At one time Oxford books were produced
almost always at the instance of an
author; and many Oxford books are
still so produced. A scholar having devoted,
it may be, many years of his life
to a subject which he has made his own,
applies to the University Press for publication
of his researches; and such a claim is often admitted
as irresistible. In modern times, however, the need for
organization by the publisher has become increasingly
apparent. Many books which if published in isolation
would reach only a small public are found capable of
a wider usefulness when issued as part of a larger plan;
and thus the initiative in publishing passes more and
more into the hands of the professional commanding
the advice of a body of experts. School-books, reprints
of the Classics, text-books of the applied sciences, and
books of the nature of Dictionaries and Encyclopaedias
are now almost always conducted in this way by co-operative
enterprise.
The number of such homogeneous series promoted by
the Press during the last twenty years is large, even if all
school-books are excluded. The Oxford English Dictionary
(which is of earlier origin) bulks so large in the public
eye as somewhat to obscure all humbler enterprises; but
it does not stand alone. In English literature the Press
has built up in a quarter of a century a whole library of
uniform series, all of respectable dimensions. The Oxford
English Texts are library editions of famous authors edited
after exhaustive examination of the materials, in print
and in manuscript, and handsomely printed from type;
the Tudor and Stuart Library consists of first editions and
exact reprints of famous books of that period, printed in
the types of the period on paper calculated to last for
many centuries more; these books are now finding their
way into the second-hand catalogues and the collections
of connoisseurs; the Oxford Library of Prose and Poetry is
a series of little books for fanciers, offering especially the
classics of the Romantic Revival in a form approximating
to that of the originals; the Oxford Poets claim to be the
last word for accuracy of text, condensed yet fine printing,
and the lowest price compatible with these qualities; the
Oxford Standard Authors offer the same texts as the Oxford
Poets, together with many prose classics, in a cheaper
form; the average volume containing nearly 600 pages of
close yet legible print. Finally, the World’s Classics
furnish a collection of over two hundred of the most
famous English books in a very handy form, still
maintained in print as far as possible in spite of the costs
of production, which make it increasingly difficult to keep
any but the most popular books on sale in a cheap series.
None of these series has been created by the simple
expedient of taking an existing edition and sending it to
the printer—a plan too commonly followed, as is well
known to every one who has ever investigated the text of
a well-known author, and has found that each edition
contains almost all the errors of its predecessors and adds
fresh errors of its own. The Oxford texts are the result
of the laborious co-operation of editor, publisher, and
printer, involving the choice of the most authoritative
original—very often the collation of a number of printed
originals and sometimes of manuscripts as well—expert
attention to the problems both editorial and typographical
of which the successful solution produces a well-designed
book, and finally scrupulous diligence in the elimination
of error. The substantial accuracy of Oxford texts is
widely recognized, and is known to be due to the united
vigilance of the editors, the publishers (themselves scholars
and sometimes editors), and the printers. It is less well
known how complex and difficult are the problems which
the modern editor has to solve. The scientific editing of
English texts is indeed a relatively recent growth, and
depends upon the application of principles which in the
field of Greek and Latin textual criticism have been
elaborated in the course of centuries. It is thus no accident
that the work done in English editing in the last five-and-twenty
years has been largely in the hands of scholars
trained in the Oxford school of Literae Humaniores,
and has synchronized with the production of the Scriptorum
Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis.
This series, now popularly known as the Oxford Classical
Texts, is the only large series of critical texts of Greek
and Latin authors produced in recent times outside
Germany and able to hold its own in competition with
its great German rivals. The texts, which now fill nearly
eighty volumes and include the most important writers of
the ‘classical’ periods of Greek and Roman literature,
have been based upon much fresh examination of the
manuscript originals. Some of the editors, indeed, have
devoted years to this kind of investigation; the labours
of Mr. Allen on the manuscripts of Homer and of Professor
Clark and Sir William Peterson on those of Cicero
have secured for their authors a permanent place in the
long history of classical scholarship.
The aim of the series is to give the best text which the
examination of the manuscripts in their relation to each
other affords, and to provide in a brief apparatus criticus
sufficient information to show the evidence on which the
editor has based his decision. Conjectural emendations
are mentioned in the notes when they are considered
plausible, but are not admitted to the text except where
they reach a high degree of probability. This principle,
which is mainly due to the authority of the late Ingram
Bywater, has commended itself in the course of years
even to those who were at first disposed to think it too
austere, and has greatly enhanced the permanent value of
the series, which before the war was finding its way into
Germany itself. A famous German publisher went so far
indeed as to address to Oxford (on the eve of the war)
a letter of remonstrance on the price of the series, which
was described as too low for its value.
The Oxford Library of Translations consists mainly of
prose versions of Greek and Latin authors. These have
not been made to order or in accordance with any single
principle of translation, but have been produced at the
instance of scholars unable to deny themselves the satisfaction
of translating a favourite author. This, which is
perhaps the best guarantee of excellence, accounts for the
miscellaneous constitution of the series, which has been
enlarged by degrees as a happy conjunction of author and
translator chanced to present itself, and from the same
cause admits some interesting authors seldom or never included
in series of translations made upon a less elastic plan.
Another series of translations is the great collection of
the Sacred Books of the East, which was begun many
years ago by the late Max Müller and reached its fiftieth
and concluding volume in 1910. The value of these
translations to Orientalists is shown by the steady sale,
which after forty years is still increasing, and by the
high prices asked for the few volumes which are now
unfortunately out of print.
History, and the subjects akin thereto, afford less scope
for homogeneous series than does the editing of ancient
and modern classical literature; and it has been the
policy of the Press rather to secure monographs of unique
authority in special fields than to compile works of encyclopaedic
information. A few examples will serve to
illustrate the range and importance of the Oxford books
produced in this way which have become classics in their
subject: in the History of Antiquity, Sir Arthur Evans’s
Scripta Minoa, Sir Edward Maunde Thompson’s Palaeography,
Vincent Smith’s Early History of India; in the Fine Arts,
Barclay Head’s Historia Numorum, Vincent Smith’s Fine
Art in India, Dalton’s Byzantine Art; in Constitutional
History and Law, Anson’s Law and Custom of the Constitution
and Law of Contract, Sir Courtenay Ilbert’s Government of
India, Lord Bryce’s Studies in History and Jurisprudence,
Hall’s International Law, Prof. Keith’s Responsible Government,
Sir Erskine Holland’s Jurisprudence; in British
History, Stubbs’s Constitutional History of England, Freeman’s
Norman Conquest, Sir Paul Vinogradoff’s Villainage in
England and English Society in the Eleventh Century, Sir
Charles Oman’s Peninsular War; in European History,
Finlay’s Greece, Hodgkin’s Italy and Her Invaders; in Geography,
Prof. Beazley’s Dawn of Modern Geography and
Mr. R. L. Poole’s great Historical Atlas.
Books of this kind best represent the type at which
Oxford has aimed in the historical and human sciences,
and it is to the promotion of such works that the resources
of the Press have in this field been most advantageously
applied. When, however, the progress of a subject and
the enthusiasm of an editor have combined to suggest
another way, the opportunity has been taken of organizing
research upon a common plan. Notable results of
such combined endeavour are the Oxford Survey of the
British Empire and the Historical Geography of the Dominions
promoted by the late Prof. Herbertson and by Sir Charles
Lucas of the Colonial Office respectively. The former
work, containing in six volumes a general and a particular
survey of the geographical, economic, and administrative
aspects of the Empire and its constituent parts, was
completed within a short time and published within a
few weeks of the outbreak of the war. In an important
sense therefore it cannot become out of date, since it
affords a conspectus of conditions as they existed at the
culmination of the former age, to which it will always
be necessary to refer as a standard of comparison. The
other series, which is in seven volumes (comprising twice
as many separate parts), has had a longer and more
chequered history, the march of events since the early
years of the century, when publication began, having
made necessary frequent revision and reconstitution. The
work is still in progress, and India has recently been
added to its scope.
A more recent collection arose out of the demand
during the war for a compendious survey of the history
of the belligerent powers. To satisfy the demand was
one of the pieces of war work undertaken by the Press,
and the evident usefulness of the volumes having survived
the war has led to the establishment of a series on a
permanent and wider plan, including Histories of the
Nations and treatises of similar scope on leading questions
of International politics. The series now covers France,
Belgium, Italy, Portugal, the Balkans, Serbia, Russia,
Prussia, China, and Japan, with books on the Eastern
Question, Diplomacy, Nineteenth-Century Treaties, and
other topics. Many of the volumes have been frequently
reprinted, and additions are in preparation.
Not the least interesting of Oxford books written by
a number of contributors on a uniform plan is Shakespeare’s
England, an Account of the Life and Manners of his Age,
published in two volumes in the centenary year 1916.
The book contains an Ode by the Poet Laureate, a long
essay on the Age of Elizabeth by Sir Walter Raleigh,
and some forty special articles by the first authorities.
Another co-operative enterprise is the Oxford History
of Music, which in six volumes surveys the whole subject
from the beginning to the time of Wagner; it is not
a collection of biographies, but a history of music as
such—of origins, tendencies, and evolution. The authors
include the late H. E. Wooldridge, the late Sir Hubert
Parry, and Sir Henry Hadow, whose enlightened enthusiasm
has done so much for the study of music in England.
Oxford is proud to consider itself as par excellence
the Imperial University. The administration of the
Empire owes much to Oxford men, as the University in its
turn owes much to her sons from overseas. Imperial
subjects are an important and growing branch of study at
Oxford; and the Press, true to its tradition of building
upon the foundations of experience, has in time put
together an imposing collection as well of the classics of
colonization and administration as of new and original
treatises by scholars versed in its theory and practice. These
books being very diverse have not been confined within the
limits of a series uniform in size or appearance; but
they have a real unity, and deserve it is believed to be
acquired as a whole by every library with any pretensions
to an imperial character. Among the most important
volumes may be enumerated Wakefield’s View of the Art
of Colonization, first published in 1849, Lord Durham’s
Report on British North America, Cornewall Lewis’s
Government of Dependencies; and (among modern treatises)
Prof. Keith’s Responsible Government (in its present form
published as recently as 1912, yet already an established
classic), and the same author’s Imperial Unity, Prof Egerton’s
Federations and Unions, Sir Courtenay Ilbert’s Government
of India.
The Press is so strong in books on India that it has
seemed well to issue a special catalogue bringing together
a mass of books which in the General Catalogue are
listed under a variety of subject-headings. These include
a large and important section published by the Press
under the patronage of the Secretary of State—notably
the Imperial Gazetteer of India in twenty-six volumes,
the noble series of documents on the early history of
‘John Company’ compiled at the India Office, and the
sumptuous publication of Sir Aurel Stein’s discoveries in
Turkestan; but they include also a whole library of
books produced by the Press at its sole charges and
dealing with the history of India from the Empire of
Asoka to the formulation of Dyarchy, with the geography,
politics, and economics of modern India, and with the
religion and literature, the fine art, and the music of
Hindostan. The production by the Press in India itself
of vernacular and other educational books has recently
made great progress. (See also p. 65 for some notice of
the series of Classics of Indian History.)
The standard of scholarship, accuracy, and literary
excellence which the Delegates maintain in the books
published under their authority is believed to be as high
as that attempted by any other publisher in the world.
Its maintenance imposes upon the Delegates much labour
and expense; but the effort is repaid in the reputation
which Oxford books enjoy in the public estimation.
The supervision exercised by the Delegates, both personally
and through their advisers, is not limited to the
initial judgement passed upon a book offered to them
for publication; it extends through the whole process
of revision in manuscript and in proof. When a book
is favourably considered, an expert’s detailed report is
very often laid before the author, who is asked to
consider the suggestions made and to confer with the
Delegates’ advisers; and this process of scrutiny is
frequently far-reaching, the criticism being invited at
one stage or another of a number of specialists in various
fields. In this way many, perhaps most, of the books
produced by the Press have received substantial improvement;
and not a few have undergone something like
transformation. To these benefits abundant testimony
is borne in the prefaces of authors; more, perhaps,
reposes in the archives in Walton Street.
The technical services rendered to scholarship by the
Clarendon Press proof-readers are likewise commemorated
in many a preface. The late Mr. J. C. Pembrey, who in
1847 read Wilson’s Sanskrit Grammar, and in 1916 read
Prof. Macdonell’s Vedic Grammar for press, was well
known to three generations of Oriental scholars; the late
Mr. W. F. R. Shilleto did much to secure accuracy and
uniformity in the series of Oxford Classical Texts; and
Mr. George Ostler has left the marks of his vigilance
upon many editions of the English classics. Long training
in a severe school develops unusual powers; and
authors are sometimes startled by instances of what seems
beyond natural acumen. An author who had misquoted
Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis in the
usual form, was naturally astonished when the reader
inquired in the margin ‘Should it not be et nos?’, which
is of course unmetrical. The reader was right, nevertheless;
but the source of his information remained obscure.
In fields less recondite than this the authority of the readers
is generally recognized; many editors have confessed
that in the matter of Greek accents they should not
think of disputing it.
The attention thus paid to the claims of scholarship
and accuracy brings doubtless unmixed benefits to learning
and education. To the Press as a business concern
the blessing is less unequivocal. The Delegates’ resources
are not without limits; and they are sometimes embarrassed
by the ambitions of learned authors from all parts
of the world, to whom nothing but the imprint of the
Clarendon Press seems an adequate reward. They are
obliged to pick and choose, and sometimes to decline
a proposal which would attract them if it had fewer
rivals. Another imputation is less deserved. A distinguished
American who had been invited to dine in an
Oxford College confessed afterwards that as he entered
the room his knees knocked at the thought that ‘all
these Fellows talked Latin’; and the public is sometimes
frightened away from an Oxford book by the apprehension
that it will be found full of Greek quotations.
There is in fact no necessary connexion between accuracy
and pedantry; and even Dons are often men of the
world, well acquainted with the limitations of the average
intelligence. No one need be afraid that an Oxford
book on any ordinary subject will be any more abstruse
than another book, though its facts will perhaps be better
authenticated and its arguments more closely reasoned.
The booksellers know this; and in reply to a customer’s
inquiry ‘Is this a good book?’ have been heard to reply
‘Why it’s an Oxford book’.
Another fallacy which dies hard is that Oxford books
are dear. This is perhaps no more than a hasty inference
from the fact that Oxford produces an exceptionally
large proportion of books which from their nature
cannot be cheap. No one would expect to buy Liddell
and Scott’s Greek Lexicon, or the Index Kewensis, for
a few shillings; but these books and many like them
are really inexpensive, if regard is paid to the number
of words they contain. The Oxford Dictionary itself
is sold at an almost nominal price. Many of the books,
however, which appeal to a narrow public are properly
priced higher than if they could be sold in large numbers;
for the price of a book depends mainly upon two things—the
number of words it contains and the number of
people who will buy it. The art of publishing lies in
nothing so much as in estimating whether a book is more
likely to sell say, 750 copies at 15s. or 5,000 at 5s. The
policy of the Press has always been elastic in this respect;
and very many of its books are among the cheapest in
their kind.
Specimen of work done by M. Burghers, Engraver to the University about 1700
Specimen of work done in the studio of the Clarendon Press to-day
From Lily’s Latin Grammar, Oxford 1692
One of the drawings by Henry Ford from A School History of England
by C. R. L. Fletcher and Rudyard Kipling, 1911
The publication by the Press of beautifully illustrated
books is mainly a development of comparatively recent
years, and it has been furthered by the progress
of collotype printing at Oxford. The catalogue now
includes a large number of sumptuous monographs on
artistic subjects. In its facsimiles of manuscripts and rare
printed books, published on its own account or for the
British Museum, the Press has done much to make
accessible to scholars the treasures of the great collections.
Well-known examples are the magnificent collotype reproduction
of the New Testament part of the Codex
Sinaiticus (from negatives made at St. Petersburg under
the old régime; negatives were fortunately made of the
Old Testament part as well, and the reproduction of the
whole of this most famous of all manuscripts will before
long be completed); and the complete collotype reproduction
of the Shakespearian corpus, consisting of the
Folio of 1623, which went out of print on publication in
1912, and the Poems and Pericles from the first editions,
still on sale.
The Press has also published very numerous reproductions
of works of art of all kinds, partly by way of illustrated
catalogues of special collections or genres (such as
the three folio volumes of Oxford Drawings by the old
masters, the numerous coin catalogues, and the cheap collection
of British Historical Portraits in half-tone); partly
in the form of profusely illustrated monographs, which
moreover are all scientific works by experts and not mere
collections of pretty pictures with illustrative letterpress.
These works are of great importance to students and
collectors, and a select list is appended: Head’s Historia
Numorum, Gardner’s Ancient Coinage, Beazley’s and other
books on Greek Vases, Hill’s Renaissance Medals, Dalton’s
Byzantine Art, Maunde Thompson’s Palaeography, Murray’s
History of Chess, ffoulkes’s Armour and Weapons, Rivoira’s
Moslem Architecture, Vincent Smith’s Fine Art in India,
Sir Aurel Stein’s Khotan and Serindia and other special
works on Eastern Art, the important series of monographs
on English Church Art written or edited by the
late Francis Bond, with his comprehensive Introduction to
English Church Architecture in two volumes, and many
more too numerous to cite, particularly the great wealth
of British Museum catalogues. A very welcome recent
accession to the catalogue is supplied by the sumptuous
monographs on Italian Masters produced by the Harvard
and Princeton University Presses.
The use of illustration is, however, by no means confined
to facsimiles and works on the arts. The modern
productions of the Press have made an increasing use of
illustration both as an embellishment and as a medium of
information. School-books in particular are now lavishly
illustrated with portraits, maps, diagrams, and other reproductions,
often either of modern photographs or of old
cuts and engravings carefully chosen, so that the actual
men and things of former times may be faithfully
mirrored.
The Press prints for the British Museum and other
London collections, as well as for the Ashmolean Museum
at Oxford, very large numbers of postcards in collotype,
by means of which a knowledge of our national art
treasures is being widely spread.
The Press prints for the official purposes of the University
the University Gazette (recording the official
Acts and Agenda of the University), the annual Calendar
(primarily a list of the members of the University), the
Statuta Universitatis and the Examination Statutes (both
published every year), and a number of smaller pamphlets
&c. giving special information. The numerous and far-reaching
changes, made necessary by the war and the fruits
of the war, have hitherto precluded the republication of
the useful and popular Oxford University Handbook, last
published in 1915. Meanwhile, the pamphlet of General
Information (on admission, residence, scholarships, and
some examinations) will be found valuable by those, at
home and abroad, who wish to form a general conception
of the opportunities afforded to students and the requirements
which they must fulfil.
There are many other official books, both utilitarian
and antiquarian. Employers and others have often
occasion to inquire what places a member of the University
obtained in the class-lists. The information, not
always available elsewhere, is given, from the beginning
to 1900, in the Historical Register of the University, and
for the years 1901-20, in the Supplement to that work
recently published. Benefactors and others interested
in University Finance are directed to the Abstract of the
Accounts of the University and Colleges published annually.
Other publications of local usefulness include the Oxford
University Pocket Diary for the academical year, and the
terminal list of all Resident Members of the University
(with addresses, telephone numbers, &c.).
The University twice during the war printed its Roll
of Service, and in 1920 published the third and definitive
edition: it contains the names, fourteen thousand
five hundred and sixty-one in number, of those members
of the University who served in the Military and Naval
forces of the Crown. The names of those who gave their
lives, two thousand four hundred and seventy-four in
number, are distinguished by heavy type.
The Oxford University Almanack has been printed
annually since 1674, and of the illustrations since 1716
the Press possesses the original plates. By far the greater
number are still on sale. Many of the recent plates are
of great interest and beauty; those for 1906-10, and
that for 1918, are collotypes from drawings made for
the Almanack by Mr. Muirhead Bone; most of the later
issues are chromo-collotypes reproducing water-colour
drawings, preserved at Oxford, by J. M. W. Turner and
other artists of his time.
The historical books dealing with Oxford and published
by the Press include Mr. Madan’s Oxford Books, ‘1468’-1650,
a work much esteemed by bibliographers; Mr.
Shadwell’s Enactments in Parliament (concerning Oxford,
Cambridge, Winchester, Eton, and Westminster); Mrs.
Poole’s three volumes (one is out of print) of illustrated
catalogues of Oxford Portraits (all these published for,
or in co-operation with, the Oxford Historical Society);
and, in a lighter vein, Mr. Lamborn’s popular Story of
Architecture in Oxford Stone and handy guides, written by
experts, to the Bodleian, other Oxford Libraries, the
Ashmolean Museum, the University Museum (of Natural
Science), and the picturesque Degree Ceremony (by the
Warden of Wadham). The Press offers also a History
of Oxford Rowing, and the collected Orationes of the late
Public Orator, Dr. W. W. Merry, perhaps the only
man of modern times who could make a Latin speech
intelligible to an audience of undergraduates and ladies.
Lord Curzon’s work on University Reform published
in 1909 is still on sale.
The work described on its title-page as A New
English Dictionary on Historical Principles, and long
known familiarly as N.E.D. or Murray’s Dictionary, but
now generally as the Oxford Dictionary, has a continuous
history of more than half a century. It was in 1857
that Dean Trench (afterwards Archbishop Trench) laid
the foundation of the work by calling the attention of
the Philological Society to the inadequacy of all existing
English Dictionaries. He pointed out that thousands of
words which had become obsolete, but remained in the
national literature, had either escaped the diligence of
lexicographers or had been excluded by the limitations
of their plan; and in especial that no dictionary gave
any account of the history of words and their senses; in
none was it ascertained when a word was first used, when
(if obsolete) it had last been used, and how its senses had
been developed.
The members of the Philological Society threw
themselves eagerly into the plan proposed for supplying
these deficiencies, and an army of volunteers set
about the systematic examination of the whole body
of English literature. At length a dictionary was
projected (in place of the supplement first suggested,
which it was realized would be much larger than the
works it was designed to supplement), and Mr. Herbert
Coleridge was appointed editor. Fresh volunteers were
enlisted, and the work made progress. But it could
hardly have taken shape without the tireless industry
and indomitable courage of the next editor, Dr. Furnivall,
who saw, but did not shrink from, the immense preparatory
labours yet to be faced. Furnivall realized
that an English Dictionary could not be made until the
roots of the language could be examined in the mass of
our early literature, which was then hardly known; and
to provide this essential he founded in 1864 the Early
English Text Society—the long list of whose publications,
still growing, may be read in the Clarendon Press
Catalogue.
But even the enthusiasm of a Furnivall did not avail
to prevent a growing sense of despondency, when the
work seemed to lengthen out indefinitely with no promise
of performance. No private publisher could be found
to undertake a work so vast. It was decided to
invite the co-operation of the Clarendon Press. The
Philological Society and Dr. James Murray, who had
thrown himself into the work with an energy equal to
Furnivall’s own, and was by acclamation designated as
editor, entered into negotiations with the Delegates of
the Press, and an agreement was signed.
It is fortunate that the magnitude of human undertakings
is seldom perceived by those who engage upon
them. Coleridge had intimated that it would be time to
begin the Dictionary when a hundred thousand quotations
had been pigeon-holed. The efforts of Furnivall and
Murray brought the total to three and a half million
quotations, selected by thirteen hundred readers from the
works of five thousand authors. The work of accumulation
has gone on for forty years since, and to-day the
Dictionary contains about one and three-quarter million
printed quotations, selected from a greatly larger number.
Dr. Murray himself agreed with the Delegates for a work
of between 6,000 and 7,000 pages. The total will exceed
15,000. He expected to complete the book in ten years
with a small staff. To-day, thirty-five years after printing
began, the work, to which Murray himself contributed
more than 7,000 pages, is being carried on by three
editors with twelve assistants; and the end is not yet.
It is impossible to value too highly the services of
voluntary helpers from the beginning to the present day.
The completeness and accuracy of the work, which is
probably without a rival in any country or in any age,
could not have been secured except by editors of the
greatest learning and ability and by the training of
a lifetime; but these qualities would not have availed if
the work had not been founded upon inductive investigations
of a range never before attempted. For the wealth
of the materials made available our gratitude is due to
readers not only in the United Kingdom but in all parts
of the world, and notably in the United States of America,
where the Dictionary is regarded with affectionate
admiration as the common achievement of the English-speaking
people.
Valuable, however, as the work of these voluntary
helpers has been, an even larger debt of gratitude is due
to the faithful labours of the editorial staff of assistants,
some of whom can trace back their term of service to the
earliest years of the undertaking. To their acumen,
vigilance, and zeal have been and are due in large measure
the completeness of the evidence and the correctness of
detail in the presentation of words and their meanings.
Dr. Murray with his staff moved to Oxford in 1885,
and there the work has been continuously carried on,
partly in the Scriptorium attached to Dr. Murray’s house,
partly (and in recent years wholly) in the Old Ashmolean
Building, next door to the old Sheldonian Press and
within a stone’s throw of the Bodleian. Here, as
a section of the alphabet comes to be treated, the
material is sifted, extracts from it are put in order, fresh
investigations, often laborious, are undertaken to settle
etymologies and doubtful points in the history of a word;
copy is prepared for the printer, and references are
checked. The complete preparation of the material involves
researches of the most varied nature, some of
which lead the editors even beyond the confines of our
own language to novel and important discoveries.
The scope of the Dictionary, in the form which it finally
assumed, is thus stated in the preface to Volume I:—‘The
aim of this dictionary is to furnish an adequate account
of the meaning, origin, and history of English words now
in general use, or known to have been in use at any time
during the last seven hundred years. It endeavours (1) to
show, with regard to each individual word, when, how, in
what shape, and with what signification, it became English;
what development of form and meaning it has since received;
which of its uses have, in the course of time,
become obsolete, and which still survive; what new uses
have since arisen, by what processes, and when: (2) to
illustrate these facts by a series of quotations ranging
from the first known occurrence of the word to the latest,
or down to the present day; the word being thus made
to exhibit its own history and meaning: and (3) to treat
the etymology of each word strictly on the basis of
historical fact, and in accordance with the methods and
results of modern philological science.’
GATEWAY OF THE OLD ASHMOLEAN
As the history of many English words begins with
the Anglo-Saxon period, and the ‘first known occurrence’
may be as early as the seventh century, the period actually
covered by hundreds of the articles in the Dictionary is
one of ten, eleven, or twelve centuries.
The extent to which the aim of the Dictionary has been
accomplished is not yet so widely known as it ought to be.
Many discussions as to the origin, history, and meaning
of words are carried on in newspapers and periodicals
which could be decided at once by a reference to the
Dictionary. Inquirers spend much of their own and
others’ time, and in the end write to one of the editors,
in quest of information which has for years been available
in the published volumes. Nor is it solely the
student of language who can profit by the use of the
Dictionary, although in this respect it is of unique value
both for English and Continental philologists. Every
scholar and scientist is likely to find in it some fresh light
upon his own subject, for many special points in the history
and terminology of the various sciences have for the first
time been elucidated in its pages.
The reputation, however, of the Dictionary is now so
widely spread that it would be superfluous to call witnesses
to its unique qualities and its profound usefulness. In the
legislature and in the law courts, as well as in the library
and the market place, its ruling on the meanings and use
of words is accepted as final. Nor is the range of the
work limited in this respect to the usage of the United
Kingdom; it embraces all forms of the language sanctioned
as standard by literary use, wherever English is
spoken and written.
For these and other reasons no proper comparison can
be made with any other English dictionary; but the
magnitude of the result may none the less be gauged by
means of these. Taking one of the ten volumes as a basis
of comparison, the seventh, comprising words beginning
with O and P, has nearly 49,000 words (of which over
5,000 are obsolete and nearly 2,000 are naturalized aliens).
No other English dictionary has more than 27,000 words
beginning with O and P. When comparison is made
of the number of illustrative quotations, the difference
is overwhelming; Vol. VII has 175,000 quotations, and
no other dictionary has much more than 20,000 for the
same sections of the alphabet.
If it is thought that, great as the work is, it has taken
an inordinate time to produce, comfort may be taken
from the fate of comparable enterprises abroad. The
great Deutsches Wörterbuch started by the brothers Grimm
in 1838 began to be printed as long ago as 1851, and
thus had a start of over thirty years; but though it is
only some two-thirds of the scale of the Oxford book,
there still after sixty-seven years remains about a sixth to
do. The Dutch Woordenboek is less advanced, and the
dictionary of the Swedish Academy has not passed the
letter D.
The state of the work to-day is that of the ten
volumes nine are published, and of the tenth (Ti-Z)
substantial parts are complete, namely Ti-Ty, and V,
X Y Z, and the first sections of U and W. The end,
however, is not so near as might be thought; U is a large
section, and W is in many respects the most difficult letter
in the alphabet, consisting as it does almost entirely of
words of Teutonic origin, and therefore of obscure etymology
and complicated history. A lexicographer makes
light work of parallelepiped and supralapsarian; it is when
he comes to words like wealth and work, war and waste,
wild and wilful, that his powers of discovery and of
discrimination are seriously taxed.
Sir James Murray (he was knighted in 1908) died
26 July 1915. His ambition to see the completion of
the work on his eightieth birthday in 1917 was not
fulfilled, and even if he had lived to devote to it his
amazing powers of application, could not have been
fulfilled. He lived, however, to see the end of his life-work
in sight, and more than that of any other man his
name will be associated with the long and efficient
working of the great engine of research. The volumes
produced by him have characteristic excellences which
cannot be exactly matched, though they may be rivalled
by merits of another kind.
The work is now carried on by three editors, working
independently on different sections of the alphabet.
Dr. Henry Bradley, whose period of work on the Dictionary
now rivals Murray’s in point of time, is by
common consent the greatest of living English philologists.
He has been an editor since 1888. Professor W. A.
Craigie, who has been an editor since 1901, and Rawlinson
and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon since 1916, brings
to the work of the Dictionary a rare combination of
qualifications. He is especially eminent as a Scandinavian
scholar. Mr. C. T. Onions, appointed an editor
in 1913, has been on the staff since 1895. He is also
known to scholars as the author of the Oxford Shakespeare
Glossary and for his editorial part in Shakespeare’s England.
The London Goldsmiths’ Company contributed £5,000
towards the cost of the sixth volume of the Dictionary,
the title-page of which records their generous support.
Apart from this the whole of the editorial and manufacturing
cost of the work has been borne by the Delegates
of the Press, who have defrayed from their general
revenues a heavy annual outlay for many years. This
has necessarily risen since the war, and it is fortunate that
so large a part of the work had been completed under
conditions less onerous than now obtain.
The price of the Dictionary has been kept very low,
the sections being published at the rate of 2s. 6d. for
sixty-four pages or less than a halfpenny per page containing
on an average over 300 lines of type and nearly
3,000 words. Few books have ever been sold at so
low a rate. The prices of volumes and half volumes
stoutly bound in leather have necessarily been advanced
in recent years to meet the enhanced cost of manufacturing;
but the price of the Dictionary is still no
more than nominal, if regard is paid to the outlay
precedent to the actual manufacture of the books.
Sections in paper wrappers, issued after 1920, will be
priced at the rate of 5s. for sixty-four pages; but it is
not proposed to raise the price of the bulk of the work
in this form.
The London Times in 1897 described the Dictionary
as ‘the greatest effort which any University, it may be
any printing press, has taken in hand since the invention
of printing.... It will be not the least of the glories of
the University of Oxford to have completed this gigantic
task’.
Lord Curzon in his Letter to the University of 1909
wrote: ‘In the staff of the English Dictionary alone the
Press contributes to the University what is probably
the largest single engine of Research working anywhere
at the present time.’
This, the largest of all national collections of
biography, owes its existence to the enterprise and
munificence of the late George Smith, who founded
it in 1882. The work was produced by the co-operation
of a large number of scholars acting under the direction of
the late Sir Leslie Stephen, with whom was afterwards
associated Mr. Sidney Lee; and the latter half of the
work was produced under Sir Sidney Lee’s sole editorship.
It was produced in sixty-three quarterly volumes,
1885-1900, the arrangement being alphabetical; and the
lives of those who died too late to be admitted in their
alphabetical place were included by the issue of three
supplementary volumes, which brought the work down to
the death of Queen Victoria and just past the close of the
nineteenth century. The sixty-six volumes were later
reissued, with corrections, on thinner paper, three volumes
being converted into one; and this edition in twenty-two
volumes constitutes the main dictionary from the
earliest times to the close of the Victorian era, in the
form now on sale. It contains, in rather more than
30,000 pages, some 30,000 lives, each equipped with
a select bibliography. The roll of contributors includes
many famous names; conspicuous among the articles are
those of Sir Leslie Stephen himself, which are models of
form and substance, and those of the present Regius
Professor of Modern History at Oxford, Dr. C. H. Firth,
whose Life of Cromwell is an acknowledged classic.
Continuing the work of the founder, Mrs. George
Smith undertook a Supplement covering the years 1901-1911,
which was produced by Sir Sidney Lee in 1912-13.
This, as the first of a series of twentieth-century volumes,
inaugurated what may be regarded as a second and
distinct work.
Further, in 1903 was published in one volume an
Index and Epitome to the Dictionary, giving within 1,500
pages 30,000 succinct biographies. The value of this compendium,
to the very large non-professional public to
whom the main work in twenty-two bulky volumes is not
readily accessible, need not be emphasized. It has been
thought proper, however, to lay stress upon its usefulness
as an independent work of reference, which may fairly
be expected to take its place, upon thousands of shelves,
along with other compendious dictionaries and encyclopaedias;
the Index and Epitome, therefore, along with
the Index and Epitome to the Supplement of 1901-11,
bound with it, is now issued under the short title of
Concise Dictionary of National Biography.
The Dictionary of National Biography, with the
responsibility for its maintenance, was offered to the
University of Oxford in 1917 and gratefully accepted.
Work is now in progress on a further decennial
supplement covering the years 1912-21. This supplement
will be edited by Mr. H. W. Carless Davis of
Balliol and Mr. J. R. H. Weaver of Trinity. The
Supplement of 1901-11, the Concise Dictionary, and many
volumes of the main work, have recently been reprinted
from plates; and the sale of the work shows an improvement
when compared with the years preceding the war.
Whether it will in the future be found practicable to
attempt the systematic revision of the main work must
still remain in doubt. The manufacturing expense of a
new edition would be very heavy, and could be justified
only by searching investigations, leading to a very substantial
gain in accuracy, which must occupy years and
involve a further heavy expenditure. The total outlay
required has been estimated at £100,000, and this perhaps
could not be defrayed without the munificence of a second
founder. It may, however, be hoped that such a work
will not at last languish for lack of funds. Meanwhile,
under the direction of Mr. H. W. Carless Davis, the
Delegates’ adviser upon the Dictionary, preliminary work
is being steadily carried on. Subject-indexes have been
prepared; a bibliography is in hand of the biographical
literature which has accumulated since the publication of
the Dictionary; and various special investigations are
being made into periods for which the work is especially
in need of revision. When it is remembered that a whole
army of scholars was continually at work upon the
material of the New English Dictionary for more than a
quarter of a century before the first page was sent to
press, it will be seen that the material of the Dictionary of
National Biography may have to be newly surveyed with
something of the same elaboration, if that Dictionary is
ever to be rebuilt from its foundations.
In the year 1907 a Joint Committee was formed
between the Oxford University Press and Messrs.
Hodder and Stoughton, under the Directorship of
Mr. Humphrey Sumner Milford and Sir Ernest Hodder
Williams, which had for its object the production of
Medical, Surgical, and Scientific books, under the general
title of the ‘Oxford Medical Publications’.
The Committee were peculiarly fortunate in having
the invaluable advice and assistance, in the choice of
Authors and Subjects, of the late Sir William Osler,
Regius Professor of Medicine in the University of Oxford,
and a Delegate of the Press.
The key-note of the Oxford Medical Publications has
always been the practical character of the treatment.
The popular Medical Manuals, Monographs, and the
‘General Practitioner Series’ have now a world-wide
reputation, and include a large number of standard works,
such as Diseases of the Heart, and Principles of Diagnosis
and Treatment in Heart Affections by Sir James Mackenzie,
A System of Operative Surgery by F. F. Burghard, C.B.,
Common Disorders and Diseases of Childhood by G. F. Still,
Practical Obstetrics by Professor E. Hastings Tweedy, Guide
to Gynaecology in General Practice by Comyns Berkeley and
Victor Bonney, The Practitioner’s Encyclopaedia of Medical
Treatment, The Practitioner’s Encyclopaedia of Medicine and
Surgery.
By the acquisition in 1908 of Mr. Young J. Pentland’s
business, leading Text-books by the most eminent Scottish
authors were incorporated, including such well-known
books as Cunningham’s Text-book of Anatomy and Manual
of Practical Anatomy, Muir and Ritchie’s Manual of
Bacteriology, Thomson and Miles’s Manual of Surgery,
Waring’s Manual of Operative Surgery, Thomson’s Outlines
of Zoology.
The Oxford Medical Publications were awarded the
Grand Prix at the seventeenth International Congress of
Medicine held in London in 1913. This award was
bestowed for the general excellence of the Students’ books
produced in the Series, and for the production of new
and original work therein.
In 1916 the Committee sustained a great loss in the
death of their Editor, James Keogh Murphy. A further
heavy loss was sustained at the end of 1919 by the death
of Sir William Osler, whose advice and assistance had
always been of inestimable value. After the death of
Mr. Murphy, the Editorship was temporarily undertaken
by Lieut.-Colonel Sir D’Arcy Power, who was responsible
for several important additions to the Series, including the
well-known Oxford War Primers of Medicine and Surgery.
Towards the close of hostilities Captain Robert McNair
Wilson, M.B., Ch.B., late Assistant to Sir James Mackenzie
under the Medical Research Committee, became Editor,
and under his direction further important additions have
been made, including Menders of the Maimed by Professor
Arthur Keith, Studies in Neurology by Henry Head,
Operative Treatment of Chronic Intestinal Stasis by Sir W.
Arbuthnot Lane, Diagnosis and Treatment of Venereal
Diseases in General Practice by Brevet-Colonel L. W.
Harrison, D.S.O., Plastic Surgery of the Face by Major
H. D. Gillies, C.B.E., R.A.M.C., War Neuroses and Shell
Shock by Sir Frederick Mott, K.B.E., Trench Fever by
Lieut.-Colonel W. Byam, O.B.E., Clinical Ophthalmology for
the General Practitioner by A. Maitland Ramsay, and Tropical
Ophthalmology by Lieut.-Colonel R. H. Elliot, I.M.S.
The present Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford,
Sir Archibald Garrod, is a Delegate of the Press and an
Oxford author.
The Oxford Catalogue now devotes many pages to the
medical list, and the American Branch, by the publication
of the encyclopaedic ‘loose-leaf’ Oxford Surgery, has produced
an important and valuable adaptation of a British
original. In the Quarterly Journal of Medicine the University
possesses one of the most valuable scientific
journals in the world; and in the other medical publications
it administers what is at once a valuable property
and a powerful instrument of education. Oxford medical
books are known wherever English is spoken.
The more recent activities of the Press include a
notable enterprise, started by Mr. Henry Frowde
jointly with Messrs. Hodder and Stoughton, but now
carried on by Mr. Milford alone. This was the foundation
in 1907 of a new department for the issue of educational
works for elementary schools, and of ‘gift-books’, useful
and recreative literature, for young people of all ages.
The Oxford Reading Books, which headed the list, set
a new literary standard for books of the class; and the
series established itself not only in this country but in
parts of the Empire so remote and so diverse as Australia
and Burma. It was followed by further series of reading
books, and of books on history, geography, arithmetic,
nature study, and other subjects of the elementary curriculum.
The part taken by the Press in the educational
system of the English-speaking world may now be said
to comprehend the whole scholastic field from the infant
school upwards.
Concurrently with the school publications, the J. Department,
as it is known for convenience, has issued from
Falcon Square a great variety of books for the leisure
hours of boys and girls. These include finely illustrated
editions of classics, such as Robinson Crusoe, Grimm’s Tales,
Kingsley’s Water Babies, Alice in Wonderland; books on
nature, science, industry, imperial history; miscellanies
both instructive and entertaining; stories for boys, girls,
and young children; and for the very youngest, picture
books of all kinds.
All these publications are edited with care, and both
on the literary and on the artistic side a high level of
excellence is aimed at. Some two million copies of the
books are distributed during the year.