PREDICTIONS OF SERVIAN TRAGEDIES
Prediction of the Assassination of Prince Michael—Natalie’s
Visit to the Parisian Fortune-teller—The Prediction in
London of the Murder of Draga and Alexander.
Strange and mysterious as it may seem, the
occult, the supernatural, has played no small
part in the destiny of Servian affairs. Personally,
I am not of clairvoyant proclivities,
I know nothing whatever of the goings-on
at spiritualistic seances, neither am I even
slightly versed in anything that pertains to
psychical research, but in this chapter I am
compelled to give credence to the cabalistic
power displayed by three persons, two women
and one man, in their wonderful predictions
of three separate and distinct turning points
in the life of the Servian nation.
The first of these was the prognostication
of the fate of Prince Michael, the second was
that of the social ascendency of Draga, and
the third, that of the horrible death of Queen
Draga and her husband—this latter foretold
in a foreign city, almost three months before
the tragedy really occurred, by one who had
neither seen nor had had any connection whatever
with the King and Queen of Servia.
On the morning of the very day of the assassination
of Prince Michael Obrenovitch in
Topchidere Park, a poor peasant of Cremna,
of local distinction because of his occult powers
of divination but unknown outside of his immediate
community, tore through the mountains
like a madman, beating his breasts with
his fists and crying, “Our Prince is dead!
They have murdered our Prince!”
The cry was taken up by all with whom he
came in contact, repeated broadcast and, in
an incredibly short space of time, it was upon
the lips of every one in Belgrade.
The peasant of Cremna was seized and
thrown into prison, charged with being a fanatical
disturber, but hardly before the verification
of the tragedy had reached the capital.
The facts of this case are now preserved in
the minutes of the national assembly.
The second instance of occultism occurred
in 1897 while Draga was in the service of
Queen Natalie, the year before she met her
future husband.
Natalie had laughingly suggested to Draga and Mademoiselle Tzanka,
another member of the Queen’s coterie, that they accompany her on
a visit to a certain mind-reader and spiritualistic medium of wide
reputation in Paris. The trio called upon this supernaturally-endowed
person, Madame de Thebes by name, and Natalie requested that the future
be read for her son, the young Alexander, and for her friends. To her
the Parisian fortune-teller replied, “Madame, you nourish in your bosom
a viper which will turn and sting you”; evidently meaning Draga. She
continued that the marriage of the young King
would determine the whole future of Servia.
Some inept futurity was predicted for
Mademoiselle Tzanka, but to Draga the
woman said: “You, Madame, will rise to a
higher position than you even imagined. One
day you will even reign a queen; but when
that day dawns your life will be in danger,
and you will drag your lover and your husband
to his ruin and his death.”
This story was published eventually in the
newspapers and, three years after Draga’s
ascent to the throne was prophesied, she denied
vehemently that such had ever been predicted,
but in the same breath she denounced
Mademoiselle Tzanka scurrilously for having
dared to repeat what had taken place in
Paris.
In describing the seance at which the
prediction was made of the murder of Alexander
and Draga I can do no better than to take,
verbatim, in part or as a whole, the statements
of Mr. William Stead, editor of the Review
of Reviews, who was the host on that occasion,
and of his Excellency, M. Mijatovich, at
that time Servian Minister at the Court of
St. James and a distinguished diplomat.
These signed statements were made to the
press by Mr. Stead and others who were present,
and relate what actually took place at the
seance.
Mr. Stead’s Statement
“I had invited a numerous company, including
M. Mijatovich, Earl Grey, Mr.
L——, Mr. Gilbert Elliot, etc., to come on
Friday, March 20th, 1903, to witness an experiment
in psychometry by Mrs. Burchell at
our weekly ‘at home’ in Mowbray House.
“The ‘at home’ at Mowbray House began
at four in the afternoon. The psychometric
experiment began an hour later, in the presence
of seventy or eighty persons. In about
half an hour it was seen that the conditions
were adverse, and Mrs. Burchell went upstairs
to give private sittings, where she succeeded
much better, while the company remained below
and discussed psychometry. This went on
till after seven.... About eight we went to
the restaurant of Gatti and Rodesano, Strand
... I sat at the head of the table, with Mrs.
Burchell on my right and Mrs. Manks on my
left. Mr. L—— sat at the opposite end of
the table, next to my private secretary, on
the other side of Mrs. Burchell....
“During the dinner the conversation was
general. We talked at my end of the table
about many things, and as Mr. L—— was
present, I talked about him and about Servia.
But as far as I can remember the name of the
King was never mentioned, nor was anything
said that directly or indirectly could suggest
the idea of his assassination. No such thought
was present to my mind. As for Mrs. Burchell,
she is a plain North Country woman,
who dispenses medicine of her own making,
who has had a family of ten children and who
did not seem to me a person who had either
interest in, or knowledge of, the Balkan Peninsula.
She has since, in the St. James Gazette,
written: ‘As to my knowledge of Servian
affairs, I was then completely ignorant,
and did not know either the King’s name or
the Queen’s antecedents or name, or anything
in connection with them in any way.’ She
was tired and silent at dinner, depressed by
the consciousness of the afternoon failure at
psychometry, and I addressed most of my remarks
to Mrs. Manks.
“After the dinner there were several descriptions
given by Mrs. Burchell of the impressions
which she had received in connection
with various members of the company. It
was in her descriptions of the impressions she
had received from Mr. L—— that he nodded
from time to time; an indiscretion which led
to a protest from my private secretary. This,
however, had nothing to do with the vision of
the assassination. When the prediction was
made Mrs. Burchell had her eyes closed. I
had no idea, while she was speaking, whether
she was describing a tragedy that had taken
place long ago or was predicting what would
happen. I did not know what was in the envelope
which she placed to her brow until
after all was over. When the paper was
taken out of the envelope, not being able to
decipher the Cyrillic characters, I asked Mr.
L—— whose name it was. He replied, ‘The
King.’He then entered into conversation
with Mrs. Burchell, but I did not hear what
she said.
“The other two clairvoyants present, Mrs.
Brenchley and Mrs. Manks, declared that they
saw the same scene when it was in progress,
and Mrs. Brenchley was only one degree less
excited than Mrs. Burchell. It was she who
added the detail about the Russian uniforms.”
The Statement of M. Mijatovich
“I, Chedomille Mijatovich, now residing
at 51, Palace Gardens Terrace, Kensington,
make this statement, as being, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, a full and exact narrative
of what I know of this remarkable affair.
“I have long taken a deep interest in psychical
research, and this brought me, five or
six years ago, to make the acquaintance of
Mr. Stead, the editor of Borderland and The
Review of Reviews. Knowing my interest in
these subjects, Mr. Stead invited me to be
present at a meeting in his office in Mowbray
House, Norfolk Street, London, on Friday
afternoon, March 20, 1903, when a psychometrist
of some repute was to give a demonstration
of her capacity to receive impressions
from articles held in her hand, of the origin
and nature of which she had no information.
The following is an extract from Mr. Stead’s
letter:
“‘On Friday next at our “at home” we
shall have a very good clairvoyant at Mowbray
House. She has undertaken to do from
twelve to twenty tests. That is to say, ten or
twenty articles will be submitted to her at
random, of all of which she will know nothing,
and she will state what she sees in connection
with each. I hope that you will be able to
come and to bring with you one or two articles,
the clairvoyant reading of which might be of
interest or value....’
“I accepted the invitation. The rooms at
Mowbray House were crowded. The lady,
whose name I was told was Mrs. Burchell,
complained that the conditions were bad, and
the experiment was a failure.
“Among the articles brought to Mowbray
House for submission to the psychometrist
was the signature of King Alexander. The
name was signed in Cyrillic characters on a
sheet of paper which was enclosed in an envelope.
It was prepared in order to see
whether the psychometrist, from handling the
envelope, could ‘sense’ and describe the person
of the King. That was the sole object of
the experiment. Nothing more was claimed
or expected.
“Owing to the number of articles offered
for experiment, and owing also to the abrupt
termination of the trials, the envelope with the
King’s signature was not produced....
While I was present nothing was said as to
its existence.
“When I quitted Mowbray House the
King’s signature was left with one of the company,
Mr. L——, who remained behind to
dine with Mr. Stead, Mrs. Burchell and some
others. I was unable to stay to dinner as I
had to go to the Court at Buckingham Palace
that evening. I returned home feeling that
the experiment had been a failure.
“On the following morning ... I was surprised
to receive a visit at my house ... from
Mr. L——. He said that after the dinner in
the restaurant a seance had been held, at
which he had submitted the envelope, containing
the King’s signature, to Mrs. Burchell.
He told me that on receiving the envelope she
had been thrown into a state of violent agitation.
She had then described the assassination
of the King and the attempted assassination
of the Queen in the interior of the palace. He
gave me many details which had convinced
him that Mrs. Burchell had actually seen in
clairvoyant vision the assassination of my
Sovereign in the interior of his palace.
“On the following Tuesday, March 24th, I
made it my business to call at Mowbray
House in order to ascertain from Mr. Stead
his version of what had happened.... On
returning home I made an entry in my journal,
of which the following is an exact copy:
“‘London (51, Palace Gardens Terrace),
“‘March 24, 1903.
“‘This afternoon I went to Mowbray
House, Norfolk Street, Victoria Embankment,
to see Mr. William Stead (the editor
of Review of Reviews), and to ask him what
it was that his clairvoyant of last Friday
(March 20th) said of King Alexander. Mr.
Stead told me.
“‘Mr. L—— gave her into her hand a
small paper. She held it for a moment and
then said: “This is the signature of a young
man in a very high position! Yes, it is the
signature of a King!” (She then proceeded
to describe King Alexander’s appearance).
“He has his Queen at his side; she is a brunette,
older than he. But, O God! What do
I see? Oh, it is too terrible....” And then,
Mr. Stead said, she suddenly fell on her
knees, clasping excitedly her hands, and with
closed eyes and uplifted head she prayed to
the Great Spirit to—save them, if possible!
“I see them both, the King and Queen; and
there is a dark man with the dagger in hand.
He tries to kill them; it is a terrible struggle;
the Queen escapes unhurt, but the King is
assassinated!” Stead said Mrs. Bourcher
(sic), the clairvoyant, was terribly agitated.
She described what she saw in the presence of
several ladies and gentlemen, who were deeply
impressed with it.’
“Four days later, on March 28th, I wrote a letter to King Alexander,
in the course of which I felt it my duty to warn him as to impending
danger. I did not keep a copy of my letter, but I perfectly well
remember the passage in question.... I wrote as follows:
“‘I know your Majesty will laugh, as you
usually laughed when I spoke to you about
clairvoyance, so I am not going to give you
all particulars about the latest experience
which I have had, but I implore your Majesty
to take all possible measures for your personal
safety, not only when you drive about or when
you go to the church or the theatre or to the
park, but when in your palace especially, because
I have reason to believe that an attempt
will be made to assassinate you in your own
palace.’
“My wife read my letter before it was sent
off and she confirms the accuracy of this account
of its contents. I may say that I had
often talked to King Alexander about psychic
experiences, but he always mocked me and
would not take them seriously. I never before
sent him any warning as to an attempt
on his person.
“I was myself so deeply impressed by the
importance of the clairvoyant’s vision that I
half expected that the King, despite his skepticism,
would summon me to Belgrade in order
to hear more details. This expectation was
not realized. He neither sent for me nor took
any notice of my warning.
“When the news arrived of his tragic end,
my thoughts instantly recurred to the warning
which I had sent him, and I stated to
several representatives of the press the fact,
which was duly published in the London evening
newspapers of June 11th.”
What Actually Took Place at the Seance
“It was after ten o’clock at the restaurant
when Mr. L—— thrust an envelope into Mr.
Stead’s hand, saying, ‘Try her with that!’
Mr. Stead took the envelope, not knowing
what it contained, and waited till the good
lady had finished a description to the last of
the sitters. She was getting tired and wished
to go home. Mr. Stead put the envelope in
her hands and asked her to try once more and
see if she could get anything with it.
“Mrs. Burchell took the envelope in her
two hands and sat for a moment, still. She
turned the envelope round and round once or
twice and then said, in a loud, clear voice,
‘Royalty! An important person—a King!’
“The announcement riveted attention and
we listened eagerly for what was to follow.
Mrs. Burchell spoke with extreme rapidity
and in breathless excitement. There was nothing
to indicate that the medium was in a
trance. She had been talking quite normally
just before Mr. Stead gave her the envelope.
Her eyes were closed, but this might have
been done to aid in abstracting her from her
surroundings. She spoke exactly as if she
were looking through a window into an interior
and describing what she saw to us who
were beside her. Near to her were two other
clairvoyants, Mrs. Brenchley and Mrs.
Manks.
“Mrs. Burchell began by saying, ‘Royalty!
An important person—a King! He is standing
in a room in his palace. He is dark; stout
body and long neck. With him is a lady, the
Queen—brunette. And there,’pointing to a
corner of the room, ‘I see a child.’ Then,
becoming very excited, the medium exclaimed,
‘Terrible! Terrible! It is all bloody. I cannot
bear to look. Oh, it is terrible! I cannot
bear it. I see a very dark man rushing into
the chamber. He tries to kill the King. The
lady implores them to spare him. Oh—’ and
with a cry of horror Mrs. Burchell suddenly
flung herself upon her knees in such a way
that Mr. Stead thought she would fall and
stretched out his hand to save her. She did
not fall, however, but with clasped hands the
medium continued in a voice of agonized entreaty:
“‘They are killing him. Oh, save him, save
him! The Queen falls on her knees and implores
them to save her life—they will not
listen. Oh, what tumult! what bloodshed!
How terrible—they kill him; she pleads in
vain. Now they fling her on one side and stab
her with a dagger, and—Oh, oh!’—and
then Mrs. Burchell, exhausted with emotion,
was falling over on her side on the floor when
Mr. Stead got her up and put her on her seat.
“When Mrs. Burchell fell on her knees,
Mrs. Brenchley sprang up, saying, ‘Yes, yes,
I get it in the air. They are killing him; I
see it.’
“‘And I also,’ said Mrs. Manks clasping
hands with Mrs. Brenchley, and both following
her (probably Mrs. Burchell’s) distracted
cries and utterances with cries of, ‘Yes, yes!
We see it; she is quite right.’
“Mrs. Burchell, in her agitation, dropped
the envelope on the floor. Mrs. Brenchley
picked it up and, holding it, continued to describe
the scene in an agitation only a little less
than Mrs. Burchell’s, exclaiming, ‘Oh, the
blood—how horrible! Look, how dark it
becomes; see—the soldiers are coming upon
us—shooting down all they meet—’
“‘What are they like?’ asked someone.
“‘They seem to me like Russian uniforms;
but it is dark and I cannot see clearly....’
“‘Now the King is dead!’ she (Mrs.
Brenchley) cried. ‘But, oh, what confusion!
What bloodshed!’
“All these ejaculatory comments were
rapidly uttered as Mrs. Burchell was being
helped to her seat and not much notice was
taken of them at the time. Mrs. Brenchley,
however, declares that she has a lively recollection
of what she saw and what she said.
“Mr. Stead turned an inquiring gaze to
Mr. L——, who had given him the envelope....
“‘What was in the envelope?’ Mr. Stead
asked.
“‘Look!’ said Mr. L——. Opening the
envelope he took out a sheet of note-paper on
which was the signature, ‘Alexander.’
“‘It is the King,’ he exclaimed.
“‘But,’ said Mr. Stead, ‘her description—was
it correct?’
“‘It was exact,’ replied Mr. L——. ‘The
palace, the King, the Queen. Her description
is exact.’
“And then the medium, who had been
silent as if recovering from the emotion
through which she had just passed, said:
“‘Depend upon it, it will all happen as I
have seen it, if nothing is done to prevent it,
and that ere long!’
“Mrs. Burchell’s own version is that she
added,‘Even then, although they may postpone
it, it will certainly come to pass.’”