IN speaking of the native races of Alaska it
is not my purpose to enter into the subject
except in so far as it belongs to a book of this
character. As was said of the mines, the real
student of such subjects will find (in the journals
devoted to ethnology) what definite information
he seeks. Strangely enough, however,
a diligent search has revealed that there is not
to be found in any library a book or in any
magazine an article dealing with that most unusual
custom which prevails among the Eskimos,—the
trial marriage. Whether this custom
exists among any other natives of the world I
do not know. But I think not.
The natives of Alaska are of four groups.
First, the Eskimos, who dwell in the northern
part of the territory in the area near the Arctic
Ocean and Bering Sea. Second, the Aleut, a
people closely related to the Eskimos, who are
to be found only in the Aleutian Islands and the
mainland adjacent thereto. Third, the Thlinkits,
who are Indians and confined to the southeastern
section of the country known as the Panhandle.
Fourth, the Athabaskans, of the same
stock as the American Indian, who occupy the
interior and touch the coast only at Cook Inlet.
The Thlinkits were once the most civilized and
at the same time the most warlike of the native
tribes. When the Russians came they found
them living in well-built log houses and with an
organized tribal system. They are to-day of
greater intelligence than any of the other native
tribes and are skilled craftsmen. The Athabaskans,
on the other hand, with the exception of
some of the most isolated Eskimo tribes, are the
least civilized. Only those on the coast have any
kind of tribal organization and this is not countenanced
by the United States Government. Like
the clansmen of Scotland, they seem to group
themselves in families. The Aleuts were once
quite prosperous, expert in the taking of the
sea-otter, a very difficult animal to catch. The
ravages of the Russian fur-traders almost annihilated
the native population. They enslaved
them and compelled them to capture the sea-otters
for them. But the latter are now almost
extinct and the Aleuts eke out a precarious
existence by fishing and trapping foxes. They
call their habitations barábaras and they resemble
the igloos of the Eskimos.
It is the latter people that I know best and of
whom I would speak most. There are no Indians
in St. Michael. The native people here
are wholly Eskimos, and one has to live among
them to realize the moral descent of a once-fine
native race. One must know them in order to
comprehend the height from which they have
fallen! In winter they live in their igloos. And
an igloo is a place so unspeakably filthy that one
can scarcely entertain a thought (much less a
sight) of it. In summer they live in tents. Yet——.
In spite of their uncleanliness, in spite of
every other argument which may be urged
against them, one always finds himself at the end
of his ruminations admitting to himself that, after
all, they are a fine native race! It is a conclusion
at which he never fails to arrive even in
the face of appalling evidence. The conviction
will not be downed.
I have often walked about their summer camps
at St. Michael, Nome and other localities. Always
I have found the scene practically the same.
One cannot help being struck with the industry
which the Eskimos display. Every inmate of
the tent will be at work! And each is at work
upon something useful! Not one of them will
be caught idle. The father usually will be seen
carving a piece of ivory, or wood. The Eskimos
are skilled carvers. While President Taft was
in office a magnificent piece was sent him for his
desk. It was carved from the tusk of a walrus
by a native. In the tent the mother will be
making mukluks, or fur boots, while the older
daughter beats out and twists the caribou sinew
into that strong thread with which the furs and
boots are sewed. Let me add that they never come
unsewed! The smaller children will each be engaged
in some light task, such as making curios,
or smoothing the first roughness off of the ivory
from which the father, later, will carve something.
Every member of the family will be engaged
in producing something of value. Wherever
one goes among the Eskimos he will be
struck by this admirable trait.
They are a light-hearted, good-natured people,
easily amused. They have a ready smile for
you as you pass them by. Compared with the
white man they are undersized. From my own
six-feet-two they seem rather diminutive to me
when I look down upon them, but they are by
no means the dwarfs that people imagine them.
The average height of the man is five-feet-four.
Tall Eskimos are not unusual. They are well-built,
graceful in movement and possessed of
small hands and feet. The nose (in some of the
tribes) is flat, but in others it is quite the opposite,
and the mouth, although somewhat large, is
always filled with beautiful teeth. Their smile
is most attractive. I have seen many handsome
Eskimos,—that is, they would be handsome if
they were clean!
The centaur of old was no more a part of his
horse than the Eskimo is a part of his boat. He
is a born navigator,—as aquatic as a duck. He
fashions for himself a small boat of skin in
which he practically encloses himself. These
boats are of two kinds and in their construction
the Eskimo reveals his ingenuity. They are
cunningly contrived and cleverly managed.
With this primitive craft he performs all sorts
of unbelievable stunts. An expert and daring
fisherman is he. The smaller boat (called a
kayak) is a sealskin canoe and is a rather tiny
affair. It has circular hatches for one man. The
bidarka (or bidocky) will hold two men. But
the baidará is made of walrus hide and will hold
from twenty to thirty persons. It will live in a
heavy sea and is taken on long sea voyages. The
stranger who travels even a short distance in
one, however, usually does so with his heart in his
mouth most of the time. The fabric belies its
looks. It appears so flimsy as to be dangerous
and the water is plainly visible underneath. But
the natives walk boldly about in them. Every
step depresses the skin for two or three inches,
but long experience has taught them that the
spot on which they stand will sustain the weight
of a ton! I have actually seen them turn a summersault
in the water with one of these home-made
craft and come up smiling! Yet, strange
to say, while they are, apparently, more at home
on the water than on the land, few of them swim.
Perhaps it is that the water is too cold.
Who that has seen these diminutive people
venture forth into a treacherous and perilous sea
with naught between them and death but this
tiny home-made boat to do battle with the huge
monsters of the ice-encumbered deep—the whale,
the walrus and the seal—can question their courage?
Not I! The Eskimo has made no effort to
conquer his environment. More wisely he has
adapted himself to it and constrained it to his
needs. The land of his birth is inhospitable. His
environment is savage. He wrings his sustenance
from the land only by powerful effort, and human
nature takes on a new dignity in the life
of such people. Only the sturdiest of creatures,
set naked in an Arctic world, could rise superior
to such an environment.
As for the Eskimo woman,—in youth she is
not unattractive, often quite good-looking, in
fact. But I hereby testify that of all the hideously
unattractive and ugly creatures known to
the human race the full-blooded, middle-aged
Eskimo woman carries off the palm. As it was
in the beginning, before God said "Let there be
light"—she is without form and void! She ages
rapidly. She dresses as do the men, in the
parka, a long, loose garment reaching to the
knee, made of muskrat and reindeer skin in
winter and of drill in summer, fur-seal boots and
breeches. As the men are nearly always smooth-faced
it is often difficult to tell them apart. They
both use tobacco. And they are nothing if not
economical! They chew it until every particle
of flavor has vanished. Then they dry and smoke
it!
A friend of mine, a well-known woman writer
who once served the American Minister to China
as personal secretary, one day confided to me that
since the day she left the celestial empire (some
fifteen years ago) she had never seen any dirt
worth mentioning! Obviously, she has never
glimpsed the interior of an igloo! With an American
Army Officer of the Medical Corps I once
visited one. We were told that it was one of the
cleanest Eskimo villages in Alaska. The saints
preserve me from a visit to the dirtiest one! An
igloo is a windowless hut, shut tight against the
air. It is usually crowded with a large family,
grossly clad in skins which are poorly tanned,
partly decayed. They are unspeakably fed,
greasy of skin. Refuse of every kind was piled
about the igloo and a recent thaw made the place
a mass of liquid filth.
Of course, the reason for all this is apparent,
and in a way unavoidable. Fuel is scarce and hard
to obtain. Therefore, ventilation, with its waste
of heat, would be fatally extravagant. Food is
gathered in summer and stored for winter. When
it comes out of storage much of it is decayed.
Crowding is unavoidable and this means filth and
infection. Water is scanty, cleanliness impossible.
All this leads to the prevalence of disease
and the disease most prevalent is tuberculosis.
Moreover, this village which we visited has no
doctor. The nearest one is seven miles away.
Conditions in Alaska, so far as medical relief
for the natives is concerned, are distressing and
inexcusable. Year after year, with persistent regularity,
the Sundry Civil Appropriation Committee
of the House strikes out the modest sum
of seventy-five thousand dollars petitioned for by
the Board of Education for medical relief work
among the natives of Alaska. In all southeastern
Alaska there is but one hospital for natives,—a
Presbyterian institution at Haines. Dr.
Romig, a former Moravian Medical Missionary
in the Bristol Bay district in Bering Sea, gave
as an estimate that forty per cent of the Eskimo
population of this district, numbering some
seventeen hundred people, were afflicted with
transmissible diseases—chiefly tuberculosis, syphilis
and trachoma. The physical condition of
these people is pitiable in the extreme. Yet the
government provides one physician and a small
inadequate infirmary without proper equipment
and maintained in an abandoned schoolhouse!
Contrast this with what is being done for the
Indians of the United States. For the three hundred
thousand there are now employed two hundred
doctors, eighty nurses, seven dentists, seventy
field matrons, and seventy-seven miscellaneous
hospital attendants. Also, the government maintains
for the Indians forty-nine hospitals, four
tuberculosis sanitaria with a capacity for caring
for a thousand four hundred and ninety-nine patients!
The reason for the striking contrast between
this and the shameful neglect of the Alaskan
natives ought to be found and removed. The
present condition is a reproach to us as a nation.
Not only this, it is a menace to the health and
safety of the white people already there and an
argument against the coming of others.
Much has been said and written of the origin
of the Eskimos. There is a difference of opinion
as to whence, originally, they came. My own belief
is that they are of Mongolian origin. A similarity
of language would tend to strengthen this
belief. When it comes to a native tongue I confess
that the Eskimo has a peculiarity which is
unique and baffling, more so than I have ever encountered
in any other language. I once got up
against this in a manner which took some time to
untangle. As United States Commissioner at St.
Michael it was part of my duty to try offenders
against the law. The first time the offender
chanced to be an Eskimo I suddenly discovered
that I had troubles of my own. Apparently his
no meant yes, and vice versa. I could not understand
it at first, but at last it dawned upon me
that although he spoke brokenly in English he
was thinking in his own tongue. For instance,
I would say to him:
"You did so-and-so, didn't you?"
"Yes!" he would reply, when I knew very well
that he meant to deny it.
I called in a priest, a man who spoke the native
language, from whom I learned that my surmise
was correct. The Eskimo, when he says
yes means "Yes, I did not!" When he says no
he means "No, I did!" There you are! One has
to be mentally cross-eyed in order to get him!
The Eskimos are very peaceable people except
when (in violation of the law) the white
man sells them whisky. It must be acknowledged
that the latter has done little to encourage
their uplift. In fact, he is largely to blame
for the demoralized condition of the Eskimo to-day.
One may no longer sell liquor in Alaska,
but the mischief, so far as the natives is concerned,
is already done. For a long time there seemed
no way to prevent the furnishing of whisky to
the Eskimos. A law might cover it, it is true.
But experience has taught me that if a man is
clever enough and unscrupulous enough he can
drive a horse and wagon through the best law
that was ever made! Where there was no saloon
the liquor was furnished the natives in the
guise of pay or bribe, and every man who has
lived in Alaska knows how little regard the white
man has had for the sanctity of the native home.
Wives and daughters were constantly dishonored.
If the husband or father protested or put
up a fight he was overcome by threats or bribes
and given liquor to drink until what natural good
qualities he once possessed disappeared forever.
If one would see the native races at their best
he must see them as far as possible from the
haunts of the white men. There he will find them
by no means an inferior people. I know of one
cannery where every employee except the superintendent
and the bookkeeper is a native, and one
has but to observe their work to be convinced of
their capability. But it seems impossible for
them to live near the white people without both
whites and natives starting down hill. From the
acquaintance to the debauchery of the native
woman by a certain type of white man is but a
step. It has not been a great many years since
the whalers used to come up from San Francisco
to winter in the Arctic and catch whales. Their
first act on arriving was to carry off the native
women, take them aboard the vessels and keep
them all winter. In the spring when they got
ready to return they would throw them ashore
unceremoniously. This went on many years but
has now been stopped by the government. Sometimes
the white men marry the native women and
when they do they quickly sink to their level. The
native man, always imitative of the white man,
in time forsakes the hunting and fishing which
once furnished him an honest living and sooner
or later he is to be seen hanging around the villages,
picking up odd jobs.
Some of the customs of the natives of Alaska
(and elsewhere) are both quaint and startling.
When a native guest enters a house neither host
nor guest take notice of each other. The host
goes on with his work and the visitor either assists
him or produces some of his own. When he
departs, however, the host says to him:
"Inûvdluaritse!" (Live well!)
But they greet the white visitor in smiling
friendliness and when he leaves the host usually
says to him:
"Aporniakinatit!" (Do not hurt thy head!)
Presumably this is a warning against the upper
part of the low doorway.
The Eskimo's idea of hospitality sometimes
extends to lengths which are somewhat appalling
and occasionally it requires not a little diplomacy
to refuse them without giving offense.
When one gets caught in an Eskimo village and
has to spend the night there it is the commonest
of occurrences for the man of the house to offer
him not only the freedom of his home but his wife
as well! Among the natives the interchange of
wives is common.
And this brings us to that most discussed of
all questions,—the morality (or the lack of it)
of the native peoples of the earth. No matter to
what far corner of the world one may journey
he will find this problem the same in all of them.
The Eskimo is no exception. Before the coming
of the white man he was utterly godless. He
had no religion, no form of worship, no imagery,
no idea of any "happy hunting ground" hereafter.
In many sections this is still true, although
they have been brought under the influence of the
church in some localities.
In St. Michael the natives are not permitted
to live in the village, but their tents dot the hillsides
around and during the summer months the
streets are alive with them. Often they come
from great distances with their furs, carved ivory,
etc., which they have for sale. Their winter
dwelling, the igloo, is a pit in the ground, roofed
over with logs and sometimes, not always, a window
made of fish skin or the entrail of a walrus.
The hut is entered by a kind of ante-chamber
in the top of which is a hole large enough to
admit a man. If he chances to be a large man
he sometimes has difficulty in getting through!
He must descend a ladder to a narrow passage
or tunnel which leads to the principal room, often
fifteen or twenty feet from the entrance. The
sole furniture of a native residence is a seal-oil
lamp which is used for both heating and cooking.
It is lighted in the autumn and burns incessantly
until spring.
The igloo is usually from six to eight feet high
and about thirty feet in circumference. Often
it houses from ten to twenty persons. During
the cold and stormy weather every aperture is
closed. How they endure the odor and the vitiated
air is something no white man can understand.
The summer dwellings were formerly
constructed above ground and consisted of light
poles roofed over with skins. Now, however,
these have given way to the ordinary tent which
is not only cheaper but preferable for many reasons.
In almost every village, or native settlement,
the visitor will find the council-house, a much
larger hut than the others. It is called a
kashga, and is used also as a sort of club where
the youths and the unmarried men of the village
congregate. Here matters of importance are discussed
and guests from a distance lodged. The
hut is usually about twenty feet square and ten
feet high.
It was in one of these kashgas that I had
what was perhaps the most interesting experience
in connection with the native races that I
have had during the years that I have lived in
Alaska. I have come in touch with the ceremonies
of the natives of many corners of the
earth, but this one was unique,—even more so
than the celebrated Snake Dance of the Hopi,
of Arizona. I had once been able to befriend
a young Eskimo. In gratitude for the favor he
invited me to attend a native festival to which
(he gave me to understand) no white man had
ever been admitted. Whether this meant that
no white man had ever been admitted or that
none had seen the ceremony as indulged in by
this particular tribe I am unable to say. Nevertheless
I understood that he was attempting to
honor me. I confess that it was with some misgivings
that I went, but I have never been sorry.
This particular ceremony was known as The
Ten Year Festival. Some tribe from another
locality is asked to visit the home tribe and the
ceremony is held during the visit. The visitors
this year came from Unalakleet, bringing large
quantities of gifts and many of them going back
empty-handed at the end of the festival. "Potlatching,"
or trading, is the favorite occupation
of the Eskimos and many a time have I been a
victim. But I usually hastened to "potlatch"
whatever I happened to draw off onto some one
else at the earliest possible opportunity!
In some respects the Ten Year Festival is not
unlike the ceremonies of the American Indians.
In the kashga, heated to suffocation, the natives
and their visitors foregather. A square hole is
cut in the floor and a sort of shelf, or bench, runs
around the sides of the room. On this bench
sit the principal personages of the tribe, their
feet dangling and not infrequently kicking those
below them in the face. The "orchestra" with
their tom-toms begin their monotonous drumming.
The medicine man is heard below chanting
a weird tribal song and presently his head
appears through the hole in the floor. He comes
up, dancing and singing, both song and chant
increasing in intensity as he appears. The other
members of the tribe join the dance and the song.
Their motions become more and more violent. A
perspiration which is largely grease, due to the
oil which exudes from their skin, rolls from their
naked bodies as they writhe and lash themselves
into a perfect frenzy. The women join the dance,
cavorting about unclothed, just as the men do.
The final episode of the ceremony occurs when
the medicine man breaks from the kashga and
runs outside in the bitter cold. Of course, everything
is frozen tight, but a hole is cut in the Bay
and into the ice-cold water he plunges, returning
to the kashga dripping wet. He then tells
them that he has been in consultation with the
Great Spirit, or whatever it is that they call their
ruling power, and that he has been instructed
to tell them that the crops will be good, the furs
plentiful, that they will be successful in catching
the walrus and the seal.
I have already spoken of the unusual custom
of the trial marriage which exists among the natives
of the Far North. So far as I know, it
exists nowhere else,—at least under supervision
of the church. But when the United States purchased
Alaska there was a paragraph in the
treaty which read as follows:
"The inhabitants of the ceded territory, according
to their choice, reserving their natural
allegiance, may return to Russia within three
years, but if they should prefer to remain in the
ceded territory they, with the exception of the
uncivilized tribes, shall be admitted to the enjoyments
and all the rights, advantages and immunities
of citizens of the United States, and shall
be maintained and protected in the full enjoyment
of their liberty, property and religion. The
uncivilized tribes will be subject to such laws
and regulations as the United States may from
time to time adopt in regard to aboriginal tribes
of that country."
The supposition is that the "laws and regulations"
were not immediately forthcoming and
that gradually the natives came under the influence
of the Greek Catholic Church. The trial
marriage is a blending of the customs of both of
these.
I presume that there is no other place in the
world where the natives approach more nearly
to living in a state of nature than here. This
applies as much to their family life as to their
out-door existence. In former times when the
Eskimo man and woman decided that they would
like to wage the war of life together, to combine
against their implacable foes, the cold, the storm
and the darkness, they just went ahead and did
it. This was and in many cases still is the beginning
and the end of the subject of marriage
with them. The native custom in the olden days
was a somewhat strenuous experience for the
bride. It is still followed, but it has now become
a mere ceremony, quaint and picturesque. The
young Eskimo seldom "falls in love." He selects
a wife, usually choosing her for her health
and strength. In the olden days, having picked
her out, he would lie in wait for her, seize her by
the hair of her head and drag her off to his igloo,
the whole family following and (apparently) attempting
to rescue her. Strangely enough, his
choice was not always the young girl. There
was a lively competition for widows, especially
if they were the mothers of sons who would be
able to help bring in the whale and keep the wolf
from the door.
Of Eskimo morality and civilization there are
many degrees. Some of the tribes as yet untouched
by the influence of the missionaries have
moral laws of extreme refinement. And they
live up to them! Do you know of another spot
on earth where both man and woman who have
proved guilty of unfaithfulness are meted out
the same punishment? I do not. But the reindeer
Koriaks, one of the tribes not far from
Nome, place the greatest stress upon loyalty and
chastity of both man and woman, and the punishment
for both, when they transgress the law,
is instant death!
As to many of the tribes, however, little can
be said and that little is not to their credit. They
have no higher conception of life than that which
is wholly animalistic. Through all the long
ages, with them a physical act has been merely
a physical act. It has had no moral significance.
And can the idea of untold ages be easily eradicated?
And, after all, are they worse than other
people? Comparisons are odious. But it must
be remembered that these natives live out their
lives thus thinking no evil! What, then, of the
white man, born with the knowledge of the moral
significance which is attached to the personal relationship
and who has permitted himself to become
degraded by the vices of civilization? The
native man is unmoral. The white man is immoral.
There is a difference! Moreover, the
Scarlet Letter is not alone for the Hester
Prynnes of Old Plymouth. From time immemorial
among some of the tribes of the North
the unchaste Eskimo woman has been forced to
wear a sign of her degradation,—a green band
in her hair. However, unlike Hester Prynne,
she is given another chance, albeit an unfair one.
If she gives birth to an able-bodied boy she becomes
an object of unusual and sincere respect
and her green band becomes, as it were, a crown.
Humanity itself, in the Far North, sometimes
becomes quite as cold and frozen as the land itself.
But there is one thing which never fails
to thaw it,—children. And any one who lives
long in the north country can not but realize
that children are of vital necessity in any sparsely-settled
land. The Reverend Hudson Stuck,
to whose admirable volume, Voyages on the Yukon,
reference has already been made, relates
a good story bearing on this point. Long residence
in Alaska has taught him much that has
never yet been writ in books and has made of
him, although a man of the strictest religious
convictions, kindly tolerant of the frailties of
humankind. Above all else, he is impatient, as
we all are, of the non-essentials in education
which are being crammed down the throats of
the natives by teachers, often due to youth and
inexperience, while the essentials, the things of
real value to them as individuals and to the country
as a whole, are neglected. The Archdeacon
relates that once he visited a Mission where the
man in charge, a youth, with misguided enthusiasm,
boasted that there was neither a half-breed
nor an illegitimate child in the village! The
Archdeacon received the information in silence,
but after a tour of inspection he returned to
the subject.
"I see no children at all," he remarked.
"Aren't there any?"
The young man proudly admitted that there
were none,—whereupon the Archdeacon proceeded
to shock him.
"I much prefer half-breed children or even
illegitimate children to no children at all!" he
said. "By the grace of God, much may be done
with the half-breed or even the illegitimate child.
But in the name of all that is hopeless and preposterous,"
he finished, "what can ever be accomplished
in a country where there are no children
at all?"
It has always been a matter of real regret to
me that the Archdeacon did not record the answer
to his question!
Just when the custom of the trial marriage
in its present form originated I do not know.
That it must have entered with or at least followed
closely in the wake of the Greek Catholic
Church is undeniable. As was the case with
the native ceremonies of the American Indians,—the
Sun Dance, the Ghost Dance, the Flute
Dance and the Snake Dance—religious ceremonies,
every one of them, exaggerated and highly-colored
reports of which were carried to the government
by over-enthusiastic and sometimes fanatical
missionaries and agents with the result
that the government took steps to suppress them,
the trial marriage of the natives of Alaska, while
not yet suppressed, now rests under official displeasure.
A part of my duty was to investigate
this subject. I did so—with a result more astonishing
to myself than it could possibly have
been to any one else. Like the man of old who
went to the temple to scoff and remained to
pray, I issued forth from this investigation with
most of my preconceived theories on the subject
knocked galley-west. Some of my hitherto
staunchest principles, if not quite broken, were
so badly bent that I have never yet been able to
hammer them out quite straight again!
I had it out one day with Father B——, a
priest of the Greek Church, a benevolent and
kindly old man who in the early days of his mission
among the Eskimos had cherished a dream
of them as a separate people,—a race apart, who
should work out their own salvation with the
assistance (not the insistence) of a wisely directed
form of religion. That dream for a while
promised to be realized, at least to a certain extent.
But with the coming of the first white men,
most of whom were utterly lawless, he saw his
vision fade and finally vanish. Nevertheless he
worked on and the trial marriage is his solution
of the problem. It is a sort of welding of the
customs of both the native and the church.
There is one point in regard to the custom on
which I wish to be plainly understood. In
Alaska it is against the law for an unmarried
man and woman to live together. To say that
the custom exists with the consent of the Church
is wholly unfair. Every one who has lived in
such a country as this knows very well that many
of the customs as well as the laws are born of
necessity, and the custom of the trial marriage
is unquestionably one of these. It certainly exists
with the knowledge of the Church and its
origin undoubtedly lies in this fact: The parishes
over which one priest has jurisdiction lie
far apart. A visit to each of them is possible
only about once a year. Without the Church
there would be no marriage, even a belated one.
Not infrequently it happens that a young Eskimo
who wishes a wife goes to the priest and
asks his assistance in finding one. The girl may
(and often does) live in one parish and the young
man in another. He will either go to her home
or she will go to his. But they can not be married
until the next visit of the priest which is
sometimes a whole year later.
Before the priest will consent to assist the
youth in finding a suitable companion, however,
he makes certain requirements which the young
man must meet. He must build an igloo, furnish
it and stock it with supplies. He must then
construct his boat in order that he may fish and
thus make a living for them both. This done he
may have his girl. Score one in favor of the trial
marriage! He may not have her unless he is
prepared to house and support her. When his
igloo and boat are complete the young people go
to the new home and live together for one year.
At the end of the year, however, they must be
married by the ceremony of the Church. If they
do not come to him to be married the priest seeks
them out and forbids them to live together any
longer.
While the idea itself rather sticks in one's
throat, the thoughtful man can not deny that the
trial marriage has much to recommend it. They
who have come most closely in touch with it, the
missionaries and priests, say that it is indeed seldom
that the couple fail to return at the end of
the year to be married. When they do, it is
asserted, there is usually a reason, and when this
reason exists, they claim, it is far better for
them to separate. The year of trial has proved
that they are not suited to each other. If a child
has come to them, the mother takes it and goes
back to her people, and both the man and woman
may select another mate and enter into another
compact if they desire. But this seldom happens.
I argued the question to a finish with Father
B——. He could not be moved from his position
and in the end I could but acquiesce in much
that he said. How much better this system is
than that which prevails under the stress of our
present day civilization! In the rapid and feverish
life of the cities of the world to-day,—what
happens? The lover and his lass during the
period of courtship put forth their whole stock
of attractiveness. Seeing each other periodically
it is quite simple to keep out of sight one's faults
and weaknesses. No sooner are they married
than the hitherto concealed frailties begin to appear.
Then——. They realize that there exists
a bond between them and more often than not,
like a dog straining at his leash, they endeavor to
find out just how elastic the tie is,—just how far
they can strain or stretch it. First arguments,
then differences, then quarrels. Before they
know it the cord snaps. Life is never the same
again. Lovers' quarrels may be made up. Family
quarrels never! What then? Nine times out
of ten, for social or economic reasons, they go on
living together, ekeing out an unhappy and often
tortured existence. What could be worse?
That which (for lack of a better term to apply
to it) we call the social evil is not confined to the
scarlet woman of the streets. It often exists in
the best families of the land!
Among these people of the Northland, however,
it is different. Both the youth and the
maiden know very well that at the end of the
year there is a possibility of either leaving the
other. The result of this knowledge is that from
the very first they fall into the habit of trying
to please each other! And it is a habit they
seldom outgrow. If they find that they can not
please each other they are privileged to separate,—in
fact, are required to do so. They are not
permitted to remain together quarreling all their
lives and ruining the family life of the children
who come to them. This, in my judgment, explains
the light-heartedness of the Eskimos.
They are a happy people and the parents never
punish the children. Domesticity counts for
much among them. Home is sanctuary from the
elements. They have little else,—but they have
each other! The manner in which they are forced
to live for so many months of the year, so closely
confined, draws them very closely together. I
question whether what they lack, or what we
imagine they lack, does not matter less than we
think. To me it seems that they miss little of
life's essential meaning. They do not have much,
it is true. They are often ill-fed. They are not
intellectual. They are not sentimental. They
are just human! And although they may be for
months shut in by the icy blasts of winter they
do not complain. Why? Because no cold can
penetrate the inner glow and warmth which is
born of an adequate comradeship!
The trial marriage permits the indulgence in
one of their quaintest of customs. No Eskimo
maiden ever accepts a proposal of marriage. Indifference
to the attention of her admirer is the
acme of good form! I find that "keeping up
appearances" is characteristic of humanity
whether the latter dwell on Greenland's icy
mountain or India's coral strand! And propinquity
is and ever has been the most prolific parent
of love—at either the North Pole or the Equator.
The "force" with which the Eskimo youth of to-day
seizes his bride by the hair to "drag" her off
to his igloo is altogether counterfeit, as is also
the attempt on the part of her family to "rescue"
her. It is merely the indulgence in one of their
most ancient customs.
I have been much among the natives,—especially
those who abide on my island, and because
of what I have seen of their family life I am almost
a convert to the system. As a rule the
Eskimo makes a good husband, willing to perform
any labor, endure any hardship or suffer
any deprivation in order to procure food for his
wife and children. Many an Arctic man of my
acquaintance has died for his family, and I am
often reminded when I think of them of the familiar
lines:
"All love that hath not friendship for its base
Is like a mansion built upon the sand!
Love, to endure life's sorrow and earth's woe,
Needs friendship's solid masonry below!"
It is said that some one once asked Diogynes
this question:
"At what age is it best for a man to marry?"
With the classical brevity of the Greeks he
replied:
"In youth it is too soon,—in age too late!"
I disclaim any intention of offering a treatise
on the subject of marriage, but the investigation
of this custom of the natives unquestionably
gave me a huge jolt! It turned my thoughts
into a channel which otherwise I might never
have had occasion to explore. Would that I
could chart it! If only we could bring ourselves
to regard marriage as a profession and would set
ourselves in a business-like way to excelling in it!
Could it in any way detract from its dignity?
Or its sacredness? Surely not. Medicine and
surgery are professions. The Law is a profession,
and the Church. Diplomacy, legislation and
arms are professions. Marriage is the greatest
of all professions,—and the most difficult of any
to master! One may master to a degree which
may be regarded as little short of perfection the
other professions,—music, art, oratory, etc.
What man of to-day has the conceit to regard
himself as a well-nigh perfect husband?
That the rewards of marriage are incomparable
is undeniable. Life's journey, at best, is
lonely. No man can deny that even though his
daily task may take him amidst the crowd he lives
the greater part of his life alone! A dear and
close companionship is all that makes life tolerable.
Nothing else ever has, will or can. Fame
is a delusion and a snare. Ambition is a disease.
Affectionate companionship and a home are the
only things worth having. Why not build a
home instead of a house? Why not go about
the process in a business-like way? Why not
make honor and loyalty fashionable and permit
faithlessness to go out of style?
One of America's foremost writers declares repeatedly
throughout his excellent novels that
judgment has never yet entered into the selection
of a mate,—that sentiment and emotion alone
decide the after life of every couple who are wed.
This is, unfortunately, true except in rare cases.
None would care to abolish wholly the electrical
current which flashes between the sexes. And
yet——. Marriage entered into from a sense
of duty on both sides is not without its strong
argument. He who undertakes marriage because
he regards it as both a duty and a privilege,
or solely from a sense of duty, who either actively
or passively selects a mate for no other
reason, is very likely because of that same sense
of duty to fulfill his obligations faithfully and to
behave well. Nothing in all the earth is quite so
fine as an active conscience! For such a man
life reserves some of her grandest hours. The
Golden Apples do not grow so far above the
heads of any of us that we can not reach out and
gather them if we try! And he who follows the
path of duty will find his own apple quite as
luscious and sweet at the core as that of him who
trod the flowery road of personal pleasure!
I am one of those who hope that with the end
of the great World War a new spirit of tolerance
may spread its white wings over all the
world and that sooner or later some of the time-worn
social rules and regulations, archaic because
designed for a civilization two thousand years
ago, may be abrogated or at least amended and
modified. May the day come when life shall be
individual, when creed and dogma shall be buried
in a grave so deep that there shall be no possibility
of a Resurrection! When that nameless
and indefinite thing known as Public Opinion
shall be forced to lower its threatening finger
and lose its power! When all men and all women
shall enjoy the privilege of working out, each
for himself and herself, that most potent factor
in the human experience, namely, the personal
relationship, and when we shall all live saner,
cleaner, healthier, happier and more moral lives
in consequence!
Dr. William H. Dall, Paleontologist of the
United States Geological Survey and Honorary
Curator of Mollusks at the National Museum at
Washington, D. C., has written the following
charming verses about the natives of Alaska.
"Innuit" is the name by which the Eskimo calls
himself and his people from Greenland to Mt. St.
Elias. The topek is the winter house of turf
and walrus hide. In the igloo, or snow house,
there is no wood. All Innuit believe in evil spirits
which are supposed to dwell far inland, away
from the shores. In times of starvation Innuit
ethics permit a mother to put her baby, when she
can no longer feed it, out in the snow to die.
The child's mouth must be stuffed with mud or
grass. Otherwise its spirit will return and be
heard crying about the house at night.
O, we are the Innuit people,
Who scatter about the floe
And watch for the puff of the breathing seal
While the whistling breezes blow.
By a silent stroke the ice is broke
And the struggling prey below
With the crimson flood of its spouting blood
Reddens the level snow.
O, we are the Innuit people,
Who flock to the broken rim
Of the Arctic pack where the walrus lie
In the polar twilight dim.
Far from the shore their surly roar
Rises above the whirl
Of the eager wave, as the Innuit brave
Their flying lances hurl.
O, we are the Innuit people
Who lie in the topek warm;
While the northern blast flies strong and fast
And fiercely roars the storm;
Recounting the ancient legends
Of fighting, hunting and play,
When our ancestors came from the southland tame
To the glorious Arctic day.
There is one sits by in silence
With terror in her eyes,
For she hears in dreams the piteous screams
Of a cast-out babe that dies—
Dies in the snow as the keen winds blow
And the shrieking northers come,—
On that dreadful day when the starving lay
Alone in her empty home.
O, we are the Innuit people,
And we lie secure and warm
Where the ghostly folk of the Nunatak
Can never do us harm.
Under the stretching walrus hide
Where at the evening meal
The well-filled bowl cheers every soul
Heaped high with steaming seal.
The Awful Folk of the Nunatak
Come down in the hail and the snow,
And slash the skin of the kayak thin
To work the hunter woe.
They steal the fish from the next day's dish
And rot the walrus lines—
But they fade away with the dawning day
As the light of summer shines.
O, we are the Innuit people
Of the long, bright Arctic day,
When the whalers come and the poppies bloom
And the ice-floe shrinks away;
Afar in the buoyant umiak
We feather our paddle blades
And laugh in the light of the sunshine bright,
Where the white man's schooner trades.
O, we are the Innuit people
Rosy and brown and gay;
And we shout as we sing of the wrestling ring
Or toss the ball at play.
In frolic chase we oft embrace
The waist of a giggling maid
As she runs on the sand of the Arctic strand
Where the ice-bears bones are laid.
O, we are the Innuit people,
Content in our northern home;
Where the kayak's prow cuts the curling brow
Of the breakers snowy foam.
The merry Innuit people,
Of the cold, gray Arctic sea,
Where the breathing whale, the Aurora pale
And the snow-white foxes be.
There is a diversity of opinion as to the ultimate
fate of the native races of the earth. To
my mind there is but one answer. Search the
wide world over to-day and where will you find
a wilderness? There are none which the aggressive
white man has not penetrated. And wherever
the white man enters the native man begins
to disappear. It has always been so, and it always
will be so.
If only the white man would let them alone!
Is it not better to have the vast Arctic spaces
people by a native race than to have it unpeopled
by anybody? The Eskimos live where no one
else on earth can or will live. They are a picturesque
and harmless people. In their struggle
for existence they have fought valiantly. Surely
they have earned the right to exist unmolested,
earned it bravely.