THE QUEEN'S FRIEND.
THE PRINCESS OF WALES—MOTHER AND DAUGHTER—GEORGE
III.—THE CABAL—THE WAR WITH ALGIERS—THE PALACE OF
HIRSCHHOLM—FALL OF THE PREMIER—PROPOSED REFORMS—STRUENSEE'S
MAXIMS—THE COUNCIL OF STATE—THE
ROYAL HUNT—A LOVELY WOMAN—BRANDT'S FOLLY.
On June 9, 1770, the Dowager Princess of Wales
set out with her son, the Duke of Gloucester, and a
numerous retinue from Carlton House en route for the
Continent. As this was the first time during thirty-four
years that her royal highness had quitted England,
her departure gave rise to the wildest conjectures
among her opponents. As mystery and policy
were imputed to all her motives by the so-called liberal
party, her declaration, straightforward though it
was, that she was going to visit her brother and her
daughters, was not believed. Some said that she was
going to meet Lord Bute, while others expected that
some coup d'état was about to be carried out during
her absence, to which she might plead not having
been privy. As the Duke of Gloucester accompanied
her, more charitable persons supposed that she was
trying to break off his liaison with Lady Waldegrave;
others, or the uncharitable, declared that the princess
was displeased with the increasing powers of the queen,
her daughter-in-law, while others again supposed that
she was conveying her treasures out of the country for
safety.
The resolute old lady cared little what was said
about her, and, though she was hooted as she passed
through Canterbury, I dare say her feeling was,
"laudatur ab hiss." She was allowed to embark
quietly at Dover, and, much to Walpole's affected
surprise, no bonfires or illuminations took place in
London in honour of her departure. The princess
ostensibly wanted to see her daughter, the Princess of
Brunswick, probably for some little family intrigue;
but the journey was really intended to the address of
Caroline Matilda. Some good-natured friend had told
George III. an exaggerated story about his sister's
conduct; and this, together with the political crisis
which was preparing in Denmark, led to the Princess
of Wales's journey. In those benighted days it was
considered of the utmost importance by English ministers
that Bernstorff should remain in power, because
he was devoted to Russia, and thus prevented a Gallo-Danish
alliance.
It was arranged that the Princess of Wales and her
daughter should meet at Brunswick, and the ducal
court made great preparations to receive the exalted
guests worthily, but at the moment when the King
and Queen of Denmark were expected, the grand
marshal arrived with news that Queen Matilda was
unwell and unable to travel. I can hardly think that
her illness was of a very serious nature, or lasted any
length of time. The court usually played cards at
Traventhal till midnight, and were out riding by five
in the morning, for the days seemed too short for
pleasure.
However this might be, the Princess of Wales
would not be disappointed, and proposed a second
meeting at Lüneburg, a town much nearer Denmark
than Brunswick was. The King and Queen of Denmark
arrived, their suite only consisting of Struensee
and Warnstedt, who were seated in the carriage with
them. They arrived late and tired; when the princess
addressed her daughter in English, a language which
Struensee did not understand, the queen pretended
to have forgotten it. The conversation was cold and
constrained; they retired to bed at an early hour, met
again at eleven A.M., and parted again in the afternoon.
Caroline Matilda did the civil thing by asking her
mother and brother to pay a visit to Copenhagen, which
was declined politely, and they never met again.[118]
Horace Walpole, who reminds me greatly of Father
Holt, in "Esmond," who wished to be supposed omniscient,
but was every now and then detected in
some jumbling details which destroyed his claim to
authenticity, describes the interview between mother and daughter with
as much circumstantiality as if he had been present. He says, that when
the princess lamented the fall of Bernstorff, the old servant of the
family, the Queen of Denmark said, "Pray, madam, allow me to govern my
kingdom as I please." Unfortunately for the story, Bernstorff had not
yet been overthrown. However, I dare say that some conversation did take
place about the premier, and that Caroline Matilda showed her hand too
openly.
The Princess of Wales returned to England, after requesting Mr.
Woodford, her son's minister in Lower Saxony, who was at Lüneburg, to
seek an opportunity for insinuating a portion of what she had intended to
say to her daughter. Another minister, who passed through Copenhagen on
his way to Sweden, having been intrusted by the King of England with some
remonstrances for his sister, was not admitted. This monarch, also, wrote
the most earnest letters: the first was very coldly received, and the
rest not even read. We see that everybody had entered into a conspiracy
to misunderstand Caroline Matilda's motives, and attribute the lowest of
causes to her intimacy with Struensee; even her own family, who should
have known her better, believed that in so short a time she had forgotten
the lessons of her youth, and would not see that she was forced into her
present position, because her pride would not allow her to be dictated to
by the ministers, and insulted by foreign envoys. Because
she selected the only man as an ally whom she
thought she could take without danger, she was accused
of forgetting her marriage vows, and no one
would give her credit for more exalted motives. Had
George III. been able to draw a distinction between
the lover and the friend, he should have rejoiced at
the intimacy between his sister and Struensee, because
the latter was determined to break the power of Russia
in Denmark; but he was a man of low birth, and naturally
such a person could only be favoured by a
queen through the very lowest of motives.[119] Perhaps,
though, in those days when virtue was considered a
most troublesome attribute, King George can hardly
be blamed for the opinion which he formed of his
sister's conduct. In fact, the king's own truthfulness
and rectitude were very injurious to Caroline Matilda.
He believed what he was told, and remonstrated with
his sister instead of examining into the reports more
closely, while she, naturally offended that her brother
dared to insult her by entertaining such suspicions,
neglected all prudence, and rendered the breach between
them irreparable.
From Lüneburg, the royal couple hastened back to
Copenhagen, and proceeded, on August 24, to the
palace of Frederiksborg. This palace, which was
burnt down in January, 1860, was the Versailles of
Denmark, and erected by Christian IV. from 1606-1620.
It was built on three small islets connected by
bridges, in a lake, and the chief wing so completely
covered this island, that it seemed to rise directly from
the water. In one of the state rooms leading to the
royal closet in the chapel, Caroline Matilda wrote
with a diamond, upon the window, the touching words,
"Oh, keep me innocent, make others great."
The country around the palace is remarkably fine,
and the drives and walks through the forest are beautiful.[120]
It is not surprising, therefore, that the queen
should make it her favourite residence, owing to her
love of exercise and privacy.
That the residence of the royal couple at Traventhal
was not devoted to frivolous orgies, as the enemies of
the queen and Struensee, and even her princely brother-in-law
at Gottorp asserted, has been sufficiently
proved. On the contrary, the time was employed in
meditating the mode of carrying out great reforms,
though what extent they would have depended on the
future. The condition of the king was now of such a
sad nature that he helplessly signed the orders laid
before him for his assent. Struensee was the only man
who was still able to make the king form a resolution
by his quiet remarks, and the stay at Frederiksborg,
away from the seat of government, was purposely
selected, in order to carry through the reforms already
arranged with the queen, without any external opposition,
and to bring them to the knowledge of the public.
Count Rantzau-Ascheberg had, in the meanwhile,
preceded the returning court, and arrived at Copenhagen
by August 14. Two days after his arrival in
the capital, he was appointed third deputy of the War
Department. It can hardly be believed that he had
done so much to obtain so little: indeed, it had been
at first arranged that he should be placed at the head
of this department by the retirement of his two seniors,
but one of them was Gähler, the husband of the pretty
and docile woman who had become so necessary at
court, and the other was an old friend of the queen.
Rantzau also retained the command of the queen's
regiment, and was likewise appointed on the 29th of
the same month commandant of Glückstadt, though he
remained in Copenhagen. Still, it was a great error
on the part of Struensee to have placed so ambitious a
man as Rantzau in such a subaltern position, and it
proved that he possessed but little common sense or
knowledge of the human heart. In politics it is wrong
to be ungrateful, and more especially to be so by
halves. After what had passed, Rantzau could no
longer remain indifferent, and a man of that character
does a great deal of evil or a great deal of good.
Therefore, he ought to have been appointed minister,
or else exiled.[121]
At the same time, however, a man reappeared in
the capital in whom the opposite party fancied they
had a support against Rantzau. This was Major-General
Chevalier Michael Filosofow, who had just
been appointed Envoy Extraordinary and Minister
Plenipotentiary of Russia. He had arrived three
weeks previously in Hamburg, but had not hurried to
reach Copenhagen, probably because he did not expect
much from a speedy return to the capital. In the
latter case he was perfectly right: for in the present
state of affairs the most speedy return would have
been too late for him and his designs.
In order to furnish a just idea of the reforms which
Struensee undertook, it is necessary to take a glance at
the state of Denmark at the period when he assumed
the administration. Before the war against Charles
Gustavus, King of Sweden, the government of Denmark
had been a thorough oligarchy, much like that
of Poland. The chief power was vested in the hands
of the nobles, or of a senate composed of their representatives,
and entrusted with their interests: the crown
was elective, and the king had no authority but what
the senate left him. The clergy had lost their power
and wealth through the Reformation. An almost absolute
despotism weighed on the citizens of the capital
and the other towns, though their deputies figured as
a species of third estate in the diets of the nation: the
country people, adstricti glebæ, were divided among the
noble landowners like herds of cattle, and were employed
by them to till the soil.
In 1660, the citizens of Copenhagen, who had just
repulsed the Swedes from their walls, took advantage
of their momentary strength to change the government;
they abolished the senate, rendered the crown
hereditary, and by a solemn treaty unreservedly handed
over the whole power to their king, Frederick III.,
both for himself and his heirs for ever, hoping, doubtless,
that the yoke of a single master would be less
oppressive than that of a caste of nobles.
Frederick III. regulated the absolute power with
which he was invested, and in order to compensate the
nobility in some measure for what they had lost, he
called to him the most considerable of them and formed
them into a privy council, which was, as it were, the
image of that senate by which the nation had been so
long governed. But his successor, Christian V., gave
his entire confidence to Schumacker, the son of a wine
merchant, who governed Denmark skilfully under the
title of Count von Griffenfeldt, and this system was
continued even after the favourite's fall.
Under the following reigns, as the sovereigns still
suspected the nobility of their country, they summoned
foreigners into their service; and as this policy was
persisted in, foreigners gradually seized on not only
the home and foreign offices, but even the most considerable
civil and military posts. These foreigners,
not having any relatives or friends in the country, and
not being always able to obtain subordinates from
abroad, chose their confidential agents among their
most devoted servants, and procured them advantageous
posts as a reward, or else to secure them as partisans.
This example was soon followed by the natives; and
just as in ancient Rome the power fell into the hands
of freed men, lackeys became in Denmark influential
personages, who did not limit their ambition to subaltern
employments.
In proportion as foreigners and people in their service
assumed a greater share in the government, offices,
appointments, and pensions were multiplied; and under
the specious pretext of benefiting the interests of
the state or the public, a multitude of establishments
were erected, with the requisite officers to manage them
and perform the different duties. Some served the
prince, others managed the finances and crown lands,
or entered the army, the police, or the law. There
were establishments for the relief of the poor, for the
advancement of the arts and sciences, education, agriculture,
trade, and manufactures, and they were required
for everything.
Just as the state displayed its luxury in land and
sea forces, at foreign courts and at home, each branch of
the administration had also its abundance of officers,
registrars and clerks. Still, beyond certain limits, it is
impossible to endow new officers without trenching
on the salaries of the old ones: hence it happened that,
in excessively increasing the number of clerks, the
wages of the majority were reduced to the most
moderate rate. As money ran short, recourse was
had to titles and honorary distinctions, the etiquette of
each rank being settled with the minutest details, as
well as the respect or deference attaching to it. When
it was decided that rank and titles conferred by the
government should receive the honours and consideration
due to merit, there was an eager rush to
obtain them. The tradesman left his counter, the
artisan his shop, the plain citizen gave up his modest
livelihood, in order to acquire a title and become somebody.
This vanity, penetrating all classes, gave a
great impulse to luxury and ostentation.
Government was not chary in granting a largess that
cost it so little. It accorded titles to favour: it gave
them as reward for services, and even sold them.
Rank soon ceased to be exclusively attached to office,
and more than once encroached on the principles of
military subordination. Thus, an officer in the army
would take precedence of his commander, and bring
the rules of discipline under those of etiquette. Still,
it appeared that the profusion of titles, far from inspiring
disgust, strengthened the mania for them:
men were ashamed not to have what so many people
possessed.
Eminent titles, such as those of Count or Baron, retained
a portion of their privileges: those who held
them could not be arrested for debt, and they found at
their manors an asylum against criminal prosecutions
until sentence was passed. These estates, which were
partly free from taxes, could not be confiscated even
for high treason, and were transmissible by inalienable
succession from eldest son to eldest son. These noble
landowners exercised the rights of high and low jurisdiction
on their estates, and these privileges recalled
the olden times of lordly rule. But nothing recalled
it so much as the serfdom which continued to oppress
the class of peasants, and the militia duties appeared
to double the burden.
Nevertheless, we must allow that this numerous and
interesting portion of the population was not quite
forgotten. In each district, a bailiff administering on
royal account either the lands taken from the clergy
at the Reformation, or lapsed feudal estates and the
other domains of the crown, had among his other
duties that of hearing the complaints of the peasants
against their lords, and protecting them against oppression.
But the bailiff could not always be found at
home, and was not always disposed to compromise his
own interests in sustaining those of the peasants.
A portion of the woes of Denmark evidently resulted
from these old institutions; and many of the abuses
would have sprung up without the interference of
foreigners. Besides, it is indubitable that there were
men of merit among the foreigners called in to govern
the country: but the best intentioned nearly all committed
the error of trying to introduce a system successfully
carried out in other countries, without considering
that it agreed neither with the wants of
Denmark nor her resources; in this they resembled a
farmer who plants exotics in his fields, instead of cultivating
those suited to the ground and the climate.
In this way, academies of science and fine arts were
established at Copenhagen, in imitation of the nations
farthest advanced in civilization. Under the ministry
preceding Struensee, learned men had been sent at the
king's expense to the East, for the purpose of studying
its monuments and antiquities, as if Denmark were in
a position to make such sacrifices to satisfy curiosity:
thus new trades were introduced, new manufactures
undertaken, without consulting the resources of the
country and the merchants, and they had no other
effect but impoverishing the Treasury. In the same
way money was squandered in sending envoys to look
after interests unconnected with the country; and
following the example of powerful nations, armaments
were made, intended to be imposing, but which, being
disproportionate to the real strength of Denmark, only
served to prove her weakness.
Although the state had enjoyed uninterrupted peace
since 1720, the errors of the administration had produced
the effect of a cruel war: the debt of 20,000,000
of dollars was tending to increase instead of diminishing.
The burdens that oppressed it not only prevented its
strength from developing, but seemed daily to weaken
it. It languished like a robust body, threatening to
fall into a state of atrophy, because unable to perform
its natural functions freely. A species of constraint
was felt from the throne down to the lowest classes,
and reforms seemed to be invoked by the public voice.[122]
The royal family remained for ten days at Frederiksborg,
but this short stay was rendered remarkable
by the first appearance of a royal message without
the adhesion of the Council of State or other administrative
authorities. As it is notorious that this message
was proposed to the king by Struensee, the latter's participation
in the government is generally dated from
this period. The message contained various regulations,
bearing the date of September 14, and was of a
very important nature. The first related to the future
restriction in granting titles. We read in it that the
number of persons who had, during the last year, been
granted titles on festal occasions, or through recommendation,
had grown so enormously large that distinctions
of this nature had ceased to be a reward for services, or
a proof of special royal favour. Hence the king had
resolved to grant such distinctions, in future, more
sparingly, and only for their real purpose. Henceforth
regard would solely be had, in such cases, to faithful
performance of duties, zeal and diligence in office, and
special abilities. Government officials, who recommended
persons for honorary distinctions, would be
responsible that no undeserving person obtained them.[123]
The writer and suggester of this proclamation certainly
deserved the thanks of his contemporaries; and
all sensible persons were pleased at this message from
their sovereign. The second decree referred to the
quarrel then going on with the Dey of Algiers. A
commission was appointed, consisting of Count Rantzau-Ascheberg,
Lieutenant-General von Gähler, Vice-Admiral
von Römeling, and the Schoutbynacht (Rear-Admiral)
Hoogland, whose duty it would be to inquire
whether Algiers could be taken, or the city so injured
that the dey would be compelled to make peace, or
whether satisfaction must be extorted from the piratical
prince in some other way. The appointment of this
commission entailed an investigation into the conduct
of Admiral Kaas and all the promoters of the unsuccessful
expedition against the piratical state, which had
cost Denmark 2,000,000 dollars. A few words about
this strange affair may be advisable here.
The Dey of Algiers, though he was quite absolute,
or, perhaps, from the fact of his absolutism, was obliged
to humour his army and keep it in good temper. The
troops, who lived principally on plunder, were very annoyed
at the truces, or treaties of peace, concluded with
nearly all the maritime powers. The tribute which
the nations of second rank consented to pay, in order
to buy the safety of their commerce, represented the
prince's share of the plunder; but the soldiers insisted
on having a nation given up to them every now and
then, as a compensation for their trade depression.
Sieur Oerboë, the Danish consul, not having been able
to take the right steps, on the expiration of his treaty
in 1769, for its renewal, the dey gave him orders to
withdraw in three days, and all the subjects of the
king in six weeks, alleging as motive that the Danes
had favoured the Russians in their war with the Sublime
Porte, and had abused the safety granted to their
flag by protecting the trade of hostile nations.
The Copenhagen cabinet began by negotiating at
Constantinople; and it was settled with the Porte that
Denmark should send an expedition which would intimidate
the troops of Algiers, and prevent them from
murmuring at the facility with which the dey revoked
his orders; and that at the same time, in order to contradict
the rumours of the pretended aid to Russia, the
Danish squadron should have on board a messenger
from his highness, bearing instructions to the dey
to renew the peace. Bernstorff, who had been the
founder of the Danish Levant trade, and was naturally
very proud of his bantling, intrusted the embassy
to Vice-Admiral Kaas, who had performed, a few
years previously, a similar commission to the Emperor
of Morocco in a satisfactory manner.
Bernstorff proposed to Count Laurvig, the head of
the Admiralty, that the squadron should be composed
of three men-of-war, two frigates, and two bomb-ketches;
and Laurvig, without consulting with his
colleagues, decided that this force was sufficient. As
Denmark possessed no bomb-ketches, merchantmen
were purchased and fitted up for the purpose, which
considerably delayed the expedition; and Kaas was
not able to leave the Baltic till 1770. On arriving
off Algiers, he first hoisted a white flag, and the dey
sent off a Christian consul to ask what he wanted. He
answered that he demanded peace, reparation for injuries
inflicted on his nation, and the expenses of the
expedition. The envoy from the Porte, who was
landed, was hardly listened to, because he spoke on
behalf of a master who was engaged elsewhere, and
who was not feared. The negotiation being at once
broken off, Kaas began throwing shells into the city,
and firing at the batteries, but with so little effect,
that the Algerines, in mockery, brought their children
down to the beach to fire pistols in reply to the Danish
bomb-ketches. After throwing in seventy-four shells,
the admiral held a council of war, in which he showed
that the ketches were too weak for the duty; that the
seams were beginning to open; that the vessels would
suffer more harm from the guns of the forts than they
inflicted on the ramparts; and it was unanimously decided
that they must retire to Mahon and refit.
The most important of the cabinet orders issued,
however, was the one that abolished the censorship,
and rendered the press perfectly free. The king—such
was the reason given for a decree which entailed
terrible consequences—was of opinion that it was injurious
to the impartial examination of the truth, and
prevented the uprooting of antiquated errors, if honest-minded
patriots, who felt anxious about the general
welfare and the true benefit of their fellow-citizens,
were unable to express their views and convictions
openly through the press, assail abuses, and show up
prejudices. Hence his Majesty had determined to
introduce unbounded freedom of the press in all the
countries beneath his sceptre, so that, henceforth, no
one would be obliged to subject books and pamphlets,
which he intended to print, to the previous examination
and opinion of the censor.
There is but little doubt that Struensee, in passing
this law, hoped that the gent écrivassière would take
advantage of it to abuse Bernstorff, whose downfall
took place almost simultaneously. Unfortunately, the
weapons were turned against himself, for the Danes,
constitutionally prone to stand on ancient customs,
disliked the innovations, and, above all, that they were
introduced by a German. One great cause of offence
was, that the decrees emanated from the royal cabinet,
and cabinet orders were a rarity in those days; but,
indubitably, the chief annoyance was felt at the decrees
being drawn up in German, which language was henceforth
employed in all public proclamations. For, although
German was the language of the court and the
nobles, royal orders, which did not concern the duchies,
had hitherto always been drawn up in Danish.
Before the royal pair left Frederiksborg they were
present at the Copenhagen shooting festival, which
honour had only been bestowed on the citizens before
by Queen Charlotte Amelia, consort of Christian V.
Caroline Matilda, however, granted the company an
even greater honour, by firing a shot herself and hitting
the popinjay, in which her consort attempted to imitate
her, but made a grand miss. While the queen gained
many hearts by her condescension, she aroused quite
as much anger by her free and easy manners. She
appeared at this feast in male clothing, sitting her horse
like a man, which created great scandal among the
females. She did so, however, by the special request
of her husband, who hated ceremony, and, according
to his peculiar mania, liked his wife to display her
beautiful form. It is certain that riding en homme
soon after became the prevalent fashion among the fine
ladies of Copenhagen.[124]
This was one of the long series of errors that Caroline
Matilda committed in her short career. Indeed, ever
since she had become intimate with Frau von Gähler
and the other light beauties who formed her court, a
great change had taken place in her, and a defiant recklessness
of public opinion grieved her best friends, and
was a terrible mistake in so puritanical a country as
Denmark. The priests took advantage of the popular
feeling, and many a sarcastic allusion to Jezebel could
be heard from the pulpit. Of course, the freedom of
the press found a splendid opening in abuse of the
queen and her supposed minion, and the capital was
soon flooded with the most scandalous attacks on the
couple. Ere long, caricatures, in which the queen and
her Cicisbeo were represented in the most ignoble postures;
satires, in which the most disgusting scenes
were described, were spread about the city, and not
merely pasted on the walls, but even in the passages of
the palace.[125]
The court next proceeded to Hirschholm for the
summer. This palace, only a few miles from the capital,
was the most magnificent of all the royal residences
in Denmark, and has been described as the
"culminating point of the luxury and magnificence
that sprang up in the reign of Louis XIV." Adorned
externally with all the nicest French refinements in
gardening and pleasure-grounds, it dazzled the eye
within by the profusion of solid silver intermingled
with mother-o'-pearl and rock crystal, with which not
only pictures and looking-glasses, but even the very
panels of the audience-chamber, were prodigally encircled.[126]
According to the "Old Chamberlain," this
palace was built by Sophia Magdalena, who demolished
the celebrated old castle, and erected a new palace in
the middle of the lake on many thousands of piles
driven into the ground, which was formed of mould
brought from a long distance. A large iron gate,
standing open, between high stone pillars, formed the
entrance to a wide alley laid out upon a dyke, leading
across the lake to the palace, which was connected with
the land by this avenue only, and occupied the whole
of the square island in the centre of the lake. Above
two low ranges of building rose a broad Italian wing,
with a flat roof in the form of a balcony, and in the
middle of it a prodigious gate tower, terminating at
top in a pyramid, supported by four lions couchant,
and surmounted with a royal crown. Through this
gateway could be seen a quadrangular court, in which
a fountain, adorned with marble figures, threw up its
jets. Two large pavilions, at the two extremities of
the balcony wing, connected this with the side wing
and inner main wing, while two bridges, one on
either side of the palace, communicated with the gardens
and stables. The inner wing had windows toward
the palace yard, as well as toward the south side
of the garden beyond the lake, which was very wide,
and separated the palace from the gardens. Two narrow
gravel walks, at the foot of the broad flight of
stone steps, ran along the walls of the palace.
In the gardens was a summer-house, which was used
as a temporary theatre for the diversion of Queen Matilda
and her companions; and in another part was a
wooden building called a Norway house, containing
landscapes in relief and imitations of rocks, with wooden
cottages perched on them, and wooden roads. In the
gardens were numerous fountains, and the dining-room
was also remarkable for a jet d'eau and twelve fountains
which spouted from the sides.[127]
The style of living at Hirschholm matched with the
splendour of the interior. The usual number that sat
down to dinner at the king's table was twelve, alternately
five ladies and seven gentlemen, or seven ladies
and five gentlemen. The king cut a wretched figure
on these occasions; but the queen dressed very superbly,
and made a noble appearance. The king and
queen were served on gold plate by noble pages; the
marshal of the palace sat at the foot of the table, the
chief lady of the household at the head; and the company
opposite to their Majesties.
A table of eighty covers was provided every day in
the chamber called the Rose, for the great officers of
state, who were served on silver plate. At this table
Struensee, Brandt, and their friends and favourites,
male and female, used to dine. The courtiers paid
Struensee more homage than they did the king, and
even in these early days of his prosperity it was noticed
that he was growing haughty and imperious; but it
would have needed a stronger head than he possessed
to withstand the influences of his sudden change. But
a few years before he had been seriously thinking of
going across the ocean to better his fortunes, and now
he was a confidential intimate of royalty, and honoured
with the too favourable consideration of an amiable
and accomplished queen.
While the court was at Hirschholm, the measures
were taken to liberate the party of the new era from
their dangerous opponent, Count Bernstorff. For
some time past the premier had seen the efforts made
to induce him, by insult or coarse allusions, voluntarily
to retire; and he had seen equally clearly that his reception
from the king was growing more and more
cold. He asked himself the question, whether he
should anticipate his fate or await it. He chose the
latter course, and soon after gave occasion for still
greater zeal on the part of those who were preparing
his overthrow. Without heeding Rantzau's promise
not to interfere in the Russian negociations about the
exchange of territory, Bernstorff expressed himself
in a report to the king rather freely about the opponents
of the negotiation, and as Rantzau at once
learned the fact from Struensee, he resolved to be
avenged. It may be assumed that the doctor had
some share in the count's dismissal, and indeed he did
not deny it afterwards. But he was in an awkward
position, for though he disapproved of Bernstorff's
policy, the latter had been his benefactor. The king,
however, was easily persuaded to dismiss his minister,
as he had never liked him.
On September 13, 1770, the king wrote an autograph
letter to Bernstorff, in which he thanked him
for past faithful services, but at the same time intimated
that, in consequence of intended changes in
the system of government, he no longer required his
advice, and therefore dismissed him with a pension of
6,000 dollars. Bernstorff was seated at his writing-table
when this letter was handed to him. He read
the contents in silence, and then rose with a look of
pain. To Councillor of Legation Sturtz, who was
present, the count said calmly, "I am dismissed from
office," and added, with his eyes raised to heaven,
"Almighty, bless this country and its king!" On
October 3 he quitted the capital, accompanied by
Klopstock, who was residing with him. Bernstorff
thought that the most suitable place to which he could
retire was his estate of Borstel, in Holstein, which had
come to him through his wife, and where he allowed
his mother-in-law, Frau von Buchwold, to reside.
He had always been received there with open arms,
whenever he had found time to escape from business;
and such had been the case in this very year. As the
château was large, and could contain several families,
he sent an upholsterer to get two rooms ready for him.
Frau von Buchwold turned out the upholsterer, and
refused to receive her son-in-law, who, through his
facile generosity, had given up his own house to her.
The disgraced minister spent the winter in Hamburg,
and the following summer at his château of Wotersen,
in Lauenburg.[128]
Bernstorff's fate aroused general sympathy. It is
true that he had fostered the extravagance of the
court, favoured foreigners, and repeatedly allowed the
state to be swindled by projectors. Nor could he be
acquitted of a certain vanity; but still he was a man
of noble character, and honestly desired the welfare of
the state. He had sacrificed a large portion of his
fortune in the service of his adopted country, and the
prospect of a permanent peace with Russia was his
work. The incorporation of the ducal estates of Plön,
when this line died out, with the royal portion of
Holstein, was owing to his exertions; he had materially
raised the prestige of the kingdom at foreign
courts, by carrying through the profitable free trade,
and creating a maritime trade in the Mediterranean
and the Levant. He was a true father to the poor,
and hence we can understand that the whole nation
regretted his fall, and that general respect accompanied
him on his departure.
Bernstorff's post as minister of foreign affairs was
not immediately filled up. For this reason, the ministers
of the foreign courts were requested to address the
king directly in writing in matters concerning their
courts. The real object of this was to prevent the
Russian ambassador, Filosofow, from causing the king
to alter his mind through personal representations. The
intention did not escape Filosofow; he became terribly
excited, and vented his anger in the bitterest complaints
and remarks. He openly threatened the vengeance
of his court, and sent off at once by a courier
a full account of the remarkable events he had
witnessed in the course of a few weeks.[129]
Bernstorff's discharge was followed by a great
number of others. The first blow fell on the father-in-law
of the ex-favourite, chief secretary at war, and
intendant of the navy, Admiral Danneskjold Laurvig,[130]
a man who was universally despised, and consequently
not a voice was raised against his dismissal. His post
was not filled up, but Vice-Admiral Römeling was appointed
first deputy of the Admiralty College, with immediate
reference to the king. In the War Department
important changes also took place. Lieutenant-General
Von Hauch lost the presidency, which was
given to Gähler, and Rantzau-Ascheberg was promoted
to be second deputy. In the College of Finances,
Privy Councillor Shack and Count Gustavus
Holck were dismissed, and their post was given to
Von Scheel. In the two War Offices a number of dismissals
and promotions also took place.
These changes principally affected individuals, but
the new Regent did not stop with these, and it became
more and more clear that he intended a thorough reform
of the administration. But no comprehensive
and connected scheme was drawn up. Conferenzrath
Struensee read, as lecteur du roi, letters and proposals
for reforms to the king, which he recommended for
further consideration and resolution, but he consulted
no one else about his views. The king, himself, then
decided in Struensee's presence what should be done,
and how carried out. At times Struensee laid before
the king proposals drawn up by himself, which Christian
either sanctioned or altered, but wrote his own
orders himself. Conferenzrath Schumacher drew up
these orders in an official form, and the king read
them all through once more before he affixed his signature.
It was clear that the monarch chiefly listened
to Struensee's propositions, and equally certain that
the bases of reforms in the administration emanated
from the latter. The more important of these reforms
were as follows:—
All representations addressed to the king must be
in writing, and the kings decisions would be given in
the same way. At the same time persons would be
careful so to draw up the petitions, that they only
contained the material points, and the questions on
which the king had to decide must be plainly and
clearly brought forward. In cases where the king
might find it necessary to consult with other persons,
he would either request the opinion of the college in
question, or appoint a commission to investigate the
matter, but everything, as far as was possible, should
be settled by the ordinary government organs—the
departments. The colleges would strive, as far as the
matter allowed, to treat and bring forward all affairs
in a similar form. As the king in deciding on matters
did not wish to enter into details, but expected it to
be done by the colleges, the latter would urge their
subordinates to attend to this duty and make them
responsible for it, so that all government business
might be treated in a similar mode. Lastly, the
business of the several departments would be so kept
separate, that each would only attend to those matters
which naturally fell to it, and none would have an influence
over the other. The number of departments
would, moreover, be reduced, so that there would be
only one department for each division of the administration.
As regards the different branches of the administration,
the following rules were laid down concerning
foreign affairs: the king had resolved to strive
after no further influence over foreign courts in any
matters that did not affect the position of his own
kingdom and the prosperity of trade. At the same
time, the king wished to spare the expense which
numerous first-class embassies at foreign courts entailed.
On the other hand, the king would not allow
foreign courts any influence over the internal affairs
of his kingdoms. Although Struensee could not thoroughly
convince himself of the importance of the Holstein
territorial exchange for the Danish monarchy,
he was still of opinion that the king must remain true
to the Russian alliance, and create no suspicion at the
court of Petersburg. However, the Russian court must
not seek guarantees in accidental and immaterial circumstances,
but solely trust to the rectitude of the
king, of which he had lately given the empress the
most manifest proofs. As regards these ticklish relations
Struensee entertained very different views from
Rantzau-Ascheberg, who was of opinion that Denmark
should not lean exclusively on Russia, but draw
nearer to other courts, especially the Swedish.
As regards Sweden, Struensee, speaking through
the king, entertained wise and peaceful sentiments.
These were, that the court should get rid of the disquieting
idea that Sweden was necessarily the enemy
of Denmark, gradually retire from officious interference
in the affairs of that kingdom, and, before all,
not expend such large sums upon it. Struensee was
also of opinion that France should no longer be treated
with the coldness which had set in when she gave up
subsidizing Denmark, and attempts be made to regain
her friendship. The French and Swedish envoys, Marquis
de Blosset and Baron von Sprengtporten, were the
only foreign ministers who paid respect to Struensee
during the period of his grandeur, and the only envoys
who appeared at his levees.
When the arguments on these points were ended,
the king read through everything that had been urged
by the two advisers of the crown, and decided in favour
of Struensee, though he had previously had no
fixed opinion on the subject.
As regards home affairs, it was decided that everything
connected with the finances of the state should be
placed under one college. Order and economy were
recognised as the sole means of relieving the embarrassed
finances, and all enterprises not based on those
two principles were given up. The whole of the state
revenue would be paid into one exchequer, and the
requisite sums paid out of it to the other departments,
so that the king might more easily see the state of
his income and out-goings. As a relief for the subjects
and the tax-gatherers, the payments in kind would
be converted into payments in money, in order to promote
the industry of the country people, and prevent
the frequent abuses which so often occurred in payments
in kind. The king wished the out-goings for
the government to be kept quite distinct from the
private expenditure for the court and royal family.
Factories, which, owing to their nature and the
circumstances of the country, could not exist without
assistance, would no longer be supported by the Treasury,
and the support of others would be given in the
shape of premiums, as the king wished to have no
partnership in them; and the same would be the case
with commerce. All pensions which appeared excessive
in proportion to the royal income would be reduced.
As regarded the administration of justice, the
king would not decide in any matter till it had been
legally discussed by the courts. The number of courts
would be reduced, as everybody, no matter his rank,
would be regarded as a simple citizen in judicial matters.
The judges would receive no fees, but have
a settled salary from the Treasury, and trials would
take place more rapidly.
General St. Germain had effected such excellent
reforms in the army, that the king in council proposed
to make no change in it, although the system of recruiting
among the natives had not yet been introduced.
For the navy, the sensible regulation was established
that its strength did not consist in the number of vessels,
but in those already existing being fit for sea and
properly equipped. It was also of importance that
everything required for a bombardment should always
be kept in store. As regards the court, every superfluity
that only served for pomp would be removed,
and only that intended for amusement retained, but
it must be borne in mind that the amusements and
court circles would be arranged in accordance with
the taste of the king and queen.
In addition to these general rules for the future
administration, there were several maxims which
Struensee often repeated to the king, and tried to
imprint on his weak memory. The principal of them
were to the following effect:—
It was injurious to foster the flocking to court of
persons who hoped to make their fortune there, for it
only tended to ruin such persons, to impoverish the
country, and entail losses on the king's Treasury. It
would be better for the nobility to live on their estates
if they did not desire employment, and those who
wished for an official appointment must render themselves
fit for it in subordinate posts.[131] Exceptions to
this rule should only occur for valid reasons, and not
through favour or a lengthened residence at court.
In giving appointments, the king must trust to the
recommendations of the colleges, and pay no regard
to the requests of courtiers or patronage. The king
must issue no decree by which the privileges of citizens
were attacked. His Majesty also, at least during the
first years, must grant no distinctions or titles that
did not agree with the office held by the recipient.[132]
Pensions must only be granted in extraordinary cases,
and after long service, and no alms were to be bestowed
on courtiers, but all the more copiously on
those who really needed them. The king must strive
to make Copenhagen great and prosperous, not by
luxury and numerous consumers, but by industry and
foreign commerce, so that capitalists might be attracted
to the capital. Improved morals could not be
produced by police laws, which were an encroachment
as well on human liberty; for immoral conduct, if it
have no immediate injurious influence on the quiet
and safety of society, must be left to conscience to
condemn. The secret vices which force and oppression
entailed were frequently much greater offences
against morality, and constraint only generated hypocrisy.
It cannot be denied that such a system of government,
in many respects, agreed with the principal
wants of society and the country at that day. Still
it must be carried out without precipitation, with
caution, and a thorough knowledge of the country and
the national character. Two points in this advice to
the king deserve comment, however. In his opinion
about the nobility, Struensee showed himself to be a
man who had but slight confidence in himself, and
was more competent to form great schemes than carry
them out. A statesman displays his weakness when
he shows a fear of that class of his fellow-citizens who
are able to weigh his actions properly. In the hands
of a wise regent and a clever minister the service of
the nobility must be the principal support of the state,
and not the object of ignoble apprehension. As regards
Struensee's views about morality, and its influence
in the welfare of the state, he was one of those
sciolists who derive their principles neither from reason
nor virtue, and who, under the deceptive mask of
respect for the rights of society, give admission to the
utmost irregularity.
The general overthrow, which had not spared any
class of officials, and had hurled the highest of them
from office, aroused an indescribable alarm in every
mind. The queen dowager quietly watched this terrible
storm from a distance: her dissatisfaction at it
was as uncertain as it was of little consequence; she
merely made a point of meeting those persons, on
whom the ruinous blows had fallen, with the greatest
expressions of sympathy and friendship on every occasion.
In the meanwhile, the young queen and her
adviser enjoyed the advantages they had acquired; the
confidential union and peace in which they lived was
heightened by the most agreeable amusements, and
their happy days were passed in undisturbed delight.
Still they did not forget to insure the permanency
of this state of things, and followed a very cleverly-devised
plan. Struensee, whose far-sighted schemes
aimed at getting the whole royal authority into his
hands and the queen's, felt that this was impossible
so long as the power was not brought into one hand,
and that hand must be the king's.
The king was certainly an absolute ruler, but there
was a serious obstacle to the proposed scheme in
the traditional respect felt for the council of state,
which had grown, as it were, into a law of custom.
Through Bernstorff's fall the council had certainly received
a shock, but the earnest Thott, the experienced
Moltke, and the clever Rosenkrantz, were still members
of it, and possessed numerous partisans. The
privy council aroused a certain degree of reverence,
both because it was established on the introduction of
absolutism into Denmark in 1660, and because it had
always consisted of members of the highest aristocracy.
Hence it seemed a serious matter to abolish it all at
once, and Struensee, therefore, resolved upon an expedient.
After Bernstorff's dismissal the privy council was
not called together for eleven days, and on September
24 a royal rescript to the following effect was sent to
its members. As it was the king's wish, the rescript
ran, to have the council of state organised in the best
manner, he requested that on the first occasion of
their usual meeting they should properly consider the
matters laid before them, and leave the final decision
to his Majesty, for the privy council, in a monarchical
state, was intended to offer the king all possible assistance
in governing. With respect to this, the king
expected the members of the council of state ever
to reflect that in a sovereign state like Denmark the
narrowest limits must be given to subordinate authority,
so that there might be no encroachment on the
sovereign power, which was solely represented by the
person of the king. The privy councillors must therefore
never forget that the king did not grant them any
power of decision in any matter that was ventilated,
and much less any legislative and executive authority,
and that the council of state was merely established
in order to place the matters intrusted to it for consultation
in a clear light, and lay an opinion before
the king. Hence, in judicial matters, no appeal to the
privy council would hereafter be permitted, and the
Danish and German chanceries would henceforth report
directly to the king, as would the departments of
foreign affairs and the finances.[133] The privy council
would meet once or twice a week, and when important
matters had to be discussed the king would preside in
person, but in his absence the council would send in a
report in writing about its session to the king.
About this period the salt tax was repealed, which
had produced great dissatisfaction among the poorer
classes, and even caused an outbreak in the island of
Bornholm. The abolition of this tax was effected at
a time when government had heavy extraordinary expenses
to defray on account of the expedition against
Algiers. But Struensee, who, in spite of all his faults,
always thought of alleviating the necessities of the
poor, considered this tax, which only oppressed the
lower orders, so unjust, that he proposed its immediate
abolition. Ere long, other reforms followed.
Although in most of the other Protestant countries
the excessive number of religious holidays had been
done away with, they were still kept in Denmark and
the crown lands, and were spent in idleness and excesses.
In consequence, there appeared, on October
26, a decree, which abolished the previous three days'
holiday at Christmas, Easter and Whitsuntide, Twelfth
day, St. John's and Michaelmas days, All Saints, the
Purification, Visitation and Transfiguration of the Virgin
Mary, and the annual Te Deums for the repulse of
the attack on the capital on February 11,[134] and the
great fire of October 23. This regulation caused great
annoyance among the large clique of pietists, who considered
the Christian religion deeply injured by the
abolition of superfluous holidays.
On the same day a second cabinet order appeared,
which purposed to prevent the filling up of offices of
state by favour and simony, as it was desired that future
candidates should have their abilities subjected to a
strict examination.
It must not be supposed, however, that it was all work and no play at
Hirschholm. The queen became about this time excessively fond of hunting,
and the court, magnificent in everything, kept up three establishments;
and for each of these there was a very costly uniform. That for the
king's stag hunt was a buff coat with light-blue collar and cuffs; the
coat was trimmed all round with silver lace, and lined with blue; the
blue waistcoat was also laced; the breeches were of leather; and the
cocked-hat laced, with a black cockade. The uniform for the hare hunt was
a green velvet coat and waistcoat, leathern breeches, brown top-boots,
and cocked-hat with green cockade. The falcon or hawk hunt uniform was
the most magnificent of all, being crimson velvet, with green cuffs and
collar trimmed with gold lace, leathern breeches, gold-laced cocked-hat,
and green cockade. Matilda, when she hunted, was attired, I am sorry
to say, exactly like a man. Her hair was dressed with less powder, and
pinned up closer, but in the usual style, with side curls, toupet, and
turned up behind; she wore a dove-colour beaver hat with a deep gold
band and tassels, a long scarlet coat faced with gold all round, a buff
gold-laced waistcoat, frilled shirt, a man's neckerchief, and buckskin
small clothes and spurs. She looked splendidly when mounted and dashing
through the woods, but when she dismounted the charm was, to a great
degree, dispelled, for she appeared shorter than she really was; the
shape of her knees betrayed her sex, and her belt seemed to cut her in
two.[135]
But when Caroline Matilda was dressed in the
manner becoming her sex, incessu patuit dea, she was
every inch a queen. She had grown much taller and
stouter since her arrival in Denmark, and any one who
had not seen her for the last four years would hardly
have recognised her. She was always gay and tasteful
in her dress, and combined a happy mean between
London and Paris fashions. Her complexion was exquisitely
fair, and it was a disadvantage to her beauty
that the fashions of the day obliged her to hide the colour
and texture of her fine silver tresses under a load of
powder and pomatum. The best description of Caroline
Matilda I have met with, and one which exactly
corresponds with the portraits of her that I have seen,
will be found in a work published in Denmark a few
years ago, which, though in the form of a novel, bears
evident traces of being what it represents to be—the
"Recollections of an Old Chamberlain:"—
"Over a marble table hung a portrait in a broad
gilt frame. It represented a lady in a dress of bluish
satin, embroidered with gold and edged with lace, the
sleeves and puffs over the full bosom being of brownish
brocade. Round her neck was a closely-strung necklace
of pearls, and similar rings were in her ears. The
hair was turned up and powdered; it occupied a
height and breadth which, agreeably to the fashion of
the times, exceeded that of the whole face, and was
decorated with a gold chain, enamels and jewels, entwined
with a border of blonde, which hung down
over one ear. The face was oval, the forehead high
and arched, the nose delicately carved, the mouth
pretty large, the lips red and swelling, the eyes large,
and of a peculiar light blue, mild, and at the same
time serious, deep, and confiding. I could describe
the entire dress, piece by piece, and the features trait
by trait; but in vain should I endeavour to convey an
idea of the peculiar expression, the amiable loftiness,
or lofty amiability, which beamed from that youthful
face, the freshness of whose colour I have never seen
surpassed. It needed not to cast your eye upon the
purple mantle, bordered with ermine, which hung
over her shoulder, to discover in her a queen; she
could be nothing of inferior rank. This the painter,
too, had felt, for the border of the mantle was so narrow
as to be almost overlooked. It was as though he
meant to say: 'This woman would be a queen without
a throne.' But she was more," the author adds;
"she was an angel, and the Danes still cling with
affectionate regard to the memory of the lovely being
thus portrayed."
Although I do not believe entirely in the accounts of
the orgies at Hirschholm, as described by the author of
the MS. in "Northern Courts," I cannot help allowing
that much happened there which offered cause for regret.
The old court had been austere and devoted,
the new one became futile and impious, as the preachers
called it. Sunday had been in former times given to
the Lord, and the Saturday employed in preparation
for it; but now these days were purposely selected for
pleasure. As if this were not enough, Brandt was
guilty of the inconceivable folly of ascending the pulpit
of the palace chapel and delivering an absurd sermon
to the assembled court. As a fresh amusement,
Equerry von Warnstedt got up horse-races, at which
the king offered a prize of 600 dollars. All this
folly naturally strengthened the game of the queen
dowager, who, though she kept quiet, was incessantly
on the watch for her opportunity.