I have often been charged with not being fond of dogs; a charge which
does not at first sight appear to be very serious, but which I
nevertheless desire to clear myself of, for it implies a certain amount
of dislike. People who prefer cats are thought by many to be cruel,
sensuous, and treacherous, while dog-lovers are credited with being
frank, loyal, and open-hearted,—in a word, possessed of all the
qualities attributed to the canine race. I in no wise deny the merits of
Médor, Turk, Miraut, and other engaging animals, and I am prepared to
acknowledge the truth of the axiom formulated by Charlet,—“The best
thing about man is his dog.” I have been the owner of several, and I
still own some. Should any of those who seek to discredit me come to my
house, they would be met by a Havana lap-dog barking shrilly and
furiously at them, and by a greyhound that very likely would bite their
legs for them. But my affection for dogs has an understratum of fear.
These excellent creatures, so good, so faithful, so devoted, so loving,
may go mad at any moment, and then they become more dangerous than a
lance-head snake, an asp, a rattlesnake or a cobra capella. This reacts
on my love for dogs. Then dogs strike me as a bit uncanny; they have
such a searching, intense glance; they sit down in front of you with so
questioning a look that it is fairly embarrassing. Goethe disliked that
glance of theirs that seems to attempt to incorporate man’s soul within
itself, and he drove away dogs, saying, “You shall not swallow my monad,
much as you may try.”
The Pharamond of my canine dynasty was called Luther. He was a big white
spaniel, with liver spots, and handsome brown ears. He was a setter, had
lost his owner, and after looking for him a long time in vain, had taken
to living in my father’s house at Passy. Not having partridges to go
after, he had taken to rat-hunting, and was as clever at it as a Scotch
terrier. At that time I was living in that blind alley of the Doyenné,
now destroyed, where Gérard de Nerval, Arsène Houssaye and Camille
Rogier were the heads of a little picturesque and artistic Bohemia, the
eccentric mode of life in which has been so well told by others that it
is unnecessary to relate it over again. There we were, right in the
centre of the Carrousel, as independent and solitary as on a desert
island in Oceanica, under the shadow of the Louvre, among the blocks of
stone and the nettles, close to an old ruinous church, with fallen-in
roof which looked most romantic in the moonlight. Luther, with whom I
was on a most friendly footing, seeing that I had finally abandoned the
paternal nest, made a point of coming to see me every morning. He
started from Passy, no matter what the weather was, came down the Quai
de Billy, the Cours-la-Reine, and reached my place at about eight
o’clock, just as I was waking. He used to scratch at the door, which was
opened for him, and he dashed joyously at me with yelps of joy, put his
paws on my knees, received with a modest and unassuming air the caresses
his noble conduct merited, took a look round the room, and started back
to Passy. On arriving there, he went to my mother, wagged his tail,
barked a little, and said as plainly as if he had spoken: “I have seen
young master; don’t worry; he is all right.” Having thus reported to the
proper person the result of his self-imposed mission, he would drink up
half a bowlful of water, eat his food, lie down on the carpet by my
mother’s chair,—for he entertained peculiar affection for her,—and
sleep for an hour or two after his long run. Now, how do people who
maintain that animals do not think and are incapable of putting two and
two together explain this morning visit, which kept up family relations
and brought to the home-nest news of the fledgeling that had so recently
left it?
Poor Luther’s end was very sad. He became taciturn, morose, and one fine
morning bolted from the house, feeling the rabies on him and resolved
not to bite his masters; so he fled, and we have every reason to believe
that he was killed as a mad dog, for we never saw him again.
After a pretty long interregnum a new dog was brought into the house. It
was called Zamore, and was a sort of spaniel, of very mixed breed, small
in size, with a black coat, save the tan spots over his eyes and the tan
hair on his stomach. On the whole he was insignificant physically, and
ugly rather than handsome; but morally, he was a remarkable dog. He
absolutely despised women, would not obey them, never would follow them,
and never once did my mother or my sisters manage to win from him the
least sign of friendship or deference. He would accept their attentions
and the tit-bits they gave him with a superior air, but never did he
express any gratitude for them. Never would he yelp, never would he rap
the floor with his tail, never bestow on them a single one of those
caresses dogs are so fond of lavishing. He remained impassible in a
sphinx-like pose, like a serious man who will not take part in the
conversation of frivolous persons. The master he had elected was my
father, in whom he acknowledged the authority of the head of the house,
and whom he considered a mature and serious man. But his affection for
him was austere and stoical, and was not shown by gambadoes, larks, and
lickings. Only, he always kept his eyes upon him, followed his every
motion and kept close to heel, never allowing himself the smallest
escapade or the least nod to any passing comrades. My dear and lamented
father was a great fisherman before the Lord, and he caught more barbels
than Nimrod ever slew antelopes. It certainly could not be said of his
fishing-rod that it was a pole and string with a worm at one end and a
fool at the other, for he was a very clever man, and none the less he
daily filled his basket with fish. Zamore used to accompany him on his
trips, and during the long night-watches entailed by ground-line
fishing for the big fellows, he would stand on the very edge of the
water, apparently trying to fathom its dark depths and to follow the
movements of the prey. Although he often pricked up his ears at the
faint and distant sounds that, at night, are heard in the deepest
silence, he never barked, having understood that to be mute is a quality
indispensable in a fisherman’s dog. In vain did Phœbe’s alabaster
brow show above the horizon reflected in the sombre mirror of the river;
Zamore would not bay at the moon, although such prolonged ululation
gives infinite delight to creatures of his species. Only when the bell
on the set-line tinkled did he look at his master and allow himself one
short bark, knowing that the prey was caught; and he appeared to take
the greatest interest in the manœuvres involved in the landing of a
three or four pound barbel.
No one would have suspected that under his calm, abstracted,
philosophical look, this dog, so serious that he was almost melancholy,
and despised all frivolity, nursed an overmastering, strange, never to
be suspected passion, absolutely contrary to his apparent moral and
physical character.
“You do not mean,” I hear my reader exclaim, “that the good Zamore had
hidden vices?—that he was a thief?” No. “A libertine?” No. “That he
loved brandied cherries?” No. “That he bit people?” Never. Zamore was
crazy about dancing. He was an artist devoted to the choregraphic art.
He became conscious of his vocation in the following manner. One day
there appeared on the square at Passy a gray moke, with sores on its
back, and drooping ears, one of those wretched mountebanks’ asses that
Decamps and Fouquet used to paint so well. The two baskets balanced on
either side of his raw and prominent backbone contained a troupe of
trained dogs, dressed as marquesses, troubadours, Turks, Alpine
shepherdesses, or Queens of Golconda, according to their sex. The
impresario put down the dogs, cracked his whip, and suddenly every one
of the actors forsook the horizontal for the perpendicular position, and
transformed itself into a biped. The drum and fife started up and the
ballet commenced.
Zamore, who was gravely idling around, stopped smitten with wonder at
the sight. The dogs, dressed in showy colours, braided with imitation
gold lace on every seam, a plumed hat or a turban on their heads, and
moving in cadence to a witching rhythm, with a distant resemblance to
human beings, appeared to him to be supernatural creatures. The
skilfully linked steps, the slides, the pirouettes delighted but did not
discourage him. Like Correggio at the sight of Raphael’s painting, he
exclaimed in his canine speech, Anch’ io son pittore! and when the
company filed past him, he also, filled with a noble spirit of
emulation, rose up, somewhat uncertainly, upon his hind legs and
attempted to join them, to the great delight of the onlookers.
The manager did not see it in that light, and let fly a smart cut of his
whip at Zamore, who was driven from the circle, just as a spectator
would be ejected from the theatre did he, during the performance, take
on himself to ascend to the stage and to take part in the ballet.
This public humiliation did not check Zamore’s vocation. He returned
home with drooping tail and thoughtful mien, and during the whole of the
remainder of that day was more reserved, more taciturn, and more morose
than ever. But in the dead of night my sisters were awakened by slight
sounds, the cause of which they could not conjecture, which proceeded
from an uninhabited room next theirs, where Zamore was usually put to
bed on an old arm-chair. It sounded like a rhythmic tread, made more
sonorous by the silence of night. They at first supposed that the mice
were romping round, but the sound of steps and leaps on the flooring was
too loud for that. The bravest of my sisters rose, partly opened the
door, and by the light of a moonbeam streaming in through a pane, she
beheld Zamore on his hind legs, pawing the air with his fore paws, and
busy studying the dancing steps he had admired in the street that
morning. The gentleman was practising!
Nor did this prove, as might be supposed, a passing fancy, a momentary
attraction; Zamore persisted in his choregraphic aspirations and turned
out a fine dancer. Every time he heard the fife and drum he would run
out on the square, slip between the spectators’ legs and watch, with the
closest attention, the trained dogs performing their exercises. Mindful,
however, of the whip-cut, he no longer attempted to take part in the
dancing; he took note of the poses, the steps, and the attitudes, and
then, at night, in the silence of his room, he would work away at them,
remaining the while, during the day, as austere in his bearing as ever.
Ere long he was not satisfied with copying; he took to composing, to
inventing, and I am bound to say few dogs surpassed him in the elevated
style. I often used to watch him through the half-open door; he
practised with such enthusiasm that every night he would drain dry the
bowl of water placed in one corner of the room.
When he had become quite sure of himself and the equal of the most
accomplished of four-footed dancers, he felt he could no longer hide his
light under a bushel and that he must reveal the mystery of his
accomplishments. The court-yard of the house was closed, on one side, by
an iron fence with spaces sufficiently wide to allow moderately stout
dogs to enter in easily. So one fine morning some fifteen or twenty dog
friends of his, connoisseurs no doubt, to whom Zamore had sent letters
of invitation to his début in the choregraphic art, met around a square
of smooth ground nicely levelled off, which the artist had previously
swept with his tail, and the performance began. The dogs appeared to be
delighted and manifested their enthusiasm by ouahs! ouahs! closely
resembling the bravi of dilettanti at the Opera. With the sole
exception of an old and pretty muddy poodle, very wretched looking, and
a critic, no doubt, who barked out something about forgetting sound
tradition, all the spectators proclaimed Zamore the Vestris of dogs and
the god of dancing. Our artist had performed a minuet, a jig, and a
deux temps waltz. A large number of two-footed spectators had joined
the four-footed ones, and Zamore enjoyed the honour of being applauded
by human hands.
Dancing became so much a habit of his that when he was paying court to
some fair, he would stand up on his hind legs, making bows and turning
his toes out like a marquis of the ancien régime. All he lacked was
the plumed hat under his arm.
Apart from this he was as hypochondriacal as a comic actor and took no
part in the life of the household. He stirred only when he saw his
master pick up his hat and stick. Zamore died of brain fever, brought
on, no doubt, by overwork in trying to learn the schottische, then in
the full swing of its popularity. Zamore may say within his tomb, as
says the Greek dancer in her epitaph: “Earth, rest lightly on me, for I
rested lightly on thee.”
How came it that being so talented, Zamore was not enrolled in Corvi’s
company? For I was even then sufficiently influential as a critic to
manage this for him. Zamore, however, would not leave his master, and
sacrificed his self-love to his affection, a proof of devotion which one
would look for in vain among men.
A singer, named Kobold, a thorough-bred King Charles from the famous
kennels of Lord Lauder, took the place of the dancer. It was a queer
little beast, with an enormous projecting forehead, big goggle eyes,
nose broken short off at the root, and long ears trailing on the ground.
When Kobold was brought to France, knowing no language but English, he
was quite bewildered. He could not understand the orders given him;
trained to answer to “Go on,” or “Come here,” he remained motionless
when he was told in French, “Viens,” or “Va-t’en.” It took him a year to
learn the tongue of the new country in which he found himself and to
take part in the conversation. Kobold was very fond of music, and
himself sang little songs with a very strong English accent. The A would
be struck on the piano, and he caught the note exactly and modulated
with a flute-like sound phrases that were really musical and that had no
connection whatever with barking or yelping. When we wanted to make him
go on, all we had to do was to say, “Sing a little more,” and he would
repeat the cadence. Although he was fed with the utmost care, as was
proper in the case of a tenor singer and so distinguished a gentleman,
Kobold had one eccentric taste: he would eat earth just like a South
American savage. We never succeeded in curing him of the habit, which
proved the cause of his death. He was very fond of the stablemen, the
horses, and the stable, and my ponies had no more constant companion
than he. He spent his time between their loose-boxes and the piano.
After Kobold, the King Charles, came Myrza, a tiny Havana poodle that
had the honour of being for a time the property of Giulia Grisi, who
gave her to me. She is snow-white, especially when she is fresh from her
bath and has not had time to roll over in the dust, a fancy some dogs
share with dust-loving birds. She is extremely gentle and affectionate,
and as sweet-tempered as a dove. Her little fluffy face, her two little
eyes that might be mistaken for upholstery nails, and her little nose
like a Piedmont truffle, are most comical. Tufts of hair, curly as
Astrakhan fur, fall over her face in the most picturesque and unexpected
way, hiding first one eye and then the other, so that she has the most
peculiar appearance imaginable and squints like a chameleon.
In Myrza, nature imitates the artificial so perfectly that the little
creature looks as if she had stepped out of a toy-shop. When her coat is
nicely curled, and she has got on her blue ribbon bow and her silver
bell, she is the image of a toy dog, and when she barks it is impossible
not to wonder whether there is a bellows under her paws.
She spends three-fourths of her time in sleep, and her life would not be
much changed were she stuffed, nor does she seem particularly clever in
the ordinary intercourse of life. Yet she one day exhibited an amount of
intelligence absolutely unparalleled in my experience. Bonnegrâce, the
painter of the portraits of Tchoumakoff and E. H., which attracted so
much attention at the exhibitions, had brought to me, in order to get my
opinion upon it, one of his portraits painted in the manner of Pagnest,
remarkable for truthfulness of colour and vigour of modelling. Although
I have lived on terms of closest intimacy with animals and could tell a
hundred traits of the ingenuity, reasoning, and philosophical powers of
cats, dogs, and birds, I am bound to confess that animals wholly lack
any feeling for art. Never have I seen a single one notice a picture,
and the story of the birds that picked at the grapes in the painting by
Zeuxis, strikes me as a piece of invention. It is precisely the feeling
for ornament and art that distinguishes man from brutes. Dogs never look
at pictures and never put on earrings. Well, Myrza, at the sight of the
portrait placed against the wall by Bonnegrâce, sprang from the stool on
which she was lying curled up, dashed at the canvas and barked furiously
at it, trying to bite the stranger who had made his way into the room.
Great was her surprise when she found herself compelled to recognise
that she had a plane surface before her, that her teeth could not lay
hold of it, and that it was no more than a vain presentment. She smelled
the picture, tried to wedge in behind the frame, looked at us both with
a glance of questioning and wonder, and returned to her place, where she
disdainfully went to sleep again, refusing to have anything more to do
with the painted individual. Myrza’s features will not be lost to
posterity, for there is a fine portrait of her by the Hungarian artist,
Victor Madarasz.
Let me close with the story of Dash. One day a dealer in broken bottles
and glass stopped at my door in quest of such wares. He had in his cart
a puppy, three or four months old, which he had been commissioned to
drown, whereat the worthy fellow grieved much, for the dog kept looking
at him with a tender and beseeching look as if he knew well what was
going to happen. The reason of the severe sentence passed on the puppy
was that he had broken his fore paw. My heart was filled with pity for
him, and I took charge of the condemned creature; called in a vet, and
had Dash’s paw set in splints and bandaged. It was impossible, however,
to stop him gnawing at the dressings; the paw could not be cured, and
the bones not having knitted, it hung limp like the sleeve of a man who
has lost an arm. His infirmity, however, did not prevent his being
jolly, lively, and full of fun, and he managed to race along quite fast
on his three legs.
He was an out and out street dog, a rascally little cur that Buffon
himself would have been puzzled to classify. He was ugly, but his
features were uncommonly mobile and sparkled with cleverness. He seemed
to understand what was told him, and his expression would change
according as the words addressed to him, in the same tone of voice, were
flattering or injurious. He rolled his eyes, turned up his lips,
indulged in the wildest of nervous twitchings, or else grinned and
showed his white teeth, obtaining in this way most comical effects of
which he was perfectly conscious. He would often try to talk; laying his
paw on my knee, he would fix on me that earnest gaze of his and begin a
series of murmurs, sighs, and grunts, so varied in intonation that it
was hard not to recognise them as language. Sometimes in the course of a
conversation of this sort, Dash would break out into a bark or a yelp,
and then I would look sternly at him and say: “That is barking, not
speaking. Is it possible that you are an animal?” Dash, feeling
humiliated at the suggestion, would go on with his vocalisation, giving
it the most pathetic expression. We used to say then that Dash was
telling his tale of woe.
He was passionately fond of sugar, and at dessert, when coffee was
brought in, he would invariably beg each guest for a piece with such
insistence that he was always successful. He had ended by transforming
this merely benevolent gift into a regular tax which he collected with
unfailing regularity. He was but a little mongrel, yet with the frame of
a Thersites he had the soul of an Achilles. Infirm though he was, he
would attack, with madly heroic courage, dogs ten times his size and
was regularly and terribly thrashed by them. Like Don Quixote, the brave
Knight of La Mancha, he set out triumphantly and returned in most evil
plight. Alas! he was destined to fall a victim to his own courage. Some
months ago he was brought home with a broken back, the work of a
Newfoundland, an amiable brute, which the next day played the same trick
to a small greyhound.
Dash’s death was the first of a series of catastrophes: the mistress of
the house where he met with the death-stroke was, a few days later,
burned alive in her bed, and the same fate overtook her husband who was
trying to save her. This was merely a fatal coincidence and by no means
an expiation, for these people were of the kindest and as fond of
animals as is a Brahmin, besides being wholly innocent of our poor
Dash’s tragic fate.
It is true that I have still another dog, called Nero, but he is too
recent an inmate of our home to have a story of his own.
(Note.—Alas! Nero has been poisoned quite recently, just as if he had
been supping with the Borgias, and his epitaph comes in the very first
chapter of his life.)