IT is a fact universally allowed, that few authors are so totally
indifferent to the stamp which their writings may bear in the minds of
the public, as to feel no anxiety concerning their success; and to
contemplate with perfect composure, the prospect of a critical analysis
of their productions, in which, each blemish is to be exposed to the
most rigid censure.
No writer is entirely exempt from this doubtful solicitude—even those
who have raised themselves above the quibblings of fire-side
commentators, and are only read to be admired, have their moments of
fear;—the opinions of the public may change; critics may condemn, and
their names may be tarnished by a failure.
Since then, those who possess every classical requisite for poetical
excellence; who are blessed with time, retirement, and an access to the
writings of all nations, and ages; whose minds are cheered in their
pursuits, by a solid hope of success, founded on the remembrance of
former approbation, cannot altogether confide in their infallibility. It
will not be doubted, that a youth, unlettered, and unlearned, who in his
first essay has been debarred all those advantages which are considered
almost indispensible in the pursuit of literary distinction—should
appear before the public with the utmost diffidence; fearful that the
pursuit which has given him employment in his midnight hours, and added
a zest to his short period of leisure, should reflect discredit upon his
authorship.
The writer of Hours of Childhood, far from enjoying “Poetic leisure,”
has, from the age of thirteen, filled a situation which requires “the
vigorous hand of stedfast application,” and, which has left little time
for studious improvement: But his work is to appear on the same stage,
with the productions of the man of science; and to be judged by the same
tribunal.—These are not happy auspices—yet, he ventures to present
this volume to the public, conscious of the many defects which may be
discovered in it,—but hoping to reap instruction from its fate. Nor
would he deprecate criticism; he wishes only that the sentence bestowed
upon it, should, as far as justice will allow, consider the
circumstances under which it appears. It has no patron; it goes forth
into the world, unprotected, and alone—to stand or fall by its own
merits—as a tender parent ushers into the world a beloved
child;—sensible of his faults, he cherishes a hope, that it will judge
of them with charity; nor crush, by a sentence too severe, the latent
seeds of virtue which may spring up to maturity and perfection. The
child has been his comfort, in many an hour of sorrow; and fancy, with
healing influence, has drawn his growing virtues starting forth into
fragrant blossom. For whatever national feeling is expressed in this
work, an apology cannot be necessary to a reasonable person, of what
country soever: The warm attachment of the author to his Native Land,
is but the natural feeling of every honest heart,—in that land, the
hours of infancy were whiled away under the influence of hope, and
fancy; and the delights of that innocent period, are engraven on the
tablets of memory, in the lovely hues of youthful imagination. Nor does
this laudable partiality cast a reflection upon the same predilection in
the natives of other countries; those who feel the true amor patriæ
are charmed with the same sentiment in others of whatever nation.
The smaller pieces are the effusions of the moment written at different
times, and are incapable of being altered from their original
crudeness.