(Vol. vii., p. 528.)
"Charity thinketh no evil;" but we must feel both surprise and regret
that any one should, in 1853, consider it a doubtful question whether
Bishop Butler died in the communion of the Church of England. The bishop
has now been in his grave more than a hundred years; but Warburton says
truly, "How light a matter very often subjects the best-established
characters to the suspicions of posterity—how ready is a remote age
to catch at a low revived slander, which the times that brought it forth
saw despised and forgotten almost in its birth."
X. Y. Z. says he would be glad to have this charge (originally brought
forward in 1767) sifted. He will find that it has been sifted, and
in the most full and satisfactory manner, by persons of no less
distinction than Archbishop Secker and Bishop Halifax. The strong
language employed by the archbishop, when refuting what he terms a
"gross and scandalous falsehood," and when asserting the bishops
"abhorrence of popery," need not here be quoted, as "N.& Q." is not
the most proper channel for the discussion of theological subjects; but
it is alleged that every man of sense and candour was convinced at the
time that the charge should be retracted; and it must be a
satisfaction to your correspondent to know, that as Bishop Butler lived
so he died, in full communion with that Church, which he adorned
equally by his matchless writings, sanctity of manners, and spotless
life.
J. H. Markland.
Bath.
Footnote 4:(return)
Your correspondent may be referred to Memoirs of the Life of Bishop
Butler, by a connexion of his own, the Rev. Thomas Bartlett, A.M.,
published in 1839; and to a review of the same work in the Quarterly
Review, vol. lxiv. p. 331.
In reference to the Query by X. Y. Z., as to whether Bishop Butler
died in the Roman Catholic communion, allow me to refer your
correspondent to the contents of the letters from Dr. Forster and Bishop
Benson to Secker, then Bishop of Oxford, concerning the last illness and
death of the prelate in question, deposited at Lambeth amongst the
private MSS. of Archbishop Seeker, "as negative arguments against the
calumny of his dying a Papist."
Than the allegations that Butler died with a Roman Catholic book of
devotion in his hand, and that the last person in whose company he was
seen was a priest of that persuasion, nothing can be more unreasonable,
if at least it be meant to deduce from these unproved statements that the
bishop agreed with the one and held communion with the other. Dr.
Forster, his chaplain, was with him at his death, which happened about 11
a.m., June 16; and this witness observes (in a
letter to the Bishop of Oxford, June 18) that "the last four-and-twenty
hours preceding which [i. e. his death] were divided between short
broken slumbers, and intervals of a calm but disordered talk when awake."
Again (letter to Ditto, June 17), Forster says that Bishop Butler, "when,
for a day or two before his death, he had in a great measure lost the use
of his faculties, was perpetually talking of writing to your lordship,
though without seeming to have anything which, at least, he was at all
capable of communicating to you." Bishop Benson writes to the Bishop of
Oxford (June 12) that Butler's "attention to any one or anything is
immediately lost and gone;" and, "my lord is incapable, not only of
reading, but attending to anything read or said." And again, "his
attention to anything is very little or none."
There was certainly an interval between this time (June 12) and "the
last four-and-twenty hours" preceding his death, during which, writes
Bishop Benson (June 17), Butler "said kind and affecting things more than
I could bear." Yet, on the whole, I submit that these extracts, if fully
weighed and considered with all the attending circumstances, contain
enough of even positive evidence to refute conclusively the injurious
suspicions alluded to by X. Y. Z., if such are still current.
J. R. C.
(Vol. iv., p. 434., &c.)
I have asked many questions, and turned over many volumes and files of
newspapers, to get at the real facts of the cases of mitigation stated in
"N. & Q." Having winnowed the chaff as thoroughly as I could, I send
the very few grains I have found. Those only who have searched annual
registers, magazines, and journals for the foundation of stories
defective in names and dates, will appreciate my difficulties.
I have not found any printed account of the "Jeannie Deans" case, "N.
& Q.," Vol. iv., p. 434.; Vol. v., p. 444.; Vol. vi., p. 153. I have
inquired of the older members of the Northern Circuit, and they never
heard of it. Still a young man may have been convicted of forgery "about
thirty-five years ago:" his sister may have presented a well-signed
petition to the judges, and the sentence may have been commuted without
the tradition surviving on the circuit. All however agree, that no man
who ever sat on the bench deserved the imputation of "obduracy" less than
Baron Graham. I should not have noticed the anecdote but for its
mythic accompaniments, which I disposed of in "N. & Q.," Vol.
v., p. 444.
In Vol. vi., p. 496., W. W. cites from Wade's British
History:
"July 22, 1814. Admiral William B——y found guilty of
forging letters to defraud the revenue. He was sentenced to death, which
was commuted to banishment."
The case is reported in The Sun, July 25, 1814; and the
subsequent facts are in The Times, July 30, and August 16 and 20.
It was tried before Mr. Justice Dampier at the Winchester Summer Assizes.
There were five bills against the prisoner for forgery, and one for a
fraud. That on which he was convicted, was for defrauding the post-master
of Gosport of 3l. 8s. 6d. He took to the post-office
a packet of 114 letters, which he said were "ship letters," from the
"Mary and Jane." He received the postage, and signed the receipt "W.
Johnstone." The letters were fictitious. The case was fully proved, and
he received sentence of death. He was respited for a fortnight, and
afterwards during the pleasure of the Prince Regent. He was struck off
the list of retired rear-admirals. It was proved at the
trial, that, in 1809, he commanded "The Plantagenet;" but, from the
unsettled state of his mind, the command had been given up to the
first lieutenant, and that he was shortly after superseded. This, and the
good character he received, were probably held to excuse the pardon.
I now come to the great case of George III. and Mr. Fawcett. I much
regret that Whunside has not replied in your
pages to my question (Vol. vii., p. 163.), as I could then have commented
upon the facts, and his means of knowing them, with more freedom. I have
a private communication from him, which is ample and candid. He objects
to bring his name before the public, and I have no right to press that
point. He is not quite certain as to the convict's name, but can
procure it for me. He would rather that it should not be published, as it
might give pain to a respectable family. Appreciating the objection, and
having no use for it except to publish, I have declined to ask it of
him.
The case occurred in 1802 or 1803, when Whunside was a pupil of Mr. Fawcett. He says:
"Occasionally Mr. Fawcett used to allow certain portions of a weekly
newspaper to be read to the boys on a Saturday evening. This case was
read to us, I think from the Leeds Mercury; and though Mr.
Fawcett's name was not mentioned, we were all aware who the minister
was."
Thus we have no direct evidence of the amount of Mr. Fawcett's
communications with George III. How much of the story as it is now told
was read to the boys, we do not know; but that it came to them first
through a weekly paper, is rather against than for it.
We all know the tendency of good stories to pick up additions as they
go. I have read that the first edition of the Life of Loyola was
without miracles. This anecdote seems to have reached its full growth in
1823, in Pearson's Life of W. Hey, Esq., and probably in the two
lives of George III., published after his death, and mentioned by Whunside. Pearson, as cited in "N. & Q.," Vol. vi.,
p. 276., says, that by some means the Essay on Anger had been
recommended to the notice of George III., who would have made the author
a bishop had he not been a dissenter; that he signified his wish to serve
Mr. Fawcett, &c. That on the conviction of H——, Mr.
Fawcett wrote to the king; and a letter soon arrived, conveying the
welcome intelligence, "You may rest assured that his life is safe,"
&c.
It is not stated that this was "private and confidential:" if it was,
Mr. Fawcett had no right to mention it; if it was not, he had no reason
for concealing what was so much to his honour, and so extraordinary as
the king's personal interference in a matter invariably left to the
Secretary of State for the Home Department. If, however, Mr. Fawcett was
silent from modesty, his biographers had no inducement to be so; yet, let
us see how they state the case. The Account of the Life, Writings, and
Ministry of the late Rev. John Fawcett: London, 1818, cited in "N.
& Q.," Vol. vi., p. 229., says:
"He was induced, in conjunction with others, to solicit the
exercise of royal clemency in mitigating the severity of that punishment
which the law denounces: and it gladdened the sympathetic feelings of his
heart to know that these petitions were not unavailing; but the modesty
of his character made him regret the publicity which had been given to
this subject."
The fifth edition of the Essay on Anger, printed for the Book
Society for Promoting Religious Knowledge, London, no date, has a
memoir of the author. The "incident" is said not to have been circulated
in any publication by the family; but "it was one of the secrets
which obtain a wider circulation from the reserve with which one relator
invariably retails it to another." That is exactly my view. Secrecy
contributes to diffusion, but not to accuracy. At the risk of being
thought tedious, I must copy the rest of this statement:
"Soon after the publication of this treatise, the author took an
opportunity of presenting a copy to our late much revered sovereign;
whose ear was always accessible to merit, however obscure the individual
in whom it was found. Contrary to the fate of most publications laid at
the feet of royalty, it was diligently perused and admired; and a
communication of this approbation was afterwards made known to the
author. It happened some time afterwards, a relative of one of his
friends was convicted of a capital crime, for which he was left for
execution. Application was instantly made for an extension of royal
favour in his behalf; and, among others, one was made by Mr. Fawcett: and
his majesty, no doubt recollecting the pleasure he had derived from
the perusal of his Essay on Anger, and believing that he would not
recommend an improper person to royal favour, was most graciously
pleased to answer the prayer of the petition; but as to precisely how
far the name of Mr. Fawcett might have contributed to this successful
application must await the great disclosures of a future
judgment."
The reader will sift this jumble of inferences and facts, and perhaps
will not go so far as to have "no doubt."
Whunside tells me, that about 1807 he employed
a bookbinder from Halifax; who, on hearing that he had been a pupil of
Mr. Fawcett, said he had seen two copies of the Essay on Anger,
most beautifully bound, to be sent to the king.
The conclusion to which I come is, that Mr. Fawcett sent a copy of the
Essay on Anger to the king; that the receipt of it was
acknowledged, possibly in some way more complimentary than the ordinary
circular; that a young man was convicted of forgery; that Mr. Fawcett and
others petitioned for his pardon, and that he was pardoned. All the rest
I hold to be mere rumours, not countenanced by Mr. Fawcett or his family,
and not asserted by his biographers.
H. B. C.
U. U. Club.
(Vol. vii., p. 326.)
Mr. Keightley's rule is only partially true,
and in the part which is true is not fully stated. The following rules,
qualified by the accompanying remarks, will I trust be found
substantially correct.
English monosyllables, formed from Greek or Latin monosyllabic
roots,
(1.) When the root ends in a single consonant preceded by a vowel,
require the lengthening e.
(2.) When the root ends in a single consonant preceded by a diphthong,
or in more than one consonant preceded by a vowel, reject the
e.
1. Examples from the Greek:—σχῆμ-α, scheme; λύρ-α (lyr-a),
lyre; ζών-η (zon-a), zon-e; βάσ-ις,
base; φράσ-ις, phras-e; τρόπ-ος, trop-e. From
Latin, ros-a, ros-e; fin-is, fin-e; fum-us, fum-e;
pur-us, pur-e; grad-us, grad-e. Compare, in verbs, ced-o,
ced-e.
Remarks.—This rule admits of a modification; e.g.
we form from ζῆλ-ος zeal (the sound
hardly perceptibly differing from zel-e); from ὥρ-α (hor-a), hour; from flos (flor-is),
flower and flour (the long sound communicated to the vowel
in the other words by the added e, being in these already
contained in the diphthong). Add ven-a, vein; van-us, vain;
sol-um, soil, &c.; and compare -ceed in proceed,
succeed, formed from compounds of ced-o. Some, but not all, of
these words have come to us through the French.
2. Examples from the Greek:—ῥεῦμ-α, rheum; χάσμ-α,
chasm; μύρρ-α, myrrh; γλῶσσ-α, gloss;
νύμφ-η
(nymph-a), nymph; δίσκ-ος, (disc-us),
disk; πλίνθ-ος, plinth;
ψαλμ-ός, psalm. From
Latin, fraus (fraud-is), fraud; laus (laud-is), laud;
plant-a, plant; orb-is, orb; plumb-um, plumb;
long-us, long, flux-us, flux; port-us, port.
Compare, in verbs, damn-o, damn; err-o, err; add-o,
add; vex-o, vex.
Remarks.—From roots ending in the same consonant doubled,
our derived words ordinarily drop one of them; e.g. στέμμ-α,
stem; gemm-a, gem; summ-a, sum; penn-a, pen;
carr-us, car. (Note this tendency of our language, by comparing
our man with the German mann.)
If the root ends in s or v preceded by a diphthong, or
in a consonant +s or +v preceded by a vowel,
our derived words add e, as παῦσ-ις (paus-a),
paus-e; caus-a, cause-e; næv-a, nav-e; puls-us,
puls-e; dens-us, dens-e; ἁψ-ίς, aps-e; laps-us,
laps-e; vers-us, vers-e; valv-a, valv-e; nerv-us,
nerv-e.
The cause of this lies in the genius of our language, which totally
rejects the ending v, and uses s (single) very sparingly in
the singular number, except in the ending ous, the genitive case,
the third person of the present tense, the obsolete wis, and
was. Other words are, the interjection alas; pronouns or
pronominal particles; proper names, as Thomas, Chaos;
compounds, as Lammas, Christmas; plural adverbs, as
towards, thereabouts; and the (perhaps)
plural—it ought to be so—alms.
From roots ending in a mute +a liquid, our derived words also
end in e, and are then in fact dissyllables; e.g. βίβλ-ος, bible;
κύκλ-ος, cycl-e;
μίτρ-α,
mitr-e; νίτρ-ον, nitr-e; πέτρ-ος, petr-e. In this
class of words the final letters (after the analogy of Latin) have
sometimes become transposed; e.g. λεπρ-ός, lep-er. So
now-a-days, cent-er as well as centr-e. Compare
metr-e, diamet-er.
To apply our rules to the words required to be formed in an English
shape from μῦθ-ος.
Very few words in our language end in th which are not of
purely native growth. Frith is questionable exception. Besides the
monosyllable plinth, we have imported from the Greek
colocynth, hyacinth, labyrinth, with the proper
names Corinth, Erymanth, all terminating in nth.
In the ending the our language does not rejoice. Most of such
words are verbs, so distinguished from their cognate substantives, as
wreathe from wreath. We have, as substantives, lathe
(A.-S. leð),
hythe (hyð),
scythe (more properly sithe, sıðe), tythe (tyðe); as adjectives, blithe
(blıðe),
lithe (lıð). There may be one or two more.
In all these the sounds is ð (th in this) not þ (th in thick). This appears worth
notice.
On the whole, I should venture to say that so uncouth a slip as
mythe, when set in our soil, was unlikely to thrive. Still myth is objectionable, though we at Cambridge might quote
gyp. However I may seem to be a breaker of my own laws, I
suggest, if we must have an English form of the word, that we should
write and pronounce myth. Several words
ending in th have the preceding vowel lengthened, e.g.
both, sloth, ruth, truth (though with the
inconsistency attributed to us, one, by the way, generally of orthography
rather than pronunciation, we shorten the diphthong in breath,
death). Compare also the sound of the endings ild and
ind.
I have already troubled you with a very long Note; but, before I
close, allow me to add that in what I have advanced I have had in view
only our modern mode of spelling, without binding myself to an opinion
of its inferiority or superiority to that of our forefathers. I beg also
to protest against Mr. Keightley's wish to banish
mythical from our vocabulary. It may be hybrid, but equally
so are critical, grammatical, musical,
physical, poetical, with a long string of et ceteras.
Charles Thiriold.
Footnote 5:(return)
Except x (=cs). Compare flax, wax,
ox.
Footnote 6:(return)
From serv-us (after the French) we form serf.
Footnote 7:(return)
Rebus, overplus, and surplus may, if not
satisfied, take an omnibus, bring their action at the Nisi
Prius, and meet there with a nonplus.
(Vol. vii., pp. 261. 409.)
This very able and valuable work, as to which your correspondent
inquires, was written by Wm. Paterson, the projector of the Bank of
England and the Darien scheme; a great and memorable name, but which, to
the discredit of British biography, will be sought for in vain in
Chalmers's or our other biographical dictionaries. The book above noticed
appears to be a continuation of another tract by the same author,
entitled An Inquiry into the Reasonableness and Consequences of an
Union with Scotland, containing a brief Deduction of what hath been done,
designed, or proposed in the Matter of the Union during the last Age, a
Scheme of an Union as accommodated to the present Circumstances of the
two Nations, also States of the respective Revenues, Debts, Weights,
Measures, Taxes, and Impositions, and of other Facts of moment: with
Observations thereupon, as communicated to Laurence Philips, Esq., near
York: London, printed and sold by R. Bragg, 1706, 8vo., 160 pages.
This was preceded by an earlier tract by the same author: Conferences
on the Public Debts, by the Wednesday's Club in Friday Street:
London, 1695, 4to. The last is noticed, with a short account of the
author, by Mr. McCulloch (Lib. of Political Economy, p.
159.), but he has not mentioned the two other works previously adverted
to. In all of them the author adopts the form of a report of the
proceedings of a club; but, without attempting to deny the actual
existence of a Wednesday's club in Friday Street (the designation he
assumes for it), nothing can be more clear to any one who reads the three
tracts than that the conversations, proceedings, and personages mentioned
are all the creatures of his own fertile invention, and made use of, more
conveniently to bring out his facts, arguments, and statements. The
dramatic form he gives them makes even the dry details of finance
amusing; and abounding, as they do, in information and thought, these
works may always be consulted with profit and pleasure. The Inquiry
into the State of the Union, 1717, 8vo., for which Walpole is said to
have furnished some of the materials, was answered, but rather feebly, in
an anonymous pamphlet entitled Wednesday Club Law; or the Injustice,
Dishonour, and Ill Policy of breaking into Parliamentary Contracts for
public Debts: London, printed for E. Smith, 1717, 8vo., pp. 38. The
author of this pamphlet appears to have been a Mr. Broome. Those who
would wish see one of the financial questions discussed in the
Inquiry treated with equal force and ability, and with similar
views, by a great cotemporary of Paterson, whose pamphlet came out
simultaneously, may read Fair Payment no Spunge; or some
Considerations on the Unreasonableness of refusing to receive back Money
lent on public Securities, and the Necessity of setting the Nation free
from the unsupportable Burthen of Debt and Taxes, with a View of the
great Advantage and Benefit which will arise to Trade and to the Landed
Interest, as well as to the Poor, by having these heavy Grievances taken
off: London, printed and sold by Brotherton: Meadows and Roberts,
1717, 8vo., pp. 79. This is one of the pamphlets which, though it has
been sometimes erroneously assigned to Paterson, both on external and
internal evidence may be confidently attributed to Defoe, but which has
unaccountably escaped the notice of all his biographers.
James Crossley.
(Vol. vii., p. 498.)
The lines which your correspondent R. Vincent
attributes to Sir Walter Scott are part of an old English inscription
which Longfellow quotes in Outremer, p. 66., and thus describes in
a note:
"I subjoin this relic of old English verse entire.... It is copied
from a book whose title I have forgotten, and of which I have but a
single leaf, containing the poem. In describing the antiquities of the
church of Stratford-upon-Avon, the writer gives the following account of
a very old painting upon the wall, and of the poem which served as its
motto. The painting is no longer visible, having been effaced in
repairing the church:
"'Against the west wall of the nave, on the south side of the arch,
was painted the martyrdom of Thomas à Becket, while kneeling at the altar
of St. Benedict, in Canterbury Cathedral. Below this was the figure of an
angel, probably St. Michael, supporting a long scroll, upon which were
seven stanzas in old English, being an allegory of mortality.'"
The lines given at p. 498. of "N. & Q." seem to be taken from the
two following stanzas, which stand third and fourth in the old
inscription:
"Erth apon erth wynnys castellys and towrys,
Then seth erth unto erth thys ys all owrys.
When erth apon erth hath bylde hys bowrys,
Then schall erth for erth suffur many hard schowrys.
"Erth goth apon erth as man apon mowld,
Lyke as erth apon erth never goo schold,
Erth goth apon erth as gelsteryng gold,
And yet schall erth unto erth rather than he wold."
Dugdale, in his Antiquities of Warwickshire, p. 517., tells us
that John de Stratford, who was Archbishop of Canterbury in the reign of
Edward III., built a chapel on the south side of the church, "to the
honour of God and of St. Thomas the Martyr;" and as at p. 521. he
describes it as "in the south ile of the said church," the west wall of
this chapel answers very well the description of the position of the
painting, and inscription. But in The Beauties of England and
Wales, vol. xv. p. 238., the chapel of the gild of the Holy
Cross, in the centre of the town, is mentioned as the place in which
the pictures were discovered, during some repairs which it underwent in
the year 1804.
I have since ascertained that the work to which Longfellow refers is
Weaver's Account of Stratford-upon-Avon.
Erica.
As a companion to the unpublished epigram in No. 186. of "N.
& Q.," I beg to hand you the following epitaph, copied by myself
about thirty years since, and referring, as I believe, to an old
brass in the church of St. Helen's, London:
"Here lyeth ye bodyes of
James Pomley, ye sonne of ould
Dominick Pomley and Jane his
Wyfe: ye said James deceased ye 7th
day of Januarie Anno Domini 1592
he beyng of ye age of 88 years, and
ye sayd Jane deceased ye —— day
of —— D——.
Earth goeth upō earth as moulde upō moulde;
Earth goeth upō earth all glittering as golde,
As though earth to ye earth never turne shoulde;
And yet shall earth to ye earth sooner than he woulde."
William Williams.
(Vol. vii., pp. 190. 463.)
In accordance with the request of Z. E. R., I have pleasure in
forwarding the extracts from the Catechismus brevis et Catholicus,
referred to at pp. 190. 463. of the present volume. It is needful to
premise, 1. That the pages of the catechism are not numbered. This will
account for the absence of precise references. 2. That only so much is
quoted as may exhibit the parallelism; and, 3. That the citations are not
consecutive in the original, but arranged in the order of the questions
and answers of the Church Catechism, beginning with the fourteenth
question, "How many sacraments hath Christ ordained in His Church?"
Q. 14. How many, &c.
"Quot sunt Ecclesiæ Catholicæ Sacramenta?
Septem sunt in universum," &c.
"Quis instituit Baptismum?
Ipse Servator ac Dominus noster Jesus Christus."
[Similarly of the Eucharist.]
Q. 15. What meanest thou, &c.
"Ecquur hæc ipsa—et dicantur et sint Sacramenta?
Sacramenta sunt et dicuntur quia sacra atque efficacia sunt signa
divinæ erga nos voluntatis."
Q. 16. How many parts, &c.
"Habetque unumquodque horum (quod sacramentis peculiare est verbum)
Elementum, et Gratiam invisibilem. Quod verbum nos docet, et promittit
nobis, hoc Elementum seu visibile signum similitudine quâdam demonstrat,
hoc idem Gratia quoque (nisi tamen obicem objiciat homo) in anima
invisibiliter operatur.
Da paucis singulorum Sacramentorum signa et invisibilem gratiam?"
Q. 17. What is the outward, &c.
"In Baptismo signum externum Aqua est."
Q. 18. What is the inward, &c.
"Quid efficit seu prodest Baptismus?
"Res seu gratia est renovatio et sanctificatio animæ, ablutio omnium
peccatorum, adoptio baptizati in filium Dei.
'Baptizatus sum in Nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti.'
"Tinctione illa aquæ, operationeque Spiritus Sancti, eripitur
baptizatus à regno et tyrannide diaboli, donatur remissione peccatorum ac
innocentia, addicitur perpetuò uni veroque Deo Patri et Filio et Spiritui
Sancto, hujus denique filius atque hæres instituitur."
Q. 19. What is required, &c.
"Requiritur in eo (adulto), et verus fidei usus, et vita professione
Christiana, Baptismique voto digna: hoc est ut corde credat, et ore fidem
confiteatur, utque peccatis mortificatis in vitæ ambulet novitate.
Proba sacræ Scripturæ testimoniis, quod Fides in Baptizato
requiratur."
Q. 20. Why then are infants, &c.
"Sed quomodo infantes possunt credere, ut qui nondum usum habeant
rationis?
His fides Ecclesiæ et susceptorum suffragatur, donec idonei fiant suo
illam assensu percipere, adhæc et fidei gratiam in Baptismo ii
consequuntur."
Q. 21. Why was the Sacrament, &c.
"Quur vero sacram Eucharistiam Christus instituit?
... Ut suæ passionis ac mortis recordemur, eamque annuntiemus
perpetuò."
Q. 22. What is the outward, &c.
Q. 23. What is the inward, &c.
"Da paucis ... signa et invisibilem gratiam.
In Eucharistia, Elementum est panis ac vini species: res autem, verum
corpus, et verus Christi sanguis est, fructusque dignam sumptionem
sequentes."
Q. 24. What are the benefits, &c.
"Jam recense paucis quinam fructus dignam Eucharistæ sumptionem
sequantur?
Principio quidem virtute escæ hujus confirmamur in fide, munimur
adversus peccata, ad bonorum operum studium excitamur, et ad charitatem
inflammamur. Hinc vero per eam incorporamur adjungimurque capiti nostro
Christo, ut unum cum ipso constituamus corpus," &c.
Q. 25. What is required, &c.
"Quonam pacto dignè sumitur Eucharistia?
Digna sumptio, omnium primum requirit, ut homo peccata sua agnoscat ex
animo ob ea verè doleat—ac firmum etiam animo concipiat amplius non
peccandi propositum. Deinde exigit etiam digna sumptio, ut communicaturus
simultatem omnem odiumque animo eximat: reconcilietur læso, et charitatis
contra viscera induat. Postremo vero et fides cum primis in sumente
requiritur ... ut credat corpus Christi pro se esse traditum mortem, et
sanguinem ejus in remissionem peccatorum suorum vere effusum,"
&c.
I fear the unavoidable length of the previous extracts will be against
the insertion of the full title of the book, and one remark. The title
is,—
"Catechismus brevis et Catholicus in gratiam Juventutis conscriptus,
Autore Iacobo Schœppero, Ecclesiasta Tremoniano. Cui accessit Pium
diurnarum precum Enchiridion, ex quo pueri toto die cum Deo colloqui
discant. Antverpiæ, apud Ioan. Bellerum ad insigne Falconis, 1555."
My remark is, that some of the coincidences above enumerated are at
least singular, though they do not perhaps prove that the compiler
of the Church Catechism, in the places referred to, had them
before him.
B. H. C.
(Vol. vii., p. 428.)
Of old Jacob Bobart, who originally came from Brunswick, Granger
(Biog. Hist., vol. v. p. 287., edit. 1824) gives us the following
account:
"Jacob Bobart, a German, whom Plot styles 'an excellent gardener and
botanist,' was, by the Earl of Danby, founder of the physic-garden at
Oxford, appointed the first keeper of it. He was author of Catalogus
Plantarum Horti Medici Oxoniensis, scil. Latino-Anglicus et
Anglico-Latinus: Oxon. 1648, 8vo. One singularity I have heard of him
from a gentleman of unquestionable veracity, that on rejoicing days he
used to have his beard tagged with silver. The same gentleman informed
me, that there is a portrait of him in the possession of one of the
corporation at Woodstock. He died the 4th of February, 1679, in the
eighty-first year of his age. He had two sons, Tillemant and Jacob, who
both belonged to the physic-garden. It appears that the latter succeeded
him in his office."
There is a very fine print of the elder Bobart, now extremely scarce,
"D. Loggan del., M. Burghers, sculp." It is a quarto of the largest size.
Beneath the head, which is dated 1675, is this distich:
"Thou German prince of plants, each year to thee
Thousands of subjects grant a subsidy."
In John Evelyn's Diary, under the date Oct. 24, 1664, is the
following entry:
"Next to Wadham, and the physic garden, where were two large
locust-trees, and as many platani (plane-trees), and some rare plants
under the culture of old Bobart."
The editor of the last edition, after repeating part of Granger's
note, and mentioning the portrait, adds:
"There is a small whole-length in the frontispiece of
Vertumnus, a poem on that garden. In this he is dressed in a long
vest, with a beard. One of his family was bred up at college in Oxford;
but quitted his studies for the profession of the whip, driving one of
the Oxford coaches (his own property) for many years with great credit.
In 1813 he broke his leg by an accident; and in 1814, from the respect he
had acquired by his good conduct, he was appointed by the University to
the place of one of the Esquire Beadles."
Vertumnus, the poem mentioned in the above note, was addressed
to Mr. Jacob Bobart, in 1713, by Dr. Evans. It is a laudatory epistle on
the botanical knowledge of the Bobarts; and we learn from it that Jacob,
the younger, collected a Hortus Siccus (a collection of plants
pasted upon paper, and kept dry in a book) in twenty volumes.
"Thy Hortus Siccus ...
In tomes twice ten, that world immense!
By thee compiled at vast expense."
The broadsides about which H. T. Bobart
inquires are of the greatest possible rarity. They were the production of
Edmund Gayton, the author of Festivious Notes on Don Quixote,
&c. Copies may be seen in the Ashmolean Library, under the
press-marks Nos. 423. and 438., but I think not in any other repository
of a like nature.
Among the Ashmolean MSS. (No. 36, art. 296.) is a poem of 110 lines
"Upon the most hopeful and ever-flourishing Sprouts of Valour, the
indefatigable Centrys of the Physick-Garden." This, I apprehend, is a MS.
copy of the first broadside mentioned by your correspondent.
I shall merely add, the Bobarts, father and son, were personal friends
of Ashmole and Ray, and that, in all probability, among their
correspondence much curious and minute information might be obtained.
Edward F. Rimbault.
(Vol. vii., p. 510.)
I was somewhat surprised to find, in No. 186. of "N. & Q.," two
instances quoted of the use of the word "its" in the
version of the Bible. It has long been an established opinion that this
word did not exist in it; and the fact has been recently referred to by
two different authorities, Mr. Keightley in "N.
& Q.," Vol. vii., p. 160., and Mr. Watts of the British Museum, in a
paper "On some philological peculiarities in the English authorised
Version of the Bible," read before the Philological Society on December
10, 1852.
Feeling curious on the subject, I have taken the trouble of referring
to several different versions of the Bible in the British Museum, and the
following variorum readings of the verses quoted by your
correspondent B. H. C. are the result:
1. The Wickliffite version, before 1390 (edit. Forshall and
Wadden):
"And he shal ben as a tree, that is plauntid beside the doun rennyngis
of watris; that his frut shal ȝive in his time."—Ps. i. 3.
"Duke of the weie thou were in his (sc. the vine) siȝt; and thou
plauntidist his rootis, and it fulfilde the erthe."—Ps.
lxxx. 10.
2. Coverdale's Bible, 1536:
"Yt brīgeth forth his frute in due
season."
"Thou maydest rowme for it, and caused it to take rote, so
yt it fylled the lōde."
3. Matthews, 1537:
"That bryngeth forth his frute in due season."
"Thou madest rowme for it, and caused it to take rote, so that it
fylled the lande."
4. Cranmer, 1539:
"Yt wyll brynge forth hys frute in due season."
"Thou madest rowme for it, and whan it had taken rote it fylled
ye lande."
5. The Bishops' Bible, 1568:
"That bryngeth foorth her fruite in due season."
"Thou madst roome before it, thou causedst it to take roote, and it
hath filled the lande."
6. Geneva Bible, 1578. In this there are two translations, one
"according to the Ebrewe," the other "used in the Common Prayer":
i. "That wil bring forth her fruite in due season."
ii. "That will bring forth his fruite in due season."
i. "Thou madest roome for it, and when it had taken roote, it filled
the lande."
ii. "Thou madest roume for it, and didest cause it to take roote, and
it filled the land."
7. The Douay Bible (Roman Catholic version), 1609-10:
"Which shal geue his fruite in his time."
"Thou wast the guide of the way in the sight thereof; thou
didst plant the rootes thereof, and it filled the earth."
8. Authorised version, 1611:
"That bringeth forth his fruit in his season."
"Thou preparedst roome before it, and didst cause it to take deepe
roote, and it filled the land."
It will thus be perceived that "its" is wanting in all the above
passages, and that "his," "her," and "thereof" invariably supply its
place. I have been equally unsuccessful in detecting the word in the
Common Prayer-Book version of the Psalms, which is well known to be that
of the "Great Bible," or Cranmer's edition of 1539, and which has
remained in use without alteration ever since. May I therefore ask
B. H. C. to be so good as to point out the particular "Old version of the
Psalms" from which he has derived his quotation?
W. B. Rye.
(Vol. vii., p. 495.)
In reply to your correspondent's remarks (May 21) on my translation of
Hoveden, I beg to state that, in suggesting Cork, I did not allude to the
city of Cork, but the territory of Desmond or Cork, which probably
extended to within a short distance of Waterford. Hoveden more than once,
in his foreign geography, confounds places with territories or kingdoms;
this fact, and the similarity of the names, Croch and
Corch, as the kingdom of Cork is elsewhere called by him, led me
to believe that a landing in the territory of Cork was meant. "Crook,"
"Hook Point," or "The Crook," is only supposed to have been the
place of landing on this occasion. I confess that I was not aware that
"Erupolis" was an alias of the diocese of Ossory: I cannot find it
mentioned as such in the dictionaries at my command. My Note, however,
was worded in such a way as to give offence to no reasonable person: and,
among the many hundreds, perhaps thousands of suggestions, made in the
notes (in a proper spirit, I hope,) I should be greatly surprised to find
that I had miscarried in none. For your correspondent's information, I
beg to state, that I am not an Irishman either by birth or descent; and
that I have never had the good fortune to pay a visit to that country.
Were I inclined to follow his example in making remarks upon the
"ominousness" of names, I might perhaps retaliate upon him with
interest.
Why I have forfeited all claim to be treated by this gentleman with
courtesy or common politeness, I am quite at a loss to conceive; but I
beg to remind him that vituperation does not carry conviction, and that
criticism is enfeebled by an alliance with abuse.
Henry T. Riley.
(Vol. vii., p. 469.)
In your 185th Number, two or three Queries are proposed by the Rev. Mr. Corser in connexion with that
interesting branch of literature called Books of Emblems. To these
it shall be my endeavour to reply.
First. Some years ago I made particular inquiry from the surviving
relatives of the late Rev. William Beloe, whether among his manuscripts
there had been found any "Treatise on Emblems," or any notices which had
a bearing on the subject? They informed me that they had made search, but
without success.
Second. Of Thomas Combe, mentioned by Meres in his Palladis
Tamia, I have been unable to learn anything.
Third. It appears certain that Bunyan never published any Book of
Emblems, whatever may have been hawked under his name; nor can I
find, in the Account of his Life and Writings just published in Glasgow,
Edinburgh, and London, or in any preceding edition of his works, that
such a production was ever contemplated by him.
Fourth. In the extensive and valuable "English Books of Emblems"
furnished (chiefly from his own library) by Mr.
Corser, he mentions R. Burton's Choice Emblems, Divine and
Moral; or Delights for the Ingenious, &c., 12mo. 1721. Perhaps my
learned and accomplished friend may not be aware that Burton is an
assumed name, placed in the title-pages of several cheap books
which appeared at the end of the seventeenth and the beginning of the
eighteenth centuries, but which were thought to have been written by a
Mr. Nathaniel Crouch, a bookseller, who sold them. I have a sixth edition
of these "choice emblems," dated 1732, which was then sold for "two
shillings bound." The work is merely a collection of fifty emblems,
taken, without acknowledgment, from George Wither, the copper-plate
engravings being poor copies from those of Depasse. To this sixth edition
there is prefixed a portrait of K. Charles I., with eight pages of
sympathising verses.
Mr. Corser's list of English works is very
complete. I possess, however, an unpublished manuscript translation of
Alciato into English verse. It is of the time of James I., and possesses
much merit; but it has unfortunately been mutilated.
I also possess the following:
"Amorum Emblemata figuris æneis incisa studio Othonis Væni,
Batavo-Lugdunensis. Emblemes of Love, with verses in Latin, English, and
Italian, obl. 4to.: Antverpiæ, 1608."
Prefixed is an English dedication "to the most Honourable and Worthy
Brothers William, Earl of Pembroke, and Philip, Earl of Montgomerie,
Patrons of Learning and Chevalrie," whose coat of arms also is given.
"The Doctrine of Morality, or a View of Human Life according to the
Stoic Philosophy, &c. A translation, by T. M. Gibbs, from the French
of M. De Gomberville, with 103 copper plates by Daret, folio: London,
1721."
To each engraving are appended quotations from Horace, &c., with
English translations: but both engravings and quotations have been
pirated (without the least acknowledgment) from Van Veen's Horatia
Emblemata.
It must be admitted that a comprehensive work on European Books of
Emblems, illustrated with fac-similes of the various engravings, &c.,
is a great desideratum in modern literature. I feel highly flattered by
the kind commendations which Mr. Corser has
bestowed upon my two small attempts towards such a work, and by his
encouraging me to proceed "to enlarge and complete" the same. Now, I do
not altogether despair of enlarging it. But when my excellent
friend puts forward a proposal to complete it, he should be
informed that my library alone contains nearly 250 volumes strictly
emblematical, and published during the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries. By far the greater part of these are in Latin. To carry
forward a work of such magnitude to anything like completion must
therefore be rather wished for than expected.
Jos. B. Yates.
West Dingle, near Liverpool.
Allow me to add the following to Mr. Corser's
list:
"The Christian's Divine Amusement, consisting of Emblems and
Hieroglyphicks on a great Variety of Subjects, Moral and Divine, in four
books. By the late Rev. Mr. J. Jones. Embellished with near 100 beautiful
emblematical cuts, 12mo. pp. 191.: London, 1764."
I know not who the Rev. Mr. J. was, but his book is the old one of
Francis Quarles. The author, or rather adapter, attacks and demolishes
the fable as a method of instruction, and would substitute the emblems.
In remodelling Quarles, Mr. Jones makes the following alterations, or
improvements:—Instead of the Latin motto under each cut, he
presents us with four lines of English verse, which contain a general
explanation of the emblem. The page facing the cut he divides into two
parts or sections of odes and hymns suited to common psalmody, and the
moral, or application, also in a poetical dress.
A prose work belonging to the class under notice is an
"Emblematical Representation of the Paradise of God; showing the
Nature of Spiritual Industry, in the similitude of a Garden well ordered,
dressed, and kept. London, 1779."
The author of this was a visionary Scots gardener named Alexander
Clark, who had been favoured with a special manifestation of divine
glory, "by which," he says, "(to my own astonishment) I was enabled to
see through every profound passage of Scripture, and to spiritualise
every material thing;" but he belongs to my fanatical rather than to
my emblematical shelf, and may be worth a separate Note hereafter.
Under the name of Farlie, or Fairlie, Mr.
Corser mixes up the titles of two distinct books; they are now
before me, and divide themselves thus:
1. "Lychnocavsia, sive Moralia Facvm Emblemata. Light's Moral Emblems.
Authore Roberto Farlæo, Scoto-Britanno. 12mo.: London, Th. Cotes for M.
Sparke, 1638."
Containing fifty-eight emblems in Latin and English, each with a cut,
with a dedication in Latin to the Earl of Ancrum, and one in English to
his Countess. There are also complimentary verses by J. Hooper, Christ.
Drayton, Mr. Povey, Thos. Beedome, and Edm. Coleman.
2. "Kalendarium Humanæ Vitæ. The Kalendar of Man's Life. Authore
R. F., S.-B. 12mo. London, for W. Hope, 1638."
With a Latin dedication to his patron the Earl of Ancrum. The book
contains verses upon the various stages of man's life, under the heads of
Spring, Summer, Autumn, and Winter; again subdivided into moralisations
upon the months, as corresponding with the periods of life, as "August,
or Man's Youth," &c. This has also a variety of curious cuts, and
both have engraved emblematical titles, the latter bearing on its face
"G. Glover fecit."
When book-rarities were in more request, these were costly little
volumes; and I shall be glad if any of your correspondents can direct me
where to find any notice of Robert Fairlie, the author of two of the most
interesting of the emblematical series.
J. O.
[The following paper, which has been kindly communicated to us by
Mr. Pollock at the request of Dr. Diamond, describes a process which deserves the
especial attention of our photographic friends, for the beauty and
uniformity of its results.]
The paper should be carefully chosen, by holding up every sheet
to the light, and only those sheets which are homogeneous in appearance
and free from spots should be kept for use.
The albumen should be obtained from new-laid hens' eggs;
twenty-four is a convenient number to use at a time: these will yield
twenty-four ounces of albumen, to which should be added six ounces of
distilled writer (making thirty ounces in all) and four per cent. of
chloride of ammonium, viz. one ounce and a quarter.
The albumen water and chloride should be whipped with a silver fork
for several minutes, and then put into a narrow tall jar, and allowed to
stand for not less than two days (forty-eight hours). In cool weather it
will keep well for eight days, at the end of which time the upper half of
the albumen is to be poured off into a shallow vessel, rather larger than
the sheets of paper intended to be albumenised.
To put the Albumen on the Paper.—Take a sheet by two
opposite corners; turn one up; place the sheet boldly on the albumen, the
centre first coming in contact with the albumen; lower the corners of the
paper, gradually carefully excluding, the air. Let the sheet so placed
remain four minutes: then take it by the turned up corner, and rip it
from the albumen quickly, so as to carry up a quantity of the albumen
with it. Let it drain for a minute or two, moving it so as not to allow
the albumen to run in streaks; pin it to a piece of tape; and, when dry,
pass a very hot iron over the back. This ends the albumenising
process.
To make the Paper sensitive.—Place the albumenised side
downwards, for four minutes, on the surface of a solution of nitrate of
silver, of the strength of ninety grains to the ounce of distilled water;
pin it up by one corner to dry, and keep it between pieces of
blotting-paper. This must be done by yellow light, or the light of a
candle.
To print from the Negative.—The simplest apparatus to
have is a number of pieces of plate-glass a quarter of an inch thick,
colourless, about twelve inches by ten in size.
The sensitive paper is to be placed on one of the plates of glass,
sensitive side upwards, and the negative is to be placed firmly upon it,
collodion side downwards; and a second glass plate is then to be placed
on the negative, and the whole arrangement exposed to the light. The time
for exposure is from three minutes to an hour. With a little practice the
negative can be lifted up, and the positive viewed front time to time,
without any risk of displacement.
The best rule is to print the lightest shade on the positive very
decidedly darker than it would be wished that it should remain
permanently.
To fix the Positive.—On removing it from the pressure
frame, place it in a bath made as follows:
|
Water
|
6 oz.
|
|
Hyposulphite of soda
|
1 oz.
|
|
Nitrate of silver solution, 50 grs. to oz.
|
15 minims.
|
|
Iodide of silver, dissolved in a saturated solution of hypo.
|
10 minims.
|
|
Chloride of gold
|
2 grains.
|
|
Chloride of silver (blackened by light)
|
5 grains.
|
|
Acetic acid
|
2 drops.
|
Mix these: let them stand some hours; and filter before use. If the
chloride of silver is omitted, the bath will do very well, but will very
much improve with age, as it will acquire chloride of silver from the
positives placed in it.
The time to leave the positive in the fixing bath varies from one hour
to twelve. To get good black and white tints, the average time is five or
six hours. When the desired tint is obtained, remove it into a bath
composed of
Leave in this for half an hour, and then keep it in running water for
several hours. If the water is hot, the time of soaking may be lessened:
boiling water is objectionable. Nearly dry the positive between sheets of
clean blotting-paper, and finish it by passing a very hot iron over
it.
General Remarks.—The albumenised paper will keep any
length of time in a dry place.
When made sensitive, as directed, it will keep three days, always
supposing that it is both prepared and kept most carefully excluded from
white light. If, instead of a solution of nitrate of silver of ninety
grains to the ounce, a weaker one be used, to make the paper sensitive,
it will keep when sensitive a much longer time,—with a thirty-grain
solution, a fortnight, or sometimes even a month; but then it does not
give a positive of the same force and tone as that obtained with the
stronger solution.
After the fixing bath has done its day's work, it should be poured
back into the bottle from which it came, and the bottle be filled up from
the finishing bath; and so the bath is kept always of the same quantity;
and by adding from time to time chloride of gold, it is kept of the same
quality.
The nitrate of silver and chloride of silver will never have to be
renewed. The iodide of silver should be added as at first, viz. ten drops
for about every two hundred positives fixed; and the acetic acid, viz.
two drops for about every four hundred.
In a bath of twenty-four ounces, as many as thirty positives, five
inches by four, may be placed at one time: but the dark tints will then
appear very slowly and gradually.
To insure a good positive, next to having a good negative, it is most
important to print of the right depth, neither too much nor too little.
Great attention should be paid to this: for the finest tints are only to
be obtained in positives exposed exactly the right time.
Positives printed in a bright sun quickly are always better than those
obtained by longer exposure without sun.
H. P.
21. Maddox Street, Regent Street.
Test for Lenses.—In applying the methods recommended in
your last Number for the purpose of testing lenses, there is one
precaution absolutely necessary to be taken, but which all your
correspondents have omitted to point out. The operator must take care
that his focussing-glass is placed at precisely the same distance
from the lens as the collodionised glass is. To insure this, my
practice is to place a piece of ground glass in the dark frame, which is
afterwards to receive the collodionised glass, and to obtain the focus of
the lens on that; then to put in the proposed plate, and obtain an
impression as described by Mr. Shadbolt. In this
way I secure myself from what I believe is often a source of fallacy in
these experiments, and am sure that I give the lens a fair trial.
E. S.
Washing Collodion Pictures.—I have never offered to your
readers an opinion in photography without having bonâ fide tested
it, to the best of my ability; and however correct my friend Mr. Shadbolt may be, chemically and theoretically, I am
convinced that in practice so good a tone is never obtained in a positive
collodion picture which has been washed, as in one which has been
instantly fixed with the old saturated solution of hyposulphite of soda.
The unpleasant tints obtained upon positive collodion pictures, I believe
to be much dependent upon the frequent washings in the proofs. When a
collodion picture is properly treated, it surpasses in pleasing effect
every other photograph.
H. W. Diamond.