(Vol. vii., pp. 206. 305. 435. 479.)
I had forwarded for insertion a short answer to the Query as to
Pylades and Corinna before Dr. Maitland's
communication was printed; but as it now appears more distinctly what was
the object of the Query, I can address myself more directly to the point
he has raised. And, in the first place, I cannot suppose that Defoe had
anything to do with Pylades and Corinna, or the History of
Formosa. In all Defoe's fictions there is at least some trace of the
master workman, but in neither of these works is there any putting forth of his power,
or any similitude to his manner or style. When the History of
Formosa appeared (1704), he was ingrossed in politics, and was not,
as far as any evidence has yet informed us, in the habit of translating
or doing journeyman work for booksellers. Then the book itself is, in
point of composition, far beneath Defoe, even in his most careless moods.
As to Pylades and Corinna, Defoe died so soon after Mrs.
Thomas—she died on the 3rd February, 1731, and he on the 24th April
following, most probably worn out by illness—that time seems
scarcely afforded for getting together and working up the materials of
the two volumes published. The editor, who signs himself "Philalethes,"
dates his Dedication to the first volume, in which are contained the
particulars about Psalmanazar, "St. John Baptist, 1731," which day would
be after Defoe's death. Nor is there any ground for supposing that Defoe
and Curll had much connexion as author and publisher. Curll only printed
two works of Defoe, as far as I have been able to discover, the
Memoirs of Dr. Williams (1718, 8vo.), and the Life of Duncan
Campbell (1720, 8vo.), and for his doing so, in each case, a good
reason may be given. As regards the genuineness of the correspondence in
Pylades and Corinna, I do not see any reason to question it. Sir
Edward Northey's certificate, and various little particulars in the
letters themselves, entirely satisfy me that the correspondence is not a
fictitious one. The anecdotes of Psalmanazar are quite in accordance with
his own statements in his Life—(see particularly p. 183.,
Memoirs, 1765, 8vo.); and if they were pure fiction, is it not
likely that, living in London at the time when they appeared, he would
have contradicted them? In referring (Vol. vii., p. 436., "N. & Q.")
to the Gentleman's Magazine for these anecdotes, I had not
overlooked their having appeared in Pylades and Corinna, but had
not then the latter book at hand to include it in the reference. Dr. Maitland considers Pylades and Corinna "a
farrago of low rubbish, utterly beneath criticism." Is not this rather
too severe and sweeping a character? Unquestionably the poetry is but
so-so, and of the poem the greater part might have been dispensed with;
but, like all Curll's collections, it contains some matter of interest
and value to those who do not despise the minutiæ of literary
investigation. The Autobiography of the unfortunate authoress (Mrs.
Thomas), who was only exalted by Dryden's praise to be ignominiously
degraded by Pope, and "whose whole life was but one continued scene of
the utmost variety of human misery," has always appeared to me an
interesting and rather affecting narrative; and, besides a great many
occasional notices in the correspondence, which are not without their
use, there are interspersed letters from Lady Chudleigh, Norris of
Bemerton, and others, which are not to be elsewhere met with, and which
are worth preserving.
For Psalmanazar's character, notwithstanding his early peccadilloes, I
can assure Dr. Maitland that I have quite as high
a respect as himself, even without the corroborative evidence of our
great moralist, which on such a subject may be considered as perfectly
conclusive.
James Crossley.
(Vol. vii., p. 66.)
This prelate seems to have been a cadet of the family of Wauchope, of
Niddry, or Niddry Marischall, in the county of Midlothian, to which
family once belonged the lands of Wauchopedale in Roxburghshire. The
exact date of his birth I have never been able to discover, nor which
"laird of Niddrie" he was the son of. Robert was a favourite name in the
family long before his time, as is evidenced by an inscription at the
entry to a burial chapel belonging to the family to this effect: "This
tome was Biggit Be Robert Vauchop of Niddrie Marchal, and interit heir
1387." I am at present out of reach of all books of reference, and have
only a few manuscript memoranda to direct further research; and these
memoranda, I am sorry to say, are not so precise in their reference to
chapter and verse as they ought to be.
According to these notes, mention is made of Robert Wauchope, doctor
of Sorbonne, by Leslie, bishop of Ross, in the 10th book of his
History; by Labens, a Jesuit, in the 14th tome of his
Chronicles; by Cardinal Pallavicino, in the 6th book of his
Hist. Conc. Trid.; by Fra Paolo Sarpi, in his Hist. Conc.
Trid. Archbishop Spottiswood says that he died in Paris in the year
1551, "much lamented of all the university," on his return home from one
of his missions to Rome.
One of my notes, taken from the Memoirs of Sir James Melville,
I shall transcribe, as it is suggestive of other Queries more generally
interesting. The date is 1545:
"Now the ambassador met in a secret part with Oneel(?) and his
associates, and heard their offers and overtures. And the patriarch of
Ireland did meet him there, who was a Scotsman born, called Wauchope, and
was blind of both his eyes, and yet had been divers times at Rome by
post. He did great honour to the ambassadour, and conveyed him to see St.
Patrick's Purgatory, which is like an old coal pit which had taken fire,
by reason of the smoke that came out of the hole."
Query 1. What was the secret object of the ambassador?
Query 2. Has St. Patrick's Purgatory any existence at the present
time?
D. W. S. P.
(Vol. vii., p. 452.)
The curious article of your correspondent Senex relative to this seal, as described and figured
in Barrett's History of Attleburgh, has a peculiar interest as
connected with the device of a man combating a lion.
The first time I saw this device was in a most curious MS. on
"Memorial Trophies and Funeral Monuments, both in the old Churches of
London before the Fire, and the Churches and Mansions in many of the
Counties of England." The MS. is written by Henry St. George, and will be
found in Lansd. MSS. 874. The arms and tombs are all elaborately and
carefully drawn, with their various localities, and the epitaphs which
belong to them; and the whole is accompanied with an Index of Persons,
and another of Places.
At p. 28. this device of a man combating a lion is represented
associated with a shield of arms of many quarterings, showing the arms
and alliances of the royal family of Stuart, and is described as having
formed the subject of a window in the stewards house adjoining the church
of St. Andrew's, Holborn. In the Catalogue of the Lansdowne MSS.
is a long and interesting note on this device, with references to the
various works where it may be found, to which I have had access at the
Museum, and find them correct, and opening a subject for investigation of
a most curious kind.
The figure of the knight, in this drawing, differs considerably from
that on Dr. Barrett's seal. He is here represented on foot, dressed in
the chain mail and tunic of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, with a
close-barred helmet, with a broad flat crown, such as was worn in France
in the time of Louis IX., called St. Louis. The lion is in the act of
springing upon him, and he is aiming a deadly blow at him with a ragged
staff, as his sword lies broken at his feet. The figure is represented as
fighting on the green sward. From a cloud over the lion proceeds an arm
clothed in chain mail, and holding in the hand, suspended by a baldrick,
a shield bearing the arms of France (modern)—Azure, three fleurs-de-lis
or. On a scutcheon of pretence in the centre, Argent, a lion ramp. gules,
debruised with ragged staff, proper. This device forms the 1st quarter of
the quarterings of the Stuart family.
In this device there is no figure of a lizard, dragon, or chimera,
whichever it is, under the horse's feet, as represented in the seal of
D'Albini.
I could much extend this reply, by showing the antiquity of this
device, which by a long process of investigation I have traced as
connected with the legendary songs of the troubadours; but I think I have
said sufficient for the present, in reply to Senex.
In addition to the above, I may mention a seal of a somewhat similar
character to that of D'Albini, representing a knight on horseback, with
his sword in his hand, and his shield of arms, which are also on the
housings of the horse, under whose feet is the dragon: on the reverse is
the combat of the knight with the lion. The
knight is holding his shield in front, and holding his sword in his left
hand. This seal is that of Roger de Quincy, earl of Winchester, and
appended to a deed "m.cc. Quadrigresimo Quinto."
It occurs in Harl. MSS. 6079. p. 127.
E. G. Ballard.
Footnote 3:(return)
I say modern, for the ancient arms of France were Azure, semée
of fleurs-de-lis, as they are represented in old glass, when quartered
with those of England by our Henries and Edwards.
Pray request Senex to withdraw every word he
has said about me. I do not recollect that I ever said or wrote a word
about the Seal of William D'Albini; and I cannot find that my name occurs
in Dr. Barrett's volume.
Edw. Hawkins.
(Vol. vii., p. 356.)
The difficulty as to the proper use of the auxiliaries shall
and will, will be found to arise from the fact, that while these
particles respectively convey a different idea in the first person
singular and plural, from that which they imply in the second and
third persons singular and plural, the distinction has been lost
sight of in the amalgamation of both; as if they were
interchangeable, in one tense, according to the old grammatical
formula I shall or will. With a view of giving my own views
on the subject, and attempting to supply what appears to me a grammatical
deficiency, I shall proceed to make a few remarks; from which I trust
your Hong Kong correspondent W. T. M. may be able to form "a clear and
definite rule," and students of English assisted in their attempts to
overcome this formidable conversational "shibboleth."
The fact is simply thus:—Will is volitive in the
first persons singular and plural; and simply declarative
or promissory in the second and third persons
singular and plural. Shall, on the other hand, is
declaratory or promissory in the first person
singular and plural; volitive in the second and
third singular and plural. Thus, the so-called future is properly
divisible into two tenses: the first implying
influence or volition; the second (or future proper)
intention or promise. Thus:
|
1.
|
2.
|
|
I will go.
|
I shall go.
|
|
Thou shalt go.
|
Thou wilt go.
|
|
He shall go.
|
He will go.
|
|
We will go.
|
We shall go.
|
|
You shall go.
|
You will go.
|
|
They shall go.
|
They will go.
|
When the above is thoroughly comprehended by the pupil, it will be
only necessary to impress upon his mind (as a concise rule) the necessity
of making use of a different auxiliary in speaking of the future actions
of others, when he wishes to convey the same idea respecting
such actions which he has done, or should do, in speaking of his
own, and vice versâ. Thus:
I will go, and you shall accompany me.
(i. e. it is my wish to go, and also that you shall
accompany me.)
I shall go, and you will accompany me.
(i. e. it is my intention to go; and believe, or know, that it is
your intention to accompany me.)
The philosophical reason for this distinction will be evident, when we
reflect upon the various ideas produced in the mind by the expression of
either volition or mere intention (in so far as the latter
is distinguishable from active will) with regard to our own
future actions, and the same terms with reference to the future actions
of others. It will be seen that a mere intention in the
first person, becomes influence when it extends to the
second and third; we know nothing, à priori (as it
were) of the intentions of others, except in so far as we may have
the power of determining them. When I say "I shall go"
(j'irai), I merely express an intention or promise
to go; but if I continue "You and they shall go," I convey
the idea that my intention or promise is operative on you
and them; and the terms which I thus use become unintentionally
influential or expressive of an extension of my volition to the
actions of others. Again, the terms which I use to signify
volition, with reference to my own actions, are but
declaratory or promissory when I speak of your
actions, or those of others. I am conscious of my own wish
to go; but my wish not influencing you, I do, by continuing
the use of the same auxiliary, but express my belief or knowledge that
your wish is, or will be, coincident with my own. When I
say "I will go" (je veux aller), I express a desire to go; but if
I add, "You and they will go," I simply promise on behalf
of you and them, or express my belief or knowledge
that you and they will also desire to go.
It is not unworthy of note, that the nice balance between shall
and will is much impaired by the constant use of the ellipse,
"I'll, you'll," &c.; and that volition and intention
are, to a great extent, co-existent and inseparable in the first
person: the metaphysical reasons for this do not here require
explanation.
I am conscious that I have not elucidated this apparently simple, but
really complex question, in so clear and concise a manner as I could have
wished; but, feeling convinced that my principle at least is sound, I
leave it, for better consideration, in the hands of your
correspondent.
William Bates.
Birmingham.
Brightland's rule is,—
"In the first person simply shall foretells;
In will a threat or else a promise dwells:
Shall in the second and the third does threat;
Will simply then foretells the coming feat."
(See T. K. Arnold's Eng. Gram. for Classical Schools, 3rd
edit., p. 41.; Mitford, Harmony of Language; and note 5. in Rev.
R. Twopeny's Dissertations on the Old and New Testament.)
The inconsistency in the use of shall and will is best
explained by a doctrine of Mr. Hare's (J. C. H.), the usus
ethicus of the future. (See Cambridge Philological Museum,
vol. ii. p. 203., where the subject is mentioned incidentally, and in
illustration; and Latham's English Language, 2nd edit., p. 498.,
where Mr. Hare's hypothesis is given at length. Indeed, from Latham and
T. K. Arnold my Note has been framed.)
F. S., B. A.
Lee.
(Vol. vii., p. 127.)
Your correspondent Balliolensis, at p. 127. of
the current volume of "N. & Q.," gives several forms of inscriptions
in books. The following may prove interesting to him, if not to the
generality of your readers.
A MS. preserved in the Bibliothèque Sainte Généviève—it appears
to have been the cellarer's book of the ancient abbey of that name, and
to have been written about the beginning of the sixteenth
century—bears on the fly-sheet the name of "Mathieu Monton,
religieux et célérier de l'église de céans," with the following
verses:
"Qui ce livre cy emblera,
Propter suam maliciam
Au gibet pendu sera,
Repugnando superbiam
Au gibet sera sa maison,
Sive suis parentibus,
Car ce sera bien raison,
Exemplum datum omnibus."
An Ovid, printed in 1501, belonging to the Bibliothèque de Chinon, has
the following verses:
"Ce present livre est à Jehan Theblereau.
"Qui le trouvera sy lui rende:
Il lui poyra bien le vin
Le jour et feste Sainct Martin,
Et une mésenge à la Sainct Jean,
Sy la peut prendre.
"Tesmoin mon synet manuel, cy mis le xe jour de avril mil
vc trente et cyns, après Pasque."
Here follows the paraphe.
School-boys in France write the following lines in their books after
their names, and generally accompany them with a drawing of a man hanging
on a gibbet:
"Aspice Pierrot pendu,
Quòd librum n'a pas rendu;
Pierrot pendu non fuisset,
Si librum reddidisset."
English school-boys use these forms:
"Hic liber est meus
Testis est Deus.
Si quis furetur
A collo pendetur
Ad hunc modum."
This is always followed by a drawing of a gibbet.
"John Smith, his book.
God give him grace therein to look;
Not only look but understand,
For learning is better than house or land.
When house and land are gone and spent,
Then learning is most excellent."
"John Smith is my name,
England is my nation,
London is my dwelling-place,
And Christ is my salvation.
When I am dead and in my grave,
And all my bones are rotten,
When this you see, remember me,
When I am 'most forgotten."
"Steal not this book, my honest friend,
For fear the gallows should be your end,
And when you're dead the Lord should say,
Where is the book you stole away?"
"Steal not this book for fear of shame,
For under lies the owner's name:
The first is John, in letters bright,
The second Smith, to all men's sight;
And if you dare to steal this book,
The devil will take you with his hook."
Honoré de Mareville.
Guernsey.
I forward you the following inscription, which I met with in an old
copy of Cæsar's Commentaries (if I remember rightly) at
Pontefract, Yorkshire:
"Si quis hunc librum rapiat scelestus
Atque scelestis manibus reservet
Ibit ad nigras Acherontis undas
Non rediturus."
F. F. G. (Oxford).
(Vol. vii., p.493.)
I have to thank L. for his notice of my edition of the Advancement
of Learning, as well as for the information which he has given me, of
which I hope to have an early opportunity of availing myself. As he
expresses a hope that it may be followed by similar editions of other of
Bacon's works, I may state that the Essays, with the Colours of
Good and Evil, are already printed, and will be issued very shortly.
I am quite conscious that the references in the margin are by no means
complete: indeed, as I had only horæ subsecivæ to give to the
work, I did not attempt to make them so. But I thought it might
be useful to give a general indication of the sources from which the
writer drew, and therefore put in all that I could find, without the
expenditure of a great deal of time. Consequently I fear that those I
have omitted will not be found to be the most obvious.
I shall be glad to make a few remarks on some of the passages noticed
by L.
P. 25.—Of this piece of carelessness—for which I do not
the less feel that I deserved a rebuke because L. has not administered
it—I had already been made aware by the kindness of a friend. I
confess I had never heard of Osorius, which is perhaps no great matter
for wonder; but I looked for his name both in Bayle and the catalogue of
the library of the British Museum, and by some oversight missed it. I
have since found it in both. I cannot help, however, remarking that this
is a good example of the advantage of noting every deviation from
the received text. Had I tacitly transposed three letters of the word in
question (a small liberty compared with some that my predecessors have
taken), my corruption of the text might have passed unnoticed. I have not
had much experience in these things; but if the works of English writers
in general have been tampered with by editors as much as I have found the
Advancement and Essays of Lord Bacon to be, I fear they
must have suffered great mutilation. I rather incline to think it is the
case, for I have had occasion lately to compare two editions of Paley's
Horæ Paulinæ, and I find great differences in the text. All this
looks suspicious.
P. 34.—I spent some time in searching for this passage in
Aristotle, but I could not discover it. I did not look elsewhere.
P. 60.—In the forthcoming edition of the Essays I have
referred to Plutarch, Gryll., 1., which I incline to think is the
passage Bacon had in his mind. The passage quoted from Cicero I merely
meant to point out for comparison.
P. 146.—The passage quoted is from Sen. ad Lucil.,
52.
P. 147.—Ad Lucil., 53.
P. 159.—Ad Lucil., 71.
Two or three other passages from Seneca will be found without any
reference. One of them, p. 13., "Quidam sunt tam umbratiles ut putent in
turbido esse quicquid in luce est," I have taken some pains to hunt for,
but hitherto without success. Another noticeable one, "Vita sine
proposito languida et vaga est," is from Ep. ad Lucil., 95.
For the reference to Aristotle I am much obliged. I was anxious to
trace all the quotations from Aristotle, but could not find this one.
P. 165.—I cannot answer this question. Is it possible that he
was thinking of St. Augustine? In the Confessions, i. 25., we kind
the expression vinum erroris.
P. 177.—No doubt Bacon had read the treatise of Sallust quoted,
but my impression is that he thought the proverb had grown out of the
line in Plautus.
P. 180.—I have searched again for "alimenta socordiæ," as it is
quoted in the Colours of Good and Evil, but cannot fix upon any
passage from which I can say it was taken, though there are many which
might have suggested it. One at p. 19. of the Advancement, which I
missed at first, I have since met with. It is from the Cherson.,
p. 106.
Thomas Markby.
Test for a good Lens.—The generality of purchasers of
photographic lenses can content themselves with merely the following
rules when they buy. It ought to be achromatic, i. e. consisting
of the usual two pieces of crown and flint glass, that its curves are the
most recommended, and that it is free from bubbles: to ascertain the
latter, hold the lens between the finger and thumb of the right hand,
much as an egg-merchant examines an egg before a strong gas flame, and a
little to the right of it; this reveals every bubble, however small, and
another kind of texture like minute gossamer threads. If these are too
abundant, it should not be chosen; although the best lenses are never
altogether free from these defects, it is on the whole better to have one
or two good-sized bubbles than any density of texture; because it
follows, that every inequality will refract pencils of light out of the
direction they ought to go; and as bubbles do the same thing, but as they
do not refract away so much light, they are not of much consequence.
I believe if a lens is made as thin as it safely can be, it will be
quicker than a thicker one. I have two precisely the same focus, and one
thinner than the other; the thinner is much the quicker of the two. An
apparently indifferent lens should be tried with several kinds of
apertures, till it will take sharp pictures; but if no size of aperture
can make it, or a small aperture takes a very long time, it is a bad
lens. M. Claudet, whose long experience in the art has given him the
requisite judgment, changes the diameter of his lenses often during the
day; and tries occasionally, in his excellent plan, the places of the
chemical focus: by this his time is always nearly the same, and the
results steady. As he is always free in communicating his knowledge, he
will, I think, always explain his method when he is applied to. The
inexperienced photographer is often too prone to blame his lens when the
failure proceeds more from the above causes. The variation of the
chemical focus during a day's work is often the cause of disappointment:
though it does not affect the landscape so much as the portrait operator.
If any one has a lens, the chemical and visual focus being different,
his only remedy is M. Claudet's method. And this method will also prove
better than any other way at present known of ascertaining whether a lens
will take a sharp picture or not. If, however, any plan could be devised
for making the solar spectrum visible upon a sheet of paper inside the
camera, it would reduce the question of taking sharp pictures at once
into a matter of certainty.
All lenses, however, should be tried by the opticians who sell them;
and if they presented a specimen of their powers to a buyer, he could see
in a moment what their capabilities were.
Weld Taylor.
Bayswater.
Photography and the Microscope (Vol. vii., p. 507.).—I
beg to inform your correspondents R. I. F. and J., that in Number 3. of
the Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science (Highley, Fleet
Street) they will find three papers containing more or less information
on the subject of their Query; and a plate, exhibiting two positive
photographs from collodion negatives, in the same number, will give a
good idea of what they may expect to attain in this branch of the
art.
Practically, I know nothing of photography; but, from my acquaintance
with the modern achromatic microscope, I venture to say that photography
applied to this instrument will be of no farther use than as an
assistant to the draughtsman. A reference to the plates alluded to
will show how incompetent it is to produce pictures of microscopic
objects: any one who has seen these objects under a good instrument will
acknowledge that these specimens give but a very faint idea of what the
microscope actually exhibits.
It is unfortunately the case, that the more perfect the instrument,
the less adapted it is for producing photographic pictures; for, in those
of the latest construction, the aperture of the object-glasses is carried
to such an extreme, that the observer is obliged to keep his hand
continually on the fine adjustment, in order to accommodate the focus to
the different planes in which different parts of the object lie.
This is the case even with so low a power as the half-inch
object-glasses, those of Messrs. Powell and Lealand being of the enormous
aperture of 65°; and if this is the case while looking through the
instrument when this disadvantage is somewhat counteracted by the power
which the eye has, to a certain degree, of adjusting itself to the object
under observation, how much more inconvenient will it be found in
endeavouring to focus the whole object at once on the ground glass plate,
where such an accommodating power no longer exists. The smaller the
aperture of the object-glasses, in reason, the better they will be
adapted for photographic purposes.
Again, another peculiarity of the object-glasses of the achromatic
microscope gives rise to a farther difficulty; they are over-corrected
for colour, the spectrum is reversed, or the violet rays are projected
beyond the red: this is in order to meet the requirements of the
eye-piece. But with the photographic apparatus the eye-piece is not used,
so that, after the object has been brought visually into focus in the
camera, a farther adjustment is necessary, in order to focus for the
actinic rays, which reside in the violet end of the spectrum. This is
effected by withdrawing the object-glass a little from the object, in
which operation there is no guide but experience; moreover, the amount of
withdrawal differs with each object-glass.
However, the inconvenience caused by this over-chromatic correction
may, I think, be remedied by the use of the achromatic condenser in the
place of an object-glass; that kind of condenser, at least, which is
supplied by the first microscopic makers. I cannot help thinking
that this substitution will prove of some service; for, in the first
place, the power of the condenser is generally equal to that of a quarter
of an inch object-glass, which is perhaps the most generally useful of
all the powers; and again, its aperture is, I think, not usually so great
as that which an object-glass of the same power would have; and,
moreover, as to correction, though it is slightly spherically
under-corrected to accommodate the plate-glass under the object, yet the
chromatic correction is perfect. The condenser is easily detached
from its "fittings," and its application to the camera would be as simple
as that of an ordinary object-glass.
However, my conviction remains that, in spite of all that perseverance
and science can accomplish, it never will be in the power of the
photographer to produce a picture of an object under the microscope,
equally distinct in all its parts; and unless his art can effect
this, I need scarcely say that his best productions can be but useful
auxiliaries to the draughtsman.
I see by an advertisement that the Messrs. Highley supply everything
that is necessary for the application of photography to the
microscope.
H. C. K.
—— Rectory, Hereford.
In reply to your correspondent J., I would ask if he has any
photographic apparatus? if so, the answer to his question "What extra
apparatus is required to a first-rate microscope in order to obtain
photographic microscopic pictures?" would be None; but if not, he
would require a camera, or else a wooden conical body, with plate-holder,
&c., besides the ordinary photographic outfit. Part III. of the
Microscopical Journal, published by Highley & Son, Fleet
Street, will give him all the information he requires.
φ. (p. 506.) may find a solution of his
difficulties regarding the production of stereoscopic pictures, in the
following considerations. The object of having two pictures is to present
to each eye an image of what it sees in nature; but as the angle
subtended by a line, of which the pupils of the eyes form the
extremities, must differ for every distance, and for objects of varying
sizes, it follows there is no absolute rule that can be laid down
as the only correct one. For distant views there is in nature
scarcely any stereoscopic effect; and in a photographic stereoscopic view
the effect produced is not really a representation to the eye of the
view itself, but of a model of such view; and the apparent
size of the model will vary with the angle of incidence of the two
pictures, being smaller and nearer as the angle increases.
I believe Professor Wheatstone recommends for landscapes 1 in 25, or
about half an inch to every foot.
Geo. Shadbolt.
Cement for Glass Baths.—In reply to numerous inquiries
which have appeared in "N. & Q." relative to a good cement for making
glass baths for photographic purposes, I send a recipe which I copied a
year or two ago from some newspaper, and which seems likely to answer the
purpose: I have not tried it myself, not being a photographer.
Caoutchouc 15 grains, chloroform 2 ounces, mastic ½ an ounce. The two
first-named ingredients are to be mixed first, and after the gum is
dissolved, the mastic is to be added, and the whole allowed to macerate
for a week. When great elasticity is desirable, more caoutchouc may be
added. This cement is perfectly transparent, and is to be applied with a
brush cold.
H. C. K.
—— Rectory, Hereford.
Mr. Lyte's Mode of Printing.—All persons who have
experienced disappointment in the printing of their positive pictures
will feel obliged by Mr. Lyte's suggestion as to
the bath; but as the preparation of the positive paper has also a great
deal to say to the ultimate result, Mr. Lyte
would confer an additional obligation if he gave the treatment he adopts
for this.
I have observed that the negative collodion picture exercises a good
deal of influence on the ultimate colour of the positive, and that
different collodion negatives will give different results in this
respect, when the paper and treatment with each has been precisely the
same. Does this correspond with other persons' experience?
C. E. F.
Eulenspiegel or Ulenspiegel (Vol. vii., pp. 357. 416.
507.).—Mr. Thoms's suggestion, and his
quotation in proof thereof from the Chronicler, are farther verified by
the following inscription and verses which I transcribe from an engraved
portrait of the famous jester:
"Ulenspiegel.
"Ligt Begraben zu Dom in Flandern in der grosen Kirch, auf dem
Grabister also Likend abgebildet. Starb Ao. 1301."
These lines are above the portrait, and beneath it are the verses next
following:
"Tchau Ulenspiegeln hier. Das Bildniss macht dich lachen:
Was wurdst du thun siehst du jhn selber Possen machen?
Zwar Thÿle ist ein Bild und Spiegel dieser Welt,
Viel Bruder er verliess; Wir treiben Narretheÿen,
In dem uns dunckt, dass wir die grosten Weysen seÿen,
Drum lache deiner selbst; diss Blat dich dir vorstellt."
The portrait, evidently that of a man of large intellect, is very
life-like, and full of animation. He seems to be some fifty years of age
or so; he has a cap, ornamented by large feather, on his head. He is
seated in a chair, has a book in his hand, and is attired in a kind of
magisterial robe bordered with fur. There is a good-humoured roguish
twinkle in his eyes; and I should be inclined to call him, judging from
the portrait before me, an epigrammatist rather than mere vulgar jester.
The engraving is beautifully executed: it has neither date nor place of
publication, but its age may perhaps be determined by the names of the
painter (Paulus Furst) and engraver (P. Troschel). The orthography is by
no means of recent date. I cannot translate the verses to my own
satisfaction; and should feel much obliged if you, Mr.
Editor, or Mr. Thoms, would favour the
readers of "N. & Q." with an English version thereof.
Henry Campkin.
Reform Club.
Lawyers' Bags (Vol. vii., pp. 85. 144.).—Colonel Landman
is doubtless correct in his statement as to the colour of barristers'
bags; but from the evidence of A Templar and
Causidicus, we must place the change from green
to red at some period anterior to the trial of Queen Caroline. In Queen
Anne's time they were green.
"I am told, Cousin Diego, you are one of those that have undertaken to
manage me, and that you have said you will carry a green bag
yourself, rather than we shall make an end of our lawsuit: I'll teach
them and you too to manage."—The History of John Bull, by
Dr. Arbuthnot, Part I. ch. xv.
T. H. Kersley, B. A.
Audlem, Cheshire.
"Nine Tailors make a Man" (Vol. vi., pp. 390. 563.; Vol. vii.,
p. 165.).—The origin of this saying is to be sought for elsewhere
than in England only. Le Conte de la Villemarqué, in his interesting
collection of Breton ballads, Barzas-Breiz, vol. i. p. 35., has
the following passage:
"Les tailleurs, cette classe vouée au ridicule, en Bretagne, comme
dans le pays de Galles, en Irlande, en Ecosse, en Allemagne et ailleurs,
et qui l'était jadis chez toutes les nations guerrières, dont la vie
agitée et errante s'accordait mal avec une existence casanière et
paisible. Le peuple dit encore de nos jours en Bretagne, qu'il faut
neuf tailleurs pour faire un homme, et jamais il ne prononce leur
nom, sans ôter son chapeau, et sans dire: 'Sauf votre respect.'"
The saying is current also in Normandy, at least in those parts which
border on Britany. Perhaps some of the readers of "N. & Q." may be
able to say whether it is to be found in other parts of Europe.
Honoré de Mareville.
Guernsey.
"Time and I" (Vol. vii., pp. 182. 247.).—Arbuthnot calls
it a Spanish proverb. In the History of John Bull, we read among
the titles of other imaginary chapters in the "Postscript," that
of—
"Ch. XVI. Commentary upon the Spanish Proverb, Time and I
against any Two; or Advice to Dogmatical Politicians, exemplified in
some New Affairs between John Bull and Lewis Baboon."
T. H. Kersley, B. A.
Audlem, Cheshire.
Carr Pedigree (Vol. vii., pp. 408. 512.).—W. St. says that William Carr married Elizabeth, daughter
of Edward Sing, Bishop of Cork. The name is Synge, not Sing. The family
name was originally Millington, and was changed to Synge by Henry VIII.
or Queen Elizabeth, on account of the sweetness of the voice of one of
the family, who was a clergyman, and the ancestor of George Synge, Bishop
of Cloyne; Edward Synge, Bishop of Ross; Edward Synge, Archbishop of
Tuam; Edward Synge, Bishop of Leighlin and Ferns; Nicholas Synge, Bishop
of Killaloe; the late Sir Samuel Synge Hutchinson, Archdeacon of Killala;
and of the present Sir Edward Synge.
I cannot find that any of these church dignitaries had a daughter
married to Wm. Carr. Nicholas Synge, Bishop of Killaloe, left a daughter,
Elizabeth, who died unmarried in 1834, aged ninety-nine; but I cannot
discover that either of the other bishops of that family had a daughter
Elizabeth.
Gulielmus.
Campvere, Privileges of (Vol. vii., pp. 262. 440.).—What
were these privileges, and whence was the term derived?
"Veria, quæ et Canfera, vel Campoveria potius dicitur, alterum est
inter oppida hujus insulæ, muro et mœnibus clausa, situ quidem ad
aquilonem obversa, et in ipso oceani littore: fossam habet, quæ
Middelburgum usque extenditur, à quâ urbe leucæ tantum unius, etc.
"Estque oppidulum satis concinnum, et mercimoniis florens, maxime
propter commercia navium Scoticarum, quæ in isto potissimum portu
stare adsueverunt.
"Scotorum denique, superioribus annis, frequentatione celebris
et Scoticarum mercium, præcipue vellerum ovillorum, stapula, ut
vocant, et emporium esse cœpit."—L. Guicciardini,
Belgium (1646), vol. ii. pp. 67, 68.
Will J. D. S. be so good as to say where he found the "Campvere
privileges" referred to?
E.
Haulf-naked (Vol. vii., p. 432.).—The conjecture that
Half-naked was a manor in co. Sussex is verified by entries in
Cal. Rot. Pat., 11 Edw. I., m. 15.; and 13 Edw. I., m. 18. Also in
Abbreviatio Rot. Orig., 21 Edw. III., Rot. 21.; in which
latter it is spelt Halnaked.
J. W. S. R.
St. Ives, Hunts.
Old Picture of the Spanish Armada (Vol. vii., p.
454.).—Although perhaps this may not be reckoned an answer to
J. S. A.'s Query on this head, I have to inform you that in the steeple
part of Gaywood Church near this town, is a fine old painting of Queen
Elizabeth reviewing the forces at Tilbury Fort, and the Spanish fleet in
the distance. It is framed, and sadly wants cleaning.
J. N. C.
King's Lynn.
Parochial Libraries (Vol. vi., p. 432., &c.).—We have
in St. Margaret's parish a parochial library, which is kept in a room
fitted up near the vestry of the church in this town.
J. N. C.
King's Lynn.
To the list of places where there are parochial libraries may be added
Bewdley, in Worcestershire. There is a small library in the Grammar
School of that place, consisting, if I recollect aright, mainly of old
divinity, under the care of the master: though it is true, for some
years, there has been no master.
S. S. S.
In the preface to the Life of Lord Keeper Guilford, by Roger
North, it appears that Dudleys youngest daughter of Charles, and
granddaughter of Dudley Lord North, dying,—
"Her library, consisting of a choice collection of Oriental books, by
the present Lord North and Grey, her only surviving brother, was given to
the parochial library of Rougham in Norfolk, where it now remains."
This library then existed in 1742, the date of the first edition of
the work.
Furvus.
St. James's.
How to stain Deal (Vol. vii., p. 356.).—Your
correspondent C. will find that a solution of asphaltum in boiling
turpentine is a very good stain to dye deal to imitate oak. This must be
applied when cold with a brush to the timbers: allowed to get dry, then
size and varnish it.
The dye, however, which I always use, is a compound of raw umber and a
small portion of blue-black diluted to the shade required with strong
size in solution: this must be used hot. It is evident that this will not
require the preparatory sizing before the application of the varnish.
Common coal, ground in water, and used the same as any other colour, I
have found to be an excellent stain for roof timbers.
W. H. Cullingford.
Cromhall, Gloucestershire.
Roger Outlawe (Vol. vii., p. 332.).—Of this person, who
was Lord Deputy of Ireland for many years of the reign of Edward III.,
some particulars will be found in the notes to the Proceedings against
Dame Alice Kyteler, edited for the Camden Society by Mr. Wright, p.
49. There is evidently more than one misreading in the date of the
extract communicated by the Rev. H. T. Ellacombe:
"die pasche in viiij mense anno B. Etii post ultimum conquestum hibernia
quarto." I cannot interpret "in viiij mense;" but the rest should
evidently be "anno Regis Edwardi tertii post ultimum conquestum
Hiberniæ quarto."
May I ask whether this "last conquest of Ireland" has been noticed by
palæographers in other instances?
Anon.
Tennyson (Vol. vii., p. 84.).—Will not the following
account by Lord Bacon, in his History of Henry VII., of the
marriage by proxy between Maximilian, King of the Romans, and the
Princess Anne of Britany, illustrate for your correspondent H. J. J. his
last quotation from Tennyson?
"She to me
Was proxy-wedded with a bootless calf,
At eight years old."
"Maximilian so far forth prevailed, both with the young lady and with
the principal persons about her, as the marriage was consummated by
proxy, with a ceremony at that time in these parts new. For she was not
only publicly contracted, but stated, as a bride, and solemnly bedded;
and after she was laid, there came in Maximilian's ambassador with
letters of procuration, and in the presence of sundry noble personages,
men and women, put his leg, stripped naked to the knee, between the
espousal sheets," &c.
Tyro.
Dublin.
Old Fogie (Vol. vii., p. 354.).—Mr.
Keightley supposes the term of old fogie, as applied to
"mature old warriors," to be "of pure Irish origin," or "rather of Dublin
birth." In this he is certainly mistaken, for the word fogie, as
applied to old soldiers, is as well known, and was once as familiarly
used in Scotland, as it ever was or could have been in Ireland. The race
was extinct before my day, but I understand that formerly the permanent
garrisons of Edinburgh, and I believe also of Stirling, Castles,
consisted of veteran companies; and I remember, when I first came to
Edinburgh, of people who had seen them, still talking of "the Castle
fogies."
Dr. Jamieson, in his Scottish Dictionary, defines the word
"foggie or fogie," to be first, "an invalid, or garrison soldier,"
secondly, "a person advanced in life" and derives it from "Su. G.
fogde, formerly one who had the charge of a garrison."
This seems to me a more satisfactory derivation than Mr. Keightley's, who considers it a corruption or
diminutive of old folks.
J. L.
City Chambers, Edinburgh.
Errata corrigenda.—Vol. ii., p. 356. col. 2., near the
bottom, for Sir William Jardine, read Sir Henry Jardine.
Sir William and Sir Henry were very different persons, though the former
was probably the more generally known. Sir H. was the author of the
report referred to.
Vol. vii., p. 441. col. 1. line 15, for Lenier read
Ferrier.
J. L.
City Chambers, Edinburgh.
Anecdote of Dutens (Vol. vii., pp. 26. 390.).—
"Lord Lansdowne at breakfast mentioned of Dutens, who wrote
Mémoires d'un Voyageur qui se repose, and was a great antiquarian,
that, on his describing once his good luck in having found (what he
fancied to be) a tooth of Scipio's in Italy, some one asked him what he
had done with it, upon which he answered briskly: 'What have I done with
it? Le voici,' pointing to his mouth; where he had made it supplemental
to a lost one of his own."—Moore's Journal, vol. iv. p.
271.
E. H. A.
Gloves at Fairs (Vol. vii., p. 455.).—In Hone's
Every-day Book (vol. ii. p. 1059.) is the following
paragraph:—
"Exeter Lammas Fair.—The charter for
this fair is perpetuated by a glove of immense size, stuffed and carried
through the city on a very long pole, decorated with ribbons, flowers,
&c., and attended with music, parish beadles, and the mobility. It is
afterwards placed on the top of the Guildhall, and then the fair
commences: on the taking down of the glove, the fair
terminates.—P."
As to Crolditch, alias Lammas Fair, at Exeter, see Izacke's
Remarkable Antiquities of the City of Exeter, pp. 19, 20.
C. H. Cooper.
Cambridge.
At Macclesfield, in Cheshire, a large glove was, perhaps is, always
suspended from the outside of the window of the town-hall during the
holding of a fair; and as long as the glove was so suspended, every one
was free from arrest within the township, and, I have heard, while going
and returning to and from the fair.
Edward Hawkins.
At Free Mart, at Portsmouth, a glove used to be hung out of the
town-hall window, and no one could be arrested during the fortnight that
the fair lasted.
F. O. Martin.
Arms—Battle-axe (Vol. vii., p. 407.).—The families
which bore three Dane-axes or battle-axes in their coats armorial were
very numerous in ancient times. It may chance to be of service to your
Querist A.C. to be informed, that those of Devonshire which displayed
these bearings were the following: Dennys, Batten, Gibbes, Ledenry, Wike,
Wykes, and Urey.
J. D. S.
Enough (Vol. vii., p. 455.).—In Staffordshire, and I
believe in the other midland counties, this word is usually pronounced
enoo, and written enow. In Richardson's Dictionary
it will be found "enough or enow;" and the etymology is evidently from
the German genug, from the verb genugen, to suffice, to be
enough, to content, to satisfy. The Anglo-Saxon is genog. I
remember the burden of an old song which I frequently heard in my boyish
days:
"I know not, I care not,
I cannot tell how to woo,
But I'll away to the merry green woods,
And there get nuts enow."
This evidently shows what the pronunciation was when it was
written.
J. A. H.
Enough is from the same root as the German genug, where
the first g has been lost, and the latter softened and almost lost
in its old English pronunciation, enow. The modern pronunciation
is founded, as that of many other words is, upon an affected style of
speech, ridiculed by Holofernes. The word bread, for example,
is almost universally called bred; but in Chaucer's poetry and
indeed now in Yorkshire, it is pronounced bré-äd, a dissyllable.
T. J. Buckton.
Birmingham.
Footnote 4:(return)
The Euphuists are probably chargeable with this corruption.
In Vol. vii., p. 455. there is an inquiry respecting the change in the
pronunciation of the word enough, and quotations are given from
Waller, where the word is used, rhyming with bow and
plough. But though spelt enough, is not the word, in both
places, really enow? and is there not, in fact, a distinction
between the two words? Does not enough always refer to
quantity, and enow to number: the former, to what
may be measured; the latter, to that which may be counted?
In both quotations the word enough refers to numbers?
S. S. S.
Feelings of Age (Vol. vii., p. 429.).—A.C. asks if it "is
not the general feeling, that man in advancing years would not like to
begin life again?" I fear not. It is a wisdom above the average of what
men possess that made the good Sir Thomas Browne say:
"Though I think no man can live well once, but he that could live
twice, yet for my own part I would not live over my hours past, or begin
again the thread of my dayes: not upon Cicero's ground—because I
have lived them well—but for fear I should live them worse. I find
my growing judgment daily instruct me how to be better, but my untamed
affections and confirmed vitiosity make me daily do worse. I find in my
confirmed age the same sins I discovered in my youth; I committed many
then, because I was a child, and, because I commit them still, I am yet
an infant. Therefore I perceive a man may be twice a child before the
days of dotage, and stand in need of Æson's bath before threescore."
The annotator refers to Cic., lib. xxiv. ep. 4.:
"Quod reliquum est, sustenta te, mea Terentia, ut potes, honestissimè.
Viximus: floruimus: non vitium nostrum, sed virtus nostra, nos afflixit.
Peccatum est nullum, nisi quod non unâ animam cum ornamentis
amisimus."—Edit. Orell., vol. iii. part i. p. 335.
However, it seems probable that Sir Thomas meant that this sentiment
is rather to be gathered from Cicero's writings,—not enunciated in
a single sentence.
H. C. K.
—— Rectory, Hereford.
Optical Query (Vol. vii., p. 430.).—In reply to the
optical Query by H. H., I venture to suggest that a stronger gust of wind
than usual might easily occasion the illusion in question, as I myself
have frequently found in looking at the fans on the tops of chimneys. Or
possibly the eyes may have been confused by gazing on the revolving
blades, just as the tongue is frequently influenced in its accentuation
by pronouncing a word of two syllables in rapid articulations.
F. F. S.
Oxford.
Cross and Pile (Vol. vii., p.487.).—Here is another
explanation at least as satisfactory as some of the previous ones:
"The word coin itself is money struck on the coin or
head of the flattened metal, by which word coin or head is
to be understood the obverse, the only side which in the infancy
of coining bore the stamp. Thence the Latin cuneus, from
cune or kyn, the head.
"This side was also called pile, in corruption from
poll, a head, not only from the side itself being the coin
or head, but from its being impressed most commonly with some head
in contradistinction to the reverse, which, in latter times, was oftenest
a cross. Thence the vulgarism, cross or pile, poll,
head."—Cleland's Specimen of an Etymological Vocabulary,
p. 157.
A. Holt White.
Capital Punishments (Vol. vii., pp. 52. 321.).—The
authorities to which W. L. N. refers not being generally accessible, he
would confer a very great obligation by giving the names and dates of
execution of any of the individuals alluded to by him, who have undergone
capital punishment in this country for exercising the Roman Catholic
religion. Herein, it is almost needless to remark, I exclude such cases
as those of Babington, Ballard, Parsons, Garnett, Campion, Oldcorne, and
others, their fellows, who suffered, as every reader of history knows,
for treasonable practices against the civil and christian policy and
government of the realm.
Cowgill.
Thomas Bonnell (Vol. vii., p. 305.).—In what year was
this person, about whose published Life J. S. B. inquires, Mayor
of Norwich? His name, as such, does not occur in the lists of Nobbs,
Blomefield, or Ewing.
Cowgill.
Passage in the First Part of Faust (Vol. vii., p.
501.).—Mr. W. Fraser will find good
illustrations of the question he has raised in his second suggestion for
the elucidation of this passage in The Abbot, chap. 15. ad
fin. and note.
A few weeks after giving this reference, in answer to a question by
Emdee (see "N. & Q.," Vol. i., p. 262.; Vol.
ii., p. 47.), I sent in English, for I am not a German scholar, as an
additional reply to Emdee, the very same passage
that Mr. Fraser has just forwarded, but it was
not inserted, probably because its fitness as an illustration was not
very evident.
My intention in sending that second reply was to show that, as in
Christabel and The Abbot, the voluntary and
sustained effort required to introduce the evil spirit was of a
physical, so in Faust it was of a mental character; and I confess
that I am much pleased now to find my opinion supported by the accidental
testimony of another correspondent.
It must, however, be allowed that the peculiar wording of the passage
under consideration may make it difficult, if not impossible, to separate
earnest from the magical form in which Faust's command to
enter his room is given. Göthe's intention, probably, was to combine and
illustrate both.
As proofs of the belief in the influence of the number three in
incantation, I may refer to Virg. Ecl. viii. 73—78.; to a
passage in Apuleius, which describes the resuscitation of a corpse by
Zachlas, the Egyptian sorcerer;
"Propheta, sic propitiatus, herbulam quampiam ter ob os corporis, et
aliam pectori ejus imponit."—Apul. Metamorph., lib. ii.
sect. 39. (Regent's Classics);
and to the rhyming spell that raised the White Lady of Avenel at the
Corrie nan Shian. (See The Monastery, chaps. xi. and xvii.)
C. Forbes.
Sir Josias Bodley (Vol. vii., p. 357.).—Your
correspondent Y. L. will find some account of the family of Bodley in
Prince's Worthies of Devon, edit. 1810, pp. 92-105., and in
Moore's History of Devon, vol. ii. pp. 220-227. See also "N. &
Q.," Vol. iv., pp. 59. 117. 240.
J. D. S.
Claret (Vol. vii., p. 237.).—The word claret is
evidently derived directly from the French word clairet; which is
used, even at the present day, as a generic name for the "vins
ordinaires," of a light and thin quality, grown in the south of
France. The name is never applied but to red wines; and it is very
doubtful whether it takes its appellation from any place, being always
used adjectively—"vin clairet," not vin de
clairet. I am perhaps not quite correct in stating, that the word
is always used as an adjective; for we sometimes find clairet used
alone as a substantive; but I conceive that in this case the word
vin is to be understood, as we say "du Bordeaux," "du Champagne,"
meaning "du vin de Bordeaux," "du vin de Champagne." Eau clairette
is the name given to a sort of cherry-brandy; and lapidaries apply the
name clairette to a precious stone, the colour of which is not so
deep as it ought to be. This latter fact may lead one to suppose that the
wine derived its name from being clearer and lighter in colour
than the more full-bodied vines of the south. The word is constantly
occurring in old drinking-songs. A song of Olivier Basselin, the minstrel
of Vire, begins with these words:
"Beau nez, dont les rubis out coûté mainte pipe
De vin blanc et clairet."
By the way, this song is the original of one in the musical drama of
Jack Sheppard, which many of the readers of "N. & Q." may
remember, as it became rather popular at the time. It began thus:
"Jolly nose, the bright gems that illumine thy tip,
Were dug from the mines of Canary."
I am not aware that the plagiarism has been noticed before.
Honoré de Mareville.
Guernsey.