I.
THE SOCIALISTIC SPIRIT IN 1885.
“Working-men! Throw aside your tools;
take to guns; destroy your oppressors; tear
down the barriers which close the way to happiness,
to true manhood and freedom; secure
for yourselves such conditions as shall enable
every one who is willing to work to enjoy to the
utmost the fruits of his labor! And you tramps,
who, hungry, cold, and homeless, wander
through the country, a moving picture of our
splendid civilization, while a lazy, paltry crowd
in their well-warmed palaces treat themselves
to the products of your labor,—you may yet
hope soon to have a reckoning, and take what
belongs to you. You, too, will yet be able to
enjoy life if you will resolve to use the power
which Nature has given you, and which makes
it possible for you to produce riches. Band together,
then, and arm yourselves! To the fight,
working-men! up, proletariat!... Among the
friends of freedom, socialists, and other revolutionists,
the fixed idea is still met with, that the
good must in the nature of things certainly prevail
sooner or later. This, too, is a remnant of
religious superstition. For the idea can only
be maintained on the assumption of a certain
conformity to a purpose in the course of history;
and this in turn pre-supposes the existence
of a higher conscious being. That this
idea must enfeeble and narcotize the energy is
evident. It is the most dangerous opiate that
there is for revolutionists. Religion, authority,
and State are all of a piece. To the devil with
theory! The savior of the present world
must be one who will free us from the savior
of the old world.... His common name is
‘Reason.’ ... His proper name is ‘Atheism,’
or ‘Disbelief.’”—The Anzeiger, New Haven,
Conn., February, 1885.
II.
A REVOLUTION NEAR AT HAND.—“IT MUST
COME.”
“The anarchist leaders met yesterday in
secret session in a saloon on Pennsylvania
Avenue. There were delegates present from
nearly all the manufacturing towns in this section
of the country. The meeting was called
by J. W. Gorsuch and Samuel Fielden, who
were sent here by the anarchists from Chicago
to present a plan whereby the work of the
cause could be carried on among the working-men
unknown to the employers.
“Fielden before he came here spoke at all the
manufacturing towns. He found, he said, that
many laborers were socialists at heart, but
were afraid to attend the meetings. They
came to the conclusion, therefore, that the
work must be carried on secretly until the
time when the final blow is to be struck. He
argued that it was time to revolt. There was
no use denying the condition of the working-men,
as the producers had grown steadily worse,
while the non-producers increased their wealth
to enormous degrees. This system was criminal
to workmen, who must strike for their
freedom.
“Gorsuch said Americans were not free men
now, and that the only way they could demonstrate
their right to the title was by destroying
the system which perpetuates the galling contrast
of princely wealth and degrading poverty.
Fielden was asked, ‘Do you believe in dynamite
as a means of warfare?’
“‘We will not hesitate to use anything when
the time arrives. A revolution is near at hand.
It must come. We want to abolish the present
system of government. Some one must suffer
in every reform, and lives must be sacrificed.
I am in favor of the quickest means for the
accomplishment of our purpose.’”—Despatch
from Pittsburg, Pa., to the New York World,
Feb. 22, 1885.
III.
A FEMALE SOCIALIST’S ADVICE.
“Mrs. Parsons, who is a colored woman,
made an unusually fiery speech. She began
by berating her hearers as cowards, and unworthy
of the name of manhood, because they
allowed the aggressions of capital to continue
and their daughters to barter their virtue for
bread. If they were men, as they claimed to
be, she said, they would blow up every house
on the adjoining avenues before they would
submit to it. They would demolish the police-stations,
court-house, and jails, and fling dynamite
in the faces of the army and navy. If
they were afraid to do this, however, they need
not look for a captain, for she would fill her
apron with dynamite and lead them along the
avenues of the city where the rich reside,
destroying as they went.
“Her husband advised his hearers to study
chemistry and take lessons from those expert
in the manufacture of deadly explosives.”—Extract
from a newspaper report of a meeting
of “the dynamite section” of the Chicago socialists,
Feb. 22, 1885.
IV.
ATHEISM, COMMUNISM, AND ANARCHY.
The “New England Anzeiger” of March 14,
1885, appeared with a first page framed in
gory red, and containing lurid accounts of the
revolutions of March 14, 1848, in Vienna; of
March 18, 1848, in Berlin; of March 18, 1871,
in Paris; and of the assassination of the Czar
of Russia, March 13, 1881. The following
extract shows the tone of the article:—
“The dead of the 14th of March were buried,
and with them the revolution; for everything
that then happened in Berlin—yes, in all Germany—proved
the political immaturity of the
people; and the friend of humanity looks on
in sadness to think how much good might
have been accomplished in the year 1848 if
the people had known what they know to-day,—to-day,
when all the countries of Europe have
behind them the powerful and deep-seated
labor movement of more than twenty years,
and when the principles of atheism, communism,
and anarchy are daily and hourly, in
the hut and in the palace (in the former
with enthusiasm, in the latter with anxiety),
considered and pondered over.”
V.
THE FORCES ARRAYED AGAINST CIVILIZATION.
“There are worse things than dynamite. The
godless and law-defying forces back of it constitute
the real danger. These forces are arrayed
against civilization. All over the world
the masses are in a state of agitation. New
ideas and false theories are being presented
and expounded by fanatics, charlatans, and
demagogues. In an age of free speech and
free print new doctrines spread rapidly. The
poor, unsuccessful, dissatisfied, and lawless elements
of society are boiling over with the
maddening thought that somebody is doing
them a great wrong. The restlessness of these
people has been intensified by the teachings
of earnest and well-meaning but misguided
men. Henry George’s opinions have spread
like wildfire, and taught millions to believe
that private property in land is against the
laws of nature and of God. Hyndman, in
England, and other writers are spreading the
notion that capital is the enemy of labor, eating
up all the profits and keeping the working-man
on starvation-wages. Others follow
Prudhon, and declare that ‘all property is robbery.’
Others argue that religion, morality,
government are all tricks of the oppressor,
designed to keep the people down and out of
their rights.”—Editorial in The Atlanta, Ga.,
Constitution, March, 1885.
VI.
THE PROSPECTS OF AN ALLIANCE BETWEEN
DYNAMITERS AND COMMUNISTS.
“The communists were in high feather
last night at the Germania Assembly Rooms.
They met to commemorate all operations of
rebellious societies against governments in
general and the Paris revolution of 1871 in
particular.... When the speaker referred to
the barricades, and prophesied an early recognition
of the ‘establishment of human liberty’
and the destruction of all crowned heads by
an agent more powerful than the dreaded guillotine,
the sons of Clavis sent up a roar of
applause and bravos, intermingled with an
occasional ‘hear, hear!’ from a dozen nitro-dynamiteurs
who came to explore the prospects
of an alliance, offensive and defensive, with
their fiery Continental brothers on behalf of
the ‘rights of man.’”—New York Tribune
report, March 23, 1885.
VII.
TWO CONTEMPORARY CRITICISMS.
“The existence of passion, favoritism, nepotism,
and subjection to the behests of party,
instead of love of country, thoughtfulness, and
systematic business principles in the administration
of government, with too much esotericism
in its conduct, gives posts of honor to
servants that impede, and retains officials that
resist reform and accuracy in the civil service
of the country. They forget that they are
chosen to be about their country’s business,
in which every citizen has an interest. Thus
the want of business capacity and fidelity
to the people’s trust furnishes many causes for
the law’s delay, and some for its death.”—Chief-Justice
Thomas F. Hargis in the North
American Review for April, 1885.
“The predominant vices of America, especially
as represented by its great cities, are its irreverence,
its recklessness, its impatience,—in
one word, its materialism. A nation in which
the artistic sense is almost dead; which is practically
without a literature; which is impatient
of all sanctions and indifferent to all religions;
which is corrupt from the highest pinnacle
of its public life down to the lowest depth of
its primalism; which is at once thin-skinned
under criticism and aggressive to criticise;
which worships material forces in every shape
and form; which despises conventional conditions,
yet is slavish to ignoble fashions;
which, too hasty to think for itself, takes recklessly
at second-hand any old or new clothes
philosophy that may be imported from Europe,
yet, while wearing the raiment openly, mocks
and ridicules the civilization that wove the
fabric,” etc.—Robert Buchanan in the same
number of the same Review.
VIII.
THE COURTS.—ONE JOURNALISTIC WARNING
OUT OF MANY.
“One of the main reliances of the criminal
element of our city for escaping from the
clutches of the law is the subornation of perjury.
A class of professional false swearers
has grown up, and their aid is invoked without
hesitation in the criminal courts. This startling
and shameful fact was fully revealed to
the public on the Ford trial. Society can find
no protection under the ægis of the courts
until this iniquity shall have been uprooted and
cast out. The ermine sits under a upas-tree
as long as men and women in droves dare commit
the crime of perjury. No jury can justly
decide any case if a terrible blow be not first
struck at false testimony. And there are back
of these perjurers the suborners. The master
should be reached as well as the hireling.”—Editorial
in the New Orleans Picayune, March
2, 1885.
IX.
THE UNPROTECTED ATLANTIC COAST.
Early in February, 1885, the New York
Produce Exchange presented a Memorial to
the Congress of the United States, setting
forth, among other things, that the city of New
York and the adjacent cities of Brooklyn and
Jersey City “represent an interest in house
ownership and real estate amounting to over
$3,000,000,000; that all this realty is entirely
unprotected from an attack by hostile fleets,
which could bombard the city and the neighboring
populated districts without even entering
the Narrows.
“It is known abroad as well as at home,”
the memorialists say, “that the shores of this
country are entirely unprotected; and it would
be only an act of reasonable precaution that
New York, the chief city of the nation, should
be defended by such permanent forts, floating
batteries, gunboats, and torpedo service as will
give us a guaranty against sudden invasion
until the country shall have time to build an
adequate fleet for defensive purposes.”
X.
A SINGLE ILLUSTRATION OF THE IRISH-AMERICAN
SPIRIT.
The hundred and seventh anniversary of
Robert Emmet’s birth was celebrated in Faneuil
Hall by the Irish citizens of Boston in
February, 1885. The chief address of the
evening was delivered by the Rev. P. A.
McKenna. In the course of it he said, as
reported by a Boston daily paper:—
“It seems almost advisable that since the
Prince of Wales goes to Ireland as an invader,
he should be treated as such. There is one
principle which justifies the taking of human
life, and that is the principle of self-defence
of the person or the nation. It would not be
becoming to advocate extreme measures; but
let Irishmen contemptuously ignore the presence
of the Prince of Wales.” [Applause.]
Mrs. Marguerite Moore was introduced as a
woman recently from Ireland who had suffered
incarceration for the cause. She spoke of love
for Ireland, of hate for England, and pictured
the misery of her native land in the past and
in the present. “The Irishmen of America
demand vengeance. The opportunity has
come in England’s present difficulty, and advantage
will be taken of that fact. The sappers
and miners, who blow the people up, are
as necessary to the Irish army as are dashing
cavalry or steady infantry. [Applause.]
Every man to his like in this respect,” said
she. [And voices cried out “Dynamite!”]
Thomas Riley spoke on the topic of “Dynamite.”
He did not think it necessary to say
that they preferred to use that mode of warfare,
but they would insist that they had no
tears to shed at the consequences. “Is there
anything wrong in the use of dynamite under
certain conditions?” [“No, no!” cried out
a dozen voices.] Dynamite, the speaker declared,
had done no more injury than had
other methods used by England. O’Donovan
Rossa was mentioned, and a continued round
of applause, cheers and “tigers,” followed.
The speaker urged unity among Irishmen.
“Ireland is ripe,” said he, “and the hour is
approaching. If England but raises her hand
against any nation, even a third or fourth class
nation, Ireland will stab her in the back and
stab her to the heart; and if she needs the
knife, we’ll send it to her.”
The meeting closed with three cheers for
O’Donovan Rossa; but before so doing, passed,
as suggested by the last speaker, resolutions
as follows:—
“Whereas the present unsettled condition
of Europe, especially our old enemy England,
indicates that an uprising of the oppressed
people will in the very near future occur;
“And whereas the Irish and those of Irish-American
descent have been for a long period
of years proclaiming to the world Ireland’s
sufferings and wrongs and England’s unlawful
and brutal usurpations;
“And whereas, as in the past the principal
cause of our weakness and failures to
effect the removal of said usurpation was
disunion among ourselves, through which unhappily
the common enemy was armed and we
disarmed;
“And whereas, if we expect to effect the
freedom of Ireland it must be accomplished as
united brothers tolerant of each other, working
harmoniously in the same sacred cause, to
secure the same holy object;
“Therefore be it resolved that we, Irish-American
citizens of Boston and vicinity, in
Faneuil Hall assembled, send forth from this
historic cradle of liberty an earnest appeal to
all aspirants and workers for Ireland’s disenthralment
to forget all past differences and
unite for the opportune crisis, fast approaching,
to strike the successful blow for Ireland.”
XI.
THE ARMY OF THE DISCONTENTED.
“That a deep-rooted feeling of discontent
pervades the masses, none can deny; that there
is a just cause for it, must be admitted. The
old cry, ‘These agitators are stirring up a
feeling of dissatisfaction among working-men,
and they should be suppressed,’ will not avail
now. Every thinking person knows that the
agitator did not throw two millions of men out
of employment.... That the army of the discontented
is gathering fresh recruits day by
day is true; and if this army should become so
large that, driven to desperation, it should one
day arise in its wrath and grapple with its real
and fancied enemy, the responsibility for that
act must fall upon the heads of those who
could have averted the blow, but who turned
a deaf ear to the supplication of suffering
humanity, and gave the screw of oppression
an extra turn because they had the power.”—T.
V. Powderly, 1885.
XII.
DEFENDING DYNAMITE ASSASSINATION.
On April 7, 1885, O’Donovan Rossa delivered
an address in Tremont Temple, Boston.
From a report of his remarks which appeared
in the “Boston Herald” of April 8, the following
extracts are taken:—
“The papers of New York and of Boston
represented him as a man who took dynamite
to bed with him. [Laughter and cheers.] But
this very thing England used in all her wars,
and now had tons of it in Woolwich. Mr. Parnell
told them two years ago that he had all
the resources of civilization at command. He
meant then that he only wanted an excuse to
send over more of this destructive material.
[Laughter and applause.] Scientific warfare
alarmed England, and she would like Ireland
to keep petitioning and not go to arms. Then
they were asked, while they had the Coercion
Acts, to come out and fight in honorable warfare.
[Laughter.] He would rather fight in
the open field if allowed, but the speaker went
in for fighting the devil with his own weapons.
[Applause.] He would not wish to hurt an
Englishman, but there was no other way to root
English government from Ireland. [Cheers,
and a voice: ‘Yes, and we will root them out.’]
He would show that it would cost England more
to hold Ireland than it was worth. [Cheers.]
After England had passed all her stringent
laws, the recent explosions had occurred. Until
England gave up Ireland, dynamite would
go in.... There might be some who did not
like to deal with dynamite, but they only wanted
it done secretly. They said the speaker blew
too much. [Laughter.] Well, he had to blow
a bit to get them in. He had to make a noise,
or else he would not get any aid for the men
who are fighting England so as to make her
understand it would be advisable to give Ireland
a Parliament like that of 1801. [Cheers.]
When they had that, he would rest for a time.
But if she wished to stop the dynamite work in
London, let her give Ireland justice. Till she
did that, he would ask the people of Boston to
give all the aid they could.... In conclusion,
he asked his audience to do something to help
the brave men working for the liberty of Ireland.
He said there were to-day Irishmen
working for the cause in England who had
never seen America; but the scare they were
giving England in the heart of London was
doing more than twenty thousand men in the
field. He did not like dynamite, and the English
did not [laughter]; but he had no objection
that the Irishmen in London or in Ireland
should use all the dynamite they could get.
[Applause.] England had done all she could
with fire and sword to exterminate the race in
Ireland. Why, she had sold the Irish people
as slaves. England had banished the Irish
people, and she kept doing it. He asked the
chairman, if his family had been separated and
forced to go to a strange country by the work
of a Government, would he object to using dynamite,
or hell-fire itself? [Great applause.]”
University Press: John Wilson & Son, Cambridge