The paper, which will be published in full by the Building
Stone Department of the Tenth Census of the United
States, considers the building stones employed in New York
city and its suburbs, i. e., Brooklyn, Staten Island, Jersey
City, and Hoboken.
The materials of general construction occur in the following
percentage proportion to the total number of buildings
in the cities stated in the table below:
|
New York. |
Brooklyn. |
Staten Isl'd. |
Jersey City. |
Hoboken. |
Entire Metropolis. |
| No. of buildings. |
100,193 |
75,526 |
7,725 |
20,880 |
6,284 |
210,608 |
| Brick and stucco. |
63.2 |
30.9 |
9.5 |
22.8 |
32.7 |
47.9 |
| Frame. |
24.3 |
50.9 |
90.0 |
75.2 |
64.7 |
42.5 |
| Stone. |
11.6 |
9.1 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
9.1 |
| Iron. |
0.9 |
0.1 |
.. |
.. |
.. |
0.5 |
In New York city proper, the several varieties of stone are
used in the following proportion to the entire number of
stone buildings:
| Brown sandstone |
78.6 |
| Nova Scotia sandstone |
9.0 |
| Marble |
7.9 |
| Granyte |
1.8 |
| Ohio sandstone |
1.6 |
| Gneiss |
0.9 |
| Foreign sandstone |
0.1 |
| Bluestone and limestone |
0.1 |
In Brooklyn, the Connecticut brownstone is the variety
predominating among the stone buildings (95.7 per cent.),
and is employed almost altogether for the fronts of residences.
Very few iron buildings occur, but over three times
as many stucco fronts as in New York. The frame buildings
predominate, particularly in the outskirts, e. g., Long
Island City (80.5 per cent).
In Staten Island, stone enters in very small proportion
into the fronts of buildings, though commonly employed, as
in New York and throughout this district, for the dressing
of apertures, the walls of inclosures, and other masonry.
In Jersey City, the proportions of the materials are much
as in Staten Island. The selection of the dark trap from the
Heights behind the city, for the construction of many fronts
or entire buildings, is a local feature of interest.
In Hoboken, the same general features prevail as in Jersey
City.
The annual reports of the Committee on Fire Patrol of the
New York Board of Fire Underwriters, for the years 1881
and 1882, have yielded the following statistics, which, so far
as they go, closely approximate my own:
|
Number of buildings. |
| South of Canal Street |
10,553 |
| Between Canal and Fourteenth Streets |
26,700 |
| Between Fourteenth and Fifty-ninth Streets |
33,815 |
| Between Fifty-ninth Street and Harlem River |
18,746 |
|
——— |
| Total |
89,814 |
The materials of construction for this district, which does
not include the 23d and 24th Wards, north of the Harlem
River, are reported as follows:
| Brick, with stone trimmings, and, in part, with stone facings |
64,783 |
| Brick and frame |
3,616 |
| Frame |
21,415 |
An exceedingly rich and varied series is brought to our
docks, and the number and variety are constantly increasing.
A few of the more important may be here mentioned.
Freestones (Carboniferous sandstone), commonly styled
"Nova Scotia stone," or "Dorchester stone," in various
shades of buff, olive-yellow, etc., from Hopewell and Mary's
Point, Albert, N. B., and from Wood Point, Sackville, Harvey,
and Weston, N. B., Kennetcook, N. S., etc. A very
large number of private residences in New York and Brooklyn,
etc., the fences, bridges, etc., in Central and Prospect
Parks, many churches, banks, etc.
Freestone (Mesozoic sandstone), commonly styled "brownstone,"
from East Longmeadow and Springfield, Mass., but
chiefly from Portland, Conn., in dark shades of reddish-brown,
inclining to chocolate. This is the most common
stone used in the fronts of private residences, many churches,
Academy of Design in Brooklyn, etc.
Freestone (Mesozoic sandstone), "brownstone," from Middletown,
Conn., Trinity Church, Brooklyn, etc.
Red sandstone (Potsdam sandstone), Potsdam, N. Y.
Several residences, buildings of Columbia College, etc.
Freestone (Potsdam sandstone), "brownstone," Oswego,
N. Y. Part of Masonic Temple in 23d Street.
Freestone (Mesozoic sandstone), "brownstone," in several
shades of light reddish-brown, orange-brown, etc., and generally
fine-grained, from Belleville, N. J. Very many of the
best residences and churches, e. g., cor. 60th and 64th Streets,
and Madison Avenue, etc.
Also, varieties of the same "brownstone" from Little
Falls, N. J. (Trinity Church, New York), from the base of
the Palisades (part of the wall around Central Park), etc.
Freestone (Lower Carboniferous sandstone), commonly
styled "Ohio stone," from Amherst, East Cleveland, Independence,
Berea, Portsmouth, Waverly, etc., Ohio, in various
shades of buff, white, drab, dove-colored, etc. Many
private residences and stores, the Boreel building, Williamsburgh
Savings Bank, Rossmore Hotel, etc.
Freestone (Mesozoic sandstone), often styled "Carlisle
stone," from the English shipping port, or "Scotch stone,"
from Corsehill, Ballochmile and Gatelaw Bridge, Scotland;
in shades of dark red to bright pink. Fronts of several residences,
trimmings of Murray Hill Hotel, the "Berkshire"
building, etc.
Also, varieties from Frankfort-on-the-Main, Germany, etc.
Blue sandstone (Devonian sandstone), commonly styled
"bluestone," from many quarries in Albany, Greene, Ulster,
and Delaware counties, N. Y., and Pike county, Penn. The
trimmings of many private residences and business buildings,
walls and bridges in the parks, part of Academy of
Design in 23d Street, Penitentiary on Blackwell's Island,
house at 72d Street and Madison Avenue, etc.
Freestone (Oolite limestone), "Caenstone," from Caen,
France. Fronts of several residences in 9th Street, trimmings
of Trinity Chapel, the reredos in Trinity Church, New
York, etc.
Limestone (Niagara limestone), Lockport, N. Y., Lenox
Library, trimmings of Presbyterian Hospital, etc.
Limestone (Lower Carboniferous), styled "Oolitic limestone,"
from Ellitsville, Ind. Several private residences
(e. g., cor. 52d Street and Fifth Avenue), trimmings of business
buildings, etc.
Also, varieties of limestone from Kingston and Rondout,
N. Y., Isle La Motte, Lake Champlain, Mott Haven, and
Greenwich, Conn., etc. Part of the anchorages of the Brooklyn
Bridge, walls in Central Park, etc.
Granyte, Bay of Fundy, N. S. Columns in Stock Exchange,
etc.
Red granyte, Blue Hills, Me. U. S. Barge Office.
Gray granyte, East Blue Hills, Me. Part of towers and
approaches of New York and Brooklyn Bridge, etc.
Granyte, Spruce Head, Me. Part of towers of Brooklyn
Bridge, bridges of Fourth Avenue Improvement, Jersey City
Reservoir, etc.
Gray granyte, Hurricane Island, Me. Part of New York
Post Office and of towers and approaches of Brooklyn Bridge, etc.
Granyte, Fox Island, Me. Basement of Stock Exchange, etc.
Granyte, Hallowell, Me. Trimmings in St. Patrick's Cathedral,
Jersey City Heights, etc.
Granyte, Round Point, Me. Seventh Regiment Armory,
etc.
Granyte, Jonesborough, Me. Welles' building, panels in
Williamsburgh Savings Bank, etc.
Granyte, Frankfort, Me. Part of towers and approaches
of Brooklyn Bridge, etc.
Granyte, Dix Island, Me. New York Post Office, part of
Staats Zeitung building, etc.
Also, varieties from Calais, Red Beach, East Boston,
Clark's Island, Mt. Waldo, Mosquito Mountain, Mt. Desert,
Ratcliff's Island, etc., Me.
Granyte, Concord, N. H. Booth's Theater, German Savings
Bank, etc.
Granyte, Cape Ann, Mass. Dark base-stone and spandrel
stones of towers and approaches of Brooklyn Bridge, etc.
Granyte, Quincy, Mass. Astor House, Custom House, etc.
Granyte, Westerly, R. I. Part of Brooklyn anchorage of
Brooklyn Bridge.
Granyte, Stony Creek, Conn. Part of New York anchorage
of Brooklyn Bridge.
Also, varieties from St. Johnsville, Vt., Millstone Point,
Conn., Cornwall, N. Y., Charlottesburgh, N. J., Rubislaw,
and Peterhead, Scotland, etc.
Gray gneiss, New York Island, and Westchester county,
N. Y. A large number of churches, Bellevue Hospital, the
Reservoir at 42d Street, etc., and the foundations of most of
the buildings throughout the city.
Gray gneiss, Willett's Point, and Hallett's Point, Kings
county, N. Y. Many churches in Brooklyn, the Naval Hospital,
etc.
Marble, Manchester, Vt. Drexel & Morgan's building,
church cor. 29th Street and Fifth Avenue, etc.
Also, many varieties from Swanton, West Rutland, Burlington,
Isle La Motte, etc., Vt. The "Sutherland" building
at 63d Street and Madison Avenue, residences at 58th Street
and Fifth Avenue, etc.
Marble, Lee, Mass. Turrets of St. Patrick's Cathedral, etc.
Marble, Stockbridge, Mass. Part of old City Hall, New
York.
Marble, Hastings, N. Y. The University building, etc.
Marble, Tuckahoe, N. Y. Part of St. Patrick's Cathedral,
residence on the cor. of 34th Street and Fifth Avenue, etc.
Marble, Pleasantville, N. Y., styled "Snowflake marble."
Greater part of St. Patrick's Cathedral, Union Dime Savings
Bank, many residences and stores, etc.
Also, many varieties from Canaan, Conn., Williamsport,
Penn., Knoxville, Tenn., Carrara and Sienna, Italy, etc.;
used generally, especially for interior decoration, etc.
Trap (Mesozoic diabase), from many quarries along the
"Palisades," at Jersey City Heights, Weehawken, etc. Stevens
Institute, Hoboken, N. J., Court House on Jersey City
Heights, old rubble work buildings at New Utrecht, etc., on
the outskirts of Brooklyn, etc.
Trap (Mesozoic diabase), styled "Norwood stone," from
Closter, N. J. Grace Episcopal Church, Harlem.
Also, varieties from Graniteville, Staten Island, N. Y.,
and Weehawken, N. J.
Serpentine, Hoboken, N. J. Many private residences,
masonry, etc., in Hoboken. Also, varieties from Chester, Pa.
In addition to the edifices referred to above, many public
buildings of importance are constructed of stone, e. g.: Prisons
in the city and on the islands, bridges in the parks and
over the Harlem River, in which sandstone, limestone, granyte,
and gneiss are used.
The sewers are constructed of gneiss from New York
Island and vicinity, as well as of bowlders of trap, granyte,
etc., from excavations.
The Croton Aqueduct, the High Bridge, the Reservoirs in
the Central and Prospect Parks and at 42d Street, in which
gneiss from the vicinity and granyte from New England were used.
The walls, buildings, bridges, and general masonry in the
parks are constructed of the following varieties of stone:
Freestone (sandstone), from Albert, Dorchester, and Weston,
N. B.
Brownstone, from Belleville and the base of the Palisades,
N. J.
Bluestone and "mountain graywacke," from the Hudson
River.
Limestone, from Mott Haven and Greenwich, Conn.
Granyte, from Radcliffe's Island, etc., Me.
Gneiss, from New York, Westchester, and Kings counties, N. Y.
Marble, from Westchester county, N. Y.
The fortifications in the harbor and entrance to the sound,
constructed of granyte from Dix Island, Spruce Head, etc.,
Me., gneiss from the vicinity, brownstone from Conn., etc.
The stonework of the New York and Brooklyn Bridge,
as I am kindly informed by Mr. F. Collingwood, the engineer
in charge of the New York approach, is constructed of the
following materials:
Granyte, from Frankfort, Spruce Head, Hurricane Island,
East Blue Hill and Mt. Desert, Me., Concord, N. H., Cape
Ann, Mass., Westerly, R. I., Stony Creek, Conn., and Charlottesburg,
N. J.
Limestone, from Rondout and Kingston, N. Y., also from
Isle La Motte and Willsboro Point, Lake Champlain, and
vicinity of Catskill, N. Y.
In the anchorages, the corner stones, exterior of the cornice
and coping, and the stones resting on anchor plates,
consist of granyte from Charlottesburg and Stony Creek, in
the New York anchorage, and from Westerly, in the Brooklyn
anchorage. The rest of the material is entirely limestone,
mainly from Rondout, largely from Lake Champlain.
In the towers, limestone was chiefly employed below the
water line, and, above, granyte from all the localities named,
except Charlottesburg, Westerly, and Stony Creek. In the
approaches the materials were arranged in about the same
way as in the towers. Additional particulars are given concerning
the quantity, prices, tests of strength, and reasons
for selection of the varieties of stone.
For roofing, slate is largely employed throughout these
cities, being mainly derived from Poultney, Castleton, Fairhaven,
etc., Vt., and Slatington, Lynnport, Bethlehem, etc.,
Penn.
For pavements, the bowlders of trap and granyte from excavations
have been widely used in the "cobblestone" pavements.
The trap (or diabase) of the Palisades across the
Hudson, immediately opposite New York city, and from
Graniteville, Staten Island, is used in the "Russ" and Belgian
pavement; also, granyte from the Highlands of the
Hudson, from Maine, etc, in the "granite block" pavement
in both New York and Brooklyn; large quantities of
crushed trap from Weehawken and Graniteville, for the
macadamized streets and roads in the parks and outskirts;
and also wood, concrete, and asphalt in various combinations.
For sidewalks and curbstones, the material generally employed
is the flagstone, a thinly bedded blue sandstone or
graywacke from the interior of the State, the Catskill Mountains,
and from Pennsylvania; also, granyte, chiefly from
Maine. In the older streets, a mica slate from Bolton, Conn.,
and micaceous slaty gneiss from Haddam, Conn., were once
largely used, and may still be occasionally observed in
scattered slabs.
Additional facts were given concerning the ruling prices
for the varieties of stone, tables presenting all the determinations
obtainable in reference to the crushing strength of
the varieties used in New York, lists of the dealers in building
and ornamental stones, etc.
All varieties of soft, porous, and untested stones are being
hurried into the masonry of the buildings of New York city
and its vicinity. On many of them the ravages of the weather
and the need of the repairer are apparent within five years
after their erection, and a resistance to much decay for
twenty or thirty years is usually considered wonderful and
perfectly satisfactory.
Notwithstanding the general injury to the appearance of
the rotten stone, and the enormous losses annually involved
in the extensive repairs, painting, or demolition, little concern
is yet manifested by either architects, builders, or house
owners. Hardly any department of technical science is so
much neglected as that which embraces the study of the
nature of stone, and all the varied resources of lithology in
chemical, microscopical, and physical methods of investigation,
wonderfully developed within the last quarter century,
have never yet been properly applied to the selection and
protection of stone, as used for building purposes. Much
alarm has been caused abroad in the rapid decay and fast
approaching ruin of the most important monuments, cathedrals,
and public buildings, but in many instances the means
have been found for their artificial protection, e. g., the
Louvre, and many palaces in and near Paris, France, St.
Charles Church in Vienna, Austria, the Houses of Parliament,
etc., in London, England, etc.
In New York, the Commissioners of the Croton Aqueduct
Department complained, twenty years ago, of the crumbling
away of varieties of the gneiss used in embankments; the
marbles of Italy, Vermont, and of Westchester county soon
become discolored, are now all more or less pitted or softened
upon the surface (e. g., the U. S. Treasury), and are
not likely to last a century in satisfactory condition (e. g., the
U. S. Hotel); the coarser brown sandstones are exfoliating in
the most offensive way throughout all of our older streets
and in many of the newer (e. g., the old City Hall); the few
limestones yet brought into use are beginning to lose their
dressed surfaces and to be traversed by cracks (e. g., the
Lenox Library); and even the granytes, within a half century,
show both discoloration, pitting (e. g., the Custom
House), or exfoliation (e. g., the Tombs). To meet and properly
cope with this destructive action, requires, first, a
clear recognition of the hostile external agencies concerned
in the process. These belong to three classes: chemical,
physical, and organic.
The chemical agencies discussed were the following: sulphurous
and sulphuric acids, discharged in vast quantities
into the air of the city, by the combustion of coal and gas,
the decomposition of street refuse and sewer gas, etc.; carbonic,
nitric, and hydrochloric acids; carbolic, hippuric,
and many other organic acids derived from smoke, street
dust, sewer vapors, etc.; oxygen and ozone, ammonia, and
sea salt.
The mechanical and physical agencies discussed were the
following: frost; extreme variations in temperature, amounting
in our climate to 120° F. in a year, and even 70° in a
single day; wind and rain, most efficient on fronts facing the
north, northeast, and east; crystallization by efflorescence;
pressure of superincumbent masonry; friction; and fire.
The organic agencies consist of vegetable growths, mostly
confervæ, etc., within the city, and lichens and mosses
without, and of boring mollusks, sponges, etc.
The internal elements of durability in a stone depend, first,
upon the chemical composition of its constituent minerals
and of their cement. This involves a consideration of their
solubility in atmospheric waters, e. g., the calcium-carbonate
of a marble or limestone, the ferric oxide of certain sandstones,
etc.; their tendency to oxidation, hydration, and decomposition,
e. g., of the sulphides (especially marcasite) in
a roofing slate or marble, the biotite and ferruginous orthoclase
in a granyte or sandstone, etc.; the inclosure of fluids
and moisture, e. g., as "quarry-sap," in chemical combination,
as hydrated silicates (chlorite, kaolin, etc.), and iron
oxides, and as fluid cavities locked up in quartz, etc.
The durability of a stone depends again upon its physical
structure, in regard to which the following points were discussed:
the size, form, and position of its constituent minerals;
e. g., an excess of mica plates in parallel position may
serve as an element of weakness; the porosity of the rock
permitting the percolation of water through its interstices,
especially important in the case of the soft freestones, and
leading to varieties of discoloration upon the light-colored
stones, which were described in detail; the hardness and
toughness, particularly in relation to use for pavements,
sidewalks, and stoops; the crystalline structure, which, if
well-developed, increases the strength of its resistance; the
tension of the grains, which appears to explain especially
the disruption of many crystalline marbles; the contiguity of
the grains and the proportion of cement in their interstices;
and the homogeneity of the rock.
Again, the durability of a rock may depend upon the
character of its surface, whether polished, smoothly dressed,
or rough hewn, since upon this circumstance may rest the
rapidity with which atmospheric waters are shed, or with
which the deposition of soot, street dust, etc., may be favored;
also upon the inclination and position of the surface, as
affecting the retention of rainwater and moisture, exposure
to northeast gales and to burning sun, etc.
In such methods, two classes may be distinguished, the
natural and the artificial.
The former embrace, first, the examination of quarry outcrops,
where the exposure of the surface of the rock during
ages may give some indication of its power of resistance to
decomposition, e. g., the dolomitic marbles of New York and
Westchester counties, some of which present a surface crumbling
into sand; and, secondly, the examination of old masonry.
Few old buildings have survived the changes in our
restless city, but many observations were presented in regard
to the condition of many materials, usually after an exposure
of less than half a century.
Another source of information, in this regard, was found
in the study of the stones erected in our oldest cemeteries,
e. g., that of Trinity Church. There could hardly be devised
a superior method for thoroughly testing by natural means
the durability of the stone than by its erection in this way,
with partial insertion in the moist earth, complete exposure
to the winds, rain, and sun on every side, its bedding lamination
standing on edge, and several of its surfaces smoothed
and polished and sharply incised with dates, inscriptions,
and carvings, by which to detect and to measure the character
and extent of its decay. In Trinity Churchyard, the
stones are vertical, and stand facing the east. The most
common material is a red sandstone, probably from Little
Falls, N. J., whose erection dates back as far as 1681, and
which remains, in most cases, in very fair condition. Its
dark color, however, has led to a frequent tendency to splitting
on the western side of the slabs, i. e., that which faces
the afternoon sun. Other materials studied consisted of
bluestone, probably from the Catskills, black slate, gray
slate, green hydromicaceous schist, and white oolitic limestone,
all in good condition, and white marble, in a decided
state of decay.
The artificial methods of trial of stone, now occasionally
in vogue, whenever some extraordinary pressure is brought
upon architects to pay a little attention to the durability of
the material they propose to employ, are, from their obsolete
antiquity, imperfection, or absolute inaccuracy, unworthy of
the age and of so honorable a profession. They usually consist
of trials of solubility in acids, of absorptive power for
water, of resistance to frost, tested by the efflorescence of
sodium-sulphate, and of resistance to crushing. The latter
may have the remotest relationship to the elements of durability
in many rocks, and yet is one on which much reliance
of the architectural world is now placed. Sooner or later a
wide departure will take place from these incomplete and
antique methods, in the light of modern discovery.
Reference was made to certain experiments by Professor
J. C. Draper on the brownstone and Nova Scotia stone used
in this city, by Dr. Page, on a series of the building stones,
and by Professors J. Henry and W. R. Johnson on American
marbles, in some cases with conflicting results, which
were probably due to the limited number and methods of
the experiments.
We have here to consider certain natural principles of construction,
and then the methods for the artificial preservation
of the stone used in buildings. Under the first head, there
are four divisions.
Selection of Stone.—As it is universally agreed that the utmost
importance rests upon the original selection of the
building material, it is here that all the resources of lithological
science should be called in. Only one investigation,
aiming at thorough work, has ever been carried through,
that of the Royal Commission appointed for the selection of
stone for the Houses of Parliament. But the efforts of these
able men were restricted by the little progress made at that
time in the general study of rocks, and were afterward completely
thwarted by the discharge of the committee and by
the delivery of the execution of the work of selection to incompetent
hands. There will be hereafter, from investigations
made in the light of modern researches, no excuse for
such annoying results and enormous expenses as those which
attended the endless repairs which have been required, since
a period of four or five years after the completion of the
great building referred to.
Seasoning.—The recommendations of Vitruvius 2,000 years
ago have been observed at times down to the day of Sir Christopher
Wren, who would not accept the stone which he proposed
to use in the erection of St. Paul's Cathedral, in London,
until it had laid for three years, seasoning upon the
seashore. Since then little or no attention appears to have
been paid to this important requirement by modern architects,
in the heedless haste of the energy of the times. Building
stone, even for many notable edifices, is hurried from the
quarries into its position in masonry, long before the "quarry-sap"
has been permitted, by its evaporation to produce solid
cementation in the interstices of the stone.
Position.—The danger of setting up any laminated material
on edge, rather than on its natural bedding-plane, has
been widely acknowledged; yet it is of the rarest occurrence,
in New York city, to observe any attention paid to
this rule, except where, from the small size or square
form of the blocks of stone employed, it has been really
cheapest and most convenient to pile them up on their
flat sides.
Form of Projections.—The principle is maintained by all
the best English and French architects that projections (i. e.,
cornices, sills, lintels, etc.) should be "throated," that is,
undercut in such a way as to throw off the dripping of rainwater,
etc., from the front of the building, but in New
York this principle is almost universally neglected. It was
pointed out that the severity of our climate even requires
the further care that the upper surface of projections should
be so cut as to prevent the lodgment or long retention of
deposits either of rainwater or snow. It is immediately
above and below such deposits that the ashlar of our fronts
is most rapidly corroded and exfoliated, an effect evidently
due mainly to the repeated thawing and solution, freezing
and disintegration, which are caused by the water, slush,
and snow, which rest, often for weeks, upon a window-sill,
balcony, cornice, etc. Thus from the initial and inexcusable
carelessness in the construction and form of the projections,
and, later, the neglect of the houseowner, due to
ignorance of the results involved, to remove the deposits of
snow, etc., as fast as they accumulate on the projections, is
derived a large part of the discoloration of the marble, Nova
Scotia stone, or light colored granyte, and especially the exfoliation
of the brownstone beneath the window-sills, balconies,
etc., by the water alternately trickling down the
front and freezing, by day and by night, for long periods.
The artificial means of preservation are of two classes,
organic and inorganic. The former depend on the application
of some organic substance in a coating or in the injection
of fatty matters; but, as the substances are with greater
or less rapidity oxidized, dissolved, and carried away by
the atmospheric fluids, the methods founded on their use
have been properly denounced by many authorities as only
costly palliatives, needing frequent repetition, and therefore
exerting an influence toward the destruction of delicate
carving. The following were discussed: coal-tar; paint,
which has been used in New York for many residences, as
in Washington for the Capitol, and in London for Buckingham
Palace, etc., but lasts only a few years, and often even
permits the disintegration to progress beneath it; oil, often
used in New York, but as objectionable as paint; soap and
alum-solution; and paraffine, beeswax, resin, tallow, etc.,
dissolved in naphtha, turpentine, camphene, oil, etc.
The preparations of an inorganic nature, which have
been proposed and used abroad, have in some cases met
with success; but the exact nature of their action, and the
conditions to which they are each suited, are yet to be investigated,
especially with reference to the entirely different
climate by which the stone in our city is being tried. The
processes which have been proposed, and in some cases
practically used, involve the application of the following
substances: waterglass, in connection with salts of calcium
or barium, or bitumen; oxalate of aluminum; barium solution,
in connection with calcium superphosphate or ferro-silicic
acid; copper salts, used by Dr. Robert in Paris to
stop the growth of vegetation on stone, etc. There is certainly
a call for processes by which, at least, those stones
which are used in isolated, exposed, and unnatural positions
may receive artificial protection, such as the stone
sills and lintels of windows, stone balusters, projecting
cornices, and ashlar-stone set up on edge. It will doubtless
be found that only those stones which possess a coarse,
porous texture and strong absorptive power for liquids will
be found particularly available for protection by artificial
preservatives, and that such stones should indeed never be
used in construction in a raw or crude state. In the spongy
brown and light olive free-stones, a marble full of minute
crevices, and a cellular fossiliferous limestone, a petrifying
liquid may permeate to some depth, close up the pores by
its deposits, and incase the stone in solid armor; while,
upon a more compact rock, such as a granyte or solid limestone,
it can only deposit a shelly crust or enamel, which
time may soon peel off. The carelessness with which stone
is selected and used, and the ignorance in regard to its proper
preservation, when the decay of a poor stone becomes
apparent, have led to an increased use of brick and terra
cotta, much to be deplored; durable stones are to be obtained
in great variety, methods for the preservation of the
porous stones can easily be devised, and stones of a fireproof
character do exist in this country in abundance.
In conclusion, three suggestions were offered: 1st, that
householders invoke the magic use of the broom on the
fronts of their residences as carefully as upon the sidewalks;
2d, that house-builders insist upon the undercutting
of all projections, and the exclusion of brackets or other
supports to sills and cornices, which only lead to the oozing
of water and a line of corrosion down the ashlar; 3d, that
house repairers recut the projections in this way, whenever
possible, and entirely avoid the use of paint, oil, or other
organic preservatives.