160. Syntax treats of the use of words in
sentences
161. Sentences may be classified as
follows:—
1. DECLARATIVE, which state something;
as,—
puer scrībit, the boy is writing.
2. INTERROGATIVE, Which ask a question;
as,—
quid puer scrībit, what is the boy writing?
3. EXCLAMATORY, which are in the form of an
exclamation; as,—
quot librōs scrībit, how many books he
writes!
4. IMPERATIVE, which express a command or an
admonition; as,—
162. Questions may be either
Word-Questions or Sentence-Questions.
1. Word-Questions. These are introduced by the various
interrogative pronouns and adverbs, such as—quis,
quī, quālis, quantus, quot,
quotiēns, quō, quā, etc.
Thus:—
quis venit, who comes? quam dīū
manēbit, how long will he stay?
2. Sentence-Questions. These are introduced—
a) By nōnne implying the answer 'yes';
as,—
nōnne vidētis, do you not see?
b) By num implying the answer 'no'; as,—
num exspectās, do you expect? (i.e. you
don't expect, do you?)
c) by the enclitic -ne, appended to the emphatic word
(which usually stands first), and simply asking for information;
as,—
A question introduced by -ne may receive a
special implication from the context; as,—
sēnsistīne, did you not perceive?
d) Sometimes by no special word, particularly in expressions of
surprise or indignation; as,—
tū in jūdicum cōnspectum venīre audēs,
do you dare to come into the presence of the judges?
3. Rhetorical Questions. These are questions merely in form,
being employed to express an emphatic assertion; as, quis dubitat,
who doubts? (= no one doubts).
4. Double Questions. Double Questions are introduced by the
following particles:—
utrum ... an;
-ne ... an;
—— ... an.
If the second member is negative, annōn (less often
necne) is used. Examples:—
|
utrum honestum est an turpe,
|
}
|
|
honestumne est an turpe,
|
} is it honorable or base?
|
|
honestum est an turpe,
|
}
|
|
suntne dī annōn, are there gods or not?
|
a. An was not originally confined to double questions,
but introduced single questions, having the force of -ne,
nōnne, or num. Traces of this use survive in classical
Latin; as,—
Ā rēbus gerendīs abstrahit senectūs. Quibus? An
eīs quae juventūte geruntur et vīrībus? Old
age (it is alleged) withdraws men from active pursuits. From what
pursuits? Is it not merely from those which are carried on by the
strength of youth?
5. Answers.
a. The answer YES is expressed by
ita, etiam, vērō, sānē,
or by repetition of the verb; as,—
'vīsne locum mūtēmus?' 'sānē'.
'Shall we change the place?' 'Certainly.'
'estīsne vōs lēgatī?' 'sumus.' 'Are you
envoys?' 'Yes.'
b. The answer NO is expressed by
nōn, minimē, minimē vērō,
or by repeating the verb with a negative; as,—
'jam ea praeteriit?' 'nōn.' 'Has it passed?'
'No.'
'estne frāter intus?' 'nōn est.' 'Is your brother
within?' 'No.'
163. The two essential parts of a
sentence are the SUBJECT and PREDICATE.
The SUBJECT is that concerning which
something is said, asked, etc. The PREDICATE
is that which is said, asked, etc., concerning the SUBJECT.
164. Sentences containing but one Subject
and one Predicate are called SIMPLE SENTENCES, those containing more are called COMPOUND SENTENCES. Thus puer
librōs legit, the boy reads books, is a Simple Sentence;
but puer librōs legit et epistulās scrībit, the
boy reads books and writes letters, is a Compound Sentence. The
different members of a Compound Sentence are called Clauses.
165. COÖRDINATE
AND SUBORDINATE CLAUSES. Clauses which stand upon an equality are called
COÖRDINATE; a Clause dependent on another is
called SUBORDINATE. Thus in puer librōs
legit et epistulās scrībit the two clauses are Coördinate;
but in puer librōs legit quōs pater scrībit, the
boy reads the books which his father writes, the second clause is
Subordinate to the first.
166. The Subject of a Finite Verb
(i.e. any form of the Indicative, Subjunctive, or Imperative) is
in the Nominative Case.
1. The Subject may be—
a) A Noun or Pronoun; as,—
puer scrībit, the boy writes;
hīc scrībit, this man writes.
decōrum est prō patriā morī, to die for
one's county is a noble thing.
opportūnē accīdit quod vīdistī, it
happened opportunely that you saw.
2. A Personal Pronoun as Subject is usually implied in the Verb and is
not separately expressed; as,—
scrībō, I write; videt, he
sees.
a. But for the purpose of emphasis or contrast the Pronoun is
expressed; as,—
ego scrībō et tū legis, I write, and you
read.
3. The verb is sometimes omitted when it can be easily supplied from
the context, especially the auxiliary sum; as,—
rēctē ille (sc. facit), he does
rightly; consul profectus (sc. est), the
consul set out.
167. A PREDICATE
NOUN is one connected with the Subject by some
form of the verb Sum or a similar verb.
168. A Predicate Noun agrees with its
Subject in Case;[47]
as,—
Cicerō ōrātor fuit, Cicero was an
orator;
Numa creātus est rēx, Numa was elected
king.
1. when possible, the Predicate Noun usually agrees with its Subect in
Gender also; as,—
philosophia est vītae magistra, philosophy is the guide
of life.
2. Besides sum, the verbs most frequently accompanied by a
Predicate Noun are—
a) fiō, ēvādō,
exsistō; maneō; videor; as,—
Croesus nōn semper mānsit rēx, Croesus did
not always remain king.
b) Passive verbs of making, calling,
regarding, etc.; as, creor, appellor,
habeor; as,—
Rōmulus rēx appellatus est, Romulus was called
king;
habitus est deus, he was regarded as a god.
169. 1. An Appositive is a Noun
explaining or defining another Noun denoting the same person or thing;
as,—
Cicerō cōnsul, Cicero, the Consul;
urbs Rōma, the city Rome.
2. An Appositive agrees with its Subject in Case; as,—
opera Cicerōnīs ōrātōris, the works
of Cicero, the orator;
apud Hērodotum, patrem historiae, in the works of
Herodotus, the father of history.
3. When possible, the Appositive agrees with its Subject in Gender
also; as,—
assentātiō adjūtrīx vitiōrum,
flattery, the promoter of evils.
4. A Locative may take in Apposition the Ablative of urbs or
oppidum, with or without a preposition; as,—
Corinthī, Achāiae urbe, or in Achāiae
urbe, at Corinth, a city of Greece.
5. PARTITIVE APPOSITION. A Noun denoting a whole is frequently
followed by an Appositive denoting a part; as,—
mīlitēs, fortissimus quisque, hostibus
restitērunt, the soldiers, all the bravest of them, resisted
the enemy.
THE NOMINATIVE.
170. The Nominative is confined to its
use as Subject, Appositive, or Predicate Noun, as already explained. See
§§ 166-169.
THE VOCATIVE.
171. The Vocative is the Case of direct
address; as,—
crēdite mihi, jūdicēs, believe me,
judges.
1. By a species of attraction, the Nominative is occasionally used for
the Vocative, especially in poetry and formal prose; as, audī
tū, populus Albānus, hear ye, Alban people!
2. Similarly the Appositive of a Vocative may, in poetry, stand in the
Nominative; as, nāte, mea magna potentia sōlus, O
son, alone the source of my great power.
THE ACCUSATIVE.
172. The Accusative is the Case of the
Direct Object.
173. The Direct Object may express either
of the two following relations:—
A. The PERSON OR THING AFFECTED by the action;
as,—
cōnsulem interfēcit, he slew the consul;
legō librum, I read the book.
B. The RESULT PRODUCED by the action; as,—
librum scrīpsī, I wrote a book (i.e.
produced one);
templum struit, he constructs a temple.
174. Verbs that admit a Direct Object of
either of these two types are TRANSITIVE VERBS.
a. Verbs that regularly take a Direct Object are sometimes used
without it. They are then said to be employed absolutely;
as,—
rūmor est meum gnātum amāre, it is rumored
that my son is in love.
175. 1. This is the most frequent use of
the Accusative; as in—
parentēs amāmus, we love our parents;
mare aspicit, he gazes at the sea.
2. The following classes of Verbs taking an Accusative of this kind
are worthy of note:—
a) Many Intransitive Verbs, when compounded with a Preposition,
become Transitive. Thus:—
1) Compounds of circum, praeter, trāns;
as,—
hostēs circumstāre, to surround the enemy;
urbem praeterīre, to pass by the city;
mūrōs trānscendere, to climb over the
walls.
2) Less frequently, compounds of ad, per, in,
sub; as,—
adīre urbem, to visit the city;
peragrāre Italiam, to travel through Italy;
inīre magistrātum, to take office;
subīre perīculum, to undergo danger.
b) Many Verbs expressing emotions, regularly Intransitive, have
also a Transitive use; as,—
queror fātum, I lament my fate;
doleō ejus mortem, I grieve at his death;
rīdeō tuam stultitiam, I laugh at your
folly.
So also lūgeō, maereō,
mourn; gemō, bemoan; horreō,
shudder, and others.
c) The impersonals decet, it becomes;
dēdecet, it is unbecoming; juvat, it
pleases, take the Accusative of the Person Affected; as,—
mē decet haec dīcere, it becomes me to say
this.
d) In poetry many Passive Verbs, in imitation of Greek usage,
are employed as Middles (§ 256, 1; 2), and take
the Accusative as Object; as,—
galeam induitur, he puts on his helmet;
cīnctus tempora hederā, having bound his temples
with ivy;
nōdō sinus collēcta, having gathered her
dress in a knot.
176. 1. The ordinary type of this
Accusative is seen in such expressions as—
librum scrībō, I write a book;
domum aedificō, I build a house.
2. Many Verbs usually Intransitive take a Neuter Pronoun, or
Adjective, as an Accusative of Result. Thus:—
a) A Neuter Pronoun; as,—
haec gemēbat, he made these moans;
idem glōriārī, to make the same
boast;
eadem peccat, he makes the same mistakes.
b) A Neuter Adjective,—particularly Adjectives of
number or amount,—multum, multa,
pauca, etc.; also nihil; as,—
multa egeō, I have many needs;
pauca studet, he has few interests;
multum valet, he has great strength;
nihil peccat, he makes no mistake.
NOTE.—In poetry other Adjectives are
freely used in this construction; as—
minitantem vāna, making vain threats;
acerba tuēns, giving a fierce look;
dulce loquentem, sweetly talking.
3. The adverbial use of several Neuter Pronouns and Adjectives grows
out of this Accusative; as,—
multum sunt in vēnātiōne, they are much
engaged in hunting.
a. So also plūrimum, very greatly;
plērumque, generally; aliquid, somewhat;
quid, why? nihil, not at all; etc.
4. Sometimes an Intransitive Verb takes an Accusative of Result which
is of kindred etymology with the Verb. This is called a COGNATE ACCUSATIVE, and is
usually modified by an Adjective; as,—
sempiternam servitūtem serviat, let him serve an
everlasting slavery;
vītam dūram vīxī, I have lived a hard
life.
a. Sometimes the Cognate Accusative is not of kindred
etymology, but merely of kindred meaning; as,—
stadium currit, he runs a race;
Olympia vincit, he wins an Olympic victory.
5. The Accusative of Result occurs also after Verbs of tasting
and smelling; as,—
piscis mare sapit, the fish tastes of the sea;
ōrātiōnēs antīquitātem redolent,
the speeches smack of the past.
177. Many Verbs of Making,
Choosing, Calling, Showing, and the like, take two
Accusatives, one of the Person or Thing Affected, the other a Predicate
Accusative; as,—
mē hērēdem fēcit, he made me
heir.
Here mē is Direct Object, hērēdēm
Predicate Accusative. So also—
eum jūdicem cēpēre, they took him as
judge;
urbem Rōmam vocāvit, he called the city
Rome;
sē virum praestitit, he showed himself a man.
2. The Predicate Accusative may be an Adjective as well as a Noun;
as,—
hominēs caecōs reddit cupiditās, covetousness
renders men blind;
Apollō Sōcratem sapientissimum jūdicāvit,
Apollo adjudged Socrates the wisest man.
a. Some Verbs, as reddō, usually admit only an
Adjective as the Predicate Accusative.
3. In the Passive the Direct Object becomes the Subject, and the
Predicate Accusative becomes Predicate Nominative (§
168, 2, b): as,—
urbs Rōma vocāta est, the city was called
Rome.
a. Not all Verbs admit the Passive construction;
reddō and efficiō, for example, never take
it.
178. 1. Some Verbs take two Accusatives,
one of the Person Affected, the other of the Result Produced.
Thus:—
a) Verbs of requesting and demanding;
as,—
ōtium dīvōs rogat, he asks the gods for
rest;
mē duās ōrātiōnēs postulās,
you demand two speeches of me.
So also ōrō, poscō,
reposcō, exposcō, flāgitō,
though some of these prefer the Ablative with ab to the Accusative
of the Person; as,—
opem ā tē poscō, I demand aid of you.
b) Verbs of teaching (doceō and its
compounds); as,—
tē litterās doceō, I teach you your
letters.
c) Verbs of inquiring; as,—
tē haec rogō, I ask you this;
tē sententiam rogō, I ask you your
opinion.
d) Several Special Verbs; viz. moneō,
admoneō, commoneō, cōgō,
accūsō, arguō, and a few others. These admit
only a Neuter Pronoun or Adjective as Accusative of the Thing;
as,—
hōc tē moneō, I give you this advice;
mē id accūsās, you bring this accusation
against me;
id cōgit nōs nātūra, nature compels us
(to) this.
e) One Verb of concealing, cēlō;
as,—
nōn tē cēlāvī sermōnem, I have
not concealed the conversation from you.
2. In the Passive construction the Accusative of the Person becomes
the Subject, and the Accusative of the Thing is retained; as,—
omnēs artēs ēdoctus est, he was taught all
accomplishments;
rogātus sum sententiam, I was asked my opinion;
multa ādmonēmur, we are given many
admonitions.
a. Only a few Verbs admit the Passive construction.
179. 1. Transitive compounds of
trāns may take two Accusatives, one dependent upon the Verb,
the other upon the Preposition, as,—
mīlitēs flūmen trānsportat, he leads his
soldiers across the river.
2. With other compounds this construction is rare.
3. In the Passive the Accusative dependent upon the preposition is
retained; as,—
mīlitēs flūmen trādūcēbantur,
the soldiers were led across the river.
180. 1. The Synecdochical (or Greek)
Accusative denotes the part to which an action or quality refers;
as,—
tremit artūs, literally, he trembles as to his
limbs, i.e. his limbs tremble;
nūda genū, lit. bare as to the knee,
i.e. with knee bare;
manūs revinctus, lit. tied as to the hands,
i.e. with hands tied.
2. Note that this construction—
a) Is borrowed from the Greek.
b) Is chiefly confined to poetry.
c) Usually refers to a part of the body.
d) Is used with Adjectives as well as Verbs.
181. 1. Duration of Time and
Extent of Space are denoted by the Accusative; as,—
quadrāgintā annōs vīxit, he lived forty
years;
hīc locus passūs sescentōs aberat, this place
was six hundred paces away;
arborēs quīnquāgintā pedēs altae,
trees fifty feet high;
abhinc septem annōs, seven years ago.
2. Emphasis is sometimes added by using the Preposition per;
as,
per biennium labōrāvī, I toiled throughout
two years.
182. 1. The Accusative of Limit of Motion
is used—
a) With names of Towns, Small Islands, and
Peninsulas; as,—
Rōmam vēnī, I came to Rome;
Athēnās proficīscitur, he sets out for
Athens;
Dēlum pervēnī, I arrived at Delos.
b) With domum, domōs, rūs;
as,—
domum revertitur, he returns home;
rūs ībō, I shall go to the country.
NOTE.—When domus means
house (i.e. building), it takes a preposition;
as,—
in domum veterem remigrāre, to move back to an old
house.
2. Other designations of place than those above mentioned require a
Preposition to denote Limit of Motion; as,—
ad Italiam vēnit, he came to Italy.
a. The Preposition is also customary with the Accusatives
urbem or oppidum when they stand in apposition with the
name of a town; as,—
Thalam, in oppidum magnum, to Thala, a large town;
Genavam ad oppidum, to the town Geneva.
b. The name of a town denoting limit of motion may be combined
with the name of a country or other word dependent upon a preposition;
as,—
Thūriōs in Italiam pervectus, carried to Thurii in
Italy;
cum Acēn ad exercitum vēnisset, when he had come
to the army at Ace.
3. To denote toward, to the vicinity of, in the
vicinity of, ad is used; as,—
ad Tarentum vēnī, I came to the vicinity of
Tarentum;
ad Cannās pugna facta est, a battle was fought near
Cannae.
4. In poetry the Accusative of any noun denoting a place may be used
without a preposition to express the limit of motion; as,—
Italiam vēnit, he came to Italy.
5. The goal notion seems to represent the original function of
the Accusative Case. Traces of this primitive force are recognizable in
the phrase īnfitiās īre, to deny (lit. to
go to a denial), and a few other similar expressions.
183. The Accusative, generally modified
by an Adjective, is used in Exclamations; as,—
mē miserum, ah, wretched me!
Ō fallācem spem, oh, deceptive hope!
184. The Subject of the Infinitive is put
in the Accusative; as,—
videō hominem abīre, I see that the man is going
away.
185. Here belong—
1. Some Accusatives which were originally Appositives;
viz.—
id genus, of that kind; as, hominēs id
genus, men of that kind (originally hominēs, id genus
hominum, men, that kind of men);
virīle secus, muliebre secus, of the male
sex, of the female sex;
meam vicem, tuam vicem, etc., for my part,
etc.;
bonam partem, magnam partem, in large part;
maximam partem, for the most part.
2. Some phrases of doubtful origin; as,—
|
id temporis, at that time;
|
quod si, but if;
|
|
id aetātis, at that time;
|
cētera, in other respects.
|
THE DATIVE.
186. The Dative case, in general,
expresses relations which are designated in English by the prepositions
to and for.
187. The commonest use of the Dative is
to denote the person to whom something is given,
said, or done. Thus:—
I. With transitive verbs in connection with the Accusative;
as,—
hanc pecūniam mihi dat, he gives me this money;
haec nōbīs dīxit, he said this to us.
a. Some verbs which take this construction (particularly
dōnō and circumdō) admit also the Accusative
of the person along with the Ablative of the thing. Thus:—
Either Themistoclī mūnera dōnāvit, he
presented gifts to Themistocles, or
Themistoclem mūneribus dōnāvit, he presented
Themistocles with gifts;
urbī mūrōs circumdat, he builds walls around
the city, or
urbem mūrīs circumdat, he surrounds the city with
walls
II. With many intransitive verbs; as,—
nūllī labōrī cēdit, he yields to no
labor.
a. Here belong many verbs signifying favor,[48] help,
injure, please, displease, trust,
distrust, command, obey, serve,
resist, indulge, spare, pardon, envy,
threaten, be angry, believe, persuade, and
the like; as,—
Caesar populāribus favet, Caesar favors (i.e. is
favorable to) the popular party;
amīcīs cōnfīdō, I trust (to) my
friends;
Orgetorīx Helvētiīs persuāsit, Orgetorix
persuaded (made it acceptable to) the Helvetians;
bonīs nocet quī malīs parcit, he injures
(does harm to) the good, who spares the bad.
NOTE.—It is to be borne in mind that
these verbs do not take the Dative by virtue of their apparent English
equivalence, but simply because they are intransitive, and adapted
to an indirect object. Some verbs of the same apparent English
equivalence are transitive and govern the Accusative; as,
juvō, laedō, dēlectō. Thus:
audentēs deus juvat, God helps the bold;
nēminem laesit he injured no one.
b. Verbs of this class are used in the passive only
impersonally; as,—
tibi parcitur, you are spared;
mihi persuādētur, I am being persuaded;
eī invidētur, he is envied.
c. Some of the foregoing verbs admit also a Direct Object in
connection with the Dative; as,—
mihi mortem minitātur, he threatens me with death
(threatens death to me).
III. With many verbs compounded with the prepositions: ad,
ante, circum, com,[49] in, inter, ob,
post, prae, prō, sub, super.
These verbs fall into two main classes,—
1. Many simple verbs which cannot take a Dative of the indirect object
become capable of doing so when compounded with a preposition;
as,—
afflīctīs succurrit, he helps the
aflicted;
exercituī praefuit, he was in command of the
army;
intersum cōnsiliīs, I share in the
deliberations.
2. Many transitive verbs which take only a direct object become
capable, when compounded, of taking a dative also as indirect object;
as,—
pecūniae pudōrem antepōnit, he puts honor
before money;
inicere spem amīcīs, to inspire hope in one's
friends;
mūnītiōni Labiēnum praefēcit, he
put Labienus in charge of the fortifications.
188. 1. The Dative of Reference denotes
the person to whom a statement refers, of whom it is true, or
to whom it is of interest; as,—
mihi ante oculōs versāris, you hover before my
eyes (lit. hover before the eyes to me);
illī sevēritās amōrem nōn
dēminuit, in his case severity did not diminish love
(lit. to him severity did not diminish);
interclūdere inimīcīs commeātum, to cut
of the supplies of the enemy.
a. Note the phrase alicui interdīcere aquā et
īgnī, to interdict one from fire and water.
NOTE.—The Dative of Reference, unlike
the Dative of Indirect Object, does not modify the verb, but rather the
sentence as a whole. It is often used where, according to the English
idiom, we should expect a Genitive; so in the first and third of the
above examples.
2. Special varieties of the Dative of Reference are—
a) Dative of the Local Standpoint. This is regularly a
participle; as,—
oppidum prīmum Thessaliae venientibus ab
Ēpīrō, the first town of Thessaly as you come from
Epirus (lit. to those coming from Epirus).
b) Ethical Dative. This name is given to those Dative
constructions of the personal pronouns in which the connection of the
Dative with the rest of the sentence is of the very slightest sort;
as,—
tū mihi istīus audāciam dēfendis? tell
me, do you defend that man's audacity?
quid mihi Celsus agit? what is my Celsus doing?
c) Dative of Person Judging; as,—
erit ille mihi semper deus, he will always be a god to
me (i.e. in my opinion);
quae ista servitūs tam clāro hominī, how can
that be slavery to so illustrious a man (i.e. to his
mind)!
d) Dative of Separation. Some verbs of taking
away, especially compounds of ab, dē, ex,
ad, govern a Dative of the person, less often of the thing;
as,—
honōrem dētrāxērunt hominī, they
took away the honor from the man;
Caesar rēgī tetrarchiam ēripuit, Caesar took
the tetrarchy away from the king;
silicī scintillam excūdit, he struck a spark from
the flint.
189. The Dative is used to denote
agency—
1. Regularly with the Gerundive; as,—
haec nōbīs agenda sunt, these things must be done
by us;
mihi eundum est, I must go (lit. it must be gone by
me).
a. To avoid ambiguity, ā with the Ablative is
sometimes used with the Gerundive; as,—
hostibus ā nōbīs parcendum est, the enemy
must be spared by us.
2. Much less frequently with the compound tenses of the passive voice
and the perfect passive participle; as,—
disputātiō quae mihi nūper habita est, the
discussion which was recently conducted by me.
3. Rarely with the uncompounded tenses of the passive; as,—
honesta bonīs virīs quaeruntur, noble ends are
sought by good men.
190. The Dative of Possession occurs with
the verb esse in such expressions as:—
mihi est liber, I have a book;
mihi nōmen est Mārcus, I have the name
Marcus.
1. But with nōmen est the name is more commonly attracted
into the Dative; as, mihi Mārcō nōmen est.
191. The Dative of Purpose or Tendency
designates the end toward which an action is directed or the
direction in which it tends. It is used—
1. Unaccompanied by another Dative; as,—
castrīs locum dēligere, to choose a place for a
camp;
legiōnēs praesidiō relinquere, to leave the
legions as a guard (lit. for a guard);
receptuī canere, to sound the signal for a
retreat.
2. Much more frequently in connection with another Dative of the
person:—
a) Especially with some form of esse; as,—
fortūnae tuae mihi cūrae sunt, your fortunes are a
care to me (lit. for a care);
quibus sunt odiō, to whom they are an object of
hatred;
cui bonō? to whom is it of advantage?
b) With other verbs; as,—
hōs tibi mūnerī mīsit, he has sent these
to you for a present;
Pausaniās Atticīs vēnit auxiliō,
Pausanias came to the aid of the Athenians (lit. to the
Athenians for aid).
3. In connection with the Gerundive; as,—
decemvirī lēgibus scrībundīs, decemvirs
for codifying the laws;
mē gerendō bellō ducem creāvēre, me
they have made leader for carrying on the war.
NOTE.—This construction with the
gerundive is not common till Livy.
192. The use of the Dative with
Adjectives corresponds very closely to its use with verbs.
Thus:—
1. Corresponding to the Dative of Indirect Object it occurs with
adjectives signifying: friendly, unfriendly,
similar, dissimilar, equal, near, related
to, etc.; as,—
mihi inimīcus, hostile to me;
sunt proximī Germānis, they are next to the
Germans;
noxiae poena pār estō, let the penalty be equal to
the damage.
a. For propior and proximus with the Accusative,
see § 141, 3.
2. Corresponding to the Dative of Purpose, the Dative occurs with
adjectives signifying: suitable, adapted, fit;
as,—
castrīs idōneus locus, a place fit for a
camp;
apta diēs sacrificiō, a day suitable for a
sacrifice.
NOTE.—Adjectives of this last class
often take the Accusative with ad.
193. In the poets the Dative is
occasionally used to denote the direction of motion;
as,—
it clāmor caelō, the shout goes
heavenward;
cinerēs rīvō fluentī jace, cast the
ashes toward a flowing stream.
1. By an extension of this construction the poets sometimes use the
Dative to denote the limit of motion; as,—
dum Latiō deōs īnferret, till he should bring
his gods to Latium.
THE GENITIVE.
194. The Genitive is used with Nouns,
Adjectives, and Verbs.
GENITIVE WITH NOUNS.
195. With Nouns the Genitive is the
case which defines the meaning of the limited noun more closely. This
relation is generally indicated in English by the preposition of.
There are the following varieties of the Genitive with Nouns:—
|
Genitive of Origin,
|
Objective Genitive,
|
|
Genitive of Material,
|
Genitive of the Whole,
|
|
Genitive of Possession,
|
Appositional Genitive,
|
|
Subjective Genitive,
|
Genitive of Quality.
|
196. Genitive of Origin; as,—
Mārcī fīlius, the son of Marcus.
197. Genitive of Material; as,—
talentum aurī, a talent of gold;
acervus frūmentī, a pile of grain.
198. Genitive of Possession or Ownership;
as,—
domus Cicerōnis, Cicero's house.
1. Here belongs the Genitive with causā and
grātiā. The Genitive always precedes; as,—
hominum causā, for the sake of men;
meōrum amīcōrum grātiā, for the
sake of my friends.
2. The Possessive Genitive is often used predicatively, especially
with esse and fierī; as,—
domus est rēgis, the house is the king's;
stultī est in errōre manēre, it is (the part)
of a fool to remain in error;
dē bellō jūdicium imperātōris est,
nōn mīlitum, the decision concerning war belongs to the
general, not to the soldiers.
a. For the difference in force between the Possessive Genitive
and the Dative of Possession, see § 359, 1.
199. Subjective Genitive. This denotes
the person who makes or produces something or who has a feeling;
as,—
dicta Platōnis, the utterances of Plato;
timōrēs līberōrum, the fears of the
children.
200. Objective Genitive. This denotes
the object of an action or feeling; as,—
metus deōrum, the fear of the gods;
amor lībertātis, love of liberty;
cōnsuētūdō bonōrum hominum,
intercourse with good men.
1. This relation is often expressed by means of prepositions;
as,—
amor ergā parentēs, love toward one's
parents.
201. Genitive of the Whole. This
designates the whole of which a part is taken. It is
used—
1. With Nouns, Pronouns, Comparatives, Superlatives, and Ordinal
Numerals; as,—
magna pars hominum, a great part of mankind;
duo mīlia peditum, two thousand foot-soldiers;
quis mortālium, who of mortals?
major frātrum, the elder of the brothers;
gēns maxima Germānōrum, the largest tribe of
the Germans;
prīmus omnium, the first of all.
a. Yet instead of the Genitive of the Whole we often find
ex or dē with the Ablative, regularly so with Cardinal
numbers and quīdam; as,—
fidēlissimus dē servīs, the most trusty of
the slaves;
quīdam ex amīcīs, certain of his
friends;
ūnus ex mīlitibus, one of the soldiers.
b. In English we often use of where there is no relation
of whole to part. In such cases the Latin is more exact, and does not use
the Genitive; as,—
quot vōs estis, how many of you are there?
trecentī conjūrāvimus, three hundred of us
have conspired (i.e. we, three hundred in number).
2. The Genitive of the Whole is used also with the Nominative or
Accusative Singular Neuter of Pronouns, or of Adjectives used
substantively; also with the Adverbs parum, satis, and
partim when used substantively; as,—
quid cōnsilī, what purpose?
tantum cibī, so much food;
plūs auctōritātis, more authority;
minus labōris, less labor;
satis pecūniae, enough money;
parum industriae, too little industry.
a. An Adjective of the second declension used substantively may
be employed as a Genitive of the Whole; as, nihil bonī,
nothing good.
b. But Adjectives of the third declension agree directly with
the noun they limit; as, nihil dulcius, nothing
sweeter.
3. Occasionally we find the Genitive of the Whole dependent upon
Adverbs of place; as,—
ubi terrārum? ubi gentium? where in the world?
a. By an extension of this usage the Genitive sometimes occurs
in dependence upon prīdiē and
postrīdiē, but only in the phrases prīdiē
ejus diēī, on the day before that;
postrīdiē ejus diēī, on the day after
that.
202. Appositional Genitive. The Genitive
sometimes has the force of an appositive; as,—
nōmen rēgis, the name of king;
poena mortis, the penalty of death;
ars scrībendī, the art of writing.
203. Genitive of Quality. The Genitive
modified by an Adjective is used to denote quality. This construction
presents several varieties. Thus it is used—
1. To denote some internal or permanent characteristic of a person or
thing; as,—
vir magnae virtūtis, a man of great virtue;
ratiōnēs ejus modī, considerations of that
sort.
a. Only a limited number of Adjectives occur in this
construction, chiefly magnus, maximus, summus,
tantus, along with ejus.
2. To denote measure (breadth, length, etc.);
as,—
fossa quīndecim pedum, a trench fifteen feet wide
(or deep);
exsilium decem annōrum, an exile of ten years.
3. Equivalent to the Genitive of Quality (though probably of different
origin) are the Genitives tantī, quantī,
parvī, magnī, minōris,
plūris, minimī, plūrimī,
maximī. These are used predicatively to denote indefinite
value; as,—
nūlla studia tantī sunt, no studies are of so much
value;
magnī opera ejus exīstimāta est, his
assistance was highly esteemed.
4. By an extension of the notion of value, quantī,
tantī, plūris, and minōris are also
used with verbs of buying and selling, to denote
indefinite price; as,—
quantī aedēs ēmistī, at how high a price
did you purchase the house?
5. Any of the above varieties of the Genitive of Quality may be used
predicatively; as,—
tantae mōlis erat Rōmānam condere gentem, of
so great difficulty was it to found the Roman race.
GENITIVE WITH ADJECTIVES.
204. The Genitive is used with many
Adjectives to limit the extent of their application.
Thus:—
1. With adjectives signifying desire, knowledge,
familiarity, memory, participation, power,
fullness, and their opposites; as,—
studiōsus discendī, desirous of learning;
perītus bellī, skilled in war;
īnsuētus labōris, unused to toil;
immemor mandātī tuī, unmindful of your
commission;
plēna perīculōrum est vīta, life is full
of dangers.
a. Some participles used adjectively also take the Genitive;
as,—
diligēns vēritātis, fond of truth;
amāns patriae, devoted to one's country.
2. Sometimes with proprius and commūnis;
as,—
virī propria est fortitūdō, bravery is
characteristic of a man.
memoria est commūnis omnium artium, memory is common to
all professions.
a. proprius and commūnis are also construed
with the Dative.
3. With similis the Genitive is the commoner construction in
Cicero, when the reference is to living objects; as,—
fīlius patris simillimus est, the son is exactly like
his father;
meī similis, like me; vestrī similis,
like you.
When the reference is to things, both Genitive and Dative occur;
as,—
mors somnō (or somnī) similis est,
death is like sleep.
4. In the poets and later prose writers the use of the Genitive with
Adjectives is extended far beyond earlier limits; as, atrōx
animī, fierce of temper; incertus
cōnsilī, undecided in purpose.
GENITIVE WITH VERBS.
205. The Genitive is used with the
following classes of Verbs:—
206. 1. WHEN REFERRING
TO PERSONS—
a. meminī always takes the Genitive of personal or
reflexive pronouns; as,—
meī meminerīs, remember me!
nostrī meminit, he remembers us.
With other words denoting persons meminī takes the
Accusative, rarely the Genitive; as,—
Sullam meminī, I recall Sulla;
vīvōrum meminī, I remember the
living.
b. oblīvīscor regularly takes the Genitive;
as,—
Epicūrī nōn licet oblīvīscī,
we mustn't forget Epicurus.
2. WHEN REFERRING TO THINGS, meminī, reminīscor,
oblīvīscor take sometimes the Genitive, sometimes the
Accusative, without difference of meaning; as,—
animus praeteritōrum meminit, the mind remembers the
past;
meministīne nōmina, do you remember the
names?
reminīscere veteris incommodī, remember the former
disaster;
reminīscēns acerbitātem, remembering the
bitterness.
a. But neuter pronouns, and adjectives used substantively,
regularly stand in the Accusative; as,—
haec meminī, I remember this;
multa reminīscor, I remember many things.
3. The phrase mihi (tibi, etc.) in mentem
venit, following the analogy of meminī, takes the
Genitive; as,—
mihi patriae veniēbat in mentem, I remembered my
country.
207. These verbs, in addition to an
Accusative of the person, occasionally take a Genitive of the thing;
as,—
tē veteris amīcitiae commonefaciō, I remind
you of our old friendship.
a. But more frequently (in Cicero almost invariably) these
verbs take dē with the Ablative; as,—
mē admonēs dē sorōre, you remind me of
your sister.
b. A neuter pronoun or adjective used substantively regularly
stands in the Accusative (§ 178, 1, d);
as,—
tē hōc admoneō, I give you this
warning.
208. 1. Verbs of Accusing,
Convicting, Acquitting take the Genitive of the
charge; as,—
mē fūrtī accūsat, he accuses me of
theft;
Verrem avāritiae coarguit, he convicts Verres of
avarice;
impietātis absolūtus est, he was acquitted of
blasphemy.
2. Verbs of Condemning take—
a. The Genitive of the charge; as,—
pecūniae pūblicae condemnātus, condemned (on
the charge) of embezzlement (lit. public money);
capitis damnātus, condemned on a capital charge
(lit. on a charge involving his head).
b. The Ablative of the penalty; as,—
capite damnātus est, he was condemned to death;
mīlle nummīs damnātus est, he was condemned
(to pay) a thousand sesterces (lit. by a thousand sesterces,
Abl. of Means).
3. Note the phrases:—
vōtī damnātus, vōtī reus, having
attained one's prayer (lit. condemned on the score of one's
vow);
dē vī, (accused, convicted,
etc.) of assault;
inter sīcāriōs, (accused,
convicted, etc.) of murder.
209. 1. The Impersonals pudet,
paenitet, miseret, taedet, piget take the
Accusative of the person affected, along with the Genitive of
the person or thing toward whom the feeling is directed;
as,—
pudet mē tuī, I am ashamed of you (lit. it
shames me of you);
paenitet mē hūjus factī, I repent of this
act;
eum taedet vītae, he is weary of life;
pauperum tē miseret, you pity the poor.
a. Instead of the Genitive of the thing we often find an
Infinitive or Neuter Pronoun used as subject of the verb.
Thus;—
mē paenitet hōc fēcisse, I repent of having
done this;
mē hōc pudet, I am ashamed of this.
2. Misereor and miserēscō also govern the
Genitive; as,—
miserēminī sociōrum, pity the allies.
210. With interest, it
concerns, three points enter into consideration;
viz.—
a) the person concerned;
b) the thing about which he is concerned;
c) the extent of his concern.
211. 1. The person concerned is
regularly denoted by the Genitive; as,—
patris interest, it concerns the father.
a. But instead of the Genitive of the personal pronouns,
meī, tuī, nostrī, vestrī,
the Latin uses the Ablative Singular Feminine of the Possessive,
viz.: meā, tuā, etc.;
as,—
meā interest, it concerns me.
2. The thing about which a person is concerned is
denoted—
a) by a Neuter Pronoun as subject; as,—
hōc reī pūblicae interest, this concerns the
state.
b) by an Infinitive; as,—
omnium interest valēre, it concerns all to keep
well.
c) by an Indirect Question; as,—
meā interest quandō veniās, I am concerned as
to when you are coming.
3. The degree of concern is denoted—
a) by the Genitive (cf. § 203, 3):
magnī, parvī, etc.; as,—
meā magnī interest, it concerns me
greatly.
b) by the Adverbs, magnopere, magis,
maximē, etc.; as,—
cīvium minimē interest, it concerns the citizens
very little.
c) by the Neuters, multum, plūs,
minus, etc.; as,—
multum vestrā interest, it concerns you much.
4. Rēfert follows interest in its construction,
except that it rarely takes the Genitive of the person. Thus:—
meā rēfert, it concerns me;
but rarely illīus rēfert, it concerns him.
212. 1. Verbs of Plenty and
Want sometimes govern the Genitive; as,—
pecūniae indigēs, you need money.
a. These verbs more commonly take the Ablative (§ 214, 1); indigeō is the only verb which
has a preference for the Genitive.
2. Potior, though usually followed by the Ablative, sometimes
takes the Genitive, almost always so in Sallust; and regularly in the
phrase potīrī rērum, to get control of
affairs.
3. In poetry some verbs take the Genitive in imitation of the Greek;
as,—
dēsine querellārum, cease your complaints;
operum solūtī, freed from their tasks.
THE ABLATIVE.
213. The Latin Ablative unites in itself
three cases which were originally distinct both in form and in
meaning; viz.—
The Ablative or from-case.
The Instrumental or with-case.
The Locative or where-case.
The uses of the Latin Ablative accordingly fall into Genuine Ablative
uses, Instrumental uses, and Locative uses.
GENUINE ABLATIVE USES.
214. The Ablative of Separation is
construed sometimes with, sometimes without, a preposition.
1. The following words regularly take the Ablative without a
preposition:—
a) The Verbs of freeing: līberō,
solvō, levō;
b) The Verbs of depriving: prīvō,
spoliō, exuō, fraudō,
nūdō;
c) The Verbs of lacking: egeō,
careō, vacō;
d) The corresponding Adjectives, līber,
inānis, vacuus, nūdus,
and some others of similar meaning.
Thus:—
cūrīs līberātus, freed from
cares;
Caesar hostēs armīs exuit, Caesar stripped the
enemy of their arms;
caret sēnsū commūnī, he lacks common
sense;
auxiliō eget, he needs help;
bonōrum vīta vacua est metū, the life of the
good is free from fear.
NOTE 1.—Yet Adjectives and
līberō may take the preposition
ab,—regularly so with the Ablative of persons;
as,—
urbem ā tyrannō līberārunt, they freed
the city from the tyrant.
NOTE 2.—Indigeō usually
takes the Genitive. See § 212, 1, a.
2. Of Verbs signifying to keep from, to remove, to
withdraw, some take the preposition, others omit it. The same Verb
often admits both constructions. Examples:—
abstinēre cibō, to abstain from food;
hostēs fīnibus prohibuērunt, they kept the
enemy from their borders;
praedōnēs ab īnsulā prohibuit, he kept
the pirates from the island.
3. Other Verbs of separation usually take the Ablative with a
Prepositon, particularly compounds of dis- and sē-;
as,—
dissentiō ā tē, I dissent from you;
sēcernantur ā nōbīs, let them be
separated from us.
4. The Preposition is freely omitted in poetry.
215. The Ablative of Source is used with
the participles nātus and ortus (in poetry also with
ēditus, satus, and some others), to designate
parentage or station; as,—
Jove nātus, son of Jupiter;
summō locō nātus, high-born (lit. born
from a very high place);
nōbilī genere ortus, born of a noble
family.
1. Pronouns regularly (nouns rarely) take ex; as,
ex mē nātus, sprung from me.
2. To denote remoter descent, ortus ab, or oriundus
(with or without ab), is used; as,—
ab Ulixe oriundus, descended from Ulysses.
216. The Ablative accompanied by
ā (ab) is used with passive verbs to denote the
personal agent; as,—
ā Caesare accūsātus est, he was arraigned by
Caesar.
1. Collective nouns referring to persons, and abstract nouns when
personified, may be construed as the personal agent. Thus:—
hostēs ā fortūnā dēserēbantur,
the enemy were deserted by Fortune;
ā multitūdine hostium mōntēs
tenēbantur, the mountains were held by a multitude of the
enemy.
2. Names of animals sometimes admit the same construction.
Thus:—
ā canibus laniātus est, he was torn to pieces by
dogs.
217. 1. The Ablative is often used with
Comparatives in the sense of than; as,—
melle dulcior, sweeter than honey;
patria mihi vītā cārior est, my country is
dearer to me than life.
2. This construction, as a rule, occurs only as a substitute for
quam (than) with the Nominative or Accusative. In other
cases quam must be used; as,—
tuī studiōsior sum quam illīus, I am fonder
of you than of him.
—Studiōsior illō would have meant, I am
fonder of you than he is.
Plūs, minus, amplius, longius are
often employed as the equivalents of plūs quam, minus
quam, etc. Thus:—
amplius vīgintī urbēs incenduntur, more than
twenty cities are fired;
minus quīnque mīlia prōcessit, he advanced
less than five miles.
3. Note the use of opīniōne with Comparatives;
as,—
opīniōne celerius venit, he comes more quickly
than expected (lit. than opinion).
INSTRUMENTAL USES OF THE ABLATIVE.
218. The Ablative is used to denote
means or instrument; as,—
Alexander sagittā vulnerātus est, Alexander was
wounded by an arrow.
There are the following special varieties of this Ablative:—
1. Ūtor, fruor, fungor, potior,
vescor, and their compounds take the Ablative; as,—
dīvitiīs ūtitur, he uses his wealth (lit.
he benefits himself by his wealth);
vītā fruitur, he enjoys life (lit. he
enjoys himself by life);
mūnere fungor, I perform my duty (lit. I busy
myself with duty);
carne vescuntur, they eat flesh (lit. feed themselves
by means of);
castrīs potītus est, he got possession of the
camp (lit. made himself powerful by the camp).
a.. Potior sometimes governs the Genitive. See § 212, 2.
2. With opus est (rarely ūsus est), there is
need; as,—
duce nōbīs opus est, we need a leader.
a. A Neuter Pronoun or Adjective often stands as subject with
opus as predicate. Thus:—
hōc mihi opus est, this is necessary for me.
b. An ordinary substantive rarely stands as subject. Thus
dux nōbīs opus est is a rare form of expression.
c. Note the occasional use of a perfect passive participle with
opus est; as,—
opus est properātō, there is need of
haste.
3. With nītor, innīxus, and
frētus; as,—
nītitur hastā, he rests on a spear (lit.
supports himself by a spear);
frētus virtūte, relying on virtue (lit.
supported by virtue).
4. With continērī, cōnsistere,
cōnstāre, consist of; as,—
nervīs et ossibus continentur, they consist of sinews
and bones (lit. they are held together by sinews and
bones);
mortālī cōnsistit corpore mundus, the world
consists of mortal substance (lit. holds together by means of,
etc.).
6. In expressions of the following type:—
quid hōc homine faciās, what can you do with this
man?
quid meā Tulliolā fīet, what will become of
my dear Tullia? (lit. what will be done with my dear
Tullia?)
7. In the following special phrases at variance with the ordinary
English idiom:—
proeliō contendere, vincere, to contend, conquer
in battle;
proeliō lacessere, to provoke to battle;
currū vehī, to ride in a chariot;
pedibus īre, to go on foot;
castrīs sē tenēre, to keep in camp.
8. With Verbs of filling and Adjectives of plenty;
as,—
fossās virgultīs complērunt, they filled the
trenches with brush.
a. But plēnus more commonly takes the Genitive. See
§ 204, 1.
9. Under 'Means' belongs also the Ablative of the Way by Which;
as,—
vīnum Tiberī dēvectum, wine brought down (by)
the Tiber.
10. The means may be a person as well as a thing. Thus:—
mīlitibus ā lacū Lemannō ad montem Jūram
mūrum perdūcit, with (i.e. by means of)
his troops he runs a wall from Lake Geneva to Mt. Jura.
219. The Ablative is used to denote
cause; as,—
multa glōriae cupiditāte fēcit, he did many
things on account of his love of glory.
1. So especially with verbs denoting mental states; as,
dēlector, gāudeō, laetor,
glōrior, fīdō,
cōnfīdō. Also with contentus; as,—
fortūnā amīcī gaudeō, I rejoice at
the fortune of my friend (i.e. on account of it);
victōriā suā glōriantur, they exult over
their victory;
nātūrā locī cōnfīdēbant,
they trusted in the character of their country (lit. were
confident on account of the character).
a. fīdō and cōnfīdō
always take the Dative of the person (§ 187, II,
a); sometimes the Dative of the thing.
2. As Ablatives of Cause are to be reckoned also such Ablatives as
jussū, by order of, injussū, without the
order, rogātū, etc.
220. The Ablative with cum is used
to denote manner; as,—
cum gravitāte loquitur, he speaks with dignity.
1. The preposition may be absent when the Ablative is modified by an
adjective; as,—
magnā gravitāte loquitur, he speaks with great
dignity.
2. The preposition is regularly absent in the expressions
jūre, injūriā, jocō,
vī, fraude, voluntāte,
fūrtō, silentiō.
3. A special variety of the Ablative of Manner denotes that in
accordance with which or in pursuance of which anything is or
is done. It is generally used without a preposition. Thus:—
meā sententiā, according to my opinion;
suīs mōribus, in accordance with their
custom;
suā sponte, voluntarily, of his (their) own
accord;
eā condiciōne, on these terms.
221. The Ablative is often used to denote
an attendant circumstance of an action or an event; as,—
bonīs auspiciīs, under good auspices;
nūlla est altercātiō clāmōribus umquam
habita majōribus, no debate was ever held under circumstances
of greater applause;
exstinguitur ingentī lūctū prōvinciae,
he dies under circumstances of great grief on the part of the
province;
longō intervāllō sequitur, he follows at a
great distance.
222. The Ablative with cum is used
with verbs of motion to denote accompaniment; as,—
cum comitibus profectus est, he set out with his
attendants;
cum febrī domum rediit, he returned home with a
fever.
1. In military expressions the Ablative may stand without cum
when modified by any adjective except a numeral; as,—
omnibus cōpiīs, ingentī exercitū, magnā
manū; but usually cum exercitū, cum duābus
legiōnibus.
222A. The Ablative is
often used with verbs of joining, mixing, clinging,
exchanging; also with assuēscō,
cōnsuēscō, assuēfaciō, and some
others to denote association; as,—
improbitās scelere jūncta, badness joined with
crime;
āēr calōre admixtus, air mixed with
heat;
assuētus labōre, accustomed to (lit.
familiarized with) toil;
pācem bellō permūtant, they change peace
for (lit. with) war.
223. The Ablative is used with
comparatives and words involving comparison (as post, ante,
īnfrā, suprā) to denote the degree of
difference; as,—
dimidiō minor, smaller by a half;
tribus pedibus altior, three feet higher;
paulō post, a little afterwards;
quō plurā habēmus, eō cupimus
ampliōra, the more we have, the more we want.
224. The Ablative, modified by an
adjective, is used to denote quality; as,—
puella eximiā fōrmā, a girl of exceptional
beauty;
vir singulārī industriā, a man of singular
industry.
1. The Ablative of Quality may also be used predicatively;
as,—
est magnā prūdentiā, he is (a man) of great
wisdom;
bonō animā sunt, they are of good courage.
2. In place of the Adjective we sometimes find a limiting Genitive;
as,—
sunt speciē et colōre taurī, they are of the
appearance and color of a bull,
3. In poetry the Ablative of Quality sometimes denotes
material; as,—
scopulīs pendentībus antrum, a cave of arching
rocks.
225. With verbs of buying and
selling, price is designated by the Ablative; as—
servum quīnque minīs ēmit, he bought the
slave for five minae.
1. The Ablatives magnō, plūrimō,
parvō, minimō (by omission of pretiō)
are used to denote indefinite price; as,—
aedēs magnō vēndidīt, he sold the house
for a high price.
2. For the Genitive of Indefinite Price, see §
203, 4.
226. The Ablative of Specification is
used to denote that in respect to which something is or is done;
as,—
Helvētiī omnibus Gallīs virtūte
praestābant, the Helvetians surpassed all the Gauls in
valor;
pede claudus, lame in his foot.
1. Note the phrases:—
major nātū, older (lit. greater as to
age);
minor nātū, younger.
2. Here belongs the use of the Ablative with dignus,
worthy, indignus, unworthy, and dignor,
deem worthy of; as,—
dignī honōre, worthy of honor (i.e. in point of
honor);
fidē indignī, unworthy of confidence;
mē dignor honōre, I deem myself worthy of
honor.
227. The Ablative Absolute is
grammatically independent of the rest of the sentence. In its commonest
form it consists of a noun or pronoun limited by a participle;
as,—
urbe captā, Aenēās fūgit, when the city
had been captured, Aeneas fled (lit. the city having been
captured).
1. Instead of a participle we often find an adjective or noun;
as,—
vīvō Caesare rēs pūblica salva erat,
while Caesar was alive the state was safe (lit. Caesar being
alive);
Tarquiniō rēge, Pythagorās in Italiam
vēnit, in the reign of Tarquin Pythagoras came into Italy
(lit. Tarquin being king);
Cn. Pompejō, M. Crassō cōnsulibus, in the
consulship of Gnaeus Pompey and Marcus Crassus (lit. P. and C.
being consuls).
2. The Ablative Absolute is generally used in Latin where in English
we employ subordinate clauses. Thus the Ablative Absolute may correspond
to a clause denoting—
a) Time, as in the foregoing examples.
b) Condition; as,—
omnēs virtūtēs jacent, voluptāte dominante,
all virtues lie prostrate, if pleasure is master.
perditīs omnibus rēbus, virtūs sē
sustentāre potest, though everything else is lost, yet Virtue
can maintain herself.
nūllō adversante rēgnum obtinuit, since no
one opposed him, he secured the throne.
e) Attendant circumstance; as,—
passīs palmīs pācem petīvērunt,
with hands outstretched, they sued for peace.
3. An Infinitive or clause sometimes occurs in the Ablative Absolute
construction, especially in Livy and later writers; as,—
audītō eum fūgisse, when it was heard that he
had fled.
4. A noun or pronoun stands in the Ablative Absolute construction only
when it denotes a different person or thing from any in the clause in
which it stands. Exceptions to this principle are extremely rare.
LOCATIVE USES OF THE ABLATIVE.
A. Place where.
228. The place where is regularly denoted
by the Ablative with a preposition; as,—
in urbe habitat, he dwells in the city.
1. But certain words stand in the Ablative without a preposition;
viz.—
a) Names of towns,—except Singulars of the First and
Second Declensions (see § 232, 1); as,—
Carthāginī, at Carthage;
Athēnis, at Athens;
Vejīs, at Veii.
b) The general words locō, locīs,
parte; also many words modified by tōtus or even by
other Adjectives; as,—
hōc locō, at this place;
tōtīs castrīs, in the whole camp.
c) The special words: forīs, out of doors;
rūrī, in the country, terrā
marīque, on land and sea.
d) The poets freely omit the preposition with any word denoting
place; as,—
stant lītore puppēs, the sterns rest on the
beach.
B. Place from which.[50]
229. Place from which is regularly
denoted by the Ablative with a preposition; as,—
ab Italiā profectus est, he set out from Italy;
ex urbe rediit, he returned from the city.
1. But certain words stand in the Ablative without a preposition;
viz.—
a) Names of towns and small islands; as,—
Rōma profectus est, he set out from Rome;
Rhodō revertit, he returned from Rhodes.
b) domō, from home; rūre,
from the country.
c) Freely in poetry; as,—
Italiā dēcessit, he withdrew from Italy.
2. With names of towns, ab is used to mean from the vicinity
of, or to denote the point whence distance is measured;
as,—
ā Gergoviā discessit, he withdrew from the
vicinity of Gergovia;
ā Rōmā X mīlia aberat, he was ten miles
distant from Rome.
Urbe and oppidō, when standing in apposition with a
town name, are accompanied by a preposition; as,—
Curibus ex oppidō Sabīnōrum, from Cures, a
town of the Sabines
A. Time at which.
230. The Ablative is used to denote the
time at which; as,—
quārtā hōrā mortuus est, he died at the
fourth hour;
annō septuāgēsimō cōnsul creātus,
elected consul in his seventieth year.
1. Any word denoting a period of time may stand in this construction,
particularly annus, vēr, aestās,
hiems, diēs, nox, hōra,
comitia (Election Day), lūdī (the
Games), etc.
2. Words not denoting time require the preposition in, unless
accompanied by a modifier. Thus:—
in pāce, in peace; in bellō, in
war;
but secundō bellō Pūnicō, in the second
Punic War.
3. Expressions like in eō tempore, in summa
senectūte, take the preposition because they denote
situation rather than time.
B. Time within which.
231. Time within which is denoted
by the Ablative either with or without a preposition;
as,—
stella Sāturnī trīgintā annīs cursum
cōnficit, the planet Saturn completes its orbit within thirty
years;
ter in annō, thrice in the course of the year.
1. Occasionally the Ablative denotes duration of time;
as,—
bienniō prōsperās rēs habuit, for two
years he had a prosperous administration.
THE LOCATIVE.
232. The Locative case occurs chiefly in
the following words:—
1. Regularly in the Singular of names of towns and small islands of
the first and second declensions, to denote the place in which;
as,—
|
Rōmae, at Rome;
|
Corinthī, at Corinth;
|
|
|
Rhodī, at Rhodes.
|
2. In the following special forms:—
|
domī, at home;
|
humī, on the ground;
|
|
bellī, in war;
|
mīlitiae, in war;
|
|
vesperī, at evening;
|
herī, yesterday.
|
3. Note the phrase pendēre animī, lit. to be in
suspense in one's mind.
4. For urbs and oppidum in apposition with a Locative,
see § 169, 4.
233. 1. The word with which an Adjective
agrees is called its Subject.
2. Attributive and Predicate Adjectives. An Attributive
Adjective is one that limits its subject directly; as,—
A Predicate Adjective is one that limits its subject through the
medium of a verb (usually esse); as,—
vir est sapiēns, the man is wise;
vir vidēbātur sapiēns, the man seemed
wise;
vir jūdicātus est sapiēns, the man was judged
wise;
hunc virum sapientem jūdicāvimus, we adjudged this
man wise.
3. Participles and Adjective Pronouns have the construction of
Adjectives.
234. Agreement with One Noun. When an
Adjective limits one noun it agrees with it in Gender, Number, and
Case.
1. Two Adjectives in the Singular may limit a noun in the Plural, as;
prīma et vīcēsima legiōnēs, the first
and twentieth legions.
2. A Predicate Adjective may stand in the Neuter when its Subject is
Masculine or Feminine and denotes a thing; as,—
omnium rērum mors est extrēmum, death is the end
of all things.
235. Agreement with Two or More
Nouns.
A. AGREEMENT AS TO NUMBER.
1. When the Adjective is Attributive, it regularly agrees in number
with the nearest noun; as,—
pater tuus et māter, your father and mother;
eadem alacritās et studium, the same eagerness and
zeal.
2. When the Adjective is Predicative, it is regularly Plural;
as,—
pāx et concordia sunt pulchrae, peace and concord are
glorious.
B. AGREEMENT AS TO GENDER.
1. When the Adjective is Attributive, it regularly agrees in gender
with the nearest noun; as,—
rēs operae multae ac labōris, a matter of much
effort and labor.
2. When the Adjective is Predicative—
a) If the nouns are of the same gender, the Adjective agrees
with them in gender; as,—
pater et fīlius captī sunt, father and son were
captured.
Yet with feminine abstract nouns, the Adjective is more
frequently Neuter; as,—
stultitia et timiditās fugienda sunt, folly and
cowardice must be shunned.
b) If the nouns are of different gender; then,—
α) In case they denote persons, the Adjective is Masculine;
as,—
pater et māter mortuī sunt, the father and mother
have died.
β) In case they denote things, the Adjective is Neuter;
as,—
honōrēs et victōriae fortuīta sunt,
honors and victories are accidental.
γ) In case they include both persons and things, the Adjective
is,—
αα) Sometimes Masculine; as,—
domus, uxor, līberī inventī sunt, home, wife,
and children are secured.
ββ) Sometimes Neuter; as,—
parentēs, līberōs, domōs vīlia
habēre, to hold parents, children, houses cheap.
γγ) Sometimes it agrees with the nearest noun;
as,—
populī prōvinciaeque līberātae sunt,
nations and provinces were liberated.
c) Construction according to Sense. Sometimes an
Adjective does not agree with a noun according to strict grammatical
form, but according to sense; as,—
pars bēstiīs objectī sunt, part (of the men)
were thrown to beasts.
236. 1. PLURAL
ADJECTIVES USED SUBSTANTIVELY. Adjectives are quite freely used as
Substantives in the Plural. The Masculine denotes persons; the Neuter
denotes things; as,—
|
doctī, scholars;
|
parva, small things;
|
|
malī, the wicked;
|
magna, great things;
|
|
Graecī, the Greeks;
|
ūtilia, useful things;
|
|
|
nostrī, our men.
|
2. Neuter Plural Adjectives thus used are confined mainly to the
Nominative and Accusative cases. Such forms as magnōrum,
omnium; magnīs, omnibus, would ordinarily lead
to ambiguity; yet where there is no ambiguity, they sometimes occur;
as,—
parvīs compōnere magna, to compare great things
with small
Otherwise the Latin says: magnārum rērum,
magnīs rēbus, etc.
237. SINGULAR
ADJECTIVES USED SUBSTANTIVELY. Adjectives are less freely used as
Substantives in the Singular than in the Plural.
1. Masculine Adjectives occur only occasionally in this use;
as,—
probus invidet nēminī, the honest man envies
nobody.
a. Usually vir, homō, or some similar word
is employed; as,—
homō doctus, a scholar;
vir Rōmānus, a Roman.
b. But when limited by a pronoun any adjective may be so used;
as,—
hīc doctus, this scholar;
doctus quīdam, a certain scholar.
2. Neuters are likewise infrequent; as,—
vērum, truth;
jūstum, justice;
honestum, virtue.
a. This substantive use of Neuter Singulars is commonest in the
construction of the Genitive of the Whole, and after Prepositions;
as,—
aliquid vērī, something true;
nihil novī, nothing new;
in mediō, in the midst.
238. From Adjectives which, like the
above, occasionally admit the substantive use, must be carefully
distinguished certain others which have become nouns; as,—
|
adversārius, opponent;
|
hīberna, winter quarters;
|
|
aequālis, contemporary;
|
propinquus, relative;
|
|
amīcus, friend;
|
socius, partner;
|
|
cognātus, kinsman;
|
sodālis, comrade;
|
|
|
vīcīnus, neighbor; etc.
|
239. The Latin often uses an Adjective
where the English idiom employs an Adverb or an adverbial phrase;
as,—
senātus frequēns convēnit, the senate
assembled in great numbers;
fuit assiduus mēcum, he was constantly with me.
240. 1. The Comparative often corresponds
to the English Positive with 'rather,' 'somewhat,'
'too'; as,—
senectūs est loquācior, old age is rather
talkative.
2. So the Superlative often corresponds to the Positive with
'very'; as,—
vir fortissimus, a very brave man.
3. Strengthening Words. Vel and quam are often
used with the Superlative as strengthening particles, vel with the
force of 'very,' and quam with the force of 'as
possible'; as,—
vel maximus, the very greatest;
quam maximae cōpiae, as great forces as
possible.
4. Phrases of the type 'more rich than brave' regularly take
the Comparative in both members; as,—
exercitus erat dītior quam fortior, the army was more
rich than brave.
241. 1. Certain Adjectives may be used to
denote a part of an object, chiefly prīmus,
extrēmus, summus, medius, īnfimus,
īmus; as,—
summus mōns, the top of the mountain;
extrēmā hieme, in the last part of the
winter.
2. Prior, prīmus, ultimus, and
postrēmus are frequently equivalent to a relative clause;
as,—
prīmus eam vīdī, I was the first who saw
her;
ultimus dēcessit, he was the last who withdrew.
3. When multus and another adjective both limit the same noun
et is generally used; as,—
multae et magnae cōgitātiōnēs, many
(and) great thoughts.
242. 1. The Personal Pronouns as subjects
of verbs are, as a rule, not expressed except for the purpose of
emphasis, contrast, or clearness. Thus
ordinarily:—
videō, I see; amat, he loves.
But ego tē videō, et tū mē vidēs, I
see you, and you see me.
2. The Genitives meī, tuī, nostrī,
vestrī are used only as Objective Genitives; nostrum
and vestrum as Genitives of the Whole. Thus:—
memor tuī, mindful of you;
dēsīderium vestrī, longing for you;
nēmō vestrum, no one of you.
a. But nostrum and vestrum are regularly used in
the place of the Possessive in the phrases omnium nostrum,
omnium vestrum.
3. The First Plural is often used for the First Singular of Pronouns
and Verbs. Compare the Eng. editorial 'we.'
4. When two Verbs govern the same object, the Latin does not use a
pronoun with the second, as is the rule in English. Thus:—
virtūs amīcitiās conciliat et cōnservat,
virtue establishes friendships and maintains them (not eās
cōnservat).
243. 1. The Possessive Pronouns, as a
rule, are not employed except for the purpose of clearness.
Thus:—
patrem amō, I love my father;
dē fīliī morte flēbās, you wept for
the death of your son.
dē morte fīliī meī flēbās, you
wept for the death of my son.
a. When expressed merely for the sake of clearness, the
possessive usually stands after its noun; but in order to indicate
emphasis or contrast, it precedes; as,—
suā manū līberōs occīdit, with his
own hand he slew his children;
meā quidem sententiā, in my opinion at
least.
2. Sometimes the Possessive Pronouns are used with the force of an
Objective Genitive; as,—
metus vester, fear of you;
dēsīderium tuum, longing for you.
3. For special emphasis, the Latin employs ipsīus or
ipsōrum, in apposition with the Genitive idea implied in the
Possessive; as,—
meā ipsīus operā, by my own help;
nostrā ipsōrum operā, by our own
help.
a. So sometimes other Genitives; as,—
meā ūnīus operā, by the assistance of me
alone.
244. 1. The Reflexive Pronoun
sē and the Possessive Reflexive suus have a double
use:—
I. They may refer to the subject of the clause (either principal or
subordinate) in which they stand,—'Direct Reflexives';
as,—
sē amant, they love themselves;
suōs amīcōs adjuvāt, he helps his own
friends;
eum ōrāvī, ut sē servāret, I
besought him to save himself.
II. They may stand in a subordinate clause and refer to the subject of
the principal clause,—'Indirect Reflexives'; as,—
mē ōrāvit ut sē dēfenderem, he
besought me to defend him (lit. that I defend himself);
mē ōrāvērunt, ut fortūnārum
suārum dēfēnsiōnem susciperem, they besought
me to undertake the defense of their fortunes.
a. The Indirect Reflexive is mainly restricted to those clauses
which express the thought, not of the author, but of the subject of the
principal clause.
2. The Genitive suī is regularly employed, like
meī and tuī, as an Objective Genitive,
e.g. oblītus suī, forgetful of himself;
but it occasionally occurs—particularly in post-Augustan
writers—in place of the Possessive suus; as, fruitur
fāmā suī, he enjoys his own fame.
3. Sē and suus are sometimes used in the sense,
one's self, one's own, where the reference is not to any
particular person; as,—
sē amāre, to love one's self;
suum genium propitiāre, to propitiate one's own
genius.
4. Suus sometimes occurs in the meaning his own,
their own, etc., referring not to the subject but to an
oblique case; as,—
Hannibalem suī cīvēs ē cīvitāte
ējēcērunt, his own fellow-citizens drove out
Hannibal.
a. This usage is particularly frequent in combination with
quisque; as,—
suus quemque error vexat, his own error troubles
each.
5. The Reflexives for the first and second persons are supplied by the
oblique cases of ego and tū (§
85); as,—
vōs dēfenditis, you defend yourselves.
245. 1. The Latin has no special
reciprocal pronoun ('each other'), but expresses the reciprocal notion by
the phrases: inter nōs, inter vōs, inter
sē; as,—
Belgae obsidēs inter sē dedērunt, the Belgae
gave each other hostages (lit. among themselves);
amāmus inter nōs, we love each other;
Gallī inter sē cohortātī sunt, the Gauls
exhorted each other.
a. Note that the Object is not expressed in sentences of this
type.
246. 1. Where hīc and
ille are used in contrast, hīc usually refers to the
latter of two objects, and ille to the former.
2. Hīc and ille are often used in the sense of 'the
following'; as,—
Themistoclēs hīs verbīs epistulam mīsit,
Themistocles sent a letter (couched) in the following words;
illud intellegō, omnium ōra in mē conversa esse,
I understand this, that the faces of all are turned toward me.
3. Ille often means the famous; as, Solōn
ille, the famous Solon.
4. Iste frequently involves contempt; as, iste
homō, that fellow!
5. The above pronouns, along with is, are usually attracted to
the gender of a predicate noun; as, hīc est honor, meminisse
officium suum, this is an honor, to be mindful of one's
duty.
247. 1. Is often serves as the
antecedent of the relative quī. Thus:—
Maximum, eum quī Tarentum recēpit,
dīlēxī, I loved Maximus, the man who retook
Tarentum.
a. Closely akin to this usage is is in the sense of
such (= tālis); as,—
nōn sum is quī terrear, I am not such a person as
to be frightened.
b. Note the phrase id quod, where id stands in
apposition with an entire clause; as,—
nōn suspicābātur (id quod nunc sentiet) satis
multōs testēs nōbīs reliquōs esse, he did
not suspect (a thing which he will now perceive) that we had witnesses
enough left.
Yet quod alone, without preceding id,
sometimes occurs in this use.
2. Is also in all cases serves as the personal pronoun of the
third person, 'he,' 'she,' 'it,' 'they,'
'them.'
3. When the English uses 'that of,' 'those of,' to avoid
repetition of the noun, the Latin omits the pronoun: as,—
in exercitū Sullae et posteā in Crassī fuerat,
he had been in the army of Sulla and afterward in that of
Crassus;
nūllae mē fābulae dēlectant nisi
Plautī, no plays delight me except those of Plautus.
4. Note the phrases et is, et ea, etc., in the
sense: and that too; as,—
vincula, et ea sempiterna, imprisonment, and that too
permanently.
248. 1. Īdem in apposition
with the subject or object often has the force of also,
likewise; as,—
quod idem mihi contigit, which likewise happened to me
(lit. which, the same thing);
bonus vir, quem eundem sapientem appellāmus, a good
man, whom we call also wise.
For īdem atque (ac), the same as, see § 341, 1. c.
249. 1. Ipse, literally
self, acquires its special force from the context; as,—
eō ipsō diē, on that very day;
ad ipsam rīpam, close to the bank;
ipsō terrōre, by mere fright;
valvae sē ipsae aperuērunt, the doors opened of
their own accord;
ipse aderat, he was present in person.
2. The reflexive pronouns are often emphasized by the addition of
ipse, but ipse in such cases, instead of standing in apposition
with the reflexive, more commonly agrees with the subject; as,—
sēcum ipsī loquuntur, they talk with
themselves;
sē ipse continēre nōn potest, he cannot
contain himself
3. Ipse is also used as an Indirect Reflexive for the purpose
of marking a contrast or avoiding an ambiguity; as,—
Persae pertimuērunt nē Alcibiadēs ab ipsīs
dēscīsceret et cum suīs in grātiam redīret,
the Persians feared that Alcibiades would break with them and become
reconciled with his countrymen;
ea molestissimē ferre dēbent hominēs quae
ipsōrum culpā contrācta sunt, men ought to chafe
most over those things which have been brought about by their own
fault (as opposed to the fault of others).
250. Agreement. 1. The Relative Pronoun
agrees with its antecedent in Gender, Number, and Person, but its case is
determined by its construction in the clause in which it stands;
as,—
mulier quam vidēbāmus, the woman whom we
saw;
bona quibus fruimur, the blessings which we enjoy.
2. Where the antecedent is compound, the same principles for number
and gender prevail as in case of predicate adjectives under similar
conditions (see § 235, B, 2).
Thus:—
pater et fīlius, qui captī sunt, the father and
son who were captured;
stultitia et timiditās quae fugienda sunt, folly and
cowardice which must be shunned;
honōrēs et victōriae quae sunt fortuīta,
honors and victories, which are accidental.
3. The Relative regularly agrees with a predicate noun (either
Nominative or Accusative) instead of its antecedent; as,—
carcer, quae lautumiae vocantur, the prison, which is called
Lautumiae;
Belgae, quae est tertia pars, the Belgians, who are the
third part.
4. Sometimes the Relative takes its gender and number from the meaning
of its antecedent; as,—
pars quī bēstiīs objectī sunt, a part
(of the men) who were thrown to beasts.
5. Occasionally the Relative is attracted into the case of its
antecedent; as,—
nātus eō patre quō dīxī, born of
the father that I said.
251. Antecedent. 1. The antecedent of the
Relative is sometimes omitted; as,—
quī nātūram sequitur sapiēns est, he who
follows Nature is wise.
2. The antecedent may be implied in a possessive pronoun (or rarely an
adjective); as,—
nostra quī remānsimus caedēs, the slaughter
of us who remained;
servīlī tumultū, quōs ūsus ac
disciplīna sublevārunt, at the uprising of the slaves,
whom experience and discipline assisted (servīlī =
servōrum).
3. Sometimes the antecedent is repeated with the Relative;
as,—
erant itinera duo, quibus itineribus, there were two routes,
by which (routes).
4. Incorporation of Antecedent in Relative Clause. The antecedent is
often incorporated in the relative clause. Thus:—
a) When the relative clause stands first; as,—
quam quisque nōvit artem, in hāc sē exerceat,
let each one practice the branch which he knows.
b) When the antecedent is an appositive; as,—
nōn longē ā Tolōsātium fīnibus
absunt, quae cīvitās est in prōvinciā, they
are not far from the borders of the Tolosates, a state which is in our
province.
c) When the logical antecedent is a superlative; as,—
Themistoclēs dē servīs suīs, quem habuit
fidēlissimum, mīsit, Themistocles sent the most trusty
slave he had.
d) In expressions of the following type—
quā es prūdentiā; quae tua est prūdentia,
such is your prudence (lit. of which prudence you are; which is
your prudence).
5. The Relative is never omitted in Latin as it is in English. Thus
the boy I saw must be puer quem vīdī.
6. The Relative is used freely in Latin, particularly at the beginning
of a sentence, where in English we employ a demonstrative; as,—
quō factum est, by this it happened;
quae cum ita sint, since this is so;
quibus rēbus cognitīs, when these things became
known.
7. The Relative introducing a subordinate clause may belong
grammatically to a clause which is subordinate to the one it introduces;
as,—
numquam dignē satis laudārī philosophia poterit, cui
quī pāreat, omne tempus aetātis sine molestiā possit
dēgere, philosophy can never be praised enough, since he who
obeys her can pass every period of life without annoyance (lit. he
who obeys which, etc.).
Here cui introduces the subordinate clause possit and
connects it with philosophia; but cui is governed by
pāreat, which is subordinate to possit.
252. 1. Quis, any one, is
the weakest of the Indefinites, and stands usually in combination with
sī, nisi, nē, num; as,—
sī quis putat, if any one thinks.
2. Aliquis (adj. aliquī) is more definite than
quis, and corresponds usually to the English some one,
somebody, some; as,—
nunc aliquis dīcat mihī, now let somebody tell
me;
utinam modo agātur aliquid, oh that something may be
done.
3. Quīdam, a certain one, is still more definite
than aliquis; as,—
homō quīdam, a certain man (i.e.,
one whom I have in mind).
a. Quīdam (with or without quasi, as
if) is sometimes used in the sense: a sort of, kind of;
as,—
cognātiō quaedam, a sort of relationship;
mors est quasi quaedam migrātiō, death is a kind
of transfer as it were.
4. Quisquam, any one, any one whoever (more
general than quis), and its corresponding adjective
ūllus, any, occur mostly in negative and conditional
sentences, in interrogative sentences implying a negative, and in clauses
of comparison; as,—
jūstitia numquam nocet cuiquam, justice never harms
anybody;
sī quisquam, Catō sapiēns fuit, if anybody
was ever wise, Cato was;
potestne quisquam sine perturbātiōne animī
īrāscī, can anybody be angry without
excitement?
sī ūllō modō poterit, if it can be done
in any way;
taetrior hīc tyrannus fuit quam quisquam superiōrum,
he was a viler tyrant than any of his predecessors.
5. Quisque, each one, is used especially under the
following circumstances:—
a) In connection with suus. See §
244, 4, a.
b) In connection with a Relative or Interrogative Pronoun;
as,—
quod cuique obtigit, id teneat, what falls to each, that let
him hold.
c) In connection with superlatives; as,—
optimus quisque, all the best (lit. each best
one).
d) With ordinal numerals; as,—
quīntō quōque annō, every four years
(lit. each fifth year).
6. Nēmō, no one, in addition to its other
uses, stands regularly with adjectives used substantively; as,—
nēmō mortālis, no mortal;
nēmō Rōmānus, no Roman.
253. 1. Alius, another, and
alter, the other, are often used correlatively;
as,—
aliud loquitur, aliud sentit, he says one thing, he thinks
another;
aliī resistunt, aliī fugiunt, some resist, others
flee;
alter exercitum perdidit, alter vēndidit, one ruined
the army, the other sold it;
alterī sē in montem recēpērunt, alterī ad
impedīmenta sē contulērunt, the one party retreated
to the mountain, the others betook themselves to the baggage.
2. Where the English says one does one thing, another another,
the Latin uses a more condensed form of statement; as,—
alius aliud amat, one likes one thing, another
another;
aliud aliīs placet, one thing pleases some, another
others.
a. So sometimes with adverbs; as,—
aliī aliō fugiunt, some flee in one direction,
others in another.
3. The Latin also expresses the notion 'each other' by means of
alius repeated; as,—
Gallī alius alium cohortātī sunt, the Gauls
encouraged each other.
4. Cēterī means the rest, all the
others; as,—
cēterīs praestāre, to be superior to all the
others.
5. Reliquī means the others in the sense of the
rest, those remaining,—hence is the regular word with
numerals; as,—
reliquī sex, the six others.
6. Nescio quis forms a compound indefinite pronoun with the
force of some one or other; as,—
causidicus nescio quis, some pettifogger or other;
mīsit nescio quem, he sent some one or other;
nescio quō pactō, somehow or other.
254. 1. Agreement in Number and
Person. A Finite Verb agrees with its subject in Number and Person;
as,—
vōs vidētis, you see;
pater fīliōs īnstituit, the father trains his
sons.
2. Agreement in Gender. In the compound forms of the verb the
participle regularly agrees with its subject in gender; as,—
sēditiō repressa est, the mutiny was
checked.
3. But when a predicate noun is of different gender or number from its
subject, the verb usually agrees with its nearest substantive;
as,—
Tarquiniī māterna patria erat, Tarquinii was his
native country on his mother's side;
nōn omnis error stultitia est dīcenda, not every
error is to be called folly.
a. Less frequently the verb agrees with an appositive;
as,—
Coriolī, oppidum Volscōrum, captum est, Corioli, a
town of the Volsci, was captured.
4. Construction according to Sense. Sometimes the verb agrees
with its subject according to sense instead of strict grammatical form.
Thus:—
multitūdō hominum convēnerant, a crowd of men
had gathered.
duo mīlia crucibus adfīxī sunt, two thousand
(men) were crucified.
255. 1. Agreement in Number. With
two or more subjects the verb is regularly plural; as,—
pater et fīlius mortuī sunt, the father and son
died.
2. But sometimes the verb agrees with the nearest subject;
viz.,—
a) When the verb precedes both subjects or stands between them;
as,—
mortuus est pater et fīlius;
pater mortuus est et fīlius.
b) When the subjects are connected by aut; aut ...
aut; vel ... vel; neque ... neque; as,—
neque pater neque fīlius mortuus est, neither father
nor son died.
3. When the different subjects are felt together as constituting a
whole, the singular is used; as,—
temeritās ignōrātiōque vitiōsa est,
rashness and ignorance are bad.
a. This is regularly the case in senātus populusque
Rōmānus.
4. Agreement in Person. With compound subjects of different
persons the verb always takes the first person rather than the
second, and the second rather than the third;
as,—
sī tū et Tullia valētis, ego et Cicerō
valēmus, if you and Tullia are well, Cicero and I are
well.
5. Agreement in Gender. With subjects of different genders the
participle in the compound tenses follows the same principles as laid
down for predicate adjectives. See § 235,
B, 2.
256. 1. The Passive Voice sometimes
retains traces of its original middle or reflexive meaning;
as,—
ego nōn patiar eum dēfendī, I shall not allow
him to defend himself.
2. In imitation of Greek usage many perfect passive participles are
used by the poets as indirect middles, i.e. the subject is viewed
as acting not upon itself, but as doing something in his own
interest; as,—
vēlātus tempora, having veiled his
temples.
a. Occasionally finite forms of the verb are thus used;
as,—
tunicā indūcitur artūs, he covers his limbs
with a tunic.
3. Intransitive Verbs may be used impersonally in the passive;
as,—
curritur, people run (lit. it is run);
ventum est, he (they, etc.) came
(lit. it was come).
TENSES OF THE INDICATIVE.
257. 1. The Latin tenses express two
distinct notions:—
a) The period of time to which the action belongs:
Present, Past, or Future.
b) The kind of action: Undefined, Going on, or
Completed.
The Latin with its six tenses is able to express each of the three
kinds of action for each of the three periods of time (making practically
nine tenses). It does this by employing certain tenses in more than one
way, as may be seen by the following table:—
|
KIND OF ACTION.
|
PERIOD OF TIME.
|
|
|
PRESENT.
|
PAST.
|
FUTURE.
|
|
UNDEFINED
|
Present: scrībō, I
write.
|
Historical Perfect: scrīpsī, I
wrote.
|
Future: scrībam, I shall
write.
|
|
GOING ON.
|
Present: scrībō, I am
writing.
|
Imperfect: scrībēbam, I was
writing.
|
Future: scrībam, I shall be
writing.
|
|
COMPLETED.
|
Present Perfect: scrīpsī, I have
written.
|
Pluperfect: scrīpseram, I had
written.
|
Future Perfect: scrīpserō, I shall have
written.
|
2. It will be seen that the Present may express Undefined action or
action Going on; so also the Future. The Perfect likewise has a double
use, according as it denotes action Completed in present time (Present
Perfect) or Undefined action belonging to past time (Historical
Perfect).
258. Tenses which denote Present or
Future time are called Principal (or Primary) Tenses, those which
denote Past time are called Historical (or Secondary).
The Principal Tenses of the Indicative are: Present, Future, Present
Perfect, Future Perfect.
The Historical Tenses are: Imperfect, Historical Perfect,
Pluperfect.
259. Besides the two uses indicated in
the table, the Present Indicative presents the following
peculiarities:—
1. It is used to denote a general truth, i.e. something
true not merely in the present but at all times ('Gnomic Present');
as,—
virtūs conciliat amīcitiās et cōnservat,
virtue establishes ties of friendship and maintains them
(i.e. always does so).
2. It is used of an attempted action ('Conative Present');
as,—
dum vītant vitia, in contrāria currunt, while they
try to avoid (vītant) vices, they rush into opposite
ones.
3. In lively narration the Present is often used of a past action
('Historical Present'); as,—
Caesar imperat magnum numerum obsidum, Caesar demanded a
large number of hostages (lit. demands).
4. In combination with jam, jam diū, jam
prīdem, and similar words, the Present is frequently used of an
action originating in the past and continuing in the present;
as,—
jam prīdem cupiō tē vīsere, I have long
been desiring to visit you (i.e. I desire and have long
desired).
260. 1. The Imperfect primarily denotes
action going on in past time; as,—
librum legēbam, I was reading a book.
a. This force makes the Imperfect especially adapted to serve
as the tense of description (as opposed to mere
narration).
2. From the notion of action going on, there easily develops
the notion of repeated or customary action; as,—
lēgātōs interrogābat, he kept asking the
envoys;
C. Duīlium vidēbam puer, as a boy I often used to
see Gaius Duilius.
3. The Imperfect often denotes an attempted action ('Conative
Imperfect') or an action as beginning ('Inceptive Imperfect');
as,—
hostēs nostrōs intrā mūnītiōnēs
prōgredī prohibēbant, the enemy tried to
prevent (prohibēbant) our men from advancing within
the fortifications ('Conative');
ad proelium sē expediēbant, they were beginning to
get ready for battle ('Inceptive').
4. The Imperfect, with jam, jam diū, jam
dūdum, etc., is sometimes used of an action which had
been continuing some time; as,—
domicilium Rōmae multōs jam annōs habēbat,
he had had his residence at Rome for many years (i.e. he
had it at this time and had long had it).
261. 1. The Latin is much more exact in
the use of the Future than is the English. We say: 'If he comes, I
shall be glad,' where we really mean: 'If he shall come,'
etc. In such cases the Latin rarely admits the Present, but
generally employs the Future.
2. Sometimes the Future has Imperative force; as,
dīcēs, say!
262. A. PRESENT PERFECT. Several Present
Perfects denote the state resulting from a completed act, and so
seem equivalent to the Present; as,—
nōvī, cognōvī, I know (lit.
I have become acquainted with);
cōnsuēvī, I am wont (lit. I have
become accustomed).
B. HISTORICAL PERFECT. The Historical Perfect is the tense of
narration (as opposed to the Imperfect, the tense of
description); as,—
Rēgulus in senātum vēnit, mandāta exposuit,
reddī captivōs negāvit esse ūtile, Regulus
came into the Senate, set forth his commission, said it was useless for
captives to be returned.
1. Occasionally the Historical Perfect is used of a general truth
('Gnomic Perfect').
263. The Latin Pluperfect, like the
English Past Perfect, denotes an act completed in the past;
as,—
Caesar Rhēnum trānsīre dēcrēverat, sed
nāvēs deerant, Caesar had decided to cross the Rhine,
but had no boats.
a. In those verbs whose Perfect has Present force (§ 262, A), the Pluperfect has the force of an
Imperfect; as,—
264. The Future Perfect denotes an action
completed in future time. Thus:—
scrībam epistulam, cum redieris, I will write the
letter when you have returned (lit. when you shall have
returned).
a. The Latin is much more exact in the use of the Future
Perfect than the English, which commonly employs the Present Perfect
instead of the Future Perfect.
b. In those verbs whose Perfect has Present force (§ 262, A) the Future Perfect has the force of
a Future; as,—
265. In letters the writer often uses
tenses which are not appropriate at the time of writing, but which will
be so at the time when his letter is received; he thus employs the
Imperfect and the Perfect for the Present, and the Pluperfect for the
Present Perfect; as,—
nihil habēbam quod scrīberem, neque enim novī
quidquam audieram et ad tuās omnēs epistulās jam
rescrīpseram, I have nothing to write, for I have heard no
news and have already answered all your letters.
TENSES OF THE SUBJUNCTIVE.
266. A. In Independent
sentences. See §§ 272-280.
B. In Dependent Sentences. In dependent sentences the
tenses of the subjunctive usually conform to the so-called
267. 1. In the Subjunctive the Present
and Perfect are Principal tenses, the Imperfect and Pluperfect,
Historical.
2. By the Sequence of Tenses Principal tenses are followed by
Principal, Historical by Historical. Thus:—
PRINCIPAL SEQUENCE,—
videō quid faciās, I see what you are
doing.
vidēbō quid faciās, I shall see what you are
doing.
vīderō quid faciās, I shall have seen what
you are doing.
videō quid fēcerīs, I see what you have
done.
vidēbō quid fēcerīs, I shall see what
you have done.
vīderō quid fēcerīs, I shall have seen
what you have done.
HISTORICAL SEQUENCE,—
vidēbam quid facerēs, I saw what you were
doing.
vīdī quid facerēs, I saw what you were
doing.
vīderam quid facerēs, I had seen what you were
doing.
vidēbam quid fēcissēs, I saw what you had
done.
vīdī quid fēcissēs, I saw what you had
done.
vīderam quid fēcissēs, I had seen what you
had done.
3. The Present and Imperfect Subjunctive denote incomplete action, the
Perfect and Pluperfect completed action, exactly as in the
Indicative.
268. 1. The Perfect Indicative is usually
an historical tense (even when translated in English as a Present
Perfect), and so is followed by the Imperfect and Pluperfect Subjunctive;
as,—
dēmōnstrāvī quārē ad causam
accēderem, I have shown why I took the case (lit. I
showed why, etc.).
2. A dependent Perfect Infinitive is treated as an historical tense
wherever, if resolved into an equivalent Indicative, it would be
historical; as,—
videor ostendisse quālēs deī essent, I seem
to have shown of what nature the gods are (ostendisse here
corresponds to an Indicative, ostendī, I showed).
3. The Historical Present is sometimes regarded as a principal tense,
sometimes as historical. Thus:—
Sulla suōs hortātur ut fortī animō sint,
Sulla exhorts his soldiers to be stout-hearted;
Gallōs hortātur ut arma caperent, he exhorted the
Gauls to take arms.
4. Conditional sentences of the 'contrary-to-fact' type are not
affected by the principles for the Sequence of Tenses; as,—
honestum tāle est ut, vel sī ignōrārent id
hominēs, suā tamen pulchritūdine laudabīle esset,
virtue is such a thing that even if men were ignorant of it, it would
still be worthy of praise for its own loveliness.
5. In conditional sentences of the 'contrary-to-fact' type the
Imperfect Subjunctive is usually treated as an Historical tense;
as,—
sī sōlōs eōs dīcerēs miserōs,
quibus moriendum esset, nēminem tū quidem eōrum quī
vīverent exciperēs, if you called only those wretched
who must die, you would except no one of those who live.
6. In clauses of Result and some others, the Perfect Subjunctive is
sometimes used as an historical tense. Thus:—
rēx tantum mōtus est, ut Tissaphernem hostem
jūdicārit, the king was so much moved that he adjudged
Tissaphernes an enemy.
This construction is rare in Cicero, but frequent in Nepos and
subsequent historians. The Perfect Subjunctive in this use represents a
result simply as a fact without reference to the continuance of the
act, and therefore corresponds to an Historical Perfect Indicative of
direct statement. Thus, jūdicārit in the above example
corresponds to adjūdicāvit, he adjudged. To
denote a result as something continuous, all writers use the
Imperfect Subjunctive after historical tenses.
7. Sometimes perspicuity demands that the ordinary principles of
Sequence be abandoned altogether. Thus:
a) We may have the Present or Perfect Subjunctive after an
historical tense; as,—
Verrēs Siciliam ita perdidit ut ea restituī nōn
possit, Verres so ruined Sicily that it cannot be restored
(Direct statement: nōn potest restitui);
ārdēbat Hortēnsius dīcendī cupiditāte
sīc, ut in nūllō flagrantius studium vīderim,
Hortensius burned so with eagerness to speak that I have seen in no
one a greater desire (Direct statement: in nūllō
vīdī, I have seen in no one).
NOTE.—This usage is different from that
cited under 6. Here, by neglect of Sequence, the Perfect is used, though
a principal tense; there the Perfect was used as an historical tense.
b) We may have a principal tense followed by the Perfect
Subjunctive used historically; as,—
nesciō quid causae fuerit cūr nūllās ad mē
litterās darēs, I do not know what reason there was why
you did not send me a letter.
Here fuerit is historical, as is shown by the
following Imperfect Subjunctive.
269. The Future and Future Perfect, which
are lacking to the Latin Subjunctive, are supplied in subordinate clauses
as follows:—
1.
a) The Future is supplied by the
Present after principal tenses, by the Imperfect after historical
tenses.
b) The Future Perfect is supplied by the Perfect after
principal tenses, by the Pluperfect after historical tenses.
This is especially frequent when the context clearly shows, by the
presence of a future tense in the main clause, that the reference is to
future time. Thus:—
Gallī pollicentur sē factūrōs, quae Caesar
imperet, the Gauls promise they will do what Caesar shall
order;
Gallī pollicēbantur sē factūrōs, quae
Caesar imperāret, the Gauls promised they would do what
Caesar should order;
Gallī pollicentur sē factūrōs quae Caesar
imperāverit, the Gauls promise they will do what Caesar shall
have ordered;
Gallī pollicēbantur sē factūrōs quae
Caesar imperāvisset, the Gauls promised they would do what
Caesar should have ordered.
2. Even where the context does not contain a Future tense in the main
clause, Future time is often expressed in the subordinate clauses by the
Present and Imperfect Subjunctive. Thus:—
timeō nē veniat, I am afraid he will come;
Caesar exspectābat quid cōnsilī hostēs
caperent, Caesar was waiting to see what plan the enemy would
adopt.
3. Where greater definiteness is necessary, the periphrastic forms in
-ūrus sim and -ūrus essem are employed,
especially in clauses of Result, Indirect Questions, and after
nōn dubitō quīn; as,—
nōn dubitō quīn pater ventūrus sit, I do
not doubt that my father will come;
nōn dubitābam quīn pater ventūrus esset,
I did not doubt that my father would come.
4. Where the verb has no Future Active Participle, or where it stands
in the passive voice, its Future character may be indicated by the use of
the particles mox, brevī, statim, etc.,
in connection with the Present and Imperfect Subjunctive; as,—
nōn dubitō quīn tē mox hūjus reī
paeniteat, I do not doubt that you will soon repent of this
thing;
nōn dubitābam quīn haec rēs brevī
cōnficerētur, I did not doubt that this thing would soon
be fnished.
TENSES OF THE INFINITIVE.
270. 1. The tenses of the Infinitive
denote time not absolutely, but with reference to the verb on which
they depend. Thus:—
a) The Present Infinitive represents an act as
contemporaneous with the time of the verb on which it depends;
as,—
vidētur honōrēs adsequī, he seems to be
gaining honors;
vidēbātur honōrēs adsequī, he
seemed to be gaining honors.
b) The Perfect Infinitive represents an act as prior to
the time of the verb on which it depends; as,—
vidētur honōrēs adsecūtus esse, he seems
to have gained honors;
vīsus est honōrēs adsecūtus esse, he
seemed to have gained honors.
c) The Future Infinitive represents an act as subsequent
to that of the verb on which it depends; as,—
vidētur honōrēs adsecūtūrus esse,
he seems to be about to gain honors;
vīsus est honōrēs adsecūtūrus esse,
he seemed to be about to gain honors.
2. Where the English says 'ought to have done,' 'might have
done,' etc., the Latin uses dēbuī,
oportuit, potuī (dēbēbam,
oportēbat, poteram), with the Present Infinitive;
as,—
dēbuit dīcere, he ought to have said (lit.
owed it to say);
opōrtuit venīre, he ought to have come;
potuit vidēre, he might have seen.
a. Oportuit, volō, nōlō
(and in poetry some other verbs), may take a Perfect Infinitive instead
of the Present; as,—
hōc jam prīdem factum esse oportuit, this ought
long ago to have been done.
3. PERIPHRASTIC FUTURE
INFINITIVE. Verbs that have no Participial Stem,
express the Future Infinitive Active and Passive by fore ut or
futūrum esse ut, with the Subjunctive; as,—
spērō fore ut tē paeniteat levitātis, I
hope you will repent of your fickleness (lit. hope it will happen
that you repent);
spērō futūrum esse ut hostēs arceantur,
I hope that the enemy will be kept off.
a. The Periphrastic Future Infinitive is often used, especially
in the Passive, even in case of verbs which have the Participial Stem;
as,—
spērō fore ut hostēs vincantur, I hope the
enemy will be conquered.
4. Passives and Deponents sometimes form a Future Perfect Infinitive
with fore; as,—
spērō epistulam scrīptam fore, I hope the
letter will have been written;
dīcō mē satis adeptum fore, I say that I
shall have gained enough.
MOODS IN INDEPENDENT SENTENCES.
271. The Indicative is used for the
statement of facts, the supposition of facts, or inquiry
after facts.
1. Note the following idiomatic uses:—
possum multa dīcere, I might say much;
poteram multa dīcere, I might have said much (§ 270, 2).
b) In such expressions as longum est, aequum est,
melius est, difficile est, ūtilius est, and
some others; as,—
longum est ea dīcere, it would be tedious to tell
that;
difficile est omnia persequī, it would be difficult to
enumerate everything.
272. The Subjunctive is used in
Independent Sentences to express something—
1. As willed—Volitive Subjunctive;
2. As desired—Optative Subjunctive;
3. Conceived of as possible—Potential Subjunctive.
VOLITIVE SUBJUNCTIVE.
273. The Volitive Subjunctive represents
the action as willed. It always implies authority on the part of
the speaker, and has the following varieties:—
A. HORTATORY SUBJUNCTIVE.
274. The Hortatory Subjunctive expresses
an exhortation. This use is confined to the first person plural of
the Present. The negative is nē. Thus:—
eāmus, let us go;
amēmus patriam, let us love our country;
nē dēspērēmus, let us not
despair.
B. JUSSIVE SUBJUNCTIVE.
275. The Jussive Subjunctive expresses a
command. The Jussive stands regularly in the Present Tense, and is
used—
1. Most frequently in the third singular and the third plural;
as,—
dīcat, let him tell;
dīcant, let them tell;
quārē sēcēdant improbī, wherefore
let the wicked depart!
2. Less frequently in the second person, often with indefinite force;
as,—
istō bonō ūtāre, use that
advantage;
modestē vīvās, live temperately.
C. PROHIBITIVE SUBJUNCTIVE.
276. The Subjunctive is used in the
second and third persons singular and plural, with nē, to
express a prohibition. Both Present and Perfect occur, and without
appreciable difference of meaning; as,—
nē repugnētis, do not resist!
tū vērō istam nē relīquerīs,
don't leave her!
impiī nē plācāre audeant deōs, let
not the impious dare to appease the gods!
a. Neither of these constructions is frequent in classical
prose.
b. A commoner method of expressing a prohibition in the second
person is by the use of nōlī (nōlīte)
with a following infinitive, or by cavē or cavē
nē with the Subjunctive; as,—
nōlī hōc facere, don't do this (lit.
be unwilling to do)!
nōlīte mentīrī, do not lie!
cavē ignōscās, cavē tē misereat, do
not forgive, do not pity!
cavē nē haec faciās, do not do this (lit.
take care lest you do)!
D. DELIBERATIVE SUBJUNCTIVE.
277. The Deliberative Subjunctive is used
in questions and exclamations implying doubt, indignation, the
impossibility of an act, obligation, or propriety. The Present is
used referring to present time, the Imperfect referring to past. The
negative is nōn. Thus:—
quid faciam, what shall I do?
ego redeam, I go back!
huic cēdāmus! hūjus condiciōnēs
audiāmus! are we to bow to him! are we to listen to his
terms!
quid facerem, what was I to do?
hunc ego nōn dīligam, should I not cherish this
man?
a. These Deliberative Questions are usually purely Rhetorical
in character, and do not expect an answer.
E. CONCESSIVE SUBJUNCTIVE.
278. The Subjunctive is used to indicate
something as granted or conceded for the sake of argument. The
Present is used for present time, the Perfect regularly for past. The
negative is nē. Thus:—
sit hōc vērum, I grant that this is true (lit.
let this be true);
nē sint in senectūte vīrēs, I grant
there is not strength in old age;
fuerit malus cīvis aliīs; tibi quandō esse
coepit, I grant that he was a bad citizen to others; when did he
begin to be so toward you?
OPTATIVE SUBJUNCTIVE.
279. The Optative Subjunctive occurs in
expressions of wishing. The negative is regularly
nē.
1. The Present Tense, often accompanied by utinam, is used
where the wish is conceived of as possible.
dī istaec prohibeant, may the gods prevent
that!
falsus utinam vātēs sim, oh that I may be a false
prophet!
nē veniant, may they not come!
2. The Imperfect expresses, in the form of a wish, the regret that
something is not so now; the Pluperfect that something was not so
in the past. The Imperfect and Pluperfect are regularly accompanied
by utinam; as,—
utinam istud ex animō dīcerēs, would that you
were saying that in earnest (i.e. I regret that you are not
saying it in earnest);
Pēlīdēs utinam vītāsset Apollinis
arcūs, would that Achilles had escaped the bow of
Apollo;
utinam nē nātus essem, would that I had not been
born.
POTENTIAL SUBJUNCTIVE.
280. The Potential Subjunctive expresses
a possibility. The negative is nōn. The following uses
are to be noted:—
1. The 'May' Potential.—The Potential Subjunctive may
designate a mere possibility (English auxiliary may). Both
Present and Perfect occur, and without appreciable difference of meaning.
Thus:—
dīcat aliquis, some one may say;
dīxerit aliquis, some one may say.
a. This construction is by no means frequent, and is confined
mainly to a few phrases like those given as examples.
2. 'Should'-'Would' Potential.—The Potential Subjunctive
may represent something as depending upon a condition expressed or
understood (English auxiliary should, would). Both
Present and Perfect occur, and without appreciable difference of meaning.
Thus:—
fortūnam citius reperiās quam retineās, one
would more quickly find Fortune than keep it (i.e. if one
should make the trial);
crēdiderim, I should believe.
a. Here belongs the use of velim, mālim,
nōlim, as softened forms of statement for volō,
mālō, nōlō. Thus:—
velim mihi ignōscās, I wish you would forgive
me;
nōlim putēs mē jocārī, I don't want
you to think I'm joking.
b. When the condition is expressed, we get one of the regular
types of Conditional Sentences (see § 303);
as,—
diēs dēficiat, sī cōner ēnumerāre
causās, time would fail if I should attempt to enumerate the
reasons.
3. 'Can'-'Could' Potential.—In the Present and Imperfect
the Potential occurs in the second person singular (with
indefinite force; § 356, 3) of a few verbs
of perceiving, seeing, thinking, and the like;
as,—
videās, cernās, one can see, one can
perceive;
crēderēs, one could believe;
vidērēs, cernerēs, one could see,
perceive;
putārēs, one could imagine.
4. The Imperfect and Pluperfect in the Apodosis of conditional
sentences of the contrary-to-fact type (see § 304)
are also Potential in character. By omission of the Protasis, such an
Apodosis sometimes stands alone, particularly vellem,
nōllem, māllem; as,—
vellem id quidem, I should wish that (i.e. were I
bold enough).
281. The Imperative is used in
commands, admonitions and entreaties (negative
nē), as,—
ēgredere ex urbe, depart from the city;
mihi ignōsce, pardon me;
valē, farewell.
1. The Present is the tense of the Imperative most commonly used, but
the Future is employed—
a) Where there is a distinct reference to future time,
especially in the apodosis of conditional sentences; as,—
rem vōbīs prōpōnam; vōs eam
penditōte, I will lay the matter before you; do you (then)
consider it;
sī bene disputābit, tribuitō litterīs
Graecis, if he shall speak well, attribute it to Greek
literature.
b) In laws, treaties, wills, maxims, etc.;
as,—
cōnsulēs summum jūs habentō, the consuls
shall have supreme power;
hominem mortuom in urbe nē sepelītō, no one
shall bury a dead body in the city;
amīcitia rēgī Antiochō cum populō
Rōmānō hīs legibus et condiciōnibus
estō, let there be friendship between Antiochus and the Roman
people on the following terms and conditions;
quārtae estō partis Mārcus hērēs,
let Marcus be heir to a fourth (of the property);
ignōscitō saepe alterī, numquam tibi, forgive
your neighbor often, yourself never.
2. Except with the Future Imperative the negative is not used in
classical prose. Prohibitions are regularly expressed in other ways. See
§ 276, b.
3. Questions in the Indicative introduced by quīn (why
not?) are often equivalent to an Imperative or to the Hortatory
Subjunctive; as,—
quīn abīs, go away! (lit. why don't you go
away?);
quīn vōcem continētis, keep still! (lit.
why don't you stop your voices?);
quīn equōs cōnscendimus, let us mount our
horses (lit. why do we not mount our horses?)
MOODS IN DEPENDENT CLAUSES.
282. 1. Clauses of Purpose are introduced
most commonly by ut (utī), quō (that, in order
that), nē (in order that not, lest), and stand in
the Subjunctive, as,—
edimus ut vīvāmus, we eat that we may
live;
adjūtā mē quō hōc fīat facilius,
help me, in order that this may be done more easily;
portās clausit, nē quam oppidānī injūriam
acciperent, he closed the gates, lest the townspeople should
receive any injury.
a. Quō, as a rule, is employed only when the
purpose clause contains a comparative or a comparative idea. Occasional
exceptions occur; as,—
haec faciunt quō Chremētem absterreant, they are
doing this in order to frighten Chremes.
b. Ut nē is sometimes found instead of
nē. Thus:—
ut nē quid neglegenter agāmus, in order that we
may not do anything carelessly.
c. Ut nōn (not nē) is used where the
negation belongs to some single word, instead of to the purpose clause as
a whole. Thus:—
ut nōn ējectus ad aliēnōs, sed
invītātus ad tuōs videāre, that you may seem
not driven out among strangers, but invited to your own friends.
d. To say 'and that not' or 'or that not,' the
Latin regularly uses nēve (neu); as,—
ut eārum rērum vīs minuerētur, neu pontī
nocērent, that the violence of these things might be
lessened, and that they might not harm the bridge;
profūgit, nē caperētur nēve
interficerētur, he fled, that he might not be captured or
killed.
e. But neque (for nēve) is sometimes used in
a second Purpose Clause when ut stands in the first, and, after
the Augustan era, even when the first clause is introduced by
nē.
f. Purpose Clauses sometimes stand in apposition with a
preceding noun or pronoun: as,—
hāc causā, ut pācem habērent, on this
account, that they might have peace.
2. A Relative Pronoun (quī) or Adverb (ubi,
unde, quō) is frequently used to introduce a Purpose
Clause; as,—
Helvētiī lēgātōs mittunt, quī
dīcerent, the Helvetii sent envoys to say (lit. who
should say);
haec habuī, dē senectūte quae dīcerem, I
had these things to say about old age;
nōn habēbant quō sē reciperent, they had
no place to which to flee (lit. whither they might flee).
a. Quī in such clauses is equivalent to ut
is, ut ego, etc.; ubi to ut ibi;
unde to ut inde; quō to ut eō.
3. Relative Clauses of purpose follow dignus, indignus,
and idōneus; as,—
idōneus fuit nēmō quem imitārēre,
there was no one suitable for you to imitate (cf.
nēmō fuit quem imitārēre, there was no one
for you to imitate);
dignus est quī aliquandō imperet, he is worthy to
rule sometime.
4. Purpose Clauses often depend upon something to be supplied from the
context instead of upon the principal verb of their own sentences;
as,—
ut haec omnia omittam, abiimus, to pass over all this,
(I will say that) we departed.
283. 1. A relative clause used to
express a quality or characteristic of a general or indefinite
antecedent is called a Clause of Characteristic, and usually stands
in the Subjunctive; as,—
multa sunt, quae mentem acuant, there are many things which
sharpen the wits.
Clauses of Characteristic are opposed to those relative clauses which
are used merely to state some fact about a definite antecedent, and which
therefore take the Indicative; as,—
Catō, senex jūcundus, quī Sapiēns
appellātus est, Cato, a delightful old man, who was called
'The Wise.'
The Clause of Characteristic implies 'a person of the sort that
does something'; the Indicative relative clause implies 'a
particular person who does something.'
2. Clauses of Characteristic are used especially after such
expressions as, est quī; sunt quī;
nēmō est quī; nūllus est quī;
ūnus est quī; sōlus est quī; quis
est quī; is quī; etc. Thus:—
sunt quī dīcant, there are (some) who say;
nēmō est quī nesciat, there is nobody who is
ignorant;
sapientia est ūna quae maestitiam pellat, philosophy is
the only thing that drives away sorrow;
quae cīvitās est quae nōn ēvertī
possit, what state is there that cannot be overthrown?
nōn is sum quī improbōs laudem, I am not the
sort of man that praises the wicked.
a. Sometimes (very rarely in Cicero and Caesar) the clause of
characteristic is used after comparatives; as,—
nōn longius hostēs aberant quam quō tēlum
adigī posset, the enemy were not too far off for a dart to
reach them (lit. further off than [a point] to which a dart could
be cast).
3. The Clause of Characteristic often conveys an accessory notion of
cause (since) or opposition (although). Thus:—
a) Cause. The relative is then frequently accompanied by
ut, quīppe, utpote; as,—
ō fortūnāte adulēscēns, quī tuae
virtūtis Homērum praecōnem invēnerīs, O
fortunate man, since you have found a Homer as the herald of your
valor;
ut quī optimō jūre eam prōvinciam
obtinuerit, since he held that province by excellent
right.
egomet quī sērō Graecās litterās
attigissem, tamen complūrēs diēs Athēnīs
commorātus sum, I, although I had taken up Greek literature
late in life, nevertheless tarried several days at Athens.
4. Clauses of Characteristic may also be introduced by quīn =
quī (quae, quod) nōn; as,—
nēmō est quīn saepe audierit, there is no one
who has not often heard;
nēmō fuit mīlitum quīn
vulnerārētur, there was no one of the soldiers who was
not wounded.
5. Related to Clauses of Characteristic are also phrases of the
type:
quod sciam, so far as I know; quem (quam,
quod), audierim, so far as I have heard.
284. 1. Clauses of Result are usually
introduced by ut (that, so that), negative ut
nōn (so that not), and take the Subjunctive. The main
clause often contains tantus, tālis, tot,
is (= tālis), tam, ita, sīc,
adeō, or some similar word. Thus:—
quis tam dēmēns est ut suā voluntāte
maereat, who is so senseless as to mourn of his own
volition?
Siciliam ita vāstāvit ut restituī in antīquum
statum nōn possit, he so ravaged Sicily that it cannot be
restored to its former condition;
mōns altissimus impendēbat, ut facile perpaucī
prohibēre possent, a very high mountain overhung, so that a
very few could easily stop them;
nōn is es ut tē pudor umquam ā turpitūdine
āvocārit, you are not so constituted that shame ever
called you back from baseness.
2. A Result Clause is often introduced by a Relative Pronoun or
Adverb, quī (= ut is), quō (= ut
eō), etc.; as,—
nēmō est tam senex quī sē annum nōn putet
posse vīvere, nobody is so old as not to think he can live a
year;
habētis eum cōnsulem quī pārēre
vestrīs dēcrētīs nōn dubitet, you have a
consul such as does not hesitate to obey your decrees.
a. These Relative Clauses of Result are closely related to the
Clause of Characteristic, and sometimes it is difficult to distinguish
the two constructions. It is best to class the relative clause as one of
Characteristic, unless the result idea is clear and unmistakable.
3. Result clauses may also be introduced by quīn = ut
nōn; as,—
nihil tam difficile est quīn quaerendō
invēstīgārī possit, nothing is so difficult
that it cannot be discovered by searching;
nēmō est tam fortis quīn reī novitāte
perturbētur, no one is so steadfast as not to be thrown into
confusion by a strange occurrence.
4. Note the use of quam ut (sometimes quam alone) to
denote Result after comparatives; as,—
urbs erat mūnītior quam ut prīmō impetū
capī posset, the city was too strongly fortified to be taken
at the first attack (lit. more strongly fortified than [so] that
it could be taken, etc.).
285. Causal clauses are introduced
chiefly by the following particles:—
1. Quod, quia, quoniam.
2. Cum.
3. Quandō.
286. The use of moods is as
follows:—
1. Quod, quia, quoniam take the Indicative when
the reason is that of the writer or speaker; they take the
Subjunctive when the reason is viewed as that of another.
Thus:—
Parthōs timeō quod diffīdō cōpiīs
nostrīs, I fear the Parthians, because I distrust our
troops.
Themistoclēs, quia nōn tūtus erat, Corcyram
dēmigrāvit, Themistocles, since he was not safe, moved
to Corcyra.
neque mē vīxisse paenitet, quoniam bene
vīxī, I do not regret having lived, since I have lived
well.
Sōcratēs accūsātus est quod corrumperet
juventūtem, Socrates was arraigned on the ground that he was
corrupting the young. (Here the reason is not that of the writer but
of the accuser. Hence the Subjunctive.)
Haeduī Caesarī grātiās ēgērunt quod
sē perīculō līberāvisset, the Haedui
thanked Caesar because he had delivered them from danger. (The reason
of the Haedui.)
quoniam Miltiadēs dīcere nōn posset, verba prō
eō fēcit Tīsagorās, since Miltiades could not
speak, Tisagoras spoke for him. (The reason of Tisagoras.)
noctū ambulābat Themistoclēs, quod somnum capere
nōn posset, Themistocles used to walk at night because (as he
said) he couldn't sleep.
a. Verbs of thinking and saying often stand in
the Subjunctive in causal clauses as though the act of thinking or
saying, and not the contents of the thought or language, constituted the
reason. Thus:—
Bellovacī suum numerum nōn complēvērunt quod
sē suō nōmine cum Rōmānīs bellum
gestūrōs dīcerent, the Bellovaci did not furnish
their complement, because they said they were going to wage war with the
Romans on their own account.
b. Nōn quod, nōn quō (by
attraction for nōn eō quod), nōn quia,
not that, not because; and nōn quod nōn,
nōn quō nōn, nōn quīn, not that
... not; not because ... not; not but that, are usually
employed merely to introduce a hypothetical reason, and hence take the
Subjunctive; as,—
id fēcī, nōn quod vōs hanc
dēfēnsiōnem dēsīderāre arbitrārer, sed
ut omnēs intellegerent, this I did, not because I thought you
needed this defense, but that all might perceive;
Crassō commendātiōnem nōn sum pollicitus,
nōn quīn eam valitūram apud tē arbitrārer, sed
egēre mihi commendātiōne nōn vidēbātur,
I did not promise a recommendation to Crassus, not that I did not
think it would have weight with you, but because he did not seem to me to
need recommendation.
c. But clauses introduced by nōn quod, nōn
quīa take the Indicative if they state a fact, even
though that fact is denied to be the reason for something; as,—
hōc ita sentiō, nōn quia sum ipse augur, sed quia
sīc exīstimāre nōs est necesse, this I think,
not because I am myself an augur (which I really am), but because it is
necessary for us to think so.
2. Cum causal regularly takes the Subjunctive; as,—
quae cum īta sint, since this is so;
cum sīs mortālis, quae mortālia sunt,
cūrā, since you are mortal, care for what is
mortal.
a. Note the phrase cum praesertim (praesertim cum),
especially since; as,—
Haeduōs accūsat, praesertim cum eōrum precibus
adductus bellum suscēperit, he blamed the Haedui, especially
since he had undertaken the war at their entreaties.
3. Quandō (less frequent than the other causal particles)
governs the Indicative; as,—
id omittō, quandō vōbīs ita placet, I
pass over that, since you so wish.
287. 1. Postquam
(posteāquam), after; ut, ubi,
when; cum prīmum, simul, simul ac
(simul atque), as soon as, when used to refer to a
single past act regularly take the Perfect Indicative; as,—
Epamīnōndās postquam audīvit vīcisse
Boeōtiōs, 'Satis' inquit 'vīxī,' Epaminondas,
after he heard that the Boeotians had conquered, said, 'I have lived
enough;'
id ut audīvit, Corcyram dēmigrāvit, when he
heard this, he moved to Corcyra;
Caesar cum prīmum potuit, ad exercitum contendit,
Caesar, as soon as he could, hurried to the army;
ubi dē Caesaris adventū certiōrēs factī
sunt, lēgātōs ad eum mittunt, when they were
informed of Caesar's arrival, they sent envoys to him.
a. The Historical Present may take the place of the Perfect in
this construction.
2. To denote the repeated occurrence of an act, ut, ubi,
simul atque, as often as, when following an historical tense,
take the Pluperfect Indicative (compare §§ 288, 3;
302, 3); as,—
ut quisque Verris animum offenderat, in lautumiās statim
coniciēbātur, whenever anybody had offended Verres's
feelings, he was forthwith put in the stone-quarry;
hostēs, ubi aliquōs ēgredientēs
cōnspexerant, adoriēbantur, whenever the enemy had seen
any men disembarking, they attacked them.
a. In Livy and succeeding historians the Imperfect and
Pluperfect Subjunctive are used to denote this repeated occurrence of an
act ('Indefinite Frequency'); as,—
id ubi dīxisset hastam mittēbat, whenever he had
said that, he hurled a spear.
3. Occasionally the above conjunctions are followed by the Pluperfect
Indicative of a single occurrence. This is regularly the case with
postquam in expressions denoting a definite interval of time
(days, months, years, etc.), such as post tertium annum
quam, trienniō postquam. Thus:—
quīnque post diēbus quam Lūcā discesserat, ad
Sardiniam vēnit five days after he had departed from Luca he
came to Sardinia;
postquam occupātae Syrācūsae erant, profectus est
Carthāginem, after Syracuse had been seized, he set out for
Carthage.
4. The Imperfect Indicative also sometimes occurs, to denote a
continued state; as,—
postquam Rōmam adventābant, senātus cōnsultus
est, after they were on the march toward Rome, the Senate was
consulted;
postquam strūctī utrimque stābant, after they
had been drawn up on both sides and were in position.
5. Rarely postquam, posteāquam, following the
analogy of cum, take the Subjunctive, but only in the historical
tenses; as,—
posteāquam sūmptuōsa fieri fūnera coepissent,
lēge sublāta sunt, after funerals had begun to be
elaborate, they were done away with by law.
A. Cum REFERRING TO THE PAST.
288. 1. Cum, when referring to the
past, takes,—
A. The Indicative (Imperfect, Historical Perfect, or
Pluperfect) to denote the point of time at which something
occurs.
B. The Subjunctive (Imperfect or Pluperfect) to denote the
situation or circumstances under which something occurs.
Examples:—
an tum erās cōnsul, cum in Palātiō mea domus
ārdēbat, or were you consul at the time when my house
burned up on the Palatine?
crēdō tum cum Sicilia flōrēbat opibus et
cōpiīs magna artificia fuisse in eā īnsulā,
I believe that at the time when Sicily was powerful in riches and
resources there were great crafts in that island;
eō tempore pāruit cum pārēre necesse erat,
he obeyed at the time when it was necessary to obey;
illō diē, cum est lāta lēx dē mē,
on that day when the law concerning me was passed.
Lysander cum vellet Lycūrgī lēgēs
commūtāre, prohibitus est, when Lysander desired to
change the laws of Lycurgus, he was prevented;
Pythagorās cum in geōmetriā quiddam novī
invēnisset, Mūsīs bovem immolāsse dīcitur,
when Pythagoras had discovered something new in geometry, he is said
to have sacrificed an ox to the Muses.
a. Note that the Indicative is much less frequent in such
clauses than the Subjunctive, and is regularly confined to those cases
where the main clause has tum, eō diē, eō
annō, eō tempore or some similar correlative of the
cum. Sometimes it depends entirely upon the point of view of the
writer whether he shall employ the Indicative or Subjunctive.
2. Cum Inversum. When the logical order of the clauses is
inverted, we find cum with the Perfect Indicative or Historical
Present, in the sense of when, when suddenly. The main
clause in such cases often has jam, vix, aegrē,
nōndum; as,—
jam Gallī ex oppidō fugere apparābant, cum
mātrēs familiae repente prōcurrērunt, the
Gauls were already preparing to flee, when suddenly the matrons rushed
forth (logically, the matrons rushed forth as the Gauls were
preparing to flee);
Trēvirī Labiēnum adorīrī parābant,
cum duās legiōnēs vēnisse cognōscunt, the
Treviri were preparing to attack, when (suddenly) they learned that two
legions had arrived.
3. To denote a recurring action in the past, cum is
followed by the Indicative, particularly of the Pluperfect (compare §§ 287, 2; 302, 3);
as,—
cum ād aliquod oppidum vēnerat, eādem
lectīcā ad cubiculum dēferēbātur,
whenever he had arrived at some town, he was (always) carried in the
same litter to his room;
cum equitātus noster sē in agrōs ējēcerat,
essedāriōs ex silvīs ēmittēbat, whenever
our cavalry had advanced into the fields, he would send his charioteers
out from the woods.
a. Sometimes the Imperfect or Pluperfect Subjunctive is thus
used; as,—
saepe cum aliquem vidēret minus bene vestītum, suum
amiculum dedit, often, wherever he saw some one more poorly
clothed, he gave him his own mantle;
cum prōcucurrissent, Numidae effugiēbant, as often
as they had advanced, the Numidians ran away.
This construction is frequent in Livy and subsequent
historians.
B. Cum REFERRING TO THE PRESENT OR FUTURE.
289. When cum refers to the
Present or Future it regularly takes the Indicative; as,—
tum tua rēs agitur, pariēs cum proximus ārdet,
your own interests are at stake when your neighbor's house is
burning;
cum vidēbis, tum sciēs, when you see, then you
will know.
a. The Indicative of the Present or Future may denote also a
recurring action; as,—
stabilitās amīcitiae cōnfirmārī potest,
cum hominēs cupīdinibus imperābunt, firm friendship
can be established whenever men shall control their desires.
C. OTHER USES OF Cum.
290. 1. Cum Explicative.
Cum, with the Indicative, is sometimes used to indicate the
identity of one act with another; as,—
cum tacent clāmant, their silence is a shout (lit.
when they are silent, they shout).
2. Cum ... tum. When cum ... tum mean both ...
and, the cum-clause is in the Indicative; but when cum
has the force of while, though, it may take the
Subjunctive; as,—
cum tē semper dīlēxerim, tum tuīs factīs
incēnsus sum, while I have always loved you, at the same time
I am stirred by your conduct.
A. WITH THE INDICATIVE.
291. Antequam and priusquam
(often written ante ... quam, prius ... quam) take the
Indicative to denote an actual fact.
1. Sometimes the Present or Future Perfect; as,—
prius respondēs quam rogō, you answer before I
ask;
nihil contrā disputābō priusquam dīxerit,
I will say nothing in opposition, before he speaks.
2. Sometimes the Perfect, especially after negative clauses;
as,—
nōn prius jugulandī fīnis fuit, quam Sulla
omnēs suōs dīvitiīs explēvit, there was
no end of murder until Sulla satisfied all his henchmen with
wealth.
B. WITH THE SUBJUNCTIVE.
292. Antequam and priusquam take
the Subjunctive to denote an act as anticipated.
1. Thus the Subjunctive may denote—
a) An act in preparation for which the main act takes place;
as,—
priusquam dīmicārent, foedus īctum est, i.e.
in anticipation of the fight, a treaty was struck.
By an extension of this usage, the Subjunctive is
sometimes used of general truths, where the anticipatory notion
has faded out; as,—
tempestās minātur antequam surgat, the tempest
threatens before it rises.
b) An act anticipated and forestalled; as,—
priusquam tēlum adicī posset, omnis aciēs terga
vertit, before a spear could be hurled, the whole army
fled.
c) An act anticipated and deprecated; as,—
animum omittunt priusquam locō dēmigrent, they die
rather than quit their post.
2. After historical tenses the Imperfect Subjunctive is used,
especially by some writers, where the notion of anticipation has
practically vanished; as,—
sōl antequam sē abderet fugientem vīdit
Antōnium, the sun before it set saw Antony fleeing.
293. 1. Dum, while,
regularly takes the Indicative of the Historical Present; as,—
Alexander, dum inter prīmōrēs pugnat, sagittā
ictus est, Alexander, while he was fighting in the van, was struck
by an arrow;
dum haec geruntur, in fīnēs Venellōrum
pervēnit, while these things were being done, he arrived in
the territory of the Venelli.
II. Dum, dōnec, and quoad, as long
as, take the Indicative; as,—
dum anima est, spēs est, as long as there is life,
there is hope;
Lacedaemoniōrum gēns fortis fuit, dum Lycūrgī
lēgēs vigēbant, the race of the Lacedaemonians was
powerful, as long as the laws of Lycurgus were in force;
Catō, quoad vīxit, virtūtum laude crēvit,
Cato, at long as he lived, increased in the fame of his
virtues.
III. Dum, dōnec, and quoad, until,
take:—
1. The Indicative, to denote an actual event; as,—
dōnec rediit, fuit silentium, there was silence till he
came;
ferrum in corpore retinuit, quoad renūntiātum est
Boeōtiōs vīcisse, he kept the iron in his body
until word was brought that the Boeotians had conquered.
a. In Livy and subsequent historians dum and
dōnec in this sense often take the Subjunctive instead of the
Indicative; as,—
trepidātiōnis aliquantum ēdēbant dōnec
timor quiētem fēcisset, they showed some trepidation,
until fear produced quiet.
2. The Subjunctive, to denote anticipation or
expectancy; as,—
exspectāvit Caesar dum nāvēs convenīrent,
Caesar waited for the ships to assemble;
dum litterae veniant, morābor, I shall wait for the
letter to come.
294. A Substantive Clause is one which as
a whole serves as the Subject or Object of a verb, or stands in some
other case relation.
295. Substantive Clauses Developed from
the Volitive are used with the following classes of verbs:—
1. With verbs signifying to admonish, request,
command, urge, persuade, induce,[51] etc. (conjunctions
ut, nē, or ut nē); as,—
postulō ut fīat, I demand that it be done
(dependent form of the Jussive fīat, let it be
done!);
ōrat, nē abeās, he begs that you will not go
away;
mīlitēs cohortātus est ut hostium impetum
sustinērent, he exhorted his soldiers to withstand the attack
of the enemy;
Helvētiīs persuāsit ut exīrent, he
persuaded the Helvetii to march forth.
a. Jubeō, command, order, regularly
takes the Infinitive.
2. With verbs signifying to grant, concede,
permit, allow,[52] etc. (conjunction ut);
as,—
huic concēdō ut ea praetereat, I allow him to pass
that by (dependent form of the Jussive ea praetereat, let
him pass that by!);
cōnsulī permissum est ut duās legiōnēs
scrīberet, the consul was permitted to enroll two
legions.
3. With verbs of hindering, preventing,[53] etc. (conjunctions
nē, quōminus, quīn); as,—
nē lūstrum perficeret, mors prohibuit, death
prevented him from finishing the lustrum (dependent form after past
tense of nē lūstrum perficiat, let him not
finish, etc.);
prohibuit quōminus in ūnum coīrent, he
prevented them from coming together;
nec quīn ērumperet, prohibērī poterat,
nor could he be prevented from rushing forth.
a. Quīn is used only when the verb of
hindering is accompanied by a negative, or stands in a question
implying a negative; it is not necessarily used even then.
4. With verbs of deciding, resolving,[54] etc. (conjunctions ut,
nē, or ut nē); as,—
cōnstitueram ut prīdiē Īdūs
Aquīnī manērem, I had decided to remain at Aquinum
on the 12th;
dēcrēvit senātus ut Opīmius vidēret,
the Senate decreed that Opimius should see to it;
convēnit ut ūnīs castrīs miscērentur,
it was agreed that they should be united in one camp.
5. With verbs of striving,[55] etc. (conjunctions ut,
nē, or ut nē); as,—
fac ut eum exōrēs, see to it that you prevail upon
him!
cūrā ut vir sīs, see to it that you are a
man!
labōrābat ut reliquās cīvitātēs
adjungeret, he was striving to join the remaining states to
him.
a. Cōnor, try, always takes the
Infinitive.
NOTE.—Verbs of all the above classes
also admit the Infinitive, especially in poetry.
6. With a few other expressions, such as necesse est,
reliquus est, sequitur, licet, oportet;
as,—
sequitur ut doceam, it remains for me to show;
licet redeās, you may return;
oportet loquāmur, we must speak.
On the absence of ut with licet and oportet, see
paragraph 8.
7. Here also belong phrases of the type: nūlla causa est
cūr, quīn; nōn est cūr,
etc.; nihil est cūr, etc.; as,—
nūlla causa est cūr timeam, there is no reason why
I should fear (originally Deliberative: why should I fear? There's
no reason);
nihil est quīn dīcam, there is no reason why I
should not say.
8. Many of the above classes of verbs at times take the simple
Subjunctive without ut. In such cases we must not recognize any
omission of ut, but simply an earlier form of expression which
existed before the ut-clause arose. This is regularly the case
with necesse est, licet, and oportet; see 6. Other
examples are:—
eōs moneō dēsinant, I warn them to
stop;
huic imperat adeat cīvitātēs, he orders him
to visit the states.
296. Substantive Clauses Developed from
the Optative occur:—
1. With verbs of wishing, desiring, especially
cupiō, optō, volō,
mālō (conjunctions ut, nē, ut
nē); as,—
optō ut in hōc jūdiciō nēmō improbus
reperiātur, I hope that in this court no bad man may be
found (here ut reperiātur represents a simple optative of
direct statement, viz. reperiātur, may no bad man
be found!);
cupiō nē veniat, I desire that he may not
come.
a. The simple Subjunctive (without ut) sometimes occurs
with verbs of this class. (See § 295, 8.) Examples
are: velim scrībās, I wish you would write;
vellem scrīpsisset, I wish he had written.
2. With expressions of fearing (timeō,
metuō, vereor, etc.). Here nē means
that, lest, and ut means that not;
as,—
timeō nē veniat, I fear that he will come
(originally: may he not come! I'm afraid [he will]);
timeō ut veniat, I fear that he will not come
(originally: may he come! I'm afraid [he won't]).
a. Nē nōn sometimes occurs instead of
ut, especially where the verb of fearing has a negative, or
where the writer desires to emphasize some particular word in the
dependent clause; as,—
nōn vereor ne hōc nōn fīat, I am not
afraid that this will not happen;
vereor nē exercitum fīrmum habēre nōn
possit, I fear that he is unable (nōn possit)
to have a strong army.
297. Substantive Clauses of Result
(introduced by ut, ut nōn) are a development of pure
Result clauses, and occur with the following classes of words:—
1. As object clauses after verbs of doing, accomplishing
(especially faciō, efficiō,
cōnficiō). Thus:—
gravitās morbī facit ut medicīnā
egeāmus, the severity of disease makes us need
medicine.
2. As the subject of several impersonal verbs, particularly
fit, efficitur, accidit, ēvenit,
contingit, accēdit, fierī potest,
fore, sequitur, relinquitur. Thus:—
ex quō efficitur, ut voluptās nōn sit summum
bonum, from which it follows that pleasure is not the greatest
good;
ita fit, ut nēmō esse possit beātus, thus it
happens that no one can be happy;
accēdēbat ut nāvēs deessent, another
thing was the lack of ships (lit. it was added that ships were
lacking).
3. As predicate or appositive after expressions like jūs
est, mōs est, cōnsuētūdō est;
also after neuter pronouns, hōc, illud, etc.
Thus:—
est mōs hominum ut nōlint eundem plūribus rēbus
excellere, it is the way of men not to wish the same person to
excel in many things.
298. Substantive Clauses introduced by
quīn (used sometimes as subject, sometimes as object) occur
after negative and interrogative expressions of doubt,
omission, and the like, particularly after nōn
dubitō, I do not doubt; quis dubitat, who
doubts?; nōn (haud) dubium est, there is no doubt.
The mood is the Subjunctive. Examples:—
quis dubitat quīn in virtūte dīvitiae sint,
who doubts that in virtue there are riches?
nōn dubium erat quīn ventūrus esset, there
was no doubt that he was about to come.
a. In Nepos, Livy, and post-Augustan writers an Infinitive
sometimes takes the place of the quīn-clause after
nōn dubitō; as,—
nōn dubitāmus inventōs esse, we do not doubt
that men were found
b. Nōn dubitō, I do not hesitate, is
regularly followed by the Infinitive, though sometimes by a
quīn-clause.
299. 1. Quod, the fact
that, that, introduces Substantive Clauses in the Indicative.
This construction occurs especially—
a) In apposition with a preceding demonstrative, as
hōc, id, illud, illa, ex eō,
inde, etc. Thus:—
illud est admīrātiōne dignum, quod
captīvōs retinendōs cēnsuit, this is
especially worthy of admiration, that he thought the prisoners ought to
be kept;
hōc ūnō praestāmus vel maximē ferīs,
quod colloquimur inter nōs, in this one respect we are
especially superior to the beasts, that we talk with each other.
b) After bene fit, bene accidit, male fit,
bene facere, mīror, etc.; as,—
bene mihi ēvenit, quod mittor ad mortem, it is well for
me that I am sent to death;
bene fēcistī quod mānsistī, you did well
in remaining.
2. Quod at the beginning of the sentence sometimes has the
force of as regards the fact that. Thus:—
quod multitūdinem Germānōrum in Galliam
trādūcō, id meī mūniendī causā
faciō, as regards the fact that I am transporting a multitude
of Germans into Gaul, I am doing it for the sake of strengthening
myself;
quod mē Agamemnona aemulārī putās,
falleris, as regards your thinking that I emulate Agamemnon, you
are mistaken.
300. 1. Indirect Questions are
Substantive Clauses used after verbs of asking, inquiring,
telling, and the like. They take their verb in the Subjunctive[56]. Like Direct Questions
(see § 162) they may be introduced—
a) By Interrogative Pronouns or Adverbs; as,—
dīc mihi ubi fuerīs, quid fēcerīs, tell
me where you were, what you did;
oculīs jūdicārī nōn potest in utram partem
fluat Arar, it cannot be determined by the eye in which direction
the Arar flows;
bis bīna quot essent, nesciēbat, he did not know
how many two times two were.
NOTE.—Care should be taken to
distinguish Indirect Questions from Relative Clauses. The difference
between the two appears clearly in the following:—
effugere nēmō id potest quod futūrum est, no
one can escape what is destined to come to pass; but saepe autem
ne ūtile quidem est scīre quid futūrum sit, but
often it is not even useful to know what is coming to pass.
b) By num or -ne, without distinction of meaning;
as,—
Epamīnōndās quaesīvit num salvus esset
clipeus, or salvusne esset clipeus, Epaminondas asked
whether his shield was safe;
disputātur num interīre virtūs in homine possit,
the question is raised whether virtue can die in a man;
ex Sōcrate quaesītum est nōnne Archelāum
beātum putāret, the question was asked of Socrates
whether he did not think Archelaus happy.
NOTE.—Nōnne in Indirect
Questions occurs only after quaerō, as in the last example
above.
2. Often the Indirect Question represents a Deliberative Subjunctive
of the direct discourse; as,—
nesciō quid faciam, I do not know what to do.
(Direct: quid faciam, what shall I do!)
3. After verbs of expectation and endeavor
(exspectō, cōnor, experior,
temptō) we sometimes find an Indirect Question introduced by
sī; as,—
cōnantur sī perrumpere possint, they try whether
they can break through.
a. Sometimes the governing verb is omitted; as,—
pergit ad proximam spēluncam sī forte eō
vēstīgia ferrent, he proceeded to the nearest cave (to
see) if the tracks led thither.
4. Indirect Double Questions are introduced in the main by the
same particles as direct double questions (§ 162,
4); viz.;—
utrum ... an;
-ne ... an;
—— ... an;
—— ... ne.
Examples:—
quaerō utrum vērum an falsum sit,
quaerō vērumne an falsum sit, quaerō
vērum an falsum sit, quaerō vērum
falsumne sit,
|
} } I ask whether it } is true or false? }
|
a. 'Or not' in the second member of the double question
is ordinarily expressed by necne, less frequently by an
nōn; as,—
dī utrum sint necne, quaeritur, it is asked whether
there are gods or not.
5. Haud sciō an, nesciō an, by omission of the
first member of the double question, occur with the Subjunctive in the
sense: I am inclined to think, probably, perhaps; as,—
haud sciō an ita sit, I am inclined to think this is
so.
6. In early Latin and in poetry the Indicative is sometimes used in
indirect Questions.
CONDITIONAL SENTENCES.
301. Conditional Sentences are compound
sentences (§ 164) consisting of two parts, the
Protasis (or condition), usually introduced by sī,
nisi, or sīn, and the Apodosis (or conclusion).
There are the following types of Conditional Sentences:—
302. 1. Here we regularly have the
Indicative in both Protasis and Apodosis. Any tense may be used;
as,—
sī hōc crēdis, errās, if you believe
this, you are mistaken;
nātūram sī sequēmur, numquam
aberrābimus, if we follow Nature, we shall never go
astray;
sī hōc dīxistī, errāstī, if
you said this, you were in error.
2. Sometimes the Protasis takes the Indefinite Second Person Singular
(§ 356, 3) of the Present or Perfect Subjunctive,
with the force of the Indicative; as,—
memoria minuitur, nisi eam exerceās, memory is impaired
unless you exercise it.
3. Here belong also those conditional sentences in which the Protasis
denotes a repeated action (compare §§ 287, 2; 288, 3); as,—
sī quis equitum dēciderat, peditēs
circumsistēbant, if any one of the horsemen fell, the
foot-soldiers gathered about him.
a. Instead of the Indicative, Livy and subsequent writers
employ the Subjunctive of the Historical tenses in the Protasis to denote
repeated action; as,—
sī dīcendō quis diem eximeret, if (ever)
anybody consumed a day in pleading; sī quandō
adsidēret, if ever he sat by.
4. Where the sense demands it, the Apodosis in conditional sentences
of the First Type may be an Imperative or one of the Independent
Subjunctives (Hortatory, Deliberative, etc.); as,—
sī hōc crēditis, tacēte, if you believe
this, be silent;
sī hōc crēdimus, taceāmus, if we believe
this, let us keep silent.
303. Here we regularly have the
Subjunctive (of the Present or Perfect tense) in both Protasis and
Apodosis; as,—
sī hōc dīcās, errēs, or sī
hōc dīxerīs, errāverīs, if you should say
this, you would be mistaken;
sī velim Hannibalis proelia omnia dēscrībere,
diēs mē dēficiat, if I should wish to describe all
the battles of Hannibal, time would fail me;
mentiar, sī negem, I should lie, if I should deny
it;
haec sī tēcum patria loquātur, nōnne
impetrāre dēbeat, if your country should plead thus with
you, would she not deserve to obtain her request?
a. The Subjunctive in the Apodosis of conditional sentences of
this type is of the Potential variety.
b. Sometimes we find the Indicative in the Apodosis of
sentences of the Second Type, where the writer wishes to assert the
accomplishment of a result more positively; as,—
aliter sī faciat, nūllam habet
auctōritātem, if he should do otherwise, he has no
authority.
304. 1. Here we regularly have the
Subjunctive in both Protasis and Apodosis, the Imperfect referring to
present time, and the Pluperfect referring to past;
as,—
sī amīcī meī adessent, opis nōn
indigērem, if my friends were here, I should not lack
assistance;
sī hōc dīxissēs, errāssēs, if
you had said this, you would have erred;
sapientia nōn expeterētur, sī nihil efficeret,
philosophy would not be desired, if it accomplished nothing;
cōnsilium, ratiō, sententia nisi essent in senibus,
nōn summum cōnsilium majōrēs nostrī
appellāssent senātum, unless deliberation, reason, and
wisdom existed in old men, our ancestors would not have called their
highest deliberative body a senate.
2. Sometimes the Imperfect Subjunctive is found referring to the past,
especially to denote a continued act, or a state of things still
existing; as,—
Laelius, Fūrius, Catō sī nihil litterīs
adjuvārentur, numquam sē ad eārum studium
contulissent, Laelius, Furius, and Cato would never have devoted
themselves to the study of letters, unless they had been (constantly)
helped by them;
num igitur sī ad centēsimum annum vīxisset,
senectūtis eum suae paenitēret, if he had lived to his
hundredth year, would he have regretted (and now be regretting) his old
age?
3. The Apodosis in conditional sentences of this type sometimes stands
in the Indicative (Imperfect, Perfect, or Pluperfect),
viz.—
a) Frequently in expressions of ability,
obligation, or necessity; as,—
nisi fēlīcitās in sōcordiam vertisset, exuere
jugum potuērunt, unless their prosperity had turned to folly,
they could have thrown off the yoke;
NOTE.—In sentences of this type,
however, it is not the possibility that is represented
as-contrary-to-fact, but something to be supplied in thought from the
context. Thus in the foregoing sentence the logical apodosis is et
exuissent understood (and they would have shaken it off). When
the possibility itself is conditioned, the Subjunctive is
used.
eum patris locō colere dēbēbās, sī
ūlla in tē pietās esset, you ought to revere him as
a father, if you had any sense of devotion.
b) With both the Periphrastic Conjugations; as,—
sī Sēstius occīsus esset, fuistisne ad arma
itūrī, if Sestius had been slain, would you have
proceeded to arms?
sī ūnum diem morātī essētis, moriendum
omnibus fuit, if you had delayed one day, you would all have had
to die.
305. 1. The Protasis is not always
expressed by a clause with sī, but may be implied in a word,
a phrase, or merely by the context; as,—
aliōquī haec nōn scrīberentur,
otherwise (i.e. if matters were otherwise) these things
would not be written;
nōn potestis, voluptāte omnia dīrigentēs,
retinēre virtūtem, you cannot retain virtue, if you
direct everything with reference to pleasure.
2. Sometimes an Imperative, or a Jussive Subjunctive, serves as
Protasis. Thus:—
crās petitō, dabitur, if you ask to-morrow, it
shall be given you (lit. ask to-morrow, etc.);
haec reputent, vidēbunt, if they consider this, they
will see (lit. let them consider, etc.);
rogēs Zēnōnem, respondeat, if you should ask
Zeno, he would answer.
306. 1. Nisi, unless,
negatives the entire protasis; sī nōn negatives a single
word; as,—
ferreus essem, nisi tē amārem, I should be
hard-hearted unless I loved you; but—
ferreus essem, sī tē nōn amārem, I
should be hard-hearted if I did NOT love you.
In the first example, it is the notion of loving you that is
negatived, in the second, the notion of loving.
2. Sī nōn (sī minus) is regularly
employed:—
a) When an apodosis with at, tamen,
certē follows; as,—
dolōrem sī nōn potuerō frangere, tamen
occultābō, if I cannot crush my sorrow, yet I will hide
it.
b) When an affirmative protasis is repeated in negative form;
as,—
sī fēceris, magnam habēbō grātiam; sī
nōn fēceris, ignōscam, if you do it, I shall be
deeply grateful; if you do not do it, I shall pardon you.
a. But if the verb is omitted in the repetition, only si
minus or sin minus is admissible; as,—
hōc sī assecūtus sum, gaudeō; sī minus,
mē cōnsōlor, if I have attained this, I am glad; if
not, I console myself.
3. Sīn. Where one protasis is followed by another opposed
in meaning, but affirmative in form, the second is introduced by
sīn; as,—
hunc mihi timōrem ēripe; sī vērus est, nē
opprimar, sīn falsus, ut timēre dēsinam, relieve me
of this fear; if it is well founded, that I may not be destroyed; but if
it is groundless, that I may cease to fear.
4. Nisi has a fondness for combining with negatives
(nōn, nēmō, nihil); as,—
nihil cōgitāvit nisi caedem, he had no thought but
murder.
a. Nōn and nisi are always separated in the
best Latinity.
5. Nisi forte, nisi vērō, nisi sī,
unless perchance, unless indeed (often with ironical force), take
the Indicative; as,—
nisi vērō, quia perfecta rēs nōn est, nōn
vidētur pūnienda, unless indeed, because an act is not
consummated, it does not seem to merit punishment.
307. 1. Conditional Clauses of Comparison
are introduced by the particles, ac sī, ut sī,
quasi, quam sī, tamquam sī, velut
sī, or simply by velut or tamquam. They stand in
the Subjunctive mood and regularly involve an ellipsis (see § 374, 1), as indicated in the following
examples:—
tantus patrēs metus cēpit, velut sī jam ad
portās hostis esset, as great fear seized the senators as
(would have seized them) if the enemy were already at the gates;
sed quid ego hīs testibus ūtor quasi rēs dubia aut
obscūra sit, but why do I use these witnesses, as (I should
do) if the matter were doubtful or obscure;
serviam tibi tam quasi ēmerīs mē argentō,
I will serve you as though you had bought me for money.
2. Note that in sentences of this kind the Latin observes the regular
principles for the Sequence of Tenses. Thus after principal tenses the
Latin uses the Present and Perfect (as in the second and third examples),
where the English uses the Past and Past Perfect.
308. The term 'Concessive' is best
restricted to those clauses developed from the Jussive Subjunctive which
have the force of granted that, etc.; (see § 278) as,—
sit fūr, sit sacrilegus, at est bonus imperātor,
granted that he is a thief and a robber, yet he is a good
commander;
haec sint falsa, granted that this is false;
nē sit summum malum dolor, malum certē est,
granted that pain is not the greatest evil, yet it is certainly an
evil.
309. Clauses introduced by
quamvīs, quamquam, etsī,
tametsī, cum, although, while often classed as
'Concessive,' are yet essentially different from genuine Concessive
clauses. As a rule, they do not grant or concede anything,
but rather state that something is true in spite of something
else. They accordingly emphasize the adversative idea, and are
properly Subordinate Adversative Clauses. The different particles used to
introduce these clauses have different meanings and take different
constructions, as follows:—
1. Quamvīs, however much, although, does not
introduce a statement of fact, but represents an act merely as conceived.
It is followed by the Subjunctive, usually of the present tense;
as,—
hominēs quamvīs in turbidīs rēbus sint, tamen
interdum animīs relaxantur, in however stirring events men
may engage, yet at times they relax their energies;
nōn est potestās opitulandī reī pūblicae
quamvīs ea premātur perīculīs, there is no
opportunity to succor the state, though it be beset by dangers.
2. Quamquam, etsī, tametsī,
although, introduce a statement of fact, and are followed by the
Indicative (of any tense); as,—
quamquam omnis virtūs nōs allicit, tamen jūstitia id
maximē efficit, although all virtue attracts us, yet justice
does so especially;
Caesar, etsī nōndum cōnsilium hostium
cognōverat, tamen id quod accidit suspicābātur,
Caesar, though he did not yet know the plans of the enemy, yet was
suspecting what actually occurred.
a. Etsī, although, must be distinguished
from etsī, even if. The latter is a conditional
particle and takes any of the constructions admissible for
sī. (See §§ 302-304.)
3. Cum, although, is followed by the Subjunctive;
as,—
Atticus honōrēs nōn petiit, cum eī
patērent, Atticus did not seek honors, though they were open
to him.
4. Licet sometimes loses its verbal force (see § 295, 6) and sinks to the level of a conjunction
with the force of although. It takes the Subjunctive, Present or
Perfect; as,—
licet omnēs terrōrēs impendeant, succurram,
though all terrors hang over me, (yet) I will lend aid.
5. Quamquam, with the force and yet, is often used to
introduce principal clauses; as,—
quamquam quid loquor, and yet why do I speak?
6. In post-Augustan writers quamquam is freely construed with
the Subjunctive, while quamvīs is often used to introduce
statements of fact, and takes either the Indicative or the Subjunctive.
Thus:—
quamquam movērētur hīs vōcibus, although
he was moved by these words;
quamvīs multī opīnārentur, though many
thought;
quamvīs īnfēstō animō
pervēnerās, though you had come with hostile
intent.
310. These particles are followed by the
Subjunctive (negative nē) and have two distinct
uses:—
I. They are used to introduce clauses embodying a wish
entertained by the subject of the leading verb; as,—
multī honesta neglegunt dummodo potentiam
cōnsequantur, many neglect honor in their desire to obtain
power (if only they may attain);
omnia postposuī, dum praeceptīs patris
pārērem, I made everything else secondary, in my desire
to obey the injunctions of my father;
nīl obstat tibi, dum nē sit dītior alter,
nothing hinders you in your desire that your neighbor may not be
richer than you.
II. They are used to express a proviso ('provided
that'); as,—
ōderint, dum metuant, let them hate, provided they
fear;
manent ingenia senibus, modo permaneat studium et industria,
old men retain their faculties, provided only they retain their
interest and vigor;
nūbant, dum nē dōs fiat comes, let them
marry, provided no dowry goes with it.
311. Relative Clauses are introduced by
Relative Pronouns, Adjectives, or Adverbs.
312. 1. Relative clauses usually stand in
the Indicative Mood, especially clauses introduced by those General
Relatives which are doubled or have the suffix -oumque;
as,—
quidquid id est, timeō Danaōs et dōna
ferentēs, whatever it is, I fear the Greeks even when they
offer gifts;
quidquid oritur, quālecumque est, causam ā
nātūrā habet, whatever comes into being, of
whatever sort it is, has its primal cause in Nature.
2. Any simple Relative may introduce a conditional sentence of any of
the three types mentioned in §§ 302-304;
as,—
quī hōc dīcit, errat, he who says this is
mistaken (First Type);
quī hōc dīcat, erret, he would be mistaken
who should say this (Second Type);
quī hōc dīxisset, errāsset, the man who
had said this would have been mistaken.
313. When the language or thought of any
person is reproduced without change, that is called Direct Discourse
(Ōrātiō Recta); as, Caesar said, 'The die is
cast.' When, on the other hand, one's language or thought is made to
depend upon a verb of saying, thinking, etc., that
is called Indirect Discourse (Ōrātiō Oblīqua);
as, Caesar said that the die was cast; Caesar thought that his troops
were victorious.
a. For the verbs most frequently employed to introduce Indirect
Discourse, see § 331.
MOODS IN INDIRECT DISCOURSE.
314. 1. Declarative Sentences upon
becoming Indirect change their main clause to the Infinitive with Subject
Accusative, while all subordinate clauses take the Subjunctive;
as,—
Rēgulus dīxit quam diū jūre jūrandō
hostium tenērētur nōn esse sē
senātōrem, Regulus said that as long as he was held by
his pledge to the enemy he was not a senator. (Direct: quam
diū teneor nōn sum senātor.)
2. The verb of saying, thinking, etc., is
sometimes to be inferred from the context; as,—
tum Rōmulus lēgātōs circā
vīcīnās gentēs mīsit quī societātem
cōnūbiumque peterent: urbēs quoque, ut cētera, ex
īnfimō nāscī, then Romulus sent envoys around
among the neighboring tribes, to ask for alliance and the right of
intermarriage, (saying that) cities, like everything else, start from a
modest beginning.
3. Subordinate clauses which contain an explanatory statement of the
writer and so are not properly a part of the Indirect Discourse, or which
emphasize the fact stated, take the Indicative; as,—
nūntiātum est Ariovistum ad occupandum Vesontiōnem,
quod est oppidum maximum Sēquanōrum contendere, it was
reported that Ariovistus was hastening to seize Vesontio, which is the
largest town of the Sequani.
4. Sometimes a subordinate clause is such only in its external form,
and in sense is principal. It then takes the Infinitive with Subject
Accusative. This occurs especially in case of relative clauses, where
quī is equivalent to et hīc, nam hīc,
etc.; as,—
dīxit urbem Athēniēnsium prōpugnāculum
oppositum esse barbarīs, apud quam jam bis classēs
rēgiās fēcisse naufragium, he said the city of the
Athenians had been set against the barbarians like a bulwark, near which
(= and near it) the fleets of the King had twice met disaster.
5. The Subject Accusative of the Infinitive is sometimes omitted when
it refers to the same person as the subject of the leading verb, or can
easily be supplied from the context; as,—
cum id nescīre Māgō dīceret, when Mago
said he did not know this (for sē nescīre).
315. 1. Real questions of the Direct
Discourse, upon becoming indirect, are regularly put in the Subjunctive;
as,—
Ariovistus Caesarī respondit: sē prius in Galliam
vēnisse quam populum Rōmānum. Quid sibi vellet? Cūr
in suās possessiōnēs venīret, Ariovistus
replied to Caesar that he had come into Gaul before the Roman people.
What did he (Caesar) mean? Why did he come into his domain? (Direct:
quid tibi vīs? cūr in meās possessiōnēs
venīs?)
2. Rhetorical questions, on the other hand, being asked merely for
effect, and being equivalent in force to emphatic statements, regularly
stand in the Infinitive in Indirect Discourse. Thus :—
quid est levius (lit. what is more trivial, = nothing is
more trivial) of the Direct Discourse becomes quid esse levius in
the Indirect.
3. Deliberative Subjunctives of the Direct Discourse remain unchanged
in mood in the Indirect: as,—
quid faceret, what was he to do? (Direct: quid
faciat?)
316. All Imperatives or Jussive
Subjunctives of the Direct Discourse appear as Subjunctives in the
Indirect; as,—
mīlitēs certiōrēs fēcit paulisper
intermitterent proelium, he told the soldiers to stop the battle
for a little. (Direct: intermittite.)
a. The negative in such sentences is nē;
as,—
nē suae virtūtī tribueret, let him not
attribute it to his own valor!
TENSES IN INDIRECT DISCOURSE.
317. These are used in accordance with
the regular principles for the use of the Infinitive as given in § 270.
a. The Perfect Infinitive may represent any past tense of the
Indicative of Direct Discourse. Thus:—
sciō tē haec ēgisse may mean—
I know you were doing this.(Direct: haec
agēbās.)
I know you did this. (Direct: haec
ēgistī.)
I know you had done this. (Direct: haec
ēgerās.)
318. These follow the regular principle
for the Sequence of Tenses, being Principal if the verb of saying
is Principal; Historical if it is Historical. Yet for the sake of
vividness, we often find the Present Subjunctive used after an historical
tense (Repraesentātiō); as,—
Caesar respondit, sī obsidēs dentur, sēsē
pācem esse factūrum, Caesar replied that, if hostages be
given, he would make peace.
a. For the sequence after the Perfect Infinitive, see § 268, 2.
CONDITIONAL SENTENCES IN INDIRECT DISCOURSE.
319. A. THE APODOSIS. Any tense of the
Indicative is changed to the corresponding tense of the Infinitive (§§ 270; 317, a).
B. THE PROTASIS. The protasis takes those tenses of the
Subjunctive which are required by the Sequence of Tenses.
Examples:—
|
DIRECT.
|
INDIRECT.
|
|
sī hōc crēdis, errās,
|
dīcō, sī hōc crēdās, tē
errāre; dīxī, sī hōc
crēderēs, tē errāre.
|
|
sī hōc crēdēs, errābis,
|
dīcō, sī hōc crēdās, tē
errātūrum esse; dīxī, sī
hōc crēderēs, tē errātūrum
esse.
|
|
sī hōc crēdideris, errābis,
|
dīcō, sī hōc crēderīs, tē
errātūrum esse; dīxī, sī
hōc crēdidissēs, tē errātūrum
esse.
|
|
sī hōc crēdēbās, errāvistī,
|
dīcō, sī hōc crēderēs, tē
errāvisse; dīxī, sī hōc
crēderēs, tē errāvisse.
|
a. Note that a Future Perfect Indicative of the Direct
Discourse regularly appears in the Indirect as a Perfect Subjunctive
after a principal tense, and as a Pluperfect Subjunctive after an
historical tense.
320. A. THE APODOSIS. The Present
Subjunctive of the Direct Discourse regularly becomes the Future
Infinitive of the Indirect.
B. THE PROTASIS. The Protasis takes those tenses of the
Subjunctive demanded by the sequence of tenses.
Examples:—
|
sī hōc crēdās, errēs,
|
dīcō, sī hōc crēdās, tē
errātūrum esse; dīxī, sī
hōc crēderēs, tē errātūrum
esse;
|
321. A. THE APODOSIS.
1. The Imperfect Subjunctive of the Direct Discourse becomes the
Future Infinitive.
a. But this construction is rare, being represented in the
classical Latinity by a single example (Caesar, V. 29. 2). Some scholars
question the correctness of this passage.
2. The Pluperfect Subjunctive of the Direct Discourse
becomes:—
a) In the Active Voice the Infinitive in -ūrus
fuisse.
b) In the Passive Voice it takes the form futūrum
fuisse ut with the Imperfect Subjunctive.
B. THE PROTASIS. The protasis in Conditional Sentences of this
type always remains unchanged.
Examples:—
|
sī hōc crēderēs, errārēs,
|
dīcō (dīxī), sī hōc
crēderēs, tē errātūrum esse;
|
|
sī hōc crēdidissēs, errāvissēs,
|
dīcō (dīxī), sī hōc
crēdidissēs, tē errātūrum fuisse;
|
|
sī hōc dīxissēs, pūnītus
essēs.
|
dīcō (dīxī), sī hōc
dīxissēs, futūrum fuisse ut
pūnīrēris.
|
322. When an apodosis of a conditional
sentence of the Third Type referring to the past is at the same time a
Result clause or a quīn-clause (after nōn
dubitō, etc.), it stands in the Perfect Subjunctive in
the form -ūrus fuerim; as,—
ita territī sunt, ut arma trāditūrī
fuerint,[57] nisi
Caesar subitō advēnisset, they were so frightened that
they would have given up their arms, had not Caesar suddenly
arrived;
nōn dubitō quīn, sī hōc
dīxissēs, errātūrus fuerīs,[57] I do not doubt that, if you had said
this, you would have made a mistake.
a. This peculiarity is confined to the Active Voice. In the
Passive, such sentences, when they become dependent, remain unchanged;
as,—
nōn dubitō quīn, sī hōc
dīxissēs, vituperātus essēs, I do not doubt
that, if you had said this, you would have been blamed.
b. When an Indirect Question becomes an apodosis in a
conditional sentence of the Third Type, -ūrus fuerim (rarely
-ūrus fuissem) is used; as,—
quaerō, num, sī hōc dīxissēs,
errātūrus fuerīs (or fuissēs).
c. Potuī, when it becomes a dependent apodosis in
sentences of this Type, usually changes to the Perfect Subjunctive;
as,—
concursū tōtīus civitātis
dēfēnsī sunt, ut frīgidissimōs quoque
ōrātōrēs populī studia excitāre
potuerint, they were defended before a gathering of all the
citizens, so that the interest of the people would have been enough to
excite even the most apathetic orators.
IMPLIED INDIRECT DISCOURSE.
323. The Subjunctive is often used in
subordinate clauses whose indirect character is merely implied by the
context; as,—
dēmōnstrābantur mihi praetereā, quae
Sōcratēs dē immortālitāte animōrum
disseruisset, there were explained to me besides, the arguments
which Socrates had set forth concerning the immortality of the soul
(i.e. the arguments which, it was said, Socrates had set
forth);
Paetus omnēs librōs quōs pater suus relīquisset
mihi dōnāvit, Paetus gave me all the books which (as he
said) his father had left.
SUBJUNCTIVE BY ATTRACTION.
324. 1. Subordinate clauses dependent
upon the Subjunctive are frequently attracted into the same mood
especially when they do not express a fact, but constitute an
essential part of one complex idea; as,—
nēmō avārus adhūc inventus est, cui, quod
habēret, esset satis, no miser has yet been found who was
satisfed with what he had;
cum dīversās causās afferrent, dum fōrmam
suī quisque et animī et ingeniī redderent, as they
brought forward different arguments, while each mirrored his own
individual type of mind and natural bent;
quod ego fatear, pudeat? should I be ashamed of a thing
which I admit?
2. Similarly a subordinate clause dependent upon an Infinitive is put
in the Subjunctive when the two form one closely united whole;
as,—
mōs est Athēnīs quotannīs in cōntiōne
laudārī eōs quī sint in proeliīs
interfectī, it is the custom at Athens every year for those
to be publicly eulogized who have been killed in battle. (Here the
notion of 'praising those who fell in battle' forms an inseparable
whole.)
325. These are the Infinitive,
Participle, Gerund, and Supine. All of these partake of the nature of the
Verb, on the one hand, and of the Noun or Adjective, on the other.
Thus:—
As Verbs,—
a) They may be limited by adverbs;
b) They admit an object;
c) They have the properties of voice and tense.
As Nouns or Adjectives,—
a) They are declined;
b) They take Noun or Adjective constructions.
THE INFINITIVE.
326. This is used chiefly as Subject or
Object but also as Predicate or Appositive.
NOTE.—The Infinitive was originally a
Dative, and traces of this are still to be seen in the poetical use of
the Infinitive to express purpose; as, nec dulcēs
occurrent ōscula nātī praeripere, and no sweet
children will run to snatch kisses.
A. As Subject.
327. 1. The Infinitive without Subject
Accusative is used as the Subject of esse and various impersonal
verbs, particularly opus est, necesse est, oportet,
juvat, dēlectat, placet, libet,
licet, praestat, decet, pudet,
interest, etc.; as,—
dulce et decōrum est prō patriā morī, it
is sweet and noble to die for one's country;
virōrum est fortium toleranter dolōrem patī,
it is the part of brave men to endure pain with patience;
senātuī placuit lēgātōs mittere,
the Senate decided (lit. it pleased the Senate) to send
envoys.
2. Even though the Infinitive itself appears without Subject, it may
take a Predicate Noun or Adjective in the Accusative; as,—
aliud est īrācundum esse, aliud īrātum,
it is one thing to be irascible, another to be angry;
impūne quaelibet facere, id est rēgem esse, to do
whatever you please with impunity, that is to be a king.
a. But when licet is followed by a Dative of the person,
a Predicate Noun or Adjective with esse is attracted into the same
case; as, licuit esse ōtiōsō Themistoclī, lit.
it was permitted to Themistocles to be at leisure. So sometimes
with other Impersonals.
B. As Object.
328. 1. The Infinitive without Subject
Accusative is used as the Object of many verbs, to denote another action
of the same subject, particularly after—
volō, cupiō, mālō,
nōlō, dēbeo, ought;
statuō, cōnstituō, decide;
audeō, dare; studeō,
contendō, strive; parō,
prepare (so parātus); incipiō,
coepī, īnstituō, begin;
pergō, continue; dēsinō,
dēsistō, cease; possum,
can; cōnor,
try;
|
cōgitō, meditor, purpose,
intend; neglegō, neglect;
vereor, timeō, fear;
mātūrō, festīnō,
properō, contendō, hasten;
assuēscō, cōnsuēscō,
accustom myself (so assuētus,
īnsuētus, assuēfactus);
discō, learn; sciō, know
how; soleō, am
wont;
|
as,—
tū hōs intuērī audēs, do you dare
to look on these men?
Dēmosthenēs ad flūctūs maris
dēclāmāre solēbat, Demosthenes used to declaim
by the waves of the sea.
2. A Predicate Noun or Adjective with these Infinitives is attracted
into the Nominative; as,—
beātus esse sine virtūte nēmō potest, no
one can be happy without virtue;
Catō esse quam vidērī bonus mālēbat,
Cato preferred to be good rather than to seem so.
329. This is used chiefly as Subject or
Object but also as Predicate or Appositive.
A. As Subject.
330. The Infinitive with Subject
Accusative (like the simple Infinitive) is used as Subject with
esse and Impersonal verbs, particularly with aequum est,
ūtile est, turpe est, fāma est,
spēs est, fās est, nefās est, opus
est, necesse est, oportet, cōnstat,
praestat, licet, etc.; as,—
nihil in bellō oportet contemnī, nothing ought to
be despised in war;
apertum est sibi quemque nātūrā esse cārum,
it is manifest that by nature everybody is dear to himself.
B. As Object.
331. The Infinitive with Subject
Accusative is used as Object after the following classes of verbs:
1. Most frequently after verbs of saying, thinking,
knowing, perceiving, and the like (Verba Sentiendi et
Dēclārandī). This is the regular construction of
Principal Clauses of Indirect Discourse. Verbs that take this
construction are, among others, the following: sentiō,
audiō, videō, cognōscō;
putō, jūdicō, spērō,
cōnfīdō; sciō, meminī;
dicō, affīrmō, negō (say that
... not), trādō, nārrō,
fateor, respondeō, scrībō,
prōmittō, glōrior. Also the phrases:
certiōrem faciō (inform), memoriā
teneō (remember), etc.
Examples:—
Epicūrēī putant cum corporibus simul animōs
interīre, the Epicureans think that the soul perishes with
the body;
Thalēs dīxit aquam esse initium rērum, Thales
said that water was the first principle of the universe;
Dēmocritus negat quicquid esse sempiternum, Democritus
says nothing is everlasting;
spērō eum ventūrum esse, I hope that he will
come.
II. With jubeō, order, and vetō,
forbid; as,—
Caesar mīlitēs pontem facere jussit, Caesar
ordered the soldiers to make a bridge.
a. When the name of the person who is ordered or forbidden to
do something is omitted, the Infinitive with jubeō and
vetō is put in the Passive; as, Caesar pontem fierī
jussit.
III. With patior and sinō, permit,
allow; as,—
nūllō sē implicārī negōtiō
passus est, he did not permit himself to be involved in any
difficulty.
IV. With volō, nōlō,
mālō, cupiō, when the Subject of the
Infinitive is different from that of the governing verb; as,—
nec mihi hunc errōrem extorquērī volō,
nor do I wish this error to be wrested from me;
eās rēs jactārī nōlēbat, he
was unwilling that these matters should be discussed;
tē tuā fruī virtūte cupimus, we desire
that you enjoy your worth.
a. When the Subject of both verbs is the same, the simple
Infinitive is regularly used in accordance with §
328, 1. But exceptions occur, especially in case of esse and
Passive Infinitives as,—
cupiō mē esse clēmentem, I desire to be
lenient;
Tīmoleōn māluit sē diligī quam
metuī, Timoleon preferred to be loved rather than
feared.
b. Volō also admits the Subjunctive, with or
without ut; nōlō the Subjunctive alone. (See § 296, 1, a.)
V. With Verbs of emotion (joy, sorrow,
regret, etc.), especially gaudeō,
laetor, doleō; aegrē ferō,
molestē ferō, graviter ferō, am
annoyed, distressed; mīror, queror,
indignor; as,—
gaudeō tē salvum advenīre, I rejoice that you
arrive safely;
nōn molestē ferunt sē libīdinum vinculīs
laxātōs ēsse, they are not troubled at being
released from the bonds of passion;
mīror tē ad mē nihil scrībere, I wonder
that you write me nothing.
a. Instead of an Infinitive these verbs also sometimes admit a
quod- clause as Object. (See § 299.)
Thus:—
mīror quod nōn loqueris, I wonder that you do not
speak.
VI. Some verbs which take two Accusatives, one of the Person and the
other of the Thing (§ 178, 1), may substitute an
Infinitive for the second Accusative; as,—
cōgō tē hōc facere, I compel you to do
this (cf. tē hōc cōgō);
docuī tē contentum esse, I taught you to be
content (cf. tē modestiam docuī, I taught
you temperance).
332. Those verbs which in the Active are
followed by the Infinitive with Subject Accusative, usually admit the
personal construction of the Passive. This is true of the following and
of some others:—
a) jubeor, vetor, sinor; as,—
mīlitēs pontem facere jussī sunt, the
soldiers were ordered to build a bridge;
pōns fierī jussus est, a bridge was ordered
built;
mīlitēs castrīs exīre vetitī sunt,
the troops were forbidden to go out of the camp;
Sēstius Clōdium accūsāre nōn est
situs, Sestius was not allowed to accuse Clodius.
b) videor, I am seen, I seem;
as,—
vidētur comperisse, he seems to have
discovered.
c) dīcor, putor, exīstimor,
jūdicor (in all persons); as,—
dīcitur in Italiam vēnisse, he is said to have
come into Italy;
Rōmulus prīmus rēx Rōmānōrum fuisse
putātur, Romulus is thought to have been the first king of
the Romans.
d) fertur, feruntur, trāditur,
trāduntur (only in the third person); as,—
fertur Homērus caecus fuisse, Homer is said to have
been blind;
carmina Archilochī contumēliīs referta esse
trāduntur, Archilochus's poems are reported to have been full
of abuse.
NOTE.—In compound tenses and
periphrastic forms, the last two classes of verbs, c), d),
more commonly take the impersonal construction; as—
trāditum est Homērum caecum fuisse, the story goes
that Homer was blind.
333. The Infinitive with Adjectives
(except parātus, assuētus, etc.; see § 328, 1) occurs only in poetry and post-Augustan
prose writers; as,—
contentus dēmōnstrāsse, contented to have
proved;
audāx omnia perpetī, bold for enduring
everything.
334. The Infinitive is used in
Exclamations implying scorn, indignation, or regret.
An intensive -ne is often attached to some word in the clause.
Examples:—
huncine sōlem tam nigrum surrēxe mihi, to think
that to-day's sun rose with such evil omen for me!
sedēre tōtōs diēs in vīllā, to
stay whole days at the villa.
335. The Infinitive is often used in
historical narrative instead of the Imperfect Indicative. The Subject
stands in the Nominative; as,—
interim cottīdiē Caesar Haeduōs frūmentum
flāgitāre, meanwhile Caesar was daily demanding grain of
the Haedui.
PARTICIPLES.
336. 1. The tenses of the Participle,
like those of the infinitive (see § 270), express
time not absolutely, but with reference to the verb upon which the
Participle depends.
2. The Present Participle denotes action contemporary with that
of the verb. Thus:—
audiō tē loquentem = you ARE speaking and I
hear you;
audiēbam tē loquentem = you WERE speaking
and I heard you;
audiam tē loquentem = you WILL BE speaking and I
shall hear you.
a. The Present Participle is sometimes employed with Conative
force; as,—
assurgentem rēgem resupīnat, as the king was
trying to rise, he threw him down.
3. The Perfect Passive Participle denotes action prior to that
of the verb. Thus:—
locūtus taceō = I HAVE spoken and am
silent;
locūtus tacui = I HAD spoken and then was
silent;
locūtus tacēbō = I SHALL speak and
then shall be silent.
4. The absolute time of the action of a participle, therefore, is
determined entirely by the finite verb with which it is connected.
5. Certain Perfect Passive Participles of Deponent and Semi-Deponent
Verbs are used as Presents; viz. arbitrātus,
ausus, ratus, gāvīsus, solitus,
ūsus, cōnfīsus, diffīsus,
secūtus, veritus.
337. As an Adjective the Participle may
be used either as an attributive or predicate modifier of a
Substantive.
1. Attributive Use. This presents no special peculiarities. Examples
are:—
glōria est cōnsentiēns laus bonōrum,
glory is the unanimous praise of the good;
Conōn mūrōs ā Lysandrō dīrutōs
reficit, Conon restored the walls destroyed by Lysander.
2. Predicate Use. Here the Participle is often equivalent to a
subordinate clause. Thus the Participle may denote:—
omne malum nāscēns facile opprimitur, every evil
is easily crushed at birth.
mente ūtī nōn possumus cibō et
pōtiōne complētī, if gorged with food and
drink, we cannot use our intellects.
Solōn senēscere sē dīcēbat multa in
diēs addiscentem, Solon said he grew old learning many new
things daily.
sōl oriēns diem cōnficit, the sun, by its
rising, makes the day.
e) Opposition ('though'); as,—
mendācī hominī nē vērum quidem
dīcentī crēdimus, we do not believe a liar, though
he speaks the truth.
perfidiam veritus ad suōs recessit, since he feared
treachery, he returned to his own troops.
3. Videō and audiō, besides the Infinitive,
take the Present Participle in the Predicate use; as,—
videō tē fugientem, I see you fleeing.
a. So frequently faciō, fingō,
indūcō, etc.; as,—
eīs Catōnem respondentem facimus, we represent
Cato replying to them;
Homērus Laërtem colentem agrum facit, Homer represents
Laërtes tilling the field.
4. The Future Active Participle (except futūrus) is
regularly confined to its use in the Periphrastic Conjugation, but in
poets and later writers it is used independently, especially to denote
purpose; as,—
vēnērunt castra oppugnātūrī, they
came to assault the camp.
5. The Perfect Passive Participle is often equivalent to a coördinate
clause; as,—
urbem captam dīruit, he captured and destroyed the
city (lit. he destroyed the city captured).
6. The Perfect Passive Participle in combination with a noun is
sometimes equivalent to an abstract noun with a dependent Genitive;
as,—
post urbem conditam, after the founding of the city;
Quīnctius dēfēnsus, the defense of
Quinctius;
quibus animus occupātus, the preoccupation of the mind
with which.
7. Habeō sometimes takes a Perfect Passive Participle in
the Predicate construction with a force not far removed from that of the
Perfect or Pluperfect Indicative; as,—
equitātus quem coāctum habēbat, the cavalry
which he had collected.
8. The Gerundive denotes obligation, necessity,
etc. Like other Participles it may be used either as Attributive
or Predicate.
a) Less frequently as Attributive. Thus:—
liber legendus, a book worth reading;
lēgēs observandae, laws deserving of
observance.
b) More frequently as Predicate.
1) In the Passive Periphrastic Conjugation (amandus est,
etc.). In this use Intransitive Verbs can be used only
impersonally, but admit their ordinary case-construction (Gen., Dat.,
Abl.); as,—
veniendum est, it is necessary to come;
oblīvīscendum est offēnsārum, one must
forget injuries;
numquam prōditōrī crēdendum est, you
must never trust a traitor;
suō cuique ūtendum est jūdiciō, every
man must use his own judgment.
2) After cūrō, provide for; dō,
trādō, give over; relinquō,
leave; concēdō, hand over, and some other
verbs, instead of an object clause, or to denote purpose; as,—
Caesar pontem in Ararī faciendum cūrāvit,
Caesar provided for the construction of a bridge over the
Arar;
imperātor urbem mīlitibus dīripiendam concessit,
the general handed over the city to the soldiers to plunder.
9. For the Gerundive as the equivalent of the Gerund, see § 339, 1.
THE GERUND.
338. As a verbal noun the Gerund admits
noun constructions as follows:—
1. Genitive. The Genitive of the Gerund is used—
a) With Nouns, as objective or Appositional Genitive (see §§ 200, 202); as,—
cupiditās dominandī, desire of ruling;
ars scrībendī, the art of writing.
cupidus audiendī, desirous of hearing.
c) With causā, grātiā;
as,—
discendī causā, for the sake of learning.
2. Dative. The Dative of the Gerund is used—
aqua ūtilis est bibendō, water is useful for
drinking.
b) With Verbs (rarely); as,—
adfuī scrībendō, I was present at the
writing.
3. Accusative. The Accusative of the Gerund is used only with
Prepositions, chiefly ad and in to denote purpose;
as,—
homō ad agendum nātus est, man is born for
action.
4. Ablative. The Ablative of the Gerund is used—
a) Without a Preposition, as an Ablative of Means, Cause,
etc. (see §§ 218,
219); as,—
mēns discendō alitur et cōgitandō, the
mind is nourished by learning and reflection.
Themistoclēs maritimōs praedōnēs
cōnsectandō mare tūtum reddidit, Themistocles made
the sea safe by following up the pirates.
b) After the prepositions ā, dē,
ex, in; as,—
summa voluptās ex discendō capitur, the keenest
pleasure is derived from learning;
multa dē bene beātēque vīvendō ā
Platōne disputāta sunt, there was much discussion by
Plato on the subject of living well and happily.
5. As a rule, only the Genitive of the Gerund and the Ablative
(without a preposition) admit a Direct Object.
339. 1. Instead of the Genitive or
Ablative of the Gerund with a Direct Object, another construction may
be, and very often is, used. This consists in putting the Direct
Object in the case of the Gerund (Gen. or Abl.) and using the Gerundive
in agreement with it. This is called the Gerundive Construction.
Thus:—
|
GERUND CONSTRUCTION.
|
GERUNDIVE CONSTRUCTION.
|
|
cupidus urbem videndī, desirous of seeing the
city.
|
cupidus urbis videndae;
|
|
dēlector ōrātōrēs legendō, I
am charmed with reading the orators.
|
dēlector ōrātōribus legendīs
|
2. The Gerundive Construction must be used to avoid a Direct
Object with the Dative of the Gerund, or with a case dependent upon a
Preposition; as,—
locus castrīs mūniendīs aptus, a place
adapted to fortifying a camp;
ad pācem petendam vēnērunt, they came to ask
peace;
multum temporis cōnsūmō in legendīs
poētīs, I spend much time in reading the poets.
3. In order to avoid ambiguity (see § 236, 2),
the Gerundive Construction must not be employed in case of Neuter
Adjectives used substantively. Thus regularly—
philosophī cupidī sunt vērum
invēstīgandī, philosophers are eager for
discovering truth (rarely vērī
invēstīgandī);
studium plūra cognōscendī, a desire of
knowing more (not plūrium cognōscendōrum).
4. From the nature of the case only Transitive Verbs can be used in
the Gerundive construction; but ūtor, fruor,
fungor, potior (originally transitive) regularly admit it;
as,—
hostēs in spem potiundōrum castrōrum
vēnerant, the enemy had conceived the hope of gaining
possession of the camp.
5. The Genitives meī, tuī, suī,
nostrī, vestrī, when used in the Gerundive
Construction, are regularly employed without reference to Gender or
Number, since they were originally Neuter Singular Adjectives used
substantively. Thus:—
mulier suī servandī causā aufūgit, the
woman fled for the sake of saving herself;
lēgātī in castra vēnērunt suī
pūrgandī causā, the envoys came into camp for the
purpose of clearing themselves.
So nostrī servandī causā, for the sake of
saving ourselves.
6. Occasionally the Genitive of the Gerundive Construction is used to
denote purpose; as,—
quae ille cēpit lēgum ac lībertātis
subvertundae, which he undertook for the purpose of overthrowing
the laws and liberty.
7. The Dative of the Gerundive Construction occurs in some expressions
which have the character of formulas; as,—
decemvirī lēgibus scrībundīs, decemvirs
for codifying the laws;
quīndecimvirī sacrīs faciundīs,
quindecimvirs for performing the sacrifices.
THE SUPINE.
340. 1. The Supine in -um is used
after Verbs of motion to express purpose; as,—
lēgātī ad Caesarem grātulātum
convēnērunt, envoys came to Caesar to congratulate
him.
a. The Supine in -um may take an Object; as,—
pācem petītum ōrātōrēs Rōmam
mittunt, they send envoys to Rome to ask for peace.
dō (collocō) fīliam nūptum, I give my
daughter in marriage.
2. The Supine in -ū is used as an Ablative of
Specification with facilis, difficilis,
incrēdibilis, jūcundus, optimus,
etc.; also with fās est, nefās est,
opus est; as,—
haec rēs est facilis cognitū, this thing is easy
to learn;
hōc est optimum factū, this is best to do.
a. Only a few Supines in -ū are in common use,
chiefly audītū, cognitū, dictū,
factū, vīsū.
b. The Supine in -ū never takes an Object.
341. Copulative Conjunctions.
These join one word, phrase, or clause to another.
1.
a) et simply connects.
b) -que joins more closely than et, and is used
especially where the two members have an internal connection with each
other; as,—
parentēs līberīque, parents and
children;
cum hominēs aestū febrīque jactantur, when
people are tossed about with heat and fever.
c) atque (ac) usually emphasizes the second of
the two things connected,—and also, and indeed, and in fact.
After words of likeness and difference, atque
(ac) has the force of as, than. Thus:—
ego idem sentiō ac tū, I think the same as
you;
haud aliter ac, not otherwise than.
d) neque (nec) means and not,
neither, nor.
2.
a) -que is an enclitic, and is
appended always to the second of two words connected. Where it connects
phrases or clauses, it is appended to the first word of the second
clause; but when the first word of the second clause is a Preposition,
-que is regularly appended to the next following word;
as,—
ob eamque rem, and on account of that thing.
b) atque is used before vowels and consonants; ac
never before vowels, and seldom before c, g, qu.
c) et nōn is used for neque when the
emphasis of the negative rests upon a special word; as,—
vetus et nōn ignōbilis ōrātor, an old
and not ignoble orator.
d) For and nowhere, and never, and none,
the Latin regularly said nec ūsquam, nec umquam,
nec ūllus, etc.
3. Correlatives. Copulative Conjunctions are frequently used
correlatively; as,—
et ... et, both ... and;
neque (nec) ... neque (nec), neither ... nor;
cum ... tum, while ... at the same time;
tum ... tum, not only ... but also.
et ... neque; neque ... et.
a. Note that the Latin, with its tendency to emphasize
antithetical relations, often uses correlatives, especially et ...
et, et ... neque, neque ... et, where the English
employs but a single connective.
4. In enumerations—
a) The different members of a series may follow one another
without connectives (Asyndeton; see § 346).
Thus:—
ex cupiditātibus odia, discidia, discordiae,
sēditiōnēs, bella nāscuntur, from covetous
desires spring up hatred, dissension, discord, sedition, wars.
b) The different members may severally be connected by
et (Polysyndeton). Thus:—
hōrae cēdunt et diēs et mēnsēs et
annī, hours and days and months and years pass away.
c) The connective may be omitted between the former members,
while the last two are connected by -que (rarely et);
as,—
Caesar in Carnutēs, Andēs Turonēsque
legiōnēs dēdūcit, Caesar leads his legions
into the territory of the Carnutes, Andes, and Turones.
342. Disjunctive Conjunctions indicate an
alternative.
1.
a) aut must be used when the
alternatives are mutually exclusive; as,—
cita mors venit aut victōria laeta, (either) swift
death or glad victory comes.
b) vel, -ve (enclitic) imply a choice between the
alternatives; as,—
quī aethēr vel caelum nōminātur, which
is called aether or heaven.
2. Correlatives. Disjunctive Conjunctions are often used
correlatively; as,—
aut ... aut, either ... or;
vel ... vel, either ... or;
sīve ... sīve, if ... or if.
343. Adversative Conjunctions. These
denote opposition.
1.
a) sed, but, merely
denotes opposition.
b) vērum, but, is stronger than sed,
but is less frequently used.
c) autem, but on the other hand, however,
marks a transition. It is always post-positive.
DEFINITION. A post-positive word is one that
cannot begin a sentence, but is placed after one or more words.
d) at, but, is used especially in disputation, to
introduce an opposing argument.
e) atquī means but yet.
f) tamen, yet, usually stands after the emphatic
word, but not always.
g) vērō, however, indeed, in
truth, is always post-positive.
2. Note the correlative expressions:—
nōn sōlum (nōn modo) ... sed etiam, not only
... but also;
nōn modo nōn ... sed nē ... quidem, not only
not, but not even; as,—
nōn modo tibi nōn īrāscor, sed nē
reprehendō quidem factum tuum, I not only am not angry with
you, but I do not even blame your action.
a. But when the sentence has but one verb, and this stands with
the second member, nōn modo may be used for nōn modo
nōn; as,—
adsentātiō nōn modo amīcō, sed nē
līberō quidem digne est, flattery is not only not worthy
of a friend, but not even of a free man.
344. Illative Conjunctions. These
represent the statement which they introduce as following from or
as in conformity with what has preceded.
1.
a) itaque = and so,
accordingly.
b) ergō = therefore, accordingly.
c) igitur (regularly post-positive[58]) = therefore,
accordingly.
2. Igitur is never combined with et, atque,
-que, or neque.
345. Causal Conjunctions. These
denote cause, or give an explanation. They are nam,
namque, enim (post-positive), etenim,
for.
346. Asyndeton. The conjunction is
sometimes omitted between coördinate members, particularly in lively or
impassioned narration. Thus:—
a) A copulative Conjunction is omitted; as,—
avāritia īnfīnīta, īnsatiābilis
est, avarice is boundless (and) insatiable;
Cn. Pompejō, M. Crassō cōnsulibus, in the
consulship of Gnaeus Pompey (and) Marcus Crassus.
The conjunction is regularly omitted between the names of consuls when
the praenomen (Mārcus, Gaius, etc.) is
expressed.
b) An Adversative Conjunction may be omitted; as,—
ratiōnēs dēfuērunt, ūbertās
ōrātiōnis nōn dēfuit, arguments were
lacking, (but) abundance of words was not.
ADVERBS.
347. 1. The following particles,
sometimes classed as Conjunctions, are more properly Adverbs:—
etiam, also, even.
quoque (always post-positive), also.
quidem (always post-positive) lays stress upon the preceding
word. It is sometimes equivalent to the English indeed, in
fact, but more frequently cannot be rendered, except by vocal
emphasis.
nē ... quidem means not even; the emphatic word or
phrase always stands between; as, nē ille quidem, not even
he.
tamen and vērō, in addition to their use as
Conjunctions, are often employed as Adverbs.
2. Negatives. Two negatives are regularly equivalent to an
affirmative as in English, as nōn nūllī,
some; but when nōn, nēmō,
nihil, numquam, etc., are accompanied by neque
... neque, nōn ... nōn, nōn modo, or
nē ... quidem, the latter particles simply take up the
negation and emphasize it; as,—
habeō hīc nēminem neque amīcum neque
cognātum, I have here no one, neither friend nor
relative.
nōn enim praetereundum est nē id quidem, for not
even that must be passed by.
a. Haud in Cicero and Caesar occurs almost exclusively
as a modifier of Adjectives and Adverbs, and in the phrase haud
sciō an. Later writers use it freely with verbs.
348. In the normal arrangement of the
Latin sentence the Subject stands at the beginning of the sentence, the
Predicate at the end; as,—
Dārīus classem quīngentārum nāvium
comparāvit, Darius got ready a fleet of five hundred
ships.
349. But for the sake of emphasis the
normal arrangement is often abandoned, and the emphatic word is put at
the beginning, less frequently at the end of the sentence; as,—
magnus in hōc bellō Themistoclēs fuit, GREAT was Themistocles in this war;
aliud iter habēmus nūllum, other course we
have NONE.
SPECIAL PRINCIPLES.
350. 1. Nouns. A Genitive or other
oblique case regularly follows the word upon which it depends.
Thus:—
a) Depending upon a Noun:—
tribūnus plēbis, tribune of the plebs;
fīlius rēgis, son of the king;
vir magnī animī, a man of noble spirit.
Yet always senātūs cōnsultum,
plēbis scītum.
b) Depending upon an Adjective:—
ignārus rērum, ignorant of affairs;
dignī amīcitiā, worthy of friendship;
plūs aequō, more than (what is) fair.
2. Appositives. An Appositive regularly follows its Subject;
as,—
Philippus, rēx Macedonum, Philip, king of the
Macedonians;
adsentātiō, vitiōrum adjūtrīx,
flattery, promoter of evils.
Yet flūmen Rhēnus, the River
Rhine; and always in good prose urbs Rōma, the city
Rome.
3. The Vocative usually follows one or more words;
as,—
audī, Caesar, hear, Caesar!
4. Adjectives. No general law can be laid down for the position
of Adjectives. On the whole they precede the noun oftener than they
follow it.
a. Adjectives of quantity (including numerals)
regularly precede their noun; as,—
omnēs hominēs, all men;
septingentae nāvēs, seven hundred vessels.
b. Note the force of position in the following:—
media urbs, the middle of the city;
urbs media, the middle city,
extrēmum bellum, the end of the war;
bellum extrēmum, the last war.
c. Rōmānus and Latīnus regularly
follow; as,—
senātus populusque Rōmānus, the Roman Senate
and People;
lūdī Rōmānī, the Roman
games;
fēriae Latīnae, the Latin holidays.
d. When a Noun is modified both by an Adjective and by a
Genitive, a favorite order is: Adjective, Genitive, Noun; as,—
summa omnium rērum abundantia, the greatest abundance
of all things.
5. Pronouns.
a. The Demonstrative, Relative, and Interrogative Pronouns
regularly precede the Noun; as,—
hīc homō, this man;
ille homō, that man;
erant duo itinera, quibus itineribus, etc., there
were two routes, by which, etc.
quī homō? what sort of man?
b. But ille in the sense of 'that well known,'
'that famous,' usually stands after its Noun; as,—
testula illa, that well-known custom of ostracism;
Mēdēa illa, that famous Medea.
c. Possessive and Indefinite Pronouns usually follow their
Noun; as,—
pater meus, my father;
homō quīdam, a certain man;
mulier aliqua, some woman.
But for purposes of contrast the Possessive often
precedes its Noun; as,—
meus pater, MY father
(i.e. as opposed to yours, his, etc.).
d. Where two or more Pronouns occur in the same sentence, the
Latin is fond of putting them in close proximity; as,—
nisi forte ego vōbīs cessāre videor, unless
perchance I seem to you to be doing nothing.
6. Adverbs and Adverbial phrases regularly precede the word they
modify; as,—
valdē dīligēns, extremely diligent;
saepe dīxī, I have often said;
tē jam diū hortāmur, we have long been urging
you;
paulō post, a little after.
7. Prepositions regularly precede the words they govern.
a. But limiting words often intervene between the Preposition
and its case; as,—
dē commūnī hominum memoriā, concerning
the common memory of men;
ad beātē vīvendum, for living
happily.
b. When a noun is modified by an Adjective, the Adjective is
often placed before the preposition; as,—
magnō in dolōre, in great grief;
summā cum laude, with the highest credit;
quā dē causā, for which cause;
hanc ob rem, on account of this thing.
c. For Anastrophe, by which a Preposition is put after its
case, see § 144, 3.
8. Conjunctions. Autem, enim, and igitur
regularly stand in the second place in the sentence, but when combined
with est or sunt they often stand third; as,—
ita est enim, for so it is.
9. Words or Phrases referring to the preceding sentence or to some
part of it, regularly stand first; as,—
id ut audīvit, Corcyram dēmigrāvit, when he
heard that (referring to the contents of the preceding sentence),
he moved to Corcyra;
eō cum Caesar vēnisset, timentēs cōnfirmat,
when Caesar had come thither (i.e. to the place just
mentioned), he encouraged the timid.
10. The Latin has a fondness for putting side by side words which are
etymologically related; as,—
ut ad senem senex dē senectūte, sīc hōc
librō ad amīcum amīcissimus dē amīcitiā
scrīpsī, as I, an old man, wrote to an old man, on old
age, so in this book, as a fond friend, I have written to a friend,
concerning friendship.
11. Special rhetorical devices for indicating emphasis are the
following:—
a) Hypérbaton, which consists in the separation of words
that regularly stand together; as,—
septimus mihi Orīginum liber est in manibus, the
seventh book of my 'Origines' is under way;
receptō Caesar Ōricō proficīscitur,
having recovered Oricus, Caesar set out.
b) Anáphora, which consists in the repetition of the
same word or the same word-order in successive phrases; as,—
sed plēnī omnēs sunt librī, plēnae
sapientium vōcēs, plēna exemplōrum vetustās,
but all books are full of it, the voices of sages are full of it,
antiquity is full of examples of it.
c) Chiásmus,[59] which consists in changing the relative
order of words in two antithetical phrases; as,—
multōs dēfendī, laesī nēminem, many
have I defended, I have injured no one;
horribilem illum diem aliīs, nōbīs faustum,
that day dreadful to others, for us fortunate.
d) Sýnchysis, or the interlocked arrangement. This is
mostly confined to poetry, yet occurs in rhetorical prose, especially
that of the Imperial Period; as,—
simulātam Pompejānārum grātiam partium,
pretended interest in the Pompeian party.
12. Metrical Close. At the end of a sentence certain cadences
were avoided; others were much employed. Thus:—
as, esse vidētur (close of
hexameter).
as, esse potest (close of pentameter).
b) Cadences frequently employed.
as, auxerant.
as, comprobāvit.
as, esse videātur.
as, rogātū tuō.
351. 1. Unity of Subject.—In
complex sentences the Latin regularly holds to unity of Subject in the
different members; as,—
Caesar prīmum suō, deinde omnium ex cōnspectū
remōtīs equīs, ut aequātō perīculō
spem fugae tolleret, cohortātus suōs proelium
commīsit, Caesar having first removed his own horse from
sight, then the horses of all, in order, by making the danger equal, to
take away hope of flight, encouraged his men and joined battle.
2. A word serving as the common Subject or Object of the main clause
and a subordinate one, stands before both; as,—
Haeduī cum sē dēfendere nōn possent,
lēgātōs ad Caesarem mittunt, since the Haedui could
not defend themselves, they sent envoys to Caesar;
ille etsī flagrābat bellandī cupiditāte, tamen
pācī serviendum putāvit, although he was burning
with a desire to fight, yet he thought he ought to aim at peace.
1) When the Subject of the main clause is Object (Direct or Indirect)
of a subordinate clause; as,—
Caesar, cum hōc eī nūntiatum esset,
mātūrat ab urbe proficīscī, when this had been
reported to Caesar he hastened to set out from the city.
2) When the Subject of a subordinate clause is at the same time the
Object (Direct or Indirect) of the main clause; as,—
L. Mānliō, cum dictātor fuisset, M. Pompōnius
tribūnus plēbis diem dīxit, M. Pomponius, tribune
of the people, instituted proceedings against Lucius Manlius, though he
had been dictator.
3. Of subordinate clauses, temporal, conditional, and adversative
clauses more commonly precede the main clause; indirect questions and
clauses of purpose or result more commonly follow; as,—
postquam haec dīxit, profectus est, after he said this,
he set out;
sī quis ita agat, imprūdēns sit, if any one
should act so, he would be devoid of foresight;
accidit ut ūnā nocte omnēs Hermae
dēicerentur, it happened that in a single night all the
Hermae were thrown down.
4. Sometimes in Latin the main verb is placed within the subordinate
clause; as,—
sī quid est in mē ingenī, quod sentiō quam sit
exiguum, if there is any talent in me, and I know how little it
is.
5. The Latin Period. The term Period, when strictly used,
designates a compound sentence in which the subordinate clauses are
inserted within the main clause; as,—
Caesar etsī intellegēbat quā dē causā ea
dīcerentur, tamen, nē aestātem in Trēverīs
cōnsūmere cōgerētur, Indutiomārum ad sē
venīre jussit, though Caesar perceived why this was said,
yet, lest he should be forced to spend the summer among the Treveri, he
ordered Indutiomarus to come to him.
In the Periodic structure the thought is suspended until the end of
the sentence is reached. Many Roman writers were extremely fond of this
sentence-structure, and it was well adapted to the inflectional character
of their language; in English we generally avoid it.
6. When there are several subordinate clauses in one Period, the Latin
so arranges them as to avoid a succession of verbs. Thus:—
At hostēs cum mīsissent, quī, quae in castrīs
gererentur, cognōscerent, ubi sē dēceptōs
intellēxērunt, omnibus cōpiīs subsecūtī ad
flūmen contendunt, but the enemy when they had sent men to
learn what was going on in camp, after discovering that they had been
outwitted, followed with all their forces and hurried to the
river.
352. In this chapter brief consideration
is given to a few features of Latin diction which belong rather to style
than to formal grammar.
353. 1. Where a distinct reference to
several persons or things is involved, the Latin is frequently much
more exact in the use of the Plural than is the English;
as,—
domōs eunt, they go home (i.e. to their homes);
Germānī corpora cūrant, the Germans care for
the body;
animōs mīlitum recreat, he renews the courage of
the soldiers;
diēs noctēsque timēre, to be in a state of
fear day and night.
2. In case of Neuter Pronouns and Adjectives used substantively, the
Latin often employs the Plural where the English uses the Singular;
as,—
omnia sunt perdīta, everything is lost;
quae cum ita sint, since this is so;
haec omnibus pervulgāta sunt, this is very well known
to all.
3. The Latin is usually more concrete than the English, and
especially less bold in the personification of abstract qualities.
Thus:—
ā puerō, ā puerīs, from boyhood;
Sullā dictātōre, in Sulla's
dictatorship;
mē duce, under my leadership;
Rōmānī cum Carthāginiēnsibus pācem
fēcērunt = Rome made peace with Carthage;
liber doctrīnae plēnus = a learned book;
prūdentiā Themistoclīs Graecia servāta est
= Themistocles's foresight saved Greece.
4. The Nouns of Agency in -tor and -sor (see § 147, 1) denote a permanent or
characteristic activity; as,—
accūsātōrēs, (professional)
accusers;
ōrātōrēs, pleaders;
cantōrēs, singers;
Arminius, Germāniae līberātor, Arminius,
liberator of Germany.
a. To denote single instances of an action, other expressions
are commonly employed; as,—
Numa, quī Rōmulō successit, Numa, successor
of Romulus;
quī mea legunt, my readers;
quī mē audiunt, my auditors.
5. The Latin avoids the use of prepositional phrases as modifiers of a
Noun. In English we say: 'The war against Carthage'; 'a journey
through Gaul'; 'cities on the sea'; 'the book in my
hands'; 'the fight at Salamis'; etc. The Latin in such
cases usually employs another mode of expression. Thus:—
dolor injūriārum, resentment at injuries.
urbēs maritimae, cities on the sea;
pugna Salamīnia, the fight at Salamis.
pugna ad Cannās facta, the battle at Cannae.
d) A Relative clause; as,—
liber quī in meīs manibus est, the book in my
hands.
NOTE.—Yet within certain limits the
Latin does employ Prepositional phrases as Noun modifiers. This is
particularly frequent when the governing noun is derived from a verb. The
following are typical examples:—
trānsitus in Britanniam, the passage to
Britain;
excessus ē vītā, departure from life;
odium ergā Rōmānōs, hatred of the
Romans;
liber dē senectūte, the book on old age;
amor in patriam, love for one's country.
354. 1. Special Latin Equivalents for
English Adjectives are—
virtūtēs animī = moral virtues;
dolōrēs corporis = bodily ills.
b) An Abstract Noun; as,—
novitās reī = the strange circumstance;
asperitās viārum = rough roads.
c) Hendiadys (see § 374, 4);
as,—
ratiō et ōrdō = systematic order;
ārdor et impetus = eager onset.
d) Sometimes an Adverb; as,—
omnēs circā populī, all the surrounding
tribes;
suōs semper hostēs, their perpetual foes.
2. Often a Latin Noun is equivalent to an English Noun modified by an
Adjective; as,—
doctrīna, theoretical knowledge;
prūdentia, practical knowledge;
oppidum, walled town;
libellus, little book.
3. Adjectives are not used in immediate agreement with proper names;
but an Adjective may limit vir, homō, ille, or
some other word used as an Appositive of a proper name; as,—
Sōcratēs, homō sapiēns = the wise
Socrates;
Scīpiō, vir fortissimus = the doughty
Scipio;
Syrācūsae, urbs praeclārissima = famous
Syracuse.
4. An Adjective may be equivalent to a Possessive or Subjective
Genitive; as,—
pāstor rēgius, the shepherd of the king;
tumultus servīlis, the uprising of the slaves.
355. 1. In Compound Sentences the
Relative Pronoun has a fondness for connecting itself with the
subordinate clause rather than the main one; as,—
ā quō cum quaererētur, quid maximē
expedīret, respondit, when it was asked of him what was best,
he replied. (Less commonly, quī, cum ab eō
quaererētur, respondit.)
2. Uterque, ambō. Uterque means each of
two; ambō means both; as,—
uterque frāter abiit, each of the two brothers
departed (i.e. separately);
ambō frātrēs abiērunt, i.e. the two
brothers departed together.
a. The Plural of uterque occurs—
1) With Nouns used only in the Plural (see §
56); as,—
in utrīsque castrīs, in each camp.
2) Where there is a distinct reference to two groups of persons or
things; as,—
utrīque ducēs clārī fuērunt, the
generals on each side (several in number) were famous.
356. 1. In case of Defective and Deponent
Verbs, a Passive is supplied:—
a) By the corresponding verbal Nouns in combination with
esse, etc.; as,—
in odiō sumus, we are hated;
in invidiā sum, I am envied;
admīrātiōnī est, he is admired;
oblīviōne obruitur, he is forgotten (lit.
is overwhelmed by oblivion);
in ūsū esse, to be used.
b) By the Passive of Verbs of related meaning. Thus:—
agitārī as Passive of persequī;
temptārī as Passive of adorīrī.
2. The lack of the Perfect Active Participle in Latin is
supplied—
a) Sometimes by the Perfect Passive Participle of the Deponent;
as,—
adhortātus, having exhorted;
veritus, having feared.
b) By the Ablative Absolute; as,—
hostium agrīs vāstātīs Caesar exercitum
redūxit, having ravaged the country of the enemy, Caesar led
back his army.
c) By subordinate clauses; as,—
eō cum advēnisset, castra posuit, having arrived
there, he pitched a camp;
hostes quī in urbem irrūperant, the enemy having
burst into the city.
3. The Latin agrees with English in the stylistic employment of the
Second Person Singular in an indefinite sense (= 'one').
Cf. the English 'You can drive a horse to water, but you can't
make him drink.' But in Latin this use is mainly confined to certain
varieties of the Subjunctive, especially the Potential (§ 280), Jussive (§ 275),
Deliberative (§ 277), and the Subjunctive in
conditional sentences of the sort included under §
302, 2, and 303. Examples:—
vidērēs, you could see;
ūtāre vīribus, use your strength,
quid hōc homine faciās, what are you to do with
this man?
mēns quoque et animus, nisi tamquam lūminī oleum
īnstīllēs, exstinguuntur senectūte, the
intellect and mind too are extinguished by old age, unless, so to speak,
you keep pouring oil into the lamp;
tantō amōre possessiōnēs suās amplexī
tenēbant, ut ab eīs membra dīvellī citius posse
dīcerēs, they clung to their possessions with such an
affectionate embrace, that you would have said their limbs could sooner
be torn from their bodies.
357. 1. To denote 'so many years,
etc., afterwards or before' the Latin employs not merely the Ablative
of Degree of Difference with post and ante (see § 223), but has other forms of expression.
Thus:—
post quīnque annōs, five years afterward;
paucōs ante diēs, a few days before;
ante quadriennium, four years before;
post diem quārtum quam ab urbe discesserāmus, four
days after we had left the city;
ante tertium annum quam dēcesserat, three years before
he had died.
2. The Latin seldom combines both Subject and Object with the same
Infinitive; as,—
Rōmānōs Hannibalem vīcisse
cōnstat.
Such a sentence would be ambiguous, and might mean either that the
Romans had conquered Hannibal, or that Hannibal had conquered the Romans.
Perspicuity was gained by the use of the Passive Infinitive;
as,—
Rōmānōs ab Hannibale victōs esse
cōnstat, it is well established that the Romans were defeated
by Hannibal.
358. 1. The English for does not
always correspond to a Dative notion in Latin, but is often the
equivalent of prō with the Ablative, viz. in the
senses—
prō patriā morī, to die for one's
country.
b) Instead of, in behalf of; as,—
ūnus prō omnibus dīxit, one spoke for
all;
haec prō lēge dicta sunt, these things were said
for the law.
c) In proportion to; as,—
prō multitūdine hominum eōrum fīnēs erant
angustī, for the population, their territory was
small.
2. Similarly, English to when it indicates motion is rendered
in Latin by ad.
a. Note, however, that the Latin may say either
scrībere ad aliquem, or scrībere alicui,
according as the idea of motion is or is not predominant. So in several
similar expressions.
3. In the poets, verbs of mingling with, contending
with, joining, clinging to, etc., sometimes take
the Dative. This construction is a Grecism. Thus:—
sē miscet virīs, he mingles with the men;
contendis Homērō, you contend with Homer;
dextrae dextram jungere, to clasp hand with hand.
359. 1. The Possessive Genitive gives
emphasis to the possessor, the Dative of Possessor emphasizes
the fact of possession; as,—
hortus patris est, the garden is my father's;
mihi hortus est, I possess a garden.
2. The Latin can say either stultī or stultum est
dīcere, it is foolish to say; but Adjectives of one
ending permit only the Genitive; as,—
sapientis est haec sēcum reputāre, it is the part
of a wise man to consider this.