"The ideal is in thyself; thy condition is but the stuff thou art to
shape that same ideal out of. What matters whether such stuff be of
this sort or of that, so the form thou give it be heroic, be poetic."—Sartor
Resartus.
Every state of society has, happily, its originals; men
and women who, in more or fewer respects, think, speak,
and act, naturally and unconsciously, in a different way
from the generality of men. There are several causes from
which this originality may arise, particularly in a young
community less gregarious than those of the civilized countries
of the Old World.
The commonest of these causes in a society like that of the
United States is, perhaps, the absence of influences to which
almost all other persons are subject. The common pressure
being absent in some one direction, the being grows out in
that direction, and the mind and character exhibit more or
less deformity to the eyes of all but the individual most concerned.
The back States afford a full harvest of originals
of this class; while in England, where it is scarcely possible
to live out of society, such are rarely to be found.
Social and professional eccentricity comes next. When
local and professional influences are inadequately balanced
by general ones, a singularity of character is produced,
which is not so agreeable as it is striking and amusing. Of
this class of characters few examples are to be seen at
home; but, instead of them, something much worse, which
is equally rare in America. In England we have confessors
to tastes and pursuits, and martyrs to passions and
vices, which arise out of a highly artificial state of society.
In England we have a smaller proportion of grave, innocent,
professional buffoons; but in America there are few or no
fashionable ingrained profligates, few or no misers.
In its possession of a third higher class, it is reasonable
and delightful to hope that there is no superiority in the
society of any one civilized country over that of any other.
Of men and women who have intellectual power to modify
the general influences to which, like others, they are subject,
every nation has its share. In every country there
have been beings who have put forth more or less of the
godlike power involved in their humanity, whereby they can
stem the current of circumstance, deliberately form the purpose
of their life, and prosecute it, happen what may. The
number is not large anywhere, but the species is nowhere
unknown.
A yet smaller class of yet nobler originals remains; those
who, with the independent power of the last mentioned, are
stimulated by strong pressure of circumstance to put forth
their whole force, and form and achieve purposes in which
not only their own life, but the destiny of others, is included.
Such, being the prophets and redeemers of their age and
country, rise up when and where they are wanted. The
deed being ripe for the doing, the doer appears. The field
being white for harvest, the reaper shows himself at the
gate, whether the song of fellow-reapers cheers his heart,
or lions are growling in his solitary path.
Many English persons have made up their minds that
there is very little originality in America, except in regions
where such men as David Crockett grow up. In the wilds
of Tennessee and Kentucky twenty years ago, and now in
Arkansas and Missouri, where bear-hunting and the buffalo
chase are still in full career, it is acknowledged that a man's
natural bent may be seen to advantage, and his original
force must be fully tested. But it is asked, with regard to
America, whether there is not much less than the average
amount of originality of character to be found in the places
where men operate upon one another. It is certain that
there is an intense curiosity in Americans about English
oddities; and a prevailing belief among themselves that
England is far richer in humorists than the United States.
It is also true that the fickleness and impressibleness of the
Americans (particularly of the New-Englanders) about systems
of science, philosophy, and morals, exceed anything
ever seen or heard of in the sober old country; but all this
can prove only that the nation and its large divisions are not
original in character, and not that individuals of that character
are wanting.
It should be remembered that one great use of a metropolis,
if not the greatest, is to test everything for the benefit of
the whole of the rest of the country. The country may,
according to circumstances, be more or less ready to avail
itself of the benefit; but the benefit exists and waits for acceptance.
Now the Americans have no metropolis. Their
cities are all provincial towns. It may be, in their circumstances,
politically good that they should have the smallest
possible amount of centralization; but the want of this centralization
is injurious to their scientific and philosophical
progress and dignity, and, therefore, to their national originality.
A conjurer's trip through the English counties is
very like the progress of a lecturer or newly-imported philosopher
through the American cities. The wonder, the excitement,
the unbounded credulity are much alike in the two
cases; but in the English village there may be an old man
under the elm smiling good-naturedly at the show without
following after it; or a sage young man who could tell how
the puppets are moved as well as if he saw the wires. And
so it is in the American cities. The crowd is large, but
everybody is not in it; the believers are many, but there are
some who foresee how soon the belief will take a new
turn.
When Spurzheim was in America, the great mass of society
became phrenologists in a day, wherever he appeared;
and ever since itinerant lecturers have been reproducing the
same sensation in a milder way, by retailing Spurzheimism,
much deteriorated, in places where the philosopher had not
been. Meantime the light is always going out behind as
fast as it blazes up round the steps of the lecturer. While
the world of Richmond and Charleston is working at a multiplication
of the fifteen casts (the same fifteen or so) which
every lecturer carries about, and all caps and wigs are pulled
off, and all fair tresses dishevelled in the search after organization,
Boston has gone completely round to the opposite
philosophy, and is raving about spiritualism to an excess
which can scarcely be credited by any who have not heard
the Unknown Tongues. If a phrenological lecturer from
Paris, London, or Edinburgh should go to Boston, the
superficial, visible portion of the public would wheel round
once more, so rapidly and with so clamorous a welcome on
their tongues, that the transported lecturer would bless his
stars which had guided him over to a country whose inhabitants
are so candid, so enlightened, so ravenous for truth.
Before five years are out, however, the lecturer will find
himself superseded by some professor of animal magnetism,
some preacher of homœopathy, some teacher who will undertake
to analyze children, prove to them that their spirits
made their bodies, and elicit from them truths fresh from
heaven. All this is very childish, very village-like; and it
proves anything rather than originality in the persons concerned.
But it does not prove that there is not originality
in the bosom of a society whose superficial movement is of
this kind; and it does not prove that national originality may
not arise out of the very tendencies which indicate that it
does not at present exist.
The Americans appear to me an eminently imaginative
people. The unprejudiced traveller can hardly spend a
week among them without being struck with this every day.
At a distance it is seen clearly enough that they do not put
their imaginative power to use in literature and the arts;
and it does certainly appear perverse enough to observers
from the Old World that they should be imitative in fictions
(whether of the pen, the pencil, stone, or marble), and imaginative
in their science and philosophy, applying their
sober good sense to details, but being sparing of it in regard
to principles. This arbitrary direction of their imaginative
powers, or, rather, its restriction to particular departments,
is, I believe and trust, only temporary. As their numbers
increase and their society becomes more delicately organized;
when, consequently, the pursuit of literature, philosophy,
and art shall become as definitely the business of some men
as politics and commerce now are of others, I cannot doubt
that the restraints of imitation will be burst through, and that
a plenitude of power will be shed into these departments as
striking as that which has made the organization of American
commerce (notwithstanding some defects) the admiration
of the world, and vindicated the originality of American politics
in theory and practice.
However this may be, it is certain that there are individuals
existing everywhere, in the very heart of Boston itself,
as original as Sam Weller and David Crockett, or any other
self-complacent mortal who finds scope for his humours
amid the kindly intricacies of London or the canebrakes of
Tennessee.
Some of the most extraordinary instances I met with of
persons growing mentally awry were among the scholars
who are thinly sprinkled through the Southern and Western
settlements. When these gentlemen first carried their accomplishments
into the wilderness, they were probably
wiser than any living and breathing being they encountered.
The impression of their own wisdom was deep from the beginning,
and it continues to be deepened by every accident
of intercourse with persons who are not of their way of
thinking; for to differ from them is to be wrong. At the
same time their ways of thinking are such as are not at all
likely to accord with other people's; so that their case of
delusion is complete. I saw a charming pair of professors
in a remote state most blessed in their opinions of themselves.
They were able men, or would have been so amid the discipline
of equal society; but their self-esteem had sprouted
out so luxuriantly as to threaten to exhaust all the better part
of them. One of the most remarkable circumstances in the
case was that they seemed aware of their self-complacency,
and were as complacent about it as about anything else.
One speaking of the other, says, "A. has been examining
my cranium. He says I am the most conceited man in the
States, except himself."
The exception was a fair one. When I saw B., I thought
that I had seen the topmost wonder of the world for self-complacency;
but upon this Alp another was to arise, as I
found when I knew A. The only point of inferiority in A.
is that he is not quite immoveably happy in himself. His
feet are far from handsome, and no bootmaker at the West
End could make them look so. This is the bitter drop in
A.'s cup. This is the vulnerable point in his peace. His
pupils have found it out, and have obtained a hold over him
by it. They have but to fix their eyes upon his feet to
throw him into disturbance; but, if they have gone too far,
and desire to grow into favour again, they need only compliment
his head, and all is well again. He lectures to them
on Phrenology; and, when on the topic of Galen's scull,
declares that there is but one head known which can compare
with Galen's in its most important characteristics.
The students all raise their eyes to the professor's bald
crown, and the professor bows. He exhibits a cast of
Burke's head, mentioning that it combines in the most perfect
manner conceivable all grand intellectual and moral
characteristics; and adding that only one head has been
known perfectly to resemble it. Again the students fix their
gaze on the summit of the professor, and he congratulates
them on their scientific discernment.
This gentleman patronises Mrs. Somerville's scientific
reputation. He told me one morning, in the presence of
several persons whom he wished to impress with the highest
respect for Mrs. Somerville, the particulars of a call he
once made upon her during a visit to England. It was a
long story; but the substance of it was, that he found her a
most extraordinary person, for that she knew more than he
did. He had always thought himself a pretty good mathematician,
but she had actually gone further. He had prided
himself upon being a tolerable chymist, but he found she
could teach him something there. He had reason to think
himself a good mineralogist; but, when he saw her cabinet,
he found that it was possible to get beyond him. On entering
her drawing-room he was struck by some paintings
which he ascertained to be done by her hand, while he
could not pretend to be able to paint at all. He acknowledged
that he had, for once, met his superior. Two days
after, among a yet larger party, he told me the whole story
over again. I fell into an absent fit in planning how I could
escape from the rest of his string of stories, to talk with
some one on the opposite side of the room. When he
finally declared, "In short, I actually found that Mrs. Somerville
knows more than I do," I mechanically answered,
"I have no doubt of it." A burst of laughter from the whole
party roused me to a sense of what I had done in taking the
professor at his word. His look of mortification was pitiable.
It was amusing to see him with the greatest statesman in
the country, holding him by the button for an hour together,
while lecturing in the style of a master to a hopeful schoolboy.
The pompous air of the professor and the patient
snufftaking of the statesman under instruction made a capital
caricature subject. One of the professor's most serious
declarations to me was, that the time had long been past
when he believed he might be mistaken. He had once
thought that he might be in the wrong like other people, but
experience had taught him that he never erred. As, therefore,
he and I did not agree on the point we were conversing
about, I must be mistaken. I might rely upon him that it
was so.
It is not to be expected that women should resist dangers
of position which men, with their wider intercourses, cannot
withstand. The really learned and able women of the
United States are as modest and simple as people of sound
learning and ability are; but the pedantry of a few bookish
women in retired country situations exceeds anything I ever
saw out of novels and farces.
In a certain region of the United States there are two sisters,
living at a considerable distance from each other, but
united (in addition to their undoubted sisterly regard) by
their common belief that they are conspicuous ornaments of
their country. It became necessary for me to make a call
on one of these ladies. She knew when I was going, and
had made preparation for my reception. I was accompanied
by three ladies, one of whom was an avowed authoress;
a second was a deep and thoroughly-exercised scholar, and
happened to have published, which the pedantic lady did not
know. The third was also a stranger to her, but a very clever
woman. We were treated with ludicrous precision, according
to our supposed merits; the third-mentioned lady being
just honoured with a passing notice, and the fourth totally
neglected. There was such an unblushing insolence in the
manner in which the blue-stocking set people who had written
books above all the rest of the world, that I could not let
it pass unrebuked; and I treated her to my opinion that they
are not usually the cleverest women who write; and that far
more general power and wisdom are required to conduct
life, and especially to educate a family of children well, than
to write any book or number of books. As soon as there
was a pause in the conversation, I rose to go. Some weeks
afterward, when I was on a journey, a lady drove up from a
distance of two miles to make an afternoon call upon me.
It was the sister. She told me that she came to carry me
home with her for the night, "in order," said she, "that you
may see how we who scribble can keep house." As I had
never had any doubt of the compatibility of the two things,
it was of little consequence that I could not go. She informed
me that she lectured on Mental and Moral Philosophy
to young ladies. She talked with much admiration of
Mr. Brown as a metaphysician. I concluded this gentleman
to be some American worthy with whom I had to become
acquainted; but it came out to be Dr. Thomas Brown
whom she was praising. She appeared not to know even
the names of metaphysicians out of the Scotch school; and
if the ghosts of the Scotch schoolmen were present, they
might well question whether she understood much of them.
She told me that she had a great favour to ask of me: she
wanted permission to print, in a note to the second edition of
her Lectures on Mental and Moral Philosophy, a striking
observation of mine made to her sister, which her sister had
transmitted to her by the next post. I immediately assured
her that she might print anything that I had said to her sister.
She then explained that the observation was that they
are not usually the cleverest women who write. I recommended
her to make sure of the novelty of the remark before
she printed it; for I was afraid that Shakspeare or somebody
had had it first. What was the fate of the opinion I
do not know; but it may be of use to the sisters themselves
if it suggests that they may be mistaken in looking down
upon all their sex who do not "scribble."
I think it must have been a pupil of theirs who wrote me
a letter which I threw into the fire in a fit of disgust the moment
I had read it. A young lady, who described herself as
"an ambitious girl," sent me some poetry in a magazine,
and an explanation in writing of her own powers and aspirations.
No one likes aspiration better than I, if only there
be any degree of rational self-estimate connected with it.
This young lady aspired to enter the hallowed precincts of
the temple where Edgeworth, More, and others were immortalized.
As for how she was to do it, her case seemed
to be similar to that of a West Indian lady, who once complained
to me that, while she was destined by her innate love
of the sublime and the beautiful to be distinguished, Providence
would not let her. The American young lady, however,
hoped that a friendship with me might persuade the
world to recognise her powers; and she informed me that
she had come to town from a distance, and procured an invitation
to a house where I was to spend the evening, that
we might begin our friendship. The rooms happened to be
so tremendously crowded that I was not obliged to see any
more persons than those immediately about me. I was told
that the "ambitious girl" was making herself very conspicuous
by standing on tiptoe, beaming and fluttering; but
I did not look that way, and never saw her. I hope she may
yet read her own poetry again with new eyes, and learn that
the best "ambition" does not write about itself, and that the
strongest "powers" are the least conscious of their own
operation.
In two of the eastern cities I met with two ladies who
had got a twist in opposite directions. It has been represented
in England that a jealousy of English superiority,
even in natural advantages, is very prevalent in the United
States. I do not think so; and I am by no means sure that
it is not nearly as rare as the opposite extreme. One instance
of each kind of prejudice came under my notice, and
I am not aware of more. At a party at Philadelphia, a lady
asked me if I had not crossed the Alleghanies, and whether
I did not think them stupendous mountains. I admired the
views they presented, and said all I could for the Alleghanies;
but it was impossible to agree that they were stupendous
mountains. The lady was so evidently mortified, that
I began to call the rivers stupendous, which I could honestly
do; but this was not the same thing. She said, in a complaining
tone,
"Well, I cannot think how you can say there are no high
mountains in the United States."
"You mistake me," I said. "I have not seen the White
Mountains yet; and I hear they are very grand."
"You English boast so of the things you have got at
home!" said she. "Why, I have seen your river Avon,
that you make so much of. I stood by the Avon, under
Warwick Castle, and I said to my husband that it was a
mighty small thing to be talked of at such a distance. Why,
if I had been ten years younger, I could almost have jumped
over it."
I told her that I believed the Avon was not so celebrated
for the quantity of water in it as on some other accounts.
The lady who went on the opposite tack is not very old,
and I suppose, therefore, that her loyalty to the crown of
England is hereditary. She made great efforts to see me,
that she might enjoy my British sympathies. With a grieved
countenance she asked me whether the folly and conceit of
her countrymen in separating themselves from the crown
were not lamentable. She had hoped that, before this, they
would have become convinced of the guilt and silliness of
their rebellion, and have sought to be taken back; but she
hoped it was not yet too late. I fear she considered me a
traitor to my country in not condemning hers. I was sorry
to deprive her of her last hope of sympathy; but what
could one do in such a case?
There must be many local and professional oddities in a
country like America, where individuals fill a larger space
in society, and are less pressed upon by influences, other
than local and professional, than in Old World communities.
A judge in the West is often a remarkable personage to European
eyes. I know one who unites all the odd characteristics
of the order so as to be worth a close study. Before
I left home, a friend desired me to bring her something, she
did not care what, that should be exclusively American;
something which could not be procurable anywhere else.
When I saw this judge I longed to pack him up, and direct
him, per next packet from New-York, to my friend; for he
was the first article I met with that could not by possibility
have been picked up anywhere out of the United States.
He was about six feet high, lank as a flail, and seeming to
be held together only by the long-tailed drab greatcoat into
which he was put. He had a quid in his cheek whenever I
saw him, and squirted tobacco-juice into the fireplace or
elsewhere at intervals of about twenty seconds. His face
was long and solemn, his voice monotonous, his manner dogmatical
to a most amusing degree. He was a dogged republican,
with an uncompromising hatred of the blacks, and
with an indifferent sort of pity for all foreigners. This last
feeling probably induced him to instruct me on various matters.
He fixed his eyes on the fire, and talked on for my
edification, but without taking express notice of the presence
of any one, so that his lecture had the droll appearance of
being a formal soliloquy. In the same speech he declared
that no man was made by God to run wild through a forest
who was not able to comprehend Christianity at sight;
missions to the heathen being therefore sanctioned from
heaven itself; and that men with a dark skin cannot, in
three years, learn the name of a rope or a point of the compass,
and that they are therefore meant to be slaves. It
seemed to me that he was bound to suspend the operation
of the law against all coloured persons on the ground of
their incapacity, their lack of understanding of the common
affairs of life. But the ground of their punishment in this
life seemed to be that they might be as wise as they pleased
about the affairs of the next. He proceeded with his enunciations,
however, without vouchsafing an explanation of
these mysteries. It must be an awkward thing to be either
a heathen or a negro under his jurisdiction, if he acts upon
his own doctrines.
Country doctors are not unlike wild country judges. Being
obliged to call in the aid of a village doctor to a companion,
I found we had fallen in with a fine specimen of the
class. I was glad of this afterward, but much annoyed at the
time by the impossibility of extracting from him the slightest
information as to my friend's state and prospects in regard
to her health. I detained him in conversation day after day
to no purpose, and varied my questions with as much American
ingenuity as I could command; but all in vain. He
would neither tell me what was the matter with her, nor
whether her illness was serious or trifling, or whether it was
likely to be long or short. He would give me no hint
which could enable me to form my plans, or to give my distant
friends an idea whether or when they might expect to
see us. All that he would say was, "Hope your friend
will be better;" "hope she will enjoy better health;" "will
make her better if we can;" "must try to improve her
health;" and so on. I was informed that this was all that
I should extract if the illness were to last a twelvemonth.
He took a blue paper with some white powder in it out of
one pocket, and a white paper with some other powder
out of another pocket; spilled some at random into
smaller papers, and gave directions when they should be
taken, and my friend speedily and entirely recovered. I
never was so completely in the dark about the nature of any
illness I saw, and I am completely in the dark still. I fancy
I hear now the short, sharp, conceited tones of the doctor,
doggedly using his power of exasperating my anxiety.
Such was not his purpose, however. The country doctors
themselves and their patients believe that they cure with far
more certainty than any other doctors; the profession are
probably convinced that they owe much to the implicit faith
of their charge, and are resolved to keep up this faith by
being impenetrable, allowing no part of their practice to be
made a subject of discussion which can possibly be rendered
mysterious. The chief reason of the success of country
doctors is, doubtless, that they have to treat chiefly diseases
of local prevalence, about which they employ long experience
and practised sagacity, without having much account
to give of their method of proceeding.
A country physician of higher pretensions than the one
who tormented me while curing my friend, told me that
Yankee inquisitiveness is the plague of the life of a country
doctor. The querists seem to forget that families may object
to have domestic sickness made the talk of the village
or hamlet, and that the doctor must dislike to be the originator
of news of this kind. They stop him on his rounds
to ask whom he is visiting in this direction, and whom
in that, and who could be sick on the road in which he was
seen going yesterday morning; and what such a one's
complaint is called, and how it is going to be cured, &c.
The physician told me that he was driven to invent modes
of escape. If he was riding, he appeared to see some acquaintance
at a distance, clapped spurs to his horse, and was
off; if he was walking, he gave a name of six syllables to
the disease talked about, and one of seven syllables to the
remedy, thus defying repetition. If our doctor took me to
be one of this class of querists, I could easily forgive his reserve.
I was told a story of an American physician which is
characteristic (if it be true), showing how patriotic regards
may enter into the practice of medicine. But I give it only
as an on dit. It is well known that Adams and Jefferson
died on the 4th of July of one year, and Monroe of another.
Mr. Madison died on the 28th of June last year. It is said
that the physician who attended Mr. Monroe expressed
regret that he had not the charge of Mr. Madison, suspecting
that he might have found means to keep him alive (as
he died of old age) till the 4th of July. The practice in
Mr. Monroe's case is said to have been this: When he was
sinking, some one observed what a remarkable thing it would
be if he should die on the anniversary, like Adams and Jefferson.
The physician determined he would give his patient
the chance of its ending so. He poured down brandy and
other stimulants, and omitted no means to keep life in the
failing body. On the 3d of July, the patient was sinking so
rapidly that there seemed little chance of his surviving the
day. The physician's exertions were redoubled; and the
consequence was, that, on the morning of the 4th, there
seemed every probability of the patient's living to the 5th,
which was not exactly desired. He died (just as if he
wished to oblige his friends to the last) late in the afternoon
of the 4th. So the story runs.
It is astonishing what may be done by original genius, in
availing itself of republican sentiment for professional purposes.
The drollery infused into the puffing system in
America would command the admiration of Puff himself.
It may be doubted whether he would have been up to the
invention of a recommendation of a certain oil for the hair
which I saw at Washington, and which threw us into such
a convulsion of laughter that the druggist behind the counter
had to stand waiting some time before we could explain our
business to him. A regiment of persons were represented
walking up to a perfumer's counter with bald sculls of all
degrees of ugliness, and walking away from it graced with
flowing tresses of every hue, which they were showing off
with gestures of delight. This was an ingenious device,
but not perfectly wise, as it contained no appeal to patriotic
feelings. I saw one at an optician's at Baltimore of a decidedly
more elevated character. There were miniature busts
in the window of Franklin, Washington, and Lafayette, each
adorned with a tiny pair of spectacles, which made the busts
appear as sage as life. Washington's spectacles were
white, Franklin's green, and Lafayette's neutral tint.
I acknowledge myself indebted for a new professional
idea to an original in the bookselling line in a large American
city. I am not sure that his originality extended beyond
the frankness of his professional discourse; but that was infinitely
striking. He told me that he wanted to publish for
me, and would offer as good terms as anybody. I thanked
him, but objected that I had nothing to publish. He was
sure I must have a book written about America. I had not,
and did not know that I ever should have. His answer,
given with a patronising air of suggestion, was, "Why,
surely, madam, you need not be at a loss about that. You
must have got incident plenty by this time; and then you
can Trollopize a bit, and so make a readable book."
In the West we were thrown into the society of a girl
about whom we were completely puzzled. Our New-England
friends could only conclude, with us, that she had been
trained amid the usages of some retired district to a freedom
which is certainly very unusual in the country. In a stage
which took up our party at a country hotel, near the Mammoth
Cave, in Kentucky, was a girl of about two-and-twenty,
oddly dressed. She got out and breakfasted with
the other passengers, looking perfectly at her ease. We
concluded that she belonged to one of two gentlemen in the
stage, and we rather wondered that any gentleman should
like to travel with a companion so untidily dressed as she
was. She had a good black silk gown, but over it was
pinned a square net handkerchief, unhemmed, and therefore
looking ragged. She had black stockings, but shabby shoes
of some dark-coloured leather, not black; and they were
tied on with twine where the strings had given way. Her
straw bonnet was shabby. She had nothing with her but a
basket which she carried on her knees. She joined freely
and pleasantly in conversation, and showed none of the
common troublesome timidity amid the disasters of the day
and of the ensuing night. It was very sultry weather. One
of the horses fell from heat in the midst of the Barrens, and
we all had to walk up the hills, and no short distance in the
forest. The roads were so bad that the driver tried his utmost
to alarm the passengers, in order to induce some to
lighten his vehicle by remaining behind; but the girl seemed
not in the least daunted. In the course of the night we
were overturned, and had no light but what was afforded
by the gentlemen walking before the stage, holding tallow
candles which they had bought by the roadside; but nothing
disconcerted the young lady. She was a girl of nerve and
of patience, it was clear. She refused to sit down to the first
meal we had on the road, and the reason of her abstinence
appeared before the day was over. When we changed
coaches, and it was necessary to pay on striking into a
new route, she coolly inquired if any gentleman would ask
a free passage for her till she could send the money out of
Indiana, where she was going. It was now evident that
she was alone, every passenger having supposed that she
was of the party of somebody else. She gave no further
explanation than that she had "come off in a hurry," no
one knowing of it but two of the slaves, and that she should
send the money out of Indiana. There was not the slightest
confusion in her manner, nor any apparent consciousness
that she was behaving strangely. One of the gentlemen
made himself answerable for her fare, and she proceeded
with us.
At Elizabethtown the next morning she refused breakfast
with the utmost cheerfulness; but our friend Mr. L. invited
her to sit down with us, which she did with a good grace.
At seven in the evening we arrived at Louisville, and alighted
at the great hotel; one of the largest, handsomest, and most
luxurious in the United States, and, of course, expensive.
We chose apartments while Mr. L. ordered supper in a private
room for our party. Almost before my companion
and I could turn ourselves round in our chamber, the lone
girl, who had followed us about like a ghost, was taking her
hair down at my dressing-table. Mrs. L. hastened to inform
her that this room was engaged; but, pointing out that
there were three beds, she said she should like to lodge
here. Of course this could not be allowed; and, as soon
as she found that we wished to be alone, she went away.
When we descended with Mrs. L. to her room, we found
the poor girl dressing there. Mrs. L. now took upon her
to advise. She observed to the young person that she
would probably be more comfortable in a less expensive hotel,
to which she agreed. The same elderly gentleman who
answered for her fare took her to a respectable hotel near
at hand, and commended her to the care of the landlady,
who promised to see her off for Indiana in the morning.
We left Louisville at dawn, and heard no more of the
lone girl, of whom we have often since thought and spoken.
The odd circumstances of the case were her freedom from
all embarrassment, and her cheerfulness on the road and
while fasting, from want of money. There was not a trace
of insanity in her manners, though her dress at first suggested
the idea; and we could perceive no symptoms of the fear
of pursuit or hurry of spirits which would have been natural
consequences of a clandestine flight. Yet, by her own account,
she must have done something of the kind.
Though the freedom of travelling is not such as to admit
of young ladies making their way about quite alone, in a
way so unceremonious as this, the liberty of intercourse on
the road is very great, and highly amusing to a stranger.
One day in Virginia, on entering our parlour at a hotel
where we were merely stopping to dine, I was amused to
see our lawyer companion, Mr. S., in grave consultation
with the hostess, while Mrs. S., her silk bonnet on her knee,
and a large pair of scissors in hand, was busy cutting,
slashing, and rending a newspaper on which the bonnet
peak was spread. There was evidently so much more show
than use in what she was doing, that I could not understand
her proceedings. "What are you about?" asked I. Mrs.
S. pointed to the landlady, and, trying to help laughing,
told me that the hostess had requested the pattern of her
bonnet. While this pretence of a pattern was in course of
preparation by the lady, the hostess was getting a legal
opinion out of the gentleman about a sum of eight hundred
dollars which was owing to her. If we had only stayed to
tea, I doubt not our landlady would have found some employment
for every one of us, and have favoured us, in
return, with all the rest of her private affairs.
Originals who are so in common circumstances, through
their own force of soul, ruling events as well as being
guided by them, yield something far better than amusement
to the observer. Some of these, out of almost every class,
I saw in America, from the divine and statesman down to
the slave. I saw a very old lady whom I consider to be
one, not on account of her extraordinary amiability and
sympathy with all ages (which cause her to be called
grandmamma by all who know her), but because this temper
of mind is the result of something higher than an easy disposition
and prosperous circumstances. It is the accomplishment
of a long-settled purpose. When Grandmamma J.
was eight years old, she was in company with an old lady
who was jealous, exacting, and peevish. On returning
home, the child ran to her mother and said, "If I am ever
an old lady, I will be a good-tempered old lady." This
was not said and forgotten, like many childish resolutions
formed under the smart of elderly people's faults. It was
a real purpose. She knew that, in order not to be cross
when old, it is necessary to be meek, patient, and cheerful
when young. She was so; and the consequence is, that
Grandmamma J.'s popularity is unbounded. She is cherished
by the whole community to whom she is known.
The children want to have her at their dances, and the youths
and maidens are always happiest where she is. She looks
as if no shadow of care had been cast over her bright spirit
for many a long year, and as if she might yet have many
sunny years to come. She is preacher, prophet, and dispenser
of amiability, all in one.
The venerable Noah Worcester is an original. I am
thankful to have seen this aged apostle, for so he should
be considered, having had a mission, and honourably discharged
it. He is the founder of Peace Societies in America.
Noah Worcester was a minister of the Gospel, of orthodox
opinions. By the time he was surrounded by a
family of young children, he had changed his opinions, and
found himself a Unitarian. He avowed the change, resigned
his parish, and went forth with his family, without a
farthing in the world, or any prospect of being able to obtain
a subsistence. He wrote diligently, but on subjects
which were next his heart, and on which he would have
written in like manner if he had been the wealthiest of
American citizens. He set up the "Christian Disciple,"
a publication which has done honour to its supporters both
under its original title and its present one of "The Christian
Examiner." He devoted his powers to the promotion of
Peace principles and the establishment of Peace Societies.
Whatever may be thought of the practical effects, in a narrow
view, of such societies, they seem to have well answered
a prodigious purpose in turning men's contemplations full
on the subject of true and false honour, and in inducing a
multitude of glorious experiments of living strictly according
to a principle which happens to be troublesome in its application.
The number of peacemen, practisers of nonresistance,
out of the Quaker body, is considerable in America,
and their great living apostle is Noah Worcester. The
leaders of the abolition movement are for the most part
peacemen; an inestimable circumstance, as it takes out the
sting from the worst of the slanders of their enemies, and
gives increased effect to their moral warfare. Human
nature cannot withstand the grandeur of the spectacle of
men who have all the moral power on their side, and who
abide unresistingly all that the physical power of the other
side can inflict The boldest spirits tremble, hearts the
most hardened in prejudice melt, when once they come into
full view of this warfare; and the victory rests with the men
of peace, who all love the name of Noah Worcester.
Nearly twenty years ago he was encompassed with distresses
for a time. Indeed, his life has been one of great
poverty till lately. He is not one of the men made to be
rich, or to spend his thoughts on whether he was happy or
not. He was sent into the world for a very different purpose,
with which and with its attendant enjoyments poverty
could but little interfere. But in the midst of his deep
poverty came sickness. His two daughters were at once
prostrated by fever, and a severe struggle it was before
they got through. Two friends of mine nursed them; and
in the discharge of their task learned lessons of faith which
they will be for ever thankful for, and of those graces which
accompany the faith of the heart, cheerfulness of spirits,
and quietude and simplicity of manner. My friends were
not, at the beginning, fully aware of the condition of the
household. They were invited to table at the early dinner
hour. On the table stood a single brown loaf and a pitcher
of water. Grace was said, and they were invited to partake
with the utmost ease and cheerfulness, and not a word
passed in reference to the restriction of the fare. This was
what God had been pleased to provide, and it was thankfully
accepted and hospitably shared. The father went from
the one sick room to the other, willing to receive what
tidings might await him, but tender to his daughters, as
they have since been to him. On one evening when all
looked threatening, he asked the friendly nurse whether the
voice of prayer would be injurious to his sick children;
finding that they desired to hear him, he set open the doors
of their chambers, kneeled in the passage between, and
prayed, so calmly, so thankfully, that the effect was to compose
the spirits of the invalids. One now lives with him
and cherishes him. She has changed her religious opinions
and become orthodox, but she has not changed towards
him. They are as blessed in their relation as ever.
Noah Worcester was seventy-six when I saw him in the
autumn of 1835. He was very tall, dressed in a gray
gown, and with long white hair descending to his shoulders.
His eye is clear and bright, his manner serious but cheerful.
His evening meal was on the table, and he invited us
to partake with the same grace with which he offered his
harder fare to the guests of former years. He lives at
Brighton, a short distance from Boston, where his daughter
manages the postoffice, by which their humble wants are
supplied. He had lately published, and he now presented
me with his "Last Thoughts" on some religious subjects
which had long engaged his meditations. I hope his serene
old age may yet be prolonged, gladsome to himself and eloquent
to the world.
There is a remarkable man in the United States, without
knowing whom it is not too much to say that the United
States cannot be fully known. I mean by this, not only
that he has powers and worth which constitute him an element
in the estimate to be formed of his country, but that
his intellect and his character are the opposite of those
which the influences of his country and his time are supposed
almost necessarily to form. I speak of the author of
the oration which I have already mentioned as being delivered
before the Phi Beta Kappa Society last August, Mr.
Emerson. He is yet in the prime of life. Great things are
expected from him, and great things, it seems, he cannot
but do, if he have life and health to prosecute his course.
He is a thinker and a scholar. He has modestly and silently
withdrawn himself from the perturbations and conflicts of
the crowd of men, without declining any of the business of
life, or repressing any of his human sympathies. He is a
thinker without being solitary, abstracted, and unfitted for
the time. He is a scholar without being narrow, bookish,
and prone to occupy himself only with other men's thoughts.
He is remarkable for the steadiness and fortitude with which
he makes those objects which are frequently considered the
highest in their own department subordinate to something
higher still, whose connexion with their department he has
clearly discovered. There are not a few men, I hope, in
America, who decline the pursuit of wealth; not a few who
refrain from ambition; and some few who devote themselves
to thought and study from a pure love of an intellectual life.
But the case before us is a higher one than this. The intellectual
life is nourished from a love of the diviner life of
which it is an element. Consequently, the thinker is ever
present to the duty, and the scholar to the active business
of the hour; and his home is the scene of his greatest acts.
He is ready at every call to action. He lectures to the
factory people at Lowell when they ask it. He preaches
when the opportunity is presented. He is known at every
house along the road he travels to and from home, by the
words he has dropped and the deeds he has done. The
little boy who carries wood for his household has been enlightened
by him; and his most transient guests owe to him
their experience of what the highest grace of domestic manners
may be. He neglects no political duty, and is unmindful
of nothing in the march of events which can affect the
virtue and peace of men. While he is far above fretting
himself because of evil-doers, he has ever ready his verdict
for the right, and his right hand for its champions. While
apart from the passions of all controversies, he is ever present
with their principles, declaring himself and taking his
stand, while appearing to be incapable of contempt of persons,
however uncompromising may be his indignation
against whatever is dishonest and harsh. Earnest as is the
tone of his mind, and placidly strenuous as is his life, an exquisite
spirit of humour pervades his intercourse. A quiet
gayety breathes out of his conversation; and his observation,
as keen as it is benevolent, furnishes him with perpetual
material for the exercise of his humour. In such a man
it is difficult to point out any one characteristic; but if, out
of such a harmony, one leading quality is to be distinguished,
it is in him modest independence. A more entire and
modest independence I am not aware of having ever witnessed,
though in America I saw two or three approaches
to it. It is an independence equally of thought, of speech,
of demeanour, of occupation, and of objects in life; yet
without a trace of contempt in its temper, or of encroachment
in its action. I could give anecdotes; but I have
been his guest, and I restrain myself. I have spoken of
him in his relation to society, and have said only what may
be and is known to common observers.
Such a course of life could not have been entered upon
but through discipline. It has been a discipline of calamity
as well as of toil. As for the prospect, it is to all appearance
very bright. Few persons are apparently placed so
favourably for working out such purposes in life. The condition
seems hard to find fault with; and as to the spirit
which is to work upon it—though I differ from some of the
views of the thinker, and do not sympathize with all of those
tastes of the scholar which I am capable of entering into—I
own that I see no defect, and anticipate nothing short of
triumph in the struggle of life.
Something may be learned of this thinker and his aims
from a few passages of his address; though this is the last
purpose, I doubt not, that he dreamed of his work being
used for. He describes the nature of the occasion. "Our
holyday has been simply a friendly sign of the survival of
the love of letters among a people too busy to give to letters
any more." His topic is the American scholar, and he
describes the influences which contribute to form or modify
him: the influence of Nature, the mind of the past, and
action in life. He concludes with a consideration of the
duty of the scholar.
"There goes in the world a notion that the scholar should
be a recluse, a valetudinarian, as unfit for any handiwork or
public labour as a penknife for an axe. The so-called
'practical men' sneer at speculative men as if, because they
speculate or see, they could do nothing. I have heard it
said that the clergy—who are always, more universally than
any other class, the scholars of their day—are addressed as
women; that the rough spontaneous conversation of men
they do not hear, but only a mincing and diluted speech.
They are often virtually disfranchised; and, indeed, there
are advocates for their celibacy. As far as this is true of
the studious classes, it is not just and wise. Action is with
the scholar subordinate, but it is essential. Without it he is
not yet man. Without it thought can never ripen into
truth. While the world hangs before the eye as a cloud of
beauty, we cannot even see its beauty. Inaction is cowardice;
but there can be no scholar without the heroic
mind. The preamble of thought, the transition through
which it passes from the unconscious to the conscious, is
action. Only so much do I know as I have lived."
... "The mind now thinks, now acts, and each fit
reproduces the other. When the artist has exhausted his
materials, when the fancy no longer paints, when thoughts
are no longer apprehended, and books are a weariness, he
has always the resource to live. Character is higher than
intellect. Thinking is the function. Living is the functionary.
"The stream retreats to its source. A great soul will
be strong to live as well as strong to think. Does he lack
organ or medium to impart his truths? He can still fall
back on this elemental force of living them. This is a total
act. Thinking is a partial act. Let the grandeur of justice
shine in his affairs. Let the beauty of affection cheer his
lowly roof. Those 'far from fame' who dwell and act with
him will feel the force of his constitution in the doings and
passages of the day better than it can be measured by any
public and designed display. Time shall teach him that the
scholar loses no hour which the man lives. Herein he unfolds
the sacred germe of his instinct screened from influence.
What is lost in seemliness is gained in strength.
Not out of those on whom systems of education have exhausted
their culture comes the helpful giant to destroy the
old or to build the new, but out of unhandselled savage
nature, out of terrible Druids and Bersirkirs come at last
Alfred and Shakspeare. I hear, therefore, with joy whatever
is beginning to be said of the dignity and necessity of
labour to every citizen. There is virtue yet in the hoe and
the spade for learned as well as for unlearned hands. And
labour is everywhere welcome; always we are invited to
work; only be this limitation observed, that a man shall not,
for the sake of wider activity, sacrifice any opinion to the
popular judgments and modes of action."
... "They (the duties of the scholar) are such as
become man thinking. They may all be comprised in
self-trust. The office of the scholar is to cheer, to raise,
and to guide men by showing them facts amid appearances.
He plies the slow, unhonoured, and unpaid task of observation.
Flamstead and Herschel, in their glazed observatory,
may catalogue the stars with the praise of all men, and, the
results being splendid and useful, honour is sure. But he, in
his private observatory, cataloguing obscure and nebulous
stars of the human mind, which as yet no man has thought
of as such; watching days and months, sometimes, for a few
facts; correcting still his old records; must relinquish display
and immediate fame. In the long period of his preparation
he must betray often an ignorance and shiftlessness
in popular arts, incurring the disdain of the able who
shoulder him aside. Long he must stammer in his speech,
often forego the living for the dead. Worse yet, he must
accept, how often! poverty and solitude. For the ease and
pleasure of treading the old road, accepting the fashions, the
education, the religion of society, he takes the cross of
making his own, and, of course, the self-accusation, the faint
heart, the frequent uncertainty, and loss of time which are
the nettles and tangling vines in the way of the self-relying
and self-directed; and the state of virtual hostility in which
he seems to stand to society, and especially to educated
society. For all this loss and scorn, what offset? He is to
find consolation in exercising the highest functions of human
nature. He is one who raises himself from private considerations,
and breathes and lives on public and illustrious
thoughts. He is the world's eye. He is the world's heart.
He is to resist the vulgar prosperity that retrogrades ever to
barbarism, by preserving and communicating heroic sentiments,
noble biographies, melodious verse, and the conclusions
of history. Whatsoever oracles the human heart in
all emergencies, in all solemn hours has uttered as its commentary
on the world of actions, these he shall receive and
impart. And whatsoever new verdict Reason from her inviolable
seat pronounces on the passing men and events of
to-day, this he shall hear and promulgate. These being his
functions, it becomes him to feel all confidence in himself,
and to defer never to the popular cry. He, and he only,
knows the world. The world of any moment is the merest
appearance. Some great decorum, some fetish of a government,
some ephemeral trade, or war, or man, is cried up by
half mankind and cried down by the other half, as if all
depended on this particular up or down. The odds are that
the whole question is not worth the poorest thought which
the scholar has lost in listening to the controversy. Let him
not quit his belief that a popgun is a popgun, though the
ancient and honourable of the earth affirm it to be the crack
of doom. In silence, in steadiness, in severe abstraction,
let him hold by himself; add observation to observation;
patient of neglect, patient of reproach, and bide his own
time, happy enough if he can satisfy himself alone that this
day he has seen something truly."
... "I read with joy some of the auspicious signs
of the coming days as they glimmer already through poetry
and art, through philosophy and science, through church
and state. One of these signs is the fact that the same
movement which effected the elevation of what was called
the lowest class in the state, assumed in literature a very
marked and as benign an aspect. Instead of the sublime
and beautiful, the near, the low, the common was explored
and poetized. That which had been negligently trodden
under foot by those who were harnessing and provisioning
themselves for long journeys into far countries, is suddenly
found to be richer than all foreign parts. The literature of
the poor, the feelings of the child, the philosophy of the
street, the meaning of household life, are the topics of the
time. It is a great stride. It is a sign—is it not?—of new
vigour, when the extremities are made active, when currents
of warm life run into the hands and feet. I ask not for the
great, the remote, the romantic; what is doing in Italy and
Arabia; what is Greek art or Provencal minstrelsy; I embrace
the common, I explore and sit at the feet of the familiar,
the low. Give me insight into to-day, and you may
have the antique and future worlds. What would we really
know the meaning of? The meal in the firkin; the milk
in the pan; the ballad in the street; the news of the boat;
the glance of the eye; the form and the gait of the body;
show me the ultimate reason of these matters; show me
the sublime presence of the highest spiritual cause lurking,
as always it does lurk, in these suburbs and extremities of
nature; let me see every trifle bristling with the polarity
that ranges it instantly on an eternal law; and the shop,
the plough, and the leger referred to the like cause by
which light undulates and poets sing; and the world lies
no longer a dull miscellany and lumber-room, but has form
and order; there is no trifle, there is no puzzle, but one
design unites and animates the farthest pinnacle and the
lowest trench."
... "Another sign of our times, also marked by an
analogous political movement, is the new importance given
to the single person. Everything that tends to insulate the
individual—to surround him with barriers of natural respect,
so that each man shall feel the world is his, and man shall
treat with man as a sovereign state with a sovereign state—tends
to true union as well as greatness. 'I learned,'
said the melancholy Pestalozzi, 'that no man in God's wide
earth is either willing or able to help any other man.' Help
must come from the bosom alone. The scholar is that man
who must take up into himself all the ability of the time, all
the contributions of the past, all the hopes of the future. He
must be a university of knowledges. If there be one lesson
more than another which should pierce his ear, it is, The
world is nothing; the man is all; in yourself is the law of
all nature, and you know not yet how a globule of sap ascends;
in yourself slumbers the whole of Reason; it is for
you to know all; it is for you to dare all. Mr. President
and gentlemen, this confidence in the unsearched might of
man belongs by all motives, by all prophecy, by all preparation,
to the American scholar. We have listened too long
to the courtly muses of Europe. The spirit of the American
freeman is already suspected to be timid, imitative,
tame. Public and private avarice make the air we breathe
thick and fat. The scholar is decent, indolent, complaisant.
See already the tragic consequence. The mind of this country,
taught to aim at low objects, eats upon itself. There
is no work for any but the decorous and the complaisant.
Young men of the fairest promise, who begin life upon our
shores, inflated by the mountain winds, shined upon by all
the stars of God, find the earth below not in unison with
these; but are hindered from action by the disgust which
the principles on which business is managed inspire, and
turn drudges or die of disgust, some of them suicides. What
is the remedy? They did not yet see, and thousands of
young men as hopeful now crowding to the barriers for the
career do not yet see, that if the single man plant himself indomitably
on his instincts, and there abide, the huge world
will come round to him. Patience, patience; with the
shades of all the good and great for company; and for solace,
the perspective of your own infinite life; and for work,
the study and the communication of principles, the making
those instincts prevalent, the conversion of the world. Is it
not the chief disgrace in the world not to be a unit; not to
be reckoned one character; not to yield that peculiar fruit
which each man was created to bear, but to be reckoned
in the gross, in the hundred, or the thousand of the party,
the section to which we belong; and our opinion predicted
geographically, as the North or the South? Not so, brothers
and friends; please God, ours shall not be so. We will
walk on our own feet; we will work with our own hands;
we will speak our own minds."
Of the last class of originals—those who are not only strong
to form a purpose in life and fulfil it, but who are driven by
pressure of circumstance to put forth their whole force for
the control of other destinies than their own—there is no
more conspicuous example than Father Taylor, as he is
called. In America there is no need to explain who Father
Taylor is. He is known in England, but not extensively.
Father Taylor is the seamen's apostle. He was a sailor-boy
himself, and at twenty years old was unable to read.
He rose in his calling, and at length became full of some
religious convictions which he longed to express. He has
found a mode of expression, and is happy. He is one of
the busiest and most cheerful of men; and, of all preachers
living, probably the most eloquent to those whom his preaching
suits. So it would appear from events. I heard him
called a second homely Jeremy Taylor; and I certainly
doubt whether Jeremy Taylor himself could more absolutely
sway the minds and hearts of the learned and pious of his
day than the seamen's friend does those of his flock. He
has a great advantage over other preachers in being able to
speak to his hearers from the ground of their common experience;
in being able to appeal to his own sealife. He
can say, "You have lodged with me in the forecastle; did
you ever know me profane?" "You have seen me land
from a long voyage. Where did I betake myself? Am not
I a proof that a sealife need not be soiled with vice on
land?" All this gives him some power; but it would be
little without the prodigious force which he carries in his
magnificent intellect and earnest heart.
A set of institutions is connected with the Boston Port
Society, whose agent Mr. Taylor is. There is the Seamen's
Bethel, in North Square, where Mr. Taylor preaches; a
Reading-room, and a Nautical School; a Temperance Society,
and the Bethel Union, the last being an association of
seamen and masters of vessels for the purpose chiefly of
settling disputes without litigation and scandal, promoting
the just and kind treatment of seamen, and watching over
their rights. There is also a Clothing Society, the object
of which is economy rather than charity; and a Savings'
Bank for seamen, the merits of which are sufficiently indicated
by the title.
Father Taylor is the life and soul of all this. Some help
him liberally with the purse, and many with head and hands;
but he is the animating spirit of the whole. His chapel is
filled, from year's end to year's end, with sailors. He has
no salary, and will not hear of one. He takes charge of all
the poor connected with his chapel. To many this must look
like an act of insanity. No class is more exposed to casualties
than that of seamen; and, when a life is lost, an
entire helpless family comes upon the charity of society.
Father Taylor speaks of his ten thousand children, and all
the woes and faults of a multitude are accumulated upon his
hands; and yet he retains the charge of all his poor, though
he has no fixed income whatever. He does it by putting
his charge in the way of helping each other and themselves.
He encourages sobriety and economy in all their habits, and
enforces them with a power which it would be vain to attempt
to give an idea of. He uses the utmost openness
about his plans, and thereby obtains valuable co-operation.
He has a collection of money made twice every Sunday in
his church. The sums are given by the seamen almost exclusively,
and are in very small coin; but the amount has
gone on increasing, from first to last, except during intervals
when Father Taylor was absent for his health. Between
the years 1828 and 1835, the annual sum thus contributed
rose from 98 to 1079 dollars.
Boston owes to Mr. Taylor and to Dr. Tuckerman its
convictions of the pernicious operation of some of the old
methods of charity by almsgiving; and the names of these
gentlemen ought ever to be held in honour for having saved
the young community in which they dwell from the curse of
such pauperism in kind (the degree could never have become
very formidable) as has afflicted the kingdoms of the Old
World. Mr. Taylor owns that he little foresaw what he
was undertaking in assuming the charge of all his poor,
under such liabilities as those who follow the seaman's
calling are exposed to: but he does it. The funds are, as
it has been seen, provided by the class to be benefited; and
they have proved hitherto sufficient, under the wise administration
of the pastor and his wife, and under the animating
influence of his glowing spirit, breathed forth from
the pulpit and amid their dwellings. It seems as if his
power was resorted to in difficult and desperate cases, like
that of a superior being; such surprising facts was I told of
his influence over his flock. He was requested to visit an
insane man, who believed himself to be in heaven, and
therefore to have no need of food and sleep. The case had
become desperate, so long had the fasting and restlessness
continued. Father Taylor prevailed at once; the patient
was presently partaking of "the feast of the blessed" with
Father Taylor, and enjoying the "saints' rest on a heavenly
couch." From carrying a single point like this to redeeming
a whole class from much of the vice and wo which had
hitherto afflicted it, the pastor's power seems universally to
prevail.
I have not mentioned all this time what Father Taylor's
religion is, or, rather, what sect he belongs to. This is one
of the last considerations which, in his case, occurs to an
observer. All the essentials of his faith must be so right to
produce such results, that the separate articles of belief do
not present themselves for inquiry. He is "orthodox"
(Presbyterian), but so liberal as to be in some sort disowned
by the rigid of his sect. He opens his pulpit to ministers
of any Protestant denomination; and Dr. Beecher and other
bigots of his own sect refused to preach thence after
Unitarians. When this opposition of theirs diminished the
contributions of his people during his absence, they twitted
him with it, and insultingly asked whether he cheated the
Unitarians, or they him? to which he replied, that they understood
one another, and left all unfair proceedings to a
third party.
Mr. Taylor has a remarkable person. He is stoutly
built, and looks more like a skipper than a preacher. His
face is hard and weather-beaten, but with an expression of
sensibility, as well as acuteness, which it is wonderful that
features apparently so immoveable can convey. He uses a
profusion of action. His wife told me that she thought his
health was promoted by his taking so much exercise in the
shape of action, in conversation as well as in the pulpit.
He is very loud and prodigiously rapid. His splendid
thoughts come faster than he can speak them; and, at times,
he would be totally overwhelmed by them, if, in the midst
of his most rapid utterance of them, a burst of tears, of
which he is wholly unconscious, did not aid in his relief. I
have seen them streaming, bathing his face, when his words
breathed the very spirit of joy, and every tone of his voice
was full of exhilaration. His pathos, shed in thoughts and
tones so fleeting as to be gone like lightning, is the most
awful of his powers. I have seen a single clause of a short
sentence call up an instantaneous flush on the hundreds of
hard faces turned to the preacher; and it is no wonder to
me that the widow and orphan are cherished by those who
hear his prayers for them. The tone of his petitions is importunate,
even passionate; and his sailor hearers may be
forgiven for their faith, that Father Taylor's prayers cannot
be refused. Never, however, was anything stranger than
some particulars of his prayers. I have told
elsewhere[13] how
importunately he prayed for rain in fear of conflagration,
and, as it happened, the Sunday before the great New-York
fire. With such petitions, urged with every beauty of expression,
he mixes up whatever may have struck his fancy
during the week, whether mythology, politics, housewifery,
or anything else. He prayed one day, when dwelling on
the moral perils of seamen, "that Bacchus and Venus might
be driven to the end of the earth, and off it." I heard him
pray that the members of Congress might be preserved from
buffoonery. Thence he passes to supplication, offered in a
spirit of sympathy which may appear bold at another moment,
but which is true to the emotion of the hour. "Father!
look upon us! We are a widow." "Father! the mother's
heart thou knowest; the mother's bleeding heart thou
pitiest. Sanctify to us the removal of this lamb!"
The eloquence of his sermons was somewhat the less
amazing to me from my feeling that, if there be inspiration
in the world, it arises from being so listened to. It was not
like the preaching of Whitfield, for all was quiet in Father
Taylor's church. There were no groans, few tears, and
those unconsciously shed, rolling down the upturned face,
which never for a moment looked away from the preacher.
His voice was the only sound; now tremendously loud and
rapid, overpowering the senses; now melting into a tenderness
like that of a mother's wooings of her infant. The
most striking discourse I heard from him was on the text,
"That we, through the comfort of the Scriptures, might have
hope." A crew from among his hearers were going to sail
in the course of the week. He gave me a totally new view
of the great trial of the seaman's life, the pining for rest.
Never, among the poets of the earth, was there finer discourse
of the necessity of hope to man, and never a more
tremendous picture of the state of the hopeless. Father
Taylor is no reader except of his Bible, and probably
never heard of any poem on the subject on which he was
speaking; and he therefore went unhesitatingly into a picture
of what hope is to the mariner in his midnight watches
and amid the tossing of the storm; and, if Campbell had
been there, he would have joyfully owned himself outdone.
But then the preacher went off into one of his strange descriptions
of what people resort to when longing for a home
for their spirits, and not finding the right one. "Some get
into the stomach, and think they can make a good home of
that; but the stomach is no home for the spirit;" and then
followed some particular reasons why. Others nestle down
into people's good opinion, and think, if they can get praise
enough, they shall be at peace. "But opinion is sometimes
an easy tradewind, and sometimes a contrary hurricane."
Some wait and wait upon change; but the affairs of Providence
go on while such are standing still, "and God's
chronometer loses no time." After a long series of pictures
of forlornness and pinings for home, he burst forth suddenly
upon the promise, "I will give you rest." He was for the
moment the wanderer finding rest; his flood of tears and of
gratitude, his rapturous account of the change from pining
to hope and rest were real to himself and to us for the time.
The address to the departing seamen was tender and cheerful;
with a fitting mention of the chances of mortality, but
nothing which could be ever construed by the most superstitious
of them, in the most comfortless of their watches,
into a foreboding.
Such preaching exerts prodigious power over an occasional
hearer, and it is an exquisite pleasure to listen to it;
but it does not, for a continuance, meet the religious wants
of any but those to whom it is expressly addressed. The
preacher shares the mental and moral characteristics, as
well as the experience in life of his nautical hearers; their
imaginative cast of mind, their superstition, their strong capacity
for friendship and love, their ease about the future,
called recklessness in some, and faith in others. This is so
unlike the common mind of landsmen, that the same expression
of worship will not suit them both. So Father Taylor
will continue to be the seaman's apostle; and, however admired
and beloved by the landsman, not his priest. This is
as it should be, and as the good man desires. His field of
labour is wide enough for him. No one is more sensible
than he of its extent. He told me what he tells seamen
themselves, that they are the eyes and tongues of the world;
the seed carriers of the world; the winged seeds from which
good or evil must spring up on the wildest shores of God's
earth. His spirit is so possessed with this just idea of the
importance of his work, that praise and even immediate
sympathy are not necessary; though the last is, of course,
pleasant to him. One Christmas day there was a misunderstanding
as to whether the chapel would be open, and not
above twenty people were present; but never did Father
Taylor preach more splendidly.
There is one great drawback in the religious services of
his chapel. There is a gallery just under the roof for the
people of colour; and "the seed carriers of the world" are
thus countenanced by Father Taylor in making a root of
bitterness spring up beside their homes, which, under his
care, a better spirit should sanctify. I think there can be no
doubt that an influence so strong as his would avail to abolish
this unchristian distinction of races within the walls of his
own church; and it would elevate the character of his influence
if the attempt were made.
No one doubts Garrison's being an original. None who
know him can wonder that the coloured race of Americans
look upon him as raised up to be their deliverer, as manifestly
as Moses to lead the Israelites out of bondage.
William Lloyd Garrison was, not many years ago, a
printer's boy. The time will come when those who worked
by his side will laboriously recall the incidents of the printing-office
in those days, to make out whether the poor boy
dropped expressions or shot glances which indicated what a
spirit was working within him, or prophesied of the work
which awaited him. By some accident his attention was
turned to the condition of the coloured race, and to colonization
as a means of rescue. Like all the leading abolitionists,
Garrison was a colonizationist first; but, before his
clear mind, enlightened by a close attachment to principles,
and balanced by his being of a strong practical turn, the
case soon appeared in its true aspect.
Garrison, then a student in some country college, I believe,
engaged to deliver a lecture on colonization; and, in
order to prepare himself, he went down to Baltimore to
master the details of the scheme on the spot where it was
in actual operation. His studies soon convinced him of the
fallacies and iniquities involved in the plan, and he saw
that nothing short of the abolition of the slave system would
redeem the coloured race from their social depression. A
visitation of persecution came at this time in aid of his convictions.
A merchant of Newburyport, Massachusetts,
gave permission to the master of a vessel of which he was
the owner to freight the ship with slaves at Baltimore, and
carry them down to the New-Orleans market. Garrison
commented upon this transaction in a newspaper in the
terms which it deserved, but which were libellous, and he was,
in consequence, brought to a civil and criminal trial, thrown
into prison, and fined 1000 dollars, which he had not the
remotest prospect of being able to pay. When he had been
imprisoned three months, he was released by the fine being
paid by Arthur Tappan, of New-York; a gentleman who
was an entire stranger to Garrison, and who did this act
(the first of a long series of munificent deeds) for the sake
of the principle involved in the case.
Of this gentleman a few words before we proceed. He
is one of the few wealthy original abolitionists, and his
money has been poured out freely in the cause. He has
been one of the most persecuted, and his nerves have never
appeared to be shaken. He has been a mark for insult from
the whole body of his countrymen (except a handful of abolitionists)
for a series of years; and he has never, on this
account, altered his countenance towards man or woman.
His house was attacked in New-York, and his family driven
from the city; he quietly took up his abode on Long Island.
His lady and children are stared at like wild beasts on board
a steamboat; he tranquilly observes on the scenery. His
partners early remonstrated with him on the injury he was
doing to his trade by publicly opposing slavery, and supported
one another in declaring to him that he must give up
his connexion with the abolitionists. He heard them to an
end; said, "I will be hanged first," and walked off. When
I was in America, immense rewards for the head, and even
for the ears of Mr. Tappan, were offered from the South,
through advertisements in the newspapers and handbills.
Whether these rewards were really offered by any committee
of vigilance or not was the same thing to Mr. Tappan;
he was, in either case, in equal danger from wretches
who would do the deed for money. But it cannot be thought
improbable that a committee of vigilance should commit an
act of any degree of eccentricity at a time of such panic
that a meeting was called in a new settlement in Alabama
for the purpose of voting Mr. O'Connell a nuisance. Mr.
Tappan's house on Long Island is in an exposed situation;
but he hired no guard, and lost not an hour's sleep. When
some one showed him one of these handbills, he glanced
from the sum promised to the signatures. "Are these good
names?" said he. A cause involving a broad principle,
and supported to the point of martyrdom by men of this
make, is victorious from the beginning. Its complete triumph
is merely a question of time.
Garrison lectured in New-York in favour of the abolition
of slavery, and in exposure of the colonization scheme, and
was warmly encouraged by a few choice spirits. He went
to Boston for the same purpose; but in the enlightened and
religious city of Boston, every place in which he could lecture
was shut against him. He declared his intention of
lecturing on the Common if he could get no door opened
to him, and this threat procured for him what he wanted.
At his first lecture he fired the souls of some of his hearers;
among others, of Mr. May, the first Unitarian clergyman
who embraced the cause. On the next Sunday Mr. May,
in pursuance of the custom of praying for all distressed persons,
prayed for the slaves; and was asked, on descending
from the pulpit, whether he was mad.
Garrison and his fellow-workman, both in the printing-office
and the cause—his friend Knapp—set up the Liberator,
in its first days a little sheet of shabby paper, printed with
old types, and now a handsome and flourishing newspaper.
These two heroes, in order to publish their paper, lived for
a series of years in one room on bread and water, "with
sometimes," when the paper sold unusually well, "the luxury
of a bowl of milk." In course of time twelve men
formed themselves into an abolition society at Boston, and
the cause was fairly afoot.
It was undergoing its worst persecutions just before I entered
Boston for the winter. I had resolved some time before,
that, having heard every species of abuse of Garrison,
I ought in fairness to see him. The relation of the above
particulars quickened my purpose, and I mentioned my wish
to the relator, who engaged that we should meet, mentioning
that he supposed I was aware what I should encounter
by acknowledging a wish to see Garrison. I was staying
at the house of a clergyman in Boston, when a note was
brought in which told me that Mr. Garrison was in town,
and would meet me at any hour, at any friend's house, the
next day. My host arrived at a knowledge of the contents
of the note quite against my will, and kindly insisted that
Mr. Garrison should call on me at home. At ten o'clock
he came, accompanied by his introducer. His aspect put
to flight in an instant what prejudices his slanderers had
raised in me. I was wholly taken by surprise. It was a
countenance glowing with health, and wholly expressive of
purity, animation, and gentleness. I did not now wonder
at the citizen who, seeing a print of Garrison at a shop window
without a name to it, went in and bought it, and framed
it as the most saintlike of countenances. The end of the
story is, that when the citizen found whose portrait he had
been hanging up in his parlour, he took the print out of the
frame and huddled it away. Garrison has a good deal of a
Quaker air; and his speech is deliberate like a Quaker's,
but gentle as a woman's. The only thing that I did not
like was his excessive agitation when he came in, and his
thanks to me for desiring to meet one "so odious" as himself.
I was, however, as I told him, nearly as odious as
himself at that time; so it was fit that we should be acquainted.
On mentioning afterward to his introducer my
impression of something like a want of manliness in Garrison's
agitation, he replied that I could not know what it
was to be an object of insult and hatred to the whole of society
for a series of years; that Garrison could bear what
he met with from street to street, and from town to town;
but that a kind look and shake of the hand from a stranger
unmanned him for the moment. How little did the great
man know our feelings towards him on our meeting; how
we, who had done next to nothing, were looking up to him
who is achieving the work of an age, and, as a stimulus,
that of a nation!
His conversation was more about peace principles than
the great subject. It was of the most practical cast. Every
conversation I had with him confirmed my opinion that sagacity
is the most striking attribute of his conversation. It
has none of the severity, the harshness, the bad taste of his
writing; it is as gladsome as his countenance, and as gentle
as his voice. Through the whole of his deportment breathes
the evidence of a heart at ease; and this it is, I think, more
than all his distinct claims, which attaches his personal friends
to him with an almost idolatrous affection.
I do not pretend to like or to approve the tone of Garrison's
printed censures. I could not use such language
myself towards any class of offenders, nor can I sympathize
in its use by others. But it is only fair to mention that
Garrison adopts it warily; and that I am persuaded that he
is elevated above passion, and has no unrighteous anger to
vent in harsh expressions. He considers his task to be the
exposure of fallacy, the denunciation of hypocrisy, and the
rebuke of selfish timidity. He is looked upon by those who
defend him in this particular as holding the branding-iron;
and it seems true enough that no one branded by Garrison
ever recovers it. He gives his reasons for his severity with
a calmness, meekness, and softness which contrast strongly
with the subject of the discourse, and which convince the
objector that there is principle at the bottom of the practice.
One day, when he was expressing his pleasure at Dr.
Channing having shaken hands with him the preceding day,
he spoke with affectionate respect of Dr. Channing. I
asked him who would have supposed he felt thus towards
Dr. Channing, after the language which had been used about
him and his book in the Liberator of the last week. His
gentle reply was,
"The most difficult duty of an office like mine is to find
fault with those whom I love and honour most. I have been
obliged to do it about————, who is one of my best
friends. He is clearly wrong in a matter important to the
cause, and I must expose it. In the same way, Dr. Channing,
while aiding our cause, has thought fit to say that the
abolitionists are fanatical; in other words, that we set up
our wayward wills in opposition to the will we profess to
obey. I cannot suffer the cause to be injured by letting this
pass; but I do not the less value Dr. Channing for the things
he has done."
I was not yet satisfied of the necessity of so much severity
as had been used. Garrison bore with me with a meekness
too touching to be ever forgotten.
He never speaks of himself or his persecutions unless
compelled, and his child will never learn at home what a
distinguished father he has. He will know him as the tenderest
of parents before he becomes aware that he is a great
hero. I found myself growing into a forgetfulness of the
deliverer of a race in the friend of the fireside. One day,
in Michigan, two friends (who happened to be abolitionists)
and I were taking a drive with the governor of the state,
who was talking of some recent commotion on the slavery
question. "What is Garrison like?" said he. "Ask Miss
M.," said one smiling friend: "Ask Miss M.," said the
other. I was asked accordingly; and my answer was, that
I thought Garrison the most bewitching personage I had
met in the United States. The impression cannot but be
strengthened by his being made such a bugbear as he is;
but the testimony of his personal friends, the closest watchers
of his life, may safely be appealed to as to the charms
of his domestic manners.
Garrison gayly promised me that he would come over
whenever his work is done in the United States, that we
may keep jubilee in London. I believe it would be safe
to promise him a hundred thousand welcomes as warm as
mine.