That celebrity has not always been the attendant on merit, many
mortifying examples may be produced to prove. Of those who have by their
writings conferred a lasting obligation on their country, and at the
same time raised its reputation, many have been suffered to descend into
the grave without any memorial; and when the time has arrived, in which
their works have raised a curiosity to be informed of the general
tenour, or petty habits of their lives, always amusing, and frequently
useful, little more is to be collected, than that they once lived, and
are no more.
Such has been the fate of William Somervile, who may, with great
propriety, be called the Poet of the Chase; and of whom it is to be
regretted that so few circumstances are known. By the neglect of friends
while living, and the want of curiosity in the publick, at the time of
his death, he has been deprived of that portion of fame to which his
merits have entitled him; and though the worth of his works is now
universally acknowledged, his amiable qualities, and he is said to have
possessed many, are forgotten and irrevocably lost to the world. In the
lapse of more than half a century, all his surviving friends, from whom
any information could be derived, are swept away. The little which has
been hitherto collected concerning him, will be found, on examination,
not perfectly satisfactory; and of that little, some part is less
accurate than our respect for so excellent a writer leads us to wish it
had been.
He was of a family of great antiquity in the county of Warwick. His
ancestor came into England with William the Conqueror, and left two
sons. The eldest, from whom our poet was descended, had Whichnour, in
the county of Stafford, for his inheritance; and the other, the ancestor
of Lord Somervile, settled in the kingdom of Scotland. The eldest branch
afterwards removed to Ederston, in the county of Warwick; which manor
Thomas Somervile became possessed of, by marrying Joan, daughter and
sole heir of John Aylesbury, the last heir male who owned that estate.
This Thomas died in the year 1501, leaving one son, Robert, who also
left one son, John, who was the father of William Somervile, whose only
son, Sir William Somervile, Knight, left a posthumous son, William, who
died in 1676, having married Anne, daughter of John Viscount Tracey, of
the kingdom of Ireland, by whom he had eleven sons and five daughters.
Of this numerous progeny, none seem to have survived except Robert, who
married Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Sir Charles Wolseley, and by her
became the father of three sons; 1. our author; 2. Robert, who was
killed in India; and, 3. Edward, who was of New College, Oxford; where
he took the degree of B. C. L. December 7, 1710, and D. C. L. April 26,
1722, and died between the years 1733 and 1742.
William Somervile, our poet, was born in the year 1677, at Ederston,
“near Avona’s winding stream,” as he himself records in one of his
poems. At the age of thirteen, in the year 1690, he was admitted a
scholar of Winchester College, and continued there until the year 1694,
when he was sent to New College, Oxford. It does not appear, as Dr.
Johnson observes, that in the places of his education, he exhibited any
uncommon proofs of genius or literature. He is said, by the same author,
to have been elected a Fellow of New College; but as he does not seem to
have taken any degree at the university, that assertion may be doubted.
It is more probable, that he soon quitted the college for the country,
where his powers were first displayed, and where he was distinguished as
a poet, a gentleman, and a skilful and useful justice of the peace.
How soon he began to write verses we are not informed, there being few
dates in his poems; but it is certain that he was no early candidate for
literary fame. He had reached the age of fifty years, before he
presented any of his works to the publick, or was the least known. In
the year 1727, he published his first volume of Poems; the merit of
which, like most collections of the same kind, is various. Dr. Johnson
says, that, “though, perhaps, he has not, in any mode of poetry, reached
such excellence as to raise much envy, it may commonly be said, at
least, that he ‘writes very well for a gentleman.’ His serious pieces
are sometimes elevated, and his trifles are sometimes elegant. In his
verses to Addison, the couplet which mentions Clio, is written with
the most exquisite delicacy of praise: it exhibits one of those happy
strokes that are seldom attained. In his Odes to Marlborough, there are
beautiful lines; but in the second ode, he shows that he knew little of
his hero, when he talks of his private virtues. His subjects are
commonly such as require no great depth of thought, or energy of
expression. His fables are generally stale, and therefore excite no
curiosity. Of his favourite, the Two Springs, the fiction is
unnatural, and the moral inconsequential. In his tales, there is too
much coarseness, with too little care of language, and not sufficient
rapidity of narration.” To the justice of this estimate, it may be
doubted whether an unreserved assent will be readily given. Dr. Johnson
has often dealt out his praise with too scanty and parsimonious a hand.
His success as an author, whatever were his merits at that time, was
however sufficient not to discourage his further efforts. In the year
1735, he produced the work now republished: a work, which has scarce
ever been spoken of but to be commended, though Dr. Johnson, whose
habits of life, and bodily defects, were little calculated to taste the
beauties of this poem, or to enter into the spirit of it, coldly says,
“to this poem, praise cannot be totally denied.” He adds, however, “he
(the author,) is allowed by sportsmen to write with great intelligence
of his subject, which is the first requisite to excellence; and though
it is impossible to interest common readers of verse in the dangers or
the pleasures of the chase, he has done all that transition and variety
could easily effect; and has, with great propriety, enlarged his plan by
the modes of hunting used in other countries.” Dr. Warton observes, that
he “writes with all the spirit and fire of an eager sportsman. The
description of the hunting the hare, the fox, and the stag, are
extremely spirited, and place the very objects before our eyes: of such
consequence is it for a man to write on that, which he hath frequently
felt with pleasure.”
Many other testimonies might be added; but its best praise, is the
continued succession of new editions since its original publication.
As Mr. Somervile advanced in life, his attention to literary pursuits
increased. In the year 1740, he produced “Hobbinol, or the Rural Games;”
a burlesque poem, which Dr. Warton has classed among those best
deserving notice, of the mock heroick species. It is dedicated to Mr.
Hogarth, as the greatest master in the burlesque way; and at the
conclusion of his preface, the author says, “If any person should want a
key to this poem, his curiosity shall be gratified. I shall in plain
words tell him, ‘it is a satire against the luxury, the pride, the
wantonness, and quarrelsome temper of the middling sort of people,’ As
these are the proper and genuine cause of that barefaced knavery, and
almost universal poverty, which reign without control in every place;
and as to these we owe our many bankrupt farmers, our trade decayed, and
lands uncultivated, the author has reason to hope, that no honest man,
who loves his country, will think this short reproof out of season; for,
perhaps, this merry way of bantering men into virtue, may have a better
effect than the most serious admonitions, since many who are proud to be
thought immoral, are not very fond of being ridiculous.”
He did not yet close his literary labours. In the year 1742, a few
months only before his death, he published Field Sports; a poem
addressed to the Prince of Wales; and from Lady Luxborough’s letters we
learn, that he had translated Voltaire’s Alzira, which, with several
other pieces not published, were in her possession. One of these,
written towards the close of life, is so descriptive of the old age of a
sportsman, and exhibits so pleasing a picture of the temper and turn of
mind of the author, we shall here insert. It is an “Address to his Elbow
Chair, new clothed.”
My dear companion, and my faithful friend!
If Orpheus taught the listening oaks to bend,
If stones and rubbish, at Amphion’s call,
Danced into form, and built the Theban wall;
Why should’st not thou attend my humble lays,
And hear my grateful harp resound thy praise?
True, thou art spruce and fine; a very beau;
But what are trappings, and external show?
To real worth alone I make my court;
Knaves are my scorn, and coxcombs are my sport.
Once I beheld thee, far less trim and gay,
Ragged, disjointed, and to worms a prey,
The safe retreat of every lurking mouse,
Derided, shunn’d, the lumber of my house!
Thy robe, how changed from what it was before!
Thy velvet robe, which pleased my sires of yore!
’Tis thus capricious fortune wheels us round;
Aloft we mount—then tumble to the ground.
Yet grateful then, my constancy I proved;
I knew thy worth; my friend in rags I loved;
I loved thee more; nor, like a courtier, spurn’d
My benefactor when the tide was turn’d.
With conscious shame, yet frankly I confess,
That in my youthful days—I loved thee less.
Where vanity, where pleasure call’d, I stray’d;
And every wayward appetite obey’d.
But sage experience taught me how to prize
Myself; and how, this world: she bade me rise
To nobler flights, regardless of a race
Of factious emmets; pointed where to place
My bliss, and lodged me in thy soft embrace.
Here, on thy yielding down, I sit secure;
And, patiently, what Heaven has sent, endure;
From all the futile cares of business free;
Not fond of life, but yet content to be:
Here mark the fleeting hours; regret the past;
And seriously prepare to meet the last.
So safe on shore, the pension’d sailor lies,
And all the malice of the storm defies;
With ease of body bless’d, and peace of mind,
Pities the restless crew he left behind;
Whilst, in his cell, he meditates alone,
On his great voyage, to the world unknown.
To those who have derived entertainment or instruction from Mr.
Somervile’s works, the information will be received with pain, that the
latter part of his life did not pass without those embarrassments which
attend a deranged state of pecuniary circumstances. Shenstone, who in
this particular much resembled him, thus notices his lamentable
catastrophe. “Our old friend Somervile is dead! I did not imagine I
could have been so sorry as I find myself on this occasion. Sublatum
quærimus. I can now excuse all his foibles; impute them to age, and to
distress of circumstances: the last of these considerations wrings my
very soul to think on. For a man of high spirit, conscious of having (at
least in one production,) generally pleased the world, to be plagued and
threatened by wretches that are low in every sense; to be forced to
drink himself into pains of the body, in order to get rid of the pains
of the mind, is a misery which I can well conceive; because I may,
without vanity, esteem myself his equal in point of economy, and,
consequently, ought to have an eye to his misfortunes.” Dr. Johnson
says, “his distresses need not to be much pitied; his estate is said to
have been fifteen hundred a year, which by his death devolved to Lord
Somervile of Scotland. His mother, indeed, who lived till ninety, had a
jointure of six hundred.” This remark is made with less consideration
than might have been expected, from so close an observer of mankind.
Such an estate, incumbered in such a manner, and perhaps otherwise,
frequently leaves the proprietor in a very uneasy situation, with but a
scanty pittance; and it is evident, that our author was by no means an
economist. Shenstone says, “for whatever the world might esteem in poor
Somervile, I really find, upon critical inquiry, that I loved him for
nothing so much as his flocci-nauci-nihili-pili-fication of money.” Lady
Luxborough declares him to have been a gentleman who deserved the esteem
of every good man, and one who was regretted accordingly.
He died July 19, 1742, and was buried at Wotton, near Henley on Arden.
He had been married to Mary, daughter of Hugh Bethel, of Yorkshire, who
died before him, without leaving any issue. By his will, proved the
third of September, 1742, he remembered New College, the place of his
education, by leaving to the master and fellows, fifteen volumes of
Montfaucon’s Antiquities, and Addison’s works, for their library; and,
apparently to encourage provincial literature, he bequeathed twenty
pounds to purchase books for the parish library of the place of his
residence.