The life of my early manhood is full of my acquaintance
with John O’Donovan, the great Irish scholar;
and when now—forty years after that acquaintance—I
am writing my “recollections,” it would not be right to
pass the old times by, and pass the old friends by, without
saying a word about them. I will, therefore, devote
this chapter to the letters of John O’Donovan that
are here before me. When writing to me he used to
touch upon all subjects: Genealogy, politics, public
men, history, seanachus, sinsearacht, his family, his
friends and his children. His son Edmond, whom I
knew when he was a child, and who, when grown into
manhood, became active and prominent in the Fenian
movement, and active and prominent as a war correspondent
in Asia and Africa, for the London journals—killed
in the Soudan, or some other expedition—will
be recognized in these letters of his father that I am
going to show you. I will also show you, at the end of
the chapter, three letters of Edmond’s own.
The old Dublin Penny Journal of my boyhood days
was a very interesting journal to read. In it were
papers on Irish genealogy, written by John O’Donovan.
I was interested in the genealogy of my own name, and
in the nickname of “Rossa” attached to it; because it
it was only in whispers, my father and the families of
his five uncles who lived in the town, would speak that
nickname—though all the neighbors around called
them “Muintir-a-Rossa.” The secret of the privacy
was this: The nickname came to the family from their
having owned the lands around Rossmore some generations
before that, and from their having been deprived
of those lands because they would not change their religion
and go to church. The Hungerfords and the
Townsends and the Bernards and the other “people of
Quality” around, were in possession of those lands
now; my people were defeated in the battle for their
rights; they were allowed, here and there, by the
Cromwellians, to live as tenants on their own lands,
but if they stuck to the name “Rossa,” which the people
gave them, it would imply that they held fast to
the desire “to have their own again,”—and that was a
desire they did not want to make manifest.
Reading John O’Donovan’s papers in the Penny
Journal, I took it in my head to write to him. I have
not a copy of the letter I wrote, but the nature of it
may be judged by this letter of reply that I received
from him:
Dublin, No. 36 Upper Buckingham St.
December 24th, 1854.
Dear Sir—It amused me very much to learn that
you have taken me for a Protestant! I have not the
honor of having had one Protestant ancestor, from 1817
to 493, when St. Patrick cursed our ancestor Lonan, in
the plain of Hy-Figenti. We have all remained unworthy
members of the Church of Rome ever since!
(The Protestant wives all turned to mass.) But I am
sorry to think, and to be obliged to confess that we
have not been a pious, wise or prudent race, and I am
convinced that we are doomed to extinction.
Many curses hang over us! (if curses have aught of
force in modern times). Saint Patrick cursed Lonan
in 493; the holy Columb MacKerrigan, Bishop of
Cork, cursed our progenitor Donovan (from whom we
all descend), and our names Donovanides, in the year
976, in the most solemn manner that any human being
ever was cursed or denounced; and, so late as 1654, a
good and pious Protestant woman’s family (the children
of Dorothy Ford), cursed Daniel O’Donovan of Castle
Donovan, and caused a “braon-sinshir,” or corroding
drop, to trickle from a stone arch in Castle Donovan,
which will never cease to flow till the last of the race
of the said Daniel O’Donovan is extinct. It appears,
from the depositions in Trinity College, Dublin, that
the said Daniel O’Donovan and Teige-a-Duna McCarthy
hanged the said Dorothy Ford at Castle Donovan,
to deprive her and her family of debts lawfully
due unto them.
You and I escape this last curse, but we reel under
that pronounced by the Holy Columb (if indeed, its
rage is not spent). God’s curse extends to the fifth
generation, but I believe man’s goes further. But in
addition to these ancient maledictions, I, and my unfortunate
sept of Ida in Ossory labor under two other
denunciations which hang over us like two incubi!
I return you my warmest and best thanks for your
kind invitation to Skibbereen, and hope to make a tour
thither next autumn, but I will not be very troublesome
to you, as my stay will not be long.
Wishing you many happy returns of this holy season,
I remain yours truly,
John O’Donovan.
To Mr. Jeremiah O’Donovan-Rossa.
I have about thirty or forty of those letters of John
O’Donovan, written from the year 1854 to the year of
his death, 1862. They are very interesting to me and
to men like me. They may never see the light of day
if I pass them by now. But, I cannot publish the
whole of them; I will run through them and show you
the ones that I consider interesting, as throwing some
light on the character, the thoughts, the opinions, and
the genial family surroundings of the greatest Irish
scholar of this century. His next letter is this:
Dublin, Dec. 31st, 1854.
Dear Sir—The old name of Castle Salem was Kilbritton.
This castle was the chief residence of McCarthy-Reagh,
by whom it was erected. The O’Donovans had
nothing to do with this castle, notwithstanding the
authority of the ignorant historian Dr. Smith!
The Professor Donovan, who wrote the article on
coffee in 1834, is my friend Michael Donovan, of No.
11 Clare street, Dublin, who is a very distinguished
chemist and member of our Royal Irish Academy,
where he frequently reads papers on the most scientific
subjects. He wrote several works which were published
in Lardner’s Cyclopedia, on galvanism, chemistry,
domestic economy, etc. He has made a discovery
in chemical science which he has as yet failed to establish;
that is, the process of turning water into gas.
He was given up the Gas-house at Dover to test this
discovery; the house got burned, for which he had to
stand his trial; but he succeeded in proving that the
house was burned by the workmen, who were prejudiced
against him. His father was born at Kilmacow,
near the River Suir, in the county of Kilkenny, within
sight of where I was born. I was born in 1809 in the
parish of Atateemore, in the barony of Ida, and
county of Kilkenny. But we are not in any way related.
His grandfather turned Protestant about the
year 1750, since which period his family have been the
wealthiest Donovans in Ireland, except perhaps, those
of Ballymore, County Wexford.
You may rely on it that “Felicitas Columba” knows
nothing of the O’Donovans-Rossa except what I have
published in the appendix to “The Annals of the Four
Masters.” I have no sympathy with falsehood in any
shape or form, and a lie (white, black or red,) coming
from a minister of any religion, (which I am told
“Felicitas” is), is doubly hideous. We have truths in
vast abundance, and the discovery of them in history
and science is a praiseworthy result of patient investigation;
but no false assertion should be ventured
upon. Truth will ultimately triumph over falsehood,
and those who have attempted to sustain false assertions,
are contemptible in the estimation of the honorable,
and the lovers of true truth. Believe me to be
yours sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
I here pass by some letters on genealogy, which may
be considered interesting only to myself and to my
family name and connections, and come on to this one:
Dublin, 29th May, 1856.
Jeremiah O’Donovan-Rossa,
Dear Sir—Please read the enclosed American letter
and return to me. It is rather to show the spirit of
the Irish mind in America. I would do anything in
my power to encourage nationality, because we are becoming
extinct very rapidly.
I have it in contemplation to try and notice the
three branches of our sept in the “Danish wars” to be
published by Dr. Todd. I have furnished him with
very many notes on other subjects and families, and I
feel satisfied that he will insert what I intend to furnish
him on the three septs of our family, namely, Clan-Cahill,
MacEnesles and Clan-Loughlin. Of the first,
Morgan O’Donovan, of Montpelier, Douglas, Cork, is
decidedly the head and chief representative; of the
second, either you or some one of your relatives; and
of the third, my old friend Alexander O’Donovan, of
Kilrush (if he be alive), or his next of kin.
I am of a senior branch of the Clan-Cahill, and, as
we always believed, descended from the eldest son,
Donell O’Donovan, who died in 1638; but we lost our
birthright by the crime of our ancestors, by the just
decree of the laws of God and man, and we ought to
be thankful for not having become extinct; for we are
widely spread throughout Leinster and America, and
we are likely to last to the end of time. Behold us all
in the following table:
1. Donal O’Donovan, married to Joanna McCarthy,
of Castle Donovan, who died A. D., 1638.
2. Edmond, married to Catharine de Burgo, killed
1643.
3. Conor, married to Rose Kavanagh.
4. William, married to Mary Oberlin, a Puritan,
died 1749.
5. Edmond, married to Mary Archdeacon, died
1798.
6. Edmond, married to Ellen Oberlin, died 1817.
7. John O’D. L.L. D., married to Mary Anne
Broughton of Cromwellian descent.
8. Edmond, born 1840, died 1842; John, living,
born 1842; Edmond, living, born 1844; William, living,
born 1846; Richard, living, born 1848; Henry, dead,
1850; Henry, born 1852, living; Daniel, living, 1856.
Eight sons, without any daughter intervening, is a
sort of effort of nature to preserve the name.
I can hardly believe that Mr. John D’Alton will live
long enough to bring out another edition of his book,
because he is very old and feeble. I shall, however,
write him a note on the subject of your branch of our
sept Hy-Donovane, which I hope he will be tempted to
print (if he prints at all), because one of them—Captain
Donell Boy MacEnesles O’Donovan was very distinguished,
and was restored to property under the Act of
Settlement and Explanation. If he does not print it, I
shall be on the lookout for some other national work in
which to insert it. In the meantime, I hope you will
now and again, write to me, and believe me to be your
affectionate clansman,
John O’Donovan.
Next comes this letter:
Dublin, June 12, 1856.
Dear Sir—I have just received your letter dated
9th inst., enclosing note from my neighbor John
D’Alton, which I can hardly read, the handwriting is
so unearthly. I did not pass through Skibbereen at
the time you mention. So that you might have looked
for me, but I fear you would have learned that I was
in the North, among the Presbyterians. I am very glad
that you have satisfied yourself that you are of the
MacEnesles O’Donovans, (MacAneeis is the local
name), because I had written in my published pedigree
of the O’Donovans, before I ever had the honor of receiving
any communication from you on the subject,
the following sentence:
“The editor has not been able to identify any living
member of this sept,” (of MacEnesles).
Aneslis, who was the second son of Crom O’Donovan,
1254, had four sons, Donogh More, Rickard, Walter
and Randal, who became the founders of four distinct
septs, who all bore the generic tribe-name of Clann
Enesles, or MacAneeis, and whose territories are mentioned
in various inquisitions, etc. The townland of
Gortnascreena, containing three plough-lands (in the
parish of Drimoleague), belonged in the year 1607 to
the Sliocht Randal O’Donovan. In the same year the
sept of MacEnesles possessed the townlands of Barnahulla,
(now Butler’s gift), and also the lands of Meeny
and Derryclough Lower, in the parish of Drinagh.
On the 20th of August, 1632, Dermot MacTeige
MacEnesles O’Donovan was possessed of the lands of
Lisnabreeny, west of the parish of Glenawilling, or
Kilmeen, and I take this Dermot to be your ancestor.
If you descend from Dermot MacTeige MacEnesles,
who lived at Lisnabreeny in 1632, and may have lived
down to 1688, you do not want many generations in
your line, with your present knowledge.
I will do all I can to fill up this chasm. You come
of an older sept than Rickard O’Donovan, the clerk of
the Crown. Yours ever sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
In reply to that letter, I wrote the following one to
John O’Donovan, a copy of which I find among my old
Irish papers:
Skibbereen, June 14, 1856.
Dear Sir—I have received your welcome letter and
am convinced beyond a doubt that I am descended from
Dermot MacEnesles, who, as you say lived at Lisnabreeny
in the year 1632. I made mention to you in one
of my former letters, of a great-grandaunt’s daughter of
mine, Nance Long, (that time living), who was a bit of
a genealogist, and I am sorry that she forfeited my good
opinion of her veracity, by telling me that her grandfather
Teige a Rossa was a grandson of Teige MacAneeis,
who lived in Glean-a-Mhuilin; and, as I thought
there was no MacAneeis, but the first named, I believed
her as much as I would believe a man of the
present day who would tell me he was a grandson of
Brian Boru. She also said it was her grandfather who
first came from Kilmeen to the neighborhood of Ross
Carbery, where her uncle Denis (my great-grandfather)
married Sheela Ni Islean, or Julia O’Donovan-Island.
She used to speak much on the downfall supposed to
be brought upon the Rossa family on account of such
an alliance. To use her own words, her “grandfather
was deprived of all his land by the Cromwells; and the
Donovan Islands, having come by riches some way, were
glad to catch any of the family.”
If you had any truthful correspondent about Ross,
when editing your “Annals of the Four Masters,” he
would or should have told you of my Clan-Donovan,
my grandfather and five brothers of his (all with families),
were then living at Milleenroe and Carrigagrianane.
The names of these six brothers, Anglianized
were: Jer, Denis, Conn, Dan, Flor and John. I was
surprised they did not perpetuate the name of Teige,
and on making inquiries to that effect, I learned that
they had an uncle of the name who was a poet, was
considered eccentric, and was known by the cognomen
of Teige-na Veirsee; and they feared the eccentricity
may follow the name. But the present generation
(mostly now in America), have adopted it again.
As you have helped me, down as far as Dermot, son
of the above Teige MacEnesles, I will give you the
descent from him, and if it agrees with the intervening
time, there can be no reason to doubt its correctness.
My father, Denis, was born about the year 1790,
married in 1818, and died in 1847. He was son of
Jer, son of Denis, son of Teige. The old woman’s
grandfather and his grandfather, being Teige MacEnesles,
or Teige MacAneeis, he must have been the
son of the Dermot MacTeige MacEnesles mentioned in
your letter. Yours, ever obliged,
Jer. O’Donovan-Rossa.
That letter brought this reply:
Dublin, June 23, 1856.
Dear Sir—I have received yours of the 14th inst.,
and was glad to learn that there is a representative of
the second branch of the O’Donovans, namely of MacEnesles,
locally shortened to MacEneeis. I will prepare
any note you like on this sept, and your descent
therefrom for Mr. Alton’s second edition of his thick
book on King James II.’s Army list, but I suppose he
will want you to pay for giving it insertion.
Mr. Windele, of Cork, tells a story about the
O’Connells of Bally Carbery, in Kerry, which affords a
fair specimen of the kind of family history given by
“Felicitas Columba” and other writers like him.
On one occasion, McCarthy More sent to the Castle
of Bally Carbery for tribute, but the lord of the castle
took the messenger and hanged him. Now who was
O’Connell of Bally Carbery? He was McCarthy
More’s constable, holding three acres of land, and the
wardship of the castle.
This description of history is truly disgraceful, in any
country whose history is known. The Red Indians,
who have no documents, may enjoy any stories of this
kind that are consistent with their traditions; but the
Irish have records which leave no room for fictions like
that given by Windele.
I met a young friend of yours in the college the other
day, whose name is O’Mahony. He is a Protestant,
but a very intelligent, nice young fellow.
Yours truly,
John O’Donovan.
That O’Mahony was Thaddeus, the brother of James
O’Mahony of Bandon, of whom I spoke in a previous
chapter. In a subsequent letter my correspondent
says:
“Your friend O’Mahony has been recently married,
and I am told that he gives out that he was once a
priest.”
I don’t think he was ever a priest, but I think he had
an uncle a priest. His mother’s name was Kearney;
she lived and died a Catholic, and I think she had a
brother, a Father Kearney, who was stationed one time,
somewhere near Bandon. Yes, Thaddeus O’Mahony
of Trinity College, married a Protestant, became a
Protestant minister, and died—I don’t know what.
Writing July 3, 1856, John O’Donovan says: “What
puzzles me most is, why the epithet, or appellative of
Rossa clings to your sept. The O’Donovans of Rossmore
are mentioned in an inquisition taken at Cork on
the 3d of April, 1639, when Thaddeus MacDonogh
O’Donovan was ten years dead, leaving a son, Teige
O’Donovan, his son and heir, who was of age when his
father died.
“Where is Rossmore situated, and what reason have
you for believing that your appellative of Rossa is not
derived from that place.”
I told John O’Donovan that that was the place from
which the appellative of Rossa was derived. That the
family lived there; that the family tradition was, that
they were driven out of it by fines, inquisitions and
confiscations—fines for not attending service in the
Protestant churches—inquisitions into titles to property,
when they had no titles but what belonged to
them as being Irish, and owners of the soil upon which
they and their fathers were born; and consequent confiscation
of their lands, for not paying the fines, and for
not being able to show an English title to their property.
That is how nearly all the lands of all the old
Irish families were confiscated into the possession of the
descendants of the Englishmen who hold them to-day.
The more modern and more distinguishing appellative
of Rossa—from Rossmore—followed my family when
they were driven from Rossmore, and the Clan-name of
MacAneeis (MacAeneas) was dropped from the tongues
of the people.
Rossmore is the same place as Kilmeen, and Lisnabreeny,
and Glean-a-Mhuilin are neighboring townlands
in the parish of Rossmore or Kilmeen.
This is the next letter:
August 26th, 1857.
Dear Sir—When I arrived here yesterday, the
servant girl told me that a young Mr. O’Donovan had
called early in the morning. I thought it might be
Mr. John O’Donovan of Enniscorthy, but I have since
seen him and he told me it was not he. I thought it
might be Henry Donovan the mathematician, but I
find it was not. After making several inquiries among
my Donovan friends, I have come to the conclusion
that it must be you. The girl describes the gentleman
who called, as about twenty-three years old; brown-haired,
tall, and thin in the face. He had with him,
she says, a countryman from Clare or Kerry.
I waited within in the evening till 8 o’clock yesterday.
I am going to the Arran Islands in the Bay of Galway
on the 3d of September, with the British Association,
and on my return I am thinking of going to the
South to see my O’Donovan friends.
I make my first appearance at 11 o’clock to-morrow,
before the Savans of Europe, on “The characteristics
of the Old Irish Race”. I feel rather nervous, but I
hope I won’t fail altogether.
Should you come to Dublin soon again, please to let
me know where a note could find you, and how long
you will remain, for then I will be able to go for you,
or send a messenger.
I stay within this evening till 8 o’clock, expecting
you might call; but I must go out then, as a member of
the British Association.
Yours sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
The English war of the Indian Mutiny was going on
in the year 1857. England was blowing the Sepoys
from the cannon’s mouth; and whenever England won
a battle there were days of fasting and prayer declared
in England—and Ireland, too—to give thanks to God.
Of course, it was taken for granted that God was at
the side of England—for England had the heavy cannon,
and the giant powder, and the mitrelleuse artillery.
I suppose I, in writing to John O’Donovan, told him
that I fasted fiercely, and prayed hard one of those
days, as I find he makes allusion to the matter in this
letter:
Dublin, October 9th, 1857.
Dear Sir—I was much amused by your description
of the braon-sinshir which is likely to extinguish us all.
Deborah Ford was hanged about Shrovetide, 1641, by
O’Donovan (Daniel, son of Donell, son of Donell-na-g
Croicean,) and Teige-a-duna McCarthy of Dunmanway.
If the drops had ceased on the death of the late General
O’Donovan of Bawnlahan, in 1829, the tradition
would have been oracular; but the drops are likely to
continue to fall as long as the grouted arch retains its
solidity. Drops of this kind are shown in various parts
of Ireland. A drop like these fell on the tomb of
O’Fogarty at Holy Cross Abbey, but ceased when the
last of the race was hanged at Clonmel for Whiteboyism!
Another braon aillse continued to fall on the
tomb of the White knights at Kilmallock, till the last
of the direct descendants of these knights died without
issue.
What the drops of Castle Donovan may do it is hard
to divine. I do not believe that the Clan-Donovan are a
long-lived or a prudent race. They are all fond of their
drop, and I believe that they are likely to become extinct
in Ireland, or to be removed westward to the new
world by the steady encroachment of the Saxon race.
The drops will surely outlive the present Montpelier
family, but they have nothing to say to the murder of
Deborah Ford. They should have ceased at the
extinction of the head of the Bawnlahan family in 1829.
But this family is not yet extinct, and the deadly drops
hang over them like fatal swords.
There were O’Donovans at Crookhaven, whose pedigree
is preserved. Is Timothy O’Donovan of Arhahill
still living? Is Richard Donovan of Lisheens House
at Ballincolla still living?
I was glad to hear that you fasted and prayed on
Wednesday last. In the last century, the Milesian Irish
showed a great disinclination to pray for the success of
the arms of England. Timothy O’Sullivan wrote about
1800, on the proclamation of George III.
Go sintear mo phiob-sa le ramharcorda, choi’che ma
ghiodhfiod air maithe leosan—
“May my windpipe be stretched by a very stout cord,
If e’er for their welfare, I pray to the Lord.”
But we are getting more and more English and loyal
every century. Timothy O’Donovan of the Cove, is
one of the highest Tories you have in Cork County—though
a great Papist; and so is his relative Rickard
Donovan, clerk of the Crown.
The O’Donovan writes to me—October 8th, 1857.
“We have just now an abatement of an awful storm
and deluge of rain, such as rarely occurs. I trust it
may not have damaged those two noble ships, Austrian
and Great Britain, that left this port on Monday and
Tuesday for India, with 2,000 soldiers.”
Yours as ever,
J. O’Donovan.
Irish tories are those Irishmen who side with the
government of Ireland by England. The O’Donovan
of Montpelier was a tory and a Protestant; Timothy
O’Donovan of O’Donovan’s Cove, was a tory and a
Papist. Those two held landlord possession of lands
that belonged equally to their clansmen; England protected
them in that landlord possession of the robbery
from their own people, and that is why and how those
Irish landlords all over Ireland back England in maintaining
a foreign government in their native land.
And here, I may as well pause to let my readers see
some old historical records that will corroborate what
I, in a previous chapter, said about my people being
deprived of their lands because they would not turn
Protestant; not alone my people, but all the people of
the old blood of Ireland from Cork and Kerry to Donegal
and Antrim.
The Skibbereen Eagle of February 19, 1898, reprinting
a historical paper about my native diocese, from
the Lamp, says:
Though the diocese of Ross was small, it was not
too small to tempt the rapacity and greed of the Reformation
leaders. A certain William Lyons, who was
an apostate from the beginning, was appointed Protestant
Bishop of Ross in 1582. He met with a characteristic
reception from the brave and zealous priests
and people of Ross. All the plate, ornaments, vestments
and bells connected with the cathedral and monastery,
as well as a chime of bells in solid silver, valued
at £7,000, were secreted in the strand at Ross Bay.
And so well was the secret kept, that though the
priest and friars were tortured and hanged—in the
hope that love of life would tempt them to disclose the
hiding place, the treasure remained undiscovered to
this date.
The people were not behind hand in their opposition.
Determined that the residence that had been consecrated
by so many saints and patriots should not be
contaminated by the presence of an apostate, they set
fire to the old Episcopal mansion, so that the intruder to
the See of Ross had to report to the Commissioners, in
1615, that on his arrival he found no residence, “but
only a place to build one on.” Lyons, however, was
not to be denied a place whereon to lay his head. He
built himself a house at the cost of £300, a large sum
for those days, “but in three years it was burned by
the rebel, O’Donovan.” The Protestant Bishop, for
want of something better to do, turned planter; for we
have a record that he was commissioned “to find out
ways and means to people Munster with English inhabitants.”
Elizabeth at this time was Queen of England, and in
the first year of her reign were passed these laws:
First year of Elizabeth, Chapter 2, Section 8. And
all and every person or persons inhabitating within this
realm shall diligently and faithfully resort to their
Parish church or chapel, or to some usual place where
Common Prayer and other Service of God is used or ministered,
upon pain that every person so offending shall
forfeit for every such offence twelve pence, to be levied
by the church wardens of the parish, by way of distress
on the goods, lands and tenements of such offender.
Statute 23 of Elizabeth, Chapter 2, says:
“And be it likewise enacted, that every person who
shall say or sing mass, being thereof lawfully convicted,
shall forfeit the sum of two hundred marks, and be
committed to prison in the next jail, there to remain
by the space of one year, and from thenceforth till he
have paid the said sum of two hundred marks. And
that every person who shall willingly hear mass, shall
forfeit the sum of one thousand marks, and suffer imprisonment
for a year.
“Be it also further enacted that every person above
the age of fourteen years who shall not repair to some
church, chapel or usual place of Common prayer, but
forbear the same, contrary to the tenor of a statute
made in the first year of Her Majesty’s reign, for uniformity
of Common prayer, and being thereof lawfully
convicted, shall forfeit to the Queen’s majesty for
every month which he or she shall so forbear, twenty
pounds of lawful English money.”
The 29th statute of Elizabeth, Chapter 6, Section 4,
says:
“And be it also enacted that every such offender in
not repairing to Divine Service, who shall fortune to
be thereof once convicted, shall pay into the said receipt
of the exchequer, after the rate of twenty pounds
for every month. And if default shall be made in any
part of any payment aforesaid, that then, and so often,
the Queen’s Majesty shall and may by process out of the
said exchequer, take, seize and enjoy all the goods, and
two parts as well of all the lands, tenements and hereditaments,
leases and farms of such offender, as of all
other lands, tenements and hereditaments liable to such
seizure, leaving the third part only of the same lands,
tenements and hereditaments, leases and farms to and
for the maintenance and relief of the same offender, his
wife, children and family.”
Elizabeth dies in the year 1603 and James I.
comes to the throne. He makes all haste to confirm
all that Elizabeth had done to plunder and persecute
Irish Catholics, and gets his Parliament to pass these
acts:
Statute 1, James, Chapter 4. “And be it further
enacted by authority of this present parliament, that
where any seizure shall be had of the two parts of any
lands, tenements, hereditaments, leases or farms, for
the non-payment of the twenty pounds due, and payable
for each month, according to the statute in that
case made and provided; that in every such case, every
such two parts shall, according to the extent thereof,
go toward the satisfaction and payment of the twenty
pounds due and payable for each month, and unpaid by
any such recusant.”
Statute 3 of James, Chapter 4, says:
“Inasmuch as it is found by daily experience, that
many of His Majesty’s subjects that adhere in their
hearts to the Popish religion, by the infection drawn
from thence, and by the wicked and devilish counsel of
Jesuits, Seminaries, and other like persons dangerous to
the Church and State, and so far perverted in the point
of their loyalties, and due allegiance unto the King’s
Majesty, and the Crown of England, and do the better
to cover and hide their false hearts, repair sometimes
to church, to escape the penalty of the laws in behalf
provided.
“Be it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty,
the lords spiritual and temporal, and the commoners
in this present parliament assembled: That every
Popish recusant, convicted, or hereafter to be convicted,
which heretofore hath conformed him or herself, and
who shall not repair to church and receive the sacrament
of the Lord’s supper, he or she shall, for such not
receiving, lose and forfeit for the first year, twenty
pounds a month; for the second year for such not receiving,
forty pounds a month, until he or she shall
have received the said sacrament as is aforesaid.
“And if after he or she shall have received the said
sacrament as is aforesaid, and after that, shall eftsoons
at any time offend in not receiving the said sacrament
as is aforesaid by the space of one whole year; that in
every such case the person so offending shall for every
such offence lose and forfeit three-score pounds of lawful
English money.”
Then, to meet the cases of estated and wealthy Catholics
who would rather pay the fines and forfeits of
twenty, forty and sixty pounds, than attend the Protestant
churches, an act was passed to deprive them of
two-thirds of their lands, tenements, leases and farms.
Here are the words of that act:
“Now, forasmuch as the said penalty of twenty
pounds monthly is a greater burden unto men of small
living, than unto such as are of better ability, and do
refuse to come unto Divine Service as aforesaid, who,
rather than they will have two parts of their lands to
be seized, will be ready always to pay the said twenty
pounds, and yet retain in their own hands the residue
of their livings and inheritance—being of great yearly
value, which they do for the most part employ to the
maintenance and superstition of the Popish religion.
Therefore, to the intent that hereafter the penalty for
not repairing to Divine service might be inflicted in
better proportion upon men of great ability: Be it
enacted that the King’s Majesty, his heirs and successors,
shall have full power and liberty to refuse the
penalty of twenty pounds a month, and thereupon to
seize and take to his own use two parts in three of all
the lands, tenements, hereditaments, leases and farms,
and the same to remain to his own and other uses, interest
and purposes hereafter in this act provided, in
lieu and in full recompense of the twenty pounds
monthly.”
I heard at my father’s fireside, before I was able to
read a book, about those laws which I am now copying
from an old law book of the seventeenth century. All
my readers are victims of these laws. Father Campbell
and Father Brown, the priests of my parish to-day,
are victims of them. They, and the many other good
priests who are tenants on the estate of the United
Irishmen newspaper, ought not to blame me much, if I
was ever during my life, ready and willing to join any
society of Irishmen that were aiming at destroying
English rule, and English government in Ireland.
I am not done with John O’Donovan’s letters. I
regard them as historical—historical, after we are all
dead; so I let you see some more of them.
Dublin, October 24, 1858.
My dear Friend—My second son, Edmond, desires
me to send to you his first attempt at painting the
armorial bearings of the O’Donovans. He drew them
very well in pencil, but he spoiled his drawing in laying
on the colors, at which he is not yet sufficiently
expert. He has been about a year at drawing under
the tuition of Mr. Bradford of the Jesuits’ Seminary,
No. 6 Great Denmark street, but I have determined
upon withdrawing him from this amusement, as he was
spending all his time at drawing cats and dogs, and
neglecting his more important duties. He has been
put into Homer and Euclid this quarter, which will occupy
all his time.
A young friend of mine, William John O’Donovan
of the Middle Temple, London, has been making researches
in London about O’Donovans, and has found
some particulars about the sept of Kilmeen, or Mac
Enesles, which escaped me. I will write to him on the
subject when I hear of his arriving in London. He is
a very young man of some fortune, and a most enthusiastic
herald and genealogist.
Since I wrote to you last, I lost my only brother,
and am now the last of my generation. He left one
grandson of the ominous name of Kerrigan (which was
the name of the old bishop of Cork who left a curse on
our race for their having murdered Mahon King of
Munster, the brother of Brian Boru). My brother’s
daughter, Adelia ni Donovan was married to Thomas
Frederick Kerrigan, the only son of an old merchant
of New York. She had no money, of course, and the
old man turned his son out of doors for this imprudent
marriage. Then the son went to California, where he
went through a variety of adventures. At length the
father died, and the hero of California has returned to
his wife and child, and taken his father’s place in New
York.
I enclose you his note to me, from which I infer that
he believed I had known all about my brother’s death;
but I had not known a word about it except in a dream,
from which I would venture to calculate the minute at
which he died.
The enclosed extract from a note from the Reverend
Mr. Hayman, Protestant minister of Youghal, reminded
me of you, and I send it, hoping that you will be able
to tell me something about the Nagles mentioned by
him. I remain, dear sir, yours ever sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
Dublin, 36 Upper Buckingham Street,
October 25, 1858.
Diarmuid O’Donnobhain
(Mac Enesles, Rosa-Mhoir.)
My dear Friend—The O’Donovan and I are good
friends? He seems to me to be a kind and good man,
and really an Irishman of some spirit. I gave the
young gentleman of the Inner Temple, London, a letter
of introduction to him last August, and he spent
about ten days with him at Montpelier, while he was
examining the registry of Cork, for O’Donovan Wills.
He told me that The O’Donovan treated him with
great urbanity, hospitality and kindness. This young
gentleman is of the Wexford Sept of the Hy-Figenti;
is about twenty-six years old, six feet two inches tall;
a Protestant, (but he is likely to be fished up by the
Pope some day or another, like the Ramm of Gorey!)
Next year, during the vacation, he promises to examine
the Herbert documents for me. Herbert had given me
permission to examine his papers several years since,
but I have not been able to take time to go to Killarney.
This young gentleman has been in receipt of
£350 per annum in right of his mother, who died
when he was eighteen months old. His father, who is
about sixty-seven years old, married a young wife a
year or two since, but he will leave this young Mr.
John O’Donovan £400 a year in addition to what he
has already. He is the cousin-german of the Captain
E. O’Donovan, who took the Russian battery at Alma,
and of Henry O’Donovan who was shot through the
head at the taking of the Little Redan at Sebastopol.
As I feel convinced that you take a great interest in
all true branches of our name, I enclose you a letter
from a Daniel Donovan of Queenstown (Cove of
Cork) who appears to me to be a very respectable and
worthy man, though little known in his neighborhood,
except as a baker. Who is he? I firmly believe that
the name will become important again, though now
sunk low enough as regards landed property.
I forgot to ask you in my last letter what happened to
our American friend, your cousin Florence, who expected
to be appointed Consul at Cork. Has he written
to you since? Has he any desire to return home?
I do not believe that my ancestor Edward comes
under the curse of the Braon-Sinshir of Dorothy Ford,
for he was killed by a cannon ball, which I think I
have, about six years before she was hanged by Daniel
O’Donovan and Teige-a-doona McCarthy; but I labor
under the curse of the holy Bishop Kerrigan, and so do
you, and the whole race; but I believe—hope—it lost
its withering force, or that its fulminatory influence
was nearly spent after the fifth generation. Curses
among the Jews exhausted themselves in the fifth generation.
The Irish belief is that the curse returns on
the pronouncer if it was not deserved. Our ancestor
really deserved the curse pronounced on him.
Let me congratulate you on the subject of your
many sons. I am particularly fortunate in that respect,
for I have no daughter to run away with any
Kerrigan; but, as the Emperor of China said: “Where
there are many sons, there are many dangers.” Excuse
hurry, late toward midnight, and after a hard
day’s work. My sight is failing.
Yours sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
Dublin, Nov. 10, 1858.
My dear Friend—You will oblige me by returning
to me the descent of the Rev. Mr. Hayman of Youghal
(with any remarks you have to make on the Nagles), at
your earliest convenience. I want to try what my
grenadier namesake in London can make of it. He is
pedigree-mad, if any man ever was so, and would read
a whole library for one fact relating to any branch of
the O’Donovans.
Write me such a note as I can send him (without
making any allusion to Protestants) and I will get him
to make any searches you like about the Kilmeen or
Glean-a-Mhuilin Sept.
My eldest boy John entered Trinity College, Dublin,
on the 5th instant, and was admitted to contend for
mathematical honors. He feels himself like a fish out
of water among the Tory Protestants, after leaving the
Jesuit fathers of Great Denmark street.
It is reported here that a young Ireland war is beginning
to be organized in Cork and Kerry, but I do
not believe it. You need not make any allusion to
this in your notes, because my young friend is an aristocrat,
though he hates the Saxons more than I do.
Yours in great haste,
John O’Donovan.
The “Young Ireland War” as he calls it, got me
into prison a few weeks after he wrote that letter. He
wrote it on the 10th of November, 1858. I was arrested
on the 5th of December, and kept in Cork Jail
until August, 1859; but that did not make John
O’Donovan afraid of writing to me. I wrote to him on
some subjects from Cork Jail. He was in England at
the time, and I got this letter from his son Edmond,
who was then fifteen years old.
Dublin, June 20, 1859.
Mr. O’Donovan Rossa, County Jail, Cork.
Sir—My father and my brother John are at present
in Oxford, else you would have long since received an
answer to your letter. As you would probably wish to
write to him again, I send you his address, which is in
care of Dr. Bandenel, Bodleian Library, Oxford. We
expect them home about the 24th of July.
I remain your, etc.,
E. O’Donovan.
That is the Edmond O’Donovan who became so celebrated
as a war correspondent in Asia and Africa, for
the London papers, and who was killed in the Soudan
in the year 1882. About June the 14th, 1859, his
father wrote me this letter:
Dear Sir—I have received your letter of the 5th
instant, and was glad to hear that your enthusiasm had
not cooled down. I was, since I wrote to you last,
away in the beautiful land of the Saxon, where they
seem to know as much about us as they do about the
Pawnee Loups of North America. I worked in the
British Museum, the Tower of London, the State paper
office, the Lambeth Library, all in London, and in the
Lambeth Library at Oxford. The State papers are full
of most curious information relating to Ireland, which
will be published some time between this and the day
of judgment, for the enlightenment of posterity, but not
in our times.
John Collins of Myross, the last Irish poet and antiquary
of Carbery was an Irish Senachy without any
critical knowledge whatsoever.
The tribe of the O’Donovans which he calls MacAeneas
or MacAongus, had never any existence under
that appellation, but the O’Donovans of Glenawilling,
are frequently mentioned in old Irish pedigrees, under
the name of MacEnesles, and in the public records under
that of MacEnesles-Mac-I-Crime. This MacEnesles
family was the third (second by descent) most important
sept of the O’Donovans of Carbery, and the descent
of their ancestor Aneslis, or Stanislaus, is given
thus by MacFirbis:
1. Donovan, ancestor of the O’Donovans, slain, 977,
by Brian Boru.
2. Cathal, fought at Clontarf, 1014.
3. Amhlaff or Auliffe, flourished 1041.
4. Murrough.
5. Aneslis.
6. Raghnall or Reginald.
7. Mulrony.
8. Crom, slain, 1254, by O’Mahony in
Glanachryme near Dunmanway.
9. Cathal, a quo Clancahill, anciently of Castle
Donovan in Drimoleague.
Aneslis, a quo MacEnesles of Glenawilling.
Loughlin, a quo the Clan Loughlin of Cloghatradbally.
10. Donogh More, son of Aneslis.
The pedigrees of the Clancahill of Castle-Donovan,
and of the Clan Loughlin of Kilmaccabee and Reenogriana
are preserved, but that of the sept of Mac
Enesles (now locally Mac MacIninish) has been entirely
neglected. The last distinguished man of the sept
was Captain Daniel Boy O’Donovan of Kilcoleman,
who had served his Majesty faithfully beyond the
seas, 1641. In 1632, Dermod MacTeige MacEnesles
O’Donovan possessed the lands of Lisnabreeny West,
in the parish of Kilmeen; but here I lose sight of
them altogether! They had no local historian.
Aneslis their ancestor had four sons, Donogh More,
Rickard, Walter and Randal, who became the founder of
four distinct septs generally called in the public records,
Slught Eneslis MacIcroyme. Denis na Meeny,
so much talked of by John Collins, was one of this
sept. Yours ever sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
After I came out of jail, our correspondence continued;
I will continue it here by showing you this
letter:
Dublin, March 1, 1860.
My dear Friend—I have just received your note,
and was glad to see your handwriting. I should be
glad to contribute in any way to illustrate the literature
of old Ireland, but my hands are more than full
just now. I have too many irons in the fire, so that
some of them must get burned. My boys are of no
help to me, because they have too many studies to attend
to, and I do not like to interrupt them. I have
the eldest in Trinity College, and three others at the
Jesuits’ Grammar School, where they are making considerable
progress in classic and science. I have buried
the youngest, Morgan Kavanaugh O’C. O’D., who died
on the 11th of February, 1860, at the age of one year
and forty-nine days, so that I calculate he went off the
stage of this world without any stain from ancient or
modern sin. I have no reason to be sorry for his departure
from this wicked world. But his mother is so
sorry after him that she refused to take food for two
days, which has brought her to the brink of insanity.
I was glad to learn that Henry O’Donovan, Esq., of
Lissard, had an heiress. He may have a house full of
children now, of both sexes, as he has broken the ice,
notwithstanding the curse of the Coarb of St. Barry.
Our ancestor Donobhan, son of Cathal, was certainly
a singularly wicked and treacherous man, but it is to
be hoped that his characteristics have not been transmitted,
and therefore that the curse of the good Coarb
of St. Barry has spent its rage long since. But still if
you view the question fairly, you will incline with me
to believe that the curse still hangs over us:
1. Castle-Donovan was forfeited in 1641, and given
away, forever.
2. My ancestor Edmond killed the son of O’Sullivan
Beare, and was killed himself in 1643, leaving his
descendants landless. Right!
3. The race of Colonel Daniel O’Donovan became
extinct in 1829, in the person of General O’Donovan,
who left the small remnant of his patrimonial inheritance
to Powell, a Welshman. Curse!
4. The present O’Donovan is childless. His brother
Henry has one daughter, who, if she be the only heir,
will leave the name landless.
These four reasons, adding to them your imprisonment
in 1859, convinces me that the curse of the good
Coarb still hangs over us all. But I hope we may escape
it in the next world!
John O’Mahony (the descendant of the real murderer
of Mahon, King of Munster), who was proclaimed here
in 1848, is now in America, a greater rebel than ever.
His translation of Keating’s history of Ireland is rather
well done.
Wishing you every happiness, I remain dear sir,
yours ever,
J. O’Donovan.
Dublin, March 21, 1860.
My dear Friend—I have promised to write for Sir
Bernard Burk’s “Family Vicissitudes” a few articles
on fallen Irish families, and I was thinking of giving a
note of James O’Donovan of Cooldurragha, whom you
told me was in the poorhouse, Skibbereen. You mentioned
to me that he had no son. Perhaps you might
not think it troublesome to ask himself if he would
like this notice of him to appear. If he should like it,
you will oblige me by letting me know exactly what he
has to say on the “vicissitudes” of his family. I know
you have a quick apprehension and a lively imagination,
and I will therefore expect from your pen a curious
story from the dictation of James O’D. himself, on
the vicissitudes of his family. I believe that his descent
is pure, and that he is now the senior representative
of Donogh, the fourth son of O’Donovan by the
daughter of Sir Owen McCarthy-Reagh. This is a
high descent for one who is a porter in the poorhouse,
and I think his story might be worked up into a narrative
that might do justice to the genius of Plutarch.
Your friend Edmond, the painter, has got free access
to the records of the Ulster King’s Tower. I am
almost afraid to let him indulge his tastes for heraldry;
but I am willing to let him go there every second day,
on condition that he will not neglect his classical
studies. Should you be writing to your cousin Florence,
of New York, you will oblige me by asking him
to call on my nephew-in-law, Thomas Francis Kerrigan,
telling him that I wish them to become acquainted.
This has been a very severe March, but as you have
youth, health and enthusiasm on your side, you must
have come off more scathless from the effects of it than
one who is a regular Mananan Mac Lir—a regular
thermometer—from the effects of rheumatism.
Yours, ever sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
As he asked me to see James O’Donovan, I saw him.
He was a porter at the entrance gate of the Skibbereen
Poorhouse, at a salary of twelve pounds a year.
When he would have a vacation day, he’d come into
my house in town. One day I told him what John
O’Donovan wanted me to get from him. He did not
like to give it; he was afraid it would injure him.
Henry O’Donovan brother to “The O’Donovan” was
an ex-officio poor law guardian; Powell, the Welshman,
who inherited the lands of General O’Donovan was an
ex-officio P. L. G., and if he, James, got anything published
about who and what he was, they may think he
had some design upon ownership of the lands of the
O’Donovan clan, which they held because their fathers
and their kin turned Protestant, while James’ fathers
remained Catholics, and so lost their patrimony; so
James did not like to give me the information John
O’Donovan wanted, for fear it would—to the loss of
his situation—prejudice the landlord guardians against
him, most of whom were the possessors of the plundered
property of the people.
I told that to John O’Donovan, telling him I did not
like to press James to give me his story.
The next of his letters is this:
Dublin, March 24, 1860.
My dear Friend—I have received your letter, and
was exceedingly sorry to hear you had lost your wife—a
great loss in case of ardent affection on both sides;
but you are young and vigorous; and time, the dulce
molimen—the soft soother—will finally reduce your
grief to “a softer sadness.” Your imprisonment must
have weighed heavily upon her spirits.
My nephew-in-law seems to be a sensible man of the
world. He seems to be a great Catholic. Of his politics
I know nothing, but calculate that they are ultramontane;
and I think Finghin Ceannmor and he
would agree very well. I have no faith in politics of
any kind, nor have I any trust in Whig or Tory. I
was glad to learn that poor James was in good health,
and not utterly destitute. I hope you will be able to
get out of him all the Shanachus that he has in his
head about the Clann-Donnabhain. I am sure it
would offend him to hear that Donell-na-g Croicean,
who died in 1584, was unquestionably a bastard—Teige,
his father, was never married. Donell-na-g
Croicean “kept” Eileen ni Laoghaire—Ellen
O’Leary, but afterward married her. Domhnall, their
son, married Juana, daughter of Sir Owen McCarthy.
Daniel, their first son, is the ancestor of General
O’Donovan, of Bawnlahan, who died in 1829. Teige,
their second son, is the ancestor of Morgan, now
O’Donovan. Donogh, the fourth son is the ancestor
of James of Cooldurragha.
It is useless to tell him this, because he would not
believe it, though it was sworn to by “Sir Finghin
O’Driscoll, and divers other good and trustworthy witnesses”;
but he heard from the Clan-Loughlin and
other septs of the O’Donovans, that such was the
tradition.
This illegitimacy of the senior branch is, in my opinion,
another result of the curse of the good Coarb of
St. Barry.
I have given in the Appendix to the Annals, all that
I could find about James’ pedigree; but what I want
from him now is his story of how the property gradually
passed from him and his ancestors, giving dates as
often as possible, and also the cause of the loss of the
lands. It is very curious how the descendants of the
youngest son, Kedagh, succeeded better than any of
the rest, except the Protestants.
How many acres did James farm when he was married?
My western correspondents always speak of him as
a poor, struggling farmer, but a man of strict probity
and high principles. Does any other male descendant
of his ancestor Donogh or Denis survive? If there is
none, does it not strike you that the curse is at work
in removing the name out of Clancahill? I am actually
superstitious on this point. I believe that most
members of the family are high-minded, and remarkably
honest, but I believe, also, that they are reckless,
addicted to drink, and irritable to a degree that counterbalances
all their amiable characteristics. I am
anxious to preserve a memorial of James, as by all accounts,
he has been a virtuous, honest and honorable
man; and only unfortunate, as being overwhelmed by
adverse circumstances, or perhaps, as not having sufficient
craft or cunning to grapple with the world. I
enclose you the Jesuits’ letter about my boys. These
Jesuits are very clever. I also enclose a note from W.
J. O’Donovan of the Protestant sept of Wexford, who
beats us all hollow in enthusiasm for the name and its
pedigree.
Hoping that you keep up your spirits, I remain,
dear sir, yours ever sincerely,
John O’Donovan.
Dublin, March 27, 1860.
My dear Friend—You told me when last in Dublin,
that the family of Deasy were Irish, and were
called in Irish, O’Daosaigh. Are you quite certain
that the O’ is prefixed to the name by the Irish-speaking
people of the County of Cork?
We have in the County Kilkenny a family of the
name of O’Daedi, anglicized Deady, and I have been
long of the opinion that your Deasys of County Cork
are the same. You have a Dundeady in the parish of
Rathbarry, in your county, a well-known promontory.
You will oblige me exceedingly by asking James of
Cooldurragha, whether the Deasys are a Cork family,
and what the name is called by the Irish-speaking people.
Please to ask James the following questions:
First.—Are there O’Deadys and O’Deasys in the
County Cork?
Second.—If not; how long have the O’Deasys been
in the County Cork; and where did they come from?
What is the tradition?
We have O’Deadys in Ossory, but believe that they
came from Munster; and John MacWalter Walsh, in
his dirge, lamenting the downfall of the Irish, sets
down O’Deady as one of the Irish chieftains next after
O’Coileain, now Collins. This looks odd; for I cannot
find any Irish chieftain of the name of O’Deady in the
Irish annals, or Irish genealogies. I have several relatives
of this name.
Third.—How long have the Deasys of your county
(of whom is the Attorney-General Rickard Deasy)
been in the County Cork? Are they aborigines or late
comers? If aborigines, where were they seated? If
late comers, how is it known that they are of Irish descent?
How long are they among the rank of the
gentry? Are there many of the name in the county?
Are they a clan anywhere? I suppose they are
O’Deadys.
Fourth.—Did James ever hear of a sept of the
O’Donovans in the County of Cork, who were not descended
from Crom, or the Donovan who captured
Mahon, King of Munster at Bruree? It appears there
was a sept of the O’Donovans of the same race as
O’Driscoll of Colthuighe, before the race of the treacherous
Donovan of Bruree had settled in the O’Driscoll
territory; but I fear they cannot now be distinguished.
They were seated in Tuath-Feehily, near Inchydoney,
on the Bay of Clonakilty.
Yours ever,
John O’Donovan.
Dublin, March 29, 1860.
My dear Friend—I return you the letters of Donal
Oge and Edward O’Sullivan (Edward, the Cork butter
merchant, now dead—1898), and thank you most
heartily for the read of them. Donald Oge (Dan
McCartie, now in New York—1898), seems very
clever, but the other seems wild. Your cousin,
Finghin Ceannmor and my nephew-in-law in New
York may be of mutual advantage to each other, as
they seem bent on business and industry. I fear your
political friends are too sublime in their notions to
herd with either of them.
You will oblige me by getting hold of Shemus of
Cooldurragha soon as you can, or his brother. Have
they any share of education? I suppose John Collins
was their chief tutor.
I was often invited by the O’Donovan and his
brother Henry to visit them, but I have never been
able to spare time. I thought to send Edmond last
year, but his mother would not let him go. Next
summer or autumn I may take a stroll to the Southwest
with one or two of the boys, to show them gentes
cunnabula nostrae.
Meantime, believe me, yours ever,
S. O’Donobhan.
Dublin, April 20, 1860.
My dear Friend—Many thanks for your letter
about the Deasys. I fear that their pedigree is not on
the rolls of time, and that we can never discover any
more about them.
Your observations about the Pope have amused me
very much. My faction of boys are divided into two
deadly political enemies to each other on the subject,
and I can hardly keep them from fighting on the subject.
One party is for our Holy Father the Pope and
his temporal power, and another for ceding him his
spiritual power only. They are all for Napoleon;
which, in my opinion, is not fair, and they hope that
the Bourbons will never be restored.
My eldest son John, got the prize for chemistry in
the Museum of Industry here, which was a great effort
for him, being just turned off seventeen and having to
contend with the practical young chemists of Dublin.
My second son, Edmond, is actually mad at his heraldic
studies, though I have been constantly telling
him that it is an obsolete science, and that mankind
will soon do very well without it. But my admonition
is slighted, and he continues to cultivate the old
knightly science. You will soon see some of his doings
in my article on Wilhelm Count Gall Von Bourkh of
the Austrian service, from whose brother Walter we
descend collaterally.
My third son, William, is the cleverest of all, and is
likely to become a Jesuit or a Passionist. He is entirely
for the Pope and his temporal power; and inclines
to sneer at the Nation and Irishman equally.
We get both these eccentric Irish newspapers. My
fourth son Richard is all for statistics and geography.
He knows more of European statistics than any boy of
his age in the world (except, perhaps, some of the
mnemonistic students) but he is wicked and selfish and
will be very lucky if he is not yet killed fighting
against the niggers.
Hoping to hear of your second marriage (which is a
right, natural and proper thing), I remain, dear sir,
your well wisher,
John O’Donovan.
While I was in prison, from 1865 to 1871, Edmond
O’Donovan was taking an active part in Fenian politics.
In that enterprise he had traveled through Ireland,
England, Scotland, and had made a few visits to
America. After I left prison and came to America, I
got this letter from him;
County Durham, England,
May 9, 1872.
My dear Rossa—Twenty times within the past
four months, I have sat down with the intention of
writing you a long letter; but as often those circumstances
over which one has no control interposed their
ill-favored presence. Even as it is, I cannot catch time
for an interchange of thoughts, and only scribble a few
lines to ask you to get our friend whom it concerns to
look after two gentlemen of my acquaintance, now on
your side of the Atlantic, and who complain they can’t
get credit among you. Their names and addresses are
as follows: Thomas Smith and Owen Murray, late of
the North of England. Address, under cover, to John
Kelly, Spuyten Duyvil, Westchester County, N. Y. If
you would kindly see after this I would be obliged.
I duly received your card, per favor of Mr. Scanlan,
to whose letter, by the way, I have never since replied,
and about which you must apologize for me, should you
see him, as he is an old and valued friend.
I address this to the private address on your card—under
cover, to Mrs. Kelly.
I have been reading your letters to the Dublin Irishman
with great interest, and having the misfortune to
know something about the United States, through two
visits made during your imprisonment, I can thoroughly
appreciate and feel for your unenviable position of nineteenth
century knight-errant and Paladin in the cause
of distressed virtue.
Be assured that if ever I take up such a rôle—and
you must pardon my saying so—I will display greater
discrimination in the choice of a sphere of action. I
know well the retort that will spring to your lips—that
those “who live in glass houses should not throw
stones”—and, that those who constitute themselves
champions of a lot of “coundfounded, hairy, greasy foreigners”
should not talk of wisdom. But, after all,
you know what the United States Germans say—“the
longer a man lives, the more he finds out,” and I can
only say in the words of the immemorial schoolboy,
“I’ll never do it again, sir.”
I was a prisoner of war in Bavaria when I read of
your release, and, would you believe it, it was a Roman
Catholic clergyman who brought me the news, and was
actually—he said—glad to hear of it.
Truth, they say, is stranger than fiction—and as the
Turcos used to exclaim, “Be chesm, on my head and
my eyes be it,” if what I tell you isn’t correct.
Time, paper and nonsensical ideas being all run out—with
best respects to Mrs. O’D. and all old friends,
I remain ever yours,
E. O’Donovan.
P. S. Excuse rubbish; the fact being that I am
writing a book on metaphysics, and under the circumstances,
you cannot expect common sense.
E. O’D.
P. A. Collins, of Boston, was active in Fenian politics
those days. So was Colonel Tom Kelly, one of the
men rescued in Manchester. This is a letter written
by Edmond O’Donovan to P. A. Collins:
My dear Mr. Collins—Should any question arise
as to the part which Colonel Kelly intends playing in
the present arrangement for unifying the I. R. B., of
Great Britain—and should any doubt arise as to his
abiding by the decision of the committee—a member
of which you are, I beg to state that I am authorized
by Colonel Kelly to speak for him in the matter, and
hold myself in readiness to appear before the convention,
or any committee appointed by them to investigate
the true state of the case.
Furthermore, I am authorized by Colonel Kelly,
should such be necessary for the harmonious working
of the parties, to lay before you his complete and entire
resignation of all claims to authority over any branch
of the organization, either here or in Great Britain and
Ireland. Your obedient servant.
E. O’Donovan.
P. A. Collins, Esq.
When Edmond was in Asia and Africa, some of the
native tribes made him their king. I take from Appleton’s
Encyclopedia this account of how he came by his
death:
“The battle ground had been selected by the Mahdi
with his usual sagacity. It was a narrow rocky passage
between wooded hills, in which he had placed the
guns and rifles captured in former engagements, in positions
where they could be used with effect, but where
it was impossible for General Hicks to deploy his
artillery. Into this ambuscade the Egyptian advance
was led by a treacherous guide. The army of Hicks
Pasha was totally annihilated. The troops are reported
to have fought three days without water, until all their
cartridges were expended. General Hicks then ordered
a bayonet charge, but the army was immediately overwhelmed,
and not a man escaped. The commander-in-chief,
with Alla-ed-Din, Governor General of the Soudan,
Abbas Bey, Colonel Farquahar, Major Von Seckendorf,
Massy, Warner and Evans, Captain Horlth
and Anatyaga, Surgeon-general Georges Bey, Surgeon
Rosenberg, O’Donovan the well-known war correspondent,
a number of Egyptian pashas and beys, and all
the officers, who numbered 1,200, and soldiers of the
army, were slain.”
In a book bearing the title of “Mr. Parnell, M.P.,
and the I. R. B.” I read this passage:
“The most distinguished literary man ever known to
be in the ranks of Fenianism was undoubtedly Edmond
O’Donovan, who was a ‘V,’ or organizer for the
North of England, and afterward the well-known
Asiatic traveler and writer.”
Looking at the death of the three eldest sons of John
O’Donovan—John, Edmond and William—I cannot
help thinking on what their father says about his being
almost superstitious on the head of that holy curse
pronounced against the name. John was drowned
while bathing in the river at St. Louis; Edmond was
slain in Africa; and William died here in New York a
dozen years ago; I saw him buried in Calvary Cemetery.
The three were actively connected with the
Fenian movement in Ireland. I don’t know I may
blame myself for having anything to do with that connection.
The father, John O’Donovan, died in the year 1862,
at the age of fifty-three, and his co-laborer in Celtic
literature, Eugene Curry, died a few months after.
God be merciful to them, and to all the souls we are
bound to pray for!
Another word; a few words; these few verses from
a poem written by Thomas D’Arcy McGee on the death
of John O’Donovan will end this chapter:
And thus it is, that even I,
Though weakly and unworthily,
Am moved by grief
To join the melancholy throng
And chant the sad entombing song
Above the chief:
Too few, too few, among our great,
In camp or cloister, church or state,
Wrought as he wrought;
Too few, of all the brave we trace
Among the champions of our race
Gave us his thought.
Truth was his solitary test,
His star, his chart, his east, his west;
Nor is there aught
In text, in ocean, or in mine,
Of greater worth, or more divine
Than this he sought.
With gentle hand he rectified
The errors of old bardic pride,
And set aright
The story of our devious past,
And left it, as it now must last
Full in the light.