The man that on the forehead of his fortune
Bears figures of renown and miracle.
—I. Tamburlaine, ii.
A combination, and a form, indeed,
Where every god did seem to set his seal,
To give the world assurance of a man.
—Hamlet, iii, 4.
At the point where the path from the Theater
penetrated the brick wall on the eastern boundary
of Finbury Fields, late in the afternoon of June
the first, 1593, a man had paused, apparently to
prevent overtaking a crowd that was preceding
him in the direction of the Shore-ditch Highway.
A fog of varying density, that had already enveloped
the streets of London, was drifting across
the fields, and hid not only the Theater and Curtain
from view, but also the buildings, nearer at
hand, of the dissolved Priory of Holywell. In
spite of the obscuring mist, if one had stood at
one end of the broken wall while the man, just
spoken of, had paused in the center of the opening,
the form and features of the latter could have
been seen to advantage. His face would first have
attracted attention. Both energy and sensibility
could have been traced upon it even in repose when
the dark and glowing eyes were closed. The first
characteristic was displayed in a close-shaven chin
which was almost pugnacious in its squareness,
and in a nose which, while too fine for that of a
Cæsar, had all the lordly outline of the latter. Intelligence
and sensitiveness were written on the
full and finely curved lips, and the glow upon his
cheeks pronounced the extreme of temperance in
habit, or an inexhaustible power of recuperation.
In the eyes and broad and compact forehead evidences
of genius were disclosed, but it could not
be determined whether it was in the fiery glance
of the former, or in the serenity of the latter, that
such proof was written. The letters were of a
type intelligible to all readers. The lines of
thought, between his brows and on his cheeks,
were indicative of age, but his laugh was from the
heart of youth alone. Between the two one would
have guessed his years correctly as close to thirty.
He was slender in stature and slightly above
medium height. His dress was of the extreme
style of the period; but although rich in texture,
was worn with much use, and stained from evident
dissipation. The black cloak, with buff silk
lining, was torn across one shoulder. The scarlet
doublet, because of missing buttons, was open
more than its maker intended, to show the vest
of same color, and gayly embroidered shirt front.
The belt around the doublet was enriched with
silver cord, and held a long rapier, whose bejeweled
hilt was enough to excite the cupidity of vagrants
or rufflers. The trunk hose of black fabric, reaching
half way down his upper leg, was slashed so as
to admit the protruding of purple silk, while tights
of the latter color extended from the bottoms of
the trunks down into the low shoes. He wore a flat
cap with single white feather, and under it a mass
of black hair hung to his shoulders.
The crowd before him was one dispersing after
a short afternoon performance3 at both theaters.
It was smaller than usual and was the last of the
season. The Plague had firmly engrafted itself in
the city, and was gathering new life with increase
of deaths.
Even in the suburbs the red crosses were being
marked upon the doors of infected houses. A
week previously, the Lord Mayor had issued a
proclamation prohibiting the holding open of
places of amusement during the prevalence of the
epidemic. This order, aimed at the gathering of
multitudes where germs of disease might be readily
propagated, was nugatory outside the city walls, but
it had had its effect upon the theater-going public.
It was a warning of greater force than those thundered
from the pulpits. The hegira of the wealthier
class of people to the country had begun, and
the poorer classes were closing their doors and venturing
out only as necessity compelled.
It was this condition of affairs that had caused
the managers of the play-houses in Finbury Fields
to announce a closing of their doors, and the prospect
of a reopening before the fall, or possibly the
winter season, was not encouraging.
Such a cessation of occupation assured discomfort
and perhaps misery to the man described; for
his livelihood depended upon the prosperity of the
theaters; but if he had at any time seriously considered
the matter, the consideration had in no
wise affected his perennial good humor. He
laughed at the unsuccessful attempts of several
crows at lighting upon one of the wings of a near
windmill that turned slightly one way and then
another in the shifting breeze. And then again
he was amused at the actions of an apparently intoxicated
man, who, having stumbled from the
path, had in the fog encountered the wall near by,
and with one hand against it was repeating in loud
voice the lines he had lately heard from the lips of
a ranting actor:
“Swing back the gates, thou triple-headed fiend,
Or by the gods this hand will draw a blade
To make thy shoulders strangers to thy head.”
The laugh which these words and gestures
awakened on the part of the quiet observer just
described was joined in by another man who was
approaching by the same path. The latter had
been whistling with all the ardor and enthusiasm
of tender years and an undisturbed mind, until the
loud voice of the drunkard provoked him to
laughter.
He was a beardless youth of apparently twenty
years of age. As he laughed his little blue eyes
were almost closed beneath his red eyebrows, so
that their expression alone was enough to excite
the merriment of an observer. His wide open
mouth revealed two rows of white teeth, separated
by at least two inches of space at the moment that
the loudest peal of laughter came forth. His round
cheeks were red with superabundance of health,
and proclaimed contact with country air. It was
not an overshrewd face nor one showing resolution;
but it was so open, so frank and good natured,
that even a person injured by carelessness on
the part of its owner would have paused in expressing
a natural remonstrance.
One would have expected to have seen a rough
doublet of Kendal green, or of homespun russet,
with patched trousers and low cockers upon the
slender figure beneath this face; but, on the contrary,
he was attired in a neat-fitting garb appropriate
for the page of a lord or rich country squire.
His blue coat, with velvet facing, had even an
Italian ruff with a hundred double turnings upon
it. A short sword was belted at his waist, and his
trunks, of strong material, disappeared into top
boots. The latter, however, were patched, of crude
manufacture, and looked to have been worn
through plowed fields at some recent period.
Neither was his hat in keeping with his new body
apparel, but was one evidently picked, for wearing
on this particular expedition, out of some pile of
discarded garments of the man whom he served.
As he saw the man first described a gleam of
recognition showed in his face.
“Ho!” he exclaimed, joyfully, “Is that you?”
“None else,” returned the other, carelessly, as
though the discovery of himself by the stranger
was of the least concern.
“Sir Kit?” queried the youth, taking off a hat,
still adorned with a broken feather, and bowing
with a grace which was evidently a recent acquirement,
for it savored of a contact with people far removed
from a service in which he must have acquired
his rough field boots.
“‘Sir,’ if so you will have it, but ‘Kit’ without
doubt,” answered the man addressed, smiling at the
youth’s appearance, and at the same time taking an
interest in the jolly face of its owner. The latter
feeling caused him to inquire:
“Hast thou any matter of concern to communicate
to me?”
“You do not recognize me,” returned the stranger,
as though the matter of his identity was first
necessary to be established.
The gentleman studied the other for a moment,
and then said:
“I have seen thy face before, but can not place
thee. Where was it and who are you?”
“You saw me in Deptford, and my name is Tabbard.
I come now from Sayes Court, where I have
lately entered into better service than that of an attendant
upon gentle folk in a wayside inn. The
duke took a fancy to me.”
“And gave you a new doublet, and his old hat,
eh?”
“True,” said Tabbard, “and the promise of long
service, good wages and promotion.”
“Your star is in the ascendant,” laughed the
other, and then added, “but what do you want to
tell me?”
“It is this. The Duke of Sussex is at Sayes
Court now, and many more who have left London
with him. You are to attend there a masque with
the remainder of the Earl’s actors.”
“Well,” interrupted the other, impatiently.
“But I am not here to tell you that alone. When
I last saw you, you were at the Golden Hind, Dodsman’s
tavern, in Deptford. They called me Tabbard
there, and so did you when I waited upon you,
and you gave me an angel for my attendance.”
“I do not remember the gold. When I give gold
my memory is gone as well,” said the other, while
an expressive smile played upon his lips.
“Well,” again began Tabbard, hurriedly, “at the
same time that you were there, a gentleman named
Manuel Crossford, from Canterbury, was there also
with his daughter.”
“Yes, yes,” the man addressed as Kit exclaimed,
and with it all the reserve that he had maintained
vanished.
“Let details go,” he continued, grasping Tabbard’s
arm, “I remember it all and you too. What
of her?”
“The father did not look favorably upon your
suit.”
“You evidently learned more than was proper
for one in your position,” again interrupted the
other, “but you are certainly not here to badger
words with me. What else have you to say?”
The two men had moved close to one end of the
brick wall, so as to avoid being brushed against by
the occasional stragglers, who were still issuing
from the mist in one direction and vanishing in the
other. These stragglers came singly, in pairs, and
in groups. Here would ride by a mounted cavalier
in Spanish hat, loose velvet cloak that covered him
to his knees, and high boots rattling with clumsy
silver spurs. Then close in the latter’s wake would
follow a ragged, sneaking vagrant of the Straits,4
who having caught a glimpse of the spurs and the
gold cord on the rider’s hat, was now intent on
dogging him, until upon the latter’s dismounting
at some ordinary or ale-house within the city,
a groat might be earned by holding the horse.
After these, a line of truant apprentices would stagger
by with locked arms and swaying black-capped
heads, endeavoring, by blocking the path, to keep
a group of gayly dressed women from hurrying toward
the tenements in the Garden Alleys.5
The sight of these trailing members of the great
body of people which had disappeared did not
seem to disturb the attention of the gentleman
or his inferior; and pausing but for a moment the
latter continued:
“Well, she is there at the Golden Hind to-day.
I saw her face at one of the windows as I was riding
by and then I remembered your words to never fail
to inform you if I ever saw her again. I dismounted
and went in.”
“Was she there alone?” asked Kit, without endeavoring
to conceal his interest.
“I do not know, except——”
“And what do you know?”
“Let me proceed. Thou art too impatient. A
line of horses was before the place and a crowd inside.
I went through the tap-room and up the
staircase without having made up my mind how to
announce myself as coming from thee—coming
from thee, mind—or for what purpose; and marry
sir, she was at the head of the stairs and I simply
blurted out: ‘Kit will be here to-night, and would
see thee.’”
“And what answer made she, thou fool?”
“‘At nine,’ she said sir, ‘and tell him not to fail,’
and at that moment a man who had followed me
into the hall set his foot on the lower stair and
stumbled. This must have startled her, for she
stopped speaking.”
“And didst thou not ask the number of the
room?”
“Wait. I heard the step and looked below, and
when I turned again her finger was on her lips and
she drew back.”
“Canst thou never learn expedition?” exclaimed
the other, biting his lip.
“She was behind the balustrade,” resumed Tabbard,
unmindful of the interruption, “and where
the light from the skylight fell upon her. He
could not see her, nor she him, but she heard him
hit the stairs. I say he could not see——”
“Go on, you stumble in your speech.”
“——not see her, but I could. She was dressed
like a lady; her cheeks pink, her eyes as dark as
thine own; her hair golden.”
“The same,” uttered the other, nodding his
head.
“She went into the room with carved panels on
the door.”
“Are they not all carved?”
“May be so; but I think not. No, ’twas the first
guest’s room; the second door on the right from
the head of the stairs. The man passed me as
I went down.”
“Who was he?”
“I never saw him before.”
“Was he not her father?”
“Oh, no. He was a young man dressed in grand
style. In face he was so like thee that I almost
stopped him as I have thee now.”
“And did you make no inquiry at the bar?”
“The tapster was busy; the serving men were
strangers to me, and Dodsman was not in sight.”
“And you learned nothing more?”
“No; I mounted and came on.”
“Marry, and why didst thou not wait, and why
didst thou not find me before?” questioned the
other, in tones of reproof. “It is now near six
o’clock and three miles lie between here and London
bridge and then another three miles or more
to Deptford.”
“Is that not time enough?”
“And how much can one spare from it for a full
meal and a glass of Canary at the Red Bull or the
Mermaid? I would not chance more than a mug
of sack and a square of black bread at the ale-house
next to the London wall. And how can one push
his horse faster than a walk through such a fog
as this? But let us press on.”
Through the fields they proceeded along a wide
path unfenced and bordered with stretches of grass
and rushes.
“You ask me why I did not wait for knowledge
about the lady,” at length said Tabbard, thinking
that some explanation was still due. “It was then
late, and besides the message I had for the Earl’s
actors, I wished to see Gabriel Spencer as the king
in ‘Edward the Second,’ at the Theater. I could
not miss that, Sir Kit.”
“And nearly missed seeing me,” said Kit, absently.
“I expected to see thee there, too. For admission
I paid my last penny, or at not seeing thee on
the stage I should have gone to the other playhouse.
I tried to go into the galleries, but an upstart
youth in bare head and with sword at his side,
like one of the Queen’s men, forced me back, demanding
another penny. Before me went a crowd
of women, and the galleries were filled with them.
Unlike those in the open pit, they sat under roof
and without fear of rain.6 So into the pit I went,
and must needs have paid another penny for a seat
had not Dudden, a countryman of mine from near
Maidstone, in Kent, whom I had not seen for four
years, touched me on the shoulder and bade me
squeeze in between him and a friend. They had
brought bottles of sack in with them,7 and not a
drink would they take without my joining them.”
“And did that require much urging?”
“Little at first,” answered Tabbard, “but when
once the play was well on, I could not drink for
fear of taking my eyes from the stage; not that the
devil heads on the tops of the posts on each side interested
me, or the dandies on the stools and dried
rushes on the stage-floor8 under these heads, but
the actors! Ah, but the actors, Sir Kit! Were
there ever such crimson doublets and cloaks with
copper lacings worn? And the rich dresses that
the men wore, who played the parts of the Queen
and ladies, made me think that they had broken
into the wardrobe at Whitehall. And do ladies
never play such parts, Sir Kit?”
“Never,”9 answered the other, shaking his head.
“But Dudden swore they were ladies, and when
one of the spectators on the stage hissed the Queen
for forgetting a line he threw one of the empty
bottles of sack at him. It was all so grand, so fierce,
so bloody. And Dudden went into a drunken fit
when the head of Mortimer was brought in. But
that was at the end. My own heart was in my
throat at the sight of the mowers, with their Welch
hooks, taking the king captive.”
“Art thou so easily disturbed, fellow?” asked
Kit, with a twinkle in his eye.
“Prut!” exclaimed Tabbard, “Thou couldst
never have seen the play, if you say that. What
man could sit still when the king moaned; ‘Lay
me on a litter and to the gates of hell——’”
“Hold,” interrupted the other, “not quite so.
These are the words:
‘A litter hast thou? Lay me in a hearse,
And to the gates of hell convey me hence:
Let Pluto’s bells ring out my fatal knell,
And hags howl for my death at Charon’s shore.’”
“Then he throws off his disguise,” continued
Tabbard, excitedly. “Why those sound like the
very words. Didst thou ever play the part of Edward?”
“Nay,” said Kit, shaking his head.
“Or Gaveston or Mortimer?”
“Nay, neither.”
Tabbard looked at his companion with open
mouth, and then asked:
“And what says the king when he hands the
Bishop his crown?”
“Now, sweet God of Heaven, make me despise
this transitory pomp,” answered the other without
hesitation.
“Well, and dost thou know all the play?” asked
Tabbard in amazement.
“Much of it,” came the answer.
“And never was in it as an actor?”
“Never.”
“And how comes it that you know it all?”
“I wrote it,” quietly answered the other.
“Wrote it!” exclaimed Tabbard, “and then thou
art——”
“Christopher Marlowe,” continued the gentleman,
“commonly called Kit.”
The effect on the excited youth was something
magical. He stopped talking but gave vent to a
prolonged “Oh,” that died into a whisper. He was
in the presence of genius; this was the man who
had written the lines which for three hours under
a hot sun, he had listened to in silent awe and
tremblings of terror. He could scarcely believe his
eyes; and Marlowe noticing Tabbard’s stupid
amazement said:
“How much sack did you punish, Tabbard?”
The question was designed to bring the latter-mentioned
person out of his stupefaction, and it
had this effect; but in his recovery Tabbard’s wonder
ran along the mental line of inquiry concerning
how it was that genius could be interested in such
common matters.
“Enough to have lost my way and the place
where I tied my horse,” at length answered Tabbard,
recovering his voice, and looking about him.
“Tied him? Witless, you should have had a
boy hold him,” said Marlowe, exhibiting some interest
in the welfare of the man who had brought
him the message of all others the most pleasing to
his ear.
“Then I needst must have cheated the boy, for I
have not an old Harry Groat in my pocket,” answered
Tabbard, spreading his hands open before
him, with palms turned up.
“It is not safe to trust one’s animal with rope
and post in these fields nor in this lane,” said Marlowe
in the tone of an adviser.
“Well a boy held two horses near where I tied
mine to a tree not a great way from this opening.
But for the fog I could see him. And I said ‘keep
an eye on him. He can not be held.’”
“Which was false, undoubtedly,” nodded Marlowe,
smiling.
“Ay, for the brute needs spurs for walking
smooth roads. But the watching required no
labor.”
“And I suppose that your horse is a pleasing
sight to look upon,” said the other.
“True, Sir Kit, and so the score will be even.”
“Was one horse gray that the boy held, and one
black, and did the boy wear a cap and stand under
an apple tree next to the Priory wall?”
“That is all true,” responded Tabbard.
“Well, the gray horse is mine,” said Marlowe.
“And why did you leave him so far from the
entrance to the play-houses?” asked Tabbard.
“A man who has creditors must appear to be a
beggar on foot. I limped to the theater and have
now let the crowd precede me as you see,” explained
the other, and then noticing a group emerging
from the fog, he exclaimed: “Ah! here the boy is
now, and there is your horse where you tied him.”
The pair had been following the path for some
distance, and now mounting their horses, rode
down the lane between brick walls, over which
great orchard trees extended their branches, and
again on between low houses with green blinds
where the miserable outcasts of the city had located
themselves. Before them ran the Shore-ditch
highway, and entering this they rode on
toward the invisible city wall.
In this vacancy of event, there is space for an
epitome of the period, in so far as it affected the
condition of the principal character of this romance.
The somberness of the natural scenery,
and the obscurity of the sky were in keeping with
his social surroundings and the uncertainty of his
existence. The fog might rise disclosing a sky
conducive of joyous spirits, or it might gather so
dense that naught but the austere form of Melancholy,
with her trailing robes of black, could walk
with firm and unfaltering strides within it. It
was the latter condition that was to follow. At
that moment, in the mind of Marlowe, the rosiest
dreams of life pursued one another as though conceived
by an Ovid, and impelled by the spirit of a
Homer; but they were to be buried in the blackness
of what seemed eternal night.
Fired with the ambition of a god, he had issued
from the studious walks of Cambridge in 1587.
Finding dramatic art confined to a close circle,
wherein only rhyming productions were considered
fit for presentation on the stage, and the public
clamorous for aught that possessed the fire of action
and the thunder of bombastic declamation, he
cast from his shoulders the splendid cloak of
rhyme, in which for a moment he had adorned himself,
and with the plain but majestic front of a warrior,
with feet in the buskins of an actor, he presented
himself before the public. It fell in adoration
at his feet. The thunder of his tread shook
all the gods of rhyme from their immemorial
thrones, and from amid the ruins Greene, Nashe
and others lifted their protesting voices. Recognizing
him as the son of the clerk of the parish
church of St. Mary, Greene insisted that he could
not “write true English without the help of clerks
of parish churches,”10 and Nashe, like Gervinus in
his analysis of the “Shakespere” plays, saw in the
productions of this late graduate of Cambridge
and dramatic innovator, the lines of Seneca read
under the light of the English candle.11 But all
in vain was the outcry.
In the production of Tamburlaine he had with one
bound reached an eminence from which it was impossible
to dislodge him,12 and, in quick succession,
followed the dramas of Faustus, The Jew of Malta,
Edward the Second, and the Massacre at Paris.
These plays had been produced during a term of
six years, wherein he had alternated his afternoon
occupation as an actor at the Curtaine,13
with nights as a dramatic writer. These productions,
teeming with majestic lines, and filled with
a spirit from “translunary” sources, required not
the critical minds of a later school of commentators
to establish their worth.14 Some passages
are still recognized as having “no parallel in all the
range of tragedy.”15 Thus it was that at this
period he was throned in a school where all his
fellows were his servile imitators. Among them
were Nashe, Peele, and Lilly; but poor Greene,
with one more outburst against the “upstart crow,”
with “his tygres heart,”16 who could have been none
else than the writer whom he had attacked in 1587,
had finished his unfortunate career. And his
career was the one being pursued by all these fiery
and impatient souls. It was Marlowe, especially,
who had plunged into all the mad excesses of an
unbridled life,17 the temporary drift of a youth
with convictions unsettled by draughts from Greek
philosophers, senses inflamed by the voluptuousness
of Ovid, and an existence checkered by frequent
shadows of poverty and flitting gleams of
plenty. It was the unsettled state of vigorous
youth, augmented by the peculiar social conditions
then existing.
Upon the continent the civil wars of Henry IV.
had approached their close. In England the Starchamber
held its secret sessions; the block of the
executioner was kept warm with the blood of the
insecure nobility; while the torch for the fires
of heretics was never allowed to smolder. Elizabeth
had been on the throne 35 years; Francis
Bacon, with mind bent on pre-eminence as a
philosophic writer, was her counsel learned extraordinary,
and William Shakespere, six years
previously arrived from the obscure village of
Stratford-on-Avon, was a member of Lord Pembroke’s
Company of actors. There were no theaters
at that time within the walls of the city; histrionic
exhibitions being presented on the boards of the
“gorgeous playing houses erected in the fields.”
The edict against strolling players was rigorously
enforced; freedom of expression in matters of religious
belief was the subject of penal laws, and
any animadversions concerning the policy of the
government were declared treasonable.
As an evidence of the barbarity of the times,
the Southwark end of the London bridge was decorated
with the heads of thirty traitors, all of which
had fallen beneath the axe of the executioner after
the hanging and disemboweling of the bodies.
The tower held many martyrs of religion; and
Fleet Street prison, with its foul quarters, was the
abiding place of hopeless prisoners for debt. If
the pinch of poverty of itself was spur enough to
have produced the poems of Goldsmith, the wonder
at the immortal dramas and poems of the
Elizabethan era must vanish upon consideration
of what poverty and debt then meant, and the insecurity
of the beggar who gave expression to his
coin-producing thoughts.
It was during a time, thus out of joint, that
Hamlet and Richard the III. walked, as embodied
entities, from the brain of their author. Besides
the barbarity of the period, the intolerant spirit,
and the harsh laws, did any other factor add its
motive power toward these productions? Had
some crisis been reached in the life of the author
greater than that evolved through poverty and the
prospect of imprisonment alone?