and on the other hand, defective parents children
who are well formed, or else imperfect in the same part of the body
as the parents. It is a well-known fact also, that marks, moles, and
even scars, are reproduced in members of the same family in successive
generations. The mark which the Daci make on their arms for the
purpose of denoting their origin, is known to last even to the fourth
generation.987
(12.) We have heard it stated that three members of the family of the
Lepidi have been born, though not in an uninterrupted succession, with
one of the eyes covered with a membrane.988 We observe, too, that
some children strongly resemble their grandfather, and that of twins
one child is like the father, while the other resembles the mother;
and have known cases where a child that was born a year after another,
resembled him as exactly as though they had been twins. Some women
have children like themselves, some like their husband, while others
again bear children who resemble neither the one nor the other. In
some cases the female children resemble the father, and the males the
mother. The case of Nicæus, the celebrated wrestler of Byzantium, is
a well-known and undoubted instance. His mother was the produce of
an act of adultery, committed with a male of Æthiopia; and although
she herself differed in no way from the ordinary complexion of other
females, he was born with all the swarthy complexion of his Æthiopian
grandfather.989
These strong features of resemblance proceed, no doubt, from the
imagination of the parents, over which we may reasonably believe
that many casual circumstances have a very powerful influence; such,
for instance, as the action of the eyes, the ears, or the memory,
or impressions received at the moment of conception. A thought990
even, momentarily passing through the mind of either of the parents,
may be supposed to produce a resemblance to one of them separately,
or else to the two combined. Hence it is that the varieties are much
more numerous in the appearance of man than in that of other animals;
seeing that, in the former, the rapidity of the ideas, the quickness
of the perception, and the varied powers of the intellect, tend to
impress upon the features peculiar and diversified marks; while in
the case of the other animals, the mind is immovable, and just the
same in each and all individuals of the same species.991 A man named
Artemon, one of the common people,992 bore so strong a resemblance
to Antiochus, the king of Syria, that his queen Laodice, after her
husband Antiochus was slain, acted the farce of getting this man993
to recommend her as the successor to the crown. Vibius, a member
of the plebeian order,994 and Publicius as well, a freedman who
had formerly been a slave, so strongly resembled Pompeius Magnus in
appearance as to be scarcely distinguishable from him; they both had
that ingenuous countenance995 of his, and that fine forehead,996
which so strongly bespoke his noble descent. It was a similar degree of
resemblance to this, that caused the surname of his cook, Menogenes, to
be given to the father of Pompeius Magnus, he having already obtained
that of Strabo, on account of the cast in his eye,997 a defect
which he had contracted through imitating a similar one in his slave.
Scipio, too, had the name of Serapion given him, after the vile slave
of a pig-jobber: and after him, another Scipio of the same family was
surnamed Salvitto, after a mime998 of that name. In the same way,
too, Spinther and Pamphilus, who were respectively actors of only
second and third rate parts, gave their names to Lentulus and Metellus,
who were at that time colleagues in the consulship; so that, by a very
curious but disagreeable coincidence, the likenesses of the two consuls
were to be seen at the same moment on the stage.
On the other hand again, L. Plancus, the orator, bestowed his surname
on the actor Rubrius: the player, Burbuleius, again, gave his name
to the elder Curio, and the player, Menogenes, to Messala, the
censor.999 There was a certain fisherman, too, a native of Sicily,
who bore a strong resemblance to the proconsul, Sura, not only in
his features, but in the mode even of opening his mouth, and the
spasmodic contraction of his tongue, and his hurried and indistinct
utterance when speaking. Cassius Severus,1000 the celebrated orator,
had it thrown in his teeth how strongly he resembled Armentarius, the
gladiator.1001 Toranius, a slave-dealer, sold to Antony, while he was
one of the Triumvirs, two boys of remarkable beauty, as being twins,
so strong was their resemblance; whereas, in reality, one of them was
born in Asia, and the other beyond the Alps. The fraud, however, having
been soon afterwards discovered through the difference in the language
of the youths, Antony, who was greatly exasperated, violently upbraided
the dealer, and, among other things, complained that he had fixed the
price at so high a sum as two hundred thousand sesterces.1002 The
crafty slave-merchant, however, made answer that that was the very
reason for his having set so high a price upon them; for, as he said,
there would have been nothing particularly striking in the resemblance
of the boys, if they had been born of the same mother, whereas,
children found to be so exactly like each other, though natives of
different countries, ought to be deemed above all price; an answer
which produced such a reasonable feeling of surprise and admiration
in the mind of the proscriber,1003 that he who was but just before
frantic under the injury he had received, was led to set a higher value
on no part whatever of all the property in his possession.
There exists a kind of peculiar antipathy between the bodies of
certain persons, which, though barren with respect to each other, are
not so when united to others;1004 such, for instance, was the case
with Augustus and Livia.1005 Certain individuals, again, both men and
women, produce only females, others males; and, still more frequently,
children of the two sexes alternately; the mother of the Gracchi,
for instance, who had twelve children, and Agrippina, the mother of
Germanicus, who had nine. Some women, again, are barren in their youth,
while to others it is given to bring forth once only during their
lives. Some women never go to their full time, or if, by dint of great
care and the aid of medicine, they do give birth to a living child,
it is mostly a girl. Among other instances of rare occurrence, is the
case of Augustus, now deified, who, in the year in which he departed
this life, witnessed the birth of M. Silanus,1006 the grandson of
his grand-daughter: having obtained the government of Asia, after his
consulship, he was poisoned by Nero, on his accession to the throne.
Q. Metellus Macedonicus,1007 leaving six children, left eleven
grandsons also, with daughters-in-law and sons-in-law,1008
twenty-seven individuals in all, who addressed him by the name and
title of father. In the records of the times of the Emperor Augustus,
now deified, we find it stated that, in his twelfth consulship,
Lucius Sylla being his colleague, on the third day before the ides
of April,1009 C. Crispinus Hilarus, a man of a respectable family
of the plebeian order, living at Fæesulæ,1010 came to the Capitol,
to offer sacrifice, attended by eight children (of whom two were
daughters), twenty-eight grandsons, nineteen great-grandsons, and eight
granddaughters, who all followed him in a lengthened train.
Women cease to bear children at their fiftieth year, and, with the
greater part of them, the monthly discharge ceases at the age of forty.
But with respect to the male sex, it is a well-known fact, that King
Masinissa, when he was past his eighty-sixth year, had a son born to
him, whom he named Metimanus,1011 and that Cato the Censor, after
he had completed his eightieth year, had a son by the daughter of his
client, Salonius: a circumstance from which, while the descendants of
his other sons were surnamed Liciniani, those of this son were called
Saloniani, of whom Cato of Utica was one.1012 It is equally well
known, too, that L. Volusius Saturninus,1013 who lately died while
prefect of the city, had a son when he was past his seventy-second
year,1014 by Cornelia, a member of the family of the Scipios,
Volusius Saturninus, who was afterwards consul. Among the lower classes
of the people, we not uncommonly meet with men who become the fathers
of children after the age of seventy-five.
Among the whole range of animated beings, the human female is the
only one that has the monthly discharge,1015 and in whose womb are
found what we term “moles.” These moles consist of a shapeless mass of
flesh, devoid of all life, and capable of resisting either the edge
or the point of the knife; they are movable in the body, and obstruct
the menstrual discharge; sometimes, too, they are productive of fatal
consequences to the woman, in the same manner as a real fœtus; while,
at other times, they remain in the body until old age; in some cases,
again, they are discharged, in consequence of an increased action of
the bowels.1016 Something of a very similar nature is produced in the
body of the male, which is called a “schirrus;”1017 this was the case
with Oppius Capito, a man of prætorian rank.
It would indeed be a difficult matter to find anything which
is productive of more marvellous effects than the menstrual
discharge.1018 On the approach of a woman in this state, must will
become sour, seeds which are touched by her become sterile, grafts
wither away, garden plants are parched up, and the fruit will fall
from the tree beneath which she sits. Her very look, even, will dim
the brightness of mirrors, blunt the edge of steel, and take away the
polish from ivory. A swarm of bees, if looked upon by her, will die
immediately; brass and iron will instantly become rusty, and emit an
offensive odour; while dogs which may have tasted of the matter so
discharged are seized with madness, and their bite is venomous and
incurable.
In addition to this, the bitumen which is found at certain periods
of the year, floating on the lake of Judæa, known as Asphaltites, a
substance which is peculiarly tenacious, and adheres to everything that
it touches, can only be divided into separate pieces by means of a
thread which has been dipped in this virulent matter.1019 It is said
that the ant, even an insect so extremely minute, is sensible of its
presence, and rejects the grains which it has been carrying, and will
not return to them again.1020
This discharge, which is productive of such great and singular effects,
occurs in women every thirty days, and in a greater degree every three
months.1021 In some individuals it occurs oftener than once a month,
and in others, again, it never takes place. Women of this nature,
however, are not capable of bearing children, because it is of this
substance that the infant is formed.1022 The seed of the male, acting
as a sort of leaven, causes it to unite and assume a form, and in due
time it acquires life, and assumes a bodily shape. The consequence is,
that if the flow continues during pregnancy, the child will be weak, or
else will not live; or if it does, it will be full of gross humours,
Nigidius says.
(16.) The same author is also of opinion, that the milk of a woman who
is giving suck will not become impure, if she should happen to become
pregnant again by the same man.1023
Conception is generally said to take place the most readily, either at
the beginning or the end of the menstrual discharge.1024 It is said,
too, that it is a certain sign of fecundity in a woman, when her saliva
becomes impregnated with any medicament which has been rubbed upon her
eye-lids.1025
It is a matter beyond doubt, that in young children the front teeth
are produced at the seventh month, and, nearly always, those in the
upper jaw the first. These are shed in the seventh year, and are then
replaced by others.1026 Some infants are even born with teeth:1027
such was the case with Manius Curius, who, from this circumstance,
received the name of Dentatus; and also with Cn. Papirius Carbo,
both of them distinguished men. When this phenomenon happened in the
case of a female, it was looked upon in the time of the kings as an
omen of some inauspicious event. At the birth of Valeria, under such
circumstances as these, it was the answer of the soothsayers, that
any city to which she might happen to be carried, would be destroyed;
she was sent to Suessa Pometia,1028 at that time a very flourishing
place, but the prediction was ultimately verified by its destruction.
Some female children are born with the sexual organs closed,1029 a
thing of very unfavourable omen; of which Cornelia, the mother of the
Gracchi, is an instance. Some persons are born with a continuous bone
in the mouth, in place of teeth; this was the case with the upper jaw
of the son of Prusias, the king of Bithynia.1030
The teeth are the only parts of the body which resist the action of
fire, and are not consumed along with the rest of it.1031 Still,
however, though they are able thus to resist flame, they become
corroded by a morbid state of the saliva. The teeth are whitened by
certain medicinal agents.1032 They are worn down by use, and fail
in some persons long before any other part of the body. They are
necessary, not only for the mastication of the food, but for many other
purposes as well. It is the office of the front teeth to regulate
the voice and the speech; by a certain arrangement, they receive, as
if in concert, the stroke communicated by the tongue, while by their
structure in such regular order, and their size, they cut short,
moderate, or soften the utterance of the words. When they are lost,
the articulation becomes altogether confused and indistinct.1033
In addition to this, it is generally supposed that we may form
prognostics from the teeth. The number of teeth allotted to all men,
with the exception of the nation of the Turduli,1034 is thirty-two;
those persons who have a greater number, are thought to be destined to
be long-lived. Women have fewer teeth than men.1035 Those females who
happen to have two canine teeth on the right side of the upper jaw,
have promise of being the favourites of fortune, as was the case with
Agrippina,1036 the mother of Domitius Nero: when they are on the left
side, it is just the contrary. It is the custom of most nations not to
burn the bodies of children who die before they have cut their teeth.
We shall have more to say on this subject when we give an account of
the different parts of the body.1037
We find it stated that Zoroaster was the only human being who ever
laughed on the same day on which he was born. We hear, too, that his
brain pulsated so strongly that it repelled the hand when laid upon it,
a presage of his future wisdom.
It is a well-known fact, that, at the age of three years, the body of
each person is half the height that it will ever attain. Taking it all
in all, it is observed that in the human race, the stature is almost
daily becoming less and less, and that sons are rarely taller than
their parents, the fertility of the seed being dried up by the heat
of that conflagration to which the world is fast approaching.1038 A
mountain of the island of Crete having been burst asunder by the action
of an earthquake, a body was found there standing upright, forty-six
cubits in height;1039 by some persons it is supposed to have been
that of Orion;1040 while others again are of opinion that it was that
of Otus.1041 It is generally believed, from what is stated in ancient
records, that the body of Orestes, which was disinterred by command
of an oracle, was seven cubits in height.1042 It is now nearly
one thousand years ago, that that divine poet Homer was unceasingly
complaining, that men were of less stature in his day than they had
formerly been.1043 Our Annals do not inform us what was the height
of Nævius Pollio;1044 but we learn from them that he nearly lost his
life from the rush of the people to see him, and that he was looked
upon as a prodigy. The tallest man that has been seen in our times,
was one Gabbaras1045 by name, who was brought from Arabia by the
Emperor Claudius; his height was nine feet and as many inches.1046
In the reign of Augustus, there were two persons, Posio and Secundilla
by name, who were half a foot taller than him; their bodies have been
preserved as objects of curiosity in the museum of the Sallustian
family.1047
In the reign of the same emperor, there was a man also, remarkable for
his extremely diminutive stature, being only two feet and a palm in
height; his name was Conopas, and he was a great pet with Julia, the
grand-daughter of Augustus. There was a female also, of the same size,
Andromeda by name, a freed-woman of Julia Augusta. We learn from Varro,
that Manius Maximus and M. Tullius, members of our equestrian order,
were only two cubits in height; and I have myself seen them, preserved
in their coffins.1048 It is far from an unknown fact, that children
are occasionally born a foot and a half in height, and sometimes a
little more; such children, however, have finished their span of
existence by the time they are three years old.1049
We find it stated by the historians, that the son of Euthymenes of
Salamis had grown to be three cubits in height, at the age of three
years; that he was slow of gait and dull of comprehension; that at
that age he had attained puberty even, and his voice had become
strong, like that of a man. We hear, also, that he died suddenly of
convulsions of the limbs, at the completion of his third year.1050 I
myself, not very long ago, was witness to exactly similar appearances,
with the exception of the state of puberty, in a son of Cornelius
Tacitus, a member of the equestrian order, and procurator1051 of
Belgic Gaul.1052 The Greeks call such children as these,
Ἐκτραπέλοι; we have no name for them in Latin.
(17.) It has been observed, that the height of a man from the crown of
the head to the sole of the foot, is equal to the distance between the
tips of the middle fingers of the two hands when extended in a straight
line; the right side of the body, too, is generally stronger than the
left; though in some, the strength of the two sides is equal; while in
others again, the left side is the strongest. This, however, is never
found to be the case in women.1053
Males are heavier than females, and the bodies of all animals are
heavier when they are dead than when alive; they also weigh more when
asleep than when awake. The dead bodies of men float upon the back,
those of women with the face downwards; as if, even after death,
nature were desirous of sparing their modesty.1054
(18.) We find it stated, that there are some men whose bones are solid,
and devoid of marrow,1055 and that one mark of such persons is the
fact that they are never thirsty, and emit no perspiration. At the
same time, we know that by the exercise of a resolute determination,
any one may resist the feeling of thirst; a fact which was especially
exemplified in the case of Julius Viator, a Roman of equestrian rank,
but by birth one of the Vocontii, a nation on terms of alliance with
us. Having, in his youth, been attacked by dropsy, and forbidden the
use of liquids by his physicians,1056 use with him became a second
nature, and so, in his old age, he never took any drink at all. Other
persons also, have, by the exercise of a strong determination, laid
similar restraints upon themselves.
(19.) It is said that Crassus, the grandfather of Crassus, who
was slain by the Parthians, was never known to laugh; from which
circumstance he obtained the name of Agelastus.1057 There are other
persons again, who have never been seen to weep. Socrates, who was so
famous for his wisdom, always appeared with the same countenance, and
was never known to appear either more gay or more sad than ordinary.
This even tenor of the mind, however, sometimes degenerates into a
sort of harshness, and a rigorous and inflexible sternness of nature,
entirely effacing all the human affections. The Greeks, among whom
there have been many persons of this description, are in the habit of
calling them Ἀπαθεῖς.1058 A very remarkable thing, too, is
the fact, that among these persons are to be found some of the greatest
masters of philosophy. Diogenes the Cynic, for instance, Pyrrho,
Heraclitus, and Timon, which last allowed himself to be so entirely
carried away by this spirit, as to become a hater of all mankind. Less
important peculiarities of nature, again, are to be observed in many
persons; Antonia,1059 for instance, the wife of Drusus, was never
known to expectorate; and Pomponius, the poet, a man of consular rank,
was never troubled with eructation. Those rare instances of men,1060
whose bones are naturally solid and without marrow, are known to us as
men “of horn.”1061
Varro, speaking of persons remarkable for their strength, gives us an
account of Tributanus, a celebrated gladiator, and skilled in the use
of the Samnite1062 arms;1063 he was a man of meagre person, but
possessed of extraordinary strength. Varro makes mention of his son
also, who served in the army of Pompeius Magnus. He says, that in all
parts of his body, even in the arms and hands, there was a network of
sinews,1064 extending across and across. The latter of these men,
having been challenged by an enemy, with a single finger of the right
hand, and that unarmed,1065 vanquished him, and then seized and
dragged him to the camp. Vinnius Valens, who served as a centurion in
the prætorian guard of Augustus, was in the habit of holding up waggons
laden with casks, until they were emptied; and of stopping a carriage
with one hand, and holding it back, against all the efforts of the
horses to drag it forward. He performed other wonderful feats also, an
account of which may still be seen inscribed on his monument. Varro,
also, gives the following statement: “Fusius, who used to be called the
‘bumpkin1066 Hercules,’ was in the habit of carrying his own mule;
while Salvius was able to mount a ladder, with a weight of two hundred
pounds attached to his feet, the same to his hands, and two hundred
pounds on each shoulder.” I myself once saw,—a most marvellous display
of strength,—a man of the name of Athanatus walk across the stage,
wearing a leaden breast-plate of five hundred pounds weight, while shod
with buskins of the same weight. When Milo, the wrestler, had once
taken his stand, there was not a person who could move him from his
position; and when he grasped an apple in his hand, no one could so
much as open one of his fingers.
It was considered a very great thing for Philippides to run one
thousand one hundred and sixty stadia, the distance between Athens
and Lacedæmon, in two days, until Amystis, the Lacedæmonian courier,
and Philonides,1067 the courier of Alexander the Great, ran from
Sicyon to Elis in one day, a distance of thirteen hundred and five
stadia.1068 In our own times, too, we are fully aware that there
are men in the Circus, who are able to keep on running for a distance
of one hundred and sixty miles; and that lately, in the consulship
of Fonteius and Vipstanus,1069 there was a child eight years of
age, who, between morning and evening, ran a distance of seventy-five
miles.1070 We become all the more sensible of these wonderful
instances of swiftness, upon reflecting that Tiberius Nero, when he
made all possible haste to reach his brother Drusus, who was then sick
in Germany, reached him in three stages, travelling day and night on
the road; the distance of each stage was two hundred miles.1071
Instances of acuteness of sight are to be found stated, which, indeed,
exceed all belief. Cicero informs us,1072 that the Iliad of Homer
was written on a piece of parchment so small as to be enclosed in a
nut-shell. He makes mention also of a man who could distinguish objects
at a distance of one hundred and thirty-five miles.1073 M. Varro
says, that the name of this man was Strabo; and that, during the Punic
war, from Lilybæum, the promontory of Sicily, he was in the habit
of seeing the fleet come out of the harbour of Carthage, and could
even count the number of the vessels.1074 Callicrates1075 used
to carve ants and other small animals in ivory, so minute in size,
that other persons were unable to distinguish their individual parts.
Myrmecides1076 also was famous in the same line;1077 this man made,
of similar material, a chariot drawn by four horses, which a fly could
cover with its wings; as well as a ship which might be covered by the
wings of a tiny bee.1078
We have one instance on record of remarkable acuteness of hearing; the
noise of the battle, on the occasion when Sybaris1079 was destroyed,
was heard, the day on which it took place, at Olympia.1080 But, as to
the victory over the Cimbri,1081 and that over Perseus, the news of
which was conveyed to Rome by the Castors,1082 they are to be looked
upon in the light of visions and presages proceeding immediately from
the gods.
Of patience in enduring pain, that being too frequently the lot of our
calamitous fate, we have innumerable instances related. One of the most
remarkable instances among the female sex is that of the courtesan
Leæna, who, although put to the torture, refused to betray the
tyrant-slayers, Harmodius and Aristogiton.1083 Among those of men,
we have that of Anaxarchus, who, when put to the torture for a similar
reason, bit off his tongue and spit it into the face of the tyrant,
thus destroying the only hope1084 of his making any betrayal.
It would be far from easy to pronounce what person has been the most
remarkable for the excellence of his memory, that blessing so essential
for the enjoyment of life, there having been so many who have been
celebrated for it. King Cyrus knew all the soldiers of his army by
name:1085 L. Scipio the names of all the Roman people. Cineas,
the ambassador of king Pyrrhus, knew by name all the members of the
senate and the equestrian order, the day after his arrival at Rome.
Mithridates,1086 who was king of twenty-two nations, administered
their laws in as many languages, and could harangue each of them,
without employing an interpreter. There was in Greece a man named
Charmidas, who, when a person asked him for any book in a library,
could repeat it by heart, just as though he were reading. Memory, in
fine, has been made an art; which was first invented by the lyric
poet, Simonides,1087 and perfected by Metrodorus of Scepsis, so
as to enable persons to repeat word for word exactly what they have
heard.1088 Nothing whatever, in man, is of so frail a nature as
the memory; for it is affected by disease, by injuries, and even by
fright; being sometimes partially lost, and at other times entirely
so. A man, who received a blow from a stone, forgot the names of the
letters only;1089 while, on the other hand, another person, who fell
from a very high roof, could not so much as recollect his mother,
or his relations and neighbours. Another person, in consequence of
some disease, forgot his own servants even; and Messala Corvinus, the
orator, lost all recollection of his own name. And so it is, that very
often the memory appears to attempt, as it were, to make its escape
from us, even while the body is at rest and in perfect health. When
sleep, too, comes over us, it is cut off altogether; so much so, that
the mind, in its vacancy, is at a loss to know where we are.1090
The most remarkable instance, I think, of vigour of mind in any man
ever born, was that of Cæsar, the Dictator. I am not at present
alluding to his valour and courage, nor yet his exalted genius, which
was capable of embracing everything under the face of heaven, but I am
speaking of that innate vigour of mind, which was so peculiar to him,
and that promptness which seemed to act like a flash of lightning. We
find it stated that he was able to write or read, and, at the same
time, to dictate and listen. He could dictate to his secretaries
four letters at once, and those on the most important business; and,
indeed, if he was busy about nothing else, as many as seven. He
fought as many as fifty pitched battles, being the only commander who
exceeded M. Marcellus,1091 in this respect, he having fought only
thirty-nine.1092 In addition, too, to the victories gained by him in
the civil wars, one million one hundred and ninety-two thousand men
were slain by him in his battles. For my own part, however, I am not
going to set it down as a subject for high renown, what was really an
outrage committed upon mankind, even though he may have been acting
under the strong influence of necessity; and, indeed, he himself
confesses as much, in his omission to state the number of persons who
perished by the sword in the civil wars.
With much more justice we may award credit to Pompeius Magnus, for
having taken from the pirates1093 no less than eight hundred and
forty-six vessels: though at the same time, over and above the great
qualities previously mentioned, we must with equal justice give Cæsar
the peculiar credit of a remarkable
degree of clemency, a quality,
in the exercise of which, even to repentance, he excelled all other
individuals whatsoever. The same person has left us one instance of
magnanimity, to which there is nothing that can be at all compared.
While one, who was an admirer of luxury, might perhaps on this occasion
have enumerated the spectacles which he exhibited, the treasures which
he lavished away, and the magnificence of his public works, I maintain
that it was the great proof, and an incomparable one, of an elevated
mind, for him to have burnt with the most scrupulous carefulness the
papers of Pompeius, which were taken in his desk at the battle of
Pharsalia, and those of Scipio, taken at Thapsus, without so much as
reading them.1094
But now, as it belongs fully as much to the glorious renown of the
Roman Empire, as to the victorious career of a single individual, I
shall proceed on this occasion to make mention of all the triumphs
and titles of Pompeius Magnus: the splendour of his exploits having
equalled not only that of those of Alexander the Great, but even
of Hercules, and perhaps of Father Liber1095 even. After having
recovered Sicily, where he first commenced his career as a partisan of
Sylla, but in behalf of the republic, after having conquered the whole
of Africa, and reduced it to subjection, and after having received for
his share of the spoil the title of “Great,”1096 he was decreed the
honours of a triumph; and he, though only of equestrian rank,1097
a thing that had never occurred before, re-entered the city in the
triumphal chariot: immediately after which, he hastened to the west,
where he left it inscribed on the trophy which he raised upon the
Pyrenees, that he had, by his victories, reduced to subjection eight
hundred and seventy-six cities, from the Alps to the borders of Farther
Spain; at the same time he most magnanimously said not a word about
Sertorius.1098 After having put an end to the civil war, which indeed
was the primary cause of all the foreign ones, he, though still of only
equestrian rank, again entered Rome in the triumphal chariot, having
proved himself a general thus often before having been a soldier.1099
After this, he was dispatched to the shores of all the various seas,
and then to the East, whence he brought back to his country the
following titles of honour, resembling therein those who conquer at the
sacred games—for, be it remembered, it is not they that are crowned,
but their respective countries.1100 These honours then did he award
to the City, in the temple of Minerva,1101 which he consecrated from
the spoils that he had gained: “Cneius Pompeius Magnus, Imperator,
having brought to an end a war of thirty years’ duration, and having
defeated, routed, put to the sword, or received the submission of,
twelve millions two hundred and seventy-eight thousand men, having
sunk or captured eight hundred and forty-six vessels, having received
as allies one thousand five hundred and thirty-eight cities and
fortresses, and having conquered all the country from the Mæotis to the
Red Sea, dedicates this shrine as a votive offering due to Minerva.”
Such, in few words, is the sum of his exploits in the East. The
following are the introductory words descriptive of the triumph which
he obtained, the third day before the calends1102 of October,1103
in the consulship of M. Piso and M. Messala;1104 “After having
delivered the sea-coast from the pirates, and restored the seas to
the people of Rome, he enjoyed a triumph over Asia, Pontus, Armenia,
Paphlagonia, Cappadocia, Cilicia, Syria, the Scythians, Judæa, the
Albanians, Iberia, the island of Crete, the Basterni, and, in addition
to all these, the kings Mithridates and Tigranes.”
The most glorious, however, of all glories, resulting from these
exploits, was, as he himself says, in the speech which he made in
public relative to his previous career, that Asia, which he received as
the boundary of the empire, he left its centre.1105 If any one should
wish, on the other hand, in a similar manner, to pass in review the
exploits of Cæsar, who has shown himself greater still than Pompeius,
why then he must enumerate all the countries in the world, a task, I
may say, without an end.
Many other men have excelled in different kinds of virtues. Cato,
however, who was the first of the Porcian family,1106 is generally
thought to have been an example of the three greatest of human
endowments, for he was the most talented orator, the most talented
general, and the most talented politician;1107 all which merits,
if they were not perceptible before him, still shone forth, more
refulgently even, in my opinion, in Scipio Æmilianus, who besides was
exempted from that hatred on the part of many others under which Cato
laboured:1108 in consequence of which it was, what must be owned to
be a peculiarity in Cato’s career, that he had to plead his own cause
no less than four and forty times;1109 and yet, though no person was
so frequently accused, he was always acquitted.
A minute enquiry by whom the greatest valour has ever been exhibited,
would lead to an endless discussion, more especially if all the fables
of the poets are to be taken for granted. Q. Ennius admired T. Cæcilius
Denter1110 and his brother to such a degree, that on their account
he added a sixteenth book to his Annals. L. Siccius Dentatus, who was
tribune of the people in the consulship of Spurius Tarpeius and A.
Aterius,1111 not long after the expulsion of the kings, has also very
numerous testimonies in his favour. This hero fought one hundred and
twenty battles, was eight times victorious in single combat, and was
graced with forty-five wounds in the front of the body, without one on
the back. The same man also carried off thirty-four spoils,1112 was
eighteen times presented with the victor’s spear,1113 and received
twenty-five pendants,1114 eighty-three torcs,1115 one hundred
and sixty bracelets,1116 twenty-six crowns, (of which fourteen were
civic, eight golden, three mural, and one obsidional), a fisc1117 of
money, ten prisoners, and twenty oxen altogether.1118 He followed
in the triumphal processions of nine generals, who mainly owed their
victories to his exertions; besides all which, a thing that I look upon
as the most important of all his services, he denounced to the people
T. Romilius,1119 one of the generals of the army, at the end of his
consulship, and had him convicted of having made an improper use of his
authority.1120
The military honours of Manlius Capitolinus would have been no less
splendid than his, if they had not been all effaced at the close of
his life. Before his seventeenth year, he had gained two spoils, and
was the first of equestrian rank who received a mural crown; he also
gained six civic crowns, thirty-seven donations, and had twenty-three
scars on the fore-part of his body. He saved the life of P. Servilius,
the master of the horse, receiving wounds on the same occasion in
the shoulders and the thigh. Besides all this, unaided, he saved the
Capitol, when it was attacked by the Gauls, and through that, the state
itself; a thing that would have been the most glorious act of all, if
he had not so saved it, in order that he might, as its king, become its
master.1121 But in all matters of this nature, although valour may
effect much, fortune does still more.
No person living, in my opinion at least, ever excelled M.
Sergius,1122 although his great-grandson, Catiline, tarnished the
honours of his name. In his second campaign he lost his right hand;
and in two campaigns he was wounded three and twenty times; so much
so, that he could scarcely use either his hands or his feet; still,
attended by a single slave, he afterwards served in many campaigns,
though but an invalided soldier. He was twice taken prisoner by
Hannibal, (for it was with no ordinary enemy that he would engage,) and
twice did he escape from his captivity, after having been kept, without
a single day’s intermission, in chains and fetters for twenty months.
On four occasions he fought with his left hand alone, two horses being
slain under him. He had a right hand made of iron, and attached to
the stump, after which he fought a battle, and raised the siege of
Cremona, defended Placentia, and took twelve of the enemy’s camps in
Gaul. All this we learn from an oration of his, which he delivered
when, in his prætorship, his colleagues attempted to exclude him from
the sacred rites, on the ground of his infirmities.1123 What heaps
upon heaps of crowns would he have piled up, if he had only had other
enemies! For, in matters of this nature, it is of the first importance
to consider upon what times in especial the valour of each man has
fallen. What civic crowns did Trebia, what did the Ticinus, what did
Lake Thrasymenus afford? What crown was there to be gained at Cannæ,
where it was deemed the greatest effort of valour to have escaped1124
from the enemy? Other persons have been conquerors of men, no doubt,
but Sergius1125 conquered even Fortune herself.1126
Among so many different pursuits, and so great a variety of works and
objects, who can select the palm of glory for transcendent genius?
Unless perchance we should agree in opinion that no more brilliant
genius ever existed than the Greek poet Homer, whether it is that
we regard the happy subject of his work, or the excellence of its
execution. For this reason it was that Alexander the Great—and it is
only by judges of such high estate that a sentence, just and unbiassed
by envy, can be pronounced in the case of such lofty claims—when
he found among the spoils of Darius, the king of Persia, a casket
for perfumes,1127 enriched with gold, precious stones, and pearls,
covered as he was with the dust of battle, deemed it beneath a warrior
to make use of unguents, and, when his friends were pointing out to
him its various uses, exclaimed, “Nay, but by Hercules! let the casket
be used for preserving the poems of Homer;” that so the most precious
work of the human mind might be placed in the keeping of the richest
work of art. It was the same conqueror, too, who gave directions that
the descendants and house of the poet Pindar1128 should be spared,
at the taking of Thebes. He likewise rebuilt the native city1129 of
Aristotle, uniting to the extraordinary brilliancy of his exploits this
speaking testimony of his kindliness of disposition.
Apollo impeached by name the assassins of the poet Archilochus1130
at Delphi. While the Lacedæmonians were besieging Athens, Father Liber
ordered the funeral rites to be performed for Sophocles, the very
prince of the tragic buskin; repeatedly warning their king, Lysander,
in his sleep, to allow of the burial of his favourite. Upon this, the
king made enquiry who had lately died in Athens; and understanding
without any difficulty from the Athenians to whom the god referred, he
allowed the funeral rites to be performed without molestation.
Dionysius the tyrant, who otherwise manifested a natural propensity for
cruelty and pride, sent a vessel crowned with garlands to meet Plato,
that high-priest of wisdom; and on his disembarcation, received him on
the shore, in a chariot drawn by four white horses. Isocrates was able
to sell a single oration of his for twenty talents.1131 Æschines, the
great Athenian orator, after he had read to the Rhodians the speech
which he had made on the accusation of Demosthenes, read the defence
made by Demosthenes, through which he had been driven into exile among
them. When they expressed their admiration of it, “How much more,”
said he, “would you have admired it, if you had heard him deliver it
himself;”1132 a striking testimony, indeed, given in adversity, to
the merit of an enemy! The Athenians sent their general, Thucydides,
into banishment, but recalled him as their historian, admiring his
eloquence, though they had punished his want of valour.1133 A strong
testimony, too, was given to the merit of Menander, the famous comic
poet, by the kings of Egypt and Macedonia, in sending to him a fleet
and an embassy; though, what was still more honourable to him, he
preferred enjoying the converse of his literary pursuits to the favour
of kings.
The nobles too of Rome have given their testimonies in favour of
foreigners, even. Cn. Pompeius, after having finished the war against
Mithridates, when he went to call at the house of Posidonius, the
famous teacher of philosophy, forbade the lictor to knock at the door,
as was the usual custom;1134 and he, to whom both the eastern and the
western world had yielded submission, ordered the fasces to be lowered
before the door of a learned man. Cato the Censor, after he had heard
the speech of Carneades,1135 who was one of the embassy sent from
Athens, of three men famous for their learning, gave it as his opinion,
that the ambassadors ought to be dismissed as soon as possible,
because, in consequence of his ingenious method of arguing, it became
extremely difficult to distinguish truth from falsehood.1136 What an
extraordinary change too in our modes of thinking! This Cato constantly
gave it out as his decided opinion that all Greeks ought to be expelled
from Italy, while, on the other hand, his great-grandson, Cato of
Utica, upon his return from his military tribuneship, brought back
with him a philosopher, and a second one1137 when he returned from
his embassy to Cyprus;1138 and it is a very remarkable fact, that
the same language which had been proscribed by one of the Cato’s, was
introduced among us by the other. But let us now give some account of
the honours of our own countrymen.
The elder Africanus ordered that the statue of Ennius should be placed
in his tomb, and that the illustrious surname, which he had acquired,
I may say, as his share of the spoil on the conquest of the third part
of the world, should be read over his ashes, along with the name of
the poet.1139 The Emperor Augustus, now deified, forbade the works
of Virgil to be burnt, in opposition to the modest directions to that
effect, which the poet had left in his will: a prohibition which
was a greater compliment paid to his merit, than if he himself had
recommended his works.
M. Varro1140 is the only person, who, during his lifetime, saw his
own statue erected. This was placed in the first public library that
was ever built, and which was formed by Asinius Pollio with the spoils
of our enemies.1141 The fact of this distinction being conferred
upon him by one who was in the first rank, both as an orator and a
citizen, and at a time, too, when there was so great a number of men
distinguished for their genius, was not less honourable to him, in
my opinion, than the naval crown which Pompeius Magnus bestowed upon
him in the war against the pirates. The instances that follow among
the Romans, if I were to attempt to reckon them, would be found to be
innumerable; for it is the fact that this one nation has furnished
a greater number of distinguished men in every branch than all the
countries of the world taken together.1142
Put what atonement could I offer to thee, Marcus Tullius,1143 were I
to be silent respecting thy name? or on what ground am I to pronounce
thee as especially pre-eminent? On what, indeed, that can be more
convincing than the most abundant testimony that was offered in thy
favour by the whole Roman people? Contenting myself with the selection
only of such of the great actions of the whole of your life, as were
performed during your consulship.—You speak, and the tribes surrender
the Agrarian law, or, in other words, their very subsistence;1144 you
advise them to do so, and they pardon Roscius,1145 the author of the
law for the regulation of the theatres, and, without any feelings of
resentment, allow a mark to be put upon themselves by allotting them
an inferior seat; you entreat, and the sons of proscribed men blush
at having canvassed for public honours: before your genius, Catiline
took to flight, and it was you who proscribed M. Antonius. Hail then
to thee, who wast the first of all to receive the title of Father of
thy country,1146 who wast the first of all, while wearing the toga,
to merit a triumph, and who didst obtain the laurel for oratory. Great
father, thou, of eloquence and of Latin literature! as the Dictator
Cæsar, once thy enemy, wrote in testimony of thee,1147 thou didst
require a laurel superior to every triumph! How far greater and more
glorious to have enlarged so immeasurably the boundaries of the Roman
genius, than those of its sway!
(31.) Those persons among the Romans, who surpass all others in wisdom,
have the surnames of Catus and Corculus1148 given to them. Among the
Greeks, Socrates was declared by the oracle of the Pythian Apollo to be
superior to all others in wisdom.
Again, men have placed on an equality with those of the oracles the
precepts uttered by Chilon,1149 the Lacedæmonian. These have been
consecrated at Delphi in letters of gold, and are to the following
effect: “That each person ought to know himself, and not to desire to
possess too much;”1150 and “That misery is the sure companion of debt
and litigation.” He died of joy, on hearing that his son had been
victorious in the Olympic games, and all Greece assisted at his funeral
rites.
A spirit of divination, and a certain communion with the gods, of the
most exalted nature, was manifested—among women, in the Sibyl, and
among men, in Melampodes,1151 the Greek, and in Marcius,1152 the
Roman.
Scipio Nasica is the only individual who, since the commencement of
the Roman era, has been declared, by a vote of the senate, confirmed
by oath, to be the most excellent of men.1153 And yet, the same
person, when he was a candidate for office, was twice stigmatized by
a repulse of the Roman people. He was not allowed, in fine, to die in
his native country,1154—no, by Hercules! no more than Socrates, who
was declared by Apollo to be the wisest of men, was permitted to die
outside of a prison.
Sulpicia, the daughter of Paterculus, and wife of Fulvius Flaccus, has
been considered, in the judgment of matrons, to have been the chastest
of women. She was selected from one hundred Roman ladies, who had
been previously named, to dedicate a statue of Venus, in obedience to
the precepts contained in the Sibylline books.1155 Again, Claudia
gave strong proof of her piety and virtue, on the occasion of the
introduction into Rome of the Mother of the gods.1156
Infinite is the number of examples of affection which have been known
in all parts of the world: but one in particular occurred at Rome, to
which no other can possibly be compared. A woman of quite the lower
class, and whose name has consequently not come down to us, having
lately given birth to a child, obtained permission to visit her
mother,1157 who was confined in prison; but was always carefully
searched by the gaoler before being admitted, to prevent her from
introducing any food. At last, however, she was detected nourishing
her mother with the milk of her breast; upon which, in consideration
of the marvellous affection of the daughter, the mother was pardoned,
and they were both maintained for the rest of their days at the public
charge; the spot, too, was consecrated to Piety, a temple to that
goddess being built on the site of the prison, in the consulship1158
of C. Quintius and M. Acilius, where the theatre of Marcellus1159 now
stands.
The father of the Gracchi, on finding two serpents in his house,
consulted the soothsayers, and received an answer to the effect,
that he would survive if the serpent of the other sex was put to
death.—“No,” said he, “rather kill the serpent of my own sex, for
Cornelia is still young, and may yet bear children.”1160 Thus did
he shew himself ready, at the same moment, to spare his wife and to
benefit the state; and shortly after, his wish was accomplished.
M. Lepidus died of regret for his wife, Apuleia, after having been
divorced from her.1161 P. Rupilius,1162 who was at the time
affected by a slight disease, instantly expired, upon news being
brought to him that his brother had failed in obtaining the consulship.
P. Catienus Plotinus was so much attached to his patron, that on
finding himself named heir to all his property, he threw himself on the
funeral pile.
Innumerable are the men who have excelled in the various arts; we
may, however, take a cursory survey of them, by citing the names of
the principal ones. Berosus excelled in astrology; and on account of
his divinations and predictions, a public statue was erected in his
honour by the Athenians. Apollodorus, for his skill as a grammarian,
had public honours decreed him by the Amphictyonic Council of Greece.
Hippocrates excelled in medicine; before its arrival, he predicted
the plague, which afterwards came from Illyria, and sent his pupils
to various cities, to give their assistance. As an acknowledgment of
his merit, Greece decreed him the same honours as to Hercules.1163
King Ptolemy rewarded a similar degree of skill in the person of
Cleombrotus of Ceos, by a donation of one hundred talents, at the
Megalensian games,1164 he having succeeded in saving the life of King
Antiochus.1165 Critobulus also rendered himself extremely famous, by
extracting an arrow1166 from the eye of King Philip with so much
skill, that, although the sight was lost, there was no defect to be
seen.1167 Asclepiades of Prusa, however, acquired the greatest fame
of all—he founded a new sect, treated with disdain the promises of
King Mithridates conveyed to him by an embassy, discovered a method
of successfully treating diseases by wine,1168 and, breaking in
upon the funeral ceremony, saved the life of a man, who was actually
placed1169 on the funeral pile. He rendered himself, however, more
celebrated than all, by staking his reputation as a physician against
Fortune herself, and asserting that he did not wish to be so much as
looked upon as a physician, if he should ever happen in any way to fall
sick; and he won his wager, for he met his death at an extreme old age,
by falling down stairs.1170
M. Marcellus, too, at the taking of Syracuse, offered a remarkable
homage to the sciences of geometry and mechanics, by giving orders that
Archimedes was to be the only person who should not be molested; his
commands, however, were disregarded, in consequence of the imprudence
of one of the soldiers.1171 Chersiphron, also, the Cnossian,1172
was rendered famous by the admirable construction of the temple
of Diana at Ephesus; Philon, by the construction of the basin at
Athens, which was capable of containing one thousand vessels;1173
Ctesibius, by the invention of pneumatics and hydraulic machines; and
Dinochares,1174 by the plan which he made of the city of Alexandria,
founded by Alexander in Egypt. The same monarch, too, by public edict,
declared that no one should paint his portrait except Apelles, and
that no one should make a marble statue of him except Pyrgoteles, or
a bronze one except Lysippus.1175 These arts have all been rendered
glorious by many illustrious examples.
King Attalus gave one hundred talents,1176 at a public auction, for
a single picture of Aristides, the Theban painter.1177 Cæsar, the
Dictator, purchased two pictures, the Medea and the Ajax of Timomachus,
for eighty talents,1178 it being his intention to dedicate them
in the temple of Venus Genetrix. King Candaules gave its weight in
gold for a large picture by Bularchus, the subject of which was the
destruction of the Magnetes. Demetrius, who was surnamed the “taker
of cities,”1179 refused to set fire to the city of Rhodes, lest he
should chance to destroy a picture of Protogenes, which was placed
on that side of the walls against which his attack was directed.
Praxiteles1180 has been ennobled by his works in marble, and more
especially by his Cnidian Venus, which became remarkable from the
insane love which it inspired in a certain young man,1181 and the
high value set upon it by King Nicomedes, who endeavoured to procure it
from the Cnidians, by offering to pay for them a large debt which they
owed. The Olympian Jupiter day by day bears testimony to the talents of
Phidias,1182 and the Capitoline Jupiter and the Diana of Ephesus to
those of Mentor;1183 to which deities, also, were consecrated vases
made by this artist.
The highest price ever given for a man born in slavery, so far as I
am able to discover, was that paid for Daphnus, the grammarian, who
was sold by Natius of Pisaurum1184 to M. Scaurus, the first man in
the state, for seven hundred thousand sesterces.1185 In our day, no
doubt, comic actors have fetched a higher price, but then they were
purchasing their own freedom. In the time of our ancestors, Roscius,
the actor, gained five hundred thousand sesterces annually. Perhaps,
too, a person might in the present instance refer to the case of the
army commissary1186 in the Armenian war, which was of late years
undertaken in favour of Tiridates; which officer, in our own time,
received his manumission from Nero for the sum of thirteen million
sesterces;1187 but, in this case, the consideration was the profit to
be derived from the war,1188 and it was not the value of the man that
was paid for. And so, too, when Lutorius Priscus bought of Sejanus,
the eunuch, Pæzon, for fifty million sesterces,1189 the price was
given, by Hercules! rather to gratify the passion of the purchaser,
than in commendation of the beauty of the slave. Universal sorrow and
consternation then reigning, the public were too much pre-occupied with
it to put a stop to a bargain of so scandalous a nature.1190
Of all nations of the earth, the Romans have, without doubt, excelled
every other in the display of valour.1191 The human judgment cannot,
however, possibly decide what man has enjoyed the highest degree of
happiness, seeing that every one defines a state of prosperity in a
way different from another, and entirely in conformity with his own
notions. If we wish to form a true judgment and come to a decision,
casting aside all the allurements and illusions of fortune, we are
bound to say that no mortal is happy. Fortune has dealt well, and,
indeed, indulgently, to him who feels that he has a right to say that
he is not unhappy. For if there is nothing else, at all events, there
is the fear lest fortune should fail at last; which fear itself, when
it has once fastened upon us, our happiness is no longer unalloyed.
And then, too, is it not the case that there is no mortal who is
always wise? Would that there were many to be found, who could feel a
conviction that this is false, and that it had not been enunciated by
an oracle itself, as it were! Mortals, vain as they are, and ingenious
in deceiving themselves, calculate in the same way as the Thracians,
who, according to their experience of each day, deposit in an urn a
black or a white pebble; at the close of their life, these pebbles are
separated, and from the relative number of each kind, they form their
conclusions.1192 But really, may not that very day that has been
complimented with a white pebble, have contained in itself the germ of
some misfortune? How many a man has got into trouble by the very power
which has been bestowed upon him? How many have been brought to ruin
and plunged into the deepest misery by their own blessings? or rather,
by what have been looked upon too fondly as blessings, for the hour
during which they were in the full enjoyment of them. But most true
it is, that it is the day after, that is the judge of the day before;
and after all, it is only the last day that is to set its stamp on the
whole; the consequence is, that we can put our trust in none of them.
And then, too, is it not the fact that the blessings of life would
not be equal to its evils, even though they were equal in number? For
what pleasure is there that can compensate for the slightest grief?
Alas! what a vain and unreasonable task we impose upon ourselves! We
trouble ourselves with counting the number of days, when it is their
weight1193 that ought to be taken into consideration.
During the whole course of ages, we find only one woman, and that,
Lampido, the Lacedæmonian, who was the daughter of a king, the wife of
a king, and the mother of a king.1194 Berenice was the only woman
who was daughter, sister, and mother of conquerors in the Olympian
games.1195 The family of the Curios1196 has been the only one to
produce three orators in succession; that of the Fabii alone has given
three chiefs of the senate in succession, Fabius Ambustus, his son
Fabius Rullianus, and his grandson Quintus Fabius Gurges.1197
As to examples of the vicissitudes of Fortune, they are innumerable.
For what great pleasures has she ever given us, which have not taken
their rise in misfortunes? And what extraordinary misfortunes have not
taken their first rise in great pleasures? (43.) It was fortune that
preserved the Senator, M. Fidustius,1198 who had been proscribed by
Sylla, for a period of thirty-six years. And yet he was proscribed a
second time; for he survived Sylla, even to the days of Antony, and, as
it appears, was proscribed by him, for no other reason but because he
had been proscribed before.
Fortune has determined that P. Ventidius alone should enjoy the honour
of a triumph over the Parthians, and yet the same individual, when he
was a child, she led in the triumphal procession of Cneius Pompeius,
the conqueror of Asculum.1199 Indeed, Masurius says, that he had been
twice led in triumph; and according to Cicero, he used to let out mules
for the bakers of the camp.1200 Most writers, indeed, admit that his
younger days were passed in the greatest poverty, and that he wore the
hob-nailed shoes1201 of the common soldier. Balbus Cornelius, also,
the elder, was elected to the consulate;1202 but he had previously
been accused, and the judges had been charged to discuss the point
whether he could or not lawfully be scourged with rods; he being the
first foreigner,1203—born even on the very shores of the ocean,—who
obtained that honour, which our ancestors denied even to the people
of Latium.1204 Among other remarkable instances, also, we have that
of L. Fulvius,1205 the consul of the rebellious Tusculani, who,
immediately upon his coming over to the Romans, obtained from them the
same honour. He is the only individual who, in the same year in which
he had been its enemy, enjoyed the honour of a triumph in Rome, and
that too, over the people whose consul he had previously been.
Down to the present time, L. Sylla is the only man who has claimed
to himself the surname of “Happy;”1206 a name which he derived,
forsooth, from the bloodshed of the citizens and the oppression of
his country! But what claim had he on which to found his title to
this happiness? Was it the power which he had of proscribing and
massacreing so many thousands of his fellow-citizens? Oh interpretation
most disgraceful, and which must stamp him as “Unhappy”1207 to all
future time! Were not the men who perished in those times, of the
two, to be looked upon as the more fortunate—seeing that with them
we sympathize, while there is no one who does not detest Sylla?
And then, besides, was not the close of his life more horrible than
the sufferings which had been experienced by any of those who had
been proscribed by him? his very flesh eating into itself, and so
engendering his own punishment.1208 And this, although he may have
thought proper to gloss it over by that last dream of his,1209 in the
very midst of which he may be said, in some measure, to have died; and
in which, as he pretended, he was told that his glory alone had risen
superior to all envy; though at the same time, he confessed that it was
still wanting to his supreme happiness, that he had not dedicated the
Capitol.1210
Q. Metellus, in the funeral oration which he made in praise of his
father, L. Metellus, who had been pontiff, twice consul,1211
dictator, master of the horse, one of the quindecemvirs for dividing
the lands,1212 and the first who had elephants in his triumphal
procession,1213 the same having been taken in the first Punic war,
has left it written to the effect that his father had attained the ten
greatest and best things, in the search after which wise men have spent
all their lives. For, as he states, he was anxious to become the first
warrior, the best orator, the bravest general, that the most important
of all business should be entrusted to his charge, that he should
enjoy the very highest honours, that he should possess consummate
wisdom, that he should be regarded as the most distinguished senator,
that he should by honourable means acquire a large fortune, that he
should leave behind him many children, and that he should be the most
illustrious person in the state. To refute this assertion, would be
tedious and indeed unnecessary, seeing that it is contradicted more
than sufficiently by the single fact, that Metellus passed his old age,
deprived of his sight, which he had lost in a fire, while rescuing the
Palladium from the temple of Vesta;1214 a glorious action, no doubt,
although the result was unhappy: on which account it is, that although
he ought not to be called unfortunate, still he cannot be called
fortunate. The Roman people, however, granted him a privilege which no
one else had ever obtained since the foundation of the city, that of
being conveyed to the senate-house in a chariot whenever he went to the
senate:1215 a great distinction, no doubt, but bought at the price of
his sight.
(44.) The son also, of the same Q. Metellus, who has given the above
account of his father, is considered himself to have been one of the
rarest instances of human felicity.1216 For, in addition to the
very considerable honours which he obtained, and the surname which he
acquired from the conquest of Macedonia, he was carried to the funeral
pile by his four sons,1217 one of whom had been prætor, three of
them consuls, two had obtained triumphs, and one had been censor; each
of which honours falls to the lot of a very few only. And yet, in the
very full-blown pride of his dignity, as he was returning from the
Campus Martius at mid-day, when the Forum and the Capitol are deserted,
he was seized by the tribune, Caius Atinius Labeo,1218 surnamed
Macerion, whom, during his censorship, he had ejected from the senate,
and was dragged by him to the Tarpeian rock, for the purpose of being
precipitated therefrom. The numerous band, however, who called him
by the name of father, flew to his assistance, though tardily, and
only just, as it were, at the very last moment, to attend his funeral
obsequies, seeing that he could not lawfully offer resistance, or
repel force by force in the sacred case of a tribune;1219 and he was
just on the very point of perishing, the victim of his virtues and the
strictness of his censorship, when he was saved by the intervention of
another tribune,—only obtained with the greatest difficulty,—and so
rescued from the very jaws of death. He afterwards had to subsist on
the bounty of others, his property having been consecrated1220 by the
very man whom he had degraded; and who, as if that had not satiated
his vengeance, still farther wreaked his malice upon him, by throwing a
rope around his neck,1221 and twisting it with such extreme violence
that the blood flowed from out of his ears.1222 And for my part, too,
I should look upon it as in the number of his misfortunes, to have
been the enemy of the second Africanus; indeed, Macedonicus, in this
instance, bears testimony against himself; for he said to his sons,
“Go, my children, render the last duties to Scipio; you will never
witness the funeral of a greater citizen than him;” and this speech
he made to his sons, one of whom had already acquired the surname of
Balearicus, and another of Diadematus,1223 he himself at the time
bearing that of Macedonicus.
Now, if we take into account the above injury alone, can any one justly
pronounce that man happy, whose life was thus endangered by the caprice
of an enemy, and that enemy, besides, not an Africanus? What victories
over enemies could possibly be counterbalanced by such a price as this?
What honours, what triumphs, did not Fortune cancel, in suffering a
censor to be dragged through the middle of the city—indeed, that was
his only resource for gaining time1224—dragged to that Capitol,
whither he himself, in his triumph, had forborne to drag in a similar
manner even the very captives whom he had taken in his conquests? This
crime, too, must be looked upon as all the greater, from its having so
nearly deprived Macedonicus of the honours of his funeral, so great
and so glorious, in which he was borne to the pile by his triumphant
children, he himself thus triumphing, as it were, in his very
obsequies. Most assuredly, there is no happiness that can be called
unalloyed, when the terror of our life has been interrupted by any
outrage, and much more by such an outrage as this. As for the rest, I
really am at a loss whether we ought most to commend the manners of the
age,1225 or to feel an increased degree of indignation, that, among
so many members of the family of the Metelli, such wicked audacity as
that of C. Atinius remained unpunished.
In the life of the now deified emperor Augustus even, whom the whole
world would certainly agree to place in this class,1226 if we
carefully examine it in all its features, we shall find remarkable
vicissitudes of human fate. There was his rejection from the post
of master of the horse, by his uncle,1227 and the preference
which was given to Lepidus, and that, too, in opposition to his own
requests; the hatred produced by the proscription; his alliance in
the Triumvirate1228 with some among the very worst of the citizens,
and that, too, with an unequal share of influence, he himself being
entirely borne down by the power of Antony; his illness1229 at the
battle of Philippi; his flight, and his having to remain three days
concealed in a marsh,1230 though suffering from sickness, and,
according to the account of Agrippa and Mecænas, labouring under a
dropsy; his shipwreck1231 on the coast of Sicily, where he was again
under the necessity of concealing himself in a cave; his desperation,
which caused him even to beg Proculeius1232 to put him to death,
when he was hard-pressed by the enemy in a naval engagement;1233 his
alarm about the rising at Perusia;1234 his anxiety at the battle
of Actium;1235 the extreme danger he was in from the falling of a
tower during the Pannonian war;1236 seditions so numerous among his
soldiers; so many attacks by dangerous diseases;1237 the suspicions
which he entertained respecting the intentions of Marcellus;1238
the disgraceful banishment, as it were, of Agrippa;1239 the many
plots against his life;1240 the deaths of his own children,1241
of which he was accused, and his heavy sorrows, caused not merely by
their loss;1242 the adultery1243 of his daughter, and the discovery
of her parricidal designs; the insulting retreat of his son-in-law,
Nero;1244 another adultery, that of his grand-daughter;1245 to
which there were added numerous other evils, such as the want of
money to pay his soldiers; the revolt of Illyria;1246 the necessity
of levying the slaves; the sad deficiency of young men;1247 the
pestilence that raged in the City;1248 the famine in Italy; the
design which he had formed of putting an end to his life, and the fast
of four days, which brought him within a hair’s breadth of death.
And then, added to all this, the slaughter of Varus;1249 the base
slanders1250 whispered against his authority; the rejection of
Posthumius Agrippa, after his adoption,1251 and the regret to which
Augustus was a prey after his banishment;1252 the suspicions too
respecting Fabius, to the effect that he had betrayed his secrets;
and then, last of all, the machinations of his wife and of Tiberius,
the thoughts of which occupied his last moments. In fine, this same
god,1253 who was raised to heaven, I am at a loss to say whether
deservedly or not, died, leaving the son of his own enemy his
heir.1254
In reference to this point, two oracles of Delphi may come under our
consideration, which would appear to have been pronounced as though in
order to chastise the vanity of man. These oracles were the following:
by the first, Pedius was pronounced to be the most happy of men, who
had just before fallen in defence of his country.1255 On the second
occasion, when it had been consulted by Gyges, at that time the most
powerful king in the world, it declared that Aglaüs of Psophis1256
was a more happy man than himself.1257 This Aglaüs was an old man,
who lived in a poor petty nook of Arcadia, and cultivated a small farm,
though quite sufficient for the supply of his yearly wants;1258
he had never so much as left it, and, as was quite evident from his
mode of living, his desires being of the most limited kind, he had
experienced but an extremely small share of the miseries of life.
While still surviving, and in full possession of his senses, by the
command of the same oracle, and with the sanction of Jupiter, the
supreme Father of the gods, Euthymus,1259 the pugilist, who had
always, with one exception, been victorious in the Olympic games,
was deified. He was a native of Locri, in Italy. I find that
Callimachus,1260 considering it a more wonderful circumstance than
any he had ever known, that the two statues which had been erected to
him, one at Locri, and the other at Olympia, were struck by lightning
on the same day, ordered sacrifices to be offered up to him, which
was accordingly done, both during his life-time, and after his death.
Nothing, indeed, has appeared to me so remarkable, as this mark of
approval given by the gods.
Not only the differences of climate, but the multitude of instances
named, and the peculiar destiny attached to each of us from the moment
of his birth,1261 tend to render one very uncertain in forming any
general conclusion respecting the length and duration of human life.
Hesiod, who was the first to make mention of this subject, while he
states many circumstances about the age of man, which appear to me to
be fabulous, gives to the crow nine times the ordinary duration of
our life, to the stag four times the length of that of the crow, to
the raven three times the length of that of the stag, besides other
particulars with reference to the phœnix and the Nymphs of a still more
fabulous nature. The poet Anacreon gives1262 one hundred and fifty
years to Arganthonius,1263 the king of the Tartessii; ten more to
Cinaras,1264 the king of Cyprus, and two hundred to Ægimius.1265
Theopompus gives one hundred and fifty-three years to Epimenides of
Cnossus; according to Hellenicus, some of the nation of the Epii, in
Ætolia, have completed their two hundredth year; and his account is
confirmed by Damastes, who relates that Pictoreus, one of this nation,
who was remarkable for his size and strength, lived even to his three
hundredth year. Ephorus says that some kings of Arcadia have lived
three hundred years; Alexander Cornelius, that there was one Dandon,
in Illyricum, who lived five hundred years. Xenophon, in his Periplus,
gives to a king of the island of the Lutmii six hundred years, and, as
though in that instance he had lied too sparingly, to his son eight
hundred.1266 All these statements, however, have originated in a want
of acquaintance with the accurate measurement of time. For some nations
reckon the summer as one year, and the winter as another; others again,
consider each of the four seasons a year; the Arcadians, for instance,
whose years were of three months each. Others, such as the Egyptians,
calculate by the moon, and hence it is that some individuals among them
are said to have lived as many as one thousand years.
Let us proceed, however, to what is admitted to be true. It is pretty
nearly certain, that Arganthonius of Gades1267 reigned eighty years,
and he is supposed to have commenced his reign when he was forty.
Masinissa, beyond a doubt, reigned sixty years,1268 and Gorgias, the
Sicilian, lived one hundred and eight.1269 Quintus Fabius Maximus
was an augur for sixty-three years.1270 M. Perperna, and more
recently, L. Volusius Saturninus, survived all those whose suffrages
each had solicited on the occasion of his consulship;1271 Perperna
lived ninety-eight years, and left after him only seven of those whose
names, when censor, he had enrolled. Connected with this fact, it also
suggests itself, and deserves to be remarked, that it has happened
only once, that five successive years have ever passed without the
death of a senator taking place; this was the case from the occasion on
which the censors Flaccus and Albinus performed the lustration, in the
year of the City 579, until the time of the succeeding censors.1272
M. Valerius Corvinus completed one hundred years, forty-six of which
intervened between his first and sixth consulship.1273 He occupied
the curule chair twenty-one times,1274 a thing that was never the
case with any one besides. The pontiff Metellus also attained the same
age.1275
Among women also, Livia, the wife of Rutilius, exceeded her
ninety-sixth year; during the reign of Claudius, Statilia, a member
of a noble family, died at the age of ninety-nine; Terentia, the wife
of Cicero, lived one hundred and three years, and Clodia, the wife of
Ofilius, one hundred and fifteen; she had fifteen children.1276
Lucceia, an actress in the mimes, performed on the stage when one
hundred years old, and Galeria Copiola returned to the stage, to
perform in the interludes,1277 at the votive games which were
celebrated for the health of the deified Augustus, in the consulship of
C. Poppæus and Q. Sulpicius.1278 She had made her first appearance
when eight years of age, just ninety-one years before that time, when
M. Pomponius was ædile of the people, in the consulship of C. Marius
and Cn. Carbo.1279 When Pompeius Magnus dedicated his great theatre,
he brought her upon the stage, as being quite a wonder, considering
her old age. Asconius Pedianus informs us, that Sammula also lived one
hundred and ten years. I consider it less wonderful that Stephanio,
who was the first to dance on the stage in comedy descriptive of Roman
manners, should have1280 danced at the two secular games, those
celebrated by the deified Augustus, and by Claudius Cæsar, in his
fourth consulship, considering that the interval that elapsed between
them was no more than sixty-three years;1281 indeed, he lived a
considerable time after the last period. We are informed by Mutianus,
that, on the peak of Mount Tmolus, which is called Tempsis, the people
live one hundred and fifty years, and that T. Fullonius, of Bononia,
was set down as of the same age, in the registration which took place
under the censorship of Claudius Cæsar; and this appeared to be
confirmed by comparing the present with former registrations, as well
as many other proofs that he had been alive at certain periods—for
that prince greatly interested himself in ascertaining the exact truth
of the matter.
The present conjuncture would appear to demand from me some
opinion upon the science of the stars. Epigenes1282 used to
maintain that human life could not be possibly prolonged to one
hundred and twelve years, and Berosus1283 that it could exceed
one hundred and seventeen. The system is still in existence which
Petosiris and Necepsos1284 transmitted to us, and called by them
“tartemorion,”1285 from the division of the signs into four portions;
from which it would appear, that life, in the region of Italy, may
possibly be extended to one hundred and twenty-four years. They
maintain that, reckoning from the commencement of an ascending sign, no
life can possibly exceed a period of ninety degrees from that point;
which periods they call by the name of “anaphoræ;”1286 they say also,
that these anaphoræ may be intercepted by meeting with malign stars or
their rays even, or those of the sun.1287 To theirs the school of
Æsculapius succeeded, which admits that the allotted duration of life
is regulated by the stars, but that it is quite uncertain what is the
greatest extent of the period. These say that long life is uncommon,
because a very great number of persons are born at critical moments
in the hours of the lunar days; for example, in the seventh and the
fifteenth hours, both by day and night; these individuals are subject
to the malign influence of that ascending scale of the years which is
termed the “climacteric,”1288 and never hardly, when born under these
circumstances, exceed the fifty-fourth year. First of all, however,
it must strike us that the variations which have taken place in this
science prove its uncertainty; and to this consideration may be added
the experience of the very last census, which was made four years ago,
under the direction of the Emperors Vespasian, father and son.1289 I
shall not search through the registers;1290 I shall only cite some
instances in the middle district that lies between the Apennines and
the river Padus. At Parma, three persons declared themselves to be
one hundred and twenty years of age; at Brixellum,1291 one was one
hundred and twenty-five; at Parma, two were one hundred and thirty;
at Placentia, one was one hundred and thirty; at Faventia, one woman
was one hundred and thirty-two; at Bononia, L. Terentius, the son of
Marcus, and at Ariminum, M. Aponius, were one hundred and forty, and
Tertulla, one hundred and thirty-seven. In the hills which lie around
Placentia is the town of Veleiacium,1292 in which six persons gave
in their ages as one hundred and ten years, and four one hundred and
twenty, while one person, M. Mucius, the son of Marcus, surnamed Felix,
and of the Galerian tribe,1293 was aged one hundred and forty. Not,
however, to dwell upon what is generally admitted, in the eighth region
of Italy, there appeared by the register, to be fifty-four persons
of one hundred years of age, fourteen of one hundred and ten, two of
one hundred and twenty-five, four of one hundred and thirty, the same
number of one hundred and thirty-five to one hundred and thirty-seven,
and three of one hundred and forty.
Again, we have another illustration of the uncertain tenure of human
life. Homer informs us that Hector and Polydamas1294 were born on
the same night,1295 and yet how different was their fate! M. Cælius
Rufus1296 and C. Licinius Calvus were born on the same day, the
fifth before the calends of June, in the consulship of C. Marius and
Cn. Carbo; they both of them lived to be orators, it is true, but how
different their destiny! The same thing, too, happens every day, and
in every part of the world, with respect to men that are born in the
self-same hour; masters and slaves, kings and beggars, come into the
world at the same moment.
P. Cornelius Rufus,1297 who was consul with M. Curio, lost his sight
while he was asleep and dreaming that that accident had befallen
him. On the other hand, Jason, of Pheræ, when he was labouring under
an abscess and had been given up by the physicians, determined to
end his life in battle, where he received a wound in the chest, and
found, at the hands of the enemy, a remedy for his disease.1298 Q.
Fabius Maximus,1299 the consul, having engaged in battle with the
Allobroges and the Arverni, at the river Isara, on the sixth day before
the ides of August, and having slain there one hundred and thirty
thousand of the enemy, found himself cured, during the engagement, of a
quartan fever.
This gift of life, which is bestowed upon us by nature, is extremely
uncertain and frail, whatever portion of it may be allotted to us. The
measure is, indeed, but scanty and brief, even when it is the largest,
if we only reflect upon the extent of eternity. And then, besides,
if we take into account our sleep during the night, we can only be
properly said to live half the period of our life; seeing that just one
half of it is passed, either in a state resembling death, or else of
bodily suffering, if we are unable to sleep. Added to this, we ought
not to reckon the years of infancy, during which we are not sensible of
our existence, nor yet the years of old age, which is prolonged only
for the punishment of those who arrive at it. There are so many kinds
of dangers, so many diseases, so many apprehensions, so many cares, we
so often invoke death, that really there is nothing that is so often
the object of our wishes. Nature has, in reality, bestowed no greater
blessing on man than the shortness of life. The senses become dull,
the limbs torpid, the sight, the hearing, the legs, the teeth, and
the organs of digestion, all of them die before us, and yet we reckon
this state as a part of our life. The solitary instance of Xenophilus,
the musician,1300 who lived one hundred and five years without any
infirmity of body, must be regarded then as a kind of miracle; for,
by Hercules! all other men are subject, at certain fixed periods,
to recurring and deadly attacks by heat or cold, in every part of
the body, a thing that is not the case with other animals; and these
attacks, too, return not only at regular hours, but on certain days
and certain nights—sometimes the third day, sometimes the fourth,
sometimes every day throughout the year.
And then, too, there is another kind of fatal disease, that which is
produced by over-exertion of the mental faculties.1301 Nature has
appointed certain laws as well for our maladies; quartan fevers never
commence at the winter solstice, nor yet during the winter months;
some diseases never attack us after the sixtieth year; some again
disappear at the age of puberty, especially in females;1302 while
aged persons are but seldom affected by the plague. There are some
diseases which attack whole nations; others prevail among classes; some
among slaves,1303 others among the higher ranks, and others among
other classes of society. It has been remarked, in reference to this
subject, that the plague always takes a course from the south towards
the west,1304 and scarcely ever in an opposite direction; it never
appears in the winter, or lasts longer than three months.
And now to speak of the premonitory signs of death. Among these are
laughter, in madness;1305 in cases of delirium,1306 the patient
carefully folding the fringe or the plaits of the bedclothes;1307
insensibility to the attempts of those who would rouse them from sleep;
and involuntary discharges from the body, which it is not necessary
here to particularize; but the most unequivocal signs of all, are
certain appearances of the eyes and the nose, a lying posture with
the face continually upwards, an irregular and feeble motion of the
pulse,1308 and the other symptoms, which have been observed by that
prince of physicians, Hippocrates. At the same time that there are
innumerable signs of death, there are none of health and safety; so
much so, that Cato the Censor, when speaking to his son in relation to
those who appear to be in good health, declared, as though it had been
the enunciation of some oracle,1309 that precocity in youth is a sign
of an early death.1310
The number of diseases is infinite. Pherecydes of Scyros died from
vast numbers of worms issuing from his body.1311 Some persons are
distressed by a perpetual fever; such was the case with C. Mæcenas;
during the last three years of his life, he could never get a single
moment’s sleep.1312 Antipater of Sidon, the poet, was attacked with
fever every year, and that only on his birthday; he died of it at an
advanced age.1313
Aviola,1314 a man of consular rank, came to life again when on
the funeral pile; but, by reason of the violence of the flames, no
assistance could be rendered him, in consequence of which he was burnt
alive. The same thing is said to have happened to L. Lamia, a man of
prætorian rank. Messala, Rufus,1315 and many other authors, inform
us, that C. Ælius Tubero, who had filled the office of prætor, was
also rescued from the funeral pile. Such then is the condition of us
mortals: to these and the like vicissitudes of fortune are we born;
so much so, that we cannot be sure of any thing, no, not even that a
person is dead. With reference to the soul of man, we find, among other
instances, that the soul of Hermotinus of Clazomenæ was in the habit
of leaving his body, and wandering into distant countries, whence it
brought back numerous accounts of various things, which could not have
been obtained by any one but a person who was present. The body, in the
meantime, was left apparently lifeless.1316 At last, however, his
enemies, the Cantharidæ,1317 as they were called, burned the body, so
that the soul, on its return, was deprived of its sheath, as it were.
It is stated also, that in Proconnesus,1318 the soul of Aristeas
was seen to fly out of his mouth, under the form of a raven;1319 a
most fabulous story, however, which may be well ranked with the one
that follows. It is told of Epimenides1320 of Cnossus, that when he
was a boy, being fatigued by heat and walking, he fell asleep in a
cave, where he slept for fifty-seven years; and that when he awoke, as
though it had been on the following day, he was much astonished at the
changes which he saw in the appearance of every thing around him: after
this, old age, it is said, came upon him in an equal number of days
with the years he had slept, but his life was prolonged to his hundred
and fifty-seventh year.1321 The female sex appear more especially
disposed to this morbid state,1322 on account of the misplacement of
the womb;1323 when this is once corrected, they immediately come to
themselves again. The volume of Heraclides1324 on this subject, which
is highly esteemed among the Greeks, contains the account of a female,
who was restored to life, after having appeared to be dead for seven
days.
Varro informs us,1325 that when he was one of the “vigintiviri,” or
twenty commissioners,1326 appointed to superintend the division of
the lands at Capua, a man who had been carried to the funeral pile,
returned on foot from the Forum to his own house, and that the very
same thing happened also at Aquinum. He states also, that Corfidius,
who had married his maternal aunt, came to life again, after the
funeral had been all arranged, and that he afterwards attended the
funeral of the person who had so arranged his own. He gives in addition
some other marvellous relations, the whole of which it may be as well
to set forth; he says that there were two brothers, members of the
equestrian order, and named Corfidius:1327 it so happened that the
elder of these was seen to breathe his last to all appearance, and on
opening his will, it was found that he had named his brother his heir,
who accordingly ordered his funeral. In the meanwhile, however, he who
had been thought to be dead, clapping his hands,1328 summoned the
servants, and told them that he was just come from his brother’s house,
who had placed his daughter in his charge; in addition to which, he
had mentioned to him the place where he had secretly buried some gold,
and had requested that the funeral preparations which had been made,
might be employed for himself. While he was stating to this effect,
the servants of his brother came in the greatest haste, and informed
them that he was dead: the gold too, was found in the place just as he
had stated. But throughout the whole of our lives we are perpetually
hearing of such predictions as these; they are not, however, worth
collecting, seeing that they are almost always false, as we shall
illustrate by the following remarkable instance.
In the Sicilian war, Gabienus, the bravest of all Cæsar’s naval
commanders, was taken prisoner by Sextus Pompeius, who ordered his
throat to be cut; after which, his head almost severed from his body,
he lay the whole of the day upon the sea-shore. Towards evening,
with groans and entreaties, he begged the crowds of people who had
assembled, that they would prevail upon Pompeius to come to him, or
else send one of his most confidential friends, as he had just returned
from the shades below, and had some important news to communicate.
Pompeius accordingly sent several of his friends, to whom Gabienus
stated that the good cause and virtuous partisans of Pompeius were well
pleasing to the infernal deities, and that the event would shortly
prove such as he wished: that he had been ordered to announce to this
effect, and that, as a proof of its truthfulness, he himself should
expire the very moment he had fulfilled his commission; and his death
actually did take place.
We have instances also of men who have been seen after their burial;
but, for the present, we are treating of the operations of nature, and
not of miracles.
Among the things that are looked upon as more especially singular,
though of frequent occurrence, is sudden death, a thing that, in
fact, is the greatest happiness of life, and, as we will shew, only a
natural occurrence. Verrius has given many instances of it; we will
limit ourselves by only making a selection. Besides Chilo, who has been
already mentioned,1329 Sophocles,1330 and Dionysius,1331 the
tyrant of Sicily, both of them, died of joy, on learning that they had
obtained the prize for tragedy. After the defeat at Cannæ, a mother
died of joy, on seeing that her son had returned in safety, she having
heard a false report of his death.1332 Diodorus, the professor of
logic,1333 died of mortification, because he could not immediately
answer some question which had been put to him by Stilpo, by way of
joke.
Two of the Cæsars,1334 one of whom was at the time prætor, and the
other had previously discharged that office, and was the father of
the Dictator Cæsar, died without any apparent cause, in the morning,
while putting on their shoes; the former at Pisæ, the latter at Rome.
Quintus Fabius Maximus died during his consulship, on the day before
the calends of January,1335 and in his place C. Rebilus got himself
elected consul for only a few hours.1336 The same thing happened
also to the senator, C. Volcatius Gurges; these were all of them so
well, and in such perfect health, that they were actually preparing
to go from home. Q. Æmilius Lepidus,1337 just as he was leaving
his house, struck his great toe against the threshold of his chamber
door. C. Aufustius, having gone from home, was proceeding to the
senate-house, when he stumbled in the Comitium,1338 and expired.
Their ambassador, who had just been pleading the cause of the Rhodians
in the senate, to the admiration of every one, suddenly expired at
the door of the senate-house, just as he was about to retire. Cn.
Bæbius Tamphilus,1339 who had been prætor also, expired while he
was enquiring of a boy1340 what time it was: Aulus Pompeius1341
died just after saluting the gods in the Capitol; and M. Juventius
Thalna,1342 the consul, while he was sacrificing. C. Servilius Pansa
expired at the second hour of the day,1343 while he was standing
in the Forum, near a shop there,1344 and leaning on the arm of his
brother, Publius Pansa: the judge Bæbius, while he was giving an order
for an enlargement of bail:1345 M. Terentius Corax, while he was
making an entry in his note-book in the Forum: only last year too, a
member of the equestrian order at Rome, while whispering in the ear of
a man of consular rank, before the ivory Apollo, in the Forum1346 of
Augustus;1347 and, what is more singular than all, C. Julius, the
physician, while he was applying, with his probe,1348 some ointment
to the eye of a patient. Aulus Manlius Torquatus, a man of consular
rank, died in the act of reaching a cake at dinner; L. Tuscius Valla,
the physician, while he was taking a draught of honeyed wine;1349
Ap. Saufeius, while, on his return from the bath, after drinking
some honeyed wine and water, he was swallowing an egg: P. Quinctius
Scapula, while he was dining with Aquilius Gallus: Decimus Saufeius,
the scribe, while he was breakfasting at his house. Corn. Gallus,1350
who had filled the office of prætor, and Titus Haterius,1351 a man
of equestrian rank, died in the venereal act; and, a thing that was
especially remarked by those of our day, two members of the equestrian
order expired in the embraces of the same actor of pantomimes, Mysticus
by name, who was remarkable for his singular beauty.
But the most perfect state, to all appearance, of security from death,
was that of which we have an account given by the ancients, in the
case of M. Ofilius Hilarus. He was an actor, and after having been
very greatly applauded by the people, was giving, on his birthday, an
entertainment. During dinner he called for a cup of warm drink; at the
same time, looking at the masque which he had worn during the day, he
placed upon it the chaplet,1352 which he had taken from his own head;
and in that position he remained rigidly fixed, without moving, no one
being aware of what had taken place, until the person who was reclining
next to him reminded him that the drink was getting cold; upon which he
was found to be dead.
These are instances of persons dying a happy death;1353 but, on
the other hand, there are innumerable cases also of unfortunate ends.
L. Domitius,1354 a member of a most illustrious family, having been
conquered at Massilia by Cæsar, and taken prisoner by him at Corfinium,
being weary of life, took poison; but, immediately after, he used
every possible exertion to prolong his life. We find it stated in our
Annals, that Felix, a charioteer of the red party,1355 being placed
on the funeral pile, some one of the number of his admirers threw
himself upon the pile; a most silly piece of conduct. Lest, however,
this circumstance might be attributed to the great excellence of the
dead man in his art, and so redound to his glory, the other parties all
declared that he had been overpowered by the strength of the perfumes.
Not long ago, M. Lepidus, a man of very noble birth, who died, as I
have stated above,1356 of chagrin caused by his divorce, was hurled
from the funeral pile by the violence of the flames, and in consequence
of the heat, could not be replaced upon it; in consequence of which,
his naked body was burnt with some other pieces of brushwood, in the
vicinity of the pile.
The burning of the body after death, among the Romans, is not a very
ancient usage; for formerly, they interred it.1357 After it had been
ascertained, however, in the foreign wars, that bodies which had been
buried were sometimes disinterred, the custom of burning them was
adopted. Many families, however, still observed the ancient rites,
as, for example, the Cornelian family, no member of which had his
body burnt before Sylla, the Dictator; who directed this to be done,
because, having previously disinterred the dead body of Caius Marius,
he was afraid that others might retaliate on his own.1358 The term
“sepultus”1359 applies to any mode whatever of disposing of the dead
body; while, on the other hand, the word “humatus” is applicable solely
when it is deposited in the earth.
After burial come the different quiddities as to the existence of the
Manes. All men, after their last day,1360 return to what they were
before the first; and after death there is no more sensation left in
the body or in the soul than there was before birth. But this same
vanity of ours extends even to the future, and lyingly fashions to
itself an existence even in the very moments which belong to death
itself: at one time it has conferred upon us the immortality of the
soul; at another transmigration; and at another it has given sensation
to the shades below, and paid divine honours to the departed spirit,
thus making a kind of deity of him who has but just ceased to be a man.
As if, indeed, the mode of breathing with man was in any way different
from that of other animals, and as if there were not many other animals
to be found whose life is longer than that of man, and yet for whom
no one ever presaged anything of a like immortality. For what is the
actual substance of the soul, when taken by itself? Of what material
does it consist? Where is the seat of its thoughts? How is it to see,
or hear, or how to touch? And then, of what use is it, or what can it
avail, if it has not these faculties? Where, too, is its residence, and
what vast multitudes of these souls and spirits1361 must there be
after the lapse of so many ages? But all these are the mere figments
of childish ravings, and of that mortality which is so anxious never
to cease to exist. It is a similar piece of vanity, too, to preserve
the dead bodies of men; just like the promise that he shall come to
life again, which was made by Democritus;1362 who, however, never
has come to life again himself. Out upon it! What downright madness is
it to suppose that life is to recommence after death! or indeed, what
repose are we ever to enjoy when we have been once born, if the soul is
to retain its consciousness in heaven, and the shades of the dead in
the infernal regions? This pleasing delusion, and this credulity, quite
cancel that chief good of human nature, death, and, as it were, double
the misery of him who is about to die, by anxiety as to what is to
happen to him after it. And, indeed, if life really is a good, to whom
can it be so to have once lived?
How much more easy, then, and how much more devoid of all doubts, is it
for each of us to put his trust in himself, and guided by our knowledge
of what our state has been before birth, to assume that that after
death will be the same.
Before we quit the consideration of the nature of man, it appears
only proper to point out those persons who have been the authors of
different inventions. Father Liber1363 was the first to establish
the practice of buying and selling; he also invented the diadem, the
emblem of royalty, and the triumphal procession. Ceres1364 introduced
corn, the acorn having been previously used by man for food; it was
she, also, who introduced into Attica the art of grinding corn1365
and of making bread, and other similar arts into Sicily; and it was
from these circumstances that she came to be regarded as a divinity.
She was the first also to establish laws;1366 though, according
to some, it was Rhadamanthus. I have always been of opinion, that
letters were of Assyrian origin, but other writers, Gellius,1367 for
instance, suppose that they were invented in Egypt by Mercury: others,
again, will have it that they were discovered by the Syrians; and that
Cadmus brought from Phœnicia sixteen letters into Greece. To these,
Palamedes, it is said, at the time of the Trojan war, added these four,
Θ, Ξ, Φ, and Χ. Simonides,1368
the lyric poet, afterwards added a like number, Ζ, Η,
Ψ, and Ω; the sounds denoted by all of which are now
received into our alphabet.1369
Aristotle, on the other hand, is rather of opinion, that there were
originally eighteen letters,1370Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ο
Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ, and that two, Θ namely and Χ, were
introduced by Epicharmus,1371 and not by Palamedes. Aristides says,
that a certain person of the name of Menos, in Egypt, invented letters
fifteen years before the reign of Phoroneus,1372 the most ancient
of all the kings of Greece, and this he attempts to prove by the
monuments there. On the other hand, Epigenes,1373 a writer of very
great authority, informs us that the Babylonians have a series of
observations on the stars, for a period of seven hundred and twenty
thousand years, inscribed on baked bricks. Berosus and Critodemus,
who make the period the shortest, give it as four hundred and ninety
thousand years.1374 From this statement, it would appear that
letters have been in use from all eternity. The Pelasgi were the first
to introduce them into Latium.
The brothers Euryalus and Hyperbius1375 were the first who
constructed brick-kilns and houses at Athens; before which, caves
in the ground served for houses. Gellius1376 is inclined to think
that Toxius, the son of Cælus, was the first inventor of mortar, it
having been suggested to him by the nest of the swallow. Cecrops1377
gave to a town the name of Cecropia, after himself; this is now the
citadel of Athens. Some persons will have it, that Argos had been
founded before this period by King Phoroneus; others, again, that
Sicyon had been previously built; while the Egyptians declare that
their own city, Diospolis, had been in existence long before them.
Cinyra,1378 the son of Agriopas,1379 invented tiles and discovered
copper-mines,1380 both of them in the island of Cyprus; he also
invented the tongs, the hammer, the lever, and the anvil. Wells were
invented by Danaus,1381 who came from Egypt into that part of Greece
which had been previously known as Argos Dipsion.
The first stone-quarries were opened by Cadmus at Thebes, or else,
according to Theophrastus, in Phœnicia. Walls were first built by
Thrason;1382 according to Aristotle, towers were first erected by the
Cyclopes,1383 but according to Theophrastus, by the Tirynthii. The
Egyptians invented weaving;1384 the Lydians of Sardis the art of
dyeing wool.1385 Closter, the son of Arachne, invented the spindle
for spinning wool;1386 Arachne herself, linen cloth and nets;1387
Nicias of Megara, the art of fulling cloth;1388 and Tychius, the
Bœotian, the art of making shoes.1389 The Egyptians will have it that
the medical art was first discovered among them, while others attribute
it to Arabus, the son of Babylonis and Apollo; botany and pharmacy are
ascribed to Chiron, the son of Saturn and Philyra.1390
Aristotle supposes that Scythes, the Lydian, was the first to fuse
and temper copper, while Theophrastus ascribes the art to Delas, the
Phrygian.1391 Some persons ascribe the working of copper to the
Chalybes, others to the Cyclopes. Hesiod says, that iron was discovered
in Crete, by the Idæan Dactyli.1392 Erichthonius, the Athenian, or,
as some people say, Æacus, discovered silver.1393 Gold mines, and the
mode of fusing that metal, were discovered by Cadmus, the Phœnician,
at the mountain of Pangæus,1394 or, according to other accounts,
by Thoas or Eaclis, in Panchaia;1395 or else by Sol, the son of
Oceanus, whom Gellius mentions as having been the first who employed
honey in medicine. Midacritus1396 was the first who brought tin from
the island called Cassiteris.1397 The Cyclopes invented the art of
working iron.1398 Choræbus, the Athenian, was the first who made
earthen vessels;1399 but Anacharsis, the Scythian, or, according
to others, Hyperbius, the Corinthian, first invented the potter’s
wheel. Dædalus1400 was the first person who worked in wood; it was
he who invented the saw, the axe, the plummet, the gimlet, glue, and
isinglass;1401 the square, the level, the turner’s lathe, and the
key, were invented by Theodorus, of Samos.1402 Measures and weights
were invented by Phidon, of Argos,1403 or, according to Gellius, by
Palamedes. Pyrodes, the son of Cilix, was the first to strike fire from
the flint, and Prometheus taught us how to preserve it, in the stalk of
giant-fennel.1404
The Phrygians first taught us the use of the chariot with four
wheels;1405 the Carthaginians the arts of merchandize,1406 and
Eumolpus, the Athenian,1407 the cultivation of the vine, and of
trees in general. Staphylus, the son of Silenus,1408 was the first
to mix water with wine; olive-oil and the oil-press, as also honey, we
owe to Aristæus, the Athenian;1409 the use of oxen and the plough
to Buzyges, the Athenian,1410 or, according to other accounts, to
Triptolemus.1411
The Egyptians were the first who established a monarchical government,
and the Athenians, after the time of Theseus, a democracy.
Phalaris,1412 of Agrigentum, was the first tyrant1413 that existed;
the Lacedæmonians were the introducers of slavery;1414 and the first
capital punishment inflicted was ordered by the Areiopagus.1415 The
first battles were fought by the Africans against the Egyptians, with
clubs, which they are in the habit of calling phalangæ. Prœtus and
Acrisius1416 were the first to use shields, in their contests with
each other; or, as some say, Chalcus, the son of Athamas. Midias,
the Messenian, invented the coat of mail, and the Lacedæmonians
the helmet, the sword, and the spear.1417 Greaves and crests
were first used by the Carians; Scythes, the son of Jupiter, it is
said, invented the bow and arrows, though some say that arrows were
invented by Perses, the son of Perseus.1418 Lances were invented
by the Ætolians; the javelin, with the thong1419 attached, by
Ætolus,1420 the son of Mars; the spear of the light infantry1421
by Tyrrhenus; the dart1422 by Penthesilea, the Amazon; the axe by
Pisæus; the hunting-spear, and the scorpion to hurl missiles, by the
Cretans;1423 the catapulta, the balista,1424 and the sling, by the
Syrophœnicians.1425 Pisæus, the Tyrrhenian, was the first to invent
the brazen trumpet,1426 and Artemon, of Clazomenæ, the use of the
testudo.1427 The battering-horse, for the destruction of walls,
which is at the present day styled the “ram,” was invented by Epeus,
at Troy.1428 Bellerophon was the first who mounted the horse;1429
bridles and saddles for the horse were invented by Pelethronius.1430
The Thessalians, who are called Centauri, and who dwell along Mount
Pelion, were the first to fight on horse-back. The people of Phrygia
were the first who used chariots with two horses; Erichthonius first
used four.1431 Palamedes, during the Trojan war, was the first who
marshalled an army, and invented watchwords,1432 signals, and the
use of sentinels. Sinon, at the same period, invented the art of
correspondence by signals. Lycaon was the first to think of making a
truce, and Theseus a treaty of alliance.
The art of divination by means of birds1433 we owe to Car, from
whom Caria derives its name; Orpheus extended it to other animals.
Delphus taught us the art of divining by the inspection of entrails;
Amphiaraüs1434 divination by fire; and Tiresias, the Theban,
presages from the entrails of birds. We owe to Amphictyon1435 the
interpretation of portents and of dreams, and to Atlas,1436 the son
of Libya, the art of astrology, or else, according to other accounts,
to the Egyptians or the Assyrians. Anaximander,1437 the Milesian,
invented the astronomical sphere; and Æolus, the son of Hellen, gave us
the theory of the winds.
Amphion was the inventor of music;1438 Pan, the son of Mercury,
the music of the reed, and the flute with the single pipe; Midas,
the Phrygian,1439 the transverse flute;1440 and Marsyas, of the
same country, the double-pipe.1441 Amphion invented the Lydian
measures in music; Thamyris the Thracian, the Dorian, and Marsyas
the Phrygian, the Phrygian style.1442 Amphion, or, according to
some accounts, Orpheus, and according to others, Linus, invented the
lyre.1443 Terpander, adding three to the former four, increased the
number of strings to seven; Simonides added an eighth, and Timotheus a
ninth.1444 Thamyris was the first who played on the lyre, without the
accompaniment of the voice; and Amphion, or, as some say, Linus, was
the first who accompanied it with the voice. Terpander was the first
who composed songs expressly for the lyre; and Ardalus, the Trœzenian,
was the first who taught us how to combine the voice with the music of
the pipe.1445 The Curetes taught us the dance in armour,1446 and
Pyrrhus, the Pyrrhic dance, both of them in Crete.
We are indebted to the Pythian oracle for the first heroic verse.1447
A very considerable question has arisen, as to what was the origin
of poetry; it is well known to have existed before the Trojan war.
Pherecydes of Scyros, in the time of King Cyrus, was the first to write
in prose, and Cadmus, the Milesian, was the first historian.1448
Lycaon1449 first instituted gymnastic games, in Arcadia; Acastus
funereal games,1450 at Iolcos;1451 and, after him, Theseus
instituted them at the Isthmus.1452 Hercules first instituted the
athletic contests at Olympia.1453 Pythus invented the game of
ball.1454 Painting was invented in Egypt by Gyges, the Lydian,1455
or, according to Aristotle, in Greece, by Euchir, a kinsman1456
of Dædalus; according to Theophrastus, again, it was invented by
Polygnotus, the Athenian.
Danaüs was the first who passed over in a ship from Egypt to
Greece.1457 Before his time, they used to sail on rafts,1458 which
had been invented by King Erythras,1459 to pass from one island to
another in the Red Sea. There are some writers to be found, who are of
opinion that they were first thought of by the Mysians and the Trojans,
for the purpose of crossing the Hellespont into Thrace. Even at the
present day, they are made in the British ocean, of wicker-work covered
with hides;1460 on the Nile they are made of papyrus, rushes, and
reeds.
We learn from Philostephanus, that Jason was the first person who
sailed in a long vessel;1461 Hegesias says it was Paralus,
Ctesias,1462 Semiramis,1463 and Archemachus, Ægæon. According to
Damastes,1464 the Erythræi1465 were the first to construct vessels
with two banks of oars; according to Thucydides,1466 Aminocles, the
Corinthian, first constructed them with three banks of oars; according
to Aristotle, the Carthaginians, those with four banks; according to
Mnesigiton, the people of Salamis, those with five banks;1467 and,
according to Xenagoras, the Syracusans, those with six; those above
six, as far as ten, Mnesigiton says were first constructed by Alexander
the Great. From Philostephanus, we learn that Ptolemy Soter made
them as high as twelve banks; Demetrius, the son of Antigonus, with
fifteen; Ptolemy Philadelphus, with thirty; and Ptolemy Philopater,
who was surnamed Tryphon, with forty.1468 Hippus, the Tyrian, was
the first who invented merchant-ships; the Cyrenians, the pinnace;
the Phœnicians, the passage-boat; the Rhodians, the skiff; and the
Cyprians, the cutter.1469
We are indebted to the Phœnicians for the first observation of the
stars in navigation; the Copæ invented the oar, and the Platæans
gave it its broad blade.1470 Icarus was the person who invented
sails,1471 and Dædalus the mast and yards; the Samians, or else
Pericles, the Athenian, transports for horses,1472 and the Thracians,
long covered vessels,1473—before which time they used to fight only
from the prow or the stern. Pisæus, the Tyrrhenian, added the beak to
ships;1474 Eupalamus, the anchor; Anacharsis, that with two flukes;
Pericles, the Athenian, grappling-irons, and hooks like hands;1475
and Tiphys,1476 the helm and rudder. Minos was the first who waged
war by means of ships; Hyperbius, the son of Mars, the first who killed
an animal; and Prometheus, the first who slew the ox.1477
There was at the very earliest1478 period a tacit consent among all
nations to adopt the letters now used by the Ionians.1479 (58.)
That the ancient Greek letters were almost the same with the modern
Latin,1480 is proved by the ancient Delphic inscription on copper,
which is now in the Palatine library, having been dedicated by the
emperors to Minerva; this inscription is as follows:
ΝΑΥΣΙΚΡΑΤΗΣ ΑΝΕΘΕΤΟ ΤΗΙ ΔΙΟΣ ΚΟΡΗΙ.
[“Nausicrates offered this to the daughter of Zeus.”]1481
The next point upon which all nations appear to have agreed, was the
employment of barbers.1483 The Romans, however, were more tardy
in the adoption of their services. According to Varro, they were
introduced into Italy from Sicily, in the year of Rome 454,1484
having been brought over by P. Titinius Mena: before which time the
Romans did not cut the hair. The younger Africanus1485 was the first
who adopted the custom of shaving every day. The late Emperor Augustus
always made use of razors.1486
(60.) The third point of universal agreement was the division of time,
a subject which afterwards appealed to the reasoning faculties. We have
already stated, in the Second Book,1487 when and by whom this art
was first invented in Greece; the same was also introduced at Rome,
but at a later period. In the Twelve Tables, the rising and setting of
the sun are the only things that are mentioned relative to time. Some
years afterwards, the hour of midday was added, the summoner1488 of
the consuls proclaiming it aloud, as soon as, from the senate-house, he
caught sight of the sun between the Rostra and the Græcostasis;1489
he also proclaimed the last hour, when the sun had gone down from the
Mænian column1490 to the prison. This, however, could only be done
in clear weather, but it was continued until the first Punic war. The
first sun-dial is said to have been erected among the Romans twelve
years before the war with Pyrrhus, by L. Papirius Cursor,1491 at
the temple of Quirinus,1492 on which occasion he dedicated it in
pursuance of a vow which had been made by his father. This is the
account given by Fabius Vestalis; but he makes no mention of either the
construction of the dial or the artist, nor does he inform us from what
place it was brought, or in whose works he found this statement made.
M. Varro1493 says that the first sun-dial, erected for the use of
the public, was fixed upon a column near the Rostra, in the time of
the first Punic war, by the consul M. Valerius Messala, and that it
was brought from the capture of Catina, in Sicily: this being thirty
years after the date assigned to the dial of Papirius, and the year
of Rome 491. The lines in this dial did not exactly agree with the
hours;1494 it served, however, as the regulator of the Roman time
ninety-nine years, until Q. Marcius Philippus, who was censor with L.
Paulus, placed one near it, which was more carefully arranged: an act
which was most gratefully acknowledged, as one of the very best of his
censorship. The hours, however, still remained a matter of uncertainty,
whenever the weather happened to be cloudy, until the ensuing lustrum;
at which time Scipio Nasica, the colleague of Lænas, by means of
a clepsydra, was the first to divide the hours of the day and the
night into equal parts: and this time-piece he placed under cover and
dedicated, in the year of Rome 595;1495 for so long a period had the
Romans remained without any exact division of the day. We will now
return to the history of the other animals, and first to that of the
terrestrial.
Summary.—Remarkable events, narratives, and observations,
seven hundred and forty-seven.
Roman authors quoted.—Verrius Flaccus,1496 Cneius
Gellius,1497 Licinius Mutianus,1498 Massurius Sabinius,1499
Agrippina, the wife of Claudius,1500 M. Cicero,1501 Asinius
Pollio,1502 M. Varro,1503 Messala Rufus,1504 Cornelius
Nepos,1505 Virgil,1506 Livy,1507 Cordus,1508 Melissus,1509
Sebosus,1510 Cornelius Celsus,1511 Maximus Valerius,1512
Trogus,1513 Nigidius Figulus,1514 Pomponius Atticus,1515 Pedianus
Asconius,1516 Fabianus,1517 Cato the Censor,1518 the Register of
the Triumphs,1519 Fabius Vestalis.1520
Foreign authors quoted.—Herodotus,1521 Aristeas,1522
Bæton,1523 Isigonus,1524 Crates,1525 Agatharchides,1526
Calliphanes,1527 Aristotle,1528 Nymphodorus,1529
Apollonides,1530 Phylarchus,1531 Damon,1532 Megasthenes,1533
Ctesias,1534 Tauron,1535 Eudoxus,1536 Onesicritus,1537
Clitarchus,1538 Duris,1539 Artemidorus,1540 Hippocrates1541
the physician, Asclepiades1542 the physician, Hesiod,1543
Anacreon,1544 Theopompus,1545 Hellanicus,1546 Damastes,1547
Ephorus,1548 Epigenes,1549 Berosus,1550 Petosiris,1551
Necepsos,1552 Alexander Polyhistor,1553 Xenophon,1554
Callimachus,1555 Democritus,1556 Diyllus1557 the historian,
Strabo,1558 who wrote against the Euremata of Ephorus, Heraclides
Ponticus,1559 Aclepiades,1560 who wrote the Tragodoumena,
Philostephanus,1561 Hegesias,1562 Archimachus,1563
Thucydides,1564 Mnesigiton,1565 Xenagoras,1566 Metrodorus1567
of Scepsos, Anticlides,1568 Critodemus.1569
BOOK VIII. THE NATURE OF THE TERRESTRIAL ANIMALS. — CHAP. 1. (1.)—ELEPHANTS; THEIR CAPACITY. — CHAP. 2. (2.)—WHEN ELEPHANTS WERE FIRST PUT INTO HARNESS. — CHAP. 3. (3.)—THE DOCILITY OF THE ELEPHANT. — CHAP. 4.—WONDERFUL THINGS WHICH HAVE BEEN DONE BY THE ELEPHANT. — CHAP. 5. (4.)—THE INSTINCT OF WILD ANIMALS IN PERCEIVING DANGER. — CHAP. 6. (6.)—WHEN ELEPHANTS WERE FIRST SEEN IN ITALY. — CHAP. 7. (7.)—THE COMBATS OF ELEPHANTS. — CHAP. 8. (8.)—THE WAY IN WHICH ELEPHANTS ARE CAUGHT. — CHAP. 9. (9.)—THE METHOD BY WHICH THEY ARE TAMED. — CHAP. 10. (10.)—THE BIRTH OF THE ELEPHANT, AND OTHER PARTICULARS RESPECTING IT. — CHAP. 11. (11.)—IN WHAT COUNTRIES THE ELEPHANT IS FOUND; THE ANTIPATHY OF THE ELEPHANT AND THE DRAGON. — CHAP. 12. (12.)—THE SAGACITY OF THESE ANIMALS. — CHAP. 13. (13.)—DRAGONS. — CHAP. 14. (14.)—SERPENTS OF REMARKABLE SIZE. — CHAP. 15. (15.)—THE ANIMALS OF SCYTHIA; THE BISON. — CHAP. 16.—THE ANIMALS OF THE NORTH; THE ELK, THE ACHLIS, AND THE BONASUS. — CHAP. 17.—LIONS; HOW THEY ARE PRODUCED. — CHAP. 18.—THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF LIONS. — CHAP. 19.—THE PECULIAR CHARACTER OF THE LION. — CHAP. 20.—WHO IT WAS THAT FIRST INTRODUCED COMBATS OF LIONS AT ROME, AND WHO HAS BROUGHT TOGETHER THE GREATEST NUMBER OF LIONS FOR THAT PURPOSE. — CHAP. 21.—WONDERFUL FEATS PERFORMED BY LIONS. — CHAP. 22.—A MAN RECOGNIZED AND SAVED BY A DRAGON. — CHAP. 23.—PANTHERS. — CHAP. 24.—THE DECREE OF THE SENATE, AND LAWS RESPECTING AFRICAN ANIMALS; WHO FIRST BROUGHT THEM TO ROME, AND WHO BROUGHT THE GREATEST NUMBER OF THEM. — CHAP. 25.—TIGERS: WHEN FIRST SEEN AT ROME; THEIR NATURE. — CHAP. 26.—CAMELS: 1699 THE DIFFERENT KINDS. — CHAP. 27.—THE CAMELEOPARD; WHEN IT WAS FIRST SEEN AT ROME. — CHAP. 28. (19.)—THE CHAMA, AND THE CEPUS. — CHAP. 29. (20.)—THE RHINOCEROS. — CHAP. 30. (21.)—THE LYNX, THE SPHINX, THE CROCOTTA, AND THE MONKEY. — CHAP. 31.—THE TERRESTRIAL ANIMALS OF INDIA. — CHAP. 32.—THE ANIMALS OF ÆTHIOPIA; A WILD BEAST WHICH KILLS WITH ITS EYE. — CHAP. 33.—THE SERPENTS CALLED BASILISKS. — CHAP. 34. (22.)—WOLVES; THE ORIGIN OF THE STORY OF VERSIPELLIS. — CHAP. 35. (23.)—DIFFERENT KINDS OF SERPENTS. — CHAP. 36.—THE ICHNEUMON. — CHAP. 37. (25.)—THE CROCODILE. — CHAP. 38.—THE SCINCUS. — CHAP. 39.—THE HIPPOPOTAMUS. — CHAP. 40. (26.)—WHO FIRST EXHIBITED THE HIPPOPOTAMUS AND THE CROCODILE AT ROME. — CHAP. 41. (27.)—THE MEDICINAL REMEDIES WHICH HAVE BEEN BORROWED FROM ANIMALS. 1773 — CHAP. 42. (28.)—PROGNOSTICS OF DANGER DERIVED FROM ANIMALS. — CHAP. 43. (29.)—NATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN EXTERMINATED BY ANIMALS. — CHAP. 44. (30.)—THE HYÆNA. — CHAP. 45.—THE COROCOTTA; THE MANTICHORA. 1799 — CHAP. 46.—WILD ASSES. — CHAP. 47.—BEAVERS, AMPHIBIOUS ANIMALS; 1801 OTTERS. — CHAP. 48. (31.)—BRAMBLE-FROGS. — CHAP. 49.—THE SEA-CALF; BEAVERS; LIZARDS. — CHAP. 50. (32.)—STAGS. — CHAP. 51.—THE CHAMELEON. — CHAP. 52.—OTHER ANIMALS WHICH CHANGE COLOUR; THE TARANDUS, THE LYCAON, AND THE THOS. — CHAP. 53. (35.)—THE PORCUPINE. — CHAP. 54. (36.)—BEARS AND THEIR CUBS. — CHAP. 55. (37.)—THE MICE OF PONTUS AND OF THE ALPS. — CHAP. 56.—HEDGEHOGS. — CHAP. 57. (38.)—THE LEONTOPHONUS, AND THE LYNX. 1858 — CHAP. 58.—BADGERS AND SQUIRRELS. — CHAP. 59. (39.)—VIPERS AND SNAILS. — CHAP. 60.—LIZARDS. 1872 — CHAP. 61. (40.)—THE QUALITIES OF THE DOG; EXAMPLES OF ITS ATTACHMENT TO ITS MASTER; NATIONS WHICH HAVE KEPT DOGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF WAR. — CHAP. 62.—THE GENERATION OF THE DOG. 1888 — CHAP. 63.—REMEDIES AGAINST CANINE MADNESS. 1890 — CHAP. 64. (42.)—THE NATURE OF THE HORSE. — CHAP. 65.—THE DISPOSITION OF THE HORSE; REMARKABLE FACTS CONCERNING CHARIOT HORSES. — CHAP. 66.—THE GENERATION OF THE HORSE. 1916 — CHAP. 67.—MARES IMPREGNATED BY THE WIND. — CHAP. 68. (45.)—THE ASS, ITS GENERATION. — CHAP. 69. (44.)—THE NATURE OF MULES, 1940 AND OF OTHER BEASTS OF BURDEN. — CHAP. 70. (45.)—OXEN; THEIR GENERATION. — CHAP. 71. (46.)—THE EGYPTIAN APIS. 1965 — CHAP. 72. (47.)—SHEEP, AND THEIR PROPAGATION. 1971 — CHAP. 73. (43.)—THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF WOOL, AND THEIR COLOURS. 1984 — CHAP. 74.—DIFFERENT KINDS OF CLOTHS. — CHAP. 75.—THE DIFFERENT SHAPES OF SHEEP; THE MUSMON. — CHAP. 76. (50.)—GOATS AND THEIR PROPAGATION. — CHAP. 77. (51.)—THE HOG. 2060 — CHAP. 78.—THE WILD BOAR; WHO WAS THE FIRST TO ESTABLISH PARKS FOR WILD ANIMALS. — CHAP. 79. (53.)—ANIMALS IN A HALF-WILD STATE. — CHAP. 80. (54.)—APES. — CHAP. 81. (55.)—THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF HARES. — CHAP. 82. (56.)—ANIMALS WHICH ARE TAMED IN PART ONLY. — CHAP. 83. (58.)—PLACES IN WHICH CERTAIN ANIMALS ARE NOT TO BE FOUND. — CHAP. 84. (59.)—ANIMALS WHICH INJURE STRANGERS ONLY, AS ALSO ANIMALS WHICH INJURE THE NATIVES OF THE COUNTRY ONLY, AND WHERE THEY ARE FOUND.
Let us now pass on to the other animals, and first of all to the land
animals. The elephant is the largest of them all, and in intelligence
approaches the nearest to man. It understands the language of its
country, it obeys commands, and it remembers all the duties which it
has been taught. It is sensible alike of the pleasures of love and
glory, and, to a degree that is rare among men even, possesses notions
of honesty, prudence, and equity; it has a religious respect also for
the stars, and a veneration for the sun and the moon.1570 It is
said by some authors, that, at the first appearance of the new moon,
herds of these animals come down from the forests of Mauritania to a
river, the name of which is Amilo;1571 and that they there purify
themselves in solemn form by sprinkling their bodies with water; after
which, having thus saluted the heavenly body, they return to the woods,
carrying before them1572 the young ones which are fatigued. They are
supposed to have a notion, too, of the differences of religion;1573
and when about to cross the sea, they cannot be prevailed upon to go
on board the ship, until their keeper has promised upon oath that they
shall return home again. They have been seen, too, when worn out by
disease, (for even these vast masses are liable to disease,) lying on
their back, and throwing the grass up into the air, as if deputing the
earth to intercede for them with its prayers.1574 As a proof of their
extreme docility, they pay homage to the king, fall upon their knees,
and offer him the crown. Those of smaller growth, which the Indians
call bastards,1575 are employed by them in ploughing.1576
The first harnessed elephants that were seen at Rome, were in the
triumph of Pompeius Magnus over Africa, when they drew his chariot;
a thing that is said to have been done long before, at the triumph
of Father Liber on the conquest of India. Procilius1577 says, that
those which were used at the triumph of Pompeius, were unable to go in
harness through the gate of the city. In the exhibition of gladiators
which was given by Germanicus,1578 the elephants performed a sort of
dance with their uncouth and irregular movements. It was a common thing
to see them throw arrows with such strength, that the wind was unable
to turn them from their course, to imitate among themselves the combats
of the gladiators, and to frolic through the steps of the Pyrrhic
dance.1579 After this, too, they walked upon the tight-rope,1580
and four of them would carry a litter in which lay a fifth, which
represented a woman lying-in. They afterwards took their places at
table, reclining upon couches which were filled with people; and so
nicely did they manage their steps, that they did not so much as touch
any of those who were drinking there.
It is a well-known fact,1581 that one of these animals, who was
slower than usual in learning what was taught him, and had been
frequently chastised with blows, was found conning over his lesson in
the night-time.1582 It is a most surprising thing also, that the
elephant is able not only to walk up the tight-rope backwards; but
to come down it as well, with the head foremost.1583 Mutianus, who
was three times consul, informs us that one of these animals had been
taught to trace the Greek letters, and that he used to write in that
language the following words: “I have myself written these words, and
have dedicated the Celtic spoils.”1584 Mutianus states also, that he
himself was witness to the fact, that when some elephants were being
landed at Puteoli1585 and were compelled to leave the ship, being
terrified at the length of the platform, which extended from the vessel
to the shore, they walked backwards, in order to deceive themselves by
forming a false estimate of the distance.
These animals are well aware that the only spoil that we are anxious
to procure of them is the part which forms their weapon of defence, by
Juba, called their horns, but by Herodotus, a much older writer, as
well as by general usage and more appropriately, their teeth.1586
Hence it is that, when their tusks have fallen off, either by accident
or from old age, they bury them in the earth.1587 These tusks form
the only real ivory, and, even in these, the part which is covered by
the flesh is merely common bone, and of no value whatever; though,
indeed, of late, in consequence of the insufficient supply of ivory,
they have begun to cut the bones as well into thin plates. Large
teeth, in fact, are now rarely found, except in India, the demands
of luxury1588 having exhausted all those in our part of the world.
The youthfulness of the animal is ascertained by the whiteness of the
teeth.1589 These animals take the greatest care of their teeth;
they pay especial attention to the point of one of them, that it may
not be found blunt when wanted for combat; the other they employ for
various purposes, such as digging up roots and pushing forward heavy
weights. When they are surrounded by the hunters, they place those in
front which have the smallest teeth, that the enemy may think that the
spoil is not worth the combat; and afterwards, when they are weary of
resistance, they break off their teeth, by dashing them against a
tree, and in this manner pay their ransom.1590
It is a wonderful thing, that most animals are aware why it is that
they are sought after, and what it is, that, under all circumstances,
they have to guard against. When an elephant happens to meet a man in
the desert, who is merely wandering about, the animal, it is said,
shows himself both merciful and kind, and even points out the way.
But the very same animal, if he meets with the traces of a man,1591
before he meets the man himself, trembles in every limb, for fear of an
ambush, stops short and scents the wind, looks around him, and snorts
aloud with rage; and then, without trampling upon the object, digs it
up,1592 and passes it to the next one, who again passes it to the
one that follows, and so on from one to the other, till it comes to
the very last. The herd then faces about, returns, and ranges itself
in order of battle; so strongly does the odour, in all cases, attach
itself to the human footstep, even though, as is most frequently the
case, the foot itself is not naked. In the same way, too, the tigress,
which is the dread of the other wild beasts, and which sees, without
alarm, the traces even of the elephant itself, is said at once, upon
seeing the footsteps of man, to carry off her whelps. How has the
animal acquired this knowledge? And where has it seen him before, of
whom it stands in such dread? Doubt there can be none, that forests
such as it haunts are but little frequented by man! It is not to be
wondered at, if they are astonished at the print of a footstep before
unknown; but how should they know that there is anything that they
ought to dread? And, what is still more, why should they dread even
the very sight of man, seeing that they are so far superior to him in
strength, size, and swiftness? No doubt, such is the law of Nature,
such is the influence of her power—the most savage and the very
largest of wild beasts have never seen that which they have reason to
fear, and yet instantly have an instinctive feeling of dread, when the
moment has come for them to fear.1593
(5.) Elephants always move in herds.1594 The oldest takes the lead,
and the next in age brings up the rear. When they are crossing a river,
they first send over the smallest, for fear lest the weight of the
larger ones may increase the depth of the channel, by working away the
bed of the river. We learn from Antipater, that King Antiochus had two
elephants, which he employed in his wars, and to which he had given
the names of celebrated men; and that they were aware too of this mark
of distinction.1595 Cato, in his Annals, while he has passed over in
silence the names of the generals, has given that of an elephant called
Surus, which fought with the greatest valour in the Carthaginian army,
and had lost one of its tusks. When Antiochus was sounding the ford of
a river, an elephant named Ajax, which on other occasions had always
led the van, refused to enter the stream; upon which proclamation was
made, that the first rank should belong to the one which should take
the lead in passing over. One called Patroclus hazarded the attempt,
and as a reward, the king presented it with some silver pendants,1596
a kind of ornament with which these animals are particularly delighted,
and assigned it all the other marks of command. Upon this, the
elephant that had been degraded refused to take its food, and so
preferred death to ignominy. Indeed their sense of shame is wonderful,
and when one of them has been conquered, it flies at the voice of the
conqueror, and presents him with earth and vervain.1597
These animals are sensible to feelings of modesty; they never couple
but in secret:1598 the male after it has attained its fifth year, the
female after the age of ten.1599 It is said, that their intercourse
takes place only every second year, and for five days only, and no
more; on the sixth day they plunge into a river, before doing which
they will not rejoin the herd. Adulterous intercourse is unknown to
them, and they have none of those deadly combats for the possession
of the female, which take place among the other animals. Nor is this
because they are uninfluenced by the passion of love. One in Egypt,
we are told, fell in love with a woman, who was a seller of garlands;
and let no one suppose that he made a vulgar choice, for she was the
especial object of the love of Aristophanes, who held the very highest
rank as a grammarian. Another became attached to the youth Menander,
a native of Syracuse, in the army of Ptolemy; whenever it did not see
him, it would manifest the regret which it experienced, by refusing its
food. Juba gives an account also of a female who dealt in perfumes, to
whom one of these creatures formed an attachment. All these animals
manifested their attachment by their signs of joy at the sight of
the person, by their awkward caresses, and by keeping for them and
throwing into their bosom the pieces of money which the public had
given them.1600 Nor, indeed, ought we to be surprised, that an
animal which possesses memory should be sensible of affection: for
the same author relates, that an elephant recognized, after the lapse
of many years, an old man who had been its keeper in his youth. They
would seem also to have an instinctive feeling of justice. King Bocchus
once fastened thirty elephants to the stake, with the determination of
wreaking his vengeance on them, by means of thirty others; but though
men kept sallying forth among them to goad them on, he could not, with
all his endeavours, force them to become the ministers of the cruelty
of others.
Elephants were seen in Italy, for the first time, in the war with King
Pyrrhus,1601 in the year of the City 472; they were called “Lucanian
oxen,” because they were first seen in Lucania.1602 Seven years
after this period, they appeared at Rome in a triumph.1603 In the
year 502 a great number of them were brought to Rome, which had been
taken by the pontiff Metellus, in his victory gained in Sicily over
the Carthaginians;1604 they were one hundred and forty-two1605 in
number, or, as some say, one hundred and forty, and were conveyed to
our shores upon rafts, which were constructed on rows of hogsheads
joined together. Verrius informs us, that they fought in the Circus,
and that they were slain with javelins, for want of some better method
of disposing of them; as the people neither liked to keep them nor yet
to give them to the kings.1606 L. Piso tells us only that they were
brought into the Circus; and for the purpose of increasing the feeling
of contempt towards them, they were driven all round the area of that
place by workmen, who had nothing but spears blunted at the point. The
authors who are of opinion that they were not killed, do not, however,
inform us how they were afterwards disposed of.
There is a famous combat mentioned of a Roman with an elephant, when
Hannibal compelled our prisoners to fight against each other. The one
who had survived all the others he placed before an elephant, and
promised him his life if he should slay it; upon which the man advanced
alone into the arena, and, to the great regret of the Carthaginians,
succeeded in doing so.1607 Hannibal, however, thinking that the news
of this victory might cause a feeling of contempt for these animals,
sent some horsemen to kill the man on his way home. In our battles
with Pyrrhus it was found, on making trial, that it was extremely easy
to cut off the trunks of these animals.1608 Fenestella informs us,
that they fought at Rome in the Circus for the first time during the
curule ædileship of Claudius Pulcher, in the consulship of M. Antonius
and A. Postumius, in the year of the City 655; and that twenty years
afterwards, during the curule ædileship of the Luculli, they were set
to fight against bulls. In the second consulship1609 of Pompeius, at
the dedication of the temple of Venus Victrix,1610 twenty elephants,
or, as some say, seventeen, fought in the Circus against a number
of Gætulians, who attacked them with javelins. One of these animals
fought in a most astonishing manner; being pierced through the feet,
it dragged itself on its knees towards the troop, and seizing their
bucklers, tossed them aloft into the air: and as they came to the
ground they greatly amused the spectators, for they whirled round and
round in the air, just as if they had been thrown up with a certain
degree of skill,1611 and not by the frantic fury of a wild beast.
Another very wonderful circumstance happened; an elephant was killed
by a single blow. The weapon pierced the animal below the eye, and
entered the vital part of the head. The elephants attempted, too, by
their united efforts, to break down the enclosure, not without great
confusion among the people who surrounded the iron gratings.1612 It
was in consequence of this circumstance, that Cæsar, the Dictator, when
he was afterwards about to exhibit a similar spectacle, had the arena
surrounded with trenches1613 of water, which were lately filled up
by the Emperor Nero,1614 when he added the seats for the equestrian
order.1615 When, however, the elephants in the exhibition given by
Pompeius had lost all hopes of escaping, they implored the compassion
of the multitude by attitudes which surpass all description, and
with a kind of lamentation bewailed their unhappy fate. So greatly
were the people affected by the scene, that, forgetting the general
altogether, and the munificence which had been at such pains to do them
honour, the whole assembly rose up in tears, and showered curses on
Pompeius, of which he soon afterwards became the victim. They fought
also in the third consulship of the Dictator Cæsar, twenty of them
against five hundred foot soldiers.1616 On another occasion twenty
elephants, carrying towers,1617 and each defended by sixty men, were
opposed to the same number of foot soldiers as before, and an equal
number of horsemen. Afterwards, under the Emperors Claudius and Nero,
the last exploit1618 that the gladiators performed was fighting
single-handed1619 with elephants.
The elephant is said to display such a merciful disposition towards
animals that are weaker than itself, that, when it finds itself in a
flock of sheep, it will remove with its trunk1620 those that are
in the way, lest it should unintentionally trample upon them.1621
They will never do any mischief except when provoked, and they are of
a disposition so sociable, that they always move about in herds, no
animal being less fond of a solitary life. When surrounded by a troop
of horsemen, they place in the centre of the herd those that are weak,
weary, or wounded, and then take the front rank each in its turn, just
as though they acted under command and in accordance with discipline.
When taken captive, they are very speedily tamed, by being fed on the
juices of barley.1622
In India1623 they are caught by the keeper guiding one of the tame
elephants towards a wild one which he has found alone or has separated
from the herd; upon which he beats it, and when it is fatigued mounts
and manages it just the same way as the other. In Africa1624 they
take them in pit-falls; but as soon as an elephant gets into one, the
others immediately collect boughs of trees and pile up heaps of earth,
so as to form a mound, and then endeavour with all their might to drag
it out. It was formerly the practice to tame them by driving the herds
with horsemen into a narrow defile, artificially made in such a way
as to deceive them by its length; and when thus enclosed by means of
steep banks and trenches, they were rendered tame by the effects of
hunger; as a proof of which, they would quietly take a branch that was
extended to them by one of the men. At the present day, when we take
them for the sake of their tusks, we throw darts at their feet, which
are in general the most tender part of their body. The Troglodytæ, who
inhabit the confines of Æthiopia, and who live entirely on the flesh
of elephants procured by the chase, climb the trees which lie near the
paths through which these animals usually pass. Here they keep a watch,
and look out for the one which comes last in the train; leaping down
upon its haunches, they seize its tail with the left hand, and fix
their feet firmly upon the left thigh. Hanging down in this manner,
the man, with his right hand, hamstrings the animal on one side, with
a very sharp hatchet. The elephant’s pace being retarded by the wound,
he cuts the tendons of the other ham, and then makes his escape; all of
which is done with the very greatest celerity. Others, again, employ
a much safer, though less certain method; they fix in the ground, at
considerable intervals, very large bows upon the stretch; these are
kept steady by young men remarkable for their strength, while others,
exerting themselves with equal efforts, bend them, and so wound the
animals as they pass by, and afterwards trace them by their blood. The
female elephant is much more timid by nature than the male.
Elephants of furious temper are tamed by hunger1625 and blows, while
other elephants are placed near to keep them quiet, when the violent
fit is upon them, by means of chains. Besides this, they are more
particularly violent when in heat,1626 at which time they will level
to the ground the huts of the Indians with their tusks. It is on this
account that they are prevented from coupling, and the females are kept
in herds separate from the males, just the same way as with other
cattle. Elephants, when tamed, are employed in war, and carry into the
ranks of the enemy towers filled with armed men; and on them, in a very
great measure, depends the ultimate result of the battles that are
fought in the East. They tread under foot whole companies, and crush
the men in their armour. The very least sound, however, of the grunting
of the hog terrifies them:1627 when wounded and panic-stricken, they
invariably fall back, and become no less formidable for the destruction
which they deal to their own side, than to their opponents. The African
elephant is afraid of the Indian, and does not dare so much as look at
it, for the latter is of much greater bulk.1628
The vulgar notion is, that the elephant goes with young ten
years;1629 but, according to Aristotle, it is two years only. He says
also that the female only bears once, and then a single young one; that
they live two hundred years, and some of them as much as three hundred.
The adult age of the elephant begins at the sixtieth year.1630 They
are especially fond of water, and wander much about streams, and this
although they are unable to swim, in consequence of their bulk.1631
They are particularly sensitive to cold, and that, indeed, is their
greatest enemy. They are subject also to flatulency, and to looseness
of the bowels, but to no other kind of disease.1632 I find it
stated, that on making them drink oil, any weapons which may happen to
stick in their body will fall out; while, on the contrary, perspiration
makes them the more readily adhere.1633 If they eat earth it is
poison to them, unless indeed they have gradually become accustomed by
repeatedly doing so. They also devour stones as well; but the trunks
of trees are their most favourite food. They throw down, with a blow
from their forehead, palms of exceeding height, and when lying on the
ground, strip them of their fruit. They eat with the mouth, but they
breathe, drink,1634 and smell with [the proboscis], which is not
unaptly termed their “hand.” They have the greatest aversion to the
mouse of all animals,1635 and quite loathe their food, as it lies
in the manger, if they perceive that it has been touched by one of
those animals. They experience the greatest torture if they happen
to swallow, while drinking, a horseleech, an animal which people are
beginning, I find, to call almost universally a “blood-sucker.”1636
The leech fastens upon the wind-pipe, and produces intolerable pain.
The skin of the back is extremely hard, that of the belly is softer.
They are not covered with any kind of bristles, nor yet does the tail
even furnish them with any protection from the annoyance of flies; for
vast as these animals are, they suffer greatly from them. Their skin
is reticulated, and invites these insects by the odour it exhales.
Accordingly, when a swarm of them has settled on the skin, while
extended and smooth, the elephant suddenly contracts it; and, in this
way, the flies are crushed between the folds which are thus closed.
This power serves them in place of tail, mane, and hair.1637
Their teeth are very highly prized, and from them we obtain the most
costly materials for forming the statues of the gods. Luxury has
discovered even another recommendation in this animal, having found a
particularly delicate flavour in the cartilaginous part of the trunk,
for no other reason, in my belief, than because it fancies itself to be
eating ivory.1638 Tusks of enormous size are constantly to be seen
in the temples; but, in the extreme parts of Africa, on the confines
of Æthiopia, they are employed as door-posts for houses; and Polybius
informs us, on the authority of the petty king Gulussa,1639 that they
are also employed as stakes in making fences for the folds of cattle.
Africa produces elephants, beyond the deserts of the Syrtes, and in
Mauritania; they are found also in the countries of the Æthiopians and
the Troglodytæ, as mentioned above.1640 But it is India that produces
the largest,1641 as well as the dragon,1642 which is perpetually at
war with the elephant, and is itself of so enormous a size, as easily
to envelope the elephants with its folds, and encircle them in its
coils. The contest is equally fatal to both; the elephant, vanquished,
falls to the earth, and by its weight, crushes the dragon which is
entwined around it.1643
The sagacity which every animal exhibits in its own behalf is
wonderful, but in these it is remarkably so. The dragon has much
difficulty in climbing up to so great a height, and therefore, watching
the road, which bears marks of their footsteps when going to feed, it
darts down upon them from a lofty tree. The elephant knows that it
is quite unable to struggle against the folds of the serpent, and so
seeks for trees or rocks against which to rub itself. The dragon is
on its guard against this, and tries to prevent it, by first of all
confining the legs of the elephant with the folds of its tail; while
the elephant, on the other hand, endeavours to disengage itself with
its trunk. The dragon, however, thrusts its head into its nostrils, and
thus, at the same moment, stops the breath and wounds the most tender
parts. When it is met unexpectedly, the dragon raises itself up, faces
its opponent, and flies more especially at the eyes; this is the reason
why elephants are so often found blind, and worn to a skeleton with
hunger and misery. What other cause can one assign for such mighty
strifes as these, except that Nature is desirous, as it were, to make
an exhibition for herself, in pitting such opponents against each other?
There is another story, too, told in relation to these combats—the
blood of the elephant, it is said, is remarkably cold; for which
reason, in the parching heats of summer,1644 it is sought by the
dragon with remarkable avidity. It lies, therefore, coiled up and
concealed in the rivers, in wait for the elephants, when they come to
drink; upon which it darts out, fastens itself around the trunk, and
then fixes its teeth behind the ear, that being the only place which
the elephant cannot protect with the trunk. The dragons, it is said,
are of such vast size, that they can swallow the whole of the blood;
consequently, the elephant, being thus drained of its blood, falls to
the earth exhausted; while the dragon, intoxicated with the draught, is
crushed beneath it, and so shares its fate.
Æthiopia produces dragons, not so large as those of India, but still,
twenty cubits in length.1645 The only thing that surprises me is,
how Juba came to believe that they have crests.1646 The Æthiopians
are known as the Asachæi, among whom they most abound; and we are
told, that on those coasts four or five of them are found twisted and
interlaced together like so many osiers in a hurdle, and thus setting
sail, with their heads erect, they are borne along upon the waves, to
find better sources of nourishment in Arabia.
Megasthenes informs us, that in India, serpents grow to such an immense
size, as to swallow stags and bulls;1647 while Metrodorus says, that
about the river Rhyndacus,1648 in Pontus, they seize and swallow the
birds that are flying above them, however high and however rapid their
flight.1649 It is a well-known fact, that during the Punic war, at
the river Bagrada, a serpent one hundred and twenty feet in length was
taken by the Roman army under Regulus, being besieged, like a fortress,
by means of balistæ and other engines of war.1650 Its skin and jaws
were preserved in a temple at Rome, down to the time of the Numantine
war. The serpents which in Italy are known by the name of boa, render
these accounts far from incredible, for they grow to such a vast size,
that a child was found entire in the stomach of one of them, which
was killed on the Vaticanian Hill during the reign of the Emperor
Claudius.1651 These are nourished, in the first instance, with the
milk of the cow, and from this they take their name.1652 As to the
other animals, which have been of late repeatedly brought to Italy from
all parts of the world, it is quite unnecessary to give any minute
account of their form.
Scythia produces but very few animals, in consequence of the scarcity
of shrubs. Germany, which lies close adjoining it, has not many
animals, though it has some very fine kinds of wild oxen: the bison,
which has a mane, and the urus,1653 possessed of remarkable strength
and swiftness. To these, the vulgar, in their ignorance, have given
the name of bubalus:1654 whereas, that animal is really produced in
Africa, and rather bears a resemblance to the calf and the stag.
The North, too, produces herds of wild horses, as Africa and Asia do
of wild asses;1655 there is, also, the elk, which strongly resembles
our steers, except that it is distinguished by the length of the ears
and of the neck. There is also the achlis,1656 which is produced in
the island of Scandinavia;1657 it has never been seen in this city,
although we have had descriptions of it from many persons; it is not
unlike the elk, but has no joints in the hind leg. Hence, it never lies
down, but reclines against a tree while it sleeps; it can only be taken
by previously cutting into the tree, and thus laying a trap for it, as
otherwise, it would escape through its swiftness. Its upper lip is so
extremely large, for which reason it is obliged to go backwards when
grazing; otherwise, by moving onwards, the lip would get doubled up. In
Pæonia, it is said, there is a wild animal known as the bonasus;1658
it has the mane of the horse, but is, in other respects, like the bull,
with horns, however, so much bent inwards upon each other, as to be of
no use for the purposes of combat. It has therefore to depend upon its
flight, and, while in the act of flying, it sends forth its excrements,
sometimes to a distance of even three jugera;1659 the contact of
which burns those who pursue the animal, just like a kind of fire.
It is a remarkable fact, that pards,1660 panthers, lions, and other
animals of this kind, walk with the points of their nails concealed in
a sheath in the body, lest they should be broken or blunted; and that,
when they run, their hooked claws are turned backwards, and are never
extended, except in the act of seizing their prey.1661
(16.) The noble appearance of the lion is more especially to be seen
in that species which has the neck and shoulders covered with a mane,
which is always acquired at the proper age by those produced from
a lion; while, on the other hand, those that are the offspring of
the pard, are always without this distinction. The female also has
no mane. The sexual passions of these animals are very violent, and
render the male quite furious. This is especially the case in Africa,
where, in consequence of the great scarcity of water, the wild beasts
assemble in great numbers on the banks of a few rivers. This is also
the reason why so many curious varieties of animals are produced
there, the males and females of various species coupling promiscuously
with each other.1662 Hence arose the saying, which was common in
Greece even, that “Africa is always producing something new.” The lion
recognizes, by the peculiar odour of the pard, when the lioness has
been unfaithful to him, and avenges himself with the greatest fury.
Hence it is, that the female, when she has been guilty of a lapse,
washes herself, or else follows the lion at a considerable distance.
I find that it was a common belief, that the lioness is able to bear
young no more than once, because, while delivering herself, she tears
her womb with her claws.1663 Aristotle, however, gives a different
account; a man of whom I think that I ought here to make some further
mention, seeing that upon these subjects, I intend, in a great measure,
to make him my guide. Alexander the Great, being inflamed with a strong
desire to become acquainted with the natures of animals, entrusted
the prosecution of this design to Aristotle, a man who held the
highest rank in every branch of learning; for which purpose he placed
under his command some thousands of men in every region of Asia and
Greece, and comprising all those who followed the business of hunting,
fowling, or fishing, or who had the care of parks, herds of cattle,
the breeding of bees, fish-ponds, and aviaries, in order that no
creature that was known to exist might escape his notice. By means of
the information which he obtained from these persons, he was enabled
to compose some fifty volumes, which are deservedly esteemed, on the
subject of animals; of these I purpose to give an epitome, together
with other facts with which Aristotle was unacquainted; and I beg the
kind indulgence of my readers in their estimate of this work of mine,
as by my aid they hastily travel through all the works of nature, and
through the midst of subjects with which that most famous of all kings
so ardently desired to be acquainted.
Aristotle then informs us, that the lioness, at the first birth,
produces five whelps, and one less every succeeding year, until, after
having produced one only, she ceases to bear.1664 The young ones,
when first born, are shapeless and extremely small in flesh, being
no larger than a weasel; for six months they are scarcely able to
walk,1665 and until they are two months old, they cannot move. Lions,
he says, are found in Europe, but only between the rivers Achelous and
Nestus; being much superior in strength to those which are produced in
Africa or Syria.1666
There are two species of lions; in the one the body is shorter and
more compact, and the mane more crisp and curly;1667 these are more
timid than those with a longer body and straight hair, which, in fact,
have no fear of wounds. The males raise the leg like the dog, when
they pass their urine;1668 which has a most disagreeable odour, the
same being the case too with their breath. They seldom drink, and only
take food every other day;1669 when they have gorged themselves,
they will sometimes go without food for three days. They swallow
their food whole, without mastication, so far as they are able; and
when they have taken more than the stomach can possibly receive, they
extract part of it by thrusting their claws into the throat; the same
too, if, when full, they have occasion to take to flight. That they
are very long-lived is proved by the fact, that many of them are found
without teeth. Polybius,1670 the companion of Æmilianus, tells us,
that when they become aged they will attack men, as they have no longer
sufficient strength for the pursuit of wild beasts. It is then that
they lay siege to the cities of Africa; and for this reason it was,
that he, as well as Scipio, had seen some of them hung upon a cross;
it being supposed that others, through dread of a similar punishment,
might be deterred from committing the like outrages.
The lion is the only one of all the wild beasts that shows mercy
to the suppliant; after it has conquered, it will spare,1671 and
when enraged, it will vent its fury rather upon men than women, and
never upon children, unless when greatly pressed by hunger. It is the
belief in Libya, that it fully understands the entreaties which are
addressed to it. At all events, I have heard it asserted as a fact,
that a female slave, who was returning from Gætulia, was attacked by
a number of lions in the forests; upon which she summoned sufficient
courage to address them, and said that she was a woman, a fugitive,
helpless creature, that she implored the compassion of the most
generous of animals, the one that has the command of all the others,
and that she was a prey unworthy of their high repute—and by these
means effectually soothed their ferocity. There are various opinions
on this point, as to whether it is through some peculiar disposition of
the animal, or merely by accident, that their fury is thus soothed by
addressing them. As to what is alleged, too, about serpents, that they
can be drawn from their holes by singing, and thus be made to yield
themselves up to death, the truth or falsity of it has not by any means
been satisfactorily ascertained.1672
The tail of the lion gives indication of the state of his feelings,
just as the ears do in the horse; for these are the distinguishing
signs which Nature has given to each of the most generous of animals.
Hence it is that, when pleased, the tail is without motion, and the
animal fawns upon those who caress him; a thing, however, that very
rarely happens, for his most frequent state is that of rage. He begins
by beating the earth with his tail; and as he becomes more furious, he
lashes his sides, as if trying to excite himself. His greatest strength
is situate in the breast. From every wound that he makes, whether it
is with his claws or his teeth, a black blood issues.1673 When his
hunger is satisfied, he becomes harmless. The generous disposition of
the lion is more especially manifested in time of danger; not only at
the moment when, despising all weapons, he long defends himself solely
by the terror which he inspires, and protests, as it were, that he
is compelled thus to defend himself, but when he rises at last, not
as though constrained by danger, but as if enraged by the mad folly
of his adversaries. This, however, is a still more noble feature of
his courage—however numerous the dogs and hunters may be that press
upon him, as he makes his retreat he comes to a stand every now and
then upon the level plain, while he is still in view, and scowls
contemptuously upon them: but as soon as ever he has entered the
thickets and dense forests, he scours away at the swiftest possible
pace, as though aware that the place itself will shelter his shame.
When in pursuit, the lion advances with a leap, but he does not do so
when in flight. When wounded, he discovers, with wonderful sagacity,
the person who struck the blow, and will find him out, however great
may have been the multitude of his pursuers. If a person has thrown a
dart at him, but has failed to inflict a wound, the animal seizes him,
whirls him round and throws him to the ground, but without wounding
him. When the lioness is defending her whelps, it is said that she
fixes her eyes steadily on the ground, that she may not be frightened
at the spears of the hunters. In all other respects, these animals
are equally free from deceit and suspicion. They never look at an
object obliquely, and they dislike being looked at themselves in such
a manner. It is generally believed, that, when the lion is dying,
he bites at the earth, and sheds tears at his fate.1674 Powerful,
however, and fierce as this animal is, he is terrified by the motion
of wheels or of an empty chariot, and still more on seeing the crest
or hearing the crowing of a cock;1675 but most of all, is he afraid
of fire. The only malady to which the lion is subject, is loss of
appetite; this, however, is cured by putting insults upon him, by means
of the pranks of monkeys placed about him, a thing which rouses his
anger; immediately he tastes their blood, he is relieved.
Q. Scævola, the son of P. Scævola, when he was curule ædile, was the
first to exhibit at Rome a combat of a number of lions; and L. Sylla,
who was afterwards Dictator, during his prætorship, gave the spectacle
of a fight of one hundred lions with manes.1676 After him, Pompeius
Magnus exhibited six hundred lions in the Circus, three hundred and
fifteen of which had manes; Cæsar, the Dictator, exhibited four
hundred.
It was formerly a very difficult matter to catch the lion, and it
was mostly done by means of pit-falls. In the reign, however, of the
Emperor Claudius, accident disclosed a method which appears almost
disgraceful to the name of such an animal; a Gætulian shepherd stopped
a lion, that was rushing furiously upon him, by merely throwing his
cloak1677 over the animal; a circumstance which afterwards afforded
an exhibition in the arena of the Circus, when the frantic fury of the
animal was paralyzed in a manner almost incredible by a light covering
being thrown over its head, so much so, that it was put into chains
without the least resistance; we must conclude, therefore, that all its
strength lies in its eyes. This circumstance renders what was done by
Lysimachus1678 less wonderful, who strangled a lion, with which he
had been shut up by command of Alexander.1679
Antony subjected lions to the yoke, and was the first at Rome to
harness them to his chariot;1680 and this during the civil war, after
the battle on the plains of Pharsalia; not, indeed, without a kind of
ominous presage, a prodigy that foretold at the time how that generous
spirits were about to be subdued. But to have himself drawn along in
this manner, in company with the actress Cytheris,1681 was a thing
that surpassed even the most monstrous spectacles that were to be
seen at that calamitous period. It is said that Hanno, one of the most
illustrious of the Carthaginians, was the first who ventured to touch
the lion with the hand, and to exhibit it in a tame state. It was on
this account that he was banished; for it was supposed, that a man
so talented and so ingenious would have it in his power to persuade
the people to anything, and it was looked upon as unsafe to trust the
liberties of the country to one who had so eminently triumphed over
even ferocity itself. There are some fortuitous occurrences cited also,
which have given occasion to these animals to display their natural
clemency. Mentor, a native of Syracuse, was met in Syria by a lion, who
rolled before him in a suppliant manner; though smitten with fear and
desirous to escape, the wild beast on every side opposed his flight,
and licked his feet with a fawning air. Upon this, Mentor observed
on the paw of the lion a swelling and a wound; from which, after
extracting a splinter, he relieved the creature’s pain.1682 There
is a picture at Syracuse, which bears witness to the truth of this
transaction.
In the same manner, too, Elpis, a native of Samos, on landing from a
vessel on the coast of Africa, observed a lion near the beach, opening
his mouth in a threatening manner; upon which he climbed a tree, in
the hope of escaping, while, at the same time, he invoked the aid of
Father Liber; for it is the appropriate time for invocations when
there is no room left for hope. The wild beast did not pursue him as
he fled, although he might easily have done so; but, lying down at the
foot of the tree, by the open mouth which had caused so much terror,
tried to excite his compassion. A bone, while he was devouring his food
with too great avidity, had stuck fast between his teeth, and he was
perishing with hunger; such being the punishment inflicted upon him by
his own weapons, every now and then he would look up and supplicate
him, as it were, with mute entreaties. Elpis,1683 not wishing to risk
trusting himself to so formidable a beast, remained stationary for
some time, more at last from astonishment than from fear. At length,
however, he descended from the tree and extracted the bone, the lion in
the meanwhile extending his head, and aiding in the operation as far
as it was necessary for him to do. The story goes on to say, that as
long as the vessel remained off that coast, the lion showed his sense
of gratitude by bringing whatever he had chanced to procure in the
chase. In memory of this circumstance, Elpis consecrated a temple at
Samos to Father Liber, which the Greeks, from the circumstance above
related, called “the temple κεχηνότος Διονύσου,” or “of the
open-mouthed Bacchus.” Can we wonder, after this, that the wild beasts
should be able to recognize the footsteps of man,1684 when of him
alone of all animals they even hope for aid? For why should they not
have recourse to others for assistance? Or how is it that they know
that the hand of man has power to heal them? Unless, perhaps, it is
that the violence of pain can force wild beasts even to risk every
thing to obtain relief.
(17.) Demetrius, the natural philosopher, relates an equally remarkable
instance, in relation to a panther.1685 The animal was lying in the
middle of the road, waiting for some one to pass that way, when he was
suddenly perceived by the father of one Philinus, an ardent lover
of wisdom.1686 Seized with fear, he immediately began to retreat;
while the beast rolled itself before him, evidently with the desire
of caressing him, at the same time manifesting signs of grief, which
could not be misunderstood in a panther even. The animal had young
ones, which had happened to fall into a pit at some distance from the
place. The first dictates of compassion banished all fear, and the next
prompted him to assist the animal. He accordingly followed her, as she
gently drew him on by fixing her claws in his garment; and as soon as
he discovered what was the cause of her grief and the price of his own
safety, he took the whelps out of the pit, and they followed her to the
end of the desert; whither he was escorted by her, frisking with joy
and gladness, in order that she might more appropriately testify how
grateful she was, and how little she had given him in return; a mode of
acting which is but rarely found, among men even.
Facts such as these induce us to give some credit to what Democritus
relates, who says that a man, called Thoas, was preserved in Arcadia by
a dragon.1687 When a boy, he had become much attached to it, and had
reared it very tenderly; but his father, being alarmed at the nature
and monstrous size of the reptile, had taken and left it in the desert.
Thoas being here attacked by some robbers who lay in ambush, he was
delivered from them by the dragon, which recognized his voice and came
to his assistance. But as to what has been said respecting infants that
have been exposed and nourished by the milk of wild beasts,1688 as
in the case of the founders of our city by a wolf, I am disposed to
attribute such cases as these rather to the greatness of the destinies
which have to be fulfilled, than to any peculiarity in the nature of
the animals themselves.
The panther and the tiger are nearly the only animals that are
remarkable for a skin distinguished by the variety of its spots;1689
whereas others have them of a single colour, appropriate to each
species. The lions of Syria alone are black. The spots of the
panther are like small eyes, upon a white ground. It is said that
all quadrupeds are attracted in a most wonderful manner by their
odour,1690 while they are terrified by the fierceness of their
aspect; for which reason the creature conceals its head, and then
seizes upon the animals that are attracted to it by the sweetness of
the odour. It is said by some, that the panther has, on the shoulder, a
spot which bears the form of the moon; and that, like it, it regularly
increases to full, and then diminishes to a crescent. At present, we
apply the general names of varia1691 and pard, (which last belongs to
the males), to all the numerous species of this animal, which is very
common in Africa and Syria.1692 Some writers distinguish the panther,
as being remarkable for its whiteness: but as yet I have not observed
any other difference between them.
There was an ancient decree of the senate, which prohibited animals
being imported from Africa into Italy; but Cn. Aufidius, the tribune
of the people,1693 procured a law repealing this, which allowed of
their being brought over for the games of the Circus. Scaurus, in his
ædileship,1694 was the first who sent over the parti-coloured kind,
one hundred and fifty in the whole; after which, Pompeius Magnus sent
four hundred and ten, and the late Emperor Augustus four hundred and
twenty.
The same emperor was the first person who exhibited at Rome a tame
tiger1695 on the stage.1696 This was in the consulship of Q.
Tubero and Fabius Maximus,1697 at the dedication of the theatre of
Marcellus, on the fourth day before the nones of May: the late Emperor
Claudius exhibited four at one time.1698
(18.) Hyrcania and India produce the tiger, an animal of tremendous
swiftness, a quality which is more especially tested when we deprive it
of all its whelps, which are always very numerous. They are seized by
the hunter, who lies in wait for them, being provided with the fleetest
horse he can possibly obtain, and which he frequently changes for a
fresh one. As soon as the female finds her lair empty—for the male
takes no care whatever of his offspring—headlong she darts forth, and
traces them by the smell. Her approach is made known by her cries, upon
which the hunter throws down one of the whelps; this she snatches up
with her teeth, and more swift, even, under the weight, returns to her
lair, and then again sets out in pursuit; and this she continues to do,
until the hunter has reached his vessel, while the animal vainly vents
her fury upon the shore.
Camels are found feeding in herds in the East. Of these there are two
different kinds, those of Bactria and those of Arabia;1700 the former
kind having two humps on the back, and the latter only one; they have
also another hump under the breast, by means of which they support
themselves when reclining. Both of these species, like the ox, have no
teeth in the upper jaw.1701 They are all of them employed as beasts
of burthen, in carrying loads on the back, and they answer the purpose
of cavalry in battle. Their speed is the same with that of the horse,
but their power of holding out in this respect is proportioned in
each to its natural strength: it will never go beyond its accustomed
distance, nor will it receive more than its usual load. The camel has
a natural antipathy to the horse.1702 It can endure thirst for four
days even, and when it has the opportunity of obtaining water, it
drinks, as it were, both for past and future thirst, having first taken
care to trouble the water by trampling in it; without doing which,
it would find no pleasure in drinking. They live fifty years, some
indeed as much as one hundred. These animals, too, are liable to fits
of frenzy.1703 A peculiar mode of castrating them, and the females,
even, when required for the purposes of war, has been discovered;
it renders them more courageous, by the destruction of all sexual
feelings.
There are two other1704 animals, which have some resemblance to the
camel. One of these is called, by the Æthiopians, the nabun.1705 It
has a neck like that of the horse, feet and legs like those of the
ox, a head like that of the camel, and is covered with white spots
upon a red ground; from which peculiarities it has been called the
cameleopard.1706 It was first seen at Rome in the Circensian games
held by Cæsar, the Dictator.1707 Since that time too, it has been
occasionally seen. It is more remarkable for the singularity of its
appearance than for its fierceness; for which reason it has obtained
the name of the wild sheep.1708
It was at the games of Pompeius Magnus that the chama1709 was first
exhibited; an animal called rufius by the Gauls; having the figure of
a wolf, with the spots of the pard. There were also exhibited some
animals from Æthiopia, which they called by the Greek name, κήποι,1710 the
hinder extremities of which resembled the human feet
and legs, while the fore-feet were like hands. These animals have not
been seen at Rome since that time.
At the same games the rhinoceros was also exhibited, an animal
which has a single horn projecting from the nose;1711 it has been
frequently seen since then. This too is another natural-born enemy of
the elephant.1712 It prepares itself for the combat by sharpening its
horn against the rocks; and in fighting directs it chiefly against the
belly of its adversary, which it knows to be the softest part. The two
animals are of equal length, but the legs of the rhinoceros are much
the shorter: its skin is the colour of box-wood.
Æthiopia produces the lynx1713 in abundance, and the sphinx, which
has brown hair and two mammæ on the breast,1714 as well as many
monstrous kinds of a similar nature; horses with wings, and armed
with horns, which are called pegasi;1715 the crocotta, an animal
which looks as though it had been produced by the union of the wolf
and the dog,1716 for it can break any thing with its teeth, and
instantly on swallowing it digest it with the stomach; monkeys, too,
with black heads, the hair of the ass, and a voice quite unlike that
of any other animal.1717 There are oxen, too, like those of India,
some with one horn, and others with three; the leucrocotta, a wild
beast of extraordinary swiftness, the size of the wild ass, with the
legs of a stag, the neck, tail, and breast of a lion, the head of a
badger, a cloven hoof, the mouth slit up as far as the ears, and one
continuous bone instead of teeth;1718 it is said, too, that this
animal can imitate the human voice. Among the same people, there is
also found an animal called eale; it is the size of the river-horse,
has the tail of the elephant, and is of a black or tawny colour.1719
It has also the jaws of the wild boar, and horns that are moveable,
and more than a cubit in length, so that, in fighting, it can employ
them alternately, and vary their position by presenting them directly
or obliquely, according as necessity may dictate. But the wild bulls
which this country produces are the fiercest of all; they are larger
than our domestic bull, and exceed all the others in swiftness; are of
a tawny colour, with azure eyes, and the hair turned the contrary way;
while the jaws open as far as the ears, and the horns are as moveable
as those of the eale. The hide of this animal is as hard as flint, and
effectually resists all wounds. These creatures pursue all the other
wild beasts, while they themselves can only be taken in pitfalls, where
they always perish from excess of rage. Ctesias informs us, that among
these same Æthiopians, there is an animal found, which he calls the
mantichora;1720 it has a triple row of teeth, which fit into each
other like those of a comb, the face and ears of a man, and azure eyes,
is of the colour of blood, has the body of the lion, and a tail ending
in a sting, like that of the scorpion. Its voice resembles the union of
the sound of the flute and the trumpet; it is of excessive swiftness,
and is particularly fond of human flesh.
There are in India oxen also with solid hoofs1721 and a single
horn;1722 and a wild beast called the axis, which has a skin like
that of a fawn, but with numerous spots on it, and whiter;1723 this
animal is looked upon as sacred to Bacchus. The Orsæan Indians hunt
down a kind of ape, which has the body white1724 all over; as well
as a very fierce animal called the monoceros,1725 which has the head
of the stag, the feet of the elephant, and the tail of the boar, while
the rest of the body is like that of the horse; it makes a deep lowing
noise, and has a single black horn, which projects from the middle of
its forehead, two cubits in length.1726 This animal, it is said,
cannot be taken alive.
Among the Hesperian Æthiopians is the fountain of Nigris, by many,
supposed to be the head of the Nile. I have already mentioned the
arguments by which this opinion is supported.1727 Near this fountain,
there is found a wild beast, which is called the catoblepas;1728 an
animal of moderate size, and in other respects sluggish in the movement
of the rest of its limbs; its head is remarkably heavy, and it only
carries it with the greatest difficulty, being always bent down towards
the earth. Were it not for this circumstance, it would prove the
destruction of the human race; for all who behold its eyes, fall dead
upon the spot.1729
There is the same power also in the serpent called the basilisk.1730
It is produced in the province of Cyrene, being not more than twelve
fingers in length. It has a white spot on the head, strongly resembling
a sort of a diadem.1731 When it hisses, all the other serpents fly
from it: and it does not advance its body, like the others, by a
succession of folds, but moves along upright and erect upon the middle.
It destroys all shrubs, not only by its contact, but those even that
it has breathed upon; it burns up all the grass too, and breaks the
stones, so tremendous is its noxious influence. It was formerly a
general belief that if a man on horseback killed one of these animals
with a spear, the poison would run up the weapon and kill, not only the
rider, but the horse as well. To this dreadful monster the effluvium
of the weasel is fatal, a thing that has been tried with success, for
kings have often desired to see its body when killed; so true is it
that it has pleased Nature that there should be nothing without its
antidote. The animal is thrown into the hole of the basilisk, which
is easily known from the soil around it being infected. The weasel
destroys the basilisk by its odour, but dies itself in this struggle of
nature against its own self.1732
In Italy also it is believed that there is a noxious influence in
the eye of a wolf; it is supposed that it will instantly take away
the voice of a man,1733 if it is the first to see him. Africa and
Egypt produce wolves of a sluggish and stunted nature;1734 those
of the colder climates are fierce and savage. That men have been
turned into wolves, and again restored to their original form,1735
we must confidently look upon as untrue, unless, indeed, we are
ready to believe all the tales, which, for so many ages, have been
found to be fabulous. But, as the belief of it has become so firmly
fixed in the minds of the common people, as to have caused the term
“Versipellis”1736 to be used as a common form of imprecation, I
will here point out its origin. Euanthes, a Grecian author of no mean
reputation, informs us that the Arcadians assert that a member of the
family of one Anthus is chosen by lot, and then taken to a certain
lake in that district, where, after suspending his clothes on an
oak, he swims across the water and goes away into the desert, where
he is changed into a wolf and associates with other animals of the
same species for a space of nine years. If he has kept himself from
beholding a man during the whole of that time, he returns to the same
lake, and, after swimming across it, resumes his original form, only
with the addition of nine years in age to his former appearance. To
this Fabius1737 adds, that he takes his former clothes as well. It is
really wonderful to what a length the credulity1738 of the Greeks
will go! There is no falsehood, if ever so barefaced, to which some of
them cannot be found to bear testimony.
So too, Agriopas, who wrote the Olympionics,1739 informs us that
Demænetus, the Parrhasian, during a sacrifice of human victims, which
the Arcadians were offering up to the Lycæan1740 Jupiter, tasted the
entrails of a boy who had been slaughtered; upon which he was turned
into a wolf, but, ten years afterwards, was restored to his original
shape and his calling of an athlete, and returned victorious in the
pugilistic contests at the Olympic games.
It is also commonly supposed, that the tail of this animal contains a
small lock of hair, which possesses an amatory power; and that when
the creature is caught, this hair is shed by it, but has no virtue
whatever, unless it is procured from the animal while alive.1741 It
is said that these animals couple for no more than twelve days in the
year;1742 and that when pressed by hunger they will eat earth. Among
the points of augury, to have our progress cut short to the right by
a wolf, if at the time its mouth is full, is the best of omens. There
is a species, which is known as the stag-wolf, such as we have already
said1743 were brought from Gaul and exhibited in the Circus by
Pompeius Magnus. It is said, that however hungry this animal may chance
to be, if it only turns its head while eating, it immediately becomes
oblivious of the food that is before it, and takes its departure to
seek it elsewhere.1744
With reference to serpents, it is generally known, that they
assume the colour of the soil in which they conceal themselves. The
different species of them are innumerable. The cerastes1745 has
little horns, often four in number, projecting from the body, by the
movement of which it attracts birds, while the rest of its body lies
concealed.1746 The amphisbæna1747 has two heads,1748 that is to
say, it has a second one at the tail, as though one mouth were too
little for the discharge of all its venom. Some serpents have scales,
some a mottled skin, and they are all possessed of a deadly poison. The
jaculus1749 darts from the branches of trees; and it is not only to
our feet that the serpent is formidable, for these fly through the air
even, just as though they were hurled from an engine.1750 The neck of
the asp1751 puffs out,1752 and there is no remedy whatever against
its sting, except the instant excision of the affected part.1753
This reptile, which is thus deadly, is possessed of this one sense,
or rather affection; the male and the female are generally found
together,1754 and the one cannot live without the other; hence it is
that, if one of them happens to be killed, the other takes incredible
pains to avenge its death. It follows the slayer of its mate, and will
single him out among ever such a large number of people, by a sort of
instinctive knowledge; with this object it overcomes all difficulties,
travels any distance, and is only to be avoided by the intervention
of rivers or an accelerated flight. It is really difficult to decide,
whether Nature has altogether been more liberal of good or of evil.
First of all, however, she has given to this pest but weak powers of
sight, and has placed the eyes, not in the front of the head, so that
it may see straight before it, but in the temples, so that it is more
frequently put in motion by the approach of the footstep than through
the sight. (24.) The ichneumon, too, is its enemy1755 to the very
death.
This hostility is the especial glory of this animal, which is also
produced in Egypt. It plunges itself repeatedly into the mud, and then
dries itself in the sun: as soon as, by these means, it has armed
itself with a sufficient number of coatings, it proceeds to the combat.
Raising its tail, and turning its back to the serpent, it receives its
stings, which are inflicted to no purpose, until at last, turning its
head sideways, and viewing its enemy, it seizes it by the throat. Not
content, however, with this victory, it conquers another creature also,
which is no less dangerous.
The Nile produces the crocodile also,1756 a destructive quadruped,
and equally dangerous on land and in the water. This is the only land
animal that does not enjoy the use of its tongue,1757 and the only
one that has the upper jaw moveable, and is capable of biting with
it; and terrible is its bite, for the rows of its teeth fit into each
other, like those of a comb.1758 Its length mostly exceeds eighteen
cubits. It produces eggs about the size of those of the goose, and, by
a kind of instinctive foresight, always deposits them beyond the limit
to which the river Nile rises, when at its greatest height.1759 There
is no animal that arrives at so great a bulk as this, from so small a
beginning.1760 It is armed also with claws, and has a skin, that
is proof against all blows. It passes the day on land, and the night
in the water, in both instances on account of the warmth.1761 When
it has glutted itself with fish, it goes to sleep on the banks of the
river, a portion of the food always remaining in its mouth; upon which,
a little bird, which in Egypt is known as the trochilus, and, in Italy,
as the king of the birds, for the purpose of obtaining food, invites
the crocodile to open its jaws; then, hopping to and fro, it first
cleans the outside of its mouth, next the teeth, and then the inside,
while the animal opens its jaws as wide as possible, in consequence of
the pleasure which it experiences from the titillation.1762 It is at
these moments that the ichneumon, seeing it fast asleep in consequence
of the agreeable sensation thus produced, darts down its throat like an
arrow, and eats away its intestines.1763
Like the crocodile, but smaller even than the ichneumon, is the
scincus,1764 which is also produced in the Nile, and the flesh of
which is the most effectual antidote against poisons, and acts as a
powerful aphrodisiac upon the male sex. But so great a pest was the
crocodile to prove, that Nature was not content with giving it one
enemy only; the dolphins, therefore, which enter the Nile, have the
back armed with a spine,1765 which is edged like a knife, as if for
this very purpose; and although these animals are much inferior in
strength, they contrive to destroy the crocodile by artifice, which on
the other hand attempts to drive them from their prey, and would reign
alone in its river as its peculiar domain. For all animals have an
especial instinct in this respect, and are able to know not only what
is for their own advantage, but also what is to the disadvantage of
their enemies; they fully understand the use of their own weapons, they
know their opportunity, and the weak parts of those with which they
have to contend.
The skin of the belly of the crocodile is soft and thin; aware of this,
the dolphins plunge into the water, as if in great alarm, and diving
beneath its belly, tear it open with their spines. There is a race of
men also, who are peculiarly hostile to this animal; they are known as
the Tentyritæ, from an island in the Nile which they inhabit.1766
These men are of small stature, but of wonderful presence of mind,
though for this particular object only. The crocodile is a terrible
animal to those who fly from it, while at the same time it will fly
from those who pursue it; these, however, are the only people who dare
to attack it. They even swim in the river after it, and mount its back
like so many horsemen; and just as the animal turns up its head for
the purpose of biting them, they insert a club into its mouth, holding
which at each end, with the two hands, it acts like a bit, and by these
means they drive the captured animal on shore. They also terrify the
crocodile so much by their voice alone even, as to force it to disgorge
the bodies which it has lately swallowed, for the purpose of burial.
This island, therefore, is the only place near which the crocodile
never swims; indeed, it is repelled by the odour of this race of men,
just as serpents are by that of the Psylli.1767 The sight of this
animal is said to be dull when it is in the water, but, when out of the
water, piercing in the extreme; it always passes the four winter months
in a cave, without taking food.1768 Some persons say, that this is
the only animal that continues to increase in size as long as it lives;
it is very long-lived.
The Nile produces the hippopotamus, another wild beast, of a still
greater size. It has the cloven hoof of the ox; the back, the mane, and
the neighing of the horse; and the turned-up snout, the tail, and the
hooked teeth of the wild boar, but not so dangerous.1769 The hide
is impenetrable, except when it has been soaked with water; and it is
used for making shields and helmets.1770 This animal lays waste the
standing corn, and determines beforehand what part it shall ravage on
the following day; it is said also, that it enters the field backwards,
to prevent any ambush being laid for it on its return.
M. Scaurus was the first who exhibited this animal at Rome, together
with five crocodiles, at the games which he gave in his ædileship, in
a piece of water1771 which had been temporarily prepared for the
purpose. The hippopotamus has even been our instructor in one of the
operations of medicine.1772 When the animal has become too bulky by
continued over-feeding, it goes down to the banks of the river, and
examines the reeds which have been newly cut; as soon as it has found a
stump that is very sharp, it presses its body against it, and so wounds
one of the veins in the thigh; and, by the flow of blood thus produced,
the body, which would otherwise have fallen into a morbid state, is
relieved; after which, it covers up the wound with mud.
The bird also, which is called the ibis,1774 a native of the same
country of Egypt, has shewn us some things of a similar nature. By
means of its hooked beak, it laves the body through that part, by which
it is especially necessary for health that the residuous food should be
discharged. Nor, indeed, are these the only inventions which have been
borrowed from animals, to prove of use to man. The power of the herb
dittany, in extracting arrows, was first disclosed to us by stags that
had been struck by that weapon; the weapon being discharged on their
feeding upon this plant.1775 The same animals, too, when they happen
to have been wounded by the phalangium, a species of spider, or by any
insect of a similar nature, cure themselves by eating crabs. One of
the very best remedies for the bite of the serpent, is the plant1776
with which lizards treat their wounds when injured in fighting with
each other. The swallow has shown us that the chelidonia1777 is very
serviceable to the sight, by the fact of its employing it for the cure
of its young, when their eyes are affected. The tortoise recruits its
powers of effectually resisting serpents, by eating the plant which
is known as cunile bubula;1778 and the weasel feeds on rue, when it
fights with the serpent in the pursuit of mice.1779 The stork cures
itself of its diseases with wild marjoram, and the wild boar with ivy,
as also by eating crabs, and more particularly those that have been
thrown up by the sea.1780 The snake, when the membrane which covers
its body has been contracted by the cold of winter, throws it off in
the spring by the aid of the juices of fennel,1781 and thus becomes
sleek and youthful in appearance. First of all, it disengages the head,
and it then takes no less than a day and a night in working itself out,
and divesting itself of the membrane in which it has been enclosed.
The same animal, too, on finding its sight weakened during its winter
retreat, anoints and refreshes its eyes by rubbing itself on the plant
called fennel or marathrum; but if any of the scales are slow in coming
off,1782 it rubs itself against the thorns of the juniper. The dragon
relieves the nausea which affects it in spring, with the juices of the
lettuce.1783 The barbarous nations go to hunt the panther, provided
with meat that has been rubbed with aconite, which is a poison.1784
Immediately on eating it, compression of the throat overtakes them,
from which circumstance it is, that the plant has received the name of
pardalianches.1785 The animal, however, has found an antidote against
this poison in human excrements; besides which, it is so eager to get
at them, that the shepherds purposely suspend them in a vessel, placed
so high, that the animal cannot reach them even by leaping, when it
endeavours to get at them; accordingly, it continues to leap until
it has quite exhausted itself, and at last expires: otherwise, it is
so tenacious of life, that it will continue to fight long after its
intestines have been dragged out of its body.
When an elephant has happened to devour a chameleon, which is of the
same colour with the herbage, it counteracts this poison by means
of the wild olive. Bears, when they have eaten of the fruit of the
mandrake, lick up numbers of ants.1786 The stag counteracts the
effect of poisonous plants by eating the artichoke. Wood-pigeons,
jackdaws, blackbirds, and partridges, purge themselves once a year
by eating bay leaves; pigeons, turtle-doves, and poultry, with
wall-pellitory, or helxine; ducks, geese, and other aquatic birds, with
the plant sideritis or vervain; cranes, and birds of a similar nature,
with the bulrush. The raven, when it has killed a chameleon, a contest
in which even the conqueror suffers, counteracts the poison by means of
laurel.
There are a thousand other facts of this kind: and the same Nature
has also bestowed upon many animals as well, the faculty of observing
the heavens, and of presaging the winds, rains, and tempests, each
in its own peculiar way. It would be an endless labour to enumerate
them all; just as much as it would be to point out the relation of
each to man.1787 For, in fact, they warn us of danger, not only by
their fibres and their entrails, to which a large portion of mankind
attach the greatest faith, but by other kinds of warnings as well.
When a building is about to fall down, all the mice desert it1788
before-hand, and the spiders with their webs are the first to drop.
Divination from birds has been made a science among the Romans, and the
college of its priests is looked upon as peculiarly sacred.1789 In
Thrace, when all parts are covered with ice, the foxes are consulted,
an animal which, in other respects, is baneful from its craftiness. It
has been observed, that this animal applies its ear to the ice, for the
purpose of testing its thickness; hence it is, that the inhabitants
will never cross frozen rivers and lakes until the foxes have passed
over them and returned.
We have accounts, too, no less remarkable, in reference even to the
most contemptible of animals. M. Varro informs us, that a town in
Spain was undermined by rabbits, and one in Thessaly, by mice; that
the inhabitants of a district in Gaul were driven from their country
by frogs,1790 and a place in Africa by locusts;1791 that the
inhabitants of Gyarus,1792 one of the Cyclades, were driven away
by mice;1793 and the Amunclæ, in Italy, by serpents. There is a
vast desert tract on this side of the Æthiopian Cynamolgi,1794 the
inhabitants of which were exterminated by scorpions and venomous
ants.1795 and Theophrastus informs us, that the people of
Rhœteum1796 were driven away by scolopendræ.1797 But we must now
return to the other kinds of wild beasts.
It is the vulgar notion, that the hyæna possesses in itself both
sexes, being a male during one year, and a female the next, and that
it becomes pregnant without the co-operation: of the male; Aristotle,
however, denies this.1798 The neck, with the mane, runs continuously
into the back-bone, so that the animal cannot bend this part without
turning round the whole body. Many other wonderful things are also
related of this animal; and strangest of all, that it imitates the
human voice among the stalls of the shepherds; and while there, learns
the name of some one of them, and then calls him away, and devours him.
It is said also, that it can imitate a man vomiting, and that, in this
way, it attracts the dogs, and then falls upon them. It is the only
animal that digs up graves, in order to obtain the bodies of the dead.
The female is rarely caught: its eyes, it is said, are of a thousand
various colours and changes of shade. It is said also, that on coming
in contact with its shadow, dogs will lose their voice, and that, by
certain magical influences, it can render any animal immoveable, round
which it has walked three times.
By the union of the hyæna with the Æthiopian lioness, the corocotta
is produced, which has the same faculty of imitating the voices of
men and cattle. Its gaze is always fixed and immoveable; it has no
gums in either of its jaws, and the teeth are one continuous piece of
bone; they are enclosed in a sort of box as it were, that they may not
be blunted by rubbing against each other. Juba informs us, that the
mantichora of Æthiopia can also imitate the human speech.
Great numbers of hyænas are produced in Africa, which also gives birth
to multitudes of wild asses. In this species each male rules over a
herd of females. Fearing rivals in their lust, they carefully watch
the pregnant females, and castrate the young males with their teeth,
as soon as they are born.1800 The pregnant females, on the other
hand, seek concealment, and endeavour to bring forth in secret, being
desirous to increase their opportunities of sexual indulgence.
The beavers of the Euxine, when they are closely pressed by danger,
themselves cut off the same part, as they know that it is for this
that they are pursued. This substance is called castoreum by the
physicians.1802 In addition to this, the bite of this animal is
terrible; with its teeth it can cut down trees on the banks of rivers,
just as though with a knife.1803 If they seize a man by any part of
his body, they will never loose their hold until his bones are broken
and crackle under their teeth. The tail is like that of a fish;1804
in the other parts of the body they resemble the otter;1805 they are
both of them aquatic animals, and both have hair softer than down.
Bramble-frogs,1806 also, which live both on land and in water, are
replete with various medicinal substances, which they are said to
discharge each day, and to take in again with their food, of which they
only retain the poisonous parts.
The sea-calf, too, lives equally in the sea and on land, being
possessed of the same degree of intelligence as the beaver. It vomits
forth its gall, which is useful for many purposes in medicine; also
the rennet,1807 which serves as a remedy in epilepsy; for it is well
aware that it is hunted for these substances. Theophrastus informs
us, that lizards1808 also cast their skins like the serpent, and
instantly devour them, thus depriving us of a powerful remedy for
epilepsy; he says, too, that the bite of the lizard is fatal in Greece,
but harmless in Italy.1809
Stags, although the most mild of all animals, have still their own
feelings of malignancy;1810 when hard pressed by the hounds, of
their own accord they fly for refuge to man; and when the females
bring forth, they are less anxious to avoid the paths which bear
traces of human footsteps, than solitary spots which offer a retreat
to wild beasts.1811 They become pregnant after the rising of the
constellation Arcturus;1812 they bring forth after a gestation of
eight months, and sometimes produce two young ones. They separate
after conception, but the males, upon being thus abandoned, become
maddened with the fury of their passion; they dig up the earth, and
their muzzles become quite black, until they have been washed by the
rain.1813 The females, before they bring forth, purge themselves by
means of a certain herb, which is called seselis, by the use of which
parturition is rendered more easy. After delivery, they take a mixture
of the two plants called seselis1814 and aros,1815 and then return
to the fawn; they seem desirous, for some reason or other, that
their first milk, after parturition, should be impregnated with the
juice of these plants. They then exercise the young ones in running,
and teach them how to take to flight, leading them to precipices,
and showing them how to leap. The sexual passion of the male having
been now satisfied, he repairs to the pasture lands with the greatest
eagerness. When they feel themselves becoming too fat, they seek some
retired spot, thus acknowledging the inconvenience arising from their
bulk. Besides this, they continually pause in their flight, stand
still and look back, and then again resume their flight when the enemy
approaches. This pause is occasioned by the intense pain which they
feel in the intestines, a part which is so weak, that a very slight
blow will cause them to break within. The barking of a dog instantly
puts them to flight, and they always run with the wind, in order that
no trace of them may be left. They are soothed by the shepherd’s pipe
and his song;1816 when their ears are erect, their sense of hearing
is very acute, but when dropped, they become deaf.1817
In other respects the stag is a simple animal, which regards every
thing as wonderful, and with a stupid astonishment; so much so, indeed,
that if a horse or cow happens to approach it, it will not see the
hunter, who may be close at hand, or, if it does see him, it only gazes
upon his bow and arrow. Stags cross the sea in herds, swimming in a
long line, the head of each resting on the haunches of the one that
precedes it, each in its turn falling back to the rear. This has been
particularly remarked when they pass over from Cilicia to the island
of Cyprus. Though they do not see the land, they still are able to
direct themselves by the smell. The males have horns, and are the only
animals that shed them every year, at a stated time in the spring; at
which period they seek out with the greatest care the most retired
places, and after losing them, remain concealed, as though aware that
they are unarmed. Still, however, they envy us the good that these
might do us; for it is said the right horn, which possesses, as it
were, certain medicinal properties, can never be found, a circumstance
the more astonishing, from the fact that they change their horns every
year, even when kept in parks;1818 it is generally thought that they
bury their horns in the ground. The odour of either horn, when burnt,
drives away serpents and detects epilepsy. They also bear the marks
of their age on the horns, every year, up to the sixth,1819 a fresh
antler being added; after which period the horns are renewed in the
same state, so that by means of them their age cannot be ascertained.
Their old age, however, is indicated by their teeth, for then they have
only a few, or none at all; and we then no longer perceive, at the base
of their horns, antlers projecting from the front of the forehead, as
is usually the case with the animal when young.
When this animal is castrated it does not shed its horns, nor are they
reproduced. When the horns begin to be reproduced, two projections are
to be seen, much resembling, at first, dry skin; they grow with tender
shoots, having upon them a soft down like that on the head of a reed.
So long as they are without horns, they go to feed during the night.
As the horns grow, they harden by the heat of the sun, and the animal,
from time to time, tries their strength upon the trees; when satisfied
with their strength, it leaves its retreat.
Stags, too, have been occasionally caught with ivy green and growing on
their horns,1820 the plant having taken root on them, as it would on
any piece of wood, while the animal was rubbing them against the trees.
The stag is sometimes found white, as is said to have been the case
with the hind of Q. Sertorius, which he persuaded the nations of Spain
to look upon as having the gift of prophecy.1821 The stag, too,
fights with the serpent: it traces out the serpent’s hole, and draws
it forth by the breath of its nostrils,1822 and hence it is that the
smell of burnt stags’ horn has the remarkable power of driving away
serpents. The very best remedy for the bite of a serpent is the rennet
of a fawn that has been killed in the womb of its mother.
The stag is generally admitted to be very long lived; some were
captured at the end of one hundred years with the golden collars which
Alexander the Great had put upon them, and which were quite concealed
by the folds of the skin, in consequence of the accumulation of
fat.1823 This animal is not subject to fever, and, indeed, it is a
preservative against that complaint. We know that of late some women of
princely rank have been in the habit of eating the flesh of the stag
every morning, and that they have arrived at an extreme old age, free
from all fevers. It is, however, generally supposed that the animal
must be killed by a single wound to make sure of it possessing this
virtue.
(33.) Of the same species is an animal, which only differs from the
stag in having a beard and long hair about the shoulders: it is called
tragelaphus,1824 and is produced nowhere except on the banks of the
Phasis.1825
Africa is almost the only country that does not produce1826 the
stag, but then it produces the chameleon,1827 although it is much
more commonly met with in India. Its figure and size are that of a
lizard, only that its legs are straight and longer. Its sides unite
under its belly, as in fishes, and its spine projects in a similar
manner. Its muzzle is not unlike the snout of a small hog, so far as
in so small an animal it can be. Its tail is very long, and becomes
smaller towards the end, coiling up in folds like that of the viper.
It has hooked claws, and a slow movement like that of the tortoise;
its body is rough like that of the crocodile; its eyes are deep sunk
in the orbits, placed very near each other, very large, and of the
same colour as the body. It never closes them, and when the animal
looks round, it does so, not by the motion of the pupil, but of the
white of the eye.1828 It always holds the head upright and the mouth
open, and is the only animal which receives nourishment neither by meat
nor drink, nor anything else, but from the air alone.1829 Towards
the end of the dog-days1830 it is fierce, but at other times quite
harmless. The nature of its colour, too, is very remarkable, for it is
continually changing; its eyes, its tail, and its whole body always
assuming the colour of whatever object is nearest, with the exception
of white and red.1831 After death, it becomes of a pale colour. It
has a little flesh about the head, the jaws, and the root of the tail,
but none whatever on the rest of the body. It has no blood whatever,
except in the heart and about the eyes, and its entrails are without a
spleen.1832 It conceals itself during the winter months, just like
the lizard.
The tarandrus,1833 too, of the Scythians, changes its colour, but
this is the case with none of the animals which are covered with hair,
except the lycaon1834 of India, which is said to have a mane on the
neck. But with respect to the thos,1835 (which is a species of wolf,
differing from the common kind in having a larger body and very short
legs, leaping with great activity, living by the chase, and never
attacking man); it changes its coat, and not its colour, for it is
covered with hair in the winter, and goes bare in summer. The tarandrus
is of the size of the ox; its head is larger than that of the stag, and
not very unlike it; its horns are branched, its hoofs cloven, and its
hair as long as that of the bear. Its proper colour, when it thinks
proper to return to it, is like that of the ass. Its hide is of such
extreme hardness, that it is used for making breast-plates. When it is
frightened, this animal reflects the colour of all the trees, shrubs,
and flowers, or of the spots in which it is concealed; hence it is that
it is so rarely captured. It is wonderful that such various hues should
be given to the body, but still more so that it should be given to the
hair.
India and Africa produce the porcupine, the body of which is covered
with prickles. It is a species of hedgehog, but the quills of the
porcupine are longer, and when it stretches the skin, it discharges
them like so many missiles. With these it pierces the mouths of the
dogs which are pressing hard upon it, and even sends its darts to some
distance further.1836 It conceals itself during the winter months,
which, indeed, is the nature of many animals, and more especially the
bear.
Bears couple in the beginning of winter,1837 and not after the
fashion of other quadrupeds; for both animals lie down and embrace each
other.1838 The female then retires by herself to a separate den,
and there brings forth on the thirtieth day, mostly five young ones.
When first born, they are shapeless masses of white flesh, a little
larger than mice;1839 their claws alone being prominent. The mother
then licks them gradually into proper shape. There is nothing more
uncommon than to see a she-bear in the act of parturition.1840 The
male remains in his retreat for forty days, the female four months.
If they happen to have no den, they construct a retreat with branches
and shrubs, which is made impenetrable to the rain and is lined with
soft leaves. During the first fourteen days they are overcome by so
deep a sleep, that they cannot be aroused by wounds even. They become
wonderfully fat, too, while in this lethargic state. This fat is much
used in medicine; and it is very useful in preventing the hair from
falling off.1841 At the end of these fourteen days they sit up, and
find nourishment by sucking their fore-paws.1842 They warm their
cubs, when cold, by pressing them to the breast, not unlike the way
in which birds brood over their eggs. It is a very astonishing thing,
but Theophrastus believes it, that if we preserve the flesh of the
bear, the animal being killed in its dormant state, it will increase in
bulk, even though it may have been cooked.1843 During this period no
signs of food are to be found in the stomach of the animal, and only
a very slight quantity of liquid; there are a few drops of blood only
near the heart, but none whatever in any other part of the body.1844
They leave their retreat in the spring, the males being remarkably
fat: of this circumstance, however, we cannot give any satisfactory
explanation, for the sleep, during which they increase so much in bulk,
lasts, as we have already stated, only fourteen days.1845 When they
come out, they eat a certain plant, which is known as aros,1846 in
order to relax the bowels, which would otherwise become in a state of
constipation; and they sharpen the edges of their teeth against the
young shoots of the trees. Their eye-sight is dull, for which reason
in especial, they seek the combs of bees, in order that from the bees
stinging them in the throat and drawing blood, the oppression in the
head may be relieved.1847 The head of the bear is extremely weak,
whereas, in the lion, it is remarkable for its strength: on which
account it is, that when the bear, impelled by any alarm, is about to
precipitate itself from a rock, it covers its head with its paws. In
the arena of the Circus they are often to be seen killed by a blow on
the head with the fist. The people of Spain have a belief, that there
is some kind of magical poison in the brain of the bear, and therefore
burn the heads of those that have been killed in their public games;
for it is averred, that the brain, when mixed with drink, produces
in man the rage of the bear.1848 These animals walk on two feet,
and climb down trees backwards.1849 They can overcome the bull, by
suspending themselves, by all four legs, from its muzzle and horns,
thus wearing out its powers by their weight. In no other animal is
stupidity found more adroit in devising mischief. It is recorded in our
Annals, that on the fourteenth day before the calends of October,1850
in the consulship of M. Piso and M. Messala, Domitius Ahenobarbus, the
curule ædile, brought into the Circus one hundred Numidian bears, and
as many Æthiopian hunters. I am surprised to find the word Numidian
added, seeing that it is well known that there are no bears produced in
Africa.1851
The mice of Pontus also conceal themselves during the winter; but only
the white ones.1852 I wonder how those authors, who have asserted
that the sense of taste in these animals is very acute, found out
that such is the fact. The Alpine mice, which are the same size as
badgers, also conceal themselves;1853 but they first carry a store
of provisions into their retreat. Some writers, indeed, say that the
male and female, lying on their backs alternately, hold in their paws a
bundle of gnawed herbs, and, the tail of each in its turn being seized
by the teeth of the other, in this way, they are dragged into their
hole; hence it is, that at this season their hair is found to be rubbed
off their backs. There is a similar animal also in Egypt,1854 which
sits, in the same way, upon its haunches, and walks on two feet, using
the fore feet as hands.
Hedgehogs also lay up food for the winter; rolling themselves on
apples as they lie on the ground, they pierce one with their quills,
and then take up another in the mouth, and so carry them into the
hollows of trees. These animals also, when they conceal themselves
in their holes, afford a sure sign that the wind is about to change
from north-east to south.1855 When they perceive the approach of
the hunter, they draw in the head and feet, and all the lower part of
the body, which is covered by a thin and defenceless down only, and
then roll themselves up into the form of a ball, so that there is no
way of taking hold of them but by their quills. When they are reduced
to a state of desperation, they discharge a corrosive urine, which
injures their skin and quills, as they are aware that it is for the
sake of them that they are hunted. A skilful hunter, therefore, will
only pursue them when they have just discharged their urine. In this
case the skin retains its value; while in the other case, it becomes
spoilt and easily torn, the quills rotting and falling off, even though
the animal should escape with its life. For this reason it is that it
never moistens itself with this poisonous fluid, except when reduced to
the last stage of desperation; for it has a perfect hatred for its own
venomous distillation, and so careful is the animal, so determined to
wait till the very last moment, that it is generally caught before it
has employed this means of defence.
They force it to unroll itself, by sprinkling warm water upon it, and
then, suspended by one of its hind legs, it is left to die of hunger;
for there is no other mode of destroying it, without doing injury
to its skin. This animal is not, as many of us imagine, entirely
useless to man. If it were not for the quills which it produces, the
soft fleece of the sheep would have been given in vain to mankind;
for it is by means of its skin, that our woollen cloth is dressed.
From the monopoly of this article, great frauds and great profits
have resulted;1856 there is no subject on which the senate has more
frequently passed decrees, and there is not one of the Emperors, who
has not received from the provinces complaints respecting it.1857
There are also two other animals, whose urine possesses very wonderful
properties. We have heard speak of a small animal, to which the name of
leontophonus1859 has been given, and which is said to exist only in
those countries where the lion is produced; if its flesh is only tasted
by the lion, so intensely venomous is its nature, that this lord of the
other quadrupeds instantly expires. Hence it is, that the hunters of
the lion burn its body to ashes, and sprinkle a piece of flesh with the
powder, and so kill the lion by means of the ashes even—so fatal to
it is this poison! The lion, therefore, not without good reason hates
the leontophonus, and after destroying its sight, kills it without
inflicting a bite: the animal, on the other hand, sprinkles the lion
with its urine, being well aware that this too is fatal to it.
The urine of the lynx, in the countries1860 where that animal is
produced, either becomes crystallized, or else hardens into a precious
stone, resembling the carbuncle, and which shines like fire.1861 This
is called lyncurium;1862 and hence it is, that many persons believe
that this is the way in which amber is produced. The lynx, being well
aware of this property, envies us the possession of its urine, and
therefore buries it in the earth;1863 by this, however, it becomes
solid all the sooner.
The badger, when alarmed, shows its fear by a different kind of
artifice; inflating the skin, it distends it to such a degree, as
to repel equally the blows of men and the bite of dogs.1864 The
squirrel, also, has the power of foreseeing storms, and so, stopping
up its hole at the side from which the wind blows, it leaves the other
side open; besides which, the tail, which is furnished with longer hair
than the rest of the body, serves as a covering for it. It appears,
therefore,1865 that some animals lay up a store of food for the
winter, while others pass the time in sleep, which serves them instead
of food.
It is said, that the viper is the only one among the serpents that
conceals itself in the earth; the others lurking either in the
hollows of trees or in holes in the rocks.1866 Provided they are
not destroyed by cold, they can live there, without taking food, for
a whole year.1867 During the time that they are asleep in their
retreat, none of them are venomous.
A similar state of torpor exists also in snails. These animals again
become dormant during the summer, adhering very powerfully to stones;
and even, when turned up and pulled away from the stones, they will not
leave their shells. In the Balearic isles, the snails which are known
as the cave-snail,1868 do not leave their holes in the ground, nor
do they feed upon any green thing, but adhere to each other like so
many grapes. There is another less common species also, which is closed
by an operculum that adheres to the shell.1869 These animals always
burrow under the earth, and were formerly never found, except in the
environs of the Maritime Alps: they have, however, of late been dug up
in the territory of Liternum;1870 the most valued, however, of all,
are those of the island of Astypalæa.1871
It is said, that the lizard, the greatest enemy of all to the snail,
never prolongs its life beyond six months. The lizards of Arabia are
a cubit in length,1873 while those upon Nysa,1874 a mountain of
India, are twenty-four feet long, their colour being either yellow,
purple, or azure blue.
Among the animals, also, that are domesticated with mankind, there are
many circumstances that are far from undeserving of being known: among
these, there are more particularly that most faithful friend of man,
the dog, and the horse. We have an account of a dog that fought against
a band of robbers, in defending its master; and although it was pierced
with wounds, still it would not leave the body, from which it drove
away all birds and beasts. Another dog, again, in Epirus, recognized
the murderer of its master, in the midst of an assemblage of people,
and, by biting and barking at him, extorted from him a confession of
his crime. A king of the Garamantes also was brought back from exile
by two hundred dogs, which maintained the combat against all his
opponents. The people of Colophon1875 and Castabala1876 kept troops
of dogs, for the purposes of war; and these used to fight in the front
rank, and never retreat; they were the most faithful of auxiliaries,
and yet required no pay. After the defeat of the Cimbri, their dogs
defended their moveable houses, which were carried upon waggons. Jason,
the Lycian, having been slain, his dog refused to take food, and died
of famine. A dog, to which Darius gives the name of Hyrcanus, upon the
funeral pile of King Lysimachus being lighted, threw itself into the
flames,1877 and the dog of King Hiero did the same. Philistus also
gives a similar account of Pyrrhus, the dog of the tyrant Gelon: and
it is said, also, that the dog of Nicomedes, king of Bithynia, tore
Consingis,1878 the wife of that king, in consequence of her wanton
behaviour, when toying with her husband.
Among ourselves, Volcatius, a man of rank, who instructed Cascellius in
the civil law,1879 as he was riding on his Asturian jennet, towards
evening, from his country-house, was attacked by a robber, and was only
saved by his dog. The senator Cælius,1880 too, while lying sick at
Placentia, was surprised by armed men, but received not a wound from
them until they had first killed his dog. But a more extraordinary fact
than all, is what took place in our own times, and is testified by the
public register of the Roman people. In the consulship of Appius Junius
and P. Silius, when Titius Sabinus1881 was put to death, together
with his slaves, for the affair of Nero, the son of Germanicus, it was
found impossible to drive away a dog which belonged to one of them from
the prison; nor could it be forced away from the body, which had been
cast down the Gemitorian steps;1882 but there it stood howling, in
the presence of vast multitudes of people; and when some one threw a
piece of bread to it, the animal carried it to the mouth of its master.
Afterwards, when the body was thrown into the Tiber, the dog swam into
the river, and endeavoured to raise it out of the water; quite a throng
of people being collected to witness this instance of an animal’s
fidelity.
Dogs are the only animals that are sure to know their masters; and if
they suddenly meet him as a stranger, they will instantly recognize
him. They are the only animals that will answer to their names, and
recognize the voices of the family. They recollect a road along which
they have passed, however long it may be. Next to man, there is no
living creature whose memory is so retentive. By sitting down on the
ground, we may arrest their most impetuous attack, even when prompted
by the most violent rage.
In daily life we have discovered many other valuable qualities in this
animal; but its intelligence and sagacity are more especially shown
in the chase. It discovers and traces out the tracks of the animal,
leading by the leash1883 the sportsman who accompanies it straight up
to the prey; and as soon as ever it has perceived it, how silent it is,
and how secret but significant is the indication which it gives, first
by the tail and afterwards by the nose!1884 Hence it is, that even
when worn out with old age, blind, and feeble, they are carried by the
huntsman in his arms, being still able to point out the coverts where
the game is concealed, by snuffing with their muzzles at the wind. The
Indians raise a breed between the dog and the tiger,1885 and for this
purpose tie up the females in the forests when in heat. The first two
litters they look upon as too savage to be reared, but they bring up
the third.
The Gauls do the same with the wolf and the dog;1886 and their packs
of hounds have, each of them, one of these dogs, which acts as their
guide and leader. This dog they follow in the chase, and him they
carefully obey; for these animals have even a notion of subordination
among themselves. It is asserted that the dogs keep running when they
drink at the Nile, for fear of becoming a prey to the voracity of the
crocodile.1887 When Alexander the Great was on his Indian expedition,
he was presented by the king of Albania with a dog of unusual size;
being greatly delighted with its noble appearance, he ordered bears,
and after them wild boars, and then deer, to be let loose before it;
but the dog lay down, and regarded them with a kind of immoveable
contempt. The noble spirit of the general became irritated by the
sluggishness thus manifested by an animal of such vast bulk, and he
ordered it to be killed. The report of this reached the king, who
accordingly sent another dog, and at the same time sent word that its
powers were to be tried, not upon small animals, but upon the lion or
the elephant; adding, that he had had originally but two, and that
if this one were put to death, the race would be extinct. Alexander,
without delay, procured a lion, which in his presence was instantly
torn to pieces. He then ordered an elephant to be brought, and never
was he more delighted with any spectacle; for the dog, bristling up
its hair all over the body, began by thundering forth a loud barking,
and then attacked the animal, leaping at it first on one side and then
on the other, attacking it in the most skilful manner, and then again
retreating at the opportune moment, until at last the elephant, being
rendered quite giddy by turning round and round, fell to the earth, and
made it quite re-echo with his fall.
This animal brings forth twice in the year; it is capable of bearing
young when a year old, and gestation continues for sixty days. The
young ones are born blind, and the greater the supply of nourishment
from the mother’s milk, the more slowly do they acquire their sight;
still, however, this never takes place later than the twentieth day, or
earlier than the seventh. It is said by some writers, that if only one
is born, it is able to see on the ninth day; and that if there are two,
they begin to see on the tenth, every additional one causing the power
of seeing to come a day later. It is said, too, that the females which
are produced by the mother in her first litter, are subject to the
night-mare.1889 The best dog of the litter is the one which is last
in obtaining its sight, or else the one which the mother carries first
into her bed.
Canine madness is fatal to man during the heat of Sirius,1891 and,
as we have already said, it proves so in consequence of those who are
bitten having a deadly horror of water.1892 For this reason, during
the thirty days1893 that this star exerts its influence, we try to
prevent the disease by mixing dung from the poultry-yard with the
dog’s food; or else, if they are already attacked by the disease, by
giving them hellebore.
(41.) We have a single remedy against the bite, which has been but
lately discovered, by a kind of oracle, as it were—the root of the
wild rose, which is called cynorrhodos,1894 or dog-rose. Columella
informs us, that if, on the fortieth day after the birth of the pup,
the last bone of the tail is bitten off, the sinew will follow with
it; after which, the tail will not grow, and the dog will never become
rabid.1895 It is mentioned, among the other prodigies, and this I
take to be one indeed, that a dog once spoke;1896 and that when
Tarquin was expelled from the kingdom, a serpent barked.
King Alexander had also a very remarkable horse;1897 it was called
Bucephalus, either on account of the fierceness of its aspect, or
because it had the figure of a bull’s head marked on its shoulder. It
is said, that he was struck with its beauty when he was only a boy, and
that it was purchased from the stud of Philonicus, the Pharsalian, for
thirteen talents.1898 When it was equipped with the royal trappings,
it would suffer no one except Alexander to mount it, although at
other times it would allow any one to do so. A memorable circumstance
connected with it in battle is recorded of this horse; it is said that
when it was wounded in the attack upon Thebes, it would not allow
Alexander to mount any other horse. Many other circumstances, also, of
a similar nature, occurred respecting it; so that when it died, the
king duly performed its obsequies, and built around its tomb a city,
which he named after it.1899
It is said, also, that Cæsar, the Dictator, had a horse, which would
allow no one to mount but himself, and that its fore-feet were like
those of a man; indeed it is thus represented in the statue before the
temple of Venus Genetrix.1900 The late Emperor Augustus also erected
a tomb to his horse; on which occasion Germanicus Cæsar1901 wrote a
poem, which still exists. There are at Agrigentum many tombs of horses,
in the form of pyramids.1902 Juba informs us, that Semiramis was so
greatly enamoured of a horse, as to have had connection with it.1903
The Scythian horsemen make loud boasts of the fame of their cavalry. On
one occasion, one of their chiefs having been slain in single combat,
when the conqueror came to take the spoils of the enemy, he was set
upon by the horse of his opponent, and trampled on and bitten to death.
Another horse, upon the bandage being removed from his eyes, found
that he had covered his mother, upon which he threw himself down a
precipice, and was killed. We learn, also, that for a similar cause, a
groom was torn to pieces, in the territory of Reate.1904 For these
animals have a knowledge of the ties of consanguinity, and in a stud
a mare will attend to its sister of the preceding year, even more
carefully than its mother.
Their docility, too, is so great, that we find it stated that the
whole of the cavalry of the Sybarite army were accustomed to perform
a kind of dance to the sound of musical instruments. These animals
also foresee battles; they lament over their masters when they have
lost them, and sometimes shed tears1905 of regret for them. When
King Nicomedes was slain, his horse put an end to its life by fasting.
Phylarchus relates, that Centaretus,1906 the Galatian, after he had
slain Antiochus in battle, took possession of his horse, and mounted
it in triumph; upon which the animal, inflamed with indignation,
regardless of the rein and become quite ungovernable, threw itself
headlong down a precipice, and they both perished together. Philistus
relates, that Dionysius having left his horse stuck fast in a morass,
the animal, as soon as it disengaged itself, followed the steps of its
master, with a swarm of bees, which had settled on its mane; and that
it was in consequence of this portent, that Dionysius gained possession
of the kingdom.1907
These animals possess an intelligence which exceeds all
description.1908 Those who have to use the javelin are well aware
how the horse, by its exertions and the supple movements of its body,
aids the rider in any difficulty he may have in throwing his weapon.
They will even present to their master the weapons collected on the
ground. The horses too, that are yoked to the chariots in the Circus,
beyond a doubt, display remarkable proofs how sensible they are to
encouragement and to glory. In the Secular games, which were celebrated
in the Circus, under the Emperor Claudius, when the charioteer Corax,
who belonged to the white party,1909 was thrown from his place at the
starting-post, his horses took the lead and kept it, opposing the other
chariots, overturning them, and doing every thing against the other
competitors that could have been done, had they been guided by the most
skilful charioteer; and while we quite blushed to behold the skill of
man excelled by that of the horse, they arrived at the goal, after
going over the whole of the prescribed course. Our ancestors considered
it as a still more remarkable portent, that when a charioteer had
been thrown from his place, in the plebeian games of the Circus,1910
the horses ran to the Capitol, just as if he had been standing in the
car, and went three times round the temple there. But what is the
greatest prodigy of all, is the fact that the horses of Ratumenna came
from Veii to Rome, with the palm branch and chaplet, he himself having
fallen from his chariot, after having gained the victory; from which
circumstance the Ratumennian gate derived its name.1911
When the Sarmatæ are about to undertake a long journey, they prepare
their horses for it, by making them fast the day before, during which
they give them but little to drink; by these means they are enabled to
travel on horseback, without stopping, for one hundred and fifty miles.
Some horses are known to live fifty years; but the females are not so
long-lived.1912 These last come to their full growth at the fifth
year, the males a year later. The poet Virgil has very beautifully
described the points which ought more especially to be looked for,
as constituting the perfection of a horse;1913 I myself have also
treated of the same subject, in my work1914 on the Use of the Javelin
by Cavalry, and I find that pretty nearly all writers are agreed
respecting them.1915 The points requisite for the Circus are somewhat
different, however; and while horses are put in training for other
purposes at only two years old, they are not admitted to the contests
of the Circus before their fifth year.
The female of this animal carries her young for eleven months, and
brings forth in the twelfth. The connection takes place at the vernal
equinox, and generally in both sexes, at the age of two years; but the
colt is much stronger when the parents are three years old. The males
are capable of covering up to the thirty-third year, and it is not
till after the twentieth that they are taken for this purpose from
the Circus. At Opus,1917 it is said, a horse served as a stallion
until his fortieth year; though he required some assistance in raising
the fore part of the body. There are few animals, however, in which
the generative powers are so limited, for which reason it is only
admitted to the female at certain intervals;1918 indeed it cannot
cover as many as fifteen times in the course of one year.1919 The
sexual passion of the mare is extinguished by cropping her mane; she is
capable of bearing every year up to the fortieth. We have an account
of a horse having lived to its seventy-fifth year. The mare brings
forth standing upright, and is attached, beyond all other animals, to
her offspring. The horse is born with a poisonous substance on its
forehead, known as hippomanes,1920 and used in love philtres; it
is the size of a fig, and of a black colour; the mother devours it
immediately on the birth of the foal, and until she has done so, she
will not suckle it. When this substance can be rescued from the mother,
it has the property of rendering the animal quite frantic by the smell.
If a foal has lost its mother, the other mares in the herd that have
young, will take charge of the orphan. It is said that the young of
this animal cannot touch the earth with the mouth for the first three
days after its birth. The more spirited a horse is, the deeper does it
plunge its nose into the water while drinking. The Scythians prefer
mares for the purposes of war, because they can pass their urine
without stopping in their career.
It is well known that in Lusitania, in the vicinity of the town
of Olisipo1921 and the river Tagus, the mares, by turning their
faces towards the west wind as it blows, become impregnated by its
breezes,1922 and that the foals which are conceived in this way are
remarkable for their extreme fleetness; but they never live beyond
three years. Gallicia and Asturia are also countries of Spain; they
produce a species of horse known to us as thieldones,1923 and when
smaller, asturcones;1924 they have a peculiar and not common pace
of their own, which is very easy, and arises from the two legs of the
same side being moved together;1925 it is by studying the nature of
this step that our horses have been taught the movement which we call
ambling.1926 Horses have very nearly the same diseases as men;1927
besides which, they are subject to an irregular action of the bladder,
as, indeed, is the case with all beasts of burden.1928
M. Varro informs us that Quintus Axius, the senator, paid for an ass
the sum of four hundred thousand sesterces;1929 I am not sure
whether this did not exceed the price ever given for any other animal.
It is certainly a species of animal singularly useful for labour and
ploughing,1930 but more especially for the production of mules.1931
In these animals also, the country in which they are born is taken
into consideration; in Greece, those from Arcadia1932 are the most
valued; and in Italy, those of Reate.1933 The ass is an animal which
is unable to endure cold,1934 for which reason it is that it is
never produced in Pontus; nor is it allowed to cover at the vernal
equinox, like other cattle, but at the summer solstice. The males are
less proper for covering, when out of work. The earliest age at which
the females are ever capable of bearing is the thirtieth month, but
the usual time begins at the age of three years. The number to which
it gives birth is the same as the mare, which it also resembles, in
the length of its gestation, and in its mode of bringing forth; but
the female will discharge the generative fluid from the womb, being
unable to retain it, unless by blows she is forced to run immediately
after being covered. They seldom bring forth two at one birth.1935
When the she-ass is about to bring forth, she shuns the light and seeks
darkness, in order to escape the observation of man. Asses are capable
of breeding throughout the whole of their life, which extends to thirty
years. Their attachment to their young is great in the extreme, but
their aversion to water is still greater. They will pass through fire
to get at their foals, while the very same animal, if the smallest
stream intervenes, will tremble, and not dare so much as to wet even
its feet. Nor yet in their pastures will they ever drink at any but the
usual watering-place, and they make it their care to find some dry path
by which to get at it. They will not pass over a bridge either, when
the water can be seen between the planks beneath.1936 Wonderful to
relate, too, if their watering-places are changed, though they should
be ever so thirsty, they will not drink without being either beaten or
caressed. They ought always to have plenty of room for sleeping; for
they are very subject to various diseases in their sleep, when they
repeatedly throw out their feet, and would immediately lame themselves
by coming in contact with any hard substance; so that it is necessary
that they should be provided with an empty space. The profit which
is derived from these animals exceeds that arising from the richest
estate. It is a well-known fact, that in Celtiberia there are some
she-asses which have produced to their owners as much as four hundred
thousand sesterces.1937 In the rearing of she-mules it is said to
be particularly necessary to attend to the colour of the hair of the
ears and the eyelids, for, although the rest of the body be all of one
colour, the mule that is produced will have all the colours that are
found in those parts. Mæcenas was the first person who had the young
of the ass served up at his table;1938 they were in those times much
preferred to the onager or wild ass;1939 but, since his time, the
taste has gone out of fashion. An ass, after witnessing the death of
another ass, survives it but a very short time only.
From the union of the male ass and the mare a mule is produced in the
thirteenth month, an animal remarkable for its strength in laborious
work. We are told that, for this purpose, the mare ought not to be less
than four years old, nor more than ten. It is said also that these two
species will repulse each other, unless the male has been brought up,
in its infancy, upon the milk of the other species; for which reason
they take the foals away from the mare, in the dark, and substitute
for them the male colts of the ass. A mule may also be produced from
a horse and a female ass; but it can never be properly broken in,
and is incorrigibly sluggish,1941 being in all respects as slow as
an old animal. If a mare has conceived by a horse, and is afterwards
covered by an ass, the first conception is abortive; but this is not
the case when the horse comes after the ass. It has been observed,
that the female is in the best state for receiving the male in the
seventh day after parturition, and that the males are best adapted
for the purpose when they are fatigued.1942 A female ass, which
has not conceived before shedding what are called the milk-teeth, is
considered to be barren; which is also looked upon as the case when a
she-ass does not become pregnant after the first covering. The male
which is produced from a horse and a female ass, was called by the
ancients “hinnulus,” and that from an ass and a mare “mulus.”1943
It has been observed that the animal which is thus produced by the
union of the two species is of a third species, and does not resemble
either of the parents; and that all animals produced in this way, of
whatever kind they may be, are incapable of reproduction; she-mules are
therefore barren. It is said, indeed, in our Annals, that they have
frequently brought forth;1944 but such cases must be looked upon only
as prodigies.1945 Theophrastus says that they commonly bring forth
in Cappadocia; but that the animal of that country is of a peculiar
species.1946 The mule is prevented from kicking by frequently giving
it wine to drink.1947 It is said in the works of many of the Greek
writers, that from the union of a mule with a mare, the dwarf mule is
produced, which they call “ginnus.” From the union of the mare and the
wild ass, when it has been domesticated, a mule is produced which is
remarkably swift in running, and has extremely hard feet, and a thin
body, while it has a spirit that is quite indomitable. The very best
stallion of all, however, for this purpose, is one produced from a
union of the wild ass and the female domesticated ass. The best wild
asses are those of Phrygia and Lycaonia. Africa glories in the wild
foals which she produces, as excelling all others in flavour; these are
called “lalisiones.”1948 It appears from some Athenian records, that
a mule once lived to the age of eighty years. The people were greatly
delighted with this animal, because on one occasion, when, on the
building of a temple in the citadel,1949 it had been left behind on
account of its age, it persisted in promoting the work by accompanying
and assisting them; in consequence of which a decree was passed, that
the dealers in corn were not to drive it away from their sieves.1950
We find it stated, that the oxen of India are of the height of camels,
and that the extremity of their horns are four feet asunder. In our
part of the world the most valuable oxen are those of Epirus, owing, it
is said, to the attention paid to their breed by King Pyrrhus.1951
This perfection was acquired by not permitting them to breed until
after their fourth year. By these means he brought them to a very large
size, and descendants of this breed are still to be seen at the present
day. But in our times, we set heifers to breed in their first year, or,
at the latest, in their second. Bulls are fit for breeding in their
fourth year; one being sufficient, it is said, for ten cows during the
whole year. If the bull, after covering, goes to the right side, the
produce will be a male; if to the left, a female.1952 Conception
takes place after a single union; but if, by any accident, it should
not have taken place, the cow seeks the male again, at the end of
twenty days. She brings forth in the tenth month; whatever may be
produced before that time cannot be reared. Some writers say, that the
birth takes place the very day on which the tenth month is completed.
This animal but rarely produces twins. The time of covering begins at
the rising of the Dolphin, the day before the nones of January,1953
and continues for the space of thirty days. Sometimes it takes place
in the autumn; and among those nations which live upon milk, they
manage so as to have a supply of it at all times of the year. Bulls
never cover more than twice in the same day. The ox is the only animal
that walks backwards while it is feeding; among the Garamantes, they
feed in no other manner.1954 The females live fifteen years at the
longest, and the males twenty; they arrive at their full vigour in
their fifth year. It is said that they are made fat by being washed
in warm water, or by having the entrails inflated with air by means of
a reed, introduced through an incision in the skin. We must not look
upon those kinds as having degenerated, the appearance of which is not
so favourable. Those that are bred in the Alps, although very small
of body, give a great quantity of milk, and are capable of enduring
much labour; they are yoked by the horns, and not by the neck. The
oxen of Syria have no dewlap, but they have a hump on the back. Those
of Caria also, which is in Asia, are unsightly1955 in appearance,
having a hump hanging over the shoulders from the neck; and their horns
are moveable;1956 they are said, however, to be excellent workers,
though those which are either black or white are condemned as worthless
for labour.1957 The horns of the bull are shorter and thinner than
those of the ox. Oxen must be broken in when they are three years old;
after that time it is too late, and before that time too early. The
ox is most easily broken in by yoking it with one that has already
been trained.1958 This animal is our especial companion, both in
labour generally, and in the operations of agriculture. Our ancestors
considered it of so much value, that there is an instance cited of a
man being brought before the Roman people, on a day appointed, and
condemned, for having killed an ox, in order to humour an impudent
concubine of his, who said that she had never tasted tripe; and he
was driven into exile, just as though he had killed one of his own
peasants.1959
The bull has a proud air, a stern forehead, shaggy ears, and horns
which appear always ready, and challenging to the combat; but it is
by his fore feet that he manifests his threatening anger. As his rage
increases, he stands, lashing back his tail1960 every now and then,
and throwing up the sand against his belly; being the only animal that
excites himself by these means. We have seen them fight at the word of
command, and shown as a public spectacle; these bulls whirled about and
then fell upon their horns, and at once were up again; then, at other
times, they would lie upon the ground and let themselves be lifted up;
they would even stand in a two-horsed chariot, while moving at a rapid
rate, like so many charioteers.1961 The people of Thessaly invented a
method of killing bulls, by means of a man on horseback, who would ride
up to them, and seize one of the horns, and so twist their neck. Cæsar
the Dictator was the first person who exhibited this spectacle at Rome.
Bulls are selected as the very choicest of victims, and are offered up
as the most approved sacrifice for appeasing the gods.1962 Of all the
animals that have long tails, this is the only one whose tail is not of
proportionate length at the moment of birth; and in this animal alone
it continues to grow until it reaches its heels. It is on this account,
that in making choice of a calf for a victim, due care is taken that
its tail reaches to the pastern joint; if it is shorter than this, the
sacrifice is not deemed acceptable to the gods. This fact has also been
remarked, that calves, which have been carried to the altar on men’s
shoulders, are not generally acceptable to the gods; and also, if they
are lame, or of a species which is not appropriate,1963 or if they
struggle to get away from the altar. It was a not uncommon prodigy
among the ancients, for an ox to speak;1964 upon such a fact being
announced to the senate, they were in the habit of holding a meeting in
the open air.
In Egypt an ox is even worshipped as a deity; they call it Apis. It
is distinguished by a conspicuous white spot on the right side, in
the form of a crescent. There is a knot also under the tongue, which
is called “cantharus.”1966
This ox is not allowed to live beyond
a certain number of years; it is then destroyed by being drowned in
the fountain of the priests. They then go, amid general mourning, and
seek another ox to replace it; and the mourning is continued, with
their heads shaved, until such time as they have found one; it is not
long, however, at any time, before they meet with a successor. When
one has been found, it is brought by the priests to Memphis. There are
two temples appropriated to it, which are called thalami,1967 and
to these the people resort to learn the auguries. According as the
ox enters the one or the other of these places, the augury is deemed
favourable or unfavourable. It gives answers to individuals, by taking
food from the hand of those who consult it. It turned away from the
hand of Germanicus Cæsar, and not long after he died.1968 In general
it lives in secret; but, when it comes forth in public, the multitudes
make way for it, and it is attended by a crowd of boys, singing hymns
in honour of it; it appears to be sensible of the adoration thus paid
to it, and to court it. These crowds, too, suddenly become inspired,
and predict future events. Once in the year a female is presented to
the ox, which likewise has her appropriate marks, although different
from those on the male; and it is said that she is always killed the
very same day that they find her. There is a spot in the Nile, near
Memphis, which, from its figure, they call Phiala;1969 here they
throw into the water a dish of gold, and another of silver, every year
upon the days on which they celebrate the birth of Apis.1970 These
days are seven in number, and it is a remarkable thing, that during
this time, no one is ever attacked by the crocodile; on the eighth day,
however, after the sixth hour, these beasts resume all their former
ferocity.
Many thanks, too, do we owe to the sheep, both for appeasing the gods,
and for giving us the use of its fleece. As oxen cultivate the fields
which yield food for man, so to sheep are we indebted for the defence
of our bodies. The generative power lasts in both sexes from the second
to the ninth year, sometimes to the tenth.1972 The lambs produced
at the first birth are but small. The season for coupling, in all of
them, is from the setting of Arcturus, that is to say, the third day
before the ides of May,1973 to the setting of Aquila, the tenth day
before the calends of August.1974 The period of gestation is one
hundred and fifty days. The lambs that are produced after this time are
feeble; the ancients called those that were born after it, cordi.1975
Many persons prefer the lambs that are born in the winter to those of
the spring, because it is of much more consequence that they should
have gained strength before the summer solstice than before the winter
one; consequently, the sheep is the only animal that is benefitted
by being born in the middle of winter. It is the nature of the ram
to reject the young and prefer the old ones, and he himself is more
serviceable when old,1976 and when deprived of his horns.1977 He
is also rendered less violent by having one horn pierced towards the
ear. If the right testicle is tied up, the ram will generate females,
and if the left, males.1978 The noise of thunder produces abortion
in sheep, if they are left alone; to prevent such accidents, they are
brought together into flocks, that they may be rendered less timid by
being in company. When the north-east wind blows, males are said to be
conceived; and when the south wind, females. In this kind of animal,
the mouth of the ram is especially looked to, for whatever may be the
colour of the veins under the tongue, the wool of the young one will be
of a similar colour.1979 If these veins are many in number, it will
be mottled. Any change, too, in their water or drink, will render them
mottled.1980
There are two principal kinds of sheep, the covered1981 and the
colonic,1982 or common sheep; the former is the more tender animal,
but the latter is more nice about its pastures, for the covered sheep
will feed on brambles even. The best coverings for sheep are brought
from Arabia.1983
The most esteemed wool of all is that of Apulia, and that which in
Italy is called Grecian wool, in other countries Italian. The fleeces
of Miletus hold the third rank.1985 The Apulian wool is shorter in
the hair, and only owes its high character to the cloaks1986 that are
made of it. That which comes from the vicinity of Tarentum and Canusium
is the most celebrated; and there is a wool from Laodicea, in Asia, of
a similar quality.1987 There is no white wool superior to that of the
countries bordering on the Padus,1988 nor up to the present day has
any wool exceeded the price of one hundred sesterces per pound.1989
The sheep are not shorn in all countries; in some places it is still
the custom to pull off the wool.1990 There are various colours of
wool; so much so, indeed, that we want terms to express them all.
Several kinds, which are called native,1991 are found in Spain;
Pollentia, in the vicinity of the Alps,1992 produces black fleeces of
the best quality; Asia, as well as Bætica,1993 the red fleeces, which
are called Erythræan; those of Canusium are of a tawny colour;1994
and those of Tarentum have their peculiar dark tint.1995 All kinds of
wool, when not freed from the grease,1996 possess certain medicinal
properties. The wool of Istria is much more like hair than wool, and is
not suitable for the fabrication of stuffs that have a long nap;1997
so too is that which Salacia,1998 in Lusitania, finds the most useful
for making its chequered cloths. There is a similar wool, too, found
about Piscenæ,1999 in the province of Narbonensis, as also in Egypt;
a garment, when it has been worn for some time, is often embroidered
with this wool, and will last for a considerable time.
The thick, flocky wool has been esteemed for the manufacture of
carpets from the very earliest times; it is quite clear, from what
we read in Homer, that they were in use in his time.2000 The Gauls
embroider them in a different manner from that which is practised by
the Parthians.2001 Wool is compressed also for making a felt,2002
which, if soaked in vinegar,2003 is capable of resisting iron
even; and, what is still more, after having gone through the last
process,2004 wool will even resist fire; the refuse, too, when taken
out of the vat of the scourer, is used for making mattresses,2005
an invention, I fancy, of the Gauls. At all events, it is by Gallic
names that we distinguish the different sort of mattresses2006 at the
present day; but I am not well able to say at what period wool began to
be employed for this purpose. Our ancestors made use of straw2007 for
the purpose of sleeping upon, just as they do at present when in camp.
The gausapa2008 has been brought into use in my father’s memory, and
I myself recollect the amphimalla2009 and the long shaggy apron2010
being introduced; but at the present day, the laticlave tunic2011 is
beginning to be manufactured, in imitation of the gausapa.2012 Black
wool will take no colour. I shall describe the mode of dyeing the
other kinds of wool when speaking of the sea-purple,2013 or of the
nature of various plants.2014
Varro informs us, he himself having been an eye-witness, that in the
temple of Sancus,2015 the wool was still preserved on the distaff and
spindle of Tanaquil,2016 who was also called Caia Cæcilia; and he
says that the royal waved2017 toga, formerly worn by Servius Tullius,
and now in the temple of Fortune, was made by her. Hence was derived
the custom, on the marriage of a young woman, of carrying in the
procession a dressed distaff and a spindle, with the thread arranged
upon it. Tanaquil was the first who wove the straight tunic,2018
such as our young people wear with the white toga;2019 newly-married
women also. Waved garments were at first the most esteemed of all:
after which those composed of various colours2020 came into vogue.
Fenestella informs us, that togas with a smooth surface, as well
as the Phryxian togas,2021 began to be used in the latter part of
the reign of Augustus. Thick stuffs, in the preparation of which the
poppy2022 was used, are of more ancient date, being mentioned by the
poet Lucilius, in his lines on Torquatus. The prætexta2023 had its
origin among the Etrurians. I find that the trabea2024 was first
worn by the kings; embroidered garments are mentioned by Homer,2025
and in this class originated the triumphal robes.2026 The Phrygians
first used the needle for this purpose,2027 and hence this kind of
garment obtained the name of Phrygionian. King Attalus, who also lived
in Asia, invented the art of embroidering with gold, from which these
garments have been called Attalic.2028 Babylon was very famous for
making embroidery in different colours, and hence stuffs of this kind
have obtained the name of Babylonian.2029 The method of weaving
cloth with more than two threads was invented at Alexandria; these
cloths are called polymita;2030 it was in Gaul that they were first
divided into chequers.2031 Metellus Scipio, in the accusation which
he brought against Cato,2032 stated that even in his time Babylonian
covers for couches were selling for eight hundred thousand sesterces,
and these of late, in the time of the Emperor Nero, had risen to four
millions.2033 The prætextæ of Servius Tullius, with which the statue
of Fortune, dedicated by him, was covered,2034 lasted until the
death of Sejanus; and it is a remarkable fact, that, during a period
of five hundred and sixty years, they had never become tattered,2035
or received injury from moths. I myself have seen the fleece upon
the living animal dyed purple, scarlet, and violet,—a pound and a
half2036 of dye being used for each,—just as though they had been
produced by Nature in this form, to meet the demands of luxury.
In the sheep, it is considered a proof of its being of a very fair
breed, when the legs are short, and the belly is covered with wool;
when this part is bare, they used to be called apicæ, and were looked
upon as worthless.2037 The tail of the Syrian sheep is a cubit in
length,2038 and it is upon that part that most of the wool is found.
It is considered too early to castrate lambs before they are five
months old.
(49.) There is in Spain, and more especially in Corsica, a peculiar
kind of animal called the musmon,2039 not very unlike a sheep, but
with a fleece which more resembles the hair of the goat than the wool
of the sheep. The ancients gave the name of umbri2040 to the breed
between this animal and the sheep. The head of the sheep is the weakest
part of all, on which account it is obliged, when it feeds, to turn
away from the sun.2041 The animals which are covered with wool are
the most stupid of all.2042 When they are afraid to enter any place,
if one is only dragged into it by the horns, all the rest will follow.
The longest duration of their life is ten years; but in Æthiopia it is
thirteen. Goats live in that country eleven years, but in other parts
of the world mostly eight years only. Both of these animals require to
be covered not more than four times to ensure conception.
The goat occasionally brings forth as many as four at a birth; but
this is rarely the case.2043 It is pregnant five months, like the
sheep. Goats become barren when very fat. There is little advantage
to be derived from their bringing forth before their third year,
or after the fourth, when they begin to grow old.2044 They are
capable of generating in the seventh month, and while they are still
sucking. In both sexes those that have no horns are considered the
most valuable.2045 A single coupling in the day is not sufficient;
the second and the following ones are more effectual. They conceive
in the month of November, so as to bring forth in the month of March,
when the buds are bursting; this is sometimes the case with them when
only one year old, and always with those of the second year; but the
produce of those which are three years old is the most valuable.2046
They continue to bring forth for a period of eight years. Cold produces
abortion. When their eyes are surcharged, the female discharges the
blood from the eye by pricking it with the point of a bulrush, and the
male with the thorn of a bramble.
Mutianus relates an instance of the intelligence of this animal, of
which he himself was an eye-witness. Two goats, coming from opposite
directions, met on a very narrow bridge, which would not admit of
either of them turning round, and in consequence of its great length,
they could not safely go backwards, there being no sure footing on
account of its narrowness, while at the same time an impetuous torrent
was rapidly rushing beneath; accordingly, one of the animals lay down
flat, while the other walked over it.
Among the males, those are the most esteemed which have flat noses and
long hanging ears,2047 the shoulders being covered with very thick
shaggy hair; the mark of the most valuable among the females is the
having two folds2048 hanging down the body from under the neck. Some
of these animals have no horns; but where there are horns, the age
of the animal is denoted by the number of knots on them. Those that
have no horns give the most milk.2049 According to Archelaus,2050
they breathe, not through the nose, but the ears,2051 and they are
never entirely free from fever,2052 from which circumstance it is,
probably, that they are more animated than sheep, more ardent, and
have stronger sexual passions. It is said also, that they have the
power of seeing by night as well as in the day, for which reason those
persons who are called Nyctalopes,2053 recover the power of seeing
in the evening, by eating the liver of the he-goat. In Cilicia, and
in the vicinity of the Syrtes, the inhabitants shear the goat for the
purpose of clothing themselves.2054 It is said that the she-goats in
the pastures will never look at each other at sun-set, but lie with
their backs towards one another,2055 while at other times of the day
they lie facing each other and in family groups. They all have long
hair hanging down from the chin, which is called by us aruncus.2056
If any one of the flock is taken hold of and dragged by this hair,
all the rest gaze on in stupid astonishment; and the same happens
when any one of them has eaten of a certain herb.2057 Their bite is
very destructive to trees, and they make the olive barren by licking
it;2058 for which reason they are not sacrificed to Minerva.2059
The period for coupling the hog lasts from the return of the west wind
to the vernal equinox; the proper age commences in the eighth month,
indeed, in some places, in the fourth even, and continues until the
eighth year.2061 They bring forth twice in the year, the time of
gestation being four months; the number at a birth amounts to twenty
even, but they cannot rear so large a number.2062 Nigidius informs
us, that those which are produced within ten days of the winter
solstice are born with teeth. One coupling is sufficient, but it is
repeated, on account of their extreme liability to abortion; the remedy
for which is not to allow coupling the first time the female is in
heat, nor until its ears are flaccid and pendant. The males do not
generate after they are three years old. When the females become feeble
from old age, they receive the males lying down.2063 It is not looked
upon as anything portentous when they eat their young. The young of the
hog is considered in a state of purity for sacrifice when five days
old,2064 the lamb on the seventh day, and the calf on the thirtieth.
Coruncanius asserts, that ruminant animals are not proper for victims
until they have two teeth.2065 It has been supposed, that when a
pig has lost one eye, it will not live long;2066 otherwise, these
animals generally live up to fifteen, or sometimes twenty years. They
sometimes become mad; besides which, they are liable to other diseases,
especially to quinsy2067 and to scrofula.2068 It is an indication
that the hog is diseased, when blood is found at the root of a bristle
pulled from its back, and when it holds its head on one side while
walking. When the female becomes too fat, she has a deficiency of milk;
the first litter is always the least numerous. Animals of this kind
delight in rolling in the mud.2069 The tail is curled, and it has
also been remarked, that those are a more acceptable offering to the
gods, whose tail is turned to the right than those which have it turned
to the left. They may be fattened in sixty days, and more especially
if they have been kept without food for three days before fattening.
The swine is by far the most brutish of all the animals, and it has
been said, and not unaptly, that life has been given them in place of
salt.2070 And yet it has been known, that these animals, when carried
away by thieves, have recognized the voice of their keeper; and when
a vessel has been under water through the inclination of one of its
sides, they have had the sense to go over to the other side. The leader
of the herd will even learn to go to market, and to different houses
in the city. In the wild state also, they have the sense to pass their
urine in plashy places, that they may destroy all traces of them, and
so lighten themselves for flight.2071 The female is spayed, just
as is done with the camel; after they have fasted two days, they are
suspended by the hind feet, and the orifice of the womb is cut; after
this operation, they fatten more quickly.2072
M. Apicius2073 made the discovery, that we may employ the same
artificial method of increasing the size of the liver of the sow, as
of that of the goose;2074 it consists in cramming them with dried
figs, and when they are fat enough, they are drenched with wine mixed
with honey, and immediately killed. There is no animal that affords
a greater variety to the palate of the epicure; all the others have
their own peculiar flavour, but the flesh of the hog has nearly
fifty different flavours. Hence it is, that there are whole pages of
regulations made by the censors, forbidding the serving up at banquets
of the belly, the kernels,2075 the testicles, the womb, and the
cheeks. However, notwithstanding all this, the poet Publius,2076 the
author of the Mimes, when he ceased to be a slave, is said to have
given no entertainment without serving up the belly of a sow, to which
he also gave the name of “sumen.”
The flesh of the wild boar is also much esteemed. Cato, the Censor, in
his orations, strongly declaimed against the use of the brawn of the
wild boar.2077 The animal used to be divided into three portions, the
middle part of which was laid by,2078 and is called boar’s chine. P.
Servilius Rullus was the first Roman who served up a whole boar at a
banquet; the father of that Rullus, who, in the consulship of Cicero,
proposed the Agrarian law. So recent is the introduction of a thing
which is now in daily use. The Annalists have taken notice of such a
fact as this, clearly as a hint to us to mend our manners; seeing that
now-a-days two or three boars are consumed, not at one entertainment,
but as forming the first course only.
(52.) Fulvius Lupinus was the first Roman who formed parks2079 for
the reception of these and other wild animals: he first fed them in the
territory of Tarquinii: it was not long, however, that imitators were
found in L. Lucullus and Q. Hortensius.2080 The wild sow brings forth
once only in the year. The males are very fierce during the rutting
time; they fight with each other, having first hardened their sides by
rubbing them against the trees, and covered themselves with mud. The
females, as is the case with animals of every kind, become more fierce
just after they have brought forth. The wild boar is not capable of
generating before the first year. The wild boar of India2081 has two
curved teeth, projecting from beneath the muzzle, a cubit in length;
and the same number projecting from the forehead, like the horns of the
young bull. The hair of these animals, in a wild state, is the colour
of copper, the others are black. No species whatever of the swine is
found in Arabia.
In no species is the union with the wild animal so easy as in that
of the swine; the produce of such unions was called by the ancients
hybrid,2082 or half savage; which appellation has also been
transferred to the human race, as it was to C. Antonius, the colleague
of Cicero in his consulship. Not only, however, with respect to the
hog, but all other animals as well, wherever there is a tame species,
there is a corresponding wild one as well; a fact which is equally
true with reference to man himself, as is proved by the many races of
wild men of which we have already spoken.2083 There is no kind of
animal, however, that is divided into a greater number of varieties
than the goat. There are the capræa,2084 the rupicapra or rock-goat,
and the ibex, an animal of wonderful swiftness, although its head is
loaded with immense horns, which bear a strong resemblance to the
sheath of a sword.2085 By means of these horns the animal balances
itself, when it darts along the rocks, as though it had been hurled
from a sling;2086 more especially when it wishes to leap from one
eminence to another. There are the oryges also,2087 which are said to
be the only animals that have the hair the contrary way, the points
being turned towards the head. There are the dama also,2088 the
pygargus,2089 and the strepsiceros,2090 besides many others which
strongly resemble them. The first mentioned of these animals,2091
however, dwell in the Alps; all the others are sent to us from the
parts beyond sea.
The different kinds of apes, which approach the nearest to the human
figure, are distinguished from each other by the tail.2092 Their
shrewdness is quite wonderful. It is said that, imitating the hunters,
they will besmear themselves with bird-lime, and put their feet into
the shoes, which, as so many snares, have been prepared for them.2093
Mucianus says, that they have even played at chess, having, by
practice, learned to distinguish the different pieces, which are made
of wax.2094 He says that the species which have tails become quite
melancholy when the moon is on the wane, and that they leap for joy
at the time of the new moon, and adore it. Other quadrupeds also are
terrified at the eclipses of the heavenly bodies. All the species of
apes manifest remarkable affection for their offspring. Females, which
have been domesticated, and have had young ones, carry them about and
shew them to all comers, shew great delight when they are caressed,
and appear to understand the kindness thus shewn them. Hence it is,
that they very often stifle their young with their embraces. The
dog’s-headed ape2095 is of a much fiercer nature, as is the case with
the satyr. The callitriche2096 has almost a totally different aspect;
it has a beard on the face, and a tail, which in the first part of it
is very bushy. It is said that this animal cannot live except in the
climate of Æthiopia, which is its native place.
There are also numerous species of hares. Those in the Alps are
white,2097 and it is believed that, during the winter, they live
upon snow for food; at all events, every year, as the snow melts, they
acquire a reddish colour; it is, moreover, an animal which is capable
of existing in the most severe climates. There is also a species of
hare, in Spain, which is called the rabbit;2098 it is extremely
prolific, and produces famine in the Balearic islands, by destroying
the harvests. The young ones, either when cut from out of the body
of the mother, or taken from the breast, without having the entrails
removed, are considered a most delicate food; they are then called
laurices.2099 It is a well-known fact, that the inhabitants of the
Balearic islands begged of the late Emperor Augustus the aid of a
number of soldiers, to prevent the too rapid increase of these animals.
The ferret2100 is greatly esteemed for its skill in catching them.
It is thrown into the burrows, with their numerous outlets, which the
rabbits form, and from which circumstance they derive their name,2101
and as it drives them out, they are taken above. Archelaus informs us,
that in the hare, the number of cavernous receptacles in the body for
the excrements always equals that of its years;2102 but still the
numbers are sometimes found to differ. He says also, that the same
individual possesses the characteristics of the two sexes, and that it
becomes pregnant just as well without the aid of the male. It is a kind
provision of Nature, in making animals which are both harmless and good
for food, thus prolific. The hare, which is preyed upon by all other
animals, is the only one, except the dasypus,2103 which is capable of
superfœtation;2104 while the mother is suckling one of her young, she
has another in the womb covered with hair, another without any covering
at all, and another which is just beginning to be formed. Attempts
have been made to form a kind of stuff of the hair of these animals;
but it is not so soft as when attached to the skin, and, in consequence
of the shortness of the hairs, soon falls to pieces.
Hares are seldom tamed, and yet they cannot properly be called wild
animals; indeed, there are many species of them which are neither tame
nor wild, but of a sort of intermediate nature; of the same kind there
are among the winged animals, swallows and bees, and among the sea
animals, the dolphin.
(57.) Many persons have placed that inhabitant of our houses, the
mouse, in this class also; an animal which is not to be despised, for
the portents which it has afforded, even in relation to public events.
By gnawing the silver shields at Lanuvium,2105 mice prognosticated
the Marsian war; and the death of our general, Carbo, at Clusium,2106
by gnawing the latchets with which he fastened his shoes.2107 There
are many species of this animal in the territory of Cyrenaica; some
of them with a wide, others with a projecting, forehead, and some
again with bristling hair, like the hedgehog.2108 We are informed
by Theophrastus, that after the mice had driven the inhabitants of
Gyara2109 from their island, they even gnawed the iron; which they
also do, by a kind of natural instinct, in the iron forges among the
Chalybes. In gold mines, too, their stomachs are opened for this
purpose, and some of the metal is always to be found there, which they
have pilfered,2110 so great a delight do they take in stealing! We
learn from our Annals, also, that at the siege of Casilinum,2111 by
Hannibal, a mouse was sold for two hundred denarii,2112 and that the
person who sold it perished with hunger, while the purchaser survived.
To be visited by white mice is considered as indicative of a fortunate
event; but our Annals are full of instances in which the singing2113
of a mouse has interrupted the auspices.2114 Nigidius informs us,
that the field-mouse conceals itself during winter: this is also said
to be the case with the dormouse, which the regulations of the censors,
and of M. Scaurus, the chief of the senate, when he was consul,2115
have banished from our tables,2116 no less than shell-fish and
birds, which are brought from a foreign country. The dormouse is also
a half-wild animal, and the same person2117 made warrens for them
in large casks, who first formed parks for wild boars. In relation to
this subject, it has been remarked that dormice will not mate, unless
they happen to be natives of the same forest; and that if those are
put together that are brought from different rivers or mountains, they
will fight and destroy each other. These animals nourish their parents,
when worn out with old age, with a singular degree of affection. This
old age of theirs is put an end to by their winter’s rest, when they
conceal themselves and sleep; they are young again by the summer. The
field-mouse2118 also enjoys a similar repose.
It is a remarkable fact, that nature has not only assigned different
countries to different animals, but that even in the same country,
it has denied certain species to peculiar localities.2119 In Italy
the dormouse is found in one part only, the Messian forest.2120
In Lycia the gazelle never passes beyond the mountains which border
upon Syria;2121 nor does the wild ass in that vicinity pass over
those which divide Cappadocia from Cilicia. On the banks of the
Hellespont, the stags never pass into a strange territory, and about
Arginussa2122 they never go beyond Mount Elaphus; those upon that
mountain, too, have cloven ears. In the island of Poroselene,2123
the weasels will not so much as cross a certain road. In Bœotia, the
moles, which were introduced at Lebadea, fly from the very soil of
that country, while in the neighbourhood, at Orchomenus, the very same
animals tear up all the fields. We have seen coverlets for beds made
of the skins of these creatures, so that our sense of religion does
not prevent us from employing these ominous animals for the purposes
of luxury. When hares have been brought to Ithaca, they die as soon
as ever they touch the shore, and the same is the case with rabbits,
on the shores of the island of Ebusus;2124 while they abound in the
vicinity, Spain namely, and the Balearic isles. In Cyrene, the frogs
were formerly dumb, and this species still exists, although croaking
ones were carried over there from the continent. At the present day,
even, the frogs in the island of Seriphos are dumb; but when they are
carried to other places, they croak; the same thing is also said to
have taken place at Sicandrus, a lake of Thessaly.2125 In Italy, the
bite of the shrew-mouse2126 is venomous; an animal which is not to
be found in any region beyond the Apennines. In whatever country it
exists, it always dies immediately if it goes across the rut made by
a wheel. Upon Olympus, a mountain of Macedonia, there are no wolves,
nor yet in the isle of Crete.2127 In this island there are neither
foxes, nor bears, nor, indeed, any kind of baneful animal,2128 with
the exception of the phalangium, a species of spider, of which I
shall speak in its appropriate place.2129 It is a thing still more
remarkable, that in this island there are no stags, except in the
district of Cydon;2130 the same is the case with the wild boar, the
woodcock,2131 and the hedgehog. In Africa, there are neither wild
boars, stags, deer, nor bears.
Besides this, there are certain animals, which are harmless to the
natives of the country, but destroy strangers; such are the little
serpents at Tirynthus,2132 which are said to spring from out of the
earth. In Syria, also, and especially on the banks of the Euphrates,
the serpents never attack the Syrians when they are asleep, and even if
they happen to bite a native who treads upon them, their venom is not
felt; but to persons of any other country they are extremely hostile,
and fiercely attack them, causing a death attended with great torture.
On this account, the Syrians never kill them. On the contrary, on
Latmos, a mountain2133 of Caria, as Aristotle tells us, strangers are
not injured by the scorpions, while the natives are killed by them.
But I must now give an account of other animals as well, and of the
productions of the earth.2134
Summary.—Remarkable events, narratives, and observations,
seven hundred and eighty-seven.
Roman authors quoted.—Mucianus,2135 Procilius,2136
Verrius Flaccus,2137 L. Piso,2138 Cornelius Valerianus,2139
Cato the Censor,2140 Fenestella,2141 Trogus,2142 the Register
of the Triumphs,2143 Columella,2144 Virgil,2145 Varro,2146
Lucilius,2147 Metellus Scipio,2148 Cornelius Celsus,2149
Nigidius,2150 Trebius Niger,2151 Pomponius Mela,2152 Mamilius
Sura.2153
Foreign authors quoted.—King Juba,2154 Polybius,2155
Herodotus,2156 Antipater,2157 Aristotle,2158 Demetrius2159
the physician, Democritus,2160 Theophrastus,2161 Euanthes,2162
Agriopas,2163 who wrote the “Olympionicæ,” King Hiero,2164
King Attalus,2165 Philometor, Ctesias,2166 Duris,2167
Philistus,2168 Archytas,2169 Phylarchus,2170 Amphilochus2171
of Athens, Anaxapolis2172 the Thasian, Apollodorus2173 of
Lemnos, Aristophanes2174 the Milesian, Antigonus2175 the
Cumæan, Agathocles2176 of Chios, Apollonius2177 of Pergamus,
Aristander2178 of Athens, Bacchius2179 of Miletus, Bion2180
of Soli, Chæreas2181 the Athenian, Diodorus2182 of Priene,
Dion2183 the Colophonian, Epigenes2184 the Rhodian, Euagon2185
of Thasos, Euphronius2186 of Athens, Hegesias2187 of Maronea, the
Menanders2188 of Priene and of Heraclea, Menecrates2189 the poet,
Androtion2190 who wrote on Agriculture, Æschrion2191 who wrote on
Agriculture, Lysimachus2192 who wrote on Agriculture, Dionysius2193
who translated Mago, Diophanes2194 who made an epitome of the work of
Dionysius, King Archelaus,2195 Nicander.2196
BOOK IX. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF FISHES. — CHAP. 1. (1.)—WHY THE LARGEST ANIMALS ARE FOUND IN THE SEA. — CHAP. 2. (3.)—THE SEA MONSTERS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN. — CHAP. 3. (4.)—THE LARGEST ANIMALS THAT ARE FOUND IN EACH OCEAN. — CHAP. 4. (5.)—THE FORMS OF THE TRITONS AND NEREIDS. THE FORMS OF SEA ELEPHANTS. — CHAP. 5. (6.)—THE BALÆNA AND THE ORCA. — CHAP. 6.—WHETHER FISHES RESPIRE, AND WHETHER THEY SLEEP. — CHAP. 7. (8.)—DOLPHINS. — CHAP. 8.—HUMAN BEINGS WHO HAVE BEEN BELOVED BY DOLPHINS. — CHAP. 9.—PLACES WHERE DOLPHINS HELP MEN TO FISH. — CHAP. 10.—OTHER WONDERFUL THINGS RELATING TO DOLPHINS. — CHAP. 11. (9.)—THE TURSIO. — CHAP. 12. (10.)—TURTLES. 2290 THE VARIOUS KINDS OF TURTLES, AND HOW THEY ARE CAUGHT. — CHAP. 13. (11.)—WHO FIRST INVENTED THE ART OF CUTTING TORTOISE-SHELL. — CHAP. 14. (12.)—DISTRIBUTION OF AQUATIC ANIMALS INTO VARIOUS SPECIES. — CHAP. 15. (13.)—THOSE WHICH ARE COVERED WITH HAIR, OR HAVE NONE, AND HOW THEY BRING FORTH. SEA-CALVES, OR PHOCÆ. — CHAP. 16.—HOW MANY KINDS OF FISH THERE ARE. — CHAP. 17. (15.)—WHICH OF THE FISHES ARE OF THE LARGEST SIZE. — CHAP. 18.—TUNNIES, CORDYLA, AND PELAMIDES, AND THE VARIOUS PARTS OF THEM THAT ARE SALTED. MELANDRYA, APOLECTI, AND CYBIA. — CHAP. 19.—THE AURIAS AND THE SCOMBER. — CHAP. 20.—FISHES WHICH ARE NEVER FOUND IN THE EUXINE; THOSE WHICH ENTER IT AND RETURN. — CHAP. 21.—WHY FISHES LEAP ABOVE THE SURFACE OF THE WATER. — CHAP. 22. (16.)—THAT AUGURIES ARE DERIVED FROM FISHES. — CHAP. 23.—WHAT KINDS OF FISHES HAVE NO MALES. — CHAP. 24.—FISHES WHICH HAVE A STONE IN THE HEAD; THOSE WHICH KEEP THEMSELVES CONCEALED DURING WINTER; AND THOSE WHICH ARE NOT TAKEN IN WINTER, EXCEPT UPON STATED DAYS. — CHAP. 25.—FISHES WHICH CONCEAL THEMSELVES DURING THE SUMMER; THOSE WHICH ARE INFLUENCED BY THE STARS. — CHAP. 26. (17.)—THE MULLET. — CHAP. 27.—THE ACIPENSER. — CHAP. 28.—THE LUPUS, ASELLUS. — CHAP. 29.—THE SCARUS, THE MUSTELA. — CHAP. 30.—THE VARIOUS KINDS OF MULLETS, AND THE SARGUS THAT ATTENDS THEM. — CHAP. 31.—ENORMOUS PRICES OF SOME FISH. — CHAP. 32.—THAT THE SAME KINDS ARE NOT EVERYWHERE EQUALLY ESTEEMED. — CHAP. 33.—GILLS AND SCALES. — CHAP. 34. (19.)—FISHES WHICH HAVE A VOICE.—FISHES WITHOUT GILLS. — CHAP. 35.—FISHES WHICH COME ON LAND. THE PROPER TIME FOR CATCHING FISH. — CHAP. 36. (20.)—CLASSIFICATION OF FISHES, ACCORDING TO THE SHAPE OF THE BODY. — CHAP. 37.—THE FINS OF FISH, AND THEIR MODE OF SWIMMING. — CHAP. 38. (21.)—EELS. — CHAP. 39. (23.)—THE MURÆNA. — CHAP. 40. (24.)—VARIOUS KINDS OF FLAT FISH. — CHAP. 41. (25.)—THE ECHENEIS, AND ITS USES IN ENCHANTMENTS. — CHAP. 42. (26.)—FISHES WHICH CHANGE THEIR COLOUR. — CHAP. 43.—FISHES WHICH FLY ABOVE THE WATER.—THE SEA-SWALLOW.—THE FISH THAT SHINES IN THE NIGHT.—THE HORNED FISH.—THE SEA-DRAGON. — CHAP. 44. (28.)—FISHES WHICH HAVE NO BLOOD.—FISHES KNOWN AS SOFT FISH. — CHAP. 45. (29.)—THE SÆPIA, THE LOLIGO, THE SCALLOP. — CHAP. 46.—THE POLYPUS. — CHAP. 47.—THE NAUTILUS, OR SAILING POLYPUS. — CHAP. 48. (30.)—THE VARIOUS KINDS OF POLYPI; THEIR SHREWDNESS. — CHAP. 49.—THE SAILING NAUPLIUS. — CHAP. 50.—SEA-ANIMALS, WHICH ARE ENCLOSED WITH A CRUST; THE CRAY-FISH. — CHAP. 51.—THE VARIOUS KINDS OF CRABS; THE PINNOTHERES, THE SEA URCHIN, COCKLES, AND SCALLOPS. — CHAP. 52.—VARIOUS KINDS OF SHELL-FISH. — CHAP. 53. (34.)—WHAT NUMEROUS APPLIANCES OF LUXURY ARE FOUND IN THE SEA. — CHAP. 54.—PEARLS; HOW THEY ARE PRODUCED, AND WHERE. — CHAP. 55.—HOW PEARLS ARE FOUND. — CHAP. 56.—THE VARIOUS KINDS OF PEARLS. — CHAP. 57.—REMARKABLE FACTS CONNECTED WITH PEARLS—THEIR NATURE. — CHAP. 58.—INSTANCES OF THE USE OF PEARLS. — CHAP. 59.—HOW PEARLS FIRST CAME INTO USE AT ROME. — CHAP. 60.—THE NATURE OF THE MUREX AND THE PURPLE. — CHAP. 61.—THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF PURPLES. — CHAP. 62. (38.)—HOW WOOLS ARE DYED WITH THE JUICES OF THE PURPLE. — CHAP. 63. (39.)—WHEN PURPLE WAS FIRST USED AT ROME: WHEN THE LATICLAVE VESTMENT AND THE PRÆTEXTA WERE FIRST WORN. — CHAP. 64.—FABRICS CALLED CONCHYLIATED. — CHAP. 65.—THE AMETHYST, THE TYRIAN, THE HYSGINIAN, AND THE CRIMSON TINTS. — CHAP. 66. (42.)—THE PINNA, AND THE PINNOTHERES. — CHAP. 67.—THE SENSITIVENESS OF WATER ANIMALS; THE TORPEDO, THE PASTINACA, THE SCOLOPENDRA, THE GLANIS, AND THE RAM-FISH. — CHAP. 68. (45.)—BODIES WHICH HAVE A THIRD NATURE, THAT OF THE ANIMAL AND VEGETABLE COMBINED—THE SEA-NETTLE. — CHAP. 69.—SPONGES; THE VARIOUS KINDS OF THEM, AND WHERE THEY ARE PRODUCED: PROOFS THAT THEY ARE GIFTED WITH LIFE BY NATURE. — CHAP. 70. (46.)—DOG-FISH. 2747 — CHAP. 71.—FISHES WHICH ARE ENCLOSED IN A STONY SHELL—SEA ANIMALS WHICH HAVE NO SENSATION—-OTHER ANIMALS WHICH LIVE IN THE MUD. — CHAP. 72. (48.)—VENOMOUS SEA-ANIMALS. — CHAP. 73. (49.)—THE MALADIES OF FISHES. — CHAP. 74. (50.)—THE GENERATION OF FISHES. — CHAP. 75.—FISHES WHICH ARE BOTH OVIPAROUS AND VIVIPAROUS. — CHAP. 76.—FISHES THE BELLY OF WHICH OPENS IN SPAWNING, AND THEN CLOSES AGAIN. — CHAP. 77. (52.)—FISHES WHICH HAVE A WOMB; THOSE WHICH IMPREGNATE THEMSELVES. — CHAP. 78. (53.)—THE LONGEST LIVES KNOWN AMONGST FISHES. — CHAP. 79. (54.)—THE FIRST PERSON THAT FORMED ARTIFICIAL OYSTER-BEDS. — CHAP. 80.—WHO WAS THE FIRST INVENTOR OF PRESERVES FOR OTHER FISH. — CHAP. 81. (55.)—WHO INVENTED PRESERVES FOR MURENÆ. — CHAP. 82. (56.)—WHO INVENTED PRESERVES FOR SEA-SNAILS. — CHAP. 83. (57.)—LAND FISHES. — CHAP. 84. (58.)—THE MICE OF THE NILE. — CHAP. 85. (59.)—HOW THE FISH CALLED THE ANTHIAS IS TAKEN. — CHAP. 86. (60.)—SEA-STARS. — CHAP. 87. (61.)—THE MARVELLOUS PROPERTIES OF THE DACTYLUS. — CHAP. 88. (62.)—THE ANTIPATHIES AND SYMPATHIES THAT EXIST BETWEEN AQUATIC ANIMALS.
We have now given an account of the animals which we call terrestrial,
and which live as it were in a sort of society with man. Among the
remaining ones, it is well known that the birds are the smallest; we
shall therefore first describe those which inhabit the seas, rivers,
and standing waters.
(2.) Among these there are many to be found that exceed in size any
of the terrestrial animals even; the evident cause of which is the
superabundance of moisture with which they are supplied. Very different
is the lot of the winged animals, whose life is passed soaring aloft
in the air. But in the seas, spread out as they are far and wide,
forming an element at once so delicate and so vivifying, and receiving
the generating principles2197 from the regions of the air, as they
are ever produced by Nature, many animals are to be found, and indeed,
most of those that are of monstrous form; from the fact, no doubt, that
these seeds and first principles of being are so utterly conglomerated
and so involved, the one with the other, from being whirled to and fro,
now by the action of the winds and now by the waves. Hence it is that
the vulgar notion may very possibly be true, that whatever is produced
in any other department of Nature, is to be found in the sea as well;
while, at the same time, many other productions are there to be found
which nowhere else exist. That there are to be found in the sea the
forms, not only of terrestrial animals, but of inanimate objects even,
is easily to be understood by all who will take the trouble to examine
the grape-fish,2198 the sword-fish,2199 the saw-fish,2200 and the
cucumber-fish,2201 which last so strongly resembles the real cucumber
both in colour and in smell. We shall find the less reason then to be
surprised to find that in so small an object as a shell-fish2202 the
head of the horse is to be seen protruding from the shell.
But the most numerous and largest of all these animals are those
found in the Indian seas; among which there are balænae,2203 four
jugera2204 in extent, and the pristis,2205 two hundred cubits
long: here also are found cray-fish2206 four cubits in length, and
in the river Ganges there are to be seen eels three hundred2207
feet long. But at sea it is more especially about the time of the
solstices that these monsters are to be seen. For then it is that in
these regions the whirlwind comes sweeping on, the rains descend, the
hurricane comes rushing down, hurled from the mountain heights, while
the sea is stirred up from the very bottom, and the monsters are driven
from their depths and rolled upwards on the crest of the billow. At
other times again, there are such vast multitudes of tunnies met with,
that the fleet of Alexander the Great was able to make head against
them only by facing them in order of battle, just as it would have
done an enemy’s fleet. Had the ships not done this, but proceeded in a
straggling manner, they could not possibly have made their escape. No
noises, no sounds, no blows had any effect on these fish; by nothing
short of the clash of battle were they to be terrified, and by nothing
less than their utter destruction were they overpowered.
There is a large peninsula in the Red Sea, known by the name of
Cadara:2208 as it projects into the deep it forms a vast gulf, which
it took the fleet of King Ptolemy2209 twelve whole days and nights
to traverse by dint of rowing, for not a breath of wind was to be
perceived. In the recesses of this becalmed spot more particularly,
the sea-monsters attain so vast a size that they are quite unable
to move. The commanders of the fleets of Alexander the Great have
related that the Gedrosi,2210 who dwell upon the banks of the river
Arabis,2211 are in the habit of making the doors of their houses
with the jaw-bones2212 of fishes, and raftering the roofs with their
bones, many of which were found as much as forty cubits in length. At
this place, too, the sea-monsters, just like so many cattle,2213
were in the habit of coming on shore, and, after feeding on the roots
of shrubs, they would return; some of them, which had the heads of
horses,2214 asses, and bulls, found a pasture in the crops of grain.
The largest animals found in the Indian Sea are the pistrix and the
balæna; while of the Gallic Ocean the physeter2215 is the most bulky
inhabitant, raising itself aloft like some vast column, and as it
towers above the sails of ships, belching forth, as it were, a deluge
of water. In the ocean of Gades there is a tree,2216 with outspread
branches so vast, that it is supposed that it is for that reason it
has never yet entered the Straits. There are fish also found there
which are called sea-wheels,2217 in consequence of their singular
conformation; they are divided by four spokes, the nave being guarded
on every side by a couple of eyes.
A deputation of persons from Olisipo,2218 that had been sent for the
purpose, brought word to the Emperor Tiberius that a triton had been
both seen and heard in a certain cavern, blowing a conch-shell,2219
and of the form under which they are usually represented. Nor yet is
the figure generally attributed to the nereids2220 at all a fiction;
only in them, the portion of the body that resembles the human figure
is still rough all over with scales. For one of these creatures was
seen upon the same shores, and as it died, its plaintive murmurs were
heard even by the inhabitants at a distance. The legatus of Gaul,2221
too, wrote word to the late Emperor Augustus that a considerable
number of nereids had been found dead upon the sea-shore. I have, too,
some distinguished informants of equestrian rank, who state that they
themselves once saw in the ocean of Gades a sea-man,2222 which bore
in every part of his body a perfect resemblance to a human being, and
that during the night he would climb up into ships; upon which the side
of the vessel where he seated himself would instantly sink downward,
and if he remained there any considerable time, even go under water.
In the reign of the Emperor Tiberius, a subsidence of the ocean
left exposed on the shores of an island which faces the province of
Lugdunum2223 as many as three hundred animals or more, all at once,
quite marvellous for their varied shapes and enormous size, and no less
a number upon the shores of the Santones;2224 among the rest there
were elephants2225 and rams, which last, however, had only a white
spot to represent horns. Turranius has also left accounts of several
nereids, and he speaks of a monster2226 that was thrown up on the
shore at Gades, the distance between the two fins at the end of the
tail of which was sixteen cubits, and its teeth one hundred and twenty
in number; the largest being nine, and the smallest six inches in
length.
M. Scaurus, in his ædileship, exhibited at Rome, among other wonderful
things, the bones of the monster to which Andromeda was said to have
been exposed, and which he had brought from Joppa, a city of Judæa.
These bones exceeded forty feet in length, and the ribs were higher
than those of the Indian elephant, while the back-bone was a foot and a
half2227 in thickness.
The balæna2228 penetrates to our seas even. It is said that they are
not to be seen in the ocean of Gades before the winter solstice, and
that at periodical seasons they retire and conceal themselves in some
calm capacious bay, in which they take a delight in bringing forth.
This fact, however, is known to the orca,2229 an animal which is
peculiarly hostile to the balæna, and the form of which cannot be in
any way adequately described, but as an enormous mass of flesh armed
with teeth. This animal attacks the balæna in its places of retirement,
and with its teeth tears its young, or else attacks the females which
have just brought forth, and, indeed, while they are still pregnant;
and as they rush upon them, it pierces them just as though they had
been attacked by the beak of a Liburnian2230 galley. The female
balænæ, devoid of all flexibility, without energy to defend themselves,
and over-burdened by their own weight, weakened, too, by gestation, or
else the pains of recent parturition, are well aware that their only
resource is to take to flight in the open sea and to range over the
whole face of the ocean; while the orcæ, on the other hand, do all in
their power to meet them in their flight, throw themselves in their
way, and kill them either cooped up in a narrow passage, or else drive
them on a shoal, or dash them to pieces against the rocks. When these
battles are witnessed, it appears just as though the sea were infuriate
against itself; not a breath of wind is there to be felt in the bay,
and yet the waves by their pantings and their repeated blows are heaved
aloft in a way which no whirlwind could effect.
An orca has been seen even in the port of Ostia, where it was attacked
by the Emperor Claudius. It was while he was constructing the
harbour2231 there that this orca came, attracted by some hides which,
having been brought from Gaul, had happened to fall overboard2232
there. By feeding upon these for several days it had quite glutted
itself, having made for itself a channel in the shoaly water. Here,
however, the sand was thrown up by the action of the wind to such an
extent, that the creature found it quite impossible to turn round;
and while in the act of pursuing its prey, it was propelled by the
waves towards the shore, so that its back came to be perceived above
the level of the water, very much resembling in appearance the keel
of a vessel turned bottom upwards. Upon this, Cæsar ordered a great
number of nets to be extended at the mouth of the harbour, from shore
to shore, while he himself went there with the prætorian cohorts, and
so afforded a spectacle to the Roman people; for boats assailed the
monster, while the soldiers on board showered lances upon it. I myself
saw one of the boats2233 sunk by the water which the animal, as it
respired, showered down upon it.
Balænæ have the mouth2234 in the forehead; and hence it is that, as
they swim on the surface of the water, they discharge vast showers of
water in the air. (7.) It is universally agreed, however, that they
respire, as do a very few other animals2235 in the sea, which have
lungs among the internal viscera; for without lungs it is generally
supposed that no animal can breathe. Those, too, who are of this
opinion are of opinion also that no fishes that have gills are so
constituted as to inhale and exhale alternately, nor, in fact, many
other kinds of animals even, which are entirely destitute of gills.
This, I find, was the opinion of Aristotle,2236 who, by his learned
researches2237 on the subject, has induced many others to be of the
same way of thinking. I shall not, however, conceal the fact, that I
for one do not by any means at once subscribe to this opinion, for it
is very possible, if such be the will of Nature, that there may be
other organs2238 fitted for the purposes of respiration, and acting
in the place of lungs; just as in many animals a different liquid
altogether takes the place of blood.2239 And who, in fact, can find
any ground for surprise that the breath of life can penetrate the
waters of the deep, when he sees that it is even exhaled2240 from
them? and when we find, too, that it can even enter the very depths
of the earth, an element of so much greater density, a thing that is
proved by the case of animals which always live under ground, the mole
for instance? There are other weighty reasons as well, which induce me
to be of opinion that all aquatic animals respire, conformably to their
natural organization; for, in the first place, there has been often
remarked in fishes a certain degree of anhelation during the heat of
summer, and at other times again, a kind of leisurely gaping,2241 as
it were. And then, besides, we have the admission of those who are of
the contrary opinion, that fishes do sleep; but what possibility is
there of sleeping2242 without respiring as well? And again, we see
their breath disengaged in bubbles which rise to the water’s surface,
and the influence too of the moon makes even the very shells2243 grow
in bulk.
But the most convincing reason of all is, the undoubted fact that
fishes have the power of hearing2244 and of smelling, two senses for
the operation of both of which the air is a necessary vehicle; for
by smell we understand nothing else than the air being charged with
certain particles.2245 However, let every person form his own opinion
on these subjects, just in such way as he may think best.
Neither the balæna nor the dolphin has any gills.2246 Both of these
animals respire2247 through vent-holes, which communicate with the
lungs; in the balæna they are on the forehead,2248 and in the dolphin
on the back. Sea-calves, too, which we call “phocæ,”2249 breathe and
sleep upon dry land—sea-tortoises also,2250 of which we shall have
more to say hereafter.
The swiftest2251 not only of the sea animals, but of all animals
whatever, is the dolphin.2252 He is more rapid in his movements than
a bird, more instantaneous than the flight of an arrow, and were it not
for the fact that his month is situate much below his muzzle,2253
almost, indeed, in the middle of the belly, not a fish would be able
to escape his pursuit. But Nature,2254 in her prudence, has thrown
certain impediments in his way; for unless he turns, and throws himself
on his back, he can seize nothing, and it is this circumstance more
especially that gives proof of his extraordinary swiftness. For, if
pressed by hunger,2255 he will follow a fish, as it flies down, to
the very bottom of the water, and then after holding his breath thus
long, will dart again to the surface to respire, with the speed of an
arrow discharged from a bow; and often, on such occasions, he is known
to leap out of the water with such a bound, as to fly right over the
sails2256 of a ship.
Dolphins generally go in couples; the females bring forth their
young in the tenth month, during the summer season, sometimes two in
number.2257 They suckle their young at the teat like the balæna, and
even carry them during the weakness of infancy; in addition to which,
long after they are grown up, they accompany them, so great is their
affection for their progeny. The young ones grow very speedily, and
in ten years are supposed to arrive at their full size. The dolphin
lives thirty years; a fact that has been ascertained from cutting
marks2258 on the tail, by way of experiment. It conceals itself for
thirty days, at about the rising of the Dog-star, and hides itself so
effectually, that it is not known whither it goes; a thing that is more
surprising still, if it is unable to respire under water. Dolphins are
in the habit of darting upon the shore, for some reason or other, it is
not known2259 what. They do not die the moment that they touch the
dry land, but will die much more speedily if the vent-hole is closed.
The tongue, contrary to the nature of aquatic animals in general, is
moveable, being short and broad, not much unlike that of the pig.
Instead of a voice, they emit a moaning sound2260 similar to that
made by a human being; the back is arched, and the nose turned up. For
this reason2261 it is that they all recognize in a most surprising
manner the name of Simo, and prefer to be called by that rather than by
any other.
The dolphin is an animal not only friendly to man, but a lover of
music as well; he is charmed by melodious concerts,2262 and more
especially by the notes of the water-organ.2263 He does not dread
man, as though a stranger to him, but comes to meet ships, leaps and
bounds to and fro, vies with them in swiftness, and passes them even
when in full sail.
In the reign2264 of the late Emperor Augustus, a dolphin which had
been carried to the Lucrine Lake2265 conceived a most wonderful
affection for the child of a certain poor man, who was in the habit of
going that way from Baiæ to Puteoli2266 to school, and who used to
stop there in the middle of the day, call him by his name of Simo, and
would often entice him to the banks of the lake with pieces of bread
which he carried for the purpose. I should really have felt ashamed to
mention this, had not the incident been stated in writing in the works
of Mæcenas, Fabianus, Flavius Alfius, and many others. At whatever
hour of the day he might happen to be called by the boy, and although
hidden and out of sight at the bottom of the water, he would instantly
fly to the surface, and after feeding from his hand, would present his
back for him to mount, taking care to conceal the spiny projection of
his fins2267 in their sheath, as it were; and so, sportively taking
him up on his back, he would carry him over a wide expanse of sea to
the school at Puteoli, and in a similar manner bring him back again.
This happened for several years, until at last the boy happened to fall
ill of some malady, and died. The dolphin, however, still came to the
spot as usual, with a sorrowful air and manifesting every sign of deep
affliction, until at last, a thing of which no one felt the slightest
doubt, he died purely of sorrow and regret.
Within these few years also,2268 another at Hippo Diarrhytus,2269
on the coast of Africa, in a similar manner used to receive his food
from the hands of various persons, present himself for their caresses,
sport about among the swimmers, and carry them on his back. On being
rubbed with unguents by Flavianus, the then proconsul of Africa, he
was lulled to sleep, as it appeared, by the sensation of an odour so
new to him, and floated about just as though he had been dead. For
some months after this, he carefully avoided all intercourse with man,
just as though he had received some affront or other; but at the end
of that time he returned, and afforded just the same wonderful scenes
as before. At last, the vexations that were caused them by having to
entertain so many influential men who came to see this sight, compelled
the people of Hippo to put the animal to death.
Before this, there was a similar story told of a child at the city of
Iasus,2270 for whom a dolphin was long observed to have conceived
a most ardent affection, until at last, as the animal was eagerly
following him as he was making for the shore,2271 it was carried by
the tide on the sands, and there expired. Alexander the Great appointed
this boy2272 high priest of Neptune at Babylon, interpreting this
extraordinary attachment as a convincing proof of the favour of that
divinity.
Hegesidemus has also informed us, that in the same city2273 of Iasus
there was another boy also, Hermias by name, who in a similar manner
used to traverse the sea on a dolphin’s back, but that on one occasion
a tempest suddenly arising, he lost his life, and was brought back
dead; upon which, the dolphin, who thus admitted that he had been the
cause of his death, would not return to the sea, but lay down upon the
dry land, and there expired.
Theophrastus2274 informs us, that the very same thing happened at
Naupactus also; nor, in fact, is there any limit to similar instances.
The Amphilochians2275 and the Tarentines2276 have similar
stories also about children and dolphins; and all these give an air
of credibility to the one that is told of Arion,2277 the famous
performer on the lyre. The mariners being on the point of throwing him
into the sea, for the purpose of taking possession of the money he had
earned, he prevailed upon them to allow him one more song, accompanied
with the music of his lyre. The melody attracted numbers of dolphins
around the ship, and, upon throwing himself into the sea, he was taken
up by one of them, and borne in safety to the shore of the Promontory
of Tænarum.2278
There is in the province of Gallia Narbonensis and in the territory of
Nemausus2279 a lake known by the name of Latera,2280 where dolphins
fish in company with men. At the narrow outlet2281 of this lake, at
stated seasons of the year innumerable multitudes of mullets make their
way into the sea, taking advantage of the turn of the tide; hence it
is that it is quite impossible to employ nets sufficiently strong to
bear so vast a weight, even though the fish had not the instinctive
shrewdness to watch their opportunity. By a similar instinct the fish
immediately make with all speed towards the deep water which is found
in a gulf in that vicinity, and hasten to escape from the only spot
that is at all convenient for spreading the nets. As soon as ever the
fishermen perceive this, all the people—for great multitudes resort
thither, being well aware of the proper time, and especially desirous
of sharing in the amusement—shout as loud as they can, and summon
Simo to the scene of action. The dolphins very quickly understand that
they are in requisition, as a north-east wind speedily carries the
sound to their retreats, though a south one would somewhat retard it
by carrying it in an opposite direction. Even then however, sooner
than you could have possibly supposed, there are the dolphins, in all
readiness to assist. They are seen approaching in all haste in battle
array, and, immediately taking up their position when the engagement
is about to take place, they cut off all escape to the open sea, and
drive the terrified fish into shallow water. The fishermen then throw
their nets, holding them up at the sides with forks, though the mullets
with inconceivable agility instantly leap over them;2282 while
the dolphins, on the other hand, are waiting in readiness to receive
them, and content themselves for the present with killing them only,
postponing all thoughts of eating till after they have secured the
victory. The battle waxes hot apace, and the dolphins, pressing on with
the greatest vigour, readily allow themselves to be enclosed in the
nets; but in order that the fact of their being thus enclosed may not
urge the enemy to find additional means of flight, they glide along so
stealthily among the boats and nets, or else the swimmers, as not to
leave them any opening for escape. By leaping, which at other times is
their most favourite amusement, not one among them attempts to make
its escape, unless, indeed, the nets are purposely lowered for it; and
the instant that it has come out it continues the battle, as it were,
up to the very ramparts. At last, when the capture is now completed,
they devour those among the fish which they have killed;2283 but
being well aware that they have given too active an assistance to be
repaid with only one day’s reward, they take care to wait there till
the following day, when they are filled not only with fish, but bread
crumbs soaked in wine as well.
The account which Mucianus gives of a similar mode of fishing in the
Iasian Gulf differs from the preceding one, in the fact that there the
dolphins make their appearance of their own accord, and do not require
to be called: they receive their share from the hands of the people,
each boat having its own particular associate among the dolphins;
and this, although the fishing is carried on at night-time by the
light2284 of torches.
Dolphins, also, form among themselves2285 a sort of general
community. One of them having been captured by a king of Caria and
chained up in the harbour, great multitudes of dolphins assembled at
the spot, and with signs of sorrow which could not be misunderstood,
appealed to the sympathies of the people, until at last the king
ordered it to be released. The young dolphins, also, are always
attended2286 by a larger one, who acts as a guardian to them; and
before now, they have been seen2287 carrying off the body of one
which had died, that it might not be devoured by the sea-monsters.
There is a fish called the tursio,2288 which bears a strong
resemblance to the dolphin; it differs from it, however, in a certain
air of sadness, and is wanting in its peculiar vivacity. This animal
most resembles the dog-fish,2289 however, in the shape and dangerous
powers of the muzzle.
The Indian Sea2291 produces turtles of such vast2292 size, that
with the shell of a single animal they are able to roof a habitable
cottage;2293 and among the islands of the Red Sea, the navigation
is mostly carried on in boats formed of these shells. They are to be
caught in many ways; but they are generally taken when they have come
up to the surface of the water just before midday, a season at which
they experience great delight in floating on the calm surface, with the
back entirely out of the water. Here the delightful sensations2294
which attend a free respiration beguile them to such a degree, and
render them so utterly regardless of their safety, that their shell
becomes dried up by the heat of the sun, so much so, indeed, that they
are unable to descend, and, having to float against their will, become
an easy prey to the fishermen. It is said also, that they leave the
water at night for the purpose of feeding, and eat with such avidity as
to quite glut themselves: upon which, they become weary, and the moment
that, on their return in the morning, they reach the sea, they fall
asleep on the surface of the water. The noise of their snoring betrays
them, upon which the fishermen stealthily swim towards the animals,
three to each turtle; two of them, in a moment, throw it on its back,
while a third slings a noose around it, as it lies face upwards, and
then some more men, who are ready on shore, draw it to land.
In the Phœnician Sea they are taken without the slightest difficulty,
and, at stated periods of the year, come of their own accord to the
river Eleutherus,2295 in immense numbers. The turtle has no teeth,
but the edge of the mouth is sharp, the upper part shutting down
over the lower just like the lid of a box. In the sea it lives upon
shell-fish,2296 and such is the strength of its jaws, that it is able
to break stones even; when on shore, it feeds upon herbage. The female
turtle lays eggs like those of birds, one hundred in number; these she
buries on the dry land, and covering them over with earth, pats it
down with her breast, and then having thus rendered it smooth, sits on
them during the night. The young are hatched in the course of a year.
Some persons are of opinion that they hatch their eggs by means of the
eyes, by merely looking at them, and that the female refuses to have
any intercourse with the male until he has placed a wisp of straw2297
upon her back. The Troglodytæ have turtles with horns,2298 which
resemble the branches of a lyre; they are large, but moveable, and
assist the animal like so many oars while swimming. The name of this
fine, but rarely-found turtle, is “chelyon;”2299 for the rocks, from
the sharpness of their points, frighten away the Chelonophagi,2300
while the Troglodytæ, whose shores these animals frequent, worship
them as sacred. There are some land turtles also, the shells of
which, used for the purposes of art, are thence called by the name of
“chersinæ;”2301 they are found in the deserts of Africa, in the parts
where the scorched sands are more especially destitute of water, and
subsist, it is believed, upon the moisture of the dews. No other animal
is to be found there.
Carvilius Pollio, a man of prodigal habits and ingenious in inventing
the refinements of luxury, was the first to cut the shell of the
tortoise into laminæ, and to veneer beds and cabinets2302 with it.
The integuments of the aquatic animals are many in number. Some are
covered with a hide and hair, as the sea-calf and hippopotamus, for
instance; others again, with a hide only, as the dolphin; others again,
with a shell,2303 as the turtle; others, with a coat as hard as a
stone, like the oyster and other shell-fish; others, with a crust, such
as the cray-fish; others, with a crust and spines, like the sea-urchin;
others, with scales, as fishes in general; others, with a rough skin,
as the squatina,2304 the skin of which is used for polishing wood and
ivory; others, with a soft skin, like the muræna;2305 and others with
none at all, like the polypus.2306
Those aquatic animals which are covered with hair are viviparous, such,
for instance, as the pristis, the balæna,2307 and the sea-calf. This
last brings forth its young on land, and, like the sheep, produces an
after-birth. In coupling, they adhere after the manner of the canine
species; the female sometimes produces even more than two, and rears
her young at the breast. She does not take them down to the sea until
the twelfth day, and after that time makes them become used to it by
degrees.2308 These animals are killed with the greatest difficulty,
unless the head is cut off at once. They make a noise which sounds
like lowing, whence their name of “sea-calf.” They are susceptible,
however, of training, and with their voice, as well as by gestures,
can be taught to salute the public; when called by their name, they
answer with a discordant kind of grunt.2309 No animal has a deeper
sleep2310 than this; on dry land it creeps along as though on feet,
by the aid of what it uses as fins when in the sea. Its skin, even
when separated from the body, is said to retain a certain sensitive
sympathy with the sea, and at the reflux2311 of the tide, the hair on
it always rises upright: in addition to which, it is said that there is
in the right fin a certain soporiferous influence, and that, if placed
under the head, it induces sleep.
(14.) There are only two animals without hair that are viviparous, the
dolphin and the viper.2312
There are seventy-four2313 species of fishes, exclusive of those
that are covered with crusts; the kinds of which are thirty in number.
We shall, on another occasion,2314 speak of each individually;
but, for the present, we shall treat only of the nature of the more
remarkable ones.
Tunnies are among the most remarkable for their size; we have found
one weighing as much as fifteen2315 talents, the breadth of its tail
being five cubits and a palm.2316 In some of the rivers, also, there
are fish of no less size, such, for instance, as the silurus2317 of
the Nile, the isox2318 of the Rhenus, and the attilus2319 of the
Padus, which, naturally of an inactive nature, sometimes grows so fat
as to weigh a thousand pounds, and when taken with a hook, attached to
a chain, requires a yoke of oxen to draw it2320 on land. An extremely
small fish, which is known as the clupea,2321 attaches itself, with
a wonderful tenacity, to a certain vein in the throat of the attilus,
and destroys it by its bite. The silurus carries devastation with
it wherever it goes, attacks every living creature, and often drags
beneath the water horses as they swim. It is also remarkable, that in
the Mœnus,2322 a river of Germany, a fish that bears2323 a very
strong resemblance to the sea-pig, requires to be drawn out of the
water by a yoke of oxen; and, in the Danube, it is taken with large
hooks of iron.2324 In the Boryrsthenes, also, there is said to be a
fish of enormous size, the flesh of which has no bones or spines in it,
and is remarkable for its sweetness.
In the Granges, a river of India, there is a fish found which they call
the platanista;2325 it has the muzzle and the tail of the dolphin,
and measures sixteen cubits in length. Statius Sebosus says, a thing
that is marvellous in no small degree, that in the same river there are
fishes2326 found, called worms; these have two gills,2327 and are
sixty cubits in length; they are of an azure colour, and have received
their name from their peculiar conformation. These fish, he says, are
of such enormous strength, that with their teeth they seize hold of the
trunks of elephants that come to drink, and so drag them into the water.
The male tunny has no ventral fin;2328 these fish enter the Euxine
in large bodies from the main2329 sea, in the spring, and will spawn
nowhere else. The young ones, which in autumn accompany the females
to the open sea, are known as “cordyla.”2330 In the spring they are
called “pelamides,”2331 from πηλὸς, the Greek for “mud,”
and after they are a year old, “thynni.” When this fish is cut up
into pieces, the neck, the belly, and the throat,2332 are the most
esteemed parts; but they must be eaten only when they are quite fresh,
and even then they cause severe fits of flatulence; the other parts;
with the flesh entire, are preserved in salt. Those pieces, which bear
a resemblance to an oaken board, have thence received the name of
“melandrya.”2333 The least esteemed among these parts are those which
are the nearest to the tail, because they have no fat upon them; while
those parts are considered the most delicate, which lie nearest the
neck;2334 in other fishes, however, the parts about the tail have
the most nutriment2335 in them. The pelamides are cut up into small
sections, known as “apolecti;”2336 and these again are divided into
cubical pieces, which are thence called “cybia.”2337
All kinds of fish grow2338 with remarkable rapidity, and more
especially those in the Euxine; the reason2339 of which is the
vast number of rivers which discharge their fresh water into it. One
fish, the growth of which is quite perceptible, day by day, is known
as the amia.2340 This fish, and the pelamides, together with the
tunnies,2341 enter the Euxine in shoals, for the purpose of obtaining
a sweeter nutriment, each under the command of its own leader; but
first of all the scomber2342 appears, which is of a sulphureous tint
when in the water, but when out of it resembles other fish in colour.
The salt-water preserves2343 of Spain are filled with these last
fish, but the tunnies do not consort with them.2344
The Euxine, however, is never entered by any animal2345 that is
noxious to fish, with the exception of the sea-calf and the small
dolphin. On entering, the tunnies range along2346 the shores to the
right, and on departing, keep to those on the left; this is supposed
to arise from the fact that they have better sight with the right eye,
their powers of vision with either being naturally very limited. In the
channel of the Thracian Bosporus, by which the Propontis is connected
with the Euxine, at the narrowest part of the Straits which separate
Europe from Asia, there is, near Chalcedon, on the Asiatic side, a rock
of remarkable whiteness, the whole of which can be seen from the bottom
of the sea at the surface. Alarmed at the sudden appearance of this
rock, the tunnies always hasten in great numbers, and with headlong
impetuosity, towards the promontory of Byzantium, which stands exactly
opposite to it, and from this circumstance has received the name of the
Golden Horn.2347 Hence it is, that all the fishing is at Byzantium,
to the great loss of Chalcedon,2348 although it is only separated
from it by a channel a mile in width. They wait, however, for the
blowing of the north wind to leave the Euxine with a favourable tide,
and are never taken until they have entered the harbour of Byzantium.
These fish do not move about in winter;2349 in whatever place they
may happen to be surprised by it, there they pass the winter, till the
time of the equinox.
Manifesting a wonderful degree of delight, they will often accompany
a vessel in full sail, and may be seen from the poop following it
for hours, and a distance of several miles. If a fish-spear even is
thrown at them ever so many times, they are not in the slightest degree
alarmed at it. Some writers call the tunnies which follow ships in this
manner, by the name of “pompili.”2350
Many fishes pass the summer in the Propontis, and do not enter the
Euxine; such, for instance, as the sole,2351 while on the other
hand, the turbot2352 enters it. The sepia2353 is not found in
this sea, although the loligo2354 is. Among the rock-fish, the
sea-thrush2355 and the sea-blackbird are wanting, as also purples,
though oysters abound here. All these, however, pass the winter in the
Ægean Sea; and of those which enter the Euxine, the only ones that
do not2356 return are the trichiæ.2357—It will be as well to
use the Greek names which most of them bear, seeing that to the same
species different countries have given different appellations.—These
last, however, are the only ones that enter the river Ister,2358 and
passing along its subterraneous passages, make their way from it to
the Adriatic;2359 and this is the reason why they are to be seen
descending into the Euxine Sea, but never in the act of returning
from it. The time for taking tunnies is, from the rising of the
Vergiliæ2360 to the setting of Arcturus:2361 throughout the rest
of the winter season, they lie concealed at the bottom of deep creeks,
unless they are induced to come out by the warmth of the weather or the
full moon. These fish fatten2362 to such an extraordinary degree as
to burst. The longest period of their life2363 is two years.
There is a little animal,2364 in appearance like a scorpion, and
of the size of a spider.2365 This creature, by means of its sting,
attaches itself below the fin to the tunny and the fish known as the
sword-fish2366 and which often exceeds the dolphin in magnitude, and
causes it such excruciating pain, that it will often leap on board of
a ship even. Fish will also do the same at other times, when in dread
of the violence of other fish, and mullets more especially, which are
of such extraordinary swiftness, that they will sometimes leap over a
ship, if lying crosswise.
Auguries are also derived from this department of Nature, and fishes
afford presages of coming events. While Augustus2367 was walking on
the sea-shore, during the time of the Sicilian war, a fish leapt out of
the sea, and fell at his feet. The diviners, who were consulted, stated
that this was a proof that those would fall beneath the feet of Cæsar
who at that moment were in possession of the seas—it was just at this
time that Sextus Pompeius had adopted2368 Neptune as his father, so
elated was he with his successes by sea.
The females of fishes are larger2369 in size than the males, and in
some kinds there are no males2370 at all, as in the erythini2371
and the channi;2372 for all of these that are taken are found to be
full of eggs. Nearly all kinds of fish that are covered with scales
are gregarious. They are most easily taken before sunrise;2373 for
then more particularly their powers of seeing are defective. They sleep
during the night; and when the weather is clear, are able to see just
as well then as during the day. It is said, also, that it greatly tends
to promote their capture to drag the bottom of the water, and that by
so doing more are taken at the second haul2374 than at the first.
They are especially fond of the taste of oil, and find nutriment in
gentle showers of rain. Indeed, the very reeds,2375 even, although
they are produced in swamps, will not grow to maturity without the
aid of rain: in addition to this, we find that wherever fishes remain
constantly in the same water, if it is not renewed they will die.
All fish have a presentiment of a rigorous winter, but more especially
those which are supposed to have a stone2376 in the head, the
lupus,2377 for instance, the chromis,2378 the sciæna,2379 and
the phagrus.2380 When the winter has been very severe, many fish
are taken in a state of blindness.2381 Hence it is, that during
these months they lie concealed in holes, in the same manner as land
animals, as we have already2382 mentioned; and more especially the
hippurus,2383 and the coracinus,2384 which are never taken during
the winter, except only on a few stated days, which are always the
same. The same with the muræna2385 also, and the orphus,2386 the
conger,2387 the perch,2388 and all the rock-fish. It is said
that, during the winter, the torpedo,2389 the psetta,2390 and the
sole, conceal themselves in the earth, or rather, I should say, in
excavations made by them at the bottom of the sea.
Other fishes,2391 again, are unable to bear the heat of summer,
and lie concealed during the sixty days of the hottest weather
of midsummer; such, for instance, as the glaucus,2392 the
asellus,2393 and the dorade.2394 Among the river-fish, the
silurus2395 is affected by the rising of the Dog-star, and at other
times it is always sent to sleep by thunder. The same is also believed
to be the case with the sea-fish called cyprinus.2396 In addition
to this, the whole sea is sensible2397 of the rising of this star,
a thing which is more especially to be observed in the Bosporus: for
there sea-weeds and fish are seen floating on the surface, all of which
have been thrown up from the bottom.
One singular propensity of the mullet2398 has afforded a subject
for laughter;2399 when it is frightened, it hides its head, and
fancies that the whole of its body is concealed. Their salacious
propensities2400 render them so unguarded, that in Phœnicia and in
the province of Gallia Narbonensis, at the time of coupling, a male,
being taken from out of the preserves, is fastened to a long line,
which is passed through his mouth and gills; he is then let go in the
sea, after which he is drawn back again by the line, upon which the
females will follow him to the very water’s edge; and so, on the other
hand, the male will follow the female, during the spawning season.
Among the ancients, the acipenser2401 was esteemed the most noble
fish of all; it is the only one that has the scales turned towards the
head, and in a contrary direction to that in which it swims. At the
present day, however, it is held in no esteem, which I am the more
surprised at, it being so very rarely found. Some writers call this
fish the elops.
At a later period, they set the highest value on the lupus2402 and
the asellus,2403 as we learn from Cornelius Nepos, and the poet,
Laberius, the author of the Mimes. The most approved kinds of the lupus
are those which have the name of “lanati,” or “woolly,” in consequence
of the extreme whiteness and softness of the flesh. Of the asellus
there are two sorts, the callarias, which is the smallest, and the
bacchus,2404 which is only taken in deep water, and is hence much
preferred to the former. On the other hand, among the varieties of the
lupus, those are the most esteemed which are taken in rivers.
At the present day, the first place is given to the scarus,2405 the
only fish that is said to ruminate, and to feed on grass and not on
other fish. It is mostly found in the Carpathian Sea, and never of
its own accord passes Lectum,2406 a promontory of Troas. Optatus
Elipertius, the commander of the fleet under the Emperor Claudius, had
this fish brought from that locality, and dispersed in various places
off the coast between Ostia and the districts of Campania. During five
years, the greatest care was taken that those which were caught should
be returned to the sea; but since then they have been always found in
great abundance off the shores of Italy, where formerly there were none
to be taken. Thus has gluttony introduced these fish, to be a dainty
within its reach, and added a new inhabitant to the seas; so that we
ought to feel no surprise that foreign birds breed at Rome.
The fish that is next in estimation for the table is the mustela,2407
but that is valued only for its liver. A singular thing to tell of—the
lake of Brigantia,2408 in Rhætia, lying in the midst of the Alps,
produces them to rival even those of the sea.2409
Of the remaining fish that are held in any degree of esteem, the
mullet2410 is the most highly valued, as well as the most abundant
of all; it is of only a moderate size, rarely exceeds two pounds
in weight, and will never grow beyond that weight in preserves
or fish-ponds. These fish are only to be found in the Northern
Ocean,2411 exceeding two pounds in weight, and even there in none
but the more westerly parts. As for the other kinds, the various
species are numerous; some2412 live upon sea-weed, while others
feed on the oyster, slime, and the flesh of other fish. The more
distinctive mark is a forked beard, that projects beneath the lower
lip. The lutarius,2413 or mud-mullet, is held in the lowest esteem
of all. This last is always accompanied2414 by another fish, known
as the sargus, and where the mullet stirs up the mud, the other finds
aliment for its own sustenance. The mullet that is found on the coast
is not2415 highly esteemed, and the most esteemed of all have a
strong flavour2416 of shell-fish. Fenestella is of opinion, that this
fish received its name of mullet mullus from its resemblance to the
colour of the red or mullet-coloured shoes.2417 The mullet spawns
three2418 times a year: at all events, the fry makes its appearance
that number of times. The masters in gastronomy inform us, that the
mullet, while dying, assumes a variety of colours and a succession of
shades, and that the hue of the red scales, growing paler and paler,
gradually changes, more especially if it is looked at enclosed in
glass.2419 M. Apicius, a man who displayed a remarkable degree of
ingenuity in everything relating to luxury, was of opinion, that it
was a most excellent plan to let the mullet die in the pickle known as
the “garum of the allies”2420—for we find that even this has found
a surname—and he proposed a prize for any one who should invent a new
sauce,2421 made from the liver of this fish. I find it much easier to
relate this fact, than to state who it was that gained the prize.
Asinius Celer,2422 a man of consular rank, and remarkable for his
prodigal expenditure on this fish, bought one at Rome, during the
reign of Caius,2423 at the price of eight thousand sesterces.2424
A reflection upon such a fact as this will at once lead us to turn our
thoughts to those who, making loud complaints against luxury, have
lamented that a single cook cost more money to buy than a horse; while
at the present day a cook is only to be obtained for the same sum that
a triumph would cost, and a fish is only to be purchased at what was
formerly the price for a cook! indeed, there is hardly any living being
held in higher esteem than the man who understands how, in the most
scientific fashion, to get rid of his master’s property.
(18.) Licinius Mucianus relates, that in the Red Sea there was caught
a mullet eighty2425 pounds in weight. What a price would have been
paid for it by our epicures, if it had only been found off the shores
in the vicinity of our city!
There is this also in the nature of fish, that some are more highly
esteemed in one place, and some in another; such, for instance, as the
coracinus2426 in Egypt, the zeus,2427 also called the faber,2428
at Gades, the salpa,2429 in the vicinity of Ebusus,2430 which
is considered elsewhere an unclean fish, and can nowhere2431 be
thoroughly cooked, wherever found, without being first beaten with a
stick: in Aquitania, again, the river salmon2432 is preferred to all
the fish that swim in the sea.
Some fishes have numerous gills, others again single2433 ones,
others double; it is by means of these that they discharge the water
that has entered the mouth. A sign of old age2434 is the hardness of
the scales, which are not alike in all. There are two lakes2435 of
Italy at the foot of the Alps, called Larius and Verbanus, in which
there are to be seen every year, at the rising of the Vergiliæ,2436
fish remarkable for the number of their scales, and the exceeding
sharpness2437 of them, strongly resembling hob-nails2438 in
appearance; these fish, however, are only to be seen during that
month,2439 and no longer.
Arcadia produces a wonder in its fish called exocœtus,2440 from the
fact that it comes ashore to sleep. In the neighbourhood of the river
Clitorius,2441 this fish is said to be gifted with powers of speech,
and to have no gills;2442 by some writers it is called the adonis.
Those fish, also, which are known by the name of sea-mice,2443 as
well as the polypi2444 and the murænæ,2445 are in the habit of
coming ashore—besides which, there is in the rivers of India2446
one kind that does this, and then leaps back again into the water—for
they are found to pass over into standing waters and streams. Most
fishes have an evident instinct, which teaches them where to spawn in
safety; as in such places there are no enemies found to devour their
young, while at the same time the waves are much less violent. It will
be still more a matter of surprise, to find that they thus have an
appreciation of cause and effect, and understand the regular recurrence
of periods, when we reflect how few persons there are that know that
the most favourable time for taking fish is while the sun is passing
through the sign of Pisces.2447
Some sea-fish are flat, such, for instance, as the rhombus,2448 the
sole,2449 and the sea-sparrow;2450 which last only differs from
the rhombus in the lateral position of the body. The rhombus lies with
the right side upwards,2451 while in the sea-sparrow the left side is
uppermost. Some sea-fish, again, are long, as the muræna and the conger.
Hence it is that there is a difference,2452 also, in the fins of
fish, which have been given them to serve in place of feet, none having
more than four,2453 some two2454 only, and others none.2455
It is in Lake Fucinus2456 only that there is a fish found that
has eight fins2457 for swimming. Those fishes which are long and
slimy, have only two at most, such, for instance, as eels and congers:
others, again, have none, such as the muræna, which is also without
gills.2458 All these fish2459 make their way in the sea by an
undulatory motion of the body, just as serpents do on land; on dry
land, also, they are able to crawl along, and hence those of this
nature are more long-lived than the others. Some of the flat-fish,
also, have no fins, the pastinacæ,2460 for instance—for these swim
broad-wise—those, also, which are known as the “soft” fish, such as
the polypi, for their feet2461 serve them in stead of fins.
Eels live eight2462 years; they are able to survive out of water as
much as six days,2463 when a north-east wind blows; but when the
south wind prevails, not so many. In winter,2464 they cannot live
if they are in very shallow water, nor yet if the water is troubled.
Hence it is that they are taken more especially about the rising of the
Vergiliæ,2465 when the rivers are mostly in a turbid state. These
animals seek their food at night; they are the only fish the bodies of
which, when dead, do not float2466 upon the surface.
(22.) There is a lake called Benacus,2467 in the territory of Verona,
in Italy, through which the river Mincius flows.2468 At the part of
it whence this river issues, once a year, and mostly in the month of
October, the lake is troubled, evidently by the constellations2469
of autumn, and the eels are heaped together2470 by the waves, and
rolled on by them in such astonishing multitudes, that single masses
of them, containing more than a thousand in number, are often taken in
the chambers2471 which are formed in the bed of the river for that
purpose.
The muræna brings forth every month, while all the other fishes
spawn only at stated periods: the eggs of this fish increase with
the greatest rapidity.2472 It is a vulgar2473 belief that the
muræna comes on shore, and is there impregnated by intercourse with
serpents. Aristotle2474 calls the male, which impregnates the female,
by the name of “zmyrus;” and says that there is a difference between
them, the muræna being spotted2475 and weakly, while the zmyrus is
all of one colour and hardy, and has teeth which project beyond the
mouth. In northern Gaul all the murænæ have on the right jaw seven
spots,2476 which bear a resemblance to the constellation of the
Septentriones,2477 and are of a gold colour, shining as long as
the animal is alive, but disappearing as soon as it is dead. Vedius
Pollio,2478 a Roman of equestrian rank, and one of the friends of
the late Emperor Augustus, found a method of exercising his cruelty by
means of this animal, for he caused such slaves as had been condemned
by him, to be thrown into preserves filled with murænæ; not that the
land animals would not have fully sufficed for this purpose, but
because he could not see a man so aptly torn to pieces all at once by
any other kind of animal. It is said that these fish are driven to
madness by the taste of vinegar. Their skin is exceedingly thin; while
that of the eel, on the other hand, is much thicker. Verrius informs
us that formerly the children of the Roman citizens, while wearing the
prætexta,2479 were flogged with eel-skins, and that, for this reason,
no pecuniary penalty2480 could by law be inflicted upon them.
There is another kind of flat fish, which, instead of bones, has
cartilage, such, for instance, as the raia,2481 the pastinaca,2482
the squatina,2483 the torpedo,2484 and those which, under their
respective Greek names, are known as the ox,2485 the lamia,2486
the eagle,2487 and the frog.2488 In this number, also, the
squali2489 ought to be included, although they are not flat fish.
Aristotle was the first to call these fish by the one generic name of
σελάχη,2490 which he has given them: we, however, have no
mode of distinguishing them, unless, indeed, we choose to call them the
“cartilaginous” fishes. All these fish are carnivorous,2491 and feed
lying on their backs, just as dolphins do, as already2492 noticed;
while the other fishes,2493 too, are oviparous, this one kind, with
the exception of that known as the sea-frog, is viviparous, like the
cetacea.2494
There is a very small fish2495 that is in the habit of living among
the rocks, and is known as the echeneis.2496 It is believed that
when this has attached itself to the keel of a ship its progress
is impeded, and that it is from this circumstance that it takes its
name.2497 For this reason, also, it has a disgraceful repute, as
being employed in love philtres,2498 and for the purpose of retarding
judgments and legal proceedings—evil properties, which are only
compensated by a single merit that it possesses—it is good for staying
fluxes of the womb in pregnant women, and preserves the fœtus up to
birth: it is never used, however, for food.2499 Aristotle2500 is
of opinion that this fish has feet, so strong is the resemblance, by
reason of the form and position of the fins.
Mucianus speaks of a murex2501 of larger size than the purple, with a
head that is neither rough nor round; and the shell of which is single,
and falls in folds on either side.2502 He tells us, also, that some
of these creatures once attached themselves to a ship freighted with
children2503 of noble birth, who were being sent by Periander for the
purpose of being castrated, and that they stopped its course in full
sail; and he further says, that the shell-fish which did this service
are duly honoured in the temple of Venus,2504 at Cnidos. Trebius
Niger says that this fish is a foot in length, and that it can retard
the course of vessels, five fingers in thickness; besides which, it has
another peculiar property—when preserved in salt, and applied, it is
able to draw up gold which has fallen into a well, however deep it may
happen to be.2505
The mæna changes2506 its white colour, and in summer becomes swarthy.
The phycis2507 also changes its colour, and while at other times it
is white, in spring it is parti-coloured. This last is the only fish
that builds itself a nest; it makes it of sea-weed, and there deposits
its eggs.
The sea-swallow,2508 being able to fly, bears a strong resemblance to
the bird of that name; the sea-kite2509 too, flies as well.
(27.) There is a fish that comes up to the surface of the sea, known,
from the following circumstance, as the lantern-fish:2510 thrusting
from its mouth a tongue that shines like fire, it emits a most
brilliant light on calm nights. Another fish, which, from its horns,
has received its name,2511 raises them nearly a foot and a half
above the surface of the water. The sea-dragon,2512 again, if caught
and thrown on the sand, works out a hole for itself with its muzzle,
with the most wonderful celerity.
The varieties of fish which we shall now mention are those which have
no blood: they are of three kinds2513—first, those which are known
as “soft;” next, those which have thin crusts; and, lastly, those which
are enclosed in hard shells. The soft fish are the loligo,2514 the
sæpia,2515 the polypus,2516 and others of a similar nature. These
last have the head between the feet and the belly, and have, all of
them, eight feet: in the sæpia and the loligo two of these feet are
very long2517 and rough, and by means of these they lift the food to
their mouth, and attach themselves to places in the sea, as though with
an anchor; the others act as so many arms, by means of which they seize
their prey.2518
The loligo is also able to dart above the surface of the water, and
the scallop does the same, just like an arrow as it were. In the
sæpia,2519 the male is parti-coloured, blacker than the female, and
more courageous. If the female is struck with a fish-spear, the male
comes to her aid; but the female, the instant the male is struck, takes
to flight. Both of them, as soon as ever they find themselves in danger
of being caught. discharge2520 a kind of ink, which with them is in
place of blood,2521 and thus darkening the water, take to flight.
There are numerous kinds of polypi. The land2522 polypus is larger
than that of the sea; they all of them use their arms2523 as feet
and hands; and in coupling they employ the tail, which is forked2524
and sharp. The polypus has a sort of passage in the back,2525 by
which it lets in and discharges the water, and which it shifts from
side to side, sometimes carrying it on the right, and sometimes on the
left. It swims obliquely,2526 with the head on one side, which is of
surprising hardness while the animal is alive, being puffed out with
air.2527 In addition to this, they have cavities2528 dispersed
throughout the claws, by means of which, through suction, they can
adhere to objects; which they hold, with the head upwards, so tightly,
that they cannot be torn away. They cannot attach themselves, however,
to the bottom of the sea, and their retentive powers are weaker in the
larger ones. These are the only2529 soft fish that come on dry land,
and then only where the surface is rugged: a smooth surface they will
not come near. They feed upon the flesh of shell-fish, the shells of
which they can easily break in the embrace of their arms: hence it is
that their retreat may be easily detected by the pieces of shell which
lie before it. Although, in other respects, this is looked upon as a
remarkably stupid kind of animal, so much so, that it will swim towards
the hand of a man, to a certain extent in its own domestic matters it
manifests considerable intelligence. It carries its prey to its home,
and after eating all the flesh, throws out the debris, and then pursues
such small fish as may chance to swim towards them. It also changes
its colour2530 according to the aspect of the place where it is, and
more especially when it is alarmed. The notion is entirely unfounded
that it gnaws2531 its own arms; for it is from the congers that this
mischance befalls it; but it is no other than true that its arms shoot
forth again, like the tail in the colotus2532 and the lizard.2533
Among the most remarkable curiosities is the animal which has the
name2534 of nautilus, or, as some people call it, the pompilos. Lying
with the head upwards, it rises to the surface of the water, raising
itself little by little, while, by means of a certain conduit in its
body, it discharges all the water, and this being got rid of like so
much bilge-water as it were, it finds no difficulty in sailing along.
Then, extending backwards its two front arms, it stretches out between
them a membrane2535 of marvellous thinness, which acts as a sail
spread out to the wind, while with the rest of its arms it paddles
along below, steering itself with its tail in the middle, which acts
as a rudder. Thus does it make its way along the deep, mimicking the
appearance of a light Liburnian2536 bark; while, if anything chances
to cause it alarm, in an instant it draws in the water, and sinks to
the bottom.2537
Belonging to the genus of polypi is the animal known as the
ozæna,2538 being so called from the peculiarly strong smell exhaled
by the head;2539 in consequence of which, the murænæ2540 pursue it
with the greatest eagerness. The polypi keep themselves concealed for
two months in the year; they do not live beyond two2541 years, and
always die of consumption, the females even sooner,2542 and mostly
after bringing forth. I must not omit here the observations which L.
Lucullus, the proconsul of Bætica, made with reference to the polypus,
and which Trebius Niger, one of his suite, has published. He says that
it is remarkably fond of shell-fish, and that these, the moment that
they feel themselves touched by it, close their valves, and cut off
the feelers of the polypus, thus making a meal at the expense of the
plunderer. Shell-fish are destitute of sight, and, indeed, all other
sensations but those which warn them of hunger and the approach of
danger. Hence it is, that the polypus lies in ambush2543 till the
fish opens its shell, immediately upon which, it places within it a
small pebble, taking care, at the same time, to keep it from touching
the body of the animal, lest, by making some movement, it should chance
to eject it. Having made itself thus secure, it attacks its prey, and
draws out the flesh, while the other tries to contract itself, but all
in vain, in consequence of the separation of the shell, thus effected
by the insertion of the wedge. So great is the instinctive shrewdness
in animals that are otherwise quite remarkable for their lumpish
stupidity.
In addition to the above, the same author states, that there is not
an animal in existence, that is more dangerous for its powers of
destroying a human being2544 when in the water. Embracing his body,
it counteracts his struggles, and draws him under with its feelers and
its numerous suckers, when, as often is the case, it happens to make an
attack upon a shipwrecked mariner or a child. If, however, the animal
is turned over, it loses all its power; for when it is thrown upon the
back, the arms open of themselves.
The other particulars, which the same author has given, appear still
more closely to border upon the marvellous. At Carteia,2545 in the
preserves there, a polypus was in the habit of coming from the sea
to the2546 pickling-tubs that were left open, and devouring the
fish laid in salt there—for it is quite astonishing how eagerly all
sea-animals follow even the very smell of salted condiments, so much
so, that it is for this reason, that the fishermen take care to rub
the inside of the wicker fish-kipes2547 with them.—At last, by
its repeated thefts and immoderate depredations, it drew down upon
itself the wrath of the keepers of the works. Palisades were placed
before them, but these the polypus managed to get over by the aid of a
tree,2548 and it was only caught at last by calling in the assistance
of trained dogs, which surrounded it at night, as it was returning to
its prey; upon which, the keepers, awakened by the noise, were struck
with alarm at the novelty of the sight presented. First of all, the
size of the polypus was enormous beyond all conception; and then it
was covered all over with dried brine, and exhaled a most dreadful
stench. Who could have expected to find a polypus there, or could have
recognized it as such under these circumstances? They really thought
that they were joining battle with some monster, for at one instant,
it would drive off the dogs by its horrible fumes,2549 and lash at
them with the extremities of its feelers; while at another, it would
strike them with its stronger arms, giving blows with so many clubs,
as it were; and it was only with the greatest difficulty that it could
be dispatched with the aid of a considerable number of three-pronged
fish-spears. The head of this animal was shewn to Lucullus; it was in
size as large as a cask of fifteen amphoræ, and had a beard,2550
to use the expressions of Trebius himself, which could hardly be
encircled with both arms, full of knots, like those upon a club, and
thirty feet in length; the suckers or calicules,2551 as large as
an urn, resembled a basin in shape, while the teeth again were of a
corresponding largeness: its remains, which were carefully preserved as
a curiosity, weighed seven hundred pounds. The same author also informs
us, that specimens of the sæpia and the loligo have been thrown up on
the same shores of a size fully as large: in our own seas2552 the
loligo is sometimes found five cubits in length, and the sæpia, two.
These animals do not live beyond two years.
Mucianus also relates that he had seen, in the Propontis, another
curious resemblance to a ship in full sail.2553 There is a
shell-fish, he says, with a keel, just like that of the vessel which
we know by the name of acatium,2554 with the poop curving inwards,
and a prow with the beak2555 attached. In this shell-fish there
lies concealed also an animal known as the nauplius, which bears a
strong resemblance to the sæpia, and only adopts the shell-fish as
the companion of its pastimes. There are two modes, he says, which it
adopts in sailing; when the sea is calm, the voyager hangs down its
arms,2556 and strikes the water with a pair of oars as it were; but
if, on the other hand, the wind invites, it extends them, employing
them by way of a helm, and turning the mouth of the shell to the wind.
The pleasure experienced by the shell-fish is that of carrying the
other, while the amusement of the nauplius consists in steering; and
thus, at the same moment, is an instinctive joy felt by these two
creatures, devoid as they are of all sense, unless, indeed, a natural
antipathy to man—for it is a well-known fact, that to see them thus
sailing along, is a bad omen, and that it is portentous of misfortune
to those who witness it.
The cray-fish,2557 which belongs to that class of animals which is
destitute of blood, is protected by a brittle crust. This creature
keeps itself concealed for five months, and the same is the case with
crabs, which disappear for the same period. At the beginning of spring,
however, they both2558 of them, after the manner of snakes, throw
off old age, and renew their coverings. While other animals swim on the
water, cray-fish float with a kind of action like creeping. They move
onwards, if there is nothing to alarm2559 them, in a straight line,
extending on each side their horns, which are rounded at the point
by a ball peculiar to them; but, on the other hand, the moment they
are alarmed, they straighten these horns, and proceed with a sidelong
motion. They also use2560 these horns when fighting with each other.
The cray-fish is the only animal that has the flesh in a pulpy state,
and not firm and solid, unless it is cooked alive in boiling water.
(31.) The cray-fish frequents rocky places, the crab2561 spots which
present a soft surface. In winter they both choose such parts of
the shore as are exposed to the heat of the sun, and in summer they
withdraw to the shady recesses of deep inlets of the sea. All fish
of this kind suffer from the cold of winter, but become fat during
autumn and spring, and more particularly during the full moon; for the
warmth of that luminary, as it shines in the night, renders2562 the
temperature of the weather more moderate.
There are various kinds of crabs,2563 known as carabi,2564
astaci,2565 maiæ,2566 paguri,2567 heracleotici,2568
lions,2569 and others of less note. The carabus differs2570
from other crabs, in having a tail: in Phœnicia they are called
hippoi,2571 or horses, being of such extraordinary swiftness, that it
is impossible to overtake them. Crabs are long-lived, and have eight
feet, all of which are bent obliquely. In the female2572 the first
foot is double, in the male single; besides which, the animal has two
claws with indented pincers. The upper part only of these fore-feet is
moveable, the lower being immoveable: the right claw is the largest in
them all.2573 Sometimes they assemble together in large bodies;2574
but as they are unable to cross the mouth of the Euxine, they turn back
again and go round by land, and the road by which they travel is to be
seen all beaten down with their foot-marks.
The smallest crab of any is that known as the pinnotheres,2575 and
hence it is peculiarly exposed to danger; its shrewdness, however, is
evinced by its concealing itself in the shell of the oyster; and as it
grows larger, it removes to those of a larger size.
Crabs, when alarmed, go backwards as swiftly as when moving forwards.
They fight with one another like rams, butting at each other with their
horns. They have2576 a mode of curing themselves of the bites of
serpents. It is said,2577 that while the sun is passing through the
sign of Cancer, the dead bodies of the crabs, which are lying thrown up
on the shore, are transformed into serpents.
To the same class2578 also belongs the sea-urchin,2579 which has
spines in place of feet;2580 its mode of moving along is to roll
like a ball, hence it is that these animals are often found with their
prickles rubbed off. Those among them which have the longest spines of
all, are known by the name of echinometræ,2581 while at the same time
their body is the very smallest. They are not all of them of the same
glassy colour; in the vicinity of Torone2582 they are white,2583
with very short spines. The eggs2584 of all of them are bitter, and
are five in number; the mouth is situate in the middle of the body,
and faces the earth.2585 It is said2586 that these creatures
foreknow the approach of a storm at sea, and that they take up little
stones with which they cover2587 themselves, and so provide a sort
of ballast against their volubility, for they are very unwilling by
rolling along to wear away their prickles. As soon as seafaring persons
observe this, they at once moor their ship with several anchors.
(32.) To the same genus2588 also belong both land and water2589
snails, which thrust the body forth from their abode, and extend or
contract two horns, as it were. They are without eyes,2590 and have,
therefore, to feel their way, by means of these horns.
(33.) Sea-scallops2591 are considered to belong to the same class,
which also conceal themselves during severe frosts and great heats; the
onyches,2592 too, which shine in the dark like fire, and in the mouth
even while being eaten.
Let us now pass on to the murex2593 and various kinds of shell-fish,
which have a stronger shell, and in which Nature, in her sportive
mood, has displayed a great variety—so many are the various hues of
their tints, so numerous are their shapes, flat,2594 concave,2595
long,2596 crescent-shaped,2597 rounded into a globe, cut2598
through into a semi-globe, arched in the back, smooth, rough, indented,
streaked, the upper part spirally wreathed, the edge projecting in
a sharp point, the edge wreathed outwards,2599 or else folding
inwards.2600 And then, too, there are the various distinctions2601
of rayed shells, long-haired2602 shells, wavy-haired shells,
channelled shells, pectinated shells, imbricated shells, reticulated
shells, shells with lines oblique or rectilinear, thick-set shells,
expanded shells, tortuous shells, shells the valves of which are united
by one small knot, shells which are held together all along one side,
shells which are open as if in the very act of applauding,2603 and
shells which wind,2604 resembling a conch. The fish of this class,
known as the shells of Venus,2605 are able to navigate the surface
of the deep, and, presenting to the wind their concave side, catch the
breeze, and sail along on the surface of the sea. Scallops are also
able to leap2606 and fly above the surface of the water, and they
sometimes employ their shell by way of a bark.
But why mention such trifles as these, when I am sensible that no
greater inroads have been made upon our morals, and no more rapid
advances have been made by luxury, than those effected through the
medium of shell-fish? Of all the elements that exist, the sea is the
one that costs the dearest to the belly; seeing that it provides so
many kinds of meats, so many dishes, so many exquisite flavours
derived from fish, all of which are valued in proportion to the danger
undergone by those who have caught them.
(35.) But still, how insignificant is all this when we come to think
of our purple, our azure,2607 and our pearls; it was not enough,
forsooth, for the spoils of the sea to be thrust down the gullet—but
they must be employed as well to adorn the hands, the ears, the head,
the whole body, in fact, and that of the men pretty nearly as much
as the women. What has the sea to do with our clothes?2608 What is
there in common between waves and billows and a sheep’s fleece? This
one element ought not to receive us, according to ordinary notions,
except in a state of nakedness. Let there be ever so strong an alliance
between it and the belly, on the score of gluttony, still, what can it
possibly have to do with the back? It is not enough, forsooth, that we
are fed upon what is acquired by perils, but we must be clothed, too,
in a similar way; so true it is, that for all the wants of the body,
that which is sought at the expense of human life, is sure to please us
the most.
The first rank then, and the very highest position among all valuables,
belongs to the pearl. It is the Indian Ocean that principally sends
them to us: and thus have they, amid those monsters so frightful and
so huge which we have already described,2609 to cross so many seas,
and to traverse such lengthened tracts of land, scorched by the ardent
rays of a burning sun: and then, too, by the Indians themselves they
have to be sought in certain islands, and those but very few in number.
The most productive of pearls is the island of Taprobane, and that of
Stoïdis, as already mentioned2610 in the description of the world;
Perimula,2611 also, a promontory of India. But those are most highly
valued which are found in the vicinity of Arabia,2612 in the Persian
Gulf, which forms a part of the Red Sea.
The origin2613 and production of the shell-fish is not very different
from that of the shell of the oyster. When the genial season of the
year2614 exercises its influence on the animal, it is said that,
yawning, as it were, it opens its shell, and so receives a kind of
dew, by means of which it becomes impregnated; and that at length it
gives birth, after many struggles, to the burden of its shell, in the
shape of pearls, which vary according to the quality of the dew. If
this has been in a perfectly pure state when it flowed into the shell,
then the pearl produced is white and brilliant, but if it was turbid,
then the pearl is of a clouded colour also; if the sky should happen
to have been lowering when it was generated, the pearl will be of a
pallid colour; from all which it is quite evident that the quality of
the pearl depends much more upon a calm state of the heavens than of
the sea, and hence it is that it contracts a cloudy hue, or a limpid
appearance, according to the degree of serenity of the sky in the
morning.
If, again, the fish is satiated in a reasonable time, then the pearl
produced increases rapidly in size. If it should happen to lighten at
the time, the animal shuts its shell, and the pearl is diminished in
size in proportion to the fast that the animal has to endure: but if,
in addition to this, it should thunder2615 as well, then it becomes
alarmed, and closing the shell in an instant, produces what is known
as a physema,2616 or pearl-bubble, filled with air, and bearing a
resemblance to a pearl, but in appearance only, as it is quite empty,
and devoid of body; these bubbles are formed by the abortion of the
shell-fish. Those which are produced in a perfectly healthy state
consist of numerous layers, so that they may be looked upon, not
inappropriately, as similar in conformation to the callosities on the
body of an animal; and they should therefore be cleaned by experienced
hands. It is wonderful, however, that they should be influenced thus
pleasurably by the state of the heavens, seeing that by the action
of the sun the pearls are turned of a red colour, and lose all their
whiteness, just like the human body. Hence it is that those which
keep their whiteness the best are the pelagiæ, or main-sea pearls,
which lie at too great a depth to be reached by the sun’s rays; and
yet these even turn yellow with age, grow dull and wrinkled, and it
is only in their youth that they possess that brilliancy which is so
highly esteemed in them. When old, too, the coat grows thick, and they
adhere to the shell,2617 from which they can only be separated with
the assistance of a file.2618 Those pearls which have one surface
flat and the other spherical, opposite to the plane side, are for that
reason called tympania,2619 or tambour-pearls. I have seen pearls
still adhering to the shell; for which reason the shells were used as
boxes for unguents. In addition to these facts, we may remark that the
pearl is soft2620 in the water, but that it grows hard the instant it
is taken out.
The fish, as soon as ever it perceives the hand,2621 shuts its shell
and covers up its treasures, being well aware that it is for them that
it is sought; and if it happens to catch the hand,2622 it cuts it
off with the sharp edge of the shell. And no punishment is there that
could be more justly inflicted. There are other penalties added as
well, seeing that the greater part of these pearls are only to be found
among rocks and crags, while on the other hand, those which lie out
in the main sea are generally accompanied by sea-dogs.2623 And yet,
for all this, the women will not banish these gems from their ears!
Some writers say,2624 that these animals live in communities, just
like swarms of bees, each of them being governed by one remarkable for
its size and its venerable old age;2625 while at the same time it is
possessed of marvellous skill in taking all due precautions against
danger; the divers, they say, take especial care to find these, and
when once they are taken, the others stray to and fro, and are easily
caught in their nets. We learn also that as soon as they are taken they
are placed under a thick layer of salt in earthen-ware vessels; as
the flesh is gradually consumed, certain knots,2626 which form the
pearls, are disengaged2627 from their bodies, and fall to the bottom
of the vessel.
There is no doubt that pearls wear with use, and will change their
colour, if neglected. All their merit consists in their whiteness,
large size, roundness, polish, and weight; qualities which are not
easily to be found united in the same; so much so, indeed, that no
two pearls are ever found perfectly alike; and it was from this
circumstance, no doubt, that our Roman luxury first gave them the name
of “unio,”2628 or the unique gem: for a similar name is not given
them by the Greeks; nor, indeed, among the barbarians by whom they
are found are they called anything else but “margaritæ.”2629 Even
in the very whiteness of the pearl there is a great difference to be
observed. Those are of a much clearer water that are found in the Red
Sea,2630 while the Indian pearl resembles in tint the scales2631
of the mirror-stone, but exceeds all the others in size. The colour
that is most highly prized of all, is that of those which are thence
called alum-coloured2632 pearls. Long pearls also have their peculiar
value; those are called “elenchi,” which are of a long tapering shape,
resembling our alabaster2633 boxes in form, and ending in a full
bulb.2634 Our ladies quite glory in having these suspended from their
fingers, or two or three of them dangling from their ears. For the
purpose of ministering to these luxurious tastes, there are various
names and wearisome refinements which have been devised by profuseness
and prodigality; for after inventing these ear-rings, they have given
them the name of “crotalia,”2635 or castanet pendants, as though
quite delighted even with the rattling of the pearls as they knock
against each other; and now, at the present day, the poorer classes
are even affecting them, as people are in the habit of saying, that “a
pearl worn by a woman in public, is as good as a lictor2636 walking
before her.” Nay, even more than this, they put them on their feet,
and that, not only on the laces of their sandals, but all over the
shoes;2637 it is not enough to wear pearls, but they must tread upon
them, and walk with them under foot as well.
Pearls used formerly to be found in our sea, but more frequently
about the Thracian Bosporus;2638 they were of a red colour, and
small,2639 and enclosed in a shell-fish known by the name of “myes.”
In Acarnania there is a shell-fish called “pina,”2640 which produces
pearls; and from this it is quite evident that it is not one kind of
fish only that produces them. Juba states also, that on the shores
of Arabia there is a shell-fish which resembles a notched comb, and
covered all over with hair2641 like a sea-urchin, and that the pearl
lies imbedded in its flesh, in appearance bearing a strong resemblance
to a hailstone.2642 No such shell-fish, however, as these are ever
brought to Rome. Nor yet are any pearls of value found in Acarnania,
being shapeless, rough, and of a marble hue; those are better which are
found in the vicinity of Actium; but still they are small, which is
the case also with those found on the coast of Mauritania. Alexander
Polyhistor and Sudines2643 are of opinion that as they grow old their
tints gradually fade.
It is quite clear that the interior of the pearl is solid, as no fall
is able to break it. Pearls are not always found in the middle of the
body of the animal, but sometimes in one place, and sometimes another.
Indeed, I have seen some which lay at the edge of the shell, just as
though in the very act of coming forth, and in some fishes as many as
four or five. Up to the present time, very few have been found which
exceeded half an ounce in weight, by more than one scruple. It is a
well-ascertained fact, that in Britannia2644 pearls are found, though
small, and of a bad colour; for the deified Julius Cæsar2645 wished
it to be distinctly understood,2646 that the breast-plate which he
dedicated to Venus Genetrix, in her temple, was made of British pearls.
I once saw Lollia Paulina,2647 the wife of the Emperor
Caius2648—it was not at any public festival, or any
solemn ceremonial, but only at an ordinary wedding
entertainment2649—covered with emeralds and pearls, which shone in
alternate layers upon her head, in her hair, in her wreaths, in her
ears, upon her neck, in her bracelets, and on her fingers, and the
value of which amounted in all to forty millions2650 of sesterces;
indeed2651 she was prepared at once to prove the fact, by showing
the receipts and acquittances. Nor were these any presents made by a
prodigal potentate, but treasures which had descended to her from her
grandfather, and obtained by the spoliation of the provinces. Such are
the fruits of plunder and extortion! It was for this reason that M.
Lollius2652 was held so infamous all over the East for the presents
which he extorted from the kings; the result of which was, that he was
denied the friendship of Caius Cæsar, and took poison;2653 and all
this was done, I say, that his grand-daughter might be seen, by the
glare of lamps, covered all over with jewels to the amount of forty
millions of sesterces! Now let a person only picture to himself, on the
one hand, what was the value of the habits worn by Curius or Fabricius
in their triumphs, let him picture to himself the objects displayed to
the public on their triumphal litters,2654 and then, on the other
hand, let him think upon this Lollia, this one bit2655 of a woman,
the head of an empire, taking her place at table, thus attired; would
he not much rather that the conquerors had been torn from their very
chariots, than that they had conquered for such a result as this?
Nor, indeed, are these the most supreme evidences of luxury. There were
formerly two pearls, the largest that had been ever seen in the whole
world: Cleopatra, the last of the queens of Egypt, was in possession
of them both, they having come to her by descent from the kings of the
East. When Antony had been sated by her, day after day, with the most
exquisite banquets, this queenly courtesan, inflated with vanity and
disdainful arrogance, affected to treat all this sumptuousness and
all these vast preparations with the greatest contempt; upon which
Antony enquired what there was that could possibly be added to such
extraordinary magnificence. To this she made answer, that on a single
entertainment she would expend ten millions2656 of sesterces. Antony
was extremely desirous to learn how that could be done, but looked
upon it as a thing quite impossible; and a wager was the result. On
the following day, upon which the matter was to be decided, in order
that she might not lose the wager, she had an entertainment set before
Antony, magnificent in every respect, though no better than his usual
repast. Upon this, Antony joked her, and enquired what was the amount
expended upon it; to which she made answer that the banquet which he
then beheld was only a trifling appendage2657 to the real banquet,
and that she alone2658 would consume at the meal to the ascertained
value of that amount, she herself would swallow the ten millions of
sesterces; and so ordered the second course to be served. In obedience
to her instructions, the servants placed before her a single vessel,
which was filled with vinegar, a liquid, the sharpness and strength of
which is able2659 to dissolve pearls. At this moment she was wearing
in her ears those choicest and most rare and unique productions of
Nature; and while Antony was waiting to see what she was going to do,
taking one of them from out of her ear, she threw it into the vinegar,
and directly it was melted, swallowed it. Lucius Plancus,2660 who
had been named umpire in the wager, placed his hand upon the other at
the very instant that she was making preparations to dissolve it in a
similar manner, and declared that Antony had lost—an omen which,2661
in the result, was fully confirmed. The fame of the second pearl is
equal to that which attends its fellow. After the queen, who had thus
come off victorious on so important a question, had been seized, it was
cut asunder, in order that this, the other half of the entertainment,
might serve as pendants for the ears of Venus, in the Pantheon at Rome.
Antony and Cleopatra, however, will not bear away the palm of
prodigality in this respect, and will be stripped of even this boast
in the annals of luxury. For before their time, Clodius, the son of
the tragic actor Æsopus,2662 had done the same at Rome; having been
left by his father heir to his ample wealth and possessions. Let not
Antony then be too proud, for all his triumvirate, since he can hardly
stand in comparison with an actor; one, too, who had no wager to induce
him—a thing which adds to the regal munificence of the act—but was
merely desirous of trying, by way of glorification to his palate, what
was the taste of pearls. As he found it to be wonderfully pleasing,
that he might not be the only one to know it, he had a pearl set
before each of his guests for him to swallow. After the surrender of
Alexandria, pearls came into common and, indeed, universal use at Rome;
but they first began to be used about the time of Sylla, though but of
small size and of little value, Fenestella says—in this, however, it
is quite evident that he is mistaken, for Ælius Stilo tells us, that
it was in the time of the Jugurthine war, that the name of “unio” was
first given to pearls of remarkable size.
And yet pearls may be looked upon as pretty nearly a possession of
everlasting duration—they descend from a man to his heir, and they
are alienated from one to another just like any landed estate. But
the colours that are extracted from the murex2663 and the purple
fade from hour to hour; and yet luxury, which has similarly acted as
a mother to them, has set upon them prices almost equal to those of
pearls.
(36.) Purples live mostly seven2664 years. Like the murex, they keep
themselves in concealment for thirty days, about the time of the rising
of the Dog-star; in the spring season they unite in large bodies, and
by rubbing against each other, produce a viscous spittle, from which a
kind of wax is formed. The murex does the same; but the purple2665
has that exquisite juice which is so greatly sought after for the
purpose of dyeing cloth, situate in the middle of the throat. This
secretion consists of a tiny drop contained in a white vein, from which
the precious liquid used for dyeing is distilled, being of the tint of
a rose somewhat inclining to black. The rest of the body is entirely
destitute of this juice. It is a great point to take the fish alive;
for when it dies, it spits out this juice. From the larger ones it is
extracted after taking off the shell; but the small fish are crushed
alive, together with the shells, upon which they eject this secretion.
In Asia the best purple is that of Tyre, in Africa that of Meninx2666
and the parts of Gætulia that border on the Ocean, and in Europe that
of Laconia. It is for this colour that the fasces and the axes2667
of Rome make way in the crowd; it is this that asserts the majesty
of childhood;2668 it is this that distinguishes the senator2669
from the man of equestrian rank; by persons arrayed in this colour are
prayers2670 addressed to propitiate the gods; on every garment2671
it sheds a lustre, and in the triumphal vestment2672 it is to be
seen mingled with gold. Let us be prepared then to excuse this frantic
passion for purple, even though at the same time we are compelled to
enquire, why it is that such a high value has been set upon the produce
of this shell-fish, seeing that while in the dye the smell of it is
offensive, and the colour itself is harsh, of a greenish hue, and
strongly resembling that of the sea when in a tempestuous state?
The tongue of the purple is a finger2673 in length, and by means of
this it finds subsistence, by piercing other shell-fish,2674 so hard
is the point of it. They die in fresh water, and in places where rivers
discharge themselves into the sea; otherwise, when taken, they will
live as long as fifty days on their saliva. All shell-fish grow very
fast, and purples more especially; they come to their full size at the
end of a year.
Were I at this point to pass on to other subjects, luxury, no
doubt would think itself defrauded of its due, and so accuse me of
negligence; I must therefore make my way into the very workshops even,
so that, just as among articles of food the various kinds and qualities
of corn are known, all those who place the enjoyment of life in these
luxuries, may have a still better acquaintance with the objects for
which they live.2675
There are two kinds of fish that produce the purple colour; the
elements in both are the same, the combinations only are different;
the smaller fish is that which is called the “buccinum,” from its
resemblance to the conch by which the sound of the buccinus or trumpet
is produced, and to this circumstance it owes its name: the opening in
it is round, with an incision in the margin.2676 The other fish is
known as the “purpura,” or purple, and has a grooved and projecting
muzzle, which being tubulated on one side in the interior, forms a
passage for the tongue;2677 besides which, the shell is studded with
points up to the very apex, which are mostly seven in number, and
disposed2678 in a circle; these are not found on the buccinum, though
both of them have as many spirals as they are years old. The buccinum
attaches itself only to crags, and is gathered about rocky places.
(37.) Purples also have another name, that of “pelagiæ”2679 there
are numerous kinds of them, which differ only in their element and
place of abode. There is the mud2680 purple, which is nurtured upon
putrid mud; and the sea-weed2681 purple, which feeds on sea-weed;
both of which are held in the very lowest esteem. A better kind is
the reef-purple,2682 which is collected on the reefs or out at sea;
still, however, the colour extracted from this is too light and thin.
Then, again, there is the variety known as the pebble-purple,2683
so called from the pebbles of the sea, and wonderfully well adapted
for dyeing; and, better than any of them, that known by the name of
“dialutensis,”2684 because of the various natures of the soil on
which it feeds. Purples are taken with a kind of osier kipe2685 of
small size, and with large meshes; these are cast into the sea, and in
them cockles are put as a bait, that close the shell in an instant,
and snap at an object, just as we see mussels do. Though half dead,
these animals, as soon as ever they are returned to the sea, come to
life again, and open their shells with avidity; upon which the purples
seek them, and commence the attack, by protruding their tongues. The
cockles, on the other hand, the moment they feel themselves pricked,
shut their shells, and hold fast the object that has wounded them: in
this way, victims to their greediness, they are drawn up to the surface
hanging by the tongue.
The most favourable season for taking these fish is after the
rising of the Dog-star, or else before spring; for when they have
once discharged2686 their waxy secretion, their juices have no
consistency: this, however, is a fact unknown in the dyers’ workshops,
although it is a point of primary importance. After it is taken,
the vein is extracted, which we have2687 previously spoken of, to
which it is requisite to add salt, a sextarius2688 about to every
hundred pounds of juice. It is sufficient to leave them to steep for
a period of three days, and no more, for the fresher they are, the
greater virtue there is in the liquor. It is then set to boil in
vessels of tin,2689 and every hundred amphoræ2690 ought to be
boiled down to five hundred pounds of dye, by the application of a
moderate heat; for which purpose the vessel is placed at the end of a
long funnel, which communicates with the furnace; while thus boiling,
the liquor is skimmed from time to time, and with it the flesh, which
necessarily adheres to the veins. About the tenth day, generally, the
whole contents of the cauldron are in a liquified state, upon which a
fleece, from which the grease has been cleansed, is plunged into it
by way of making trial; but until such time as the colour is found to
satisfy the wishes of those preparing it, the liquor is still kept on
the boil. The tint that inclines to red is looked upon as inferior to
that which is of a blackish hue. The wool is left to lie in soak for
five hours, and then, after carding it, it is thrown in again, until it
has fully imbibed the colour. The juice of the buccinum is considered
very inferior if employed by itself, as it is found to discharge its
colour; but when used in conjunction with that of the pelagiæ, it
blends2691 with it very well, gives a bright lustre to its colour,
which is otherwise too dark, and imparts the shining crimson hue of
the kermes-berry, a tint that is particularly valued. By the admixture
of their respective virtues these colours are thus heightened or
rendered sombre by the aid of one another. The proper proportions for
mixing are, for fifty pounds of wool, two hundred pounds of juice of
the buccinum and one hundred and eleven of juice of the pelagiæ. From
this combination is produced the admirable tint known as amethyst
colour.2692 To produce the Tyrian hue the wool is soaked in the juice
of the pelagiæ while the mixture is in an uncooked and raw state; after
which its tint is changed by being dipped in the juice of the buccinum.
It is considered of the best quality when it has exactly the colour of
clotted blood, and is of a blackish hue to the sight, but of a shining
appearance when held up to the light; hence it is that we find Homer
speaking of “purple blood.”2693
I find that, from the very first, purple has been in use at Rome, but
that Romulus employed it for the trabea.2694 As to the toga prætexta
and the laticlave2695 vestment, it is a fact well ascertained, that
Tullus Hostilius was the first king who made use of them, and that
after the conquest of the Etruscans. Cornelius Nepos, who died in the
reign of the late Emperor Augustus, has left the following remarks: “In
the days of my youth,” says he, “the violet purple was in favour, a
pound of which used to sell at one hundred denarii; and not long after,
the Tarentine2696 red was all the fashion. This last was succeeded
by the Tyrian dibapha,2697 which could not be bought for even one
thousand denarii per pound. P. Lentulus Spinther, the curule ædile, was
the first who used the dibapha for the prætexta, and he was greatly
censured for it; whereas now-a-days,” says he, “who is there that does
not have purple hangings2698 to his banqueting-couches, even?”
This Spinther was ædile in the consulship of Cicero, and in the year
from the Building of the City, 691. “Dibapha” was the name given to
textures that had been doubly dyed, and these were looked upon as a
mighty piece of costly extravagance; while now, at the present day,
nearly all the purple cloths that are reckoned of any account are dyed
in a similar manner.
Fabrics that are called conchyliated are subjected to the same process
in all other respects, but without any admixture of the juice of the
buccinum; in addition to which, the liquid is mixed with water and
human urine in equal parts,2699 one-half2700 only of the proportion
of dye being used for the same quantity of wool. From this mixture a
full colour is not obtained, but that pale tint, which is so highly
esteemed; and the clearer2701 it is, the less of it the wool has
imbibed.
(40.) The prices of these dyes vary in proportion to the quantity
produced by the various shores; still, however, those who are in the
habit of paying enormous prices for them, may as well be informed that
on no occasion ought the juice of the pelagiæ to exceed fifty,2702
and that of the buccinum one hundred sesterces for one hundred
pounds.2703
But no sooner have we finished with one branch of this subject than we
have to begin upon another, for we find that it is made quite a matter
of sport to create expense; and not only this, but the sport must be
doubled by making new mixtures and combinations, and falsifying over
again what was a falsification of the works of Nature already; such,
for instance, as staining tortoise-shell,2704 alloying gold with
silver for the purpose of making electrum,2705 and then adding copper
to the mixture to make Corinthian metal.2706
(41.) It was not sufficient to have borrowed from a precious stone the
name of “amethyst” for a dye, but when we have obtained this colour
we must drench it over again with Tyrian tints,2707 so that we may
have an upstart name2708 compounded of both, and at the same moment a
two-fold display of luxury; for as soon as ever people have succeeded
in obtaining the conchyliated colour, they immediately begin to think
that it will do better as a state of transition to the Tyrian hues.
There can be little doubt that this invention is due to some artist
who happened to change his mind, and alter a tint with which he was
not pleased: hence a system has taken its rise, and spirits, ever on
the rack for creating wonders, have transformed what was originally
a blunder into something quite desirable; while, at the same time, a
double path has been pointed out to luxury, in thus making one colour
carry another, and thereby become, as they say, softer and more mellow.
And what is even more than this, human ingenuity has even learned to
mingle with these dyes the productions of the earth, and to steep
in Tyrian purple fabrics already dyed crimson with the berry of the
kermes, in order to produce the hysginian2709 tint. The kermes of
Galatia, a red berry which we shall mention when we come to speak2710
of the productions of the earth, is the most esteemed of all, except,
perhaps, the one that grows in the vicinity of Emerita,2711 in
Lusitania. However, to make an end, once for all, of my description of
these precious dyes, I shall remark, that the colour yielded by this
grain2712 when a year old, is of a pallid hue, and that if it is more
than four years old, it is quickly discharged: hence we find that its
energies are not developed either when it is too young or when old.
I have now abundantly treated of an art, by means of which men, just as
much as women, have an idea that their appearance may be set off to the
greatest possible advantage.
Belonging to the shell-fish tribe there is the pinna2713 also: it is
found2714 in slimy spots, always lying upright, and never without a
companion, which some writers call the pinnotheres,2715 and others,
again, pinnophylax, being a small kind of shrimp, or else a parasitical
crab. The pinna,2716 which is destitute of sight, opens its shell,
and in so doing exposes its body within to the attacks of the small
fish, which immediately rush upon it, and finding that they can do so
with impunity, become bolder and bolder, till at last they quite fill
the shell. The pinnotheres, looking out for the opportunity, gives
notice to the pinna at the critical moment by a gentle bite, upon which
the other instantly closes its shell, and so kills whatever it has
caught there; after which, it divides the spoil with its companion.
Upon2717 reflecting on such facts as these, I am the more inclined
to wonder at the circumstance that some persons have been found who
were of opinion that the water animals are devoid of all sense. The
torpedo2718 is very well aware of the extent of its own powers, and
that, too, although it experiences no benumbing effects from them
itself. Lying concealed in the mud, it awaits the approach of the
fish, and, at the moment that they are swimming above in supposed
security, communicates the shock, and instantly darts upon them: there
is no delicate2719 morsel in existence that is preferred to the liver
of this fish. And no less wonderful, too, is the shrewdness2720
manifested by the sea-frog,2721 which is known by us as the “fisher.”
Stirring up the mud, it protrudes from the surface two little horns,
which project from beneath the eyes, and so attracts the small fish
which are sporting around it, until at last they approach so close that
it is able to seize them. In a similar manner, too, the squatina and
the rhombus2722 conceal themselves, but extend their fins, which,
as they move to and fro, resemble little worms; the ray also does the
same. The pastinaca,2723 too, lies lurking in ambush, and pierces
the fish as they pass with the sting with which it is armed. Another
proof of instinctive shrewdness is the fact, that although the ray is
the very slowest of all the fish in its movements, it is found with the
mullet in its belly, which is the swiftest of them all.
(43.) The scolopendra,2724 which bears a strong resemblance2725
to the land insect which we call a centipede, if it chances to swallow
a hook, will vomit forth all its intestines, until it has disengaged
itself, after which it will suck them in again. The sea-fox2726 too,
when exposed to a similar peril, goes on swallowing the line until it
meets with a weak part of it, and then with its teeth snaps it asunder
with the greatest ease. The fish called the glanis2727 is more
cautious; it bites at the hooks from behind, and does not swallow them,
but only strips them of the bait.
(44.) The sea-ram2728 commits its ravages just like a wary robber; at
one time it will lurk in the shadow of some large vessel that is lying
out at sea, and wait for any one who may be tempted to swim; while at
another, it will raise its head from the surface of the water, survey
the fishermen’s boats, and then slily swim towards them and sink them.
Indeed, for my own part, I am strongly of opinion that there is sense
existing in those bodies which have the nature2729 of neither animals
nor vegetables, but a third which partakes of them both:—sea-nettles
and sponges, I mean. The sea-nettle2730 wanders to and fro by night,
and at night changes its locality. These creatures are by nature a sort
of fleshy branch,2731 and are nurtured upon flesh. They have the
power of producing an itching, smarting pain,2732 just like that
caused by the nettle found on land. For the purpose of seeking its
prey, it contracts and stiffens itself to the utmost possible extent,
and then, as a small fish swims past, it will suddenly spread out its
branches, and so seize and devour2733 it. At another time it will
assume the appearance of being quite withered away, and let itself be
tossed2734 to and fro by the waves like a piece of sea-weed, until
it happens to touch a fish. The moment it does so, the fish goes to
rub itself against a rock, to get rid of the itching; immediately upon
which, the nettle pounces upon it. By night also it is on the look-out
for scallops and sea-urchins. When it perceives a hand approaching it,
it instantly changes its colour, and contracts itself; when touched it
produces a burning sensation, and if ever so short a time is afforded,
makes its escape. Its mouth is situate, it is said, at the root or
lower part,2735 and the excrements2736 are discharged by a small
canal situated above.
We find three2737 kinds of sponges mentioned; the first are thick,
very hard, and rough, and are called “tragi:”2738 the second, are
thick, and much softer, and are called “mani;”2739 of the third,
being fine and of a closer texture, tents for sores are made; this last
is known as “Achillium.”2740 All of these sponges grow on rocks, and
feed upon2741 shell- and other fish, and slime. It would appear that
these creatures, too, have some intelligence; for as soon as ever they
feel2742 the hand about to tear them off, they contract themselves,
and are separated with much greater difficulty: they do the same also
when the waves buffet them to and fro. The small shells that are found
in them, clearly show that they live upon food: about Torone2743 it
is even said that they will survive after they have been detached, and
that they grow again from the roots which have been left adhering to
the rock. They leave a colour similar to that of blood upon the rock
from which they have been detached, and those more especially which are
produced in the Syrtes of Africa.2744
The manos is the one that grows to the largest size, but the softest
of all are those found in the vicinity of Lycia. Where the sea is
deep and calm, they are more particularly soft, while those which are
found in the Hellespont are rough, and those in the vicinity of Malea
coarse.2745 When lying in places exposed to the sun, they become
putrid: hence it is that those which are found in deep water are the
best. While they are alive, they are of the same blackish colour that
they are when saturated with water. They adhere to the rock not by
one part only, nor yet by the whole body: and within them there are a
number of empty tubes, generally four or five in number, by means of
which, it is thought, they take their food. There are other tubes also,
but these are closed at the upper extremity; and a sort of membrane
is supposed to be spread beneath the roots by which they adhere. It
is well known that sponges are very long-lived. The most inferior
kind of all are those which are called “aplysiæ,”2746 because it is
impossible to clean them: these have large tubes, while the other parts
of them are thick and coarse.
Vast numbers of dog-fish infest the seas in the vicinity of the
sponges, to the great peril of those who dive for them. These persons
say that a sort of dense cloud gradually thickens over their2748
heads, bearing the resemblance of some kind of animal like a
flat-fish,2749 and that, pressing downward upon them, it prevents
them from returning to the surface. It is for this reason that they
carry stilettos with them,2750 which are very sharp at the point,
and attached to them by strings; for if they did not pierce the object
with the help of these, it could not be got rid of. This, however,
is entirely the result, in my opinion, of the darkness and their own
fears; for no person has ever yet been able to find, among living
creatures, the fish-cloud or the fish-fog, the name which they give to
this enemy of theirs.
The divers, however, have terrible combats with the dog-fish, which
attack with avidity the groin, the heels, and all the whiter parts
of the body. The only means of ensuring safety, is to go boldly to
meet them, and so, by taking the initiative, strike them with alarm:
for, in fact, this animal is just as frightened at man, as man is at
it; and they are on quite an equal footing when beneath the water.
But the moment the diver has reached the surface, the danger is much
more imminent; for he loses the power of boldly meeting his adversary
while he is endeavouring to make his way out of the water, and his
only chance of safety is in his companions, who draw him along by a
cord that is fastened under his shoulders. While he is engaging with
the enemy, he keeps pulling this cord with his left hand, according
as there may be any sign of immediate peril, while with the right he
wields the stiletto, which he is using in his defence. At first they
draw him along at a moderate pace, but as soon as ever they have got
him close to the ship, if they do not whip him out in an instant, with
the greatest possible celerity, they see him snapped asunder; and
many a time, too, the diver, even when already drawn out, is dragged
from their hands, through neglecting to aid the efforts of those who
are assisting him, by rolling up his body in the shape of a ball. The
others, it is true, are in the meantime brandishing their pronged
fish-spears; but the monster has the craftiness to place himself
beneath the ship, and so wage the warfare in safety. Consequently,
every possible care is taken by the divers to look out2751 for the
approach of this enemy.
(47.) It is the surest sign of safety to see flat-fish, which never
frequent the spots where these noxious monsters are found: and it is
for this reason that the divers2752 call them sacred.
Those animals, however, it must be admitted, which lie enclosed in a
stony shell, have no sensation whatever—such as the oyster,2753
for instance. Many, again, have the same nature as vegetables; such
as the holothuria,2754 the pulmones,2755 and the sea-stars.2756
Indeed, I may say that there is no land production which has not its
like in the sea;2757 no, not even those insects which frequent our
public-houses2758 in summer, and are so troublesome with their nimble
leaps, nor yet those which more especially make the human hair their
place of refuge; for these are often drawn up in a mass2759 collected
around the bait. This, too, is supposed to be the reason why the sleep
of fish is sometimes so troubled in the night. Upon some fish, indeed,
these animals breed2760 as parasites: among these, we find the fish
known as the chalcis.2761
Nor yet are dire and venomous substances found wanting in the sea:
such, for instance, as the sea-hare2762 of the Indian seas, which
is even poisonous by the very touch, and immediately produces vomiting
and disarrangement of the stomach. In our seas it has the appearance
of a shapeless mass, and only resembles the hare in colour; in India
it resembles it in its larger size, and in its hair, which is only
somewhat coarser: there it is never taken alive. An equally deadly
animal is the sea-spider,2763 which is especially dangerous for a
sting which it has on the back: but there is nothing that is more
to be dreaded than the sting which protrudes from the tail of the
trygon,2764 by our people known as the pastinaca, a weapon five
inches in length. Fixing this in the root of a tree, the fish is able
to kill it; it can pierce armour too, just as though with an arrow, and
to the strength of iron it adds all the corrosive qualities of poison.
We do not find it stated that all kinds of fishes are subject to
epizoötic diseases,2765 like other animals of a wild nature: but it
is evidently the fact that individuals2766 among them are attacked by
maladies, from the emaciated appearance that many present, while at the
same moment others of the same species are taken quite remarkable for
their fatness.
The curiosity and wonder which have been excited in mankind by this
subject, will not allow me any longer to defer giving an account
of the generation of these animals. Fishes couple by rubbing their
bellies2767 against one another; an operation, however, that is
performed with such extraordinary celerity as to escape the sight.
Dolphins2768 also, and other animals of the cetaceous kind, couple
in a similar manner, though the time occupied in so doing is somewhat
longer. The female fish, at the season for coupling, follows the
male, and strikes against its belly with its muzzle; while the male
in its turn, when the female is about to spawn, follows it and
devours2769 the eggs. But with them, the simple act of coupling is
not sufficient2770 for the purposes of reproduction; it is necessary
for the male to pass among the eggs which the female has produced,
in order to sprinkle them with its vitalizing fluid. This does not,
however, reach all the eggs out of so vast a multitude; indeed, if it
did, the seas and lakes would soon be filled, seeing that each female
produces these eggs in quantities innumerable.2771
(51.) The eggs2772 of fishes grow in the sea; some of them with the
greatest rapidity, those of the muræna, for instance; others, again,
somewhat more slowly. Those among the flat fishes,2773 whose tails or
stings are not in the way, as well as those of the turtle kind, couple
the one upon the other: the polypus by attaching one of its feelers to
the nostrils2774 of the female, the sæpia and loligo, by means of
the tongue; uniting the arms, they then swim contrary ways; these last
also bring forth at the mouth. The polypi,2775 however, couple with
the head downwards towards the ground, while the rest of the soft2776
fish couple backwards in the same manner as the dog; cray-fish and
shrimps do the same, and crabs employ the mouth.
Frogs leap the one upon the other, the male with its fore-feet clasping
the armpits of the female, and with its hinder ones the haunches. The
female produces tiny pieces of black flesh, which are known by the
name of gyrini,2777 and are only to be distinguished by the eyes
and tail; very soon, however, the feet are developed, and the tail,
becoming bifurcate, forms the hind legs. It is a most singular thing,
but, after a life of six months’ duration, frogs melt away2778 into
slime, though no one ever sees how it is done; after which they come
to life again in the water during the spring, just as they were2779
before. This is effected by some occult operation of Nature, and
happens regularly every year.
Mussels, also, and scallops are produced in the sand by the
spontaneous2780 operations of nature. Those which have a harder
shell, such as the murex and the purple, are formed from a viscous
fluid like saliva, just as gnats are produced from liquids turned
sour,2781 and the fish called the apua,2782 from the foam of the
sea when warm, after the fall of a shower.
Those fish, again, which are covered with a stony coat, such as the
oyster, are produced from mud in a putrid state, or else from the
foam that has collected around ships which have been lying for a long
time in the same position, about posts driven into the earth, and
more especially around logs of wood.2783 It has been discovered, of
late years, in the oyster-beds,2784 that the animal discharges an
impregnating liquid,2785 which has the appearance of milk. Eels,
again, rub themselves against rocks, upon which, the particles2786
which they thus scrape from off their bodies come to life, such being
their only means of reproduction. The various kinds of fishes do not
couple out of their own kind, with the exception of the squatina and
the ray.2787 The fish that is produced from the union of these two,
resembles a ray in the fore part, and bears a name among the Greeks
compounded of the two.2788
Certain animals are produced only at certain seasons of the year, both
in water and on the land, such, for instance, as scallops, snails,
and leeches, in the spring, which also disappear at stated periods.
Among fishes, the wolf-fish2789 and the trichias2790 bring forth
twice in the year, as also do all kinds of rock-fish; the mullet and
the chalcis2791 thrice in the year, the cyprinus2792 six times,
the scorpæna2793 twice, and the sargus in spring and autumn. Among
the flat-fish, the squatina brings forth twice a year, being the
only2794 one that does so at the setting of the2795 Vergiliæ in
autumn. Most fish spawn in the three months of April, May, and June.
The salpa brings forth in the autumn, the sargus, the torpedo, and
the squalus2796 about the time of the autumnal equinox. The soft
fishes2797 bring forth in spring, the sæpia every month in the year;
its eggs adhere together with a kind of black glutinous substance, in
appearance like a bunch of grapes, and the male is very careful to go
among them and breathe2798 upon them, as otherwise they would be
barren. The polypi couple in winter, and produce eggs in the spring
twisted in spiral clusters, in a similar manner to the tendrils of
the vine; and so remarkably prolific are they, that when the animal
is killed in a state of pregnancy, the cavities of the head are quite
unable to contain the multitude2799 of eggs enclosed therein. They
bring forth these eggs at the fiftieth day, but in consequence of
the vast number of them, great multitudes perish. Cray-fish, and
other sea-animals with a thinner crust, lay their eggs one upon the
other, and then sit upon them. The female polypus sometimes sits upon
its eggs, and at other times closes the entrance of its retreat by
spreading out its feelers, interlaced like a net. The sæpia brings
forth on dry land, among reeds or such sea-weed as it may find growing
there, and hatches its eggs on the fifteenth day. The loligo produces
its eggs out at sea, clustered together like those of the sæpia. The
purple,2800 the murex, and other fishes of the same kind, bring forth
in the spring. Sea-urchins have their eggs at full moon during the
winter; sea-snails2801 also are produced during the winter season.
The torpedo is known to have as many as eighty young ones. It
produces within itself2802 very soft eggs, which it then transfers
to another place in the uterus, and from that part ejects them. The
same is the case with all those fish to which we have given the name
of cartilaginous; hence it is, that these alone of all the fishes are
at once viviparous and oviparous. The male silurus2803 is the only
fish among them all that watches the eggs after they are brought forth,
often for as long a period as fifty days, that they may not be devoured
by other fish. The females of other kinds bring forth their eggs in the
course of three days, if the male has only touched them.
The sea-needle,2804 or the belone, is the only fish in which the
multitude of its eggs, in spawning, causes the belly to open asunder;
but immediately after it has brought forth, the wound heals again: a
thing which, it is said, is the case with the blind-worm as well. The
sea-mouse2805 digs a hole in the earth, deposits its eggs there, and
then covers them up. On the thirtieth day it opens the hole, and leads
its young to the water.
The fishes called the erythinus2806 and the channe2807 are said to
have a womb; and those which by the Greeks are called trochi,2808 it
is said, impregnate themselves. The young of all aquatic animals are
without sight at their birth.2809
We have lately heard of a remarkable instance of length of life in
fish. Pausilypum2810 is the name of a villa in Campania, not far
from Neapolis; here, as we learn from the works of M. Annæus Seneca, a
fish is known to have died sixty years after it had been placed in the
preserves of Cæsar2811 by Vedius Pollio; while others of the same
kind, and its equals in age, were living at the time that he wrote.
This mention of fish-preserves reminds me that I ought to mention a
few more particulars connected with this subject, before we leave the
aquatic animals.
The first person who formed artificial oyster-beds was Sergius
Orata,2812 who established them at Baiæ, in the time of L. Crassus,
the orator, just before the Marsic War. This was done by him, not
for the gratification of gluttony, but of avarice, as he contrived
to make a large income by this exercise of his ingenuity. He was the
first, too, to invent hanging baths,2813 and after buying villas and
trimming them up, he would every now and then sell them again.2814
He, too, was the first to adjudge the pre-eminence for delicacy of
flavour to the oysters of Lake Lucrinus;2815 for every kind of
aquatic animal is superior in one place to what it is in another. Thus,
for instance, the wolf-fish of the river Tiber is the best that is
caught between the two bridges,2816 and the turbot of Ravenna is the
most esteemed, the murena of Sicily, the elops of Rhodes; the same,
too, as to the other kinds, not to go through all the items of the
culinary catalogue. The British2817 shores had not as yet sent their
supplies, at the time when Orata thus ennobled the Lucrine oysters: at
a later period, however, it was thought worth while to fetch oysters
all the way from Brundisium, at the very extremity of Italy; and in
order that there might exist no rivalry2818 between the two flavours,
a plan has been more recently hit upon, of feeding the oysters of
Brundisium in Lake Lucrinus, famished as they must naturally be after
so long a journey.
In the same age, also, Licinius Murena2819 was the first to form
preserves for other fish; and his example was soon followed by the
noble families of the Philippi and the Hortensii. Lucullus had a
mountain pierced near Naples, at a greater outlay even, than that which
had been expended on his villa; and here he formed a channel,2820 and
admitted the sea to his preserves; it was for this reason that Pompeius
Magnus gave him the name of “Xerxes in a toga.”2821 After his
death, the fish in his preserves was sold for the sum of four million
sesterces.
C. Hirrus2822 was the first person who formed preserves for the
murena; and it was he who lent six thousand of these fishes for the
triumphal banquets of Cæsar the Dictator; on which occasion he had them
duly weighed, as he declined to receive the value of them in money or
any other commodity. His villa, which was of a very humble character in
the interior, sold for four millions2823 of sesterces, in consequence
of the valuable nature of the stock-ponds there. Next after this, there
arose a passion for individual fish. At Bauli,2824 in the territory
of Baiæ, the orator Hortensius had some fish-preserves, in which there
was a murena to which he became so much attached, as to be supposed
to have wept on hearing of its death.2825 It was at the same villa
that Antonia,2826 the wife of Drusus, placed earrings upon a murena
which she had become fond of; the report of which singular circumstance
attracted many visitors to the place.
Fulvius Lupinus2827 first formed preserves for sea-snails,2828 in
the territory of Tarquinii, shortly before the civil war between Cæsar
and Pompeius Magnus. He also carefully distinguished them by their
several species, separating them from one another. The white ones
were those that are produced in the district of Reate;2829 those of
Illyria were remarkable for the largeness of their size; while those
from Africa were the most prolific; those, however, from the Promontory
of the Sun2830 were the most esteemed of all. For the purpose,
also, of fattening them, he invented a mixture of boiled wine,2831
spelt-meal, and other substances; so that fattened periwinkles even
became quite an object of gastronomy; and the art of breeding them
was brought to such a pitch of perfection, that the shell of a single
animal would hold as much as eighty quadrantes.2832 This we learn
from M. Varro.
Besides these, there are still some wonderful kinds of fishes2833
which we find mentioned by Theophrastus: he says, that when the waters
subside, which have been admitted for the purposes of irrigation in the
vicinity of Babylon, there are certain fish which remain in such holes
as may contain water; from these they come forth for the purpose of
feeding, moving along with their fins by the aid of a rapid movement of
the tail. If pursued, he says, they retreat to their holes, and, when
they have reached them, will turn round and make a stand. The head is
like that of the sea-frog, while the other parts are similar to those
of the gobio,2834 and they have gills like other fish. He says also,
that in the vicinity of Heraclea and Cromna,2835 and about the river
Lycus, as well as in many parts of the Euxine, there is one kind of
fish2836 which frequents the waters near the banks of the rivers, and
makes holes for itself, in which it lives, even when the water retires
and the bed of the river is dry; for which reason these fishes have to
be dug out of the ground, and only show by the movement of the body
that they are still alive. He says also, that in the vicinity of the
same Heraclea, when the river Lycus ebbs, the eggs are left in the mud,
and that the fish, on being produced from these, go forth to seek their
food by means of a sort of fluttering motion,—their gills being but
very small, in consequence of which they are not in need of water; for
this reason it is that eels also can live so long out of water;2837
and that their eggs come to maturity on dry land, like those of the
sea-tortoise2838. In the same regions also of the Euxine, he says,
various kinds of fishes are overtaken by the ice, the gobio more
particularly, and they only betray signs of life, by moving when they
have warmth applied by the saucepan. All these things, however, though
very remarkable, still admit of some explanation. He tells us also,
that in Paphlagonia, land fishes are dug up that are most excellent
eating; these, he says, are found in deep holes or spots where there
is no standing water whatever, and he expresses his surprise at their
being thus produced without any contact with moisture, stating it as
his opinion, that there is some innate virtue in these holes,2839
similar to that of wells; as if, indeed, fishes really were to be found
in wells.2840 However this may be, these facts, at all events, render
the life of the mole under ground less a matter for surprise; unless,
perhaps, these fishes mentioned by Theophrastus are similar in nature
to the earth-worm.
But all these things, singular as they are, are rendered credible by
a marvel which exceeds them all, at the time of the inundation of the
Nile; for, the moment that it subsides, little mice2841 are found,
the first rudiments of which have been formed by the generative powers
of the waters and the earth: in one part of the body they are already
alive, while in that which is of later formation, they are still
composed of earth.
Nor would it be right to omit what is said about the fish called
anthias, and which I find is looked upon as true by most writers. I
have already mentioned2842 the Chelidoniæ, certain islands off the
coast of Asia; they are situate off a promontory there, in the midst
of a sea full of crags and reefs. These parts are much frequented by
this fish, which is very speedily taken by the employment of a single
method of catching it. A fisherman pushes out in a little boat, dressed
in a colour resembling that of his boat; and every day, for several
days together, at the same hour, he sails over the same space, while
doing which he throws a quantity of bait into the sea. Whatever is
thrown from the boat is an object of suspicion to the fish, who keep
at a distance from what causes them so much alarm; but after this
has been repeated a considerable number of times, one of the fish,
reassured by becoming habituated to the scene, at last snaps at the
bait. The movements of this one are watched with the greatest care and
attention, for in it are centred all the hopes of the fishermen, as
it is to be the means of securing them their prey; nor, indeed, is it
difficult to recognize it, seeing that for some days it is the only one
that ventures to come near the bait. At last, however, it finds some
others to follow its example, and by degrees it is better and better
attended, till at last it brings with it shoals innumerable. The older
ones, at length becoming quite accustomed to the fisherman, easily
recognize him, and will even take food from his hands. Upon this, the
man throws out, a little way beyond the tips of his fingers, a hook
concealed in a bait, and smuggles them out one by one, rather than
catches them, standing in the shadow of the boat and whipping them out
of the water with a slight jerk, that the others may not perceive it;
while another fisherman is ready inside to receive them upon pieces of
cloth, in order that no floundering about or other noise may scare the
others away. It is of importance to know which has been the betrayer
of the others, and not to take it, otherwise the shoal will take to
flight, and appear no more for the future.2843 There is a story that
a fisherman, having quarrelled once with his mate, threw out a hook
to one of these leading fishes, which he easily recognized, and so
captured it with a malicious intent. The fish, however, was recognized
in the market by the other fisherman, against whom he had conceived
this malice; who accordingly brought an action against him for
damages;2844 and, as Mucianus adds, he was condemned to pay them on
the hearing of the case. These anthiæ, it is said, when they see one of
their number taken with a hook, cut the line with the serrated spines
which they have on the back, the one that is held fast stretching it
out as much as it can, to enable them to cut it. But among the sargi,
the fish itself, that is held fast, rubs the line asunder against the
rocks.
In addition to what I have already stated, I find that authors,
distinguished for their wisdom, express surprise at finding a star in
the sea—for such, in fact, is the form of the animal, which has but
very little flesh2845 within, and nothing but a hard skin without. It
is said that in this fish there is such a fiery heat, that it scorches
everything it meets with in the sea, and instantaneously digests its
food. By what experiments2846 all this came to be known, I cannot so
easily say; but I am about to make mention of one fact which is more
remarkable still, and which we have the opportunity of testing by every
day’s experience.
Belonging also to the class of shell-fish is the dactylus,2847 a fish
so called from its strong resemblance to the human nails. It is the
property of these fish to shine brightly in the dark, when all other
lights are removed, and the more moisture they have, the brighter is
the light they emit. In the mouth even, while they are being eaten,
they give forth their light, and the same too when in the hands; the
very drops, in fact, that fall from them on the ground, or on the
clothes, are of the same nature. Hence it is beyond a doubt, that it is
a liquid that possesses this peculiar property, which, even in a solid
body, would be a ground for considerable surprise.
There are also marvellous instances to be found of antipathies and
sympathies existing between them. The mullet and the wolf-fish2848
are animated with a mutual hatred; and so too, the conger and the
murena gnaw each other’s2849 tails. The cray-fish has so great
a dread of the polypus, that if it sees it near, it expires in an
instant: the conger dreads the cray-fish; while, again, the conger
tears the body of the polypus. Nigidius informs us that the wolf-fish
gnaws the tail of the mullet, and yet that, during certain months, they
are on terms of friendship; all those, however, which thus lose their
tails, survive their misfortune. On the other hand, in addition to
those which we have already mentioned as going in company together, an
instance of friendship is found in the balæna and the musculus,2850
for, as the eye-brows of the former are very heavy, they sometimes fall
over its eyes, and quite close them by their ponderousness, upon which
the musculus swims before, and points out the shallow places which are
likely to prove inconvenient to its vast bulk,2851 thus serving it
in the stead of eyes. We shall now have to speak of the nature of the
birds.
Summary.—Remarkable facts, narratives, and observations, 650.
Roman authors quoted.—Turranius Gracilis,2852 Trogus,2853
Mæcenas,2854 Alfius Flavus,2855 Cornelius Nepos,2856 Laberius the
Mimographer,2857 Fabianus,2858 Fenestella,2859 Mucianus,2860
Ælius Stilo,2861 Statius Sebosus,2862 Melissus,2863
Seneca,2864 Cicero,2865 Æmilius Macer,2866 Messala
Corvinus,2867 Trebius Niger,2868 Nigidius.2869
Foreign authors quoted.—Aristotle,2870 King
Archelaus,2871 Callimachus,2872 Democritus,2873 Theophrastus,2874
Thrasyllus,2874 Hegesidemus,2875 Cythnius,2876 Alexander
Polyhistor.2877
BOOK X. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF BIRDS. — CHAP. 1. (1.)—THE OSTRICH. — CHAP. 2. (2.)—THE PHŒNIX. — CHAP. 3. (3.)—THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF EAGLES. — CHAP. 4.—THE NATURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EAGLE. — CHAP. 5. (4.)—WHEN THE EAGLE WAS FIRST USED AS THE STANDARD OF THE ROMAN LEGIONS. — CHAP. 6. (5.)—AN EAGLE WHICH PRECIPITATED ITSELF ON THE FUNERAL PILE OF A GIRL. — CHAP. 7. (6.)—THE VULTURE. — CHAP. 8. (7.)—THE BIRDS CALLED SANGUALIS AND IMMUSULUS. — CHAP. 9. (8.)—HAWKS. THE BUTEO. — CHAP. 10.—IN WHAT PLACES HAWKS AND MEN PURSUE THE CHASE IN COMPANY WITH EACH OTHER. — CHAP. 11. (9.)—THE ONLY BIRD THAT IS KILLED BY THOSE OF ITS OWN KIND.—A BIRD THAT LAYS ONLY ONE EGG. — CHAP. 12. (10.)—THE KITE. — CHAP. 13. (11.)—THE CLASSIFICATION OF BIRDS. — CHAP. 14. (12.)—CROWS. BIRDS OF ILL OMEN. AT WHAT SEASONS THEY ARE NOT INAUSPICIOUS. — CHAP. 15.—THE RAVEN. — CHAP. 16.—THE HORNED OWL. — CHAP. 17. (13.)—BIRDS, THE RACE OF WHICH IS EXTINCT, OR OF WHICH ALL KNOWLEDGE HAS BEEN LOST. — CHAP. 18. (16.)—BIRDS WHICH ARE BORN WITH THE TAIL FIRST. — CHAP. 19. (17.)—THE OWLET. — CHAP. 20. (18.)—THE WOOD-PECKER OF MARS. — CHAP. 21. (19.)—BIRDS WHICH HAVE HOOKED TALONS. — CHAP. 22. (20.)—THE PEACOCK. — CHAP. 23.—WHO WAS THE FIRST TO KILL THE PEACOCK FOR FOOD.—WHO FIRST TAUGHT THE ART OF CRAMMING THEM. — CHAP. 24. (21.)—THE DUNGHILL COCK. — CHAP. 25.—HOW COCKS ARE CASTRATED. A COCK THAT ONCE SPOKE. — CHAP. 26. (22.)—THE GOOSE. — CHAP. 27.—WHO FIRST TAUGHT US TO USE THE LIVER OF THE GOOSE FOR FOOD. — CHAP. 28.—OF THE COMMAGENIAN MEDICAMENT. — CHAP. 29.—THE CHENALOPEX, THE CHENEROS, THE TETRAO, AND THE OTIS. — CHAP. 30. (23.)—CRANES. — CHAP. 31.—STORKS. — CHAP. 32.—SWANS. — CHAP. 33.—FOREIGN BIRDS WHICH VISIT US; THE QUAIL, THE GLOTTIS, THE CYCHRAMUS, AND THE OTUS. — CHAP. 34. (24.)—SWALLOWS. — CHAP. 35.—BIRDS WHICH TAKE THEIR DEPARTURE FROM US, AND WHITHER THEY GO; THE THRUSH, THE BLACKBIRD, AND THE STARLING—BIRDS WHICH LOSE THEIR FEATHERS DURING THEIR RETIREMENT—THE TURTLE-DOVE AND THE RING-DOVE—THE FLIGHT OF STARLINGS AND SWALLOWS. — CHAP. 36. (25.)—BIRDS WHICH REMAIN WITH US THROUGHOUT THE YEAR; BIRDS WHICH REMAIN WITH US ONLY SIX OR THREE MONTHS; WITWALLS AND HOOPOES. — CHAP. 37. (26.)—THE MEMNONIDES. — CHAP. 38.—THE MELEAGRIDES. — CHAP. 39. (27.)—THE SELEUCIDES. — CHAP. 40. (28.)—THE IBIS. — CHAP. 41. (29.)—PLACES IN WHICH CERTAIN BIRDS ARE NEVER FOUND. — CHAP. 42.—THE VARIOUS KINDS OF BIRDS WHICH AFFORD OMENS BY THEIR NOTE—BIRDS WHICH CHANGE THEIR COLOUR AND THEIR VOICE. — CHAP. 43.—THE NIGHTINGALE. — CHAP. 44.—THE MELANCORYPHUS, THE ERITHACUS, AND THE PHŒNICURUS. — CHAP. 45.—THE ŒNANTHE, THE CHLORION, THE BLACKBIRD, AND THE IBIS. — CHAP. 46. (31.)—THE TIMES OF INCUBATION OF BIRDS. — CHAP. 47. (32.)—THE HALCYONES: THE HALCYON DAYS THAT ARE FAVOURABLE TO NAVIGATION. — CHAP. 48.—OTHER KINDS OF AQUATIC BIRDS. — CHAP. 49. (33.)—THE INSTINCTIVE CLEVERNESS DISPLAYED BY BIRDS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THEIR NESTS. THE WONDERFUL WORKS OF THE SWALLOW. THE BANK-SWALLOW. — CHAP. 50.—THE ACANTHYLLIS AND OTHER BIRDS. — CHAP. 51.—THE MEROPS—PARTRIDGES. — CHAP. 52. (34.)—PIGEONS. — CHAP. 53.—WONDERFUL THINGS DONE BY THEM; PRICES AT WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN SOLD. — CHAP. 54. (38.)—DIFFERENT MODES OF FLIGHT AND PROGRESSION IN BIRDS. — CHAP. 55. (39.)—THE BIRDS CALLED APODES, OR CYPSELI. — CHAP. 56. (40.)—RESPECTING THE FOOD OF BIRDS—THE CAPRIMULGUS, THE PLATEA. — CHAP. 57. (41.)—THE INSTINCTS OF BIRDS—THE CARDUELIS, THE TAURUS, THE ANTHUS. — CHAP. 58.—BIRDS WHICH SPEAK—THE PARROT. — CHAP. 59.—THE PIE WHICH FEEDS ON ACORNS. — CHAP. 60. (48.)—A SEDITION THAT AROSE AMONG THE ROMAN PEOPLE, IN CONSEQUENCE OF A RAVEN SPEAKING. — CHAP. 61. (44.)—THE BIRDS OF DIOMEDES. — CHAP. 62. (45.)—ANIMALS THAT CAN LEARN NOTHING. — CHAP. 63. (46.)—THE MODE OF DRINKING WITH BIRDS. THE PORPHYRIO. — CHAP. 64. (47.)—THE HÆMATOPOUS. — CHAP. 65.—THE FOOD OF BIRDS. — CHAP. 66.—THE PELICAN. — CHAP. 67.—FOREIGN BIRDS: THE PHALERIDES, THE PHEASANT, AND THE NUMIDICÆ. — CHAP. 68.—THE PHŒNICOPTERUS, THE ATTAGEN, THE PHALACROCORAX, THE PYRRHOCORAX, AND THE LAGOPUS. — CHAP. 69. (49.)—THE NEW BIRDS. THE VIPIO. — CHAP. 70.—FABULOUS BIRDS. — CHAP. 71. (50.)—WHO FIRST INVENTED THE ART OF CRAMMING POULTRY: WHY THE FIRST CENSORS FORBADE THIS PRACTICE. — CHAP. 72.—WHO FIRST INVENTED AVIARIES. THE DISH OF ÆSOPUS. — CHAP. 73. (52.)—THE GENERATION OF BIRDS: OTHER OVIPAROUS ANIMALS. — CHAP. 74.—THE VARIOUS KINDS OF EGGS, AND THEIR NATURE. — CHAP. 75. (54.)—DEFECTS IN BROOD-HENS, AND THEIR REMEDIES. — CHAP. 76. (55.)—AN AUGURY DERIVED FROM EGGS BY AN EMPRESS. — CHAP. 77. (56.)—THE BEST KINDS OF FOWLS. — CHAP. 78. (57.)—THE DISEASES OF FOWLS, AND THEIR REMEDIES. — CHAP. 79. (58.)—WHEN BIRDS LAY, AND HOW MANY EGGS. THE VARIOUS KINDS OF HERONS. — CHAP. 80.—WHAT EGGS ARE CALLED HYPENEMIA, AND WHAT CYNOSURA. HOW EGGS ARE BEST KEPT. — CHAP. 81. (61.)—THE ONLY WINGED ANIMAL THAT IS VIVIPAROUS, AND NURTURES ITS YOUNG WITH ITS MILK. — CHAP. 82. (62.)—TERRESTRIAL ANIMALS THAT ARE OVIPAROUS.—VARIOUS KINDS OF SERPENTS. — CHAP. 83. (63.)—GENERATION OF ALL KINDS OF TERRESTRIAL ANIMALS. — CHAP. 84. (64.)—THE POSITION OF ANIMALS IN THE UTERUS. — CHAP. 85.—ANIMALS WHOSE ORIGIN IS STILL UNKNOWN. — CHAP. 86. (66.)—SALAMANDERS. — CHAP. 87. (68.)—ANIMALS WHICH ARE BORN OF BEINGS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN BORN THEMSELVES—ANIMALS WHICH ARE BORN THEMSELVES BUT ARE NOT REPRODUCTIVE—ANIMALS WHICH ARE OF NEITHER SEX. — CHAP. 88. (69.)—THE SENSES OF ANIMALS—THAT ALL HAVE THE SENSES OF TOUCH AND TASTE—THOSE WHICH ARE MORE REMARKABLE FOR THEIR SIGHT, SMELL, OR HEARING—MOLES—WHETHER OYSTERS HAVE THE SENSE OF HEARING. — CHAP. 89. (70.)—WHICH FISHES HAVE THE BEST HEARING. — CHAP. 90.—WHICH FISHES HAVE THE FINEST SENSE OF SMELL. — CHAP. 91.—DIVERSITIES IN THE FEEDING OF ANIMALS. — CHAP. 92. (72.)—ANIMALS WHICH LIVE ON POISONS. — CHAP. 93.—ANIMALS WHICH LIVE ON EARTH—ANIMALS WHICH WILL NOT DIE OF HUNGER OR THIRST. — CHAP. 94.—DIVERSITIES IN THE DRINKING OF ANIMALS. — CHAP. 95. (74.)—ANTIPATHIES OF ANIMALS. PROOFS THAT THEY ARE SENSIBLE OF FRIENDSHIP AND OTHER AFFECTIONS. — CHAP. 96.—INSTANCES OF AFFECTION SHOWN BY SERPENTS. — CHAP. 97. (75.)—THE SLEEP OF ANIMALS. — CHAP. 98.—WHAT ANIMALS ARE SUBJECT TO DREAMS.
The history of the birds2878 follows next, the very largest of which,
and indeed almost approaching to the nature of quadrupeds, is the
ostrich2879 of Africa or2880 Æthiopia. This bird exceeds in height
a man sitting on horseback, and can surpass him in swiftness, as wings
have been given to aid it in running; in other respects ostriches
cannot be considered as birds, and do not raise themselves from the
earth. They have cloven talons, very similar to the hoof2881 of the
stag; with these they fight, and they also employ them in seizing
stones for the purpose of throwing2882 at those who pursue them.
They have the marvellous property of being able to digest2883 every
substance without distinction, but their stupidity2884 is no less
remarkable; for although the rest of their body is so large, they
imagine, when they have thrust their head and neck into a bush, that
the whole of the body is concealed. Their eggs2885 are prized on
account of their large size, and are employed as vessels for certain
purposes, while the feathers of the wing and tail are used as ornaments
for the crest and helmet of the warrior.
Æthiopia and India, more especially, produce2886 birds of diversified
plumage, and such as quite surpass all description. In the front rank
of these is the phœnix,2887 that famous bird of Arabia; though I
am not quite sure that its existence is not all a fable. It is said
that there is only one in existence in the whole world, and that that
one has not been seen very often. We are told that this bird is of the
size of an eagle,2888 and has a brilliant golden plumage around the
neck, while the rest of the body is of a purple colour; except the
tail, which is azure, with long feathers intermingled of a roseate
hue; the throat is adorned with a crest, and the head with a tuft of
feathers. The first Roman who described this bird, and who has done so
with the greatest exactness, was the senator Manilius, so famous for
his learning; which he owed, too, to the instructions of no teacher.
He tells us that no person has ever seen this bird eat, that in Arabia
it is looked upon as sacred to the sun, that it lives five hundred
and forty years,2889 that when it becomes old it builds a nest of
cassia and sprigs of incense, which it fills with perfumes, and then
lays its body down upon them to die; that from its bones and marrow
there springs at first a sort of small worm, which in time changes into
a little bird: that the first thing that it does is to perform the
obsequies of its predecessor, and to carry the nest entire to the city
of the Sun near Panchaia,2890 and there deposit it upon the altar of
that divinity.
The same Manilius states also, that the revolution of the great
year2891 is completed with the life of this bird, and that then a
new cycle comes round again with the same characteristics as the former
one, in the seasons and the appearance of the stars; and he says that
this begins about mid-day of the day on which the sun enters the sign
of Aries. He also tells us that when he wrote to the above effect,
in the consulship2892 of P. Licinius and Cneius Cornelius, it was
the two hundred and fifteenth year of the said revolution. Cornelius
Valerianus says that the phœnix took its flight from Arabia into Egypt
in the consulship2893 of Q. Plautius and Sextus Papinius. This bird
was brought to Rome in the censorship of the Emperor Claudius, being
the year from the building of the City, 800, and it was exposed to
public view in the Comitium.2894 This fact is attested by the public
Annals, but there is no one that doubts that it was a fictitious phœnix
only.
Of all the birds with which we are acquainted, the eagle is looked upon
as the most noble, and the most remarkable for its strength. There are
six2895 different kinds; the one called “melanaetos”2896 by the
Greeks, and “valeria” in our language, the least in size of them all,
but the most remarkable for its strength, is of a blackish colour. It
is the only one among all the eagles that feeds its young; for the
others, as we shall mention just now, drive them away; it is the only
one too that has neither cry nor murmur; it is an inhabitant of the
mountains. The second kind is the pygargus,2897 an inhabitant of the
cities and plains, and distinguished by the whiteness of its tail. The
third is the morphnos,2898 which Homer also calls the “percnos,”
while others, again, call it the “plangus” and the “anataria;” it is
the second in size and strength, and dwells in the vicinity of lakes.
Phemonoë, who was styled the “daughter of Apollo,” has stated that this
eagle has teeth, but that it has neither voice nor tongue; she says
also that it is the blackest of all the eagles, and has a longer tail
than the rest; Bœus is of the same opinion. This eagle has the instinct
to break the shell of the tortoise by letting it fall from aloft, a
circumstance which caused the death of the poet Æschylus. An oracle, it
is said, had predicted his death on that day by the fall of a house,
upon which he took the precaution of trusting himself only under the
canopy of the heavens.
The fourth kind of eagle is the “percnopterus,”2899 also called the
“oripelargus;”2900 it has much the appearance of the vulture, with
remarkably small wings, while the rest of the body is larger than the
others; but it is of a timid and degenerate nature, so much so, that
even a raven can beat it. It is always famishing and ravenous, and has
a plaintive murmuring cry. It is the only one among the eagles that
will carry off the dead carcase; the others settle on the spot where
they have killed their prey. The character of this species causes the
fifth one to be known by the distinctive name of “gnesios,”2901 as
being the genuine eagle, and the only one of untainted lineage; it is
of moderate size, of rather reddish colour, and rarely to be met with.
The haliætus2902 is the last, and is remarkable for its bright and
piercing eye. It poises itself aloft, and the moment it catches sight
of a fish in the sea below, pounces headlong upon it, and cleaving the
water with its breast, carries off its prey.
The eagle which we have mentioned as forming the third species, pursues
the aquatic birds in the vicinity of standing waters: in order to make
their escape they plunge into the water every now and then, until at
length they are overtaken by lassitude and sleep, upon which the eagle
immediately seizes them. The contest that takes place is really a sight
worthy to be seen. The bird makes for the shore to seek a refuge, and
especially if there should happen to be a bed of reeds there; while
in the meantime the eagle endeavours to drive it away with repeated
blows of its wings, and tumbles into the water in its attempts to seize
it. While it is standing on the shore its shadow is seen by the bird,
which immediately dives beneath, and then making its way in an opposite
direction, emerges at some point at which it thinks it is the least
likely to be looked for. This is the reason why these birds swim in
flocks, for when in large numbers they are in no danger from the enemy;
as by dashing up the spray with their wings they blind him.
Again, it often happens that the eagle is not able to carry the bird
aloft on account of its weight, and in consequence they both of them
sink together. The haliætus, and this one only, beats its young ones
while in an unfledged state, with its wings, and forces2903 them
from time to time to look steadily upon the rays of the sun; and if it
sees either of them wink, or even its eye water, it throws it headlong
out of the nest, as being spurious and degenerate, while, on the
other hand, it rears the one whose gaze remains fixed and steady. The
haliætus2904 is not a species of itself, but is an eagle of mixed
breed: hence their produce are of the species known as the ossifrage,
from which again is produced the smaller vulture; while this in its
turn produces the large vulture, which, however, is quite barren.
Some writers add to the above a seventh kind, which they call the
“bearded”2905 eagle; the Tuscans, however, call it the ossifrage.
The first three and the fifth class of eagles employ in the
construction of their aerie the stone aëtites,2906 by some known as
“gangites;” which is employed also for many remedial purposes, and is
proof against the action of fire. This stone has the quality also, in a
manner, of being pregnant, for when shaken, another stone is heard to
rattle within, just as though it were enclosed in its womb; it has no
medical properties, however, except immediately after it has been taken
from the nest.
Eagles build among rocks and trees; they lay three eggs, and generally
hatch but two young ones, though occasionally as many as three have
been seen. Being weary of the trouble of rearing both, they drive one
of them from the nest: for just at this time the providential foresight
of Nature has denied them a sufficiency of food, thereby using due
precaution that the young of all the other animals should not become
their prey. During this period, also, their talons become reversed,
and their feathers grow white from continued hunger, so that it is
not to be wondered at that they take a dislike to their young. The
ossifrage, however, a kindred species, takes charge of the young ones
thus rejected, and rears them with its own; but the parent bird still
pursues them with hostility, even when grown up, and drives them away,
as being its rivals in rapine. And indeed, under any circumstances, one
pair of eagles requires a very considerable space of ground to forage
over, in order to find sufficient sustenance; for which reason it is
that they mark out by boundaries their respective allotments, and seek
their prey in succession to one another. They do not immediately carry
off their prey, but first deposit it on the ground, and it is only
after they have tested its weight that they fly away with it.
They die, not of old age, nor yet of sickness, or of hunger; but the
upper part of the beak grows to such an extent, and becomes so curved,
that they are unable to open it. They take the wing, and begin upon the
labours of the chase at mid-day; sitting in idleness during the hours
of the morning, until such time as the places2907 of public resort
are filled with people. The feathers of the eagle, if mixed with those
of other birds, will consume them.2908 It is said that this is the
only bird that has never been killed by lightning; hence it is, that
usage has pronounced it to be the armour-bearer of Jove.
Caius Marius, in his second consulship, assigned the eagle exclusively
to the Roman legions. Before that period it had only held the first
rank, there being four others as well, the wolf, the minotaur,
the horse, and the wild boar, each of which preceded a single
division.2909 Some few years before his time it had begun to be
the custom to carry the eagle only into battle, the other standards
being left behind in camp; Marius, however, abolished the rest of them
entirely. Since then, it has been remarked that hardly ever has a Roman
legion encamped for the winter, without a pair of eagles making their
appearance at the spot.
The first and second species of eagle, not only prey upon the whole
of the smaller quadrupeds, but will attack deer even. Rolling in the
dust, the eagle covers its body all over with it, and then perching
on the antlers of the animal, shakes the dust into its eyes, while
at the same time it beats it on the head with its wings, until the
creature at last precipitates itself down the rocks. Nor, indeed, is
this one enemy sufficient for it; it has still more terrible combats
with the dragon,2910 and the issue is much more doubtful, although
the battle is fought in the air. The dragon seeks the eggs of the eagle
with a mischievous avidity; while the eagle, in return, carries it off
whenever it happens to see it; upon these occasions, the dragon coils
itself about the wings of the bird in multiplied folds, until at last
they fall to the earth together.
There is a very famous story about an eagle at the city of Sestos.
Having been reared by a little girl, it used to testify its gratitude
for her kindness, first by bringing her birds, and in due time various
kinds of prey: at last she died, upon which the bird threw itself on
the lighted pile, and was consumed with her body. In memory of this
event, the inhabitants raised upon the spot what they called an heroic
monument,2911 in honour of Jupiter and the damsel, the eagle being a
bird consecrated to that divinity.
Of the vultures, the black ones2912 are the strongest. No person has
yet found a vulture’s nest: hence it is that there are some who have
thought, though erroneously, that these birds come from the opposite
hemisphere.2913 The fact is, that they build their nest upon the
very highest rocks; their young ones, indeed, are often to be seen,
being generally two in number. Umbricius, the most skilful among the
aruspices of our time, says that the vulture lays thirteen eggs,2914
and that with one of these eggs2915 it purifies the others and its
nest, and then throws it away: he states also that they hover about for
three2916 days, over the spot where carcases are about to be found.
There has been considerable argument among the Roman augurs about
the birds known as the “sangualis” and the “immusulus.” Some persons
are of opinion that the immusulus is the young of the vulture, and
the sangualis that of the ossifrage. Massurius says,2917 that the
sangualis is the same as the ossifrage, and that the immusulus is the
young of the eagle, before the tail begins to turn white. Some persons
have asserted that these birds have not been seen at Rome since the
time of the augur Mucius; for my part, I think it much more likely,
that, amid that general heedlessness as to all knowledge, which has of
late prevailed, no notice has been taken of them.
We find no less than sixteen2918 kinds of hawks mentioned; among
these are the ægithus, which is lame2919 of one leg, and is looked
upon as the most favourable omen for the augurs on the occasion of a
marriage, or in matters connected with property in the shape of cattle:
the triorchis also, so called from the number of its testicles,2920
and to which Phemonoë has assigned the first rank in augury. This last
is by the Romans known as the “buteo;” indeed there is a family2921
that has taken its surname from it, from the circumstance of this bird
having given a favourable omen by settling upon the ship of one of them
when he held a command. The Greeks call one kind2922 “epileus;” the
only one, indeed, that is seen at all seasons of the year, the others
taking their departure in the winter.
The various kinds are distinguished by the avidity with which they
seize their prey; for while some will only pounce on a bird while on
the ground, others will only seize it while hovering round the trees,
others, again, while it is perched aloft, and others while it is flying
in mid air. Hence it is that pigeons, on seeing them, are aware of the
nature of the danger to which they are exposed, and either settle on
the ground or else fly upwards, instinctively protecting themselves by
taking due precautions against their natural propensities. The hawks
of the whole of Massæsylia, breed in Cerne,2923 an island of Africa,
lying in the ocean; and none of the kinds that are accustomed to those
parts will breed anywhere else.
In the part of Thrace which lies above Amphipolis, men2924 and hawks
go in pursuit of prey, in a sort of partnership as it were; for while
the men drive the birds from out of the woods and the reed-beds, the
hawks bring them down as they fly; and after they have taken the game,
the fowlers share it with them. It has been said, that when sent aloft,
they will pick2925 out the birds that are wanted, and that when the
opportune moment for taking them has come, they invite the fowler
to seize the opportunity by their cries and their peculiar mode of
flying. The sea-wolves, too, in the Palus Mæotis, do something of a
very similar nature; but if they do not receive their fair share from
the fishermen, they will tear their nets as they lie extended.2926
Hawks will not2927 eat the heart of a bird. The night-hawk is called
cybindis;2928 it is rarely found, even in the woods, and in the
day-time its sight is not good; it wages war to the death with the
eagle, and they are often to be found clasped in each other’s talons.
The cuckoo seems to be but another form of the hawk,2929 which at a
certain season of the year changes its shape; it being the fact that
during this period no other hawks are to be seen, except, perhaps,
for a few days only; the cuckoo, too, itself is only seen for a short
period in the summer, and does not make its appearance after. It is the
only one among the hawks that has not hooked talons; neither is it like
the rest of them in the head, or, indeed, in any other respect, except
the colour only, while in the beak it bears a stronger resemblance to
the pigeon. In addition to this, it is devoured by the hawk, if they
chance at any time to meet; this being the only one among the whole
race of birds that is preyed upon by those of its own kind. It changes
its voice also with its appearance, comes out in the spring, and goes
into retirement at the rising of the Dog-star. It always lays its eggs
in the nest of another bird, and that of the ring-dove2930 more
especially,—mostly a single egg, a thing that is the case with no
other bird; sometimes however, but very rarely, it is known to lay two.
It is supposed, that the reason for its thus substituting its young
ones, is the fact that it is aware2931 how greatly it is hated by all
the other birds; for even the very smallest of them will attack it.
Hence it is, that it thinks its own race will stand no chance of being
perpetuated unless it contrives to deceive them, and for this reason
builds no nest of its own: and besides this, it is a very timid animal.
In the meantime, the female bird, sitting on her nest, is rearing a
supposititious and spurious progeny; while the young cuckoo, which is
naturally craving and greedy, snatches away all the food from the other
young ones, and by so doing grows plump and sleek, and quite gains the
affections of his foster-mother; who takes a great pleasure in his
fine appearance, and is quite surprised that she has become the mother
of so handsome an offspring. In comparison with him, she discards her
own young as so many strangers, until at last, when the young cuckoo
is now able to take the wing, he finishes by devouring2932 her. For
sweetness of the flesh, there is not a bird in existence to be compared
to the cuckoo at this season.
The kite, which belongs to the same genus, is distinguished from the
rest of the hawks by its larger size. It has been remarked of this
bird, extremely ravenous as it is, and always craving, that it has
never been known to seize any food either from among funereal oblations
or from the altar of Jupiter at Olympia; nor yet, in fact, does it ever
seize any of the consecrated viands from the hands of those who are
carrying them; except where some misfortune is presaged for the town
that is offering the sacrifice. These birds seem to have taught man the
art of steering, from the motion of the tail, Nature pointing out by
their movements in the air the method required for navigating the deep.
Kites also disappear during the winter months, but do not take their
departure before the swallow. It is said, also, that after the summer
solstice they are troubled with the gout.
The first distinctive characteristic among birds is that which bears
reference more especially to their feet: they have either hooked
talons, or else toes, or else, again, they belong to the web-footed
class, geese for instance, and most of the aquatic birds. Those which
have hooked talons feed, for the most part, upon nothing but flesh.
Crows, again, have another kind of food. Nuts being too hard for their
beak to break, the crow flies to a great height, and then lets them
fall again and again upon the stones or tiles beneath, until at last
the shell is cracked, after which the bird is able to open them. This
is a bird with a very ill-omened garrulity, though it has been highly
praised by some.2933 It is observed, that from the rising of the
constellation Arcturus until the arrival of the swallow, it is but
rarely to be seen about the sacred groves and temples of Minerva; in
some places, indeed, not at all, Athens for instance.2934 In addition
to these facts, it is the only one that continues to feed its young for
some time after they have begun to fly. The crow is most inauspicious
at the time of incubation, or, in other words, just after the summer
solstice.
All the other birds of the same kind drive their young ones from their
nest, and compel them to fly; the raven, for instance, which not only
feeds on flesh, but even drives its young, when able to fly, to a still
greater distance. Hence it is that in small hamlets there are never
more than two2935 pairs to be found; and in the neighbourhood of
Crannon, in Thessaly, never more than one, the parents always quitting
the spot to give place to their offspring. There have been some
differences observed between this and the bird last mentioned. Ravens
breed before the summer solstice, and continue in bad health for sixty
days—being afflicted with a continual thirst more particularly—before
the ripening of the fig in autumn; while, on the other hand, the crow
is attacked by disease after that period. The raven lays, at most, but
five eggs. It is a vulgar belief, that they couple, or else lay, by
means of the beak; and that, consequently, if a pregnant woman happens
to eat a raven’s egg, she will be delivered by the mouth. It is also
believed, that if the eggs are even so much as brought beneath the
roof, a difficult labour will be the consequence. Aristotle denies
it, and assures us in all good faith that there is no more truth in
this than in the same story about the ibis in Egypt; he says that it
is nothing else but that same sort of billing that is so often seen
in pigeons.2936 Ravens are the only birds that seem to have any
comprehension of the meaning of their auspices; for when the guests
of Medus2937 were assassinated, they all took their departure from
Peloponnesus and the region of Attica. They are of the very worst omen
when they swallow their voice, as if they were being choked.
The birds of the night also have crooked talons, such as the
owlet,2938 the horned owl, and the screech-owl, for instance; the
sight of all of which is defective in the day-time. The horned owl
is especially funereal, and is greatly abhorred in all auspices of
a public nature: it inhabits deserted places, and not only desolate
spots, but those of a frightful and inaccessible nature: the monster of
the night, its voice is heard, not with any tuneful note, but emitting
a sort of shriek. Hence it is that it is looked upon as a direful
omen to see it in a city, or even so much as in the day-time. I know,
however, for a fact, that it is not portentous of evil when it settles
on the top of a private house. It cannot fly whither it wishes in a
straight line, but is always carried along by a sidelong movement. A
horned owl entered the very sanctuary of the Capitol, in the consulship
of Sextus Palpelius Hister and L. Pedanius; in consequence of which,
Rome was purified on the nones2939 of March in that year.
An inauspicious bird also is that known as the “incendiary;”2940
on account of which, we find in the Annals, the City has had to be
repeatedly purified; as, for instance, in the consulship of L. Cassius
and C. Marius,2941 in which year also it was purified, in consequence
of a horned owl being seen. What kind of bird this incendiary bird
was, we do not find stated, nor is it known by tradition. Some persons
explain the term this way; they say that the name “incendiary”
was applied to every bird that was seen carrying a burning coal
from the pyre, or altar; while others, again, call such a bird a
“spinturnix”;2942 though I never yet found any person who said that
he knew what kind of bird this spinturnix was.
(14.) I find also that the people of our time are ignorant what bird it
was that was called by the ancients a “clivia.” Some persons say that
it was a clamatory, others, again, that it was a prohibitory, bird. We
also find a bird mentioned by Nigidius as the “subis,” which breaks the
eggs of the eagle.
(15.) In addition to the above, there are many other kinds that are
described in the Etruscan ritual, but which no one now living has ever
seen. It is surprising that these birds are no longer in existence,
since we find that even those kinds abound, among which the gluttony of
man commits such ravages.
Among foreigners, a person called Hylas is thought to have written the
best treatise on the subject of augury. He informs us that the owlet,
the horned owl, the woodpecker, which makes holes in trees, the trygon,
and the crow, are produced from the egg with the tail2943 first; for
the egg, being turned upside down through the weight of the head of the
chick, presents the wrong end to be warmed by the mother as she sits
upon it.
The owlet shows considerable shrewdness in its engagements with other
birds; for when surrounded by too great a number, it throws itself on
its back, and so, resisting with its feet, and rolling up its body
into a mass, defends itself with the beak and talons; until the hawk,
attracted by a certain natural affinity, comes to its assistance, and
takes its share in the combat. Nigidius says, that the incubation of
the owlet lasts sixty days, during the winter, and that it has nine
different notes.
There are some small birds also, which have hooked talons; the
wood-pecker, for example, surnamed “of Mars,” of considerable
importance in the auspices. To this kind belong the birds which make
holes in trees, and climb stealthily up them, like cats; mounting with
the head upwards, they tap against the bark, and learn by the sound
whether or not their food lies beneath; they are the only birds that
hatch their young in the hollows of trees. It is a common belief,
that if a shepherd drives a wedge into their holes, they apply a
certain kind of herb,2944 immediately upon which it falls out.
Trebius informs us that if a nail or wedge is driven with ever so much
force into a tree in which these birds have made their nest, it will
instantly fly out, the tree making a loud cracking noise the moment
that the bird has lighted upon the nail or wedge.
These birds have held the first rank in auguries, in Latium, since
the time of the king2945 who has given them their name. One of the
presages that was given by them, I cannot pass over in silence. A
woodpecker came and lighted upon the head of Ælius Tubero, the City
prætor, when sitting on his tribunal dispensing justice in the Forum,
and showed such tameness as to allow itself to be taken with the hand;
upon which the augurs declared that if it was let go, the state was
menaced with danger, but if killed, disaster would befall the prætor;
in an instant he tore the bird to pieces, and before long the omen was
fulfilled.2946
Many birds of this kind feed also on acorns and fruit, but only those
which are not carnivorous, with the exception of the kite; though when
it feeds on anything but flesh, it is a bird of ill omen.
The birds which have hooked talons are never gregarious; each one seeks
its prey by itself. They nearly all of them soar to a great height,
with the exception of the birds of the night, and more especially those
of larger size. They all have large wings, and a small body; they walk
with difficulty, and rarely settle upon stones, being prevented from
doing so by the curved shape of their talons.
We shall now speak of the second class of birds, which is divided into
two kinds; those which give omens2947 by their note, and those which
afford presages by their flight. The variation of the note in the one,
and the relative size in the other, constitute the differences between
them. These last, therefore, shall be treated of first, and the peacock
shall have precedence of all the rest, as much for its singular beauty
as its superior instinct, and the vanity it displays.
When it hears itself praised, this bird spreads out its gorgeous
colours, and especially if the sun happens to be shining at the time,
because then they are seen in all their radiance, and to better
advantage. At the same time, spreading out its tail in the form of a
shell, it throws the reflection upon the other feathers, which shine
all the more brilliantly when a shadow is cast upon them; then at
another moment it will contract all the eyes2948 depicted upon its
feathers in a single mass, manifesting great delight in having them
admired by the spectator. The peacock loses its tail every year at the
fall of the leaf, and a new one shoots forth in its place at the flower
season; between these periods the bird is abashed and moping, and seeks
retired spots. The peacock lives twenty-five years, and begins to show
its colours in the third. By some authors it is stated that this bird
is not only a vain creature, but of a spiteful disposition also, just
in the same way that they attribute bashfulness to the goose.2949 The
characteristics, however, which they have thus ascribed to these birds,
appear to me to be utterly unfounded.
The orator Hortensius was the first Roman who had the peacock killed
for table; it was on the occasion of the banquet given by him on his
inauguration in the college of the priesthood. M. Aufidius Lurco2950
was the first who taught the art of fattening them, about the time of
the last war with the Pirates. From this source of profit he acquired
an income of sixty thousand sesterces.2951
Next after the peacock, the animal that acts as our watchman by night,
and which Nature has produced for the purpose of arousing mortals
to their labours, and dispelling their slumbers, shows itself most
actuated by feelings of vanity. The cock knows how to distinguish the
stars, and marks the different periods of the day, every three hours,
by his note. These animals go to roost with the setting of the sun, and
at the fourth watch of the camp recall man to his cares and toils. They
do not allow the rising of the sun to creep upon us unawares, but by
their note proclaim the coming day, and they prelude their crowing by
clapping their sides with their wings. They exercise a rigorous sway
over the other birds of their kind, and, in every place where they are
kept, hold the supreme command. This, however, is only obtained after
repeated battles among themselves, as they are well aware that they
have weapons on their legs, produced for that very purpose, as it were,
and the contest often ends in the death of both the combatants at the
same moment. If, on the other hand, one of them obtains the mastery, he
instantly by his note proclaims himself the conqueror, and testifies by
his crowing that he has been victorious; while his conquered opponent
silently slinks away, and, though with a very bad grace, submits to
servitude. And with equal pride does the throng of the poultry yard
strut along, with head uplifted and crest erect. These, too, are the
only ones among the winged race that repeatedly look up to the heavens,
with the tail, which in its drooping shape resembles that of a sickle,
raised aloft: and so it is that these birds inspire terror even in the
lion,2952 the most courageous of all animals.
Some of these birds, too, are reared for nothing but warfare and
perpetual combats, and have even shed a lustre thereby on their native
places, Rhodes and Tanagra. The next rank is considered to belong
to those of Melos2953 and Chalcis. Hence, it is not without very
good reason that the consular purple of Rome pays these birds such
singular honours. It is from the feeding of these creatures that the
omens2954 by fowls are derived; it is these that regulate2955 day
by day the movements of our magistrates, and open or shut to them their
own houses, as the case may be; it is these that give an impulse to
the fasces of the Roman magistracy, or withhold them; it is these that
command battles or forbid them, and furnish auspices for victories to
be gained in every part of the world. It is these that hold supreme
rule over those who are themselves the rulers of the earth, and whose
entrails and fibres are as pleasing to the gods as the first spoils of
victory. Their note, when heard at an unusual hour or in the evening,
has also its peculiar presages; for, on one occasion, by crowing the
whole night through for several nights, they presaged to the Bœotians
that famous victory2956 which they gained over the Lacedæmonians;
such, in fact, being the interpretation that was put upon it by way of
prognostic, as this bird, when conquered, is never known to crow.
When castrated, cocks cease to crow. This operation is performed two
different ways. Either the loins of the animal are seared with a
red-hot iron, or else the lower part of the legs; after which, the
wound is covered up with potter’s clay: this way they are fattened
much more easily. At Pergamus,2957 there is every year a public show
of fights of game-cocks, just as in other places we have those of
gladiators.
We find it stated in the Roman Annals, that in the2958 consulship of
M. Lepidus and Q. Catulus a dung-hill cock spoke, at the farm-house of
Galerius; the only occasion, in fact, that I know of.
The goose also keeps a vigilant guard; a fact which is well attested
by the defence of the Capitol, at a moment when, by the silence of
the dogs, the commonwealth had been betrayed:2959 for which reason
it is that the Censors always, the first thing of all, attend to the
farming-out of the feeding of the sacred geese. What is still more,
too, there is a love-story about this animal. At Ægium one is said to
have conceived a passion for a beautiful boy, a native of Olenos,2960
and another for Glauce, a damsel who was lute-player to King Ptolemy;
for whom at the same time a ram is said also to have conceived a
passion. One might almost be tempted to think that these creatures have
an appreciation of wisdom:2961 for it is said, that one of them was
the constant companion of the philosopher, Lacydes, and would never
leave him, either in public or when at the bath, by night or by day.
Our people, however, are more wise; for they only esteem the goose for
the goodness of its liver.2962 When they are crammed, this grows to
a very large size, and on being taken from the animal, is made still
larger by being soaked in honeyed milk.2963 And, indeed, it is
not without good reason that it is matter of debate who it was that
first discovered so great a delicacy; whether, in fact, it was Scipio
Metellus, a man of consular dignity, or M. Seius, a contemporary of
his, and a Roman of equestrian rank. However, a thing about which there
is no dispute, it was Messalinus Cotta, the son of the orator Messala,
who first discovered the art of roasting the webbed feet of the
goose, and of cooking them in a ragout with cocks’ combs: for I shall
faithfully award each culinary palm to such as I shall find deserving
of it. It is a wonderful fact, in relation to this bird, that it comes
on foot all the way from the country of the Morini2964 to Rome; those
that are tired are placed in the front rank, while the rest, taught by
a natural instinct to move in a compact body, drive them on.
A second income, too, is also to be derived from the feathers of the
white goose. In some places, this animal is plucked twice a year, upon
which the feathers quickly grow again. Those are the softest which lie
nearest to the body, and those that come from Germany are the most
esteemed: the geese there are white, but of small size, and are called
gantæ.2965 The price paid for their feathers is five denarii per
pound. It is from this fruitful source that we have repeated charges
brought against the commanders of our auxiliaries, who are in the habit
of detaching whole cohorts from the posts where they ought to be on
guard, in pursuit of these birds: indeed, we have come to such a pitch
of effeminacy, that now-a-days, not even the men can think of lying
down without the aid of the goose’s feathers, by way of pillow.
The part of Syria which is called Commagene, has discovered another
invention also; the fat of the goose2966 is enclosed with some
cinnamon in a brazen vessel, and then covered with a thick layer of
snow. Under the influence of the excessive cold, it becomes macerated,
and fit for use as a medicament, remarkable for its properties: from
the country which produces it, it is known to us as “Commagenum.”2967
To the goose genus belong also the chenalopex,2968 and the
cheneros,2969 a little smaller than the common goose, and which forms
the most exquisite of all the dainties that Britannia provides for the
table. The tetrao2970 is remarkable for the lustre of its plumage,
and its extreme darkness, while the eyelids are of a scarlet colour.
Another species2971 of this last bird exceeds the vulture in size,
and is of a similar colour to it; and, indeed, there is no bird, with
the exception of the ostrich, the body of which is of a greater weight;
for to such a size does it grow, that it becomes incapable of moving,
and allows itself to be taken on the ground. The Alps and the regions
of the North produce these birds; but when kept in aviaries, they lose
their fine flavour, and by retaining their breath, will die of mere
vexation. Next to these in size are the birds which in Spain they call
the “tarda,”2972 and in Greece the “otis;” they are looked upon
however as very inferior food; the marrow,2973 when disengaged from
the bones, immediately emits a most noisome smell.
By the departure of the cranes, which, as we have already stated,2974
were in the habit of waging war with them, the nation of the Pygmies
now enjoys a respite. The tracts over which they travel must be
immense, if we only consider that they come all the way from the
Eastern Sea.2975 These birds agree by common consent at what moment
they shall set out, fly aloft to look out afar, select a leader for
them to follow, and have sentinels duly posted in the rear, which
relieve each other by turns, utter loud cries, and with their voice
keep the whole flight in proper array. During the night, also, they
place sentinels on guard, each of which holds a little stone in its
claw: if the bird should happen to fall asleep, the claw becomes
relaxed, and the stone falls to the ground, and so convicts it of
neglect. The rest sleep in the meanwhile, with the head beneath the
wing, standing first on one leg and then on the other: the leader looks
out, with neck erect, and gives warning when required. These birds,
when tamed, are very frolicsome, and even when alone will describe a
sort of circle, as they move along, with their clumsy gait.
It is a well-known fact, that these birds, when about to fly over the
Euxine, first of all repair to the narrowest part of it, that lies
between the two2976 Promontories of Criumetopon and Carambis, and
then ballast themselves with coarse sand. When they have arrived midway
in the passage, they throw away the stones from out of their claws,
and, as soon as they reach the mainland, discharge the sand by the
throat.
Cornelius Nepos, who died in the reign of the late Emperor Augustus,
after stating that thrushes had been fattened for the first time
shortly before that period, has added that storks were more esteemed as
food than cranes: whereas at the present day, this last bird is one of
those that are held in the very highest esteem, while no one will so
much as touch the other.
Up to the present time it has not been ascertained from what place the
storks come, or whither they go when they leave us. There can be no
doubt but that, like the cranes, they come from a very great distance,
the cranes being our winter, the storks our summer, guests. When about
to take their departure, the storks assemble at a stated place, and
are particularly careful that all shall attend, so that not one of
their kind may be left behind, with the exception of such as may be in
captivity or tamed; and then on a certain day they set out, as though
by some law they were directed to do so. No one has ever yet seen a
flight of cranes taking their departure, although they have been often
observed preparing to depart; and in the same way, too, we never see
them arrive, but only when they have arrived; both their departure as
well as their arrival take place in the night. Although, too, we see
them flying about in all directions, it is still supposed that they
never arrive at any other time but in the night. Pythonoscome2977 is
the name given to some vast plains of Asia, where, as they assemble
together, they keep up a gabbling noise, and tear to pieces the one
that happens to arrive the last; after which they take their departure.
It has been remarked that after the ides of August,2978 they are
never by any accident to be seen there.
There are some writers who assure us that the stork has no tongue. So
highly are they esteemed for their utility in destroying serpents, that
in Thessaly, it was a capital crime for any one to kill a stork, and by
the laws the same penalty was inflicted for it as for homicide.
Geese, and swans also, travel in a similar manner, but then they are
seen to take their flight. The flocks, forming a point, move along
with great impetus, much, indeed, after the manner of our Liburnian
beaked galleys; and it is by doing so that they are enabled to cleave
the air more easily than if they presented to it a broad front. The
flight gradually enlarges in the rear, much in the form of a wedge,
presenting a vast surface to the breeze, as it impels them onward;
those that follow place their necks on those that go before, while the
leading birds, as they become weary, fall to the rear. Storks return
to their former nests, and the young, in their turn, support their
parents when old. It is stated that at the moment of the swan’s death,
it gives utterance to a mournful song;2979 but this is an error, in
my opinion, at least I have tested the truth of the story on several
occasions. These birds will eat the flesh of one another.
Having spoken of the emigration of these birds over sea and land, I
cannot allow myself to defer mentioning some other birds of smaller
size, which have the same natural instinct: although in the case of
those which I have already mentioned, their very size and strength
would almost seem to invite them to such habits. The quail, which
always arrives among us even before the crane, is a small bird, and
when it has once arrived, more generally keeps to the ground than
flies aloft. These birds fly also in a similar manner to those I have
already spoken of, and not without considerable danger to mariners,
when they come near the surface of the earth: for it often happens
that they settle on the sails of a ship, and that too always in the
night: the consequence of which is, that the vessel often sinks.
These birds pursue their course along a tract of country with certain
resting-places. When the south wind is blowing, they will not fly, as
that wind is always humid, and apt to weigh them down. Still, however,
it is an object with them to get a breeze to assist them in their
flight, the body being so light, and their strength so very limited:
hence it is that we hear them make that murmuring noise as they fly, it
being extorted from them by fatigue. It is for this reason also, that
they take to flight more especially when the north wind is blowing,
having the ortygometra2980 for their leader. The first of them that
approaches the earth is generally snapped up by the hawk. When they are
about to return from these parts, they always invite other birds to
join their company, and the glottis, otus, and cychramus, yielding to
their persuasions, take their departure along with them.
The glottis2981 protrudes a tongue of remarkable length, from which
circumstance it derives its name: at first it is quite pleased with the
journey, and sets out with the greatest ardour; very soon, however,
when it begins to feel the fatigues of the flight, it is overtaken by
regret, while at the same time it is equally as loth to return alone,
as to accompany the others. Its travels, however, never last more than
a single day, for at the very first resting-place they come to, it
deserts: here too it finds other birds, which have been left behind
in a similar manner in the preceding year. The same takes place with
other birds day after day. The cychramus,2982 however, is much more
persevering, and is quite in a hurry to arrive at the land which is its
destination: hence it is that it arouses the quails in the night, and
reminds them that they ought to be on the road.
The otus is a smaller bird than the horned owl, though larger than the
owlet; it has feathers projecting like ears, whence its name. Some
persons call it in the Latin language the “asio;”2983 in general it
is a bird fond of mimicking, a great parasite, and, in some measure,
a dancer as well. Like the owlet, it is taken without any difficulty;
for while one person occupies its attention, another goes behind, and
catches it.
If the wind, by its contrary blasts, should begin to prevent the onward
progress of the flight, the birds immediately take up small stones,
or else fill their throats with sand, and so contrive to ballast
themselves as they fly. The seeds of a certain venomous plant2984 are
most highly esteemed by the quails as food; for which reason it is
that they have been banished from our tables; in addition to which, a
great repugnance is manifested to eating their flesh, on account of the
epilepsy,2985 to which alone of all animals, with the exception of
man, the quail is subject.
The swallow, the only bird that is carnivorous among those which have
not hooked talons, takes its departure also during the winter months;
but it only goes to neighbouring countries, seeking sunny retreats
there on the mountain sides; sometimes they have been found in such
spots bare and quite unfledged. This bird, it is said, will not enter
a house in Thebes, because that city has been captured so frequently;
nor will it approach the country of the Bizyæ, on account of the crimes
committed there by Tereus.2986 Cæcina2987 of Volaterræ, a member of
the equestrian order, and the owner of several chariots, used to have
swallows caught, and then carried them with him to Rome. Upon gaining
a victory, he would send the news by them to his friends; for after
staining them the colour2988 of the party that had gained the day,
he would let them go, immediately upon which they would make their way
to the nests they had previously occupied. Fabius Pictor also relates,
in his Annals, that when a Roman garrison was being besieged by the
Ligurians, a swallow which had been taken from its young ones was
brought to him, in order that he might give them notice, by the number
of knots on a string tied to its leg, on what day succour would arrive,
and a sortie might be made with advantage.
In a similar manner also, the blackbird, the thrush, and the starling
take their departure to neighbouring countries; but they do not lose
their feathers, nor yet conceal themselves, as they are often to be
seen in places where they seek their food during the winter: hence
it is that in winter, more especially, the thrush is so often to be
seen in Germany. It is, however, a well-ascertained fact, that the
turtle-dove conceals itself, and loses its feathers. The ring-dove,
also, takes its departure: and with these too, it is a matter of doubt
whither they go. It is a peculiarity of the starling to fly in troops,
as it were, and then to wheel round in a globular mass like a ball, the
central troop acting as a pivot for the rest. Swallows are the only
birds that have a sinuous flight of remarkable velocity; for which
reason it is that they are not exposed to the attacks of other birds
of prey: these too, in fine, are the only birds that take their food
solely on the wing.
The time during which birds show themselves differs very considerably.
Some remain with us all the year round, the pigeon, for instance;
some for six months, such as the swallow; and some, again, for three
months only, as the thrush, the turtle-dove, and those which take their
departure the moment they have reared their young, the witwall2989
and the hoopoe, for instance.
There are some authors who say that every year certain birds2990
fly from Æthiopia to Ilium, and have a combat at the tomb of Memnon
there; from which circumstance they have received from them the name
of Memnonides, or birds of Memnon. Cremutius states it also as a fact,
ascertained by himself, that they do the same every fifth year in
Æthiopia, around the palace of Memnon.
In a similar manner also, the birds called meleagrides2991 fight in
Bœotia. They are a species of African poultry, having a hump on the
back, which is covered with a mottled plumage. These are the latest
among the foreign birds that have been received at our tables, on
account of their disagreeable smell. The tomb, however, of Meleager has
rendered them famous.
Those birds are called seleucides, which are sent by Jupiter at the
prayers offered up to him by the inhabitants of Mount Casius,2992
when the locusts are ravaging their crops of corn. Whence they2993
come, or whither they go, has never yet been ascertained, as, in fact,
they are never to be seen but when the people stand in need of their
aid.
The Egyptians also invoke their ibis against the incursions of
serpents; and the people of Elis, their god Myiagros,2994 when the
vast multitudes of flies are bringing pestilence among them; the flies
die immediately the propitiatory sacrifice has been made to this god.
With reference to the departure of birds, the owlet, too, is said to
lie concealed for a few days. No birds of this last kind are to be
found in the island of Crete, and if any are imported thither, they
immediately die. Indeed, this is a remarkable distinction made by
Nature; for she denies to certain places, as it were, certain kinds of
fruits and shrubs, and of animals as well; it is singular that when
introduced into these localities they will be no longer productive, but
die immediately they are thus transplanted. What can it be that is thus
fatal to the increase of one particular species, or whence this envy
manifested against them by Nature? What, too, are the limits that have
been marked out for the birds on the face of the earth?
Rhodes2995 possesses no eagles. In Italy beyond the Padus there is,
near the Alps, a lake known by the name of Larius beautifully situate
amid a country covered with shrubs; and yet this lake is never visited
by storks, nor, indeed, are they ever known to come within eight miles
of it; while, on the other hand, in the neighbouring territory of the
Insubres2996 there are immense flocks of magpies and jackdaws, the
only2997 bird that is guilty of stealing gold and silver, a very
singular propensity.
It is said that in the territory of Tarentum, the woodpecker of Mars
is never found. It is only lately too, and that but very rarely, that
various kinds of pies have begun to be seen in the districts that lie
between the Apennines and the City; birds which are known by the name
of “variæ,”2998 and are remarkable for the length of the tail. It
is a peculiarity of this bird, that it becomes bald every year at the
time of sowing rape. The partridge does not fly beyond the frontiers
of Bœotia, into Attica; nor does any bird, in the island2999 in the
Euxine in which Achilles was buried, enter the temple there consecrated
to him. In the territory of Fidenæ, in the vicinity of the City,
the storks have no young nor do they build nests: but vast numbers
of ringdoves arrive from beyond sea every year in the district of
Volaterræ. At Rome, neither flies nor dogs ever enter the temple of
Hercules in the Cattle Market. There are numerous other instances of a
similar nature in reference to all kinds of animals, which from time
to time I feel myself prompted by prudent considerations to omit, lest
I should only weary the reader. Theophrastus, for example, relates
that even pigeons, as well as peacocks and ravens, have been introduced
from other parts into Asia,3000 as also croaking frogs3001 into
Cyrenaica.
There is another remarkable fact too, relative to the birds which give
omens by their note; they generally change their colour and voice at
a certain season of the year, and suddenly become quite altered in
appearance; a thing that, among the larger birds, happens with the
crane only, which grows black in its old age. From black, the blackbird
changes to a reddish colour, sings in summer, chatters in winter, and
about the summer solstice loses its voice; when a year old, the beak
also assumes the appearance of ivory; this, however, is the case only
with the male. In the summer, the thrush is mottled about the neck, but
in the winter it becomes of one uniform colour all over.
The song of the nightingale is to be heard, without intermission,
for fifteen days and nights, continuously,3002 when the foliage
is thickening, as it bursts from the bud; a bird which deserves our
admiration in no slight degree. First of all, what a powerful voice in
so small a body! its note, how long, and how well sustained! And then,
too, it is the only bird the notes of which are modulated in accordance
with the strict rules of musical science.3003 At one moment, as it
sustains its breath, it will prolong its note, and then at another,
will vary it with different inflexions; then, again, it will break into
distinct chirrups, or pour forth an endless series of roulades. Then
it will warble to itself, while taking breath, or else disguise its
voice in an instant; while sometimes, again, it will twitter to itself,
now with a full note, now with a grave, now again sharp, now with a
broken note, and now with a prolonged one. Sometimes, again, when it
thinks fit, it will break out into quavers, and will run through, in
succession, alto, tenor, and bass: in a word, in so tiny a throat is to
be found all the melody that the ingenuity of man has ever discovered
through the medium of the invention of the most exquisite flute: so
much so, that there can be no doubt it was an infallible presage of his
future sweetness as a poet, when one of these creatures perched and
sang on the infant lips of the poet Stesichorus.
That there may remain no doubt that there is a certain degree of art
in its performances, we may here remark that every bird has a number
of notes peculiar to itself; for they do not, all of them, have the
same, but each, certain melodies of its own. They vie with one another,
and the spirit with which they contend is evident to all. The one that
is vanquished, often dies in the contest, and will rather yield its
life than its song. The younger birds are listening in the meantime,
and receive the lesson in song from which they are to profit. The
learner hearkens with the greatest attention, and repeats what it
has heard, and then they are silent by turns; this is understood to
be the correction of an error on the part of the scholar, and a sort
of reproof, as it were, on the part of the teacher. Hence it is that
nightingales fetch as high a price as slaves, and, indeed, sometimes
more than used formerly to be paid for a man in a suit of armour.
I know that on one occasion six thousand sesterces3004 were paid for
a nightingale, a white one it is true, a thing that is hardly ever to
be seen, to be made a present of to Agrippina, the wife of the Emperor
Claudius. A nightingale has been often seen that will sing at command,
and take alternate parts with the music that accompanies it; men, too,
have been found who could imitate its note with such exactness, that
it would be impossible to tell the difference, by merely putting water
in a reed held crosswise, and then blowing into it, a languette being
first inserted, for the purpose of breaking the sound and rendering it
more shrill.3005 But these modulations, so clever and so artistic,
begin gradually to cease at the end of the fifteen days; not that you
can say, however, that the bird is either fatigued or tired of singing;
but, as the heat increases, its voice becomes altogether changed, and
possesses no longer either modulation or variety of note. Its colour,
too, becomes changed, and at last, throughout the winter, it totally
disappears. The tongue of the nightingale is not pointed at the tip, as
in other birds. It lays at the beginning of the spring, six eggs at the
most.
The change is different that takes place in the ficedula,3006 for
this bird changes its shape as well as its colour. “Ficedula” is the
name by which it is called in autumn, but not after that period; for
then it is called “melancoryphus.”3007 In the same manner, too, the
erithacus3008 of the winter is the “phœnicurus” of the summer. The
hoopoe also, according to the poet Æschylus, changes its form; it is a
bird that feeds upon filth3009 of all kinds, and is remarkable for
its twisted top-knot, which it can contract or elevate at pleasure
along the top of the head.
The œnanthe,3010 too, is a bird that has stated days for its
retreat. At the rising of Sirius it conceals itself, and at the
setting of that star comes forth from its retreat: and this it does, a
most singular thing, exactly upon both those days. The chlorion,3011
also, the body of which is yellow all over, is not seen in the winter,
but comes out about the summer solstice.
(30.) The blackbird is found in the vicinity of Cyllene, in Arcadia,
with white3012 plumage; a thing that is the case nowhere else. The
ibis, in the neighbourhood of Pelusium3013 only is black, while in
all other places it is white.
The birds that have a note, with the exception of those previously
mentioned,3014 do not by any chance produce their young before the
vernal or after the autumnal equinox. As to the broods produced before
the summer solstice, it is very doubtful if they will survive, but
those hatched after it thrive well.
It is for this that the halcyon3015 is more especially remarkable;
the seas, and all those who sail upon their surface, well know the
days of its incubation. This bird is a little larger than a sparrow,
and the greater part of its body is of an azure blue colour, with only
an intermixture of white and purple in some of the larger feathers,
while the neck3016 is long and slender. There is one kind that is
remarkable for its larger size and its note; the smaller ones are
heard singing in the reed-beds. It is a thing of very rare occurrence
to see a halcyon, and then it is only about the time of the setting
of the Vergiliæ, and the summer and winter solstices; when one is
sometimes to be seen to hover about a ship, and then immediately
disappear. They hatch their young at the time of the winter solstice,
from which circumstance those days are known as the “halcyon days:”
during this period the sea is calm and navigable, the Sicilian sea
in particular. They make their nest during the seven days before
the winter solstice, and sit the same number of days after. Their
nests3017 are truly wonderful; they are of the shape of a ball
slightly elongated, have a very narrow mouth, and bear a strong
resemblance to a large sponge. It is impossible to cut them asunder
with iron, and they are only to be broken with a strong blow, upon
which they separate, just like foam of the sea when dried up. It has
never yet been discovered of what material they are made; some persons
think that they are formed of sharp fish-bones, as it is on fish that
these birds live. They enter rivers also; their eggs are five in number.
The sea-mew also builds its nest in rocks, and the diver3018 in trees
as well. These birds produce three at the very most; the sea-mew in
summer, the diver at the beginning of spring.
The form of the nest built by the halcyon reminds me also of the
instinctive cleverness displayed by other birds; and, indeed, in no
respect is the ingenuity of birds more deserving of our admiration. The
swallow builds its nest of mud, and strengthens it with straws. If mud
happens to fail, it soaks itself with a quantity of water, which it
then shakes from off its feathers into the dust. It lines the inside
of the nest with soft feathers and wool, to keep the eggs warm, and
in order that the nest may not be hard and rough to its young when
hatched. It divides the food among its offspring with the most rigid
justice, giving it first to one and then to another. With a remarkable
notion of cleanliness, it throws out of the nest the ordure of the
young ones, and when they have grown a little older, teaches them how
to turn round, and let it fall outside of the nest.
There is another3019 kind of swallow, also, that frequents the
fields and the country; its nest is of a different shape, though of
the same materials, but it rarely builds it against houses. The nest
has its mouth turned straight upwards, and the entrance to it is long
and narrow, while the body is very capacious. It is quite wonderful
what skill is displayed in the formation of it, for the purpose of
concealing the young ones, and of presenting a soft surface for them to
lie upon. At the Heracleotic Mouth of the Nile in Egypt, the swallows
present an insuperable obstacle to the inroads of that river, in the
embankment which is formed by their nests in one continuous line,
nearly a stadium in length; a thing that could not possibly have been
effected by the agency of man. In Egypt, too, near the city of Coptos,
there is an island sacred to Isis. In the early days of spring, the
swallows strengthen the angular corner of this island with chaff and
straw, thus fortifying it in order that the river may not sweep it
away. This work they persevere in for three days and nights together,
with such unremitting labour, that it is a well-known fact that many
of them die with their exertions. This, too, is a toil which recurs
regularly for them every year.
There is, again, a third kind3020 of swallow, which makes holes in
the banks of rivers, to serve for its nest. The young of these birds,
reduced to ashes, are a good specific against mortal maladies of the
throat, and tend to cure many other diseases of the human body. These
birds do not build nests, and they take care to migrate a good many
days before, if it so happens that the rise of the river is about to
reach their holes.
Belonging to the genus of birds known as the “vitiparræ,” there is
one3021 whose nest is formed of dried moss,3022 and is in shape so
exactly like a ball, that it is impossible to discover the mouth of it.
The bird, also, that is known as the acanthyllis,3023 makes its nest
of a similar shape, and interweaves it with pieces of flax. The nest of
one of the woodpeckers, very much like a cup in shape, is suspended by
a twig from the end of the branch of a tree, so that no quadruped may
be able to reach it. It is strongly asserted, that the witwall3024
sleeps suspended by its feet, because it fancies that by doing so it
is in greater safety. A thing, indeed, that is well-known of them all,
is the fact that, in a spirit of foresight, they select the projecting
branches of trees that are sufficiently strong, for the purpose of
supporting their nests, and then arch them over to protect them from
the rain, or else shield them by means of the thickness of the foliage.
In Arabia there is a bird known as the “cinnamolgus.”3025 It builds
its nest with sprigs of cinnamon; and the natives knock them down with
arrows loaded with lead, in order to sell them. In Scythia there is a
bird, the size of the otis, which produces two young ones always, in
a hare’s skin suspended3026 from the top branches of a tree. Pies,
when they have observed a person steadily gazing at their nest, will
immediately remove their eggs to another place. This is said to be
accomplished in a truly wonderful manner, by such birds as have not
toes adapted for holding and removing their eggs. They lay a twig upon
two eggs, and then solder them to it by means of a glutinous matter
secreted from their body; after which, they pass their neck between the
eggs, and so forming an equipoise, convey them to another place.
No less, too, is the shrewdness displayed by those birds which make
their nests upon the ground, because, from the extreme weight of their
body, they are unable to fly aloft. There is a bird, known as the
“merops,”3027 which feeds its parents in their retreat: the colour of
the plumage on the inside is pale, and azure without, while it is of a
somewhat reddish hue at the extremity of the wings: this bird builds
its nest in a hole which it digs to the depth of six feet.
Partridges3028 fortify their retreat so well with thorns and shrubs,
that it is effectually protected against beasts of prey. They make a
soft bed for their eggs by burying them in the dust, but do not hatch
them where they are laid: that no suspicion may arise from the fact
of their being seen repeatedly about the same spot, they carry them
away to some other place. The females also conceal themselves from
their mates, in order that they may not be delayed in the process
of incubation, as the males, in consequence of the warmth of their
passions, are apt to break the eggs. The males, thus deprived of the
females, fall to fighting among themselves; and it is said that the one
that is conquered, is treated as a female by the other. Trogus Pompeius
tells us that quails and dunghill cocks sometimes do the same; and
adds, that wild partridges, when newly caught, or when beaten by the
others, are trodden promiscuously by the tame ones. Through the very
pugnacity thus inspired by the strength of their passions, these birds
are often taken, as the leader of the whole covey frequently advances
to fight with the decoy-bird of the fowler; as soon as he is taken,
another and then another will advance, all of which are caught in their
turn. The females, again, are caught about the pairing season; for then
they will come forward to quarrel with the female decoy-bird of the
fowler, and so drive her away. Indeed, in no other animal is there any
such susceptibility in the sexual feelings; if the female only stands
opposite to the male, while the wind is blowing from that direction,
she3029 will become impregnated; and during this time she is in a
state of the greatest excitement, the beak being wide open and the
tongue thrust out. The female will conceive also from the action of
the air, as the male flies above her, and very often from only hearing
his voice: indeed, to such a degree does passion get the better of her
affection for her offspring, that although at the moment she is sitting
furtively and in concealment, she will, if she perceives the female
decoy-bird of the fowler approaching her mate, call him back, and
summon him away from the other, and voluntarily submit to his advances.
Indeed, these birds are often carried away by such frantic madness,
that they will settle, being quite blinded by fear,3030 upon the
very head of the fowler. If he happens to move in the direction of the
nest, the female bird that is sitting will run and throw herself before
his feet, pretending to be over-heavy, or else weak in the loins, and
then, suddenly running or flying for a short distance before him, will
fall down as though she had a wing broken, or else her feet; just as
he is about to catch her, she will then take another fly, and so keep
baffling him in his hopes, until she has led him to a considerable
distance from her nest. As soon as she is rid of her fears, and free
from all maternal disquietude, she will throw herself on her back in
some furrow, and seizing a clod of earth with her claws, cover herself
all over. It is supposed that the life of the partridge extends to
sixteen years.
Next to the partridge, it is in the pigeon that similar tendencies
are to be seen in the same respect: but then, chastity is especially
observed by it, and promiscuous intercourse is a thing quite unknown.
Although inhabiting a domicile in common with others, they will none
of them violate the laws of conjugal fidelity: not one will desert
its nest, unless it is either widower or widow. Although, too, the
males are very imperious, and sometimes even extremely exacting, the
females put up with it: for in fact, the males sometimes suspect them
of infidelity, though by nature they are incapable of it. On such
occasions the throat of the male seems quite choked with indignation,
and he inflicts severe blows with the beak: and then afterwards, to
make some atonement, he falls to billing, and by way of pressing his
amorous solicitations, sidles round and round the female with his feet.
They both of them manifest an equal degree of affection for their
offspring; indeed, it is not unfrequently that this is a ground for
correction, in consequence of the female being too slow in going to her
young. When the female is sitting, the male renders her every attention
that can in any way tend to her solace and comfort. The first thing
that they do is to eject from the throat some saltish earth, which they
have digested, into the mouths of the young ones, in order to prepare
them in due time to receive their nutriment. It is a peculiarity of
the pigeon and of the turtle-dove, not to throw back the neck when
drinking, but to take in the water at a long draught, just as beasts of
burden do.
(35.) We read in some authors that the ring-dove lives so long as
thirty years, and sometimes as much as forty, without any other
inconvenience than the extreme length of the claws, which with them, in
fact, is the chief mark of old age; they can be cut, however, without
any danger. The voice of all these birds is similar, being composed
of three notes, and then a mournful noise at the end. In winter they
are silent, and they only recover their voice in the spring. Nigidius
expresses it as his opinion that the ring-dove will abandon the place,
if she hears her name mentioned under the roof where she is sitting on
her eggs: they hatch their young just after3031 the summer solstice.
Pigeons and turtle-doves live eight years.
(36.) The sparrow, on the other hand, which has an equal degree of
salaciousness, is short-lived in the extreme. It is said that the male
does not live beyond a year; and as a ground for this belief, it is
stated that at the beginning of spring, the black marks are never to be
seen upon the beak which began to appear in the summer. The females,
however, are said to live somewhat longer.
Pigeons have even a certain appreciation of glory. There is reason for
believing that they are well aware of the colours of their plumage,
and the various shades which it presents, and even in their very
mode of flying they court our applause, as they cleave the air in
every direction. It is, indeed, through this spirit of ostentation
that they are handed over, fast bound as it were, to the hawk; for
from the noise that they make, which, in fact, is only produced by
the flapping of their wings, their long feathers become twisted and
disordered: otherwise, when they can fly without any impediment, they
are far swifter in their movements than the hawk. The robber, lurking
amid the dense foliage, keeps on the look-out for them, and seizes
them at the very moment that they are indulging their vainglorious
self-complaisance.
(37.) It is for this reason that it is necessary to keep along with
the pigeons the bird that is known as the “tinnunculus;”3032 as it
protects them, and by its natural superiority scares away the hawk: so
much so, indeed, that the hawk will vanish at the very sight of it,
and the instant it hears its voice. Hence it is that the pigeons have
an especial regard for this bird; and, it is said, if one of these
birds is buried at each of the four corners of the pigeon-house in
pots that have been newly glazed, the pigeons will not change their
abode—a result which has been obtained by some by cutting a joint of
their wings with an instrument of gold; for if any other were used,
the wounds would be not unattended with danger.—The pigeon in general
may be looked upon as a bird fond of change; they have the art, too,
among themselves of gaining one another over, and so seducing their
companions: hence it is that we frequently find them return attended by
others which they have enticed away.
In addition to this, pigeons have acted as messengers in affairs of
importance. During the siege of Mutina, Decimus Brutus, who was in the
town, sent despatches to the camp of the consuls3033 fastened to
pigeons’ feet. Of what use to Antony then were his intrenchments, and
all the vigilance of the besieging army? his nets, too, which he had
spread in the river, while the messenger of the besieged was cleaving
the air?
Many persons have quite a mania for pigeons—building towns for them on
the top of their roofs, and taking a pleasure in relating the pedigree
and noble origin of each. Of this there is an ancient instance that is
very remarkable; L. Axius, a Roman of the equestrian order, shortly
before the Civil War of Pompeius, sold a single pair for four hundred
denarii, as we learn from the writings of M. Varro.3034 Countries
even have gained renown for their pigeons; it is thought that those of
Campania attain the largest size.
The flight of the pigeon also leads me to consider that of other birds
as well. All other animals have one determinate mode of progression,
which in every kind is always the same; it is birds alone that have
two modes of moving—the one on the ground, the other in the air.
Some of them walk, such as the crow, for instance; some hop, as the
sparrow and the blackbird; some, again, run, as the partridge and the
woodhen; while others throw one foot before the other, the stork and
the crane, for instance. Then again, in their flight, some birds expand
their wings, and, poising themselves in the air, only move them from
time to time; others move them more frequently, but then only at the
extremities; while others expand them so as to expose the whole of the
side. On the other hand, some fly with the greater part of the wings
kept close to the side; and some, after striking the air once, others
twice, make their way through it, as though pressing upon it enclosed
beneath their wings; other birds dart aloft in a vertical direction,
others horizontally, and others come falling straight downwards. You
would almost think that some had been hurled upwards with a violent
effort, and that others, again, had fallen straight down from aloft;
while others are seen to spring forward in their flight. Ducks alone,
and the other birds of that kind, in an instant raise themselves aloft,
taking a spring from the spot where they stand straight upwards towards
the heavens; and this they can do from out of the water even; hence it
is that they are the only birds that can make their escape from the
pitfalls which we employ for the capture of wild beasts.
The vulture and the heavier wild birds can only fly after taking a
run, or else by commencing their flight from an elevated spot. They
use the tail by way of rudder. There are some birds that are able to
see all around them; others, again, have to turn the neck to do so.
Some of them eat what they have seized, holding it in their feet. Many,
as they fly, utter some cry; while on the other hand, many, in their
flight, are silent. Some fly with the breast half upright, others with
it held downwards, others fly obliquely, or else side-ways, and others
following the direction of the bill. Some, again, are borne along with
the head upwards; indeed the fact is, that if we were to see several
kinds at the same moment, we should not suppose that they have to make
their way in the same element.
Those birds which are known as “apodes”3035 fly the most of all,
because they are deprived of the use of their feet. By some persons
they are called “cypseli.” They are a species of swallow which build
their nests in the rocks, and are the same birds that are to be seen
everywhere at sea; indeed, however far a ship may go, however long its
voyage, and however great the distance from land, the apodes never
cease to hover around it. Other birds settle and come to a stand,
whereas these know no repose but in the nest; they are always either on
the wing or else asleep.
The instincts, also, of birds are no less varied, and more especially
in relation to their food. “Caprimulgus”3036 is the name of a bird,
which is to all appearance a large blackbird; it thieves by night, as
it cannot see during the day. It enters the folds of the shepherds,
and makes straight for the udder of the she-goat, to suck the milk.
Through the injury thus inflicted the udder shrivels away, and the goat
that has been thus deprived of its milk, is afflicted with incipient
blindness.
“Platea”3037 is the name of another, which pounces upon other birds
when they have dived in the sea, and, seizing the head with its bill,
makes them let go their prey. This bird also swallows and fills itself
with shell-fish, shells and all; after the natural heat of its crop has
softened them, it brings them up again, and then picking out the shells
from the rest, selects the parts that are fit for food.
The farm-yard fowls have also a certain notion of religion; upon laying
an egg they shudder all over, and then shake their feathers; after
which they turn round and purify3038 themselves, or else hallow3039
themselves and their eggs with some stalk or other. (42.) The
carduelis,3040 which is the very smallest bird of any, will do what
it is bid, not only with the voice but with the feet as well, and with
the beak, which serves it instead of hands. There is one bird, found
in the territory of Arelate, that imitates the lowing of oxen, from
which circumstance it has received the name of “taurus.”3041 In other
respects it is of small size. Another bird, called the “anthus,”3042
imitates the neighing of the horse; upon being driven from the pasture
by the approach of the horses, it will mimic their voices—and this is
the method it takes of revenging itself.
But above all, there are some birds that can imitate the human voice;
the parrot, for instance, which can even converse. India sends us
this bird, which it calls by the name of “sittaces;”3043 the body
is green all over, only it is marked with a ring of red around the
neck. It will duly salute an emperor, and pronounce the words it has
heard spoken; it is rendered especially frolicsome under the influence
of wine. Its head is as hard as its beak; and this, when it is being
taught to talk, is beaten with a rod of iron, for otherwise it is quite
insensible to blows. When it lights on the ground it falls upon its
beak, and by resting upon it makes itself all the lighter for its feet,
which are naturally weak.
The magpie is much less famous for its talking qualities than the
parrot, because it does not come from a distance, and yet it can speak
with much more distinctness. These birds love to hear words spoken
which they can utter; and not only do they learn them, but are pleased
at the task; and as they con them over to themselves with the greatest
care and attention, make no secret of the interest they feel. It is a
well-known fact, that a magpie has died before now, when it has found
itself mastered by a difficult word that it could not pronounce. Their
memory, however, will fail them if they do not from time to time hear
the same word repeated; and while they are trying to recollect it, they
will show the most extravagant joy, if they happen to hear it. Their
appearance, although there is nothing remarkable in it, is by no means
plain; but they have quite sufficient beauty in their singular ability
to imitate the human speech.
It is said, however, that it is only the kind3044 of pie which feeds
upon acorns that can be taught to speak; and that among these, those
which3045 have five toes on each foot can be taught with the greatest
facility; but in their case even, only during the first two years of
their life. The magpie has a broader tongue than is usual with most
other birds; which is the case also with all the other birds that can
imitate the human voice; although some individuals of almost every kind
have the faculty of doing so.
Agrippina, the wife of Claudius Cæsar, had a thrush that could imitate
human speech, a thing that was never known before. At the moment
that I am writing this, the young Cæsars3046 have a starling and
some nightingales that are being taught to talk in Greek and Latin;
besides which, they are studying their task the whole day, continually
repeating the new words that they have learnt, and giving utterance
to phrases even of considerable length. Birds are taught to talk in a
retired spot, and where no other voice can be heard, so as to interfere
with their lesson; a person sits by them, and continually repeats the
words he wishes them to learn, while at the same time he encourages
them by giving them food.
Let us do justice, also, to the raven, whose merits have been attested
not only by the sentiments of the Roman people, but by the strong
expression, also, of their indignation. In the reign of Tiberius,
one of a brood of ravens that had bred on the top of the temple of
Castor,3047 happened to fly into a shoemaker’s shop that stood
opposite: upon which, from a feeling of religious veneration, it was
looked upon as doubly recommended by the owner of the place. The bird,
having been taught to speak at an early age, used every morning to
fly to the Rostra, which look towards the Forum; here, addressing
each by his name, it would salute Tiberius, and then the Cæsars3048
Germanicus and Drusus, after which it would proceed to greet the Roman
populace as they passed, and then return to the shop: for several years
it was remarkable for the constancy of its attendance. The owner of
another shoemaker’s shop in the neighbourhood, in a sudden fit of anger
killed the bird, enraged, as he would have had it appear, because with
its ordure it had soiled some shoes of his. Upon this, there was such
rage manifested by the multitude, that he was at once driven from that
part of the city, and soon after put to death. The funeral, too, of the
bird was celebrated with almost endless obsequies; the body was placed
upon a litter carried upon the shoulders of two Æthiopians, preceded
by a piper, and borne to the pile with garlands of every size and
description. The pile was erected on the right-hand side of the Appian
Way, at the second milestone from the City, in the field generally
known as the “field of Rediculus.”3049 Thus did the rare talent of
a bird appear a sufficient ground to the Roman people for honouring
it with funeral obsequies, as well as for inflicting punishment on a
Roman citizen; and that, too, in a city in which no such crowds had
ever escorted the funeral of any one out of the whole number of its
distinguished men, and where no one had been found to avenge the death
of Scipio Æmilianus,3050 the man who had destroyed Carthage and
Numantia. This event happened in the consulship of M. Servilius and
Caius Cestius, on the fifth day3051 before the calends of April.
At the present day also, the moment that I am writing this, there is in
the city of Rome a crow which belongs to a Roman of equestrian rank,
and was brought from Bætica. In the first place, it is remarkable3052
for its colour, which is of the deepest black, and at the same time it
is able to pronounce several connected words, while it is repeatedly
learning fresh ones. Recently, too, there has been a story told about
Craterus, surnamed Monoceros,3053 in Erizena,3054 a country of
Asia, who was in the habit of hunting with the assistance of ravens,
and used to carry them into the woods, perched on the tuft of his
helmet and on his shoulders. The birds used to keep on the watch for
game, and raise it; and by training he had brought this art to such
a pitch of perfection, that even the wild ravens would attend him
in a similar manner when he went out. Some authors have thought the
following circumstance deserving of remembrance:—A crow that was
thirsty was seen heaping stones into the urn on a monument, in which
there was some rain-water which it could not reach: and so, being
afraid to go down to the water, by thus accumulating the stones, it
caused as much water to come within its reach as was necessary to
satisfy its thirst.
Nor yet must I pass by the birds3055 of Diomedes in silence. Juba
calls these birds “cataractæ,” and says that they have teeth and eyes
of a fiery colour, while the rest of the body is white: that they
always have two chiefs, the one to lead the main body, the other to
take charge of the rear; that they excavate holes with their bills,
and then cover them with hurdles, which they cover again with the
earth that has been thus thrown up; that it is in these places they
hatch their young; that each of these holes has two outlets; that one
of them looks towards the east, and that by it they go forth to feed,
returning by the one which looks towards the west; and that when about
to ease themselves, they always take to the wing, and fly against the
wind. In one spot only throughout the whole earth are these birds to be
seen, in the island, namely, which we have mentioned3056 as famous
for the tomb and shrine of Diomedes, lying over against the coast of
Apulia: they bear a strong resemblance to the coot. When strangers who
are barbarians arrive on that island, they pursue them with loud and
clamorous cries, and only show courtesy to Greeks by birth; seeming
thereby, with a wonderful discernment, to pay respect to them as the
fellow-countrymen of Diomedes. Every day they fill their throats,
and cover their feathers, with water, and so wash and purify the
temple there. From this circumstance arises the fable3057 that the
companions of Diomedes were metamorphosed into these birds.
We ought not to omit, while we are speaking of instincts, that among
birds the swallow3058 is quite incapable of being taught, and among
land animals the mouse; while on the other hand, the elephant does what
it is ordered, the lion submits to the yoke, and the sea-calf and many
kinds of fishes are capable of being tamed.
Birds drink by suction; those which have a long neck taking their drink
in a succession of draughts, and throwing the head back, as though
they were pouring the water down the throat. The porphyrio3059 is
the only bird that seems to bite at the water as it drinks. The same
bird has also other peculiarities of its own; for it will every now and
then dip its food in the water, and then lift it with its foot to its
bill, using it as a hand. Those that are the most esteemed are found in
Commagene. They have beaks and very long legs, of a red colour.
There are the same characteristics in the hæmatopous3060 also, a bird
of much smaller size, although standing as high on the legs. It is a
native of Egypt, and has three toes on each foot; flies3061 forming
its principal food. If brought to Italy, it survives for a few days
only.
All the heavy birds are frugivorous; while those with a higher flight
feed upon flesh only. Among the aquatic birds, the divers3062 are in
the habit of devouring what the other birds have disgorged.
The pelican is similar in appearance to the swan, and it would be
thought that there was no difference between them whatever, were
it not for the fact that under the throat there is a sort of second
crop, as it were. It is in this that the ever-insatiate animal stows
everything away, so much so, that the capacity of this pouch is quite
astonishing. After having finished its search for prey, it discharges
bit by bit what it has thus stowed away, and reconveys it by a sort of
ruminating process into its real stomach. The part of Gallia that lies
nearest to the Northern Ocean produces this bird.
In the Hercynian Forest, in Germany, we hear of a singular3063
kind of bird, the feathers of which shine at night like fire; the
other birds there have nothing remarkable beyond the celebrity which
generally attaches to objects situate at a distance.
(48.) The phalerides,3064 the most esteemed of all the aquatic birds,
are found at Seleucia, the city of the Parthians of that name, and in
Asia as well; and again, in Colchis, there is the pheasant,3065 a
bird with two tufts of feathers like ears, which it drops and raises
every now and then. The numidicæ3066 come from Numidia, a part of
Africa: all these varieties are now to be found in Italy.
Apicius, that very deepest whirlpool of all our epicures, has informed
us that the tongue of the phœnicopterus3067 is of the most exquisite
flavour. The attagen,3068 also, of Ionia is a famous bird; but
although it has a voice at other times, it is mute in captivity. It was
formerly3069 reckoned among the rare birds, but at the present day it
is found in Gallia, Spain, and in the Alps even; which is also the case
with the phalacrocorax,3070 a bird peculiar to the Balearic Isles, as
the pyrrhocorax,3071 a black bird with a yellow bill, is to the Alps,
and the lagopus,3072 which is esteemed for its excellent flavour.
This last bird derives its name from its feet, which are covered, as
it were, with the fur of a hare, the rest of the body being white, and
the size of a pigeon. It is not an easy matter to taste it out of its
native country, as it never becomes domesticated, and when dead it
quickly spoils.
There is another3073 bird also, which has the same name, and only
differs from the quail in size; it is of a saffron colour, and is most
delicate eating. Egnatius Calvinus, who was prefect there, pretends
that he has seen3074 in the Alps the ibis also, a bird that is
peculiar to Egypt.
During the civil wars that took place at Bebriacum, beyond the river
Padus, the “new birds”3075 were introduced into Italy—for by that
name they are still known. They resemble the thrush in appearance, are
a little smaller than the pigeon in size, and of an agreeable flavour.
The Balearic islands also send us a porphyrio,3076 that is superior
to the one previously mentioned. There the buteo, a kind of hawk, is
held in high esteem for the table, as also the vipio,3077 the name
given to a small kind of crane.
I look upon the birds as fabulous which are called “pegasi,” and are
said to have a horse’s head; as also the griffons, with long ears and
a hooked beak. The former are said to be natives of Scythia,3078
the latter of Æthiopia. The same is my opinion, also, as to the
tragopan;3079 many writers, however, assert that it is larger than
the eagle, has curved horns on the temples, and a plumage of iron
colour, with the exception of the head, which is purple. Nor yet do the
sirens3080 obtain any greater credit with me, although Dinon, the
father of Clearchus, a celebrated writer, asserts that they exist in
India, and that they charm men by their song, and, having first lulled
them to sleep, tear them to pieces. The person, however, who may think
fit to believe in these tales, may probably not refuse to believe also
that dragons licked the ears of Melampodes, and bestowed upon him the
power of understanding the language of birds; as also what Democritus
says, when he gives the names of certain birds, by the mixture of whose
blood a serpent is produced, the person who eats of which will be able
to understand the language of birds; as well as the statements which
the same writer makes relative to one bird in particular, known as the
“galerita,”3081—indeed, the science of augury is already too much
involved in embarrassing questions, without these fanciful reveries.
There is a kind of bird spoken of by Homer as the “scops:”3082 but
I cannot very easily comprehend the grotesque movements which many
persons have attributed to it, when the fowler is laying snares for
it; nor, indeed, is it a bird that is any longer known to exist.
It will be better, therefore, to confine my relation to those the
existence of which is generally admitted.
The people of Delos were the first to cram poultry; and it is with them
that originated that abominable mania for devouring fattened birds,
larded with the grease of their own bodies. I find in the ancient
sumptuary regulations as to banquets, that this was forbidden for the
first time by a law of the consul Caius Fannius, eleven years before
the Third Punic War; by which it was ordered that no bird should be
served at table beyond a single pullet, and that not fattened; an
article which has since made its appearance in all the sumptuary3083
laws. A method, however, has been devised of evading it, by feeding
poultry upon food that has been soaked in milk: prepared in this
fashion, they are considered even still more delicate. All pullets,
however, are not looked upon as equally good for the purposes of
fattening, and only those are selected which have a fatty skin about
the neck. Then, too, come all the arts of the kitchen—that the thighs
may have a nice plump appearance, that the bird may be properly divided
down the back, and that poultry may be brought to such a size that a
single leg shall fill a whole platter.3084 The Parthians, too, have
taught their fashions to our cooks; and yet after all, in spite of
their refinements in luxury, no article is found to please equally in
every part, for in one it is the thigh, and in another the breast only,
that is esteemed.
The first person who invented aviaries for the reception of all kinds
of birds was M. Lænius Strabo, a member of the equestrian order,
who resided at Brundisium. It was in his time that we thus began to
imprison animals to which Nature had assigned the heavens as their
element.
(51.) But more remarkable than anything in this respect, is the story
of the dish of Clodius Æsopus,3085 the tragic actor, which was valued
at one hundred thousand sesterces, and in which were served up nothing
but birds that had been remarkable for their song, or their imitation
of the human voice, and purchased, each of them, at the price of six
thousand sesterces; he being induced to this folly by no other pleasure
than that in these he might eat the closest imitators of man; never for
a moment reflecting that his own immense fortune had been acquired by
the advantages of his voice; a parent, indeed, right worthy of the son
of whom we have already made mention,3086 as swallowing pearls. It
would not, to say the truth, be very easy to come to a conclusion which
of the two was guilty of the greatest baseness; unless, indeed, we
are ready to admit that it was less unseemly to banquet upon the most
costly of all the productions of Nature, than to devour3087 tongues
which had given utterance to the language of man.
The generation of birds would appear to be very simple, while at the
same time it has its own peculiar marvels. Indeed, there are quadrupeds
as well that produce eggs, the chameleon, for instance, the lizard, and
those of the serpent tribe of which we have previously spoken.3088 Of
the feathered race, those which have hooked talons are comparatively
unprolific; the cenchris3089 being the only one among them that lays
more than four eggs. Nature has so ordained it in the birds, that the
timid ones should be more prolific than those which are courageous. The
ostrich, the common fowl, and the partridge, are the only birds that
lay eggs in considerable numbers. Birds have two modes of coupling,
the female crouching on the ground, as in the barn-door fowl, or else
standing, as is the case with the crane.
Some eggs are white, as those of the pigeon and partridge, for
instance; others are of a pale colour, as in the aquatic birds: others,
again, are dotted all over with spots, as is the case with those of the
meleagris; others are red, like those of the pheasant and the cenchris.
In the inside, the eggs of all birds are of two colours; those of the
aquatic kind have more of the yellow than the white, and the yellow is
of a paler tint than in those of other birds. Among fish, the eggs are
of the same colour throughout, there being, in fact, no white. The eggs
of birds are of a brittle nature, in consequence of the natural heat
of the animal, while those of serpents are supple, in consequence of
their coldness, and those of fish soft, from their natural humidity.
Again, the eggs of aquatic birds are round, while those of most other
kinds are elongated, and taper to a point. Eggs are laid with the round
end foremost, and at the moment that they are laid the shell is soft,
but it immediately grows hard, as each portion becomes exposed to the
air. Horatius Flaccus3090 expresses it as his opinion that those eggs
which are of an oblong shape are of the most agreeable flavour. The
rounder eggs are those which produce3091 the female, the others the
male. The umbilical3092 cord is in the upper part of the egg, like a
drop floating on the surface in the shell.
(53.) There are some birds that couple at all seasons of the year,
barn-door fowls, for instance; they lay, too, at all times, with the
exception of two months at mid-winter. Pullets lay more eggs than the
older hens, but then they are smaller. In the same brood those chickens
are the smallest that are hatched the first and the last. These
animals, indeed, are so prolific, that some of them will lay as many as
sixty eggs, some daily, some twice a day, and some in such vast numbers
that they have been known to die from exhaustion. Those known as the
“Adrianæ,”3093 are the most esteemed. Pigeons sit ten times a year,
and some of them eleven, and in Egypt during the month of the winter
solstice even. Swallows, blackbirds, ring-doves, and turtle-doves sit
twice a year, most other birds only once. Thrushes make their nests
of mud, in the tops of trees, almost touching one another, and lay
during the time of their retirement. The egg comes to maturity in the
ovary ten days after treading; but if the hen or pigeon is tormented
by pulling out the feathers, or by the infliction of any injury of a
similar nature, the maturing of the egg is retarded.
In the middle of the yolk of every egg there is what appears to be a
little drop3094 of blood; this is supposed to be the heart of the
chicken, it being the general belief that that part is formed the first
in every animal: at all events, while in the egg this speck is seen
to throb and palpitate. The body of the animal itself is formed from
the white fluid3095 in the egg; while the yellow part constitutes
its food. The head in every kind, while in the shell, is larger than
the rest of the body; the eyes, too, are closed, and are larger than
the other parts of the head. As the chicken grows, the white gradually
passes to the middle of the egg, while the yellow is spread around
it. On the twentieth day, if the egg is shaken, the voice of the now
living animal can be heard in the shell. From this time it gradually
becomes clothed with feathers; and its position is such that it has
the head above the right foot, and the right wing above the head: the
yolk in the meantime gradually disappears. All birds are born with the
feet first, while with every other animal the contrary is the case.
Some hens lay all their eggs with two yolks, and sometimes hatch twin
chickens from the same egg, one being larger than the other, according
to Cornelius Celsus: other writers, however, deny3096 the possibility
of twin chickens being hatched. It is a rule never to give a brood hen
more than twenty-five3097 eggs to sit upon at once. Hens begin to lay
immediately after the winter solstice. The best broods are those which
are hatched before the vernal equinox: chickens that are hatched after
the summer solstice, never attain their full growth, and the more so,
the later they are produced.
Those eggs which have been laid within the last ten days, are the
best for putting under the hen; old ones, or those which have just
been laid, will be unfruitful; an uneven number3098 also ought to
be placed. On the fourth day after the hen has begun to sit, if,
upon taking an egg with one hand by the two ends and holding it up
to the light, it is found to be clear and of one uniform colour, it
is most likely to be barren, and another should be substituted in
its place. There is also a way of testing them by means of water; an
empty egg will float on the surface, while those that fall to the
bottom, or, in other words, are full, should be placed under the hen.
Care must be taken, however, not to make trial by shaking them, for
if the organs which are necessary for life become confused, they will
come to nothing.3099 Incubation ought to begin just after the new
moon; for, if commenced before, the eggs will be unproductive. The
chickens are hatched sooner if the weather is warm: hence it is that
in summer they break the shell on the nineteenth day, but in winter
on the twenty-fifth only. If it happens to thunder during the time of
incubation, the eggs are addled, and if the cry of a hawk is heard
they are spoilt. The best remedy against the effects of thunder, is to
put an iron nail beneath the straw on which the eggs are laid, or else
some earth from off a ploughshare. Some eggs, however, are hatched by
the spontaneous action of Nature, without the process of incubation,
as is the case in the dung-hills of Egypt. There is a well-known story
related about a man at Syracuse, who was in the habit of covering eggs
with earth,3100 and then continuing his drinking bout till they were
hatched.
And, what is even more singular still, eggs can be hatched also by
a human being. Julia Augusta, when pregnant in her early youth of
Tiberius Cæsar, by Nero, was particularly desirous that her offspring
should be a son, and accordingly employed the following mode of
divination, which was then much in use among young women: she carried
an egg in her bosom, taking care, whenever she was obliged to put it
down, to give it to her nurse to warm in her own, that there might be
no interruption in the heat: it is stated that the result promised by
this mode of augury was not falsified.
It was perhaps from this circumstance, that the modern invention took
its rise, of placing eggs in a warm spot and covering them with chaff,
the heat being maintained by a moderate fire, while in the meantime
a man is employed in turning them. By the adoption of this plan, the
young, all of them, break the shell on a stated day. There is a story
told of a breeder of poultry, of such remarkable skill, that on seeing
an egg he could tell which hen had laid it. It is said also that when
a hen has happened to die while sitting, the males have been seen
to take her place in turns, and perform all the other duties of a
brood-hen, taking care in the meantime to abstain from crowing. But
the most remarkable thing of all, is the sight of a hen, beneath which
ducks’ eggs have been put and hatched.—At first, she is unable to
quite recognize the brood as her own, while in her anxiety she gives
utterance to her clucking as she doubtfully calls them; then at last
she will stand at the margin of the pond, uttering her laments, while
the ducklings, with Nature for their guide, are diving beneath the
water.
The breed of a fowl is judged of by the erectness of the crest, which
is sometimes double, its black wings, reddish beak, and toes of unequal
number, there being sometimes a fifth placed transversely above the
other four. For the purposes of divination, those that have a yellow
beak and feet are not considered pure; while for the secret rites of
Bona Dea, black ones are chosen. There is also a dwarf3101 species
of fowl, which is not barren either; a thing that is the case with no
other kind of bird. These dwarfs, however, rarely lay at any stated
periods, and their incubation is productive of injury3102 to the
eggs.
The most dangerous malady with every kind of fowl is that known as
the “pituita;;”3103 which is prevalent more particularly between the
times of harvest and vintage. The mode of treatment is to put them on a
spare diet, and to expose them, while asleep, to the action of smoke,
and more especially that of bay leaves or of the herb called savin. A
feather also is inserted, and passed across through the nostrils, care
being taken to move it every day; while their food consists of leeks
mixed with speltmeal, or else is first soaked in water in which an
owlet has been dipped, or boiled together with the seeds of the white
vine. There are also some other receipts besides.
Pigeons have the peculiarity of billing before they couple; they
generally lay two eggs, Nature so willing it, that among birds the
produce should be more frequent with some, and more numerous with
others. The ring-dove and turtle-dove mostly lay three eggs, and never
more than twice, in the spring; such being the case when the first
brood has been lost. Although they may happen to lay three eggs, they
never hatch more than two; the third egg, which is barren, is generally
known by the name of “urinum.”3104 The female ring-dove sits on the
eggs from mid-day till morning, the male the rest of the time. Pigeons
always produce a male and a female; the male first, the female the
day after. Both the male and the female pigeon sit on the eggs; the
male in the day-time, the female during the night. They hatch on the
twentieth day of incubation, and lay the fifth day after coupling.
Sometimes, indeed, in summer, these birds will rear three couples in
two months; for then they hatch on the eighteenth day of incubation,
and immediately conceive again; hence it is that eggs are often found
among the young ones, some of which last are just taking wing, while
others are only bursting the shell. The young ones, themselves, begin
to produce at the age of five months. The females, if there should
happen to be no male among them, will even tread each other, and lay
barren eggs, from which nothing is produced. By the Greeks, these eggs
are called “hypenemia.”3105
(59.) The pea-hen produces at three years old. In the first year
she will lay one or two eggs, in the next four or five, and in the
remaining years twelve, but never beyond that number. She lays for two
or three days at intervals, and will produce three broods in the year,
if care is taken to put the eggs under a common hen. The males are apt
to break the eggs in getting at the females while sitting, and hence it
is that the pea-hen lays by night, and in secret places, or else sits
on her eggs in an elevated spot; the eggs will break, too, unless they
are received upon some surface that is soft. One male is sufficient for
every five females; when there are only one or two females to a male,
all chance of their being prolific is spoilt through their extreme
salaciousness. The young breaks the shell in twenty-seven days, or, at
the very latest, on the thirtieth.
Geese pair in the water, and lay in spring; or, if they have paired
in the winter, they lay about forty eggs, after the summer solstice.
The hatching takes place twice in the year, if a hen hatches the first
brood; otherwise, their greatest number of eggs will be sixteen,
their lowest seven. If their eggs are taken away from them, they will
keep on laying until they burst; they will not hatch the eggs of any
other birds. The best number of eggs for placing under the goose for
hatching, is nine, or else eleven. The females only sit, and that for
thirty days; but if they are kept very warm, then only twenty-five. The
contact of the nettle is fatal to their young, and their own greediness
is no less so—sometimes, through over-eating, and sometimes through
over-exertion; for seizing the root of a plant with the bill, they will
make repeated efforts to tear it out of the ground, and so, at last,
dislocate the neck. A remedy against the noxious effects of the nettle,
is to place the root of that plant under the straw of their nest.
(60.) There are three kinds of herons, called, respectively, the
leucon,3106 the asterias,3107 and the pellos.3108 These birds
experience great pain in coupling; uttering loud cries, the males
bleed from the eyes, while the females lay their eggs with no less
difficulty.
The eagle sits for thirty days, as do most of the larger birds; the
smaller ones, the kite and the hawk for instance, only twenty. The
eagle mostly lays but one egg, never more than three. The bird which
is known as the “ægolios,”3109 lays four, and the raven sometimes
five; they sit, too, the same number of days as the kite and the hawk.
The male crow provides the female with food while she is sitting. The
magpie lays nine eggs, the malancoryphus more than twenty, but always
an uneven number, and no bird of this kind ever lays more; so much
superior in fecundity are the smaller birds. The young ones of the
swallow are blind at first, as is the case also with almost all the
birds the progeny of which is numerous.
The barren eggs, which we have mentioned as “hypenemia,” are either
conceived by the females when they are influenced by libidinous
fancies, and couple with one another, or else at the moment when they
are rolling themselves in the dust; they are produced not only by the
pigeon, but by the common hen as well, the partridge, the pea-hen, the
goose, and the chenalopex; these eggs are barren, smaller than the
others, of a less agreeable flavour, and more humid. There are some who
think that they are generated by the wind, for which reason they give
them the name of “zephyria.” The eggs known as “urina,” and which by
some are called “cynosura,”3110 are only laid in the spring, and at a
time when the hen has discontinued sitting. Eggs, if soaked in vinegar,
are rendered so soft thereby, that they may be twisted3111 round the
finger like a ring. The best method of preserving them is to keep them
packed in bean-meal, or chaff, during the winter, and in bran during
the summer. It is a general belief, that if kept in salt, they will
lose their contents.
Among the winged animals, the only one that is viviparous is the bat;
it is the only one, too, that has wings formed of a membrane. This is,
also, the only winged creature that feeds its young with milk from
the breast. The mother clasps her two young ones as she flies, and so
carries them along with her. This animal, too, is said to have but one
joint in the haunch, and to be particularly fond of gnats.
Again, among the terrestrial animals, there are the serpents that are
oviparous; of which, as yet, we have not spoken. These creatures couple
by clasping each other, and entwine so closely around one another, that
they might be taken for only one animal with two heads. The male viper
thrusts3112 its head into the mouth of the female, which gnaws it in
the transports of its passion. This, too, is the only one among the
terrestrial animals that lays eggs within its body—of one colour, and
soft, like those of fishes. On the third day it hatches its young in
the uterus, and then excludes them, one every day, and generally twenty
in number; the last ones become so impatient of their confinement,
that they force a passage through the sides of their parent, and so
kill her. Other serpents, again, lay eggs attached to one another, and
then bury them in the earth; the young being hatched in the following
year. Crocodiles sit on their eggs in turns, first the male, and then
the female. But let us now turn to the generation of the rest of the
terrestrial animals.
The only one among the bipeds that is viviparous is man. Man is the
only animal that repents of his first embraces; sad augury, indeed, of
life, that its very origin should thus cause repentance! Other animals
have stated times in the year for their embraces; but man, as we have
already3113 observed, employs for this purpose all hours both of
day and night; other animals become sated with venereal pleasures,
man hardly knows any satiety. Messalina,3114 the wife of Claudius
Cæsar, thinking this a palm quite worthy of an empress, selected, for
the purpose of deciding the question, one of the most notorious of
the women who followed the profession of a hired prostitute; and the
empress outdid her, after continuous intercourse, night and day, at
the twenty-fifth embrace. In the human race also, the men have devised
various substitutes for the more legitimate exercise of passion, all of
which outrage Nature; while the females have recourse to abortion. How
much more guilty than the brute beasts are we in this respect! Hesiod
has stated that men are more lustful in winter, women in summer.
Coupling is performed back to back by the elephant, the camel, the
tiger, the lynx, the rhinoceros, the lion, the dasypus, and the rabbit,
the genital parts of all which animals lie far back. Camels even seek
desert places, or, at all events, spots of a retired nature; and to
come upon them on such an occasion is not unattended with danger.
Coupling, with them, lasts a whole day; the only animal, indeed, of
all those with solid hoofs, with which such is the case. Among the
quadrupeds, it is the smell that excites the passions of the male. In
this act, dogs also, seals, and wolves turn back to back, and remain
attached, though greatly against their will. In the greater part of
the animals above mentioned, the females solicit the males; in some,
however, the males the females. As to bears, they lie down, like the
human race, as previously3115 mentioned by us; while hedgehogs
embrace standing upright. In cats, the male stands above, while the
female assumes a crouching posture; foxes lie on the side, the female
embracing the male. In the case of the cow and the hind, the female
is unable to endure the violence of the male, consequently she keeps
in motion during the time of coupling. The buck goes from one hind
to another in turn, and then comes back to the first. Lizards couple
entwined around each other, like the animals without feet.
All animals, the larger they are in bulk, are proportionably less
prolific: the elephant, the camel, and the horse produce but one,
while the acanthis,3116 a very small bird, produces twelve. Those
animals, also, which are the most prolific, are the shortest time in
breeding. The larger an animal is, the longer is the time required for
its formation in the womb; those, also, which are the longest-lived,
require the longest gestation; the growing age, too, is not suitable
for the purposes of generation. Those animals which have solid hoofs
bear but a single young one, while those which have cloven hoofs bear
two. Those, again, whose feet are divided into toes, have a still more
numerous offspring; but, while the others bring forth their young
perfect, these last bear them in an unformed state, such, for instance,
as the lioness and the she-bear. The fox also brings forth its young in
an even more imperfect state than these; it is a very uncommon thing,
however, to find it whelping. After the birth, these animals warm their
young by licking them, and thereby give them their proper shape; they
mostly produce four at a birth.
The dog, the wolf, the panther, and the jackal produce their young
blind. There are several kinds of dogs; those of Laconia,3117 of both
sexes, are ready for breeding in the eighth month, and the females
carry their young sixty or sixty-three days at most; other dogs are
fit for breeding when only six months old; the female, in all cases,
becomes pregnant at the first congress. Those which have conceived
before the proper age, bear pups which are longer blind, though not
all the same number of days. It is thought that dogs, in general, lift
the leg when they water at six months old; this, too, is looked upon
as a sign that they have attained their full growth and strength; when
doing this, the female squats. The most numerous litters known consist
of twelve, but more generally five or six is the number; sometimes,
indeed, only one is produced, but then it is looked upon as a prodigy,
and the same is the case, too, when all the pups are of one sex. In the
dog, the males come into the world first, but in other animals, the two
sexes are born alternately. The female admits the male again six months
after she has littered. Those of the Laconian breed bear eight young
ones. It is a peculiarity in this kind, that after undergoing great
labour, the males are remarkable for their salacity. In the Laconian
breed the male lives ten years, the female twelve; while other kinds,
again, live fifteen years, and sometimes as much as twenty; but they
are not fit for breeding to the end of their life, as they generally
cease at about the twelfth year. The cat and the ichneumon are, in
other respects,3118 like the dog; but they only live six years.
The dasypus3119 brings forth every month in the year, and is subject
to superfœtation, like the hare. It conceives immediately after it has
littered, even though it is still suckling its young, which are blind
at their birth. The elephant, as we have already3120 stated, produces
but one, and that the size of a calf three months old. The gestation of
the camel lasts twelve months; the female conceives when three years
old, and brings forth in the spring; at the end of a year from that
time, she is ready to conceive again. It is thought advisable to have
the mare covered so soon as three days, and indeed, sometimes, only
one, after she has foaled; and, however unwilling she may be, means
are taken to compel her. It is believed also, that it is by no means
an uncommon thing for a woman to conceive on the seventh day after her
delivery. It is recommended that the manes of mares should be cut, so
as to humble their pride, in order to make them submit to be covered by
the male ass; for when the mane is long, they are liable to be proud
and vain. This is the only animal, the female of which, after covering,
runs, facing the north or the south, according as she has conceived
a male or a female. They change their colour immediately after, and
the hair becomes of a redder hue, and deeper, whatever the colour may
naturally be; it is this that indicates that they must no longer be
covered, and they, themselves, will even resist it. Gestation does not,
however, preclude some of them from being worked, and they are often
with foal long before it is known. We read that the mare of Echecrates,
the Thessalian, conquered at the Olympic games, while with foal.
Those who are more careful enquirers into these matters, tell us
that in the horse, the dog, and the swine, the males are most ardent
for sexual intercourse in the morning, while the female seeks the
society of the male after mid-day. They say also, that mares in
harness desire the horse sixty days sooner than those that live in
herds; that it is swine only that foam at the mouth during the time
of coupling; and that a boar, if it hears the voice of a sow in heat,
will refuse to take its food,—to such a degree, indeed, as to starve
itself, if it is not allowed to cover—while the female is reduced
to such a state of frantic madness, as to attack and tear a man,
more especially if wearing a white garment. This frenzy, however, is
appeased by sprinkling vinegar on the sexual parts. It is supposed
also that salacity is promoted by certain aliments; the herb rocket,
for instance, in the case of man, and onions in that of cattle. Wild
animals that have been tamed, do not conceive, the goose, for instance;
the wild boar and the stag will only produce late in life, and even
then they must have been taken and tamed when very young; a singular
fact. The pregnant females, among the quadrupeds, refuse the male, with
the exception, indeed, of the mare and the sow; superfœtation, however,
takes place in none but the dasypus and the hare.
All those animals that are viviparous produce their young with the head
first, the young animal about the time of yeaning turning itself round
in the womb, where at other times it lies extended at full length.
Quadrupeds during the time of gestation have the legs extended, and
lying close to the belly; while, on the other hand, man is gathered up
into a ball, with the nose between the knees. With reference to moles,
of which we have previously3121 spoken, it is supposed that they are
produced when a female has conceived, not by a male, but of herself
only. Hence it is that there is no vitality in this false conception,
because it does not proceed from the conjunction of the two sexes; and
it has only that sort of vegetative existence in itself which we see in
plants and trees.
(65.) Of all those which produce their young in a perfect state, the
swine is the only one that bears them in considerable numbers as well;
and, indeed, several times in the year—a thing that is contrary to the
usual nature of animals with a solid or cloven hoof.
But it is mice that surpass all the other animals in fecundity; and
it is not without some hesitation that I speak of them, although I
have Aristotle and some of the officers of Alexander the Great for
my authority. It is said that these animals generate by licking one
another, and not by copulation. They have related cases where a single
female has given birth to one hundred and twenty young ones, and in
Persia some were found, even pregnant themselves,3122 while yet in
the womb of the parent. It is believed also that these animals will
become pregnant on tasting salt. Hence we find that we have no longer
any reason to wonder how such vast multitudes of field-mice devastate
the standing corn; though it is still a mystery, with reference to
them, in what way it is that such multitudes die so suddenly; for
their dead bodies are never to be found, and there is not a person in
existence that has ever dug up a mouse in a field during the winter.
Multitudes of these animals visit Troas, and before this they have
driven away the inhabitants in consequence of their vast numbers.
They multiply greatly during times of drought; it is said also that
when they are about to die, a little worm grows in their head. The mice
of Egypt have hard hairs, just like those of the hedge-hog. They walk
on their hind feet, as also do those of the Alps. When two animals
couple of different kinds, the union is only prolific if the time of
gestation is the same in both. Among the oviparous quadrupeds, it is
generally believed that the lizard brings forth by the mouth, though
Aristotle denies the fact. These animals, too, do not sit upon their
eggs, as they forget in what place they have laid them, being utterly
destitute of memory; hence it is that the young ones are hatched
spontaneously.
We find it stated by many authors,3123 that a serpent is produced
from the spinal marrow of a man. Many creatures, in fact, among the
quadrupeds even, have a secret and mysterious origin.
(67) Thus, for instance, the salamander, an animal like a lizard in
shape, and with a body starred all over, never comes out except during
heavy showers, and disappears the moment it becomes fine. This animal
is so intensely cold as to extinguish fire by its contact, in the same
way as ice does. It spits forth a milky matter from its mouth; and
whatever part of the human body is touched with this, all the hair
falls off, and the part assumes the appearance of leprosy.
Some animals, again, are engendered of beings that are not engendered
themselves, and have no such origin as those above mentioned, which are
produced in the spring, or at some stated period of the year. Some of
these are non-productive, the salamander, for instance, which is of no
sex, either male or female; a distinction also, which does not exist in
the eel and the other kinds that are neither viviparous nor oviparous.
The oyster also, as well as the other shell-fish that adhere to the
bottom of the sea or to rocks, are of neither sex. Again, as to those
animals which are able to engender of themselves, if they are looked
upon as divided into male and female, they do engender something, it is
true, by coupling, but the produce is imperfect, quite dissimilar to
the animal itself, and one from which nothing else is reproduced; this
we find to be the case with flies, when they give birth to maggots.
This fact is better illustrated by the nature of those animals which
are known as insects; a subject, indeed, very difficult of explanation,
and one which requires to be treated of in a Book3124 by itself. We
will, therefore, proceed for the present with our remarks upon the
instincts of the animals that have been previously mentioned.
Man excels more especially in his sense of touch, and next, in that
of taste. In other respects, he is surpassed by many of the animals.
Eagles can see more clearly than any other animals, while vultures
have the better smell; moles hear more distinctly than others,
although buried in the earth, so dense and sluggish an element as
it is; and what is even more, although every sound has a tendency
upwards, they can hear the words that are spoken; and, it is said,
they can even understand it if you talk about them, and will take to
flight immediately. Among men, a person who has not enjoyed the sense
of hearing in his infancy, is deprived of the powers of speech as
well; and there are none deaf from their birth who are not dumb also.
Among the marine animals, it is not probable that oysters enjoy the
sense of hearing, but it is said that immediately a noise is made the
solen3125 will sink to the bottom; it is for this reason, too, that
silence is observed by persons while fishing at sea.
Fishes have neither organs of hearing, nor yet the exterior orifice.
And yet, it is quite certain that they do hear; for it is a well-known
fact, that in some fish-ponds they are in the habit of being assembled
to be fed by the clapping of the hands. In the fish-ponds, too, that
belong to the Emperor, the fish are in the habit of coming, each
kind as it bears its name.3126 So too, it is said, the mullet, the
wolf-fish, the salpa, and the chromis, have a very exquisite sense of
hearing, and that it is for this reason that they frequent shallow
water.
It is quite manifest that fishes have the sense of smell also; for they
are not all to be taken with the same bait, and are seen to smell at
it before they seize it. Some, too, that are concealed in the bottom
of holes, are driven out by the fisherman, by the aid of the smell of
salted fish; with this he rubs the entrance of their retreat in the
rock, immediately upon which they take to flight from the spot, just as
though they had recognized the dead carcases of those of their kind.
Then, again, they will rise to the surface at the smell of certain
odours, such, for instance as roasted sæpia and polypus; and hence it
is that these baits are placed in the osier kipes used for taking fish.
They immediately take to flight upon smelling the bilge water in a
ship’s hold, and more especially upon scenting the blood of fish.
The polypus cannot possibly be torn away from the rock to which it
clings; but upon the herb cunila3127 being applied, the instant it
smells it the fish quits its hold. Purples also are taken by means of
fetid substances. And then, too, as to the other kinds of animals,
who is there that can feel any doubt? Serpents are driven away by the
smell of harts’ horns, and more particularly by that of storax. Ants,
too, are killed by the odours of origanum, lime, or sulphur. Gnats are
attracted by acids, but not by anything sweet.
(71.) All animals have the sense of touch, those even which have no
other sense; for even in the oyster, and, among land animals, in the
worm, this sense is found.
I am strongly inclined to believe, too, that the sense of taste exists
in all animals; for why else should one seek one kind of food, and
another another? And it is in this more especially that is to be seen
the wondrous power of Nature, the framer of all things. Some animals
seize their prey with their teeth, others, again, with their claws;
some tear it to pieces with their hooked beak; others, that have a
broad bill, wabble in their food; others, with a sharp nib, work holes
into it; others suck at their food; others, again, lick it, others
sup it in, others chew it, and others bolt it whole. And no less a
diversity is there in the uses they make of their feet, for the purpose
of carrying, tearing asunder, holding, squeezing, suspending3128
their bodies, or incessantly scratching the ground.
Roe-bucks and quails3129 grow fat on poisons, as we have already
mentioned, being themselves the most harmless of animals. Serpents
will feed on eggs, and the address displayed by the dragon is quite
remarkable.—For it will either swallow the egg whole, if its jaws will
allow of it, and roll over and over so as to break it within, and then
by coughing eject the shells: or else, if it is too young to be able to
do so, it will gradually encircle the egg with its coils, and hold it
so tight as to break it at the end, just, in fact, as though a piece
had been cut out with a knife; then holding the remaining part in its
folds, it will suck the contents. In the same manner, too, when it has
swallowed a bird whole, it will make a violent effort, and vomit the
feathers.
Scorpions live on earth. Serpents, when an opportunity presents itself,
show an especial liking for wine, although in other respects they need
but very little drink. These animals, also, when kept shut up, require
but little aliment, hardly any at all, in fact. The same is the case
also with spiders, which at other times live by suction. Hence it is,
that no venomous animal will die of hunger or thirst; it being the fact
that they have neither heat, blood, nor sweat; all which humours, from
their natural saltness, increase the animal’s voracity. In this class
of animals all those are the most deadly, which have eaten some of
their own kind just before they inflict the wound. The sphingium and
the satyr3130 stow away food in the pouches of their cheeks, after
which they will take it out piece by piece with their hands and eat it;
and thus they do for a day or an hour what the ant usually does3131
for the whole year.
(73.) The only animal with toes upon the feet that feeds upon grass is
the hare, which will eat corn as well; while the solid-hoofed animals,
and the swine among the cloven-footed ones, will eat all kinds of
food, as well as roots. To roll over and over is a peculiarity of the
animals with a solid hoof. All those which have serrated teeth are
carnivorous. Bears live also upon corn, leaves, grapes, fruit, bees,
crabs even, and ants; wolves, as we have already3132 stated, will eat
earth even when they are famishing. Cattle grow fat by drinking; hence
it is that salt agrees with them so well; the same is also the case
with beasts of burden, although they live on corn as well as grass; but
they eat just in proportion to what they drink. In addition to those
already spoken of, among the wild animals, stags ruminate, when reared
in a domesticated state. All animals ruminate lying in preference to
standing, and more in winter than in summer, mostly for seven months
in the year. The Pontic mouse3133 also ruminates in a similar manner.
In drinking, those animals which have serrated3134 teeth, lap; and
common mice do the same, although they belong to another class. Those
which have the teeth continuous, horses and oxen, for instance, sup;
bears do neither the one nor the other, but seem to bite at the water,
and so devour it. In Africa, the greater part of the wild beasts do
not drink in summer, through the want of rain; for which reason it
is that the mice of Libya, when caught, will die if they drink. The
ever-thirsting plains of Africa produce the oryx,3135 an animal
which, in consequence of the nature of its native locality, never
drinks, and which, in a remarkable manner, affords a remedy against
drought: for the Gætulian bandits by its aid fortify themselves
against thirst, by finding in its body certain vesicles filled with a
most wholesome liquid. In this same Africa, also, the pards conceal
themselves in the thick foliage of the trees, and then spring down from
the branches on any creature that may happen to be passing by, thus
occupying what are ordinarily the haunts of the birds. Cats too, with
what silent stealthiness, with what light steps do they creep towards
a bird! How slily they will sit and watch, and then dart out upon a
mouse! These animals scratch up the earth and bury their ordure, being
well aware that the smell of it would betray their presence.
Hence there will be no difficulty in perceiving that animals are
possessed of other instincts besides those previously mentioned. In
fact, there are certain antipathies and sympathies among them, which
give rise to various affections besides those which we have mentioned
in relation to each species in its appropriate place. The swan and the
eagle are always at variance, and the raven and the chloreus3136
seek each other’s eggs by night. In a similar manner, also, the raven
and the kite are perpetually at war with one another, the one carrying
off the other’s food. So, too, there are antipathies between the crow
and the owl, the eagle and the trochilus;3137—between the last two,
if we are to believe the story, because the latter has received the
title of the “king of the birds:” the same, again, with the owlet and
all the smaller birds.
Again, in relation to the terrestrial animals, the weasel is at enmity
with the crow, the turtle-dove with the pyrallis,3138 the ichneumon
with the wasp, and the phalangium with other spiders. Among aquatic
animals, there is enmity between the duck and the sea-mew, the falcon
known as the “harpe,” and the hawk called the “triorchis.” In a similar
manner, too, the shrew-mouse and the heron are ever on the watch for
each other’s young; and the ægithus,3139 so small a bird as it is,
has an antipathy to the ass; for the latter, when scratching itself,
rubs its body against the brambles, and so crushes the bird’s nest;
a thing of which it stands in such dread, that if it only hears the
voice of the ass when it brays, it will throw its eggs out of the
nest, and the young ones themselves will sometimes fall to the ground
in their fright; hence it is that it will fly at the ass, and peck at
its sores with its beak. The fox, too, is at war with the nisus,3140
and serpents with weasels and swine. Æsalon3141 is the name given
to a small bird that breaks the eggs of the raven, and the young of
which are anxiously sought by the fox; while in its turn it will peck
at the young of the fox, and even the parent itself. As soon as the
ravens espy this, they come to its assistance, as though against a
common enemy. The acanthis, too, lives among the brambles; hence it
is that it also has an antipathy to the ass, because it devours the
bramble blossoms. The ægithus and the anthus,3142 too, are at such
mortal enmity with each other, that it is the common belief that their
blood will not mingle; and it is for this reason that they have the bad
repute of being employed in many magical incantations. The thos and
the lion are at war with each other; and, indeed, the smallest objects
and the greatest just as much. Caterpillars will avoid a tree that is
infested with ants. The spider, poised in its web, will throw itself
on the head of a serpent as it lies stretched beneath the shade of the
tree where it has built, and with its bite pierce its brain; such is
the shock, that the creature will hiss from time to time, and then,
seized with vertigo, coil round and round, while it finds itself unable
to take to flight, or so much as to break the web of the spider, as it
hangs suspended above; this scene only ends with its death.
On the other hand, there is a strict friendship existing between the
peacock and the pigeon, the turtle-dove and the parrot, the blackbird
and the turtle, the crow and the heron, all of which join in a common
enmity against the fox. The harpe also, and the kite, unite against the
triorchis.
And then, besides, have we not seen instances of affection in the
serpent even, that most ferocious of all animals? We have already3143
related the story that is told of a man in Arcadia, who was saved by a
dragon which had belonged to him, and of his voice being recognized by
the animal. We must also make mention here of another marvellous story
that is related by Phylarchus about the asp. He tells us, that in Egypt
one of these animals, after having received its daily nourishment at
the table of a certain person, brought forth, and that it so happened
that the son of its entertainer was killed by one of its young ones;
upon which, returning to its food as usual, and becoming sensible of
the crime, it immediately killed the young one, and returned to the
house no more.
The question as to their sleep, is one that is by no means difficult
to solve. In the land animals, it is quite evident that all that have
eyelids sleep. With reference to aquatic animals, it is admitted that
they also sleep, though only for short periods, even by those writers
who entertain doubts as to the other animals; and they come to this
conclusion, not from any appearance of the eyes, for they have no
eyelids, indeed, to close, but because they are to be seen buried in
deep repose, and to all appearance fast asleep, betraying no motion in
any part of the body except the tail, and by starting when they happen
to hear a noise. With regard to the thunny, it is stated with still
greater confidence that it sleeps; indeed, it is often found in that
state near the shore, or among the rocks. Flat fish are also found fast
asleep in shallow water, and are often taken in that state with the
hand: and, as to the dolphin and the balæna, they are even heard to
snore.
It is quite evident, also, that insects sleep, from the silent
stillness which they preserve; and even if a light is put close to
them, they will not be awoke thereby.
Man, just after his birth, is hard pressed by sleep for several months,
after which he becomes more and more wakeful, day by day. The infant
dreams3144 from the very first, for it will suddenly awake with every
symptom of alarm, and while asleep will imitate the action of sucking.
There are some persons, however, who never dream; indeed, we find
instances stated where it has been a fatal sign for a person to dream,
who has never done so before. Here we find ourselves invited by a grand
field of investigation, and one that is full of alleged proofs on both
sides of the question, whether, when the mind is at rest in sleep, it
has any foreknowledge of the future, and if so, by what process this
is brought about, or whether this is not altogether a matter quite
fortuitous, as most other things are? If we were to attempt to decide
the question by instances quoted, we should find as many on the one
side as on the other.
It is pretty generally agreed, that dreams, immediately after we have
taken wine and food, or when we have just fallen asleep again after
waking, have no signification whatever. Indeed, sleep is nothing else
than the retiring3145 of the mind into itself. It is quite evident
that, besides man, horses, dogs, oxen, sheep, and goats have dreams;
consequently, the same is supposed to be the case with all animals that
are viviparous. As to those which are oviparous, it is a matter of
uncertainty, though it is equally certain that they do sleep. But we
must now pass on to a description of the insects.
Summary.—Remarkable facts, narratives, and observations,
seven hundred and ninety-three.
Roman authors quoted.—Manilius,3146 Cornelius
Valerianus,3147 the Acta Triumphorum,3148 Umbricius Melior,3149
Massurius Sabinus,3150 Antistius Labeo,3151 Trogus,3152
Cremutius,3153 M. Varro,3154 Macer Æmilius,3155 Melissus,3156
Mucianus,3157 Nepos,3158 Fabius Pictor,3159 T. Lucretius,3160
Cornelius Celsus,3161 Horace,3162 Deculo,3163 Hyginus,3164 the
Sasernæ,3165 Nigidius,3166 Mamilius Sura.3167
Foreign authors quoted.—Homer, Phemonoë,3168
Philemon,3169 Bœus3170 who wrote the Ornithogonia, Hylas3171
who wrote an augury, Aristotle,3172 Theophrastus,3173
Callimachus,3174 Æschylus,3175 King Hiero,3176 King
Philometor,3177 Archytas3178 of Tarentum, Amphilochus3179
of Athens, Anaxipolis3180 of Thasos, Apollodorus3181 of
Lemnos, Aristophanes3182 of Miletus, Antigonus3183 of
Cymæ, Agathocles3184 of Chios, Apollonius3185 of Pergamus,
Aristander3186 of Athens, Bacchius3187 of Miletus, Bion3188 of
Soli, Chæreas3189 of Athens, Diodorus3190 of Priene, Dion3191 of
Colophon, Democritus,3192 Diophanes3193 of Nicæa, Epigenes3194 of
Rhodes, Euagon3195 of Thasos, Euphronius3196 of Athens, Juba,3197
Androtion3198 who wrote on Agriculture, Æschrion3199 who wrote on
Agriculture, Lysimachus3200 who wrote on Agriculture, Dionysius3201
who translated Mago, Diophanes3202 who made an Epitome of Dionysius,
Nicander,3203 Onesicritus,3204 Phylarchus,3205 Hesiod.3206
3 The streams which discharge their waters into the Palus
Mæotis, or Sea of Azof.
4 Straits of the Dardanelles or of Gallipoli, spoken of in
B. iv. c. 18, as seven stadia in width.
5 The Thracian Bosporus, now the Channel or Straits of
Constantinople, and the Cimmerian Bosporus or Straits of Kaffa, or Yeni
Kale.
6 From βοῦς, an ox, and πορός, “a
passage.” According to the legend, it was at the Thracian Bosporus that
the cow Io made her passage from one continent to the other, and hence
the name, in all probability, celebrated alike in the fables and the
history of antiquity. The Cimmerian Bosporus not improbably borrowed
its name from the Thracian. See Æsch. Prom. Vinc. l. 733.
7 This sentence seems to bear reference to the one that
follows, and not, as punctuated in the Latin, to the one immediately
preceding it.
8 It is not probable that this is the case at the Straits of
Kaffa, which are nearly four miles in width at the narrowest part.
9 Now the Riva, a river of Bithynia, in Asia Minor, falling
into the Euxine north-east of Chalcedon.
11 On the river Calpas or Calpe, in Bithynia. Xenophon, in
the Anabasis, describes it as about half way between Byzantium and
Heraclea. The spot is identified in some of the maps as Kirpeh Limán,
and the promontory as Cape Kirpeh.
14 Now the Lef-ke. See the end of c. 42 of the last Book.
15 The modern Gulf of Sakaria. Of the Mariandyni, who gave
the ancient name to it, little or nothing is known.
16 Its site is now known as Harakli or Eregli. By Strabo it
is erroneously called a colony of Miletus. It was situate a few miles
to the north of the river Lycus.
18 Stephanus Byzantinus speaks of this place as producing
whetstones, or ἀκοναὶ, as well as the plant aconite.
19 This name was given to the cavern in common with several
other lakes or caverns in various parts of the world, which, like the
various rivers of the name of Acheron, were at some time supposed to be
connected with the lower world.
20 Now called Falios (or more properly Filiyos), according
to D’Anville, from the river of that name in its vicinity, supposed
by him and other geographers to be the same as the ancient Billis,
here mentioned by Pliny. By others of the ancient writers it is called
Billæus.
21 Paphlagonia was bounded by Bithynia on the west, and by
Pontus on the east, being separated from the last by the river Halys;
on the south it was divided by the chain of Mount Olympus from Phrygia
in the earlier times, from Galatia at a later period; and on the north
it bordered on the Euxine.
22 In the Homeric catalogue we find Pylæmenes leading the
Paphlagonians as allies of the Trojans; from this Pylæmenes the later
princes of Paphlagonia claimed their descent, and the country was
sometimes from them called Pylæmenia.
23 Suspected by Hardouin to have been the same as the Moson
or Moston mentioned by Ptolemy as in Galatia.
24 It is mentioned by Homer, Il. ii. 855, as situate on the
coast of Paphlagonia.
25 Strabo also, in B. xii., says that these people
afterwards established themselves in Thrace, and that gradually moving
to the west, they finally settled in the Italian Venetia, which from
them took its name. But in his Fourth Book he says that the Veneti
of Italy owe their origin to the Gallic Veneti, who came from the
neighbourhood known as the modern Vannes.
26 This city, ninety stadia east of the river Parthenius,
occupied a peninsula, and on each side of the isthmus was a harbour.
The original city, as here mentioned, seems to have had the name of
Sesamus or Sesamum, and it is spoken of by that name in Homer, Il. ii.
853, in conjunction with Cytorus. The territory of Amastris was famous
for its growth of the best box-wood, which grew on Mount Cytorus. The
present Amasra or Hanasserah occupies its site.
28 Otherwise called “Cinolis.” There is a place called Kinla
or Kinoglu in the maps, about half-way between Kerempeh and Sinope,
which is the Kinuli of Abulfeda, and probably the Cirolis or Cimolis of
the Greek geographers.
30 Now known by the name of Bartin, a corruption of its
ancient appellation.
31 It still retains its ancient appellation in its name of
Cape Kerempeh: of the ancient town nothing is known.
32 Now called Sinope, or Sinoub. Some ruins of it are still
to be seen. The modern town is but a poor place, and has probably
greatly declined since the recent attack upon it by the Russian fleet.
Diogenes, the Cynic philosopher, was a native of ancient Sinope.
33 The boundary, according to Stephanus Byzantinus, also of
the nations of Paphlagonia and Cappadocia. As Parisot remarks, this is
an error, arising from the circumstance of a small tribe bearing the
name of Cappadocians, having settled on its banks, between whom and the
Paphlagonians it served as a limit.
34 On the river Iris. It was the ancient residence of the
kings of Pontus, but in Strabo’s time it was deserted. It has been
suggested that the modern Azurnis occupies its site.
35 In the north-west of Pontus, in a fertile plain between
the rivers Halys and Amisus. It is also called Gadilon by Strabo.
D’Anville makes it the modern Aladgiam; while he calls Gaziura by the
name of Guedes.
36 Now called the Kisil Irmak, or Red River. It has been
remarked that Pliny, in making this river to come down from Mount
Taurus and flow at once from south to north, appears to confound the
Halys with one of its tributaries, now known as the Izchel Irmak.
37 Its site is now called Kiengareh, Kangreh, or Changeri.
This was a town of Paphlagonia, to the south of Mount Olgasys, at a
distance of thirty-five miles from Pompeiopolis.
38 A commercial place to the south of Sinope. Its site is
the modern Gherseh on the coast.
39 Now called Eski Samsun; on the west side of the bay or
gulf, anciently called Sinus Amisenus. According to Strabo, it was
only 900 stadia from Sinope, or 112½ Roman miles. The walls of the
ancient city are to be seen on a promontory about a mile and a half
from the modern town.
40 He means the numerous indentations which run southward
into the coast, from the headland of Sinope to a distance of about one
degree to the south.
41 On examining the map, we shall find that the distance is
at least 300 miles across to the gulf of Issus or Iskenderoon.
43 A part of it only was added to Eupatoria; and it was
separated from the rest by a wall, and probably contained a different
population from that of Amisus. This new quarter contained the
residence of the king, Mithridates Eupator, who built Eupatoria.
44 The boundaries of Cappadocia varied under the dominion of
the Persians, after the Macedonian conquest, and as a Roman province
under the emperors.
45 Founded by Archelaüs, the last king of Cappadocia. In
Hamilton’s Researches, the site has been assumed to be the modern
Ak-serai, but that place is not on the river Halys, as Leake supposes.
It is, however, considered that Ak-serai agrees very well with the
position of Archelais as laid down in the Itineraries, and that Pliny
may have been misled in supposing that the stream on which it stood was
the Halys.
46 Also called by the name of Chryse, or “Golden,” to
distinguish it from another place of the same name in Pontus. It is
generally supposed that the town of Al-Bostan, on the Sihoon or Sarus,
is on or near the site of this Comana.
47 Now called Niksar, according to D’Anville, though
Hardouin says that it is Tocat. Parisot remarks, that this place
belonged rather to Pontus than to Cappadocia.
48 A small tributary of the Iris, or Yeshil-Irmak, mentioned
in the next Chapter.
49 Still called Amasia, or Amasiyeh, and situate on the
river Iris, or Yeshil Ermak. It was at one time the residence of the
princes of Pontus, and the birth-place of the geographer Strabo.
The remains of antiquity here are very considerable, and extremely
interesting.
50 Both to the west of Neo-Cæsarea. According to Tavernier,
as quoted by Hardouin, the modern name of Sebastia is Sivas.
51 Which gave name to the district of Melitene, mentioned in
c. 20 of the last Book.
52 Near Nazianzus, in Cappadocia, the birth-place of Gregory
Nazianzen. The traveller Ainsworth, on his road from Ak-Serai to Kara
Hissar, came to a place called Kaisar Koi, and he has remarked that
by its name and position it might be identified with Diocæsarea. Some
geographers, indeed, look upon Diocæsarea and Nazianzus as the same
place.
53 Its ruins are still to be seen at Kiz Hisar. It stood in
the south of Cappadocia, at the northern foot of Mount Taurus. Tyana
was the native place of Apollonius, the supposed worker of miracles,
whom the enemies of Christianity have not scrupled to place on a par
with Jesus Christ.
54 Some ruins, nineteen geographical miles from Ayas, are
supposed to denote the site of ancient Castabala or Castabulum.
55 This place was first called Eupatoria, but not the same
which Mithridates united with a part of Amisus. D’Anville supposes that
the modern town of Tchenikeb occupies its site.
56 Or Ziela, now known as Zillah, not far south of Amasia.
It was here that Julius Cæsar conquered Pharnaces, on the occasion on
which he wrote his dispatch to Rome, “Veni, vidi, vici.”
58 Its site is still called Kaisiriyeh. It was a city of
the district Cilicia, in Cappadocia, at the base of the mountain
Argæus. It was first called Mazaca, and after that, Eusebeia. There are
considerable remains of the ancient city.
59 Hardouin remarks, that the district of Sargarausene
was not situate in front of Phrygia, but lay between Morimene and
Colopenene, in the vicinity of Pontus.
60 Now known as the Konax, a tributary of the Halys, rising
in Mount Littarus, in the chain of Paryadres.
61 Or “White Syrians.” Strabo says that in his time both the
Cappadocian peoples, those situate above the Taurus and those on the
Euxine, were called Leucosyri, or White Syrians, as there were some
Syrians who were black, and who dwelt to the east of the Amanus.
62 It is doubtful whether this is the name of a river or a
town. Notwithstanding its alleged celebrity, nothing is known of it.
63 Hecatæus, as quoted by Stephanus Byzantinus, speaks of
Chadisia as a city of the Leucosyri, or Cappadocians. Neither the river
nor the town appears to have been identified.
64 Probably on the river of that name, which has been
identified with the Mers Imak, a river two or three miles east of the
Acropolis of Amisus.
65 The extensive plain on the coast of Pontus, extending
east of the river Iris beyond the Thermodon, and celebrated as the
country of the Amazons. At the mouth of the Thermodon was a city of
the same name, which had been destroyed by the time of Augustus. It is
doubtful whether the modern Thermeh occupies its site.
66 The same place apparently as is mentioned in the last
Chapter under the name of Zela.
67 Valerius Triarius, one of the legates of Lucullus, in the
war against Mithridates. Plutarch tells us that Lucullus was obliged to
conceal Triarius from the fury of his troops.
71 He alludes to Comana, in Pontus, the site of which is now
called Gumenek, near to which, on the Tocat-su, the modern name of the
Iris, Hamilton found some remains of a Roman town, and part of a bridge
apparently of Roman construction. The language of Pliny seems to imply
that it had become in his day nothing beyond a manteium or seat of an
oracle.
72 Strabo speaks of a promontory called Genetes; and
Stephanus Byzantinus mentions a river and port of the same name.
73 Strabo places the Chaldei, who, he says, were originally
called Chalybes, in that part of the country which lies above Pharnacia
(the modern Kerasunt).
74 Or Cotyora. According to Xenophon, this was a colony
of Sinope which furnished supplies for the Ten Thousand in their
retreat. The place was on a bay called after the town. Hamilton, in his
Researches, &c., Vol. i., is of opinion that Cotyorum may have stood
on the site of Ordou, where some remains of an ancient port, cut out
of the solid rock are still visible. He remarks, however, that some
writers suppose that Cotyora was the modern bay of Pershembah, which is
more sheltered than Ordou. Cotyora was the place of embarkation of the
Ten Thousand.
75 Similar to what we call tatooing. Parisot suggests that
these people may have been the ancestors of the Mongol tribes who
still dwell in tents similar to those mentioned by Mela as used by the
Mossyni.
77 Its site is not improbably that of the modern Kheresoun,
on the coast of Asia Minor, and west of Trebizond. Lucullus is said to
have brought thence the first cherry-trees planted in Europe.
78 It has been remarked, that Pliny’s enumeration of names
often rather confuses than helps, and that it is difficult to say where
he intends to place the Bechires. We may perhaps infer from Mela that
they were west of Trapezus and east of the Thermodon.
79 Now the Kara Su, or Black River, still retaining its
ancient appellation. It rises in Cappadocia, in the chain of Mount
Argæus.
80 Still called by the same name, according to Parisot,
though sometimes it is called the river of Vatisa. More recent
authorities, however, call it Poleman Chai.
81 On the coast of Pontus, built by king Polemon, perhaps
the Second, on the site of the older city of Side, at the mouth of the
Sidenus.
82 Probably near the promontory of Jasonium, 130 stadia to
the north-east of Polemonium. It was believed to have received its name
from Jason the Argonaut having landed there. It still bears the name of
Jasoon, though more commonly called Bona or Vona.
83 Sixty stadia, according to Arrian, from the town of
Cotyora.
84 Supposed to have stood on almost the same site as the
modern Kheresoun or Kerasunda. It was built near, or, as some think, on
the site of Cerasus.
85 Still known by the name of Tireboli, on a river of the
same name, the Tireboli Su.
86 Now called Tarabosan, Trabezun, or Trebizond. This place
was originally a colony of Sinope, after the loss of whose independence
Trapezus belonged, first to Lesser Armenia, and afterwards to the
kingdom of Pontus. In the middle ages it was the seat of the so-called
empire of Trebizond. It is now the second commercial port of the Black
Sea, ranking next after Odessa.
88 Theodoret says that the Sanni, and the Lazi, subsequently
mentioned, although subdued by the Roman arms, were never obedient to
the Roman laws. The Heniochi were probably of Grecian origin, as they
were said to have been descended from the charioteers of the Argonauts,
who had been wrecked upon these coasts.
89 Or Apsarus, or Absarum. Several geographers have placed
the site of this town near the modern one known as Gonieh. Its name was
connected with the myth of Medea and her brother Absyrtus. It is not
improbable that the names Acampsis and Absarus have been given to the
same river by different writers, and that they both apply to the modern
Joruk.
90 It is suggested by Hardouin that these are the same as
the Zydretæ mentioned in the Periplus of Arrian, and by him placed
between the Heniochi and the Lazi.
98 This place was in reality thirty-seven miles and a
half from the sea. It was said to have been the native place of the
enchantresses Circe and Medea.
99 The rivers Hippos and Cyaneos do not appear to have been
identified.
102 It is doubtful whether this is the same river as that
mentioned by Strabo under the name of Chares. D’Anville says that its
modern name is Enguri.
103 Or “Feeders on Lice;” so called, according to Strabo,
from the extreme filthiness of their habits.
104 There is a nation in this vicinity still called by a
similar name. Professor Pallas, who visited them, says that nothing can
equal their dishonesty, rapacity, and voracity. Parisot suggests that
they are probably the descendants of the Phthirophagi of Pliny.
105 Now called the Khalira, according to D’Anville.
106 Now called the Hati-Scari, according to D’Anville.
115 Or nation “with the black cloaks,” from some peculiarity
in their dress.
116 This was the great trading-place of the wild tribes
in the interior; and so numerous were they, that the Greeks asserted
that there were seventy different languages spoken in the market of
Dioscurias.
117 Whence the appellation Heniochi, from the Greek
ἡνιοχὸς.
118 There were two places called Heracleium on this coast,
one north and the other south of the river Achæus: probably the latter
is here meant.
119 Said to have been descended from the Achæans or Greeks
who accompanied Jason in the Argonautic Expedition, or, according to
Ammianus, who resorted thither after the conclusion of the Trojan war.
120 Probably meaning the “martial people,” or the “people of
Mars.” This was the title, not of a single nation, but of a number of
peoples distinguished for their predatory habits.
121 This people occupied the N.E. shore of the Euxine,
between the Cimmerian Bosporus and the frontier of Colchis. Their name
is still in existence, and is applied to the whole western district of
the Caucasus, in the forms of Tcherkas, as applied to the people, and
Tcherkeskaia or Circassia, to the country.
122 Hardouin suggests that these ought to be read as
forming one name, the “Cerri Cephalatomi,” and suggests that they were
so called from their habit of cutting off the heads of their slain
enemies.
123 Meaning, nearly in the extreme corner of Pontus.
124 In the time of Strabo this was a considerable sea-port,
and after its destruction by the Heniochi, it was restored, and served
as an important frontier fortress of the Roman empire against the
Scythians.
125 This was Mithridates, king of Bosporus, which
sovereignty he obtained by the favour of the emperor Claudius, in
A.D. 41. The circumstances are unknown which led to his
subsequent expulsion by the Romans, who placed his younger brother
Cotys on the throne in his stead.
126 Hardouin thinks that the Thalli inhabited the present
country of Astrakan.
127 It was the ancient opinion, to which we shall find
frequent reference made in the present Book, that the northern portion
of the Caspian communicated with the Scythian or Septentrional ocean.
128 Mentioned only by Pliny. It is supposed to answer to the
present Ukrash river; and the town and river of Hierus are probably
identical with the Hieros Portus of Arrian, which has been identified
with the modern Sunjuk-Kala.
129 Inhabited by the Sindi, a people of Asiatic Sarmatia.
They probably dwelt in and about the modern peninsula of Taman, between
the Sea of Azof and the Black Sea, to the south of the river Hypanis,
the modern Kouban. The site of their capital, Sindos, or Sinda, is
supposed to have been the modern Anapa. Parisot conjectures that
this place was one of the ancient settlements of the Zigeunes, the
modern Bohemians or Gypsies. He seems to found his opinion upon some
observations of Malte Brun (Précis de Geographie, vol. vi.) upon the
origin of the Gypsy race, which will amply repay the perusal.
130 The peninsula on which Taman or Timoutarakan is situate.
131 The jugerum was 100 Grecian or 104 Roman feet in
length.
133 Lying between Singa and Phanagoria. Rennell fixes it at
the opening of the lake into which the Kouban flows.
134 Or the “gardens,” from the Greek κῆποι. A
town of the Cimmerian Bosporus, founded by the Milesians. Dr. Clarke
identifies the modern Sienna with it, and the curious Milesian
sculptures found there confirm the supposition.
135 Its ruins are supposed to be those near Taman, on the
eastern side of the Straits of Kaffa. It was the great emporium for all
the traffic between the coasts of the Palus Mæotis and the countries on
the south of the Caucasus, and was chosen by the kings of Bosporus as
their capital in Asia.
136 A town of the Sindæ; it possessed, like Phanagoria,
a celebrated temple of Aphrodite Apaturos, or Venus “the Deceiver,”
whence probably its name.
137 Clarke identifies it with the modern Temruk, but
Forbiger with Eskikrimm.
139 That lying on the east of the Sea of Azof. It seems
impossible to identify the spot inhabited by each of these savage
tribes. Hardouin says that the modern name of that inhabited by the
Mæotici is Coumania.
140 Parisot suggests that this tribe afterwards emigrated to
the west, and after establishing themselves in Macedonia, finally gave
its name to modern Servia. He remarks, that most of these names appear
to have been greatly mutilated, through the ignorance or carelessness
of the transcribers, no two of the manuscripts agreeing as to the mode
in which they should be spelt.
141 Or Don. It flows into the Sea of Azof by two larger
mouths and several smaller ones. Strabo says that the distance between
the two larger mouths is sixty stadia.
142 From the Greek γυναικοκρατουμενοὶ, “ruled
over by women.” It is not improbable that this name was given by some
geographer to these Sarmatian tribes on finding them, at the period of
his visit, in subjection to the rule of a queen. Parisot remarks, that
this passage affords an instance of the little care bestowed by Pliny
upon procuring the best and most correct information, for that the
Roman writers had long repudiated the use of the term “Sauromatæ.” He
also takes Pliny to task for his allusion to these tribes as coupling
with the Amazons, the existence of such a people being in his time
generally disbelieved.
143 Hardouin suggests from εὐάζω, “to celebrate the
orgies of Bacchus.”
144 Perhaps from κοίτη, a “den” or “cavern,” their
habitation.
145 Parisot suggests that they may have been a Caucasian or
Circassian tribe, because in the Circassian language the word zig
has the meaning of “man.” He also suggests that they were probably a
distinct race from the Zingi previously mentioned, whom he identifies
with the ancestors of the Zingari or Bohemians, the modern Gypsies.
146 The more common reading is “Turcæ,” a tribe also
mentioned by Mela, and which gave name to modern Turkistan.
147 The Argippæi of Herodotus and other ancient authors.
These people were bald, flat-nosed, and long-chinned. They are again
mentioned by Pliny in C. 14, who calls them a race not unlike the
Hyperborei, and then, like Mela, abridges the description given by
Herodotus. By different writers these people have been identified with
the Chinese, the Brahmins or Lamas, and the Calmucks. The last is
thought to be the most probable opinion, or else that the description
of Herodotus, borrowed by other writers, may be applied to the Mongols
in general. The mountains, at the foot of which they have been placed,
are identified with either the Ural, the western extremity of the Altaï
chain, or the eastern part of the Altaï.
148 Generally regarded as the western branch of the Ural
Mountains.
149 The former editions mostly have “there was,” implying
that in the time of Pliny it no longer existed. The name of this
place was Tanais; its ruins are still to be seen in the vicinity of
Kassatchei. It was founded by a colony from Miletus, and became a
flourishing seat of trade. The modern town of Azof is supposed to
occupy nearly its site.
150 The people of Panticapæum, on the opposite side of
the Palus Mæotis, occupying the site of the present Kertch. It was
founded by the Milesians B.C. 541, and took its name from the
neighbouring river Panticapes.
151 The Ceraunian mountains were a range belonging to the
Caucasian chain, and situate at its eastern extremity; the relation
of this range to the chain has been variously stated by the different
writers.
152 He may possibly allude to a range of mountains in the
Punjaub and the vicinity of the modern Lahore, by his reference to
the Cathæi, who are supposed to have been the ancient inhabitants of
that district. The localities of the various races here mentioned are
involved in great obscurity.
155 He includes under the term “Cappadocia,” the northern
part originally called “Cappadocia ad Pontum,” and in later times
simply Pontus, and the southern part, originally called “Cappadocia ad
Taurum,” and more recently simply Cappadocia.
156 Running from the shores of the Euxine to the borders of
Syria.
158 Meaning that part of Asia which we now call Asia Minor.
159 This ill agrees with what he has said in c. 2, that the
distance across from Sinope to the Gulf of Issus is but 200 miles.
160 Greater Armenia, now known as Erzeroum, Kars, Van, and
Erivan, was bounded on the north-east and north by the river Cyrus,
or Kur of the present day; on the north-west and west by the Moschian
mountains, the prolongation of the chain of the Anti-Taurus, and the
Euphrates, or Frat of the present day; and on the south and south-east
by the mountains called Masius, Niphates, and Gordiæi (the prolongation
of the Taurus), and the lower course of the Araxes. On the east the
country comes to a point at the confluence of the Syrus and Araxes.
161 Now known as the Kara-bel-Dagh, or Kut-Tagh, a mountain
chain running south-west and north-east from the east of Asia Minor
into the centre of Armenia, and forming the chief connecting link
between the Taurus and the mountains of Armenia.
167 This district was bounded on the east by the Euphrates,
on the north and north-west by the mountains Scodises, Paryadres, and
Anti-Taurus, and on the south by the Taurus.
168 This river is said by Ammianus to have taken its name
from Cyrus. It appears, however, to have been a not uncommon name of
the rivers of Persia.
169 It is probable that these rivers take their rise near
each other, but it is not improbable that the intervening distance
mentioned in the present passage is much too small.
170 Hardouin thinks that this is Neo-Cæsarea, mentioned as
having been built on the banks of the Euphrates.
171 Now called Ezaz, according to D’Anville. Parisot
suggests that it ought to be Gaza or Gazaca, probably a colony of
Median Gaza, now Tauris.
172 Originally called Tephrice. It stood on the river Lycus,
and not far from the sources of the Halys, having been founded by
Pompey, where he gained his first victory over Mithridates, whence its
name, the “City of Victory.” The modern Enderez or Devrigni, probably
marks its site.
173 Ritter places it in Sophene, the modern Kharpat,
and considers that it may be represented by the modern Sert, the
Tigranocerta of D’Anville.
174 The capital of Sophene, one of the districts of Armenia.
St. Martin thinks that this was the ancient heathen name of the city
of Martyropolis, but Ritter shows that such cannot be the case. It was
called by the Syrians Kortbest; its present name is Kharput.
175 Generally supposed, by D’Anville and other modern
geographers, to be represented by the ruins seen at Sert. It was the
later capital of Armenia, built by Tigranes.
176 The ancient capital of Armenia. Hannibal, who took
refuge at the court of Artaxias when Antiochus was no longer able to
afford him protection, superintended the building of it. Some ruins,
called Takt Tiridate, or Throne of Tiridates, near the junction of the
Aras and the Zengue, were formerly supposed to represent Artaxata, but
Colonel Monteith has fixed the site at a bend in the river lower down,
at the bottom of which were the ruins of a bridge of Greek or Roman
architecture.
177 A fortress in Lesser Armenia, upon the Euphrates,
seventy-five miles from Zimara, as mentioned in B. v. c. 20. It has
been identified with the modern ferry and lead mines of Kebban Ma’den,
the points where the Kara Su is joined by the Murad Chaï, 270 miles
from its source.
178 Justin makes it only 1100, and that estimate appears to
be several hundreds too much.
180 We find in Strabo the names of some of them mentioned,
such as Sophene, Acilisene, Gorgodylene, Sacassene, Gorgarene, Phanene,
Comisene Orchestene, Chorsene, Cambysene, Odomantis, &c.
181 The Ceraunian Mountains. Parisot remarks that in this
description, Pliny, notwithstanding his previous professions, does not
appear to have made any very great use of the list drawn up by Corbulo.
183 The Septentrional Ocean, with which the ancients
imagined that the northern part of the Caspian Sea is connected. See c.
15.
184 According to Strabo, Albania was bounded on the east by
the Caspian, and on the north by the Caucasus. On the west it joined
Iberia, while on the south it was divided from the Greater Armenia by
the river Cyrus. By later writers, the northern and western boundaries
are differently given. It was found to be the fact that the Albani
occupied the country on both sides of the Caucasus, and accordingly
Pliny, in c. 15, carries the country further north, as far as the river
Casius, while in this Chapter he makes the river Alazon, the modern
Alasan, the western boundary towards Iberia.
186 Iberia lay south of the great chain of the Caucasus,
forming an extensive tract bounded on the west by Colchis, on the east
by Albania, and on the south by Armenia, and watered by the river
Cyrus. It corresponded very nearly with modern Georgia.
192 “The Armenian workers in iron,” or “Chalybes of
Armenia.” See p. 9.
193 There are two chief passes over the chain of the
Caucasus, both of which were known to the ancients. The first is
between the eastern extremity of its chief north-eastern spur and
the Caspian sea, near the modern Derbend. This was called “Albaniæ,”
and sometimes, “Caspiæ Pylæ,” the “Albanian” or “Caspian Gates.” The
other, which was nearly in the centre of the Caspian range, was called
“Caucasiæ” or “Sarmaticæ Pylæ,” being the same as the modern pass of
Dariyel, and probably the one here referred to.
194 Probably the same as the present fortress of Dariyel.
195 The first instance was that of the narrow isthmus to
which the continent of Asia is reduced from Sinope across to the Gulf
of Issus, as mentioned in c. 2.
196 The shortest distance across, in a straight line, is in
reality little less than 600 miles.
197 The ancestor of the Seleucidæ, kings of Syria,
treacherously slain by Ptolemy Ceraunus, brother of Ptolemy
Philadelphus.
200 The one lying at the mouth of the Danube, and mentioned
in B. iv. c. 27.
201 Mentioned in c. 4 of the present Book. See p. 9.
202 Or “Mars’ Island,” also called Aretias; at this island,
in the south of the Euxine, the two queens of the Amazons, Otrere and
Antiope, built a temple in honour of Ares or Mars. It is thought to be
the rocky islet called by the Turks Kerasunt Ada, between three and
four miles from Kerasunt, the ancient Pharnacea.
203 It is difficult to say what chain of mountains, if
indeed any in particular, he would designate by this name. Parisot
remarks that these mountains would seem to belong rather to the region
of poetry and fable than of fact, and states that it is pretty clear
that the Balkan chain, the districts in which the Danube takes its
rise, the Alps, the Pyrenees, the Hercynian mountains, and even the
chain of Taurus and Caucasus, have at different times been described or
mentioned under the name of Riphæan Mountains. It was evidently Pliny’s
belief that the great Northern or Scythian Ocean skirted the northern
shores of Asia, a little above the latitude perhaps of the northern
extremity of the Caspian. In B. iv. c. 26, we find him crossing these,
perhaps imaginary, mountains, and then proceeding to the left, along,
as he supposes, the extreme northern shores of Europe; here he seems to
start from the same point, but turns to the right, and proceeds along
the northern, eastern, and southern shores of Asia.
207 The extremity of the supposed shores of the Hyperborei.
208 D’Anville supposes that he means the headland called
Cande-Noss or Kanin-Noss, in the White Sea. Parisot, who thinks that
Pliny had no idea of the regions which lie in those high latitudes,
supposes that he refers to Domnes-Ness in the Baltic, and that by the
Carambucis he means the river Niemen.
209 Ansart thinks that he means the Dwina, which falls into
the Gulf of Archangel.
211 For a full description of them, see B. iv. c. 26.
212 See the Note to c. 7, p. 15. This description is
borrowed from that given by Herodotus. Their sacred character has been
explained as referring to the class or caste of priests among this
Eastern people, whoever they may have been.
213 Ansart thinks that the Cicianthi, the Georgi, and the
Amazons, inhabited the modern governments of Archangel and Vologda. It
seems almost akin to rashness to hazard a conjecture.
214 It has been already stated that the Caspian Sea was, in
one portion of it, so called, and in another the Hyrcanian Sea.
215 His meaning is, that the Scythian ocean communicates on
the northern shores of Asia with the Caspian Sea. Hardouin remarks,
that Patrocles, the commander of the Macedonian fleet, was the first to
promulgate this notion, he having taken the mouth of the river Volga
for a narrow passage, by means of which the Scythian or Northern Ocean
made its way into the Caspian Sea.
216 The country of the Cadusii, in the mountainous district
of Media Atropatene, on the south-west shores of the Caspian Sea,
between the parallels of 390 and 370 north latitude. This district
probably corresponds with the modern district of Gilan.
217 Now the Syr-Daria or Yellow River, and watering the
barren steppes of the Kirghiz-Cossacks. It really discharges itself
into the Sea of Aral, and not the Caspian.
233 He alludes to the town of Arbela, where, as it is
generally said, the army of Darius was defeated by Alexander the Great;
by which engagement the conflict was terminated. It was the fact,
however, that Darius left his baggage and treasures at Arbela, while
the battle really took place near the village of Gaugamela, about
twenty miles to the north-west of Arbela. This place still retains its
name of Arbil.
234 A district in the east of Macedonia, bordering on the
Thermaic gulf and the Chalcidic peninsula.
235 Nothing is known of this place. Hardouin suggests that
it may have been built on the spot where Alexander defeated Darius.
236 Also known as Antiochia Mygdoniæ, the capital of
Mygdonia. Its ruins are still to be seen near a place called Nisibin.
It stood on the river Mygdonius, now the Nahral Huali.
237 Or Nineveh, the capital of the great Assyrian monarchy,
destroyed by the Medes and Babylonians about B.C. 606.
238 There is great difficulty in ascertaining, from the
accounts given by the ancient writers, the exact limits of this
district, but it is supposed to have included a considerable portion of
the province now known by the name of Azerbaijan. It derived its name
from Atropates or Atropes, who was governor of this district under the
last Darius.
239 Most probably the place now known as Gazæa, the royal
residence of the Parthian kings, and, as its name would imply, their
treasure city. Colonel Rawlinson thinks that this place underwent many
changes of name according to the rulers who successively occupied it;
among other names, it appears to have borne that of Ecbatana.
240 A city of great magnitude, pleasantly situate near the
foot of Mount Orontes, in the northern part of Greater Media. Its
original foundation was attributed by Diodorus Siculus to Semiramis,
and by Herodotus to Deioces. It was the capital of the Median kingdom,
and afterwards the summer residence of the Persian and Parthian kings.
The genuine orthography of the name seems to be Agbatana. The ruins
seen at the modern Hamadan are generally supposed to represent those of
the ancient Ecbatana; but it is most probable that at different times,
if not contemporaneously, there were several cities of this name in
Media.
241 Pliny in this statement, as also in the distances which
he here assigns to Ecbatana, is supposed to have confounded Ecbatana
with Europus, now Veramin, rebuilt by Seleucus Nicator.
242 This was a city in the vicinity of Rhagæ, which was
distant about 500 stadia from the Caspian Gates. It was built by the
Greeks after the Macedonian conquest of Asia. The other places here
mentioned do not appear to have been identified.
244 This was the name of the wild tribes which occupied the
high mountainous district between the great upland of Persia and the
low plains of Mesopotamia. In addition to the name mentioned by Pliny,
they were called Gordyæ, Cardaces, and Curtii. The present Kurds,
inhabiting Kurdistan, are supposed to be descended from them.
245 The Greek παρ’ ὁδὸν, “on the road”—meaning,
probably, to the Caspian Gates. Hardouin says that the Pratitæ were so
called from the Greek πρατῖται, “merchants.”
246 Although dwelling at a considerable distance, the
custody of these gates was delivered to them, Hardouin says, by the
kings of Media.
250 Its site is unknown; but it is mentioned by Appian as
one of the many towns erected by Seleucus.
251 By the use of the word “quondam,” he implies that in his
time it was in ruins.
252 A place of considerable importance, which seems to have
derived its name from its “hundred gates.” It was one of the capitals
of the Arsacidan princes; but, extensive though it may have been, there
is great doubt where it was situate, the distance recorded by ancient
writers not corresponding with any known ruins.
253 In a northern direction, along the western shores of the
Caspian.
254 According to Hardouin, Eratosthenes, as quoted by
Strabo, makes the distance 5060 stadia, or about 633 miles. He has,
however, mis-translated the passage, which gives 5600 stadia, or 700
miles exactly, as stated by Pliny.
256 Bactra, Bactrum, or Bactrium, was one of the chief
cities, if not the capital, of the province of Bactriana. It was one of
the most ancient cities in the world, and the modern Balkh is generally
supposed to occupy its site. Strabo, as well as Pliny, evidently
considers that Bactra and Zareispa were the same place, while Appian
distinguishes between the two, though he does not clearly state their
relative positions.
257 The modern Syr-Daria, mentioned in c. 15. See p. 25.
258 By some writers called Apavareticene, in the
south-eastern part of Parthia. Ansart says that it is now known as
Asterabad and Ghilan.
259 Or Dara. A strongly fortified place, built by Arsaces
I., and situate on the mountains of the Zapaorteni.
260 According to Ansart, the district now known as
Tabaristan, or Mazanderan, derives the first of those names from the
Tapyri.
261 D’Anville remarks that this river still retains its
“starry” name, being the modern Aster or Ester, on which Asterabad is
situate.
262 This district occupied the southern part of modern
Khiva, the south-western part of Bokhara, and the north-eastern part
of Khorassan. This province of the ancient Persian empire received its
name from the river Margus, now the Moorghab. It first became known to
the Greeks by the expeditions of Alexander and Antiochus I.
264 The meaning of this, which has caused great diversity of
opinion among the Commentators, seems to be, that on rebuilding it, he
preferred giving it a name borne by several cities in Syria, and given
to them in honour of kings of that country. To this he appears to have
been prompted by a supposed resemblance which its site on the Margus
bore to that of Antiochia on the Orontes.
265 The modern Moorghab; it loses itself in the sands of
Khiva.
266 Its remains are supposed to be those of an ancient city,
still to be seen at a spot called Merv, on the river Moorghab.
268 This appears to mean the nations of “Chariot
horse-breeders.”
269 In former editions, called the ‘Gridinus.’ It is
impossible to identify many of these nations and rivers, as the
spelling varies considerably in the respective MSS.
270 An extensive tribe of Sogdiana, now represented by the
district of Khawarezm, in the desert country of Khiva.
271 A tribe in the north-western part of Sogdiana. They
appear to have been situate to the east of the district of Khawarezm.
It has been suggested that they derived their name from the Sanscrit
Gandharas, a tribe beyond the Indus.
272 The chief seat of the Aorsi, who appear to have been
a numerous and powerful people both of Europe and Asia, was in the
country between the Tanais, the Euxine, the Caspian, and the Caucasus.
It seems doubtful, however, whether it is these people who are alluded
to in the present passage.
273 These would almost seem to be a different people
from those mentioned in c. 15 of the present Book, as dwelling in
Atropatene. The present appears to have been a tribe of Sogdiana.
274 Strabo mentions a town of this name, which he places,
together with Apamea, in the direction of Rhagæ. If Pliny has observed
anything like order in his recital of nations and places, the Heraclea
here mentioned cannot be that spoken of by Strabo, but must have been
distant nearly 1000 miles from it.
275 This was a tribe, apparently of Scythian origin, settled
in Margiana, on the left bank of the Oxus. Strabo says that they
worshipped the earth, and forbore to sacrifice or slay any female;
but that they put to death their fellow-creatures as soon as they had
passed their seventieth year, it being the privilege of the next of kin
to eat the flesh of the deceased person. The aged women, however, they
used to strangle, and then consign them to the earth.
276 The modern Jihoun or Amou. It now flows into the Sea
of Aral, but the ancients universally speak of it as running into the
Caspian; and there are still existing distinct traces of a channel
extending in a south-westerly direction from the sea of Aral to the
Caspian, by which at least a portion, and probably the whole of the
waters of the Oxus found their way into the Caspian; and not improbably
the Sea of Aral itself was connected with the Caspian by this channel.
277 Most probably under this name he means the Sea of Aral.
278 The Bactrus. This river is supposed to be represented by
the modern Dakash. Hardouin says that Ptolemy, B. vi. c. 11, calls this
river the Zariaspis, or Zariaspes. See the Note at the end of c. 17, p.
30.
279 Now known as the Hindoo-Koosh; a part of the great
mountain-chain which runs from west to east through the centre of the
southern portion of the highlands of Central Asia, and so divides
the part of the continent which slopes down to the Indian ocean from
the great central table-land of Tartary and Thibet. The native term,
Hindoo-Koosh, is only a form of the ancient name “Indicus Caucasus,”
which was sometimes given to this chain. The ancient name was derived
probably from the Persian word paru, a “mountain.”
280 Flowing from the north side of the Paropanisus.
According to Pliny and Ptolemy, this river flowed through Bactria into
the Oxus; but according to Strabo, through Hyrcania into the Caspian
Sea. Some suppose it to have been only another name for the Oxus.
Ansart suggests that it may have been the river now known as the Bash.
281 D’Anville says that there is still the valley of Al
Sogd, in Tartary, beyond the Oxus. The district called Sogdiana was
probably composed of parts of modern Turkistan and Bokhara. The site of
Panda does not appear to be known.
282 It was built on the Jaxartes, to mark the furthest point
reached by Alexander in his Scythian expedition. It has been suggested
that the modern Kokend may possibly occupy its site.
284 The Sacæ probably formed one of the most numerous and
most powerful of the Scythian Nomad tribes, and dwelt to the east
and north-east of the Massagetæ, as far as Servia, in the steppes of
Central Asia, which are now peopled by the Kirghiz Cossacks, in whose
name that of their ancestors, the Sacæ, is traced by some geographers.
285 Meaning the “Great Getæ.” They dwelt beyond the Jaxartes
and the Sea of Aral, and their country corresponds to that of the
Khirghiz Tartars in the north of Independent Tartary.
286 The Dahæ were a numerous and warlike Nomad tribe, who
wandered over the vast steppes lying to the east of the Caspian Sea.
Strabo has grouped them with the Sacæ and Massagetæ, as the great
Scythian tribes of Inner Asia, to the north of Bactriana.
287 See also B. iv. c. 20, and B. vi. c. 7. The position of
the Essedones, or perhaps more correctly, the Issedones, may probably
be assigned to the east of Ichim, in the steppes of the central border
of the Kirghiz, in the immediate vicinity of the Arimaspi, who dwelt on
the northern declivity of the Altaï chain. A communication is supposed
to have been carried on between these two peoples for the exchange of
the gold that was the produce of those mountain districts.
288 They dwelt, according to Ptolemy, along the southern
banks of the Jaxartes.
289 Or the Mardi, a warlike Asiatic tribe. Stephanus
Byzantinus, following Strabo, places the Amardi near the Hyrcani, and
adds, “There are also Persian Mardi, without the a;” and, speaking of
the Mardi, he mentions them as an Hyrcanian tribe, of predatory habits,
and skilled in archery.
290 D’Anville supposes that the Euchatæ may have dwelt at
the modern Koten, in Little Bukharia. It is suggested, however, by
Parisot, that they may have possibly occupied a valley of the Himalaya,
in the midst of a country known as “Cathai,” or the “desert.”
291 The first extant notice of them is in Herodotus; but
before him there was the poem of Aristeas of Proconnesus, of which
the title was ‘Arimaspea;’ and it is mainly upon the statements in
it that the stories told relative to this people rest—such as their
being one-eyed, and as to their stealing the gold from the Gryphes,
or Griffins, under whose custody it was placed. Their locality is by
some supposed to have been on the left bank of the Middle Volga, in
the governments of Kasan, Simbirsk, and Saratov: a locality which is
sufficiently near the gold districts of the Uralian chain to account
for the legends connecting them with the Gryphes, or guardians of the
gold.
292 The former reading was, “The Napæi are said to have
perished as well as the Apellæi.” Sillig has, however, in all
probability, restored the correct one. “Finding,” he says, “in the work
of Diodorus Siculus, that two peoples of Scythia were called, from
their two kings, who were brothers, the Napi and the Pali, we have
followed close upon the footsteps of certain MSS. of Pliny, and have
come to the conclusion that some disputes arose between these peoples,
which ultimately led to the destruction of one of them”.
297 Ansart suggests that this island is that now called
Idak, one of the Ogurtchinski group.
298 This would apply to the north-eastern coasts of Siberia,
if Pliny had had any idea of land situate in such high latitudes; but,
on the contrary, as already remarked, he appears to have supposed that
the continent of Asia terminated a little above the northern extremity
of the Caspian. It would be a loss of time to guess what locality is
meant by the Scythian Promontory.
300 This, it would appear, he looks upon as the extreme
north-eastern point of Asia. Parisot suggests that the word Tabis is
allied to the Mongol Daba, which signifies “mountain;” or else that it
may have some affinity with “Thibet.”
301 The people of Serica, which country with Ptolemy
corresponds to the north-western part of China, and the adjacent
portions of Thibet and Chinese Tartary. The capital, Sera, is by
most supposed to be Singan, on the Hoang-ho, but by some Peking.
Pliny evidently refers to the same people, and has some notion of the
locality of their country.
302 This is generally supposed to bear reference to the
cloths exported by the Seres, as Serica, and corresponding to our
silks. On examination, however, it will appear that he rather refers
to some textures of cotton, such as calicos or muslins; it being not
unknown to Pliny that silks or bombycina were the produce of the
bombyx or silk-worm; see B. xi. c. 22. The use of the word “canities”
points strongly to cotton as being the substance meant.
303 Whether it is silk or cotton that is here referred
to, Pliny seems in this passage to allude to some peculiarity in the
texture, which was perhaps so close, that when brought to the Western
world it was the custom to draw out a portion of the threads. In such
case it perhaps strongly resembled the Chinese crapes of the present
day. Speaking of Cleopatra in B. x. 141, of the Pharsalia, Lucan
says, “Her white breasts are resplendent through the Sidonian fabric,
which, wrought in close texture by the sley of the Seres, the needle
of the workman of the Nile has separated, and has loosened the warp by
stretching out the web.”
304 He either refers to dresses consisting of nothing but
open work, or what we may call fine lace, and made from the closely
woven material imported from China, or else to the ‘Coan vestments’
which were so much worn by the Roman women, especially those of light
character, in the Augustan age. This Coan tissue was remarkable for its
extreme transparency. It has been supposed that these dresses were made
of silk, as in the island of Cos silk was spun and woven at an early
period, so much so as to obtain a high celebrity for the manufactures
of that island. Seneca, B. vii. De Benef. severely censures the
practice of wearing these thin garments. For further information on
this subject, see B. xi. c. 26, 27, and B. xii. c. 22.
305 Meaning that they do not actively seek intercourse with
the rest of the world, but do not refuse to trade with those who will
take the trouble of resorting to them. This coincides wonderfully with
the character of the Chinese even at the present day.
309 The Emodi Montes (so called probably from the Indian
hemâdri, or the “golden”) are supposed to have formed that portion
of the great lateral branch of the Indian Caucasus, the range of the
Himalaya, which extends along Nepaul, and probably as far as Bhotan.
311 The whole of this passage seems very intricate, and it
is difficult to make sense of it. His meaning, however, is probably
this: that the coast of India, running from extreme north-east to
south-east, relatively to Greece, the country of Eratosthenes,
is exactly opposite to the coast of Gaul, running from extreme
north-west to south-west—India thus lying due west of Gaul, without
any intervening land. This, it will be remembered, was the notion of
Columbus, when contemplating the possibility of a western passage to
India.
312 This appears also to be somewhat obscure. It is clear
that if India lies to the west of Gaul, it cannot be Pliny’s meaning
that it is refreshed by the west wind blowing to it from Gaul.
He may possibly mean that the west wind, which is so refreshing to the
west of Europe, and Gaul in particular, first sweeps over India, and
thus becomes productive of that salubrity which Posidonius seems to
have discovered in India, but for which we look in vain at the present
day. Amid, however, such multiplied chances of a corrupt text, it is
impossible to assume any very definite position as to his probable
meaning. The French translators offer no assistance in solving the
difficulty, and Holland renders it, “This west wind which from behind
Gaul bloweth upon India, is very healthsome,” &c.
314 In the geographical work which Patrocles seems to have
published, he is supposed to have given some account of the countries
bordering on the Caspian Sea, and there is little doubt that, like
other writers of that period, he regarded that sea as a gulf or inlet
of the Septentrional Ocean, and probably maintained the possibility
of sailing thither by sea from the Indian Ocean. This statement,
however, seems to have been strangely misinterpreted by Pliny in
his present assertion, that Patrocles had himself accomplished this
circumnavigation.
328 One of the principal rivers of that part of India known
as the Punjaub. It rises in the north-western Himalayah mountains in
Kashmere, and after flowing nearly south, falls into the Acesines or
Chenab. Its present most usual name is the Jhelum.
329 The most eastern, and most important of the five rivers
which water the country of the Punjaub. Rising in the western Himalaya,
it flows in two principal branches, in a course nearly south-west
(under the names respectively of Vipasa and Satadru), which it retains
till it falls into the Indus at Mittimkote. It is best known, however,
by its modern name of Sutlej, probably a corrupt form of the Sanscrit
Satadru.
330 See c. 18 of the present Book. The altars there spoken
of, as consecrated by Alexander the Great, appear to have been erected
in Sogdiana, whereas those here mentioned were dedicated in the Indian
territory.
331 It does not appear that this river has been identified.
In most of the editions it is called Hesidrus; but, as Sillig observes,
there was a town of India, near the Indus, called Sydros, which
probably received its name from this river.
332 It has been suggested that this place is the modern
Kanouge, on the Ganges.
333 The modern Jumna. It must be borne in mind by the
reader, that the numbers given in this Chapter vary considerably in the
different MSS.
335 The Sanscrit for “snowy” is “himarat.” The name of
Emodus, combined with Imaüs, seems here to be a description of the knot
of mountains formed by the intersections of the Himalaya, the Hindoo
Koosh, and the Bolor range; the latter having been for many ages the
boundary between the empires of China and Turkistan. It is pretty
clear, that, like Ptolemy, Pliny imagined that the Imaüs ran from south
to north; but it seems hardly necessary, in this instance at least,
to give to the word “promontorium” the meaning attached to our word
“promontory,” and to suppose that he implies that the range of the
Imaüs runs down to the verge of the eastern ocean.
336 A name evidently given to numerous tribes of India, from
the circumstance that Alexander and his followers found it borne by the
Brahmins or priestly caste of the Hindoos.
337 Still called the Cane, a navigable river of India within
the Ganges, falling into the Ganges, according to Arrian as well as
Pliny, though in reality it falls into the Jumna.
338 The Calingæ, who are further mentioned in the next
Chapter, probably dwelt in the vicinity of the promontory of Calingon,
upon which was the town of Dandaguda, mentioned in c. 23 of the present
Book. This promontory and city are usually identified with those of
Calinapatnam, about half-way between the rivers Mahanuddy and Godavery;
and the territory of the Calingæ seems to correspond pretty nearly to
the district of Circars, lying along the coast of Orissa.
339 By the Malli, Parisot is of opinion that the people of
Moultan are meant.
340 So much so, indeed, that its sources were unknown to the
learned world till the beginning of the present century, although the
Chinese emperor Tang-Hi on one occasion sent a body of Llamas for the
purpose of inquiring into the subject. It is now ascertained that the
river Ganges is the result of the confluence of three separate streams,
which bear the respective names of the Gannavi, the Bhagirathi, and the
Alakananda. The second is of the most sacred character, and is the one
to which the largest concourse of pilgrims resort. The ancients held
various opinions as to the sources of the river.
341 The Cainas and the Jomanes, mentioned in the last
Chapter.
342 The modern Gandaki or Gundûk is generally supposed to be
represented by the Condochates.
343 Represented as flowing into the Ganges at Palimbothra,
the modern Patna. There has been considerable discussion among the
learned as to what river is indicated by this name. It has, however,
been considered most probable that it is the same as the Sonus of
Pliny, the modern Soane, though both that author, as well as Arrian,
speaks of two rivers, which they call respectively Erannoboas and
Sonus. The name was probably derived from the Sanscrit Hyranyavahas,
the poetical name of the Sonus.
344 Supposed to be the same as the river Cosi or Coravaha.
345 The wide diffusion of the Calingæ, and their close
connection with the Gangaridæ, are shown by the fact that Pliny here
calls them “Calingæ Gangarides,” and mentions the Modogalingæ on a
large island in the Ganges, and the Maccocalingæ on the upper course of
that river. See note 338, p. 42.
347 Or castes, as we call them. These institutions prevail
equally at the present day, and the divisions of the duties of the
respective castes are pretty much as Pliny states them to be, except
that the husbandmen and merchants form one class, called the Vaisya,
the Brahmins being the ministers of religion, the Kshatriya forming
the warlike class, the Sudra constituting the menial or servant class.
Pliny here represents the rulers and councillors as forming a distinct
class. Such, however, does not appear to be the fact; for we find that
the sovereign is chosen from the Kshatriya or military class, while
from the Brahmins are selected the royal councillors, judges, and
magistrates of the country.
348 He alludes to the Brahmins, who seem to have been called
by the Greek writers “Gymnosophists,” or “naked wise men.” The Brahmin
Calanus is a memorable example of this kind of self-immolation.
349 It is extremely doubtful if, even in his own day, Pliny
was correct in venturing upon so sweeping an assertion.
351 He is incorrect here; these duties devolve on the Vaisya
class.
352 Inhabited, probably, by a branch of the Calingæ
previously mentioned.
353 Ansart suggests that this may be the modern kingdom of
Pegu. He thinks also that the preceding kingdom may be that now called
Arracan.
354 These may possibly be the Daradræ of Ptolemy, but it
seems impossible to guess their locality.
355 Probably the present Patna. D’Anville, however,
identifies it with Allahabad, while Welford and Wahl are inclined to
think it the same as Radjeurah, formerly called Balipoutra or Bengala.
The Prasii are probably the race of people mentioned in the ancient
Sanscrit books under the name of the “Pragi” or the Eastern Empire,
while the Gangarides are mentioned in the same works under the name of
“Gandaressa” or Kingdom of the Ganges.
356 Hardouin is of opinion that these nations dwelt in the
localities occupied by the districts of Gwalior and Agra.
357 The Septentriones or “Seven Trions,” in the original.
Parisot is of opinion that under this name of Mount Maleus he alludes
to the Western Ghauts, and that the name still survives in the word
Malabar. He also remarks that this statement of Pliny is not greatly
exaggerated.
358 Ansart says that this is the same as the modern town of
Muttra or Matra upon the Jumna, and to the north of Agra.
359 Or Clisobora, according to Hardouin. It does not appear
to have been identified.
360 In the Indian Peninsula, constituting more especially
the presidency of Madras.
361 It is clear that he looks upon the countries of the
Indus as lying to the south of the Ganges.
362 Or Hindoo Koosh. In this statement he is supported
by Arrian, Strabo, Mela, and Quintus Curtius. It rises, however, a
considerable distance on the north-east side of the Himalaya.
364 Some writers suppose that this must be the same as the
Hydraotes, or modern Ravi, because the latter is not otherwise found
mentioned in the list given by Pliny. The name, however, leaves but
little doubt that Pliny had heard of the Acesines under its Indian name
of Chandabragha, and out of it has made another river.
369 These peoples are supposed by Hardouin to have occupied
the southern parts of the peninsula now known as Bisnagar, Calicut, and
the Deccan, with the Malabar and Coromandel coasts.
370 Hardouin suggests that this people dwelt on the present
peninsula of Guzerat.
371 None of these appear to have been identified; indeed, it
appears to be next to impossible, owing to the corrupt state in which
they have come down to us.
372 Built on the Hydaspes by Alexander after his victory
over Porus, B.C. 326, at the spot where he had crossed the
river before the battle, and in memory of his celebrated charger
Bucephalus, who had expired during the battle from fatigue and old age,
or from wounds. The exact site of this place is not known, but the
probabilities appear in favour of Jhelum, at which place is the usual
passage of the river, or else of Jellapoor, about sixteen miles lower
down.
373 Probably the same that is mentioned in c. 21 of the
present Book.
374 Parisot supposes that these were the inhabitants of the
district which now bears the name of Pekheli.
375 Gedrosia comprehended probably the same district as is
now known by the name of Mekran, or, according to some, the whole of
modern Beloochistan.
376 The people of the city and district of Arachotus,
the capital of Arachosia. M. Court has identified some ruins on the
Argasan river, near Kandahar, on the road to Shikarpur, with those of
Arachotus; but Professor Wilson considers them to be too much to the
south-east. Colonel Rawlinson thinks they are those to be seen at a
place called Ulan Robat. He states that the most ancient name of the
city, Cophen, (mentioned by Pliny in c. 25 of the present Book), has
given rise to the territorial designation. See p. 57.
377 The people of Aria, consisting of the eastern part of
Khorassan, and the western and north-western part of Afghanistan. This
was one of the most important of the eastern provinces or satrapies of
the Persian empire.
378 This was the collective name of several peoples dwelling
on the southern slopes of the Hindoo Koosh, and of the country which
they inhabited, which was not known by any other name. It corresponded
to the eastern part of modern Afghanistan and the portion of the
Punjaub lying to the west of the Indus.
379 It is supposed that the Cophes is represented by the
modern river of Kabul.
380 The place here alluded to was in the district of Goryæa,
at the north-western corner of the Punjaub, near the confluence of the
rivers Cophen and Choaspes, being probably the same place as Nagara or
Dionysopolis, the modern Nagar or Naggar.
381 The word μήρος, in Greek, signifying a “thigh.”
382 Supposed by some to have been Lower Scinde, and the
vicinity of Kurrachee, with its capital Potala.
383 Ansart suggests that these may be the Laccadives. Their
name means the “gold” and “silver” islands.
384 Probably an island near the mouths of the Indus.
385 Probably the same as the Bibacta of Arrian. The present
name of it is Chilney Isle.
386 Although Poinsinet will not admit its identity, it is
now universally agreed among the learned that the island of Taprobana
is the modern Ceylon. As Gosselin observes, in the accounts said
to have been given of Ceylon by the ambassadors to Claudius, great
allowance must be made for the wrong interpretation which, owing to
their ignorance of the language, the Romans must have given to much of
their narrative.
387 From ἀντὶ, “opposite,” and χθών, “the
earth.” Its people being supposed to be the antipodes of those of
Europe.
388 “The ancient race.” As Ansart observes, the island
contains a mountain, the name of which is “Adam’s” Peak.
390 A general term probably, as already stated, for the
great peninsula of India, below the Ganges.
391 This expression has been relied upon by those who do not
admit that Ceylon is identical with the ancient Taprobana. But it is
not improbable that the passage here referred to is from Cape Comorin
to Ceylon, and not from Cape Ramanan Cor, the nearest part of the
continent. In such case, the distance would be sixty-five or sixty-six
leagues, and we can easily conceive that Greek vessels, sailing from
nine to ten leagues per day, might occupy seven days in making the
passage from Cape Comorin, past Ramanan Cor, to the coasts of Ceylon.
392 The amphora, as a measure, contained eight congii, or
forty-eight sextarii.
393 Or “Septentrio;” “the Seven Trions,” which was more
especially employed by the nations of Europe for the purposes of
navigation.
394 Parisot suggests that the word “Radijah,” or “Rajah,”
denoting the rank which he held, may have been here taken by Pliny for
his name.
395 Ptolemy says that the ancient name of the island was
Simundi, or Palæsimundi, but speaks of no such city as the one here
mentioned, nor indeed of any other of the localities described by
Pliny.
396 It is difficult to say whether by this name is meant the
modern Cape Comorin, or that known as Ramanan Cor, which is in reality
the nearest point to the coast of Ceylon. Perhaps the latter is meant;
in which case it is not improbable that the Island of the Sun will be
represented by the islet called Rameserum in the maps, or else the one
adjoining called Manaar. It must not be confounded with the Island of
the Sun, mentioned in c. 26. See p. 60.
397 It is not improbable that he alludes to coral reefs.
398 This assertion Gosselin would either reject as a
fabulous falsehood, or as having originated in some misconception on
the part of the Romans; for, as he remarks, it is quite impossible that
the Pleiades should be a constellation unknown at that time to the
people of Ceylon; but, on the other hand, it would be equally true that
the Greater Bear was concealed from them.
399 This was also a fable, or else originated in
misapprehension of their language on the part of the Romans.
400 Gosselin remarks that their story may have been that
for about seven months in the year the shadows fell to the north, and
during the remaining five to the south, which would not have been
inconsistent with the truth.
401 This also is classed by Gosselin under the head either
of fabulous stories or misapprehensions.
402 “Seras—ab ipsis aspici.” It is difficult to say whether
this does not mean that they were in sight of the coast of the Seræ.
Under any circumstances, the Seræ here spoken of must not be taken
for the Seres or supposed Chinese. Gosselin remarks that under this
name the people of a district called Sera are probably referred to,
and that in fact such is the name of a city and a whole province at
the present day, situate on the opposite coast, beyond the mountains
which terminate the plains of the Carnatic. It is equally impossible
that under the name of “Emodi” Pliny can allude to the Himalaya chain,
distant more than 2000 miles. The mountains, on the verge of the plains
of the Carnatic, are not improbably those here referred to, and it is
not impossible that they may be discerned from the shores of Ceylon.
Gosselin is of opinion that the name of the ancient Seræ may still be
traced in that of Seringapatam, and of the city of Seringham, situate
on the river Godavery.
403 Relative to the Seræ, or inhabitants of the opposite
shores.
404 Or “Bacchus.” This means that he wears a long robe with
a train; much like the dress, in fact, which was worn on the stage by
tragic actors.
405 “Festa venatione absumi, gratissimam eam tigribus
elephantisque constare.” Holland gives this sentence quite a different
meaning, fancying that it bears reference to the mode in which the
guilty king comes to his end, which, indeed, otherwise does not appear
to be stated. “But to doe him to death in the end, they appoint a
solemne day of hunting, right pleasant and agreable unto tigres and
elephants, before which beasts they expose their king, and so he is
presently by them devoured.” It is difficult to say, however, where he
finds all this.
406 It is much more probable that they used the shells for
the purpose of making roofs for their habitations.
407 Mentioned already, towards the conclusion of c. 23 of
the present Book. See p. 51.
408 This place was included in the district of the
Paropanisus or Hindoo Koosh. It is doubtful whether Pliny is correct
in saying that it was destroyed by Cyrus, as we have no reason for
supposing that he ever advanced so far to the north-east. It is
supposed by some that Capisene represents the valley of the Kabul
river, and Capisa the town on the Indus, now known as Peshawar. Lassen,
in his researches, has found in the Chinese annals a kingdom called
Kiapiche, in the valley of Ghurbend, to the east of Bamian. It is not
improbable that Capisa and Kiapiche were different forms of the same
name.
410 The principal river of Drangiana, which rises in the
lower range of the Paropanisus or Hindoo Koosh, and enters Lake Zarah.
Its present name is Ilmend or Helmend. Burnouf has supposed it to be
the same as the Arachotus; but Professor Wilson is of opinion that the
Arachotus was one of the tributaries of the Erymanthus or Erymandrus,
and probably the modern Arkand-Ab.
411 Parisot takes the meaning of this word to be “valley,”
and is of opinion that it is the modern Chabul; not to be confounded,
however, with the country of Cabul, to the east of which it is situate.
412 Now called Birusen, according to Parisot, and not the
city of Cabul, as supposed by Hardouin.
414 This place has not been identified. It has been
suggested that it is the same as the modern city of Candahar; but that
was really Alexandria of the Paropanisadæ, quite a different place.
415 Inhabiting the district now called Arassen, according to
Parisot.
416 Inhabiting the modern Danra, according to Parisot.
417 Inhabitants of the modern Parasan, according to Parisot.
418 The modern Candahar is generally supposed to occupy its
site.
419 Pliny is thought to have here confounded the extensive
district of Ariana with the smaller province of Aria, which only formed
a portion of it. Ariana comprehended nearly the whole of what had been
previously ancient Persia.
420 The river known in modern times as the Ilincut,
according to Parisot.
421 This is supposed by Forbiger to be the modern Arghasan,
one of the tributaries of the Helmend. Parisot says that it was the
same as the modern Sat.
422 Supposed to be the same as the “Aria civitas,” or “city
of Aria” of other authors, which, however, is most probably represented
by Alexandria, the modern Herat, situate on the small stream now called
the Heri-Rud. At all events, Artacoana (proved by M. Court to be a
word of Persian origin—Arde Koun) was, if not the same place, at a
very small distance from it. M. Barbie de Bocage is of opinion that it
occupied the site of Fushing, a town on the Heri river, one stage from
Herat; and by M. Court it is thought to have been at Obeh, near the
same place.
423 Now called the Heri-Rud, which runs to the west of
Herat.
424 It is said that, judging from a traditional verse still
current among the people of Herat, that town is believed to unite the
claims of the ancient capital built by Alexander the Great, or indeed,
more properly, repaired by him, as he was but a short time in Aria.
The distance also from the Caspian Gates to Alexandria favours its
identification with the modern Herat.
425 This place does not appear to have been identified.
426 Ansart suggests that the river Pharnacotis is the same
as the modern Ferrichround, and the Ophradus probably the Kouchround.
427 Ansart suggests that the modern name is Zarang. Parisot
says that it is Corcharistan.
428 The inhabitants of Drangiana, a district at the eastern
end of the modern kingdom of Persia, and comprehending part of the
present Sejestan or Seistan.
429 They gave its name to the modern Eudras, according to
Parisot.
430 It is doubtful whether these are the same as the
Gedrosi, mentioned by Pliny in c. 23, 24. Parisot censures Hardouin for
confounding them, and says that these inhabited the modern Bassar. In
Dr. Smith’s Dictionary, they are looked upon as the same people.
431 Parisot says that this is the desert region now known as
Eremaier, to the east of Mount Maugracot.
432 As Parisot remarks, our author is now approaching
the sea-shore; these places, however, do not appear to have been
identified.
433 Not the same as the river Cophen or Cophes mentioned in
c. 24, the modern Kabul. Hardouin takes it to be the same as the Arbis
or Arabius of Ptolemy, the modern Hilmend or Ilmend.
434 Parisot seems to think that the modern names of these
rivers are the Sal, the Ghir, and the Ilmentel, which, according to
him, flow into the Ilmend.
435 Situate, according to Ptolemy, in the eastern parts of
Media.
437 Meaning the “Fish-eating Mountaineers.” According to
Parisot they occupied the site of the modern Dulcidan, and Goadel,
which are bounded by mountains, whence the name.
438 Not only the Oritæ, but all those mentioned in the
following Chapter. For further particulars as to the Ichthyophagi, see
B. vii. c. 2.
442 One of Alexander’s most distinguished officers, and a
native of Pella. He commanded the division of cavalry and light-armed
troops which accompanied the fleet of Alexander down the Indus, along
the right bank of the river. The Alexandria here mentioned does not
appear to have been identified. It is not to be confounded with
Alexandria in Arachosia, nor yet with a place of the same name in
Carmania, the modern Kerman.
443 A river Tomerus is spoken of by Arrian as lying between
the Indus and the river Arabis or Arbis.
444 They seem to have dwelt along the shores of the modern
Mukran, south of Beloochistan, and probably part of Kerman.
445 Called Nosala by Arrian. Ansart suggests that it is
the island now known by the name of Sengadip. It lay probably off the
promontory or headland of the Sun, on the eastern coast of Arabia.
446 Mela suggests the reason, but gives to the island a
different locality—“over against the mouth of the Indus.” He says
that the air of the island is of such a nature as to take away life
instantaneously, and appears to imply that the heat is the cause.
449 The Persian kings, descendants of Achæmenes. He was said
to have been reared by an eagle.
450 Called the Promontory of Harmozon by Strabo, Hardouin
says that the modern name is Cape Jash, but recent writers suggest that
it is represented by the modern Cape Bombaruk, nearly opposite Cape
Mussendom.
451 Perhaps the modern Kishon, at the entrance of the
Persian Gulf; or that may be one of the four islands next mentioned.
452 The story of Pontoppidan’s Kraken or Korven, the serpent
of the Norwegian Seas, is as old as Pliny, we find, and he derived
his information from older works.
453 Forbiger has suggested that this may be the same as the
modern Djayrah.
454 Mentioned again in c. 29 of the present Book. Its modern
name is Pasa or Fasa-Kuri, according to Parisot.
455 Supposed to be the stream called by D’Anville and
Thevenot the Boschavir, the river of Abushir or Busheer.
456 A river of ancient Susiana, the present name of which
is Karun. Pliny states, in c. 31 of the present Book, that the Eulæus
flowed round the citadel of Susa; he mistakes it, however, for the
Coprates, or, more strictly speaking, for a small stream now called the
Shapúr river, the ancient name of which has not been preserved. He is
also in error, most probably, in making the river Eulæus flow through
Messabatene, it being most likely the present Mah-Sabaden, in Laristan,
which is drained by the Kerkbah, the ancient Choaspes, and not by the
Eulæus.
457 Called, for the sake of distinction, Charax Spasinu,
originally founded by Alexander the Great. It was afterwards destroyed
by a flood, and rebuilt by Antiochus Epiphanes, under the name of
Antiochia. It is mentioned in c. 31.
458 The Shushan of Scripture, now called Shu. It was the
winter residence of the kings of Persia, and stood in the district
Cersia of the province Susiana, on the eastern bank of the river
Choaspes. The site of Susa is now marked by extensive mounds.
459 The island of Patala or Patale, previously mentioned in
c. 23.
460 Most probably the Cape Ras-el-Bad, the most easterly
peninsula of Arabia.
461 35,000,000 francs, according to Ansart, which would
amount to £1,400,000 of our money.
462 Pliny is the only writer that mentions this place among
the towns of Lower Egypt. Some suppose it to have been Nicopolis, or
the City of Victory, founded by Augustus B.C. 29, partly to
commemorate the reduction of Egypt to a Roman province, and partly to
punish the Alexandrians for their adhesion to the cause of Antony and
Cleopatra. Mannert, however, looks upon it as having been merely that
suburb of Alexandria which Strabo (B. xvii.) calls Eleusis.
464 From Coptos, the modern Kouft or Keft. Ptolemy
Philadelphus, when he constructed the port of Berenice, erected several
caravansaries or watering-places between the new city and Coptos.
Coptos was greatly enriched by the commerce between Lybia and Egypt on
the one hand, and Arabia and India on the other.
465 Belzoni found traces of several of the stations here
mentioned. The site of Berenice, as ascertained by Moresby and Carless,
1830-3, was nearly at the bottom of the inlet known as the Sinus
Immundus, or Foul Bay. Its ruins still exist.
466 Now called Gehla, a harbour and emporium at the
south-western point of Arabia Felix.
467 An emporium or promontory on the southern coast of
Arabia, in the country of the Adramitæ, and, as Arrian says, the
chief port of the incense-bearing country. It has been identified by
D’Anville with Cava Canim Bay, near a mountain called Hissan Ghorab, at
the base of which there are ruins to be seen.
468 Probably the modern Mosch, north of Mokha, near the
southern extremity of Arabia Felix.
469 Its ruins are now known as Dhafar. It was one of the
chief cities of Arabia, standing near the southern coast of Arabia
Felix, opposite the modern Cape Guardafui.
470 Or Favonius, the west wind, previously mentioned in the
present Chapter.
473 The Cottiara of Ptolemy, who makes it the chief city
of the Æi, a tribe who occupied the lower part of the peninsula of
Hindostan. It has been supposed to be represented by the modern Calicut
or Travancore. Cochin, however, appears to be the most likely.
474 Marcus observes that we may conclude that either Pliny
or the author from whom he transcribed, wrote this between the years
of the Christian era 48 and 51; for that the coincidence of the 6th of
the month Mechir with the Ides of January, could not have taken place
in any other year than those on which the first day of Thoth or the
beginning of the year fell on the 11th of August, which happened in the
years 48, 49, 50, and 51 of the Christian era.
475 An extensive province of Asia, along the northern shores
of the Persian Gulf, supposed to have comprehended the coast-line of
the modern Laristan, Kirman, and Moghostan.
476 Ptolemy mentions an inland town of Carmania of the same
name.
477 Supposed to be that known now as the Ibrahim Rud, which
falls into the Persian Gulf.
480 He gives this name to the whole expanse of sea that lies
between Arabia and Africa on the west, and India on the east, including
the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.
481 Or Erythrus. In all probability entirely a mythical
personage. The sea having been called in Greek ἐρυθραῖα,
or “red”—the legend most probably thence took its rise. No very
satisfactory reason has yet been given for its being so called. The
Hebrew name of it signifies the “Sedgy Sea.”
482 From Azania in Æthiopia, mentioned again in c. 34 of the
present Book.
492 A district of Susiana, extending from the river Eulæus
on the west, to the Oratis on the east, deriving its name perhaps
from the Elymæi, or Elymi, a warlike people found in the mountains of
Greater Media. In the Old Testament this country is called Elam.
493 Ptolemy says that this last bore the name of
“Alexander’s Island.”
494 Persis was more properly a portion only or province
of the ancient kingdom of Persia. It gave name to the extensive
Medo-Persian kingdom under Cyrus, the founder of the Persian empire,
B.C. 559.
495 The Parthi originally inhabited the country south-east
of the Caspian, now Khorassan. Under Arsaces and his descendants,
Persis and the other provinces of ancient Persia became absorbed in the
great Parthian empire. Parthia, with the Chorasmii, Sogdii, and Arii,
formed the sixteenth satrapy under the Persian empire. See c. 16 of
this Book.
496 The provinces of Parthia have been already mentioned in
detail in the preceding Chapters, except Susiana and Elymais, which are
mentioned in c. 31.
501 Not to be confounded with the place in Atropatene,
mentioned in c. 21 of the present Book.
502 It has been supposed that the modern Damgham corresponds
with this place, but that is too near the Portæ Caspiæ. It is
considered most probable that the remains of Hecatompylos ought to be
sought in the neighbourhood of a place now known as Jah Jirm. It is
mentioned in c. 17 and 21 of the present Book.
503 Media occupied the extreme west of the great table-land
of the modern Iran. It corresponded very nearly to the modern province
of Irak-Ajemi.
504 The Upper and the Lower, as already mentioned.
505 Hardouin suggests that this should be Syrtibolos. His
reasons for so thinking will be found alluded to in a note to c. 31.
See p. 80, Note 593.
506 Or the “Great Ladder.” The Baron de Bode states, in his
Travels in Luristan and Arabistan, that he discovered the remains of
a gigantic causeway, in which he had no difficulty in recognizing one
of the most ancient and most mysterious monuments of the East. This
causeway, which at the present day bears the name of Jaddehi-Atabeg, or
the “road of the Atabegs,” was looked upon by several historians as one
of the wonders of the world, who gave it the name of the Climax Megale
or “Great Ladder.” At the time even of Alexander the Great the name of
its constructor was unknown.
507 Which was rebuilt after it was burnt by Alexander, and
in the middle ages had the name of Istakhar; it is now called Takhti
Jemsheed, the throne of Jemsheed, or Chil-Minar, the Forty Pillars. Its
foundation is sometimes ascribed to Cyrus the Great, but more generally
to his son, Cambyses. The ruins of this place are very extensive.
508 Its site is unknown; but Dupinet translates it the “city
of Lor.”
509 The older of the two capitals of Persia, Persepolis
being the later one. It was said to have been founded by Cyrus the
Great, on the spot where he gained his victory over Astyages. Its
exact site is doubtful, but most modern geographers identify it with
Murghab, to the north-east of Persepolis, where there are the remains
of a great sepulchral monument of the ancient Persians, probably the
tomb of Cyrus. Others place it at Farsa or at Dorab-Gherd, both to the
south-east of Persepolis, the direction mentioned by Strabo, but not in
other respects answering his description so well as Murghab.
510 It is most probable that he does not allude here to the
Ecbatana, mentioned in c. 17 of this Book.
511 There were several mountainous districts called
Parætacene in the Persian empire, that being the Greek form of a
Persian word signifying “mountainous.”
512 In B. v. c. 21. He returns to the description of
Susiana, Elymaïs, and Characene in c. 31 of the present Book.
513 The great seat of empire of the Babylonio-Chaldæan
kingdom. It either occupied the site, it is supposed, or stood in the
immediate vicinity of the tower of Babel. In the reign of Labynedus,
Nabonnetus, or Belshazzar, it was taken by Cyrus. In the reign of
Augustus, a small part only of Babylon was still inhabited, the
remainder of the space within the walls being under cultivation. The
ruins of Babylon are found to commence a little south of the village of
Mohawill, eight miles north of Hillah.
515 On the left bank of the Euphrates, opposite to the ford
of Zeugma; a fortress of considerable importance.
516 Its site is unknown. Dupinet confounds it with the place
of this name mentioned in the last Chapter, calling them by the name of
Lor.
517 Pliny is wrong in placing Artemita in Mesopotamia. It
was a city of Babylonia, in the district of Apolloniatis. The modern
Sherbán is supposed to occupy its site.
518 Burnouf, having found the name of these people, as he
supposes, in a cuneiform inscription, written “Ayura,” would have them
to be called Aroei. The Orei are also mentioned in B. v. c. 20.
519 This Antioch does not appear to have been identified.
520 The mountains of the Gordyæi are mentioned in c. 12.
521 This, as previously mentioned in a Note to c. 16, was
the scene of the last great battle between Alexander and Darius, and
known as the battle of Arbela. It has been suggested that it may
perhaps be represented by a place now called Karnelis. See p. 27.
522 According to Ansart, now called the Lesser Zab, and by
the inhabitants the Altun-su, meaning the “Golden river.”
523 According to Parisot, the modern name is Calicala.
524 Strabo speaks of the Aborras, or modern Khabur, as
flowing in the vicinity of Anthemusia, the district probably in which
the town of Anthermis was situate. According to Isidorus of Charax, it
lay between Edessa and the Euphrates. Its site does not appear to have
been any further identified. It is called Anthemusia in B. v. c. 21.
528 This canal, leading from the Euphrates to the Tigris, is
by some thought, according to Hardouin, to have been the river Chobar,
mentioned in Ezekiel, c. i. v. 3.
529 For Arar-Melik, meaning the “River King,” according to
Parisot.
530 As to the identity of this, see a Note at the beginning
of this Chapter.
531 Meaning Jupiter Uranius, or “Heavenly Jupiter,”
according to Parisot, who observes that Eusebius interprets baal, or
bel, “heaven.” According to one account, he was the father of king
Ninus and son of Nimrod. The Greeks in later times attached to his name
many of their legendary fables.
532 The city of Seleucia ad Tigrin, long the capital of
Western Asia, until it was eclipsed by Ctesiphon. Its site has been
a matter of considerable discussion, but the most probable opinion
is, that it stood on the western bank of the Tigris, to the north of
its junction with the royal canal (probably the river Chobar above
mentioned), opposite to the mouth of the river Delas or Silla (now
Diala), and to the spot where Ctesiphon was afterwards built by the
Parthians. It stood a little to the south of the modern city of
Baghdad; thus commanding the navigation of the Tigris and Euphrates,
and the whole plain formed by those two rivers.
533 Ammianus, like Pliny, has ascribed its foundation to
the Parthians under Varanes, or Vardanes, of whom, however, nothing
is known. It stood in the south of Assyria, on the eastern or left
bank of the Tigris. Strabo speaks of it as being the winter residence
of the Parthian kings, who lived there at that season, owing to the
mildness of the climate. In modern times the site of this place has
been identified with that called by the Arabs Al Madain, or the “two
cities.”
534 Or Vologeses. This was the name of five kings of
Parthia, of the race of the Arsacidæ, Arsaces XXIII.,
XXVII., XXVIII., XXIX., XXX. It was
the first of these monarchs who founded the place here mentioned by
Pliny.
535 Or the “City of Vologesus;” certa being the Armenian
for “city.”
536 Nothing appears to be known of this place; but Hardouin
thinks that it is the same with one called Maarsares by Ptolemy, and
situate on the same river Narraga.
537 Parisot says that this river is the one set down in the
maps as falling into the Tigris below its junction with the Euphrates,
and near the mouths of the two rivers. He says that near the banks of
it is marked the town of Nabrahan, the Narraga of Pliny.
538 There is great doubt as to the correct spelling of these
names.
539 Against the attacks of robbers dwelling on the opposite
side; the Attali, for instance.
540 Or “dwellers in tents,” Bedouins, as we call them.
545 The Mediterranean and the Red Sea; the latter including
the modern Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.
546 Forbiger is of opinion that this is the same as the
Didigua or Didugua of Ptolemy. It was situate below Alpamea. D’Anville
takes it to be the modern Corna.
548 Now known as the Plain of Chelat, according to Parisot,
extending between Chelat, a city situate on a great lake and the river
Rosso, falling into the Caspian Sea.
549 Called Diglith by Josephus. Hardouin states that in his
time the name given to the river by the natives was Daghela. This name
is also supposed to be another form of the Hiddekel of Scripture. See
Genesis ii. 14.
550 According to Bochart, this was a corruption of the
Eastern name Deghel, from which were derived the forms Deger, Teger,
and ultimately Tigris.
551 Ritter has identified this with the modern lake Nazuk,
in Armenia, about thirteen miles in length and five in breadth. The
water at the present day is said to be sweet and wholesome.
552 Seneca, however, in his Quæst. Nat. B. vi., represents
the Tigris here as gradually drying up and becoming gradually smaller,
till it disappears.
553 This spot is considered by Parisot to be the modern city
of Betlis.
554 A spot where liquid bitumen or naphtha was found.
555 Or probably Arzarene, a province of the south of
Armenia, situate on the left bank of the Tigris. It derived its name
from the lake Arsene, or the town Arzen, situate on this lake. It is
comprehended in the modern Pashalik of Dyár Bekr.
556 Now called the Myrád-chaï. See B. v. c. 24. Ritter
considers it to be the southern arm of the Euphrates.
557 Or Aroei, as Littré suggests. See Note to c. 30 in p.
71.
559 The site of this place seems to be unknown. It has been
remarked that it is difficult to explain the meaning of this passage of
Pliny, or to determine the probable site of Apamea.
560 Hardouin remarks that this is the right arm of the
Tigris, by Stephanus Byzantinus called Delas, and by Eustathius Sylax,
which last he prefers.
561 According to Ammianus, one of the names of Seleucia on
the Tigris was Coche.
562 A river of Susiana, which, after passing Susa,
flowed into the Tigris, below its junction with the Euphrates. The
indistinctness of the ancient accounts has caused it to be confused
with the Eulæus, which flows nearly parallel with it into the Tigris.
It is pretty clear that they were not identical. Pliny here states that
they were different rivers, but makes the mistake below, of saying that
Susa was situate upon the Eulæus, instead of the Choaspes. These errors
may be accounted for, it has been suggested, by the fact that there
are two considerable rivers which unite at Bund-i-Kir, a little above
Ahwaz, and form the ancient Pasitigris or modern Karun. It is supposed
that the Karun represents the ancient Eulæus, and the Kerkhah the
Choaspes.
563 In c. 26 of the present Book. The custom of the Persian
kings drinking only of the waters of the Eulæus and Choaspes, is
mentioned in B. xxxi. c. 21.
565 Pliny is the only writer who makes mention of this
place. Parisot is of opinion that it is represented by the modern
Digil-Ab, on the Tigris, and suggests that Digilath may be the correct
reading.
568 The name of the district of Chalonitis is supposed to
be still preserved in that of the river of Holwan. Pliny is thought,
however, to have been mistaken in placing the district on the river
Tigris, as it lay to the east of it, and close to the mountains.
569 From Arbela, in Assyria, which bordered on it.
570 A great and populous city of Babylonia, near the Tigris,
but not on it, and eight parasangs within the Median wall. The site is
that probably now called Eski Baghdad, and marked by a ruin called the
Tower of Nimrod. Parisot cautions against confounding it with a place
of a similar name, mentioned by Pliny in B. xii. c. 17, a mistake into
which, he says, Hardouin has fallen.
571 Now called Felongia, according to Parisot. Hardouin
considers it the same as the Sambana of Diodorus Siculus, which Parisot
looks upon as the same as Ambar, to the north of Felongia.
572 Of this Antiochia nothing appears to be known. By some
it has been supposed to be the same with Apollonia, the chief town of
the district of Apolloniatis, to the south of the district of Arbela.
573 Also called the Physcus, the modern Ordoneh, an eastern
tributary of the Tigris in Lower Assyria. The town of Opis stood at its
junction with the Tigris.
574 D’Anville supposes that this Apamea was at the point
where the Dijeil, now dry, branched off from the Tigris, which
bifurcation he places near Samurrah. Lynch, however, has shown that the
Dijeil branched off near Jibbarah, a little north of 34° North lat.,
and thinks that the Dijeil once swept the end of the Median wall, and
flowed between it and Jebbarah. Possibly this is the Apamea mentioned
by Pliny in c. 27.
578 A part of Mount Zagrus, previously mentioned, according
to Hardouin.
579 Its site appears to be unknown. According to Stephanus,
it was a city of Persia. Forbiger conjectures that it is the same place
as Badaca, mentioned by Diodorus Siculus, B. xix. c. 19; but that was
probably nearer to Susa.
583 A warlike tribe on the borders of Susiana and the
Greater Media. In character they are thought to have resembled the
Bakhtiara tribes, who now roam over the mountains which they formerly
inhabited. It has been suggested that their name may possibly be
connected with the modern Khuzistan.
584 Supposed to be the same as the modern Kirmánshah
mountains.
585 As mentioned in a previous Note, (67 in p. 77), Pliny
mistakes the Eulæus for the Choaspes. In c. 26 he says that Susa is on
the river Tigris.
586 Pliny says this in B. xxxi. c. 21 of both the Eulæus and
the Choaspes.
587 Most probably the Hedyphon of Strabo, supposed to be the
same as that now called the Djerrabi.
588 Parisot thinks that this is the modern Jessed, in the
vicinity of the desert of Bealbanet.
592 The modern Saurac, according to Parisot. The more
general reading is “Sosirate.”
593 Our author has nowhere made any such statement as this,
for which reason Hardouin thinks that he here refers to the maritime
region mentioned in c. 29 of the present Book (p. 69), the name of
which Sillig reads as Ciribo. Hardouin would read it as Syrtibolos,
and would give it the meaning of the “muddy district of the Syrtes.”
It is more likely, however, that Pliny has made a slip, and refers to
something which, by inadvertence, he has omitted to mention.
594 Charax Spasinu, or Pasinu, previously mentioned in c. 26
(see p. 62). The name Charax applied to a town, seems to have meant a
fortified place.
597 Though this passage is probably corrupt, the reading
employed by Sillig is inadmissible, as it makes nothing but nonsense.
“Et jam Vipsanda porticus habet;” “and even now, Vipsanda has its
porticos.”
598 Dionysius of Charax. No particulars of him are known
beyond those mentioned by Pliny.
599 Caius, the son of Marcus Agrippa and Julia, the daughter
of Augustus. He was the adopted son of Augustus.
605 Salmasius thinks that this should be written “Nombei;”
but Hardouin remarks that the Nombæi were not of Arabian but Jewish
extraction, and far distant from Mount Libanus.
606 The only resemblance between them is, that each is a
peninsula; that of Arabia being of far greater extent than Italy. It
will be remarked that here, contrary to his ordinary practice, Pliny
makes a distinction between the Red Sea and the Persian Sea or Gulf.
607 “In eandem etiam cœli partem nulla differentia spectat.”
A glance at the map will at once show the fallacy of this assertion.
610 Mentioned in B. v. c. 21, if, indeed, that is the same
Petra.
611 Omana or Omanum was their chief place, a port on the
north-east coast of Arabia Felix, a little above the promontory of
Syagros, now Ras el Had, on a large gulf of the same name. The name is
still preserved in the modern name Oman.
612 In Sitacene, mentioned in the preceding Chapter.
613 Or rather, as Hardouin says, the shore opposite to
Charax, and on the western bank of the river.
614 Called Core Boobian, a narrow salt-water channel,
laid down for the first time in the East India Company’s chart, and
separating a large low island, off the mouth of the old bed of the
Euphrates, from the mainland.
615 The great headland on the coast of Arabia, at the
entrance of the bay of Doat-al-Kusma from the south, opposite to
Pheleche Island.
616 This is the line of coast extending from the great
headland last mentioned to the river Khadema, the ancient Achenus.
617 So called from the city of Arabia Felix, built on its
shores. Strabo says of this city, “The city of Gerra lies in a deep
gulf, where Chaldæan exiles from Babylon inhabit a salt country, having
houses built of salt, the walls of which, when they are wasted by the
heat of the sun, are repaired by copious applications of sea-water.”
D’Anville first identified this place with the modern El Khatiff.
Niebuhr finds its site on the modern Koneit of the Arabs, called “Gran”
by the Persians; but Foster is of opinion that he discovered its ruins
in the East India Company’s Chart, situate where all the ancient
authorities had placed it, at the end of the deep and narrow bay at the
mouth of which are situated the islands of Bahrein. The gulf mentioned
by Pliny is identified by Foster with that of Bahrein.
618 The modern island of Bahrein, according to Brotier,
still famous for its pearl-fishery.
619 Now Samaki, according to Ansart. Its ancient name was
Aradus.
620 Hardouin takes this to be that which by the Arabians is
called by the name of Falg.
622 Considered by modern geographers to be identical in
situation with the Black Mountains and the Cape of Asabi, and still
marked by a town and district named Sabee, close to Cape Mussendom.
627 Stephanus mentions this as an island of the Erythræan
Sea. Hardly any of these places appear to have been identified; and
there is great uncertainty as to the orthography of the names.
628 From which came the myrrh mentioned by Pliny in B. xii.
c. 36.
630 By some geographers identified with the Ocelis or Ocila,
mentioned in c. 26, the present Zee Hill or Ghela, a short distance to
the south of Mocha, and to the north of the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb.
Hardouin says, however, that it was a different place, Acila being in
the vicinity of the Persian Gulf, in which he appears to be correct.
631 Nothing relative to Numenius beyond this fact has been
recorded.
632 Hardouin and Ansart think that under this name is meant
the island called in modern times Mazira or Maceira.
633 There seem to have been three mythical personages of
this name; but it appears impossible to distinguish the one from the
other.
634 Or “Dioscoridis Insula,” an island of the Indian Ocean,
of considerable importance as an emporium or mart, in ancient times.
It lay between the Syagrus Promontorium, in Arabia, and Aromata
Promontorium, now Cape Guardafui, on the opposite coast of Africa,
somewhat nearer to the former, according to Arrian, which cannot be the
case if it is rightly identified with Socotorra, 200 miles distant from
the Arabian coast, and 110 from the north-east promontory of Africa.
635 So called from Azania, or Barbaria, now Ajan, south of
Somauli, on the mainland of Africa.
637 Their country is supposed to have been the Sheba of
Scripture, the queen of which visited king Solomon. It was situate
in the south-western corner of Arabia Felix, the north and centre of
the province of Yemen, though the geographers before Ptolemy seem to
give it a still wider extent, quite to the south of Yemen. The Sabæi
most probably spread originally on both sides of the southern part of
the Red Sea, the shores of Arabia and Africa. Their capital was Saba,
in which, according to their usage, their king was confined a close
prisoner.
639 The modern district of Hadramaut derives its name from
this people, who were situate on the coast of the Red Sea to the east
of Aden. Sabota, their capital, was a great emporium for their drugs
and spices.
644 Probably in the district now known as Akra. It was
situate on the eastern coast of the Red Sea, at the foot of Mount
Hippus.
645 See B. v. c. 12, where this town is mentioned.
646 Whose chief city was Petra, previously mentioned.
647 Supposed by some writers to have been the ancestors of
the Saracens, so famous in the earlier part of the middle ages. Some of
the MSS., indeed, read “Sarraceni.”
655 Agatharchides speaks of a town on the sea coast, which
was so called from the multitude of ducks found there. The one here
spoken of was in the interior, and cannot be the same.
656 Hardouin observes, that neither this word, nor the name
Riphearma, above mentioned, has either a Hebrew or an Arabian origin.
657 Probably the same place as we find spoken of by
Herodotus as Ampe, and at which Darius settled a colony of Miletians
after the capture of Miletus, B.C. 494.
658 Hardouin remarks that Mariaba, the name found in former
editions, has no such meaning in the modern Arabic.
659 Mentioned by Ovid in the Metamorphoses, B. v. l. 165,
et seq. Sillig, however, reads “Ciani.”
660 An intimate friend of the geographer Strabo. He was
prefect of Egypt during part of the reign of Augustus, and in the years
B.C. 24 and 25. Many particulars have been given by Strabo of
his expedition against Arabia, in which he completely failed. The heat
of the sun, the badness of the water, and the want of the necessaries
of life, destroyed the greater part of his army.
664 Its uses in medicine are stated at length in the last
Chapter of B. xxi.
665 Another form of the name of Atramitæ previously
mentioned, the ancient inhabitants of the part of Arabia known as
Hadramant, and settled, as is supposed, by the descendants of the
Joctanite patriarch Hazarmaveth.
666 Arabia at the present day yields no gold, and very
little silver. The queen of Sheba is mentioned as bringing gold to
Solomon, 1 Kings, x. 2, 2 Chron. ix. i. Artemidorus and Diodorus
Siculus make mention, on the Arabian Gulf, of the Debæ, the Alilæi, and
the Gasandi, in whose territories native gold was found. These last
people, who did not know its value, were in the habit of bringing it to
their neighbours, the Sabæi, and exchanging it for articles of iron and
copper.
668 The “mitra,” which was a head-dress especially used by
the Phrygians, was probably of varied shape, and may have been the
early form of the eastern turban.
670 Or Heroöpolis, a city east of the Delta, in Egypt, and
situate near the mouth of the royal canal which connected the Nile
with the Red Sea. It was of considerable consequence as a trading
station upon the arm of the Red Sea, which runs up as far as Arsinoë,
the modern Suez, and was called the “Gulf” or “Bay of the Heroes.” The
ruins of Heroöpolis are still visible at Abu-Keyscheid.
671 This place, as here implied, took its name from
Cambyses, the son of Cyrus.
672 In c. 9 of the preceding Book. “Dictum,” however, may
only mean, “called” the Delta.
673 Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, and Tzetzes, mention this,
not with reference to Sesostris, but Necho, the grandson of Sesostris.
674 Ptolemy Philadelphus, son of Ptolemy Soter, or Lagides.
675 Now known by the name of Scheib. They derived their name
from the saline flavour and deposition of their waters. These springs
were strongly impregnated with alkaline salts, and with muriate of
lime washed from the rocks which separated the Delta from the Red Sea.
The salt which they produced being greatly valued, they were on that
account regarded as the private property of the kings.
676 The “not thirsty” route, so called by way of
antiphrasis.
679 Or “narrow necks,” apparently, from the Greek
στηναὶ δειραὶ. If this be the correct reading, they were probably so
called from the narrow strait which ran between them.
680 An island called Halonnesus has been already mentioned
in B. iv. c. 23. None of these islands appear to have been identified.
682 This seems to be the meaning, though, literally
translated, it would be, “These were the prefects of kings.”
683 It obtained this title of πάγχρυσος, or “all
golden,” from its vicinity to the gold mines of Jebel Allaki, or
Ollaki, from which the ancient Egyptians drew their principal supply
of that metal, and in the working of which they employed criminals and
prisoners of war.
684 Or ἐπὶ δειρῆς, “upon the neck.” It was situate
on the western side of the Red Sea, near the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb.
685 Ansart suggests that the modern island of Mehun is here
meant. Gosselin is of opinion that Pliny is in error in mentioning two
islands in the Red Sea as producing the topaz.
686 Called Theron, as well as Epitheras. It was an emporium
on the coast of the Red Sea for the trade with India and Arabia. It was
chiefly remarkable for its position in mathematical geography, as, the
sun having been observed to be directly over it forty-five days before
and after the summer solstice, the place was taken as one of the points
for determining the length of a degree of a great circle on the earth’s
surface.
690 So called from Azania, the adjoining coast of Africa,
now known as that of Ajan. It was inhabited by a race of Æthiopians,
who were engaged in catching and taming elephants, and supplying the
markets of the Red Sea coast with hides and ivory.
692 Its name was Adule, being the chief haven of the
Adulitæ, of mixed origin, in the Troglodytic region, situate on a bay
of the Red Sea, called Aduliticus Sinus. It is generally supposed that
the modern Thulla or Zulla, still pronounced Azoole, occupies its
site, being situate in lat. 15° 35′ N. Ruins are said to exist there.
D’Anville, however, in his map of the Red Sea, places Adule at Arkeeko,
on the same coast, and considerably to the north of Thulla. According
to Cosmas, Adule was about two miles in the interior.
693 Pliny gives a further description of this ape in B.
viii. c. 21., and B. x. c. 72. They were much valued by the Roman
ladies for pets, and very high prices were given for them.
694 Now called Dahal-Alley, according to Gosselin.
695 Hardouin, from Strabo, suggests that the reading ought
to be Coracios.
698 D’Anville and Gosselin think that this is the island
known as the French Island.
699 Ansart thinks that this promontory is that known as Cape
de Meta, and that the port is at the mouth of the little river called
Soul or Soal.
700 In his Æthiopian expedition. According to Strabo, he had
altars and pillars erected there to record it.
701 Under the impression entertained by the ancients, that
the southern progress of the coast of Africa stopped short here, and
that it began at this point to trend away gradually to the north-west.
702 Coro. Salmasius seems with justice, notwithstanding the
censures of Hardouin, to have found considerable difficulty in this
passage. If it is Pliny’s meaning that by sea round the south of the
Promontory of Mossylum there is a passage to the extreme north-western
point of Africa, it is pretty clear that it is not by the aid of a
north-west wind that it could be reached. “Euro,” “with a south-east
wind,” has been very properly suggested.
703 By this name he means the Æthiopian Troglodytæ. Of
course it would be absurd to attempt any identification of the places
here named, as they must clearly have existed only in the imagination
of the African geographer.
704 The supposed commencement of the Atlantic, to the west
of the Promontory of Mossylum.
705 From the Greek ἀσκὸς, a “bladder,” or “inflated
skin.” It is not improbable that the story as to their mode of
navigation is derived only from the fancied origin of their name.
706 Apparently meaning in the Greek the “jackal-hunters,”
θηροθῶες. For an account of this animal, see B. viii. c. 52,
and B. xv. c. 95.
711 As to Syene and the Catadupi, see B. v. c. 10.
712 This place was also called in later times Contrapselcis.
It was situate in the Dodecaschœnus, the part of Æthiopia immediately
above Egypt, on an island near the eastern bank of the river, a little
above Pselcis, which stood on the opposite bank. It has been suggested
that this may have been the modern island of Derar. The other places do
not appear to have been identified, and, in fact, in no two of the MSS.
do the names appear to agree.
717 Dion Cassius also mentions this expedition. From Seneca
we learn that Nero dispatched two centurions to make inquiry into the
sources of the Nile.
718 Dion Cassius calls him Caius Petronius. He carried on
the war in B.C. 22 against the Æthiopians, who had invaded
Egypt under their queen Candace. He took many of their towns.
719 Du Bocage is of opinion that this place stood not far
from the present Ibrim.
720 Supposed by Du Bocage to have stood in the vicinity of
the modern Dongola.
721 He was clearly a mythical personage, and nothing certain
is known with respect to him. Tombs of Memnon were shown in several
places, as at Ptolemais in Syria, on the Hellespont, on a hill near
the mouth of the river Æsepus, near Palton in Syria, in Æthiopia, and
elsewhere.
722 Her story has been alluded to in the account of Joppa,
B. v. c. 34. Cepheus, the father of Andromeda, though possessing the
coasts of Syria, was fabled to have been king of Æthiopia.
723 See B. v. c. 10, where Meroë is also mentioned.
725 Situate beyond the Great Cataract, and on the western
bank.
726 See the Notes to the preceding Chapter, in p. 95.
727 Or dog’s-headed ape, described in B. viii. c. 80. It is
supposed to be the baboon.
728 Hesychius says that it was also called Aëria, probably
from the time of its king Ægyptus, who was called Aërius.
729 “Ubi desiimus.” This appears to be a preferable reading
to “ubi desinit,” adopted by Sillig, and apparently referring to the
river Nile. It is not improbable that our author here alludes, as
Hardouin says, to his words in the preceding Chapter, “Hinc in ora
Æthiopiæ,” &c. See p. 96.
730 Ansart thinks that the country of this people was the
modern Kordofan. This, however, could not be the case, if the Macrobii,
opposite to them, dwelt on the African side of the river.
734 Ptolemy, however, speaks of Esar and Daron as the names
of towns situate on the island of Meroë.
735 On the eastern side of the Nile, and bearing no
reference, as Hardouin remarks, to the people of modern Nubia.
736 There is considerable doubt as to the correctness of
these names, as they are differently spelt in the MSS.
737 Marcus thinks that these mountains are those which
lie to the west of the Nile, in Darfour, and Dar-Sale, or Dizzela,
mentioned by Salt, in his Travels in Abyssinia.
738 From this it would appear that Pliny, with Dalion,
supposed that the Nile ran down to the southern ocean, and then took a
turn along the coast in a westerly direction; the shore being skirted
by Syrtes, or quicksands, similar to those in the north of Africa.
739 So called from the Greek—“Eaters of wild beasts.”
743 They were thence called by the Greeks “Acridophagi.”
According to Agatharchides, these people dwelt in what is modern Nubia,
where Burkhardt found the people subsisting on lizards.
744 Hardouin remarks, that the length is measured from
south-east to south-west; and the breadth from south to north.
745 The supposed Southern Ocean, which joins the Atlantic on
the west.
746 Or the “Chariot of the gods,” mentioned also in Book ii.
c. 110, and B. v. c. 1. It is supposed to have been some portion of the
Atlas chain; but the subject is involved in the greatest obscurity.
747 Or the “Western Horn.” It is not known whether this was
Cape de Verde, or Cape Roxo. Ansart thinks that it is the same as Cape
Non. It is mentioned in c. 1 of B. v. as the “promontorium Hesperium.”
749 Marcus says that these islands are those called the “Two
Sisters,” situate to the west of the Isle of Socotra, on the coast of
Africa. They are called by Ptolemy, Cocionati.
750 The position of this island has been much discussed by
geographers, as being intimately connected with the subject of Hanno’s
voyage to the south of Africa. Gosselin, who carries that voyage no
further south than Cape Non, in about 28° north lat., identifies Cerne
with Fedallah, on the coast of Fez, which, however, is probably much
too far to the north. Major Rennell places it as far south as Arguin,
a little to the south of the southern Cape Blanco, in about 20° 5′
North latitude. Heeren, Mannert, and others, adopt the intermediate
portion of Agadir, or Souta Cruz, on the coast of Morocco, just below
Cape Ghir, the termination of the main chain of the Atlas. If we are to
trust to Pliny’s statement, it is pretty clear that nothing certain was
known about it in his day.
751 The “Pillars.” Marcus thinks that these were some small
islands near the Isle of Socotra.
752 Hardouin says that this is not the Atlantis rendered so
famous by Plato, whose story is distantly referred to in B. ii. c. 92
of this work. It is difficult to say whether the Atlantis of Plato had
any existence at all, except in the imagination.
753 Medusa and her sisters, the daughters of Phorcys and
Ceto. The identity of their supposed islands seems not to have been
ascertained. For the poetical aspect of their story, see Ovid’s Met.,
B. iv.
754 It is not improbable that these were the skins of a
species of uran-outang, or large monkey.
755 The Purpurariæ, or “Purple Islands,” probably the
Madeira group.
756 Or Islands of the Blessed—the modern Canaries.
757 Supposed to be the modern island of Fuerteventura.
764 It is impossible to see clearly what he means. Littré
says that it has been explained by some to mean, that from the
Purpurariæ, or Madeira Islands, it is a course of 250 miles to the
west to the Fortunatæ or Canary Islands; but that to return from the
Fortunatæ to the Purpurariæ, required a more circuitous route in an
easterly direction.
765 Or Pluvialia, the Rainy Island, previously mentioned.
766 Salmasius thinks that the sugar-cane is here alluded to.
Hardouin says that in Ferro there still grows a tree of this nature,
known as the “holy tree.”
767 Or the Lesser Junonia; supposed to be the same as the
modern Lanzarote.
768 Or “Snow Island,” the same as that previously called
Invallis, the modern Teneriffe, with its snow-capped peak.
771 Hardouin takes this to mean, both as to the continent,
with the places there situate, and the seas, with the islands there
found; the continent being the interior, and the seas the exterior
part. It is much more likely, however, that his description of the
interior of the earth is that given in the 2nd Book, while the
account of the exterior is set forth in the geographical notices
contained in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th.
774 Littré has the following remark: “Is it possible
that Pliny can have imagined that the extent of a surface could be
ascertained by adding the length to the breadth?” It is just possible
that such may not have been his meaning; but it seems quite impossible
to divine what it was.
775 He means to say that the interior is not inhabited
beyond a distance of 250 miles from the sea-coast.
777 He is probably speaking only of that part of Asia which
included Egypt, on the eastern side of the river Nile, according to
ancient geography. His mode, however, of reckoning the breadth of Asia,
i. e. from south to north, is singular. See p. 104.
778 On a rough calculation, these aliquot parts in all would
make 42643/42900 parts of the unit. It is not improbable that the
figures given above as the dimensions are incorrect, as they do not
agree with the fractional results here given by Pliny.
794 The famous Roman historian, a native of Padua. He died
at his native town, in the year A.D. 17, aged 76. Of his
Annals, composed in 142, only 35 Books have come down to us.
795 L. Annæus Seneca, the Roman philosopher and
millionnaire. He was put to death by Nero.
796 P. Nigidius Figulus, a Roman senator, and Pythagorean
philosopher, skilled in astrology and other sciences. He was so
celebrated for his knowledge, that Aulus Gellius pronounces him, next
to Varro, the most learned of the Romans. He was an active partisan of
Pompey, and was compelled by Cæsar to live at a distance from Rome.
He died in exile, B.C. 44. There is a letter of consolation
addressed to him by Cicero in his Epistles “ad Familiares,” which
contains a warm tribute to his worth and learning.
798 For Hecatæus of Miletus, see end of B. iv. Hecatæus of
Abdera was a contemporary of Alexander the Great and Ptolemy Lagides.
He is thought to have accompanied the former in his Asiatic expedition
as far as Syria. He was a pupil of the sceptic Pyrrho, and is called a
philosopher, critic, and grammarian. He was the author of a History of
Egypt, a work on the Hyperborei, and a History of the Jews.
801 For Eudoxus of Cnidos, see end of B. ii. Eudoxus of
Cyzicus was a geographer and a native of Egypt, who was employed by
Ptolemy Euergetes and his wife Cleopatra in voyages to India. He made
attempts to circumnavigate Africa by sailing to the south, but without
success. He is supposed to have lived about B.C. 130. See B.
ii. c. 67 of the present work.
805 He commanded the fleets of Ptolemy Philadelphia, and
of Seleucus Nicator, by whose orders he paid a visit to the coasts of
India. Strabo speaks of his account of India as the best guide to the
geography of that country.
806 A native of Miletus—see the tenth Chapter of this Book.
He appears to have written a geographical work on Asia, from which
Pliny derived considerable assistance.
807 Son of Deinon, the historian; he accompanied Alexander
in his Asiatic expedition, and wrote a history of it. Quintus Curtius
censures him for his inaccuracy. Cicero, Quintilian, and Longinus, also
speak in slighting terms of his performance.
809 He alludes to the letters of that monarch, and the
journals which were kept on the occasion of his expeditions. In the
middle ages several forged works were current under his name.
822 A Greek writer of uncertain date, who wrote, as Pliny
tells us, (c. 20 of the present Book), a work on the people called
Attaci or Attacori. He also wrote another, describing a voyage,
commenced at Memphis in Egypt.
826 The admiral of Alexander, who sailed down the river
Indus, and up the Persian Gulf. It is not known when or where he died.
After the death of Alexander, he supported the cause of Antigonus. He
left a history or journal of his famous voyage.
830 A native of Soli. He is mentioned by Diogenes Laertius,
as the author of a work on Æthiopia, of which some few fragments
are preserved. Varro and Pliny mention him, also, as a writer on
agriculture.
831 A writer on geography and botany, again mentioned by
Pliny in B. xx. c. 73. He is supposed to have lived in the first
century after Christ. See also c. 35.
832 Said to have been a native of Meroë, and to have written
a History of Æthiopia; nothing else seems to be known of him.
833 The author of a work on India, of which the second Book
is quoted by Athenæus. From what Pliny says, in c. 35, he seems to have
also written on Æthiopia. He is mentioned by Agatharchides as one of
the writers on the East: but nothing more seems to be known of him.
835 We here enter upon the third division of Pliny’s Natural
History, which treats of Zoology, from the 7th to the 11th inclusive.
Cuvier has illustrated this part by many valuable notes, which
originally appeared in Lemaire’s Bibliotheque Classique, 1827, and
were afterwards incorporated, with some additions, by Ajasson, in his
translation of Pliny, published in 1829; Ajasson is the editor of this
portion of Pliny’s Natural History, in Lemaire’s Edition.—B.
836 This remark refers to the five preceding books, in which
these subjects have been treated in detail.—B.
837 We have a similar remark in Cicero, De. Nat. Deor, ii.
47.—B.
838 Ajasson remarks, that trees have two barks, an outer,
and an inner and thinner one; but seems to think that by the word
“gemino” here, Pliny only means that the bark of trees is sometimes
double its ordinary thickness.
839 It seems to have been the custom among the ancients to
place the newborn child upon the ground immediately after its birth.
840 Pliny appears to have followed Lucretius in this gloomy
view of the commencement of human existence. See B. v. l. 223, et
seq.
841 This term of forty days is mentioned by Aristotle, in
his Natural History, as also by some modern physiologists.—B.
842 We may hence conclude, that the practice of swathing
young infants in tight bandages prevailed at Rome, in the time of
Pliny, as it still does in France, and many parts of the continent;
although it has, for some years, been generally discontinued in this
country. Buffon warmly condemned this injurious system, eighty years
ago, but without effect.—B.
843 “Feliciter natus;” this appears so inconsistent with
what is stated in the text, that it has been proposed to alter it into
infeliciter, although against the authority of all the MSS.; but it
may be supposed, that Pliny, as is not unusual with him, employs the
term ironically.—B.
844 This reminds us of the terms of the riddle proposed to
Œdipus by the Sphinx: “What being is that, which, with four feet, has
two feet and three feet, and only one voice; but its feet vary, and
where it has most it is weakest?” to which he answered, That it is man,
who is a quadruped (going on feet and hands) in childhood, two-footed
in manhood, and moving with the aid of a staff in old age.
845 He alludes to the gradual induration of the bones of the
head which takes place in the young of the human species, and imparts
strength to it. Aristotle, in his Hist. Anim., states the general
opinion of the ancients, that this takes place with the young of no
other class of animated beings.
846 There is little doubt that new forms and features of
disease are continually making their appearance among mankind, and
even the same peoples, and have been from the earliest period; it was
so at Rome, in the days of the Republic and of the Emperors. It is not
improbable that these new forms of disease depend greatly upon changes
in the temperature and diet. The plagues of 1348, 1666, and the Asiatic
cholera of the present day, are not improbably various features of what
may be radically the same disease. At the first period the beverage
of the English was beer, or rather sweet-wort, as the hop does not
appear to have been used till a later period. At the present day, tea
and coffee, supported by ardent spirits, form the almost universal
beverage.
847 Pliny forgets, however, that infants do not require to
be taught how to suck.
848 According to Cicero, this opinion was more particularly
expressed by Silenus and Euripides. Seneca also, in his Consolation
to Marcia, expresses a very similar opinion. It was a very common
saying, that “Those whom the gods love, die young.” It will be observed
that Pliny here uses the significant word “aboleri,” implying utter
annihilation after death. It will be seen towards the end of this Book,
that he laughed to scorn the notion of the immortality of the soul.
849 By the use of the word “luctus” he may probably mean
“tears;” but there is little doubt that all animals have their full
share of sorrows, brought upon them either by the tyranny and cruelty
of man, or their own unrestrained passions.
850 This is said hyperbolically by Pliny. The brutes of the
field have as strong a love of life as man, although they may not be in
fear of death, not knowing what it is. That they know what pain is, is
evident from their instinctive attempts to avoid it.
851 Under this name he evidently intends to include all
systems of religion, which he held in equal contempt.
852 Ajasson seems to think that he alludes to man’s craving
desire for posthumous fame; but it is pretty clear that he has in view
the then prevalent notions of the life of the soul after the death of
the body.
853 Pascal has a similar thought; he says that “Man is a
reed, and the weakest reed of nature.” The machinery of his body is
minute and complex in the extreme, but it can hardly be said that his
life is exposed to as many dangers dependent on the volition of, or
on accidents arising from, other animated beings, as that of minute
insects.
854 Ajasson refers to various classical authors for a
similar statement. It is scarcely necessary to remark, that it is
contrary to many well-known facts.—B. The cravings of hunger and of
the sexual appetite, are quite sufficient to preclude the possibility
of such a happy state of things among the brutes as Pliny here
describes.
855 It was this feeling that prompted the common saying
among the ancients, “Homo homini lupus”—“Man to man is a wolf;” and
most true it is, that
“Man’s inhumanity to man makes countless thousands mourn.”
856 He alludes to the description already given in his
geographical Books, of man taken in the aggregate, and grouped into
nations.
857 These are less known, as being less easy of access to
travellers, and it is accordingly in connection with these, that we
always meet with the most wonderful tales.—B.
858 This feeling is well expressed in the old and hackneyed
adage, “Omne ignotum pro mirifico”—“Everything that is unknown is
taken for marvellous.”
859 Cuvier remarks, that Pliny generally employs this kind
of oratorical language when he is entering upon a part of his work in
which he betrays a peculiar degree of credulity, and a total want of
correct judgment on physical topics.—B.
860 Being debarred from holding converse, the first great
tie of sociality.
861 Ajasson does not hesitate to style this remark,
“ridiculum sane;” as every one knows that the Greeks were more noted
for their lively imagination, than for the correctness of their
observations.—B. Surely Ajasson must have forgotten the existence of
such men as Aristotle and Theophrastus!
862 Pliny has previously denominated the Scythians
“Anthropophagi;” and in B. iv. c. 26, and B. vi. c. 20, he employs the
word as the proper name of one of the Scythian tribes.—B.
865 There can be no doubt, that cannibalism has existed at
all times, and that it now exists in some of the Asiatic and Polynesian
islands; but we must differ from Pliny in his opinion respecting the
near connection between human sacrifices and cannibalism; the first
was strictly a religious rite, the other was the result of very
different causes; perhaps, in some cases, the want of food; but, in
most instances, a much less pardonable motive.—B. Still, however,
if nations go so far as to sacrifice human beings, there is an equal
chance that a religious impulse may prompt them to taste the flesh; and
when once this has been done, there is no telling how soon it may be
repeated, and that too for the gratification of the palate. According
to Macrobius, human sacrifices were offered at Rome, down to the time
of Brutus, who, on the establishment of the Republic, abolished them.
We read, however, in other authorities, that in 116, B.C., two
Gauls, a male and a female, were sacrificed by the priests in one of
the streets of Rome, shortly after which such practices were forbidden
by the senate, except in those cases in which they had been ordered by
the Sibylline books. Still we read, in the time of Augustus, of one
hundred knights being sacrificed by his orders, at Perusia, and of a
similar immolation in the time of the emperor Aurelian, A.D.
270. These, however, were all exceptional cases, and do not imply a
custom of offering human sacrifices.
866 Pliny, in describing the Riphæan mountains, B. iv.
c. 26, calls them “gelida Aquilonis conceptacula,” “the cold asylum
of the northern blasts;” but we do not find the cavern mentioned in
this or any other passage. The name here employed has been supposed
to be derived from the Greek words, γης κλειθρον, signifying
the limit or boundary of the earth.—B. “Specuque ejus dicto,” most
probably means “the place called its cave,” and not the “cave which I
have described,” as Dr. B. seems to have thought.
867 They are merely enumerated among other tribes of
Scythians, inhabiting the country beyond the Palus Mæotis. See B. iv.
c. 26, and B. vi. c. 19.—B.
868 The figures of the Gryphons or Griffins are found not
uncommonly on the friezes and walls at Pompeii. In the East, where
there were no safe places of deposit for money, it was the custom to
bury it in the earth; hence, for the purpose of scaring depredators,
the story was carefully circulated that hidden treasures were guarded
by serpents and dragons. There can be little doubt that these stories,
on arriving in the western world, combined with the knowledge of the
existence of gold in the Uralian chain and other mountains of the East,
gave rise to the stories of the Griffins and the Arimaspi. It has been
suggested that the Arimaspi were no other than the modern Tsheremis,
who dwelt on the left bank of the Middle Volga, in the governments of
Kasan, Simbirsk, and Saratov, not far from the gold districts of the
Uralian range.
869 It has been conjectured, that these fabulous tales of
the combats of the Arimaspi with the Griffins, were invented by the
neighbouring tribes of the Issedonæ or Essedones, who were anxious
to throw a mystery over the origin of the gold, that they might
preserve the traffic in their own hands. The Altai Mountains, in the
north of Asia, contain many gold mines, which are still worked, as
well as traces of former workings. The representation of an animal,
somewhat similar to the Griffin, has been found among the sculptures
of Persepolis, and is conceived to have had some allegorical allusion
to the religion of the ancient inhabitants of the place. Ælian, Hist.
Anim. B. iv. c. 27, gives an account of the Griffin, and its contests
with the Indians, for the gold, similar to that here given.—B.
870 We have an account of the Arimaspi, and of Aristeas,
in Herodotus, B. iv. cc. 13, 15, and 27. Most of the wonderful tales
related in this Chapter may be found in Aulus Gellius, B. ix. c. 4. We
have an account, also, of the Arimaspi in Solinus, very nearly in the
words of Pliny. We have some valuable remarks by Cuvier, on the account
given by Pliny of the Arimaspi and the Griffins, and on the source from
which it appears to have originated, in Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 16, and
Ajasson, vol. vi. pp. 164, 165.—B.
872 Aulus Gellius relates this, among other wonderful
tales, which are contained in his Chapter “On the Miraculous Wonders
of Barbarous Nations,” B. ix. c. 4. He cites, among his authorities,
Aristeas and Isigonus, whom he designates as “writers of no mean
authority.”—B.
874 One of the pleasures promised to the Gothic warriors,
in the paradise of Odin, was to drink out of the skulls of their
enemies.—B.
875 The variety of the human species to which the term
Albino has been applied, from the whiteness of their hair and skin, is
supposed by Cuvier to be more frequently found in the close valleys of
mountainous districts, and may therefore have been very often met with
in Albania, which is composed of valleys in the Caucasian range.—B.
876 “Tertio die;” literally, “on the third day.” In
reckoning the time between two periods, the Romans included both of
those periods in the computation, whereas we include but one of them.
877 In countries where serpents abound, there have been,
at all times, jugglers, who profess to have a supernatural power, by
which they are rendered insensible to the poison of these animals.
This is the case with the Egyptians, and some of the oriental nations.
They remove the poison-fang from the serpent, and in this way render
it perfectly harmless. Some of the feats which were performed by the
magicians in the court of Pharaoh, seem still to be practised in Egypt;
by pressing upon the upper part of the spine, the animal is rendered
rigid, while on removing the pressure, the animal is restored to its
original state. These jugglers were also in the habit, much to the
surprise of the ignorant spectators, of sucking the poison from the
wounds produced by the bite of the serpent, which they accompanied
by various ceremonies and incantations: but it is a well-known fact,
that this may be done with perfect safety, in reference to poisons of
all kinds, provided there be no breach in the cuticle of the mouth or
lips.—B.
878 See B. xxviii. c. 7. The best account, probably, of the
Psylli, is that found in Lucan’s Pharsalia, B. ix. c. 890, et seq.
879 This custom is referred to by Lucan, in his account of
the Psylli, B. ix. l. 890, et seq.; and by Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. i.
c. 57, and B. xvi. c. 27, 28.—B.
880 Herodotus, B. iv. c. 173, gives a somewhat different
account; see also Aulus Gellius, B. xvi. c. 11, who follows the
narrative of Herodotus. Gellius also gives an account of the Marsi,
which is similar to that of Pliny.—B.
881 It is scarcely necessary to remark, that this alleged
effect of the human saliva is without foundation. The saliva of a
person who has fasted for some time, is still, in this country, a
popular remedy for ophthalmia. It contains a greater proportion of
saline matter than saliva under ordinary circumstances.—B.
882 The Nasamones have been enumerated among the inhabitants
of the northern part of Africa, near the Greater Syrtis, v. 5. See also
Herodotus, B. ii. c. 32, and B. vi. c. 172 and 190.—B.
883 Certain individuals are occasionally met with, whose
generative organs exhibit an unusual formation, so as to give the
idea of their uniting both sexes in the same person; and there are
instances, where parts peculiar to both sexes actually appear to exist,
but always in an imperfect or rudimentary state; all beyond this is
undoubtedly fabulous. See Todd’s Cyclop. of Anat.in loco.—B.
884 There are, at the present day, individuals among the
negroes, who profess to have the power of enchantment, which, however,
appears to consist in their possessing the knowledge of various
poisons, which they not unfrequently administer, and by these means
obtain great influence over the minds of the people.—B.
885 This power of the eye is referred to by Virgil, Ecl.
iii. l. 103:
“What eye is it that has fascinated my tender lambs?”
The evil eye is still an article of belief in Egypt and in some parts
of the East. Witchcraft, in various forms, was greatly credited in the
most enlightened parts of Europe, not more than two centuries ago, and
is not yet excluded from the vulgar creed.—B.
886 It is well known that nothing of this kind was ever
observed in any human eye, nor have we any method of accounting for the
origin of this singular notion.—B. Brand, in his Popular Antiquities,
says that he has no doubt whatever that the common expression “no
one can say ‘black is my eye’” [or rather “black is the white of my
eye”]—meaning that no one can justly speak ill of me, was derived
from the notion of the enchanting, or bewitching, eye. He quotes
from Reginald Scott’s “Discovery of Witchcraft:” “Many writers agree
with Virgil and Theocritus in the effect of bewitching eyes, affirming
‘that in Scythia there are women called the Bythiæ, having two balls,
or rather blacks, in the apples of their eyes.’ These, forsooth,
with their angry looks, do bewitch and hurt, not only young lambs, but
young children.” See Brand’s Popular Antiquities, vol. iii. pp. 44-46.
See also Ennemoser’s Hist. of Magic, vol. ii. pp. 160, 161. Bohn’s
Editions.
887 Some of the commentators have supposed, that Pliny,
or Phylarchus, from whom he borrows, was misled by the ambiguity of
the Greek term ἵππος, which signifies either a horse, or a
tremulous motion of the eye. But, even admitting this to be the case,
the wonder is scarcely diminished; for we have the double pupil in one
eye, while this supposed tremulous motion is confined to the other.—B.
888 In all ages, it has been a prevalent superstition,
that those endowed with magical qualities will not sink in water,
encouraged, no doubt, by the cunning of those who might wish to make
the charge a means of wreaking their vengeance. If they sank, they were
to be deemed innocent, but were drowned; if, on the other hand they
floated, they were deemed guilty, and handed over to the strong arm of
the law. In reference to this usage, Brand says (“Popular Antiquities,”
vol. iii.), “Swimming a witch was another kind of popular ordeal. By
this method she was handled not less indecently than cruelly: for she
was stripped naked and cross bound, the right thumb to the left toe,
and the left thumb to the right toe. In this state she was cast into a
pond or river, in which, if guilty, it was thought impossible for her
to sink.”
889 This is probably the meaning of the word “tabem” here;
though it may possibly signify “rottenness,” or “putrefaction.”
890 This remark is not contained in any of the works of
Cicero now extant.—B.
891 Cuvier observes, that these people probably exercise
some deception, analogous to that practised by a Spaniard, who
exhibited himself in Paris, and professed to be incombustible, but who,
eventually, was the dupe of his own quackery, and paid the penalty with
his life. It would appear, that the Hirpi were not confined to one
district, but dispersed over different parts of Italy. See the note of
Heyne, on the prayer of Aruns, Æn. B. xi. l. 785, et seq.—B.
892 Plutarch relates these supposed facts in his life of
Pyrrhus; this statement may be considered analogous to what has been
recorded in modern times, respecting the efficacy of the royal touch in
curing certain diseases, especially what has been termed the “King’s
evil.”—B.
893 Horace, Odes, B. i. O. 22, characterises the Hydaspes, a
river of India, by the title of “fabulosus.”—B.
895 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xvi. c. 11, and B. xvii. c. 26,
refers to the large size of many of the animals of India; and in B. iv.
c. 19, he especially describes the size and fierceness of the Indian
dog.—B.
896 The Ficus religiosa of Linnæus, the branches of which
have the property of taking root when they are bent down to the ground,
and of forming new stems, which again produce other branches, that may
be bent down in the same way, so as to cover an indefinite space.—B.
More popularly known as the “banyan tree.” See B. xii. c. 11.
897 The bambos arundinacea, or bamboo cane, is a reed or
plant of the gramineous kind, which frequently grows to the height of
the tallest trees. The stem is hollow, and the parts of it between the
joints are used by the natives to form their canoes. We have an account
of them in Herodotus, B. iii. c. 98.—B. See also B. xvi. c. 65 of this
work.
898 It does not appear that the stature of the Indians
exceeds that of the inhabitants of the temperate zones.—B.
899 Some practices very similar to these exist in certain
parts of India, by the Fakirs, a peculiar class of devotees, and are
regarded either in the light of religious ceremonies, or of modes of
performing penance.—B.
900 Henderson states, in his “Biblical Researches,” that
there is a race of people found in the Caucasus, and known as the
Ingusch, and that it is their belief that a race of dæmons exists,
which assume the appearance of armed men, and have the feet inverted.
901 Cuvier remarks, that these wonderful tales are generally
related of the inhabitants of mountainous districts, as being less
known and less accessible to travellers.—B.
902 This account probably originated in a species of
monkey, with a projecting muzzle, called, from this circumstance,
“cynocephalus,” or the “Dog’s head.” This account of the cynocephali
is repeated by Aulus Gellius, B. ix. c. 4.—B. The cynocephalus is
generally considered to be the baboon.
903 So called, ἀπὸ τοῦ μονοῦ κώλου, “from having
but one leg.” It is not improbable that these stories were first told
of these nations from the resemblance of their names to the Greek words
having these significations.
904 We have no method of explaining the origin of this
story. It is to be regretted, that Pliny should have adopted so many
ridiculous fables, on the doubtful authority of Ctesias.—B.
905 From Σκιαποῦς, “making a shadow with his
foot.”—B.
907 It has been conjectured, that this account may have
originated in the dwarfish stature and short necks of the northern
tribes, according to the usual exaggerated statements of the ancient
travellers. Aulus Gellius also repeats this fable, B. ix. c. 4.—B.
908 These are the great apes, which are found in some of
the Oriental islands; this name was given them from their salacious
disposition, which, it would seem, they have manifested in reference
to even the human species. We have an account of the Satyrs in Ælian,
Hist. Anim. B. xvi. c. 21.—B.
909 We may suppose that this description is taken from some
incorrect account of a large kind of ape; but it seems impossible to
refer it to any particular species.—B.
910 “Sparrow,” or “ostrich-footed;” it does not appear
that the commentators have attempted to explain this passage; may
we not conjecture that it refers to the Chinese? With respect to
the word employed, it has been generally derived from
στροῦθος, “a sparrow;” Dalechamps, however, as it would appear, with
much plausibility, thinks that it is derived from “struthio,” the
ostrich.—B. It is not improbable, however, that these were so called,
from the resemblance of their gait to that of a sparrow, as they would
be unable to step out, and be obliged to jump from place to place.
912 On this subject see B. vi. c. 20. It is clear that
either silk or cotton is here alluded to.
913 In Eastern stories we find not uncommonly, wonderful
effects attributed to the smell of the apple. See the Arabian Nights,
passim.
914 Cuvier remarks, that these accounts of the Struthopodes,
the Scyritæ, and the Atomi, are not capable of any explanation, being
mere fables.—B.
915 From τρεῖς, “three,” and σπιθαμαὶ,
“spans,” the span being about nine inches English.
916 He alludes to the wars between the Cranes and the
Pygmies in the Iliad, B. iii. l. 3-6. Their story is also referred to
by Ovid and Juvenal.
917 On the subject of the Pygmies, Cuvier remarks, “I am not
surprised at finding the Pygmies in the works of Homer; but to find
them in Pliny, I am surprised, indeed.”—B.
918 Or the “long livers,” from the Greek μακρὸς,
“long,” and βίος, “life.”
919 Of course, there is no truth in this statement; there
are, no doubt, various circumstances in these countries favourable
to longevity; but these are more than counter-balanced by certain
peculiarities in their mode of life, and by the fatal epidemics to
which they are occasionally subject.—B.
920 Pliny, in B. xxix. c. 38, speaks of the use of vipers’
flesh as an article of diet, and gives some minute directions for
its preparation. It was supposed to be peculiarly nutritive and
restorative, and it has been prescribed for the same purpose by modern
physicians. There is a medal in existence, probably struck by the
Emperor Commodus, in order to commemorate the benefit which he was
supposed to have derived from the use of the flesh of vipers.—B.
922 The cubitus and the palmus of the Romans, estimated,
respectively, at about one foot and-a-half and three inches; this would
make the height of these people eight feet.—B.
923 From the Greek Γυμνητὴς, “one who takes much
exercise of the body.”
924 There appears to be no foundation for this
statement.—B.
926 In many of the warmer climates, where the locusts are of
large size and in great abundance, they are occasionally used as food;
but we have no reason to believe that they constitute the sole, or even
the principal article of the food of any tribe or people.—B.
927 In warm climates, the females arrive at maturity
considerably earlier than in the more temperate regions, but the age
here mentioned is an exaggeration. The female also, in such climates,
ceases to bear at an earlier age, probably before the fortieth
year.—B.
928 This is the Island of Ceylon, of which Pliny has given
an account in the last Book, c. 24.
929 Such unnatural unions may have taken place occasionally,
but nothing has ever been produced from them.—B.
930 This is a still greater exaggeration than that mentioned
above, in Note 95.—B.
931 Cuvier remarks that this story must have been originally
told with reference to the race of large apes. He says, however, that
some men have the “os coccygis” greatly prolonged, and mentions a
painter of celebrity in Paris who had this malformation. “But from
this to an actual tail,” says he, “the distance is very great.” In
these times we have the (perhaps doubtful) account by M. de Couret, of
the Niam Niams, a race in Abyssinia or Nubia, with tails at least two
inches in length. Few will fail to recollect Lord Monboddo’s theory,
that mankind originally had tails, but wore them off in lapse of time
by climbing up the trees.
932 As far as there is any truth in this account, it must
refer to certain kinds of apes: but with respect to the size of the
ears, it is, of course, greatly exaggerated.—B.
934 There are many tribes who live on the sea-coast, and
who inhabit a barren country, with a bad climate, whose diet is almost
confined to fish, and who feed their cattle on it. This is the case in
some parts of Iceland, and even, to a certain extent, among the people
of the Hebrides.—B.
935 Or dog’s-headed ape, the baboon: see B. vi. c. 35, and
Note 902, p. 130.
936 Perhaps these appearances may be referred to effects of
what is termed “mirage,” a phenomenon which is described by travellers
in different parts of the torrid zone.—B. And in the temperate regions
as well; Switzerland and the Hartz mountains, for instance.
937 Columella, B. viii. c. 8, speaks of the fecundity of the
Egyptians, but without ascribing any particular cause for it.—B.
938 “Quinos.” The old reading was “binos,” “two” children
only; but Aristotle, in reference, no doubt, to the same circumstance,
says, Hist. Anim. B. vii., “One woman, at four births, gave birth to
twenty children. For she brought forth five at a time, and the greater
part of them were reared.”
939 It was a very general opinion, that the waters of the
Nile possess the property of promoting fecundity. Seneca mentions it as
an acknowledged fact, Nat. Quæst. B. iii. c. 25.—B.
940 There are well-authenticated accounts of four children
having been produced at one birth; but, beyond this, we have no
statements in which we can place much confidence. In a note by
Dalechamps, we have an example of the credulity of the authors who have
treated on this topic, as well modern as ancient.—B. In the recent
volumes, however, of “Notes and Queries,” we find some apparently
well-authenticated cases of women being delivered of five children
at a birth. Nathaniel Wanley, in his “Wonders of the Little World,”
also gives some apparently authentic instances of as many as five
children being born at a birth: but we must be excused giving credit
to the story, quoted by him, of Matilda or Margaret, Countess of
Henneberg, who was said to have been delivered, on the Friday before
Palm-Sunday, in 1276, “of 365 children, half sons and half daughters,
with the exception of one, which was an hermaphrodite, all complete
and well-fashioned, of the bigness of chickens new hatched, saith
Camerarius.”
941 From Hermaphroditus, the son of Hermes or Mercury, and
Aphrodite or Venus. According to the poetic story as told by Ovid, Met.
B. iv., he was united in one body, which bore the characteristics of
both sexes, with the nymph Salmacis.
942 Two cases of this description are mentioned by Livy,
B. xxvii. c. 37, and B. xxxi. c. 12. In this latter passage, Livy
enumerates the following prodigious births; among the Sabines, two
children of doubtful sex; at Frusino, a lamb with a sow’s head; at
Sinuessa, a pig with a human head; and among the Lucani, a foal with
five feet. He informs us that the hermaphrodites were thrown into the
sea.—B.
943 Cuvier says, “From time to time we do see persons of
this nature; and it is not long ago that such a being was exhibited in
Paris, though certainly not of a nature to have been ‘in deliciis,’ at
the present day.”
944 Pliny gives further particulars of this theatre in B.
xxxvi. c. 24. It was the first stone theatre erected at Rome, and was
built B.C. 55, and contained 40,000 spectators.
945 Solinus, the ape of Pliny, absolutely takes the meaning
of this passage to be, that Eutychis herself was exhibited on the stage
by the orders of Pompey.
947 Cuvier speaks of the wife of a porter at the Jardin du
Roi, at Paris, who, to his knowledge, had been the mother of thirty
children.
948 It seems doubtful whether Pliny means that the statue of
Alcippe was also to be seen in the Theatre of Pompey. Tatianus tells
the same story of one Glaucippe, and it is not improbable that under
that name he refers to the same person. He says that a bronze statue of
her was made by Niceretus, the Athenian. Hardouin suggests that this is
the story alluded to by Livy, B. xxvii., and by Valerius Maximus, B.
i. c. 6, in their statement that, among other portents, a boy was born
with the head of an elephant.
949 Cuvier remarks, that it is not an uncommon circumstance,
both in man and in other animals, for an atrophy of the maxillary bones
to cause the nose to sink down, and produce some resemblance to the
trunk of an elephant. To this circumstance, he refers the tales met
with, of women, sows, and dogs having produced elephants; see also Val.
Maximus, B. vi. c. 5.—B.
950 As to this war, see B. ii. c. 85. The portents observed
on this occasion were collected by the historian Sisenna, as we learn
from Cicero, De Divin. B. ii.
951 We find that this incredible tale is not only told by
Julius Obsequens, but, according to Dalechamps, by Cornelius Gemma, a
comparatively modern writer.—B.
952 Cuvier remarks, that, in certain quadrupeds, individuals
are occasionally born with the upper jaw preternaturally small, so much
so, that the lower jaw, by its projection, bears some resemblance to
a human chin. He had seen a case of this description at Geneva, in a
calf, supposed, even by persons of information, to be the produce of an
unnatural connection of a cow with a Savoyard shepherd. This subject is
treated very philosophically by Lucretius, B. v. c. 876, et seq. With
respect to the supposed Hippocentaur of Thessaly, Cuvier remarks upon
the successive additions which the story had gained, in the writings of
various authors. Cicero, in various parts of his writings, refers to
the account of the Hippocentaur as a fabulous tale; Tusc. Quæst. B. i.
c. 27; de Nat. Deor. B. i. c. 38, and B. ii. c. 2; De Divin. B. ii. c.
21.—B.
954 See B. iii. c. 9. Hardouin remarks that Aulus Gellius,
in copying from this passage, seems to have read the word “Casini,”
as though it were C. Asinii, meaning that the boy belonged to one C.
Asinius. However, it is pretty clear that the reading adopted is the
right one, Pliny having been careful to give the various localities at
which these wonderful facts occurred.
955 Phlegon tells us that this happened in the first year of
Nero, and that the name of the youth, while supposed to be a girl, was
Philotis.
957 A case of this description is mentioned by Ambrose
Paré. The individual was brought up as a girl, but, in consequence of
a sudden muscular exertion, the organs of the male were developed,
which had previously been concealed internally. It may be remarked,
that a great proportion of the well-authenticated cases of a supposed
change of sex have been from the female to the male, evidently of the
kind mentioned by Paré, where the male organs have been concealed in
childhood, and become subsequently developed. Cases, however, have
occasionally occurred of the contrary kind, arising probably from the
unusual size of the clitoris; there are also certain cases, where, from
the malformation of the parts, the sex is actually doubtful, or where
even a certain degree of the two may exist, as has been stated above,
in Note 51 to Chapter 2. This paragraph of Pliny is quoted by Aulus
Gellius, B. ix. c. 4.—B.
958 This does not correspond with the fact, as it exists
in our time; a circumstance which may probably depend upon our
improvement in the obstetrical art. Nor is the opinion, that both twins
are less likely to live, if of different sexes, sanctioned by modern
experience.—B.
959 “Feminas gigni celerius quam mares;” there has been much
discussion among the commentators, both with respect to the meaning of
these words, and the fact to which they are supposed to refer. Hardouin
interprets the phrase, “crescere, perfici, vigere, adolescere;”
Cuvier translates it, “les filles sont portées moins long-temps par
leur mère.” There is, however, no foundation for this opinion as to a
difference in the period of the gestation.—B.
960 There may be some ground for this opinion; it is
maintained by Aristotle in his Hist. Anim.—B. As also by Galen.
961 This statement is made upon the authority of
Hippocrates, Aphor. B. v. c. 48, and Aristotle, Hist. Anim.; but is
probably without foundation.—B.
962 Animals have a certain period for generation, because
they are more immediately affected by the seasons, whereas, in the
human race, the arts of life render these fixed terms unnecessary.—B.
963 Notwithstanding all the observations of the moderns,
the question is scarcely decided respecting the length of time to
which pregnancy may be prolonged. Cuvier says, that the experiments of
Tessier have shewn, that there is a greater latitude in animals than
had previously been supposed; he also remarks, that the same animals
when domesticated, become less regular in this respect than in the wild
state.—B.
964 Dalechamps has collected authorities to prove, that
a child may survive, when born even at an earlier period; but this,
although not absolutely impossible, is improbable in the highest
degree.—B.
965 Ajasson expresses himself at a loss to identify this
Pomponius; but thinks that it may have been either Julius Pomponius
Græcinus, consul A.U.C. 759, or L. Pomponius, consul
A.U.C. 794, A.D. 41.
966 Caius Caligula. The name of this woman, who was first
his mistress and then his wife, was Milonia Cæsonia. She was neither
handsome nor young when Caligula first admired her: but was noted for
her extreme licentiousness, and at the time when she first became
intimate with Caligula, had already had three children. She and
her daughter, by him, were put to death on the day on which he was
murdered. Corbulo has been mentioned in B. vi. c. 8.
967 Celsus, B. ii. c. 1, speaks of the fortieth day, as one
of the critical periods of childhood; the others are the seventh month,
the seventh year, and the period of puberty.—B.
968 Who appears to have urged the great lapse of time that
had intervened between the death of the alleged father and the birth of
his opponent.
969 Questions of this nature, of great importance, involving
property and title, have been the subject of judicial consideration
in our times; the longest period to which pregnancy may be protracted
seems still not to be determined, but the general result has been to
shorten it. Aulus Gellius, B. iii. c. 16, has collected the opinions of
many of the ancients on this subject.—B.
970 Most of the statements made in this Chapter appear to be
taken from Aristotle’s History of Animals; they are, however, either
without foundation or much exaggerated, and very incorrect.—B.
971 This opinion, although without foundation, is supported
by the authority of Hippocrates, Aphor. B. v. c. 42.—B.
972 This singular opinion is referred to by Aulus Gellius,
B. iii. c. 16.—B.
973 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 54, mentions the smell of
an extinguished lamp, as producing abortion in a mare.—B.
974 “Tinctoria mens;” there has been much discussion,
whether the text does not require correction here; and various
conjectural emendations have been proposed, but not with much success.
If the word “tinctoria” was employed by Pliny, it may be regarded as
one of those bold, and somewhat metaphorical expressions, which are not
unfrequently found in his writings.—B.
975 Valerius Maximus makes the same statement as to the
death of Anacreon, and says that “having lived to an extreme old age,
he was supporting his decayed strength by chewing raisins, when one
grain, more obstinate than the rest, stuck in his parched throat, and
so ended his life.” This story has been looked upon by some of the
modern scholars as a fiction of the poets.
976 This explanation of the name is given by Aulus Gellius,
B. xvi. c. 6.—B. It is very doubtful what are the roots from which
it is formed; though Pliny evidently thinks that the word is only a
corruption of the Latin “ægre partus,” “born with difficulty;” a notion
savouring of absurdity.
977 M. Vipsanius Agrippa, the son-in-law of Augustus,
having married his dissolute daughter, Julia. He was the son of Lucius
Agrippa, and was descended from a very obscure family. He divorced his
wife Marcella, to marry Julia, the widow of Marcellus, and the daughter
of Augustus, by his third wife, Scribonia.
978 Agrippina, the daughter of Agrippa and Julia, was the
mother of the Emperor Caligula; and of a second Agrippina, who became
the mother of Nero, by whose order she was put to death.—B.
979 Julia, the daughter of Augustus, so notorious for her
depravity, who, as already stated, was the wife of Agrippa.—B. See c.
46 of the present Book.
980 From cædo, “to cut,” apparently. The Cæsones were a
branch of the Fabian family. There has been considerable difference of
opinion among the commentators respecting the individuals referred to
in this Chapter. The subject is discussed at length in the Notes of
Hardouin, Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 62.—B. So in Macbeth, act v. sc. 7,
Macduff says to Macbeth—
“And let the angel whom thou still hast serv’d,
Tell thee, Macduff was from his mother’s womb
Untimely ripp’d.”
981 The commentators are not agreed respecting the origin of
this name; Dalechamps suggests, that it was originally Opiscus, from
ὀπίσθιον, “because one follows close upon another.”—B.
982 Hardouin says, that this is the case with the hare and
the dasypus, which is a species of hare; but there is probably no
foundation for the statement. Pliny repeats it in a subsequent passage,
B. viii. c. 81.—B.
983 Pliny evidently considers this a case of superfœtation,
and looks upon it as not uncommon in the human species: whereas it is
now considered impossible.
984 This refers to the mythological tale of Jupiter and
Amphitryon.—B.
986 Most of these statements appear to be taken from
Aristotle, Hist. Anim.—B.
987 There has been much discussion respecting the meaning of
this passage and the fact to which it refers. Aristotle, Hist. Anim.,
says, that marks made on the arm are transmitted for three generations;
and Pliny, in B. xxii. c. 2, informs us, that the Daci and the Sarmatæ
“make written marks upon their bodies.” The same custom prevails among
the lower orders, sailors especially, in our own times. We may also
remark the analogy which it hears to the practice of tattooing, so
general among the Polynesian and other barbarous nations.—B.
988 The reader may be amused by a perusal of the collection
of wonderful cases of this kind, which has been made by Dalechamps; see
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 65, note 4.—B.
989 Aristotle, in his History of Animals, relates a similar,
but not the same, story; he says that it occurred in Sicily, though he
afterwards speaks of it as having happened in Elis. It is conjectured
by Ajasson, that the individual might have been born in Sicily, and
have exhibited himself in Elis, as a wrestler. If we are really to
believe that his complexion was that of an Æthiopian, it is much more
probable that his mother may have had connection with a negro.—B.
990 Few readers will fail here to recall to mind the story
about the clock, in the opening chapter of “Tristram Shandy.”
991 Dalechamps refers us to a remark of the same kind
in Cicero, Tusc. Quæst. B. i. c. 80; but Ajasson remarks, that the
resemblance mentioned by Cicero refers to the mind and manners, not to
the body; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 67.—B.
992 Aulus Gellius says, that he was one of the royal family.
993 This man resembled Antiochus III., surnamed the Great,
to such a degree, that when that monarch had been slain in a tumult
by his people, his wife, Laodice, daughter of Mithridates V., King
of Pontus, put Artemon into a bed, pretending that he was the king,
but dangerously ill. Many persons were admitted to see him; and all
believed that they were listening to the words of their king, when he
recommended to them Laodice and her children.
994 This circumstance is related by Valerius Maximus, but he
speaks of Vibius as being “ingenuæ stirpis,” “of good family.”—B.
995 Hardouin expands the words “os probum,” into “liberale,
venustum, gratum, venerandum, probandum,” B. xxxvii. c. 6.—B.
997 The Latin word “strabo,” means “squinting,” or “having a
cast” or “defect in the eye.”
998 The word “mimus” was applied by the Romans to a species
of dramatic performance, as well as to the persons who acted in them.
The Roman mimes were imitations of trivial and sometimes indecent
occurrences in life, and scarcely differed from comedy, except in
consisting more of gestures and mimicry than of spoken dialogue. Sylla
was very fond of these performances, and they had more charms for the
Roman populace than the regular drama. As to the mime Salvitto, here
mentioned, see B. xxxv. c. 2.
999 This anecdote, and the one respecting Spinther and
Pamphilus, are mentioned also by Val. Maximus, B. ix. c. 24.—B.
1000 A celebrated orator and satirical writer of the time
of Augustus and Tiberius. He is mentioned in the Index of authors at
the end of B. xxxvi., where he is called Longulanus, as being a native
of Longula, a town of Latium. It was even thrown in his teeth, that he
was the offspring of adultery, and that this low-born person was his
father.
1001 “Mirmillonis.” Many of the editions make this word
to be a proper name, and “Armentarius” to signify the calling of
the person described, as being a herdsman. The “Mirmillones” were a
peculiar class of gladiators, said to have been so called from their
having the image of a fish, called “mormyr,” on their helmets.
1002 We assume the sestertium to be equivalent to somewhat
more than eight pounds sterling; this sum will be about £1600.—B.
1003 “Proscripter animus.” According to Hardouin, this means
“delighting in proscription,” alluding to the well-known proscriptions
of the triumvirate, in which Antony acted so conspicuous a part.—B.
1004 This opinion is maintained by Hippocrates, and by
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vii. c. 8, and is referred to by Lucretius,
B. iv. c. 1242, et seq.—B.
1005 The case of Livia and that of Agrippina, referred to by
Pliny, are mentioned by Suetonius, in the Life of Augustus, c. 63; and
that of Caligula, c. 7.—B.
1006 M. Junius Silanus, consul under Claudius, A.D.
46, with Valerius Asiaticus. He was poisoned by order of the younger
Agrippina, that he might not stand in the way of Nero.
1007 He is first mentioned in B.C. 168, when he was
serving in the army of Æmilius Paulus, in Macedonia, and was sent to
Rome with two other envoys to announce the defeat of Perseus. He united
with the aristocracy in opposing the measures of the Gracchi; and the
speech which he delivered against Tiberius Gracchus, is spoken of by
Cicero in high terms, as replete with true eloquence.
1008 He left four sons and two daughters; some writers
say three. The ten individuals, over and above his children and
grandchildren, may have consisted of the wives and husbands of his sons
and daughters then living, as also of others who had died in his
lifetime.
1011 This fact is mentioned by Valerius Maximus, B. viii. c.
13. There is some variation in the spelling of the name of the son of
Masinissa; Solinus calls him Mathumannus.—B.
1012 Hardouin gives a detailed account of the children of
Cato, by which it appears that the Licinian branch descended from the
issue by his wife Licinia, and the Saloniani, of whom Cato of Utica was
one, from his son Salonianus, by his second wife, Salonia.—B.
1013 Volusius Saturninus is again mentioned in the 49th
Chapter, as a remarkable instance of longevity; also by Tacitus, B.
xiii. c. 30.—B.
1014 This reading seems preferable to sixty-second, adopted
by Sillig; as there would be nothing very remarkable in a man becoming
a father when sixty-two years of age.
1015 Some of the “simiæ” are subject to a periodical
discharge, analogous to that of the human female; but, according to
Cuvier, it is in smaller quantity, and not at stated periods. The
females of various other animals, when in a state to receive the male,
have a discharge from the same parts, but totally different in its
properties, and the mode in which it makes its appearance. Virgil,
Geor. B. iii. l. 280, et seq., refers to this subject.—B.
1016 Pliny makes some further remarks on these substances
in a subsequent place, see B. x. c. 84; where he says they are
produced without the intercourse of the male; this point has been much
discussed, and is perhaps scarcely yet decided.—B.
1017 There is no actual resemblance between moles and
schirri; they are produced by different causes, and exist in different
parts of the body. Moles are always formed in the womb, and probably
have some connection with the generative functions; while schirri are
morbid indurations, which make their appearance in various parts of
the body. Hippocrates gives some account of moles, in his work on the
Diseases of Women. They are also noticed by Aristotle.—B.
1018 All the poisonous and noxious effects which were
attributed by the ancients to the menstrual discharge, are without the
slightest foundation. The opinions entertained on this point by the
Jews, may be collected from Leviticus, c. xv. ver. 19, et seq. Pliny
enlarges upon this subject in a subsequent place. See B. xxviii. c.
23.—B.
1019 Both Josephus, Bell. Jud. B. iv. c. 9, and Tacitus,
Hist. B. v. c. 6, give an account of this supposed action of this fluid
on the bitumen of Lake Asphaltites; the statement is no doubt entirely
unfounded, but it is a curious instance of popular credulity.—B.
1020 There are still somewhat similar superstitions in
existence, even in this country among others; it is not uncommonly
believed that meat will not take salt from the hands of a female during
the discharge of the catamenia.
1022 The fact is true, that females in whom the menstrual
discharge does not take place, are seldom, if ever, capable of
conception; but it does not depend on the cause here assigned. See the
remarks of Cuvier, Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 82, and Ajasson, vol. vi. p.
173.—B.
1023 Pliny clearly alludes to an opinion expressed by
Galen, in which he says, “that if women while giving suck, have sexual
intercourse, the milk becomes tainted.” Hardouin remarks, that Pliny
shows considerable caution here in bringing forward Nigidius as the
propounder of these opinions, the truth of which he himself seems to
have doubted.
1024 It is generally admitted, that the female is more
disposed to conceive just after the cessation of each periodical
discharge. We are informed by the French historians, that their king,
Henry II., and his wife Catharine, having been childless eleven years,
made a successful experiment of this description, by the advice of the
physician Fernel; see Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 83.—B.
1025 This is one of the many idle tales referred to by
Pliny, entirely without foundation.—B.
1026 This account is correct, to the extent that the first
teeth that appear are the two central incisors of the upper jaw;
the next are the two lower central incisors, then the upper lateral
incisors, the lower lateral incisors, and the upper and lower canines.
The molars follow a different order, the lower ones appearing before
the upper.—B.
1027 Hardouin mentions a number of authors who relate cases
of this nature. It is said to have taken place with our king Richard
III. See Shakespeare, Richard III., Act i. Scene 4. An individual of
very different character and fortune, Louis XIV., is said to have been
born with two teeth in the upper jaw.—B.
1028 A town of Latium; we learn from Livy, B. i. c. 53, that
it was captured and plundered by Tarquinius Superbus, but he makes no
mention of Valeria. See B. iii. c. 9.
1029 It is stated by Seneca, De Consol. c. 16, that Cornelia
survived a large family of children, all of whom were carried off early
in life; of these the two celebrated Gracchi, Tiberius and Caius,
met with violent deaths. The peculiarity here referred to, probably
consisted in an imperforated hymen, a mal-formation which not very
unfrequently exists, and requires a surgical operation.—B.
1030 This circumstance is mentioned by Val. Maximus, B.
i. c. 8.—B. We learn from Plutarch, that the same was the case also
with Pyrrhus, king of Epirus: Euryphæus also, the Cyrenian, and
Euryptolemus, the king of Cyprus. Herodotus, B. ix., speaks of a skull
found on the plain of Platæa, with a similar conformation.
1031 Although the teeth, and especially their enamel, form
the most indestructible substance which enters into the composition
of the body, it is not absolutely so; a certain proportion of them
consisting of animal matter, which is consumed, when exposed to
a sufficient heat; the earthy part may also be dissolved by the
appropriate chemical re-agents.—B.
1032 Powerful acids for instance; but they destroy the
enamel. Lord Bacon recommends the ashes of tobacco as a whitener of the
teeth; but that has been found to have a similar effect.
1033 We find in Haller, El. Phys. B. ix. c. 2, 4, 8, and
in other physiologists, a minute account of the effects produced by
the teeth in the articulation of the various letters which compose the
alphabet.—B.
1034 See B. iii. c. 3, and B. iv. c. 35. He does not say how
many teeth the Turduli naturally had, but no doubt he is mistaken.
1035 Pliny repeats this statement in B. xi. c. 63, and
extends it to the females of the sheep, goat, and hog. In the natural
condition of the mouth, the number of the teeth is the same in both
sexes; but, according to the observations of Cuvier, what are called
the “wisdom” teeth, though occasionally deficient in both sexes, are
most frequently so in the female.—B.
1036 He seems to allude to the younger Agrippina, the mother
of the emperor Domitius Nero; neither her life, her character, nor
her ultimate fate seem, however, to have entitled her to be called a
favourite of Fortune. Her mother, the first Agrippina, grand-daughter
of Augustus, appears, on the other hand, to have been a woman of
virtuous character, and spotless chastity, without a vice, with the
exception, perhaps, of ambition.
1038 It was one of the tenets of the Stoics, that the world
was to be alternately destroyed by water and by fire. The former
element having laid it waste on the occasion of the flood of Deucalion,
the next great catastrophe, according to them, is to be produced by
fire. Pliny has previously alluded to this opinion, B. ii. c. 110.—B.
1039 Cuvier remarks, that in the alluvial tracts throughout
Europe, Siberia, and America, and probably also in other parts of
the world, bones have been found, which have belonged to very large
animals, such as elephants, mastodons, and whales; and when discovered,
the common people, and sometimes even anatomists, have mistaken them
for the bones of giants. He especially mentions the case of the bones
of an elephant, found near Lucerne, in the sixteenth century, and
supposed by Plater to have belonged to a man seventeen feet in height.
Cuvier conceives that no man in modern times has exceeded the height
of seven feet, and even these cases are extremely rare; for further
information he refers to his Recherches sur les Ossemens Fossiles.
Some of the best authenticated facts of unusually tall men are in
Buffon, Nat. Hist. vol. ii. p. 276, and vol. iii. p. 427.—B. The
skeleton of O’Brien, in the Museum of the College of Surgeons, in
London, is about seven feet and a half in height.
1040 The story of the birth of Orion is beautifully told
by Ovid, Fasti, B. v. l. 493. et seq. He was often represented by
the poets as of gigantic stature, and after his death was fabled to
have been placed among the stars, where he appears as a giant. It is
not improbable that, like the Cyclopes, Hercules, and Atlas, he may
have been one of the earliest benefactors of mankind, and an assiduous
improver of their condition; whence the story of his gigantic size.
1041 A gigantic son of Poseidon or Neptune, and Iphimedeia,
one of the Alöeidæ.
1042 We have an account of this supposed discovery of the
body of Orestes in Herodotus, B. i. c. 68, and a reference to it, with
some pertinent remarks, in Aulus Gellius, B. iii. c. 10.—B.
1043 Il. B. v. l. 303, 4, B. xii. l. 449: this opinion of
Homer was adopted by many of the Latin poets; for example, by Virgil,
B. xii. l. 900; by Juvenal, Sat. xv. l. 69, 70; and by Horace, Od. B.
iii. O. 6, sub finem.
1044 Columella speaks of Cicero as mentioning this Pollio,
and stating that he was a foot taller than any one else. It is most
probably in Cicero’s lost book, “De Admirandis,” that this mention was
made of him.
1045 Hardouin supposes that this was not an individual name,
but a term derived from the Hebrew, descriptive of his remarkable
size.—B. He supposes also that not improbably this was the same
individual that is mentioned by Tacitus, Annals, B. xii. c. 12, as
Acharus, a king of the Arabians.
1046 According to our estimate of the Roman measures, this
would correspond to about nine feet four and a half inches of our
standard.—B.
1047 “Conditorio Sallustianorum.” The more general meaning
attributed to the word “conditorium,” is “tomb” or burial-place. We
learn from other sources that the famous “gardens of Sallust” belonged
to the emperor Augustus, and it is not improbable that there was a
museum there of curiosities, in which these remarkable skeletons were
kept.
1048 “Loculis.” It is not quite clear whether this word has
the meaning here of chest or coffin, or of a niche or cavity made in
the wall of the tomb.
1049 Among the objects of curiosity which were exhibited by
Augustus to the Roman people, as related by Suetonius, c. 43, was a
dwarf named Lucius, who is there described; but he would appear to be a
different person from any of those here mentioned.—B.
1050 Seneca also mentions him in his Consolation to Marcia,
c. 23.
1051 The procurator of a province was an officer appointed
by the Cæsar to perform the duties discharged by the quæstor in the
other provinces.
1052 We have an ingenious dissertation by Ajasson, the
object of which is to show, that the Tacitus here referred to, is
not the historian, but his father, and consequently, that the boy
prematurely born must have been the historian’s brother, not his
son.—B.
1053 It is not clear whether Pliny intended to apply all
these three observations to the female, or only the last of them;
it appears, however, that the remark is, in either case, without
foundation.—B. He appears to intend that his observations should apply
more especially to the strength of the arm.
1054 This is incorrect; the human body, after death, does
not float until decomposition has commenced, when it becomes more or
less buoyant, in consequence of the formation of gases, which partially
distend the cavities; but we do not observe any difference in the two
sexes in this respect.—B.
1056 The total abstinence from liquids in dropsy, was a
point much insisted upon by medical practitioners, even in modern
times; but it is now generally conceived to have been derived from a
false theory, and not to be essential to the cure of the disease, while
it imposes upon the patient a most severe privation. A moderate use of
fluids is even favourable to the operation of the remedies that are
employed in this disease.—B.
1057 From the Greek ἀγελαστὸς, “one who does not
laugh.” Cicero refers to this peculiarity in the character of Crassus,
in his treatise De Finibus, B. v. c. 92; and in the Tusc. Quest. B.
iii. c. 3, he informs us, on the authority of Lucilius, that Crassus
never laughed but once in his life.—B. And then, on seeing a donkey
eating thistles; upon which he exclaimed, “Similem habent labia
lactucam,” “Like lips, like lettuce.”
1058 “Without passion;” equivalent to our English word
“apathetical.”—B.
1059 The daughter of M. Antony by Octavia. She was the
mother of Germanicus Cæsar, and the grandmother of the emperor
Caligula, whom she lived to see on the throne, and who is supposed
to have hastened her death. She was celebrated for her beauty and
chastity—a rare virtue in those days.
1060 Pliny, B. xxxi. c. 45, says, that this state of the
bones is found in fishermen, from their being exposed to the action of
the sea and salt water; but both the fact and the supposed cause are
without foundation.—B.
1062 It would appear that the Samnites were not only one of
the most warlike people, with whom the Romans had to contest in the
infancy of their state, but that they were particularly celebrated as
gladiators.—B.
1063 The gladiators, called Samnites, were armed with the
peculiar “scutum,” or oblong shield, used by the Samnites, a greave on
the left leg, a sponger on the breast, and a helmet with a crest.
1064 The term “nervus” was generally applied by the ancients
to the sinews or tendons; they had a very indistinct knowledge of what
are properly called the “nerves.”—B.
1065 Pintianus suggests another reading here, which would
appear to be much more consistent with probability. “Inermi dextrâ
superatum, et uno digito postremo correptum in castra,” &c.—“Conquered
him with the right hand, and that unarmed, and then with a single
finger dragged him to the camp.”
1067 Philonides has been already mentioned, B. ii. c. 73, as
being in the habit of going from Sicyon to Elis in nine hours.—B.
1068 We may consult the learned notes of Ajasson, Lemaire,
vol. iii. p. 99, respecting the exact distances here indicated by
Pliny. We may remark, that a stadium is about one-eighth of a mile,
according to which estimate, Philippides must have gone 142 miles in
two days, and the other 150 miles in one day; as it is implied, that
these journeys were performed on foot, even the former of them is
obviously impossible.—B. Query, however, as to this last assertion;
according to recent pedestrian feats, it does not appear to be
absolutely impossible.
1070 This feat is no less incredible than those mentioned
above.—B.
1071 We have an account of this journey of Tiberius in Dion
Cassius. Val. Maximus, B. v. c. 6, also enumerates this among the
extraordinary examples of fraternal affection.—B. We learn also from
Suetonius, that on learning the accident, a fall from his horse, which
had happened to his brother Drusus, Tiberius took horse at Ticinum, and
travelled night and day till he reached his brother, who was then in
Germany, near the Rhine. He accompanied the body to Rome, preceding it
on foot all the way. There is extant a “Consolation to Livia Augusta,”
written on this occasion, some have thought, by Pedo Albinovanus, but
it is more likely to have been the work of Ovid.
1072 This statement must have been in some of his lost
works.
1073 Pliny probably here refers to a passage in the Acad.
Quæst. B. iv. c. 81, where Cicero speaks of a person who could see
objects, it was said, at a distance of 1800 stadia, equal exactly to
125 miles.—B.
1074 The actual distance between the promontory of Sicily
and the nearest part of Carthage is between fifty and sixty miles. The
acute vision of Strabo is mentioned by Val. Maximus, B. i. c. 8.—B.
1075 See also B. xxxvi. c. 4. He was a Lacedæmonian
sculptor, who, according to Athenæus, also executed embossed work on
vases.
1076 His works in ivory were said to have been so small,
that they could scarcely be seen without placing them on black hair.
1077 Cicero, Acad. Quæst. B. iv. c. 120, speaks of “one
Myrmecides, a maker of minute objects of art;” Ælian, Vac. Hist. B.
i. c. 17, also speaks of these minute performances of Myrmecides,
and styles them “a waste of time.” Pliny, in a subsequent part of
his work, B. xxxi. c. 4, speaks of similar minute works, executed by
these artists in marble; but the account which he gives is scarcely
credible.—B.
1079 It would appear that there is a little confusion
here of events. Sybaris, so noted for its luxury and effeminacy, was
destroyed by the people of Crotona, under the command of the athlete
Milo, B.C. 510. In B.C. 360. the Crotoniats were
defeated at the river Sagras, by the Locrians and Rhegians, 10,000 in
number, although they are said to have amounted to 130,000. Now it was
on the occasion of this latter battle, that, according to Cicero, De
Nat. Deor. B. ii., the noise was heard at Olympia, where the games were
being celebrated. Be it as it may, the story is clearly fabulous.
Evelyn is much more deserving of credit, where we find him stating in
his Diary, that in his garden, at Say’s Court, at Deptford, he heard
the guns fired in one of our engagements with the Dutch fleet, at a
distance thence of nearly 200 miles.]
1080 Ajasson discusses at some length, the possibility of
the fact here mentioned, and concludes, that it is not to be credited:
he estimates the distance between these two places at 120 miles.—B.
1081 As to the miraculous annunciation of the victory of
Marius and Catulus over the Cimbri, see B. ii. c. 58.
1082 Meaning, thereby, the twin brothers, Castor and Pollux;
who were said to have announced at Rome the victory gained the day
before by Paulus Æmilius over King Perseus.
1083 This circumstance is mentioned by Pausanias, in
his Attica. She was an Athenian hetæra, or courtesan, beloved by
Aristogiton, or, according to Athenæus, by Harmodius. On the murder
of Hipparchus, the son of Pisistratus, she was put to the torture,
being supposed to have been privy to the conspiracy; but she died
under her sufferings without making any disclosure, and, according to
one account, bit off her tongue, that no secret might be betrayed by
her. The Athenians erected in her honour a bronze statue of a lioness
(in reference to her name), without a tongue, in the vestibule of the
Acropolis.
1084 This story is related by Val. Maximus, B. iii. c. 3,
it is also alluded to by Cicero, Tus. Quæst. B. ii. c. 22, and De
Nat. Deor. B. ii. c. 33; but he only speaks of his tortures, without
mentioning what Pliny states of his biting off his tongue.—B. He was
a philosopher of Abdera, of the school of Democritus, and flourished
about B.C. 340. Towards Alexander the Great, whom he
accompanied into Asia, he acted the part of a base flatterer. He was
pounded to death in a mortar, by order of Nicocreon, king of Cyprus.
1085 This statement is also made by Val. Maximus, B. viii.
c. 7. Xenophon, Cyropædia, B. v., speaks of the retentive memory of
Cyrus, but considerably qualifies the account here given: he says that
Cyrus knew the names of all his commanders or prefects, and of all
those to whom he had occasion to give particular orders.—B.
1086 This account is similar to that given by Val. Maximus,
B. viii. c. 7, and by Aulus Gellius, B. xvii. c. 7. We have a learned
dissertation by Ajasson, in which he discusses the possibility of one
individual understanding so great a number of languages, as well as the
question, whether it is possible that so great a number of languages
were spoken by the subjects of Mithridates. His conclusions greatly
tend to prove both these points; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 295.—B.
1087 This invention is referred to by Cicero, De Nat. Deor.,
B. ii. c. 86. Cicero also speaks of the remarkable powers of memory
possessed by Charmidas and Metrodorus, De Oratore, B. ii. c. 88, and
Tusc. Quæst. B. i. c. 24.—B.
1088 Ajasson gives an account of some of the principal
writers in what has been termed the science of Mnemonics, or artificial
memory: he particularly commends the lectures of Aimé of Paris on the
subject; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 310, et seq.—B.
1089 This circumstance is related by Val. Maximus, B. i. c.
8.—B.
1090 This is not always the case. In dreams we often
recollect past events and localities; we know in what part of the world
we are, and even remember the substance of former dreams, and the fact
that we have dreamt of a similar subject before.
1091 The conqueror of Syracuse, and five times consul at
Rome. He was Born B.C. 268, and was slain in an engagement
with Hannibal, B.C. 208, in the vicinity of Venusia.
1092 Ajasson remarks concerning the number of battles in
which Cæsar is said to have been engaged, that it has probably been
much exceeded by some of the great warriors of later times. He says
that an individual, “who was raised over our heads and over all Europe,
and so reigned much too long,” was personally engaged in nearly 300
battles.—B.
1093 Who infested the coasts of Cilicia, and whom he
dislodged from their strongholds, and almost utterly extirpated.
1094 This fact is mentioned by Seneca, de Ira, B. ii. c. 26.
Plutarch mentions a similar circumstance with respect to Pompey.—B.
1095 Or Bacchus.—“Father Liber” is the name always given to
him by Pliny.
1096 “Magnus.” Plutarch states, that, on his return from
Africa, Sylla saluted him with the name of “Magnus,” which surname he
ever afterwards retained.—B.
1097 Plutarch says, that the law did not allow a triumph to
be granted to any one who was not either consul or prætor.—B.
1098 Sertorius had joined the party of Marius and Cinna, in
opposition to that of Sylla. He fled into Spain, and maintained the war
successfully in that country, until he was treacherously assassinated
by one of his supposed partisans. This may appear a sufficient reason
for his not being mentioned by Pompey.—B.
1099 “Toties imperator antequam miles.” He had been raised
to the highest rank without passing through the various gradations of
military life.—B.
1100 Speaking of this honorary crown, Pliny says, B. xvi.
c. 4, “At the present day it is not given to the victor himself, but
proclamation is made that he confers the crown upon his country.”
1101 It is noticed by the commentators, that Aulus Gellius,
speaking of this building, calls it the Temple of Victory, B. x. c. 1;
the error, it is supposed, may have arisen from Pompey having placed a
statue of Victory in the Temple.—B.
1103 Pliny, referring to these events, in a subsequent
place, B. xxvii. c. 6, says that it took place “pridie Kalend. Octob.
die natalis sui.” Plutarch informs us, that the triumph lasted two
days, a circumstance which may assist us in reconciling these dates.
The same author gives a very minute detail of all the transactions here
referred to.—B.
1104 According to the chronology ordinarily adopted, this
would be in the year of the City 692.—B.
1105 By Asia, as we see from the geographical portion of
this work, the ancients often designated not the large tract to which
we now apply the name, but a comparatively small district lying on the
east of the Ægean sea.—B.
1107 Val. Maximus adds, that he was the best lawyer of his
time.—B.
1108 We meet with a passage in Livy, B. xxxix. c. 44,
illustrative of this view of Cato’s character. In Cicero’s treatise,
De Senectute, where Cato bears a prominent part, frequent allusion is
made to the strictness and even severity of his principles, although
the general impression which we receive of his character and manners is
highly interesting, and, upon the whole, not unamiable.—B.
1109 Plutarch says, that nearly fifty impeachments were
brought against him, the last when he was eighty-six years of age.—B.
1110 There has been considerable difficulty in ascertaining
who was the individual here referred to; the subject is discussed
at some length by Hardouin, who shows that it is probable, that
it was Lucius Cæcilius, who was slain in a battle with the Gauls,
A.U.C. 470, and in the consulship of Dolabella and
Domitius.—B.
1111 The name of this consul has been the subject of
much discussion among the commentators. Livy, B. iii. c. 31, has
been referred to, as calling him Atermius; but in some of the best
editions, he is named Aterius. The tribunate of Dentatus took place
A.U.C. 299, fifty-five years after the expulsion of the
kings.—B.
1112 When a Roman overcame an enemy with whom he had been
personally engaged, he took possession of some part of his armour and
dress, which might bear testimony to the victory; this was termed the
“spolium.”—B.
1113 “Hasta pura;” these words, according to Hardouin,
signify a lance without an iron head. We are told that it was given to
him who gained the first victory in a battle; it was also regarded as
an emblem of supreme power, and as a mark of the authority which one
nation claimed over another.—B.
1114 “Phaleris.” These were bosses, discs or crescents of
metal, sometimes gold. They were mostly used in pairs, and as ornaments
for the helmet; but we more commonly read of them as attached to the
harness of horses, and worn as pendants from the head, so as to produce
a terrific effect when shaken by the rapid movements of the horse.
1115 The “torques” was an ornament of gold, twisted spirally
and bent into a circular form, and worn among the upper classes of the
Persians, the Gauls, and other Asiatic and northern nations. They are
often found both in France and Ireland, as well as in this country, but
varying greatly in size and weight.
1116 Golden “armillæ,” or bracelets, were worn by the Gauls
on the arms and the legs. The Sabines also wore them on the left arm,
at the time of the foundation of Rome.
1117 The word “fiscus” signifies a wicker basket or pannier,
probably of peculiar construction, in which the Romans were accustomed
to keep and carry about large sums of money. In process of time the
word came to signify a treasure or money-chest.
1118 We have nearly the same detail of the honours bestowed
on Dentatus by Val. Maximus, B. iii. c. 2. Pliny again speaks of
Dentatus, and the honours bestowed upon him, B. xxii. c. 5; and
especially notices the “corona graminea,” the grass or obsidional
crown, as the highest of his honours. The different kinds of honorary
crowns are very fully described in B. xvi. c. 3, 4, and 5; in B. xxii.
c. 4, we have a particular account of the “corona graminea;” in c. 5,
mention is made of its having been given to Dentatus, and, in the next,
other individuals are enumerated to whom it had been presented.—B.
1119 T. Romilius Rocus Vaticanus was consul B.C.
455. Having defeated the Æqui, and gained immense booty, instead of
distributing it among the soldiers, he and his colleague sold it, on
account of the poverty of the treasury. They were, in consequence,
brought to trial, and Veturius was sentenced to pay 10,000 asses.
He was, however, elected augur in 453, as some compensation for the
ill-treatment he had experienced.
1120 Livy, B. iii. c. 31, gives an account of the conviction
of Romilius, but says, that it was effected by C. Claudius Cicero, the
tribune of the people. To obviate the discordance in the names, some
commentators have proposed to substitute the words “Lucio Siccio” for
“Claudio Cicerone.”—B.
1121 We have an account of the victories, honours, and
unfortunate fate of Manlius in Livy, B. vi. c. 14-20. In enumerating
the honours conferred upon him, the numbers are given somewhat
differently in c. 20; thirty spoils of enemies slain, forty donations
from the generals, two mural and eight civic crowns.—B.
1122 M. Sergius Silus. He was one of the city prætors
B.C. 197.
1123 Among the Jews and other nations of antiquity, it was
considered an essential point for the priests to be without blemish,
perfect and free from disease.—B.
1124 In allusion to the compliment paid by the senate to the
consul, M. Terentius Varro, by whose rashness the battle of Cannæ was
lost. On his escape and safe return to Rome, instead of visiting him
with censure, he received the thanks of the senate, “that he had not
despaired of the Republic.”
1125 It appears somewhat remarkable, considering the
extraordinary acts of valour here enumerated, as performed by Sergius,
that we hear so little of him from other sources.—B.
1126 Hardouin takes the meaning to be, that though ill
fortune overtook the Romans in their wars with Hannibal, nevertheless
Sergius defeated Fortune herself, in dying before his country was
overwhelmed by those calamities.
1127 Pliny informs us, B. xiii. c. 1, that the art of making
perfumes originated with the Persians.—B.
1128 The city was taken by him by assault, and all its
buildings, with the exception of the house of Pindar, levelled to the
ground; most of the inhabitants were slaughtered, and the rest sold as
slaves.
1129 Stagirus, or Stagira, a town of Macedonia, in
Chalcidice, on the Strymonic Gulf. It was a colony of Andros, founded
B.C. 656, and originally called Orthagoria. It was destroyed
by Philip, and, according to some accounts, was rebuilt by him, as
having been the native place of Aristotle.
1130 Archilochus of Paros was one of the earliest Ionian
lyric poets, and was the first who composed in Iambic verse according
to fixed rules. He flourished about 714-676 B.C. Pliny speaks
here of his murderers; but it is generally stated by historians that
he was murdered by one individual by some called Calondas, or Corax, a
Naxian, by others Archias.
1131 We may here refer to some remarks by Hardouin and
Ajasson on the actual sum obtained by Isocrates; Lemaire, vol. iii. pp.
126, 127.—B.
1132 This anecdote is related by Cicero, De Oratore, B. iii.
c. 56, and by Val. Maximus, B. viii. c. 10.—B.
1133 This is rather a strong expression, and it is doubtful
if the great historian at all deserves it. The facts of the case seem
to have been as follow. Thucydides was employed in a military capacity,
and was in command of an Athenian squadron of seven ships at Thasos,
B.C. 424, when Eucles, who commanded in Amphipolis, sent for
his assistance against Brasidas, who was before that town with an army.
Fearing the arrival of a superior force, Brasidas offered favourable
terms to Amphipolis, which were readily accepted, as there were but few
Athenians in the place. Thucydides arrived at Eion, on the mouth of the
Strymon, the evening of the same day on which Amphipolis surrendered:
and though too late to save Amphipolis, prevented Eion from falling
into the hands of the enemy. It was in consequence of this failure,
that he became voluntarily an exile, perhaps to avoid the still severer
punishment of death, which appears to have been the penalty of such a
failure as that which he had, though unavoidably, committed. It is most
probable that he returned to Athens about B.C. 403, the period
of its liberation by Thrasybulus.
1134 The following passage in Livy, B. vi. c. 34, may serve
to illustrate this remark of Pliny:—“The lictors of Sulpicius, the
military tribune, when he went home from the forum, knocked at the door
with his staff, as the usual custom is.”
1135 Of Cyrene, the Academic philosopher. In B.C.
155, being then fifty-eight years old, he was chosen with some others
to deprecate the fine of 500 talents which had been imposed on the
Athenians for the destruction of Oropus. It was then that, in presence
of Cato the Elder, he delivered his famous orations on Justice. The
first oration was in commendation of the virtue, and on the ensuing
day the next was delivered, by which all the arguments of the first
were answered, and justice shown to be not a virtue, but only a
matter of compact for the maintenance of civil society. The honesty
of Cato was greatly shocked at this, and he moved the senate to send
the philosopher back to his school, and save the Roman youth from his
demoralizing doctrines. He lived twenty-eight years after this, and
died at Athens B.C. 129, aged eighty-five, or, according to
Cicero, ninety.
1136 This is related by Plutarch, in his Life of Cato. His
general dislike of the Grecian character is again mentioned, B. xxix.
c. 7.—B.
1138 We have an account of this embassy in Plutarch. Pliny
informs us, B. xxxiv. c. 20, that the only article which Cato retained,
of the works of art that he brought from Cyprus, was the statue of
Zeno, “not for its intrinsic merit, but because it was the statue of a
philosopher.” Valerius Paterculus, B. ii. c. 45, and Plutarch refer to
this transaction.—B.
1139 This circumstance is related by Valerius Maximus, B.
viii. c. 14, and is referred to by Cicero in his defence of Archias,
sec. 9.—B.
1140 M. Varro, the philosopher, sometimes called “the most
learned” of the Romans. His command under Pompey, in the war against
the Pirates, has been already mentioned in B. iii. c. 16. He also
served under him against Mithridates, and was his legatus in Spain, at
the first outbreak of the civil wars.
1141 Pliny refers to the same subject: in B. xxxv. c. 2, he
speaks of Pollio as “qui primus, bibliothecam dicando, ingenia hominum
rempublicam fecit”—“The first who, by forming a public library,
made public property the genius of learned men.” Aulus Gellius, B.
vi. c. 18, informs us, that the first library, formed for the use of
the public, was that collected at Athens by Pisistratus.—B. Ptolemy
Philadelphus, the king of Pergamus, and Lucullus, had formed extensive
libraries, but solely for their own use, and not that of the public.
1142 Some of these are given by Val. Maximus, B. viii. c.
15.—B. It is very doubtful, however, if Greece did not greatly excel
Rome in this respect.
1144 Cicero, in an Epistle to Atticus, B. ii. c. i.,
enumerates what he styles his consular orations: the total number is
twelve, and among them we find all those here referred to by Pliny.—B.
1145 The individual referred to is L. Roscius Otho; by
his law the Roman equites, who, before this time, sat mingled with
the people generally, had appropriate seats allotted to them. Cicero
designates this oration, “De Othone.”—B.
1146 This title was bestowed upon him by the general
acclamation of the people, at the end of his consulship. We have an
account of it in Plutarch.—B.
1147 This remark is not found in any of Cæsar’s works now
extant.—B.
1148 These terms signify “acute” and “judicious;” they are
derived respectively from “cautus” and “cor.”—B.
1149 Son of Damagetus, and one of the Seven Sages. He
flourished towards the beginning of the sixth century B.C.
Herodotus says that he held the office of Ephor Eponymus in Ol. 56. He
was a man remarkable for his wisdom and his sententious brevity, so
characteristic of his Spartan origin.
1150 It appears somewhat doubtful to which of the Grecian
sages the credit of this maxim is due.—B.
1151 We have an account of Melampus, probably the same as
the person here styled Melampodes, in Herodotus, B. ii. c. 49, and B.
ix. c. 34; Ajasson, in Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 135, has given a list
of writers who have referred to him as an eminent soothsayer. Pliny
mentions him in a subsequent passage, B. xxv. c. 21, as celebrated for
his skill in the art of divination.—B.
1152 Marcius is said by Cicero, De Divin. B. i. c. 50, to
have given his predictions in verses.—B.
1153 We have an account of this in Livy, B. xxix. c. 14, and
B. xxxvi. c. 40; it is also referred to by Valerius Maximus, B. viii.
c. 15.—B.
1154 In consequence of the number of eminent men who bore
the name of Scipio, it is not easy, in all cases, to decide to which
of them certain transactions ought to be referred. In this instance,
it has been doubted, whether it was the same Scipio who was twice an
unsuccessful candidate for the consulship, and who died in a foreign
country. Livy, B. xxxv. c. 24, remarks, “P. Corn. Cn. F. Scipio” had
been an unsuccessful candidate for the consulship; and afterwards, B.
xxxix. c. 40, that “P. and L. Scipio” were unsuccessful candidates for
the office of censor. Val. Maximus expressly states, B. v. c. 3, that
it was Scipio Nasica, who, in consequence of the little estimation in
which he was held by his fellow-citizens, went to Pergamus, and “lived
there the remainder of his life, without feeling any regrets for his
ungrateful country.”—B.
1155 We have this anecdote related by Valerius Maximus, B.
viii. c. 15. He informs us, that it was the statue of Venus Verticordia
which was ordered to be consecrated; the more readily to win the
hearts of the maidens and matrons from wanton thoughts to a life of
chastity.—B.
1156 Her story is told at great length by Ovid, in the
Fasti, B. iv. l. 305, et seq. Her name was Claudia Quinta, and
she is supposed to have been the sister of Appius Claudius Pulcher,
and grand-daughter of Appius Claudius Cæcus. The vessel which was
conveying the statue of Cybele from Pessinus to Rome having stuck fast
on a shallow at the mouth of the Tiber, the soothsayers declared that
none but a really chaste woman could move it. Claudia, who had been
previously accused of unchastity, being in the number of the matrons
who had accompanied Scipio to Ostia to receive the statue, immediately
presented herself, and calling upon the goddess to vindicate her
innocence, seized the rope, and the vessel moved forthwith. A statue
was afterwards erected to her in the vestibule of the temple of the
goddess.
1157 Solinus and Festus differ somewhat from Pliny, in
stating that it was her father whose life was thus saved by the
affectionate daughter. Valerius Maximus, who tells the story, says that
the family was “ingenui sanguinis,” meaning “of genteel origin.” Such
families were, however, sometimes reduced, even among the Romans, to a
level with the plebeian classes.
1159 This theatre is again mentioned in B. xxxvi. c. 12. It
was built of stone, and erected by Augustus in honour of his nephew
Marcellus. This is related by Valerius Maximus, B. v. c. 8, somewhat
more in detail, and with a degree of animation, which is not frequently
to be met with in that author.—B.
1160 Cicero, De Divin. B. i. c. 18, Val. Maximus, B. iv. c.
6, and Plutarch, relate this more circumstantially. The serpents were
of different sexes; if the male serpent was killed, his own death was
to be the consequence; if the female, that of his wife, Cornelia.—B.
1161 Pliny gives an account of the circumstances which
attended the death of Lepidus, in the 54th Chapter. He was the father
of the triumvir.—B.
1162 Or Rutilius, consul B.C. 132, the year after
the death of Tiberius Gracchus, whose adherents he prosecuted with
the greatest cruelty. He also obtained a triumph for bringing to a
conclusion the Servile war. He was an intimate friend of the younger
Scipio Africanus, who obtained the consulship for him, but failed in
gaining that honour for his brother Lucius. About the same period, he
was condemned, in the tribuneship of Caius Gracchus, for his illegal
acts in the prosecution of the adherents of Tiberius Gracchus. It has
been suggested that this indignity may have had a greater share than
the ill success of his brother in causing his death.
1163 Pliny again speaks of the great talents of Hippocrates,
B. xxvi. c. 6, and B. xxix. c. 2.—B.
1164 We have an account of the origin of these games in
Livy, B. xxix. c. 14.—B.
1165 Cleombrotus is supposed to be the same person who
is mentioned in B. xxix. c. 3, as Erasistratus, the grandson of
Aristotle. From Suidas we learn that a near relative of his was called
Cleombrotus, though, from his perplexed language, it is impossible to
say whether father or uncle. The story to which Pliny is supposed here
to refer is a curious one. Antiochus, the son of Seleucus Nicator, fell
in love with Stratonice, whom his father had married in his old age,
but struggled to conceal his passion. The skilful physician discovered
the nature of his disease; upon which he reported to Seleucus that it
was incurable, for that he was in love, and it was impossible that
his passion could be gratified. The king, greatly surprised, inquired
who the lady was; to which Erasistratus replied that it was his own
wife; whereupon Seleucus began to try and persuade him to give her
up to his son. The physician upon this asked him if he would do so
himself, if it were his own wife. Seleucus declared that he would;
upon which Erasistratus disclosed to him the truth. Seleucus not only
gave up Stratonice to his son, but resigned to him several provinces.
Erasistratus was one of the most famous physicians and anatomists of
antiquity.
1166 It was on this occasion that a label was said to have
been fastened on the arrow, inscribed, “To Philip’s right eye.” The
inhabitants were permitted to depart, however, when the city was taken,
with one garment to each person.
1167 This accident occurred to Philip, at the siege of
Methone, of which we have a brief account in Diodorus Siculus, B. xvi.
c. 7, and in Justin, B. vii. c. 6; but neither of these authors makes
any mention of Critobulus. Quintus Curtius, B. ix. c. 5, informs us,
that Critobulus exhibited great skill in relieving Alexander the Great
from the effects of a dangerous wound, which he received in India; but
he does not refer to the fact here mentioned.—B.
1168 At the present day, this mode of treatment would have
figured as the “wine-cure.”
1170 Pliny again speaks of Asclepiades, in B. xxvi. c. 7,
and B. xxix. c. 5. The anecdote respecting the man who was saved from
the funeral pile is referred to by Celsus, B. ii. c. 6.—B. Pliny says,
in B. xxvi. c. 7, that Asclepiades first came to Rome as a teacher
of rhetoric, and that being unsuccessful, he turned his attention
to medicine. Bruce, the Abyssinian traveller, also met his death by
falling down stairs. Rabelais, in the prologue to his Fourth Book,
refers to this peculiar death of Asclepiades.
1171 This is related more at large by Val. Maximus, B. viii.
c. 7, and by Plutarch.—B.
1173 Val. Maximus refers to Philon and his public works, in
B. viii. c. 12.—B. He was an architect of eminence in the reign of
the successors of Alexander. He built for Demetrius Phalereus, about
B.C. 318, the portico of twelve Doric columns to the great
temple at Eleusis. He also formed a basin in the Piræus, which was
destroyed at the taking of Athens by the Romans under Sylla.
1175 Plutarch, in his life of Alexander, mentions the
restriction made in favour of Lysippus, but does not extend it to
Apelles; he does not speak of Pyrgoteles. We have an apposite allusion
to this circumstance by Horace, Ep. B. i. l. 239, 240. Boileau has
elegantly imitated Horace, in his “Discours au Roi.”—B. For further
particulars of him, see B. xxxiv. c. 17 and 19. He was a native of
Sicyon, and at first a simple worker in bronze, but eventually obtained
the highest rank among the Grecian statuaries.
1176 According to the usual estimate of the value of the
Attic talent, £193 12s., the sum given for this picture would be
about £19,000.—B.
1177 Nearly all the topics here treated of are again
mentioned in B. xxxv., which is devoted to the fine arts. The 34th,
35th, and 36th Chapters of that Book, contain an account of all the
celebrated painters of antiquity, and their principal works.—B.
1180 We have a further account of this artist in B. xxxiv.
c. 19, B. xxxv. c. 39 and 40, and B. xxxvi. c. 4.
1181 This is referred to by Pliny, B. xxxvi. c. 4, and by
Valerius Maximus, B. viii. c. 4.—B.
1182 He is again mentioned in B. xxxiv. c. 19, B. xxxv. c.
34, and B. xxxvi. c. 4.—B.
1183 Mentor is noticed for his skill in carving, B. xxxiii.
c. 55.—B. Littrè says, on referring to that passage, “we find that he
was a worker in silver, and a maker of vases of great value.” He seems
disinclined to believe that he was a statuary. As Pliny tells us, ubi
supra, none of his public works were in existence in Pliny’s time.
Some small cups, however, existed, which were highly prized, though
some were undoubtedly spurious.
1185 We have the same difficulty in ascertaining the sums
here mentioned, as in all former cases. Holland estimates the sum given
for Daphnus at 300,700 sesterces, vol. i. p. 175.—B.
1186 “Dispensator;” we have an explanation of this term, B.
xxxiii. c. 13.—B.
1187 Holland estimates the sum paid for the enfranchisement
of this man at 120,000 sesterces, vol. i. p. 175.—B.
1188 In his capacity, probably, of contractor for provisions
and stores.
1189 Holland estimates the price paid on this occasion at
3,500 sesterces, ubi supra, thus differing exceedingly from Ajasson’s
estimate.—B.
1190 “Quam quidam injuriam lucri fecit ille mercatus in
luctu civitatis, quoniam arguere nulli vacabat.” We can see the meaning
of this passage, but a literal translation of it, as it stands, is out
of the question.
1191 “Virtus”—“manliness,” that being esteemed by the
Romans the ideal of true virtue.
1192 It appears that a similar custom prevailed among the
Scythians, according to Phylarchus, from whom Pliny probably took his
account of it; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 151.
1193 As being fraught with an intensity of pain, which no
number of days passed in pleasure can compensate.
1194 She was the daughter of Leotychides, and the wife
of Archidamas, and mother of Ægis. Ajasson expresses his surprise,
that so diligent a collector of facts as Pliny, should have been
acquainted with only one example of this kind.—B. “The following are
additional instances collected by Ajasson:—1. Olympias, daughter of
Neoptolemus, king of Epirus, wife of Philip II., king of Macedon, and
mother of Alexander the Great, king of Macedon. 2. Roxana, daughter
of king Darius Codomannus, and wife of Alexander the Great; her son
by whom was proclaimed king by certain generals of Alexander, but was
shortly after slain at Amphipolis. 3. Laodice the Younger, daughter of
king Antiochus Soter, sister and wife of Antiochus Theös, and mother
of king Seleucus Callinicus. 4. Berenice, daughter of king Ptolemy
Philadelphus; married to her brother king Ptolemy Euergetes, and mother
of Ptolemy Philopater, by whom she was put to death. 5. Cleopatra,
daughter of Antiochus the Great, king of Syria: she became the wife of
king Ptolemy Epiphanes, and was mother of king Ptolemy Philometor. 6.
Cleopatra Cocce, daughter of Ptolemy Philometor, married her uncle,
king Ptolemy Physcon, and became mother of kings Ptolemy Lathyrus and
Alexander I. 7. Cleopatra, another daughter of Ptolemy Philometor,
married first to Alexander Balas, the usurper of the throne of Scythia,
then to king Demetrius Nicator, and then to Antiochus Venator. Her sons
by Nicator were Seleucus V. and Antiochus Gryphus, both of whom became
kings of Syria; and her son Cyzicenius by Antiochus Venator, likewise
became king of Syria. 8. Selene or Cleopatra, daughter of king Ptolemy
Physcon, was married, first, to king Ptolemy Lathyrus, secondly, to
king Antiochus Gryphus, and thirdly, to king Antiochus Eusebes. She
was mother of king Antiochus Asiaticus. In all, she had nine kings as
her near relations or connections. 9. Stratonice, daughter of king
Demetrius Poliorcetes, was married first to king Seleucus Nicator, and
then to king Antiochus Soter, and was mother of king Antiochus Therös.
1195 Val. Maximus, B. viii. c. 15, gives nearly the same
account of a person whom he calls Pherenice; from the resemblance of
the names, it has been supposed, that they may both refer to the same
individual.—B.
1196 He alludes to the three persons, father, son, and
grandson, known by the name of C. Scribonius Curio. The first was
prætor B.C. 121, one of the most distinguished orators of his
time. His son, who acquired some reputation as an orator, was tribune
of the people B.C. 90, prætor B.C. 82, and consul
in B.C. 76, with Cn. Octavius. He is represented as being
possessed of great eloquence, and of extreme purity and brilliancy of
diction, but to have had none of the other requisites of an orator.
Like his son, he enjoyed the friendship of Cicero. The younger Curio
was an orator of great talents, which, from want of industry, he left
uncultivated. Cicero endeavoured to direct his talents into a proper
channel, but all in vain, and he remained to the end a man of worthless
and profligate character. He was married to Fulvia, who afterwards
became the wife of Antony.
1197 Hardouin observes, that M. Fabius Ambustus was three
times consul, Quintus Fabius Rullianus five times, and Q. Fabius Gurges
three times.—B.
1198 We have a similar account of the fate of Fidustius in
Dion Cassius, by whom he is named Filuscius.—B. He was at length slain
by order of Antony.
1199 We have an account of the vicissitudes in the life
of Ventidius Bassus in A. Gellius, B. xv. c. 4, and in Valerius
Paterculus, B. ii. c. 65. We learn from these writers, that Ventidius
was a native of Picenum, and that, when that city was taken by Cneius
Pompeius, in the Social war, Ventidius, then an infant, was carried in
his mother’s arms, before the car of the conqueror.—B.
1200 The passage of Cicero referred to, occurs in a letter
to Plancus, Ep. ad Fam. B. x. Ep. 18, where, speaking of Ventidius, who
had united himself to the party of Antony, he says, “And I look down
upon the camp of the mule-driver, Ventidius.”
1201 “Caliga.” A strong heavy sandal worn by the Roman
soldiers and centurions; but not by the superior officers. The term
“a caligâ,” therefore, had the same meaning as our expression, “from
the ranks.” The Emperor Caligula received that surname when a boy, in
consequence of wearing the caliga, and being inured to the life of a
common soldier.
1203 He was a native of Gades, in Spain. A party of the
Roman nobles induced an inhabitant of Gades to accuse him of having
illegally assumed the privileges of a Roman citizen. The cause was
tried B.C. 55, and he was supported by Pompey and Crassus,
and defended by Cicero. One of the tests of the being a Roman citizen,
was the immunity from being scourged, according to the provisions of
the Porcian law. So St. Paul, who, as a citizen of Tarsus, enjoyed the
rights of a Roman citizen, says to the centurion, Acts xxii. 25, “Is it
lawful for you to scourge a man that is a Roman, and uncondemned?”
1204 The accusation against Balbus appears to have been
his illegal usurpation of the rights of a Roman citizen, being born
a foreigner. Pliny has previously informed us, B. v. c. 5, that he
was a native of Gades or Cadiz. He was elected consul A.U.C.
713.—B.
1205 L. Fulvius Curius, consul B.C. 322. In
B.C. 313 he was master of the horse to the dictator, L.
Æmilius.
1206 “Felix.” Hardouin informs us, that he transmitted this
surname to his descendants; among them was Felix, the governor of
Judæa, before whom St. Paul was taken for judgment.—B.
1208 According to Pliny, B. xi. c. 39, and Plutarch, Sylla
was affected by what has been termed the “Morbus pediculosus” or “Lousy
disease.” Plutarch, however, ascribes his death to the bursting of an
internal abscess; and the same cause is assigned by Val. Maximus, B.
ix. c. 3.—B. It was probably of a similar disease that Herod Agrippa
died, whom we find mentioned in Acts xii. 23, as being eaten of worms.
1209 Plutarch refers to a dream which Sylla had a short
time before his death, but it does not seem to correspond to the one
here alluded to.—B. “Plutarch relates that shortly before his death,
Sylla dreamed that his son Cornelius, who died before his wife, Cecilia
Metella, appeared to him, and summoned him away to join his mother.
Appian also states that just before his death, Sylla beheld a spirit in
a dream, which summoned him by name; upon which he called together his
friends, made his will, and died soon after of a fever. Only two days
before his death he finished the twenty-second book of his Memoirs,
in which, foreseeing his end, he boasted of the prediction of the
Chaldæans, that it was his fate to die after a happy life, and in the
height of his prosperity.
1210 This is referred to by Tacitus, Hist. B. iii. c.
73.—B. Plutarch tells us that Catulus performed this ceremony of
dedication.
1212 Hardouin informs us, that a certain number of public
officers, which varied from three to twenty, were appointed to divide
the lands of the conquered people among the Roman colonists. Lemaire,
vol. iii. p. 159.—B.
1213 The commentators have endeavoured to prove, and not
without some success, that Pliny is not correct in the remark, that
the first elephants brought to Rome, were those which followed in the
triumph of Metellus. He has himself informed us, B. viii. c. 6, that
they were introduced by Curius Dentatus, in his triumph over Pyrrhus,
some years before that of Metellus. The same fact is also stated by
Florus, B. i. c. 18.—B.
1214 Ovid, Fast. B. vi. l. 436, et seq., and Val. Maximus,
B. i. c. 4, allude to this circumstance.—B.
1215 This fact has been supposed by Hardouin to be
controverted by the statement of Aulus Gellius, who says, B. iii.
c. 18, that all the senators, who had passed the curule chair,
were carried to the curia or senate-house, in a chariot. But, as
Ajasson correctly observes, Aulus Gellius does not assert that the
senators were carried at the public expense, which was the case with
Metellus.—B.
1216 Val. Maximus, B. vii. c. 1, details the various
fortunate circumstances which occurred to Q. Metellus; he makes no
mention, however, of the violent attack made upon him by Labeo; indeed,
he expressly states, that his good fortune continued to the last
moments of his life.—B.
1217 Val. Maximus, ubi supra, and Velleius Paterculus,
B. i. c. 11, speak of the honours obtained by the four sons of Q.
Metellus; they are also alluded to by Cicero in his 8th Philippic, sec.
4., and his Tusc. Quæst. B. i. c. 35.—B.
1218 Dalechamps remarks, that we find in the ancient
historians a similar account relative to M. Drusus, who, when tribune
of the people, hurried off the consul Philippus with such violence
to prison, that the blood started from his nostrils: also of P.
Sempronius, the tribune of the people, who, had it not been for the
opposition offered by his colleague, would have carried the censor
Appius Claudius to prison.
1219 This attack of Labeo on Metellus is mentioned in
the Epitome of Livy, B. lix. The tribunes of Rome were styled
“sacrosancti,” and it was considered a capital crime to offer personal
violence to them, under any circumstances. Hardouin remarks, that the
tribune who came to the rescue of Metellus must have been a military
tribune, who, in virtue of his office, had a right to claim the
services of Metellus for the army.—B.
1220 Cicero, in his oration “Pro Domo suâ,” sec. 47, refers
to the consecration of the property of Metellus, as a case analogous
to that of his own house, which had been similarly consecrated by
Clodius.—B. It seems to have been the custom, when a person had been
capitally condemned, for the tribune of the people to consecrate his
property, with certain formalities, to some god or goddess; after which
it could not, under ordinary circumstances, be recovered, whether
the sentence was revoked or not. Cicero had been capitally condemned
through the instrumentality of Clodius, and obliged to fly from Rome.
1221 It was a common expression among the Romans, for a
person, “obtorto collo ad prætorem trahi,” “to be dragged to the prætor
with his neck wrenched;” and we meet with it repeatedly in the writings
of Plautus. It would appear that it was customary for the lictors or
officers of justice to seize criminals in a peculiar manner, perhaps
with a rope, and with the exercise of great violence, whatever their
rank.
1222 According to the remark of Dalechamps, it appears to
have been not unusual with the Roman magistrates, when resistance was
offered to their order, to seize the party by the throat, as is here
stated to have been done by Labeo.—B.
1223 There has been considerable difficulty in ascertaining
the names which should be given to the sons of Metellus, as the
MSS. differ, and there appears to be no means of coming to any
accurate decision, by a reference to other authorities. The essential
circumstance, however, is, that two of the sons had obtained the
honour of a triumph, and had acquired appropriate surnames.—B.
Metellus Diadematus has been much confounded with his cousin, Metellus
Dalmaticus. Diadematus was so called, from his wearing, for a long
time, a bandage round his forehead, in consequence of an ulcer. He was
consul B.C. 117.
1224 By being dragged, and not proceeding willingly, in
order to gain time for succour, and so save himself from being hurled
from the Tarpeian rock.
1225 Which allowed the laws to take their course, even
against an individual of the first consequence in the state.—B.
1226 In the class of those who were considered peculiarly
fortunate; “hâc censurâ,” literally, “in this assessment,” in allusion
to the classification of the citizens of Rome, according to the
estimate of their property.—B.
1227 In B.C. 45, when, being but about eighteen
years of age, he had the presumption to ask his uncle for the office of
“magister equitum;” upon which Julius Cæsar bestowed it on M. Lepidus,
probably being of opinion that his nephew was not yet fit for the
office.
1228 In his triumvirate with Antony and Lepidus, he showed
himself no less cruel than his colleague, Antony, notwithstanding the
gloss which Pliny attempts to throw over his actions. Two thousand
equites and three hundred senators are said to have been put to death
during this proscription.
1229 Augustus was detained at Dyrrhachium for some time
before the battle of Philippi by illness, and had not recovered when
the battle took place.
1230 In the first engagement at Philippi, Brutus defeated
the army of Augustus, while Cassius was defeated by Antony. Appian
speaks also of his concealment in a marsh to the south of Philippi.
1231 In his war against Sextus Pompeius, his fleet was twice
shattered by shipwreck off the coast of Sicily, and he suffered several
defeats by sea.
1232 C. Proculeius, a member of the equestrian order, and
a familiar friend of Augustus. It is of him that Horace speaks in the
lines (II. Ode 2),
“Vivet extento Proculeius ævo
Notus in fratres animi paterni.”
He was one of the Romans to whom Augustus thought of giving his
daughter Julia in marriage. The mode of his death is mentioned in B.
xxxvi. c. 59.
1233 This circumstance is stated more fully by Suetonius in
his Life of Augustus; he tells, that “in crossing from Sicily to Italy
to rejoin his forces, Augustus was unexpectedly attacked by Demochares
and Apollophanes, two of Pompey’s captains, and only escaped in a small
vessel with the greatest difficulty.”
1234 L. Antonius having raised an army at Præneste, took
possession of the town of Perusia, which was blockaded by Augustus,
and Antonius was at last obliged to surrender. During this siege
Augustus encountered several dangers, and was once nearly killed while
sacrificing beneath the walls, by a band of gladiators, who came upon
him unawares.
1235 The victory was long doubtful, and it was only the
sudden panic of Cleopatra, that finally ensured it to Augustus.
1236 The exact nature of the accident here alluded to, is
discussed by Hardouin, Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 169; he concludes, from
the account of Suetonius and of Dion Cassius, that it was owing to the
fall of a gallery, which extended between two towers.—B.
1237 These are fully described by Suetonius, in his Life of
Augustus, c. 80 and 81.
1238 M. Claudius Marcellus, the son of Octavia, sister of
Augustus. He was adopted by Augustus. Tacitus seems to hint that he
was greatly beloved by the Roman people, and it is not improbable that
Augustus may have become suspicious or jealous of him; his decease took
place in his twentieth year.
1239 To Mitylene. This refers to the jealousy between
Marcellus and his brother-in-law, M. Vipsanius Agrippa. Pliny probably
uses the term “pudenda,” implying that Augustus showed neither firmness
nor gratitude on this occasion; for anxious, at any cost, to prevent
these differences, he sent Agrippa, against his will, as proconsul to
Syria; immediately on which Agrippa left Rome, but stopped at Mitylene,
and left the government of Syria to his legatus. Upon the death of
Marcellus, Agrippa returned to Rome.
1240 Dion Cassius mentions three conspiracies, the first
by Fabius Cæpio and Muræna, a second, of which he does not name the
authors, and a third by Cornelius Cinna.
1241 Said in allusion to the suspicious deaths of his
grandchildren Lucius and Caius, the children of his daughter Julia by
Agrippa. They were probably removed by the criminal acts of Livia;
but some historians have hinted that Augustus was privy to their
destruction, the object of which was to remove all obstacles that lay
in the way of Tiberius to the throne.
1242 Implying that he was conscience-stricken at his share
in their death, as well as struck with sorrow and remorse.
1243 She was his only child; Scribonia was her mother.
She was first married to her cousin Marcellus; on his death to L.
Vipsanius Agrippa, and after his decease to Tiberius Nero, the son
of Livia. Her profligacy was universally known, and Augustus did not
scruple to enlarge upon it before the senate; but Pliny is the only
writer who states that she contemplated an attempt on the life of his
father; though Suetonius says that she became, at a late period of her
reign, an object of interest to those who were disaffected. Julia was
first banished to Pandataria, off the coast of Campania, and then to
Rhegium, which she was never allowed to leave. Her death took place
A.D. 14.
1244 Tiberius Nero, afterwards emperor. Pliny here alludes
to his retirement to Rhodes, where he remained seven years. Tacitus
represents that his chief reason for leaving Rome was to escape the
society of his wife Julia, who treated him with the utmost contempt,
and whose licentious life was not unknown to him. During this retreat
he devoted himself to the study of astrology. He left Rome without the
consent of Augustus, who was equally unwilling to allow of his return.
1245 Julia, one of the daughters of Julia and Agrippa,
and the wife of L. Æmilius Paulus. She fully inherited the vices of
her mother. For an adulterous intercourse with D. Silanus she was
banished, by Augustus to Tremerus, off the coast of Apulia, where she
survived twenty years, dependent on the bounty of the empress Livia. A
child born after her disgrace, was, by order of Augustus, exposed as
spurious. She is supposed by some to be the Corinna of Ovid’s amatory
poems.
1246 He probably alludes to the rising of some tribes in the
provinces on the north-eastern coast of the Adriatic, in B.C.
35, who refused to pay their tribute. They were finally vanquished by
Statilius Taurus, B.C. 33.
1247 After the defeat of his general Varus, by Arminius, in
Germany.
1248 This pestilence is also mentioned by Dion Cassius; it
took place A.U.C. 732.—B.
1249 We have an account of the disastrous expedition of
Varus in Florus, B. iv. c. 12.—B.
1250 Suetonius speaks of calumnious pamphlets (libelli),
that were circulated about, even in the senate-house, to his extreme
disparagement.
1251 A posthumous son of M. Vipsanius Agrippa by Julia, the
daughter of Augustus, by whom he was adopted together with Tiberius.
He was afterwards banished to Planaria, off the coast of Corsica, on
account of his savage and intractable character, though guilty of no
crime. Augustus is said to have privately visited him there, which,
coming to the ears of Livia, increased her enmity against this youth,
and he was murdered by her orders or those of Tiberius.
1252 Tacitus, Ann. B. i. c. 3, says that he was banished by
the artifices of Nero.—B.
1253 After his death his solemn apotheosis took place in the
Campus Martius. In some of the coins which were struck even during his
life-time, he was called “Divus,” or “the god.”
1254 For Tiberius Nero, the father of Tiberius Cæsar, took
the side of M. Antonius in the Civil War.—B.
1255 We have no mention of Pedius, or Phedius, as he is
named in some of the MSS., in any of the ancient authors. A story of
the same import is related of Solon and Tellus, by Herodotus, B. i. c.
30, and by Plutarch.—B.
1257 This is also related by Valerius Maximus, B. vii. c.
1.—B.
1258 This is very similar to Virgil’s beautiful description
of the old man Corycius, in the Georgics, B. iv. l. 125, et seq.
1259 We have some account of Euthymus in Pausanias, B. vi.,
and in Ælian, Var. Hist. B. viii. c. 18.—B.
1260 It has been conjectured by Poinsinet, that the word
“Callimachus” does not refer to the well-known poet of that name, nor
to any other individual, but that it was the title of the president
of the Olympic games. The opinion is not without plausibility, but is
scarcely sanctioned by sufficient authority.—B.
1261 Pliny here alludes to the doctrine of astrology, which
forms the especial subject of the next Chapter.—B.
1262 These statements are not found in any of the works
of Hesiod now extant; it is scarcely necessary to observe, that they
are entirely without foundation, and contrary to all observation and
experience.—B.
1263 The great age of Arganthonius is referred to by Lucian,
in his treatise “De Macrobiis,” “on Long-lived Men;” by Herodotus, B.
i. c. 163; by Cicero, de Senect. sec. 19; and by Valerius Maximus,
B. viii. c. 13; the three latter writers agree in making his age
120 years, and hence Pliny assigns to him the same age in the next
page.—B. St. Augustine, De Civitate Dei, B. xv., quotes this passage
of Pliny, and mentions the age of Arganthonius, as stated by him, to
have been 152 years. For Tartessus, in Spain, see B. iii. c. 3, and B.
iv. c. 36.
1264 His story is told by Ovid, Met. B. x., where he is said
to have become unwittingly the father of Adonis, by his own daughter
Myrrha (or Smyrna), in consequence of the anger of Venus or Aphrodite.
He was said to have founded the city of Cinyra in Cyprus.
1265 Callimachus mentions a person of this name, who wrote a
treatise on the art of making cheesecakes. There was also a physician
so called, who flourished in the fifth century B.C., and who
is said by Galen to have been the first who wrote a treatise on the
probe. Whether either of these individuals is the person here alluded
to, is unknown.
1266 We have the same statement as to the age of Epimenides,
in Valerius Maximus, B. viii. s. 13; he also, in the same section,
gives an account of the Epii, of Pictoreus, of Dandon, and of the king
of the island of the Tyrians, all of which agree with the present
statement, except that the person mentioned by Damastes is called
Literius, and the last-named individual is styled the king of the
island of the Lutmii.—B.
1267 The king of the Tartessi, mentioned above.—B.
1268 Pliny has already spoken of the vigorous old age of
Masinissa, in the 12th Chapter of the present Book.—B.
1269 We have an account of Gorgias in Cicero, de Senect.
sec. 9; in Valerius Maximus, B. viii. c. 13, and in Lucian.—B.
1270 Valerius Maximus, ubi supra, reduces this to
sixty-two years.—B.
1271 We have the same statement respecting Perperna in
Valerius Maximus, but he does not mention his age.—B.
1272 The names of the succeeding censors were C. Claudius
Pulcher, and T. Sempronius Gracchus.
1273 V. Maximus gives the same account of the age of
Corvinus, but he states the interval between his consulships to
have been forty-seven years. According to the Fasti, in Dr. Smith’s
Dictionary of Antiquities, the interval was forty-eight years, from
A.U.C. 406 to A.U.C. 455.—B.
1274 The honour of the curule-chair—“sella curulis.” It was
attached to the offices of consul, prætor, and ædile; Corvinus had,
therefore, been elected to one or other of these offices twenty-one
times.—B.
1275 Valerius Maximus gives the same account of Metellus.
He also informs us that Metellus, although of an advanced age when
created pontiff, held the office for twenty-two years; so also Cicero,
de Senect. sec. 9.—B.
1276 We have the same account of these females in Valerius
Maximus. He adds, that Clodia survived all her children; Seneca, Epist.
77, also refers to the great age of Statilia.—B.
1277 “Emboliaria,” an actress in the “embolium,” or
interlude of the Roman stage; also called “acroama,” by Cicero.
It appears to have been a concert of musical instruments, perhaps
accompanied by dancing.
1279 Their consulship was A.U.C. 671, which would
leave an interval of ninety years between her first appearance and her
appearance at the votive games.—B.
1280 “Togatus saltare instituit.” He acted in the “togatæ
fabulæ,” comedies representing Roman life, or the life of those who
wore the toga, the civic costume of the Romans. The Greek comedies were
called “palliatæ.”
1281 The secular games of Augustus are stated by Suetonius,
in his Life of Augustus, c. 31, and by Dion Cassius, to have taken
place A.U.C. 739.—B.
1282 “We have an account of Epigenes, by Hardouin, Lemaire,
vol. i. pp. 86, 87, where he is designated Rhodius. He is referred to
by Varro, Columella, and Seneca; Pliny mentions him in other parts of
his work.—B.
1283 Berosus has been referred to in the 37th Chapter of the
present Book.—B.
1284 For some account of Petosiris and Necepsos, see end of
B. ii.
1285 Literally, the fourth part; according to Hardouin’s
explanation, Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 186.—B.
1286 Literally ... “repetitions.” Dalechamps explains it as
indicating, “that part of the heavens which is distant thirty parts;
that is to say, two signs from the horoscope;” Lemaire, vol. iii. p.
187.—B.
1287 Ajasson refers us to Jul. Firmicus for an explanation
of the difference which may exist in the length of the lives of
individuals as depending on their natal day; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 186.
It appears to have been one of the leading tenets of the astrologers,
that the favourable influence of the ascending sign is diminished or
counteracted by the rays of other planets, or of the sun, falling upon
the sign in certain directions or at certain angles, and that the
length of the life of the individual is shortened in proportion to this
injurious effect.—B.
1288 This term means, literally, “increasing by a regular
scale,” or, “according to a proportional series of numbers;” the
multiples of 7 have been generally supposed to be the critical periods
of human life, and, more especially, 63, or 9 times 7, which was
accordingly termed “the grand climacteric.”—B.
1289 This census appears to have taken place A.D.
74, under the fifth consulship of Vespasian, and the third of Titus;
according to Censorinus, it was the last of which we have any distinct
account.—B.
1290 “Vasaria;” it is said, by the commentators, to be
a term of German origin, derived from a word which signified the
bark of a tree. It does not appear, however, from what cause it was
appropriated to the sense in which it is used by Pliny. The word is
found in Cicero’s oration against Piso, sec. 35; but is there applied
to a totally different object.—B.
1291 Now Brigella or Brescella. Parma still retains its
ancient name, Placentia is now Piacenza, and Faventia the modern
Faenza.
1292 Probably the same as the Velia, mentioned by Phlegon
Trallianus as famous for the longevity of its inhabitants.
1293 “Marcus Mucius, M. Filius, Galeria, Felix.” It has been
doubted by the commentators, whether the word Galeria refers to the
name of the mother of Mucius, or to the tribe to which he belonged.
The latter is, perhaps, the more natural interpretation. Hardouin
and Ajasson, however, adopt the opinion, that Galeria was the mother
of Marcus; Lemaire, vol. iii. pp. 191, 192. We meet with a precisely
similar construction of words in Cicero, 9th Philip. sec. 7; “Ser.
Sulpicius, Q. Filius, Lemonia Rufus.”—B.
1294 The son of Panthöus, and friend of Hector. He was
famous for his wisdom and prudence in giving counsel. See Iliad, B.
xviii. l. 249-52.
1295 The passage referred to is in the Iliad, B. xviii. l.
249-51.—B.
1296 Respecting Cælius [formerly called Cæcilius in most
editions] Hardouin informs us that he was the accuser of Calpurnius,
that he was prætor during the consulship of P. Lentulus Spinther and L.
Metellus Nepos, and was oppressed by Clodius. Pliny refers to Cælius,
and his accusation of Calpurnius, in a subsequent passage, B. xxvii.
c. 2.—B. Licinius Calvus Macer was by some considered, as an orator,
to rival even Cicero himself; and as a poet, is generally mentioned
by the side of Catullus. He exhausted his constitution by his severe
application, and died in his thirty-fifth or thirty-sixth year. He
was remarkable for the extreme shortness of his stature. Cælius was a
partisan of Pompey, and was eventually put to death at Thurii.
1297 Consul A.U.C. 463; he is generally called
Rufinus.—B.
1298 This anecdote is mentioned by Cicero, De Nat. Deor. B.
iii. c. 28, and by Valerius Maximus, B. i. c. 8.—B. He was tyrant of
Pheræ and Tagus in Thessaly, and was finally assassinated.
1299 He was consul A.U.C. 633; in consequence of
the victories which he obtained over the Allobroges, he obtained the
agnomen of “Allobrogicus.”—B.
1300 Valerius Maximus, B. viii. c. 13, refers to the great
age of Xenophilus, but designates him “Pythagoræus;” he says that he
obtained his information respecting him from Aristoxenus, the musician,
which may have led to an inaccuracy on the part of Pliny. Poinsinet
endeavours to reconcile the discrepancy, by the circumstance, that
music formed a prominent part of the Pythagorean discipline.—B.
1301 “Per sapientiam mori.” Many conjectures have been
formed respecting the meaning of this passage, which is obscure.
Attempts have been made to amend the reading of the text, but, as
it appears, without success; see the notes of Hardouin, Ajasson,
and others, Lemaire, vol. iii. pp. 197, 8.—B. It is pretty clear,
however, that Pliny here refers to what, in the next Chapter, he calls
“sapientiæ ægritudo,” the malady by the Greeks called “phrenesis,” and
by us “frenzy,” which attacks the seat of wisdom, the understanding.
Many pages have been written upon the meaning of this passage, obvious
as it seems to be.
1302 The same doctrine is advanced in B. xxviii., which
treats of medicine, see c. 10.—B.
1303 Among the ancients, all the manufactures and mechanical
arts were carried on by slaves; they were, consequently, subjected to
the same kinds of morbid causes which are found, in modern times, to be
so detrimental to certain descriptions of workmen.—B.
1304 Our own experience has taught us the truth of this
observation in the case of the cholera; and the great plague of 1348,
which is thought to have swept off one-third of mankind, is supposed to
have travelled to Europe from the vicinity of the Ganges.
1305 Dalechamps correctly remarks, that the laughter here
referred to, is not the indication of mirth, but what has been termed
the “risus Sardonicus,” the “Sardonic laugh,” produced by a convulsive
action of the muscles of the face; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 201.—B.
1307 Pliny probably took this notion from Celsus, who speaks
of this as being a fatal symptom, B. ii. c. 6; “si manibus qui in
febre, &c., in veste floccos legit, fimbriasque diducit....”—B.
1308 “Venarum percussa;” the ancients were not acquainted
with the relation which exists between the arteries and the veins, or
the appropriate functions of these parts.—B.
1309 In Seneca, Contr. B. ii., we find the remark, “Such
genius, at so early an age, bodes no long life.” Apuleius, quoting from
some Greek writer, says, “Odi puerulos præcoci sapientiâ.” “I hate your
bits of boys, with their precocious wisdom.” We have a somewhat similar
saying to the above passage from Seneca, “He is too wise,” or “too
clever to live long.”
1310 This remark has been confirmed by various writers,
ancient and modern; it appears to depend upon an unnatural development
of the cerebral and nervous system, which renders it more liable
to disease, and less able to bear the impressions to which it is
ordinarily exposed.—B.
1311 This was probably Phthiriasis, or the “morbus
pediculosus,” which has been previously mentioned in this book with
reference to Sulla, and of which, probably, Herod Agrippa died. Some
authors state that Pherecydes put an end to his life by throwing
himself from a rock at Delphi; others give other accounts of his death.
1312 This circumstance is mentioned by Seneca, De Provid. c.
3.—B.
1313 We have the same account of Antipater in Valerius
Maximus, B. i. c. 8. He was the preceptor of Cato of Utica; Cicero
makes honourable mention of him, De Oratore, B. iii. c. 50.—B.
1314 We have an account of the death of Aviola, in Valerius
Maximus, B. i. c. 8. This name occurs in the Consular Fasti, A.U.C.
806; but it could not be that of the person referred to by Valerius
Maximus, as his work was published under the reign of Tiberius, who
died A.U.C. 789. We have also an account of the death of Lamia
in Valerius Maximus, as occurring under the same circumstances with
that of Aviola.—B.
1315 Poinsinet, vol. iii. pp. 251, 252, supposes, that
Messala and Rufus are the names of two writers, and not, as usually
supposed, of one only. The conjecture appears not improbable.—B.
1316 Plutarch, “De Deo Socratis,” gives us the same account
of Hermotinus. Ajasson has remarked, not inaptly, that this story
is very similar to the modern statements as to the effect of animal
magnetism, Lemaire, iii. 207.—B. Apuleius, in his “Defence,” has
a passage which is remarkable as clearly bearing reference to the
doctrines inculcated by the mesmerists of modern times; be says, “Quin
et illud mecum reputo, posse animum humanum, præsertim puerilem et
simplicem seu carminum avocamento, sine odorum delenimento, soporari
et ad oblivionem præsentium externari; et paulisper remotâ corporis
memoriâ, redigi et redire ad naturam suam quæ est immortalis scilicet
et divina; atque ita veluti quodam sopore futura rerum præsagire.”
1317 We have no notice of any people, under this
appellation, in Greece; Cantharus, however, occurs as the name of an
individual, and possibly these may have been his descendants, or the
members of his family.—B.
1319 We have an account of Aristeas in Herodotus, iv. 13,
but somewhat different from that here given; Aristeas is also mentioned
by Apollonius in his Hist. Mirab., and A. Gellius, B. ix. c. 4.—B.
He was an epic poet, who flourished in the time of Crœsus and Cyrus.
Herodotus mentions a story that he reappeared at Metapontum, in Italy,
340 years after his death. He is generally represented as a magician,
whose soul could leave, and re-enter his body at pleasure.
1320 A poet and prophet of Crete. The story was, that being
sent by his father to fetch a sheep, he went into a cave, and fell into
a sleep, from which he did not awake for fifty-seven years. On awaking,
he sought for the sheep, and was astonished on finding everything
altered. On returning home, he found that his young brother had in the
meantime become an aged man. His story is only equalled by the famous
one of the Seven Sleepers of Damascus, who fell asleep in the time of
the Decian persecution of the Christians, and slept in a cave till the
thirtieth year of the reign of the Emperor Theodosius, 196 years. It is
not improbable that it is to this story about Epimenides, that we are
indebted for the amusing story of Rip Van Winkle, by Washington Irving.
1321 We have the life of Epimenides by Diogenes Laertius,
who gives an account of this long-continued sleep. It is also mentioned
by other writers, but there is some difference in their statements as
to its length.—B.
1322 According to the interpretation of Dalechamps,
“spiritus et animæ interceptioni ac privationi,” “the interception and
privation of the breath and faculties;” Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 208.—B.
1323 He probably alludes to what are known among us as
hysteria, or hysterical affections.
1324 We have an account of Heraclides in Diogenes Laertius;
he was a native of Pontus, and a pupil of Aristotle.—B.
1325 This circumstance is not mentioned in either of the two
works of Varro which have come down to us, “De Re Rusticâ,” and “De
Linguâ Latinâ.”—B.
1326 They were a body of commissioners appointed for the
distribution of lands in Campania; Julius Cæsar, when consul, having
caused a law to be passed, dividing that territory among such of the
Roman citizens as should have three or more children.
1327 We are not informed, whether these persons of the name
of Corfidius, were in any way connected, nor, indeed, do we appear
to have any certain knowledge of their history.—B. L. Corfidius, a
Roman eques, is mentioned by Cicero, in his oration for Ligarius,
B.C. 46, as one of the distinguished men who were then
interceding with Cæsar on behalf of Ligarius; but after the oration
was published, Cicero was informed that he had made a mistake in
mentioning the name of Corfidius, as he had died before the speech was
delivered. It does not appear certain that he was one of the parties
here mentioned: but it is not improbable that he was the brother whose
sudden death is mentioned below.
1328 Among the ancients, servants used to be summoned
by clapping the hands, as they are, in modern times, by ringing of
bells.—B. The same practice still prevails in the east.
1329 In the twenty-third Chapter of the present Book.—B.
1330 Val. Maximus, B. ix. c. 12, and Diodorus Siculus, B.
xiii. c. 14, gives the same account. It has been said, that, when
he heard the news, he called for a draught of wine, and was choked
with a grape-stone; this incident forms the subject of an epigram by
Simonides, quoted by Hardouin, Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 210.—B.
1331 There is reason to believe, that the prize was given
rather to the rank, than to the poetry of Dionysius; see the remarks of
Ajasson, Lemaire, vol. iii. pp. 210, 211.—B.
1332 This anecdote is related by Livy, B. xxii. c. 7; by
Valerius Maximus, B. ix. c. 12; and by Aulus Gellius, B. iii. c. 15;
the two former, however, state, that it occurred after the battle of
Thrasymenus.—B.
1333 Cicero, De Fato, sec. 6, styles Diodorus, “valens
dialecticus.”—B.
1334 According to Hardouin, these were Lucius, the prætor,
and Caius, the father of the dictator; they were brothers, and the sons
of C. Cæsar.—B.
1335 Thirty-first of December; consequently his tenure of
office was for a few hours only. Cicero indulged in several jokes upon
his consulship, remarking that no one had died during it; and that the
consul was extremely vigilant, for that he had never slept during his
term of office.
1336 This took place A.U.C. 708; Macrobius, in
his Saturnalia, gives us an account of the jests passed by Cicero and
others on the brief duration of his office.—B.
1337 He is supposed to have been the same person who was
consul A.U.C. 732.—B.
1338 The Comitium was a place in the forum at Rome, where
the “comitia curiata” were held, and certain offences tried and
punished. It was here also that the tribunal, or “suggestum,” was
situate.
1339 We are informed by Hardouin, that he held the office of
Prætor A.U.C. 660.—B.
1340 “A puero;” not necessarily a slave, as Littrè seems to
think.
1341 On Hardouin’s authority, we learn that A. Pompeius was
surnamed Bithynicus, and was prætor A.U.C. 680.—B.
1342 The death of Thalna is given somewhat more in detail by
Valerius Maximus, B. ix. c. 12; it took place A.U.C. 590.—B.
1343 The ancients reckoned the hours from sun-rise; in
summer, the second hour of the day would be six o’clock A.M.,
and in the winter, a quarter past eight.—B.
1344 Bankers, and usurers more especially, had their shops
in the Roman Forum.
1346 Augustus built a third Forum, because the old one and
that of Julius Cæsar, were not found sufficient for the great increase
of business. He adorned it with a temple of Mars, and the statues of
the most distinguished Romans.
1347 According to Hardouin, this ivory statue was in the
eighth region of the city.—B.
1348 “Specillum;” this instrument is mentioned by Celsus,
B. vi. c. 6, 25, et alibi. There has been a considerable discussion
among the commentators respecting the “specillum;” see Lemaire, vol.
iii. pp. 213, 214. From the uses to which it was applied by Celsus, we
can have little doubt upon the subject. Poinsinet and Ajasson employ
the equivalent French term “eprouvette.”—B.
1349 “Mulsum” was the most universally esteemed of all the
beverages used among the Romans. It seems to have been of two kinds: in
the one case honey was mixed with wine, in the other with must. Massic
or Falernian wine was preferred for the purpose, and new Attic honey.
The proportions were four measures of wine to one of honey; and various
perfumes and spices were added. See B. xxii, c. 4. It was especially
valued as the most appropriate draught on an empty stomach.
1350 The Cornelius Gallus here mentioned could not have been
the poet of the same name, because, as we are informed, he died by his
own hand. The death of the poet Gallus is alluded to by Ovid, Amores,
B. iii. El. 9, l. 64.—B. A similar fate is said, by Tertullian, to
have overtaken Speusippus, the Platonic philosopher. The same was also
said by some of the poet Pindar.
1351 Val. Maximus, B. ix. c. 12, gives the same account of
the death of Gallus and Haterius.—B.
1352 Which was usually worn by the Romans at their
entertainments.
1353 Considering some of the above cases, Pliny must have
had a curious notion of a happy death. Ovid would have agreed with him
in one respect; for in his amatory poems, he expresses a wish that he
may die of a surfeit of sensual enjoyment.
1354 The great-grandfather of the Emperor Nero. We have a
reference to his death by Seneca, De Benef. B. iii. c. 24, and a more
full account of it by Suetonius, Life of Nero, c. 2.—B.
1355 The charioteers at Rome were divided into four
companies, or “factiones,” each distinguished by a colour, representing
the season of the year. These colours were green for the spring, red
for the summer, azure for autumn, and white for the winter. Domitian
afterwards increased them to six, adding the golden and the purple.
The most ardent party spirit prevailed among them, and the interest in
their success extended to all classes and both sexes.
1357 It would appear, from Dalechamps and Hardouin, that
this statement, respecting the period when the custom of burning
the body after death was first adopted by the Romans, is incorrect,
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 219. There is much uncertainty as to its origin,
and the source from which they borrowed it. We learn from Macrobius,
that the practice was discontinued in his time, i. e. in the fourth
century after Christ.—B.
1358 We have the same remarks, respecting the antiquity of
the custom of interring the body, the continued adoption of it by the
Cornelian family, and the supposed notion of Sylla, in ordering his
own body to be burnt, in Cicero, De Leg. B. ii. c. 22, from whom it is
probable Pliny may have borrowed them.—B.
1359 We have no English term that will preserve the
distinction which Pliny makes between the two modes of disposing of the
body after death.—B.
1360 He views the state after death in the same light as
Democritus and Epicurus, utterly denying the immortality of the soul;
though it cannot be said that he looks upon life in the same cheerful,
laissez-faire manner in which it was regarded by the latter of these
philosophers.
1361 Hardouin remarks, that the ancients made a distinction
between the souls of the dead, and their spirits or shades, “umbræ.”
The former were supposed to remain on the earth, while the latter were
removed either to Elysium or to Tartarus, according to the character or
actions of the deceased.—B.
1362 According to Varro, Democritus directs, that the body
shall not be burnt after death, but preserved in honey; on which Varro
remarks, how greatly such a practice would tend to raise the price of
that article.—B.
1363 It has been conjectured, that Bacchus derived his name
from the Greek word Βάσκω, on account of his numerous journies
into different parts of the world; it was during these that he conveyed
to the various nations which he visited the arts of civilized life.—B.
1364 We have a long discussion by Poinsinet, vol. iii.
pp. 234, 235, on the derivation of the name of Ceres, in which he
endeavours to explain the various attributes that were ascribed to her.
The character in which she was generally regarded by the writers of
antiquity, was the one here given to her by Pliny; in proof of which we
may refer, among other authorities, to Virgil, Geor. B. i. l. 147. and
to Ovid, Metam. B. iii. l. 341.—B.
1365 The earliest method of reducing corn to the state
proper for the food of man, was by pounding it in a mortar; afterwards,
when it was ground between stones, they were moved by the hand, as
is still the practice in many parts of the East. It was not until a
comparatively late period that water was employed as the moving power
for mills.—B.
1366 It has been supposed by some commentators, that the
character of legislator was bestowed upon Ceres, in consequence of the
name by which she was designated, in the ancient northern languages,
being incorrectly transferred to the Greek. Others have thought that
it might be referred to the connection which may be supposed to exist
between an advance in the arts of life generally and an improvement of
the laws.—B.
1367 We do not find the circumstance here referred to in the
“Noctes Atticæ” of Aulus Gellius.—B.
1368 It would appear that there were two individuals of this
name, who were confounded with each other; Simonides, the celebrated
poet, lived as late as the fifth century before Christ, so that it has
been thought improbable that the Greek language could have existed
without the four letters here mentioned, until so recent a period.—B.
1369 The account of the original introduction of the
alphabet into Greece, here given, is the one generally adopted in
his time. Most readers will be aware, that the actual invention of
letters, the share which the Egyptians and the Phœnicians had in it,
the identification of Cadmus, and still more of Mercury, with any of
the heroes or legislators of antiquity, of whom we have any correct
historical data, and the connection which the Greek alphabet had
with those of other nations, are among the most curious questions of
literary discussion, and are still far from being resolved with any
degree of certainty.—B.
1370 It seems to have been the general opinion, that the
Greek language had, originally, sixteen or eighteen letters, the source
of which was very uncertain, and of high antiquity; and to these,
additional letters were, from time to time, appended by different
individuals. Upon the whole, the claim of the Egyptians to the
invention of letters, seems to rest upon, at least, a very plausible
foundation.—B.
1371 Epicharmus was born in the fifth century B.C.,
in the island of Cos, but removed, probably at an early age, to Sicily,
where he passed a considerable portion of his life. His original
profession was that of a physician, but he appears to have devoted
his attention principally to general science and literature, and is
more especially remarkable as the inventor of regular comedy. A few
fragments only of his dramas remain, but the titles of no less than
forty are preserved. From a line in the Prologue to the Menæchmi of
Plautus, where it is said that the plot of the play, “non Atticissat
verum Sicilicissat” “is not Attic, but Sicilian;” it has been
conjectured, that Plautus took the plot of the piece from Epicharmus.
1372 Phoroneus was the son of Inachus, and the second king
of Argos; he began to reign about 1807 B.C.—B.
1373 Epigenes has already been referred to in the
fifty-fourth chapter of this Book.—B.
1374 There has been much discussion respecting the
interpretation of this passage. In the first place, the numbers in
the text have extended from 720 and 490 to as many thousands, by the
addition of the letter M., against the authority, however, of some
MSS. In the next place, in order to curtail the enormous periods
thus formed, the years have been supposed to be only lunar, or even
diurnal periods. The opinion of Hardouin and Marcus is perhaps the
better founded, who reject the proposed alteration, and consider
these numbers to indicate, according to their natural signification,
periods of years. The principal consideration that has been urged in
favour of the alteration of the text is derived from two passages in
Cicero’s Treatise de Divin. B. i. c. 19, and B. ii. c. 46, where he
refers to the very long periods which the Babylonians employed in
their calculations, but which he justly regards as entirely without
foundation, and even ridiculous. Pliny, however, professes to follow
the opinion of Epigenes whom he styles “gravis auctor,” and who, we
may premise, would reject these improbable tales.—B. The reading, 720
thousands, is the one adopted by Sillig.
1375 Pausanias, in his “Attica,” calls the two brothers
Agrolas and Hyperbius. Some commentators have supposed, that these
names, as well as Doxius and Cælus, mentioned below, are merely
symbolical, and that the personages are fictitious.—B.
1376 The Gellius here mentioned had the prænomen of Cneius;
he is not to be confounded with the more noted Aulus Gellius, by whom
he is quoted in the Noct. Att. B. xiii. c. 29.—B.
1377 There is a number of ancient legends attached to
the name of Cecrops, yet we have but little authentic information
respecting him. What appears to be the best established is, that he was
born in the city of Sais, in Egypt, and that, about 1556 B.C.,
he conducted a colony to Attica, where he built a fortress, on the
Acropolis of Athens, and that his descendants continued, for some
generations, to be kings of Attica.—B.
1378 If this is the Cinyra previously mentioned in c. 49,
he is more generally represented as the son of Apollo, or of Paphos, a
priest of the Paphian Aphrodite or Venus. The true reading, however, is
uncertain.
1379 Hardouin informs us, that in all the MSS. which he
has consulted, this person is named Agricola, while in the printed
editions of Pliny he is styled Agriopa, or Agriopas. Poinsinet, vol.
iii. pp. 250, 251, endeavours to explain this, by supposing, that the
word “Agricola” was the one employed by Pliny, but was used by him as
a generic, not as an appellative term. Some of the earlier editors,
however, conceiving that no agricultural operations could be carried
on, before the invention of the necessary implements, had changed the
name into Agriopa, derived from two Greek words, signifying “a man in
the savage state, who is only capable of uttering inarticulate sounds.”
This method of solving the difficulty will probably appear fanciful and
too refined, but it is the only one which has been proposed.—B.
1380 The copper-mines of Temesa, supposed to have been in
Cyprus, are mentioned by Homer. There was another place of that name in
Bruttium, and another in India, both equally famous for their copper.
1381 Danaus is said to have migrated from Egypt into Greece
about 1485 B.C. He may have introduced wells into Greece, but
they had, long before his time, been employed in Egypt and in other
countries. The term “Dipsion,” “thirsting,” which it appears had been
applied to the district of Argos, may seem to render it probable,
that, before the arrival of Danaus, the inhabitants had not adopted
any artificial means of supplying themselves with water.—B. But this
country, we are told, is naturally well supplied with water.
1382 Nothing is known respecting this individual; it does
not appear that he is mentioned by any other of the ancients.—B.
1383 There is so much fable mixed up with the account of
the Cyclopes, that it is difficult to ascertain their real history. It
seems probable, that there was a people of high antiquity, who were
particularly skilful in the erection of stone edifices of various
kinds, and more especially of those which served for the defence of
cities. The remains of walls and other structures, which have obtained
the name of Cyclopian, are found in various parts of Greece, Italy,
and Sicily, and may be regarded as among the oldest works of man in
existence, although they are probably of less antiquity than those of
Egypt and of some parts of Asia.—B.
1384 We have sufficient evidence of the early period at
which the art of weaving was practised in Egypt, from the figures to be
found on their monuments, and from the specimens of their manufactures,
some of very delicate texture, which have been found in the most
ancient of their tombs. It was doubted, at one time, whether these fine
stuffs were formed from the fibres of flax or of cotton, or, in other
words, whether they were cambric or muslin; but it is now generally
admitted that they are made of flax. We have frequent mention of the
products of the loom in the Pentateuch; we may select the 13th chapter
of Leviticus, where linen and woollen stuffs are especially mentioned,
and distinguished from each other.—B.
1385 It is very difficult, probably impossible, in the
present day, to determine to which of the nations of antiquity we are
indebted for the invention of the art of dyeing. We have notices of
coloured stuffs in various parts of the Pentateuch, and there is reason
to suppose, that the art was practised, at a very early period, by
the Egyptians, the Phœnicians, and the Indians. They had even arrived
at the knowledge of partial dyeing, or what is technically termed
“printing,” as applied to cotton or linen.—B.
1386 According to Justin, B. ii. c. 6, the Athenians
introduced the use of wool among their countrymen; but it has been
supposed that they learned it from the Egyptians.—B.
1387 Arachne is said to have been a native of Hypæpæ, near
Colophon, in Asia Minor, and has been celebrated for her skill in
embroidery by Ovid, Metam. B. vi. As we have sufficient evidence that
linen was manufactured by the Egyptians at a very early period, we may
presume that this account of Arachne is either fabulous, or that, in
some way or other, she was instrumental in the introduction of linen
into Greece.—B.
1388 Nothing is known of this individual, nor have we any
further information respecting the discovery ascribed to him.—B.
1389 Homer, Il. B. vii. l. 221, and Ovid, Fasti, B. iii. l.
824, speak of Tychius, as particularly skilful in making shoes, and
other articles of leather.—B.
1390 It is difficult to determine, how far we are to regard
the names here mentioned as belonging to real or only to fictitious
personages, nor is it easy for us to ascertain what should be regarded
as the actual invention of medicine. A certain kind of medical, or
rather surgical practice, must have existed in the rudest state of
society and in the earliest ages, which was improved and refined by
the gradual experience and increased civilization of each successive
generation.—B.
1391 In this, as in so many others of the arts, the original
invention has been given to the Egyptians, while the introduction of it
into Greece is ascribed to Cadmus. The word æs, which is generally
translated “brass,” as well as the Greek word χαλκὸς, was
applied by the ancients, either to copper, or what is properly bronze,
i. e. a mixture of copper and tin. Brass, the compound of copper and
zinc, does not appear to have been known to them. With respect to the
claim of the Scythians to the discovery of the use of copper, it has
been justly remarked, that it is natural to suppose it to have been
first known in those countries, where the ore of the metal is found in
large quantities, which is the case in the region that was anciently
named Scythia.—B.
1392 According to Pausanias, the art of forging iron was
discovered by Glaucus of Chios. Strabo ascribes it to the Idæan
Dactyli, and the art of manufacturing utensils of bronze and iron to
the Telchines; the former were inhabitants of Crete, the latter of
Rhodes.—B.
1393 According to Hyginus, silver was first discovered in
Scythia by Indus, and introduced into Attica by Erichthonius. Æacus is
said by Cassiodorus to have been the discoverer of gold.—B.
1394 Pangæus is generally described as a mountain on the
confines of Macedonia and Thrace; but Marcus says that it was a
mountain of Abyssinia, near the source of the Nile, and he adduces
various passages from the ancients to prove that the Egyptians had an
extensive traffic there in gold at a very early period; Ajasson, vol.
vi. pp. 191, 192.—B.
1395 Thoas was the king of the Tauric Chersonnesus, and
Panchaia was a district of Arabia Felix; it does not appear what
connection Thoas could have with Panchaia.—B.
1396 We have no account of any individual bearing this
name, and it has been proposed by Hardouin to substitute for it “Midas
Phrygius,” who is said, both by Hyginus and by Cassiodorus, to have
been the discoverer of lead.—B.
1397 From the accounts of Pliny, B. iv. c. 36, as well as
of Strabo, and the other ancient geographers, it appears, that he here
alludes to the Scilly Isles, including, probably, the western extremity
of Cornwall. We are informed by Herodotus, B. iii. c. 115, that tin was
brought from them, and they were hence named the “tin islands,” from
the Greek word for tin, κασσίτερος.—B.
1399 Pliny, in B. xxxv. c. 45, informs us, that Choræbus
invented the art of making pottery, and that it was first exercised, as
a trade, by Chalcosthenes. He says, that a certain district of Athens
obtained the name of “Ceramicos,” from his manufactory of earthen-ware,
derived from κέραμος, “potter’s clay.”—B.
1400 The inventions here ascribed to Dædalus, are, by many
of the ancients, given to his nephew; see Isidorus, Hyginus, Diodorus
Siculus, and Ovid, Metam. B. viii. l. 234, et seq.—B.
1401 “Ichthyocolla,” perhaps more properly, “Fish-glue.”
1402 Pausanias ascribes also to Theodorus the invention
of forging iron and copper. According to Vitruvius, the square was
invented by Pythagoras.—B.
1403 The same statement is made by Strabo, and other writers
of antiquity, and is confirmed by the Arundelian Marbles.—B.
1405 Marcus informs us, that, according to the Arundelian
Marbles, Erichthonius, the fourth king of Athens, was the inventor of
chariots.—B. See p. 229.
1406 Hardouin remarks, that Pliny, in the beginning of this
Chapter, ascribes the invention of commerce to Bacchus; we may suppose,
that the commerce there referred to, was the conveyance of goods by
land, while that of the Carthaginians was traffic by sea.—B.
1407 Eumolpus was a native of Thrace; but being expelled
from his native country, he invaded Attica, and, after various contests
with Erichthonius, obtained the office of high-priest of Ceres, which
was continued to his descendants.—B.
1408 We learn from the writings of Moses, that the planting
of the vine, and the conversion of the juice of the grape into wine,
was practised by Noah immediately after the Flood. The mixing of water
with wine would seem to be a very obvious and natural mode of procuring
a pleasant and refreshing beverage.—B.
1409 From the writings of Moses, we learn that the use of
oil and of honey was known to the inhabitants of Palestine and Egypt,
at a very early period.—B.
1410 “Buzyges” is a Greek term, signifying “one who yokes
oxen;” according to Hardouin, the real name of the person here referred
to was Epimenides.—B.
1411 For an account of Triptolemus, the reader may consult
Hyginus, and Pausanias, B. vii. Achaica.—B. Also the Fasti of Ovid, B.
iv. l. 507, et seq.
1412 Phalaris is supposed to have been contemporary with
Servius Tullius, who reigned from 577 to 533 B.C.—B.
1413 Meaning a citizen who obtained the sovereignty by
violence and usurpation.
1414 This is supposed to have taken place 1000 years before
Christ, when the Lacedæmonians conquered the Helots. But Moses had
given the Jews a code of laws, respecting the treatment of slaves,
between 400 and 500 years before that event, and we have various
intimations of the existence of slavery, in his writings, long before
his time. It appears, indeed, that in the different countries of the
East, and in Africa, slavery has existed from time immemorial.—B.
1415 This is confirmed by Ælian, Var. Hist. B. iii. c.
38.—B.
1416 According to the same fabulous account of the early
Grecian history, they were twin brothers, kings of the Argives; after
much contention, Acrisius succeeded in expelling Prœtus from Argos;
they are said to have lived 1400 years B.C. Athamas was a king
of Thebes, and the contemporary of Acrisius.—B.
1417 According to Hardouin, the Lacedæmonians had the
helmet, the sword, and the spear, of a peculiar form, different from
that used by the other natives of Greece.—B.
1418 This account of the invention of the bow and arrow
seems to have been derived from the high character which the Scythians
and Persians had acquired for their dexterity in the use of those
weapons.—B.
1419 The “amentum” was a leather thong tied to the middle
of the javelin, to assist in throwing it, though it is unknown how it
added to the effect. It has been suggested that it was by imparting
rotation, and consequent steadiness.
1420 Ætolus was said to have been the son of Endymion, of
Elis, who, having accidentally killed one of his countrymen, left
his native place, and settled in the part of Greece named after him,
Ætolia.—B.
1421 See B. xxviii. c. 6. This was the Roman “veru,” or
“verutum,” so called from its resemblance to a spit. Its shaft was
three feet and a half long, and its point five inches. The “Velites”
did not form part of the Roman legion, but fought in scattered parties
wherever they were required.
1422 The “pilum” was short and thick; its shaft, often made
of cornel, was partly square, and five feet and a half long. The head
was nine inches long. It was used either to throw or thrust with, and,
in spite of what Pliny says, was peculiar to the Romans.
1423 Julius Firmicus ascribes the invention of the apparatus
used in hunting to the Cretans; and Gratius, Cyneg. l. 108, that of the
hunting spear, with its iron spike, to Dercylus, of Amyclæ.—B.
1424 Vitruvius informs us, that the catapulta and the
balista were instruments formed upon the same principle, the former
being adapted for the discharge of arrows, and the latter, masses of
stone. Cæsar, however, in his account of the siege of Massilia, Bell.
Civ. B. ii. c. 8, speaks of stones being thrown by the catapulta.
Ælian, Hist. Var. B. vi. c. 12, says, that it was invented by
Dionysius, the first king of Syracuse.—B.
1425 Strabo ascribes the invention of the sling to the
Ætolians; he informs us, that the inhabitants of the Balearic Isles, so
famous for their dexterity in the use of this instrument, originally
obtained it from the Phrygians.—B.
1426 According to Hyginus, Tyrrhenus, the son of Hercules,
invented the trumpet; Clemens, of Alexandria, and Athenæus, ascribe the
invention to the Tyrrhenians.—B. Virgil speaks, B. viii. l. 526, of
the “clangor of the Tyrrhenian trumpet.”
1427 The “tortoise.” He probably means a military machine,
moved on wheels and roofed over, used in besieging cities, and under
which the soldiers worked in undermining the walls. It was usually
covered with raw hides or other materials, which could not easily be
set on fire. The same name was also applied to the covering formed by
a compact body of soldiers, who placed their shields over their heads,
and linked them together, to secure themselves against the darts of the
enemy. The latter kind of “testudo” was sometimes formed, by way of an
exercise, in the games of the Circus.
1428 This has been supposed to have been the real origin of
the Trojan horse, on which Virgil has built one of his most interesting
episodes; the horse, as described by Virgil, was, however, in every
respect, different from the battering ram.—B.
1429 In consequence of some false charges brought against
him, Bellerophon was sent to combat with a monster called the Chimæra,
in the expectation that he would perish in the attempt; but Minerva,
pitying his situation, provided him with a winged horse, named Pegasus,
by means of which he accomplished his perilous task in safety.—B.
1430 Pelethronius is said to have been a king of the
Lapithæ, a people of Thessaly, who were celebrated for their skill in
the management of the horse.—B.
1431 According to Cicero, De Nat. Deor. B. iii. c. 23,
Minerva was the first who used a chariot with four horses. Hardouin
supposes that the Erichthonius here mentioned was not the king of
Athens, but the son of Dardanus, the king of Troas; he does not state
the ground of his opinion, and Ælian, Hist. Var. B. iii. c. 38,
expressly speaks of him as an Athenian. Virgil, Geor. B. iii. ll.
113, 114, speaks of Erichthonius as the inventor of the chariot with
four horses; he is supposed to have lived about 1450 B.C. As
Hardouin justly remarks, we have an account, in the writings of Moses,
of chariots being used by the Egyptians long before this period. It
is not, however, stated what was the number of horses used for these
chariots.—B.
1432 “Tesseræ,” in the original, which is also the name of
the dice used in various games. But the connection in which the word
is here placed makes it more probable that it refers to some military
operation; Virgil employs it in this sense, Æneid, B. vii. l. 637,
as also Livy, B. vii. c. 35. There is, however, a tradition that
Palamedes invented the games in which dice are used, during the siege
of Troy.—B.
1433 The words are “auguria ex avibus,” while the art which
is said to have been taught by Tiresias, is termed “extispicio avium.”
The first of these consists in foretelling future events, by observing
the flight, the chirping, or the feeding of birds, the latter by the
inspection of their entrails. But it appears that this distinction is
not always observed; see Cicero, De Divin. B. i. c. 47. The observation
of the auguries was committed to a body or college of priests, regarded
as of the highest authority in the Roman state. The “Haruspices,”
whose office it was to inspect the entrails of sacrificed animals, and
from their appearance to foretell future events, were considered as an
inferior order.—B.
1434 Amphiaraüs was reputed to be the son of Apollo, and was
famous for his knowledge of futurity; he was one of the Argonauts, and
joined in the expedition of the Epigoni against Thebes, in which he
perished. Divine honours were paid to him after his death, and a temple
erected to his memory, which was resorted to as an oracle.—B.
1435 Amphictyon established the celebrated council named
after him, and which consisted of delegates from the principal cities
of Greece, who assembled at stated periods to decide upon all public
questions. He is supposed to have lived about 1500 B.C.—B.
1436 It is very difficult, perhaps impossible, to separate
the actual history of Atlas from the mythological and fabulous tales
mixed up with it. We may, however, conclude that he was a king of
Libya, or of some part of the north of Africa; that he was an observer
of the heavenly bodies, and one of the first who gave any connected
account of them. Under the term “astrology,” Pliny probably intended to
comprehend both the supposed science, now designated by that name, and
likewise astronomy, or the physical laws of the heavenly bodies.—B.
1437 Pliny has previously stated, B. ii. c. 6, that the
sphere was invented by Atlas, and that Anaximander discovered the
obliquity of the ecliptic, by which he is said “to have opened the
doors of knowledge.”—B.
1438 The simplest and most common musical instrument used by
the Greeks, was the “tibia,” or pipe.—B.
1439 According to Hardouin, the Phrygians invented the pipes
employed by hired mourners at funerals, or, more probably, were the
first to adopt the use of the pipes at that ceremony.—B.
1440 Which was played on the side, like the German flute of
the present day.
1441 It was not uncommon for two “tibiæ,” or pipes, to be
played upon by one performer at the same time, one being held in each
hand.
1442 Apuleius, Flor. B. i. c. 4, characterizes the different
kinds of music, termed “moduli” by Pliny, as follows: the Æolian, as
simple, the Asiatic varied, the Lydian plaintive, the Phrygian solemn,
and the Doric warlike.—B.
1443 According to the mythological traditions, Mercury, when
a child, found the shell of a tortoise on the banks of the Nile, and
made it into a lyre, by stretching three strings across; he presented
it to Apollo, and he gave it to Orpheus, who added two strings to it;
after the death of Orpheus, his lyre was placed among the stars, and
forms the constellation still known by that name.—B.
1444 He was a native of Miletus, and contemporary with
Philip, the father of Alexander the Great. The fact of Timotheus
having accompanied Alexander in his expedition to Asia, which forms
the basis of Dryden’s immortal Ode, is not supported by any historical
authority.—B.
1445 Pausanias (Corinth) informs us, that he was the son
of Vulcan, and invented the tibia, but he does not mention his vocal
powers.—B.
1446 According to Hardouin, the first of these, the
“saltatio armata,” or “armed dance,” was performed on foot, and
with wooden armour; the second, the Pyrrhic dance, was performed on
horseback, and consisted in the dextrous management of the animals.
Pyrrhus, from whom the dance received its name, was the son of
Achilles.—B.
1447 The honour of the invention has been given to Phemonoë,
a priestess of the oracle of Delphi.—B.
1448 Apuleius, Flor. B. ii. c. 15, says that Pherecydes was
the first to disregard the fetters of verse, and to write in desultory
language. Pliny, however, in B. v. c. 31, has ascribed the invention of
prose to Cadmus. Hardouin endeavours to reconcile this inconsistency,
by supposing that Cadmus was the first prose writer of history, and
that Pherecydes first applied prose to philosophical subjects. But
Cicero, De Orat. B. ii. c. 12, speaks of Pherecydes as a writer of
simple annals.—B.
1449 There are several persons of this name among the kings
and heroes of the semi-fabulous periods; but the one here mentioned
is said to have been the son of Phoroneus, and to have lived about
1400 B.C. These games were celebrated in honour of Pan;
the combatants were naked, and had the body anointed with oil; the
Lupercalia of the Romans, in many respects, resembled the games of
Lycaon. We are informed by Livy, B. i. c. 5, that the Lupercalia were
introduced into Italy by Evander, the Arcadian.—B. Ovid, in the Fasti,
B. i., states to the same effect.
1450 Iolcos was a city of Thessaly, from which place the
Argonauts embarked on their expedition to Colchis; Acastus was one of
them; the funereal games which he instituted were in honour of his
father, Pelias.—B.
1452 The Isthmian games were originally instituted by
Sisyphus, king of Corinth; after having been interrupted for some time,
they were re-established by Theseus, who celebrated them in honour of
Neptune.—B.
1453 These were the celebrated Olympic games; Diodorus
Siculus, B. iv. c. 3, Pausanias, and other ancient writers, as well as
Pliny, ascribe their origin to Hercules; Pausanias, however, says, that
some supposed them to have been instituted by Jupiter.—B.
1454 “Pila lusoria.” There have been many conjectures
respecting the person to whom this invention is attributed, as well as
respecting the nature of the game itself; in either case it appears
that we have nothing but mere conjecture to direct our opinion.—B.
Among the Romans, the games with the “pila, or ball,” were those played
with the “pila trigonalis,” so called, probably, from the players
standing in a triangle: the “follis” was a large ball inflated, and
used for football. “Paganica” was a similar ball, but harder, being
stuffed with feathers, and used by rustics. “Harpastum” was a small
ball, used by the Greeks, and was scrambled for on reaching the ground.
1455 The MSS. differ as to the name of the person to
whom the invention of painting is ascribed; but, in those which are
considered the most worthy of credit, he is called Gyges Ludius.
Marcus endeavours to prove, that the term “Ludius” refers to the
country of Lud or Ludim, to the south of Egypt; and he points out some
analogies between the name Gyges, and some words which are found in
ancient inscriptions, or which are still in use among the Nubians and
Abyssinians. Pliny, B. xxxv. c. 5, attributes the invention of painting
to the Egyptians, and says, that “it was practised by them long before
it was known in Greece.”—B.
1456 The term Euchir, Εὔχειρ, which is literally
“dextrous or handy,” would rather seem to be a prefix to a name, than
a proper name itself. With respect to Polygnotus, and the share which
he had in the invention of painting, the reader may examine what Pliny
says in a subsequent part of his work, B. xxxv. c. 35.—B.
1457 The vessel in which Danaüs came into Greece, may,
probably, have been of a much superior construction, or much larger
than those previously seen in that country; but it is generally
supposed, that Cecrops, Cadmus, and the other Egyptian and Phœnician
colonists, had come by sea to Greece, long before the arrival of
Danaüs. In the ancient Egyptian monuments there are representations of
different kinds of vessels of considerable size, which would imply a
knowledge of the art of navigation at a very remote period. The same is
proved by the traditionary annals of the Egyptians.—B.
1458 The word here used, “ratis,” would appear to be applied
to any species of slightly built vessel, of whatever form. The term
raft is not altogether appropriate, but we have no English word which
exactly corresponds to it.—B.
1459 According to the generally received account, Erythras
migrated from Persia to Tyrrhina, an island in the Red Sea. See B. vi.
c. 28 and 32.—B.
1460 It has been conjectured, that the ancient Britons
borrowed the peculiar form of their vessels from the Phœnicians, who
were known to have frequented the south-west coasts of our island.
Small vessels, not unlike those here described by Pliny, were used
very lately, by the fishermen in the Bristol channel.—B. They are
still used by the Welsh fishermen, and are made of oil-cloth or leather
stretched on a frame. They are called by the Welch cwrwgle, whence
our word “coracle.”
1461 By the term “longa navis,” here used, Pliny probably
designates a vessel which was propelled by a number of rowers, ranged
side by side, in contradistinction to the small skiffs which were moved
along, either by a sail or a single pair of oars, and were more of a
rounded form.—B.
1462 Ctesias has already been referred to, in c. 2 of the
present Book.—B.
1463 One of her most remarkable exploits was her expedition
against India, of which we have an account in Diodorus Siculus, B.
ii.; he says that she fitted out a fleet of between 2000 and 3000
vessels.—B.
1464 From the account of Damastes, given by Hardouin,
he was a native of Sigæum, whose works appear to have been held in
considerable estimation by the ancients.—B.
1465 There were at least three ancient cities of the name
Erythræ, but the one most noted was situate on the coast of the Ægean
Sea, opposite to the Isle of Chios.—B.
1466 The passage in Thucydides here referred to, is in B. i.
c. 13.—B.
1467 There appears to be much uncertainty respecting
the statements made in the concluding part of this paragraph, in
consequence of the variation of the MSS.—B.
1468 The position of the rowers, in the vessels of the
ancients, and, more especially, the mode in which the ranks, or
“ordines,” were disposed with respect to each other, has been a subject
of much discussion. From the incidental remarks in the classical
writers, and from the representations which still remain, particularly
those on Trajan’s Column, and on certain coins, it would appear that
they were disposed in stages, one above the other, and provided with
oars of different lengths, in proportion to their distance from the
water. But, although we may conceive that this was the case with two
or three rows, it is impossible that a greater number could have been
disposed in this manner.—B.
1469 It is not easy to determine what was the construction
and form of the four kinds of vessels here mentioned, which he
designates respectively by the terms “lembus,” “cymba,” “celes,” and
“cercurus.” The “lembus” is mentioned by Livy, B. xxiv. c. 40, as a
vessel with two benches of oars, “biremis;” and in B. xl. c. 4, he
describes it as a small vessel used for towing large ships. The “cymba”
has been supposed to have been a still smaller vessel, answering to
our idea of a common boat; the “celes,” we may suppose, was named from
“celer,” being especially adapted for quick motion, and the “cercurus”
from κερκὸς, “a tail,” from its long narrow form, or from its
having a tail-like appendage attached to it.—B.
1470 Hardouin conjectures, that the cities of Copæ and
Plateæ derived their names, respectively, from the inventions here
ascribed to them, κωπὴ and πλατὴ.—B.
1471 Pausanias ascribes this invention to Dædalus; Diodorus,
B. v. c. 1, to Æolus, who gave his name to the Æolian islands.—B.
1473 “Tecta longa;” Cæsar, Bell. Civ. B. i. c. 56, says that
the Massilians fitted out long ships, of which eleven were “tectæ.”—B.
1474 Ships of war had their prows armed with brazen beaks,
to which sharp spears were attached; these were used in their naval
engagements as instruments of attack, and, when the vessels were
captured, were considered the trophies of victory. The tribunal, in the
Roman Forum, from which the orators harangued the people, obtained its
name of “Rostra,” from its being ornamented with the beaks of captured
ships.—B.
1475 The “harpago” and the “manus ferrea” are mentioned by
Cæsar, Bell. Civ. B. i. c. 57, and by Livy, B. xxx. c. 10; Quintus
Curtius also speaks of them, but considers them as only different names
for the same instrument, B. iv. c. 2, 12.—B.
1476 Tiphys was the pilot of the vessel of the Argonauts; he
died before the expedition reached Colchis.—B.
1477 Hardouin remarks upon this passage, that Pliny probably
means to speak of the persons who first killed oxen or other animals
for what may be styled profane purposes; as they had long before this
been employed for sacrifice.—B.
1478 Herodotus, B. v. c. 59, says that the Phœnician letters
were very similar to the Ionian; and we are informed by Hardouin, that
Scaliger, in his Dissertation upon an ancient inscription on a column
discovered in the Via Appia, and removed to the Farnese Gardens, has
proved that the Ionians borrowed their letters from the Phœnicians.—B.
1479 Herodotus confirms this opinion by a reference to an
ancient tripod at Thebes, written in what he terms Cadmæan letters,
having a strong resemblance to those used by the Ionians.—B.
1480 Tacitus, Ann. B. ix. c. 14, says, “The Latin letters
have the same form as the most ancient Greek ones.”—B.
1481 There is scarcely a letter of this inscription which
has not been controverted, and no two editions hardly agree.—B.
1482 Probably the earliest existing reference to the
practice of shaving is in Genesis, xli. 14, where Joseph is said to
have shaved and changed his raiment, when brought from prison into the
presence of Pharaoh; in this case, we may presume that it was the head,
and perhaps not the beard, which was shaven.—B.
1483 The ancients had two methods of arranging the beard;
in one it was cut close to the skin, in the other it was trimmed by
means of a comb, and left of a certain length. These two methods are
alluded to by Plautus, Capt. ii. 2, 16:—B. “Now the old fellow is
in the barber’s shop; at this very instant is the other handling the
razor—but whether to say that he is going to shave him close, or to
trim him through the comb, I know not.”
1484 Varro, De Re Rus. B. ii., states this fact in almost
the same words. He remarks, in continuation, that the old statues prove
that there were formerly no barbers, by the length of their beard and
hair.—B.
1485 “Africanus sequens;” he was the son of Paulus Æmilius,
the conqueror of Perseus, and the adopted son of Scipio Africanus.
In consequence of his conquest of Carthage, he was named Africanus
the Younger. His custom of shaving is alluded to by Aulus Gellius, B.
iii. c. 4. From the remarks of these writers, we may conclude that the
Romans were not generally in the habit of shaving until after the age
of forty.—B.
1486 “Cultus.” Suetonius gives a different account of the
method in which Augustus managed his beard. After remarking upon his
carelessness as to his personal appearance, he says, that Augustus
sometimes cropped, “tonderet,” and sometimes shaved, “raderet,” his
beard. Dion. Cassius mentions the period when Augustus began to shave,
the consulship of L. Marcius Censorinus and C. Calvicius Sabinus,
A.U.C. 714; he was then in his twenty-fourth year.—B.
1487 In B. ii. c. 78; where Pliny says, that the first clock
was made at Lacedæmon, by Anaximander; he was the contemporary of
Servius Tullius, who commenced his reign 577 B.C.—B.
1488 “Accensus;” he was one of the public servants of the
magistrates, and was so called from his office of summoning the people
to the public meetings (acciere).—B.
1489 See also B. xxxiii. c. 6. This was a place in Rome
appropriated to the Greek ambassadors; it is mentioned by Cicero, in a
letter to his brother, Quintus, B. ii. c. 1.—B. It stood on the right
side of the Comitium, being allotted to the Greeks from the allied
states, for the purpose of hearing the debates in the comitia curiata.
1490 This column is supposed to have stood near the end of
the Forum, on the Capitoline Hill. It was C. Mænius (in whose honour
it was erected) who defeated the Antiates, and adorned the Forum with
the “rostra,” or beaks of their ships, from which the “rostrum,” or
orator’s stage, took its name. His statue was placed on the column. He
was consul in B.C. 338. See B. xxxiv. c. 11.
1491 Hardouin supposes that this event took place in the
consulship of Papirius Cursor, A.U.C. 461, B.C.
292. According to the commonly received Chronology, Pyrrhus came into
Italy, B.C. 280, twelve years after the consulship of Papirius
Cursor.—B.
1492 According to Censorinus, in his treatise, De Die
Natali, it was difficult to decide which was the most ancient dial in
Rome; some writers agreeing with Pliny, that it was the one in the
Temple of Quirinus, others that in the Capitol, and others the one in
the Temple of Diana, on the Aventine.—B.
1493 Marcus conjectures, that this account of the dial was
contained in the work of Varro, De Rebus Humanis, referred to by Aulus
Gellius, B. iii. c. 2, but not now extant.—B.
1494 Owing to the circumstance of the dial having been
adapted to the latitude of Catina, now Catania, about four degrees
south of Rome.—B.
1495 Vitruvius describes this instrument. Marcus, Ajasson,
vol. vi. pp. 218, 219, gives us an account of two kinds of clepsydræ,
or water-clocks, which were constructed by the Greeks.—B. See also the
account of clocks in Beckmann’s History of Inventions, vol. i.
1497 He was a contemporary of the Gracchi, and was author of
a History of Rome, down to B.C. 145 at least; supposed to have
been very voluminous and full in its details of the legendary history
of the Roman nation. Livy probably borrowed extensively from it.
1499 A hearer of Ateius Capito, and celebrated as a jurist
under Tiberius and later emperors. From him a school of legists, called
the Sabiniani, took their rise. He wrote some works on the Civil Law.
Pliny quotes him, as we have seen, in c. 4, to show the possibility of
gestation being to the thirteenth month.
1500 Daughter of the elder Agrippina and Germanicus, and the
mother of Nero. Her memoirs of her life are quoted by Tacitus, but we
have no remains of them.
1502 A distinguished orator, poet, and historian of the
Augustan age. He was an active partisan of Cæsar, and the patron of
Horace and Virgil, whose property he saved from confiscation. He wrote
a history of the civil war in seventeen books, but none of his works
have come down to us. His tragedies are highly spoken of by Virgil and
Horace.
1506 The author of the Æneid and the Georgics, the friend of
Augustus, Pollio, and Mæcenas, one of the most virtuous men of ancient
time, and the greatest probably of the Latin poets.
1508 Cremutius Cordus, a Roman historian, who was impeached
before Tiberius, by two of his clients, for having praised Brutus, and
styled Cassius “the last of the Romans,” his real offence being the
freedom with which, in his work, he had spoken against Sejanus. He
starved himself to death, and the senate ordered his works to be burnt.
Some copies, however, were preserved by his daughter, Marcia, and his
friends.
1509 C. Mæcenas Melissus, a native of Spoletum. He was of
free birth, but exposed in his infancy, and presented to be reared
by Mæcenas. He was afterwards manumitted, and obtained the favour
of Augustus, who employed him to arrange the library in the portico
of Octavia. At an advanced age he commenced the composition of a
collection of jokes and bon-mots. He also wrote plays of a novel
character, which he styled “Trabeatæ.”
1511 A. Cornelius Celsus, the celebrated writer on medicine.
Little is known of his age or origin, or even his profession. It is
supposed, however, that he lived in the time of Augustus and Tiberius.
His treatises on Medicine and Surgery are still used as hand-books for
the medical student, and his style is much admired for its purity.
1512 Or Valerius Maximus. He is supposed to have lived in
the time of Tiberius, and wrote nine books on memorable deeds and
sayings, which still survive, and are replete with curious information.
1513 Trogus Pompeius, the Roman Historian, on whose work
Justin founded his history. His grandfather, who was of the Gaulish
tribe of the Vocontii, received the citizenship of Rome during the war
against Sertorius; and his father was a private secretary of Julius
Cæsar. Except as set forth in the pages of Justin, no portion of his
history, except a few scattered fragments, exists. The quotations
from him in Pliny, are thought to have been all taken from a treatise
of his, “De Animalibus,” mentioned by Charisius, and not from his
historical works.
1515 The friend and correspondent of Cicero, descended from
one of the most ancient equestrian families of Rome. His surname was,
probably, given to him from his long residence at Athens, and his
intimate acquaintance with the Greek language and literature. Though,
generally, of a virtuous character, he neglected no means of making
money, and was, consequently, a man of great opulence. He wrote a book
of Annals, or rather an Epitome of Roman History, which, like the rest
of his works, has perished.
1516 He lived in the time of Augustus and Tiberius, and
is mentioned by the Eusebian Chronicle, as becoming blind in his
seventy-third year, during the reign of Vespasian, and attaining the
age of eighty-five. He wrote a work on the Life of Sallust, another on
the Censurers of Virgil, and commentaries on the speeches of Cicero, of
which alone a few portions are still extant, and are of considerable
value in a historical as well as a grammatical point of view.
1517 Probably Papirius Fabianus. See end of B. ii.
1522 He is said to have written an epic poem, called
Arimaspeia, full of marvellous stories respecting the Arimaspi and the
golden regions. See c. 2 of the present Book, and Note 1319 in p. 211,
where some further particulars relative to him will be found.
1524 He was a native of Nicæa, in Bithynia, and the author
of some works, characterized as being full of incredible stories.
Cyril, however, says, that he was born at Cittium, and Gellius styles
him a writer of no small authority. He is generally looked upon as
belonging to the class of writers called Paradoxographi.
1526 Or Agatharchus, a Greek grammarian of Cnidos. He
was, as we learn from Strabo, attached to the Peripatetic school of
philosophy, and wrote several historical and geographical works. He was
living in the reign of Ptolemy Philometer, who died B.C. 146.
His works, which were very numerous, are enumerated by Photius.
1530 Strabo, in B. ii. speaks of a Periplus of Europe,
written by a person of this name. There was also a physician called
Apollonides, a native of Cos, who practised at the court of Artaxerxes
Longimanus, where he was eventually put to death.
1531 A Greek historian of the reign of Ptolemy Euergetes,
and said by different authors to have been a native of Athens,
Naucratis in Egypt, and Sicyon. He wrote a work on history, of
considerable value, though his credit as an historian has been
violently attacked by Polybius.
1532 Of Cyrene, an author of uncertain date. He wrote a work
on the philosophers.
1539 Of Samos, a descendant of Alcibiades, who flourished in
the time of Ptolemy Philadelphus. When a boy, he gained a pugilistic
victory at Olympia. He eventually became tyrant of Samos; but nothing
further is known of his career. From what Pliny says, in c. 40. of B.
iii., he is supposed to have been living in the year B.C. 281.
He was the author of a history of Greece, and other historical works,
of which, however, we possess no remains.
1541 Of Cos, the father of the medical art, and in many
respects the most celebrated physician of ancient or modern times. It
is supposed that he flourished in the fifth century before Christ. A
great number of medical works, still extant, have been attributed to
him: but there were many other physicians who either had, or assumed,
this name.
1542 Of Prusa, in Bithynia. He is mentioned in c. 37 of this
Book. See Note 1170 in p. 183.
1543 Of Ascra, in Bœotia, the earliest of the Greek poets,
with the exception of Homer. His surviving works, are his “Works and
Days,” and the “Theogony.”
1544 Of Teos, in Asia Minor, famous for his amatory and
lyric poems; he died at the age of eighty-five. Pliny mentions the
supposed mode of his death, in c. 5, of the present Book.
1550 A priest of Belus, at Babylonia, and a historian of the
time of Alexander the Great. He wrote a History of Babylonia, of which
some fragments are preserved by the ecclesiastical writers.
1557 An Athenian, who wrote a history of Greece and Sicily
in twenty-six or twenty-seven books, coming down to B.C. 298,
from which time Psaon of Platæa continued it.
1558 Of Lampsacus, a Peripatetic philosopher, and tutor of
Ptolemy Philadelphus. He succeeded Theophrastus, B.C. 288,
as head of that school. He devoted himself to the study of natural
science, and appears to have held a pantheistic system of philosophy.
By Cudworth, Leibnitz, and others, he has been charged with atheism.
The “Euremata” of Ephorus, here mentioned, was a book which treated of
inventions.
1560 Of Tragilus, in Thrace, a disciple and contemporary of
Isocrates. His book, here mentioned, treated on the subjects chosen by
the Greek tragic writers, and the manner in which they had dealt with
them.
1561 Of Cyrene, the friend or disciple of Callimachus. He
flourished under Ptolemy Philadelphus, about B.C. 249. He
wrote works on places in Asia, on Rivers, and on Islands; but none of
his compositions have survived.
1562 A native of Magnesia, who wrote on rhetoric and
history, probably in the early part of the third century B.C.
Strabo speaks but slightingly of him; and Cicero and Dionysius of
Halicarnassus agree in looking upon him as a downright blockhead.
Upon the other hand, Varro rather admires his style. The history of
Alexander the Great was his favourite theme; and he is represented by
Aulus Gellius as dealing rather largely in the marvellous.
1563 Mentioned by Athenæus as having written a history of
Eubœa.
1564 See end of B. iii.; and see c. 31 of the
present Book, and Note 1133 in p. 175.
1565 Nothing whatever appears to be known of this writer.
1570 Cuvier remarks, that this account of its superior
intelligence is exaggerated, it being no greater than that of the
dog, if, indeed, equal to it. The opinion may perhaps have arisen
from the dexterity with which the animal uses its trunk; but this is
to be ascribed not to its own intelligence, but to the mechanical
construction of the part. The Indians, from whom we may presume that
Pliny derived his account, have always regarded the elephant with a
kind of superstitious veneration.—B.
1571 Some would read this “Amilo,” and others “Annulo.”
Hardouin considers it the same with the river Valo, which is mentioned
by Ptolemy, B. iv. c. 1, and said to have its rise in the mountains
known as the Seven Brothers, and mentioned in B. v. c. 1.
1572 “Præ se ferentes,” probably alluding to the use which
the animal makes of its trunk in seizing and carrying bodies.—B.
1573 “Alienæ religionis.” The meaning of this is doubtful.
It may mean “differences in religion,” or “religious feeling in
others,” or perhaps, to judge from the context, “the religious regard
for their oath which others feel.”
1574 “Veluti tellure precibus alligata,” one of the harsh
metaphorical expressions occasionally occurring in Pliny, which it is
very difficult to translate, and even perhaps fully to comprehend.—B.
1576 Cuvier remarks, that there are two kinds of elephants,
one of which attains sixteen feet, and is chiefly known in Cochin China
and Tonquin, while those that are domesticated in India are seldom more
than half that height. They are supposed, however, to be only varieties
of the same species. Pliny, in B. vi. c. 22, gives an account of the
uses which the Indians made of the elephant, and of their different
sizes, but he does not state there that it is the smaller ones only
that are employed in agriculture.—B.
1577 Plutarch informs us, that Pompey had resolved to have
his chariot drawn by four elephants, but finding the gate too narrow,
he was obliged to use horses.—B.
1578 See an account of this, and of the feats performed by
the elephants, in Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 11.—B.
1579 The Pyrrhic dance has been referred to in the last
Book, c. 57. p. 231. It is not improbable that the elephants employed
in this dance were caparisoned with armour.
1580 However ill adapted the elephant may appear, from
its size and form, for this feat, we have the testimony of Seneca,
Suetonius, Dion Cassius, and Julian, to the truth of the fact.—B.
1581 Plutarch, in his treatise on the Shrewdness of Animals,
tells us that this wonderful circumstance happened at Rome.
1582 “Eadem illa meditantem,” is the expression. It would be
curious to know in what way the elephant showed that he was “conning”
over his lesson.
1583 Suetonius is supposed to allude to this
circumstance.—B. He tells us that a horseman ascended a tight rope on
an elephant’s back.
1584 Ælian informs us, that he had seen an elephant write
Latin characters. Hardouin remarks, that the Greek would be
Αὐτὸς ἐγὼ τάδ’ ἔγραψα, λαφυρά τε Κελτ’ ἀνέθηκα.
1586 As to the tusks of the elephant, no doubt the opinion
of Herodotus, B. iii. c. 97, is correct, that they are teeth, and not
horns. They are essentially composed of the same substance with the
other teeth, and, like them, are inserted into the jaw, and not into
the os frontis, as is the case with horns.—B.
1587 Not improbably, the great quantity of fossil ivory
which has been found, may have given rise to this tale. We have in
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 581, a long extract from Cuvier’s “Recherches
sur les ossements fossiles,” in which he gives an account of the
parts of the world in which the bones of the elephant have been
discovered.—B.
1588 Tables and bedsteads were not only covered or veneered
with ivory among the Romans, but, in the later times, made of the solid
material, as we learn from Ælian and Athenæus.
1589 Plutarch, in his treatise on the Shrewdness of Animals,
gives the same statement respecting the whiteness of the teeth in the
young animal.—B.
1590 It is scarcely necessary to remark, that these
statements respecting the sagacity of the elephant in connection with
their teeth, are without foundation.—B.
1591 The word employed is vestigium; it is explained by
Ælian to refer to the herbage, which has received both the visible
impression as well as the odour of the foot.—B.
1592 In the case of a footstep, this must mean the ground
with which the foot has come in contact.
1593 It is a general opinion, and one founded upon
observations of daily occurrence, that animals have an instinctive
dread of man. We have, however, facts stated by travellers of undoubted
veracity, which would lead to an opposite conclusion. One of the most
remarkable is the account which Denham gives of the tameness of the
birds in Lake Tchad.—B.
1594 Cuvier observes, that this is correct; see Ajasson,
vol. vi. p. 408, and Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 338.—B.
1595 “Novere ea.” It is doubtful whether these words do
not mean something more than merely “knew their names,” as Hardouin
explains it, for that would be nothing wonderful in an elephant. On
the other hand, to say that they were aware of the honour which had
been conferred on them, in giving the names of famous men, would be
to make a statement which exceeds belief; for how could the elephants
show that they appreciated this honour, even supposing that they did
appreciate it? Pliny’s elliptical style repeatedly gives rise to doubts
of this nature.
1596 “Phaleris.” See Notes to B. vii. c. 29, p. 170.
1597 Pliny informs us, in B. xxii. c. 4, that this was done
by those conquered in battle.—B.
1598 We may conclude, from the account given by Aristotle,
Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 2, and by Ælian, B. viii. c. 17, that this opinion
was generally adopted by the ancients.—B. We learn from Cuvier, who
mentions the results of M. Corse’s observations, that there is no such
modesty in the elephant, and that the two at the Museum of Natural
History at Paris gave proof of the fact.
1599 This is erroneous; the males do not arrive at puberty
before the females, which takes place about the fourteenth or fifteenth
year. In the elephant which was under the inspection of M. Corse, the
period of gestation was between twenty and twenty-one months, so that
there may be some foundation for the biennial period, but the term of
five days is entirely imaginary. Aristotle makes the interval three
years.—B.
1600 There is a passage in Suetonius, in his Life of
Augustus, and one in Macrobius, where the custom of offering pieces of
money to elephants, which they took up with the proboscis, is referred
to.—B.
1601 In the Epitome of Livy, B. xiii., it is said, that
Valerius Corvinus was unsuccessful in his engagements with Pyrrhus, in
consequence of the terror produced by the elephants.—B.
1602 Varro, De Ling. Lat. B. vi. calls the elephant “Lucas
bos,” “the Lucanian ox,” from the fact of this large quadruped being
first seen by the Romans in the Lucanian army.—B.
1603 According to Seneca, Manius Curius Dentatus was the
first who exhibited elephants in his triumph over Pyrrhus. See also
Florus, B. i. c. 18.—B.
1604 There are coins extant struck to commemorate this
victory, in which there is the figure of an elephant.—B.
1605 The number of elephants brought to Rome by Metellus
is differently stated; Florus, B. ii., says that they were “about a
hundred;” in the Epitome of Livy, B. xix., they are one hundred and
twenty, and the same number is mentioned by Seneca.—B.
1606 Who were their allies, or rather vassals; for in such
case, they might make a dangerous use of them.
1607 Val. Maximus, B. ix. c. 2, gives an account of the
brutality of Hannibal on this occasion, in forcing the Roman captives
to fight against each other, until only one was left; but he does not
make mention of the combat with the elephant.—B.
1608 Florus, B. i. c. 18, states, that this was practised
in the later engagements with Pyrrhus, and that by these means the
elephants were either destroyed or rendered useless. Cuvier remarks,
that the trunk is composed of small muscles and fatty matter, enveloped
by a tendinous membrane, and covered with skin.—B.
1610 “Venus the Conqueror.” This temple was dedicated by
Pompey, after his conquests in the East, in his second consulship,
B.C. 55.
1611 Pliny here refers to an art, practised among the
Romans, of throwing up a shield into the air, in such a manner that,
after performing a circuit, it would fall down on a certain spot; this
trick is also alluded to by Martial, B. ix. Ep. 39.—B. The exercise
with the boomerang, which was known to the ancient Assyrians, and has
been borrowed in modern times from the people of Australasia, seems to
have been somewhat similar to this.
1612 “Clathri.” These were gratings of iron trellis-work,
placed in front of the lowest row of the spectators, to protect
them from the wild beasts. This exhibition took place in Pompey’s
Amphitheatre, in the Campus Martius. The arena of the amphitheatre was
mostly surrounded by a wall, distinguished by the name of “podium,”
which was generally about eighteen feet in height, and the top of which
was protected by this trellis-work. In the present instance, however,
the “podium” can hardly have been so much as eighteen feet in height.
1613 “Euripis.” Julius Cæsar caused a canal, ten feet wide,
to be formed in the Circus Maximus, around the bottom of the “podium,”
to protect the spectators from the wild beasts. These “euripi” probably
took their name from the narrow channel so called, which lay between
Bœotia and the island of Eubœa.
1614 We learn, however, from Lampridius, in his Life of
Heliogabalus, that this euripus was afterwards restored to the Circus.
1615 Tacitus and Suetonius mention this separation of the
equites from the rest of the spectators: it took place A.U.C.
816.—B. Up to the time of Augustus, A.U.C. 758, the senators,
equites, and people sat indiscriminately in the Circus; but that
emperor, and after him Claudius, Nero, and Domitian, separated the
senators and the equites from the commons.
1616 There are coins which bear the figure of an elephant
and the word Cæsar, probably struck in commemoration of these
games.—B.
1617 The practice of placing towers filled with soldiers on
the backs of the elephants is alluded to by Lucretius, B. v. l. 1301,
and by Juvenal, Sat. xii. l. 110.—B. It still prevails in India.
1618 “Consummation gladiatorum.” There is some doubt about
the exact meaning of this. It may mean, “at the conclusion of the
gladiatorial games,” as exhibited; or, what is more probable, “as the
crowning exploit of the gladiators,” who wished thereby to secure their
manumission, which was granted after remarkable feats of valour. Cælius
Rhodiginus, B. xi. c. 11, prefers this last meaning: Dalechamps, with
whom Ajasson coincides, the first.
1619 “Postea singulis.” Those who coincide with Dalechamps
and Ajasson, as to the meaning, would read it, that at the end of the
gladiatorial games, the elephants fought singly one against another,
the gladiators having retired from the arena.
1620 Pliny here uses the word “manu,” “hand,” which
although, as he afterwards remarks, it may not be an inappropriate
metaphor, could scarcely be admitted in our language.—B.
1621 This trait has been observed in all ages; the elephant
has been known to remove with its trunk a child lying in its way, and
in danger of being injured. It appears to have an instinctive dread of
trampling on a living animal; the same has also been observed in the
horse.—B.
1622 “Hordeo succo;” the exact meaning has been the subject
of much discussion; it probably refers to some preparation of barley
used by the ancients, perhaps a maceration of the corn in water; it
is scarcely to be supposed, however, that the words are to be taken
literally.—B.
1623 Albertus Magnus, in his work on Animals, B. viii. c. 3,
gives a fuller account of this method of taking the wild elephant. He
says: “A man, riding on a tame elephant, guides him to the woods, and
when he has met with some wild ones, drives the tame one against them,
and makes it strike them with its trunk: the tame one, being better
fed, soon conquers the wild elephant, and throws him to the ground;
upon which, the man leaps upon him, and flogs him with a whip, and
immediately the other becomes quiet.” Strabo, B. xv., gives a different
account of the mode of catching and taming the elephant in India.
1624 This appears to have been taken from Plutarch; and
we have the same statement in Ælian, who particularly speaks of the
sagacity of the animal, in endeavouring to extricate itself from the
trench.—B.
1625 We have the same account given by Ælian and by
Strabo.—B.
1626 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 18, remarks, that
the violence of the animal, which is produced by an accidental cause,
as also that arising from venereal excitement, are counteracted by
opposite modes of treatment; the one by depriving it of food, the other
by over-feeding it; the former, in order to break its strength, and the
latter, to divert it into a different channel.—B.
1627 Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. i. c. 38, states that the Romans
employed this mode of terrifying the elephants brought against them by
Pyrrhus.—B.
1628 That this was the general opinion among the ancients,
we learn from Polybius, Ælian, Livy, Diodorus Siculus, and others.
Cuvier remarks, that this may have been the case with the animals from
Barbary, or the north of Africa, but that it is not so with those from
the middle or south of that continent.—B.
1629 It has been stated, in a Note to chap. 5, that Mr.
Corse found the period of the gestation of the elephant to be between
twenty and twenty-one months.—B.
1630 Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iv. c. 31, considers the age of
sixty to be the prime period of their life, not the commencement of
their prime.—B.
1631 This remark is incorrect; when the water is
sufficiently deep, it swims with ease; and if the end of the trunk
remains exposed to the atmosphere, it can dive below the surface, or
swim with the body immersed.—B.
1632 Cuvier remarks, that this statement is incorrect. He
dissected three elephants at Paris, and found that their death had been
caused by inflammation of the lungs and chest. The species of elephant,
which now inhabits Asia and Africa, is certainly not adapted to a cold
climate; but the numerous remains of elephants found in the north of
Asia, prove that a species formerly existed, capable of enduring great
cold. It is to be observed, that this species was covered with a thick,
furry coat of wool and hair.—B.
1633 This is from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 26;
but it is scarcely necessary to remark, that it is without foundation.
Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. ii. c. 18, refers to it, and explains it by
supposing that the oil was not drunk, but applied externally; which is
less improbable.—B.
1634 They suck the fluid into the cavity of the trunk, and
bend the trunk into the mouth, where it is received and swallowed in
the usual manner.—B.
1637 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 1, remarks, that the
elephant is the least hairy of all animals.—B.
1638 Cuvier remarks, that the trunk, being composed of a
mixture of delicate muscular fibres and rich fat, would, when properly
prepared, afford an article of food that might be very palatable.—B.
1639 We learn from Livy, B. xlii. c. 23, that Gulussa was
the son of Massinissa.—B.
1641 We learn from Cuvier, that the elephants of Africa and
Asia belong to different species, distinguished by the form of the
head, and some peculiarities in the structure of the teeth.—B.
1642 By the term “dragon,” we may suppose that Pliny refers
to some of the great serpents which exist in hot climates, and are of
such vast size, that they might perhaps be able to perform some of the
exploits here ascribed to the dragon.—B.
1643 This account appears to be entirely without
foundation.—B.
1644 The idea of the elephant’s blood being cold, and sought
after by the dragon, is, of course, without foundation; its blood being
of the same temperature with that of other quadrupeds.—B.
1645 Cuvier states, that in India and America there are
serpents of the genus boa, or python, thirty feet or more in length.
He observes, that there are various species of aquatic reptiles in the
seas of India, but that they never swim twisted together, or with their
heads elevated. Ælian gives an account of the great size of the dragons
in Æthiopia.—B.
1646 Cuvier remarks, that there are no serpents with crests
on the head, and that Juba must have been thinking probably of some
animal of the genus lacertus, when he made this statement. We may here
remark, that the “basiliscus,” or “king of serpents,” was said by the
poets to have a crown on its head, as denoting its kingly rank. See c.
33 of this Book.
1647 It is well known, that certain serpents have the jaws
and fauces so constructed, that they will allow of the passage of an
animal more bulky than themselves; they first crush its bones, and form
it into a kind of pulp, and then pass it, without further change, into
the stomach, where it is slowly dissolved by the gastric juices.—B.
1648 Supposed to have been in Mysia, or Bithynia,
considerably to the west of Pontus.—B.
1649 This account is entirely without foundation. The same
statement is made by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. ii. c. 21, who probably
copied it from Metrodorus. There are stories of the power which
serpents possess of fascinating birds by the eye, but they are not
improbably without foundation.—B. There is little doubt, however, that
some serpents have the power, by some means or other, of fascinating
the birds which they make their prey.
1650 This is referred to by many ancient writers; among
others, by Livy, B. xviii.; Florus, B. ii. c. 2; Valerius Maximus, B.
i. c. 8; and Aulus Gellius, B. vi. c. 3.—B.
1651 As Cuvier remarks, it is difficult to conceive what
he means by the boa of Italy. At the present day, the longest Italian
serpents are the Æsculapian serpent (a harmless animal), and the
“Coluber quadrilineatus” of Linnæus, neither of which exceeds ten feet
in length. The one here mentioned, was probably, as Cuvier suggests,
one of the genuine boa or python species; but, as he says, where did it
come from? and how did it get there?
1652 It is doubtful whether any one ever witnessed a serpent
sucking a cow, but it seems to have been generally believed, and it
is therefore probable, that the name of the animal was derived from
this circumstance.—B. It is still believed of the common snake in
some parts of this country. The reading “primo” has been preferred to
“trimo,” that adopted by Sillig.
1653 Cuvier remarks upon the two animals here mentioned, the
bison and the urus, that Europe, at the present time, contains only one
species of wild ox, the bison, or aurochs of the Germans, which still
exists, although in small numbers only, in the forests of Lithuania.
There are, however, fossil remains, in different parts of the north of
Europe, of other animals of the same genus, which may have been the
urus of Pliny, and not extinct when he wrote. Ajasson, vol. vi. pp.
413, 414; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 365. The description by Cæsar of the
urus of Gaul, Bell. Gall. B. vi. c. 26, seems to agree with the remains
of the fossil animal, and may, therefore, be considered as confirming
the opinion, that both animals were in existence when Pliny wrote.—B.
1654 This appears to have been a species of antelope, the
Antelope bubalus of Linnæus. Cuvier observes, that Strabo places it
among the gazelles, and Aristotle associates it with the stag and the
deer, while Oppian’s description of the urus, agrees with those of the
gazelle.—B.
1655 We learn from various travellers, that there are
troops of wild horses and asses in many parts of Tartary and the
neighbouring countries; but it is doubtful whether they have proceeded
from an original wild stock, or may not have been the produce of some
individuals which had accidentally escaped from the domestic state.—B.
1656 No doubt Pliny has fallen into an error on this
subject, and his elk and achlis are, in reality, the same animal. The
description of the latter, for the most part, applies to the former,
with the exception of the want of joints in the legs, which is entirely
without foundation. Cæsar’s account of the elk, Bell. Gall. B. vi. c.
27, agrees generally with Pliny’s account of the achlis; he also says,
that the legs of the alces are “without articulations and joints.”
1657 The Romans had but a very imperfect knowledge of the
Scandinavian peninsula. They supposed it to be surrounded by the ocean,
and to be composed of many islands, which Ptolemy calls Scandiæ. Of
these, the largest bore especially the name of Scandia or Scandinavia,
by which name the modern Sweden was probably indicated. See B. iv. c.
30.
1658 Pliny’s account is from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix.
c. 45, but, as is often the case, with considerable exaggerations.
Aristotle says, that these animals eject their excrements to a distance
of four feet, and that it is of so acrid a nature, as to cause the hair
of the dog to fall off. The word jugerum is generally used as a measure
of superficial surface.—B.
1659 Pliny here renders the Greek πλέθρον, by
“jugerum,” which is ordinarily a measure of superficies. In the present
case, therefore, it must mean a measure of length, of 100 Grecian, or
104 Roman feet.
1660 The pard of Pliny, as we shall find stated below, is
the male of the panther.
1661 Cuvier remarks, that all the feline animals have
retractile claws, drawn by an elastic ligament into a sheath, and
protruded when required for the purpose of prehension. The sheath is
formed of a duplicature or fold of the skin and the subjacent cellular
membrane.—B.
1662 What Pliny states here, is without foundation. He
supposes that the leopard is the produce of a pard, or male panther,
and the female of the lion; but this is incorrect, the leopard being a
distinct species of animal.—B.
1663 Herodotus, B. iii. c. 108, gives the same account,
which is refuted by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 31. Aulus
Gellius, B. xiii. c. 7, refers to Herodotus, and the refutation by
Aristotle.—B.
1664 The account here given of the lioness generally,
Aristotle gives respecting the Syrian lioness only, Hist. Anim. B. vi.
c. 31; there is some reason to believe that Aristotle is not correct in
what he says. The account given by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iv. c. 33, is
nearly the same with that of Pliny.—B.
1665 There is much in this account that is incorrect. It is
well ascertained that the cubs of the lion are proportionably as large
and as perfectly formed as the young of other animals that belong to
the same family.—B.
1666 Herodotus, B. vii. c. 126, and Aristotle, Hist. Anim.
B. viii. c. 28, give a similar account of the district in which lions
are found.—B. Littré remarks, that this statement of Pliny is probably
formed, as originally suggested by M. Maury, upon the fact, that the
lions of Europe, as we learn from Herodotus, attacked the camels of
Xerxes, on his invasion of Europe.
1667 Cuvier remarks, that we have no knowledge of the lion
with curled hair, so frequently spoken of by the ancients. He suggests
that there may have been a peculiar variety between the rivers Achelous
and Nestus or Mestus, or perhaps, more probably, that it was altogether
imaginary. He states also, that we no longer see lions without manes,
but that Olivier had seen some at Bagdat. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix.
c. 44, speaks of the two species of lions, and describes them nearly as
Pliny has done.—B.
1668 According to Cuvier, this is not the case; the lion
passes its urine just as the other animals of the same family. Pliny
again refers to the odour of the lion’s breath, in B. xi. c. 115.—B.
1669 The lion, like other carnivorous animals, is able
to receive a large quantity of food into the stomach, and to remain
for a proportionably longer period without eating; but the statement
respecting its taking food on alternate days, is without foundation.
There does not appear to be any ground for the account of the mode by
which it relieves the stomach when overcharged.—B.
1670 We learn from Cicero, Ep. Fam. B. v. Ep. 12, that
Polybius wrote a history of the Numantine war, in which we may presume
the account here referred to was contained.—B.
1671 Although these accounts of the generosity and clemency
of the lion are in a great measure fabulous, still the accounts of
those who have had the best opportunity of becoming acquainted with the
character of different animals, agree in ascribing to it less ferocity
and brutality, in proportion to its size and strength, than to other
animals of the same family.—B.
1672 In various countries, and more especially in Egypt, the
magicians profess to charm serpents by incantations; and it appears
that they are able to acquire some power over them by imitating their
natural cries. Cuvier informs us, that Geoffroi St. Hilaire had
witnessed the fact, and was himself able to produce the effect.—B.
1673 Aristotle says, a matter of a yellow colour,
ἰχῶρες ὠχροὶ.
1674 Probably, there is no foundation for this opinion:
it does not appear that any animal, except man, has the faculty of
weeping, i. e. of shedding tears, in connection with a peculiar
condition of mind and feeling.—B. But query as to the horse. See c. 64
of the present Book, and the Introduction to vol. i. p. xvii.
1675 This supposed fear is without foundation, but appears
to have been a generally received opinion, as it is referred to by
Lucretius, B. iv. l. 714-725.—B.
1676 Seneca gives an account of this exhibition; he says
that the lions were turned loose into the Circus, and that spearmen
were sent by king Bocchus, who killed them with darts. Sylla was prætor
A.U.C. 661, B.C. 92.—B.
1677 “Sagum.” This was the cloak worn by the Roman soldiers
and inferior officers, in contradistinction to the “paludamentum“
of the general and superior officers. It was open in the front, and
usually, though not always, fastened across the shoulders by a clasp.
It was thick, and made of wool.
1678 This story is given also by Plutarch, in the life of
Demetrius. Lysimachus was a Macedonian by birth, but son of Agathocles,
a serf of Thessaly. Through his great courage, he became one of the
body-guard of Alexander. Quintus Curtius tells us that, when hunting
in Syria, he killed a lion of immense size single-handed, though not
without receiving severe wounds in the contest. The same author looks
upon this as the probable origin of the story here referred to by
Pliny.
1679 This is mentioned by many ancient authors; by Plutarch,
Pausanias, Seneca, Justin, and by Quintus Curtius, who thinks that the
account usually given is fabulous.—B.
1680 Related by Plutarch, as among the acts of extravagance
and folly, committed by Antony, which gave much disgust to the grave
and respectable citizens of Rome.—B.
1681 A famous courtezan of the time of Cicero; being
originally the freedwoman and mistress of Volumnius Eutrapelus, and
then successively the mistress of Antony and the poet Gallus, who
mentioned her in his poems under the name of Lycoris; she did not,
however, continue faithful to him.
1682 Aulus Gellius, B. v. c. 14, and Ælian, Anim. Nat. B.
viii. c. 48, relate a similar anecdote of Androclus or Androcles, who
extracted a thorn from the foot of a lion.—B.
1683 The text is in a state of extreme confusion here, and
so hopelessly mangled, that we can only guess at the sense of it. In
Sillig’s edition, which is generally followed, it runs to this effect:
“Neque profugienti, cum potuisset, fera institerat et procumbens ad
arborem hiatu quo terruerat miserationem quærebat. Os morsu avidiore
inhæserat dentibus cruciabatque inedia, tum pœna in ipsis ejus telis
suspectantem ac velut mutis precibus orantem, dum fortuitu fidens non
est contra feram; multoque diutius miraculo quam metu cessatum est.”
Thus paraphrased by Sillig, who devotes a long Note to it: “The lion,
therefore, being tormented by hunger and excessive pain, and thus
punishing himself for his greediness in his own weapons (his teeth),
looked up, and besought Elpis with silent prayers, as it were, not, as
he trusted to the protection fortuitously given by the branches, to
show himself distrustful of a wild beast.”
1684 This remark refers to what Pliny has related in c. 5,
respecting the sagacity of the elephant.—B.
1685 Cuvier remarks, that this “panthera” is not the
same as the πάνθηρ of the Greeks. From the description of
its spots and other circumstances, he thinks that it was one of the
African animals, known by modern naturalists as the leopard, which
appear to have been confounded by the Romans with the panther. The
term “leopardus” is not met with until after the age of Pliny; it was
supposed to be the produce of the pardus, or male panther, and the
lioness.—B.
1686 “Assectatoris sapientiæ”—“A follower of wisdom;”
meaning a “philosopher.”
1687 This word here signifies, simply, a “serpent.”
1688 Ælian, Var. Hist. B. xiii. c. i., relates an occurrence
of this kind, about Atalanta, and Justin, B. xliv. c. 4, about Habis,
a king of Spain. As to the account of Romulus having been suckled by
a wolf, it was generally regarded as a legendary tale by the Romans
themselves. See Livy, B. i. c. 4, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
Antiq. Rom. B. i.—B.
1689 Pliny, in B. xiii. c. 15, speaks of “tables of tiger
and panther pattern,” as articles of ornamental furniture among the
Romans, named from the peculiar patterns of the veins in the citrus
wood, of which they were formed.—B.
1690 This, though mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix.
c. 8, is probably incorrect; and still more the addition made by Ælian,
Anim. Nat. B. v. c. 40, that this odour is grateful to man. It has,
however, induced some to conjecture, that the animal here described
might be the civet; but the description given is inapplicable to that
animal; nor, indeed, does the civet appear to have been known to the
ancients. For further information, see the remarks of Cuvier, Ajasson,
vol. vi. p. 420, and Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 386. Pliny, in B. xxi. c.
18, says that no animal, except the panther, has any odour.—B.
1691 Meaning the “spotted” or “parti-coloured” female.
1692 Xenophon, in his Cynegeticon, says, that the pard is
found on Mount Pangæus, in Macedonia; the truth of which is denied by
Aristotle, who says that it is not to be found in Europe.
1693 He was tribune A.U.C. 670. Cicero says, Tusc.
Quæst. B. iv. c. 39, that Aufidius, although blind, was eminent for his
political and literary talents. He wrote a History of Greece.—B.
1695 See also Suetonius, Life of Augustus. Martial,
Spect. Ep. 18, relates a circumstance respecting a tame tiger, which
occurrence appears to have taken place at the time when he wrote.
Heliogabalus yoked tigers to his car, in imitation of Bacchus, as we
are informed by Lampridius.
1696 “In cavea.” In the arena or centre of the amphitheatre.
This word often signifies, however, the place where the senators,
equites, and plebeians, sat in the theatre: and in the later writers it
is used to signify the whole amphitheatre.
1698 In the winter of 1809 and 1810, an antique mosaic
pavement was discovered at Rome, in which four tigers are represented,
and which, it has been supposed, might possibly have some reference
to those exhibited by Claudius. Martial, who lived a little after
Pliny, speaks of tigers exhibited at Rome, by Domitian, in considerable
numbers. Epig. B. viii. Ep. 26.—B.
1699 Cuvier remarks, that the account given of the two
kinds of camels, and his description generally, is correct, with the
exception of their antipathy to the horse. The caravans, he says,
present a constant mixture of the two animals, and even, in Arabia, the
young foals are occasionally suckled by the female camel.—B.
1700 We have a similar statement in Aristotle, Hist. Anim.
B. ii. c. 1. Indeed, the account here given generally, is taken from
him.—B.
1702 Mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 17,
and by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iii. c. 7; but, as stated above, it is
incorrect.—B.
1703 At the time of rutting, according to Solinus.
1704 He speaks here of only one of the animals which
resemble the camel; the giraffe, namely. The other, which he for the
present omits, is the ostrich.
1705 The description of the giraffe, here given, is
sufficiently correct, but we have a more minute account of it by Dion
Cassius, B. xliii. In the time of the Emperor Gordian, ten of these
animals were exhibited at Rome at once; a remarkable fact, when we bear
in mind that so few have been imported into Europe for many centuries
past. The giraffe is figured in the mosaic at Præneste, and under it is
inscribed its name, nabi.—B. It has been found that it is unable to
bear the winters of Europe.
1706 Its form being like that of the camel, while its spots
resemble those of the leopard. Horace refers to it, when speaking of an
object calculated to excite the vulgar gaze; “Diversum confusa genus
panthera camelo”—“The race of the panther mingled with the camel,” Ep.
B. ii.; Ep. i. l. 195.
1707 According to Dion Cassius, B. xliii., these games were
celebrated A.U.C. 708.—B.
1708 This comparison can only be employed to indicate the
mild nature of the giraffe.—B.
1709 In the older editions, the names here given to this
animal were “chaus” and “ruphius;” the alteration was made by Hardouin
from a MS. in the Royal Library of Paris, which he deemed of high
authority, and has been adopted by all the modern editors. There is
considerable doubt respecting the animal here designated by the name
of “chama;” it appears to have been an inhabitant of Gaul, and in c.
34, is styled “lupus cervarius;” but the account does not enable us to
identify it with any animal known to exist in that country.—B. It is
generally supposed to have been a species of lynx.
1710 No doubt this description refers to some species of
the monkey tribe, but it is uncertain to what one in particular. Its
having been seen only once at Rome, shows that it was not of the most
common kind; Cuvier, however, thinks it probable, that Pliny may have
been incorrect in this; he supposes that it was the “Simia sphinx” of
Linnæus, Lem. vol. iii. p. 395. According to Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
ii. c. 8, κηβος is merely a monkey with a tail; see also the
account of Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. xvii. c. 8.—B.
1711 Cuvier says, that this was the single-horned rhinoceros
of India. The commentators have been at a loss to reconcile this
description with the Epigram of Martial, Spect. Ep. xxii., where he
speaks of the rhinoceros exhibited by Domitian, as having two horns.
It has been proved that this latter was of the two-horned species, by
the medals of that emperor, now in existence. Martial, Spect. Ep. ix.,
seems also to have been acquainted with the single-horned species. That
with two horns is mentioned by Pausanias as the Æthiopian bull. We
learn from modern naturalists, that the two-horned species is a native
of the southern parts of Africa, while that with one horn is from
Asia.—B.
1712 The other enemy is the dragon, as described in c. 11
and 12 of the present Book.—B.
1713 According to Cuvier, the lynx of Pliny is the Felis
caracal of Linnæus: it is common in many parts of Asia and Africa, in
the retired forest districts, and still exists in the Pyrenees and the
mountains of Naples.—B.
1714 As far as the accounts of the sphinx are to be regarded
as not entirely fabulous, we must suppose it to have originated in
some species of the monkey tribe; perhaps the Simia troglodytes or
chimpanzé.—B.
1715 Of course the winged horse is an imaginary being,
nor does it appear what is the origin of the fable; the horns are an
unusual appendage to the pegasus.—B. The pegasus and the rhinoceros
together may have given rise to that fabulous animal, the unicorn. See,
however, the Monoceros, mentioned in c. 31.
1716 Although a hybrid animal is produced by the union
of the wolf and the dog, it does not form a permanent species. But,
as Cuvier remarks, by the insertion of “velut,” Pliny seems to
imply that the crocotta unites the physical properties of the two
animals. Ctesias, Indic. c. 32, gives an account of the cynolycus, or
“dog-wolf,” from which Pliny seems to have taken his crocotta.—B.
1717 It does not seem possible to determine what species of
monkey is here designated; it is most probable that he himself had no
accurate knowledge.—B.
1718 We may here refer to the judicious remarks of Cuvier,
Ajasson, vol. vi. pp. 427, 428, and Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 399, on the
leucrocotta. It seems impossible to identify Pliny’s description with
any known animal, and it is not unlikely that he has confused the
accounts of authors who were speaking of different animals. Some of
the characteristics of the leucrocotta agree with those of the Indian
antelope, while others seem to resemble those of the hyæna.—B.
1719 Perhaps the eale may have been the two-horned
rhinoceros, as some naturalists say that there is a degree of mobility
in the horns of that animal; the same observation has been made with
respect to the wild or forest bulls, the description of which animal,
in Pliny, is probably from Diodorus Siculus.—B.
1720 This description of the mantichora appears to be taken
from the Indica of Ctesias; it has been also adopted by Aristotle and
Ælian, but they have qualified their accounts by some expressions
of doubt, which are omitted by Pliny. It has been conjectured, that
Ctesias took his description from the hieroglyphic figures in his
time, probably common in the East, and still found in the ruins of the
Assyrian and Persian cities, Nineveh and Persepolis, for instance.—B.
1726 We have a discussion by Cuvier, respecting the
existence of the unicorn, or of any animal similar to that here
described, with a single horn. He remarks, that the only single-horned
quadruped of which we have any certain knowledge, is the rhinoceros,
and that the only horns which have been discovered, and which can have
been single horns, belong to it. There are five animals mentioned by
the ancients, as having single horns, the Indian ass, the single-horned
horse, the single-horned ox, the monoceros, described in the text, and
the oryx of Africa, which Pliny speaks of in c. 79 of this Book, and
in B. xi. c. 106. There are many curious accounts given by travellers
of acknowledged veracity, respecting animals seen in the more remote
parts of Asia and Africa, answering to the description of the unicorn,
and there are representations of the same in ancient sculptures; but
they do not amount to that kind of evidence which can at all supply the
place of direct proof.—B.
1729 Ælian describes this animal more in detail, Anim. Nat.
B. vii. c. 5. Cuvier thinks it probable that it is the Antelope gnu; he
remarks, that it has a very peculiar and mournful appearance; Ajasson,
vol. vi. p. 435; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 405.—B.
1730 This account of the basilisk’s eye, like that of the
catoblepas, is entirely devoid of foundation.—B.
1731 Many species have certain marks on the head, which were
supposed to resemble a crown.—B.
1732 There is probably no foundation for this account of the
action of the effluvium of the weasel upon the basilisk or any other
species of serpent.—B.
1733 Hence the proverbial expression applied to a person
who is suddenly silent upon the entrance of another; “Lupus est tibi
visus.”
1734 Cuvier says, that the wolves of Africa are of the
ordinary size, and conjectures that this remark probably applies to the
chakale, or “Canis aureus” of Linnæus, which is of the colour of the
wolf, and the size of the fox, and is common throughout all Africa.—B.
1735 The opinion that men were converted into wolves by
enchantment, or a preternatural agency, was at one time so generally
received, as to have led to judicial processes, and the condemnation of
the supposed criminal.—B. To the relator of the above story that men
lose their voice on seeing a wolf, Scaliger wishes as many blows as at
different times he had seen a wolf without losing his voice.
1736 This literally means “changing the skin;” was applied
by some ancient medical writers to a peculiar form of insanity, where
the patient conceives himself changed into a wolf, and named
λυκανθρώπια, “lycanthropy.” The word appears to have been in common
use among the Romans, and to have been applied by them to any one who
had undergone a remarkable change in his character and habits; in this
sense it is used by Plautus, Amphitryon, Prol. l. 123, and Bacchides,
A. iv. sc. 4, l. 12.—B.
1737 It is not known who is here referred to; it is not
probable that it is Fabius Pictor, the Roman historian.—B.
1738 It is rather curious to find Pliny censuring others for
credulity; indeed he loses no opportunity of a hit at the Greeks, to
whom, after all, he is greatly indebted. See Introduction to vol. i. p.
17.
1739 An account of the victories gained at the Olympic
games.—B.
1740 It has been conjectured, that the epithet, “Lycæan,”
Λύκαιος, was given to Jupiter by the Arcadians, for this
supposed conversion of men into wolves, which was conceived to be
effected by divine interposition.—B.
1741 It does not appear what is the foundation of this
opinion; of course, it is without truth.—B.
1742 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 35, says that they
couple once only in the year. Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iv. c. 4, says that
their bringing forth continues twelve days.—B.
1743 See c. 28 of the present Book. He alludes probably to
the lynx.
1744 It is not easy to say whence this opinion was
derived; the general character of the wolf is that of quickness and
watchfulness, rather than stupidity.—B. But it would appear that it is
the lynx that is alluded to.
1745 The cerastes, or horned serpent, is mentioned by Lucan,
in his description of serpents, Pharsalia, B. ix. l. 716. One of the
Scholiasts on Lucan relates a story that when Helen was eloping with
Paris, she trod on the back of a cerastes, and broke it; from which
circumstance, the whole race moved with a crooked course.
1746 Cuvier has observed this animal burying itself in the
sand, and has seen the motion of its horns, but does not credit its
alleged power of attracting birds; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 412.—B.
1747 The amphisbæna is mentioned by Lucan, B. ix. l. 719.
“The dangerous amphisbæna, that moves on at either of its heads.”
1748 The account of the two heads is obviously incorrect;
the idea has risen from the two extremities being nearly of the same
size and appearance. It has been supposed, that there were certain
serpents, with the power of moving with equal facility in both
directions; and that the name, Ἀμφίσβαινα, was derived from
this circumstance.—B.
1749 Lucan mentions the jaculus, B. ix. l. 720, and l. 822.
In the last passage he says: “Behold! afar, around the trunk of a
barren tree, a fierce serpent—Africa calls it the jaculus—wreathes
itself, and then darts forth, and through the head and pierced temples
of Paulus it takes its flight: nothing does venom there affect, death
seizes him through the wound. It was then understood how slowly fly the
stones which the sling hurls, how sluggishly whizzes the flight of the
Scythian arrow.”
1750 There is an account of the jaculus, or, as it is called
in Greek, Ἀκοντίας, Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. vi. c. 18; it is
mentioned by Galen, Theriaca, c. 8.—B.
1751 In B. ix. l. 701, Lucan says: “Here the gore (of the
Gorgon Medusa) which first from the sand lifted a head, raised the
drowsy asp with its puffed-out neck.” The whole of this passage in
Lucan is well worth the attention of those desirous to know something
of the serpent-lore of the ancients.
1752 Cuvier says, that Geoffroi St. Hilaire has identified
this animal with the Coluber haje of Linnæus, which has, from the
earliest ages, been known as a native of Egypt, and where it still
exists. Its two most remarkable characteristics are those here referred
to; the puffing out of the neck when enraged, and its capacity of
being tamed, or, as it is styled, enchanted. This last has been taken
advantage of by the jugglers of that country from the most remote
antiquity, as appears from the writings of Moses, and something of a
similar nature is still practised. They remove the poison fangs, so as
to render the animal harmless, and by certain sounds render it obedient
to their call. It appears, also, that by pressing on the upper part
of the spine, the animal is rendered paralytic, and may be said to be
changed into a rod; this fact was witnessed by St. Hilaire. The asp is
described by Aristotle, and is frequently mentioned by Ælian. Galen
speaks of its deadly poison, in his Theriaca, c. 8. See Ajasson, vol.
vi. pp. 437-9; Lemaire, vol. iii. pp. 414, 415.—B. Pliny mentions,
however, in B. xxiii. c. 27, that the bite of the asp may be cured with
vinegar.
1753 Both Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 29, and Ælian,
ubi supra, speak of the extreme virulence of the poison of the asp,
and Cuvier remarks that the haje, and the haga, which are species of
the asp, are among the most formidable of the serpent tribe.—B.
1754 The method of attracting this serpent, by imitating
the voice of the female, proves that there is some foundation for this
statement.—B.
1755 The ichneumon of the ancients, the “Viverra ichneumon“
of Linnæus, is still common in Egypt, and renders essential service by
destroying the eggs of serpents. With respect to what is here said of
its covering its body with mud, to protect itself against the asp, the
fact appears to be, that in searching for the eggs, which are deposited
in the mud, its body becomes more or less covered with that substance,
and may possibly in this way be less exposed to the attacks of the asp.
The contest of the asp and the ichneumon is mentioned by Ælian, B. iii.
c. 22.—B.
1756 Many of the ancients have described the crocodile; of
these, the most important, for the correctness of the description,
are Herodotus, B. ii. c. 68; Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 10, et
alibi; and Diodorus Siculus, B. i.—B.
1757 The tongue of the crocodile is flat, and, as afterwards
stated, B. xi. c. 65, adheres to the lower jaw, so as to be incapable
of motion.—B.
1758 This account was first given by Herodotus, ubi supra;
and, from the form of the head and the neighbouring parts, depicts
what would naturally occur to the observer; but it is not correct.
The actual state of the parts, and their connection with each other,
as Cuvier informs us, were first satisfactorily explained by Geoffroi
Saint Hilaire.—B.
1759 Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. v. c. 52, observes, that this is
the case with the tortoise, and similar animals.—B.
1760 Cuvier says, that when it leaves the egg, the young
animal is only six inches long, and that it ultimately attains a size
of from thirty to forty feet.—B.
1761 Herodotus says, that it remains all night in the water,
as being warmer than the external air. So also Aristotle, Hist. Anim.
B. ii. c. 10.—B.
1762 The water of the Nile abounds with small leeches,
which attach to the throat of the crocodile, and, as it has no means
of removing them, it allows a little bird to enter its mouth for this
purpose; this is described by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 6, and
by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iii. c. 2.—B.
1763 Although this account is sanctioned by all the ancient
naturalists, it is called in question by Cuvier; Ajasson, vol. vi. p.
441; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 421.—B.
1764 There is a small lizard, called by the modern
naturalists the Lacerta scincus; but Cuvier conceives that this cannot
be the animal here referred to, because it is so very much smaller than
the ichneumon, that no one would have thought of comparing them; and,
what seems a better reason, because it is not found in the Nile. From
the account of the scincus in B. xxviii. c. 30, it is probable that the
animal here referred to is a species of monitor, popularly called the
land crocodile. Herodotus, B. iv. c. 192, speaks of the land crocodile
as found in Libya; it is also mentioned by Pausanias, Corinthiaca, c.
20, and by Prosper Alpinus, Ægypt. B. iv. c. 5.—B. The scincus is
probably the “Lacerta ouaran” of Cuvier.
1765 Cuvier remarks, that this account cannot really apply
to the dolphin, because none of the cetacea possess the spines here
described. He investigates the subject with his usual sagacity, and
concludes, with much probability, that the animal here referred to was
a squalus, the Squalus centrina, or spinax of Linnæus; Ajasson, vol.
vi. pp. 443, 444; Lemaire, vol. iii. pp. 422, 423. We have an account
of the contest between the crocodile and the dolphin in Seneca, Nat.
Quæst. B. iv. c. 2.—B.
1766 We have some account of the Tentyritæ in Ælian, Anim.
Nat. B. x. c. 21.—B. See B. xxviii. c. 6.
1767 See B. vii. c. 2. The best description of the Psylli is
that given by Lucan in B. ix. l. 892, et seq., where he describes the
march of Cato’s army across the burning coasts of the Syrtes.
1768 This, as Cuvier remarks, is the case with the
crocodiles of North America, which, like other reptiles, become torpid
during the cold season; Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 444; Lemaire, vol. iii. p.
424.—B.
1769 Cuvier remarks, as singular, that the descriptions
given by the ancients of the hippopotamus should have been incorrect,
more especially with reference to Herodotus, who had visited Egypt, and
who has described some of the animals of that country with considerable
accuracy; Ajasson, vol. vi. pp. 444, 445; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 425.
Pliny has copied the description of Herodotus, B. ii. c. 71, almost
verbatim, and the same has been done by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii.
c. 7. Even the Latin authors, such as Diodorus Siculus and Ælian, who
might have seen the animal in Rome, continued to transcribe the account
of Herodotus.—B.
1770 Herodotus and Aristotle, ubi supra, assert, that his
hide is so hard, that spears and other missiles are formed from it; the
statement of Pliny is, however, much more correct.—B.
1771 “Euripo.” See the Notes to c. 7 of this Book.
1772 Pliny, speaking of the hippopotamus, in B. xxviii. c.
31, styles it, “the discoverer of the art of letting blood.”—B.
1773 Cuvier remarks upon this and the following Chapter,
that they are entirely fabulous. The diseases, remedies, and
instructions given by the animals are equally imaginary, although Pliny
has taken the whole from authors of credit, and it has been repeated
by Plutarch, De Iside, and by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. ii. c. 35, and many
others. Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 446; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 426.—B.
1774 Cuvier has given an interesting account of the ibis,
the opinions entertained of it by various travellers and naturalists,
and a detail of the examination which he made of two of its mummies,
which were brought by Grobert to Paris, from the wells of Sakhara.
These mummies were found to be similar to those previously examined by
Buffon, Shaw, and others, and proved the ibis of the ancient Egyptians
to have been a species of curlew. This opinion he further supports
by a reference to various sculptures and mosaics, where this bird is
represented, and he remarks upon the errors into which most travellers
and historians have fallen as to it; the only correct account he
conceives to be that of the African traveller, Bruce, who describes and
figures it under the name of Abou hannès. See the extract in Lemaire,
vol. iii. p. 633, et seq., from his Recherches sur les Ossements
Fossiles, vol. i. p. 141, et seq. Herodotus gives an account of the
ibis, B. i. c. 75, 76, but it is not correct.—B.
1775 The fabulous account of the powers of this herb is
referred to in B. xxv. c. 53, and supported by the highest authorities;
among others, by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 6.; Cicero, De Nat.
Deor. B. ii. c. 50; Virgil, Æn. B. xii. c. 412.—B.
1776 See B. xxii. c. 45, for a similar cure. It is not
known what plant is here alluded to, but it has been thought to be the
cinara, or artichoke.
1777 The Chelidonium majus of Linnæus. It probably derived
its name from the swallow, χελίδων, because its flowers appear
at the time that bird makes its first appearance in the spring. This
supposed property is mentioned by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iii. c. 25.
Pliny speaks of its efficacy in diseases of the eyes, B. xxv. c. 50,
and c. 91.—B.
1778 Pliny speaks of the medical virtues of cunile bubula,
in B. xx. c. 61; Columella, B. vi. c. 13, says that it is a cure for
scabies. It is not certain what is the plant here referred to; it is
considered identical with origanum, by Hardouin, and has been supposed
by some to be marjoram, or pennyroyal. The effect of the cunile on
the tortoise is mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 6; by
Plutarch, Nat. Quæst.; Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. vi. c. 12; and by Albertus
Magnus, B viii. Tr. ii. c. 2; but there is some difference in their
statements. Some speak of it as an antidote, enabling the tortoise to
counteract the poison of the serpent, while others regard it as giving
the tortoise increased vigour to resist the attacks.
1779 Aristotle, ubi supra, and Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iv. c.
14, refer to this supposed fact, which is without foundation, so far,
at least, as the contest of the weasels with the serpents and the rue
are concerned. The hostility of the weasel to the mouse is probably
correct. Pliny again refers to it, B. xx. c. 51, and it forms the
subject of one of Phædrus’s Fables, B. iv. c. 2.—B.
1780 We have the same account in Plutarch.—B. Plutarch
speaks, however, of the river crab.
1781 Pliny refers to this effect, B. xx. c. 95; he speaks
also of its application to the eyes of the animal; it is probable, that
feniculum and marathrum both refer to the same plant; the latter being
the ordinary Greek, and the former the Latin, name. This effect of the
feniculum is also mentioned by Ælian, B. ix. c. 16.—B.
1782 “Si vero squamæ obtorpuere;” Hardouin supposes that
this applies particularly to the eyes.—B. There can be little doubt
that he is correct in that supposition.
1783 Aristotle, ubi supra, and Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. vi.
c. 4, state that the dragon takes the juice of the picris into the
stomach, when overloaded with food. The exact plant referred to, under
that name, cannot be ascertained for certain; but it appears probable,
that it is a wild lettuce or endive, or some plant belonging to that
family.—B.
1784 This effect of aconite, and the antidote for it, are
mentioned in B. xxvii. c. 2; they are also mentioned by Aristotle,
ubi supra; and by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iv. c. 49, and alluded to by
Cicero, De. Nat. Deor. B. ii. c. 50. It appears from a statement of
Tavernier, as referred to by Hardouin, that the same antidote against
poisoned weapons is still employed in the island of Java.—B.
1785
From the Greek παρδαλιαγχὴς, “pard-strangle.”
1786 This is again referred to, B. xxix. c. 39.—B.
1787 “Quod persequi immensum est æque scilicet quam reliquam
cum singulis hominum societatem.” The meaning of this passage is
obscure, and extremely doubtful.
1788 This is alluded to by Cicero in his letters to Atticus,
and is mentioned by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. vi. c. 41; B. xi. c. 19; and
Var. Hist. B. i. c. 11.—B. The same is still said of rats, whence our
expression “to rat,” i. e. to desert a falling cause.
1789 The priests of this college, or augurs, were among the
most important public functionaries in the Roman state, both from the
rank of the individuals and the political power which they derived from
their office.—B. The augurs, or diviners by birds, held the highest
rank in the state; but the power of their college greatly declined in
the later period of the Roman history. It was finally abolished by the
Emperor Theodosius.
1790 Other instances are mentioned by Diodorus Siculus, B.
iii. Justin, B. xv. c. 2, and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xvii. c. 41.—B.
Showers of frogs are a thing not unknown in England even. They are
probably caused by whirlwinds acting upon waters which are the haunt of
these animals.
1791 The ravages of locusts have been known in all ages;
their destructive effects in Egypt and Judea, have formed the subject
of a very elaborate dissertation by Bochart, in his work on the
“Animals of Scripture,” Part i. B. iv. c. 3 and 4.—B.
1792 Used as a place of banishment by the Romans. See B. iv.
c. 28, and c. 82, of the present Book.
1793 See c. 82 of the present Book, and B. x. c. 85.—B.
1795 “Solipugis.” There has been much discussion as to
the word here employed by Pliny, and the animal which he intends to
designate. The solipugus, solpugus, solipuga, or solipunga, probably
different names of the same animal, is mentioned by various writers;
among others, by Lucan, Phars. B. ix. l. 837; Diodorus Siculus, B.
iii.; Strabo, B. xvi.; and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xvii. c. 40. It is
again referred to in B. xxix. c. 16. The description given is, however,
too indefinite to enable us to identify it with any known animal; it
would almost seem to indicate something between the spider and the
ant.—B. We still hear in modern times of the venomous and destructive
nature of the red ants on the coast of Guinea; and it is not improbable
that it is to these that Pliny alludes.
1797 This is mentioned by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. xv. c.
26.—B. The scolopendra is one of the multipede insects.
1798 Aristotle, De Gener. Anim. B. iii. c. 6, and Hist.
Anim. B. vi. c. 32, accounts for the vulgar error, by stating that
the hyæna has a peculiar structure of the parts about the anus, which
might, to an unpractised eye, give the idea, that it possesses the
generative organs of both sexes. Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. i. c. 25, and
Oppian, Cyneget. B. iii. c. 289, have adopted this erroneous opinion.
What is said respecting the hyæna, in the remaining part of this
Chapter, is mostly without foundation.—B.
1799 We have had some account given of the mantichora, in
c. 30. The mantichora and the corocotta are altogether imaginary.—B.
Cuvier, in Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 447; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 439, thinks
that the stories of the corocotta and the catoblepas, owe their origin
to mutilated accounts of the hyæna, and the animal known to us as the
gnu.
1800 According to Cuvier, what Pliny here says respecting
the herds of wild asses, and the power of the old males, is correct;
but it is doubtful whether there is any foundation for what is said
about the castration of the newly-born animals; Ajasson, ubi supra;
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 440.—B.
1801 “De aquaticis et iisdem terrestribus;” although these
words are inserted in the title of this Chapter, the subject is not
treated of in it.—B.
1802 Pliny here adopts the vulgar opinion respecting the
origin of the substance called “castor,” and in B. xxxii. c. 13, gives
a more correct description, which he had derived from a physician,
named Sextius. It is a fetid, oily substance, secreted by a gland
situate near the prepuce. Cuvier remarks, that when the gland becomes
distended with this secretion, the animal may probably get rid of it by
rubbing the part against a stone or tree, and in this way, leave the
castor for the hunters, thus giving rise to the vulgar error. Ajasson,
vol. vi. p. 448; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 440.—B.
1803 The beaver has the most powerful teeth of any animal of
the class Rodentia, to which it belongs; it uses them for cutting down
trees, with which it constructs its habitation. Aristotle, Hist. Anim.
B, viii. c. 5, refers to this.—B.
1804 The tail is covered with a kind of scale, and is
flattened; but, in its internal organization, is formed like those of
other quadrupeds.—B.
1806 Pliny, speaking of the different kinds of frogs, B.
xxxii. c. 18, says, “There are some which live only in the hedges, and
thence have the name of rubeta, or bramble frogs.” It seems impossible
to identify this reptile with any of our known animals: and we may
conclude that there is no foundation for the statement. Ælian gives an
account of the venomous nature of this animal. Anim. Nat. B. xvii. c.
12.—B.
1807 As Cuvier remarks, it is impossible that any animal can
discharge by vomiting what Pliny terms the “coagulum,” which is the
fourth stomach of a ruminant animal; the same substance which, under
the name of rennet, is employed to coagulate milk. He conjectures, that
the error may have originated in the observation, that occasionally
in fish, when suddenly drawn out of the water, the air-bladder is
protruded from the mouth, which may have been mistaken for the stomach.
The circumstance is mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 23,
and by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iii. c. 19, as well as the vomiting of the
bile; respecting this latter, we may remark, that vomiting is produced
in various animals, when under the influence of extreme terror.—B.
1809 This is incorrect; the bite of this animal, wherever
found, is never fatal.—B.
1810 This refers to what will be found stated in this
Chapter, that stags conceal their horns, when they fall off, that they
may not be used in medicine.—B.
1811 This is mentioned by Aristotle, Plutarch, and Ælian,
but it must be considered as very doubtful.—B.
1813 It seems that Pliny here attributes the blackening
of the mouths of the stags to their turning up the earth with their
muzzles; Aristotle, however, refers it to a constitutional cause,
arising from their violent sexual excitement; Hist. Anim. B. vi. c.
29.—B.
1814 Or seseli, probably hart-wort. See B. xx. c. 87, and B.
xxv. c. 52.
1815 We learn from Hardouin, that there has been much
discussion respecting the plants or other substances which the female
is supposed to eat after parturition. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix.
c. 6, asserts that it eats the chorion, the membrane in which the
fœtus has been enveloped, and afterwards the herb seselis. To make the
account of Pliny agree with that of Aristotle, some of the commentators
have even supposed, that chorion here means the name of a plant, and
they have proposed to substitute the word chorion for aros in the
text.—B. Aros is probably the present “Arum maculatum,” or wake-robin.
See p. 307, N. 1846.
1816 Aristotle, Plutarch, and Xenophon speak of the
influence of music on these animals.—B.
1817 Aristotle, ubi supra, mentions this respecting their
ears; the same takes place, to a certain extent, with all animals that
have large external auricles.—B.
1818 Aristotle, ubi supra, Ælian, ubi supra, and B. iii.
c. 17, and Theophrastus, in a fragment on the Envious among Animals,
agree in stating that one of the horns of the stag is never found,
although they differ respecting the individual horn, whether the right
one or the left. Aristotle says that it is the left, while Theophrastus
and Ælian agree with the statement of Pliny.—B.
1819 Cuvier says, that no antlers are added after the eighth
year.—B.
1820 This, as well as most of the statements respecting the
growth of the horns, is mentioned by Aristotle, ubi supra, but it is
quite unfounded.—B.
1821 This story of the white hind of Sertorius, is given in
detail by Aulus Gellius, B. xv. c. 22, who tells us that it was given
to him by a native of Lusitania, upon which Sertorius pretended that it
had been sent from Diana, who, through it, held converse with him, and
instructed him how to act. Plutarch, Frontinus, and Valerius Maximus,
also relate the story.
1822 This story, which is obviously incorrect, is mentioned
by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. ii. c. 9; and is again referred to in B.
xxviii. c. 42.—B.
1823 Graguinus, Hist. Franc. B. ix. c. 3, relates a still
more wonderful anecdote of a similar nature; but, as Buffon remarks,
such tales are without foundation, the life of the stag not being more
than thirty or forty years. Cuvier, also, says that its life does not
exceed thirty-six or forty years.—B.
1824 The real nature of the tragelaphus of Pliny, and the
hippelaphus, or horse-stag of Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 1, which
appear to be the same animal, had long remained a disputed question
among naturalists, when, as Cuvier states, the point was decided by
Alphonse Duvaucel, who ascertained that it was a species of stag, which
inhabited the mountains of the north of Hindostan.—B.
1825 And in Arabia as well, according to Diodorus Siculus,
B. ii.
1826 This fact is confirmed by Cuvier, who observes, that
it is the more remarkable that Africa should be without stags, as it
abounds in gazelles of all forms and colours. He supposes that those
travellers, who affirm that they have seen stags in this country,
had really met with gazelles, which they mistook for those animals;
Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 451; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 453.—B.
1827 Cuvier remarks, that Pliny’s account of the chameleon
appears to be taken from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 11, but that
it is less correct. He notices Aristotle’s account of the eye, which
is more accurately given than the account of Pliny; Ajasson, vol. vi.
pp. 451, 452; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 454.—B. The chameleon receives its name from
the Greek χαμαὶ λέων, “the lion on the ground.”
1829 One of those popular errors which have descended from
the ancients to our times; the chameleon feeds on insects, which it
seizes by means of its long flexible tongue; the quantity of food
which it requires appears, however, to be small in proportion to its
bulk.—B.
1830 “Circa caprificos.” Some commentators would understand
this in reference to the wild fig-tree, and take it to mean that
the animal is more furious when in its vicinity. The conjecture of
Hardouin, however, seems more reasonable. He takes “caprificos” to mean
the same as the “caprificialis dies,” mentioned in B. xi. c. 15, as
being sacred to Vulcan, and falling towards the end of the dog-days.
1831 This is another of the erroneous opinions respecting
the chameleon, which has been very generally adopted. It forms the
basis of Merrick’s popular poem of the Chameleon. The animal, indeed,
assumes various shades or tints, but the changes depend upon internal
or constitutional causes, not any external object. Ælian, Anim. Nat.
B. ii. c. 14, refers to the change of colour, but does not allude to
its colour having any connection with that of the object with which it
comes in contact.—B.
1832 The quantity of muscular fibre and blood in the
chameleon is no doubt small in proportion to the bulk of the animal,
although not much less than in other animals of the same natural order;
its spleen is very minute, as Cuvier says, not larger than the seed of
a lentil.—B.
1833 Cuvier remarks, that this account is from the anonymous
treatise De Mirab. Auscult. p. 1152, and from Theophrastus; and that
it was probably derived, in the first instance, from the imperfect
account which the ancients possessed of the reindeer, the hair of
which animal becomes nearly white in the winter, and in the summer of
a brown or grey colour. Bekmann, however, who has written a commentary
on the above-mentioned treatise, supposes that the tarandrus is the
elk. Cuvier conceives, that the animal described by Cæsar, Bell. Gall.
B. vi. c. 26, as inhabiting the Hercynian Forest, which he designates
as “bos cervi figurâ,” is the reindeer; and suggests that “tarandrus”
may have originated in the German, das rennthier. Ajasson, vol. vi. pp. 453, 454; Lemaire, vol.
iii. pp. 456, 457. Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. ii. c. 16, speaks of the change
of colour in the tarandrus in a way which does not correspond with any
animal known to exist.—B. Pliny’s stories of the tarandrus, thos, and
chameleon are ridiculed by Rabelais, B. iv. c. 3.
1834 Cuvier supposes that the lycaon of Pliny is the Indian
tiger, which has a mane; but what is said of its change of colour is
incorrect.—B.
1835 Naturalists have differed respecting the identity of
the animal here described, but Cuvier conceives, that Bochart has
proved it to be the canis aureus chakal (jackal) of Linnæus. The
description given by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 17, and B. ix.
c. 44, agrees with this supposition; it is also described by Oppian,
Halieut. B. ii. c. 615.—B.
1836 It is possible that the quills of the porcupine may be
stuck into the skin of the dog so firmly, as to be detached from their
natural situation; but there is no reason to believe that they can be
darted out or projected by any exertion of the animal. Ælian, Anim.
Nat. B. i. c. 31, and B. xii. c. 26, describes the hystrix; see also
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 30.—B.
1837 Cuvier remarks, that this account of the bear is
generally correct; he points out, however, certain errors, which will
be duly noticed. Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. vi. c. 3, gives an account of the
parturition of the bear.—B.
1838 This description of their mode of coupling, though
from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 30, is not correct. Buffon and
other naturalists assure us that they do not differ herein from other
quadrupeds.—B.
1839 Aristotle says, that the cubs are born blind, without
hair, and that their limbs are ill formed, which is correct; but the
account here given is greatly exaggerated.—B.
1840 As the birth takes place when the mother is in
her winter retreat, it can have been witnessed only when in the
menagerie.—B.
1841 This is referred to in B. xxviii. c. 46; this property
of the fat of the bear is also mentioned by Galen and by Dioscorides,
and it still retains its place among our popular remedies; but it is
difficult to conceive that it can have any virtue above other fatty
substances of the same consistence.—B.
1842 This, which appears to be a vulgar error, is mentioned
by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 17; by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. vi.
c. 3; and by Oppian, Halieut. B. ii.—B.
1843 We have a somewhat similar account in the treatise De
Mirab. Auscult. p. 1155.—B.
1845 This apparent anomaly has been attempted to be
explained, by supposing that the bears lay up a plentiful store of
provisions in their winter retreats, which they consume while they
remain without exercise.—B.
1846 Pliny enumerates, at considerable length, the varieties
of aros, in B. xxiv. c. 92; it is also described in B. xix. c. 30; it
is probably a species of arum.—B. See pp. 299, 300, N. 1815.
1848 This supposed noxious quality is entirely without
foundation.—B.
1849 This probably refers more particularly to the mode in
which the bear descends from trees or poles, in the supine posture,
not, as is the case in most other animals, with the head downwards.—B.
1851 It appears, from the remarks of Cuvier, to be still
doubtful whether the bear be really a native of Africa; see Ajasson,
vol. vi. p. 457; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 466.—B.
1852 It is supposed that the white mouse of Pontus,
mentioned also by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 17, is the ermine,
or else the marten; but, as Cuvier remarks, Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 457,
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 467, the ermine does not hibernate.—B.
1853 Cuvier, ubi supra, conceives that the Alpine mouse
is the marmot; but he remarks, that it is inferior in size to the
badger.—B.
1854 Cuvier, ubi supra, conceives the Egyptian mouse to
be the jerboa, the Mus jaculus of Linnæus; but it is much smaller than
the marmot. Pliny, in B. x. c. 85, says, that the Egyptian mouse walks
on two feet, as does the mouse of the Alps. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
vii. c. 37, and Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. xv. c. 26, refer to the mouse of
Egypt.—B. Probably the Mus cahirinus.
1855 The faculty which these and other animals possess
of foreseeing the weather and the future direction of the wind, is
mentioned by Plutarch, and as existing especially in the hedgehog. It
is also mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 6; but it is not
confined, as Pliny states, to its change in one direction only. It
has been suggested by some commentators, that, by a slight alteration
in the text, the statement may be extended to a change of the wind in
either direction, Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 468.—B.
1856 The teasel, or carding thistle, is now used for this
purpose; as also iron wires, crooked and sharpened at the point. Not a
single quill, probably of the hedgehog, is now used in the manufacture
of cloth.
1857 Dalechamps suggests that these complaints were probably
to the effect that thistles and thorns were employed instead of the
quills of the hedgehog; that the skin of the hedgehog was brought to
market in a bad state; and again, that the rich merchants were in
the habit of buying them up, and forestalling the market. Hardouin
quotes an edict of the Emperor Zeno against monopolies of hedgehogs
and carding materials, if, indeed, that is the meaning of the word
“pectinum.”
1858 These statements are from the treatise De Mirab. Ausc.,
but, as Cuvier remarks, are fabulous, Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 470;
Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 458.—B.
1863 It is not unusual for animals to cover their excrements
with earth, probably from the fact of their being annoyed by the
unpleasant odour.—B.
1864 This statement respecting the “meles,” or badger, as
well as what is said of the prescience of the squirrel, is without
foundation. There has been some difference of opinion respecting the
identity of the animal, which Pliny calls “meles;” by some it has been
supposed to be the polecat, or else the weasel.—B.
1865 This bears reference to what is said of bears in c. 54,
and of Alpine mice and hedgehogs.
1866 This statement is contrary to the account given by
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 15; he says, that while other
serpents conceal themselves in holes in the earth, vipers conceal
themselves under rocks.—B.
1867 Cuvier remarks, Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 458, Lemaire, vol.
iii. p. 473, that nothing is more striking, either to the vulgar or to
the man of science, than the long abstinence from food which serpents
are capable of enduring.—B.
1869 This is the case with the Helix Pomatia, and still more
so with the Helix Neritoidea, which is very common in the neighbourhood
of Nice, and which, at the approach of winter, is furnished with an
operculum of great thickness.—B.
1871 See B. iv. c. 23. The Romans valued them as a delicate
food.
1872 This account appears to be principally from Aristotle,
Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 29.—B.
1873 According to Cuvier, Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 458, and
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 475, the species of lizard named monitor,
frequently exceeds this size; but he remarks, in reference to the size
of the Indian lizard, that none of the saurians, except the crocodile,
attains the length here mentioned.—B.
1877 This anecdote is referred to by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B.
vi. c. 25. He gives an account of the dog of Gelon, Anim. Nat. B. vi.
c. 62, and Var. Hist. B. i. c. 13.—B.
1878 Tzetzes, Chil. iii. of his History, calls her Ditizela,
and thus alludes to this story: “The said Nicomedes had a dog of very
large size, and of Molossian breed, which manifested great fidelity to
him. One day seeing his mistress, the wife of Nicomedes, and the mother
of Prusias, Zielus, and Lysandra, Ditizela, by name, and a Phrygian
by birth, toying with the king, he took her for an enemy, and rushing
on her, tore her right shoulder.” It is supposed that she died of the
injuries thus received. Some editions call her Condingis, and others
Cosingis.
1879 A. Cascellius was an eminent Roman jurist, but
nothing seems to be known of his preceptor, Volcatius, whose prænomen
is thought to have been Mucius. Cascellius was noted for his great
eloquence and his stern republican principles; and of Cæsar’s conduct
and government he spoke with the greatest freedom. He never advanced
in civic honours beyond the quæstorship, though he was offered the
consulship by Augustus; which he declined. He is frequently quoted
in the Digest. Horace, in his Art of Poetry, ll. 371, 372, pays a
compliment to the legal reputation of Cascellius, who is also mentioned
by Valerius Maximus and Macrobius.
1880 From Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vii. c. 10, it appears that
his name was Cælius Calvus, but probably no further particulars are
known of him.
1881 He was a distinguished Roman eques, and a friend of
Germanicus; for which reason he incurred the hatred of Sejanus. To
satisfy the vengeance of Tiberius and his favourite Sejanus, one
Latinus Latiaris, a supposed friend of Sabinus, induced him to speak
in unguarded terms of Sejanus and Tiberius, and then betrayed his
confidence. He was put to death in prison.
1882 More commonly called the Gradus or Scalæ Gemoniæ, “the
stairs of wailing;” a place down which the bodies of the criminals were
thrown, when executed in prison.—B.
1883 “Lorum,” the leather thong by which the dogs were held
until the proper moment, when they were “let slip” upon their prey.
1884 This is mentioned by Gratian, Cyneget. l. 237.—B.
1885 This practice is mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
viii. c. 33, and Diodorus Siculus, B. xvii. But Cuvier informs us, that
neither the tiger nor the panther are capable of generating with the
dog; he supposes that the account was invented to enhance the value of
the spotted or striped dogs, which were brought from India.—B.
1886 The dog is capable of generating with the wolf; and
as what is termed the shepherd’s dog much resembles the wolf, Cuvier
conceives it not impossible, that it may have originated from this
mixture; Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 459; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 481.—B.
1887 This is mentioned by Ælian, in his Anim. Nat. B. vi. c.
53, and his Var. Hist. B. i. c. 4. It likewise forms the subject of one
of Phædrus’s Fables.
1888 These statements are probably, for the most part, from
Aristotle, Hist. Anim, B. v. c. 14, and B. vi. c. 20.—B.
1889 “Faunos cerni.” Hardouin remarks on these words;
“Flitting before the sight, and rushing upon each other, like the
Ephialtes,” and refers, for a farther explanation, to his commentary
on the passage in B. xxv. c. 10, where the subject is treated more at
large. The Ephialtes is generally supposed to have been what we term
incubus or nightmare.—B.
1891 Pliny details the noxious effects, conceived to be
produced by the influence of Sirius, in B. ii. c. 40, and, among
others, its tendency to produce canine madness. In B. xxix. c. 32,
he enumerates the various remedies proposed for the disease; these,
however, are equally inefficacious with those mentioned here.—B.
1892 We have an account of this disease in Celsus, B. v. c.
27, and especially of the peculiar symptom from which it derives its
classical denomination. It is remarkable that Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
viii. c. 22, speaking of canine madness, says, that it is communicated
by the dog to all animals, except man.—B. See B. vii. c. 13.
1893 It appears that there was a difference of opinion as to
the number of days during which the Dog-star continued to exercise its
influence.—B.
1894 The history of this supposed discovery is related more
at large, B. xxv. c. 2 and 6. The popular name of the plant is still
the “dog-rose.”—B.
1895 Columella says, that the operation prevents the tail
from acquiring “fœdum incrementum,” “a foul increase;” and, as many
shepherds say, secures the animal from the disease.—B.
1896 This is one of the marvellous tales related by Julius
Obsequens, c. 103.—B.
1897 Plutarch, in his Life of Alexander, gives some account
of this celebrated horse, and Aulus Gellius, B. v. c. 2, devotes a
chapter to it.—B.
1898 Ajasson estimates the price to have been 70,200 francs,
£2925 sterling.—B.
1899 Situate on the river Hydaspes; Q. Curtius calls it
Bucephalus.—B. See B. vi. c. 23, where it is called Bucephala.
1900 This account is given by Suetonius, Life of Julius
Cæsar, c. 61. Cuvier suggests that the hoofs may have been notched,
and that the sculptor probably exaggerated the peculiarity, so as to
produce the resemblance to a human foot.—B.
1901 The nephew of Tiberius and the father of the Emperor
Caligula.—B.
1902 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xii. c. 40, states that
three mares of Miltiades and Evagoras, which had been victorious
in the Olympic games, were buried with sepulchral honours in the
Ceramicus.—B.
1903 Ajasson suggests, with much plausibility, that when
connections of this description are mentioned, the report originated
from persons who had significant names, as Lebœuf and Poulain;
analogous to our names of Lamb, Bull, Hog, &c.—B.
1905 We here find Pliny tripping, for he has previously
said, in B. vii. c. 1, that man is the only animated being that sheds
tears. See also c. 19 of the present Book, where he represents the lion
as shedding tears.
1906 Ælian calls him Centoarates. Antiochus I., or Soter, is
here alluded to. He was killed in battle with the Galli or Galatians,
B.C. 261.
1907 Mentioned by Cicero, De Divin. B. i. c. 33.—B.
1908 Hardouin refers to the works of Busbequius, in which we
meet with nearly the same account of the sagacity of the horse, as in
Pliny; Lemaire, iii. 489.
1909 As already mentioned in the Note to c. 54 of the last
Book, there were four parties or factions of the charioteers who were
named from the colour of their dress.
1910 The games of the Circus were divided into the Patrician
and the Plebeian; the first being conducted by generals, consuls, and
the curule ædiles, the latter by the ædiles of the people.—B.
1911 Related somewhat more at large by Plutarch, in his Life
of Publicola.—B.
1912 Many of these particulars are from Aristotle, Hist.
Anim. B. vi. c. 22.—B.
1918 Varro, ubi supra, gives considerably different
directions on this point; he says, “Intercourse is to be allowed, at
the proper season of the year, twice a day, morning and evening.”
1919 This sentence in Columella, ubi supra, seems to
illustrate the meaning, which is somewhat obscure. “Veruntamen
nec minus quam quindecim, nec plures quam viginti, unus debet
implere”—“One male ought to be coupled with not more than twenty
females, nor less than fifteen.”
1920 Cuvier states, that the hippomanes is a concretion
occasionally found in the liquor amnii of the mare, and which it
devours, from the same kind of instinctive feeling which causes
quadrupeds generally to devour the afterbirth. He remarks, however,
that this can have no connection with the attachment which the mother
bears to her offspring; Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 459; Lemaire, vol. iii. p.
495. The hippomanes is said to have been employed by the sorceresses of
antiquity, as an ingredient in their amatory potions. See Aristotle,
Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 24, and Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. xiv. c. 18.—B.
See also B. xxviii. c. 11.
1922 The accounts given, by Phœnician navigators, of the
fertility of Lusitania, and the frequency of the mild western breezes,
gave rise to the fable here mentioned, which has been generally
received by the ancients; and that not merely by the poets, as Virgil,
Geor. B. iii. l. 274, 275, but by practical writers, as Varro, B.
ii. c. 1, and Columella, B. vi. c. 27. Justin, however, B. xliv. c.
3, attributes the opinion to the great size of the horses, and their
remarkable fleetness, from which they were said to be the sons of the
wind.—B.
1923 The origin and meaning of this name is not known.—B.
1924 Martial describes the peculiar short, quick step of the
“asturco,” in one of his Epigrams, B. xiv. Ep. 199.—B.
1925 “Alterno crurum explicatu glomeratio;” it would not be
possible to give a literal translation, but we may judge of the meaning
by the context.—B. He clearly alludes to a movement like our canter.
1926 “Tolutim carpere incursus;” Hardouin explains this by
a reference to Plautus, Asinaria, A. iii. sc. 3, l. 116. “Tolutim ni
badizas”—“If you do not amble, lifting up your feet.”
1927 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 24, gives an account
of the diseases of horses.—B.
1928 “Genere veterino;” so called, according to Hardouin,
from “vectura,” “carriage,” as applicable to horses, asses, and mules;
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 497.—B.
1929 There is considerable difficulty in ascertaining the
exact amount of sums of money mentioned by the ancients. “We read in
Varro, B. ii. c. 1, and B. ii. c. 8, of enormous prices said to have
been given for asses, and the particular case of Axius is mentioned,
B. iii. c. 2; according to the usual estimate, the sum here mentioned
amounts to upwards of £3200 sterling.—B.
1931 Varro, B. i. c. 20, and B. iii. c. 16, and Columella,
B. vii. c. 1, enlarge upon the valuable qualities of the ass for
agricultural purposes; Columella, B. vi. c. 37, treats at length upon
the production of mules.—B.
1932 See a passage in Plautus, in which the superior
excellence of the asses of Arcadia is referred to; Asinaria, A. ii. sc.
2, l. 67.—B.
1934 This property is mentioned by Herodotus, B. iv. c. 28,
and by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 27, also De Gener. Anim. B.
ii. c. 8, and by Strabo, B. vii. The ass is a native of Arabia, and
degenerates when brought into a cold climate.—B.
1935 These circumstances appear to have been taken from
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 14, and B. vi. c. 23.—B.
1936 “Per raritatem eorum translucentibus fluviis.”—B.
1938 An epigram of Martial, B. xiii. Ep. 97, appears to
refer to the employment of the young ass as an article of food.—B. The
famous sausages of Bologna are made, it is said, of asses’ flesh.
1939 The onager, according to Cuvier, is the same with the
ass, in the wild state; it still exists in large herds in various parts
of Southern Asia, and is called by the Tartars, Kulan.—B.
1940 Most of the circumstances here mentioned appear to have
been taken from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 24 and 36; Varro, B.
ii. c. 8; and Columella, B. vi. c. 37.—B.
1941 It is expressly stated by Columella, ubi supra, that
the mules “produced from a horse and a female ass, are in all respects
most like the mother.”
1942 This is explained by Columella, ubi supra, who
remarks, that when a stallion is admitted to a female in the full heat
of its passion, it often causes mischief; which is not the case when
its ardour has been a little subdued by having been worked for some
time.—B.
1943 Varro, ubi supra, says: “The produce of a mare and a
male ass is a mule, of a horse and a female ass a hinnus.”
1944 Varro, B. ii. c. 1, alludes to this occurrence; Livy
mentions two instances, B. xxvi. c. 23, and B. xxxvii. c. 3; these
prodigies were said both to have occurred at Reate.—B.
1945 Herodotus relates two cases, which were regarded as
presaging some extraordinary event, B. iii. c. 153, and B. vii. c. 57.
Juvenal, Sat. xiii. l. 66, and Suetonius, Life of Galba, c. 4, speak of
a pregnant mule as a most extraordinary circumstance; it seems to have
given rise to a proverbial expression among the Romans.—B.
1946 Cuvier remarks, that there is, in the deserts of
Asia, a peculiar animal, with undivided hoofs, the Equus hemionus
of naturalists, and the Dgiggetai of the Tartars, which bears a
resemblance to our mules, but is not the produce of the horse and the
ass; he refers us to Professor Pallas’s account of it in Acad. Petrop.
Nov. Com. vol. xix. p. 394; Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 461; Lemaire, vol.
iii. p. 505.—B.
1947 Pliny repeats this advice in B. xxx. c. 53; it is, of
course, entirely without foundation.—B.
1948 The epigram of Martial previously referred to bears
this title.—B. See N. 1938, p. 324.
1949 This temple was the Parthenon. This anecdote is
mentioned by Arist. Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 24; Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. vi.
c. 49.—B.
1950 In which they probably exposed their samples for sale,
as our farmers do in small bags. The phrase is ἀπὸ τῶν τηλιῶν,
in Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 24, from whom Pliny takes the
story.
1951 This alleged superiority is mentioned by Aristotle,
Hist. Anim. B. iii. c. 91, by Varro, B. ii. c. 5, and by Columella,
B. vi. c. 1; but it is remarked by Dalechamps and Hardouin, that the
appellation of Pyrrhic given to these oxen, was more probably derived
from their red colour, πυῤῥὸς, than from the name of the king.
The materials of this chapter are principally from the above writers,
especially Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 21, and B. viii. c. 7.—B.
1952 This singular notion is mentioned by Varro and
Columella, ubi supra; Cuvier says, that it is the origin of the
pretended secret of producing the sexes at pleasure, which was
published by Millot; Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 461.—B.
1954 This is mentioned by Herodotus, B. iv. c. 183; this
peculiarity in their mode of taking their food is ascribed to the
extraordinary length of the horns; it is also mentioned by Ælian, Anim.
Nat. B. xvi. c. 33.—B.
1955 “Fœdi visu.” This is very similar to the expression
used by Virgil, Georg. B. iii., when describing the points of an ox, l.
52,—“oui turpi caput”—“the head of which is unsightly”— probably in
allusion to its large size.
1956 According to Cuvier, there is an ox, in warm climates,
which has a mass of fat on the shoulders, and whose horns are only
attached to the skin; Buffon has described it under the name of Zebu;
Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 461; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 512.—B.
1957 “Ad laborer damnantur;” with respect to the colour,
Varro, B. ii. c. 5, has the following remarks: “The best colours are
black, red, pale red, and white. The latter ones are the most delicate,
the first the most hardy. Of the two middle ones, the first is the
best, and both are more valuable than the first and last.”
1958 We have an account of this process in Columella, B. ii.
c. 6.—B.
1959 This anecdote is related by Valerius Maximus, B. viii.
c. 1. Virgil, Georg. B. ii. l. 537, speaks of the use of oxen in food,
as a proof of the degeneracy of later times, and as not existing during
the Golden Age; “Ante Impia quad cœsis gens est epulata juvencis.”
This feeling is alluded to by Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. xii. c. 34, and by
Suetonius, Life of Domitian, c. ix.—B.
1960 It is doubtful whether this is the meaning of “alternos
replicans orbes,” or what indeed is the meaning. Most editions omit
“orbes,” thus making the matter still worse.
1961 Hardouin supposes that this alludes to the exhibition
of oxen hunted at the exhibition of shows and in the Circus, for the
gratification of the Roman people.—B.
1962 Referred to by Virgil, Georg. B. ii. ll. 145, 146, “et
maxima taurus Victima,” “and the bull the largest victim of all.”—B.
1963 In reference to this remark, we may mention the passage
in Virgil, Æn. B. iii. c. 119, “Taurum Neptuno, taurum tibi, pulcher
Apollo.” “A bull to thee, Neptune, a bull to thee, beauteous Apollo.”
1964 Instances are mentioned by Livy, B. xxxv. c. 21, and by
Val. Maximus, B. i. c. 65.—B.
1965 We have an account of Apis in Herodotus, B. iii. c. 28;
also in Pomponius Mela, B. i. c. 9; and in Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. xi. c.
10.—B.
1966 “Quem cantharum appellant.” According to Dalechamps,
“So called from the blackness of the colour, and its resemblance to a
beetle.” Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 516. He refers the reader to a further
account in B. xxx. c. 30.—B.
1968 Tacitus, Ann. B. ii. c. 69, gives an account of the
sickness of Germanicus after his return from Egypt, but does not refer
to the circumstance here mentioned.—B.
1970 Seneca, Quæst. Nat. B. iv. c. 2, gives an account of
this ceremony, but does not refer to the birth of Apis.—B.
1971 The contents of this Chapter appear to be principally
from Varro, B. ii. cc. 1, 2, and Columella, B. vii. cc. 2, 3, 4.—B.
1972 This account is probably from Aristotle, Hist. Anim.
B. v. c. 14; B. vi. c. 19; and B. ix. c. 3, where we have various
particulars respecting the production and mode of life of the
sheep.—B.
1975 Varro, ubi supra, gives a somewhat different account:
“Those lambs are called ‘cordi,’ which are born after their time, and
have remained in the womb, called χορίον, from which they take
that name.”—B.
1976 The expression “senecta melior,” here employed, is
limited by Columella, ubi supra, to the third year.—B.
1977 Columella, B. vii. c. 8, remarks, “When deprived of his
horns he knows himself to be disarmed, as it were, and is not so ready
to quarrel and is less vehement in his passion.”
1978 Columella, B. vii. c. 23, refers to this practice; he
informs us, B. vi, c. 28, that it is practised with respect to the
horse. It is also referred to by Aristotle, De Gen. Anim. B. iv. c.
1.—B.
1979 For this we have the authority of Aristotle, ubi
supra, and of Columella, ubi supra, who quotes from Virgil in
support of it, Geor. B. iii. l. 387, et seq.—B. “Although the ram be
white himself, if there is a black tongue beneath the palate, reject
him, that he may not tinge the fleece of the young with black spots.”
1980 Varro, B. ii. c. 2, remarks, “While the coupling is
taking place, you must use the same water; for if it is changed, it
will render the wool spotted, and injure the womb.”
1981 “Tectæ.” The context shows that this means covered with
skins or a woollen girth, probably on account of their delicate nature,
while the common sheep of husbandry, or the “colonic” sheep, were able
to endure the rigour of the weather without any such protection.
1982 The words are tectum and colonicum; Columella, B.
vii. c. 4, uses the terms molle and hirsutum, and Varro, B. ii. c.
2, pellitum and hirtum. The first obtained its name from its being
covered with skins, to protect its delicate fleece. The colonic is so
called, from “colonus,” a “husbandman,” this kind being so common as to
be found in any village; whereas the tectæ were rare.
1983 We have some account of the Arabian sheep in Ælian,
Anim. Nat. B. x. c. 4.—B. Columella says, that the wool which was
brought over to make these coverings, was only to be obtained at a very
great price.
1984 The greatest part of this Chapter appears to be taken,
with little variation, from Columella, B. vii. c. 2-4.—B.
1985 Here Pliny differs from Columella, who remarks, B. vii.
c. 2, “Our people considered the Milesian, Calabrian, and Apulian wool
as of excellent quality, and the Tarentine the best of all.”
1986 “Pænula” was a check cloak, used chiefly by the Romans
when travelling, instead of the toga, as a protection against the cold
and rain. It was used by women as well as men. It was long, and without
sleeves, and with only an opening for the head. Women were forbidden by
Alexander Severus to wear it in the city. It was made particularly of
the woolly substance known as gausapa.
1987 The wool of Laodicea is celebrated by Strabo, B.
xii.—B.
1988 Columella, B. vii. c. 2, particularly notices the
excellence of the wool of Altinum, situate near the mouth of the
Padus or Po. The following epigram of Martial, B. xiv. c. 155, may
be presumed to convey the opinion of the respective merits of the
different kinds of wool; it is entitled “Lanæ albæ:” “Velleribus primis
Apulia; Parma secundis Nobilis; Altinum tertia laudat ovis.” “Apulia is
famed for its fleeces of the first quality, Parma for the second, while
Altinum is praised for those of the third.”—B.
1990 Varro remarks, B. ii. c. 2, that the term “vellus,”
obviously from “vello,” “to pluck,” proves that the wool was anciently
plucked from the sheep, before shearing had been invented.—B.
1991 “Quas nativas appellant.” The term “nativa,” as applied
to the wool, has been supposed to refer to those fleeces that possess a
natural colour, and do not require to be dyed.—B.
1992 Martial, B. xiv. Ep. 157, calls the fleeces of
Pollentia “lugentes,” “mournful,” from their black colour; they are
also mentioned by Columella, ubi supra, and by Silius Italicus, B.
viii. l. 599.—B.
1993 Martial, B. v. c. 37, describing the charms of a lady,
says, “surpassing with her locks the fleece of the Bætic sheep,” no
doubt referring to the colour. In another Epigram, B. xii. E. 200, he
speaks of the “aurea vellera,” the “golden fleece” of Bætis.—B.
1994 Martial has two Epigrams on the wool of Canusium, B.
xiv. E. 127, and E. 129. In the former it is designated as “fusca,”
tawny; in the latter, “rufa,” red.—B.
1996 The term here used, “succidus,” is explained by Varro,
B. ii. c. 11: “While the newly-clipped wool has the sweat in it, it is
called ‘succida.’” See B. xxix. c. 9.
1997 “Pexis vestibus.” According to Hardouin, the “pexa
vestis,” was worn by the rich, and had a long and prominent nap, in
contradistinction to the smooth or worn cloths. He refers to a passage
in Horace, B. i. Ep. i. l. 95, and to one in Martial, B. ii. E. 58,
which appear to sanction this explanation. See Lem. vol. iii. p.
524.—B.
Od. B. iv. l. 427. “And to throw on fair coverlets of purple, and to
lay carpets upon them.”
2001 These were probably much like what we call “Turkey”
carpets.
2002 The name given to this article, “lana coacta,”
“compressed wool,” correctly designates its texture. The manufacturers
of it were called “lanarii coactores,” and “lanarii coactiliarii.”
2003 “I have macerated unbleached flax in vinegar saturated
with salt, and after compression have obtained a felt, with a power of
resistance quite comparable with that of the famous armour of Conrad of
Montferrat; seeing that neither the point of a sword, nor even balls
discharged from fire-arms, were able to penetrate it.” Memoir on the
substance called Pilina, by Papadopoulo-Vretos, on the Mem. presented
to the Royal Academy of Inscriptions and Belles Lettres, 1845, as
quoted by Littré.
2004 Pliny probably conceived that by the removal of
all the grease from the wool, or the “purgamentum,” it became less
combustible.—B.
2005 “Tomentum;” an Epigram of Martial, B. xiv. E. 160,
explains the meaning of this word.—B.
2007 Probably in the form of what we call “palliasses.”
2008 The “gausapa,” or “gausapum,” was a kind of thick
cloth, very woolly on one side, and used especially for covering
tables, beds, and making cloaks to keep out the wet and cold. The
wealthier Romans had it made of the finest wool, and mostly of a purple
colour. It seems also to have been sometimes made of linen, but still
with a rough surface.
2009 From ἀμφίμαλλα, “napped on both sides.” They
probably resembled our baizes or druggets, or perhaps the modern
blanket.
2010 Pliny again makes mention of the “ventrale,” or apron,
in B. xxvii. c. 28.
2011 He seems to allude here to the substance of which the
laticlave tunic was made, and not any alteration in its cut or shape.
Some further information on the laticlave or broad-striped tunic will
be found in B. x. c. 63.
2012 About the time of Augustus, the Romans began to
exchange the “toga,” which had previously been their ordinary garment,
for the more convenient “lacerna” and “pænula,” which were less
encumbered with folds, and better adapted for the usual occupations of
life.—B.
2015 This deity was also called Sangus, or Semo Sancus;
and Ovid, Fasti, B. vi. c. 216, et seq., gives us much information
concerning him. He was of Sabine origin, and identical with Hercules
and Dius Fidius. If we may judge from the derivation of the name, it is
not improbable that he presided over the sanctity of oaths. His temple
at Rome was on the Quirinal, opposite to that of Quirinus, and near the
gate which from him derived the name of “Sanqualis porta.” He was said
to have been the father of the Sabine hero Sabus.
2016 According to the commonly received account, Tanaquil
was the wife of Tarquinius Priscus, and a native of Etruria; when she
removed to Rome, and her husband became king, her name was changed to
Caia Cæcilia.—B.
2017 “Undulata;” it has been suggested that this means the
same as our stuffs which we term “watered.”—B.
2018 “Tunica recta;” according to Festus, it was “so called
from being woven perpendicularly by people standing.”—B. It probably
means woven from top to bottom and cross-wise in straight lines.
2019 “Toga pura;” so called from being white, without a
mixture of any other colour.
2020 “Sororiculata;” there is much uncertainty respecting
the derivation of this word and its meaning, but it is generally
supposed to signify some kind of stuff, composed of a mixture of
different ingredients or of different colours.—B. “Orbiculata,” “with
round spots,” is one reading, and probably the correct one.
2021 According to Hardouin, these were cloths which imitated
the crisp and prominent hair of the Phryxian fleece, Lemaire, vol. iii.
p. 529. Some editions read “Phrygianas.”
2022 “Papaverata;” there is considerable difficulty in
ascertaining the meaning of this word, as applied to garments. Pliny,
in two other passages, speaks of a certain species of poppy—“from
this, linens receive a peculiar whiteness,” B. xix. “From this, linens
receive a brilliant whiteness in time,” B. xx. c. 78. It would appear,
in these cases, that the fibres of the stem of the poppy were mixed
with the flax; though, perhaps, this would be scarcely practicable with
wool.—B.
2023 The prætexta is described by Varro as a white toga,
with a purple band; it was worn by males, until their seventeenth year,
and by young women until their marriage.—B.
2024 The trabea differed from the prætexta, in being
ornamented with stripes (trabes) of purple, whence its name.—B.
2025 Helen is introduced, Il. B. iii. l. 125, weaving
an embroidered garment, in which were figured the battles of the
Greeks and Trojans. It was probably somewhat of the nature of modern
tapestry.—B.
2027 This passage, in which the needle is said to have been
used, proves that when the word “pictæ” is applied to garments, it is
equivalent to our term “embroidered.”—B.
2028 Pliny refers to the “Attalica tunica,” B. xxxiii. c.
29, and to the “Attalica vestis,” B. xxxvi. c. 20, and B. xxxvii. c. 6;
Propertius speaks of “Attalica aulæa,” B. ii. c. 32, l. 12, “Attalicas
torus,” B. ii. c. 13, l. 22, and B. iv. c. 5, l. 24, and “Attalicæ
vestes,” B. iii. c. 18, l. 19.—B.
2029 Plautus, Stich. A. ii. s. 2, l. 54, speaks of
“Babylonica peristromata, consuta tapetia,” “Babylonian hangings, and
embroidered tapestry;” and Martial, B. viii. Ep. 28, l. 17, 18, of
“Babylonica texta,” “Babylonian textures.”—B.
2030 From Martial’s epigram, entitled “Cubicularia
polymita,” B. xiv. Ep. 150, we may conclude that the Egyptian polymita
were formed in a loom, and of the nature of tapestry, while the
Babylonian were embroidered with the needle. Plautus probably refers
to the Egyptian tapestry, in the Pseud. A. i. s. 2, l. 14, “Neque
Alexandrina belluata conchyliata tapetia”—“Nor yet the Alexandrine
tapestries, figured over with beasts and shells.”
2031 “Scutulis divider.” This term may mean “squares,”
“diamonds,” or “lozenges,” something like the segments into which a
spider’s web is divided. It is not improbable that he alludes here to
the plaids of the Gallic nations.
2032 We have an account of this contention in Plutarch, and
we may presume that this accusation was produced at that time.—B.
2033 The first sum amounts to about £4,600 sterling, the
latter to £23,000.—B.
2034 The following lines in Ovid, Fasti, B. vi. l. 569, et
seq., have been supposed to refer to this temple, and prove that the
account of it is correct.
“Lux eadem, Fortuna, tuaque est, auctorque, locusque.
“Sed superinjectis quis latet æde togis?
“Servius est....”
“The same day is thine, O Fortune; the same the builder, the same the
site. But who is this that lies hid beneath the garments covering him?
It is Servius.”
2035 Perhaps “changed their colour” may be a better
translation of “defluxisse.”
2036 “Sesquipedalibus libris.” It seems impossible to
translate this literally. Hardouin explains it by supposing that the
fleeces were dyed in strips of three colours, each strip being half a
foot in breadth, and that three of these required a pound of the dyeing
materials.—B.
2037 Pliny probably took this from Varro, B. ii. c. 2. This
term is derived from πείκω, “to shear,” with the negative
prefix.—B.
2038 The word “cubitales” alone is used, which might
be supposed to refer only to the length of the tail; but Hardouin
conceives that it must also apply to the breadth, and refers to
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 28, and others, in proof of the
great size which the tails of the Syrian sheep attain, and which would
not be indicated by merely saying that they are a cubit long; this
being little more than the ordinary length in other countries.—B.
2039 According to Hardouin, this term, or some word nearly
resembling it, was applied to mules or mongrels, as well as to
individual animals of diminutive size or less perfect form.—B. Called
“moufflon” by the French.
2040 The term “umbri” appears to have been applied to a
mongrel or less perfect animal; like “musmon,” it is of uncertain
derivation.—B.
2041 So also Varro, ubi supra, and Columella, B. vii. c.
3.—B. See also B. xviii. c. 76.
2042 This remark, and the others in the remainder of this
Chapter, appear to be taken from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c.
3.—B.
2043 We have an account of the generation of the goat in
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 19. Ælian, Anim. Nat. B. iii. c. 38,
says that the goats of Egypt sometimes produce five young ones at a
birth.—B.
2044 Columella, B. vii. c. 6, gives a somewhat different
account; he says, “Before its sixth year it is old—so that when five
years old, it is not suitable for coupling.”—B.
2045 According to Columella, ubi supra, “Because those
with horns are usually troublesome, from their uncertainty of
temper.”—B.
2046 There has been considerable difference of opinion
respecting the reading of the original, whether the word “utiles,”
or “inutiles,” was the one here employed. Hardouin conceives it was
the latter, and endeavours to reconcile the sense with this reading;
Lemaire, vol. iii. pp. 538, 539. But, notwithstanding his high
authority, there is still great doubt on the matter.—B.
2047 “Infractis,” probably in contradistinction to erect
ears. Columella, ubi supra, terms them, “flaccidis et prægrandibus
auribus”—“flaccid ears, and very large.”—B.
2048 “Laciniæ;” Varro, B. ii. c. 3, describes them as
“mammulas pensiles;” Columella, ubi supra, calls them “verruculas;”
he, however, assigns this appendage to the male goat.—B.
2049 The word “mutilus” is employed, which Hardouin
interprets, “having had the horns removed.” But the same word is
applied by Columella, B. vii. c. 6, to an animal naturally without
horns.—B.
2050 On this reference to Archelaus, Dalechamps remarks that
he is incorrect; but refers to Varro, ubi supra, who ascribes this
opinion to Archelaus; Lemaire. vol. iii. p. 540.—B.
2051 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. i. c. 9, refers to this
opinion, as being erroneous; Ælian. Hist. Anim. B. i. c. 53, supposes
that they breathe both through the nose and the ears.—B.
2052 Varro, ubi supra, remarks, “that no one in his senses
speaks of a goat in health; for they are never without fever.”
2053 Meaning those who cannot see at night, who have a weak
sight, and therefore require a strong light to distinguish objects.
See also, as to the Nyctalopes, B. xxviii. c. 47. The same remedy, the
liver of the goat, is recommended for its cure.—B. See also B. xxviii.
c. 11.
2054 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 28, says that the
inhabitants of Cilicia shear the goats in the same manner as the
sheep.—B.
2055 This is mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c.
3.—B.
2056 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 3, refers to the beard
of the goat, under the name of ἤρυγγον.
2057 According to Hardouin, the herb referred to is the
“eryngium;” probably the “eringo:” he cites various authorities in
support of his opinion.—B.
2059 Varro, B. i. c. 2, says: “Hence it is that they
sacrificed no goats to Minerva, on account of the olive;” he then
explains why the circumstance of the goat injuring the olive-tree was
a reason for not offering it in sacrifice to Minerva, the patroness of
this tree. Ovid, on the other hand, in the Fasti, B. i. l. 360, says
that the goat was sacrificed to Bacchus, because it gnawed the vine.
2060 We have an account of the hog in Varro, B. ii. c. 4,
from whom most of Pliny’s remarks are probably derived.—B.
2061 Varro, B. ii. c. 4, and Columella, B. vii. c. 9. fix
upon the seventh year.—B.
2062 Varro, and Columella, ubi supra, recommend that the
sow should not be allowed to rear more than eight young ones at each
birth.—B.
2064 Varro, ubi supra, says on the tenth day; Hardouin
endeavours to prove that the number in Varro was originally five.—B.
2065 The term “bidens,” employed by Pliny, although it
literally means “having two teeth,” has been referred to the age of the
animal, as indicated rather by the respective size of the teeth than by
their number. It has been supposed to designate an animal of two years
old, when the canine teeth of the lower jaw had become prominent.—B.
2066 This is also referred to by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
vi. c. 18, but is without foundation.—B.
2067 Aristotle, ubi supra, B. viii. c. 26. It is mentioned
as a frequent occurrence by Plautus, Trinum. A. ii. s. 4, l. 139.—B.
2068 Columella, B. vii. c. 10, gives directions for the
treatment of hogs affected with scrofula. The name of the disease has
been supposed to be derived from the frequency of its occurrence in
this animal, anciently called “scrofa.”
2069 It may appear unnecessary to refer to authorities on
this subject, which is a matter of daily observation; it has, however,
been stated by some naturalists, that the hog, in its wild state, does
not exhibit any of the filthy propensities so generally observed in it
when domesticated.—B.
2070 This saying is found in Varro, B. ii. c. 4; it is
referred to by Cicero, De Nat. Deor. B. ii. c. 64, and ascribed to
Chrysippus; “ne putisceret, animam ipsam pro sale datam.”—B. “That
they are only of use for their flesh, which is kept from putridity by
their life, which acts as salt.”
2071 Pliny speaks of this more at large in B. xxviii. c.
60.—B.
2072 This operation, and the effect of it, are mentioned
by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 79, and by Columella, B. vii. c.
9.—B.
2073 There were three Romans of this name, celebrated
for their skill in gastronomy; of these the most illustrious lived
in the reigns of Augustus and Tiberius. A treatise (probably
spurious) is extant, to which his name is attached, entitled “De Arte
Culinariâ”—“On the Art of Cookery.” Pliny refers to him again, B. xix.
c. 41, and he is mentioned by many others of the classical writers.—B.
2074 See B. x. c. 1. A much more cruel mode of increasing
the liver of this animal, by confining it in hot ovens, is practised at
the present day, to satisfy the palate of the admirers of the Strasburg
patés de foies gras.
2075 Pliny, in B. ix. c. 66, employs the expression
“tonsillæ in homine, in sue glandulæ,” as if he considered them
analogous parts.—B. See Plautus passim.
2076 Publius Syrus was a comic performer and a writer,
who acquired considerable celebrity; he lived during the reign of
Augustus.—B.
2077 “Aprugnum callum;” Plautus, in detailing the
preparations for a feast, enumerates the following articles, “pernam,
callum, glandium, sumen;” Pseudolus, A. i. s. 2, l. 32; all of which
are parts of the hog.
2078 “Ponebatur.” Littré and Ajasson render this, “placed at
table.” It would appear, however, that the meaning is that this part
was put by for salting, and the other parts were served at table while
fresh.
2079 “Vivaria;” Varro, B. iii. c. 12, and Aulus Gellius,
B. ii. c. 20, give an account of the different places which were
employed by the Romans for preserving animals of various descriptions,
with their appropriate designations. Varro names the inventor Fulvius
Lippinus.—B.
2080 Varro, B. iii. c. 13, gives an animated description of
a visit to what he calls the leporarium of Hortensius, where, besides
hares, as the name implies, there was a multitude of stags, boars, and
other four-footed animals.
2081 Ælian, De Anim. Nat. B. xvi. c. 37, says, that no boar,
either wild or tame, is produced in India, and that the Indians never
use the flesh of this animal, as they would regard the use of it with
as much horror as of human flesh.—B. The “Sus babiroussa” is probably
meant by Pliny.
2082 There has been some difference of opinion respecting
the derivation of this word, but it is generally used to express a
“mongrel,” i. e. an animal whose parents are of different natures,
or, when applied to the human species, of different countries.—B.
2084 It is not easy to determine what animals Pliny intended
to designate. Cuvier employs the terms “chevreuils, chamois, and
bouquetins,” as the corresponding words in the French. In English we
have no names to express these varieties; we may, however, regard them
generally, as different species of wild goats. Cuvier conceives that
the Linnæan names of the animals mentioned were, probably, Cervus
capreolus, Antelope rupicapra, and Capra ibex.—B.
2085 The resemblance may be supposed to consist in the horns
being hollow, and tapering to a point.—B.
2086 There is considerable difficulty in ascertaining the
correct reading, or the exact meaning which the writer intended to
convey by the words employed.—B.
2087 There is some difficulty in determining the nature of
the variety which Pliny terms “oryges;” Hardouin has collected the
opinions of naturalists, and we have some remarks by Cuvier; he refers
to Buffon’s account of the Antelope oryx, as agreeing, in the essential
points, with the description given by Pliny; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 554.
See B. xi. c. 106.
2088 Cuvier remarks, that there is some doubt respecting the
dama of Pliny; he is, however, disposed to regard it as a species of
antelope. Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 464, 465; Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 554.—B.
2089 The term pygargus is derived from the words
πυγὴ ἀργὸς, denoting “white buttocks.” Probably a kind of gazelle.
2090 “With twisted horns.” It is probable that Pliny
intended to designate a species of antelope.—B. See B. xi. c. 45.
2091 In this division Pliny, probably, included what he has
termed the “capræa,” the rupicapra, and the ibex.—B.
2092 Some of these animals are entirely without a tail, and
this circumstance has been employed to form the primary division of
the simiæ into the two species, those with and those without tails.
We have an epigram of Martial, in which this is referred to. “Si mihi
cauda foret, cercopithecus eram”—“If I had but a tail, I should be a
monkey.” B. iv. Ep. 102.—B. See B. xi. c. 100.
2093 We learn from Strabo, Ind. Hist. B. xv., that, in
catching the monkey, the hunters took advantage of the propensity of
these animals to imitate any action they see performed. “Two modes,” he
says, “are employed in taking this animal, as by nature it is taught
to imitate every action, and to take to flight by climbing up trees.
The hunters, when they see an ape sitting on a tree, place within sight
of it a dish full of water, with which they rub their eyes; and then,
slyly substituting another in its place, full of bird-lime, retire and
keep upon the watch. The animal comes down from the tree, and rubs its
eyes with the bird-lime, in consequence of which the eyelids stick
together, and it is unable to escape.” Ælian also says, Hist. Anim.
B. xvii. c. 25, that the hunters pretend to put on their shoes, and
then substitute, in their place, shoes of lead; the animal attempts to
imitate them, and, the shoes being so contrived, when it has once got
them on, it finds itself unable to take them off, or to move, and is
consequently taken.
2094 There has been some difficulty in ascertaining the
exact reading here; but the meaning seems to be, that the pieces were
made of wax, and that the animals had learned to distinguish them from
each other, and move them in the appropriate manner; how far this is to
be credited, it is not easy to decide, but it would certainly require
very strong and direct evidence. We are told that the Emperor Charles
V. had a monkey that played at chess with him.—B.
2095 In the original, termed “cynocephali,” “dog’s-headed;”
an appellation given to them, according to Cuvier, from their muzzle
projecting like that of a dog; we have an account of this species in
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 13.—B. Probably the baboon. See B.
vi. c. 35, and B. vii. c. 2. The satyr is, perhaps, the uran-utang. See
B. v. c. 8, and B. vii. c. 2.
2096 Or “fine-haired monkey;” supposed to be the Silenus of
Linnæus; it is described by Buffon, under the name of Callitrix.—B. It
seems to be also called the “Simia hamadryas.”
2097 Hardouin gives references to the authors who have
observed this change in the colour of the hare, apparently depending
upon the peculiar locality, and its consequent exposure to a low
temperature. Cuvier considers it as characteristic of a peculiar
species, the Lepus variabilis, “which being peculiar to the highest
mountains, and the regions of the north, is white in winter.”—B.
2098 Or coney, “cuniculus.” Hardouin makes some observations
upon the derivation of this term, to show that Pliny was mistaken in
supposing it to be of Spanish origin; we have also an observation of
Cuvier’s to the same effect.—B.
2099 “Laurices;” we have no explanation of this word in any
of the editions of Pliny. Its origin appears to be quite unknown.
2100 According to Cuvier, the Mustela furo of Linnæus.
Ajasson, ubi supra.—B.
2101 Because, as Varro says, De Re Rus. B. iii. c. 12, they
are in the habit of making burrows—cuniculos—in the earth.
2102 This reference to the opinion of Archelaus appears to
be from Varro, ubi supra; the same reference is made by Ælian, Hist.
Anim. B. ii. c. 2.—B.
2103 Respecting the dasypus of Pliny, it has been doubted
whether it be a distinct species, a variety of the hare, or merely a
synonyme.—B.
2104 It is by some contended, that the human female, and
perhaps some other animals, have occasionally been the subjects of what
is termed superfœtation; whereas, according to Pliny, in the hare and
the dasypus it takes place frequently, but in no other animals.—B. On
this subject, see B. vii. c. 9.
2105 This is referred to by Cicero, in his treatise, De
Divinatione, B. i. c. 44, and B. ii. c. 27; in the latter he treats it
as an idle tale.—B.
2107 C. Papirius Carbo, a contemporary and friend of the
Gracchi. In B.C. 119, the orator, Licinius Crassus, brought a
charge against him, the nature of which is not known; but Carbo put an
end to his life, by taking cantharides.
2108 These different species are thus characterized
by Cuvier: “Les premiers sont les souris et les rats, de formes
ordinaires; les seconds, les grandes musaraignes [shrew-mice] de la
taille du rat, telles que l’on en trouve en Egypte; les troisiemes, une
espece de souris particuliere à l’Egypte, et peut-être à la Barbarie,
armée d’epines parmi ses poils dont Aristote avait deja parlé (B.
vi. l. 37, cap. ult.) et que M. Geoffroy a retrouvée et nommée mus
cahirinus.” Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 467, and Lemaire, ubi supra.—B. See
B. viii. c. 55, and B. x. c. 85.
2109 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 11, mentions this
circumstance, but says that it occurred in the island of Paros. For
Gyara, see B. iv. c. 23.
2110 We have two passages in Livy, B. xxvii. and B. xxx.,
where gold is said to have been gnawed by mice.—B.
2111 See B. iii. c. 9. In B.C. 217, this place was
occupied by Fabius with a strong garrison, to prevent Hannibal from
passing the Vulturnus; and the following year, after the battle of
Cannæ, was occupied by a small body of Roman troops, who, though little
more than 1000 in number, withstood the assaults of Hannibal during a
protracted siege, until compelled by famine to surrender.
2113 It is by no means improbable that “occentus” here means
“singing,” and not merely “squeaking;” as the singing of a mouse would
no doubt be deemed particularly ill-boding in those times. At the
present day, a mouse has been heard to emit a noise which more nearly
resembled singing than squeaking; and a “singing mouse” has been the
subject of an exhibition more than once.
2114 We have frequent allusions to this occurrence in the
writings of the Romans, some of which are referred to by Dalechamps;
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 563.—B.
2115A.U.C. 639; it does not appear what was the
cause of this prohibition.—B.
2120 According to Hardouin, this forest is termed, in modern
times, Bosco di Baccano; it is nine miles S.W. of Rome.
2121 Cuvier informs us, that “Le dorcas des Grecs n’est
le daim, comme le dit Hardouin, mais le chevreuil; car Aristote (De
Partib. Anim. l. iii. c. 2) dit que c’est le plus petit des animaux
à cornes que nous connaissions (sans doute en Grèce); et le dorcas
Libyca, très-bien decrit par Ælien (l. xiv. c. 4), est certainement la
gazelle commune, ‘antelope dorcas,’” Ajasson, vol. vi. pp. 467, 468;
Lemaire, vol. iii. p. 565. Respecting the localities here mentioned,
it has been proposed to substitute Cilicia for Syria, Syria and Lycia
being at a considerable distance from each other.—B.
2124 See B. iii. c. 11, and the Note to the passage. See
also c. 81 of this Book.
2125 Ælian, B. ii. c. 37, gives the same account of the
frogs of Seriphos and the lake of Thessaly, but gives the name of
Pierus to the lake.—B.
2126 “Mus araneüs; the ‘shrew-mouse,’” according to Cuvier,
“La musaraigne n’est pas venimeuse. Il s’en faut beaucoup qu’elle
n’existe pas au nord des Apennins; et elle ne périt point passe qu’elle
a traversé une ornière, quoique souvent elle puisse y être écrasée.
C’est un des quadrupèdes que l’on tue le plus aisément par un coup
léger.” Ajasson, vol. vi. p. 468.—B.
2127 Ælian, B. iii. c. 32, gives the same account, which he
professes to have taken from Theophrastus.—B.
2131 “Attagenæ;” the commentators have suspected some
inaccuracy with respect to this word, as we have no other remarks
on birds in this part of Pliny’s work; Lemaire, vol. iii. pp. 567,
568.—B.
2134 More especially of trees, plants, flowers, medicinal
substances, metals, and gems, which form the most prominent subjects of
the remaining Books after the eleventh, which concludes the account of
the animals.—B.
2136 A Roman historian, and a contemporary of Cicero. He is
thought to have written on early Roman history, as Varro quotes his
account of the Curtian Lake, and on the later history of Rome, as we
have seen Pliny referring to him in c. 2, respecting Pompey’s triumph
on his return from Africa. He was held in high estimation by Pomponius
Atticus, but seems not to have been so highly esteemed as a writer by
Cicero.
2141 A Roman historian, who flourished in the reign of
Augustus, and died A.D. 21, in the seventieth year of his
age. His great work was called “Annales,” and extended to at least
twenty-two books, and seems to have contained much minute, though not
always accurate, information with regard to the internal affairs of
the city; only a few fragments remain, which bear reference to events
subsequent to the Carthaginian wars. He is also thought to have written
a work called “Epitomæ.” A treatise was published at Vienna, in 1510,
in two Books, “On the Priesthood and Magistracy of Rome,” under the
name of Fenestella; but it is in reality the composition of Andrea
Domenico Fiocchi, a Florentine jurist of the fourteenth century.
2144 L. Junius Moderatus Columella. He was a native of
Gades, or Cadiz, and was a contemporary of Celsus and Seneca. He is
supposed to have resided at Rome, and from his works it appears that
he visited Syria and Cilicia. It has been conjectured that he died at
Tarentum. His great work is a systematic treatise upon Agriculture,
divided into Twelve Books.
2147 C. Lucilius, the first Roman satirical poet of any
importance, was born B.C. 148, and died B.C. 103.
From Juvenal we learn that he was born at Suessa of the Aurunci, and
from Velleius Paterculus and Horace other particulars respecting him.
He is supposed to have been either the maternal grand-uncle or maternal
grandfather of Pompeius Magnus. If not absolutely the inventor of
Roman satire, he was the first to mould it into that form which was
afterwards fully developed by Horace, Juvenal, and Perseus. He is
spoken of in high terms as a writer by Cicero, Horace, and Quintilian.
2148 The father of Cornelia, the wife of Pompeius Magnus.
After his defeat by Cæsar at the battle of Thapsus, he stabbed himself,
and leaped into the sea. In what way he distinguished himself as an
author, does not appear.
2151 He was one of the companions of L. Lucullus, proconsul
in Bætica, the province of Spain, B.C. 150. His work on
Natural History is several times referred to by Pliny.
2157 Of Tarsus, a Stoic philosopher, the disciple and
successor of Diogenes, and the teacher of Panætius, about B.C.
144. Of his personal history but little is known. Mention is made of
his History of Animals by the Scholiast upon Apollonius Rhodius.
2159 There were several physicians of this name; one was a
native of Apamea in Bithynia, a follower of Herophilus, who flourished
in the third or second century B.C.; another lived about the
same period, and is by some supposed to have been the same as the last.
No particulars seem to be known of the individual here mentioned.
2162 Of Miletus. He wrote on mythical subjects, and is
mentioned as an author by Diogenes Laertius; but nothing further seems
to have been known respecting him.
2163 Some of the MSS. call him Acopas, or Copas. He was the
author of an account of the victors at the Olympic games, the work here
referred to by Pliny.
2164 Hiero II., the king of Syracuse, and steady friend
and ally of the Romans. He died probably a little before the year
B.C. 216, having attained the age of ninety-two. Varro and
Columella speak of a Treatise on Agriculture written by him.
2165 Attalus III., king of Pergamus, son of Eumenes II.
and Stratonice, daughter of Ariarathes, king of Cappadocia. In his
will he made the Roman people his heirs. Being struck with remorse for
the murders and other crimes of which he had previously been guilty,
he abandoned all public business, and devoted himself to the study
of physic, sculpture, and gardening, on which he wrote a work. He
died B.C. 133, of a fever, with which he was seized through
exposing himself to the sun’s rays, while engaged in erecting a
monument to his mother.
2168 An historian of Syracuse, one of the most celebrated of
antiquity, though, unfortunately, none of his works have come down to
us. He was born about B.C. 435, and died B.C. 356. He
wrote histories of Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Phœnicia.
2169 A Greek of Tarentum, famous as a philosopher,
mathematician, statesman, and general. The lives of him by Aristoxenus
and Aristotle are unfortunately lost. He lived probably about
B.C. 400, and he is said to have saved the life of Plato by
his influence with the tyrant Dionysius. He was finally drowned in
the Adriatic. He attained great skill as a practical mechanician;
and his flying dove of wood was one of the wonders of antiquity. The
fragments and titles of works ascribed to him are very numerous, but
the genuineness of some is doubted.
2171 A writer on Agriculture, mentioned also by Varro and
Columella. In B. xviii. c. 43, Pliny speaks of a work of his on lucerne
clover and cytisus.
2172 Or Anaxipolis. He was a writer on Agricultural
subjects, and is mentioned by Varro and Columella; but nothing further
is known respecting him.
2173 A writer on Agriculture. He is supposed to have lived
before the time of Aristotle, and is also mentioned by Varro. No
further particulars are known respecting him.
2174 A writer on Agriculture; Varro calls him a native of
Mallus, in Cilicia.
2175 A native of Cumæ or Cymæ, in Asia Minor, a Greek writer
on Agriculture, mentioned also by Varro and Columella.
2176 A writer on Agriculture, mentioned also by Varro and
Columella.
2177 A writer on Agriculture, mentioned also by Varro,
Columella, Galen, and the Scholiast on Nicander.
2178 The most famous among the soothsayers of Alexander the
Great. He probably wrote the work on Prodigies, which is referred to by
Pliny in B. xvii. c. 38, and elsewhere, as also by Lucian the satirist.
2179 A writer on Agriculture, mentioned also by Varro and
Columella.
2188 Menander of Priene was a writer on Agriculture,
mentioned also by Varro and Columella. Menander of Heraclea was a
writer on Agriculture, mentioned also by Varro.
2189 A poet who wrote on Agriculture, mentioned also
by Varro. It is not improbable that he is the same person with
the Menecrates of Smyrna, the author of two epigrams in the Greek
Anthology.
2190 A Greek writer on Agriculture, who wrote before the
time of Theophrastus, by whom he is mentioned, as also by Athenæus and
Varro.
2191 He is mentioned also by Varro, but nothing is known of
him.
2192 He is often referred to by Varro and Columella. He is
also supposed to have been the writer of a History of Thebes, mentioned
by the Scholiast and Apollonius Rhodius, B. iii.
2193 Cassius Dionysius of Utica. He translated into Greek
the twenty-eight Books on Husbandry written by Mago the Carthaginian,
in the Punic language. Of Mago nothing further is known.
2194 Diophanes of Bithynia made an epitome of the same work
in Greek, and dedicated it to King Deiotarus. Columella styles Mago the
Father of Agriculture.
2195 Made king of Cappadocia by Antony, B.C. 34. He
died at Rome, at an advanced age, A.D. 17. Plutarch attributes
to King Archelaus—if, indeed, this was the same—a treatise on
Minerals.
2196 A native of Claros, near Colophon, in Ionia. It is
not a matter of certainty, but it is most probable, that he lived in
the reign of Ptolemy V., who died B.C. 181. He was a poet,
grammarian, and physician. His “Theriaca,” a poem on the wounds
inflicted by venomous animals, still exists, as also another called
“Alexipharmia.”
2197 He has already said, in B. ii. c. 3, that “the seeds of
all bodies fall down from the heavens, principally into the ocean, and
being mixed together, we find that a variety of monstrous forms are in
this way frequently produced.”
2198 Hardouin has the following remark on this passage.
“Rondelet and Aldrovandus only waste their time and pains in making
their minute inquiries into the present names of these fish, which took
their names from grapes, the wood, the saw, and the cucumber; for by
no other writer do we find them mentioned even.” Cuvier, however, does
not seem to be of Hardouin’s opinion, that such investigations are a
waste of time, and has suggested that the eggs of the Sepia officinalis
may be alluded to, the eggs of which are in clusters of a dark colour,
and bearing a strong resemblance to black grapes. This resemblance to
a bunch of grapes is noticed by Pliny himself, in c. 74 of the present
Book.
2199 He alludes, most probably, to what we call the
“sword-fish,” the “Xiphias gladius” of Linnæus.
2200 Probably, in allusion to the “Squalus pristis” of
Linnæus.
2201 Cuvier suggests that he probably alludes to the
“Holothuria pentactes” of Linnæus, or the sea-priapus; and remarks,
that when the animal contracts itself, it bears a very strong
resemblance to a cucumber.
2202 Cuvier says, that he most probably alludes to the
“Syngnathus hippocampus” of Linnæus. This little fish, he says, is also
called the sea-horse, and having the body armed with a hard coat, might
very easily have been taken for a shell-fish. Its head, in miniature,
bears a very strong resemblance to that of a horse.
2203 It is not accurately known what fish was meant by the
ancients, under the name of “balæna.” According to some writers, it is
considered to be the same with what we call the “grampus.”
2204 A space, as Hardouin remarks, greater than that
occupied by some towns, the “jugerum” being 240 feet long, and 120
broad. The vast size of great fishes was a favourite subject with some
of the ancient writers, and their accounts were eagerly copied by some
of the early fathers. Bochart has collected these various accounts in
his work on Animals, B. i. c. 7. In the “Arabian Nights” also, we find
accounts of huge fishes in the eastern seas, so large as to be taken
for islands. The existence of the sea-serpent is still a question in
dispute; and a whale of large size, is a formidable obstacle in the way
of a ship of even the largest burthen.
2205 As Hardouin remarks, we can learn neither from the
works of Pliny, nor yet of Ælian, what fish the pristis really was.
From Nonius Marcellus, c. 13, we find that it was a very long fish
of large size, but narrow body. Hardouin says that it was a fish of
the cetaceous kind, found in the Indian seas, which, in his time, was
known by some as the “vivella,” with a long bony muzzle serrated on
either side, evidently meaning the saw-fish. Pristis was a favourite
name given by the Romans to their ships. In the boat-race described by
Virgil in the Æneid, B. v., one of the boats is so called.
2206 Cuvier remarks, that he himself had often seen the
“langouste,” or large lobster, as much as four feet in length, and
the “homard,” usually a smaller kind, of an equal size. The length,
however, given by Pliny would make six or eight feet, according to the
length of the cubit.
2207 Cuvier says, that it is an exaggeration by travellers,
which there is nothing in nature at all to justify. Probably, however,
some animals of the genus boa, or python, or large water-snakes may
have given rise to the story.
2210 See B. vi. c. 23, 25. Strabo, in his fifteenth Book,
tells the same story of the Ichthyophagi, situate between the Carmani
and the Oritæ. Dalechamps suggests that the Gedrosi mentioned this in
relation to the Ichthyophagi, who were probably their neighbours.
2211 Also called the Cophetes. See B. vi. c. 25. The
commander of Alexander’s fleet more especially alluded to, is probably
Nearchus, who wrote an account of his voyage, to which Pliny has
previously made allusion in B. vi. and which is followed by Strabo, in
B. xv., and by Arrian, in his “Indica.”
2212 Hardouin remarks, that the Basques of his day were in
the habit of fencing their gardens with the ribs of the whale, which
sometimes exceeded twenty feet in length; and Cuvier says, that at
the present time, the jaw-bone of the whale is used in Norway for the
purpose of making beams or posts for buildings.
2213 Onesicritus, quoted by Strabo, B. xv., says., that in
the vicinity of Taprobane, or Ceylon, there were animals which had
an amphibious life, some of which resembled oxen, some horses, and
various other land animals. Cuvier is of opinion, that not improbably
the “Trichecum manatum” and the “Trichecum dugong” of Linnæus are
alluded to, which are herbivorous animals, though nearly allied to the
cetacea, and which are in the habit of coming to pasture on the grass
or sea-weed they may chance to find on the shore.
2214 It is remarked by Cuvier, that there is no resemblance
whatever between the domesticated animals and any of the cetacea;
but that the imagination of the vulgar has pictured to itself these
supposed resemblances, by the aid of a lively imagination.
2215 From the Greek φυσητὴρ, “a blower,” probably
one of the whale species, so called from its blowing forth the water.
Hardouin remarks, that Pliny mentions the Gallic Ocean, in B. vi. c.
33, as ending at the Pyrenees; and, probably, by this term he means
the modern Bay of Biscay. Rondeletius, B. xvi. c. 14, says, that this
fish is the same that is called by the Narbonnese peio mular, by the
Italians capidolio, and by the people of Saintonge, “sedenette.” Cuvier
conjectures also, that this was some kind of large whale; a fish which
was not unfrequently found, in former times, in the gulf of Aquitaine,
the inhabitants of the shores of which were skilled in its pursuit.
Ajasson states that Valmont de Bomare was of opinion that it was the
porpoise; but, as he justly remarks, the size of that animal does
not at all correspond with the magnitude of the “physeter,” as here
mentioned.
2216 Cuvier suggests that the idea of such an animal as
the one here mentioned, probably took its rise in the kind of sea
star-fish, now known as Medusa’s head, the Asterias of Linnæus; but
that the enormous size here attributed to it, has no foundation
whatever in reality. He remarks also, that the inhabitants of the north
of Europe, have similar stories relative to a huge polypus, which they
call the “kraken.” We may, however, be allowed to observe, that the
“kraken,” or “korven,” mentioned by good bishop Pontoppidan, bears a
closer resemblance to the so-called “sea-serpent,” than to anything of
the polypus or sepia genus.
2217 “Rotæ.” Cuvier suggests that this idea of the wheel was
taken from the class of zoophytes named “Medusæ,” by Linnæus, which
have the form of a disc, divided by radii, and dots which may have been
taken for eyes. But then, as he says, there are none of them of an
excessive size, as Pliny would seem to indicate by placing them in this
Chapter, and which Ælian has absolutely attributed to them in B. xiii.
c. 20. Of the largest rhizostoma, Cuvier says, that he had even seen,
the diameter of the disc did not exceed two feet.
2219 One of the Scholiasts on Homer says, that before the
discovery of the brazen trumpet by the Tyrrhenians, the conch-shell was
in general use for that purpose. Hardouin, with considerable credulity,
remarks here, that it is no fable, that the nereids and tritons had a
human face; and says that no less than fifteen instances, ancient and
modern, had been adduced, in proof that such was the fact. He says that
this was the belief of Scaliger, and quotes the book of Aldrovandus on
Monsters, p. 36. But, as Cuvier remarks, it is impossible to explain
these stories of nereids and tritons, on any other grounds than the
fraudulent pretences of those who have exhibited them, or asserted that
they have seen them. “It was only last year,” he says, “that all London
was resorting to see a wonderful sight in what is commonly called a
mermaid. I myself had the opportunity of examining a very similar
object: it was the body of a child, in the mouth of which they had
introduced the jaws of a sparus [probably our “gilt-head],” while for
the legs was substituted the body of a lizard. The body of the London
mermaid,” he says, “was that of an ape, and a fish attached to it
supplied the place of the hind legs.”
2220 Primarily the nereids were sea-nymphs, the daughters of
Nereus and Doris. Dalechamps informs us, that Alexander ab Alexandro
states that he once saw a nereid that had been thrown ashore on the
coasts of the Peloponnesus, that Trapezuntius saw one as it was
swimming, and that Draconetus Bonifacius, the Neapolitan, saw a triton
that had been preserved in honey, and which many had seen when taken
alive on the coast of Epirus. We may here remark, that the triton is
the same as our “mer-man,” and the nereid is our “mermaid.”
2221 Of Gallia Lugdunensis, namely. The legatus was also
called “rector,” and “proprætor.”
2222 Or “mer-man,” as we call it. Dalechamps, in his note,
with all the credulity of his time, states that a similar sea-man had
been captured, it was said, in the preceding age in Norway, and that
another had been seen in Poland, dressed like a bishop, in the year
1531. Juvenal, in his 14th Satire, makes mention of the “monsters of
the ocean, and the youths of the sea.”
2225 Dalechamps says that this elephant is the same as the
“rosmarus” of Olaus Magnus, B. xxxii. c. 11. It is remarked by Cuvier,
that cetaceous animals have at all times received the names of those
belonging to the land. The sea-ram, he thinks, may have been the great
dolphin, which is called the “bootskopf,” and which has above the eye a
white spot, curved in nearly a similar manner to the horn of a ram. The
“elephant,” again, he suggests, may have been the Trichechus rosmarus
of Linnæus, or the morse, which has large tusks projecting from its
mouth, similar to those of the elephant. This animal, however, as he
says, is confined to the northern seas, and does not appear ever to
have come so far south as our coasts. Juba and Pausanias, however,
speak of these horns of the sea-ram as being really teeth or tusks.
2226 Judging from the account of it here given, and
especially in relation to the teeth, Cuvier is inclined to think that
the cachelot whale, the Physeter macrocephalus of Linnæus, is the
animal here alluded to.
2227 Solinus, generally a faithful mimic of Pliny, makes
the measure only half a foot. Cuvier says that there can be little
doubt that the bones represented to have been those of the monster to
which Andromeda was exposed, were the bones, and more especially the
lower jaws, of the whale. Ajasson certainly appears to have mistaken
the sense of this passage. He says that it must not be supposed that
Pliny means the identical bones of the animal which was about to devour
Andromeda, but of one of the animals of that kind; and he exercises his
wit at the expense of those who would construe the passage differently,
in saying that these bones ought to have been sent to those who show in
their collections such articles as the knife with which Cain slew Abel.
Now, there can be no doubt that these bones were not those of the
monster which the poets tell us was about to devour Andromeda; but the
Romans certainly supposed that they were, and Pliny evidently thought
so too, for in B. v. c. 14, he speaks of the chains by which she was
fastened to the rock, at Joppa, as still to be seen there. M. Æmilius
Scaurus, the younger, is here referred to.
2228 As already mentioned, there is considerable doubt
what fish of the whale species is meant under this name. Cuvier says,
that even at the present day whales are occasionally found in the
Mediterranean, and says that there is the head of one in the Museum of
Natural History, that was thrown ashore at Martigues. He also observes,
that in the year 1829, one had been cast upon the coasts of Languedoc.
Ajasson suggests, that not improbably whales once frequented the
Mediterranean in great numbers, but that as commerce increased, they
gradually retreated to the open ocean.
2229 Rondelet, B. xvi. c. 13, says that this animal was
called “espaular” by the people of Saintonge. Cuvier is of opinion,
also, that it is the same animal, which is also known by the name of
“bootskopf,” the Delphinus orca of Linnæus. (See N. 2225.) This cetaceous
animal, he says, is a most dangerous enemy to the whale, which it
boldly attacks, devouring its tongue, which is of a tender quality and
enormous size. He thinks, however, that the orca taken at the port of
Ostia was no other than a cachelot.
2230 The Liburna, or Liburnica, was usually a bireme, or
two-oared galley, with the mast in the middle, though sometimes of
larger bulk. From the description given of these by Varro, as quoted
by Aulus Gellius, B. xvii. c. 3, they seem, as it has been remarked,
somewhat similar to the light Indian massooliah boats, which are used
to cross the surf? in Madras roads. Pliny tells us, in B. xvi. c. 17,
that the material of which they were constructed was pine timber, as
free from resin as it could possibly be obtained. The beak of these
vessels was of great comparative weight, and its sharpness is evidently
alluded to in the present passage, as also in B. x. c. 32. The term
“Liburna” was adopted from the assistance rendered to Augustus by the
Liburni at the battle of Actium.
2231 These works were completed by Nero the successor of
Claudius, and consisted of a new and more capacious harbour on the
right arm of the Tiber. It was afterwards enlarged and improved by
Trajan. This harbour was simply called “Portus Romanus,” or “Portus
Augusti;” and around it there sprang up a town known as “Portus,” the
inhabitants of which were called “Portuenses.”
2232 “Naufragiis tergorum.” This may probably mean a
shipwreck, in which some hides had fallen into the sea.
2233 It is remarked by Rezzonico, that Palermus, in the
account of this story given by him in B. i. c. 1, has mistaken Pliny’s
meaning, and evidently thinks that “unum” refers to the soldiers, and
not the boats engaged in the attack.
2234 “Ora.” Cuvier remarks, that it is not the “mouth of the
animal but the nostrils, that are situate on the top of the head, and
that through these it sends forth vast columns of water.” Aristotle,
in his Hist. Anim. B. i. c. 3, has a similar passage, from which Pliny
copied this assertion of his.
2235 Cuvier remarks, that these are the animals of the
cetaceous class, which resemble the quadrupeds in the formation of the
viscera, their respiration, and the mammæ; and which, in fact, only
differ from them in their general form, which more nearly resembles
that of fishes.
2237 “Doctrinæ indaginibus.” This certainly seems a better
reading than “doctrina indignis,” which has been adopted by Sillig, and
which would make complete nonsense of the passage.
2238 Dalechamps states that Cælius Rhodiginus, B. iv. c. 15,
has entered very fully into this subject.
2239 Cuvier remarks, on this passage, that the mollusca
have, instead of blood, a kind of azure or colourless liquid. He
observes also, that insects respire by means of tracheæ, or elastic
tubes, which penetrate into every part of the body; and that the gills
of fish are as essentially an organ of respiration as the lungs. All,
he says, that Pliny adds as to the introduction of air into water,
is equally conformable to truth; and that it is by means of the air
mingled with the water, or of the atmosphere which they inhale at the
surface, that fishes respire.
2240 In the shape of vapour raised by the action of the sun.
In accordance with this opinion, Cicero says, De Nat. Deor. B. ii. s.
27, “The air arises from the respiration of the waters, and must be
looked upon as a sort of vapour coming from them.”
2241 But, as Hardouin remarks, this act on the part of the
fish is caused as much by the water as the air.
2242 As Hardouin remarks, this is a somewhat singular notion
that sleep is produced by the action of the lungs.
2243 Hardouin asks, what this has to do with the question
about the air which Pliny is here discussing? and then suggests that
his meaning may possibly be, that the moon has an influence on bodies
through the medium of the air, in accordance with the notion of the
ancients that the respiration was more free during the time of full
moon. Littré says, that Pliny’s meaning is, that since the influence of
the moon is able to penetrate the waters, the air and the vital breath
can of course penetrate them also.
2244 See B. x. c. 89, where this subject is further
discussed.
2248 Cuvier remarks, that these nostrils, or vent-holes, are
placed somewhat further back on the head in the dolphin than in the
whale; but at the same time they cannot be said to be situate on the
back of the animal.
2249 Or “seals.” They will be further mentioned in c. 15 of
the present Book.
2250 Or “turtles,” which are more fully described in c. 21
of this Book.
2252 Cuvier remarks, that in the present Chapter there is a
confusion of the peculiarities of two different animals, and refers the
reader to his Note on B. viii. c. 38, which, so far as it has not been
set forth, is to the following effect:—“I may here remark, that Pliny
speaks on several occasions of dolphins with spines or stings on the
back, although at other times he is found to give that name to the same
cetaceous animal which is so denominated by us. Thus, in his story in
B. ix. c. 8, of the friendship conceived by a dolphin in Lake Lucrinus
for a child at Baiæ, he takes care to remark that the dolphin, when
taking the child on his back, concealed his spines beneath his dorsal
fin. I am of opinion, however, that I have recognized the fish which
Seneca, Pliny, and even Aristotle have sometimes confounded with the
real dolphin, apparently because it had received that name from certain
fishermen, and these are my reasons for forming this conclusion. In
c. 7 of the Ninth Book, Pliny mingles with many facts that really do
belong to the real dolphin, one trait which is quite foreign to it. ‘It
is so swift,’ says he, ‘that were it not for the fact that its mouth is
situate much beneath its muzzle, almost, indeed, in the middle of its
belly, not a fish would be able to escape its pursuit: in consequence
of this, it can only seize its prey by turning on its back.’ This,
it must be observed, is not one of those mistakes which we are to
put down to Pliny’s own account, and of which he has so many; for we
find Aristotle as well, who has so perfectly known and described the
ordinary dolphin, attributing a mouth similarly situate to the dolphin
and the cartilaginous animals. This fact, which is totally false as
regards the real dolphin, is, in all probability, applicable to the
alleged dolphin, whose back is mentioned as being armed with spines.
These three characteristics, a mouth situate very far beneath the
nose, spines on the back, and power and swiftness sufficient to enable
it to fight the crocodile, are only to be found united in certain of
the genus ‘Squalus,’ such as the ‘Squalus centrina,’ and the ‘Squalus
spinax’ of Linnæus.”
2253 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 5. From this
description Hardouin is induced to think that Rondelet and Aldrovandus
are wrong in their conclusions that it is the sea-hog, or porpoise,
that is meant. Cuvier also says, that this description will not apply
to the real dolphin, though it is strictly applicable to the Squalus
acanthias, Squalus ricinus, and others; to the former of which also
the spines or stings mentioned by Pliny appropriately belong; all the
other characteristics, he says, which are here mentioned by Pliny,
are applicable to the real dolphin, though in modern times it has
never been brought to such a degree of tameness. Hence it is that some
writers have supposed that Pliny is here speaking of the Trichechus
manatus of Linnæus, by the French called “lamentin,” by us the
“sea-cow.” Cuvier says, that he should be inclined to be of the same
opinion, were it not for the fact that that animal does not frequent
the coasts of the Mediterranean.
2254 Copied literally from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii.
c. 5, and De Part. Anim. B. iv. c. 13.
2256 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 48, says not the
sails, but the masts of ships; and Pintianus remarks, that Pliny
has been deceived by the resemblance of the words, ἱστὸς
and ἱστίον. Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xii. c. 12, has a similar
statement also.
2257 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 9. Oppian, Halieut. B.
i. l. 660.
2258 Fishermen having notched the tail of the animal when
young, and recognized it by these marks thirty years afterwards.
2259 “Incertâ de causâ.” Pintianus, following the similar
account given by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 48, takes the words
to mean “temere,” “hap-hazard,” “without any motive whatever.” Ajasson
says that it is their eager pursuit of small fishes which sometimes
betrays them into leaping on shore, and occasionally, the pain caused
by attacks of parasitical sea-insects and other animals.
2260 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 49, says that the
dolphin makes this noise when it comes to the air.
2261 He would seem to imply that the dolphin knows that
it is “simus,” or “flat-nosed,” for which reason it is particularly
fond of being called “Simo,” or “flat-nose,” a piece of good taste
and intelligence remarkable even in a dolphin. Hardouin undertakes to
explain their remarkable liking for this name on other grounds, and
says that when a song was sung, they were charmed by the pronunciation
of the word “Simo” every now and then, the last syllable being drawn
out at great length. Ajasson suggests that the only reason for which
this name delighted them, was probably the sibilant or hissing sound
made when it is frequently repeated.
2262 “Symphoniæ cantu.” Hardouin is of opinion that this
means the music of the “symphonia,” that being some kind of musical
instrument. But, as Ajasson remarks, the meaning is much more likely
to be, “singing in concert,” where there are several performers, and
each takes his own part in the symphony. It might, however, possibly
mean singing and music combined, similar to the performance of Arion,
mentioned at the end of the Chapter.
2263 The organ was so called by the ancients, from the
resemblance borne by its pipes to “hydraula,” or water-pipes, and
from the fact of the bellows being acted on by the pressure of water.
According to an author quoted by Athenæus, B. iv. c. 75, the first
organist was Ctesibius of Alexandria, who lived about B.C.
200. It is not improbable that Pliny refers to this invention in B.
vii. c. 38. The pipes of the organ of Ctesibius were partly of bronze
and partly of reed, and Tertullian describes it as a very complicated
instrument.
2264 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 15, tells this story as
well, and Aulus Gellius, B. vii. c. 8, relates it from the fifth Book
of the Ægyptiaca of Apion, who stated that he himself had witnessed the
fact.
2265 The Lucrine Lake originally communicated with the
sea, but was afterwards separated from the Bay of Cumæ by a dyke
eight stadia in length. In the time of Augustus, however, Agrippa
opened a communication between the Lake and the Bay, for the purpose
of forming the Julian harbour. If the circumstance here mentioned by
Pliny happened before this period, “invectus” must mean “carried by
human agency;” but if after, it is possible that the fish may have been
carried into the lake by the tide. For an account of the lake, see B.
iii. c. 9.
2270 The island and city of Caria. See B. v. c. 29.
2271 Being alarmed by the pursuit of the fish while he was
swimming.
2272 Athenæus, B. xiii., tells this story more at large, and
states that the name of the child was Dionysius. Hardouin remarks, that
Solinus, the ape of Pliny, has absolutely read this passage as though
the child’s name had been Babylon; upon the strength of which, Saumaise
had proposed to alter the reading in Pliny, not remembering at the time
that the boy’s name had been given by Athenæus.
2273 This story is also told by Plutarch, in his work on the
Instincts of Animals.
2274 Aulus Gellius, B. vii. c. 8, mentions this story,
borrowing it probably from Theophrastus.
2275 The people of the territory in which Amphilochian Argos
was situate, and lying to the south of Ambracia. See B. iv. c. 2.
2277 Ovid tells the story of Arion more fully, and in
beautiful language, in the Fasti, B. ii. l. 92, et seq.
2278 A promontory in the south of Laconia, now Cape
Matapan. See B. iv. c. 7. Solinus, c. 7, tells us that there was a
temple of Arion of Methymna, situate on this spot, in which there was
a figure of him seated on a dolphin’s back, and made of bronze; with
an inscription stating that this wonderful circumstance took place
in the 29th Olympiad, in which year Arion had been victorious in the
Sicilian games. Philostorgius, in B. i. of his Ecclesiastical History,
tells us also of a martyr who was saved by a dolphin, which bore him to
Helenopolis, a city of Nicomedia.
2280 Still known as the Lake of Lattes, in the department
of Narbonne. Cuvier says that the mullet-fishing is still carried
on in this lake, which is on the shores of Languedoc, and refers
to D’Astruc’s Memoirs on the Natural History of that province. The
dolphins, however, he says, no longer take part in the sport; and
he observes that the same story is told by Ælian, B. ii. c. 8, and
Albertus Magnus, De Anim. B. xxiv., with reference to other places.
Oppian, in his Halieutica, B. v., makes Eubœa the scene of these
adventures, while Albertus Magnus speaks of the shores of Italy.
Rondelet, in his Book on Fishes, says that it used to take place on
the coasts of Spain, near Palamos. Cuvier suggests, with Belon and
D’Astruc, that the story arose from the fact that the dolphins, while
pursuing the shoals of mullets, sometimes drove them into the creeks
and salt-water lakes on the coast; a fact which has been sometimes
found to cause the fish to be caught in greater abundance.
2281 Dalechamps tells us that the people of Montpellier call
this outlet “La Crau,” and that it is in the vicinity of Mangueil.
2282 Were it not for the word “nihilominus” here, it would
look as if the meaning were, that although the ends of the nets are
hoisted up, the fish are so active that they jump over the side, and
thus get enclosed. By the use of that word, however, it would seem to
mean, that although the sides are hoisted up, the fish are so nimble,
that they clear the nets altogether. If the latter is the meaning,
Pliny probably intends to speak only of what some of them are able to
do: otherwise it is hard to see of what utility the nets were in the
operation.
2283 “Quos interemere.” Pintianus suggests “æquo interim
jure”—“with equal rights,” instead of these words, and Pelicier does
not disapprove of the suggestion; for Ælian states, in B. ii. c. 8,
Hist. Anim., that the dolphins used to share the fish equally with the
fishermen of Eubœa. But, as Hardouin says, the words “quos interemere”
have reference to the statement above, that “they content themselves
for the present with killing them only.” And besides, if the fishermen
gave them an equal share, it is not likely that they would give them
still more of the fish on the following day.
2284 Ælian also mentions this, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 8.
2285 The same is stated in Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c.
74, and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 6.
2286 This is also mentioned by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix.
c. 74.
2288 Cuvier remarks, that there is some confusion here
between an animal of the dolphin kind, and another of the genus
Squalus. He suggests that the Delphinus tursio of Linnæus (our
porpoise) is meant; but then there would be no ground for comparing
its teeth with those of the dog-fish or shark. He remarks also, that
Athenæus, B. vii. p. 310, speaks of pieces of salted flesh from the
dog-fish, as being called by the name of tursio.
2289 Under this name he probably means the shark as well
as the dog-fish. This passage is curiously rendered by Holland. “But
especially they are snouted like dogges, when they snarle, grin, and
are readie to do a shrewd turne.”
2290 We may here remark, that Pliny throughout calls these
animals “testudines,”—“tortoises.” It has been thought better, in
the translation, in order to avoid confusion, to give them their
distinctive name of “turtle.”
2291 This passage, down to the words “to the fishermen,” is
found in Agatharchides, as quoted by Photius.
2293 Cuvier says that this is evidently a gross exaggeration
on the part of some traveller; and Ajasson remarks, that the very
largest turtle known does not exceed five feet in length, and four in
breadth. In such a case, the superficies of the calapash or shell would
be only from twenty to twenty-four feet, and this, be it remembered, in
one of the very largest size.
2294 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 3, has a similar
passage.
2296 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 3, states to a
similar effect.
2297 Oppian, Halieut. B. i. l. 522, has a passage to a
somewhat similar effect. Holland’s notion of the meaning of this
passage is singular in the extreme. “The female fleeth from the male,
and will not abide to engender, until such time as he pricke her
behind, and sticke somewhat in her taile for running away from him so
fast.”
2298 Cuvier remarks, that it is evident that the fore-feet
were here taken for horns, they being in the turtle long, narrow, and
pointed.
2299 From the Greek χέλυον, “tortoise-shell.” See
B. vi. c. 34.
2301 From χερσιναὶ, “land turtles,” or “tortoises.”
2302 “Repositorium” seems to have been the name for a large
tray upon which viands were brought to table; and probably for stands
similar to our sideboards, as well as cabinets or wardrobes. Carvilius
Pollio, a Roman eques, lived in the time of the Dictator Sylla, and
was celebrated for his luxury in ornamental furniture. He is again
mentioned by Pliny in B. xxx. c. 51.
2303 The Latin is “cortex,” which probably means a
“bark,” or “rind.” Ajasson remarks upon the meagreness of the Latin
language, in supplying appropriate words for scientific purposes, and
congratulates himself upon adding the word, “carapax,” (signifying
“callipash,” as we call it) to the Latin vocabulary.
2304 By us known as the “angel-fish,” the “Squalus squatina”
of Linnæus, a kind of shark. From this property of its skin, it was
called by the Greeks ῥίνη the “file.” See B. xxxii. c. 53.
2305 Probably the Muræna helena of Linnæus. See more on it
in c. 23 of the present Book.
2307 Cuvier remarks, how very inappropriately Pliny places
the pristis (probably the saw-fish) and the balæna among the animals
that are covered with hair. Aristotle, he says, in his Hist. Anim. B.
vi. c. 12, goes so far as to say that the pristis and the ox-fish (a
kind of ray or thorn-back, probably) bring forth their young like the
balæna and the dolphin, but does not go beyond that. Cuvier says also,
that what is here stated of the sea-calf is in general correct, except
the statements as to the properties of its skin and its right fin, the
stories relative to which are, of course, neither more nor less than
fabulous.
2308 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 11, states to the like
effect.
2309 “Fremitu.” From their lowing noise, the French
have also called these animals “veaux de mer,” and we call them
“sea-calves.” Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xii. c. 56, and Diodorus Siculus,
B. iii., also speak of training the sea-calf. Hardouin says that Lopez
de Gomara, one of the more recent writers on Mexico, in his day, had
given an account of an Indian sea-calf, or manati, as it was called by
the natives, that had become quite tame, and answered readily to its
name; and that, although not very large, it was able to bear ten men
on its back. He also tells us of a much more extraordinary one, which
Aldrovandus says he himself had seen at Bologna, which would give a
cheer (vocem ederet) for the Christian princes when asked, but would
refuse to do so for the Turks; just, Hardouin says, as we see dogs
bark, and monkeys grin and jump, at the mention of a particular name.
2310 Oppian, Halieut. B. i. l. 408, mentions this fact, and
Juvenal, Sat. iii. l. 238, alludes to it: “Would break the slumbers of
Drusus and of sea-calves.”
2311 This assertion, though untrue, no doubt, as to sympathy
with the tides, is in some degree supported by the statement of
Rondelet, B. xvi. c. 6, who says that he had often perceived changes
in the wind and weather prognosticated by the hide of this animal; for
that when a south wind was about to blow, the hair would stand erect,
while when a north wind was on the point of arising, it would lie so
flat that you would hardly know that there was any hair on the surface.
2312 Hardouin remarks, that Pliny classes the viper probably
among the aquatic animals, either because it was said to couple with
the muræna, or else because it has a womb not unlike that of the
cartilaginous fishes.
2313 Hardouin suggests that the proper reading here is
probably 144, because in B. xxxii. c. 51, Pliny speaks of 174 different
kinds of fishes, and here he says that the crustacea are thirty in
number. Daubenton speaks of the species of fishes as being 866 in
number, while Lacèpede says that he had examined more than a thousand,
but that was far below the real number. Cuvier mentions specimens of
about 6000 kinds of fishes, in the Cabinet du Roi. Ajasson remarks
upon the learned investigations of Cuvier on this subject, and his
researches in Sumatra, Java, Kamschatka, New Zealand, New Guinea, and
elsewhere, for the purpose of increasing the list of the known kinds of
fishes.
2315 About 1200 pounds. Cetti, in his “Natural History of
Sardinia,” vol. iii. p. 134, says that tunnies weighing a thousand
pounds are far from uncommon, and that they have been taken weighing as
much as 1800 pounds.
2316 The same as the Latin “dodrans,” or about nine inches.
This passage is taken almost verbatim from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. c.
34. Cuvier says that this passage, although like the preceding one,
taken from Aristotle, is much more incredible, (though Lacèpede, by
the way, disputes Pliny’s statement as to the weight of the tunny). “A
distance,” Cuvier says, “of from seven to eight feet from one point of
the fork of the tail to the other, would denote a fish twenty-five feet
in length; and it must be observed, that most of the MSS. of Pliny say
two cubits.” Aristotle, however, beyond a doubt says five.
2317 Now universally recognized as the sly silurus, or
sheat-fish, called in the United States the horn-pout, the Silurus
glanis of Linnæus. On this formerly much-discussed question, Cuvier has
an interesting Note. “There can now be no longer any doubt as to the
silurus; it is evidently synonymous with the ‘glanis’ of Aristotle;
as we find Pliny, in c. 17 and 51, giving the same characteristics of
the silurus, as Aristotle does of the glanis, Hist. Anim. B. viii.
c. 20, and B. ix. c. 37; such, for instance, as the care it takes
of its young, and the effects produced upon it by the dog-fish and
the approach of storms. It is easy to prove also that it is not the
sturgeon, [as Hardouin thought it to be], but the fish that is still
called ‘silurus’ by the naturalists, the ‘wels’ or ‘schaid’ of the
Germans, the ‘saluth’ of the Swiss, &c.”
2318 Cuvier remarks, that it is by no means clear what fish
is meant by this name, which is only found here and once in Hesychius,
who calls it κητώδης, “of the large kind.” Rondelet, in his
account of river fish, suggests that “exos” is the proper reading, and
that under this name is meant a species of sturgeon. Gesner asks if
it might not possibly have been the “brochet;” but, as Cuvier says,
that fish was well-known to the Romans under the name of “lucius” [our
pike], and it is not sufficiently large for Pliny to compare it to the
wels or the attilus, and for Hesychius to have enumerated it among the
“large” fishes. It is in accordance, however, with this suggestion of
Gesner that the pike genus bears the name of “esox” in modern Natural
History.
2319 Cuvier says that there are found in the river Padus,
or Po, several species of very large sturgeons, and that there is
one of these which still bears the name, according to Salvian and
Rondelet, of adello and adilo. Aldrovandus, he says, calls it adelo or
ladano. This Cuvier takes to be the attilus of Pliny. But, according
to Rezzonico, Paulus Jovius denies that the attilus or adelus of
the people of Ferrara is of the sturgeon genus; but says that it is
so much larger than the sturgeon, and so different in shape, flavour,
value, and natural habits, that the names of these two fishes were used
proverbially by the people, when they were desirous to signify two
objects of totally different nature. Rezzonico remarks, that the name
given to it in Ferrara was properly “l’adano,” which became corrupted
into “ladano,” and expresses it as his opinion that it was the same
with the esox of the Rhine. He also states, that, from the exceeding
whiteness of the flesh, the ladano was called by the fishermen,
sturione bianco.
2320 Rezzonico says that this may possibly have happened
in Pliny’s day, but that in modern times no attilus or ladano is
found weighing more than 500 pounds. He says that this fish may, in
comparison with the sturgeon, be aptly called an inert fish; for while
the sturgeon makes the greatest possible resistance to the fishermen,
the other is taken with the greatest ease.
2321 Cuvier says, that this was probably the Petromyzon
branchialis of Linnæus, the lampillon, a little fish resembling a worm,
which adheres to the gills of other fish, and sucks the blood. The
same name was also given to the Clupea alosa of Linnæus, our “shad;”
indeed Linnæus gave this name to the whole herring and pilchard genus,
erroneously classing them with the shad.
2322 The Main of the present day. But Dalechamps would read
“Rheno;” for, he says, this river was not known to the ancients by the
name of Mœnus.
2323 According to Albertus Magnus, this fish, which so
strongly resembled the sea-pig, or porpoise, was the huso, a kind of
sturgeon.
2324 See B. iv. c. 26. Cuvier says, that the fish here
alluded to, is one of the large species of sturgeon, so common in
the rivers that fall into the Black Sea, the bones of which are
cartilaginous, and the flesh is generally excellent eating.
2325 Cuvier says, that this is probably the dolphin of the
Ganges; a fish described by Dr. Roxburgh, in his “Account of Calcutta,”
vol. vii. This fish, he says, has the muzzle and the tail of the common
dolphin; but he declines to assert that it attains the length of
sixteen cubits.
2326 Solinus gives an account of these worms of the Ganges,
also from Sebosus, but not exactly to the same effect as Pliny. He
says, that they are of an azure colour, are six cubits in length,
and that they have two arms. He gives the same account as to their
extraordinary strength.
2327 It is evident that there is some mistake in the MSS.
either of Solinus or Pliny, as they both copied from the same source.
Pliny speaks of “branchiæ,” or gills, while Solinus mentions “brachia,”
or arms; the former, however, appears to be the preferable reading.
Cuvier remarks that Ctesias, in his Indica, c. 27, has given a similar
account, but that the worm mentioned by him has two teeth, and not
gills, and that it only seizes oxen and camels, and not elephants.
He states also, that an oil was extracted from it, which set on fire
everything that it touched. Cuvier observes, that in most of the MSS.
of Pliny the worm is sixty cubits long, instead of six, as in some few,
a length which was quite necessary to enable it to devour an elephant;
and he suggests that some large conger or muræna may have originally
given rise to the story. It is by no means improbable that some
individuals of the boa or python tribe, in the vicinity of the river,
may have been taken for vast fish or river worms. Among the German
traditions, we find the name “worm” given to huge serpents, which are
said to have spread devastation far and wide; and in the north of
England legends about similar “worms,” are by no means uncommon: the
story about the “Laidly Worm,” in the county of Durham, for instance.
2328 Although taken primarily from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
v. c. 9, as Cuvier observes, this assertion is incorrect, as the male
does not in any way differ from the female in the conformation of the
fins. Pliny, however, has exaggerated the statement of Aristotle, who
only says, that the female differs from the male in having a little fin
under the belly, which the male has not; and not that the male has no
ventral fin whatever.
2329 “Magno mari;” meaning, no doubt, the Mediterranean.
2331 Or “mud-fish,” either from being born in mud, as Festus
says, or from their concealing themselves in it.
2332 “Clidio.” The “clidion,” or “clidium,” was the part
of the fish which extended, as Festus says, from the two shoulders
(armos) to the breast. The “claviculæ” were thus called by the Greek
physicians.
2333 The Greeks called the inner part, or black-coloured
heart of the oak, μέλαν δρυὸς, whence the present name.
Athenæus, B. vi. speaks of the choice parts cut from the orcyni, large
tunnies, which were taken in the straits of Gades.
2334 “Faucibus.” Cuvier observes, that modern experience
has confirmed what Pliny says, as to the difference of flavour in
these various parts of the tunny. He refers to Cetti, Ist. Nat. di
Sardegna, vol. iii. p. 137.
2335 “Exercitatissima.” “In greatest request, as being most
stirred and exercised,” is the translation given by Holland; while
Littré renders it “mieux nourries,” “best nourished.” According to the
general notion in this country, the part about the tail is reckoned
inferior, and anything but the “best nourished.” It is doubtful if
“exercitatissima” is the correct reading; and if it is, its precise
meaning has yet to be ascertained.
2336 From the Greek ἀπόλεκτοι, “choice bits,” or,
as we should say, “tit-bits.”
2340 This fish does not seem to have been exactly identified
till recently; but was generally supposed to have been of the tunny
genus. Appian says, that it is rather smaller than the tunny. Rondelet,
B. viii., speaks of it as being, in his time, known by the name of
“byza.” Cuvier has the following remark. “The ‘amia’ of the ancients,
as Rondelet was well aware, was the same fish, to which, incorrectly,
upon nearly all the coasts of the Mediterranean, the name of ‘pelamis’
has been transferred. It is, in fact, the same as the ‘limosa’ of
Salvianus, the ‘pelamis’ of Belon, the ‘thynnus primus’ of Aldrovandus,
and the ‘scomber sarda’ of Bloch. The proof of all these being
synonymous, is the fact, that the ‘scomber sarda’ is the only species
of the tunny genus in the Mediterranean, which has strong, sharp,
cutting teeth, and is capable of attacking large fish, which Aristotle
relates respecting the amia, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 37. The same author
too, was well aware of the length of its gall-bladder, which is greater
than in most other fishes.”
2342 Generally supposed, as Cuvier says, to have been the
same as the mackerel, or Scomber scombrus of Linnæus, and with very
fair reason. From the frequent remarks made on the subject by the
Roman poets, we find that it was a very common fish at Rome, of small
size, and was in little repute. It was wrapped in paper when exposed
for sale, and bad poets were threatened with the mackerel, as they are
at the present day with the grocer or butterman; or, as in the time
of the Spectator, with the trunk-maker. Thus Persius says, Sat. i. l.
43. “and to leave writings worthy to be preserved in cedar, and verses
that dread neither mackerel nor frankincense.” Aristotle, Hist. Anim.
B. ix. c. 2, enumerates this fish among those that are gregarious, and
places it in company with the tunny and the pelamis, but states that it
is inferior in strength, B. viii. c. 2. Cuvier says, that the mackerel
still has names in different parts that are derived from the word
“scomber,” they being called “sgombri” at Constantinople, scombri at
Venice, and scurmu, scrumiu, and scumbirro in Sicily.
2343 Cetarias. These “cetariæ,” or “cetaria,” Papias says,
were pieces of standing salt water, in the vicinity of the sea-shore,
in which tunnies and other large fish were kept, and adjoining to which
were the salting-houses. In the middle ages these preserves were called
“tunnariæ,” or “tunneries.”
2344 As in the Euxine. Tunnies were caught on the Spanish
coasts, as we learn from Athenæus, who, as quoted above, mentions the
fisheries off Gades, for the orcynus, or large tunny. See N. 2333, p.
385.
2345 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 16, from whom Pliny
has here borrowed, makes a somewhat dissimilar statement. He says
that “no noxious animal enters the Euxine, except the phocena [or
porpoise], and the dolphin and little dolphin.” Hardouin remarks,
however, that Pliny is right in his statement that seals are to be
found in the Euxine, and that Rondelet, B. xvi. c. 9, for that reason
has suggested that the reading ought to be altered in Aristotle, and
not in Pliny.
2346 Aristotle, B. viii. c. 6. Plutarch on the Instinct of
Animals, and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 42, say the same.
2347 Called “chrysoceras,” in B. iv. c. 18, that being the
Greek name for “golden horn.” He means, that in consequence of the
lucrative nature of this fishery, it thence obtained the name of the
“golden” horn. Dalechamps is of opinion that some person has here
substituted the Latin “Aurei cornus,” for the Greek name Chrysoceras.
2348 Hence, according to Strabo, Chalcedon obtained the
name of the “City of the Blind,” the people having neglected to
choose the opposite shore for the site of their city. Still, however,
a kind of pelamis, or young tunny, from this place, had the name of
“Chalcedonia,” and is spoken of as a most exquisite dainty by Aulus
Gellius, B. vii c. 16.
2349 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 16; Ælian, Hist.
Anim. B. ix.; and Plutarch, in his Treatise on the Instincts of
Animals, state to a similar effect.
2350 Cuvier remarks that the “pompilos” of the ancients,
which accompanied ships and left them on nearing the land, was the
pilot-fish of the moderns, the Gasterosteus ductor of Linnæus. He
thinks, however, that the name may have also been given to other fish
as well, of similar habits.
2355 Cuvier suggests that the turdus, or sea-thrush, and
the merula, or sea-blackbird, were both fishes of the labrus tribe,
usually known as “breams.” Hippolytus Salvianus, in his book on the
Water Animals, states, that in his day—both these fish were extremely
well known, and that they still retained the names of tordo and merlo.
Rondelet, B. vi., says, that the fish anciently called turdus, was
in his time known by the name of “vielle,” among the French. The
dictionaries give “merling, or whiting,” as the synonyme of “merula.”
2356 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 16, says, that on
going into the Euxine, the trichiæ are either taken or else devoured by
the other fishes, for that they are never seen to return.
2357 The trichias, according to Cuvier, is a fish belonging
to the family of herrings. A scholiast on Aristophanes attributes the
origin of the name to the fine fish bones like hairs (θρὶξ),
with which the flesh is filled, which is a characteristic peculiar
to the herring kind. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 15, represents
the membras, the trichis, and the trichias, as different ages of the
same fish. The trichis was little, and very common. In Aristophanes,
Knights, l. 662, we find an obol mentioned as the price of a hundred.
From the Acharnæ of the same author, we learn that it was salted as
provision for the fleets. Cuvier thinks that everything combines to
point out the sardine, the Clupea sprattus of Linnæus, as the trichis,
or else a similar kind of fish, the melette of the African coast, the
Clupea meletta of the naturalists. In this latter case the trichias,
he thinks, may have been the sardine, or, perhaps, the Clupea ficta of
Lacèpede, which is called the “sardine” in some places, and at Lake
Garda, in Lombardy, more especially.
2358 The Danube. Cuvier says, that this passage probably
bears reference to the clupea ficta or finte, which, as well as the
shad, is in the habit of passing up streams. As for the story of
the fish finding their way to the Adriatic, it is utterly without
foundation. Cuvier adds, that the main difference between the finte and
the clupea alosa, or shad, is, that the former has very fine teeth, the
latter none at all.
2359 Pliny has already remarked, B. iii. c. 18, in reference
to the supposed descent of the Argonauts from the Ister into the
Adriatic, that such a passage by water was totally impossible; hence,
as Hardouin says, he is obliged here to have recourse to subterraneous
passages.
2360 The Pleiades. See B. ii. c. 47. The rising of the
Pleiades was considered the beginning of summer, being the forty-eighth
day after the vernal equinox. See also B. xviii. c. 59.
2361 The evening setting, namely. This took place on the
fourth day before the nones of November. See B. xviii. c. 74.
2363 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 16. Hardouin remarks,
that the tunny which Pliny mentions in c. 17, as weighing so many
hundreds of pounds, must certainly have been older than this.
2364 This is, as Cuvier has remarked, a crustaceous insect
of the parasitical class Lernæa, which are monoculous [and form the
modern class of the Epizoa]. Gmelin, he says, has called it “Pennatula
filosa,” though, in fact, it is not a pennatula [or polyp] at all. As
Dalechamps observes, its appearance is very different from that of a
scorpion. Penetrating the flesh of the tunny or sword-fish, it almost
drives the creature to a state of madness.
2365 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 19. Appian also,
in his Halieutics, B. ii., makes mention of this animal. Pintianus
remarks, that Athenæus, on reading this passage of Aristotle, read it
not as “arachnes,” but “drachmes;” not the size of a spider, but the
weight of a “drachma,” or Roman denarius.
2366 Or the emperor fish, Cuvier says, the Xiphias gladius
of Linnæus.
2367 In confirmation of this, Suetonius says, “The day
before Augustus fought the sea-battle off Sicily, while he was walking
on the sea-shore, a fish leapt out of the sea and fell at his feet.”
2368 Appian tells us, B. v., that Sextus Pompeius, on
gaining some successes against Augustus at sea, caused himself to be
called the “Son of Neptune,” as having been adopted by that divinity.
There is also a coin of Pompey extant, which attests that he adopted
the surname of “Neptunius.”
2369 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 5. Cuvier remarks, that
this is true, and more especially during the spawning season.
2370 Aristotle says the same, but with the expression of
some doubt as to the truth of the assertion. B. vi. c. 13.
2371 The erythinus is supposed to be the roach, or rochet,
of the present day, and the channe, the ruff or perch. Ovid, in his
Halieuticon, l. 107, alludes to the same notion that is here mentioned:
“And the channe, that reproduces itself, deprived of two-fold parents.”
Cuvier remarks, that, wonderful as these assertions may be, they are
not devoid, to all appearance, of a certain foundation; for that
Cavolini has observed in the Perca cabrilla and Perca scriba of
Linnæus, a species of hermaphroditism; the ovary having always in the
interior a lobe, which, from its conformation, would appear to be for
the milt; and that he is strongly of opinion that in this species, and
some others of the same genus, all the fish produce eggs, and fecundate
them themselves.
2372 Cuvier says, that the channe is the Perca cabrilla of
Linnæus, one of the serrans or trumpet-fish of the coasts of Provence.
According to Forskal, Fauna Arabica, and Sonnini, it still has the
name among the Turks and modern Greeks, of “chani,” or “channo,” and
it was in these that Cavolini observed the singular organization
previously mentioned. According to Athenæus, B. vii., Aristotle has
described this fish as of a red colour, variegated with black rays,
which answers very well to the Perca scriba of Linnæus, approaching
most nearly to the Perca cabrilla.
2375 Aristotle makes the same remark, Hist. Anim. B. viii.
c. 25.
2376 Cuvier observes, that all fishes are found to have in
the membranous labyrinth of the ear, bodies like stone, enclosed in
a certain kind of gelatinous liquor. These bodies, however, he says,
are not equally large in all kinds of fish. He says that it is found
largest in the sciæna.
2377 The Perca labrax of Linnæus. Called “loup,” or “wolf,”
on the Mediterranean coasts of France, and “bar” on the shores of the
ocean.
2378 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 19, attributes to
the chromis, Cuvier says, stones in the head, B. iv. c. 8, an acute
hearing, B. iv. c. 9, the power of making a sort of grunting noise,
and the habit of living gregariously, and depositing the eggs once
a year, B. iv. c. 9; all which characteristics, he says, are found
in the Sciæna umbra of the naturalists, the maigre of the French. In
addition to this, Epicharmus, as quoted by Athenæus, B. vii., says
that the chromis and the xiphias are, at the beginning of spring, the
very best of fish; a quality which must be admitted to belong to the
maigre, for its size and its excellent flavour. However, he says,
seeing that the glaucus, which Aristotle has distinguished from the
chromis, has a still stronger resemblance to the maigre, and that, as
Belon informs us, the ombrine, or Sciæna cirrhosa, is still sometimes
called at Marseilles the “chro,” or the “chrau,” and that, as Gyllius
says, on the coast of Genoa it has the name of “chro,” it would not
be improbable that this is really the chromis of the Greeks, as Belon
supposes.
2379 From σκιὰ, the Greek for “shadow;” which
name, as Cuvier says, has been translated by the moderns by the word
“ombre,” or “umbra.” But this name has been given at the present day
to so many fish of various kinds, from the “ombra” of the Italians
and the “maigre” of the French, the Sciæna umbra of the naturalists,
the ombrine or Sciæna cirrhosa of Linnæus, to the ombre of Auvergne,
the Salmo thymallus of Linnæus, and the ombre chevalier, the Salmo
umbra of Linnæus, that this synonyme does not aid us in discovering
its identity. Aristotle says nothing relative to his sciæna, Hist.
Anim. B. viii. c. 19, except that it has stones in the head, a thing
that is common to this with many other fish. Pliny, in copying this
passage, preserves the Greek name; but Ovid, Columella, and Ausonius
give it the name of “umbra;” the one, however, described by the first
two is a sea-fish, while that of Ausonius is a fresh-water fish. Varro,
who cites the name of umbra among those given to fish, adds that the
species which bears it owes its name to its peculiar colour; and as
Ovid calls it “liveus,” or “livid,” it may be presumed to have been of
a dark colour. It is very possible, then, that it may have been the
corvus marinus, or sea-crow, the Sciæna nigra of Linnæus.
2380 Or pagrus. This passage is from Aristotle, Hist. Nat.
B. viii. c. 19. Cuvier says that there are several names of fish, known
in the Mediterranean at the present day, as being from the
φάγρος of Aristotle, such as the pagri or pageau, the fragolino,
&c. names of a fish of a red silvery hue, the Sparus erythrinus of
Linnæus, his Sparus pagrus being another species. The modern Greeks
also call it φάγρος, the best proof of its identity with
the phagros of Aristotle, or pager or phagrus of Pliny. This phagrus,
Cuvier says, was not improbably the same as the modern pagre, as their
characteristics quite agree, so far as those of the ancient phagrus are
described. It is of red colour, and we find Ovid (Halieut. l. 108,)
speaking of the “rutilus pagur,” and it was, according to Aristotle,
B. viii. c. 13, caught equally out at sea and near the shore, and had
stones in the head, B. viii. c. 19, or, in other words, stony bodies of
large size in the labyrinthine cavities of the ear. Oppian, Halieut.
B. iii. l. 185, says that the channe forms a delicate morsel for the
pagrus, which shows that it was of considerable size; and several
authors quoted by Athenæus, B. vii., give it the epithet of “great.”
Hicesius says, in the same place, that it resembles the erythrus, the
chromis, the anthias, and other fish of very different character among
themselves; but it is only in relation to the flesh that he makes these
comparisons, so that we are unable to come to any conclusion as to the
form. But we find Numenius, also quoted by Athenæus, speaking of the
φάγρον λοφίην, the “crested phagrus,” possibly in allusion to
the height of the neck. The properties of its flesh are, if possible,
still less characteristic. Hicesius says that it is of sweet flavour
and nourishing, but rather astringent. Galen, however, says that it is
hard, and difficult of digestion, when old. Archestratus looks upon its
head as a delicacy, but thinks so little of the other parts, that they
are not, in his opinion, worth carrying away. He was, however, well
known to be much too refined in his notions of epicurism.
2381 Hardouin says that Aristotle, B. viii. c. 20, from whom
this account is taken, does not say this of all kinds of fish, but only
of those which have large heads.
2382 In B. viii. c. 54 and 55, where he is speaking of bears
and other animals.
2383 Cuvier states that Pliny takes this name from
Aristotle, and that Athenæus, B. vii., says that it is synonymous with
the Greek name, κορύφαινη. He also informs us, that modern
naturalists have applied these two names to the dorade of navigators,
the lampuga of the Spaniards and Sicilians, the Coryphæna hippurus
of Linnæus, but that it is not clear that it has been applied on
sufficient grounds: as there is no trace whatever of either of the
two ancient names on the coasts of the Mediterranean, and the ancient
writers have given no sufficient characteristics of the coryphæna or
hippurus. It was, we learn, of excellent flavour, and in the habit of
springing out of the water, from which, Athenæus says, it received the
name of “arneutes,” from ἀρνὸς, “a lamb.”
2384 Cuvier remarks, that Rondelet and others of the moderns
have thought that this was synonymous with the crow-fish, the corb of
the French, the Sciæna nigra of Linnæus, but that his own researches
on the subject had led him to a different conclusion. Its name was
derived, he says, from the Greek κόραξ, “a crow,” on account
of the blackness of its colour, as Oppian says, Halieut. B. i. l. 133;
but there were white ones as well, which Athenæus, B. viii., says,
were the best eating, though the black ones were the most common.
Aristophanes, as quoted by Athenæus, B. viii., calls it also the fish
with black gills, μελανοπτέρυγον. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v.
c. 10, says that it was a small fish, and one of those that increase
rapidly in growth. It was little esteemed, and was much used, as we
learn from Athenæus and the Geoponica, for salting, and making garum or
fish-sauce. It was also used as a bait for the anthias or flower-fish.
Strabo, B. xiii., also speaks of a river-fish of this name, as being
found in the Nile; the flesh of which Athenæus mentions as being
remarkably good eating, and the best among the fishes of the Nile.
Martial also, B. xiii. Ep. 85, calls it “princeps Niliaci macelli,” the
“prince of the produce of the Nile.” That fish, however, Pliny says,
B. xxxii. c. 5, was peculiar to the Nile; and he states, B. v. c. 9,
that in consequence of finding it in a lake of Lower Mauritania, Juba
pretended that the Nile took its rise in that lake. Athenæus says, B.
iii., that the dwellers on the Nile called it πέλτη, “the
buckler;” and in B. vii., that the people of Alexandria called it
πλάταξ, from its broad shape. Now, Cuvier remarks, it is well
known that the best fish of the Nile at the present day is the bolty,
the Labrus Niloticus of Linnæus, and the Chromis Nilotica of his own
system; and this he takes to be the Coracinus albus. It is flat and
compressed, and when held on the side, would appear almost circular
in shape. Its colour appears white in comparison with that of another
little fish of the same genus, the Sparus chromis of Linnæus, the
Chromis castanea of Cuvier, which is of a brownish colour, and is found
on the coast of France, where it has never been held in high esteem,
except for the purposes of salting or making bait for other fish. He
concludes, then, that this last was the sea coracinus, and the “bolty”
of the present day that of the Nile.
2385 Cuvier says, that it has been doubted, upon the
authority of Paulus Jovius, whether by this name was signified the
muræna of the present day, the Muræna helena of Linnæus, or the
Petromizon marinus of Linnæus, the modern lamprey. These two fishes,
he says, have in common a long smooth body, and are devoid of the
symmetrical fins, and the flesh of both is of a delicate flavour.
There are, however, several other characteristics mentioned, he says,
from which it can be easily proved that in most of the passages of
Pliny, Aristotle, and Ælian, where the muræna is mentioned, it is
the Muræna helena that is meant. Ovid says, Halieut. ll. 114, 115,
“the muræna burning with its spots of gold”—but the lamprey has no
yellow spots whatever: and in l. 27, he speaks of it as “ferox,” or
“fierce,” a characteristic which also belongs to the muræna, but not to
the lamprey. Ælian also states, B. x. c. 40, that the muræna defends
itself with its teeth, which form a double row, and Aristotle says, B.
viii. c. 2, that it lives upon flesh; while Pliny says, in c. 88 of
the present Book, that it bites off the tail of the conger. It was the
Muræna helena only, and not the lamprey, that could have devoured the
slaves whom Vedius Pollio ordered to be thrown into their preserves,
as is mentioned by our author in the present Book, and by Seneca and
Tertullian. Finally, a thing that he considers quite decisive on the
point, Aristotle says, B. ii. c. 13, that the muræna has four gills
on each side, like the eel; while the fact is that the lamprey has
only seven in all. Where we find Pliny speaking of the seven spots
upon the muræna found in Northern Gaul, it appears most likely, Cuvier
says, that he speaks after some traveller, who had observed the seven
branchial orifices on the lamprey, and had taken them for spots.
2386 This fish, Cuvier says, was of a reddish colour,
had rough scales, sharp teeth, large eyes, and a tough flesh. It
lived a solitary life in the sea, near rocks which were the resort
of shell-fish, which formed its principal nutriment. It passed the
winter in the crevices of rocks under water. Its growth was rapid, and
the length of its life two years; when cut in pieces, its muscles,
were still seen to palpitate. Rondelet, having gathered these
characteristics, looks upon the orphus as belonging to the genus
Pagrus. Cuvier says, however, that it would not be easy to prove
that this is a warranted conclusion, and that it is not justified by
tradition, as the name has utterly disappeared from the coasts of
France and Italy; though, according to Gillius and Belon, it is found
among the modern Greeks, in the shape of the “ropho.” Cuvier suggests
that it may have been the Anthias sacer of Bloch, the “barbier” of the
French.—It is supposed by some that it is our “gilt-head.”
2388 “Percæ.” Cuvier says that it is most probable that he
is here speaking of the fish generally known by the ancients as the
sea-perch; and that there is reason for thinking that it was similar
to the Perca scriba of Linnæus, having black lines running across the
body. Most naturalists are of this opinion, he says, and the serran
[our trumpet-fish] which bears this resemblance, is in many parts of
Italy, at the present day, called the “Percia marina.”
2390 Cuvier states, that Athenæus, B. vii., says that the
psetta was the same as the rhombus of the Romans, the modern turbot,
the Pleuronectes maximus of Linnæus. From a passage, however, of
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 37, he feels convinced that it is the
Pleuronectes rhombus of Linnæus, the barbue of the French, and with
us the dab or sandling. Aristotle says in that passage, that it is in
the habit of concealing itself in the sand, while it moves to and fro
the filaments around the mouth, and so attracts the little fish. These
filaments, Cuvier says, are small radii of the anterior part of the
dorsal fin, which form a sort of fringe around the mouth, whence its
French name of barbue. The turbot has no such filaments.
2391 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 20. As Hardouin
remarks, Aristotle appears to assign the sixty days to the glaucus
only.
2392 Naturalists have generally supposed, following
Rondelet, Cuvier says, that the ancient glaucus was one of the class
of centronotal fishes, the Scomber amia, or the Scomber glaucus of
Linnæus; but that the incorrectness of this notion is easily proved.
Aristotle says, that in the glaucus the appendices to the pylorus are
few in number, as in the dorado (the Sparus aurata of Linnæus), while
on the other hand the centronoti have them in almost greater number
than any other kind of fish. Athenæus says, B. iii., that the glaucus
was a large fish, and Oppian, Hal. iii. l. 193, speaks of it as taken
with mullet. Aristotle, B. ii. c. 13, says, that it dwelt in deep
water; but, according to Oppian, Hal. i. 170, it sought its food among
rocks and in the sand; in addition to which characteristics, we find
that it was a fish highly esteemed as a delicacy, the head being the
part more especially preferred. From all these circumstances, Cuvier
concludes that it was more probably a maigre, the Sciæna aquila of
Cuvier, than one of the centronotal fishes.
2393 Literally, the “little ass.” Cuvier says, that nearly
all the naturalists, following Rondelet, apply this name to the merlus,
the Gadus merluccius of Linnæus, or else the genus of the gadus,
or cod, in general. It is true, he says, that the “onos,” or “ass”
of the Greeks, the “asellus” of the Romans, was also known as the
γαδὸς, by the Greeks; but still this onos had very different
characteristics from those of the Gadus merluccius; and among all the
gadi of Linnæus, he finds the only one that presents any of them to be
the Gadus tricirrhatus, or sea-weasel, which he therefore thinks to
represent the ancient “asellus.”
2394 Aurata, “golden-fish.” Cuvier observes, that by the
Greeks this was called χρύσοφρυς, “eye-brow of gold.” It
is the French daurade of the Mediterranean, the “Sparus aurata” of
Linnæus, and is remarkable for a golden line in form of a crescent over
the eyes. Ajasson remarks, that it was also called Ἰώνισκος,
and suggests that it may have been originally called so from being
first found in the Ionian Sea. From an epigram of Martial, B. xiii. Ep.
110, it would appear that this fish was considered a very great dainty,
and that it was fattened with Lucrine oysters.
2395 This fish has been already mentioned in c. 17 of the
present Book. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 20, says this of the
glanis.
2396 Further mention is made of this fish in c. 74 of
the present Book. Aristotle mentions it in B. viii. c. 25, but says
nothing about it being a sea-fish; while Dorion, as quoted by Athenæus,
B. vii., expressly mentions it among the lake and river fish. Hence
Dalechamps seems inclined to censure our author for this addition; but
we find Oppian, Halieut. B. i. ll. 101 and 592, speaking of the sea
cyprinus; and Athenæus speaks of the cyprinus of Aristotle as being a
sea-fish.
2397 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 20. This subject is
also treated of by Pliny in B. ii. c. 40, and is again mentioned in B.
xviii. c. 58.
2398 Cuvier remarks, that it does not appear that the
characteristics of the mullet, here mentioned by Pliny, have been
observed in modern times.
2400 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 4, states to a similar
effect.
2401 Cuvier says, that the peculiarity in the scales here
mentioned is not found in any fish; but that the sturgeon genus has,
in place of scales, laminæ disposed in longitudinal lines in such a
way, that the one does not lap over the other, as is the case with fish
in general. It was this fact, misstated probably, that gave rise to
the story; and it is most likely this that has led Rondelet, and most
of the modern naturalists, to look upon the acipenser as the common
sturgeon, and to give that name to the sturgeon genus. Athenæus reckons
it among the cartilaginous fishes, and in the family of the squali; but
Pliny here speaks of it as very rare, and Martial and Cicero say the
same, which cannot be so accurately said of the sturgeon. Archestratus,
in Athenæus, speaks of it as small, having a sharp-pointed muzzle, and
of triangular shape, and tells us that a very inferior one was valued
at 1000 Attic drachmæ. The sturgeon, on the other hand, is often ten
or twelve feet in length. The acipenser was not always in vogue with
the Romans, but when it was, it was most highly esteemed; and according
to Athenæus, B. vii., and Sammonicus Severus, as quoted by Macrobius,
B. ii. c. 12, it was brought to table by servants crowned with flowers
and preceded by a piper. All these circumstances lead Cuvier to be of
opinion that under this name is meant a kind of small sturgeon with a
sharp muzzle, greatly esteemed by the Russians, and by them known as
the sterlet, the Acipenser Ruthenus of Linnæus, the Acipenser Pygmæus
of Pallas. It is found in the Black Sea, and in the rivers that fall
into it; and has been carried with success to Lake Ladoga, as also
Lake Meler, in Sweden. This is the smallest and most delicate of the
sturgeon genus, and Professor Pallas says that they are sold at St.
Petersburgh at “insane prices,” when more than two feet in length. It
is not improbable that it was found in the rivers of Asia Minor, and
thence carried to Rome occasionally. Pliny, indeed, B. xxxiii. c. 11,
says that it is not a stranger to Italy; if so, it would seem to be
different from the “elops,” of which Ovid says, Halieut. l. 96, “and
the precious elops, unknown in our waters,” though he also says of
the “acipenser,” in l. 132, “and thou, acipenser, famed in distant
waters.” Still, however, Cuvier says, the use of names was not so
accurate among the ancients, but what that of “acipenser” may have
been given to the sturgeon in general; and this may have given rise to
the present assertions of Pliny. Oppian, in Athenæus, B. vii., says,
like Pliny, that the elops was the same as the acipenser, and we find
no characteristics given of the elops to make us conclude that the
two were not synonymous. Indeed, we find that Varro, De Re Rustica,
B. ii. c. 6, and Pliny in c. 54 of the present Book, speak of the
elops as being most excellent at Rhodes, while we find Archestratus in
Athenæus, B. vii., speaking of the same as being the locality of the
acipenser; and Columella, B. viii. c. 16, and Ælian, B. viii. c. 28,
place it in the Pamphylian Sea, which is not far distant from Rhodes.
Pliny, B. xxxii. c. 11, states, that the palm of fine flavour was by
many accorded to the elops; while Matron Parodus, in Athenæus, calls
it the “most noble of all fishes, food worthy of the gods.” From the
immense sums that were given for it, as we learn from Varro, quoted by
Nonius Marcellus, it was called the “multum munus,” or “multinummus,”
the “much-money fish.” Ælian says, B. viii. c. 28, that the fishermen
who were fortunate enough to take an elops, were in the habit of
crowning themselves and their vessel with garlands, and announcing it,
on entering harbour, by the sound of the trumpet. Professor Pallas,
in his work on the Russian Zoography, takes the elops to be a kind of
sturgeon, more spiny than the rest, which is represented by Marsigli
under the name of “Huso sextus.” He does not, however, give his reason
for fixing on this as the elops of the ancients. It has been also
suggested that the elops was the same as the sword-fish.
2402 The wolf-fish. Generally supposed to be the basse, or
lubin of the French, much esteemed for their delicacy.
2404 Cuvier remarks, that we find this name in Euthydemus,
as quoted by Athenæus, B. vii., used synonymously with that of “onos.”
We also find the names Callarias, Galerias, and Galerides; but none of
the characteristics are given, by which to distinguish them.
2405 Cuvier says that this fish held, as Pliny here states,
the very highest place at the Roman tables, and was especially famous:
First, because it was supposed to ruminate; in allusion to which, Ovid
says, Halieut. l. 118, “But, on the other hand, some fishes extend
themselves on the sands covered with weeds, as the scarus, which
fish alone ruminates the food it has eaten.” Secondly, because, as
Aristotle, B. viii. c. 2, and Ælian, B. i. c. 2, inform us, it lived
solely on vegetables. Thirdly, because it had the faculty of producing
a sound, as we learn from Oppian, Halieut. B. i. l. 134, and Suidas.
Fourthly, for its salacious propensities, numbers being taken by means
of a female attached to a string. Oppian, Halieut. B. iv. l. 78, and
Ælian, B. i. c. 2. Fifthly, for its remarkable sagacity in affording
assistance to another, when taken in the net; relative to which Ovid
has the following curious passage, Halieut. l. 9, et seq. “The scarus
is caught by stratagem beneath the waves, and at length dreads the
bait fraught with treachery. It dares not strike the osiers with an
effort of its head; but, turning away, as it loosens the twigs with
frequent blows of its tail, it makes its passage, and escapes safely
into the deep. Moreover, if perchance any kind scarus, swimming behind,
sees it struggling within the osiers, he takes hold of its tail in
his mouth, as it is thus turned away, and so it makes its escape.”
Oppian, Halieut. B. iv. l. 40, and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. i. c. 4,
mention the same circumstance. We find that it was highly esteemed by
the Roman epicures, even in early times, it being mentioned by Ennius
and Horace. It was salted with the intestines in it; and Martial, B.
xiii. Ep. 84, seems to speak of it as not being good to eat without
them. It was a high-coloured fish, so much so, that Marcellus Sidetes
called it “floridum,” while by Oppian it is called ποικίλον,
or “variegated.” Rondelet thinks that it was one of spari or the labri,
while Belon describes as such, a fish now unknown to zoologists, the
tail of which, he says, has projecting spines. Aldrovandus calls it by
the name of Scarus Cretensis, a species of the genus which at present
goes by the name of Scarus, and which is distinguished by osseous
jaw-bones, resembling in shape the beak of a parrot. Cuvier says, that
on finding from Belon that the name σκάρος was still in use
in the Ægean Sea, he ordered the various kinds of it to be brought
to Paris; upon which he found that they exactly resembled the Scarus
Cretensis of Aldrovandus, and he consequently has no doubt that it
is essentially the same fish as the scarus of the Greeks and Romans.
From the resemblance above stated, it is not uncommonly called the
“parrot-fish;” while by some it has been thought to have resembled our
char.
2407 Or weasel-fish. Cuvier is of opinion that Hardouin
is right in his conjecture, that this is the Lote, or Gadus lota of
Linnæus, which is still called motelle in some of the provinces of
France. Its liver, he says, is one of the greatest delicacies that can
be eaten.
2409 Instead of “marinis,” Sillig adopts the reading
“murænis,” making them to rival the muræna even. The other, however,
seems to be the preferable reading.
2410 Cuvier says that this is the τρίγλα of the
Greeks, the triglia of modern Italy, the rouget of Provence, and the
Mullus barbatus of Linnæus.
2411 The coasts of La Manche, Cuvier says, and the Gulf of
Gascony produce a kind of mullet of larger size than usual, varied with
stripes of a yellow colour. This, the Mullus surmuletus of Linnæus, is
also to be found in the Mediterranean, but much more rarely than the
smaller kind, which is red all over.
2412 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 5; Ælian, Hist.
Anim. B. ii. c. 41; and Oppian, Halieut. B. iii. l. 435.
2413 Hardouin says that it is larger than the sea-mullet;
and that it dwells in muddy or slimy spots in the vicinity of the
sea-shore.
2415 Probably from the fact of its living in the mud.
“Doctors differ” on this point. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c.
16, says that shore-fish are superior to those caught out at sea;
while Seneca, on the other hand, Nat. Quæst. B. iii. c. 18, says that
rock-fish and those caught out at sea are the best.
2416 He would almost seem to imply by this that they feed
upon shell-fish: but Hardouin has a note to the effect, that Pliny does
not mean that they live on shell-fish, as it would be impossible for
them to break the shell to devour the fish within, but only that they
have the same flavour as shell-fish. But query as to this explanation.
2417 On the other hand, Isidorus says that the
mullet-coloured shoes were so called from the colour of the fish,
which, indeed, is most probable. These shoes were made of a kind of red
Parthian leather, probably not unlike our morocco leather. Festus seems
to say that they were worn in general by all the patricians; but the
passage of Varro which he quotes, only shows that they were worn by the
curule magistrates, the consul, prætor, and curule ædile.
2418 Hence their Greek name, τρίγλα, according to
Oppian, Halieut. B. i. l. 590.
2419 Seneca has a passage on this subject, Quæst. Nat. B.
iii. c. 18, which strongly bespeaks the barbarous tastes of the Romans.
He says: “A mullet even, if just caught, is thought little of, unless
it is allowed to die in the hand of your guest. They are carried about
enclosed in globes of glass, and their colour is watched as they die,
which is changed by the struggles of death into various shades and
hues.” And again: “There is nothing, you say, more beautiful than the
colours of the dying mullet; as it struggles and breathes forth its
life, it is first purple, and then a paleness gradually comes over it;
and then, placed as it is between life and death, an uncertain hue
comes over it.”
2420 This anchovy, pickle, or fish-sauce, will be found more
fully spoken of in B. xxxi. c. 44.
2421 Alecem. See B. xxxi. c. 44. Seneca speaks of this cruel
custom of pickling fish alive, Quæst. Nat. B. iii. c. 17. “Other fish,
again, they kill in sauces, and pickle them alive. There are some
persons who look upon it as quite incredible that a fish should be able
to live under-ground. How much more so would it appear to them, if they
were to hear of a fish swimming in sauce, and that the chief dish of
the banquet was killed at the banquet, feeding the eye before it does
the gullet?”
2422 He may have been the son of C. Asinius Gallus, who was
consul B.C. 8; but he does not appear to have ever been consul
himself.
2424 Juvenal, Sat. iv. l. 15, speaks of a mullet being
bought for 6000 sesterces, a thousand for every pound, and Suetonius
tells us that in the reign of Tiberius three mullets were sold for
30,000 sesterces. It is in allusion to this kind of extravagance that
Juvenal says, in the same Satire, that it is not unlikely that the
fisherman could be bought as a slave for a smaller sum than the fish
itself. At the above rate, each of these mullets sold for about £70 of
our money.
2425 Cuvier says that although the mullet of the Indian Seas
is in general larger than ours, it is never found at all approaching
the weight here mentioned.
2426 The bolty of the modern Egyptians, as previously
mentioned.
2427 Or Jove-fish. Cuvier says that Gillius has “applied the
name of “faber” to the dory, or fish of Saint Peter, and has stated
that the Dalmatians, who call it the “forga,” pretend that they can
find in its bones all the instruments of a forge. After him, other
modern naturalists have called the same fish Zeus faber; but nothing,
Cuvier says, goes to prove that the dory is the fish so called by the
ancients. The epithet even of “rare,” given to it by Ovid, Halieut. l.
112, is far from applicable to the dory, which is common enough in the
Mediterranean. If, indeed, the χαλκεὺς of the Greeks were the
same as the “faber,” as, indeed, we have reason to suppose, it would
be something in favour of the dory, as Athenæus, B. vii., says that
the χαλκεὺς is of a round shape: but then, on the other hand,
Oppian, Halieut. B. v. l. 135, ranks it among the rock-fish which feed
near rocks with herbage on them; while the dory is found only in the
deep sea.
2429 Cuvier says that this fish has still the same name in
Italy; that it is called the “saupe” in Provence, and the “vergadelle”
in Languedoc, being the Sparus salpa of Linnæus; and that it still
answers to all the ancient characteristics of the salpa, eating grass
and filling its stomach, and having numerous red lines upon the body.
It is common, and bad eating, but is no better at Ivica, the ancient
Ebusus, than anywhere else. M. De la Roche, when describing the fishes
of that island, says expressly that the flesh of the saupe is but
very little esteemed there. Ovid, Halieut. l. 122, speaks of it as
“deservedly held in little esteem.”
2432 Hardouin remarks, that Pliny and Ausonius are the only
Latin writers that mention this fish; while not one among the Greeks
speaks of it. It was probably a native of regions too far to the north
for them to know much about it. In this country it holds the same rank
that the scarus and the mullet seem to have held at the Roman tables.
2433 He must mean single ones, on each side of the head.
Cuvier remarks, that the present passage is from a longer one in
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 13, which, however, has come down
to us in such a corrupt and fragmentary state, that it is totally
unintelligible, or, at all events, does not correspond with modern
experience. No fish, he says, is known to us that has one or two gills
only. The Lophii of the system of Linnæus have three gills on each
side, and the greater number of fish four, with a half one attached to
the opercule. Some cartilaginous fish, again, have five or six, and the
lampreys seven.
2437 Cuvier says, that in various species of the cyprinus,
and more especially the rubellio, the Cyprinus rutilus of Linnæus, the
roach, the Cyprinus jeses of Linnæus, and the bream, the Cyprinus brama
of Linnæus, the male has, during the spawning season, little warts
adhering to the skin and scales. This appearance has been remarked in
especial on a species found in the lakes of Lombardy, known there as
the “pigo,” and similar to the roach of other countries. It is most
probable that it is to this appearance that Pliny alludes. Rondelet, in
his book on Fishes, gives a representation of it, and calls it “pigus,”
or “cyprinus clavatus;” but he wrongly, like Pliny, takes it to be a
peculiar genus of fish.
2438 “Clavorum caligarium”—“nails for the caliga.” This
was a strong, heavy sandal, worn by the Roman soldiers. It was worn by
the centurions, but not by the superior officers; and from the use of
it, the common soldiers, including the centurions, were distinguished
by the name of “caligati.” The Emperor Caligula received that cognomen
when a boy, in consequence of wearing the “caliga,” and being inured
to the life of a common soldier. The hob-nails with which the “caliga”
was studded are mentioned again in B. xxii. c. 46, and B. xxxiv. c.
41. Josephus tells us of the death of a Roman centurion, which was
occasioned by these nails. As he was running over the marble pavement
of the temple of Jerusalem, his foot slipped, and he was unable to
rise, upon which he was overpowered by the Jews, and slain. After the
decline of the Roman empire, the caliga was no longer worn by the
soldiers, but was assumed by the monks and recluses.
2439 Dalechamps says, that in a similar manner, in the lake
known by the name of Paladru, fish of most delicate flavour, called
“umblæ,” were to be taken in the month of December, and at no other
part of the year; so, too, the alausæ, which are found in the Rhine,
near Strasburg, in the month of May only, and at no other time.
2440Ἀπὸ τοῦ ἔξω κοιτᾶν “from its sleeping
out of the water.” This fish is also mentioned by Theophrastus,
in his Fragment on the “Fish that live on dry land;” by Clearchus
the Peripatetic, as quoted by Athenæus, B. viii.; Oppian, in his
Halieutics, B. i. l . 158; and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 36. The
fish, however, mentioned by all these authorities, is a sea-fish,
while that of Pliny, being found in Arcadia, must, of necessity, be
a river fish. The proper name of the fish here mentioned by him was
ποικιλίας, Hardouin says, so called from the variety of its
colours. Cuvier says, that the fish here mentioned is not the Exocœtus
of Linnæus, which is one of the flying fish, but is clearly of opinion
that it is one of the genus Blennius, or Gobio, that is alluded to;
for these small fish are often to be found left on the shore when the
waters retire, and have the property of being able to remain alive for
a considerable time without water.
2441 In the river Aroanius, which falls into the Clitorius.
Pausanias mentions this story, but adds, that he never could hear the
fish, although he often went there to listen. Mnaseas of Patræ, an
author quoted by Athenæus, B. viii., also mentions these vocal fishes.
2442 Cuvier understands this to mean only, that the
openings of the gills are remarkably small: for, as he says, there is
no fish whatever without gills. It is very possible, however, that
Pliny may have mistranslated a passage found in Athenæus, and quoted
from Clearchus the Peripatetic, in which he says that some fish have
a voice, and yet have no throat, βρόγχον; which may have,
possibly, been mistaken by our author for βράγχια, “gills.”
2443 “Marini mures.” Cuvier says, that according to Oppian,
Halieut. B. v. c. 174, et seq., the sea-mice, small as they are,
attack other fish, and offer resistance even to man himself. Their
skin, he says, is very solid, and their teeth very strong. Theophrastus
names them along with seals and birds, as feeding both on land and
at sea. Cuvier is somewhat at a loss whether to pronounce them, with
Dalechamps, to be a kind of turtle. If so, he considers that this would
be the little turtle, Testudo coriacea of Linnæus, which is by no
means uncommon in the Mediterranean. He suggests, however, that there
are equal grounds for taking it to be the Flasco psaro, or Tetrodon
lineatus of Linnæus.
2445 The Muræna helena of Linnæus. This animal, Cuvier says,
like the eel, is able to live out of water, in consequence of the
minute size of the branchial orifices, as Theophrastus very accurately
explains. It is a common opinion that they come out of the water in
search of others of their kind; but Spallanzani was informed by the
fishermen of Comacchio, that this hardly ever is the case, and that
they will only leave the water when compelled. The polypus also crawls
very briskly on the shore when it has been thrown up by the tide, and
moves with considerable swiftness.
2446 This is also stated by the author of the treatise, De
Mirab. Auscult. c. 72; and Theophrastus, in his work on the “Fishes
that can live on land,” says, that these Indian fishes resemble the
mullet. Cuvier says, that these fish are those known as the various
species of the genus Ophicephalus of Bloch, which bear a strong
resemblance to the mullet in the head and body. Mr. Hamilton Buchanan,
in his “History of the Fishes of Bengal,” says, that these fish crawl
on the grass to so great a distance from their rivers, that the people
absolutely believe that they must have fallen from heaven.
2447 Or the “Fishes.” As if, indeed, Hardouin says, the
resemblance of name given to the constellation could have any effect
upon the fish!
2450 “Passer.” Probably our “plaice”—the Pleuronectes
platessa of Linnæus.
2451 The pleuronectes in general, Cuvier says, have the two
eyes situate on the same side of the body. The turbot has them on the
left side, and lies on the sand on the right side, while the plaice or
the flounder has the eyes on the right, and lies on the left side—the
reverse of what Pliny says.
2453 By this Pliny means, Cuvier says, only the symmetrical
fins, or pairs of fins, the pectoral namely, which are in place of
arms, and the ventral, which are instead of feet; of which, in fact, no
fish has more than two pairs. Pliny does not include in this statement
the dorsal, anal, and pectoral fins.
2454 Eels and congers, for instance, which have but one
pair.
2457 Cuvier thinks that there can be no question that he is
speaking here of some mollusc or crustaceous animal.
2458 Murænæ, like eels, have gills, but the orifice, Cuvier
says, is much smaller than in the eel, and the opercula, under the
skin, are so small as to be hardly perceptible; indeed, so much so,
that modern naturalists, Lacepède, for instance, have denied the fact
of their existence.
2459 Aristotle, De Part. Anim. B. iv. c. 13, and Hist. Anim.
B. i. c. 6.
2460 Or sting-ray. On the contrary, Cuvier says, the
pastinaca, more than any other ray, has large pectoral fins,
horizontally placed; but they adhere so closely to the body that they
do not appear to be fins, unless closely examined.
2461 By this name, Cuvier says, he calls the tentacles or
feelers, which adhere to the head of the polypus, and which it uses
equally for the purpose of swimming or crawling.
2462 Spallanzani, in his “Nat. Hist. of the Eel in the
Lagunes of Comacchio,” says, that immediately after their birth they
retreat to the Lagunes, and at the end of five years re-enter the river
Po.
2463 Eighty or a hundred hours at most, Spallanzani says.
2464 Cold, or a foul state of the water, Cuvier says, is
very destructive to the eel.
2466 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 75, says the same,
and likewise that they feed mostly at night. The reason for their not
floating when dead, he says, is their peculiar conformation; the belly
being so remarkably small that the water cannot find an entrance; added
to which they have no fat upon them.
2469 The setting of the Pleiades or the rising of Arcturus.
See B. ii. c. 47.
2470 Spallanzani informs us that the fishermen of the
Lagunes of Comacchio form with reeds small chambers, by means of which
they take the eels when endeavouring to re-enter the river Po; in these
such vast multitudes are collected, that they are absolutely to be seen
above the surface of the water.
2472 Hardouin says, that though this assertion is repeated
by Pliny in c. 74 of the present Book, it is a mistake; we learn,
however, from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 11, and Athenæus, B.
vii., that the young of the muræna are remarkable for the quickness of
their growth.
2473 This vulgar belief is, however, followed by Oppian,
Halieut. B. i. c. 555; Athenæus, B. vii.; Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. i. c.
50, and B. ix. c. 66; and Nicander, Theriac., who, however, adds, “if
indeed it is the truth.” It is also alluded to by Basil, in Hexaem.
Homil. vii., and Ambrose, Homil. v. c. 7.
2474 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 11, only quotes this
story as he had heard it, and does not vouch for its truth. Doro, as
quoted by Athenæus, B. vii., makes the zmyrus and the muræna to be of
totally different genera. The zmyrus, he says, is without bone, the
whole of it is eatable, and it is remarkable for the tenderness of the
flesh. There are two kinds, of which the best, he says, are those which
are black.
2475 The common muræna, Cuvier says, is spotted with brown
and yellow, but there is a larger kind, with stronger teeth and brown
all over, the Muræna Christini, of Risso. This, he has no doubt, is the
zmyrus of the ancients. Modern naturalists, he says, have incorrectly
called Muræna zmyrus, a small kind of conger, which has yellow spots
upon the neck.
2476 Cuvier has already made some remarks on this passage in
one of his Notes to c. 24 of the present Book. See p. 395.
2477 The Seven Terriones, or plough oxen. The constellation
of Ursa Major was thus called by the Romans.
2478 This wretched man was originally a freedman, and though
he was on one occasion punished by Augustus for his cruelty, he left
him a great part of his property. He died B.C. 15. He is
supposed to be the same person as the one against whom Augustus wrote
some Fescennine verses, mentioned by Macrobius, Sat. B. ii. c. 4.
2479 Until the Roman youth assumed the toga virilis, they
wore the toga prætexta, or senatorial gown. The toga virilis was
assumed at the Liberalia, in the month of March; and though no age
appears to have been positively fixed for the ceremony, it probably
took place, as a general rule, on the feast which next followed the
completion of the fourteenth year; though it is not certain that the
completion of the fourteenth year was not always the time observed.
So long as a male wore the prætexta, he was considered “impubes,” and
when he had assumed the toga virilis, he was “pubes.” Hence the word
“investis,” or “prætextatus,” (here employed), was the same as impubes.
2480 Thus the “impubes” paid, as Hardouin says, “not in
money, but in skin.” Isidorus, in his Glossary, says, “‘Anguilla’ is
the name given to the ordinary ‘scutica,’ or whip with which boys are
chastised at school.” The witty Rabelais says, B. ii. c. 30, “Whereupon
his master gave him such a sound lashing with an eel-skin, that his own
would have been worth nothing to make bag-pipe bags of.”
2485 Galen, in his explanation of words used by Hippocrates,
speaks of the βοῦς θαλάσσιος, which is also described by
Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. l. 141, et seq. He speaks of it as growing to
the length of eleven or twelve cubits, and having small, weak teeth,
which are not easily seen, and compares it in appearance to the roof of
a house. Cuvier thinks, that although its horns are not mentioned, a
species of large horned ray is alluded to, which is known by the modern
naturalists by the name of Cephalopterus, and he thinks it very likely
these horns may have given it its Greek appellation. Indeed Pliny
himself, in another place, B. xxxii. c. 53, speaks of it under the name
of “cornuta,” the “horned-fish.”
2487 Cuvier suggests that this was the mylobates, the Raia
aquila of Linnæus, which probably obtained this name on account of the
width of the pectoral fins, and its peculiar shape.
2488Βάτραχος ἁλιεὺς, the sea-frog, the Lophius
piscatorius of Linnæus, and the baudroie of the French. Cuvier remarks,
that though there is little solidity or firmness in the bones of this
animal, it is not properly a cartilaginous fish.
2489 This is borrowed from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
v., who, however, says, καὶ πάντα τὰ γαλεώδη; from which
Massarius, Turnebus, and Hippolytus Salvianus are inclined to read
“galei,” instead of “squali.” Both terms, however, Hardouin says,
are used to denote the genus which the French call “chiens de mer,”
“dog-fish.”
2490 It is curious that Aristotle, though he was the
inventor of this name, has nowhere stated in what it originated. Galen,
De Alim. Fac. B. iii. c. 36, says that it is ἀπὸ τοῦ σέλας
ἔχειν, from the fact of their shining at night.
2491 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 5, and De Part.
Anim. B. iv. c. 13.
2494 Cuvier says that it is true that the sea-frog is
oviparous; but it is far from being the case that all the cartilaginous
fishes but it are viviparous. The rays, for instance, produce large
eggs of a square shape, and enveloped with a very hard horny shell.
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 5, and B. ii. c. 16, makes the same
exception as to the sea-frog or frog-fish.
2495 This is also from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 17.
Oppian also mentions it, Halieut. B. i. l. 223, et seq., but he gives
it all the characteristics of the modern lamprey.
2496 This is the Echeneis remora of Linnæus, Cuvier says.
It has upon the head an organ, by means of which it can attach itself
to any body. It is thus enabled to fasten to ships and larger fishes;
but as for staying a ship, it has not, as Cuvier remarks, the slightest
power over the very smallest boat. All the eloquence, therefore, which
Pliny expends upon it, in B. xxxii. c. 1, is entirely thrown away.
2497Ἀπὸ τοῦ ἔχειν νῆας. “From holding back ships.”
2498 Used for the purpose of bringing back lost love, or
preventing inconstancy.
2500 Hardouin says that it is very possible that Aristotle
may have written to this effect in some one of the fifty books of his
that have perished, but that such is not the case in his account given
of this fish in his Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 17, for there he expressly
says, “There are some people that say this fish has feet, whereas
it has none at all; but they are deceived by the fins, which bear a
resemblance to feet.” Cuvier says he cannot see in what way the fins
of the remora, or sucking-fish, resemble feet, any more than those
belonging to any other fish.
2501 Cuvier says, that the shell-fish to which Pliny here
ascribes a power similar to that of the remora, is, if we may judge
from his description of it, of the genus called Cypræa, and has very
little doubt that its peculiar form caused its consecration to Venus,
fully as much as its supposed miraculous powers. He also remarks that
Hardouin, in his Note upon this passage, supposes an impossibility, in
suggesting that the lips of this shell-fish can bite the sides of a
ship; these lips or edges being hard and immoveable. For some curious
particulars as to the peculiar form of some kinds of Cypræa, or cowry,
and why they more especially attracted attention, and were held sacred
to Venus, see the discussion on them, in the Defence made by Apuleius
against the charge of sorcery, which was brought against him.
2502 Rondelet, B. xiii. c. 12, says that this kind of shell
was formerly used for the purpose of smoothing paper.
2503 Herodotus tells us, B. iii. c. 48, that these were 300
boys of noble families of the Corcyræans, and that they were being sent
from Periander of Corinth, to Alyattes, king of Sardes.
2504 Venus was fabled to have emerged from the sea in a
shell.
2505 Rabelais refers to these wonderful stories about the
echeneis or remora, B. iv. c. 62: “And indeed, why should he have
thought this difficult, seeing that —— an echeneis or remora, a
silly, weakly fish, in spite of all the winds that blow from the
thirty-two points of the compass, will in the midst of a hurricane
make you, the biggest first-rate, remain stock still, as if she were
becalmed, or the blustering tribe had blown their last; nay, and with
the flesh of that fish, preserved with salt, you may fish gold out of
the deepest well that ever was sounded with a plummet; for it will
certainly draw up the precious metal.”
2506 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 34; Ælian, Hist.
Anim. B. xii. c. 48. Rondelet is of opinion that this mæna was the fish
still called menola by the people of Liguria and Rome. It was a fish
little valued, and we find it called by Martial, “inutilis mæna,” B.
xii. Epigr. 30. Cuvier says, that if it does not change from white to
black, as Pliny states, its colours are much more lively in the spring.
It also has an offensive smell at certain times, as is noticed by
Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 30, and to which Martial alludes in
the above epigram. Ovid also mentions it as a fish of no value; held,
in all probability, in the same degree of estimation as a sprat with
us. It is, no doubt, the Sparus mæna of Linnæus.
2507 We learn from Aristotle, B. viii. c. 30, that the
phycis was a whitish fish, which in the spring assumed a variegated
colour. In an Epigram of Apollonides it is called “red;” and
Speusippus, as quoted in Athenæus, B. v., says that it is similar to
the perch and the channe. Ovid speaks of it as frequenting the shore,
and Oppian represents it as dwelling among the sea-weed on the rocks.
It also lived on shrimps, and its flesh was light and wholesome;
while its most singular property was that of making its nest among
the fucus or sea-weed, whence its name. All these characteristics,
Cuvier says, are to be found, from what Olivi states, in the “go”
of the Venetians, found in the Adriatic, the Gobius of Linnæus; the
male of which in the spring makes a nest of the roots of the zostera
in the mud, in which the female lays her eggs, which are fecundated by
itself, and then protected by it against the attacks of enemies. This
is probably the fish that is alluded to by Ovid, Halieut. l. 121, “The
fish that imitates, beneath the waves, the pretty nests of the birds.”
2508 This name, Cuvier observes, is still common on
the coasts of the Mediterranean, to two kinds of flying fish, the
Dactylopterus, or Trigla volitans of Linnæus, and the Exocœtus volitans
of Linnæus. It is to the first, he thinks, that the ancients more
especially gave the name of swallow, although Salvianus and Belon are
of the contrary opinion. Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. ll. 457-461, ranks the
sea-swallow with the scorpion, the dragon, and other fish the spines
of which produce mortal wounds, and Ælian, B. ii. c. 5, states to the
same effect. But the exocœtus has no spines, while the dactylopterus
has terrible ones on its præopercules. Speusippus also, as quoted in
Athenæus, B. vii., gives no less decisive testimony, in saying that the
sea-cuckoo, the trigla, and the sea-swallow, have a strong resemblance
to each other; the fact being that the dactylopterus is of the same
genus as the sea-cuckoo, the Trigla cuculus of Linnæus.
2509 Ovid, Halieut. l. 96, speaks of this fish as having
a black back. Cuvier therefore suggests that it may possibly be the
perlon, the Trigla hirundo of Linuæus, the back of which is of a dark
brown, and the great size of the pectoral fins of which may have given
rise to the notion of its being able to fly. It is also very possible,
he says, that it may have been the exocœtus, the back of which is of a
blue colour.
2510 Lucerna. Probably, as Cuvier says, one of those
numerous molluscs, or zoophytes, which give out a brilliant light,
and perhaps the Pyrosoma of Péron. No period being found in the MSS.
after the word “milvus”—“kite,” it was long thought that this passage
applied to the sea-kite; and it is owing to this circumstance that we
find the ichthyologists enumerating a Trigla lucerna. The correction,
however, is approved of by Cuvier, who says that he has found none of
the genus triglæ to give forth a light; except, indeed, when, like
other fish, it begins to be putrid.
2511 Probably the “cornuta,” mentioned in the Note on the
sea-ox in c. 40; see p. 411. Cuvier says that it was long supposed that
the fish here alluded to might be the Malarmat of the Mediterranean,
the Trigla cataphracta of Linnæus, the muzzle of which is divided
into two horns; but then they are only half an inch long, instead of
a foot and a half. He is of opinion, therefore, that it is the great
horned ray, now known as the cephalopterus, which, being often fifteen
feet and more in diameter, answers much better to the description of
its size implied by Pliny from the length of its horns. It is also
mentioned under the name of cornuta in B. xxxii. c. 53, in company with
the saw-fish, the sword-fish, the dog-fish, and other large fishes.
2512 Cuvier is of opinion, that Rondelet is correct in his
suggestion that this is the sea-spider, called the “vive” in France,
the viver or weever with us, and the Trachinus draco of Linnæus, which
fish is still called δράκαινα by the modern Greeks. Pliny,
in c. 48 of the present Book, charges the sea-spider with doing much
mischief, by means of the spines or stickles on its back. Now Ælian, B.
ii. c. 50, and Oppian, Halieut. l. 458, say the same of the sea-dragon;
and this is a well-known property of the modern vive, the Trachinus
draco of Linnæus. Pliny speaks more especially, in B. xxxii. c. 53, of
the wounds which it makes with the spines or stickles of its opercules,
which the vive is also able to inflict; and in addition to this, it has
the power of burrowing into the sand in a most incredibly short space
of time.
2513 Cuvier remarks, that this division of the bloodless
fish by Aristotle into the mollusca, testacea, and crustacea, has been
followed by naturalists almost down to the present day.
2514 The Sæpia loligo of Linnæus; the calmar of the French,
or ink-fish.
2515 The Sæpia officinalis of Linnæus; the seche of the
French; our cuttle-fish.
2516 The Sæpia octopodia of Linnæus, or eight-footed
cuttle-fish.
2517 Cuvier remarks, that this account of the arms or
feelers of the sæpia and loligo is very exact.
2518 “Quibus venantur.” Hardouin suggests that the proper
reading would be “quibus natant”—“by means of which they swim;” for
Aristotle says, in the corresponding passage, “with the fins that
surround the body they swim.”
2519 Plautus has a line in his Rudens, which shows that when
the sæpia was cooked for table, it was customary to take the eyes out.
“Bid them knock out his eyes, just as the cooks do with the sæpia.”
2520 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 2, states to a similar
effect, as also Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. i. c. 34; Oppian, Halieut. B.
iii. l. 156.
2521 This so-called ink, Cuvier says, is neither their blood
nor their bile, but a liquid that is secreted in a bag peculiar to the
animal. It is said, that it is from the juices of certain polypi of
the Eastern seas, that the genuine Indian or Chinese ink is made; but
M. Abel Remusat assures us that he has found nothing in the Chinese
writers to confirm this conjecture.
2522 This, as Hardouin says, is the polypus which is found
on the sea-shore, and which more frequently comes on dry land than the
other kinds.
2523 The arms of the polypus have numerous names with
the Latin authors. Ovid calls them “flagella,”—“whips;” others
again, “cirri”—“curls;” “pedes”—“feet;” “crura”—“legs;” and
“crines”—“hair.”
2524 This, Cuvier says, is quite unintelligible; for all the
polypi have an oval body, of the shape of a bag, and there is nothing
in them that bears any resemblance to a tail, forked or otherwise.
2525 This channel, Cuvier says, is in form of a funnel
reversed, by means of which the animal draws in and ejects the water
that is requisite for its respiration, and discharges the ink and other
excretions. It is in the fore-part of the body, and at the orifice of
the bag, and not on the back, as Pliny says; but, as Cuvier remarks,
it was very easy for a person to be deceived in this matter, as the
head, being in form of a cylinder, and fringed with the so-called feet,
cannot be said to be distinguished into an upper and lower side.
2526 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 2, says that the
animal is obliged to do so, on account of the situation of the eyes.
2527 But Aristotle says, καθάπερ ἐμπεφυσημένην,
“as though it were puffed out with air.”
2528 “Acetabulis.” The acetabulum was properly a vinegar
cruet, in shape resembling an inverted cone; from a supposed similarity
in the appearance, it is here applied to the suckers of the polypus.
The Greek name is κοτυληδὼν.
2530 Cuvier says, that the changes of colour of the skin
of the polypus are continual, and succeed each other with an extreme
rapidity; but that it has not been observed, any more than the
chameleon, to take the colour of objects in its vicinity.
2531 This notion is mentioned by Athenæus, Pherecrates,
Alcæus, Hesiod, Oppian, and Ælian.
2532 Cuvier says, that Pliny states, in B. xxix. c. 28,
that the colotis, or colotes of the Greeks, is the same as their
ascalabotes, the “stellio” of the Latins. This stellio is the same as
the “gecko” of the moderns, and the species known in Italy and Greece
is the same as the “wall gecko” of the French, or the tarente of the
Provencals. From what Pliny says here about its tail, it would appear
to have been a lizard; but its identity with the stellio, Cuvier says,
is very doubtful. It will be mentioned more at length in B. xi. c. 31.
2533 It is very true, Cuvier says, that the tail of the
gecko and lizard will grow again after it has been cut off, but without
vertebræ. As to the arms of the polypus, he says, it is very possible,
seeing that the horns of the snail, which belongs to the same family,
will grow again.
2534 This account of the nautilus, Cuvier says, the
Argonauta argo of Linnæus, wonderful as it may appear, has been often
confirmed by modern observation.
2535 This, Cuvier says, is not a membrane between the
two feet or tentacles, but a distinct membranous delatation of the
extremity of each of those two organs.
2536 These vessels have been already remarked upon in Note
33 to c. 5 of the present Book.
2538 From ὄζω, “to emit an odour.” This was a small
kind of polypus.
2539 Cuvier remarks that, in this Chapter, there are many
details relative to the polypus, that have not been observed by modern
naturalists; but they may have been observed by the Greeks, upon whose
shores and islands the animal was much more frequently to be found than
in the west of Europe.
2540 Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. l. 260, describes the battles
of these animals with the polypus. He also says, B. iii. c. 198, that
they are attracted by the smell of the flesh of the polypus, and so are
easily taken.
2542 Oppian, Halieut. B. i. l. 551, says, that they hardly
live a year; and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 28, states to a similar
effect.
2543 Basil attributes a similar craftiness to the crab;
Hexaem. Homil. vii.
2544 The fishermen at the present day, upon the coast of
Normandy, say that the polypus, which they call the chatrou, is a
most formidable enemy to swimmers and divers; for when it has embraced
any of the limbs with its tentacles, it adheres with such tenacity,
that it is quite impossible for a person to disengage himself, or to
move any of his limbs.
2545 In Spain; see B. iii. c. 3. Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vi.
c. 13, tells a similar story about a polypus at Puteoli.
2546 “Lacus;” large tubs used in the process of pickling.
This story, Cuvier observes, is only surpassed by those told by the
Norwegians relative to the “kraken” of their seas, which, according
to some versions of the fable, is a polypus of such vast size, that
sailors have sometimes mistaken it for an island.
2547 “Nassis.” The “nassa” was a contrivance for catching
fish by the junction of osier or willow rods. It was probably made in
the shape of a large bottle with a narrow mouth, and placed with the
mouth facing the current. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 8, states,
that the fishermen, when they were desirous of bringing the fish out of
their holes, were in the habit of rubbing the mouth of the holes with
salted flesh.
2548 Oppian, Halieut. B. i. c. 310, tells a story of a
polypus, of the ozæna species, that was in the habit of climbing trees,
and plundering the fruit.
2549 “Afflatu terribili.” This, as Hardouin says, may either
mean its bad smell, or stinking water, ejected from its canal.
2550 Its arms or feelers. The amphora, as a measure of
capacity, held about nine English gallons.
2551 “Caliculis;” literally, “little glasses.” Its
“acetabula,” or suckers, are so called from their peculiar shape.
2552 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 2, says the same; but,
as Hardouin observes, he must mean the Ionian sea.
2553 Cuvier says, that this is only a reproduction, under
another name, and with other details, of the story of the nautilus or
argonauta; but under the impression that the polyp is not the animal
which owns the shell, but is only its associate. It has also been
asserted in modern times, he says, that the polyp has seized this shell
by force from some other animal, in order to convert it into its boat;
but the opinion has not been adopted, as the shell of the nautilus has
been never found in the possession of any other animal.
2554 Probably borrowed from the Greeks, who called it
ἄκατος. It is supposed to have been a small boat, similar to
the Roman “scapha;” like our “skiff” probably.
2556 “Palmulis.” This word also means the blade or broad
part of an oar; in which sense it may, perhaps, be here taken.
2557 “Locusta;” literally, the “locust” of the sea. By
this name is meant, Cuvier says, the “langouste” of the French (our
cray-fish), which has no large forcipes, and has a thorax covered with
spines; the Palinurus quadricornis of the naturalists. This is clearly
the κάραβος of Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 23; for we
generally find it thus translated by Pliny, when he borrows anything
from that philosopher. We know that the body of this animal was spiny,
from the fact that Tiberius, as we learn from Suetonius, cruelly caused
the face of a fisherman who had offended him, to be rubbed with a
locusta.
2558 Aristotle, and Theophrastus, in his “Treatise on
Animals which conceal themselves,” state to a similar effect.
2559 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 4, states to a
similar effect.
2560 Aristotle, loc. cit., and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. ix.
c. 25, state to the same effect.
2561 Hardouin says, that this must be only understood of the
kind of crab known as the “astacus;” that being the one mentioned by
Aristotle, in the passage from which Pliny has borrowed.
2562 He mentions, in B. ii. c. 41, the effect which the rays
of the moon have upon the growth of shell-fish.
2563 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 2, has a somewhat
similar passage. “The kinds of crabs are numerous, and not easily to
be enumerated. First, there are those known as maiæ, then the paguri,
which are also called ‘heracleotici;’ and, after them, the river crabs.
There are others, again, of a smaller size, and which, for the most
part, are known by no name in particular.”
2564 This is, no doubt, the cray-fish, the same animal that
has been called the “locusta” in the preceding Chapter. Aristotle
states, B. iv. c. 8, that the carabus has the thorax rough and spiny.
It is most probable, that it is from this name that our word “crab” is
derived.
2565 Cuvier says, that the astacus, which is very accurately
described by Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 8, is indisputably
the homard of the French (the common lobster of the English); the
Cancer gammarius of Linnæus. Pliny, in another place, B. xxx. c. ii.,
describes it himself under the name of elephantus.
2566 Cuvier remarks, that according to Aristotle, B. iv.
c. 2, the maiæ are in the number of the καρκίνοι, or crabs
that have a short tail concealed beneath the body, being those of the
largest kind. The same philosopher, De Part. Anim. B. iv. c. 8, adds,
that these have also short feet and a hard shell. Cuvier says, that
many writers have applied this name to the crabs at the present day
belonging to the genus inachus, and more especially the Cancer maia of
Linnæus. He is more inclined, however, to think that the maia was the
common French crab, known as poupart or tourtue, the Cancer pagurus of
Linnæus.
2567 Hardouin says, that these are the same that the
Venetians were in the habit of calling “cancro poro,” the last word
being a corruption, as he thinks, of pagurus. Aristotle says, loc.
cit., that they were crabs of middling size.
2568 Or Heracleotic crabs. Aristotle says, De Partib. Anim.
B. iv. c. 8, that these crabs had shorter feet and thinner than those
of the maiæ. Cuvier suggests, that these may be the commonest kind of
crab, the Cancer mænas of Linnæus, or a species very similar.
2569 “Leones.” This name is not found in Aristotle’s
account, but it is found in Athenæus, B. iii. c. 106; and in Ælian,
Hist. Anim. B. xiv. c. 9. According to Diphilus, as quoted by Athenæus,
it was of larger size than the astacus. Ælian describes it as more
slender in shape than the cray-fish, and partly of a bluish colour,
and with very large forcipes, in which it resembles, Cuvier says, the
homard of the French. It is possible, however, he adds, that it may
have been only a second name given to the astacus already mentioned; as
both Pliny and Ælian, who were not critical observers, are very liable
to make errors in names.
2570 Aristotle, Cuvier observes, states the carcini, or
crabs, have no tail, the fact being that the tail is extremely small,
and is concealed, as it were, in a furrow in the under part of the
body. The cray-fish, on the other hand, has a large and broad tail.
2571Ἱπποὶ. The more common reading is
ἱππεῖς, “horsemen.” Cuvier thinks, that in all probability, these are
a kind of crab with very long legs, vulgarly known as the sea-spider;
the Macropodia and the Leptopodia of Linnæus.
2572 Hardouin remarks, that Aristotle says this only of the
carabi, or cray-fish, and not of the crabs in general; and that, on the
contrary, in B. v. c. 7, he says, that in the crab the male does not
differ in conformation from the female, except in the opercule. There
seems, in reality, to be no foundation for the statement here made by
Pliny.
2573 Both in the crab and the cray-fish, Aristotle says.
2574 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vii. c. 24, calls this kind of
crab δρομίας, the “runner,” from the great distance it is
known to travel. He says, that they meet together, coming in one by
one, at a certain bay in the Thracian Bosporus, where those who have
arrived wait for the others; and that on finding that the waves of
the Euxine are sufficiently violent to sweep them away, they unite in
a dense body, and then waiting till the waters have retired, make a
passage across the straits.
2575 Cuvier remarks, that Hardouin is correct in considering
this the same as the crab known in France as Bernard the Hermit (our
hermit-crab), the Cancer Bernardus of Linnæus, a species of the
genus now known as the Pagur. This animal hides its tail and lower
extremities in the empty shells of whelks, or other univalves. Cuvier
suggests that our author committed a slip of the pen, in using the word
oyster here for shell-fish. This is the καρκίνιον, probably,
of Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 15, and De Part. Anim. B. iv. c.
8; and it is most probable that, as Cuvier states, the real
πιννοτήρης of Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. iv. c. 4, and B. v. c. 14, was
another of the crustacea, of which Pliny speaks under the same name in
c. 66. This last is a small crab, that lives in the shells of bivalves,
such as mussels, &c., but not when empty. See the Notes to c. 66.
2576 This circumstance is more fully treated of in B. xxxii.
c. 19.
2577 Our author speaks rather more guardedly here than
usual; and Hardouin seems almost inclined to believe the story. Ovid
also alludes to this story in the Met. B. xv. l. 370, et seq. “If you
take off the bending claws from the crab of the sea-shore, and bury the
rest in the earth, a scorpion will come forth from the part so buried,
and will threaten with its crooked tail.”
2579 The sea-urchin, the herisson de mer of the French, and
the Echinus of Linnæus.
2580 Cuvier remarks, that it does not use the spines or
prickles for this purpose, but that it moves by means of tentacules,
which it projects from between its prickles.
2581 The Echinus cidaris of Linnæus; with a small body, and
very long spines. The name, according to Hardouin, is from the Greek,
meaning the “mother of the echini.”
2583 The same, Cuvier says, with the Echinus spatagus of
Linnæus.
2584 Not “ova,” Cuvier says, but “ovaria” rather. Each
urchin has five “ovaria,” arranged in the form of stars. They are
supposed to be hermaphroditical, but there is considerable doubt on the
subject.
2585 The mouth of the sea-urchin, armed with five teeth, is
generally turned to the ground, Cuvier says.
2586 Plutarch, in his Book “on the Instincts of Animals,”
Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. l. 225, and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vii. c. 44,
all mention this.
2587 This idea probably arose from the fact of their being
sometimes found with stones sticking between their spines or prickles.
2590 It is now known, thanks to the research of Swammerdam,
that the black points at the extremity of the great horns of the land
snail, or Helix terrestris, and at the base of them in the water snail,
are eyes.
2591 “Pectines in mari;” literally, “sea-combs.” The French
still call them by a similar name, “peignes.” They are known also in
France as “coquilles de St. Jaques,” or St. James’s shells; probably,
because worn by pilgrims who had visited the shrine of St. Jago, at
Compostella. Indeed, the scallop shell was a favourite emblem with
the palmers and pilgrims of the middle ages, who were in the habit of
wearing it on their return in the hat.
2592 He Latinizes the Greek name, calling it “unguis”—“a
nail;” and, according to Varro, they were so called from their
resemblance to the human nail. Pliny mentions them again in c. 87 of
this Book, and in B. xxxii. c. 53, where he states that they are also
called “dactyli,” or “fingers.” Cuvier says, that under this name are
meant the pholades, a bivalve shell-fish, which give forth a very
brilliant light.
2600 The whelks that have the edge turned inwards, so that
one lip appears to fold under the other.
2601 As no two naturalists might probably agree as to the
exact meaning of the terms here employed, it has been thought advisable
to give the passage as it appears in the original: “Jam distinctione
virgulata, crinita, crispa, cuniculatim, pectinatim divisa, imbricatim
undata, cancellatim reticulata, in obliquum, in rectum expansa,
densata, porrecta, sinuata, brevi nodo legatis, toto latere connexis,
ad plausum apertis, ad buccinum recurvis.”
2602 In allusion, probably, to the streaks or lines drawn
upon the exterior of the shell.
2603 With the mouth wide open, like that of a person in the
act of applauding.
2604 By “ad buccinum recurvis,” he probably alludes to a
whelk, or fish with a turbinated shell, resembling the larger conch or
trumpet shell, which Triton is sometimes described as blowing.
2605 Probably some of the Cypræa; which have been already
alluded to in Note 6 to c. 41 of the present Book. Cuvier remarks, that
there are many of the univalve shell-fish that float on the surface of
the water, but none, with the exception of the argonauta or nautilus,
are known to employ a membranous sail.
2606 Cuvier says, that he has been informed that the
scallop, by suddenly bringing together the valves of its shell, is able
to make a bound, and leap above the surface of the water.
2607 Ajasson says, that the words “purpuras, conchylia,”
here signify not the fish themselves, but the various tints produced by
them; the purpura and the conchylium being, in fact, exactly the same
fish, though, as will be explained in c. 60 of the present Book, by
various modes of treatment, various colours were extracted from them.
See also B. xxi. c. 22.
2608 Dalechamps notices here an ancient proverb, which
says, “Qui nare vult, se exuit.” “He who wishes to swim, takes off his
clothes.”
2611 See B. vi. c. 23. Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xv. c. 8, says
to the same effect, but calls it “Perimuda, a city of India.”
2612 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. x. c. 13. It has been already
remarked, in the sixth Book, that the ancients looked upon the Persian
Gulf as forming part of the Erythræan or Red Sea.
2613 The pearl itself, Cuvier says, is nothing else but an
extravasation, so to say, of the juices, whose duty it is to line the
interior of the shell, to thicken and so amplify it; and consequently,
it is produced by a malady. It is possible, he says, for them to be
found in all shell-fish; but they have no beauty in them, unless the
interior of the shell, the nacre, or, as we call it, the mother of
pearl, is lustrous and beautiful itself. Hence it is, that the finest
of them come from the east, and are furnished by the kind of bivalve,
called by Linnæus, “Mytilus margaritiferus,” which has the most
beautiful mother of pearl in the interior that is known. The parts of
the Indian sea which are mentioned by Pliny, are those in which the
pearl oyster is still found in the greatest abundance.
2614 All this theory, as Cuvier says, is totally imaginary.
2615 Isidorus of Charax, in his description of Parthia,
commended by Athenæus, B. iii., says, on the other hand, that the fish
are aided in bringing forth, by rain and thunder.
2617 It sometimes happens, Cuvier says, that the secretion
which forms the mother-of-pearl makes tubercles in the interior of the
shell, which are the pearls adhering to the shell here spoken of.
2618 Persius alludes to this in Sat. ii. l. 66. “Hæc baccam
conchæ rasisse;” “to file the pearl away from its shell.”
2619 From this passage we learn that the “tympana,” or
hand-drums of the ancients, were often of a semiglobular shape, like
the kettle-drums of the present day.
2620 Cuvier remarks that this is not the fact: the
concretions are perfectly hard before the animal leaves the water.
2621 Isidorus of Charax, as quoted by Athenæus, B. iii.; and
Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. x. c. 20, make similar statements. Rondelet, in
his treatise on Testaceous Fishes, B. i., complains of Pliny using the
word “videt,” “sees,” in the present passage; but, as Hardouin says, he
only uses it in a free sense, meaning, “is aware of the approach of,”
or “has a perception of.”
2622 Isidorus of Charax, in Athenæus, B. iii., tells a
similar story; but modifies it by saying that the fish sometimes cuts
off the fingers of the divers, and not the hands.
2623 “Canes marini.” He calls by this name the same animal
that a little further on he describes by the name of “canicula,”
“dog-fish;” alluding, probably, under that name to various species
of the shark. Procopius, in his book, De Bell. Pers. B. i. c. 4, has
a wonderful story in relation to this subject. He says, that the
sea-dogs are wonderful admirers of the pearl-fish, and follow them
out to sea; that when the sea-dogs are pressed by hunger, they go in
quest of prey, and then return to the shell-fish and gaze upon it. A
certain fisherman, having watched for the moment when the shell-fish
was deprived of the protection of its attendant sea-dog, which was
seeking its prey, seized the shell-fish, and made for the shore. The
sea-dog, however, was soon aware of the theft, and making straight for
the fisherman, seized him. Finding himself thus caught, he made a last
effort, and threw the pearl-fish on shore, immediately on which he was
torn to pieces by its protector.
2624 Such, for instance, as Megasthenes, quoted by Arrian in
his Indica, and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xv. c. 8.
2625 Hardouin suggests that a preferable reading to
“vetuslate,” would be “venustate,” by its beauty; and indeed, Ælian,
in the corresponding passage, Hist. Anim. B. xv. c. 8, says, that
the chief is remarkable “for its size, and the extreme beauty of its
colours.”
2626 “Nucleos.” The Greek authors occasionally call them
“stones” and “bones.” Tertullian calls them “maladies of shell-fish and
warts”—“concharum vitia et verrucas.”
2627 Cuvier says, that the most efficient mode of extracting
all the concretions that may happen to be concealed in the body of the
animal, is to leave the flesh to dissolve in water, upon which the
concretions naturally fall to the bottom.
2628 Isidorus and Solinus, however, say that the pearl is so
called, because two are never found together. The derivation given by
Pliny is, however, the more probable one. From the Latin “unio,” comes
our word “onion;” which, like the pearl, consists of numerous coats,
one laid upon the other.
2629 Hence we must conclude that the word “margarita” is not
of Greek, but Eastern origin.
2630 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xv. c. 8, says, that the Indian
pearls, and those which come from the Red Sea, are the best.
2631 The laminæ of the lapis specularis, described by Pliny,
B. xxxvi. c. 45.
2632 “Exaluminatos.” It is clear from this passage that
Pliny was acquainted with our alum, as he here clearly implies that
the alum known to him was of a white colour. Beckmann, however, in his
History of Inventions, asserts that our alum was certainly not known
to the Greeks and Romans, and that their “alumen” was nothing else but
vitriol, the green sulphate of iron, and that not in its pure state,
but such as forms in mines. Pereira, however, in his Materia Medica,
says, that there can be little doubt that Pliny was acquainted with our
alum, but did not distinguish it from sulphate of iron, as he informs
us that one kind of alum was white, and was used for dyeing wool of
various colours. It is mentioned more fully in B. xxxv. c. 52, where he
speaks of its use in dyeing.
2633 These alabaster boxes for unguents are mentioned by
Pliny in B. xxxvi. c. 12. They were usually pear-shaped; and as they
were held with difficulty in the hand, on account of their extreme
smoothness, they were called ἀλάβαστρα, from ἀ,
“not,” and λαβέσθαι “to be held.” The reader will recollect
the offer made to our Saviour, of the “alabaster box of ointment of
spikenard, very precious.” Matt. xxvi. 7. Mark xiv. 3.
2634 Seneca, Benef. B. vii. c. 9, speaks of them as hanging
in tiers from the ears of the Roman matrons, two and two; and he says
that they are not satisfied unless they have two or three patrimonies
suspended from each ear.
2635 From their resemblance to “crotala,” used by dancers,
and similar to our castanets.
2636 That the pearls as fully bespeak the importance of the
wearer, as the lictor does of the magistrate whom he is preceding. The
honour of being escorted by one or two lictors, was usually granted to
the wives and other members of the imperial family.
2637 Even on the “socculus,” or “soccus,” a shoe or slipper
which did not require any “obstragulum,” or tie. We find from Seneca,
De Ben. B. ii. c. 12, and Pliny, B. xxxvii. c. 6, that Caligula wore
gold and pearls upon his socculi.
2638 Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xv. c. 8, states to this effect
from Juba.
2639 They are found also, Ajasson says, at the present day,
in some of the coldest rivers and torrents of Auvergne.
2640 Or “pinna,” the Greek name of this kind of pearl
oyster.
2641 Cuvier remarks, that he is here probably speaking of
some spiny bivalve, perhaps the Spondylus of Linnæus.
2642 “Grandini.” But Hardouin thinks, and probably
correctly, that the meaning here of the word is the “measles of swine;”
for Androsthenes, in Athenæus, B. iii., has a similar passage, in
which he says: “The stone (i. e. pearl) grows in the flesh of the
shell-fish, just as the measles grow in the flesh of swine.”
2643 He is also mentioned in B. xxxvi. c. 12, and B. xxxvii.
cc. 9, 11, 23, 35, and 50, as a writer on gems; but nothing else seems
to be known of him.
2644 Cuvier observes, that most of the rivers and lakes
of the north of Europe possess the mya margarifera: the pearls of
which, though much inferior to those of the East, are sufficiently
esteemed to be made an article of commerce. Bad pearls, of a dead
marble colour, are also very frequently found in the mussels taken off
our coasts. Pearls have in modern times declined very considerably in
value; those of about the size of a large pea can be purchased, of very
fine quality, for about a guinea each, while those of the size of a
pepper-corn sell at about eighteen-pence. Seed pearls, of the size of
small shot, are of very little value. Tavernier speaks of a remarkable
pearl, that was found at Catifa, in Arabia, the fishery probably
alluded to by Pliny, in C. 54, and which he bought for the sum of
£110,000, some accounts say £10,000, of our money. It is pear-shaped,
the elenchus of the ancients, regular, and without blemish. The
diameter is .63 of an inch, at the largest part, and the length from
two to three inches. It is said to be in the possession of the Shah of
Persia.
2645 Tacitus, in his Agricola, says that pearls of a tawny
and livid colour are thrown up on the shores of Britain, and there
collected. Suetonius absolutely says, c. 4, that Julius Cæsar invaded
Britain in the hope of obtaining pearls, in the weight and size of
which he took considerable interest.
2646 By the inscription placed beneath the thorax, or
breast-plate.
2647 The grand-daughter of M. Lollius, and heiress to his
immense wealth. She was first married to C. Memmius Regulus; but was
divorced from him, and married to the Emperor Caligula, who, however,
soon divorced her. At the instigation of Agrippina, Claudius first
banished her, and then caused her to be murdered. A sepulchre to her
honour was erected in the reign of the Emperor Nero.
2649 Or rather “betrothal entertainment,” “sponsalium cœna.”
The “sponsalia” were not an unusual preliminary of marriage, but were
not absolutely necessary.
2650 7,600,000 francs, Hardouin says; which would make
£304,000 of our money.
2652 He was proprætor of the province of Galatia, Consul
B.C. 21, and B.C. 16 legatus in Gaul; where he
suffered a defeat from certain of the German tribes. He was afterwards
appointed by Augustus tutor to his grandson, C. Cæsar, whom he
accompanied to the East in B.C. 2. He was a personal enemy
of Tiberius, which may in some measure account for the bad character
given him by Velleius Paterculus, who describes him as more eager to
make money than to act honourably, and as guilty of every kind of vice.
Horace, on the other hand, in the ode addressed to him, Carm. iv. 9,
expressly praises him for his freedom from all avarice. His son, M.
Lollius, was the father of Lollia Paulina.
2653 This does not appear to be asserted by any other
author; but Velleius Paterculus almost suggests as much, B.ii., “Cujus
mors intra paucos dies fortuita an voluntaria fuerit ignoro.” It was
said that he was in the habit of selling the good graces of Caius Cæsar
to the Eastern sovereigns for sums of money.
2658 “Et consumpturam eam cœnam taxationem confirmans.”
2659 “It was because pearls are calcareous, that Cleopatra
was able to dissolve hers in vinegar, and by these means to gain a bet
from her lover, as we are told by Pliny, B. ix. c. 58, and Macrobius,
Sat. B. ii. c. 13. She must, however, have employed stronger vinegar
than that which we use for our tables; as pearls, on account of their
hardness and their natural enamel, cannot be easily dissolved by a weak
acid. Nature has secured the teeth of animals against the effect of
acids, by an enamel covering, which answers the same purpose; but if
this enamel happens to be injured only in one small place, the teeth
soon spoil and rot. Cleopatra, perhaps, broke and pounded the pearls
pearl; and it is probable that she afterwards diluted the vinegar
with water, that she might be able to drink it; though dissolved
calcareous matter neutralizes acids, and renders them imperceptible to
the tongue. That pearls are not peculiar to one kind of shell-fish, as
many believe, was known to Pliny.” Beckmann’s History of Inventions,
vol. i. p. 258, note 1, Bohn’s Ed. We may remark, however that as the
story is told by Pliny, there is no appearance that Cleopatra pounded
the pearl. It is more likely that she threw it into the vinegar, and
immediately swallowed it, taking it for granted that it had melted.
2660 Macrobius, Saturn. B. iii. says, “Monatius” Plancus.
His name was in reality Lucius Munatius Plancus. He afterwards deserted
Antony, and took the side of Octavianus; and it was on his proposal
that Octavianus received the title of Augustus in B.C. 27. He
built the temple of Saturn, in order to secure the emperor’s favour. It
is not known in what year he died.
2661 “Omine rato.” He means, that in the result, it was only
too true that Antony was “victus,” conquered, and that by his enemy
Octavianus.
2662 Claudius, or Clodius Æsopus, was the most celebrated
tragic actor at Rome in the time of Cicero, and was probably a freedman
of the Clodian family. Horace and other authors put him on a level with
Roscius. From Cicero we learn that his acting was characterized chiefly
by strong emphasis and vehemence. Cicero characterizes him as a “summus
artifex,” a “consummate artist.” He was a firm friend of Cicero, whose
cause he advocated indirectly more than once during his banishment from
Rome. It appears from Pliny, B. x. c. 72, that he was far from frugal,
though he left a large fortune to his spendthrift son, Clodius Æsopus.
This man, among his other feats, dissolved in vinegar (or at least
attempted to do so), a pearl worth about £8000, which he took from the
ear-ring of Cæcilia Metella. It is alluded to by Horace, B. ii. Sat.
iii. l. 239.
2663 Or “conchylium.” We find that Pliny generally makes a
difference between the colours of the “murex,” or “conchylium,” and
those of the “purpura,” or “purple.” Cuvier says, that they were the
names of different shell-fish which the ancients employed for dyeing in
purple of various shades. It is not known exactly, at the present day,
what species they employed; but it is a fact well ascertained, that the
greater part of the univalve shell-fish, more especially the Buccini
and Murices of Linnæus, distil a kind of red liquid. The dearness of
it arose, Cuvier thinks, from the remarkably small quantity that each
animal afforded. Since the coccus, or kermes, he says, came to be well
known, and more especially since the New World has supplied us with
cochineal, we are no longer necessitated to have recourse to the juices
of the murex.
2664 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 14, says, “about six.”
The murex of Pliny is the κήρυξ of Aristotle.
2665 Aristotle says, that the purple consists of three
parts, the upper being the τράχηλος, or neck; the middle the
μήκων, or poppy; and the lower the πυθμήν, or trunk;
and that the juice lies between the first and second of these parts,
or the throat. This juice, which Pliny calls “flos,” “flower,” “ros,”
“dew,” and “succus,” “juice,” is distilled, Cuvier says, not from the
fauces of the animal, but from the mantle or membranous tissue which
lines the shell.
2667 Which preceded the Roman consuls, who were clothed with
the toga prætexta, the colour of which was Syrian purple.
2668 Hardouin seems to think that “majestate pueritiæ” means
“children of high birth;” but it was the fact that all children of free
birth wore the prætexta, edged with purple, till they attained puberty.
It is much more probable that by these words Pliny means the “majesty
of youth,” in its simplicity and guileless nature, that commands our
veneration and respect.
2669 He means that the purple laticlave or broad hem of the
senator’s toga distinguished him from the eques, who wore a toga with
an angusticlave, or narrow hem.
2670 From Cicero, Epist. Ad. Attic. B. ii. Ep. 9, we learn
that purple was worn by the priests when performing sacrifice. Ajasson,
however, agrees with Dalechamps in thinking that this passage bears
reference to the consuls, who wore purple when sacrificing to the gods.
2671 The prætexta, for instance, the laticlave, the chlamys,
the paludamentum, and the trabea.
2672 On the occasion of a triumph, the victor was arrayed
in a “toga picta,” an embroidered garment, which, from the present
passage, would appear to have been of purple and gold. Pliny tells us,
B. xxxiii. c. 19, that Tarquinius, on his triumph over the Sabines,
wore a robe of cloth of gold.
2673 Aristotle says the same, Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 14, and
De Partib. Anim. B. ii. c. 17. Cuvier says, that the buccinus and murex
have a long neck, in which there is a tongue armed with little teeth,
but very sharp, by means of which the animal is enabled to pierce other
shell-fish.
2674 “Conchylia;” other fish of the same kind apparently; as
Pliny uses the word “conchylium” synonymously with “murex.”
2676 Cuvier says that the buccini, properly so called, have
at the bottom of the orifice of the shell an incision, which is the
characteristic of the genus. Our whelks are the best known specimen of
the buccinum that we have. They received their name, he says, from the
buccinum, or buccina, the conch-shell, (with which Triton is commonly
painted), and that in its turn was so called from its resemblance to a
buccina, trumpet or herdsman’s horn.
2677 It is not the tongue, Cuvier says, that occupies
this passage, but a prolongation of the skin or coat that envelopes
the animal, and its office is to conduct to the branchiæ the water
necessary for the purposes of respiration.
2678 This description, Cuvier says, is applicable to the
Murex brandaris, the Murex tribulus of Linnæus, and other species that
denote their growth by the increase of the spirals furnished with
spines.
2679 Or “deep sea” purples. Dalechamps remarks, that Pliny
here unwittingly gives to the purples in general, a name which only
belonged to one species; there being some that only frequent the shore,
and are not found out at sea.
2686 “Quum cerificavere.” Cuvier remarks that Aristotle,
Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 14, says, that these shell-fish make “waxen
combs,” meaning thereby collections of cells, similar to those formed
by the bee; and it is to this notion that Pliny refers in the use of
the word “cerificavere.” It is the fact, Cuvier says, that the univalve
sea shell-fish, and more particularly the buccini and the murices,
envelope their eggs with glutinous vesicles of varied forms, according
to the respective species; which, when massed together, may be not
inappropriately termed “combs.”
2687 In c. 60. As Cuvier remarks, with considerable justice,
this description by Pliny of the process of dyeing in purple, is
very difficult to explain, seeing that the art is now entirely lost.
Reaumur, he says, made some attempts at dyeing with a small buccinum
found off the French coasts, the Buccinum lapillus of Linnæus; but
without any result.
2689 Because iron or brazen vessels might impart a tinge to
the colour. The same would probably be the case if the word “plumbo”
were to be considered as signifying “lead.” As, however, Pliny uses
this word in the signification of “tin,” it is most probable that that
is his meaning. Littré, however, translates the word “plombe,” “lead.”
2690 Hardouin says, that the weight of the contents of
the amphora would be about eighty pounds: it would therefore take
eight thousand pounds of material to make five hundred pounds of dye.
The passage, however, which runs as follows, “Fervere in plumbo,
singulasque amphoras centenas ad quingentenas medicaminis libras
æquari,” may be rendered, “It is then set to boil in vessels of tin,
and every hundred amphoræ of water ought to be proportioned to five
hundred pounds of the material;” indeed, this is probably the correct
translation, though Littré, who is generally very exact, adopts that
given in the text.
2691 “Alligatur:” which word may also mean, that mixed with
the buccinum, it will hold fast, and not speedily fade or wash out.
2692 So called from the gem of that name; see B. xxxvii. c.
40.
2694 The “trabea” was similar in cut to the toga, but was
ornamented with purple horizontal stripes. Servius mentions three
kinds of trabea; one wholly of purple, which was sacred to the gods,
another of purple and white, and another of purple and saffron, which
belonged to the augurs. The purple and white trabea was the royal robe,
worn by the early kings, and the introduction of which was assigned to
Romulus. The trabea was worn by the consuls in public solemnities, such
as opening the temple of Janus. The equites also wore it on particular
occasions; and it is sometimes spoken of as the badge of the equestrian
order.
2695 The latus clavus, or laticlave, was originally worn
on the tunic, and was a distinctive badge of the senatorian order.
It consisted of a single broad band of purple colour, extending
perpendicularly from the neck down the centre of the tunic. The right
of wearing the laticlave was given to children of the equestrian order,
at least, as we learn from Ovid, in the reign of Augustus.
2696 Hardouin says, that in his time there were still to
be seen the remains of the ancient dyeing houses at Tarentum, the
modern Otranto, and that vast heaps of the shells of the murex had been
discovered there.
2697 Cloths doubly dyed, or twice dipped: from the Greek
δὶς, twice, and βάπτω, to dip.
2698 “Triclinaria.” This word probably signified not only
the hangings of the table couches, but the coverings, and the coverlets
which were spread over the guests while at the meal.
2700 “Dimidia et medicamina adduntur.” This, no doubt, is
the sense of the passage, as it is evident that only a thinner dye was
required for tint, though at first sight it would appear as though
one-half more were required for the same quantity of wool. The quantity
therefore would be 155½ pounds of dye to fifty pounds of wool.
2701 “Tantoque dilutior, quanto magis vellera esuriunt.”
This seems to be the meaning of the passage: some commentators would
read “dilucidior” for “dilutior,” and it would appear to be preferable.
2702 There can be little doubt that Salmasius is right in
his conjecture that the reading here should be “quingentos,” “five
hundred,” instead of “quinquagenos,” “fifty:” as it is evident from
what Pliny has said in previous Chapters, that the juices of the
pelagia were considerably more valuable than those of the buccinum.
2703 He states this by way of warning to those who are in
the habit of paying enormous prices for dyes, such as one hundred
denarii for a pound, as mentioned in the last Chapter.
2704 This is mentioned more fully in B. xvi. c. 84.
2705 See B. xxxiii. c. 23. Electrum was an artificial
metal, resembling amber in colour, and consisting of gold alloyed with
one-fifth part of silver.
2706 See B. xxxiv. c. 3. It was a mixture of gold, silver,
and copper.
2709 From the Greek ὕσγινος, after the herb hysge,
which was used in dyeing. Judging from the present passage, it would
almost appear to have been the colour now known as puce. See B. xxi. c.
36 and c. 97; and B. xxxv. c. 26.
2712 This is in reality the Coccus ilicis of Linnæus,
a small insect of the genus Coccus, the female of which, when
impregnated, fastens itself to a tree from which they derive
nourishment, and assumes the appearance of a small grain: on which
account they were long taken for the seeds of the tree, and were hence
called grains of kermes. They are used as a red and scarlet dye, but
are very inferior to cochineal, which has almost entirely superseded
the use of the kermes. The colour is of a deep red, and will stand
better than that of cochineal, and is less liable to stain.
2713 Or pina. The Pinna marina, Cuvier says, is a large
bivalve shell-fish, which is remarkable for its fine silky hair, by
means of which it fastens itself to the bottom of the sea.
2714 The poet Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. l. 186, relates the
same story about the pinna and its protector; which is also mentioned
by Cicero, Plutarch, and Aristotle.
2715 We have already had an account of one pinnotheres, in
c. 51. Some of the editions, however, make a difference in the spelling
of the name, and call the animal mentioned in the 51st Chapter,
“pinnotheres,” and the one here spoken of, the “pinnoteres,” the
“guardian of the pinna;” from the Greek verb τηρέω, “to keep,”
or “guard.” “Pinnophylax” has the same meaning.
2716 Cuvier says, that in the shell of the pinna, as, in
fact, of all the bivalves, there are often found little crabs, which
are, as it were, imprisoned there; and that it is this fact that has
given rise to the story of the treaty of amity between these two
animals, which appears in various authors, and is related in various
forms, which only agree in being devoid of truth. Cuvier says that
a careful distinction must be made between the pinnotheres of this
Chapter, the one of which Aristotle makes mention, and that which is
mentioned by Pliny in c. 51, the hermit-crab of the moderns. There can,
however, be but little doubt that they are different accounts of the
same animal.
2717 The whole, nearly, of this Chapter is taken from
Aristotle, B. v. c. 16.
2718 Plutarch speaks of this fish, in his “Treatise on
the Instincts of Animals;” also Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. l. 62. The
Raia torpedo of Linnæus, Cuvier says, has on each side of the body
a galvanic organ, which produces an electric shock, similar to that
communicated by the use of the Leyden vial. By this means it baffles
its enemies, and drives them away; or else, having stupefied them,
devours them at its leisure.
2719 Cuvier confirms this statement. The liver of the
torpedo, he says, is very delicate eating, as, indeed, is that part in
most of the ray genus.
2720 Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. l. 86; Ælian, Hist. Anim. B.
ix. c. 24; and Cicero, De Nat. Deor. make mention of this.
2721 The Lophius piscatorius of Linnæus, the baudroie of
the French. This is a fish, Cuvier says, with a large wide mouth, and
having upon the top of the head moveable filaments, surmounted by a
sort of membranous lashes. It seems that it is the fact that it buries
itself in the sand, and then employs the artifice here mentioned by
Pliny, for the purpose of attracting the fish that serve as its food.
2722 Or turbot. This fish, the Pleuronectes maximus of
Linnæus, and the Squalus squatina of Linnæus, presents no sufficiently
distinct filaments at the extremity of the fins to justify what Pliny
says. But the word “rhombus,” Cuvier says, which ordinarily means the
common turbot, here means the psetta of the Greeks, the Pleuronectes
rhombus of Linnæus, which has the anterior radii of the dorsal fin
separated, and forming small filaments. For an account of the psetta,
see c. 24, p. 396.
2723 The sting-ray, the Raia pastinaca of Linnæus. This
fish, Cuvier says, has upon the tail a pointed spine, compressed
and notched like a saw, which forms a most dangerous weapon. It is
again mentioned in c. 72 of the present Book, under its Greek name of
“trigon.”
2724 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ii. c. 17, and B. ix. c. 51;
Oppian, Halieut. B. ii. l. 424; and Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vii. c. 35,
make a similar statement as to the scolopendra.
2725 The animal, Cuvier says, which is here mentioned as the
scolopendra, is in reality of the class of worms that have red blood,
or annelides, such, for instance, as the Nereides of larger size. These
having on the sides tentacles, which bear a strong resemblance to feet,
and sharp jaws, might, he says, be very easily taken for scolopendræ.
They have also a fleshy trunk, often very voluminous, and so flexible
that it can be extended or withdrawn, according to the necessities of
the animal. It is this trunk, Cuvier thinks, that gave occasion to the
story that it could disgorge its entrails, and then swallow them again.
2726 This fish, Cuvier says, was doubtless a species of
squalus; which have the power, in consequence of the sharpness of
their saw-like teeth, of cutting a line with the greatest ease. It is
mentioned by Aristotle, B. ix. c. 52; Ælian, Var. Hist. B. i. c. 43;
and Oppian, Halieut. B. iii. l. 144.
2727 The fish that has been previously mentioned in c. 17 of
this Book, under the name of silurus.
2728 “Aries.” The Delphinus orca of Linnæus. See c. 4 of the
present Book.
2732 Many species of the medusæ, Cuvier says, and other
animals of the same class, the physalus more especially, cause an
itching sensation in the skin when they are touched. This is noticed
also by Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. vii. c. 35; and by Diphilus of Siphnos,
in Athenæus, B. iii.
2733 This is true, Cuvier says, and more especially with
reference to the actiniæ. They have the mouth provided with numerous
fleshy tentacles, by means of which they can seize very small animals
which come within their reach, which they instantly swallow.
2734 Cuvier says, that this is the case more especially with
the medusæ and the physali.
2735 “Ora ei in radice.” Aristotle, however, says, Hist.
Anim. B. iv. c. 5, and B. viii. c. 3, that the sea-nettle has the
mouth situate ἐν μέσῳ, “in the middle of the body.” Hardouin
attempts to explain the passage on the ground that Pliny has made
a mistake, in an endeavour to suit his similitude of a tree to the
language of Aristotle. Cuvier says, that there exists one genus or
species of the medusæ, which appears to feed itself by the aid of
an apparatus of branches, and is divided into such a multitude of
filaments, almost innumerable, that it bears a strong resemblance to
the roots of a tree or vegetable. It is this kind, he says, that he has
called by the name of “Rhizostomos.”
2736 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. viii. c. 3, says the same;
though, on the other hand, in the Fourth Book, he says that the animal
has no excrements, although it has a mouth, and feeds.
2737 Cuvier remarks, that there are a great many more than
three kinds of sponges, but that Pliny here is only enumerating those
which were employed for domestic use.
2738 In the singular, “tragus,” from the Greek
τραγὸς, a goat, on account of their strong smell, which they contract
from the mud and slime in which they are found.
2739 Probably from the Greek μάνος, “rare,” “in
small quantities;” in allusion to the comparative rarity of this kind
of sponge.
2740 A term merely used, as Cælius Rhodiginus says, to
denote the strength of its texture.
2741 Cuvier says, that though sometimes shells and small
animals are found lodged in the sponge, they do not afford it any
nourishment. Having no mouth, it can only live and increase by the
inhalation of substances dissolved in the water of the sea.
2742 “Sensere.” Cuvier says, that many observers have stated
that this is the only sign of animal life that the sponge affords;
but that Grant assures us that it does not even afford that. The fact
is, however, that “the sponge itself is a cellular, fibrous tissue,
produced by small animals, almost imperceptible, called polypi, and
living in the sea. This tissue is said to be covered in its native
state with a sort of semifluid thin coat of animal jelly, susceptible
of a slight contraction or trembling on being touched; which, in fact,
is the only symptom of vitality displayed by the sponge. After death,
this gelatinous substance disappears, and leaves only the skeleton or
sponge, formed by the combination of a multitude of small capillary
tubes, capable of receiving water in the interior, and of becoming
thereby distended. Though different in their nature, sponges are
analogous in their formation to coral. On being examined with a power
of about 500 linear, the fleshy matter of the living sponge is to be
distinctly observed, having in its interior gemmæ, which are considered
to be the young. These are occasionally given off from the mass of
living matter. The greater portion of the mass of sponge consists of
small cylindrical threads or fibres, varying in size. The spiculæ
are not found within these, but in the large and flattened fibres,
and varying in number from one to three or more, imbedded in their
substance.” From Brande’s Dictionary.
2746Ἀπλυσίαι, from ἀ, “not,” and
πλύνω, “to wash.” These aplysiæ or halcyones, Cuvier says, are a kind
of sponge, of too thick and compact a nature to admit of their being
washed. It is arbitrarily, he says, that Linnæus has applied this name
to a species of the molluscæ, which is, in reality, the sea-hare of the
ancients.
2747 It is pretty clear that under the name of “canicula,”
“dog-fish,” or “canis marinus,” “sea-dog,” Pliny includes the whole
genus of sharks.
2748 Rondelet and Dalechamps absolutely interpret this
passage as though it were the dog-fish and flat-fish over whose
eyes this cloud comes, and the latter proceeds to describe it as a
malady which hinders the fish from taking its own part in the combat.
Hardouin, however, detects this absurdity, and justly reprehends
it; though it must be confessed that there is some obscurity in the
passage, arising from the way in which it is worded.
2749 Cuvier thinks it not improbable that it may have
been some of the large rays that were seen by the divers, and more
especially, the largest of them all, the Cephalopterus.
2751 Cælius Rhodigonus, B. xxv. c. 16, states that the
divers for sponges were in the habit of pouring forth oil at the bottom
of the sea, for the purpose of increasing the light there; and Pliny
states the same in B. ii. c. 106.
2752 Cuvier says, that the name of “sacred fish” has been
given to several fish of very different character; such as the anthias,
or aulopias of Aristotle, B. ix. c. 37, the pompilus and the dolphin
(Athenæus, B. vii.), because it was thought that their presence was a
guarantee against the vicinity of dangerous fish. The authors, however,
that were consulted by Pliny, seem to have given this name to the
flat-fish, the Pleuronectes of Linnæus; and in fact, unprovided as they
are with any means of defence, their presence is not unlikely to prove,
in a very great degree, the absence of the voracious class of fishes.
2753 It is singular that Pliny, after his numerous stories
as to the sensitiveness of numerous bivalves, should make this
statement in reference to the oyster; for, on the contrary, as Cuvier
says, the oyster, in common with the other bivalves, is extremely
sensitive to the touch.
2754 Cuvier says, that the different zoöphytes, the
sea-star, at least, are far from having the life of vegetables only;
for that they are real animals, which have the sense of touch, a
voluntary power of motion more or less complete, and seize and devour
their prey. It is not, however, very well known, he says, what was
the “holothurium” of the ancients. Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. i. c.
1, ranks it, as well as the oyster, among the animals which, without
being attached to any object, have not the faculty of moving; and in
his work, De Part. Anim. B. iv. c. 5, he adds, that the holothurium
and the pulmo only differ from the sponge in being detached. Cuvier is
of opinion, however, that they both belong to the halcyones, the round
kinds of which easily detach themselves from the places upon which they
have grown.
2758 “Cauponarum.” “Caupona” had two significations; that of
an inn where travellers obtained food and lodging, and that of a shop
where wine and ready-dressed meat were sold. A lower kind of inn was
the popina, which was principally frequented by the slaves and lower
classes, and was mostly used as a brothel as well.
2759 He alludes to various kinds of sea-animals, called
sea-lice and sea-fleas. Cuvier says, that there are some crustacea
which have been called sea-fleas and sea-lice, some of which kinds
are parasites, and are attached to various fishes and cetacea. Thus,
he says, a pycnogonum is commonly named “pediculus balænæ,” or the
“whale-louse;” one of the calygæ is called the “fish-flea,” another the
“mackerel-flea.” The name of sea-flea, he observes, has been given more
especially to a very diminutive kind of shrimp, in consequence of its
power of leaping from place to place.
2760 Aristotle says, that the chalcis is greatly tormented
by sea-fleas, which attach themselves to its gills. Cuvier remarks,
that a great number of fish are subject to have the gills attacked by
parasitical animals of the genus Lernæa or that of the monoculi of
Linnæus, which have been divided into many classes since. They have
nothing in common, he says, with the land-flea, except the name and the
property of living at the expense of other animals.
2761 The ancients, Cuvier says, speak of their chalcis as
being of a similar nature to the thryssa and the sardine (Athenæus,
B. vii.), gregarious fishes, which live both in the sea and in
fresh water, and the flesh of which was salted. Hence he concludes
that it was the same as the Clupea ficta of Lacepède, the “finte”
of the French, and the agone of Lombardy, which unites all these
characteristics, and is sometimes called the “sardine” of the Lago di
Garda.
2762 It is mentioned again in B. xxiii. c. 3. Cuvier says,
that the sea-hare of the ancients is the mollusc to which Linnæus has
injudiciously given the name of aplysia, which Pliny gives to certain
of the sponge genus, and to which nomenclature of Linnæus the modern
naturalists have assented. (See N. 2746, p. 456.) Its tentacles and its
muzzle, he says, resemble the muzzle and ears of the hare, closely
enough to have caused this appellation. As its smell is disagreeable,
and its figure repulsive, a multitude of marvellous, and indeed fatal
qualities, he says, have been ascribed to this animal, which fishermen
still speak of, but which, nevertheless, are not confirmed by actual
experience. The only true fact that can be alleged against it is, that
it secretes from an organ, situate in its body, a kind of acrid liquid.
As to the Indian sea-hare, the body of which was covered with hair,
Cuvier professes himself quite at a loss to know what it might be; but
he thinks that this name must have been given to some tetrodon, which
may have received the name from the cleft in the jaw and the skin,
bristling with fine and minute spines. The sailors, he says, attribute
to the tetrodon certain venomous properties.
2763 Cuvier says, that there is reason to believe that
this is the same as the vive of the French (probably our weever), the
Trachinus draco of Linnæus. This creature, with the spiny projections
of its first dorsal fin, is able to inflict wounds that are extremely
difficult to cure; not because they are venomous in any degree,
but because the extremities being very minute, sharp, and pointed,
penetrate deep into the flesh. See c. 43 of this Book.
2764 Or sting-ray, mentioned in c. 40 and c. 67 of this
Book; so called from the Greek τρυγὼν. Cuvier says, that this
sting, or spine, is sharp, like a saw; and that when it has penetrated
the flesh, it cannot be got out without enlarging the wound. This it
is, and not its fancied poisonous qualities, that renders its wound so
dangerous; and as for its action upon trees and iron, they are entirely
fabulous.
2765Νοσήματα λοιμώδη, as Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
viii. c. 25, calls them.
2766 Cuvier says, that there are some maladies by which
individuals are attacked; but that it is not uncommonly the case that
certain species are attacked universally, as it were, by a sort of
epidemic. There was an instance of this, he says, in the lake of the
valley of Montmorency, where numbers of the fish were suddenly to be
seen floating dead on the surface, the skin of which was covered with
red spots, while at the same time their flesh had become disagreeable
to the taste, and unwholesome.
2767 Cuvier says, that this is not the case in general; but
that some, more especially those which are viviparous, actually do
couple; while, on the other hand, in most, the male does nothing else
but besprinkle with the milt the eggs which the female has deposited,
as is stated by Pliny a little further on.
2768 These belong to the cetacea; which, as Cuvier says, are
now universally placed among the mammifera, and not among the fishes.
They couple, he says, in the same manner as quadrupeds do in general.
2769 As Aristotle says, “from those that are left the fishes
are produced.”
2771 It has been calculated, Cuvier says, that a female cod,
or sturgeon, produces in a year more than one hundred thousand eggs.
2772 Cuvier says, that the eggs of the common fishes, of
toads, frogs, &c., have no shells, but only a membranous tunic; and
when they have been once fecundated, they imbibe the surrounding
moisture, and increase till they produce the animal.
2773 It is probable, Cuvier thinks, that this passage
relates more especially to the ray genus, but that there is no
very positive knowledge as to the mode in which they do couple. It
is probable, he suggests, that they may do it in the manner above
mentioned, by the attrition of the belly. As to the turtle genus, he
says, it is certain that the male mounts the back of the female; and in
some species the sternum of the male is concave, the better to adapt
itself to the convex callipash of the female.
2774 More properly, the physeter, passage, or orifice.
2775 Cuvier remarks, that this account of the coupling of
the cephalopodes is taken from Aristotle. He says, that he is not aware
whether modern observation has confirmed these statements, and almost
doubts whether, considering the organization of these animals, it is
not almost more probable that they do not couple at all, and that the
male, as in the case of most other fishes, only fecundates the eggs
after they have been deposited by the female.
2776 Cuvier says, that whatever may be the sense in which
the word “mollia” is here taken, the assertion is not correct. The
gasteropod molluscs, he says, whether hermaphroditical, or whether
of separate sexes, couple side to side. The acephalous molluscs do
not couple at all, and each individual fecundates its own eggs. The
crustacea couple by attrition of the belly.
2777 “Tadpoles.” There is both truth and falsehood, Cuvier
says, in the statements here made relative to the tadpole. Frogs, he
says, produce eggs, from which the tadpole developes itself, with a
tail like that of a fish. The feet, however, are not produced by any
bifurcation of the tail, but shoot out at the base of the tail, and in
the same proportion that they grow, the tail decreases, till at last it
entirely disappears.
2778 Frogs, Cuvier says, conceal themselves in mud and slime
during the winter, but, of course, are not changed into it.
2779 “Quæ fuere.” Just in the same state, he probably means
to say, in which they were when they were melted into slime, and not as
they were when in the tadpole state.
2780 All that is asserted here, Cuvier says, about the
spontaneous operations of nature is totally false. Everything connected
with the eggs and the generation of the mussel, the murex, and the
scallop is now clearly ascertained.
2781 “Acescente humore.” Hardouin has suggested that the
proper reading may be “arescente humore”—“from moisture dried up;”
for, he remarks, Aristotle, in his Hist. Anim. B. v. c. 18, states,
that the “empides,” gnats formed from the ascarides in the slime of
wells, are more frequently produced in the autumn season.
2782 The apuæ, or aphyæ, Cuvier says, are nothing else but
the fry of fish of a large kind.
2783 Cuvier says, that some of the shell-fish deposit their
eggs upon stakes and piles, which are driven down into the water among
sea-weed, and the bottoms of old ships: but that many of them perish
from the solutions formed by those bodies in a state of rottenness, or,
at all events, are not produced from their decomposition.
2784 “Ostreariis.” This was unknown to Aristotle, who, in
his work De Gener. Anim. B. iii. c. 11, expressly denies that the
oyster secretes any generative or fecundating liquid.
2785 Cuvier says, that at the time of the oyster spawning,
its body appears swollen in some parts with a milky fluid, which is
not improbably the fecundating fluid. During this season the oyster is
generally looked upon as unfit for food; among us, from the beginning
of May to the end of July.
2786 This, Cuvier remarks, is a mere vague hypothesis, as to
the reproduction of the eel, without the slightest foundation. Pliny
borrows it from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 9.
2787 The squatina and the ray do not interbreed, Cuvier
observes, any more than other fish; and the Squatina raia, or
rhinobatis, (which was said to be their joint production), is a
particular species, more flat in form than the squalus, and longer than
the ray.
2792 This name, Cuvier says, appears so rarely in the
ancient writers, that it is difficult to ascertain its exact
signification. The moderns, he says, have pretty generally agreed to
give it to the carp, but without any good and sufficient foundation.
It was a lake or river fish, which, as Aristotle says, Hist. Anim. B.
vi. c. 14, deposited its eggs five or six times in the year, and which
had a palate so fleshy, that it might almost be mistaken for a tongue,
B. iv. c. 8, characteristics that appear well suited to the carp. But
then, on the other hand, Oppian mentions it, Halieut. B. i., as a
shore fish, implying apparently that it belonged to the sea; and Pliny
himself, in c. 25 of the present Book, does the same, by his words,
“hoc et in mari accidere cyprino.” The words “in mari,” however, he
has added, of his own accord, to the account which he has derived from
Aristotle.
2793 The fish called the sea-scorpion. Aristotle, Hist.
Anim. B. v. c. 11.
2794 “Sola autumno, occasu Vergiliarum.” It seems
questionable whether the reading should not be “solea:” “the sole in
autumn, at the setting of the Vergiliæ.”
2798 “Prosequitur afflatu.” Aristotle says that it pours
over them its ink or atramentum, καταφυσᾷ τὸν θόλον.
2799 Philostratus, Hist. B. v. c. 17, says that so full is
it of eggs, that after it is dead they will more than fill a vessel far
larger than the cavities of its head.
2802 All the chondropterygian fishes, Cuvier says, have, in
addition to their ovaries, real oviducts, which the ordinary fishes
have not; the lower part of which, being detached, acts as the uterus,
into which the eggs descend when they have gained their proper size:
and it is here that the young ones burst forth from the egg, when the
parent animal is viviparous.
2803 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. vi. c. 13, says the same of
the glanis, or silurus.
2804 The Syngnathus acus of Linnæus. This fish, Cuvier says,
and in general all of the same genus, has a channel situate under the
tail, which is opened by two moveable valves. In this they deposit
their eggs at the moment of excluding them. After this, the valves
open, to give a passage to the eggs, or the young enclosed in them.
This circumstance, he says, gave rise to the notion mentioned in the
text.
2805 Mentioned in c. 35 of the present Book. Cuvier says
that the sea tortoises, or turtles, to which no doubt this animal
belonged, do deposit their eggs much in the way here mentioned.
2806 Both these fishes have been mentioned in c. 23 of the
present Book.
2807 Pliny means to say, Cuvier says, that all these fish
are to be looked upon as females: and, in fact, he says, Cavolini
discovered eggs and a milt in every one that he examined; so that they
appear to have all the appliances of self-fecundation.
2808 Or wheel-fish: from the Greek τροχὸς, “a
wheel.” It is not clearly known what animal he alludes to under this
name. Snails, Cuvier says, are hermaphrodites, and so is the helix, but
still they require sexual connection for the purposes of reproduction.
The greater part of the marine uni-valves, on the other hand, are of
separate sexes; but the organ of the male being proportionally of great
length, and coiled in part beneath its mantle, this fact may very
possibly have given rise to the notion here mentioned by our author,
that the animal impregnates itself.
2809 This can only be understood, Cuvier says, as applying
to those animals the young of which are still enveloped in the
membranes of the egg; for in general, the young of fish, from the
moment of their birth, have eyes of great beauty, and are remarkable
for the quickness of their sight.
2810 From the Greek παυσίλυπον, “grief-assuaging.”
This was the name of a splendid villa belonging to Vedius Pollio, and
which he bequeathed to Augustus. It was famous for its fish preserves;
and it was here probably that Pollio kept his murenæ, previously
mentioned by Pliny as being fed on human flesh. The vicinity is still
called Monte Posilipo.
2811 “Cæsaris piscinis.” This may either mean, preserves
which had their name from Cæsar, or preserves which afterwards belonged
to Cæsar. The work of Seneca, in which this circumstance was mentioned,
is no longer in existence.
2812 He was a contemporary of L. Crassus, and was
distinguished for his great wealth, and his love of luxury and
refinement, but possessed an unblemished character. His surname, Orata
or Aurata, was given to him, it is said, because he was remarkably fond
of gold-fish—auratæ pisces—though, according to other authorities, it
was because he was in the habit of wearing two very large gold rings.
2813 “Pensiles balineas.” This expression has been
differently rendered by various commentators, but it is now generally
supposed to refer to the manner in which the flooring of the bathing
rooms was suspended over the hollow cells of the hypocaust or heating
furnace. This is called by Vitruvius, “Suspensura caldariorum.”
2814 “Ita mangonicatas villas subinde vendendo.”—By the use
of the word “ita,” Pliny may possibly mean that he was in the habit
of filling up the villas with the “balineæ pensiles,” which he had
invented. “Mangonizo” was to set off or trim up a thing, that it might
sell again all the better.
2815 Varro speaks of those of Tarentum, as being the best.
The Greeks preferred the oysters of Abydos; the Romans, under the
empire, those of Britain.
2816 It does not appear to be known what two bridges are
here alluded to; the Sublician, or wooden bridge, was probably one of
them, and, perhaps, the Palatine bridge was the other. The former was
built by Ancus Martius.
2817 For some further account of the British oyster, see B.
xxxii. c. 21.
2819 He was the first of this family, a branch of the
Licinian gens, who bore the surname of Murena, from his love for that
fish, it was said. He, like his father P. Licinius, attained the rank
of prætor, and was a contemporary of the orator, L. Crassus.
2821 “Xerxen togatum,” or “the Roman Xerxes,” in allusion
to Xerxes cutting a canal through the Isthmus, which connected the
Peninsula of Mount Athos with Chalcidice. See B. iv. c. 17, and the
Note, vol. i. p. 300.
2822 Probably the same person as the C. Hirrius Posthumius,
who is mentioned as a voluptuary by Cicero, De Fin. B. ii. c. 22, § 70.
Varro speaks of him, as expending the rent of his houses, amounting to
twelve millions of sesterces, in bait for his murenæ.
2823 This is, probably, the meaning of “quadragies” here,
though it has been translated 400,000.
2825 Porphyry, Tzetzes, and Macrobius relate the same story.
2826 See B. vii. c. 18, and B. xxxv. c. 36. Her grandson,
Caligula, is supposed to have hastened her death.
2827 Hirpinius is the more common reading. He is mentioned
in B. viii. c. 78. If the reading “Lupinus” is adopted, nothing seems
to be known of this epicurean trifler.
2830 Off the coast of Africa, see B. v. c. 1. These
periwinkles, or sea-snails, are again mentioned in B. xxx. c. 15.
2831 “Sapa.” Must, or new wine, boiled down to one half,
according to Pliny; and one third, according to Varro.
2832 The “quadrans” contained three cyathi, and was the
fourth part of a sextarius, which consisted of about a pint and a-half;
in which case the contents of one of their shells would be no less
than fifteen quarts!! A statement to which no credit can be attached,
unless, indeed, the sea-snail was something quite different to our
periwinkle.
2833 Cuvier remarks, that nothing is known of the fish
of the Euphrates here mentioned by Pliny from Theophrastus; as,
indeed, all particulars relative to the fresh-water fish of foreign
countries are the portion of Ichthyology with which we are the least
acquainted. Judging, however, from what is stated as to their habits
and appearance, they may he various species of the genus Gobius of
Linnæus, and more especially the one called periophthalmus by Bloch.
These species are in the habit of crawling along the grass on the banks
of rivers.
2834 Generally considered the same as our gudgeon. It is
called “cobio” (from the Greek κωβιὸς), by Pliny, in B. xxxii.
c. 53. It was a worthless fish, “Vilis piscis,” as Juvenal says.
2835 What Heraclea, if that is the correct reading, is meant
here, it is impossible to say. Cromna is mentioned in B. vi. c. 2.
2836 Cuvier thinks, that Pliny here alludes to a species of
loche, the Cobitis fossilis of Linnæus, which keeps itself concealed in
the mud, and can survive a long time in it, after the water above it is
absorbed. Hence it is often found alive in the mud of drained marshes,
or in the dried-up beds of rivers.
2837 Cuvier remarks, that many fish, the orifice of the
gills of which, like those of the eel, is small, or which have in
the interior of those parts organs proper for the preservation there
of water, are able, like the eel, to live for some time on dry land;
such, for instance, as the periophthalmi previously mentioned, the
chironectes, the ophicephali, the anabas, and others; but it is
difficult to say, he observes, of what species were those of the Lycus,
which are here mentioned.
2839 It is most probable that Sillig is right in his
supposition, that “quam” should be read “æquam;” otherwise it does not
appear that any sense can be made of the passage. Schneider, in his
commentaries upon Theophrastus, Sillig says, quite despaired of either
amending or explaining this passage; which, however, with Sillig’s
emendation is very easily to be understood.
2840 In accordance with the opinion of Vossius and Sillig,
we read here “in illis,” instead of the common, and most probably
incorrect, reading, “in nullis.”
2841 Pomponius Mela, B. i. c. 9., and Ovid, Met. B. i. l.
422, et seq., tell the same story, which, however, has no truth in it
whatever.
2845 Cuvier says, that the star-fish, the Asterias of
Linnæus, is covered with a callous shell without, and has within only
the viscera and the ovaria, apparently without any muscles. Aristotle
reckons it among the fishes which he calls ὀστρακοδέρματα,
or hard-shelled fish; while, on the other hand, Ælian, Hist. Anim. B.
xi. c. 22, reckons it among the μαλακόστρακα, or soft-shelled
fish.
2846 Cuvier says, that Pliny has good reason to say that he
does not know upon what authority this power has been attributed to the
star-fish; as it is altogether fabulous.
2847 “Or finger.” The same fish that have been mentioned
as “ungues,” or “onyches,” in c. 51 of the present Book. They are a
multivalve shell-fish, Cuvier says, which live in hardened mud or the
interior of rocks, into which they burrow cavities, from which they
cannot retreat; and they can only be taken by breaking the stone. They
have a flavour like pepper, and give out a phosphorescent light. See
the end of c. 51.
2848 Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B. ix. c. 3. Ælian, Hist. Anim.
B. v. c. 48.
2849 Aristotle says, that the tail of the conger is bitten
by the murena, but not that of the murena by the conger. Hardouin
suggests that Pliny may have learned this fact from the works of
Nigidius Figulus.
2850 Cuvier remarks, that in another passage, B. xi. c. 62,
Pliny states that the “musculus qui balænam antecedit” has no teeth,
but only bristles in its mouth. Now, in B. xxxii. c. 53, he speaks
of the musculus as among the largest of animals; from which Cuvier
concludes it to have been a species of whale, probably the “rorqual”
of the Mediterranean. In confirmation of this, he thinks that the word
“antecedit,” in B. xi. c. 62. has not the meaning of “goes before,” but
“exceeds in size;” though here it is spoken of as leading the whale;
and Oppian, Ælian, Plutarch, Claudian, speak of the conductor of the
whale as a little fish. He is of opinion, in fine, that either Pliny
or some of the authors from which he has borrowed, have made a mistake
in the name, and probably given that of “musculus,” which was really a
large fish, to a small one, which was commonly supposed to attend on
the movements of the whale.
2851 It is evident from this passage, that Pliny is speaking
of a little fish here, and not one to which he would assign such bulk
as is ascribed to the musculus in B. xxxii. c. 53.
2854 Caius Cilnius Mecænas, or rather Mæcenas, a descendant
of the kings of Etruria, and of equestrian rank. He was the favourite
minister of Augustus, and the friend and patron of Horace, Virgil, and
most of the more deserving among the learned of his day. He is supposed
to have written two tragedies, the Prometheus and Octavia; an epic
poem, and a work on Natural History, to which Pliny frequently alludes,
and which seems to have related, principally, to fishes and gems. He is
also thought to have written some memoirs of the life of Augustus.
2855 A rhetorician, who flourished in the reigns of Augustus
and Tiberius. His school was attended by the elder Seneca, who had then
recently removed to Rome from Corduba. He was regarded at Rome as a
prodigy of learning, and gave lectures before he had assumed the toga
virilis. He is supposed to have written poetry, and a history of the
Carthaginian wars.
2857 Or “writer of Mimes.” Laberius Decimus was of
equestrian rank, born about B.C. 107, and died B.C.
43. Half compelled, and half induced by the offer of a reward by Cæsar,
he appeared on the stage, in his old age, as an actor of mimes. A few
verses, and a prologue still in existence, are attributed to him.
2861 L. Ælius Præconinus Stilo, a Roman of equestrian rank,
one of the earliest grammarians, and also one of the most celebrated.
He instructed Varro, and was one of Cæsar’s instructors in rhetoric. He
received the name of Præconinus, from the circumstance of his father
having been a “præco,” and that of Stilo, on account of his writings.
He wrote commentaries on the songs of the Salii, and on the Twelve
Tables, a work De Proloquiis, &c.
2866 A poet of Verona, who died B.C. 16, He wrote a
poem upon birds, snakes, and medicinal plants, in imitation, probably,
of the Theriaca of Nicander. There is a work, still extant, under his
name, “On the Virtues of Herbs;” which, no doubt, belongs to the middle
ages. He also wrote sixteen or more Books of Annals.
2867 M. Valerius Messala Corvinus. He was born at Rome,
B.C. 59. He joined the party of Cassius against Antony
and Augustus, which last he defeated at the battle of Philippi. He
afterwards served under Antony, and then Augustus; the centre of whose
fleet he commanded at Actium. About two years before his death, which
happened in the middle of the reign of Augustus, his memory failed him,
and he was often unable to recollect his own name. He wrote a history,
or rather, commentaries on the Civil wars after the death of Cæsar,
and towards the close of his life composed a genealogical work “On the
Families of Rome.” He also wrote poems of a satirical, and sometimes
licentious character; and works on grammar, the titles of only two of
which have come down to us. He was especially famous for his eloquence.
2878 Cuvier remarks, that the accounts given by the ancients
of birds, are enveloped in greater obscurity than their information on
quadrupeds, or fishes. The quadrupeds, he says, are not so numerous,
and are known from their characteristics. The fishes also, which the
ancients so highly esteemed as an article of food, were well known to
them in general, and they have repeated occasions to speak of them:
but as to the birds, the augurs were their principal informants.
Pliny, in fact, often quotes their testimony; and we find, from what
he says, that these men had not come to any agreement among themselves
as to what were the names of divers species of birds, the movements
of which announced, according to them, the success or misfortune of
states equally with individuals. This portion, in fact, of the works
of Pliny, Cuvier remarks, is an excellent commentary on the remark of
Cicero, who, an augur himself, asked the question, how two augurs could
look each other in the face without laughing. There are also several
passages from Aristotle, who has, however, given but very little
attention to the exterior characteristics of birds: it is only from the
similarity of their habits and present names that we are able, in many
cases, to guess what bird it is that is meant.
2879 “Struthiocamelus;” from the Greek, signifying a “little
sparrow,” and a “camel.” Cuvier remarks, that Pliny’s description is
correct, and that he is only mistaken in a few slight particulars.
2880 Pliny perhaps here uses the conjunction “vel” in the
explanatory sense of “otherwise;” intending to distinguish Æthiopian
Africa from the Roman province of that name.
2881 Cuvier remarks, that there is some truth in this, so
far as that the ostrich has only two toes, like the stag and other
ruminating animals; but then they are unequal in size, and not covered
with hoofs.
2882 Father Lobo, in his account of Abyssinia, says that
when the ostrich is running at great speed, it throws the stones behind
with such violence, that they would almost seem to be thrown at those
in pursuit.
2883 An ostrich, Cuvier says, will swallow anything, but it
is by no means able to digest everything. He says, that he has seen
ostriches with the stomach ruptured by nails which they have swallowed,
or dreadfully torn by pieces of glass.
2884 It has been remarked by Diodorus Siculus, B. ii., that
so far from displaying stupidity in acting thus, it adopts a wise
precaution, its head being its most weak and defenceless part.
2885 Cuvier states that its egg is equal to twenty-four to
twenty-eight fowls’ eggs, and that he had frequently eaten of them, and
found them very delicate.
2886 “Ferunt.” With regard to this verb, Cuvier remarks,
that it is equivocal; and that it is very possible that the writer
intends to say, not that India and Æthiopia produce these marvellous
birds, but that the people of those countries report or relate
marvellous stories touching those birds. It is clear that he does not
believe in the existence of the phœnix.
2887 Cuvier remarks, that all these relations are neither
more nor less than so many absurd fables or pure allegories, but that
the description given is exactly that of a bird which does exist, the
golden pheasant, namely. The description given is probably taken from
the pretended phœnix that Pliny mentions as having been brought to Rome
in the reign of Claudius. It is not improbable, he thinks, that this
may have been a golden pheasant, brought from the interior of Asia,
when the pursuits of commerce had as yet hardly extended so far, and to
which those who showed it gave, most probably, the name of the phœnix.
Ajasson is of opinion, that under the story of the phœnix an allegory
was concealed, and thinks it may not improbably have been employed to
pourtray the doctrine of the immortality of the soul. Bailly, Hist.
de l’Astronomie, thinks that it bore reference to the great canicular
year of the Egyptians.
2891 532 years, according to Hardouin. Bailly says: “The
first men who studied the heavens remarked that the revolution of the
sun brought back the seasons in the same order. They thought that they
observed that certain variations of the temperature depended upon the
aspect of the moon, and attached different prognostics to the rising
and setting of the stars, persuading themselves that the vicissitudes
of things here below had regulated periods, like the movements of the
heavenly bodies. From this arose the impression, that the same aspect,
the same arrangement of all the stars, that had prevailed at the
commencement of the world, would also attend its destruction; and that
the period of this long revolution was the predestined duration of the
life of nature. Another impression was the idea that the world would
only perish at this epoch to be born again, and for the same order
of things to recommence with the same series of celestial phenomena.
Some fixed this universal renovation at the conjunction of all the
planets, others at the return of the stars to the same point of the
ecliptic; others, uniting these two kinds of revolutions, marked the
term of the duration of all things at the moment at which the planets
and the stars would return to the same primitive situation with regard
to the ecliptic, or in other words, they conceived an immense period,
which would include one or more complete revolutions of each of the
planets. All these periods were called the ‘great year,’ or the ‘great
revolution.’” Histoire de l’Astronomie Ancienne.
2894 A public place in the Forum, where the comitia curiata
were held, and certain offences tried and punished.
2895 Cuvier remarks, that this passage is borrowed, with
some changes, from Aristotle’s “History of Animals,” B. ix. c. 32,
but that the account given by Pliny is not very easily explained,
from the fact that the word eagle is not used by him in a rigorous
acceptation of the word. Indeed it is only at the present day that any
accurate knowledge has been obtained as to the different species of
eagles, and the changes of colour to which they are subject with the
advance of age; circumstances which have caused the species of them to
be multiplied by naturalists. It is very doubtful, he says, whether
Aristotle has distinguished the various kinds any better than Pliny;
although Buffon, who himself was not very successful in distinguishing
them, says that Aristotle understood more on the subject than the
moderns.
2896Μελανάετος, or the “black eagle.” Cuvier says,
that this description is copied exactly from Aristotle, Hist. Anim. B.
ix. c. 32. This eagle, he says, cannot be, as is commonly supposed,
the “common eagle.” It can only be, he thinks, the “small” eagle, the
female of which, according to Nauman and Savigny, when it is old is
almost all black, and without spots; only the young being spotted.
2897 From the Greek πυγὴ ἀργὴ, “white tail.”
Cuvier remarks, that this is copied exactly from Aristotle, except
that he says nothing about the whiteness of the tail, which is an
interpolation. The feathers as described agree with those of the common
eagle, the Falco fulvus, which is strong enough to seize a fawn. As
regards its habit, he says, of dwelling on plains, that would agree
better with the Jean le blanc of the French, the Falco Gallicus; while
the name of pygargus is commonly applied, at the present day, to the
great sea-eagle, the Falco albicilla; which frequents lakes and the
sea-shore, and therefore corresponds more nearly with the haliætus of
Pliny.
2898 Cuvier says, that he is almost tempted to believe that
it is the balbusard, the Falco haliætus, that is here meant, as it has
a black back, and lives in the vicinity of lakes. But then, he remarks,
it lives on fish and not aquatic birds; while, on the other hand, the
little eagle of Buffon, the Falco nævio, often seizes ducks and other
aquatic animals. He is inclined then, notwithstanding the apparent
confusion, to take this morphnos for the modern small eagle. The words
μορφνὸς and περκνὸς signify “black.”
2904 He contradicts himself, for he has already stated that
it is the sixth species.
2905 “Barbata.” Cuvier takes it to be the læmmer-geyer, or
Gypaëtus, the only bird of prey that has a beard.
2906 Or eagle-stone. See B. xxxvi. c. 39. He does not there
mention that it is combustible. It is not impossible that pieces of
aëtites, or ferruginous geodes, may have been found in an eagle’s nest.
2913 Their nests are seldom seen, in consequence of being
concealed in the crags of the highest mountains, the Pyrenees, for
instance.
2914 “Three” seems a better reading. Aristotle says “two.”
2915 Ovid, in his “Art of Love,” speaks of the use of eggs
in purifications made by lovesick damsels. See B. ii. l. 330.
2916 This story arises from the extreme acuteness of their
power of smelling a dead body. The Egyptians said that the vulture
foreknows the field of battle seven days.
2917 Festus says, also, that it is the ossifrage, and was so
called from the god Sancus.
2924 Cuvier remarks, that we here find the art of falconry
in its rough state. It was restored to Europe, no doubt, by the
Crusaders. See Beckmann’s Hist. Inventions, vol. i. p. 201. Bohn’s
Edition.
2925 “Missas in sublime sibi excipere eos.” The meaning is
very doubtful.
2926 The whole of this passage is, most probably, a gloss or
interpolation.
2928 Cuvier remarks, that Pliny has erroneously joined the
account given by Aristotle of the cybindis, to that of the hybris, or
ptynx. He takes the cybindis to be the “Strix Uralensis” of Pallas.
2929 Cuvier says, that this notion is still entertained by
the French peasantry.
2930 This is not the case. It only lays in the nests of
insectivorous birds.
2931 Cuvier remarks, that this is not a very good reason;
but we have not yet been able to find a better.
2932 Cuvier denies this story, but says, that when the
foster-mother is a very small bird, the young cuckoo will take the
whole of her head in his beak when receiving food.
2933 “Curse on your ill-betiding croak.” See “The Farmer’s
Wife and the Raven,” in Gay’s Fables.
2934 Aristotle says, that it was never to be seen in the
Acropolis or Citadel of Athens.
2935 Only the case with the large raven, or Corvus corax of
Linnæus, the others living in flocks.
2936 Doé says, that this is incorrect; the beak of the raven
not being of a similar form to that of the pigeon.
2937 Or else, “The Median guests.” It is not known to what
he alludes. Alexander ab Alexandro says, that both Alexander the Great
and Cicero were warned of their deaths by the raven.
2938 “Noctua, bubo, ulula.” It is very doubtful what birds
are meant by these names. Cuvier has been at some pains to identify
them, and concludes that the noctua, or glaux of Aristotle, is the
Strix brachyotas of Linnæus, the “short-eared screech-owl;” the bubo,
the Strix bubo of Linnæus, and the ulula, the Strix aluco of Linnæus;
our madgehowlet, grey or brown owl.
2939 Seventh of March. The year of their consulship is not
known.
2940 Cuvier suggests, that it may be the coracias of
Aristotle, our jackdaw probably, the Corvus graculus of Linnæus. It
has been said, that in its admiration of shining objects, it will take
up a burning coal; a trick which has before now caused conflagrations.
Servius speaks of it as frequenting funeral piles.
2945 Picus, the son of Saturn, king of Latium. He was
skilled in augury, and was said to have been changed into a woodpecker.
See Ovid, Met. B. xiv. l. 314.; Virgil, Æn. B. vii. c. 187. See also
Ovid, Fasti, B. iii. l. 37.
2946 Valerius Maximus, B. v. c. 6, says, that seventeen
members of this family fell at the battle of Cannæ.
2947 “Oscines” and “alites.” This was a distinction made by
the augurs, but otherwise of little utility, as all the birds with a
note fly as well.
2948 See the story of the eyes of Argus transferred to the
peacock’s tail. Ovid, Met. B. i. l. 616.
2949 It would be curious to know how the goose manifests
its modesty, or “verecundia.” We are equally at a loss with Pliny to
discover it.
2950 Tribune of the people, B.C. 61. He was
maternal grandfather of the Empress Livia. “Lurco” means a “glutton.”
2954 “Tripudia solistima.” An omen derived from the feeding
of the fowls, when they devoured their food with such avidity, that it
fell from their mouths and rebounded from the ground.
2960 Near Patræ, in Achaia. Ælian gives his name as
Amphilochus.
2961 A singular quality in a goose. Ælian says, that Lacydes
was a peripatetic philosopher, and that he honoured the goose with
splendid obsequies, when it died.
2962 See B. viii. c. 77. Horace also mentions that they were
fattened with figs.
2963 “Lacte mulso.” Perhaps honey, wine, and milk.
2965 “Gans” is still the German name. Hence our word
“gander.”
2966 This medicament is further treated of in B. xxix. c.
13.
2967 “The Commagenian mixture.” For Commagene, see B. v. cc.
13 and 20.
2968 The “goose-fox,” so called, according to Ælian, for its
cunning and mischievous qualities; and worshipped by the Egyptians for
its affection for its young. It is supposed by Cuvier to be the Anas
Ægyptiaca of Buffon.
2969 The Anas clypeata of Buffon, according to Cuvier.
2971 The Tetrao urogallus of Linnæus, according to Cuvier.
2972 The Otis tarda of Linnæus. Cuvier says, that it is not
the case that they are bad eating, and remarks that birds have no
marrow in the larger bones.
2979 M. Mauduit has a learned discussion in Panckouke’s
Translation, vol. viii., many pages in length; in which he
satisfactorily shows that this is not entirely fabulous, but that the
wild swan of the northern climates really is possessed of a tuneful
note or cadence. Of course, the statement that it only sings just
before its death, must be rejected as fabulous.
2980 The “mother of the quails.” Frederic II., in his work,
De Arte Venandi, calls the “rallus,” or “rail,” the “leader of the
quails.”
2981 From γλωττὰ, “a tongue.” It is not known what
bird is alluded to.
2982 Bellon thinks that this is the proyer, or prayer,
of the French; Aldrovandus considers it to be the ortolan.
2983 Gesner suggests from “asinus,” an “ass;” its feathers
sticking up like the ears of that animal. Dalechamps thinks it is
because its voice resembles the braying of an ass; the name “otus” is
from the Greek for “ear.”
2985 “Despui suetum.” See B. xxviii. c. 7. As Hardouin says,
in modern times they are considered delicate eating; but Schenkius,
Obsers. Med. B. i., states, that if the bird has eaten hellebore,
epilepsy is the consequence to the person who partakes of its flesh.
2990 Cuvier suggests, that these birds may have been the
Tringa pugnax of Linnæus and Buffon, the males of which engage in most
bloody combats with each other on the banks of rivers, in spring.
2991 No doubt, as Cuvier says, this was the Numida meleagris
of Linnæus, Guinea hen, or pintada. Cuvier remarks that they are very
pugnacious birds.
2995 Suetonius says, that when Tiberius was staying at
Rhodes, an eagle perched on the roof of his house; such a bird having
never been seen before on the island.
2997 It is still noted for its thieving propensities;
witness the English story of the Maid and the Magpie, and the Italian
opera of “La Gazza Ladra.” Cicero says, “They would no more trust gold
with you, than with a jackdaw.” See also Ovid’s Met. B. vii. It is the
Corvus pica of Linnæus.
3002 It was the nightingale that was said to be “Vox et
præterea nihil;” “A voice, and nothing else.”
3003 As there may be different opinions on the meaning of
the various parts of this passage, it is as well to transcribe it
for the benefit of the reader, the more especially as, contrary to
his usual practice, Pliny is here in a particularly discursive mood.
“Nunc continuo spiritu trahitur in longum, nunc variatur inflexo,
nunc distinguitur conciso, copulatur intorto, promittitur revocato,
infuscatur ex inopinato, interdum et secum ipse murmurat, plenus,
gravis, acutus, creber, extentus; ubi visum est, vibrans, summus,
medius, imus.”
3005 Something very similar to this, we often see practised
by the water-warblers in our streets.
3006 Cuvier supposes that this is one of the fly-catchers;
the “Muscicapa atricapilla” of Linnæus, which changes in appearance
entirely after the breeding season.
3008 Cuvier thinks that this is the wall nightingale, the
Motacilla phœnicurus of Linnæus, which is not seen in winter. On the
other hand, the Motacilla rubecula of Linnæus, or red-throat, is only
seen during the winter, and being like the other bird, may have been
taken for it, and named “phœnicurus.”
3009 This is not the case. Aristotle only says that
it builds its nest of human ordure; a story probably without any
foundation, but still prevalent among the French peasantry.
3010 It has not been identified with precision. Pliny, B.
xviii. c. 69 calls it a small bird. Some make it the popinjay; others,
with more probability, the lapwing. Horace, B. iii. Ode 27, mentions it
as the parra, a bird of ill omen.
3011 The Oriolus luteus, or witwall, according to Linnæus.
3012 White blackbirds (if we may employ the paradox) are
a distinct variety, according to Cuvier, to be found in various
countries, though but rarely.
3013 This is from Herodotus, but it is incorrect. The black,
or rather green ibis, Cuvier says, the Scolopax falcinellus of Linnæus,
is found not only near Pelusium, but all over the south of Europe.
3014 He alludes to the nightingale, mentioned in c. 43.
3015 The king-fisher, or Alcedo ispida of Linnæus. There is
no truth whatever in this favourite story of the ancients.
3016 In copying from Aristotle, he has put “collum,” by
mistake, for “rostrum,” the “beak.”
3017 This bird in reality builds no nest, but lays its
eggs in holes on the water side. The objects taken for its nest are
a zoophyte called halcyonium by Linnæus, as Cuvier informs us, and
similar in shape to a nest.
3019 The first is the common chimney swallow. This latter
one, Cuvier says, is either the window swallow, the Hirundo urbica of
Linnæus, or else the martinet, the Hirundo apus of Linnæus.
3020 The bank swallow, or Hirundo riparia of Linnæus.
3021 Cuvier thinks that this is either the remiz, the
Parus pendulinus of Linnæus, or else the moustache, the Parus biarmicus
of Linnæus.
3022 Not moss, Cuvier says, but blades of grass, and the
silken fibres of the poplar and other aquatic trees.
3023 Cuvier thinks that it is the same bird as the vitiparra
of Pliny.
3025 This story, in all its extravagance, is related first
by Herodotus, and then by Aristotle, who has reduced it to its present
dimensions, as given by Pliny.
3026 Cuvier suggests that, if at all based upon truth, this
may have been the case in one instance, and then ascribed to the whole
species.
3027 The Merops apiaster of Linnæus, or bee-eater.
3028 Cuvier says that the red partridge, the Tetrao rufus of
Linnæus, is meant.
3029 The same wonderful story is told by Aristotle, Hist.
Anim. B. v. c. 5, and by Ælian, Hist. Anim. B. xvii. c. 15.
3030 “Metu.” Aristotle says, by sexual passion. The reading
is probably corrupt here.
3031 See B. xviii. c. 68; where he says that the summer
solstice is past at the time of the incubation.
3032 Cuvier takes this to be the kestril, or Falco
tinnunculus of Linnæus, and considers it to be synonymous with the
cenchris, mentioned in c. 73, and in B. xxix. c. 6, though Pliny does
not seem to be aware of the identity.
3033 Hirtius and Pansa. Frontinus, B. iii. c. 13. says that
pigeons were sent by Hirtius to Brutus. At the present day, letters are
sent fastened under their wings.
3041 The “bull.” This cannot possibly be the bittern, as
some have suggested, for that is a large bird.
3042 Supposed to be the Motacilla flava of Linnæus, the
spring wagtail.
3043 Hence the Latin name “psittacus.” From this, Cuvier
thinks that the first known among these birds to the Greeks and Romans,
was the green perroquet with a ringed neck, the Psittacus Alexandri of
Linnæus.
3044 Cuvier says that this is the jay, the Corvus glandarius
of Linnæus; but that they are not more apt at speaking than the other
kinds.
3045 Cuvier remarks, that these can only be monstrosities.
3046 Britannicus, the son of Claudius, and Nero, his
stepson.
3049 Festus says that the “fane of Rediculus was without the
Porta Capena; it was so called because Hannibal, when on the march from
Capua, turned back (redierit) at that spot, being alarmed at certain
portentous visions.”
3050 P. Cornelius Scipio Æmilianus Africanus Minor, the
younger son of L. Æmilius Paulus, the conqueror of Macedonia. It is
doubtful whether he died a natural death, or was privately assassinated
by the partisans of the Gracchi. His wife, Cornelia, and his mother,
Sempronia, were suspected by some persons.
3054 Most probably in Asia Minor, and not Eriza in India.
3055 Cuvier is inclined to think that the Anas tadorna
approaches most nearly the description given here. From Ovid’s
description of their hard and pointed bills and claws, it would appear
that a petrel (Procellaria), or else a white heron (Ardea garzetta), is
intended; but these birds, he remarks, do not make holes in the earth.
Linnæus has given the name of Diomedea exulans to the albatross, a bird
of the Antarctic seas, which cannot have been known to the ancients.
3058 Albertus Magnus says that swallows can be tamed.
3059 The Fulica porphyrio of Linnæus, the Poule sultane of
Buffon.
3060 Literally, “the blood-red foot.” Cuvier says that this
description may apply to the sea-pie or oyster-eater, the Hæmatopus
ostralegus of Linnæus, or else the long-legged plover, the Charadrius
himantopus of Linnæus, but most probably the latter, more especially if
the reading here is “himantopus,” as some editions have it.
3061 “Muscæ,” “flies,” is a mistake of the copyists, Cuvier
thinks, for “musculi,” “mussels.”
3062 More especially the Larus parasiticus, Cuvier says.
3063 Dalechamps thinks that this story bears reference to
the chatterer (the Ampelis garrulus of Linnæus), the ends of certain
feathers of the wings being extended, and of a vermilion colour:
but Cuvier looks upon Pliny’s account as almost nothing more than a
poetical exaggeration.
3064 A species of duck, Cuvier thinks. from Aristophanes we
learn that they were common in the markets of Athens. Cuvier suggests
that it may, have been the Anas galericulata of Linnæus, the Chinese
teal, which the Parthians may have received from the countries lying to
the east of them.
3066 A variety of the guinea fowl; probably the Numida
Meleagris of Linnæus.
3067 Literally, the “red-wing.” The modern flamingo.
3068 Buffon thinks that this is the grouse of the English,
the Tetrao Scoticus of the naturalists; but Cuvier is of opinion that
it is either the common wood-cock, the Tetrao bonasia of Linnæus, or
else the wood-cock with pointed tail, of the south of Europe, the
Tetrao alchata of Linnæus, most probably the latter, as the male has
black and blue spots on the back; a fact which may explain the joke
in the “Birds” of Aristophanes, where a run-away slave who has been
marked with stripes, is called an attagen. By some it is called the
“red-headed hazel-hen.”
3069 In allusion, perhaps, to the words of Horace, Epod. ii.
54.
Non attagen Ionicus
Jucundior, quam lecta de pinguissimis
Oliva ramis arborum.
3070 Literally, the “bald crow.” Pliny, B. xi. c. 47, says
that it is an aquatic bird: and naturalists generally identify it with
the cormorant, the Pelecanus carbo of Linnæus.
3071 Literally, the red crow, the chocard of the Alps, the
Corvus pyrrhocorax of Linnæus.
3072 The “hare’s foot.” Identical with the snow partridge,
the Tetrao lagopus of Linnæus; it is white in winter.
3073 The same bird, Cuvier says, as seen in summer, being
then of a saffron colour, with blackish spots.
3074 Cuvier remarks, that the green courlis, the Scolopax
falcinellus of Linnæus, which is not improbably the real ibis of the
ancients, is by no means uncommon in Italy.
3075 “Novæ aves.” The grey partridge, Hardouin thinks.
3078 Scythia and Æthiopia ought to be transposed here, as
the griffons were said to be monsters that guarded the gold in the
mountains of Scythia, the Uralian chain, probably.
3079 Literally, the “goat Pan.” Cuvier thinks that the bird
here alluded to actually existed, and identifies it with the napaul, or
horned pheasant of Buffon, the penelope satyra of Gmell, a bird of the
north of India, and which answers the description here given by Pliny.
3090 B. ii. Sat. 4, l. 12. “Longa quibus facies ovis erit,
ille memento. Ut succi melioris, et ut magis alba rotundis.”
3091 Aristotle says just the reverse: but Hardouin thinks
that the passage in Aristotle has been corrupted.
3092 This, Cuvier says, in reality is not the umbilical
cord, but the chalasis, a little transparent and gelatinous ligament,
by which the yolk is suspended like a globe. The true umbilical cord of
the bird only makes its appearance after an incubation of some days.
3093 Produced in the territory of Adria. See B. iii. c. 18.
3094 Cuvier says, that after an egg has been set upon for
some days, the heart of the chicken may be seen like a small red
speck, that palpitates; but that no such thing is to be seen before
incubation.
3095 Cuvier remarks, that the chicken is not formed
exclusively from the white, and that the yellow is gradually displaced
by it, as the chicken increases in size.
3096 Cuvier tells us, that in the Memoirs of the Academy
of St. Petersburgh, there is a memoir by Wolf, entitled Ovum simplex
gemelliferum, in which these twin chickens are described with great
exactness.
3097 More generally eleven or thirteen in this country.
3099 Or rather, will produce chickens hideously deformed.
This trick is sometimes practised among the country people against
those to whom they owe a grudge.
3146 M. Manilius, mentioned in c. 2. Nothing certain is
known of him, but by some he is supposed to have been the senator and
jurisconsult of that name, contemporary with the younger Scipio. The
astronomical poem which goes under his name was probably written at a
much later period.
3149 A famous soothsayer, who predicted to Galba, as we
learn from Tacitus, the dangers to which he was about to be exposed. He
wrote on the science of Divination, as practised by the Etruscans.
3151 A Roman legislator, proconsul of Gallia Narbonensis,
and long a favourite of Augustus. According to Aulus Gellius, his
works were very numerous. He also wrote a treatise on the Etruscan
divination.
3159 He was the most ancient writer of Roman history in
prose. His history, which was written in Greek, is supposed to have
commenced with the arrival of Æneas in Italy, and to have come down
to his own time. He was sent by the Romans to consult the oracle at
Delphi, after the battle of Cannæ.
3160 The famous poet and writer on the Epicurean philosophy.
He was born B.C. 98, and slew himself B.C. 54.
3167 A writer on agriculture, mentioned by Columella.
3168 A priestess of Delphi, said to have been the inventor
of hexameter verse. Servius identifies her with the Cumæan Sibyl. Pliny
quotes from her in c. 8, probably from some work on augury attributed
to her. A work in MS. entitled “Orneosophium,” or “Wisdom of Birds,” is
attributed to Phemonoë. She is said to have been the first to pronounce
the celebrated Γνῶθι σεαυτὸν, commonly attributed to Thales.
3169 An Athenian comic poet of the New Comedy, born either
at Soli in Cilicia, or at Syracuse. Plautus has imitated several of his
plays.
3170 Nothing is known of this writer, who wrote a poem on
ornithology, as here stated. Athenæus is doubtful whether the writer
was a poet, Bœus, or a poetess, Bœo.
3201 Cassius Dionysius of Utica, flourished B.C.
40. He condensed the twenty-eight books of Mago into twenty, and
dedicated them to the Roman prætor Sextilius.
Page vii. line 31, for Coisicius, read Cossicius.
„ xvii. „ 15, for pepole, read people.
„ xviii. „ 30, for Fabulosetas, read Fabulositas.
„ 378, „ 20, for Goat-Pens, read Goat-Pans.
Transcriber’s Notes:—
The spelling, hyphenation, punctuation and accentuation are as the
original, except for apparent typographical errors which have been
corrected.
The footnotes for each of the six volumes have been renumbered, the
references to notes in other volumes have been changed accordingly.