That Omnipotence which has called the world with all its
living creatures into one animated being, especially reveals
Himself in the desolation of great pestilences. The powers
of creation come into violent collision; the sultry dryness of
the atmosphere; the subterraneous thunders; the mist of
overflowing waters, are the harbingers of destruction.
Nature is not satisfied with the ordinary alternations of life
and death, and the destroying angel waves over man and beast his
flaming sword.
These revolutions are performed in vast cycles, which the
spirit of man, limited, as it is, to a narrow circle of
perception, is unable to explore. They are, however,
greater terrestrial events than any of those which proceed from
the discord, the distress, or the passions of nations. By
annihilations they awaken new life; and when the tumult above and
below the earth is past, nature is renovated, and the mind
awakens from torpor and depression to the consciousness of an
intellectual existence.
Were it in any degree within the power of human research to
draw up, in a vivid and connected form, an historical sketch of
such mighty events, after the manner of the historians of wars
and battles, and the migrations of nations, we might then arrive
at clear views with respect to the mental development of the
human race, and the ways of Providence would be more plainly
discernible. It would then be demonstrable, that the mind
of nations is deeply affected by the destructive conflict of the
powers of nature, and that great disasters lead to striking
changes in general civilisation. For all that exists in
man, whether good or evil, is rendered conspicuous by the
presence of great danger. His inmost feelings are
roused—the thought of self-preservation masters his
spirit—self-denial is put to severe proof, and wherever
darkness and barbarism prevail, there the affrighted mortal flies
to the idols of his superstition, and all laws, human and divine,
are criminally violated.
In conformity with a general law of nature, such a state of
excitement brings about a change, beneficial or detrimental,
according to circumstances, so that nations either attain a
higher degree of moral worth, or sink deeper in ignorance and
vice. All this, however, takes place upon a much grander
scale than through the ordinary vicissitudes of war and peace, or
the rise and fall of empires, because the powers of nature
themselves produce plagues, and subjugate the human will, which,
in the contentions of nations, alone predominates.
The most memorable example of what has been advanced is
afforded by a great pestilence of the fourteenth century, which
desolated Asia, Europe, and Africa, and of which the people yet
preserve the remembrance in gloomy traditions. It was an
oriental plague, marked by inflammatory boils and tumours of the
glands, such as break out in no other febrile disease. On
account of these inflammatory boils, and from the black spots,
indicatory of a putrid decomposition, which appeared upon the
skin, it was called in Germany and in the northern kingdoms of
Europe the Black Death, and in Italy, la mortalega grande,
the Great Mortality.
Few testimonies are presented to us respecting its symptoms
and its course, yet these are sufficient to throw light upon the
form of the malady, and they are worthy of credence, from their
coincidence with the signs of the same disease in modern
times.
The imperial writer, Kantakusenos, whose own son, Andronikus,
died of this plague in Constantinople, notices great imposthumes
of the thighs and arms of those affected, which, when opened,
afforded relief by the discharge of an offensive matter.
Buboes, which are the infallible signs of the oriental plague,
are thus plainly indicated, for he makes separate mention of
smaller boils on the arms and in the face, as also in other parts
of the body, and clearly distinguishes these from the blisters,
which are no less produced by plague in all its forms. In
many cases, black spots broke out all over the body, either
single, or united and confluent.
These symptoms were not all found in every case. In
many, one alone was sufficient to cause death, while some
patients recovered, contrary to expectation, though afflicted
with all. Symptoms of cephalic affection were frequent;
many patients became stupefied and fell into a deep sleep, losing
also their speech from palsy of the tongue; others remained
sleepless and without rest. The fauces and tongue were
black, and as if suffused with blood; no beverage could assuage
their burning thirst, so that their sufferings continued without
alleviation until terminated by death, which many in their
despair accelerated with their own hands. Contagion was
evident, for attendants caught the disease of their relations and
friends, and many houses in the capital were bereft even of their
last inhabitant. Thus far the ordinary circumstances only
of the oriental plague occurred. Still deeper sufferings,
however, were connected with this pestilence, such as have not
been felt at other times; the organs of respiration were seized
with a putrid inflammation; a violent pain in the chest attacked
the patient; blood was expectorated, and the breath diffused a
pestiferous odour.
In the West, the following were the predominating symptoms on
the eruption of this disease. An ardent fever, accompanied
by an evacuation of blood, proved fatal in the first three
days. It appears that buboes and inflammatory boils did not
at first come out at all, but that the disease, in the form of
carbuncular (anthrax-artigen) affection of the lungs,
effected the destruction of life before the other symptoms were
developed.
Thus did the plague rage in Avignon for six or eight weeks,
and the pestilential breath of the sick, who expectorated blood,
caused a terrible contagion far and near; for even the vicinity
of those who had fallen ill of plague was certain death; so that
parents abandoned their infected children, and all the ties of
kindred were dissolved. After this period, buboes in the
axilla and in the groin, and inflammatory boils all over the
body, made their appearance; but it was not until seven months
afterwards that some patients recovered with matured buboes, as
in the ordinary milder form of plague.
Such is the report of the courageous Guy de Chauliac, who
vindicated the honour of medicine, by bidding defiance to danger;
boldly and constantly assisting the affected, and disdaining the
excuse of his colleagues, who held the Arabian notion, that
medical aid was unavailing, and that the contagion justified
flight. He saw the plague twice in Avignon, first in the
year 1348, from January to August, and then twelve years later,
in the autumn, when it returned from Germany, and for nine months
spread general distress and terror. The first time it raged
chiefly among the poor, but in the year 1360, more among the
higher classes. It now also destroyed a great many
children, whom it had formerly spared, and but few women.
The like was seen in Egypt. Here also inflammation of
the lungs was predominant, and destroyed quickly and infallibly,
with burning heat and expectoration of blood. Here too the
breath of the sick spread a deadly contagion, and human aid was
as vain as it was destructive to those who approached the
infected.
Boccacio, who was an eye-witness of its incredible fatality in
Florence, the seat of the revival of science, gives a more lively
description of the attack of the disease than his non-medical
contemporaries.
It commenced here, not as in the East, with bleeding at the
nose, a sure sign of inevitable death; but there took place at
the beginning, both in men and women, tumours in the groin and in
the axilla, varying in circumference up to the size of an apple
or an egg, and called by the people, pest-boils
(gavoccioli). Then there appeared similar tumours
indiscriminately over all parts of the body, and black or blue
spots came out on the arms or thighs, or on other parts, either
single and large, or small and thickly studded. These spots
proved equally fatal with the pest-boils, which had been from the
first regarded as a sure sign of death. No power of
medicine brought relief—almost all died within the first
three days, some sooner, some later, after the appearance of
these signs, and for the most part entirely without fever or
other symptoms. The plague spread itself with the greater
fury, as it communicated from the sick to the healthy, like fire
among dry and oily fuel, and even contact with the clothes and
other articles which had been used by the infected, seemed to
induce the disease. As it advanced, not only men, but
animals fell sick and shortly expired, if they had touched things
belonging to the diseased or dead. Thus Boccacio himself
saw two hogs on the rags of a person who had died of plague,
after staggering about for a short time, fall down dead as if
they had taken poison. In other places multitudes of dogs,
cats, fowls, and other animals, fell victims to the contagion;
and it is to be presumed that other epizootes among animals
likewise took place, although the ignorant writers of the
fourteenth century are silent on this point.
In Germany there was a repetition in every respect of the same
phenomena. The infallible signs of the oriental bubo-plague
with its inevitable contagion were found there as everywhere
else; but the mortality was not nearly so great as in the other
parts of Europe. The accounts do not all make mention of
the spitting of blood, the diagnostic symptom of this fatal
pestilence; we are not, however, thence to conclude that there
was any considerable mitigation or modification of the disease,
for we must not only take into account the defectiveness of the
chronicles, but that isolated testimonies are often contradicted
by many others. Thus the chronicles of Strasburg, which
only take notice of boils and glandular swellings in the
axillæ and groins, are opposed by another account,
according to which the mortal spitting of blood was met with in
Germany; but this again is rendered suspicious, as the narrator
postpones the death of those who were thus affected, to the
sixth, and (even the) eighth day, whereas, no other author
sanctions so long a course of the disease; and even in Strasburg,
where a mitigation of the plague may, with most probability, be
assumed since the year 1349, only 16,000 people were carried off,
the generality expired by the third or fourth day. In
Austria, and especially in Vienna, the plague was fully as
malignant as anywhere, so that the patients who had red spots and
black boils, as well as those afflicted with tumid glands, died
about the third day; and lastly, very frequent sudden deaths
occurred on the coasts of the North Sea and in Westphalia,
without any further development of the malady.
To France, this plague came in a northern direction from
Avignon, and was there more destructive than in Germany, so that
in many places not more than two in twenty of the inhabitants
survived. Many were struck, as if by lightning, and died on
the spot, and this more frequently among the young and strong
than the old; patients with enlarged glands in the axillæ
and groins scarcely survive two or three days; and no sooner did
these fatal signs appear, than they bid adieu to the world, and
sought consolation only in the absolution which Pope Clement VI.
promised them in the hour of death.
In England the malady appeared, as at Avignon, with spitting
of blood, and with the same fatality, so that the sick who were
afflicted either with this symptom or with vomiting of blood,
died in some cases immediately, in others within twelve hours, or
at the latest two days. The inflammatory boils and buboes
in the groins and axillæ were recognised at once as
prognosticating a fatal issue, and those were past all hope of
recovery in whom they arose in numbers all over the body.
It was not till towards the close of the plague that they
ventured to open, by incision, these hard and dry boils, when
matter flowed from them in small quantity, and thus, by
compelling nature to a critical suppuration, many patients were
saved. Every spot which the sick had touched, their breath,
their clothes, spread the contagion; and, as in all other places,
the attendants and friends who were either blind to their danger,
or heroically despised it, fell a sacrifice to their
sympathy. Even the eyes of the patient were considered a
sources of contagion, which had the power of acting at a
distance, whether on account of their unwonted lustre, or the
distortion which they always suffer in plague, or whether in
conformity with an ancient notion, according to which the sight
was considered as the bearer of a demoniacal enchantment.
Flight from infected cities seldom availed the fearful, for the
germ of the disease adhered to them, and they fell sick, remote
from assistance, in the solitude of their country houses.
Thus did the plague spread over England with unexampled
rapidity, after it had first broken out in the county of Dorset,
whence it advanced through the counties of Devon and Somerset, to
Bristol, and thence reached Gloucester, Oxford and London.
Probably few places escaped, perhaps not any; for the annuals of
contemporaries report that throughout the land only a tenth part
of the inhabitants remained alive.
From England the contagion was carried by a ship to Bergen,
the capital of Norway, where the plague then broke out in its
most frightful form, with vomiting of blood; and throughout the
whole country, spared not more than a third of the
inhabitants. The sailors found no refuge in their ships;
and vessels were often seen driving about on the ocean and
drifting on shore, whose crews had perished to the last man.
In Poland the affected were attacked with spitting blood, and
died in a few days in such vast numbers, that, as it has been
affirmed, scarcely a fourth of the inhabitants were left.
Finally, in Russia the plague appeared two years later than in
Southern Europe; yet here again, with the same symptoms as
elsewhere. Russian contemporaries have recorded that it
began with rigor, heat, and darting pain in the shoulders and
back; that it was accompanied by spitting of blood, and
terminated fatally in two, or at most three days. It is not
till the year 1360 that we find buboes mentioned as occurring in
the neck, in the axillæ, and in the groins, which are
stated to have broken out when the spitting of blood had
continued some time. According to the experience of Western
Europe, however, it cannot be assumed that these symptoms did not
appear at an earlier period.
Thus much, from authentic sources, on the nature of the Black
Death. The descriptions which have been communicated
contain, with a few unimportant exceptions, all the symptoms of
the oriental plague which have been observed in more modern
times. No doubt can obtain on this point. The facts
are placed clearly before our eyes. We must, however, bear
in mind that this violent disease does not always appear in the
same form, and that while the essence of the poison which it
produces, and which is separated so abundantly from the body of
the patient, remains unchanged, it is proteiform in its
varieties, from the almost imperceptible vesicle, unaccompanied
by fever, which exists for some time before it extends its poison
inwardly, and then excites fever and buboes, to the fatal form in
which carbuncular inflammations fall upon the most important
viscera.
Such was the form which the plague assumed in the fourteenth
century, for the accompanying chest affection which appeared in
all the countries whereof we have received any account, cannot,
on a comparison with similar and familiar symptoms, be considered
as any other than the inflammation of the lungs of modern
medicine, a disease which at present only appears sporadically,
and, owing to a putrid decomposition of the fluids, is probably
combined with hemorrhages from the vessels of the lungs.
Now, as every carbuncle, whether it be cutaneous or internal,
generates in abundance the matter of contagion which has given
rise to it, so, therefore, must the breath of the affected have
been poisonous in this plague, and on this account its power of
contagion wonderfully increased; wherefore the opinion appears
incontrovertible, that owing to the accumulated numbers of the
diseased, not only individual chambers and houses, but whole
cities were infected, which, moreover, in the Middle Ages, were,
with few exceptions, narrowly built, kept in a filthy state, and
surrounded with stagnant ditches. Flight was, in
consequence, of no avail to the timid; for even though they had
sedulously avoided all communication with the diseased and the
suspected, yet their clothes were saturated with the pestiferous
atmosphere, and every inspiration imparted to them the seeds of
the destructive malady, which, in the greater number of cases,
germinated with but too much fertility. Add to which, the
usual propagation of the plague through clothes, beds, and a
thousand other things to which the pestilential poison
adheres—a propagation which, from want of caution, must
have been infinitely multiplied; and since articles of this kind,
removed from the access of air, not only retain the matter of
contagion for an indefinite period, but also increase its
activity and engender it like a living being, frightful
ill-consequences followed for many years after the first fury of
the pestilence was past.
The affection of the stomach, often mentioned in vague terms,
and occasionally as a vomiting of blood, was doubtless only a
subordinate symptom, even if it be admitted that actual
hematemesis did occur. For the difficulty of distinguishing
a flow of blood from the stomach, from a pulmonic expectoration
of that fluid, is, to non-medical men, even in common cases, not
inconsiderable. How much greater then must it have been in
so terrible a disease, where assistants could not venture to
approach the sick without exposing themselves to certain
death? Only two medical descriptions of the malady have
reached us, the one by the brave Guy de Chauliac, the other by
Raymond Chalin de Vinario, a very experienced scholar, who was
well versed in the learning of the time. The former takes
notice only of fatal coughing of blood; the latter, besides this,
notices epistaxis, hematuria, and fluxes of blood from the
bowels, as symptoms of such decided and speedy mortality, that
those patients in whom they were observed usually died on the
same or the following day.
That a vomiting of blood may not, here and there, have taken
place, perhaps have been even prevalent in many places, is, from
a consideration of the nature of the disease, by no means to be
denied; for every putrid decomposition of the fluids begets a
tendency to hemorrhages of all kinds. Here, however, it is
a question of historical certainty, which, after these doubts, is
by no means established. Had not so speedy a death followed
the expectoration of blood, we should certainly have received
more detailed intelligence respecting other hemorrhages; but the
malady had no time to extend its effects further over the
extremities of the vessels. After its first fury, however,
was spent, the pestilence passed into the usual febrile form of
the oriental plague. Internal carbuncular inflammations no
longer took place, and hemorrhages became phenomena, no more
essential in this than they are in any other febrile
disorders. Chalin, who observed not only the great
mortality of 1348, and the plague of 1360, but also that of 1373
and 1382, speaks moreover of affections of the throat, and
describes the back spots of plague patients more satisfactorily
than any of his contemporaries. The former appeared but in
few cases, and consisted in carbuncular inflammation of the
gullet, with a difficulty of swallowing, even to suffocation, to
which, in some instances, was added inflammation of the
ceruminous glands of the ears, with tumours, producing great
deformity. Such patients, as well as others, were affected
with expectoration of blood; but they did not usually die before
the sixth, and, sometimes, even as late as the fourteenth
day. The same occurrence, it is well known, is not uncommon
in other pestilences; as also blisters on the surface of the
body, in different places, in the vicinity of which, tumid glands
and inflammatory boils, surrounded by discoloured and black
streaks, arose, and thus indicated the reception of the
poison. These streaked spots were called, by an apt
comparison, the girdle, and this appearance was justly considered
extremely dangerous.
An inquiry into the causes of the Black Death will not be
without important results in the study of the plagues which have
visited the world, although it cannot advance beyond
generalisation without entering upon a field hitherto
uncultivated, and, to this hour entirely unknown. Mighty
revolutions in the organism of the earth, of which we have
credible information, had preceded it. From China to the
Atlantic, the foundations of the earth were
shaken—throughout Asia and Europe the atmosphere was in
commotion, and endangered, by its baneful influence, both
vegetable and animal life.
The series of these great events began in the year 1333,
fifteen years before the plague broke out in Europe: they first
appeared in China. Here a parching drought, accompanied by
famine, commenced in the tract of country watered by the rivers
Kiang and Hoai. This was followed by such violent torrents
of rain, in and about Kingsai, at that time the capital of the
empire, that, according to tradition, more than 400,000 people
perished in the floods. Finally the mountain Tsincheou fell
in, and vast clefts were formed in the earth. In the
succeeding year (1334), passing over fabulous traditions, the
neighbourhood of Canton was visited by inundations; whilst in
Tche, after an unexampled drought, a plague arose, which is said
to have carried off about 5,000,000 of people. A few months
afterwards an earthquake followed, at and near Kingsai; and
subsequent to the falling in of the mountains of Ki-ming-chan, a
lake was formed of more than a hundred leagues in circumference,
where, again, thousands found their grave. In Houkouang and
Honan, a drought prevailed for five months; and innumerable
swarms of locusts destroyed the vegetation; while famine and
pestilence, as usual, followed in their train. Connected
accounts of the condition of Europe before this great catastrophe
are not to be expected from the writers of the fourteenth
century. It is remarkable, however, that simultaneously
with a drought and renewed floods in China, in 1336, many
uncommon atmospheric phenomena, and in the winter, frequent
thunderstorms, were observed in the north of France; and so early
as the eventful year of 1333 an eruption of Etna took
place. According to the Chinese annuals, about 4,000,000 of
people perished by famine in the neighbourhood of Kiang in 1337;
and deluges, swarms of locusts, and an earthquake which lasted
six days, caused incredible devastation. In the same year,
the first swarms of locusts appeared in Franconia, which were
succeeded in the following year by myriads of these
insects. In 1338 Kingsai was visited by an earthquake of
ten days’ duration; at the same time France suffered from a
failure in the harvest; and thenceforth, till the year 1342,
there was in China a constant succession of inundations,
earthquakes, and famines. In the same year great floods
occurred in the vicinity of the Rhine and in France, which could
not be attributed to rain alone; for, everywhere, even on tops of
mountains, springs were seen to burst forth, and dry tracts were
laid under water in an inexplicable manner. In the
following year, the mountain Hong-tchang, in China, fell in, and
caused a destructive deluge; and in Pien-tcheon and Leang-tcheou,
after three months’ rain, there followed unheard-of
inundations, which destroyed seven cities. In Egypt and
Syria, violent earthquakes took place; and in China they became,
from this time, more and more frequent; for they recurred, in
1344, in Ven-tcheou, where the sea overflowed in consequence; in
1345, in Ki-tcheou, and in both the following years in Canton,
with subterraneous thunder. Meanwhile, floods and famine
devastated various districts, until 1347, when the fury of the
elements subsided in China.
The signs of terrestrial commotions commenced in Europe in the
year 1348, after the intervening districts of country in Asia had
probably been visited in the same manner.
On the island of Cyprus, the plague from the East had already
broken out; when an earthquake shook the foundations of the
island, and was accompanied by so frightful a hurricane, that the
inhabitants who had slain their Mahometan slaves, in order that
they might not themselves be subjugated by them, fled in dismay,
in all directions. The sea overflowed—the ships were
dashed to pieces on the rocks, and few outlived the terrific
event, whereby this fertile and blooming island was converted
into a desert. Before the earthquake, a pestiferous wind
spread so poisonous an odour, that many, being overpowered by it,
fell down suddenly and expired in dreadful agonies.
This phenomenon is one of the rarest that has ever been
observed, for nothing is more constant than the composition of
the air; and in no respect has nature been more careful in the
preservation of organic life. Never have naturalists
discovered in the atmosphere foreign elements, which, evident to
the senses, and borne by the winds, spread from land to land,
carrying disease over whole portions of the earth, as is
recounted to have taken place in the year 1348. It is,
therefore, the more to be regretted, that in this extraordinary
period, which, owing to the low condition of science, was very
deficient in accurate observers, so little that can be depended
on respecting those uncommon occurrences in the air, should have
been recorded. Yet, German accounts say expressly, that a
thick, stinking mist advanced from the East, and spread itself
over Italy; and there could be no deception in so palpable a
phenomenon. The credibility of unadorned traditions,
however little they may satisfy physical research, can scarcely
be called in question when we consider the connection of events;
for just at this time earthquakes were more general than they had
been within the range of history. In thousands of places
chasms were formed, from whence arose noxious vapours; and as at
that time natural occurrences were transformed into miracles, it
was reported, that a fiery meteor, which descended on the earth
far in the East, had destroyed everything within a circumference
of more than a hundred leagues, infecting the air far and
wide. The consequences of innumerable floods contributed to
the same effect; vast river districts had been converted into
swamps; foul vapours arose everywhere, increased by the odour of
putrified locusts, which had never perhaps darkened the sun in
thicker swarms, and of countless corpses, which even in the
well-regulated countries of Europe, they knew not how to remove
quickly enough out of the sight of the living. It is
probable, therefore, that the atmosphere contained foreign, and
sensibly perceptible, admixtures to a great extent, which, at
least in the lower regions, could not be decomposed, or rendered
ineffective by separation.
Now, if we go back to the symptoms of the disease, the ardent
inflammation of the lungs points out, that the organs of
respiration yielded to the attack of an atmospheric
poison—a poison which, if we admit the independent origin
of the Black Plague at any one place of the globe, which, under
such extraordinary circumstances, it would be difficult to doubt,
attacked the course of the circulation in as hostile a manner as
that which produces inflammation of the spleen, and other animal
contagions that cause swelling and inflammation of the lymphatic
glands.
Pursuing the course of these grand revolutions further, we
find notice of an unexampled earthquake, which, on the 25th
January, 1348, shook Greece, Italy, and the neighbouring
countries. Naples, Rome, Pisa, Bologna, Padua, Venice, and
many other cities, suffered considerably; whole villages were
swallowed up. Castles, houses, and churches were
overthrown, and hundreds of people were buried beneath their
ruins. In Carinthia, thirty villages, together with all the
churches, were demolished; more than a thousand corpses were
drawn out of the rubbish; the city of Villach was so completely
destroyed that very few of its inhabitants were saved; and when
the earth ceased to tremble it was found that mountains had been
moved from their positions, and that many hamlets were left in
ruins. It is recorded that during this earthquake the wine
in the casks became turbid, a statement which may be considered
as furnishing proof that changes causing a decomposition of the
atmosphere had taken place; but if we had no other information
from which the excitement of conflicting powers of nature during
these commotions might be inferred, yet scientific observations
in modern times have shown that the relation of the atmosphere to
the earth is changed by volcanic influences. Why then, may
we not, from this fact, draw retrospective inferences respecting
those extraordinary phenomena?
Independently of this, however, we know that during this
earthquake, the duration of which is stated by some to have been
a week, and by others a fortnight, people experienced an unusual
stupor and headache, and that many fainted away.
These destructive earthquakes extended as far as the
neighbourhood of Basle, and recurred until the year 1360
throughout Germany, France, Silesia, Poland, England, and
Denmark, and much further north.
Great and extraordinary meteors appeared in many places, and
were regarded with superstitious horror. A pillar of fire,
which on the 20th of December, 1348, remained for an hour at
sunrise over the pope’s palace in Avignon; a fireball,
which in August of the same year was seen at sunset over Paris,
and was distinguished from similar phenomena by its longer
duration, not to mention other instances mixed up with wonderful
prophecies and omens, are recorded in the chronicles of that
age.
The order of the seasons seemed to be inverted; rains, flood,
and failures in crops were so general that few places were exempt
from them; and though an historian of this century assure us that
there was an abundance in the granaries and storehouses, all his
contemporaries, with one voice, contradict him. The
consequences of failure in the crops were soon felt, especially
in Italy and the surrounding countries, where, in this year, a
rain, which continued for four months, had destroyed the
seed. In the larger cities they were compelled, in the
spring of 1347, to have recourse to a distribution of bread among
the poor, particularly at Florence, where they erected large
bakehouses, from which, in April, ninety-four thousand loaves of
bread, each of twelve ounces in weight, were daily
dispensed. It is plain, however, that humanity could only
partially mitigate the general distress, not altogether obviate
it.
Diseases, the invariable consequence of famine, broke out in
the country as well as in cities; children died of hunger in
their mother’s arms—want, misery, and despair were
general throughout Christendom.
Such are the events which took place before the eruption of
the Black Plague in Europe. Contemporaries have explained
them after their own manner, and have thus, like their posterity,
under similar circumstances, given a proof that mortals possess
neither senses nor intellectual powers sufficiently acute to
comprehend the phenomena produced by the earth’s organism,
much less scientifically to understand their effects.
Superstition, selfishness in a thousand forms, the presumption of
the schools, laid hold of unconnected facts. They vainly
thought to comprehend the whole in the individual, and perceived
not the universal spirit which, in intimate union with the mighty
powers of nature, animates the movements of all existence, and
permits not any phenomenon to originate from isolated
causes. To attempt, five centuries after that age of
desolation, to point out the causes of a cosmical commotion,
which has never recurred to an equal extent, to indicate
scientifically the influences, which called forth so terrific a
poison in the bodies of men and animals, exceeds the limits of
human understanding. If we are even now unable, with all
the varied resources of an extended knowledge of nature, to
define that condition of the atmosphere by which pestilences are
generated, still less can we pretend to reason retrospectively
from the nineteenth to the fourteenth century; but if we take a
general view of the occurrences, that century will give us
copious information, and, as applicable to all succeeding times,
of high importance.
In the progress of connected natural phenomena from east to
west, that great law of nature is plainly revealed which has so
often and evidently manifested itself in the earth’s
organism, as well as in the state of nations dependent upon
it. In the inmost depths of the globe that impulse was
given in the year 1333, which in uninterrupted succession for six
and twenty years shook the surface of the earth, even to the
western shores of Europe. From the very beginning the air
partook of the terrestrial concussion, atmospherical waters
overflowed the land, or its plants and animals perished under the
scorching heat. The insect tribe was wonderfully called
into life, as if animated beings were destined to complete the
destruction which astral and telluric powers had begun.
Thus did this dreadful work of nature advance from year to year;
it was a progressive infection of the zones, which exerted a
powerful influence both above and beneath the surface of the
earth; and after having been perceptible in slighter indications,
at the commencement of the terrestrial commotions in China,
convulsed the whole earth.
The nature of the first plague in China is unknown. We
have no certain intelligence of the disease until it entered the
western countries of Asia. Here it showed itself as the
Oriental plague, with inflammation of the lungs; in which form it
probably also may have begun in China, that is to say, as a
malady which spreads, more than any other, by contagion—a
contagion that, in ordinary pestilences, requires immediate
contact, and only under favourable circumstances of rare
occurrence is communicated by the mere approach to the
sick. The share which this cause had in the spreading of
the plague over the whole earth was certainly very great; and the
opinion that the Black Death might have been excluded from
Western Europe by good regulations, similar to those which are
now in use, would have all the support of modern experience,
provided it could be proved that this plague had been actually
imported from the East, or that the Oriental plague in general,
whenever it appears in Europe, has its origin in Asia or
Egypt. Such a proof, however, can by no means be produced
so as to enforce conviction; for it would involve the impossible
assumption, either that there is no essential difference between
the degree of civilisation of the European nations, in the most
ancient and in modern times, or that detrimental circumstances,
which have yielded only to the civilisation of human society and
the regular cultivation of countries, could not formerly keep up
the glandular plague.
The plague was, however, known in Europe before nations were
united by the bonds of commerce and social intercourse; hence
there is ground for supposing that it sprang up spontaneously, in
consequence of the rude manner of living and the uncultivated
state of the earth, influences which peculiarly favour the origin
of severe diseases. Now we need not go back to the earlier
centuries, for the fourteenth itself, before it had half expired,
was visited by five or six pestilences.
If, therefore, we consider the peculiar property of the
plague, that in countries which it has once visited it remains
for a long time in a milder form, and that the epidemic
influences of 1342, when it had appeared for the last time, were
particularly favourable to its unperceived continuance, till
1348, we come to the notion that in this eventful year also the
germs of plague existed in Southern Europe, which might be
vivified by atmospherical deteriorations; and that thus, at least
in part, the Black Plague may have originated in Europe
itself. The corruption of the atmosphere came from the
East; but the disease itself came not upon the wings of the wind,
but was only excited and increased by the atmosphere where it had
previously existed.
This source of the Black Plague was not, however, the only
one; for far more powerful than the excitement of the latent
elements of the plague by atmospheric influences was the effect
of the contagion communicated from one people to another on the
great roads and in the harbours of the Mediterranean. From
China the route of the caravans lay to the north of the Caspian
Sea, through Central Asia, to Tauris. Here ships were ready
to take the produce of the East to Constantinople, the capital of
commerce, and the medium of connection between Asia, Europe, and
Africa. Other caravans went from India to Asia Minor, and
touched at the cities south of the Caspian Sea, and, lastly, from
Bagdad through Arabia to Egypt; also the maritime communication
on the Red Sea, from India to Arabia and Egypt, was not
inconsiderable. In all these directions contagion made its
way; and, doubtless, Constantinople and the harbours of Asia
Minor are to be regarded as the foci of infection, whence it
radiated to the most distant seaports and islands.
To Constantinople the plague had been brought from the
northern coast of the Black Sea, after it had depopulated the
countries between those routes of commerce, and appeared as early
as 1347 in Cyprus, Sicily, Marseilles, and some of the seaports
of Italy. The remaining islands of the Mediterranean,
particularly Sardinia, Corsica, and Majorca, were visited in
succession. Foci of contagion existed also in full activity
along the whole southern coast of Europe; when, in January, 1348,
the plague appeared in Avignon, and in other cities in the south
of France and north of Italy, as well as in Spain.
The precise days of its eruption in the individual towns are
no longer to be ascertained; but it was not simultaneous; for in
Florence the disease appeared in the beginning of April, in
Cesena the 1st June, and place after place was attacked
throughout the whole year; so that the plague, after it had
passed through the whole of France and Germany—where,
however, it did not make its ravages until the following
year—did not break out till August in England, where it
advanced so gradually, that a period of three months elapsed
before it reached London. The northern kingdoms were
attacked by it in 1349; Sweden, indeed, not until November of
that year, almost two years after its eruption in Avignon.
Poland received the plague in 1349, probably from Germany, if not
from the northern countries; but in Russia it did not make its
appearance until 1351, more than three years after it had broken
out in Constantinople. Instead of advancing in a
north-westerly direction from Tauris and from the Caspian Sea, it
had thus made the great circuit of the Black Sea, by way of
Constantinople, Southern and Central Europe, England, the
northern kingdoms, and Poland, before it reached the Russian
territories, a phenomenon which has not again occurred with
respect to more recent pestilences originating in Asia.
Whether any difference existed between the indigenous plague,
excited by the influence of the atmosphere, and that which was
imported by contagion, can no longer be ascertained from facts;
for the contemporaries, who in general were not competent to make
accurate researches of this kind, have left no data on the
subject. A milder and a more malignant form certainly
existed, and the former was not always derived from the latter,
as is to be supposed from this circumstance—that the
spitting of blood, the infallible diagnostic of the latter, on
the first breaking out of the plague, is not similarly mentioned
in all the reports; and it is therefore probable that the milder
form belonged to the native plague—the more malignant, to
that introduced by contagion. Contagion was, however, in
itself, only one of many causes which gave rise to the Black
Plague.
This disease was a consequence of violent commotions in the
earth’s organism—if any disease of cosmical origin
can be so considered. One spring set a thousand others in
motion for the annihilation of living beings, transient or
permanent, of mediate or immediate effect. The most
powerful of all was contagion; for in the most distant countries,
which had scarcely yet heard the echo of the first concussion,
the people fell a sacrifice to organic poison—the untimely
offspring of vital energies thrown into violent commotion.
We have no certain measure by which to estimate the ravages of
the Black Plague, if numerical statements were wanted, as in
modern times. Let us go back for a moment to the fourteenth
century. The people were yet but little civilised.
The Church had indeed subdued them; but they all suffered from
the ill consequences of their original rudeness. The
dominion of the law was not yet confirmed. Sovereigns had
everywhere to combat powerful enemies to internal tranquillity
and security. The cities were fortresses for their own
defence. Marauders encamped on the roads. The
husbandman was a feudal slave, without possessions of his
own. Rudeness was general, humanity as yet unknown to the
people. Witches and heretics were burned alive.
Gentle rulers were contemned as weak; wild passions, severity and
cruelty, everywhere predominated. Human life was little
regarded. Governments concerned not themselves about the
numbers of their subjects, for whose welfare it was incumbent on
them to provide. Thus, the first requisite for estimating
the loss of human life, namely, a knowledge of the amount of the
population, is altogether wanting; and, moreover, the traditional
statements of the amount of this loss are so vague, that from
this source likewise there is only room for probable
conjecture.
Cairo lost daily, when the plague was raging with its greatest
violence, from 10,000 to 15,000; being as many as, in modern
times, great plagues have carried off during their whole
course. In China, more than thirteen millions are said to
have died; and this is in correspondence with the certainly
exaggerated accounts from the rest of Asia. India was
depopulated. Tartary, the Tartar kingdom of Kaptschak,
Mesopotamia, Syria, Armenia, were covered with dead
bodies—the Kurds fled in vain to the mountains. In
Caramania and Cæsarea none were left alive. On the
roads—in the camps—in the
caravansaries—unburied bodies alone were seen; and a few
cities only (Arabian historians name Maarael-Nooman, Schisur, and
Harem) remained, in an unaccountable manner, free. In
Aleppo, 500 died daily; 22,000 people, and most of the animals,
were carried off in Gaza, within six weeks. Cyprus lost
almost all its inhabitants; and ships without crews were often
seen in the Mediterranean, as afterwards in the North Sea,
driving about, and spreading the plague wherever they went on
shore. It was reported to Pope Clement, at Avignon, that
throughout the East, probably with the exception of China,
23,840,000 people had fallen victims to the plague.
Considering the occurrences of the fourteenth and fifteenth
centuries, we might, on first view, suspect the accuracy of this
statement. How (it might be asked) could such great wars
have been carried on—such powerful efforts have been made;
how could the Greek Empire, only a hundred years later, have been
overthrown, if the people really had been so utterly
destroyed?
This account is nevertheless rendered credible by the
ascertained fact, that the palaces of princes are less accessible
to contagious diseases than the dwellings of the multitude; and
that in places of importance, the influx from those districts
which have suffered least, soon repairs even the heaviest
losses. We must remember, also, that we do not gather much
from mere numbers without an intimate knowledge of the state of
society. We will therefore confine ourselves to exhibiting
some of the more credible accounts relative to European
cities.
In Florence there died of the Black Plague—60,000
In Venice—100,000
In Marseilles, in one month—16,000
In Siena—70,000
In Paris—50,000
In St. Denys—14,000
In Avignon—60,000
In Strasburg—16,000
In Lübeck—9,000
In Basle—14,000
In Erfurt, at least—16,000
In Weimar—5,000
In Limburg—2,500
In London, at least—100,000
In Norwich—51,100
To which may be added—
Franciscan Friars in German—124,434
Minorites in Italy—30,000
This short catalogue might, by a laborious and uncertain
calculation, deduced from other sources, be easily further
multiplied, but would still fail to give a true picture of the
depopulation which took place. Lübeck, at that time
the Venice of the North, which could no longer contain the
multitudes that flocked to it, was thrown into such consternation
on the eruption of the plague, that the citizens destroyed
themselves as if in frenzy.
Merchants whose earnings and possessions were unbounded,
coldly and willingly renounced their earthly goods. They
carried their treasures to monasteries and churches, and laid
them at the foot of the altar; but gold had no charms for the
monks, for it brought them death. They shut their gates;
yet, still it was cast to them over the convent walls.
People would brook no impediment to the last pious work to which
they were driven by despair. When the plague ceased, men
thought they were still wandering among the dead, so appalling
was the livid aspect of the survivors, in consequence of the
anxiety they had undergone, and the unavoidable infection of the
air. Many other cities probably presented a similar
appearance; and it is ascertained that a great number of small
country towns and villages, which have been estimated, and not
too highly, at 200,000, were bereft of all their inhabitants.
In many places in France, not more than two out of twenty of
the inhabitants were left alive, and the capital felt the fury of
the plague, alike in the palace and the cot.
Two queens, one bishop, and great numbers of other
distinguished persons, fell a sacrifice to it, and more than 500
a day died in the Hôtel Dieu, under the faithful care of
the sisters of charity, whose disinterested courage, in this age
of horror, displayed the most beautiful traits of human
virtue. For although they lost their lives, evidently from
contagion, and their numbers were several times renewed, there
was still no want of fresh candidates, who, strangers to the
unchristian fear of death, piously devoted themselves to their
holy calling.
The churchyards were soon unable to contain the dead, and many
houses, left without inhabitants, fell to ruins.
In Avignon, the Pope found it necessary to consecrate the
Rhone, that bodies might be thrown into the river without delay,
as the churchyards would no longer hold them; so likewise, in all
populous cities, extraordinary measures were adopted, in order
speedily to dispose of the dead. In Vienna, where for some
time 1,200 inhabitants died daily, the interment of corpses in
the churchyards and within the churches was forthwith prohibited;
and the dead were then arranged in layers, by thousands, in six
large pits outside the city, as had already been done in Cairo
and Paris. Yet, still many were secretly buried; for at all
times the people are attached to the consecrated cemeteries of
their dead, and will not renounce the customary mode of
interment.
In many places it was rumoured that plague patients were
buried alive, as may sometimes happen through senseless alarm and
indecent haste; and thus the horror of the distressed people was
everywhere increased. In Erfurt, after the churchyards were
filled, 12,000 corpses were thrown into eleven great pits; and
the like might, more or less exactly, be stated with respect to
all the larger cities. Funeral ceremonies, the last
consolation of the survivors, were everywhere impracticable.
In all Germany, according to a probable calculation, there
seem to have died only 1,244,434 inhabitants; this country,
however, was more spared than others: Italy, on the contrary, was
most severely visited. It is said to have lost half its
inhabitants; and this account is rendered credible from the
immense losses of individual cities and provinces: for in
Sardinia and Corsica, according to the account of the
distinguished Florentine, John Villani, who was himself carried
off by the Black Plague, scarcely a third part of the population
remained alive; and it is related of the Venetians, that they
engaged ships at a high rate to retreat to the islands; so that
after the plague had carried off three-fourths of her
inhabitants, that proud city was left forlorn and desolate.
In Padua, after the cessation of the plague, two-thirds of the
inhabitants were wanting; and in Florence it was prohibited to
publish the numbers of dead, and to toll the bells at their
funerals, in order that the living might not abandon themselves
to despair.
We have more exact accounts of England; most of the great
cities suffered incredible losses; above all, Yarmouth, in which
7,052 died; Bristol, Oxford, Norwich, Leicester, York, and
London, where in one burial ground alone, there were interred
upwards of 50,000 corpses, arranged in layers, in large
pits. It is said that in the whole country scarcely a tenth
part remained alive; but this estimate is evidently too
high. Smaller losses were sufficient to cause those
convulsions, whose consequences were felt for some centuries, in
a false impulse given to civil life, and whose indirect
influence, unknown to the English, has perhaps extended even to
modern times.
Morals were deteriorated everywhere, and the service of God
was in a great measure laid aside; for, in many places, the
churches were deserted, being bereft of their priests. The
instruction of the people was impeded; covetousness became
general; and when tranquillity was restored, the great increase
of lawyers was astonishing, to whom the endless disputes
regarding inheritances offered a rich harvest. The want of
priests too, throughout the country, operated very detrimentally
upon the people (the lower classes being most exposed to the
ravages of the plague, whilst the houses of the nobility were, in
proportion, much more spared), and it was no compensation that
whole bands of ignorant laymen, who had lost their wives during
the pestilence, crowded into the monastic orders, that they might
participate in the respectability of the priesthood, and in the
rich heritages which fell in to the Church from all
quarters. The sittings of Parliament, of the King’s
Bench, and of most of the other courts, were suspended as long as
the malady raged. The laws of peace availed not during the
dominion of death. Pope Clement took advantage of this
state of disorder to adjust the bloody quarrel between Edward III
and Philip VI; yet he only succeeded during the period that the
plague commanded peace. Philip’s death (1350)
annulled all treaties; and it is related that Edward, with other
troops indeed, but with the same leaders and knights, again took
the field. Ireland was much less heavily visited that
England. The disease seems to have scarcely reached the
mountainous districts of that kingdom; and Scotland too would
perhaps have remained free, had not the Scots availed themselves
of the discomfiture of the English to make an irruption into
their territory, which terminated in the destruction of their
army, by the plague and by the sword, and the extension of the
pestilence, through those who escaped, over the whole
country.
At the commencement, there was in England a superabundance of
all the necessaries of life; but the plague, which seemed then to
be the sole disease, was soon accompanied by a fatal murrain
among the cattle. Wandering about without herdsmen, they
fell by thousands; and, as has likewise been observed in Africa,
the birds and beasts of prey are said not to have touched
them. Of what nature this murrain may have been, can no
more be determined, than whether it originated from communication
with plague patients, or from other causes; but thus much is
certain, that it did not break out until after the commencement
of the Black Death. In consequence of this murrain, and the
impossibility of removing the corn from the fields, there was
everywhere a great rise in the price of food, which to many was
inexplicable, because the harvest had been plentiful; by others
it was attributed to the wicked designs of the labourers and
dealers; but it really had its foundation in the actual
deficiency arising from circumstances by which individual classes
at all times endeavour to profit. For a whole year, until
it terminated in August, 1349, the Black Plague prevailed in this
beautiful island, and everywhere poisoned the springs of comfort
and prosperity.
In other countries, it generally lasted only half a year, but
returned frequently in individual places; on which account, some,
without sufficient proof, assigned to it a period of seven
years.
Spain was uninterruptedly ravaged by the Black Plague till
after the year 1350, to which the frequent internal feuds and the
wars with the Moors not a little contributed. Alphonso XI.,
whose passion for war carried him too far, died of it at the
siege of Gibraltar, on the 26th of March, 1350. He was the
only king in Europe who fell a sacrifice to it; but even before
this period, innumerable families had been thrown into
affliction. The mortality seems otherwise to have been
smaller in Spain than in Italy, and about as considerable as in
France.
The whole period during which the Black Plague raged with
destructive violence in Europe was, with the exception of Russia,
from the year 1347 to 1350. The plagues which in the sequel
often returned until the year 1383, we do not consider as
belonging to “the Great Mortality.” They were
rather common pestilences, without inflammation of the lungs,
such as in former times, and in the following centuries, were
excited by the matter of contagion everywhere existing, and
which, on every favourable occasion, gained ground anew, as is
usually the case with this frightful disease.
The concourse of large bodies of people was especially
dangerous; and thus the premature celebration of the Jubilee to
which Clement VI. cited the faithful to Rome (1350) during the
great epidemic, caused a new eruption of the plague, from which
it is said that scarcely one in a hundred of the pilgrims
escaped.
Italy was, in consequence, depopulated anew; and those who
returned, spread poison and corruption of morals in all
directions. It is therefore the less apparent how that
Pope, who was in general so wise and considerate, and who knew
how to pursue the path of reason and humanity under the most
difficult circumstances, should have been led to adopt a measure
so injurious; since he himself was so convinced of the salutary
effect of seclusion, that during the plague in Avignon he kept up
constant fires, and suffered no one to approach him; and in other
respects gave such orders as averted, or alleviated, much
misery.
The changes which occurred about this period in the north of
Europe are sufficiently memorable to claim a few moments’
attention. In Sweden two princes died—Haken and Knut,
half-brothers of King Magnus; and in Westgothland alone, 466
priests. The inhabitants of Iceland and Greenland found in
the coldness of their inhospitable climate no protection against
the southern enemy who had penetrated to them from happier
countries. The plague caused great havoc among them.
Nature made no allowance for their constant warfare with the
elements, and the parsimony with which she had meted out to them
the enjoyments of life. In Denmark and Norway, however,
people were so occupied with their own misery, that the
accustomed voyages to Greenland ceased. Towering icebergs
formed at the same time on the coast of East Greenland, in
consequence of the general concussion of the earth’s
organism; and no mortal, from that time forward, has ever seen
that shore or its inhabitants.
It has been observed above, that in Russia the Black Plague
did not break out until 1351, after it had already passed through
the south and north of Europe. In this country also, the
mortality was extraordinarily great; and the same scenes of
affliction and despair were exhibited, as had occurred in those
nations which had already passed the ordeal: the same mode of
burial—the same horrible certainty of death—the same
torpor and depression of spirits. The wealthy abandoned
their treasures, and gave their villages and estates to the
churches and monasteries; this being, according to the notions of
the age, the surest way of securing the favour of Heaven and the
forgiveness of past sins. In Russia, too, the voice of
nature was silenced by fear and horror. In the hour of
danger, fathers and mothers deserted their children, and children
their parents.
Of all the estimates of the number of lives lost in Europe,
the most probable is, that altogether a fourth part of the
inhabitants were carried off. Now, if Europe at present
contain 210,000,000 inhabitants, the population, not to take a
higher estimate, which might easily by justified, amounted to at
least 105,000,000 in the sixteenth century.
It may therefore be assumed, without exaggeration, that Europe
lost during the Black Death 25,000,000 of inhabitants.
That her nations could so quickly overcome such a fearful
concussion in their external circumstances, and, in general,
without retrograding more than they actually did, could so
develop their energies in the following century, is a most
convincing proof of the indestructibility of human society as a
whole. To assume, however, that it did not suffer any
essential change internally, because in appearance everything
remained as before, is inconsistent with a just view of cause and
effect. Many historians seem to have adopted such an
opinion; accustomed, as usual, to judge of the moral condition of
the people solely according to the vicissitudes of earthly power,
the events of battles, and the influence of religion, but to pass
over with indifference the great phenomena of nature, which
modify, not only the surface of the earth, but also the human
mind. Hence, most of them have touched but superficially on
the “Great Mortality” of the fourteenth
century. We, for our parts, are convinced that in the
history of the world the Black Death is one of the most important
events which have prepared the way for the present state of
Europe.
He who studies the human mind with attention, and forms a
deliberate judgment on the intellectual powers which set people
and States in motion, may perhaps find some proofs of this
assertion in the following observations:—at that time, the
advancement of the hierarchy was, in most countries,
extraordinary; for the Church acquired treasures and large
properties in land, even to a greater extent than after the
Crusades; but experience has demonstrated that such a state of
things is ruinous to the people, and causes them to retrograde,
as was evinced on this occasion.
After the cessation of the Black Plague, a greater fecundity
in women was everywhere remarkable—a grand phenomenon,
which, from its occurrence after every destructive pestilence,
proves to conviction, if any occurrence can do so, the prevalence
of a higher power in the direction of general organic life.
Marriages were, almost without exception, prolific; and double
and triple births were more frequent than at other times; under
which head, we should remember the strange remark, that after the
“Great Mortality” the children were said to have got
fewer teeth than before; at which contemporaries were mightily
shocked, and even later writers have felt surprise.
If we examine the grounds of this oft-repeated assertion, we
shall find that they were astonished to see children, cut twenty,
or at most, twenty-two teeth, under the supposition that a
greater number had formerly fallen to their share. Some
writers of authority, as, for example, the physician Savonarola,
at Ferrara, who probably looked for twenty-eight teeth in
children, published their opinions on this subject. Others
copied from them, without seeing for themselves, as often happens
in other matters which are equally evident; and thus the world
believed in the miracle of an imperfection in the human body
which had been caused by the Black Plague.
The people gradually consoled themselves after the sufferings
which they had undergone; the dead were lamented and forgotten;
and, in the stirring vicissitudes of existence, the world
belonged to the living.
The mental shock sustained by all nations during the
prevalence of the Black Plague is without parallel and beyond
description. In the eyes of the timorous, danger was the
certain harbinger of death; many fell victims to fear on the
first appearance of the distemper, and the most stout-hearted
lost their confidence. Thus, after reliance on the future
had died away, the spiritual union which binds man to his family
and his fellow-creatures was gradually dissolved. The pious
closed their accounts with the world—eternity presented
itself to their view—their only remaining desire was for a
participation in the consolations of religion, because to them
death was disarmed of its sting.
Repentance seized the transgressor, admonishing him to
consecrate his remaining hours to the exercise of Christian
virtues. All minds were directed to the contemplation of
futurity; and children, who manifest the more elevated feelings
of the soul without alloy, were frequently seen, while labouring
under the plague, breathing out their spirit with prayer and
songs of thanksgiving.
An awful sense of contrition seized Christians of every
communion; they resolved to forsake their vices, to make
restitution for past offences, before they were summoned hence,
to seek reconciliation with their Maker, and to avert, by
self-chastisement, the punishment due to their former sins.
Human nature would be exalted, could the countless noble actions
which, in times of most imminent danger, were performed in
secret, be recorded for the instruction of future
generations. They, however, have no influence on the course
of worldly events. They are known only to silent
eyewitnesses, and soon fall into oblivion. But hypocrisy,
illusion, and bigotry stalk abroad undaunted; they desecrate what
is noble, they pervert what is divine, to the unholy purposes of
selfishness, which hurries along every good feeling in the false
excitement of the age. Thus it was in the years of this
plague. In the fourteenth century, the monastic system was
still in its full vigour, the power of the ecclesiastical orders
and brotherhoods was revered by the people, and the hierarchy was
still formidable to the temporal power. It was therefore in
the natural constitution of society that bigoted zeal, which in
such times makes a show of public acts of penance, should avail
itself of the semblance of religion. But this took place in
such a manner, that unbridled, self-willed penitence, degenerated
into lukewarmness, renounced obedience to the hierarchy, and
prepared a fearful opposition to the Church, paralysed as it was
by antiquated forms.
While all countries were filled with lamentations and woe,
there first arose in Hungary, and afterwards in Germany, the
Brotherhood of the Flagellants, called also the Brethren of the
Cross, or Cross-bearers, who took upon themselves the repentance
of the people for the sins they had committed, and offered
prayers and supplications for the averting of this plague.
This Order consisted chiefly of persons of the lower class, who
were either actuated by sincere contrition, or who joyfully
availed themselves of this pretext for idleness, and were hurried
along with the tide of distracting frenzy. But as these
brotherhoods gained in repute, and were welcomed by the people
with veneration and enthusiasm, many nobles and ecclesiastics
ranged themselves under their standard; and their bands were not
unfrequently augmented by children, honourable women, and nuns;
so powerfully were minds of the most opposite temperaments
enslaved by this infatuation. They marched through the
cities, in well-organised processions, with leaders and singers;
their heads covered as far as the eyes; their look fixed on the
ground, accompanied by every token of the deepest contrition and
mourning. They were robed in sombre garments, with red
crosses on the breast, back, and cap, and bore triple scourges,
tied in three or four knots, in which points of iron were
fixed. Tapers and magnificent banners of velvet and cloth
of gold were carried before them; wherever they made their
appearance, they were welcomed by the ringing bells, and the
people flocked from all quarters to listen to their hymns and to
witness their penance with devotion and tears.
In the year 1349, two hundred Flagellants first entered
Strasburg, where they were received with great joy, and
hospitably lodged by citizens. Above a thousand joined the
brotherhood, which now assumed the appearance of a wandering
tribe, and separated into two bodies, for the purpose of
journeying to the north and to the south. For more than
half a year, new parties arrived weekly; and on each arrival
adults and children left their families to accompany them; till
at length their sanctity was questioned, and the doors of houses
and churches were closed against them. At Spires, two
hundred boys, of twelve years of age and under, constituted
themselves into a Brotherhood of the Cross, in imitation of the
children who, about a hundred years before, had united, at the
instigation of some fanatic monks, for the purpose of recovering
the Holy Sepulchre. All the inhabitants of this town were
carried away by the illusion; they conducted the strangers to
their houses with songs of thanksgiving, to regale them for the
night. The women embroidered banners for them, and all were
anxious to augment their pomp; and at every succeeding pilgrimage
their influence and reputation increased.
It was not merely some individual parts of the country that
fostered them: all Germany, Hungary, Poland, Bohemia, Silesia,
and Flanders, did homage to the mania; and they at length became
as formidable to the secular as they were to the ecclesiastical
power. The influence of this fanaticism was great and
threatening, resembling the excitement which called all the
inhabitants of Europe into the deserts of Syria and Palestine
about two hundred and fifty years before. The appearance in
itself was not novel. As far back as the eleventh century,
many believers in Asia and Southern Europe afflicted themselves
with the punishment of flagellation. Dominicus Loricatus, a
monk of St. Croce d’Avellano, is mentioned as the master
and model of this species of mortification of the flesh; which,
according to the primitive notions of the Asiatic Anchorites, was
deemed eminently Christian. The author of the solemn
processions of the Flagellants is said to have been St. Anthony;
for even in his time (1231) this kind of penance was so much in
vogue, that it is recorded as an eventful circumstance in the
history of the world. In 1260, the Flagellants appeared in
Italy as Devoti. “When the land was polluted
by vices and crimes, an unexampled spirit of remorse suddenly
seized the minds of the Italians. The fear of Christ fell
upon all: noble and ignoble, old and young, and even children of
five years of age, marched through the streets with no covering
but a scarf round the waist. They each carried a scourge of
leathern thongs, which they applied to their limbs, amid sighs
and tears, with such violence that the blood flowed from the
wounds. Not only during the day, but even by night, and in
the severest winter, they traversed the cities with burning
torches and banners, in thousands and tens of thousands, headed
by their priests, and prostrated themselves before the
altars. They proceeded in the same manner in the villages:
and the woods and mountains resounded with the voices of those
whose cries were raised to God. The melancholy chaunt of
the penitent alone was heard. Enemies were reconciled; men
and women vied with each other in splendid works of charity, as
if they dreaded that Divine Omnipotence would pronounce on them
the doom of annihilation.”
The pilgrimages of the Flagellants extended throughout all the
province of Southern Germany, as far as Saxony, Bohemia, and
Poland, and even further; but at length the priests resisted this
dangerous fanaticism, without being able to extirpate the
illusion, which was advantageous to the hierarchy as long as it
submitted to its sway. Regnier, a hermit of Perugia, is
recorded as a fanatic preacher of penitence, with whom the
extravagance originated. In the year 1296 there was a great
procession of the Flagellants in Strasburg; and in 1334, fourteen
years before the Great Mortality, the sermon of Venturinus, a
Dominican friar of Bergamo, induced above 10,000 persons to
undertake a new pilgrimage. They scourged themselves in the
churches, and were entertained in the market-places at the public
expense. At Rome, Venturinus was derided, and banished by
the Pope to the mountains of Ricondona. He patiently
endured all—went to the Holy Land, and died at Smyrna,
1346. Hence we see that this fanaticism was a mania of the
middle ages, which, in the year 1349, on so fearful an occasion,
and while still so fresh in remembrance, needed no new founder;
of whom, indeed, all the records are silent. It probably
arose in many places at the same time; for the terror of death,
which pervaded all nations and suddenly set such powerful
impulses in motion, might easily conjure up the fanaticism of
exaggerated and overpowering repentance.
The manner and proceedings of the Flagellants of the
thirteenth and fourteenth centuries exactly resemble each
other. But, if during the Black Plague, simple credulity
came to their aid, which seized, as a consolation, the grossest
delusion of religious enthusiasm, yet it is evident that the
leaders must have been intimately united, and have exercised the
power of a secret association. Besides, the rude band was
generally under the control of men of learning, some of whom at
least certainly had other objects in view independent of those
which ostensibly appeared. Whoever was desirous of joining
the brotherhood, was bound to remain in it thirty-four days, and
to have fourpence per day at his own disposal, so that he might
not be burthensome to any one; if married, he was obliged to have
the sanction of his wife, and give the assurance that he was
reconciled to all men. The Brothers of the Cross were not
permitted to seek for free quarters, or even to enter a house
without having been invited; they were forbidden to converse with
females; and if they transgressed these rules, or acted without
discretion, they were obliged to confess to the Superior, who
sentenced them to several lashes of the scourge, by way of
penance. Ecclesiastics had not, as such, any pre-eminence
among them; according to their original law, which, however, was
often transgressed, they could not become Masters, or take part
in the Secret Councils. Penance was performed twice every
day: in the morning and evening they went abroad in pairs,
singing psalms amid the ringing of the bells; and when they
arrived at the place of flagellation, they stripped the upper
part of their bodies and put off their shoes, keeping on only a
linen dress, reaching from the waist to the ankles. They
then lay down in a large circle, in different positions,
according to the nature of the crime: the adulterer with his face
to the ground; the perjurer on one side, holding up three of his
fingers, &c., and were then castigated, some more and some
less, by the Master, who ordered them to rise in the words of a
prescribed form. Upon this they scourged themselves, amid
the singing of psalms and loud supplications for the averting of
the plague, with genuflexions and other ceremonies, of which
contemporary writers give various accounts; and at the same time
constantly boasted of their penance, that the blood of their
wounds was mingled with that of the Saviour. One of them,
in conclusion, stoop up to read a letter, which it was pretended
an angel had brought from heaven to St. Peter’s Church, at
Jerusalem, stating that Christ, who was sore displeased at the
sins of man, had granted, at the intercession of the Holy Virgin
and of the angels, that all who should wander about for
thirty-four days and scourge themselves, should be partakers of
the Divine grace. This scene caused as great a commotion
among the believers as the finding of the holy spear once did at
Antioch; and if any among the clergy inquired who had sealed the
letter, he was boldly answered, the same who had sealed the
Gospel!
All this had so powerful an effect, that the Church was in
considerable danger; for the Flagellants gained more credit than
the priests, from whom they so entirely withdrew themselves, that
they even absolved each other. Besides, they everywhere
took possession of the churches, and their new songs, which went
from mouth to mouth, operated strongly on the minds of the
people. Great enthusiasm and originally pious feelings are
clearly distinguishable in these hymns, and especially in the
chief psalm of the Cross-bearers, which is still extant, and
which was sung all over Germany in different dialects, and is
probably of a more ancient date. Degeneracy, however, soon
crept in; crimes were everywhere committed; and there was no
energetic man capable of directing the individual excitement to
purer objects, even had an effectual resistance to the tottering
Church been at that early period seasonable, and had it been
possible to restrain the fanaticism. The Flagellants
sometimes undertook to make trial of their power of working
miracles; as in Strasburg, where they attempted, in their own
circle, to resuscitate a dead child: they, however, failed, and
their unskilfulness did them much harm, though they succeeded
here and there in maintaining some confidence in their holy
calling, by pretending to have the power of casting out evil
spirits.
The Brotherhood of the Cross announced that the pilgrimage of
the Flagellants was to continue for a space of thirty-four years;
and many of the Masters had doubtless determined to form a
lasting league against the Church; but they had gone too
far. So early as the first year of their establishment, the
general indignation set bounds to their intrigues: so that the
strict measures adopted by the Emperor Charles IV., and Pope
Clement, who, throughout the whole of this fearful period,
manifested prudence and noble-mindedness, and conducted himself
in a manner every way worthy of his high station, were easily put
into execution.
The Sorbonne, at Paris, and the Emperor Charles, had already
applied to the Holy See for assistance against these formidable
and heretical excesses, which had well-nigh destroyed the
influence of the clergy in every place; when a hundred of the
Brotherhood of the Cross arrived at Avignon from Basle, and
desired admission. The Pope, regardless of the intercession
of several cardinals, interdicted their public penance, which he
had not authorised; and, on pain of excommunication, prohibited
throughout Christendom the continuance of these
pilgrimages. Philip VI., supported by the condemnatory
judgment of the Sorbonne, forbade their reception in
France. Manfred, King of Sicily, at the same time
threatened them with punishment by death; and in the East they
were withstood by several bishops, among whom was Janussius, of
Gnesen, and Preczlaw, of Breslau, who condemned to death one of
their Masters, formerly a deacon; and, in conformity with the
barbarity of the times, had him publicly burnt. In
Westphalia, where so shortly before they had venerated the
Brothers of the Cross, they now persecuted them with relentless
severity; and in the Mark, as well as in all the other countries
of Germany, they pursued them as if they had been the authors of
every misfortune.
The processions of the Brotherhood of the Cross undoubtedly
promoted the spreading of the plague; and it is evident that the
gloomy fanaticism which gave rise to them would infuse a new
poison into the already desponding minds of the people.
Still, however, all this was within the bounds of barbarous
enthusiasm; but horrible were the persecutions of the Jews, which
were committed in most countries, with even greater exasperation
than in the twelfth century, during the first Crusades. In
every destructive pestilence the common people at first attribute
the mortality to poison. No instruction avails; the
supposed testimony of their eyesight is to them a proof, and they
authoritatively demand the victims of their rage. On whom,
then, was it so likely to fall as on the Jews, the usurers and
the strangers who lived at enmity with the Christians? They
were everywhere suspected of having poisoned the wells or
infected the air. They alone were considered as having
brought this fearful mortality upon the Christians. They
were, in consequence, pursued with merciless cruelty; and either
indiscriminately given up to the fury of the populace, or
sentenced by sanguinary tribunals, which, with all the forms of
the law, ordered them to be burnt alive. In times like
these, much is indeed said of guilt and innocence; but hatred and
revenge bear down all discrimination, and the smallest
probability magnifies suspicion into certainty. These
bloody scenes, which disgraced Europe in the fourteenth century,
are a counterpart to a similar mania of the age, which was
manifested in the persecutions of witches and sorcerers; and,
like these, they prove that enthusiasm, associated with hatred,
and leagued with the baser passions, may work more powerfully
upon whole nations than religion and legal order; nay, that it
even knows how to profit by the authority of both, in order the
more surely to satiate with blood the sword of long-suppressed
revenge.
The persecution of the Jews commenced in September and
October, 1348, at Chillon, on the Lake of Geneva, where the first
criminal proceedings were instituted against them, after they had
long before been accused by the people of poisoning the wells;
similar scenes followed in Bern and Freyburg, in January,
1349. Under the influence of excruciating suffering, the
tortured Jews confessed themselves guilty of the crime imputed to
them; and it being affirmed that poison had in fact been found in
a well at Zoffingen, this was deemed a sufficient proof to
convince the world; and the persecution of the abhorred culprits
thus appeared justifiable. Now, though we can take as
little exception at these proceedings as at the multifarious
confessions of witches, because the interrogatories of the
fanatical and sanguinary tribunals were so complicated, that by
means of the rack the required answer must inevitably be
obtained; and it is, besides, conformable to human nature that
crimes which are in everybody’s mouth may, in the end, be
actually committed by some, either from wantonness, revenge, or
desperate exasperation: yet crimes and accusations are, under
circumstances like these, merely the offspring of a revengeful,
frenzied spirit in the people; and the accusers, according to the
fundamental principles of morality, which are the same in every
age, are the more guilty transgressors.
Already in the autumn of 1348 a dreadful panic, caused by this
supposed empoisonment, seized all nations; in Germany especially
the springs and wells were built over, that nobody might drink of
them or employ their contents for culinary purposes; and for a
long time the inhabitants of numerous towns and villages used
only river and rain water. The city gates were also guarded
with the greatest caution: only confidential persons were
admitted; and if medicine or any other article, which might be
supposed to be poisonous, was found in the possession of a
stranger—and it was natural that some should have these
things by them for their private use—they were forced to
swallow a portion of it. By this trying state of privation,
distrust, and suspicion, the hatred against the supposed
poisoners became greatly increased, and often broke out in
popular commotions, which only served still further to infuriate
the wildest passions. The noble and the mean fearlessly
bound themselves by an oath to extirpate the Jews by fire and
sword, and to snatch them from their protectors, of whom the
number was so small, that throughout all Germany but few places
can be mentioned where these unfortunate people were not regarded
as outlaws and martyred and burnt. Solemn summonses were
issued from Bern to the towns of Basle, Freyburg in the Breisgau,
and Strasburg, to pursue the Jews as poisoners. The
burgomasters and senators, indeed, opposed this requisition; but
in Basle the populace obliged them to bind themselves by an oath
to burn the Jews, and to forbid persons of that community from
entering their city for the space of two hundred years.
Upon this all the Jews in Basle, whose number could not have been
inconsiderable, were enclosed in a wooden building, constructed
for the purpose, and burnt together with it, upon the mere outcry
of the people, without sentence or trial, which, indeed, would
have availed them nothing. Soon after the same thing took
place at Freyburg. A regular Diet was held at Bennefeld, in
Alsace, where the bishops, lords, and barons, as also deputies of
the counties and towns, consulted how they should proceed with
regard to the Jews; and when the deputies of Strasburg—not
indeed the bishop of this town, who proved himself a violent
fanatic—spoke in favour of the persecuted, as nothing
criminal was substantiated against them, a great outcry was
raised, and it was vehemently asked, why, if so, they had covered
their wells and removed their buckets. A sanguinary decree
was resolved upon, of which the populace, who obeyed the call of
the nobles and superior clergy, became but the too willing
executioners. Wherever the Jews were not burnt, they were
at least banished; and so being compelled to wander about, they
fell into the hands of the country people, who, without humanity,
and regardless of all laws, persecuted them with fire and
sword. At Spires, the Jews, driven to despair, assembled in
their own habitations, which they set on fire, and thus consumed
themselves with their families. The few that remained were
forced to submit to baptism; while the dead bodies of the
murdered, which lay about the streets, were put into empty
wine-casks and rolled into the Rhine, lest they should infect the
air. The mob was forbidden to enter the ruins of the
habitations that were burnt in the Jewish quarter; for the senate
itself caused search to be made for the treasure, which is said
to have been very considerable. At Strasburg two thousand
Jews were burnt alive in their own burial-ground, where a large
scaffold had been erected: a few who promised to embrace
Christianity were spared, and their children taken from the
pile. The youth and beauty of several females also excited
some commiseration, and they were snatched from death against
their will; many, however, who forcibly made their escape from
the flames were murdered in the streets.
The senate ordered all pledges and bonds to be returned to the
debtors, and divided the money among the work-people. Many,
however, refused to accept the base price of blood, and,
indignant at the scenes of bloodthirsty avarice, which made the
infuriated multitude forget that the plague was raging around
them, presented it to monasteries, in conformity with the advice
of their confessors. In all the countries on the Rhine,
these cruelties continued to be perpetrated during the succeeding
months; and after quiet was in some degree restored, the people
thought to render an acceptable service to God, by taking the
bricks of the destroyed dwellings, and the tombstones of the
Jews, to repair churches and to erect belfries.
In Mayence alone, 12,000 Jews are said to have been put to a
cruel death. The Flagellants entered that place in August;
the Jews, on this occasion, fell out with the Christians and
killed several; but when they saw their inability to withstand
the increasing superiority of their enemies, and that nothing
could save them from destruction, they consumed themselves and
their families by setting fire to their dwellings. Thus
also, in other places, the entry of the Flagellants gave rise to
scenes of slaughter; and as thirst for blood was everywhere
combined with an unbridled spirit of proselytism, a fanatic zeal
arose among the Jews to perish as martyrs to their ancient
religion. And how was it possible that they could from the
heart embrace Christianity, when its precepts were never more
outrageously violated? At Eslingen the whole Jewish
community burned themselves in their synagogue, and mothers were
often seen throwing their children on the pile, to prevent their
being baptised, and then precipitating themselves into the
flames. In short, whatever deeds fanaticism, revenge,
avarice and desperation, in fearful combination, could instigate
mankind to perform,—and where in such a case is the
limit?—were executed in the year 1349 throughout Germany,
Italy, and France, with impunity, and in the eyes of all the
world. It seemed as if the plague gave rise to scandalous
acts and frantic tumults, not to mourning and grief; and the
greater part of those who, by their education and rank, were
called upon to raise the voice of reason, themselves led on the
savage mob to murder and to plunder. Almost all the Jews
who saved their lives by baptism were afterwards burnt at
different times; for they continued to be accused of poisoning
the water and the air. Christians also, whom philanthropy
or gain had induced to offer them protection, were put on the
rack and executed with them. Many Jews who had embraced
Christianity repented of their apostacy, and, returning to their
former faith, sealed it with their death.
The humanity and prudence of Clement VI. must, on this
occasion, also be mentioned to his honour; but even the highest
ecclesiastical power was insufficient to restrain the unbridled
fury of the people. He not only protected the Jews at
Avignon, as far as lay in his power, but also issued two bulls,
in which he declared them innocent; and admonished all
Christians, though without success, to cease from such groundless
persecutions. The Emperor Charles IV. was also favourable
to them, and sought to avert their destruction wherever he could;
but he dared not draw the sword of justice, and even found
himself obliged to yield to the selfishness of the Bohemian
nobles, who were unwilling to forego so favourable an opportunity
of releasing themselves from their Jewish creditors, under favour
of an imperial mandate. Duke Albert of Austria burnt and
pillaged those of his cities which had persecuted the
Jews—a vain and inhuman proceeding, which, moreover, is not
exempt from the suspicion of covetousness; yet he was unable, in
his own fortress of Kyberg, to protect some hundreds of Jews, who
had been received there, from being barbarously burnt by the
inhabitants. Several other princes and counts, among whom
was Ruprecht von der Pfalz, took the Jews under their protection,
on the payment of large sums: in consequence of which they were
called “Jew-masters,” and were in danger of being
attacked by the populace and by their powerful neighbours.
These persecuted and ill-used people, except indeed where humane
individuals took compassion on them at their own peril, or when
they could command riches to purchase protection, had no place of
refuge left but the distant country of Lithuania, where Boleslav
V., Duke of Poland (1227-1279) had before granted them liberty of
conscience; and King Casimir the Great (1333-1370), yielding to
the entreaties of Esther, a favourite Jewess, received them, and
granted them further protection; on which account, that country
is still inhabited by a great number of Jews, who by their
secluded habits have, more than any people in Europe, retained
the manners of the Middle Ages.
But to return to the fearful accusations against the Jews; it
was reported in all Europe that they were in connection with
secret superiors in Toledo, to whose decrees they were subject,
and from whom they had received commands respecting the coining
of base money, poisoning, the murder of Christian children,
&c; that they received the poison by sea from remote parts,
and also prepared it themselves from spiders, owls, and other
venomous animals; but, in order that their secret might not be
discovered, that it was known only to their Rabbis and rich
men. Apparently there were but few who did not consider
this extravagant accusation well founded; indeed, in many
writings of the fourteenth century, we find great acrimony with
regard to the suspected poison-mixers, which plainly demonstrates
the prejudice existing against them. Unhappily, after the
confessions of the first victims in Switzerland, the rack
extorted similar ones in various places. Some even
acknowledged having received poisonous powder in bags, and
injunctions from Toledo, by secret messengers. Bags of this
description were also often found in wells, though it was not
unfrequently discovered that the Christians themselves had thrown
them in; probably to give occasion to murder and pillage; similar
instances of which may be found in the persecutions of the
witches.
This picture needs no additions. A lively image of the
Black Plague, and of the moral evil which followed in its train,
will vividly represent itself to him who is acquainted with
nature and the constitution of society. Almost the only
credible accounts of the manner of living, and of the ruin which
occurred in private life during this pestilence, are from Italy;
and these may enable us to form a just estimate of the general
state of families in Europe, taking into consideration what is
peculiar in the manners of each country.
“When the evil had become universal” (speaking of
Florence), “the hearts of all the inhabitants were closed
to feelings of humanity. They fled from the sick and all
that belonged to them, hoping by these means to save
themselves. Others shut themselves up in their houses, with
their wives, their children and households, living on the most
costly food, but carefully avoiding all excess. None were
allowed access to them; no intelligence of death or sickness was
permitted to reach their ears; and they spent their time in
singing and music, and other pastimes. Others, on the
contrary, considered eating and drinking to excess, amusements of
all descriptions, the indulgence of every gratification, and an
indifference to what was passing around them, as the best
medicine, and acted accordingly. They wandered day and
night from one tavern to another, and feasted without moderation
or bounds. In this way they endeavoured to avoid all
contact with the sick, and abandoned their houses and property to
chance, like men whose death-knell had already tolled.
“Amid this general lamentation and woe, the influence
and authority of every law, human and divine, vanished.
Most of those who were in office had been carried off by the
plague, or lay sick, or had lost so many members of their family,
that they were unable to attend to their duties; so that
thenceforth every one acted as he thought proper. Others in
their mode of living chose a middle course. They ate and
drank what they pleased, and walked abroad, carrying odoriferous
flowers, herbs, or spices, which they smelt to from time to time,
in order to invigorate the brain, and to avert the baneful
influence of the air, infected by the sick and by the innumerable
corpses of those who had died of the plague. Others carried
their precaution still further, and thought the surest way to
escape death was by flight. They therefore left the city;
women as well as men abandoning their dwellings and their
relations, and retiring into the country. But of these also
many were carried off, most of them alone and deserted by all the
world, themselves having previously set the example. Thus
it was that one citizen fled from another—a neighbour from
his neighbours—a relation from his relations; and in the
end, so completely had terror extinguished every kindlier
feeling, that the brother forsook the brother—the sister
the sister—the wife her husband; and at last, even the
parent his own offspring, and abandoned them, unvisited and
unsoothed, to their fate. Those, therefore, that stood in
need of assistance fell a prey to greedy attendants, who, for an
exorbitant recompense, merely handed the sick their food and
medicine, remained with them in their last moments, and then not
unfrequently became themselves victims to their avarice and lived
not to enjoy their extorted gain. Propriety and decorum
were extinguished among the helpless sick. Females of rank
seemed to forget their natural bashfulness, and committed the
care of their persons, indiscriminately, to men and women of the
lowest order. No longer were women, relatives or friends,
found in the house of mourning, to share the grief of the
survivors—no longer was the corpse accompanied to the grave
by neighbours and a numerous train of priests, carrying wax
tapers and singing psalms, nor was it borne along by other
citizens of equal rank. Many breathed their last without a
friend to soothe their dying pillow; and few indeed were they who
departed amid the lamentations and tears of their friends and
kindred. Instead of sorrow and mourning, appeared
indifference, frivolity and mirth; this being considered,
especially by the females, as conducive to health. Seldom
was the body followed by even ten or twelve attendants; and
instead of the usual bearers and sextons, mercenaries of the
lowest of the populace undertook the office for the sake of gain;
and accompanied by only a few priests, and often without a single
taper, it was borne to the very nearest church, and lowered into
the grave that was not already too full to receive it.
Among the middling classes, and especially among the poor, the
misery was still greater. Poverty or negligence induced
most of these to remain in their dwellings, or in the immediate
neighbourhood; and thus they fell by thousands; and many ended
their lives in the streets by day and by night. The stench
of putrefying corpses was often the first indication to their
neighbours that more deaths had occurred. The survivors, to
preserve themselves from infection, generally had the bodies
taken out of the houses and laid before the doors; where the
early morning found them in heaps, exposed to the affrighted gaze
of the passing stranger. It was no longer possible to have
a bier for every corpse—three or four were generally laid
together—husband and wife, father and mother, with two or
three children, were frequently borne to the grave on the same
bier; and it often happened that two priests would accompany a
coffin, bearing the cross before it, and be joined on the way by
several other funerals; so that instead of one, there were five
or six bodies for interment.”
Thus far Boccacio. On the conduct of the priests,
another contemporary observes: “In large and small towns
they had withdrawn themselves through fear, leaving the
performance of ecclesiastical duties to the few who were found
courageous and faithful enough to undertake them.”
But we ought not on that account to throw more blame on them than
on others; for we find proofs of the same timidity and
heartlessness in every class. During the prevalence of the
Black Plague, the charitable orders conducted themselves
admirably, and did as much good as can be done by individual
bodies in times of great misery and destruction, when compassion,
courage, and the nobler feelings are found but in the few, while
cowardice, selfishness and ill-will, with the baser passions in
their train, assert the supremacy. In place of virtue which
had been driven from the earth, wickedness everywhere reared her
rebellious standard, and succeeding generations were consigned to
the dominion of her baleful tyranny.
If we now turn to the medical talent which encountered the
“Great Mortality,” the Middle Ages must stand
excused, since even the moderns are of opinion that the art of
medicine is not able to cope with the Oriental plague, and can
afford deliverance from it only under particularly favourable
circumstances. We must bear in mind, also, that human
science and art appear particularly weak in great pestilences,
because they have to contend with the powers of nature, of which
they have no knowledge; and which, if they had been, or could be,
comprehended in their collective effects, would remain
uncontrollable by them, principally on account of the disordered
condition of human society. Moreover, every new plague has
its peculiarities, which are the less easily discovered on first
view because, during its ravages, fear and consternation humble
the proud spirit.
The physicians of the fourteenth century, during the Black
Death, did what human intellect could do in the actual condition
of the healing art; and their knowledge of the disease was by no
means despicable. They, like the rest of mankind, have
indulged in prejudices, and defended them, perhaps, with too much
obstinacy: some of these, however, were founded on the mode of
thinking of the age, and passed current in those days as
established truths; others continue to exist to the present
hour.
Their successors in the nineteenth century ought not therefore
to vaunt too highly the pre-eminence of their knowledge, for they
too will be subjected to the severe judgment of
posterity—they too will, with reason, be accused of human
weakness and want of foresight.
The medical faculty of Paris, the most celebrated of the
fourteenth century, were commissioned to deliver their opinion on
the causes of the Black Plague, and to furnish some appropriate
regulations with regard to living during its prevalence.
This document is sufficiently remarkable to find a place
here.
“We, the Members of the College of Physicians of Paris,
have, after mature consideration and consultation on the present
mortality, collected the advice of our old masters in the art,
and intend to make known the causes of this pestilence more
clearly than could be done according to the rules and principles
of astrology and natural science; we, therefore, declare as
follows:—
“It is known that in India and the vicinity of the Great
Sea, the constellations which combated the rays of the sun, and
the warmth of the heavenly fire, exerted their power especially
against that sea, and struggled violently with its waters.
(Hence vapours often originate which envelop the sun, and convert
his light into darkness.) These vapours alternately rose
and fell for twenty-eight days; but, at last, sun and fire acted
so powerfully upon the sea that they attracted a great portion of
it to themselves, and the waters of the ocean arose in the form
of vapour; thereby the waters were in some parts so corrupted
that the fish which they contained died. These corrupted
waters, however, the heat of the sun could not consume, neither
could other wholesome water, hail or snow and dew, originate
therefrom. On the contrary, this vapour spread itself
through the air in many places on the earth, and enveloped them
in fog.
“Such was the case all over Arabia, in a part of India,
in Crete, in the plains and valleys of Macedonia, in Hungary,
Albania, and Sicily. Should the same thing occur in
Sardinia, not a man will be left alive, and the like will
continue so long as the sun remains in the sign of Leo, on all
the islands and adjoining countries to which this corrupted
sea-wind extends, or has already extended, from India. If
the inhabitants of those parts do not employ and adhere to the
following or similar means and precepts, we announce to them
inevitable death, except the grace of Christ preserve their
lives.
“We are of opinion that the constellations, with the aid
of nature, strive by virtue of their Divine might, to protect and
heal the human race; and to this end, in union with the rays of
the sun, acting through the power of fire, endeavour to break
through the mist. Accordingly, within the next ten days,
and until the 17th of the ensuing month of July, this mist will
be converted into a stinking deleterious rain, whereby the air
will be much purified. Now, as soon as this rain shall
announce itself by thunder or hail, every one of you should
protect himself from the air; and, as well before as after the
rain, kindle a large fire of vine-wood, green laurel, or other
green wood; wormwood and camomile should also be burnt in great
quantity in the market-places, in other densely inhabited
localities, and in the houses. Until the earth is again
completely dry, and for three days afterwards, no one ought to go
abroad in the fields. During this time the diet should be
simple, and people should be cautious in avoiding exposure in the
cool of the evening, at night, and in the morning. Poultry
and water-fowl, young pork, old beef, and fat meat in general,
should not be eaten; but, on the contrary, meat of a proper age,
of a warm and dry, but on no account of a heating and exciting
nature. Broth should be taken, seasoned with ground pepper,
ginger, and cloves, especially by those who are accustomed to
live temperately, and are yet choice in their diet. Sleep
in the day-time is detrimental; it should be taken at night until
sunrise, or somewhat longer. At breakfast one should drink
little; supper should be taken an hour before sunset, when more
may be drunk than in the morning. Clear light wine, mixed
with a fifth or six part of water, should be used as a
beverage. Dried or fresh fruits, with wine, are not
injurious, but highly so without it. Beet-root and other
vegetables, whether eaten pickled or fresh, are hurtful; on the
contrary, spicy pot-herbs, as sage or rosemary, are
wholesome. Cold, moist, watery food in is general
prejudicial. Going out at night, and even until three
o’clock in the morning, is dangerous, on account of
dew. Only small river fish should be used. Too much
exercise is hurtful. The body should be kept warmer than
usual, and thus protected from moisture and cold.
Rain-water must not be employed in cooking, and every one should
guard against exposure to wet weather. If it rain, a little
fine treacle should be taken after dinner. Fat people
should not sit in the sunshine. Good clear wine should be
selected and drunk often, but in small quantities, by day.
Olive oil as an article of food is fatal. Equally injurious
are fasting and excessive abstemiousness, anxiety of mind, anger,
and immoderate drinking. Young people, in autumn
especially, must abstain from all these things if they do not
wish to run a risk of dying of dysentery. In order to keep
the body properly open, an enema, or some other simple means,
should be employed when necessary. Bathing is
injurious. Men must preserve chastity as they value their
lives. Every one should impress this on his recollection,
but especially those who reside on the coast, or upon an island
into which the noxious wind has penetrated.”
On what occasion these strange precepts were delivered can no
longer be ascertained, even if it were an object to know
it. It must be acknowledged, however, that they do not
redound to the credit either of the faculty of Paris, or of the
fourteenth century in general. This famous faculty found
themselves under the painful necessity of being wise at command,
and of firing a point-blank shot of erudition at an enemy who
enveloped himself in a dark mist, of the nature of which they had
no conception. In concealing their ignorance by
authoritative assertions, they suffered themselves, therefore, to
be misled; and while endeavouring to appear to the world with
éclat, only betrayed to the intelligent their
lamentable weakness. Now some might suppose that, in the
condition of the sciences of the fourteenth century, no
intelligent physicians existed; but this is altogether at
variance with the laws of human advancement, and is contradicted
by history. The real knowledge of an age is shown only in
the archives of its literature. Here alone the genius of
truth speaks audibly—here alone men of talent deposit the
results of their experience and reflection without vanity or a
selfish object. There is no ground for believing that in
the fourteenth century men of this kind were publicly questioned
regarding their views; and it is, therefore, the more necessary
that impartial history should take up their cause, and do justice
to their merits.
The first notice on this subject is due to a very celebrated
teacher in Perugia, Gentilis of Foligno, who, on the 18th of
June, 1348, fell a sacrifice to the plague, in the faithful
discharge of his duty. Attached to Arabian doctrines, and
to the universally respected Galen, he, in common with all his
contemporaries, believed in a putrid corruption of the blood in
the lungs and in the heart, which was occasioned by the
pestilential atmosphere, and was forthwith communicated to the
whole body. He thought, therefore, that everything depended
upon a sufficient purification of the air, by means of large
blazing fires of odoriferous wood, in the vicinity of the healthy
as well as of the sick, and also upon an appropriate manner of
living, so that the putridity might not overpower the
diseased. In conformity with notions derived from the
ancients, he depended upon bleeding and purging, at the
commencement of the attack, for the purpose of purification;
ordered the healthy to wash themselves frequently with vinegar or
wine, to sprinkle their dwellings with vinegar, and to smell
often to camphor, or other volatile substances. Hereupon he
gave, after the Arabian fashion, detailed rules, with an
abundance of different medicines, of whose healing powers
wonderful things were believed. He had little stress upon
super-lunar influences, so far as respected the malady itself; on
which account, he did not enter into the great controversies of
the astrologers, but always kept in view, as an object of medical
attention, the corruption of the blood in the lungs and
heart. He believed in a progressive infection from country
to country, according to the notions of the present day; and the
contagious power of the disease, even in the vicinity of those
affected by plague, was, in his opinion, beyond all doubt.
On this point intelligent contemporaries were all agreed; and, in
truth, it required no great genius to be convinced of so palpable
a fact. Besides, correct notions of contagion have
descended from remote antiquity, and were maintained unchanged in
the fourteenth century. So far back as the age of Plato a
knowledge of the contagious power of malignant inflammations of
the eye, of which also no physician of the Middle Ages
entertained a doubt, was general among the people; yet in modern
times surgeons have filled volumes with partial controversies on
this subject. The whole language of antiquity has adapted
itself to the notions of the people respecting the contagion of
pestilential diseases; and their terms were, beyond comparison,
more expressive than those in use among the moderns.
Arrangements for the protection of the healthy against
contagious diseases, the necessity of which is shown from these
notions, were regarded by the ancients as useful; and by man,
whose circumstances permitted it, were carried into effect in
their houses. Even a total separation of the sick from the
healthy, that indispensable means of protection against infection
by contact, was proposed by physicians of the second century
after Christ, in order to check the spreading of leprosy.
But it was decidedly opposed, because, as it was alleged, the
healing art ought not to be guilty of such harshness. This
mildness of the ancients, in whose manner of thinking inhumanity
was so often and so undisguisedly conspicuous, might excite
surprise if it were anything more than apparent. The true
ground of the neglect of public protection against pestilential
diseases lay in the general notion and constitution of human
society—it lay in the disregard of human life, of which the
great nations of antiquity have given proofs in every page of
their history. Let it not be supposed that they wanted
knowledge respecting the propagation of contagious
diseases. On the contrary, they were as well informed on
this subject as the modern; but this was shown where individual
property, not where human life, on the grand scale was to be
protected. Hence the ancients made a general practice of
arresting the progress of murrains among cattle by a separation
of the diseased from the healthy. Their herds alone enjoyed
that protection which they held it impracticable to extend to
human society, because they had no wish to do so. That the
governments in the fourteenth century were not yet so far
advanced as to put into practice general regulations for checking
the plague needs no especial proof. Physicians could,
therefore, only advise public purifications of the air by means
of large fires, as had often been practised in ancient times; and
they were obliged to leave it to individual families either to
seek safety in flight, or to shut themselves up in their
dwellings, a method which answers in common plagues, but which
here afforded no complete security, because such was the fury of
the disease when it was at its height, that the atmosphere of
whole cities was penetrated by the infection.
Of the astral influence which was considered to have
originated the “Great Mortality,” physicians and
learned men were as completely convinced as of the fact of its
reality. A grand conjunction of the three superior planets,
Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars, in the sign of Aquarius, which took
place, according to Guy de Chauliac, on the 24th of March, 1345,
was generally received as its principal cause. In fixing
the day, this physician, who was deeply versed in astrology, did
not agree with others; whereupon there arose various
disputations, of weight in that age, but of none in ours.
People, however, agree in this—that conjunctions of the
planets infallibly prognosticated great events; great revolutions
of kingdoms, new prophets, destructive plagues, and other
occurrences which bring distress and horror on mankind. No
medical author of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries omits an
opportunity of representing them as among the general prognostics
of great plagues; nor can we, for our part, regard the astrology
of the Middle Ages as a mere offspring of superstition. It
has not only, in common with all ideas which inspire and guide
mankind, a high historical importance, entirely independent of
its error or truth—for the influence of both is equally
powerful—but there are also contained in it, as in alchemy,
grand thoughts of antiquity, of which modern natural philosophy
is so little ashamed that she claims them as her property.
Foremost among these is the idea of general life which diffuses
itself throughout the whole universe, expressed by the greatest
Greek sages, and transmitted to the Middle Ages, through the new
Platonic natural philosophy. To this impression of an
universal organism, the assumption of a reciprocal influence of
terrestrial bodies could not be foreign, nor did this cease to
correspond with a higher view of nature, until astrologers
overstepped the limits of human knowledge with frivolous and
mystical calculations.
Guy de Chauliac considers the influence of the conjunction,
which was held to be all-potent, as the chief general cause of
the Black Plague; and the diseased state of bodies, the
corruption of the fluids, debility, obstruction, and so forth, as
the especial subordinate causes. By these, according to his
opinion, the quality of the air, and of the other elements, was
so altered that they set poisonous fluids in motion towards the
inward parts of the body, in the same manner as the magnet
attracts iron; whence there arose in the commencement fever and
the spitting of blood; afterwards, however, a deposition in the
form on glandular swellings and inflammatory boils. Herein
the notion of an epidemic constitution was set forth clearly, and
conformably to the spirit of the age. Of contagion, Guy de
Chauliac was completely convinced. He sought to protect
himself against it by the usual means; and it was probably he who
advised Pope Clement VI. to shut himself up while the plague
lasted. The preservation of this Pope’s life,
however, was most beneficial to the city of Avignon, for he
loaded the poor with judicious acts of kindness, took care to
have proper attendants provided, and paid physicians himself to
afford assistance wherever human aid could avail—an
advantage which, perhaps, no other city enjoyed. Nor was
the treatment of plague-patients in Avignon by any means
objectionable; for, after the usual depletions by bleeding and
aperients, where circumstances required them, they endeavoured to
bring the buboes to suppuration; they made incisions into the
inflammatory boils, or burned them with a red-hot iron, a
practice which at all times proves salutary, and in the Black
Plague saved many lives. In this city, the Jews, who lived
in a state of the greatest filth, were most severely visited, as
also the Spaniards, whom Chalin accuses of great
intemperance.
Still more distinct notions on the causes of the plague were
stated to his contemporaries in the fourteenth century by
Galeazzo di Santa Sofia, a learned man, a native of Padua, who
likewise treated plague-patients at Vienna, though in what year
is undetermined. He distinguishes carefully
pestilence from epidemy and endemy.
The common notion of the two first accords exactly with that of
an epidemic constitution, for both consist, according to him, in
an unknown change or corruption of the air; with this difference,
that pestilence calls forth diseases of different kinds; epidemy,
on the contrary, always the same disease. As an example of
an epidemy, he adduces a cough (influenza) which was observed in
all climates at the same time without perceptible cause; but he
recognised the approach of a pestilence, independently of unusual
natural phenomena, by the more frequent occurrence of various
kinds of fever, to which the modern physicians would assign a
nervous and putrid character. The endemy originates,
according to him, only in local telluric changes—in
deleterious influences which develop themselves in the earth and
in the water, without a corruption of the air. These
notions were variously jumbled together in his time, like
everything which human understanding separates by too fine a line
of limitation. The estimation of cosmical influences,
however, in the epidemy and pestilence, is well worthy of
commendation; and Santa Sofia, in this respect, not only agrees
with the most intelligent persons of the fourteenth and fifteenth
centuries, but he has also promulgated an opinion which must,
even now, serve as a foundation for our scarcely commenced
investigations into cosmical influences. Pestilence and
epidemy consist not in alterations of the four primary qualities,
but in a corruption of the air, powerful, though quite
immaterial, and not cognoscible by the senses—(corruptio
aëris non substantialis, sed qualitativa) in a disproportion
of the imponderables in the atmosphere, as it would be expressed
by the moderns. The causes of the pestilence and epidemy
are, first of all, astral influences, especially on occasions of
planetary conjunctions; then extensive putrefaction of animal and
vegetable bodies, and terrestrial corruptions (corruptio in
terra): to which also bad diet and want may contribute.
Santa Sofia considers the putrefaction of locusts, that had
perished in the sea and were again thrown up, combined with
astral and terrestrial influences, as the cause of the pestilence
in the eventful year of the “Great Mortality.”
All the fevers which were called forth by the pestilence are,
according to him, of the putrid kind; for they originate
principally from putridity of the heart’s blood, which
inevitably follows the inhalation of infected air. The
Oriental Plague is, sometimes, but by no means always occasioned
by pestilence (?), which imparts to it a character
(qualitas occulta) hostile to human nature. It
originates frequently from other causes, among which this
physician was aware that contagion was to be reckoned; and it
deserves to be remarked that he held epidemic small-pox and
measles to be infallible forerunners of the plague, as do the
physicians and people of the East at the present day.
In the exposition of his therapeutical views of the plague, a
clearness of intellect is again shown by Santa Sofia, which
reflects credit on the age. It seemed to him to depend,
1st, on an evacuation of putrid matters by purgatives and
bleeding; yet he did not sanction the employment of these means
indiscriminately and without consideration; least of all where
the condition of the blood was healthy. He also declared
himself decidedly against bleeding ad deliquium
(venæ sectio eradicativa). 2nd, Strengthening
of the heart and prevention of putrescence. 3rd,
Appropriate regimen. 4th, Improvement of the air.
5th, Appropriate treatment of tumid glands and inflammatory
boils, with emollient, or even stimulating poultices (mustard,
lily-bulbs), as well as with red-hot gold and iron. Lastly,
6th, Attention to prominent symptoms. The stores of the
Arabian pharmacy, which he brought into action to meet all these
indications, were indeed very considerable; it is to be observed,
however, that, for the most part, gentle means were accumulated,
which, in case of abuse, would do no harm: for the character of
the Arabian system of medicine, whose principles were everywhere
followed at this time, was mildness and caution. On this
account, too, we cannot believe that a very prolix treatise by
Marsigli di Santa Sofia, a contemporary relative of Galeazzo, on
the prevention and treatment of plague, can have caused much
harm, although perhaps, even in the fourteenth century, an
agreeable latitude and confident assertions respecting things
which no mortal has investigated, or which it is quite a matter
of indifference to distinguish, were considered as proofs of a
valuable practical talent.
The agreement of contemporary and later writers shows that the
published views of the most celebrated physicians of the
fourteenth century were those generally adopted. Among
these, Chalin de Vinario is the most experienced. Though
devoted to astrology still more than his distinguished
contemporary, he acknowledges the great power of terrestrial
influences, and expresses himself very sensibly on the
indisputable doctrine of contagion, endeavouring thereby to
apologise for many surgeons and physicians of his time who
neglected their duty. He asserted boldly and with truth,
“that all epidemic diseases might become contagious,
and all fevers epidemic,” which attentive observers
of all subsequent ages have confirmed.
He delivered his sentiments on blood-letting with sagacity, as
an experienced physician; yet he was unable, as may be imagined,
to moderate the desire for bleeding shown by the ignorant
monks. He was averse to draw blood from the veins of
patients under fourteen years of age; but counteracted
inflammatory excitement in them by cupping, and endeavoured to
moderate the inflammation of the tumid glands by leeches.
Most of those who were bled, died; he therefore reserved this
remedy for the plethoric; especially for the papal courtiers and
the hypocritical priests, whom he saw gratifying their sensual
desires, and imitating Epicurus, whilst they pompously pretended
to follow Christ. He recommended burning the boils with a
red-hot iron only in the plague without fever, which occurred in
single cases; and was always ready to correct those over-hasty
surgeons who, with fire and violent remedies, did irremediable
injury to their patients. Michael Savonarola, professor in
Ferrara (1462), reasoning on the susceptibility of the human
frame to the influence of pestilential infection, as the cause of
such various modifications of disease, expresses himself as a
modern physician would on this point; and an adoption of the
principle of contagion was the foundation of his definition of
the plague. No less worthy of observation are the views of
the celebrated Valescus of Taranta, who, during the final
visitation of the Black Death, in 1382, practised as a physician
at Montpellier, and handed down to posterity what has been
repeated in innumerable treatises on plague, which were written
during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
Of all these notions and views regarding the plague, whose
development we have represented, there are two especially, which
are prominent in historical importance:—1st, The opinion of
learned physicians, that the pestilence, or epidemic
constitution, is the parent of various kinds of disease; that the
plague sometimes, indeed, but by no means always, originates from
it: that, to speak in the language of the moderns, the pestilence
bears the same relation to contagion that a predisposing cause
does to an occasional cause; and 2ndly, the universal conviction
of the contagious power of that disease.
Contagion gradually attracted more notice: it was thought that
in it the most powerful occasional cause might be avoided; the
possibility of protecting whole cities by separation became
gradually more evident; and so horrifying was the recollection of
the eventful year of the “Great Mortality,” that
before the close of the fourteenth century, ere the ill effects
of the Black Plague had ceased, nations endeavoured to guard
against the return of this enemy by an earnest and effectual
defence.
The first regulation which was issued for this purpose,
originated with Viscount Bernabo, and is dated the 17th January,
1374. “Every plague-patient was to be taken out of
the city into the fields, there to die or to recover. Those
who attended upon a plague-patient, were to remain apart for ten
days before they again associated with anybody. The priests
were to examine the diseased, and point out to special
commissioners the persons infected, under punishment of the
confiscation of their goods and of being burned alive.
Whoever imported the plague, the state condemned his goods to
confiscation. Finally, none except those who were appointed
for that purpose were to attend plague-patients, under penalty of
death and confiscation.”
These orders, in correspondence with the spirit of the
fourteenth century, are sufficiently decided to indicate a
recollection of the good effects of confinement, and of keeping
at a distance those suspected of having plague. It was said
that Milan itself, by a rigorous barricade of three houses in
which the plague had broken out, maintained itself free from the
“Great Mortality” for a considerable time; and
examples of the preservation of individual families, by means of
a strict separation, were certainly very frequent. That
these orders must have caused universal affliction from their
uncommon severity, as we know to have been especially the case in
the city of Reggio, may be easily conceived; but Bernabo did not
suffer himself to be deterred from his purpose by fear—on
the contrary, when the plague returned in the year 1383, he
forbade the admission of people from infected places into his
territories on pain of death. We have now, it is true, no
account how far he succeeded; yet it is to be supposed that he
arrested the disease, for it had long lost the property of the
Black Death, to spread abroad in the air the contagious matter
which proceeded from the lungs, charged with putridity, and to
taint the atmosphere of whole cities by the vast numbers of the
sick. Now that it had resumed its milder form, so that it
infected only by contact, it admitted being confined within
individual dwellings, as easily as in modern times.
Bernabo’s example was imitated; nor was there any
century more appropriate for recommending to governments strong
regulations against the plague that the fourteenth; for when it
broke out in Italy, in the year 1399, and still demanded new
victims, it was for the sixteenth time, without reckoning
frequent visitations of measles and small-pox. In this same
year, Viscount John, in milder terms than his predecessor,
ordered that no stranger should be admitted from infected places,
and that the city gates should be strictly guarded.
Infected houses were to be ventilated for at least eight or ten
days, and purified from noxious vapours by fires, and by
fumigations with balsamic and aromatic substances. Straw,
rags, and the like were to be burned; and the bedsteads which had
been used, set out for four days in the rain or the sunshine, so
that by means of the one or the other, the morbific vapour might
be destroyed. No one was to venture to make use of clothes
or beds out of infected dwellings unless they had been previously
washed and dried either at the fire or in the sun. People
were, likewise, to avoid, as long as possible, occupying houses
which had been frequented by plague-patients.
We cannot precisely perceive in these an advance towards
general regulations; and perhaps people were convinced of the
insurmountable impediments which opposed the separation of open
inland countries, where bodies of people connected together could
not be brought, even by the most obdurate severity, to renounce
the habit of profitable intercourse.
Doubtless it is nature which has done the most to banish the
Oriental plague from western Europe, where the increasing
cultivation of the earth, and the advancing order in civilised
society, have prevented it from remaining domesticated, which it
most probably was in the more ancient times.
In the fifteenth century, during which it broke out seventeen
times in different places in Europe, it was of the more
consequence to oppose a barrier to its entrance from Asia,
Africa, and Greece (which had become Turkish); for it would have
been difficult for it to maintain itself indigenously any
longer. Among the southern commercial states, however,
which were called on to make the greatest exertions to this end,
it was principally Venice, formerly so severely attacked by the
Black Plague, that put the necessary restraint upon perilous
profits of the merchant. Until towards the end of the
fifteenth century, the very considerable intercourse with the
East was free and unimpeded. Ships of commercial cities had
often brought over the plague: nay, the former irruption of the
“Great Mortality” itself had been occasioned by
navigators. For, as in the latter end of autumn, 1347, four
ships full of plague-patients returned from the Levant to Genoa,
the disease spread itself there with astonishing rapidity.
On this account, in the following year, the Genoese forbade the
entrance of suspected ships into their port. These sailed
to Pisa and other cities on the coast, where already nature had
made such mighty preparations for the reception of the Black
Plague, and what we have already described took place in
consequence.
In the year 1485, when, among the cities of northern Italy,
Milan especially felt the scourge of the plague, a special
Council of Health, consisting of three nobles, was established at
Venice, who probably tried everything in their power to prevent
the entrance of this disease, and gradually called into activity
all those regulations which have served in later times as a
pattern for the other southern states of Europe. Their
endeavours were, however, not crowned with complete success; on
which account their powers were increased, in the year 1504, by
granting them the right of life and death over those who violated
the regulations. Bills of health were probably first
introduced in the year 1527, during a fatal plague which visited
Italy for five years (1525-30), and called forth redoubled
caution.
The first lazarettos were established upon islands at some
distance from the city, seemingly as early as the year
1485. Here all strangers coming from places where the
existence of plague was suspected were detained. If it
appeared in the city itself, the sick were despatched with their
families to what was called the Old Lazaretto, were there
furnished with provisions and medicines, and when they were
cured, were detained, together with all those who had had
intercourse with them, still forty days longer in the New
Lazaretto, situated on another island. All these
regulations were every year improved, and their needful rigour
was increased, so that from the year 1585 onwards, no appeal was
allowed from the sentence of the Council of Health; and the other
commercial nations gradually came to the support of the
Venetians, by adopting corresponding regulations. Bills of
health, however, were not general until the year 1665.
The appointment of a forty days’ detention, whence
quarantines derive their name, was not dictated by caprice, but
probably had a medical origin, which is derivable in part from
the doctrine of critical days; for the fortieth day, according to
the most ancient notions, has been always regarded as the last of
ardent diseases, and the limit of separation between these and
those which are chronic. It was the custom to subject
lying-in women for forty days to a more exact
superintendence. There was a good deal also said in medical
works of forty-day epochs in the formation of the foetus, not to
mention that the alchemists expected more durable revolutions in
forty days, which period they called the philosophical month.
This period being generally held to prevail in natural
processes, it appeared reasonable to assume, and legally to
establish it, as that required for the development of latent
principles of contagion, since public regulations cannot dispense
with decisions of this kind, even though they should not be
wholly justified by the nature of the case. Great stress
has likewise been laid on theological and legal grounds, which
were certainly of greater weight in the fifteenth century than in
the modern times.
On this matter, however, we cannot decide, since our only
object here is to point out the origin of a political means of
protection against a disease which has been the greatest
impediment to civilisation within the memory of man; a means
that, like Jenner’s vaccine, after the small-pox had
ravaged Europe for twelve hundred years, has diminished the check
which mortality puts on the progress of civilisation, and thus
given to the life and manners of the nations of this part of the
world a new direction, the result of which we cannot
foretell.