A Special General Meeting of the Midland Counties Branch of
the British Dental Association, was held on Wednesday, 6th
October, in the Memorial Hall, Albert Square, Manchester. The
President of the branch, H. Campion, Esq. (Manchester), presided,
and there were also present, Messrs. S. Wormald (Treasurer),
Stockport; Dr. W. H. Waite (Secretary), Liverpool; W. H.
Nicol (Leeds); R. E. Stewart (Liverpool); Dr. D. A. Wormald
(Bury); T. Murphy (Bolton); Q. Renshaw (Rochdale); W. H.
Ridge (Stafford); T. Mahonie (Sheffield); B. Harding (Manchester);
T. C. Parson (Clifton); H. Marsh (Manchester); T.
Dilcock (Liverpool); D. Dopson (Liverpool); L. Matheson
(Manchester); W. Dykes (Manchester); W. Headridge (Manchester);
J. G. Roberts (Liverpool); W. Taylor (Batley); W.
Shillinglaw (Birkenhead); J. S. Crapper (Hanley); and R. Rogers
(Cheltenham).
The first business before the meeting was the reading of the
minutes of the last meeting. They were taken as read.
The following letter was read by the Secretary (Dr. W. H.
Waite):—
“To the Hon. Sec. of the Midland Branch of the British Dental Association.
“Dear Sir,—I have much pleasure in informing you, that at a
485meeting of the business Committee of the representative Board of
the British Dental Association, held on the 1st instant, Edward
Saunders, Esq., in the chair, the proposed bye-laws having been
approved of, the Midland Counties Branch of the British Dental
Association was formally affiliated with the Central Body.
“According to the desire of the meeting, I have to convey to you
our best wishes for the success of your efforts.
“Yours very truly,
“James Smith Turner,
“Hon. Sec., British Dental Association.”
The report which was then read by the Secretary, was as
follows:—
As this is a Special, and not an Ordinary General Meeting, and
as the Council have only met once, there is not much upon which
they can report. In accordance with the resolution adopted at
the last meeting, circulars inviting practitioners in the Midland
District to join the Association, were issued to every name on the
Register. Up to the first of August, the Secretary had enrolled
33 members and 6 associates, and since that date there have been
six applications for membership, five of which the Council have
this day admitted, viz., Messrs. R. Rogers, Cheltenham; T. C.
Parson, Clifton, Bristol; T. Wormald, Oldham; B. L. Harding,
Manchester; W. H. Ridge, Stafford. The election of members
will be by ballot, at the Council meeting following the date of application,
and the vote of two-thirds of those present, will be
necessary to ensure election.
A book has been provided for the entry of names of members
attending the meetings, and your Council have further arranged
for the admission of visitors, each member having the privilege to
admit two visitors, whose names and addresses should be entered
in a column provided for the purpose.
The Council have nominated Mr Major Stewart of Liverpool, as
first Vice-President of the branch, and they recommend that the
Annual Meeting in April next be held in Liverpool.
An analysis of the Dentists Register shews that 1,400 names
have been enrolled, of gentlemen engaged in the practice of
Dentistry, in the Midland Counties.
Of these, about half are registered as practising in conjunction
with pharmacy, and of these last, a considerable number—are
486names not to be found in the Chemists’ and Druggists’ Directory.
Some difficulty is encountered in attempts to verify cases of incorrect
registration on account of changes of residences, alterations
or errors in spelling, &c., this pertains to both the Dentists’ and
Chemists’ Directory, so that it is not easy to identify positively in
all instances. If gentlemen, who may be aware of the facts in
any locality, would be at the pains to collect them, and submit
them in a concise form, so as to furnish clear and trustworthy
evidence of fraudulent registration, it would be of great service.
Any one practising Dentistry, but who is not on the register, or
anyone on the register, who can be shown not to have been in the
practice of dentistry at the date of the Act, these are the two
kinds of error it is desirable to expose.
It need scarcely be stated that an increase of members, both of
the Central Association, and its separate branches, is absolutely
necessary to enable the Executive to carry out the provisions of
the Act, and there is little doubt that with moderate effort, we
may all succeed in inducing others to join. The Association is
destined to represent the profession in the future, and it is our
business to make its representative character a living reality, and
not a mere empty name.
Mr. J. S. Crapper (Hanley), moved the adoption of the report.
It was seconded by Mr. Headridge (Manchester), and carried.
Mr. Major Stewart, of Liverpool, said that as his name had been
mentioned in the report, he begged to thank them for the honour
they had conferred on him by electing him Vice-President of the
branch. He thanked them, on behalf of his brethren in Liverpool,
for the honour the Society had conferred on them.
The President then delivered his address, and said:—
Gentlemen,—It is my pleasing duty in the first place to
thank you, not only for the kindness you have shown in
electing me to the responsible position of President of
your Branch, but also for having given me the honour of
being the First President of the First Branch of the British
Dental Association.
I need scarcely say that the fact of our meeting here to-day
as we are now doing is a subject for congratulation,
and the presence of so many, and the distance some of you
487have come, proves the interest you take in the great movement
of the day, which has called into existence the central
Society of which we now form a branch.
Every new movement is sure to give rise to more or less
excitement and sometimes to great expectations, and I
must, therefore, beg, first for myself, your kind forbearance
for my numerous shortcomings, of which I am only too
conscious; and secondly, for your society I must also ask
your kind consideration, if at the first it seems to you
scarcely to come up to the high standard of your anticipations,
requesting you to remember that it is still in its
infancy, that it has commenced its existence under difficulties,
and I regret to say, not without some opposition.
It will, therefore, require care and energy, not only on the
part of the Executive body, but also in each individual
member, to bring it to that state of maturity we all are
anxious to see it attain. I feel certain from your presence
here to-day that you have the interest of the Society at
heart, but I venture to remind you that the simply feeling
an interest in a thing is not sufficient in itself to command
success. That is a result which requires, especially in these
days, both energy and labour, and we must never forget
that our future position and progress as a Society, will
mainly depend on our own individual efforts, since we are
each of us an individual unit, the aggregate of which units
forms the Society itself.
It would be natural for you to expect in this, the first
introductory paper, a history of the origin and objects of
the Society, but these were so ably treated of by the
worthy Secretary of the Society on his visit to Manchester,
and so many of you were present at the London meetings,
and so much has been already written on the subject, that
it would not only be superfluous but also presumptuous for
me to attempt what has already been done by others so
much more competent than myself, and I am therefore deprived
of what would have been an interesting topic for
an address; but although the past and the present have
thus been taken from me, there still remains the future;
488and as I hope that in that future our Midland branch will
ultimately form a not unimportant unit, I will therefore
restrict what I have to say mainly to the subject of the
branch itself, and in doing so must crave your kind indulgence
for the many imperfections in my efforts, urging as
my excuse the little time that numerous professional and
other engagements leave at my disposal.
Here, I think, we may congratulate ourselves, that we
exist as a branch of the British Dental Association and not
as an independent Society, for I am sure we all feel that
the scheme for the elevation of our profession to its proper
position, which that Society has been formed to promote,
has been most judiciously planned, and has thus far been
most efficiently carried out—a scheme, which whilst it in
no way discourages the attainment of the higher qualification
of full membership of the Royal College of Surgeons,
in those who are anxious to distinguish themselves, and
possess the means and opportunity for so doing, provides
an efficient education in all those scientific and practical
subjects which it is necessary for a Dentist to know, and
by means of the Dental Diploma, affords the public a guarantee
that the possessor of that diploma has passed through
a curriculum of such a standard as fully to qualify him for
the practice of the branch of surgery which he professes.
Nor must we allow to pass unnoticed the utter unselfishness
of its promoters, who laboured out of pure love for their
profession, knowing that they could never expect to see
the good result of their labours in their lifetime, unlike the
man who is said to have remarked that he never could see
the good posterity had done for him that he need trouble
himself about posterity: and as was the case with many of
those grand memorials of the loving zeal and devotion of
our ancestors, those noble cathedrals with which so many
parts of our country are adorned, one generation was satisfied
if they were able to lay the foundations and were
permitted to see some portion of the superstructure erected
during their lifetime, so in like manner, we must wait and
not be discouraged if we are unable to see the full development
489of the present movement, but should consider it a
privilege to be permitted to assist in however humble a
degree, in taking part in what we fondly and reasonably
hope will prove the formation of a grand future for our
branch of surgery.
To our Secretary and Treasurer are due, I believe, the
credit of having originated the branch, and I take this
opportunity of saying that I am unable in any way to
claim a portion of that credit for myself, for I gather from
a letter in one of the journals, that I was not only believed
to have been one of the promoters, but that I was thought
to have been guilty of an act of discourtesy in what I had
done, or rather in what I had not done. I knew nothing
of the project till I received a printed circular inviting my
co-operation, and it was not till after the lapse of many
weeks that I found myself able to join in the scheme.
The promoters worked hard in drafting the bye-laws and
arranging the other necessary preliminaries, but I am sure
I may say for them that they feel amply rewarded by seeing
their pet child, over which they have laboured so long,
fully recognised as a legitimate offspring of the British
Dental Association.
The objects of the branch, you see by the bye-laws, are
fourfold:—
1. To render assistance, as far as possible, in carrying
out the provisions of the Dentists Act.
2. The general consideration of subjects affecting the
interests of the profession.
3. The reading and discussion of papers on Dental Surgery
and Mechanics.
4. The cultivation of a generous professional spirit
amongst practitioners throughout the district.
With respect to the first object, I think the purport of
the Act is so clear that it requires but few remarks from
me. It is impossible to draw any definite line where the
help of an unqualified person must cease and that of the
duly qualified practitioner commence. Any one who
dresses a wound or a bruise, or reduces a dislocation, practises
490surgery, and no one could for a moment imagine that
a law would ever be passed to prevent his doing so; and
in like manner, we could not expect that the legislature
would ever allow the drawing of a tooth or any other similar
operation to be made a penal action, although the person
so doing may be said to be practising Dentistry; but
as soon as any one endeavours to make the public believe
he is a qualified practitioner, by assuming the title of
Dentist or any other name implying the possession of the
Dental diploma, so soon he becomes amenable to the law;
the act thus guaranteeing to the public, that for the future,
any one who claims the professional title shall of necessity
have obtained the necessary qualification. Any person, or
any number of persons, who may wish to put the act in
force in any particular case can do so, but before taking
action it will be necessary to obtain the sanction of the
Medical Council. This at first sight may seem to be an
unnecessary precaution, yet I think on further consideration
you will admit that it is a very wise provision, as it
entirely prevents the possibility of any one being proceeded
against from personal pique or any other improper motive;
and if in any case it is thought desirable that a person’s
name should be removed from the register, all that is
necessary is to collect sufficient reliable evidence, and
transmit it to the central board in London, who will bring
the matter before the Medical Council, the only body by
whom such action can be taken. And in cases where these
proceedings may be necessary, I am sure they can be carried
out without earning for ourselves the opprobrium of
acting as spies or professional police, which some have already
been willing to assign to us.
With regard to the second object of the Society, we
must all feel that the interests of the profession will at
times require the careful consideration of its members, and
necessitate the existence of some organised body which
shall be able to act with the authority of the bulk of its
members, and for this, no better scheme can be devised
than the one we are now so much interested in—the formation
491of a central society, with recognised branches in the
more distant parts of the country, constituting an organisation
by which the feeling of the majority of the profession
may at any time be ascertained on any question that may
arise bearing on the well being of the profession.
In the third object, “The reading and discussion of
papers on Dental Surgery and Mechanics,” the surgery you
will notice is placed first, and justly so, as the higher
branch; though in early times, and I fear even to a more
recent date, the order in importance was more frequently
reversed in practice. The mere mechanical calling of former
times—for in its infancy Dentistry was little else—has
now been developed into a profession and gained admission
within the sacred portals of the College in Lincoln’s Inn
Fields, and it is for the present and future generations to
prove by the exercise of their highest mental as well as
mechanical faculties, that the profession is worthy of the
position which has been accorded to it.
It has been noticed by those who most frequently attend
the meetings of our speciality, that papers on mechanical
subjects are more easily procured, and often prove more
attractive than those on surgical subjects, but this will no
doubt become less as the educational facilities of the present
day are brought to bear more and more on the whole
body of the profession. Surely the preservation of the
natural organs is of far more importance and value to the
patient than the substitution of others, however efficiently
supplied.
What should we think of the surgeon who allowed himself
to be deterred from directing all his energies to the
preservation and restoration to health, of a diseased or
injured limb, by the thought that an artificial substitute
could be provided for it. No! No! Whatever our politics
may be let our surgery be conservative. Far be it from
me to appear to undervalue any branch of my profession,
for no one can have been long in practice without having
experienced the well earned gratification derived from
noticing the relief from pain, and in many instances the
492perfect restoration to health, that follows the substitution
of efficient members in the place of useless and diseased
ones; but far greater is the credit and higher the appreciation
of the patient, when the diseased natural organs
themselves can be preserved and restored to a state of
efficiency; and how great are the facilities for so doing in
the present day, compared with the early reminiscences
of many of our older brethren. All of us who were
fortunate enough to hear the interesting paper read
before the General Meeting of the Society in August last,
must have been forcibly struck with the contrast between
the paucity and quality of the instruments there mentioned,
and the appliances of the present day. What would
have been the feelings—I might almost say the bewilderment
of the practitioner therein described, could he have
been transported into one of the large depôts with which
we are so familiar. The numerous and beautifully adapted
instruments for the variety of operations unknown in those
days. The admirably adjusted forces for each form of
tooth, the endless variety of excavators and pluggers, the
wonderfully delicate nerve extractors, the rubber dam and
its adjustments, the saliva pump, the electric mallet, the
improvement in our chairs, and that greatest of all boons,
both to patient and operator, the Morrison engine, the
name of the inventor of which valuable instrument, ought
to be indelibly inscribed in letters of gold in the Archives of
Dentistry, to say nothing of the application of vulcanite and
celluloid, and the many ingenious appliances for the workshop.
Surely these should lead us to value the benefits we
enjoy, and teach us to strive to use them to the best of our
ability, not influenced by the thought of self-glorification
in attempting to surpass all others, in the performance of
this or that brilliant operation, but ever remembering that
the ultimate aim of all our efforts should be the increased
amount of good which we are thereby enabled to accomplish
for the benefit of our suffering fellow-creatures.
Although the Transactions of the Odontological Society
contain a very voluminous and valuable collection of
493papers bearing on one speciality, there still remain
numerous subjects and modes of operating which may be
made productive of profitable discussion. Such are the
replantation of teeth now attracting so much attention,
the erosion of the surfaces of the teeth of which so little
is known in the present day. The various improvements
in the materials for filling, and amongst a variety of
subjects, far too numerous to be mentioned here, the
startling announcement of the so-called New Departure
Creed.
As this last is a subject which I think we all feel greatly
interested in, and also bears on the branch of Dentistry
which we are now considering, I will venture a few
remarks on some of the articles of the accepted and new
departure creeds as tabulated in the Dental Cosmos.
I am not aware that the so-called accepted creed has
been the recognised standard of practice in this country.
The doctrine that gold, and nothing but gold, should be used
for permanent fillings, has certainly been extensively promulgated
by those of our Transatlantic brethren who have
settled in this country; and I cannot but look upon this
new departure, as the natural reaction which might be
expected to follow the over anxiety to build up large
adhesive gold fillings, on fragments of weak and often
disorganized teeth, totally unsuited for such an operation;
but until I can see some stronger reason than has been
hitherto adduced by the advocates of this new departure,
I must, in any case suitable for a good gold filling, confess
my unwillingness to abandon for any other of the fillings
now in use, a material that we know from past experience
is capable, when judiciously applied, of preserving and
restoring to a state of efficiency, in some cases for a
period of twenty years or even for a much longer time,
teeth which otherwise would have been lost in about the
same number of months. For the efficient use of this
material much must of course depend on the manipulative
ability of the operator, but it has often seemed to me a
matter of doubt, whether, in the case of those large
494adhesive gold fillings, the patient has received an equivalent
for the tedious and necessarily expensive operation
that has been undergone.
The choice between contour fillings and separation of
the teeth in the case of approximal cavities, must, I think,
depend in a measure on the aptitude and judgment of the
operator, since the two plans when successfully performed,
may be made equally efficient. The latter however—separation—seems
to afford greater facilities for operating,
and also for cleanliness in those patients who are unable
or unwilling to devote the time and attention necessary
for that object.
The professed incompatibility of gold as a filling
material with tooth bone, seems to me to be at variance
with the frequent success which we all must have experienced,
in the use of that filling in cavities on the labial
surface of the roots of the upper incisors. I mention this
particular position as being easy of access for operating,
and also as being one where the enamel, tooth bone, gold,
and saliva, are in constant contact with each other. In
those cases where the success of the operation has not
equalled our expectations, in endeavouring to estimate
the probable incompatibility of the filling material as a
cause of failure, it is, I think, necessary to consider
whether in the ordinary operation for filling, the whole of
the diseased dentine has been so thoroughly removed, as
to admit of its proving a satisfactory test case, for the
microscope reveals to us a change in the dentine in the
sides of a decayed cavity, even when it appears sound to
the eye, and also to the feel of the instrument; and in
those portions of the margin of the cavity which we
undercut for the retention of the filling, we have the
dentine not only denuded of its nutrient covering, the
periosteum, but also deprived of its nutrition from the pulp
by the severance of the tubes of the dentine, and the
intervention of the filling material, and in this deteriorated
condition, in all probability still exposed to the continuous
action of the same deleterious influences (whatever they
495may have been) which first caused the decay; and I
cannot but think that the failure when it occurs, is in a
greater measure due to the above named causes, rather
than to the incompatibility of the gold with the tooth
bone; but with all the success that has attended the use
of gold for so many years, we must still, I am sure, be
willing to admit the want of a perfect plastic filling,
which shall be able to withstand the friction of mastication,
and also the deleterious action of the fluids of the mouth.
The dictum that, “a tooth that can be so treated as to
be satisfactorily filled with anything, is worth filling,” is
one, I think, that all who value conservative surgery must
readily agree with.
That “unskilful and unscrupulous Dentists fill with tin
covered with gold, thereby causing galvanic action,
pulpitis, death of the pulp, abscess, and loss of the tooth,”
has certainly not been an accepted creed in this country,
for I was early taught the use of this material both alone,
and in combination with gold, when I first commenced
the study of my profession with Mr. Sheffield, of Exeter,
and long experience, and the retention of a tin filling in
my own mouth, in a perfect condition for over five-and-twenty
years, has fully proved to me the value of this
metal. When used in combination with gold, and exposed
to contact with the fluids of the mouth, it certainly undergoes
a chemical change, becoming nearly black in colour,
but without staining the tooth as some amalgams do; it
also becomes harder, and cuts harsh like an amalgam
filling, but the change does not appear to cause any
alteration in its bulk, or in any respect to interfere with
its efficiency as a filling, nor have I ever found it produce
any of the evils suggested in the creed, and I cannot but
think that it would be more used, were it not for the
universal prejudice that exists in the mind of the public
in favour of gold, partly arising from the magical charm
which resides in the word gold, and partly from the
nothing but gold theory (if I may so call it), which has
been so largely spread by our American brethren.
496That “a filling may be the best known for a tooth and
yet leak badly,” seems a simple admission that in some
cases bad is the best that we can do for them. If experience
has taught us anything, it certainly has proved that
it is the leak which does the mischief; and as in warfare
no fortress is considered stronger than its weakest part, so
is it with a tooth that is filled. A small leaking point will
soon undermine the filling, and prove its ruin.
The statement that “gutta-percha properly used is the
most permanent filling material we possess,” must make us
wish to know the meaning of the words, “properly used,”
for the rapidity with which it wears away, in any position
in which it is subjected to friction in mastication, seems to
me to prevent the possibility of its ever being permanent.
The force of the article which says that “a poor gutta-percha
filling, in its proper place, is better than a good gold
one,” seems to depend on the question as to what is the
proper place for a gutta-percha filling: surely not the
place where we can insert a good gold plug, if by “good,”
is meant one that is not only solid, but also sufficiently
tight to exclude all moisture from the cavity.
It certainly is rather startling to hear from the country
from which have come the severest criticisms on the use
and the users of amalgam fillings, the admission that
“amalgam per se, is an excellent filling material.” With
amalgams, as with the other plastic materials, a perfect
filling of its kind has yet to be discovered, for a measure
of uncertainty seems to exist in all of them; but as a
proof that an amalgam may make a good useful filling, I
can say that I have seen more than one apparently in a
perfect condition after thirty years’ wear, and I cannot but
think that much of the discredit attaching to its use, arises
from its being the filling we naturally have recourse to in
all cases of doubt and difficulty.
That “the use of plastic filling material tends to lower
the standard of Dentistry, thereby diminishing its sphere
of usefulness,” is scarcely a fair way of stating the matter.
The indiscriminate use of them would certainly do so,
497but the judicious selection of them in cases unsuited for
the use of gold, need not necessarily interfere with the
acquirement of the manipulative ability necessary for
making good gold fillings, nor is it desirable that it should
do so, as the power of manipulation required for the
successful use of gold, must tend to perfect the powers of
the operator in the use of all plastic materials, and must
thus extend the sphere of usefulness of that Dentistry
which has for its standard of excellency, ability to save
teeth.
Time has only permitted me very briefly to notice some
portions of this new creed, to show that it contains much
that might be productive of profitable discussion, but I
think from what has been said, we may reasonably conclude
that each material has its own particular advantages,
and that until we are in possession of a filling suitable for
universal application, a judicious selection is necessary on
the part of the operator in each particular case.
The fourth, and not the least important object of the
society is “the cultivation of a generous professional
spirit amongst practitioners throughout the district,” and
to this I hope may be added throughout the whole body
of the profession; for the knowledge that we are branches
of one central society, should lead to a feeling of fellowship
not only with the members of the parent society, but also
with the members of the other branches, and surely it is not
too much to hope, that with the extension of the Society
and its branches, and the feeling of professional brotherhood
thereby engendered, we may see the gradual increase
of that Christian charity which “thinketh no evil,” and
which would scorn all attempts at self-exaltation, by the
disparagement of the efforts and qualifications of a fellow
practitioner, which I fear has been greatly encouraged by
the isolation that has so long existed in our speciality.
Nor must we omit to notice the great benefit to be
derived from the friendly discussion of subjects in which
we are all mutually interested, not only to the profession
at large, but also to each one individually, for which of us
498in his early days has not felt the wish that he had thought
of this or that other mode of treatment in some particular
case; and what more likely to impress new ideas on the
memory, or, to use a familiar expression, make us “have
them at our fingers’ ends” (the place where surely they
are wanted when operating), than the friendly discussion
of them which it is one of the objects of our Society to
encourage?
The President of the Western branch has held out to us
the hand of fellowship, which I am sure I need not
ask your permission to be allowed to reciprocate most
fully—not only in the wish for their future prosperity, but
also in the assurance that any of their members who may
have an opportunity of attending our meetings, will at all
times receive that cordial welcome which it should be our
greatest pleasure to extend to all the members of our
Society and its branches, thus realizing one of the great
objects of our Association, and proving not only by our
words, but also by our actions, that we are anxious to
encourage that professional intercourse which must tend
not only to our mutual benefit, but also to that of the
community at large; and if, as their President remarked,
it is a pleasure to them to think that in the formation of
our branch we show “the benefits resulting from the good
example they have set us,” it is no less a subject of congratulation
to us to know that they have at last recognised
the good which is likely to accrue, both to themselves and
to the profession generally, by following our example, and
forming themselves into a local branch of the British
Dental Association.
And now, fearing that I have already trespassed too
long on your time and forbearance, it only remains for me
to thank you for the kind reception you have accorded me,
and to express the belief that, although the barque which
we have so successfully launched will probably meet with
the usual amount of storms and difficulties, still the old
proverbial “long pull and a strong pull and a pull all
together,” in which you are so able and willing to join,
499will carry it securely through the many undercurrents and
quicksands which may threaten it on its course, and secure
what we all so ardently hope for—a useful, as well as a
long and prosperous career, for the Midland Branch of the
British Dental Association.
Mr. Mahonie (Sheffield), moved a vote of thanks to the
President for his able and eloquent address, and in doing so, said
that when the Association was weak, Mr. Campion had come to
their aid in a very courteous manner, and they were now asked to
give him their heartiest thanks for the paper which they had just
heard read. The paper was one which would last more than a
year. It was very instructive, and he (Mr. Mahonie) thought
that Mr. Campion was eminently capable of giving them instructions
in the way of Dental Reform. He moved “That the best
thanks of this meeting be given to the President of the Midland
Counties Branch of the British Dental Association, for the able
and eloquent paper which he had just read.”
Mr. W. H. Nicol (Leeds), seconded the motion in suitable
terms.
Dr. W. H. Waite in supporting the motion, said that it was a
very great privilege for them to have such a President as they had
in Mr. Campion. His wisdom had been of great service in superintending
the efforts which the Executive have had to put forth.
They had been delighted that morning with the interesting and
instructive address which Mr. Campion had given them, but most
of all with the very high and generous tone that breathed throughout
the whole of the address, and he (Dr. Waite) thought Mr.
Campion had struck a key-note which, when the address came
to be printed, would vibrate not only throughout the Midland
Counties of England, but through every country where the Dental
profession was carried on. The motion was carried with much
enthusiasm, and the meeting then adjourned till the afternoon.
The Members assembled in the Memorial Hall at 2.30 p.m.,
Mr. Campion in the chair.
The President stated that some idea had been started of bringing
specimens to the meeting, and in order to show what curiosities
might be casually collected, he offered a few specimens to the notice
of the Members.
500Mr. Roff King, Shrewsbury, then read a paper on “Modelling
and Modelling Composition.”
Mr. J. S. Crapper (Hanley) read a paper, entitled “New Ideas
in Mechanical Dentistry,” and exhibited specimens of teeth which
had been manufactured by a new process and sent to him to
exhibit.
The Secretary read a paper received from Mr. F. Richardson,
Derby—“Has Vaccination any Effect on the Degeneration of the
Teeth?”
Mr. H. Marsh (Manchester) read a paper on the “Use of
Nitrous Oxide Gas.”
Mr. Murphy desired to ask the Chairman whether Licentiates in
Dental Surgery were legally responsible if a patient expired whilst
under the influence of the nitrous oxide gas, or subsequently to the
administration.
In the discussion which followed, there appeared to be a unanimous
opinion amongst those present that Licentiates were not
responsible, but that it would be impossible to define such a
position.
The Secretary read a letter from Mr. Kyan of Preston, in
which that gentleman expressed his regret at his inability to be
present, and hoped the Members would have a successful meeting.
Mr. Renshaw moved a vote of thanks to those gentlemen who
had furnished them with such interesting and instructive papers.
Dr. D. A. Wormald, in seconding the resolution, said they
could, with a little energy and support, make that Society very
successful, and as a representative body on behalf of their profession
in the Midland Counties, they could maintain such a position
that it would become an honour to belong to it.
The Chairman remarked that it was no light work to prepare
such papers as they had heard read; much time and trouble must
have been spent in the digest of the various subjects. He gave
the hearty thanks of the meeting to the contributors of those
papers.
The resolution was carried unanimously.
Mr. Major Stewart proposed a vote of thanks to Mr. Campion
for presiding.
Mr. King seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously.
The Chairman (Mr. Campion) returned his best thanks for the
kind reception and assistance the Members had rendered him
whilst in the chair.
In the evening a dinner was held at the Queen’s Hotel, Mr.
Campion presiding, Mr. Major Stewart in the vice-chair.
The Chairman proposed the health of “The Queen and the rest
of the Royal Family.”
Mr. Mahonie then gave a recitation from Shakespeare.
Mr. Major Stewart in rising to propose the toast of the
President of the branch said—It is my pleasing duty as your Vice-President
to propose this toast. I find our worthy Chairman took
his M.R.C.S. degree in 1856, I therefore regard him as the father
of the profession in this district of England; those who were
present this morning heard his inaugural address. Those words
were words of wisdom, and were addressed not only to the older,
but also to the younger members of our Branch Association. His
address will be read with pleasure by members of our profession
in England and America. With regard to the chairmanship of
this branch, I think it would have been wise if Mr. Campion had
been elected for three years, until we were more consolidated. I
am glad to see so many members from this district present
this evening, and will now conclude by asking you to drink a
bumper to the long life and successful career of our Chairman.
The toast was accepted most loyally.
The Chairman in responding said, gentlemen, you must have
listened to my voice sufficiently to-day—this is my last appearance
before you this session. Our Secretary has promised to allow me
to enjoy myself, otium cum dignitate, after I have returned my best
thanks. It is with great diffidence I respond to this toast, I really
feel the difficulty increased tenfold by the kind manner in which
you, sir, have proposed, and my friends accepted this toast. One
word in regard to sub-branches—I can see no reason why such
large towns as Liverpool and Manchester should not establish sub-branches;
frequent meetings, say once a month, could be held for
an exchange of thoughts and methods of operation in our department
of Surgery, in which we are all interested; so constituted,
they would be private societies, to which any member of our
branch might be admitted. The great event of the next year will
be the meeting of the International Medical Congress, held in
London during August. This Congress has held its meetings
every alternate year for the last twelve years. The London
members of the Medical profession have taken it up very warmly,
502and are making preparations, which must result in giving the
Congress such a reception as will be worthy of our capital.
The President of the Dental section is Mr. Edwin Saunders,
whilst the Vice-Presidents are Mr. John Tomes, and Mr. Spence
Bate, Mr. C. S. Tomes acts as Secretary, to all of whom we are
much indebted for their untiring efforts in raising our department
of Surgery to its present position. I trust that our branch will
be well represented at this Congress.
Another subject I will broach is the establishment of a Dental
School in Manchester. If such a school is formed it should be in
concert with the Manchester Medical School at the New Victoria
University. When the charter was first granted for the formation
of a university, a medical school was not included, but there
appears very little doubt that in the course of time such school
will be established; let us then wait patiently until we can
thoroughly and efficiently carry out such an undertaking.
I am sorry I cannot introduce you to a Dental hospital; this is
to be deplored, more especially as we took a prominent part in
Dental reform for the good of Dental practitioners. If younger
and more able men will commence the work, they shall receive my
heartiest support and co-operation. I must now conclude by expressing
regret that I have not the gift of speech, that I might
explain to you the warm feelings I have in regard to the reception
you have given me, and the kind manner in which you have drunk
my health.
Dr. D. A. Wormald sang “The Spinning Wheel.”
Dr. Wormald, in proposing “The British Dental Association,”
said: Mr. President, and gentlemen, this toast is one, I am sure,
you will drink with the utmost cordiality. Those who sit round
this board, and have taken a part during the past few years in the
politics of our profession, must experience a feeling of congratulation
that we are able to meet to-night, and realize the fact that at
last we occupy a recognized position. We need re-organization,
and we need a central body, and the British Dental Association is
that recognized body, and demands our support and assistance.
Well, join that Association, and do what you can to lift up the
profession from the low level in which we have been placed, and
raise it to a much higher level. We need, as your President so
kindly put it this afternoon, a higher professional tone, and a more
generous feeling towards our brethren; and that can only be obtained
by coming more and more in contact with each other, and
503through the influence of such an organization as this we are met
to commence, which will assist in placing our profession in a
position which it should long ago have occupied. Many of those
who are now in our ranks may not see the full result of our
labours, but depend upon this, that our labours will be recognised
in the great difference which will show itself more and more in
this country between those who are worthily following their
calling, and those who indulge in non-professional practices. The
British Dental Association will become strong and durable, and
then we may be sure that under the wisdom and the guidance of
those who have piloted our steps so far, we may safely follow them
wherever they lead, and so lay a foundation upon which the rising
generation may build up their professional career, and help to raise
the status of our profession. That profession is worthy of
all the time and attention that any honourable gentleman
will give it, if he will follow his calling worthily, and serving
the interests of a suffering public. In connection with this toast,
Mr. Chairman, my friend Dr. Waite, will have the pleasure of responding,
and I have the greatest pleasure in coupling his name
with it.
Dr. Waite responding, said, Mr. President, Mr. Vice-President,
and gentlemen, it is to me both a pleasure and a pride to be
permitted to respond to the toast of the “British Dental Association.”
I am not much of a believer in post-prandial oratory.
The period of replenishment for the physical energies, should be a
period of repose for the energies intellectual, or perhaps better
still, a time of refreshment, by agreeable and amusing conversation.
That Englishmen should be fond of dining together, is
natural and characteristic; that they should be almost equally
prone to after dinner speechifying is somewhat surprising. It is
well, however, when the usages imposed by custom can be observed,
without making a too serious demand upon our drowsy powers,
and fortunately we have a condition of things existing at the
present time which, when fairly estimated, is calculated to awaken
agreeable reflections, and inspire us with salutary hopes.
Within the short space of five years, events have occurred with
astonishing rapidity, that have substantially and permanently
altered the position of the Dental profession, not alone in its
relation to the general public, but also in its internal organisation,
and the mutual relation of individuals to the whole body. These
events may be classified in three distinct items, and in each we
504shall find elements of progress largely preponderating. First of
all, most of you will recall the feeling which prevailed when the
idea of obtaining an Act of Parliament was invoked at the Manchester
meeting of 1875—it was not regarded exactly as an utopian
idea, but certainly we felt it to be something almost too good to
hope for. Well, in less than three years from that time the
Dentists Act was passed, and now, after two years experience
and consideration, we are able to discover what it is we have
obtained, though it is all too soon as yet, to realise (except very
partially) the practical benefits the Act is destined to confer. This
much, however, we know. We have a legal status. We have
legal rights and privileges. We are admitted to the fellowship of
the honourable and learned professions. These three points are
assured, and we should see to it, that we interpose no barrier of
professional character or conduct between ourselves and the
privileges our Act bestows. We know, moreover, that there are
secured for those who will come after us, more substantial benefits
of education, of practice, of public appreciation, such as none of
us have been permitted to enjoy. This is the characteristic feature
of the Dentists Act. Its noblest provisions are for posterity.
No change, nor circumstance, can deprive any who have assisted
in passing this Act, of the pure satisfaction of knowing that they
have helped to hand on the profession of Dental Surgery in a far
better condition than that in which they received it. Many have
contributed in various ways, whose share in the work will be forgotten,
but the work remains. Identified with the whole of the
movement, the names of Tomes and Turner will be preserved and
revered for many, many years, yet withal the abundant reasons
for personal gratification which those gentlemen have, I am sure
they rejoice a thousand fold more over the results achieved, than
they do at any honour or advantage accruing to themselves.
Take it as it stands, acknowledging its few imperfections, and
recognising its many decided benefits, we have as good an Act as
we had any right to expect, and as good as it was possible for us
to get.
One of the hindrances to Dental advancement has hitherto been
the scarcity of educational facilities, and the small proportion of
practitioners who possessed any Dental qualification. At the
time to which reference has already been made, there were only
some 300 gentlemen in the whole of Great Britain who held a
Dental diploma. There was only one licensing body in the country
505which granted Dental certificates. Now we have 630 gentlemen
holding recognised Dental qualifications, viz., of London about
400, Edinburgh 16, Dublin 180, Glasgow 33, and the three last
mentioned bodies are offering to gentlemen in practice, the opportunity
of examination, sine curriculo, upon thoroughly reasonable
and accessible terms. Not only so, the Colleges of Ireland and
Scotland have caused their certificates to possess a peculiar value,
in the careful provision they have made, for preventing unprofessional
practices on the part of their licentiates.
I am certainly astonished that the number of practitioners who
have already availed themselves of these facilities is so small. I
know that this matter of obtaining a Qualification is regarded
variously by different persons, but nothing is more certain than
the growing tendency toward accredited qualification as indispensable
to professional status; the public are rapidly becoming
aware (and it is our business to educate the public in this matter)
that the operations of Dental Surgery cannot be safely entrusted
to uneducated heads or hands, and as a guarantee of something
like the necessary knowledge and skill, the public are beginning to
understand the value of a purely Dental Qualification. The larger
the number of Licentiates the more quickly the public will be
taught, and ere long the unqualified Dentist will become a mere
historic fact.
The all important feature of recent progress is the British
Dental Association. The Dental body has been afflicted with inherent
weakness through the want of organisation, a weakness that
paralyses, and at the same time, a weakness endowed with remarkable
power, the power of successfully defeating efforts toward
general reformation. So long as we were isolated and detached it
is not wonderful that we were selfish and afraid of one another,
but a new era has dawned. We have an Association to which all
are eligible, where all can meet on the common ground of professional
brotherhood and intercourse. The control of the Association,
embracing the future welfare of the whole body, is committed
to a Board constituted on a representative basis. None need be
excluded from participation, save by their own poverty of professional
spirit, a poverty exhibited alike by persistent recourse to unprofessional
practice, and by selfish indifference to professional
politics. There may be a kind of superiority in having a large
practice, or in holding a high scientific position, but unless I am
greatly mistaken the true superiority is that which overleaps all
506selfish considerations, and delights in consecrating whatever power
or position we may have to the elevation and improvement of the
whole profession. Thank God we have men who have been inspired
with a large measure of true professional spirit. Men who
could think for themselves and hold their own opinions, but who
at the same time have been large-hearted enough to merge minor
differences in the pursuit of one grand object. Such men as Edwin
Saunders, John Tomes, J. Smith-Turner, T. A. Rogers, A.
Coleman, Dr. Walker, our esteemed President, and many others,
stand forth as examples of true as distinct from sham superiority.
The facilities now afforded by our separate branches have removed
the excuse so often urged when all the meetings took place in London,
and there is practically no obstacle to our speedy improvement.
We possess advantages of a political nature quite equal to
those existing in any kindred profession.
These are the bare facts of the present time; they furnish material
for much thankfulness and for cheerful anticipation. They are the
foundation on which our future must be erected. What that
future is to be depends on what we mean to be. The scaffolding is
up, the materials are ready. Willing hearts and willing hands are
needed to complete the edifice. There is a sublime principle
working through the whole human family, the operation of which
no individual can withstand. It was formulated by the Founder
of the grandest system the world has ever known, and this is the
formula—
“Whosoever would be chief among you, let him be your servant.”
Mr. Mahonie, in proposing the toast of “Sir John Lubbock, and
the promoters of the Dentists Act,” said:—No words of mine can
add additional lustre to the names—Sir John Lubbock, Mr. John
Tomes, Mr. James Smith Turner. These men have earned a
name for themselves which neither crayons nor oils—not even if
they were placed in cathedral aisles—could add more; these men
have laboured much—laboured hard; I beg to propose their
health.
Captain Rogers, in responding, spoke of the great triumph Sir
John Lubbock had accomplished in passing Bills connected with
science, this Parliament. He had great pleasure in thanking them
for the hearty manner in which they had received the names of
these gentlemen connected with Dental Reform.
Mr T Murphy in proposing the “Manchester School of
507Medicine” said:—I have had put into my hands a toast to propose,
which is so intimately connected with our branch of the
profession, that it will require no eulogy on my part for it to be
received with acclamation, I mean the Manchester Royal School of
Medicine. Perhaps it will not be out of place if I give you a
short outline of its history. It was founded by the late Mr. T.
Turner in the year 1824; it was known for many years as the
Pine Street School. In 1850 a second school was established, and
being connected as I then was with a hospital in this city, I can
well remember the jealousy there was about the subjects that were
sent out; first one school and then another complaining that they
were not getting their fair share, and I must admit that the leaning
was towards the old school, which I think got, on the whole, rather
more than its share. In 1858 the founders of the rival schools
came to the conclusion that the interests of the students would be
best promoted by an amalgamation, forgetting their differences
and working together for the common weal. In this way, from the
Union of the Pine Street and Chatham Street Schools, that school
arose which has been long known as the Manchester School of
Medicine. For sixteen years the work was carried on in Faulkden
Street with difficulty both with regard to accommodation and light.
About the year 1872, a meeting of the Owen’s College authorities
met the leading Members of the medical staff, and it was agreed that
it would be for the welfare of the School if it were handed over to
the Owen’s College authorities. The result has been the erection
of one of the finest Medical Schools in the kingdom, replete with
everything necessary for the study of medicine. The course of
instruction not only enables students to qualify for College and
Hall, but affords the more aspiring every facility for qualifying
themselves for the higher distinctions of their profession.
When I mention the names of Turner, Jordan, Wilson, Smith,
Wilkinson, Bradley, Southam, and last, but not least, the
celebrated Dalton, and others, who have gone; Gamgee, Watson,
Williamson, Roscoe, Roberts, Morgan, Lund, Simpson, Ransome,
and other able men, who are at present at the helm, can there be a
doubt about the quality of the education given? and, in conclusion,
is it too much to ask that before long we should have established in
this city, and in connection with the Victoria University, a Dental
School where we can send our sons to receive at the hands of these
able men the necessary training to fit them for the practice of
Dentistry.
508Mr. Marsh returned thanks for the toast; he trusted some
day Mr. Campion would be appointed Consulting Dental Surgeon
to the Manchester School of Medicine.
Dr. Waite proposed “Success to the Western Counties Association,”
coupling with it the name of Mr. J. C. Parson, of
Clifton.
Mr. Parson having responded, the proceedings terminated.