Officers of both houses of Congress.—Vice President Mangum.—Speaker
Jones.—Members of Congress, their labors and unenviable state.—Eloquence
of members.—Senators Choate, Crittenden, Morehead, &c. &c.—The
Tariff, Oregon and Texas to go down to the foot of the docket and be
postponed until next session of our honorable court.
In the Senate, the Honorable Willie P.
Mangum presides. John Tyler, the Vice
President, on the death of General Harrison
became President of the United States.
The Senate thereafter elected Samuel
Southard, their presiding officer, he dying,
they elected Judge Mangum their president.
He lives, when at home, in Orange county,
North Carolina. From his name, I should
suppose that his ancestors were from Wales.
However that may be, Judge Mangum’s
family is an ancient one in North Carolina,
the name being found among the earliest
settlers of that colony. He presides in the
Senate and occupies the Vice President’s
room in the capitol. He is a man above
the common size, of fair complexion and
commanding air, rather grave in his manners,
but very agreeable and appears to be
kind hearted. His voice is clear, sufficiently
loud and distinct to be heard all over the
Senate chamber and its gallery. On the
whole, he is, taking him all and all, the best
presiding officer, that I ever saw in any legislative
assembly. He is always at his
ease, always dignified and always agreeable.
His appearance is that of a man about
forty years old. He is a whig, unwavering
and unflinching, yet, like the Kentucky
Senators, not a persecuting whig, often voting
to confirm men in offices, who are not
whigs, nor any thing else—long. He appears
to look more to the interests of his
country than his party. When I say this,
I mean to draw no invidious distinctions between
Judge Mangum and others in the
Senate. The feelings of senators must have
been often severely tried by having presented
to them the names of very incompetent
men. Where the man is not decidedly
a bad one, though wanting decision of
character, without which no man can be relied
on, in any pressing emergency, the
Senate let him pass as Hopson’s choice,
because they expect nothing better. In
this way they have confirmed many nominations
which I should have rejected at
once, as destitute of a qualification, without
possessing which, no man is fit for any office
or any calling. So far as Ohio is concerned,
not even one appointment of a citizen of
that State, has been a good one, nor such
an one as I would have made, during the
last two years. I feel no hostility to any
one of these weak men, but wish they had
belonged to some other State, not to ours.
Where the imbecility of a country is placed
in the offices, it shows the strength of our
institutions and the virtue of our people,
which can get along tolerably well, though
such weak men are appointed to offices.
To have found so much imbecility, so carefully
selected from the very surface of society,
must have cost those a vast deal of labor,
care and diligence, who have succeeded
so well, so perfectly in hunting it up, and
in bringing it forward to the President and
his secretaries for their acceptance and gratification!
It is a strong argument in favor
of the permanency of our institutions, which
can bear such appointments. The Senate
appear to be as hungry for the nomination
of men well qualified for the offices to which
they are nominated, as any trout ever was
for a well baited hook—they jump at them
in a moment and unanimously confirm them.
The confirmation of Calhoun’s appointment
as Secretary of State is a case in point. The
news spread like wildfire, and fell upon the
ear like the roar of a water fall in the ear of
a thirsty traveller, in the desert of Sahara.
Asbury Dickens is clerk of the Senate,
and a better clerk of that body could not
have been found in the Union.
Edward Dyer is sergeant-at-arms, and
he is an excellent officer.
In the House of Representatives, John
W. Jones is the speaker. He appears to understand
the rules of the House pretty well,
but owing to the weakness of his voice, or
to the structure of the room, perhaps, we
should attribute something to each cause, I
cannot hear speaker Jones at all, on any occasion,
from any location in the room which
I have ever been permitted to occupy, by
the courtesy of the House.
Caleb J. M’Nulty is clerk of this House,
and a better clerk, a more obliging one,
more correct, more industrious, more attentive
to all his duties as a clerk, more obliging,
polite, and in all respects capable and
faithful, never filled the clerk’s office. M.
St. Clair Clarke, his predecessor in office,
although applauded constantly for his good
qualities of all sorts, yet our Ohio man does,
for aught I can see, as well as M. St. Clair
Clarke himself ever did in his best days.
Among the ladies attending on this session
of Congress, we mention with pleasure
and pride Mrs. M’Nulty, wife of the clerk
of the House. She was born and educated
in Ohio. She is beautiful in form and manners
and does honor to our Buckeye State.
This handsome couple are young in
years, just beginning the world and bid
fair to live long and be useful in the world,
and be ornaments of Ohio. Prosperity and
success to them!
Doctor Lane of Louisville, Kentucky, is
the sergeant-at-arms in the House, and he
is a very gentlemanly, faithful and attentive
officer.
The door-keeper, Jesse E. Dow, and the
postmaster, John M. Johnson, are as good
officers as need be, and they give general
satisfaction.
Members of Congress, generally speaking,
are not idle men by any means. Besides
their attendance on the daily sessions
of the two houses, they are on committees,
which occupy no small portion of the day,
and, sometimes they are in their committees
to a late hour at night. The more laborious
part of the members work more hours,
than any farmer does in the country. Some
of them have a great correspondence with
their constituents and others. They are
obliged to call at the public offices, on the
business of those whom they represent.
Some members, who represent the farmers
of the interior, have little to do, and such
members, are not often chairmen of important
committees, and they may lead an easy
life. Those who represent large cities, or
many commercial people, have more than
they can find time to do it in. The same
remark applies to those who represent manufacturing
districts. Delegates from Territories,
like the Dodges, father and son,
have an immense amount of business to do,
and a great correspondence to carry on.
Such men labor night and day. Calls on
them, made by their constituents and by
others from all parts of the Union, interrupt
them a good deal. General Vance, chairman
of the committee of claims, performs
daily a very laborious task. So far as Ohio
is concerned, in sending representatives to
both houses, I am sure that we have little
reason to complain of their remissness or inattention
to the duties of their station.
There is not a dissipated man among them
nor an idler. So far as I know, they faithfully
attend to all their business in Congress.
Their per diem, eight dollars, seems
to be a very liberal compensation for their
services, but after paying all their bills for
living here, very little remains. Those
who have families here, actually fall in debt,
and have to borrow money to pay a part of
their expenses. A very considerable number
of the members have their wives with
them—and where they have daughters and
female relatives, their compensation is
wholly inadequate to pay their expenses.
The ladies visit the library often and there
read and amuse themselves, or they sit in
the gallery of the House, listening to the
debates. The families of such members as
are able to bring them here, appear to be
quite happy. By associating with many respectable,
well informed and polite people,
they learn a great deal of the world and its
affairs. They become personally acquainted
with the first men in the nation. In this
way they can form a more correct estimate
of such men, their character, dispositions,
manners, habits and talents. In vain do
we look into newspapers, pamphlets and
periodicals for correct ideas concerning
these men. They are much better, or not
so bad, as common report makes them.
Though I had known Mr. Calhoun forty
years, by common report, and, although I
had seen him often presiding in the Senate
chamber, yet until I sat down beside him
in his office, and had conversed with him
sometime, I had never had any correct ideas
of the man at all. I had always been told,
that he was impetuous, sour and morose,
but I found him to be the mildest, kindest
and most agreeable man I ever saw. I was
truly astonished at the contrast between
the man as he really was, and the one he
was represented to be! I was agreeably disappointed
in many others. With the character
of our western men I was in no case
deceived, because I knew them either personally
or from correct sources of information.
For instance, although I had never
seen the Kentucky senators, yet I found
them, Crittenden and Morehead, as agreeable,
as well informed, as friendly, kind and
conciliating in their manners, as I had always
understood they were.
By mingling in such society, our young
men may acquire a fund of information,
which may be of great value to them in after
life.
Though I knew Colonel Benton personally
well and knew him to be a man of
kind feelings towards his friends, and even
towards many who are not friendly to him,
yet, he is often represented as malignant
and overbearing. It is not true, because at
the bottom of his heart there is a great deal
of good feeling. He cannot always suppress
the exhibition of his better nature, even towards
open and avowed political opponents.
So of our senators, Tappan and Allen, the
whigs of Ohio believe that these senators
are their enemies, but I always found them
very friendly to me, doing me many favors
and no injury—quite the reverse. They
have their own political creed, differing
from mine in some respects, but they endeavor
to serve their constituents when
they come here, even if they are whigs.
Those who have been long in Congress
can be much more useful to their constituents,
than those who have had less experience.
Understanding all the rules of proceeding,
they know how to take advantage
of circumstances, when to make a motion,
and the exact moment when to oppose an
opponent. They say less and more to the
purpose. Young men are quite apt to be
impetuous, hasty and rash, and thus often
get overwhelmed by a more cool, deliberate
member. John Quincy Adams is the
hardest man to deal with in the House.
Understanding all the rules of legislation,
with a large store of information, he is sometimes
sarcastic and witty, sometimes profound
and those who attack him always
come off second best. Of all the attacks
on Mr. Adams this session, C. J. Ingersoll’s
was the most unfortunate for the assailant.
Mr. Wise related the whole of it to me in
the library, immediately after the assault
was made and the chastisement which Ingersoll
got. Mr. Wise condemned C. J.
Ingersoll, as every one else did, for his behaviour
towards an aged, respectable man,
whose public services, years learning and
talents ought to command and do command
the respect of all good men in the nation.
Any member of Congress who respects himself,
will always be treated with respect,
because he deserves it. Any young man,
who thinks to obtain any advantage by assailing
Mr. Adams, will find himself to have
made a false calculation.
The Senators preserve their own dignity,
and do not mingle much with the turbulence
around them. They are often misrepresented
by malignant letter writers,
and the falsehoods they invent, have a wide
circulation. These Senators cannot devote
up their time to explanations and contradictions
of such misrepresentations. They
have something else to do.
I will state an instance in point. About
the time that the speculators in Texan land
scrip, began their operations, to effect an
annexation of Texas to this Union, some
letter writer pretended to tell exactly how
all the Senators would vote on that question.
A number of the members of that
body told me, “that they had neither made
up nor expressed any opinion on that subject.”
I afterwards ascertained from the
highest source of information, that not a few
Senators would not vote as the speculators
had predicted they would, but exactly the
reverse. Such miscalculations are daily
made by interested or malicious persons,
who hover around the capitol. Seeing the
papers from a distance, and conversing with
the members on the subjects treated of by
the letter writers, induced me finally to
distrust all I saw, coming from such a polluted
source. These falsehoods do their
authors no good, but often an injury. Placed
as members of Congress are on a pinnacle,
in view of a whole nation, unless they possess
well ballanced minds, they are not to
be envied. They have rivals at home, sometimes
ready to misrepresent their motives,
their services and their talents. There is
always requisite, the constant exercise of
one virtue, at least, which is patience, and
they must labor incessantly to gratify friends
at home, who expect at their hands more
than they can do for them. To be a member
of Congress, requires talents of all sorts—great
industry, great attention to business,
constant care, strength of body and
strength of mind. Members of Congress,
who make a figure as orators, can do little
indeed for individuals among their friends.
Moving in a higher sphere, they aim at some
high station—to be a minister abroad, a Secretary,
or to obtain some lucrative office.
Apparently laboring for the public good,
their real object is frequently very selfish.
Such men have rivals among their own party,
and all their political opponents are opposed
to them. If they succeed to their
hearts’ content, how long does their prosperity
last? In a few short years their race
is run and they are seldom mentioned, but
oblivion covers them from our view and
even from our thoughts. Those who figured
on the stage at some great era in our national
affairs, and stood high then, are remembered
with affection and gratitude, but
the little party politician is forgotten as soon
as he walks off the stage. In this changing
world, how soon is the mere demagogue
forgotten? In his day, he impresses his retainers
with the idea, that, unless some favorite
theory is adopted, all is lost. It is
exploded, he disappears from our sight, and
the world moves on in safety. There is an
elasticity in the American character, not
existing to the same extent in any other nation.
Under any great national disappointment,
there may be, and there is, sometimes
a season of national gloom, but recovering
from such a state of mind, our people rouse
up all their wonted courage, and confiding
in their own strength, they move onward to
new enterprises, entertain new hopes, and
finally realise, and frequently more than
realise all their most sanguine expectations.
In the natural world, the storm and
the tornado may be as necessary as the
clear sunshine and the gentle shower, and
why should the mental world differ from
the natural one in this respect? “This is a
crisis,” says the demagogue—“a nation’s
fate depends on the issue of this crisis,” but
the mighty crisis passes by as harmless as
the Zephyr’s breath in May moves over the
meadow. These getters up of crises are,
on the whole, quite a harmless set of beings.
They keep up a ripple on the ocean
of human life and prevent a dead calm in
the political ocean. In this session of Congress
I have seen none of these crises and
panic makers in the two houses. The debates
on the twenty-first rule, on the Oregon
question, on the army bill, on the tariff
and some other topics were ardent, long
and exciting, but they did not produce a
very angry debate. These several storms
passed over without doing much harm, like
a squall of wind without hail, or even much
rain descending to deluge the earth.
During Dr. Hammet’s speech on the 21st
rule, I had a place, through the Doctor’s
politeness, a seat in the body of the House,
from which, by standing on my feet, I saw
every member in his place, and witnessed
the effect on the countenances of members,
which that speech produced. Those passages
which turned sixty faces pale, produced
convulsive laughter among the rest
of the members. The countenance of Mr.
Adams never changed from a serene aspect,
whereas the Ohio members mostly looked
unmoved as marble, in no wise excited by
the topics, except when the speaker alluded
to the old maids of Massachusetts. When
they were introduced into his speech, our
members were taken by surprise, and they
laughed immoderately. Even Gen. Vance,
Judge Dean and all, with all their usual
gravity, laughed heartily, and forgot to be
grave. The hit was a fair one and well deserved.
Female fanatics are doing some
harm, and can do no good. On questions,
and even doubtful ones of great national
importance, our females would show more
wisdom to be silent, than to press forward
on the stage in buskins to show themselves
as players.
Many persons think the members do
wrong to indulge themselves in so much
speaking, but better make long speeches
than pass many bad laws. That too many
laws are made by state, territorial and national
legislation is certain. The mania for
speech making is not as bad as many suppose
it to be—it is the safety valve that lets
off the superfluous steam, otherwise boilers
would burst, and blow into fragments the
vessel of state. Viewed in this light, we
can tolerate it from motives of sympathy for
the afflicted. Another good effect flows
from these long speeches, while they are
delivered, members can go into the library,
the lobby or the rotundo and amuse themselves
or converse with their friends. The
speech being made, it can be printed and
sent home to their constituents. They are
pleased and thus many ends are answered
by the delivering of a speech.
Eloquence of Members of Congress.—Under
this head I shall not say much, for
several reasons. The chambers are but
poorly calculated for hearing in them; the
places occupied by those who wish to hear
and report speeches, are not such ones as
they should be, if hearing be the object of
those who sit in them; the noise necessarily
made by three hundred persons, moving
about and sometimes talking and whispering;
the opening and shutting of doors and
the confused din, attendant on such an assemblage
of men; the many objects, such
as the Ladies in the galleries of the House,
naturally draw off the eye from the debater,
the ear from the sound of his voice and
the mind from the subject in discussion.
With all these abatements and all these impediments,
we need not wonder if the
speeches are not very correctly reported,
they being so imperfectly heard when they
are delivered. This circumstance gives rise
to every day explanations, almost, in both
houses, to correct erroneous reports of
speeches. But with all these impediments,
there is a very considerable number of good
speakers, especially in the Senate. It is
possible, however, that the Senate’s chamber
being a place wherein one can hear
better than in the gallery of the other house,
may have had quite an influence on my
opinion in this particular. Senator Choate
is quite a favorite among his friends, as an
orator. His voice is clear, sufficiently loud
and distinct; his method is clear, his language
elegant, often beautiful; the impression
which he makes on the hearer is highly
agreeable. He rises neither too high nor
sinks too low for his subject, but flies along
over the subject at a suitable elevation. He
looks as if he were a man of great labor,
and not in very good health. He appears
to be care-worn, and as if he was over-worked
by the incessant toils of his station.
I have no personal acquaintance with him,
and speak merely from what I saw of him
a few moments at Dr. Sewall’s, and from
hearing him in the Senate chamber a few
times. He is the brother-in-law of the Doctor
and lodges at his house. Mr. Choate
represents the manufacturing and commercial
classes and has a laborious task to perform,
in opposition to restless men, who, it
appears to me, mistake their own interest
in opposing commerce and manufactures.
John J. Crittenden, a senator from Kentucky,
is a most delightful speaker. With
a melodious voice, clear method, clear sentences,
in which every word is fitly chosen,
so that no one could be changed for any
other word in its location that would do as
well in its place. His arguments are lucid,
his manner is so fascinating that he is a
model of forensic eloquence in a parliamentary
debate. Honest, candid, sincere, pleasant,
sometimes eloquent, always happy in
his expressions, it is no wonder that he is
a very popular orator. On hearing him,
you esteem him as a gentleman, and love
him as a man. He was nominated by Mr.
Adams to the Senate of the United States
as a judge of the United States supreme
court, but was not confirmed, and Judge
M’Lean fills the place to which Mr. Crittenden
was nominated. He would have
made as excellent a judge, as he made a
member of General Harrison’s cabinet. He
has no enemy who personally knows him,
so pure, so sincere and candid is he in all
his intercourse with the world, that even
those who disagree in opinion with him,
love the man, his manners and his straight
forwardness of speech and of action. His
age may be forty-eight and he is quite grey
headed, of the common size and square
built. His lady has a young look and is still
handsome. She is always lady-like and
agreeable in her conversation and deportment.
In these respects she resembles the
ladies of Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee.
They always remind me of the West, and
recall to my mind the delightful recollections
of a large integral portion of my extended
life, spent among scenes and surrounded
by a people always dear to my
heart. No place, time or circumstances
will ever be able to obliterate these impressions
from my vivid recollections of a
delightful past. The Western people, possessing
as they do, unflinching courage, pure
patriotism, a love of liberty, of sincerity and
truth, decision of character, open heartedness
and sincerity, with broad and liberal
views, and possessing too an energy and a
determination to go forward, conquering
the forest and the prairie, they will soon
extend our dominion to the Pacific ocean.
Such a people will always go ahead of all
national legislation and compel Congress to
come limping and halting along on crutches
and stilts behind them.
James T. Morehead, the other Kentucky
senator, was formerly governor of that State.
He is six feet high or upwards, rather spare
in flesh, straight as an Indian, and he is
so agreeable in his manners and address, as
to be as he truly is the world’s idol. His
words flow along in a constant stream,
sweeter than honey. Sometimes he rises
into sublimity, and soars along on high, and
like our own eagle, revelling in the beams
of a clear sun. Sometimes he can be playful,
with an arch leer on his brow when he
is ironical. He can captivate with his witchery
of manner and of style. His method is
good, his sentences are clear, sometimes
pointed, sarcastic and withering. His manner
is winning and his arguments convincing.
He is shrewd, searching and occasionally
severe in his arguments, though not in
his language. His ideas may be hard, but
his words are soft, smooth and melodies.
He labors with his pen and his books incessantly,
sometimes more than his body can
well bear. Having come over into Ohio
and married and carried off a beautiful,
amiable and good lady, the daughter of my
excellent friend, J. M. Espy, of Columbus,
I wish I had it in my power to present the
reader a short biographical sketch of Gov.
Morehead.
Under the head of eloquence, I will confess,
that although I have been months attending
here, sometimes conversing with
members of Congress, sometimes with other
persons from all parts of the Union—standing
in the rotundo or sitting in the library,
there conversing or reading, I always found
it an unpleasant task to hear speeches, unless
some one was speaking whom I knew
or greatly desired to hear. I went to hear
Dr. Hammet of Mississippi, John Q. Adams,
General Dromgoole, Judge Dean, John
B. Weller, Schenck, Vinton, Florence,
Van Meter, Potter and a few others, but
I had so much difficulty to get a seat where
I could hear, that I seldom made an attempt
to get a seat in the House. Hale of New
Hampshire, when he spoke, could always
be heard and understood.
It appeared to me, that our western members
were more eloquent on the Oregon
question than the eastern members, and
that the eastern members beat the western
ones on the tariff question all hollow. The
eastern members were learned, eloquent
and sensible whenever they spoke of manufactures,
commerce or trade. These
speeches, properly digested, would make
an instructive and useful volume, that would
be read by every body.
I took an interest in the army bill, and
contrived to hear a great deal of its discussion.
M’Cay, Cave Johnson and Black
of Carolina never spoke a word in vain.
Mr. Black deserves a great deal of credit
for his exertions to reform the abuses of the
patronage of the government. The mad
ravings of the pets against him are recommendations
of him to his constituent, as
their faithful sentinel in Congress. He represents
a hardy, patriotic race of men,
whose ancesters fought bravely and well
for their country in the war of the revolution.
The Cowpens, King’s mountain, and
all that country round about them are immortalised
by deeds of arms; and by patriotic
devotion to the interests and the glory
of our common country. The nation owes
that people a debt of gratitude.
I spent an evening with Mr. Black and
Mr. Simpson, of Pendleton, S. Carolina, at
their lodgings in the old capitol, kept by
Mrs. Hill. They are excellent members
of Congress, honest, capable and faithful representatives—none
better. They are
friendly to Mr. Calhoun. Mr. Black was
born near Mr. Calhoun, that is within five
miles of him, and Mr. Simpson lives where
Mr. Calhoun does, and is his near neighbor.
He thinks highly of Mr. Calhoun’s family
and says that it is the happiest and the best
one he ever knew. If my memory serves
me, I think there is a sort of relationship
by marriage between Mr. Simpson and Mr.
Calhoun.
In the Senate are a great many good speakers.
I heard Allen, Tappan, Choate, Benton,
Woodbury, Buchanan, Crittenden, Upham,
Morehead and several others, who
spoke well and argued clearly, distinctly
and to the purpose. I have not room for a
criticism on their manner and matter, but I
was pleased to hear them speak so well on
all occasions. I wished to hear Rives and
Archer, but did not get an opportunity to
hear them, or even become personally acquainted
with them. As a Senate, we need
not be ashamed of that body, but the reverse
in all respects. M’Duffie appears to
be out of health, and I fear that he is in a
decline that will carry him off before many
years. I should have been glad to hear
Bayard of Delaware, to ascertain whether
he inherits his father’s talents, but I never
heard him. Foster of Tennessee, I know
to be a man of talents and an excellent senator,
but I had not the pleasure to hear
him. He stands high at the bar as a lawyer,
and no one is more beloved than I know
him to be by his neighbors in Nashville,
where he lives when at home. Talented,
learned and good, Tennessee may well be
proud of her beloved son.
General King has gone to Russia, and
Lewis has taken his place. General King,
like his friend Buchanan, is a bachelor; so
he can go abroad, having no family to detain
him here.
The influence of the Christian religion, it
appears to me, begins to operate beneficially
on our legislative assemblies, and it is
to be hoped that it will in the end melt
down in its crucible our whole people.
That religion is the great fountain-head of
republics. It teaches us that our Creator is
our Father, and that we are all brethren.
In some respects, there is a falling off from
the practices of our fathers—for instance,
family government is not what it once was.
In former days we had infancy, youth and
age, but by the present generation youth is
struck out of human life altogether. A boy
or a girl five years old, assumes the dress,
the manners and the airs of a young gentleman
or a young lady. Last January, at my
room, in the Broadstreet Hotel, in New
York, after hearing their youngest child
read to me, (she was only about four years
old) I inquired of her, if her sister never
curled her hair? which hung in beautiful
ringlets on her head. She replied, that “her
sister Sarah would, within a few days, curl
her hair, and then she was to have a beau!”
The remark pleased me greatly, because it
was so characteristic of these times. No
sooner is the hippen laid aside, than the
pantaloons, and the boots, and the cocked-up
hat follow, as the dress of the boy—and
the girl, is dressed like a young lady. Her
locks are curled, and she looks around her
for a beau! Of these things we mean not
to complain, but we merely note them as a
change effected in our manners, since the
last age, whether for better or for worse,
we do not say. The days of our fathers are
gone by, and this generation assumes to be
wiser than the former one was, but whether
a better one, on the whole, is at best
doubtful with me.
We prefer Old Virginia, with her old
principles to all her new fangled ideas. In
some things she may be behind the age,
but that does not convince me that she is
the worse on that account. I prefer the
principles of Washington, Jefferson, Madison,
Monroe, Marshall and Upshur, to those
of Aaron Burr and the spoilers. The former
are pure gold, in my estimation, and
the latter are mere dross. The sons, and
the descendants generally of the Randolphs,
the Lees, the Masons, and a long list of
Pendletons and other revolutionary patriots
are true to the principles of their ancesters
and the republic. Long may such men and
such principles shed a lustre on the Old Dominion.
Rives and Archer represent Virginian
interest and principles in the Senate
of the United States. In the other house
I am ignorant, wholly, as to their representatives,
and so I say nothing of them. Gilmer
was quite popular in the House, but he
is no more. Summers is a western Virginian—so
western that he is exactly like an
Ohioan in his manners and feelings. He
lives on the Kenhawa, and truly and efficiently
represents the people who send him
to Congress.
From our digression we come back to say,
on the subject of the tariff, that the eastern
members appeared to us to have the better
arguments. They said, in substance, that
the tariff of 1842 had injured no interest of
our country; that agriculture was more prosperous
than before; that manufactures were
more flourishing; that our navigation was
more active; public and private credit was
restored, both at home and abroad. These
members then enquired, whether it was
wise, prudent and statesmanlike to change
a law that worked so well? They contended
that the experience of all nations proved
that sudden and frequent changes in the
laws of any country, were highly injurious
to all classes of people. We do not use the
very words, but we give the sum and the
substance of what fell from the lips of many
friends of the present tariff law. It appeared
to me that those who wished a new tariff,
took a very narrow view of the subject.
They looked at what they considered the
interest of their several districts of country,
without looking further around them on the
whole Union. It is a matter of opinion, and
feeling as I certainly did, coolly and calmly,
I made up a deliberate judgement, as
disinterested as it could be. We in Ohio
are an agricultural, manufacturing and commercial
people. These interests are in reality
the same; they prosper or fall together.
Mr. Jefferson, by his embargoes and restrictive
measures, made the people of New
England a manufacturing people, against
their wills at first, but following his advice,
they became a manufacturing as well as a
commercial people. Their industry, perseverance
and energy made them prosperous
and rich. The change in their pursuits
ruined thousands of them at the time, but
as soon as their prosperity was everywhere
apparent, there were not wanting those,
who envied and wished to ruin that prosperity
by frequent changes in our tariff
laws. Those who wished to check their
prosperity, remind us of a private soldier in
the revolutionary war, while he was suffering
corporeal punishment. When the lash
fell upon his shoulders, he cried out, “strike
lower, strike lower!” but when the lash
struck his loins, he cried out, “strike higher.”
Strike where the corporal would, the
culprit was not at all satisfied with the
blows, nor pleased with the corporal himself.
Could all our people be willing “to
live and let live,” it appears to us that we
should all be happier and better off, and in
that way become an united people in the
bonds of mutual interest and mutual affection.
All laws calculated to affect a whole nation
should never be changed for slight
causes, nor changed without giving the people,
and the whole people, time to duly reflect
upon such changes, in all their bearings
on the whole people. Such are our
ideas of that republican form of government,
which was erected by our fathers, to promote
the happiness of the people, aye, of
the whole people. Keeping this great object
in view, the laws should be plain, simple
and few, and be changed as seldom as
possible, otherwise no man in any business
can make any safe calculations as to the
course he should pursue—what plans he
should form, or how he can execute them.
There is an union of interests, not always
duly considered. The farmer, the mechanic,
the manufacturer, the merchant and the
mariner have precisely the same interests
in the prosperity of all the great interests
of all our people. Destroy or greatly injure
any one class of people, and the whole body
politic feels the wound and suffers by
the injury. One class may feel it first, but
in the end, all feel it.
On all great national questions of policy,
time, reflection, prudence and caution seem
to be required by the dictates of patriotism
and true wisdom. And our legislators, and
indeed all our wise men, should always remember,
and be sure never to forget, that
we Americans are a very exciteable people,
more so, much more so, than many nations
are in the north of Europe. Our southern
people may be the soonest moved by any
sudden impulse, but get our northern people
once fairly started, and they move like
a tornado. Knowing ourselves, and how
exciteable we are, let us endeavor to keep
cool, on all the political questions, which
agitate the public mind, from time to time.
Our republican institutions have been dearly
bought—with the blood of our ancestors,
freely shed, in the battle fields of glorious
memory, and on the mountain waves, where
our sailors fought, bled, died and conquered
in the cause, the holy cause of liberty.—When
the liberties of this country go down
to their graves, have we not reason to fear
that free government all over the world,
will be overwhelmed in one universal ruin?
May my eyes be closed in death before that
day arrives.
Having decided that the tariff case shall
be put down to the foot of our docket, on
the principle of want of more time for national
reflection, it follows as a matter of
course, almost, that we ought to put the
Oregon question at the foot of our docket
also, and continue it for a trial at the next
term of our high court of judicature. Whether
the Texas case shall be disposed of in the
same manner, we will not decide, until we
have ascended to our seat on the bench, and
there patiently heard the arguments of
counsel learned in the law, on the motion
for a continuance of the cause until the
next session of this honorable court.
The idea that the American people are
to be taken by surprise, and that six large
States ought to be added to this confederacy
by legerdemain, without notice and
without sufficient time for reflection on all
the consequences of such an addition to our
territory, calls for deliberation, reflection
and a solemn pause, like the stillness of a
Quaker’s silent meeting, before we decide
this question—especially in the affirmitive.
Let us hear it discussed openly in the Senate,
and in all places of public resort.
Our right to Oregon, up to the fifty-fifth
degree of north latitude, is quite clear and
our people will occupy that territory forthwith,
and then Congress will limp along
after them, carrying our laws to them. In
the mean time, villages, towns and cities
will rear their spires along the rivers, the
stage driver’s horn and the steam boat’s bell
will be heard there. The sound of the axe,
the hammer and the saw, will rival in speed
the roaring of the waters rushing over mill
dams, or dashing against the rocks in the
streams of Oregon. All these things will
soon be heard and seen there, but we can
wait a little time yet, until the nation is
ready to rush in one mass of men, to wash
their feet in the waters of the Pacific, as
they roll their briny waves on to our great
western boundary. As Mr. Owen said, in
the house, “the Pacific is our destination
and our destiny.”
Lay the question over, gentlemen, till
next session of Congress. The prancing
steed and the nodding plume shall be seen
there and the star spangled banner shall
wave, and rustle in every breeze that
moves over the prairies, the hills and the
plains of our own farthest West. A rail-road
from Astoria to Boston can transport
the salmon of the Multnomah to our farthest
East. Between the salmon of Penobscot
and those of the Columbia river, let
the Bostonians decide which is preferable.
We will wait, sitting with gravity in a wig
and gown in our court, until the Bostonians
are called into it, to give their testimony on
a point of so much delicacy, in a matter of
taste, too, about which old Horace has said
there is no disputing.—“De gustibus non disputandum.”