Isaiah xlv., v. 5
& 7.
“I am the Lord, and there is none else. There is
no God beside me . . . I form the light and create darkness: I
make peace and create evil: I, the Lord, do all these
things.”
That God is the maker and preserver
of all things, both visible and invisible; that He orders all
things in heaven and earth according to His own will; that all
parts of the universe have their origin, their functions, their
capabilities from Him; that they operate or are suspended at His
word; that He exalts to prosperity, and lays low in adversity;
that He kills and makes alive—are truths which, asserted in
a general way, I suppose all of you would readily
acknowledge. But, brethren, would it not be only in
this general way? In particular and individual instances of
what are called nature’s operations, is not the great
moving or permitting power often lost sight of, ay, and virtually
denied to be at work? Much of this oversight, this
practical infidelity, is due, I doubt not, to our use of the word
“nature.” We talk of the law of nature,
we admire and wonder at the works of nature, until we
all-but deify nature, and dethrone nature’s God.
Some may say that when we speak of nature we mean God. But
do we? Does not the expression suggest to our minds some
indescribable, some unknown essence, working in a mechanical,
perfunctory, necessary, inevitable, compulsory way, more
frequently than present to us any thought of the Lord Jehovah?
And not less frequently are secondary or subordinate causes so
contemplated and insisted on as to exclude from our minds all
consideration of the great first cause.
There are indeed laws by which all the movements and
productions and changes of the natural world are effected; but we
often forget that it is God who originally ordained these laws;
that they are not, in themselves, powers, but only the
rules by which His power operates: that, in fact, these
rules for the direction of His power resolve themselves simply
into the consistent motions of His infinite wisdom: that, as by
Him everything was arranged at the beginning, so in conformity to
the laws suggested by His wisdom He has been superintending and
directing all things ever since—the laws themselves being,
of course, subject to their all-wise framer and, both by their
regular operation and their occasional wonderful diversion or
suspension, subserving the great purposes of His sovereign
government. Now, looking only into what is called the Book
of Nature, simply making our own observations on these laws
without the aid of the light of revelation, we cannot fail to
discern that they are good in themselves, and that they generally
operate for good. We see, indeed, that they can work
for evil: the nipping of the frost, the blasting of the
lightning, the overwhelming of the flood, the withering of the
drought—these are specimens of what power of destruction
there is in God’s elements. Yet they are not their
general operations; frost and electric fluid, and heat and water,
and a drying sun or wind, being in themselves good agents, agents
only occasionally productive of injurious results. If now
from these our own discoveries we turn to what God has discovered
to us in the Book of His word, we shall have all our former
observations confirmed, and the reasons for the occasional evil
tendency of what are called nature’s operations fully and
clearly explained. Fire and hail, sun and vapour, and
stormy wind fulfil His word. He maketh the winds His
messengers, and flames of fire His servants. He employs
ordinary agents to effect special ends. Instead of sending
forth new agents to perform His will, He diverts the old ones
from their usual course and makes them fulfil it.
Now when God thus makes use of naturally beneficial agents to
bring about destructive ends He does so for some particular
purpose. Calamities are never brought upon any of
God’s creatures from what we call caprice. God never
willingly afflicts or grieves; that is, He never does it
simply to satisfy His own will, or to exhibit His own
power. God’s thoughts and ways are not as our
thoughts and ways. Man, if he knows himself to be possessed
of a certain power, often exercises it without care or thought
that he is thereby injuring others, or for the bare purpose of
display. But not so God. If He afflicts, it is
because there is some need of, some good in the affliction; most
often, though by no means exclusively, it is to correct offenders, and
to warn others (by their chastisement) not to follow their
example. We have only to glance at the history of the
Israelites and the circumstances in which God afflicted them, to
be convinced that such visitations—whether of consuming
fire, of overwhelming water, of destroying sword, of famishing
dearth, or of noisome pestilence—are called forth by the
conduct of those on whom they come. We, therefore, call
these visitations judgments, judgments of punishment, of
correction or of warning. They are chastisements which,
after all gentler methods have failed, our Gracious Father,
desirous of our reformation and eternal safety, employs, and
employs most reluctantly, as among the last efforts to recall us
into His paths. How sad it is to think that very many of
the objects of these visitations allow them to come and go
unheeded, and, therefore, of course, unimproved! How much
sadder that men who heed them and feel them, in the deceitfulness
and unbelief of their hearts, refuse themselves to learn and
labour to unteach others the deep and salutary lessons which God,
by His judgments, arrests us to hear, and through them utters to
us, as it were, with an audible voice! Amid these
heaven-sprung calamities, there are to be found, not only
careless, heedless men everywhere, but alas! close
observers, full of care, so-called philosophers (one begins
almost to hate the name from its constant mal-appropriation by
the sophist and the infidel) who will observe these calamities,
note the signs of the times, speculate about what ought to be
done, and yet not dream of recognising, yea, refuse to recognise
when it is pointed out to them, the interposition of their
God! How marvellous this is! What utter folly is it! They
acknowledge that there is a God. They believe that he has
charge of all the elements; they know the general tendency of
those elements to be for good; they see them working evil; yet
they will not perceive that God has done it. Every cause is
made mention of but the great first cause. Every influence
is sooner believed in than His.
Here are we, for instance, visited with a grievous plague
among our herds and flocks. Every one feels some measure of
the calamity. All are alive to the necessity of prompt and
great efforts to stay the progress of and cure the murrain.
There are hundreds of sage suggestions as to the origin of such
things; every conceivable precaution and pains is taken to
prevent the communication of them, to remove local provocations
and incentives, to discover remedies and cures. But who
says or imagines “The hand of the Lord hath wrought
this”? Who exhorts, “Come and let us return
unto the Lord, for He hath torn and He will heal us”?
I am not making this appeal to encourage disregard of natural
causes and influences. These being the agents and
instruments which God uses for or against us, which he requires
us to foster if they are good, to remove if they are bad, it
would be desperate folly, and most provoking sin, to disregard
them. By all means let men follow on as they have begun, in
scientific inquiry, sanitary precaution and improvement, and the
like; but, besides, let them do what hitherto they do not seem to
have done at all sufficiently, namely, recognise and acknowledge
the hand of the Lord in these plagues. But you will say
“Have they not done this? Is not our presence here
to-day a proof that we, at least, have done it? Are there
not
thousands and thousands in the land who will assemble as we have
done, if their pastors invite them? Has there been any
objection to, has there not been loud approval of, the special
Collect which the authorities in Church and State have appointed
for daily use—is not that Collect itself an acknowledgment,
and a discerning acknowledgment, that the Lord has sent the
murrain among us?”
My brethren, if I could have felt that men generally assented
in heart to the doctrine of that Collect, and were
endeavouring to act out its prayers in their life, I should have
uttered none of the reproof that has passed my lips. But is
it not the fact that men are betaking themselves to God in this
way only as one of possible remedies and preventives—not
tracing the infliction to Him, but merely asking the removal, of
Him?: “Somehow we are in trouble; will God deliver
us out of it?” Well is it, indeed, when men thus far
believe in a God of Providence; for the human dogmas of our days
about fixed laws, necessary and certain revolutions or wars and
plagues to keep down the population and so forth, have reasoned
and calculated too many into the belief that prayer for the
alteration, at least of temporal circumstances, is altogether
idle, if not profane. Well is it then, if we still believe
that God can interfere in the operations of the world, and
that if we will call upon Him there is hope that He will.
But, my brethren, we shall not have drawn near with acceptable
prayer if we have only asked Him to heal us, if we have not also
acknowledged that He has torn us. The prayer will not be
acceptable, because He will be acknowledged in all His
ways, worshipped for His Majesty as well as His goodness; seen
in His wrath, as well as sought in His clemency. And,
moreover, it will not be effectual prayer; for His visitations
always have a purpose (“Ye shall know that I have not done
without cause all that I have done”), and how shall we have
responded to the purpose, if we have not recognised the
visitation?
Do you ask me what I suppose to be the purpose of this
visitation—and what, therefore, we have to do as a nation
and as individuals by way of repentance and amendment? I
venture not to answer particularly, picking out the
precise sins which characterise us as a people, for which God is
provoked, to visit us with present wrath, or for which He is but
graciously chastising us, that we may cease from them ere they
bring forth His displeasure. I rather bid you consider for
what reasons God sent His sore plagues among His people of old,
and then ask yourselves what there is in us like unto them, what
we lack that God thus laboured to produce in them. I do not
even venture to say that God is visiting sin at all. He is
the Judge, not I. When I am called to the bedside of a sick
man, I am bidden by the Church to admonish
him—“Whatsoever your sickness is, know you certainly
that it is God’s visitation.” There may be a
natural cause for it—he may know it, and I may know
it—he may have inherited it, or “accidentally and
innocently,” as we say, caught it, or by wicked conduct
incurred it; he may be able to connect it throughout with its
earthly origin, tracing the effect clearly and completely to a
natural cause. Nevertheless, I tell him “It is
God’s visitation.” I then enumerate some of the
purposes
of God’s visitations: to try patience, to increase faith,
to correct what is amiss. If I know his life—or he
opens his mind to me and reveals it—I point out what seem
to be provoking sins, or crying defects, and bid him consider
whether these are not among the probable causes of his
trouble—anyhow, (I tell him) they are things which he is
now admonished to correct; and, if he accuses and condemns
himself for all that he can discern as amiss, and resolves by all
means to draw nearer to God, this will be accounted an
acknowledgment of God’s ownership and rule of him, which
will cause the Holy One to return from His hiding-place, and show
again the favour of His countenance.
So would I speak, brethren, to you and to myself at this
time. Assuredly God’s visitation is upon us. It
may be all favour like Job’s trials, nothing may have
provoked His wrath, He may simply be fitting us for and leading
us on to greater blessedness. (We shall hardly, however,
persuade ourselves that we are so righteous in His sight!)
It may be loving correction, meant to make us abandon certain
paths that lead downwards out of His favour. Or it may be
wrath that can no longer spare the guilty. From what we
know of ourselves, brethren, do we not fancy that there is a
probable explanation of it all, in the growing contempt for
God’s sanctions and restrictions in our law-making (as for
instance in the marriage laws) in the wide-spreading persuasion
that all that happens on earth can be accounted for without
supposing the intervention or even the existence of a God, in the
self-sufficiency, self-reliance, self-laudation which
characterise us in our living only for time and for
ourselves? What is needed, then, is that we should turn indeed to
God, that we should see and acknowledge His hand in all our
circumstances, that we should live under His rule and by His
laws, that we should exhibit His rule and proclaim His
praise, and spread far and wide His glory; that we should feel
that we exist for these ends; that, if we forget God’s
purposes respecting us, we must expect Him to remind us of them
in the ways He has ever followed; that, if we frustrate His
purposes, He will most surely visit us with His wrath.
This, my brethren, is our Nation’s duty, and its several
parts are ours to do. Let each of us then set about
examining ourselves; and, trying to discern what in us
provokes God’s visitation, let us humble ourselves before
Him on account of it and repent of it, and resolve to forsake it,
and ask for grace to do so; let us pray to Him to make us think
and speak and move henceforth in the remembrance that, in Him, we
have our being; that He is our God, and we are His people.
PRINTED BY
C. W. REYNELL, LITTLE PULTENEY STREET, HAYMARKET.