In answer to the Queries put to me by Ȝ. I have to state—
1st. That I am totally unable to give any information relative to the
family of Mrs. Wolfe.
2d. Edward Wolfe was not, I believe, a native of Westerham, and only
resided there when not on active duty. His wife lived there some years,
but could only have been staying temporarily in the house where her son
was born, as it always was the residence of the vicar; the room, named
after him, is still pointed out where James Wolfe drew his first breath.
Quebec House was only rented by Edward Wolfe: to this house James was
very early removed, and, as I have always been informed, always resided
in it till he entered on his military studies; if so, he must have been
educated in the neighbourhood.
3rd. Sir Jeffrey Amherst is the same person as Ȝ. alludes to; I was
wrong, perhaps, in using the term "patronise." Wolfe and he were,
however, staunch friends through life; Amherst ever encouraged Wolfe,
who was liable to fits of despondency, and always represented him at
head quarters as one worthy of a high command in those trying times.
Amherst was afterwards executor to Mrs. Wolfe's will.
I feel gratified that the letters mentioned corroborate my assertion as
to his birth; not only is the date I gave on the tablet in Westerham
church, but was informed of the various accounts by a former curate of
Westerham, who assured me the date on the tablet was the correct one.
The circumstance of Barré's friendship with Wolfe is interesting, and I
am now enabled to mention another friend, on whom Wolfe equally relied,
viz. General Hugh Debbieg, who fought with him at Louisbourgh, and
afterwards followed him to Quebec, where he directed part of the
engineering operations.
The soldier who supported Wolfe after he received his death-wound, was
named James; he was in the artillery; he likewise served at Louisbourgh
and Quebec, and survived till 1812, when he died at Carlisle Castle,
where he had been stationed for many years as a bombardier, aged
ninety-two.
In no notice of him I have read, is he mentioned as having been at
Carthagena. The Penny Cyclopædia mentions the chief engagements he was
in, but makes no allusion to Carthagena whatever.
Southey and Gleig contemplated writing the life of Wolfe; but some
unknown circumstance prevented the completion of so laudable a
design.
In George's Westerham Journal is a curious account of Mrs. Wolfe
adopting a young man named Jacob Wolfe, and of Lord Amherst obtaining,
by her representations, a place of 700l. a-year for him. It is
extracted from Trusler's Memoirs; but being too lengthy for insertion
in "NOTES AND QUERIES," I will copy it out, if Ȝ. wishes to have it.
In Thackery's Life of the Earl of Chatham is mentioned the following
anecdote, which I have often seen otherwise applied: George II. was once
expressing his admiration of Wolfe, when some one observed that the
General was mad. "Oh! mad is he?" said the King; "then I wish he would
bite some of my other generals." Other information occurs in the same
work.
I have learnt that a family named Wolfe was settled at Saffron Walden,
Essex, in the last century, and the obituary of Sylvanus Urban for
1794, p. 770., records the death of the lady of Thomas Wolfe, Esq., of
that place. Does this give a clue as to the county in which George Wolfe
settled?
I had intended to have applied myself to "NOTES AND QUERIES" relative to
our hero; and though I have been anticipated, I will still endeavour to
follow up my enquiries, and all I can obtain shall be at the service of
Ȝ., in the hope that something substantial may be done to rescue from
the comparative oblivion the life of one of England's greatest sons.
H. G. D.
The following examples may serve as further illustrations towards
determining the origin and use of the expression.
I. "Within this hall neither rich nor yett poore
Wold do for me ought although I shold dye.
Which seeing, I gat me out of the doore,
Where Flemynges began on me for to cry,
'Master, what will you copen or by?
Fyne felt hattes, or spectacles to reede?
Lay down your silver, and here you may speede'"
Minor Poems of Lydgate [1420]. London, Lackpenny. Ed. Per. Soc. 1840, p. 105.
This is curious, as indicating that the word "Fleming," in the fifteenth
century, had become almost synonymous with "trader."
II. "Julia. I have heard enough of England: have you nothing to
return upon the Netherlands?
"Beamont. Faith, very little to any purpose. He has been
beforehand with us, as his countrymen are in their Trade, and
taken up so many vices for the use of England, that he has left
almost none for the Low Countries."
Dryden's Dutch at Amboyna,
Act II. Sc. 8.
"Towerson. Tell 'em I seal that service with my blood;
And, dying, wish to all their factories,
And all the famous merchants of our isle,
That wealth their generous industry deserves,
But dare not hope it with Dutch partnership."
Ibid. Act V. Sc. last.
III. "Yet, Urswick,
We'll not abate one penny, what in Parliament
Hath freely been contributed; we must not:
Money gives soul to action. Our competitor
The Flemish counterfeit, with James of Scotland,
Will prove what courage need and want can nourish,
Without the food of fit supplies."
Ford [1634], Perkin Warbeck, Act III. Sc. 1.
"Cuddy. Yes, I was ten days together there the last Shrove-tide.
"2nd Clown. How could that be, when there are but seven days in
the week?
"Cuddy. Prithee, peace! I reckon stila nova as a traveller;
thou understandest as a freshwater farmer, that never saw'st a
week beyond sea. Ask any soldier that ever received his pay but
in the Low Countries, and he'll tell thee there are Eight days in
the week there hard by. How dost thou think they rise in High
Germany, Italy, and those remoter places?"
Rowley, Decker, and Ford. Witch
of Edmonton, Act III. Sc. 1.
"This passage is explained by the following lines of Butler:
'The soldier does it every day,
Eight to the week, for sixpence pay.'"
Note by the Editor, Hartley Coleridge, in the
Glossary. Ed. London: Moxon, 1839.
IV. De Thou gives the following anecdote, when speaking of a defeat,
more disgraceful, however, than disastrous, which befel the French on
the borders of Flanders, A.D. 1555, in which many nobles and gentry were
captured by the Flemings:
"Cùm delectus illi ex
CCCC peditibus et
MCC equitibus conflati,
quorum dux erat Jallius ex primariâ in Andibus nobilitatæ vir, in
hosticum excurrissent, et magnas prædas abegissent, dum redirent
solutis ordinibus homines ut plurimum militiæ ignari, inter
Rigiacum Atrebatum et Bapalmam, ab Alsimontio loci illius
præfecto secus viam et oppositam silvam ac subjectum rivum,
insidiis excepti sunt, et ab exiguo numero cæsi, ac majorem
partem, cum effugium non esset capti, non sine verborum ludibrio,
nimirum, Nobiles Galliæ non appensos a Belgis capi! Quod
dicebatur allusione factâ ad Monetæ aureæ Anglicanæ genus, quod
vulgò nobilium nomine indigitatur."
Thuani Hist. lib.
XVI. ad.
a. 1555, tom. i. p. 494. ed. Genev. 1626.
"When these levies, made up of 400 foot soldiers and 1200
horsemen, whose leader was La Jaille, one of the principal
nobility of Anjou, had made a foray on the enemy's border, and
driven off an immense booty; upon their retreat, which, being men
for the most part utterly ignorant of military service, they
conducted with great disorder, between Arras and Bapaume, they
were entrapped by Osmand, who commanded in those parts, into an
ambuscade set for them close to their line of march, with a wood
in their front and a river below them. A few of them were slain,
but the greater part, inasmuch as there was no way of escape,
were taken
prisoners: which gave occasion to the following
satirical play upon words: 'That Flemings had taken French
Nobles without first weighing them!' The play on the words, of
course, alluding to the English gold coins commonly known by the
name of 'the noble.'"
The last instance shows the common opinion entertained of the Flemings,
as being traders far too keen to take any coin except it were of full
tale and weight. And although the expression "Flemish account" may have
originated from their practice as merchants, yet, from the second
instance quoted from Ford and Decker, it may not unreasonably be
inferred that it received greater currency from their method of paying
the soldiers who also served as mercenaries in the wars of the Low
Countries.
E. A. D.
MR. BARTON, in his "Note" on Pope and Flatman, inquires whether the
coincidence mentioned by him has been noticed before. I believe it has,
by more than one commentator, and among others by Croly in his edition
of Pope, London, E. J. Valpy, 1835. Dr. Croly introduces the ode of "The
Dying Christian to his Soul," with these remarks, from which it will be
seen that Flatman was not the only source of Pope's inspiration:
"Pope, in a letter to Steele, at whose suggestion he had adopted
the subject, gives this brief history of his composition:—'You
have it,' he says, 'as Cowley calls it, warm from the brain; it
came to me the first moment I waked this morning; yet you'll see
it was not so absolutely inspiration but that I had in my head
not only the verses of Hadrian, but the fine fragment of Sappho.'
Pope omitted to observe the close similarity of his lines to
those of Flatman, an obscure writer of the century before.
Between his rough versification and the polished elegance of Pope
there can be no comparison; but the thoughts are the same. Prior
translated Hadrian's ode with more fidelity, but less good
fortune."
HENRY H. BREEN.
St. Lucia.
I beg to suggest that the word London is derived from the Celtic
Luan, "the moon," and dun, "a city on a hill;" thus Luandun would
mean "the city of the moon," i.e. of "the temple of the moon." I have
seen it stated somewhere, that the site of St. Paul's was formerly that
of a temple of Diana: if this be true, it gives weight to my definition
of the word. I would also suggest that the name of Greenwich is
indicative of the religious worship of the ancient people of Britain; as
Grian is "the sun" in Celtic, and no doubt Greenwich could boast of
its "Grynean grove."
"His tibi Grynæi nemoris dicatur origo:
Ne quis sit lucus, quo se plus jactet Apollo."
FRANCIS CROSSLEY.
M. C. E. is referred to the two following passages from Fuller, if he
has not already met with them:—
"That it was so termed from Lan Dian, a temple of Diana
(standing where now St. Paul's doth) is most likely, in my
opinion."—Worthies, art. "London."
"This renders their conceit not unlikely who will have London so
called from Llan Dian, which signifieth in British, 'the temple
of Diana.'"—Church History, i. § 2.
J. EASTWOOD.
The name of London is certainly older than the Romans, and is
probably, therefore, as your correspondent says, British. Its
significance, if any, therefore, is to be sought in Welsh. Now, your
correspondent is certainly quite wrong as to the meaning of Llan in
Welsh. It always means, here at any rate, church, not plain.
Possibly your correspondent was thinking of Llano. The word is written
in Welsh Llyndon, or Llyndain, which also speaks against its being
compounded with Llan. The word certainly might mean anything: but I
know of no satisfactory explanation having been given for it as yet. The
only words for town in Welsh are, I believe, tre "city," or caer
"castle,"—as parts of compound words, I mean.
SC.
Carmarthen.
I cannot think that M. C. E.'s etymology of London is a correct one;
nor did I know that the British Llan means a "level place generally."
I take it that originally Llan meant no more than "an inclosure," as
we see in winllan, "a vineyard," "an inclosure for vines;" perllan,
"an orchard" (literally a pear-yard). As churchyards were probably for
some time almost the only inclosures in their districts, this will
explain why the names of churches in Wales so commonly begin with
Llan. Llanvair, Llanilltid, Llandilo, &c. were the inclosures, or
yards, in which churches dedicated to St. Mary, St. Iltyd, St. Teilo,
&c. were built, though in the course of time these names became applied
to the churches themselves. The word don is nothing more than din,
or dinas, "a fortress," as we see in Lugdunum, Virodunum, Londinium,
Dumbarton, Dunmore, &c.
Old chroniclers say that the city of London was nearly, if not entirely,
surrounded by water, which on the north, north-east, and south sides
spread out into considerable lakes. Present names of localities in and
about the City show traces of this. Finsbury and Moorfields take their
names from the fens and moors, or meres, which were partially reclaimed
from the lake which spread to the north
and north-east, almost
from the city wall. To the south the Thames extended far beyond its
present boundary, forming an extensive lake. Fenchurch Street,
Turnmill Street, Fleet Street, show that there were streams and fens
to the east and west.
Bearing in mind that British names were generally descriptive of the
locality, may not the situation of old London furnish a clue to its
etymology? Was not London then truly and descriptively Llyn-dun, or
Llin-dun, the fortified place or fortress in or on the lyn or lake?
CUDYN GWYN.
—The following
beautiful legend of the Robin Redbreast, which I have just met with, was
quite new to me. If you think it likely to be so to T. Y. or any other
of your readers, you will perhaps find a place for it.
"Eusebia.—Like that sweet superstition current in Brittany,
which would explain the cause why the robin redbreast has always
been a favourite and protégé of man. While our Saviour was
bearing HIS cross, one of these birds, they say, took one thorn
from HIS crown, which dyed its breast; and ever since that time
robin redbreasts have been the friends of man."—Communications
with the Unseen World, p. 26.
W. FRASER.
—Will your correspondent state
by what intermarriage the estate granted to the Duke of Albemarle,
vested in Oliver Cromwell, who died in 1821; and how, if he knows, it
departed from Monk? If acquired by purchase from the successors of Monk,
the interest ceases.
G.
—The custom of "souling", described by
MR. W. FRASER, is carried on with great zeal and energy in this
neighbourhood on All Souls' Day. The song which the children sing is
exactly the same as MR. FRASER gives, with the exception of the second
verse. In the evening, grown persons go round singing and collecting
contributions from house to house. It is universally believed in this
neighbourhood to be a remnant of the old custom of begging money, to be
applied to the purpose of procuring masses for the souls of the dead.
LEWIS EVANS.
Sandbach, Cheshire.
—With reference to this Query, I beg
to suggest the following explanation. In Scotland, a cleek signifies a
hook; and to cleek, is to hook or join together: thus, a lady and
gentleman walking arm-in-arm are said to be cleekit together. The word
is in full use at present, and has been so for centuries; and I think it
not improbable that at the time the will referred to was written, the
word might be common to both countries. On this supposition the meaning
would be, that the "two tenements" communicated with each other in some
way—probably by a bridge thrown across—so as to form one house,
which obtained its name from their being thus joined or cleekit
together.
J. S. B.
—The biography of this
individual, who was the titular prelate presiding over the see of Dublin
from 1669 to 1680, is given very fully in D'Alton's Memoirs of the
Archbishops of Dublin.
R.
—When consulting my
Lexicon this morning, I met under "Ἀπὸ" with the following,
καλέουσι ἀπὸ τῶν μητέρων ἑωϋτοὺς, they name themselves after,
or from their mothers, Herodot. i. 173. Not having the work, I am unable
to pursue the search; but perhaps the reference may assist
THEOPHYLACT
in his inquiry.
J. V. S.
Sydenham.
For the information of THEOPHYLACT, I transcribe the following passage
from Johnson's Selections from the Mahabharat, p. 67. The note is from
the pen of Professor Wilson:—
"Among the Bhotias a family of brothers has a wife in common; and
we can scarcely question the object of the arrangement, when the
unproductive region which these people occupy is considered....
What led to its adoption by the Nair tribe in Malabar is not so
easy to conjecture. At present its object seems to be to preserve
the purity of descent, which it is thought is more secure on the
female than on the male side; and accordingly, the child claims
property, or even the Raj, not through his father, but his
mother."
RECHABITE.
—Whether Lord Bacon was, or was not,
the author of the well-known lines noted and queried by R. CS., I will
leave the intended editor of Hackneyed Quotations to decide, hoping that
he will soon make his appearance as public umpire in all such cases.
Whether Lord Bacon was, or was not, really a poet, I will leave to the
decision of those who are conversant with the glorious works of his mind
and imagination.
But I have something to say to the note with which
R. CS. follows up his
query:—"Sir Nicholas Bacon, Lord Bacon, and Bacon the Sculptor,
are the
only conspicuous men of the name, and none of them, that I know, wrote
verses."
This must not go unchallenged in the truthful pages of
"NOTES AND QUERIES." "Pray, Sir," said a lady to me once, with a very complimentary
air, "though no great Latin scholar, may I not judge by your name that
you are a descendant of THE GREAT FRIAR BACON?" To which I could only
reply, "Madam, I have never yet discovered the bend sinister on our
escutcheon." From that
proud moment I have been penetrated with
the profoundest respect for the name of Roger; and I cannot patiently
see the biggest pig of our sty namelessly consigned to oblivion in the
pages of "NOTES AND
QUERIES". Pray assure R. CS. that the three Bacons
of whom he makes mention are not "the only conspicuous men of the
name." And as to the rest, "none of them that I know wrote verses," I
beg to refer him to Lord Bacon's Metrical Version of the Psalms, vol.
iv. p. 489. of his Works, ed. 1740.
PORCULUS.
Was not the poet Bacon, quoted by Boswell, the Rev. Phannel Bacon,
D.D., Rector of Balden in Oxfordshire, and Vicar of Bramber in Sussex,
who died January 2, 1783? He was not only an admirable poet, but was a
famous punster, and is described as possessing an admirable fund of
humour.
MYFANWY.
—Unless the
Legenda Aurea be prior in date to the twelfth century, I can refer
your correspondent to a still earlier authority for the tale in
question—Wace (Life of St. Nicholas), in whose pages it appears more
at length, but substantially the same.
According to (I presume) the earlier historian, the case was brought
within the jurisdiction of St. Nicholas by the "ieueu" receiving an
image of the saint in pledge, and the debtor taking his expurgatory oath
thereon.
The story is told of a saint who lived in the fourth century, and we
may, at all events, consider it as being much older than Wace himself.
F. I.
—As a
contribution towards answering MR. GATTY'S question, I send the
following extract from Hooker:
"Here it will perhaps be objected, that the power of ordination
itself was not everywhere peculiar and proper unto bishops, as
may be seen by a council of Carthage, which showeth their
church's order to have been, that presbyters should, together
with the bishop, lay hands upon the ordained. But doth it
therefore follow that the power of ordination was not principally
and originally in the bishop?... With us, even at this day,
presbyters are licensed to do as much as that council speaketh
of, if any be present."—Eccl. Pol. b. vii, c. vi. 5. vol.
iii. pp. 207-8. ed. Keble, 1836.
J. C. R.
—Weever was buried in
the old church of St. James, Clerkenwell, which was formerly part of the
Priory called Ecclesia Beatæ Mariæ de Fonte Clericorum, for nuns of
the order of St. Benedict. The inscription, on a plate shaped to a
pillar near the chancel, has been preserved by Stow, in his Survey of
London, p. 900., 1633; and by Strype, in his edition of the Survey of
London, book iv. p. 65. Fuller, in his Church History, vol. ii p.
208., edit. 1840, informs us that—
"Weever died in London in the fifty-sixth year of his age, and
was buried in St. James, Clerkenwell, where he appointed this
epitaph for himself:
'Lancashire gave me breath
And Cambridge education,
Middlesex gave me death
And this church my humation.
And Christ to me hath given
A place with him in heaven.'
"The certain date of his death I cannot attain; but, by
proportion, I collect it to be about the year of our Lord 1634."
The date supplied by Storer, in his History of Clerkenwell, p. 186.,
is "Anno Domini 1632." The epitaph given by Fuller, Strype has appended
to the original inscription. Mr. Storer adds:
"When the church was taken down, the Society of Antiquaries gave
orders for a diligent search to be made after this tablet, but
without success; which is accounted for by a correspondent in the
Gentleman's Magazine [see vol. lviii. part 2. p. 600.], that it
had been stolen a few years previously, but was perfectly
remembered by an inhabitant to have occupied the situation which
has been described."
J. Y.
Hoxton.
—I doubt not the accuracy
of Sir Nicholas Tindal's copy of the inscription, but I suspect that the
painter of the red capitals made a mistake, and that the d in the word
cedit should have been the red letter instead of the e; if so, the
chronogram would be as follows M.DCCVVVVIIIIIIIII, i.e. 1729.
H. F.
The red letters undoubtedly compose a chronogram; E in such compositions
represents 250. The date is therefore A.D. 1480.
E. H. D. D.
—The word "cabal" occurs in two different
senses in Hudibras; but I have only before me the Edinburgh edition of
1779, and so cannot tell whether Butler used it at a date previous to
that assigned to its coinage by Burnet. Hudibras was written before
the Restoration, at all events; but I have no opportunity of consulting
the first edition, which was well known for ten years before the Cabal
of 1672.
"For mystic learning, wondrous able,
In magic talisman and cabal."
Hudibras, Part I. Canto I. 529.
Upon which I find this learned note:—
"Raymund Lully interprets cabal out of the Arabic, to signify
Scientia superabundans, which his commentator, Cornelius Agrippa,
by over-magnifying, has rendered 'a very superfluous foppery.'
Vid. J. Pici, Mirandulæ de Magia et Cabala, Apol. tome i. pp.
110. 111.; Sir Walter Raleigh's History of the World, part i,
book i. p. 67., edit. 1614; Purchas' Pilgrims, part ii.
lib. vi. pp. 796, 797, 798.; Scot's Discovery of Witchcraft,
cap. xi.; Dee's Book of Spirits, with Dr. Meric Casaubon's
Preface; Churchill's Voyages, &c., vol. ii. p. 528., second
edition; Bailey's Dictionary, folio edition, under the word
'cabala;' Jacob's Law Dictionary, under the word 'cabal;' and
British Librarian, No. 6. for June, 1737, p. 340."
The other instance I am adducing gives us "cabal" in its common
acceptation:—
"Set up committees of cabals
To pack designs without the walls."
Part III. Canto II. 945.
I again copy a note from Dr. Grey:—
"A sneer probably upon Clifford, Ashley, Burlington, Arlington,
Lauderdale, who were called the CABAL in King Charles II.'s time,
from the initial letters of their names.—See Echard, vol. iii.
p. 251."
Your correspondent E. H. D. D. may be glad of these two quotations, and
I quite agree with him in ascribing an earlier date than that mentioned
by Burnet to the word "cabal" in the sense of "a secret council." The
transition from its original sense was easy and natural, and the
application to King Charles's confidential advisers ingenious.
RT.
Warmington.
—In reply to
the inquiries of H. C. C., let me refer him to pp. xi. and xxv. of the
preface and list of MSS. in vol. i. of the Ancient Laws, &c. of
England, edited by Mr. Thorpe, under the direction of the late Record
Commission. He will there find that the real MS. site of that document
is stated to be in the library of Corpus Christi, Cambridge, and to be
of the date of the tenth century. It is not stated upon what ground so
early a date is assigned to it; but as so competent a judge as the
editor seems to give that date without any expression of doubt, we may
presume that there is satisfactory proof of the fact. I do not observe
the document mentioned in Wanley's catalogue, and Nasmith's more recent
one is not at hand to refer to. The matter contained in it does not (at
least in my judgment) necessarily indicate so early a date, inasmuch
as parallel, and even identical, rights and customs, connected with the
status of persons and tenure of land, were in active existence at a
much later period of our history. It would certainly be more
satisfactory to know the precise grounds, whether extrinsic or
intrinsic, on which the date has been fixed.
With regard to the old Latin version, I will not undertake to vindicate
it except against one of the criticisms of H. C. C. He objects that
læden is translated minare. The word "minare" is used in the
translation twice, once for driving, and once for leading; and I
question whether the translator could have found a more appropriate word
to serve this double purpose than the authentic verb menare or
minare, from which the French mener has been derived.
I cannot so easily justify him for translating "bôc-riht" by "rectitudo
testamenti;" yet as the power of testamentary disposition was one of the
most signal attributes of bôc-riht, I cannot say that he has much
misrepresented the import of the original word.
The document, which is evidently a private compilation, seems to be a
custumal, or coustumier, of a district, or some considerable portion of
the country. The German lawyers would call the collection a landrecht in
one sense of that term, or, as the translator has called it, a
"landirectum." The heading is by no means an appropriate one. Whether
the writer intended to compile a code of the customs and obligations of
land tenure, free and unfree, coextensive with the Saxon name, or merely
to represent those of a certain district with which he happened to be
acquainted, is a matter open to question.
H. C. C. is perhaps not aware that the document has been examined,
corrected, translated into German, and made the subject of a very
masterly dissertation, by Dr. Heinrich Leo, of Halle. It is frequently
referred to by Lappenberg in his Anglo-Saxon History, and became known
(at least in the translation) to Sir H. Ellis in time to make copious
extracts from it in the second volume of his Introduction to Domesday.
E. S.
—In reply to
T. W. I will merely refer him and your other correspondents upon this
subject to page 391. of Moore's Life of Byron, 1 vol. edition, 1844,
where will be found this passage, in Letter 323, addressed to Mr.
Murray:—
"What does 'thy waters wasted them' mean (in the Canto)? That
is not me. Consult the MS. always."
I am fully aware this will not interpret the meaning of the passage, but
it will go far to satisfy your correspondents that their emendations and
suggestions do not completely answer Lord Byron's query in the letter
referred to by
LEON.
London.
—Having
been, some time since, greatly pleased by a fine engraving of the ruined
Temple of Jupiter Panhellenius in Ægina (but unaccompanied by any
description), and having had a well executed water-colour drawing made
therefrom, my interest was aroused on the subject, and I searched among
books within reach for particulars on the subject of what there seems
every reason to regard as the oldest temple in Greece, with the single
exception of that of Corinth. After a patient search I found Fosbroke's
Foreign Topography (4to. edition, 1828, pp. 3, 4, 5.) to contain the
best account of those interesting
ruins. The work is not a scarce
one in good libraries: I shall therefore be concise in the extracts from
it. The article entitled "Ægina (Greece)" states that the remains of the
Temple of Jupiter Panhellenius (which are engraved in the Ionian
Antiquities) prove it to have been of the Doric order; that it had six
columns in front, but only twelve on the side, in opposition to the
usual custom among Greek architects of adding one column more than
double the number of those in front. The architecture is said closely to
approach that of the hexastyle hypæthral Temple of Pæstum. Williams, in
his Travels, expresses the opinion that this Temple of Jupiter is
older than that of Theseus or the Parthenon. In Dodwell's Greece, too,
there is an ample description of it. He represents it to have been part
of the ruins of an ancient city, perhaps of Oië. Twenty-five columns
were left entire in his day; together with the greater part of the
epistylion, or architrave. The cornice, however, with the metopæ and
triglyphs, have all fallen. The view of this gloriously positioned
temple must have been magnificent from the sea; while the details of the
building must have been equally delighting to the near spectator. The
temple was built of soft porous stone, coated with a thin stucco, which
must have given it a marble appearance. The epistylia were painted, and
the cornice elegantly ornamented in a similar manner. The pavement was
also covered with a thick stucco, painted vermilion. Chandler (Greece,
12-15.) describes traces of the peribolus of this temple; and Clarke
styles it at once the most ancient and remarkable in Greece. I may add
that the Æginetans were celebrated for their works in bronze, for fine
medals (the art of coining money indeed being first introduced by the
inhabitants of this island), for their terra cotta vases, &c. Fosbroke's
excellent Cyclopædia of Antiquities may be with advantage consulted in
respect to the Eginetic school of art.
J. J. S.
The Cloisters, Temple.
—I cannot inform ÆGROTUS who
was declared to be mad for believing the sun's motion, but Herschel was
anticipated by Lalande (Mémoires, 1776), who inferred it from the
sun's rotation; also by Professor Wilson, of Glasgow (Thoughts on
Universal Gravitation, 1777), and, earlier than these, by the Rev. Mr.
Michell, in Philosophical Transactions, 1767. Mayer (De Motu
Fixarum, 1760) mentions the hypothesis, and rejects it.
ALTRON.
—Cop is not a hill or head,
as Mr. Lawrence supposes, and as the word certainly signifies in some
parts of England, but a bank. The artificial banks which confine the
Dee at and below Chester were called fifty years ago, and I dare say are
still called, Cops, with distinctive names. By SALOPIAN'S account,
Wyle Cop is such a bank. I cannot explain Wyle, but think it
probable that it was the name of some former proprietor of the ground.
It however no more needs explanation than if it were joined to Street
or Lane, instead of to Cop.
E. H. D. D.
—In reply to your
correspondent ANTIQUARIENSIS, I have to inform you that the "Macfarlane
Collections" preserved in the Advocates' Library, Edinburgh, are chiefly
of an "ecclesiastic nature." In Turnbull's Fragmenta Scoto-Monastica,
published by Stevenson of Edinburgh, 1842, I find it stated that—
"Mr. Walter Macfarlan of Macfarlan (Scoticè, of that Ilk) was
an eminent antiquary, who devoted his attentions strictly to the
historical monuments of his own country, especially the
ecclesiastic remains. He caused to be made, at his own expense,
by his clerk, one Tait, copies of most of the chartularies
accessible in his time. These are distinguished for their
fidelity and neatness. Mr. Macfarlan died 5th June, 1767, and his
MSS. were purchased by the Faculty of Advocates."
Of these valuable and highly important chartularies there has been
printed, 1. Aberdeen; 2. Arbroath; 3. Balmerino; 4. Dryburgh; 5.
Dunfermline; 6. Kelso; 7. Lindores; 8. Melros; 9. Moray; 10. St.
Andrews; and 11. Scone.
According to Douglas, in his Baronage of Scotland, folio, 1798—
"Mr. Macfarlane was a man of parts, learning, and knowledge, a
most ingenious antiquary, and by far the best genealogist of his
time. He was possessed of the most valuable collection of
materials for a work of this kind of any man in the kingdom,
which he collected with great judgment, and at a considerable
expense, and to which we always had, and still have, free access.
This sufficiently appears by the many quotations from
Macfarlane's collections, both in the Peerage and Baronage of
Scotland. In short, he was a man of great benevolence, an
agreeable companion, and a sincere friend.
"He married Lady Elizabeth Erskine, daughter of Alexander, sixth
earl of Kelly, and died without issue in June, 1767."
In the year 1846 there was engraved at the expense of W. B. C. C.
Turnbull, Esq., advocate, a fine portrait of Macfarlane, from the
original painting in the Library of the Society of Scottish Antiquaries.
Of this plate it is believed that only a few "proofs upon India paper"
were thrown off for presents.
T. G. S.
Edinburgh.