In the summer of ’49, an old acquaintance of mine, who had grown fat
upon the Black Letter of the Profession; who, for twenty years, had
hardly seen the outside of our parish; and whom I had supposed a
fixture, so fixed, as no allurements of travel could draw beyond the
limit of his daily rounds about the courts, came to my rooms, with
wonder in his eyes, to tell me that he was about to leave for Europe; to
visit England, and France, and Germany, and Italy, and the Levant, and
the Holy Land, and heaven knew what horrid places beside; and, as it
might be that he should never get back, he had called to bid me
good-bye. I congratulated him on his new-born propensity to rove, and
said to myself, now here is an opportunity for learning something of
Paqueta, of whom I have dreamed so much since Charles’ sad fate. So, I
related her story; and when my friend became interested in it—for he
had a bit of romance beneath his Law—I asked him to call upon her in
Paris, giving him her residence, with a letter addressed to “Madame
Charles R——, Née Paqueta.” He put the letter in his pocket, saying,
that really—after what he had heard—he should himself like to know
what had become of the fair widow of the Deputy; then, charging him, in
case of her removal from the hotel in which I had found her, to inquire
for her of the wife of the commissaire, we joined hands and parted.
My fortunate brother went abroad, and saw a part of the countries he had
enumerated, and returned with this tale of the message I had confided to
him—mournful indeed, but which caused me to love Paqueta more and more.
He said that, on arriving in Paris, he soon found out the street, and
the number of the hotel I had given him, and put my letter into the
commissaire’s hands. The old servant read the address, shrugged his
shoulders, crossed himself, and was silent.
“Is Madame at home?”
“Non, Monsieur; she is dead!”
The wife of the commissaire, who stood near by, within the corridor,
hearing the question, came forward and asked, whom Monsieur would be
pleased to see?
“Madame Charles R——.”
“Mon Dieu!” exclaimed the little woman, also
crossing herself, and
beginning to cry—“Madame is with the virgin in heaven; and is happier
now than she ever was with us; though Jean, my good man, knows she was
then the sweetest and happiest angel alive. Did you know her, Monsieur?”
My friend gave the kind woman my name, and said I had heard of the
Deputy’s death, and he had called, at my request, to learn something of
his widow.
“Eh, I remember him very well. He loved Madame a great deal, and Madame
loved him; I think he was her godfather. He was here in good King
Philippe’s time. Mon Dieu, mon Dieu! we were well enough under good
King Philippe, but now it is à bas this and à bas that, and vive
this and vive that, and we shall never have done until we have cut
every body’s throat. A bas les émeutes, say I; poor Monsieur Charles
and Madame were killed in an émeute.” And then, amid many crosses and
many sobs, she told how Paqueta had died.
“On the morning of the 25th of June, 1848, only four short months after
Lamartine had proclaimed the Republic, with liberty, equality and
fraternity as its watch-words—when the fight raged hottest at the Clos
St. Lazare, Paqueta called to her the wife of the commissaire. ‘You,’
said she, ‘were born in Paris, and know all its streets and blind,
crooked ways; be quick, put on that dress, and go with me.’ ‘I thought
my good lady mad,’ said the commissaire’s wife, ‘for she stood before me
habited in male attire, with a gentleman’s hat upon her head, and the
dress she offered me was like her own. But she looked so firm, and so
fearful, too, and her words were so hoarse and had such a command in
them, that I obeyed without knowing why. ‘Now, no one will know us,’
said Madame; ‘do you hear that terrible cannon! For two days it has
boomed in my ears, and in all that time Charles has not been with me. My
God! my God! they are slaughtering the people in the streets, and he is
in the battle!’ What could I do? The little creature, so soft, so
pretty, so mild, so loving to all about her, looked like a giant, and I
hastened after her, afraid to cry out, afraid to say any thing, as she
rushed ever forward in search of her husband. Where the noise was
greatest, where the shout was loudest, she ran to catch it, crying,
‘Come, quickly, quickly.’ Oh, monsieur, the poor people! Oh, monsieur,
the blood, the dying, and the dead! And Madame heeding nothing of all
that, but still crying, ‘Come, quickly, quickly.’ Mon Dieu, Monsieur, à bas les émeutes!
The strife grew nearer every step we made, the
combatants fleeing and pursuing, grew thicker, and when we entered the
Clos St. Lazare, we saw the roar of the battle. ‘Ah, there is Monsieur
Charles!’ said I. Madame sprang from me at the word, and was soon at his
side fighting with the rest; oui, monsieur, fighting with a musket
which she snatched from a falling soldier’s grasp. Monsieur, quel horreur!
I could neither fly nor go forward, but stood where I was, and
watched the war, until I saw Charles go down—and then Madame, comme un tigre,
sprang upon the ouvrier who struck him, and was avenged, and
sank not to rise any more. Oh, monsieur, quel horreur!”
When the fight was ended, and the smoke had cleared off, and quietude
had returned with death, the good wife of the commissaire reclaimed
Paqueta’s body. There was no hurt upon it, she said; and about her neck
she found, fastened by a little black ribbon, a very small bronze medal,
which she had never seen her wear before. And now she rests, side and
side with the one she loved so much, in the bosom of the Pere la Chaise.
Of all who fell upon that terrible day, Paqueta was among the noblest.
She fought on neither side; knew nothing of liberty, of despotism, of
forms of government; knew only her love, and the man who kept it, her
life and—her death. Generous Paqueta, noble Paqueta, brave Paqueta, my
pen shall ever run riot when speaking of thee—Heaven bless thy soul.
———
BY MISS MATTIE GRIFFITH.
———
The twilight now is blushing o’er the earth—
The west is glowing like a garden, rich
With summer’s many-tinted blooms; the flowers
Of earth hold up their fairy cups to catch
The softly falling dew-drops; the bright stars
Are set like glorious diamonds on the dark
Blue drapery of the halls of heaven; the pale,
Sweet moon, like some young angel of the air,
Floats from the east upon her silver wing;
Eve’s golden clouds hung low—and thin, white mists
Rise silently and beautifully up
Through the calm atmosphere. Serenity
And loveliness and beauty are abroad
O’er the whole world of Nature.
At this hour,
When all the dark, wild passions of the breast
Are hushed and quelled by Nature’s spell of power,
When every wayward feeling is rebuked
And chastened by the blended influence
Of earth and heaven, I’ve stolen forth alone
Beneath the blue and glorious sky, to hold
Communion with the golden hours now gone
Into the past eternity.
My heart
Is very soft to-night, and joys long past
Shine through the silver mists of memory,
Like sweet stars of the soul. My brow is flushed,
My bosom throbs, and blesséd tears well up
From my heart’s unsealed fountain, as I see,
Through the pale shadows of the years, the home
Where first I felt the sweet, bewildering bliss
Of new existence. Softly, through the deep
Green foliage of the grove, the beautiful
White cottage peeps with its thick-blooming vines,
And in the distance the still church-yard, where
Repose the cold, unthrobbing hearts of those
I loved in childhood, lifts its marble shafts
Beneath the drooping willows. I behold
The shaded paths where my young footsteps strayed
To gather wild flowers at the morning tide,
And for a few brief moments once again
I seem to wander through the dear old wood.
The birds sing round me, the dark forest pines,
Stirred by the breeze, make music like the low,
Faint murmurs of the sea, my playmates shout
Beside me, and my mother’s music call
Of gentle love is in my ear.
Oh, there,
In that sweet home, I cherished fairy dreams
Of happiness, sad all my being wore
A glow of deep, ideal loveliness.
My vanished childhood rises to my view
In pale and melancholy beauty. Life
Since then hath been but desolate. Alas!
What heart-chords have been broken, what bright dreams
Been shadowed by the hue of grief. No more
The Egeria of my spirit-worship haunts
The grove and wood. No charm can woo her back,
She will not hear my call, she answers not
The witching spell of fancy. It is not
That Nature has grown old. Her skies are still
As blue, her trees as green, her dews as soft,
Her flowers as sweet, her clouds as beautiful,
Her birds, her waves, her winds as musical
As when I was a child—Alas! the change
Is in my heart.
Oh, blessed memories
Of home! ye are the worshiped household gods
Upon my spirit’s altar. Vanished years!
Ye are the dew-drops that my spirit’s flowers
Enfold within their petals. Years have passed
Since that all-mournful day when, with a sad
And breaking heart, and streaming eyes, I left
The scenes of childhood, and went forth to find
A home amid the stranger-crowds, where I
Have learned to wear the mask that others wear,
To smile while agony is in my soul,
Yet at an hour like this, when Nature glows
With deepest loveliness, when earth and heaven
Unite to woo my heart from its retreat
Of gloom and sorrow, I can wander back
To quench my faint and sinking spirit’s thirst
At young life’s gushing fountains, and forget
That I am not once more a happy child.
———
BY LILIAN MAY.
———
There are hearts in Northland valleys
Throbbing, beating wild for me,
And their soul-love yearneth ever
For a far-off one to see;
And the heart-strings of a sister
Harpeth all their melody,
Wild, sweet lays, for her lone brother,
In her joyness and her glee.
Oh, the ties which bind me to her
Keep aglow my ardent heart,
Thrilling it with pure emotion—
May it nevermore depart;
Oh, I love her ever dearly,
Sister kind she’s been to me—
All her words are golden music
To my heart-hopes minstrelsy.
Through the mellow sunlight glim’ring,
Glinting down upon the stream,
Voices sweet of love-tones falleth,
On my gorgeous, bright day-dream,
And I fancy forms of beauty
Linger then anear my side—
’Mid them all I see my sister
Through the misty visions glide.
In her love, and in her beauty,
Softly, slowly doth she glide,
O’er the pathway of my day-dream,
As a moon-beam on the tide;
And she whispers close beside me,
Meekly soft, and kindly low,
Words, that kindle up my heart-hopes,
Which no other one may know.
When the fairies from the Southland
Bring from far the meek-eyed flowers—
Undine trippeth o’er the waters,
In the rosy June-day hours—
As I watch her mellow glances
Lighting up the fitful stream,
I shall tell her all the haloes
Of a youthful poet’s dream;
And I’ll gather on the lea-land,
By the hill-side, in the grove,
Gems she’ll prize far more than jewels,
The bright flowers which I love,
With the dew-drops heavy-laden,
Sparkling in the red dawn light,
As the molten glory beameth
O’er the ebon wand of night.
Oh, my heart throbs wildly ever,
In its loneliness and wo,
And I long me for the summer,
When the Southland breezes blow;
Gladly, quickly, then I’ll hasten,
In the bright mid-summer day,
To my love-light Northland sister,
In my childhood’s home away.
———
BY HENRIK CONSCIENCE. TRANSLATED BY MARY HOWITT.
———
On a splendid summer day in 1846, the diligence was rolling along the
great highway from Antwerp to Turnhout at the regular hour. The horses
trotted, the wheels rattled, the carriage creaked, the driver clucked
incessantly with his tongue in order to quicken the speed of his cattle,
dogs barked in the distance, birds soared up from the fields high into
the air, the shadow sped alongside of the diligence, and danced along
with its peculiar motion amongst the trees and bushes.
Suddenly the conductor pulled up not far from a solitary inn. He leaped
down from his seat, opened the door of the diligence without saying a
word, slapped down the step, and put out his hand to a traveler, who,
with a knapsack in his hand, descended to the road. In the same silence
the conductor again put up the step, closed the door, sprung again into
his seat, and whistled gently to intimate to the horses that they must
move. The horses trotted on; the heavy vehicle pursued its monotonous
career.
In the mean time the traveler had entered the inn, and seated himself at
a table with a glass of ale before him. He was a man of more than
ordinary size, and appeared to be about fifty. You might at the same
time have supposed him to be sixty, if his vigorous carriage, his quick
glance, and a certain youthful smile about his lips, had not testified
that his soul and senses were much younger than his appearance. His hair
was gray, his forehead and cheeks covered with wrinkles, and his
complexion bore the stamp of early age which excessive exertion and
long-continued care impress on the countenance. Yet, at the same time,
his breast heaved with vigor, he bore his head upright, and his eyes
still gleamed with the fire of manhood. By his dress you would take him
for a wealthy citizen; it had nothing peculiar, except that the
frock-coat buttoned to the throat, and the large meerschaum pipe which
hung at his breast, bespoke a Flemish or a German officer.
The people of the house, having attended to his demands, again returned
to their occupations, without taking further notice of him. He saw the
two daughters go to and fro, the father renew the fire with wood and
turf, and the mother fill the kettle with water; but not one of them
addressed to him a single word, though his eyes followed earnestly every
member of the family, and although in his friendly glance might have
been read the question—“Do you not recognize me?”
At this moment his attention was caught by the striking of a clock which
hung upon the wall. As if the sound had painfully affected him, an
expression of disagreeable surprise appeared in his countenance, and
chased the smile from his lips. He stood up and contemplated the unlucky
clock while it went sounding stroke after stroke, to the number of nine.
The mother observed the singular emotion of the stranger, and placed
herself in wonder at his side; she, too, looked at the clock, as if to
discover what he found so remarkable in it.
“The clock has a pleasant sound—has it not?” said she. “It has now gone
for twenty years without the hand of the clockmaker touching it.”
“Twenty years!” sighed the traveler. “And where, then, is the clock
which hung there before? What has become of the image of the Virgin
which stood here upon the mantlepiece. They are both probably broken and
gone.”
The woman looked in astonishment at the stranger, and replied:—“The
figure of the Virgin, Zanna broke as she played with it as a child. But
it was really so pitiful, that the priest himself had advised us to buy
another. Here stands the new one, and it is much handsomer.”
The traveler shook his head dissentingly. “And the clock,” continued the
hostess, “you will soon hear. The wretched old thing is always too late,
and has hung from time immemorial in the lumber-room. There! now it is
just beginning to buzz.”
And, in truth, there came from the adjoining room a peculiar, croaking
noise. It was like the hoarse note of a bird which slowly wheezed out
“Cuckoo! cuckoo!” But this extraordinary sound called into the
traveler’s countenance a beaming smile; accompanied by the hostess, he
hastened into the lumber-room, and there, with glistening eyes, gazed on
the old clock, which still had not got to the end of its “Cuckoo!
cuckoo!”
Both daughters approached the stranger with curiosity, and stared with
wonder at him, their large eyes turning from him to their mother full of
inquiry. The looks of the damsels awoke the stranger to consciousness,
and he returned to the room, followed by the three women. His heart
clearly felt very happy, for his features glowed with so attractive an
expression of pleasure and good-will, and his eyes bedewed with tears
glanced so brightly, that the two young girls with evident sympathy
approached him. He seized their hands and said:—
“You think my conduct strange, eh, children? You cannot conceive why the
voice of the old cuckoo delights me so much. Ah! I too have been a
child, and at that time, my father, when he had done his work, used to
come and drink here his glass of ale. When I had behaved well, I was
allowed to accompany him. For whole hours have I stood and waited for
the cuckoo opening its little door; I have danced and leaped to the
measure of her song, and admired in my childish simplicity the poor bird
as a masterpiece. And the sacred image of the Virgin, which one of you
has broken, I loved it for its beautiful blue mantle, and because the
little Jesus-child
stretched its arms toward me, and smiled as I
smiled. Now is the child—myself—almost sixty years old, with gray hair
and furrowed countenance. Four-and-thirty years have I passed in the
steppes of Russia, and yet I remember the sacred image of Mary, and the
cuckoo, as if I had only been brought hither by my father yesterday.”
“You are from our village, then?” said Zanna.
“Yes, certainly,” answered the stranger, with a joyous precipitance. But
this announcement had not the anticipated effect; the girls only smiled
familiarly; that was all; the intelligence seemed to give them neither
pleasure nor pain. The traveler turned to the mother:—
“Well,” said he, “what is become of Baes Joostens?”
“You mean Baas Jan,” answered the hostess; “he died about twenty years
ago.”
“And his wife, the good, stout Petronella?”
“Dead too,” was the answer.
“Dead! dead!” sighed the stranger; “and the young herdsman, Andries, who
made such handsome baskets?”
“Also dead,” replied the hostess.
The traveler dropped his head and gave himself up to gloomy thoughts. In
the meantime the hostess went out into the barn to relate to her husband
what had passed with the unknown guest. The host entered the room
carelessly, and awoke by his noisy wooden shoes the stranger out of his
reverie. He sprung up, and with an exclamation of delight, rushed with
outstretched arms toward the host, who coldly took his hand, and almost
with indifference looked at him.
“Don’t you either know me again, Peter Joostens?” cried the stranger,
quite confounded.
“No, I do not recollect ever to have seen you,” replied the host.
“No! Don’t you know who it was that ventured his life under the ice to
rescue you from an otherwise inevitable death?”
The host shrugged his shoulders. Deeply wounded, the traveler continued,
almost moved to tears:—
“Have you actually forgotten the youth who defended you against your
bigger comrades, and supplied you with so many birds’-eggs, that you
might make a beautiful garland for the may-pole? He who taught you to
make so many pipes of reeds, and who so often took you with him when he
went with the tile-burner’s cart to market?”
“Something of the kind floats dimly in my memory,” answered the host;
“my late father used to tell me that when I was about six years old I
was very near perishing under the ice; but that Tall Jan drew me out,
and that he went away with the rest in the emperor’s time to serve for
cannon fodder. Who knows now where his bones lie in unconsecrated earth?
God be merciful to his poor soul!”
“Ah! now at length you know me!” exclaimed the stranger, joyously; “I am
tall Jan, or rather, Jan Slaets.”
As he did not receive an immediate answer, he added, in surprise:—
“You recollect the good shot at the bird-shooting, who for four miles
round was reckoned the best sportsman, who every time carried off the
prize, and who was envied by the young men because the girls showed him
the preference? I am he, Jan Slaets of the hill.”
“Very possibly,” said the host, incredulously; “at the same time, do not
take it amiss, my good sir, if I do not remember you. Our village has no
longer a bird-shooting; the shooting-ground is converted into private
property, and for a year past has been unoccupied, owing to the death of
the possessor.”
Deterred by the cold reception of the host, the traveler gave up the
attempt to make himself known; but as he prepared to go further, he
said, calmly:—
“In the village here there live a good many of my friends who cannot
have forgotten me. You, Peter Joostens, were very young at that time. I
am persuaded that the brick-maker, Paul, will rush to my arms the moment
that he sees me. Does he yet live in the clay dale?”
“The brick-yard became, many years ago, a prey to the flames; the
clay-field is cultivated, and bears now the finest hay. The meadow now
belongs to the rich Mr. Tirt.”
“And what has become of Paul?”
“After their misfortunes, the whole family went away. . . I do not know
certainly, perhaps he, too, is dead. But I observe that you talk of our
grandfathers’ time, and it will be difficult to get answers to all your
questions unless you go to the grave-digger. He can reckon up for you on
his fingers what has happened for a hundred years past, or more.”
“I can believe that; Peter Jan must have reached his ninetieth year.”
“Peter Jan? That is not the name of the grave-digger; his name is Lauw
Stevens.”
A glad smile illumined the countenance of the traveler.
“God be praised,” he exclaimed, “that he has at least left one of my
comrades still in life!”
“Indeed! was Lauw your friend, sir?”
“Not exactly my friend,” replied the traveler, shaking his head: “we
were always at loggerheads. Once, in the heat of our strife, I flung him
from the little bridge into the brook, so that he ran great risk of
drowning; but above thirty years are flown since then. Lauw will be glad
to see me again. Give me now your hand, good Joostens; I shall often
come to drink a glass of ale with you here.”
He paid, took his knapsack under his arm, and went out. Behind the inn
he took his way through a young pine-wood. His interview with the host,
although not very animating, had, nevertheless infused comfort into the
heart of the traveler. Memories from his childhood transported him;
memories at every step crowded upon him, and gave him new life. True,
the young wood could say nothing to him; in its place stood formerly a
tall pine-wood, whose trees had concealed so many birds’-nests, under
whose shade the refreshing bilberries had ripened. It had fared with the
wood as with
the inhabitants of the village—the old trees had fallen,
or were cut down, and a new generation, who were strange and indifferent
to him, had taken their places. But the songs of the birds which
resounded on all sides were still the same; the wind murmured
complainingly as before through the branches; the cricket sang as it
used to do, and the fresh aroma of the wood still filled the air. All
objects had changed, but the work of eternal nature had continued in its
principal features the same. Thoughts like these arose in the traveler’s
soul, and now glad and inspirited he continued his way without looking
up from the ground till he came out of the wood.
Here opened before his eyes the wide extent of fields and meadows,
amongst which the brook’s silvery thread coursed playfully its way. In
the background, at the distance of a quarter of a mile, the pointed
spire of the church lifted aloft its gilded vane, which gleamed in the
sunshine like a morning-star; and still beyond it the windmill whirled
its red wings.
Overcome by an unspeakable emotion, the traveler stood still—his eyes
filled with tears, he let his knapsack fall, and stretched out his arms,
while his countenance glowed with love and rapture. At the same moment
the bells rang for Angelus. The traveler fell on his knees, sunk his
head deep upon his bosom, and continued thus for a considerable time,
immovable though trembling. A prayer streamed up from his heart and
lips; this was evident as he cast his eyes full of inward thankfulness
toward heaven, and lifted his clasped hands to God. He then took up
again his knapsack, and said, with his gaze riveted on the
church-tower—“Thou at least hast not become changed, thou little
church, in which I was baptized, in which I celebrated my first
communion, in which all looked to me so wonderful and so holy. Yes, I
shall see them again, the Sacred Virgin in her garments of gold, and her
silver diadem; St. Anthony with the little friendly swine; St. Ursula
and the devil with the red tongue, of which I so often dreamed! and the
organ, upon which the sexton played so beautifully, while we sung with
all our hearts—
‘Ave Maria
Gratia plena.’”
The last words the traveler sung aloud, while a tear trickled down his
cheek. Silent and dreaming he went on till he came to a little bridge,
which led over a brook into a meadow. There his countenance brightened,
and he said with emotion—“Here I first pressed Rosa’s hand! Here our
eyes confessed for the first time that there is a happiness on earth
which seizes irresistibly our hearts, and opens heaven to the young! As
now, so then shone the yellow iris flower in the sunshine; the frogs
croaked, full of the enjoyment of life, and the larks sang above our
heads.”
He went over the bridge and said aloud to himself—“The frogs which
witnessed our love are dead; the flowers are dead; the larks are dead!
Their children now greet the old man, who like a spectre returns home
from the past times. And Rosa, my beloved Rosa! livest thou still?
Perhaps . . . . probably married and surrounded by children. Those who stay
at home forget so soon the unhappy brother who wanders over distant
lands in sorrow and care.” . . . . His lips moved as if he were
smiling:—“Poor pilgrim!” he sighed, “there wells up again in my heart
the old jealousy, as if my heart yet remained in its first spring. The
time of love is long gone by! . . . . But so be it; if she only knows me, and
remembers our former relation, I shall not repent the long journey of
eighteen hundred miles, and will then willingly lie down in my grave,
and sleep by the side of my ancestors and friends!”
A little farther, and near the village, he went into a public-house, on
whose sign there was a plough, and bade the hostess bring him a glass of
ale. In the corner by the fire sat a very old man, who stared into the
fire as immovably as a stone. Before the hostess had returned from the
cellar, the traveler had recognized the old man. He drew his chair close
to him, seized his hand, and said gladly—
“Thank God, who has let us live so long, Baes Joos! We yet remain from
the good old time. Don’t you know me again? No! The audacious lad that
so often crept through your hedge, and stole your apples before they
were ripe?”
“Six-and-ninety years,” muttered the old man, without moving.
“Very likely, but tell me, Baes Joos, is the wainwright’s Rosa living
yet?”
“Six-and-ninety years!” repeated the old man with a hollow voice.
The hostess came with the ale, and said—“He is blind and deaf, sir,
don’t give yourself the trouble to talk with him; he cannot understand
you.”
“Blind and deaf,” exclaimed the stranger, disconcerted. “What
irrepairable devastations time commits in the space of thirty years! I
walk here in the midst of the ruins of a whole race of men.”
“You were asking after the wainwright’s Rosa?” continued the hostess;
“our wainwright has four daughters, but amongst them is no Rosa. The
eldest is called Lisbeth, and is married to the footman; the second is
named Goude, and makes caps; the third is Nell; and the youngest, Anna:
the poor thing is short-sighted.”
“I am not speaking of these people,” exclaimed the stranger, with
impatience; “I mean the family of Kobe Meulinck.”
“Ah, they are all dead long ago, dear sir!” was the hostess’s reply.
Deeply agitated, the traveler paid for his ale, and left the
public-house with a feverish impetuosity. Out of doors he pressed his
hand upon his eyes, and exclaimed in despair:—“God! even she! my poor
Rosa—dead! Always, always the inevitable word—dead! dead! Then shall
no one on earth recognize me! Not one kind eye shall greet me!”
With a staggering step, as if he were drunk, he plunged into the wood,
and pressed his throbbing head against a tree, that he thus might by
degrees recover himself. He then directed his course toward the village.
His way led him across the solitary church-yard, where he remained
standing with
bare head at the foot of a crucifix, and said:—“Here,
before the image of the Crucified One, Rosa gave me her word that she
would remain true to me, and wait for my return. Sorrow overwhelmed us;
upon this bench fell our tears; in deep grief she received the gold
cross, my dearly purchased pledge of love. Poor beloved one! Perhaps now
I stand by thy grave!”
With this sorrowful observation he sank motionless upon the bench, where
he long continued sitting, as if unconscious. His eye wandered over the
church-yard, and the small mounds of earth which covered the freshest
graves. It grieved him to see how many of the wooden crosses were fallen
with age, without the hand of a child troubling itself to raise again
these memorials in a father’s or a mother’s place of rest. His parents,
too, slept here under the earth, but who could show him the spot which
their graves occupied?
In this manner he sat long, sunk in gloomy reverie; the unfathomable
eternity weighed heavily on his soul, when a human step awoke him out of
his dreams. It was the old grave-digger, who, with his spade on his
shoulder, came along by the church-yard wall. Misery and indigence might
be read in his whole exterior: his back was bent, and through his
constant labor with the spade had become crooked; his hair was white,
and wrinkles ploughed his brow; though strength and spirit still spoke
in his eye.
The traveler recognized at the first glance Lauw—his rival, and would
have willingly sprung toward him; but the bitterly disappointed hopes
which he had already experienced held him back, and inspired him with a
resolve to say nothing, but to see whether Lauw would know him again.
The grave-digger remained standing some paces from him, contemplated him
awhile with common curiosity, and then began to mark out a long square
with his spade, and to prepare a new grave. From time to time, however,
he continued to cast stolen glances at the man who sat before him on the
bench, and a secret melancholy joy gleamed in his eyes. The traveler,
who deceived himself as to the expression in the grave-digger’s
countenance, felt his heart begin to beat, and expected that Lauw would
come forward and name his name.
But the grave-digger still continued to look him sharply in the face,
and then put his hand into his coat-pocket. He drew out a little old
book, bound in dirty parchment, to which was attached a strap with a
lead pencil. He turned round and appeared to write something in the
book.
This action, accompanied by a triumphant glance, astonished the stranger
so much that he stood up, advanced to the grave-digger, and asked him in
surprise, “What do you write in your book?”
“That is my affair,” answered Lauw Stevens; “for a confounded long time
there has stood a vacant place in my list: I make a cross by your name.”
“You know me, then?” exclaimed the traveler, with the liveliest joy.
“Know you?” answered the grave-digger, jeeringly; “that I cannot exactly
say; I only remember, as if it were yesterday, that a jealous fellow
flung me into the brook, and nearly drowned me, because the wainwright’s
Rosa loved me. Since that time many an Easter taper has burnt—”
“You! did wainwright’s Rosa love?” said the stranger, interrupting
him; “that is not true, let me tell you.”
“You know that well enough, you jealous fool. Did not she wear for a
whole year the blessed ring of silver that I brought with me from
Scherpenheuvel, till you yourself took the ring by force, and cast it
into the brook?”
The traveler’s countenance brightened into a melancholy smile.
“Lauw! Lauw! the recollection of the old times makes children of us
again. Believe me, Rosa never loved you as you fancy. She took your ring
out of friendship, and because it had been blessed. In my youth I was
rude and harsh, and did not always act in the best manner toward my
comrades; but should not the four-and-thirty years which have operated
so annihilatingly on men and things, have calmed down our evil passions?
Shall I, in the only man who has recollected me, find an irreconcilable
enemy? Come, give me your hand; let us be friends; I will make you
comfortable for your whole life.”
But the grave-digger drew angrily his hand back, and answered in a
caustic tone—
“It is too late to forget. You have embittered my life, and there passes
no day but I think of you. Is that, think you, to bless your name? You,
who contributed so much to my misfortune, may easily guess.”
The traveler struck his trembling hands together, and lifting his eyes
toward heaven, exclaimed—
“God! hatred alone recognizes me! hate only never forgets!”
“You have done well,” continued the grave-digger, “to come back to rest
amongst your departed ancestors. I have kept a good grave for you. When
the headstrong long Jan lies under the earth, the rain will wash misery
from his corpse.”
The traveler trembled in every limb at this rude jest. Anger and
displeasure kindled in his eyes. But this hasty emotion quickly
vanished; dejection and pity took their place.
“You refuse,” he said, “to extend your hand to a brother who returns
after four-and-thirty years; the first greeting which you give to an old
comrade is bitter mockery? That is not well of you, Lauw. But let it be
so; we will speak no more of this. Tell me only where my late parents
are laid.”
“That I don’t know,” said the grave-digger; “it is full five-and-twenty
years since, and since that time the same spot has certainly been thrice
used for new graves.”
These words made the traveler so sorrowful, that his head sunk on his
bosom, and with an immovable look he continued lost in his melancholy
thoughts.
The grave-digger proceeded with his labor, but he also seemed to linger
over it, as if a gloomy thought had taken possession of him. He saw the
deep suffering of the traveler, and was terrified at that thirst of
revenge which had caused him thus to torture a
fellow-mortal. This
change of mood showed itself even upon his countenance; the bitter
mockery disappeared from his lips, he contemplated for a moment with
increasing sympathy his afflicted comrade, advanced slowly toward him,
seized his hand, and said in a low, but still heart-touching voice—
“Jan, my dear friend, pardon me what I have said and done. I have
behaved cruelly and wickedly to thee; but thou must remember, Jan, that
I have suffered so much through thee.”
“Lauw!” exclaimed the stranger with emotion, and shaking his hand, “that
was the violence of our youth. See how little I thought of thy enmity,
for I felt myself infinitely happy when I heard thee name my name. And
for that I am grateful to thee, though thy bitterness has gone to my
heart. But tell me, Lauw, where is Rosa buried? She will rejoice in
heaven, when she sees us thus as reconciled brothers stand upon her last
resting-place.”
“How?—Rosa buried!” exclaimed the grave-digger. “Would to God that she
were buried, poor thing!”
“What meanest thou?” cried the traveler: “does Rosa yet live?”
“Yes, she lives,” was the answer, “if that terrible fate that she has to
endure can be called life.”
“Thou terrifiest me. For God’s sake tell me what calamity has happened
to her?”
“She is blind.”
“Blind? Rosa blind! Without eyes to see me? Wo, wo is me!”
Overwhelmed by anguish, he advanced with uncertain steps to the bench,
and sunk down upon it. The grave-digger placed himself before him, and
said—
“For ten years has she been blind—and begs her daily bread. I give her,
every week, two stivers: and, when we bake, we always remember her with
a little cake.”
The traveler sprung up, shook powerfully the grave-digger’s hand and
said—
“A thousand thanks! God bless thee for thy love to Rosa! I pledge myself
in his name to reward thee for it. I am rich, very rich. By evening we
will see one another again. But tell me now, at once, where Rosa is to
be found: every moment is to me a hundred years of suffering.”
With these words, he drew the grave-digger along with him, and directed
his steps toward the church-yard gate. Arrived there, the grave-digger
pointed with his finger, and said—
“See there, by the side of the wood, there rises a smoke from a low
chimney. That is the house of besom-binder Nelis Oom: she lives there.”
Without waiting for further explanation, the traveler hastened through
the village toward the indicated spot. He was soon at the dwelling. It
was a low hut, built of willow-wands and clay, but on the outside neatly
white-washed. Some paces from the door, four little children were
playing and amusing themselves, in the bright sunshine, with planting in
circles blue corn-flowers and red poppies. They were bare-foot and
half-naked: the eldest, a boy of about six years old, had nothing
whatever on but a linen shirt. While his little brother and sisters
looked at the stranger with fear and shyness, the boy let his eyes rest
steadily on the unknown one, full of curiosity and wonder.
The stranger smiled at the children, but advanced without delay into the
hut, in one corner of which a man was busy making besoms, while a woman
sat with her spinning-wheel by the hearth. These people could not be
more than thirty years of age, and at the first glance might be
perceived their contentment with their lot. For the rest, all around
them looked as clean as country life within such narrow space will
allow. The stranger’s entrance obviously surprised them, although they
received him with kindness and offered him their services. They were
clearly of opinion that he wanted to inquire his way, for the husband
put himself in readiness to go and show it him. But he asked with
evident emotion whether Rosa lived there: and the husband and wife cast
astonished looks at each other, and could scarcely find words to answer
him.
“Yes, good sir,” said the man at length: “Rosa lives here; but at
present she is gone out a-begging. Do you wish to speak with her?”
“God! God!” exclaimed the traveler. “Cannot you quickly find her?”
“That would be difficult to do, sir: she has gone out with Trientje, to
make her round for the week; but we expect her in an hour’s time, she
never stays out.”
“Can I wait for her here, good friends?”
Scarcely had he uttered the words, before the man hastened into the next
room, and fetched thence an easy-chair, which—although of rude
workmanship—appeared more inviting than the still ruder chairs which
stood in the outer room. Not satisfied with this, the wife took out of a
chest a white cushion, which she laid in the chair, and requested the
stranger to sit down. He was astonished at the simple but well-meant
attention, and returned the cushion with many thanks. He then sat down
in silence, and let his eyes glance round the room, as if to discover
something which might speak of Rosa. As his head was thus turned aside,
he felt a small hand gently thrust into his, and his fingers stroked. He
looked round curiously to discover who bestowed on him this mark of
friendliness, and he met the blue eyes of the boy, who—with heavenly
innocence—looked up to him, as if he had been his father or brother.
“Come here, Peterken,” said the mother; “thou shouldst not be so
forward, dear child.”
But Peterken did not seem to hear this warning, and continued to hold
the hand of the stranger, and look at him. The stranger found the
friendship of the child unaccountable, and said—
“Dear child, thy blue eyes penetrate deep into my soul. As thou art so
friendly, I will give thee something.”
He put his hand into his pocket, and took out a little purse, with
silver clasp and pearls, that changed color in the light, and gave it to
him, after he had
dropped into it some pieces of money. The boy gazed
on the purse with great delight, but did not let go the stranger’s hand.
The mother approached, and desired the child to go away.
“Peterken,” said she, “thou wilt not be rude: thank the gentleman, and
kiss his hand.”
The boy kissed his hand, stooped his head toward him, and said—in a
clear voice—
“Many thanks, tall Jan.”
A clap of thunder could not have so startled the traveler as his own
name thus pronounced by the innocent child. Tears started involuntarily
from his eyes: he lifted the boy upon his knee, and now gazed deeply
into his face.
“So, dost thou know me, thou blessed angel! me, whom thou never saw’st
before! Who taught thee my name?”
“Blind Rosa,” was the answer.
“But how is it possible that thou hast known me? It must be God himself
who has enlightened thy childish mind.”
“O, I know you very well,” said Peterken. “When I lead Rosa about to
beg, she always talks of you. She says that you are tall, and have dark,
fiery eyes; and that you will come back again, and bring us all such
beautiful things. And so I was not afraid of you, good sir; for Rosa had
bade me to love you, and you are to give me a bow and arrow.”
The child’s simple confidence made the traveler perfectly happy. He
kissed him hastily, and with tenderness, and said in a solemn tone—
“Father—mother—this child is rich! I will bring him up and educate
him, and richly endow him. It shall be a blessing to him to have
recognized me!”
Joy and amazement overwhelmed the parents. The man stammered forth—
“Ah! you are too good. We, ourselves, thought that we knew you, but we
were not so certain of it, because Rosa told us that you were not so
rich a gentleman.”
“And you, too, knew me, my good people!” exclaimed the traveler. “I find
myself amongst friends. Here I have relations and a family . . . while
hitherto I have only found death and forgetfulness!”
The wife pointed to a smoky image of the Virgin, which stood upon the
chimney-piece, and said—
“Here, every Saturday evening, burns a light for the return of Jan
Slaets, or for the repose of his soul!”
The traveler directed his eyes in devotion toward heaven, and with a
voice full of emotion, said—
“Thanks be to thee, O God, rich in love, that thou hast made affection
more powerful than hate! My enemy has shut my name within his heart,
with the dark feeling of his spite; but my friend has lived in memory of
me, has inspired all around her with her love, has kept me here present,
and made me the favorite of this child, while eighteen hundred miles
separated me from her. O God be praised, I am rewarded to the full.”
A long silence followed before Jan Slaets could subdue his emotion,
which inspired the people of the house with respect. The husband
returned to his work; but held himself ready to hasten to the service of
his guest. He, with little Peterken still upon his knee, asked quite
calmly—
“Good mother, has Rosa lived long with you?”
The wife—as if preparing herself for a long explanation—took her
wheel, set it by his side, and began—
“I will tell you, good sir, how it has gone on. You should know that
when the old Meulinck died, he divided his property amongst his
children. Rosa, whom nothing in the world could induce to marry—I need
not tell you the reason—gave her share wholly up to her brother; and
only asked, in return, to live with him during her life-time. At the
same time, she employed herself in making ornamental articles, and by
this means acquired a great deal of money. There was no need to leave
this to her brother, and she employed all her gains in doing good. She
attended the sick, and paid for a doctor when it was necessary. She had
always a pleasant word to encourage the suffering, and some delicacy to
offer the sickly. We had scarcely been married six months, when my
husband came home one day dreadfully ill of inflammation on the lungs:
the cough which you now hear is the consequence of it. We have to thank
our merciful God and the good Rosa, that our poor Nelis is not now lying
in the church-yard. If you could have but seen, dear sir, what she
wholly and solely out of love did for us! She brought us additional
bed-clothes; for it was cold, and we were wretchedly poor. She sent for
two physicians from the next parish, and had them to consult with the
doctor here on my husband’s condition. She watched by him; alleviated
his sufferings and my trouble by her affectionate conversation, and she
paid all that was necessary for food and medicine; for Rosa was esteemed
by everybody, and when she requested the ladies of the estate, or the
peasantry, to assist the poor, she was never refused. Six whole weeks
was our Nelis confined to his bed, and Rosa protected and assisted us,
till he—by degrees—could resume his work again.”
“How I long to see the poor blind one!” sighed the traveler.
The husband raised his head from his work: tears glanced in his eyes,
and he said with emotion—
“If my blood could give her her sight again, I would freely spend the
last drop of it.”
This exclamation powerfully affected Jan Slaets: the wife observed it,
and with her hand gave a sign to her husband to be silent. She then
continued—
“Three months after, God gave us a child—the same that sits upon your
knee. Rosa, who bore it to the font, desired that it might be christened
Johan, but Peter, my husband’s brother, who was godfather—a good man,
but somewhat self-willed—insisted that it should be called Peter, after
him. After a long discussion, the boy received the name of Johan Peter.
We call him Peterken, after his godfather—who still insists on its
being so, and who would be
angry if it were otherwise; but Rosa will
not hear him called so: she calls him constantly Janneken. The boy is
proud of it, and knows that she calls him Jannekin because it is your
name, good sir.”
The traveler pressed the boy with transport to his breast, and kissed
him passionately. With silent admiration he gazed into the boy’s
friendly eyes, and his heart was deeply moved. The wife went on—
“Rosa’s brother had engaged with people in Antwerp, to collect
provisions in the country round, and ship them to England. Trade was to
make him rich it was said, for every week he sent two carts to Antwerp.
In the beginning, all went well; but a bankrupt in Antwerp reduced all
the gain to nothing, for poor Tirt Meulinck, who was bound for him;
scarcely could he pay half his debts. Through grief on this account he
is dead. God be merciful to his soul!
“Rosa, after this, lived at Nand Flinck’s, the shopkeeper, in a little
room. The same year, the son Karl—who had been away as a recruit—came
home with bad eyes, and—fourteen days after—the poor young man became
blind. Rosa, who was sorry for him, and only listened to her own heart’s
suggestions, attended him during his illness, and led him by the hand,
in order to amuse him a little. Alas! she herself took the same
complaint, and from that time she has never seen the light of day. Nand
Flinck is dead, and his children are scattered about. Blind Karl lives
at a farm-house near Lierre. Then came Rosa to live with us, and we told
her how gladly we saw her with us, and how willingly we would work all
our lives for her. She accepted our invitation. Six years are now flown,
and God knows that she has never received from us a cross word: for she
is herself all affection and kindness. If it be a question of doing
something for her, the children are ready to fight which shall get to do
it first.”
“And yet she begs,” said the traveler.
“Yes, good sir,” said the wife, with a certain pride; “but that is her
own fault. Do not imagine that we have forgotten what Rosa has done for
us: and had we suffered hunger, and must have taken the yoke upon us, we
would never have obliged her to beg. What think you then of us? Six
months we kept her back from it; but beyond that point we could not
prevail. As our family was increasing, Rosa, the good soul, thought she
would become a burden to us, and wished on the contrary to help us. It
was impossible to hinder her from it: she became sick of sorrow. When we
saw that—after the half-year—we gave way to her desire. For a poor
blind person it is, nevertheless, no shame. At the same time, though we
are poor, we do not make a gain of what she earns by begging. She will,
ever and anon, compel us to take part with her; we cannot always be at
strife with her, poor thing! but we give it her double back again.
Without her knowing it, she is better clad than we are, and the food we
set before her is better than our own. There always stands at the fire a
separate little pan for her. See here: to her potatoes, she has a couple
of eggs and melted butter. Of the remainder of her gains, I believe,
from what I can learn by her words, that she is laying up a little hoard
till our children are grown up. Her love deserves our gratitude, but we
cannot oppose her will.”
The traveler had listened in silence to the whole relation, but a happy
smile upon his lips, and a mild lustre in his moistened eye, showed how
much his heart was moved. The wife had ceased to speak, and occupied
herself again with her wheel. The traveler remained awhile sunk in deep
thought, when, setting the boy hastily down, he advanced toward the
husband, and said in a commanding tone:
“Have done with your work.”
The besom-maker did not comprehend his meaning, and was startled at his
unusual tone.
“Give over your work, and give me your hand, farmer Nelis.”
“Farmer?” said the besom-maker, astonished.
“Yes,” exclaimed the traveler; “fling the besoms out of the door; I will
give you a farm, four milch cows, a calf, two horses, and all that is
necessary for housekeeping. You do not believe me,” continued he, and
showed the besom-maker a handful of money. “I tell you the truth, I
could at once give you the necessary sum; but I respect and esteem you
too much to offer you money. But I will make you the proprietor of a
farm, and protect your children both before and after my death.”
The good people looked at each other with the tears streaming from their
eyes, and did not seem rightly to comprehend what was passing. While the
traveler was about to make them fresh promises, Peterken pulled him by
the hand as if he had something to communicate.
“What wilt thou, dear child?”
“Herr Jan,” answered the boy, “see, the peasants are coming home from
the field; I know now where I shall find Rosa. Shall I run and tell her
that you are come?”
The traveler seized Peterken’s hand, and drew him with impatience toward
the door, as he said, “Come, come, lead me to her!” And while he made
his adieu to the people of the house with his hand, he followed the
child, who went with rapid pace through the midst of the village. So
soon as they came to the first house, the people ran in wonder from shop
and yard to look after them, as if they were something extraordinary.
And truly, they presented a singular spectacle; the child with his
little shirt and bare feet, who laughing and playful skipped along
holding by the hand of the unknown one. The astonished people could not
comprehend what the rich gentleman, who at least seemed to be a baron,
had to do with the besom-binder’s Peterken. Their astonishment still
increased as they saw the stranger stoop down and kiss the child. The
only thought which occurred to some of them, and over which they now
gossiped at every door, was that the rich gentleman had purchased the
child of his parents to bring him up as his own son. People from the
city who have no child of their own are often wont to do so; and the
besom-maker’s Peterken was the handsomest child in the village, with his
large, blue eyes
and his light, curly hair. At the same time it was
extraordinary that the rich gentleman took the child with him in his
bare shirt.
The traveler strode rapidly forward. The whole village seemed to him to
be magically illuminated; the leafy trees shone in their clear verdure,
the low huts smiled at him, the birds sung with a transporting harmony,
the air was filled with a balsamic odor and the warmth of life.
He had turned his attention from the child to enjoy this new happiness.
During this time, he had fixed his eye on the distance to transpierce
the dark wood which, at the other end of the village, seemed to close up
the way.
Hastily, the child pulled him by the hand with all his power, and cried:
“See there!—there comes Rosa with our Trientje!”
And actually there came forward, by a house upon a great by-road, an
elderly blind woman led by a child of five years old.
Instead of rapidly accompanying the child the traveler remained
standing, and contemplated with pain and sorrow the poor blind one, who,
at a distance, approached with unsteady steps. Was that his Rosa, the
handsome, amiable girl, whose image still lived so young and fresh in
his heart? But this contemplation lasted only a moment: he drew the
child along with him, and hastened toward his friend. When he had
arrived at about fifty paces from her, he could no longer command
himself, but cried out in the highest transport—“Rosa! Rosa!”
The instant that this sound reached the blind one’s ear, she drew her
arm from that of her leader, and began to tremble as if she were seized
with a fit of the ague. She extended her arms, and with the cry—“Jan!
Oh, Jan!” sprang forward to meet him. At the same time she drew up a
ribbon which hung round her neck, and exhibited with an agitated mien a
golden cross.
The next instant she fell into Jan Slaets’s arms, who, amid
unintelligible words, attempted to kiss her. But the blind one prevented
him gently with her hands, and as this wounded his feelings, she seized
his hand and said:
“Oh, Jan! Jan! I swoon with delight . . . but I am bound by an
oath . . . come with me . . . we will go together to the church-yard.”
Jan Slaets did not comprehend Rosa’s meaning, but in the tone of her
voice lay something so solemn, and at the same time sacred, that without
opposition he complied with the wish of his friend. Without taking heed
of the people of the village who surrounded them, he led her to the
church-yard. Here she directed her course to the seat beside the cross,
and obliged him to kneel by her side while she said—
“Pray with me; I have vowed it to God.”
She, at the same time, elevated her clasped hands, breathed forth a warm
prayer, and then flinging her arms round her friend’s neck, she kissed
him, and sank exhausted but smiling on his breast.
During this time, Peterken skipped about amongst the villagers, who
stood in wonder about, clapping his hands, and crying one time after
another, “That is tall Jan! That is tall Jan!”
On a fine autumn day of the year 1846, the diligence rolled along the
great highway from Antwerp to Turnhout, at the regular hour. In haste
the conductor drew up not far from a solitary inn, and opened the door
of the carriage. Two young travelers sprang laughing and exulting out
upon the road, and stretched their arms like escaped birds who again in
full freedom try their wings. They gazed around them on the trees, in
the beautiful blue autumn air, with a joy which we experience when we
have left the city, and with every breath can enjoy free nature. At the
same instant, the younger traveler turned his eyes upon the fields, and
exclaimed with transport—“Listen! listen!”
And in truth, there came through the wood the indistinct tones of a
distant music. The air was quick and lively, you might almost fancy that
you heard the accompanying dance. While the younger one in silence
pointed with his finger, his companion said in an almost ironical tone:
“In the shade of the lindens, to the trumpet’s joyous note,
In the dance a gay crowd doth exultingly float;
And amid all the throng, like ocean waves flying,
There is no one who thinketh of suffering and dying.”
“Come, come, dear Jan, don’t rejoice thyself so beforehand. Probably,
they are celebrating the election of a new burgomaster.”
“Nay, nay, that is no official joy. Let us too go there and see the
peasant girls dance—that is so charming.”
“Let us first drink a glass of ale with Peter Joostens, and ask him what
is going on in the village.”
“And give ourselves up to the unexpected jollification, eh? So be it.”
The two travelers entered the inn, and thought they should die of
laughter the moment they put their heads into the room. Peter Joostens
stood erect and stiff beside the fire. His long, blue, holyday coat hung
in rich folds almost down to his heels. He greeted the well-known guests
with a heavy smile, in which a certain feeling of shame manifested
itself, and he dared not move himself, for at every motion his stiff
shirt collar cut his ears.
At the entry of the travelers, he exclaimed with impatience, but without
turning his head—“Zanna! Zanna! hasten thee: I hear the music, and I
have already told thee that we shall come too late.”
Zanna came running in with a basket full of flowers. She looked so
charming with her crimped lace cap, her woollen gown, her rose-colored
bodice, the large, golden heart at her breast, and her ear-rings. Her
face was flushed with the bloom of the most joyous anticipation, and
resembled a rose which opens its closed bud.
“A beautiful peony which blows on a fine summer day,” observed the
younger companion.
Zanna had fetched the two desired glasses of ale, and now hastened out
of the door with her flowers, singing and laughing. Still more
impatiently shouted Peter Joostens with all his might:
“Lisbeth! if thou dost not come directly, I will go away without thee,
as sure as I stand here.”
An old clock which hung by the wall pointed at the same instant to nine,
and struck with a hoarse tone, “Cuckoo! cuckoo!”
“What wretched taste is that!” said one of the travelers; “have you sold
the handsome clock, and hung this up to plague yourselves the whole year
through with its death-note?”
“Yes, yes,” said the host, smiling; “make yourself merry, at your
pleasure, over this bird; it brings me in yearly fifty Dutch guilders—a
good crop that needs no tillage.”
Four cannon shots were heard at the same moment.
“O heavens!” shrieked Peter Joostens; “the feast has begun. The women
take my life with their hunting here and there.”
“But, Peter Joostens,” asked one of the travelers, “what is this that is
going on in the village? Is it the wake?—that would be odd on a
Thursday—or is the king coming to the village?”
“It is a very extraordinary thing,” replied the host; “it is an
unheard-of thing. If you knew the story, you might fill a whole book
with it, without any invention. And the old cuckoo here has its place in
Blind Rosa’s story.”
“Blind Rosa!” said the younger traveler, astonished; “what a charming
title! That would make a fine counterpart to ‘The Sick Youth.’”
“Nay, that wont do,” said the elder; “if we go out together to collect
material for stories, we must honorably divide the spoil.”
“Well, we can hereafter draw lots for it,” said the younger, half
regretfully.
“In the meantime,” observed the elder, “we actually know nothing. Pull
down your detestable shirt collar from your ears, Peter Joostens, and
begin and regularly tell us all; and for your reward you shall have a
book as soon as it is printed.”
“Now I have no time for it,” answered the host; “I hear my wife coming
down stairs; but come along with us to the village, and on the way I
will tell you why the cannon are fired and the music plays.”
The hostess entered the room, and dazzled the travelers’ eyes by her
dress, so did it blaze in all the colors of the rainbow. She rushed up
to her husband, pulled up his shirt collar again higher than ever, took
his arm, and issued out of doors with him. The two travelers accompanied
them, and Peter Joostens related on the way to his attentive hearers the
whole story of Tall Jan and Blind Rosa; and though he had almost talked
himself out of breath, he became besieged with all sorts of questions.
They learned of him, however, that Herr Slaets bought of him the old
cuckoo clock, that it might hang in its former place in the inn; that
tall Jan had been four-and-thirty years in Russia, and in the fur trade
had become a very rich man. That he had bought an estate, and meant to
live upon it with Blind Rosa and the besom-maker Nelis’s family, whose
children he had already adopted. That he had given the grave-digger a
considerable sum of money; and, finally, that this evening there was to
be held a grand folks-feast on the estate, for which occasion a whole
calf was to be roasted, and two whole copper-fulls of rice furmety to be
boiled.
Peter Joostens ceased as they came behind a house upon a great by-road.
And now the travelers listened no longer, for they were resolved to be
present, and see all the gayety which offered itself to their gaze.
All the houses in the village were adorned with green boughs, bound
together with garlands of white and many-colored flowers, and between
these, over the heads of the spectators, hung every where festoons, with
small lamps and with large red letters. Here and there stood a stately
May-pole, with hundreds of little flags glittering with tinsel, and
adorned with garlands of bird’s-eggs and pieces of glass. Along the
sides of the way the boys and girls had laid wreaths of flowers upon
silver-white sand, and bound them together at regular distances, showing
the alternating initials J. and R. for Jan and Rosa, the invention of
the schoolmaster.
Amongst all this ornament thronged a swarm of spectators from the
neighboring villages to witness this extraordinary wedding. The young
travelers went from one group to another, and listened to what the
people said. But before the procession, which came over the fields,
arrived at the village, they hastened to the church, and placed
themselves in front of it on a mound, so that they might overlook the
whole.
They beheld the procession with a feeling almost bordering on veneration
. . . and it really was so beautiful and touching that the heart of the
younger one beat with poetic rapture. More than sixty young girls from
five to ten years of age, came clad in white, and with childhood’s
enchanting smile, like little bright clouds floating through the azure
heaven. Upon their free locks, hanging around their fresh countenances,
rested garlands of monthly roses, which seemed to contend in beauty with
the vermeil lips of the children.
“It is like a saga of Andersen’s,” said the younger of the companions;
“the sylphs have quitted the bosoms of the flowers. Innocence and
simplicity, youth and joy . . . what an enchanting picture!”
“Ah, ah!” said the other, “there come the peonies! and Zanna Joostens
goes first.”
But the younger one was too much affected to notice this unpoetic
speech. He gazed with delight on the taller maidens, who in full
splendor, beaming with life and health, followed the lesser ones. What a
train of full-grown young women in snow-white lace caps! How their
blushes added to the sweetness of their countenances! How enchanting was
the modest smile about their lips, resembling the gentle curling of the
waters which the zephyr on a summer’s evening produces on the surface of
an inland lake.
Ah! there comes Blind Rosa with Herr Slaets, her bridegroom! How happy
she must be! She has suffered so much! She has been reduced even to
the
beggar’s staff. For four-and-thirty years she has succored and nourished
her soul with a hope that she herself regarded as vain . . . and now he
is there, the friend of her childhood, of her youth. Led by his hand,
she now approaches the altar of that God who has heard her prayers. Now
shall the vow made by the cross in the church-yard be accomplished, and
she shall become Jan Slaet’s wife. On her breast glitters the simple
gold cross which Tall Jan gave her. Now she listens to the joyful
congratulations, to the song and music which celebrate his return. She
trembles with emotion, and presses his arm closer to her side, as if she
doubted whether her happiness was real.
After them came Nelis with his wife and his children; they are all clad
as wealthy peasantry. The parents go forward with bowed heads, and wipe
the tears of wonder and thankfulness from their eyes, so often as they
look upon their blind benefactress. Peterken bears his head proudly
erect, and shakes his light locks, which play about his neck. He leads
his sister by the hand.
But what troop is that? The remnant of the camp which the power of time
has laid waste. About twenty men followed the children of Nelis. They
really present a singular spectacle; they are all gray-haired men or
bald. Most of them support themselves on their staves; two go on
crutches, one is blind and deaf, and all are so worn out and exhausted
by long years of weary labor, that one might imagine that death had by
force brought them again from their graves.
Lauw Stevens went first, and stooped so that his hands nearly touched
the ground; blind Baes from Plogen supported himself on the miller’s
grandfather. These old men constituted the remains of the generation
which lived when tall Jan flourished in the village, and by his youthful
courage always asserted for himself the first place. After them came the
people of the village, men and women, who were invited to the wedding.
The train entered the church . . . the organ was heard accompanying the
solemn hymn. The younger traveler drew his companion aside in the
church-yard. He stooped down, turned round, and presented to the other
his closed hand, out of which the ends of two bents of grass protruded.
“In such haste? why so?” asked the other.
“Proceed,” said the younger; “the subject pleases me, and I would
willingly know whether it will fall to me or not.”
The elder one drew a bent; the younger let his fall upon the ground, and
sighed, “I have lost!”
This is the reason, good reader, why the elder of the travelers has told
you the story of Blind Rosa. It is a pity; for otherwise you would have
read in beautiful poetry, what you have now read in prose. But fortune
another time may be more auspicious to you.
———
BY MISS M. E. ALILSON.
———
I dream of all things beautiful—
The glad, bright stars above,
As one by one they deck the heavens,
Like angel-smiles of love;
Of moonbeams as they softly rest
Upon the quiet lake,
And from its darkened brow the gloom
Of falling shadows take.
I dream of all things beautiful—
The blush of op’ning flowers,
When first their petals bright unclose
In spring-time’s leafy bowers;
Of dew-drops when they silently
At evening’s twilight close,
Stoop down and kiss the leaflets fair
Of sweet unfolding rose.
I dream of all things beautiful—
The brooklet on its way,
As sparkling bright it sings of joy
The live-long summer day;
Of shady woods where glad, free winds
Are whisp’ring softly now,
Where many birdlings, blithe and gay,
Sing sweet from ev’ry bough.
I dream of all things beautiful—
The shell of ocean’s caves,
That softly parts its rosy lips
And drinks the dewy waves;
Of emerald isles that glisten
Like gems upon the deep,
Where whispering winds their music
Untiring vigils keep.
I dream of all things beautiful—
A home beyond the seas,
Where flowers ever waft their scents
Upon the sleepy breeze;
Of summers lovely and undying,
Bright skies of cloudless blue,
Where nature smiles forever bright,
In robes of loveliest hue.
I dream of all things beautiful—
Sweet music soft and low,
When wakened ’neath a skillful touch,
Its gentle numbers flow;
Of low, sweet words, when angels near
Are whisp’ring sweet of Heaven,
Where contrite hearts shall find their chains
Of sin and darkness riven.
“Givest thou the goodly wings unto the peacocks, or wings and feathers unto the ostrich?
Which leaveth her eggs in the earth, and warmeth them in the dust?
And forgetteth that the foot may crush them, or that the wilde beast may break them.
She is hardened against her young ones as though they were not hers; her labour is in vain, without fear.
Because God hath depriveth her of wisdom, neither hath he imparted to her understanding.”
Field’s Bible, 1653.
The alleged stupidity of the ostrich and indifference to its young, is,
perhaps, the very oldest popular error in existence, and it is
principally founded on the above passages in Job. It appears, however,
that these passages are open to a different interpretation to that put
upon them in the authorized versions of the Old Testament. The word
which has been translated “leaveth” her eggs, in the sense of abandoning
them, signifies in the original “deposits,” and tekhammem signifies
actively that she heateth them, namely, by incubation, which is, indeed,
the fact. In the sixteenth verse, the bird is said to be “hardened
against her young ones as though they were not hers;” and the same want
of affection is alluded to in the third verse of the fourth chapter of
Lamentations, “the daughter of my people is become cruel, like the
ostriches in the wilderness;” but, in fact, the idea is altogether
erroneous. Recent observations show that no bird has a greater affection
for its young than the ostrich, that the eggs are carefully watched and
tended, and when the offspring have chipped their shells, and for some
days are unable to run, they are regularly supplied with grass and water
by the old birds, who are eager to defend them from harm. Thunberg
especially mentions that he once rode past a place where a female was
sitting on her nest, when the bird sprang up, and pursued him, evidently
with a view of preventing his noticing her eggs or young. Every time he
turned his horse toward her, she retreated ten or twelve paces, but as
soon as he rode on again, she pursued him, till he had gone a
considerable distance from the place where he started her.
The idea of the stupidity of the ostrich seems to have been universally
entertained, being taken for granted without investigation. Job, as we
have seen, alludes to it; and Pliny, writing from common report, says,
“A wonder this is in their nature, that whatsoever they eat—and great
devourers they be of all things without difference or choice, they
concoct and digest it. But the veriest fools they be of all others; for
as high as the rest of their body is, yet if they thrust their head and
neck once into any shrub or bush, and get it hidden, they think then
they are safe enough, and that no man seeth them.” Many a pretty nursery
tale has been written from this, and many a wise saw founded on it; and
yet the hiding of the head is, after all, a mere myth. Sparrman, when in
South Africa, expressly inquired in those parts where ostriches most
abound, and “never once heard mention made of the ostrich hiding its
head when it finds it cannot make its escape.” The truth is, the ostrich
does nothing of the sort; he tries to escape as well as he can, and
continues his efforts, till knocked on the head by the hunter, or driven
by him, as we shall presently see, to a place where he may be captured.
Conflicting accounts have been published respecting the whole process of
breeding and incubation of the ostrich. Ælian states that as many as
eighty eggs have been found in one nest,[2] fifty or sixty have been
certainly discovered, and the question has been whether these are the
produce of one female or many?
The balance of opinion inclines to the belief that one male ostrich
attaches himself to three or four females, and that all these deposit
their eggs in one nest. This, according to Burckhardt, who carefully
investigated the subject, is commonly made at the foot of some isolated
hill, by the simple process of scratching a hole in the sand; the eggs
are then placed close together, half buried in the sand, and a narrow
trench is drawn round this to carry off any water. During the extreme
heat of the day, the parent birds are instinctively aware that the
warmth of the sun renders their attention unnecessary; but as soon as
the shades of evening fall they each take their turn upon the nest. The
cockbird, however, sits during the night, and Lichtenstein says that
great numbers of the smaller beasts of prey, as jackals and wild cats,
who will run any risk to procure the eggs, are found crushed to death
around the nests; for the male rushes on them, and tramples them with
his powerful feet until life is extinct.
The nests are never completely deserted, and the parent birds relieve
each other in keeping watch on the summit of the neighboring hill. When
the Arabs descry an ostrich thus engaged, they conclude that some eggs
must be near; and on their approach, the old birds retire, although it
is not uncommon, especially in South Africa, for them to show fight.
Having discovered the nest, the Arabs dig a hole in the ground near it,
in which they place a loaded gun, having a long burning match fastened
to the touch-hole; the gun is pointed toward the nest, and is carefully
covered over with sand and stones. The birds after a time return and
resume their places on the eggs; the gun in due time explodes, and next
morning the Arab is rewarded by finding one or perhaps both of the
ostriches dead. This is the common mode of killing them practiced in the
deserts of Northern Arabia.
It is said that some addled eggs are generally found outside the nest,
and that the flies bred by their decomposition, furnish the callow young
with food.
Such may be the case, and if so, it affords a striking
illustration of that happy adaptation of means to ends visible
throughout the whole economy of nature; but probably the primary reason
for these being ejected from the nest is, that more eggs are laid than
can be conveniently covered by the bird when sitting, and that she
therefore instinctively throws out the surplus; thus at once getting rid
of a useless superabundance, and providing a magazine of food for her
future tender young.
Various are the purposes to which ostrich’s eggs are applied:—first,
they are in great favor as a culinary luxury, and are much sought after
by the captains of merchant vessels touching at the African ports, being
purchased by them of the slave herdsmen, whose perquisites they
generally are, for about sixpence each. A good sized egg weighs eleven
ounces, is near seven inches in depth, and holds five pints and a
quarter; consequently it is considered to afford a meal which will
perfectly satisfy four hungry white men, or eight of the more moderate
blacks. The yelk is very rich and luscious, and makes a most enviable
omelette, but gourmands agree that the native mode of cooking them is
perfect. The Hottentots bury the eggs in hot ashes, and through a small
hole in the upper end, the contents are continually stirred until they
acquire a certain consistence, which the sable cooks know by experience
indicates the right moment for removing them from the ashes to the
sackcloth, which covers the traveler’s primitive table. They are then
eaten with biscuit, and washed down with copious draughts of corn
brandy.
The eggs are frequently found to contain small oval pebble-like bodies,
about the size of a marrowfat pea, of a pale yellow color, and
exceedingly hard. Barrow found as many as twelve in one egg: and they
are converted into buttons by the dandified Hottentots, and perhaps also
the Boers.
The porcelain character of the shell and its shape, well adapt it for
cups, and such vessels are frequently elegantly mounted in silver, and
sometimes in chased gold. The ancient Egyptians used them in their
places of worship, and, together with the plumes, insisted on their
forming part of the tribute paid by conquered countries where ostriches
abounded. They were probably suspended in the temples, as they still are
in the Coptic churches, the Copts regarding them as emblems of
watchfulness.
When the allied sovereigns were in London, in the days when the Prince
Regent was in full possession of his powers of entertainment, and we may
add of appetite, a marvelous and unaccountable evaporation of oil took
place nightly in the murky lamps, which then served to make darkness
visible. In vain were the lamps replenished—they would go out, and
the glass receptacles were invariably found empty. The contractor was in
despair; the churchwardens took the matter up, and the minds of the
parishioners were as gloomy as their streets. One night, however, the
mystery was unexpectedly cleared up. A worthy old watchman, or
“Charley,” as the class was familiarly called, comfortably wrapped in
his sixteen-caped great coat, feeling himself tired with his exertions
in informing the sleeping world that it was “past ten o’clock and a
cloudy night,” sat down on a step in the shade to take five-and-twenty
winks, but just as he was composing his thoughts previous to dropping
off, he was startled by seeing a strangely dressed, bearded figure
approach a lamp, and after a hasty look round, actively swarm up the
post, take out the lamp, snuff the wick with his fingers, and drink the
oil! Here was a discovery! Away posted the guardian of the night and
reported what he had seen, but the inspector roundly told him that he
must have been either drunk or asleep, for he shrewdly remarked, “’Taint
likely that them beggars of furriners would go a-drinking ile when they
could get brown stout or Tipper Hale.” Notwithstanding the utter
improbability of the thing, a watch was set, and, sure enough, it turned
out that the mysterious strangers were the Cossacks, who nightly
indulged in deep libations of train-oil at the parish expense.
A not less puzzling disappearance of oil took place some years ago from
the lamps in a certain Eastern church, and so pertinaciously did the
lamps go out, that the priests felt a supernatural influence, and
apprehending something terrible, gave orders for a general penance and
scourging of backs. The minds as well as the backs of the obedient
congregation were, however, infinitely relieved by the accidental
discovery (by a dyspeptic priest who could not sleep through heartburn)
that the extinguishing of the lamps was attributable to natural and not,
as feared, to supernatural causes. A colony of rats had taken up their
quarters in the church, and following the example of the gallant Captain
Dalgetty, looked at once to the procuring of “provend.” An enterprising
member of one of the foraging parties scrambling down a rope by which
one of the lamps was suspended, was fortunate enough to hit upon some
uncommonly nice oil. The news of this glorious discovery spread, and all
the rats chorussed,
“Black rats and white, brown rats and gray
Scramble down the lamp-rope, ye that scramble may.”
Accordingly, the colony flocked to these oleaginous mines with as much
eagerness as another description of colonists are now flocking to mines
of gold. The result has been described, but in the end the rats were no
match for the priests, who, as soon as the rogues were found out,
lighted upon the expedient of passing each of the ropes through an
ostrich egg. A most effectual and tantalizing barrier was now opposed to
the predatory excursions of our furry friends. In vain they sniffed and
squeaked; each, as he attempted “to round the cape,” slid off the smooth
egg and was smashed on the stones beneath.
The ostrich is a very prudent, wary bird, for which reason the quaggas
generally attach themselves instinctively to a troop of these birds,
trusting implicitly to their caution for the discovery of danger. This
alliance was remarked by Xenophon, who says, “the country was a plain
throughout, as even as the sea, and full of wormwood. Of wild creatures
the most numerous were wild asses, (quaggas,) and not a
few ostriches,
besides bustards and roe-deer, (gazelles,) which our horsemen sometimes
chased!”[3]
This bird was not sacred among the ancient Egyptians, but there is
reason to believe that it was so with the Assyrians. It has not only
been found as an ornament on the robes of figures in the most ancient
edifices at Nimroud, but it was frequently introduced on Babylonian and
Assyrian cylinders, always accompanied by the emblematical flower. The
Romans appear to have regarded it as a delicacy, for Apicius left a
receipt for a particular sauce for dressing it; and it is recorded of
Heliogabalus, that he had the brains of six hundred of these birds
served up as a dish at one of his feasts. But in trencher feats the
pseudo-emperor Formius far outdid either, as it is related by Vopiscus,
that be devoured a whole ostrich to his own share at a single sitting.
It was broadly asserted by Aristotle, that the ostrich was partly bird
and partly quadruped; and by Pliny, that it might almost be said to
belong to the class of beasts; ridiculous as such assertions might be
supposed, they were not altogether without foundation according to the
knowledge of the times. The common name by which the ostrich was
designated by the Greeks and Romans, and also by the nations of the
East, was the camel bird. Indeed, the total want of feathers on its
long and very powerful legs, and the division of the feet into two toes
only, connected at their base by a membrane, are very similar to the
legs and long, divided hoof of the camel: nor does the resemblance cease
here, for there is another singularity in their external conformation,
which affords a still more remarkable coincidence. Both camel and
ostrich are furnished with hard, callous protuberances on the chest, and
on the posterior part of the abdomen, on which they support themselves
when at rest, and they both lie down in the same manner, by first
bending their knees, then applying the anterior callosity, and lastly
the posterior, to the ground. When to this we add the patience of thirst
of both, and their inhabiting the same arid deserts, the two may well be
compared with each other.
The ostrich is altogether destitute of the power of flight, and
accordingly the wings are reduced to a very low state of development,
merely sufficient, in fact, to aid it when running at speed. The sharp
keel of the breast-bone, which, in birds of rapid flight, affords an
extensive surface for the attachment of the muscles moving the wings, is
not required, and the surface of the bone is therefore flat, like that
of a quadruped, but the muscles of the legs are of extraordinary
magnitude.
The family of birds, of which the ostrich forms the leading type, is
remarkable for the wide dispersion of its various members: the ostrich
itself spreads over nearly the whole of the burning deserts of
Africa—the Cassowary represents it amid the luxuriant vegetation of the
Indian Archipelago. The Dinornis—chief of birds—formerly towered among
the ferns of New Zealand, where the small Apteryx now holds its place;
and the huge Æpyornis strode along the forest of Madagascar. The Emu is
confined to the great Australian continent, and the Rhea to the southern
extremity of the western hemisphere; whilst nearer home we find the
class represented by the Bustard, which—until within a few years—still
lingered upon the least frequented downs and plains of England.
With the Arabs of the desert, the chase of the ostrich is the most
attractive, and eagerly sought, of the many aristocratic diversions in
which they indulge; and we are indebted to General Daumas for a highly
interesting account of their proceedings. The first point attended to,
is a special preparation of their horses. Seven or eight days before the
intended hunt, they are entirely deprived of straw and grass, and fed on
barley only. They are only allowed to drink once a-day, and that at
sunset—the time when the water begins to freshen: at that time also
they are washed. They take long, daily exercises, and are occasionally
galloped; at which time care is taken that the harness is right, and
suited to the chase of the ostrich. “After seven or eight days,” says
the Arab, “the stomach of the horse disappears, while the chest, the
breast, and the croup remain in flesh: the animal is then fit to endure
fatigue.” They call this training techaha. The harness used for the
purpose in question is lighter than ordinary, especially the stirrups
and saddle, and the martingale is removed. The bridle, too, undergoes
many metamorphoses: the mountings and the earflaps are taken away, as
too heavy. The bit is made of a camel-rope, without a throat band, and
the frontlet is also of cord, and the reins—though strong—are very
light. The period most favorable for ostrich hunting is that of the
great heat: the higher the temperature, the less is the ostrich able to
defend himself. The Arabs describe the precise time as that, when a man
stands upright, his shadow has the length only of the sole of his foot.
Each horseman is accompanied by a servant called zemmal, mounted on a
camel, carrying four goat-skins filled with water, barley for the horse,
wheat-flour for the rider, some dates, a kettle to cook the food, and
every thing which can possibly be required for the repair of the
harness. The horseman contents himself with a linen vest and trousers,
and covers his neck and ears with a light material called havuli, tied
with a strip of camel’s hide: his feet are protected with sandals, and
his legs with light gaiters called trabag. He is armed with neither
gun nor pistol, his only weapon being a wild olive or tamarind stick,
five or six feet long, with a heavy knob at one end.
Before starting, the hunters ascertain where a large number of ostriches
are to be found. These birds are generally met with in places where
there is much grass, and where rain has recently fallen. The Arabs say,
that where the ostrich sees the light shine, and barley getting ready,
wherever it may be, thither she runs, regardless of distance, and ten
days march is nothing to her; and it has passed into a proverb in the
desert, that a man skillful in the care of flocks, and in finding
pasturage, that he
is like the ostrich, where he sees the light, there
he goes.
The hunters start in the morning. After one or two days’ journey, when
they have arrived near the spot pointed out, and they begin to perceive
traces of their game, they halt and camp. The next day, two intelligent
slaves, almost entirely stripped, are sent to reconnoitre; they each
carry a goat-skin at their side, and a little bread: they walk until
they meet with the ostriches, which are generally found in elevated
places. As soon as the game is in view, one lies down to watch, the
other returns to convey the information. The ostriches are found in
troops, comprising sometimes as many as sixty; but at the pairing time,
they are more scattered, three or four couple only remaining together.
The horsemen, guided by the scout, travel gently toward the birds: the
nearer they approach the spot the greater is their caution, and when
they reach the last ridge which conceals them from the sight of their
game, they dismount, and two creep forward to ascertain if they are
still there. Should such be the case, a moderate quantity of water is
given to the horses, the baggage is left, and each man mounts, carrying
at his side a chebouta, or goat-skin. The servants and camels follow
the track of the horsemen, carrying with them only a little corn and
water.
The exact position of the horses being known, the plans are arranged:
the horsemen divide and form a circle round the game at such a distance
as not to be seen. The servants wait where the horsemen have separated,
and as soon as they see them at their posts, they walk right before
them: the ostriches fly, but are met by the hunters, who do nothing at
first but drive them back into the circle; thus their strength is
exhausted by being made to continually run round in the ring. At the
first signs of fatigue in the birds, the horsemen dash in—presently the
flock separates; the exhausted birds are seen to open their wings—which
is a sign of great exhaustion—the horsemen, certain of their prey, now
repress their horses: each hunter selects his ostrich, runs it down, and
finishes it by a blow on the head with the stick above mentioned. The
moment the bird falls, the man jumps off his horse, and cuts her throat,
taking care to hold the neck at such a distance from the body, as not to
soil the plumage of the wings. The male bird, whilst dying, utters loud
moans, but the female dies in silence.
When the ostrich is on the point of being overtaken by the hunter, she
is so fatigued that—if he does not wish to kill her—she can easily be
driven with the stick to the neighborhood of the camels. Immediately
after the birds have been bled to death, they are carefully skinned, so
that the feathers may not be injured, and the skin is then stretched
upon a tree, or on a horse, and salt rubbed well into it. A fire is lit,
and the fat of the birds is boiled for a long time in kettles; when very
liquid, it is poured into a sort of bottle, made of the skin of the
thigh and leg down to the foot, strongly fastened at the bottom; the fat
of one bird is usually sufficient to fill two of these legs—it is said
that in any other vessel the fat would spoil. When, however, the bird is
breeding, she is extremely lean, and is then hunted only for the sake of
her feathers. After these arrangements are completed, the flesh is eaten
by the hunters, who season it well with pepper and flour.
Whilst these proceedings are in progress, the horses are carefully
tended, watered, and fed with corn, and the party remain quiet during
forty-eight hours, to give their animals rest; after that, they either
return to their encampment, or embark in new enterprises.
The fat of the ostrich is used in the preparation of the favorite dish
kouskousson, and is often eaten with bread. It is also used
medicinally. In cases of fever, for instance, the Arabs make a paste
with it and bread-crumb, which is given to the patient, who must not
drink any thing during the whole day. In rheumatism, and in renal
diseases, the painful parts are rubbed with the grease until it
disappears. The patient then lies down in the scorching sand, his head
being carefully covered, and a profuse perspiration ensuing, the cure is
often complete. In bilious attacks, the fat is melted, salted, and taken
in draughts, with powerful effect, the patient even becoming extremely
thin. The Arab doctors say, “the patient parts with every thing in his
body that is bad, gains a frame of iron, and acquires excellent
eyesight.”
Ostrich fat is sold in the markets, and in the tents of the great a
store is kept to give away to the poor—in value, one pot of this fat is
equivalent to three pots of butter. The feathers of the ostrich are sold
at the ksours, at Tougartet: at the time of the purchase of grain, the
ostrich-skins are bought, that of a male selling for four or five
douros, that of a female from eight to fourteen shillings. Formerly,
the only use made in the Sahara of the plumes was to decorate the tops
of tents.
To the Arab, the chase of the ostrich has a double attraction—pleasure
and profit: the price obtained for the skins well compensates for the
expenses. Not only do the rich enjoy the pursuit, but the poor, who know
how to set about it, are permitted to participate in it also. The usual
plan is, for a poor Arab to arrange with one who is opulent for the loan
of his camel, horse harness, and two-thirds of all the necessary
provisions. The borrower furnishes himself the remaining third, and the
produce of the chase is divided in the same proportions.
The use of ostrich-fat in medicine dates back to a very remote period:
and Pliny relates that, on a certain occasion, when Cato—surnamed
Uticensis—was accused of selling poison, because “he held cantharides
at three-score sesterces a pound, at the same time ostrich-grease was
sold for eighty sesterces the pound; and, in truth, it is much better
for any use it shall be put unto than goose-grease.”
In the quaint account of “The World encompassed by Sir Francis Drake,”
there is a curious description of the mode of hunting ostriches, as
practiced in those days at the Cape. The history is written by “Mr.
Francis Fletcher, preacher in this employment,” and he thus begins:
“Ever since Almighty God commanded Adam to subdue the earth, there hath
not wanted in all ages some heroic spirits, which—in obedience to that
high mandate—either from manifest reason alluring them, or by some
secret instinct enforcing them thereunto, have expended their wealth,
employed their times, and adventured their persons to find out the true
circuit of the world.” The worthy chaplain being safely arrived at the
Cape, goes on to say, “In this place, the people being removed up into
the country, belike for fear of our coming, we found near unto the
rocks, in houses made for that purpose, great store of ostriches, at
least to the number of fifty, with much other fowl; some dried, and some
in drying, for their provision, as it seemed, to carry with them to the
place of their dwellings. The ostriches legs were in bigness equal to
reasonable legs of mutton: they cannot fly at all; but they run so
swiftly, and take so long strides, that it is not possible for a man in
running by any means to take them, neither yet to come so nigh them as
to have any shot at them with bow or piece. Whereof our men had often
proof on other parts of that coast, for all the country is full of them.
We found there the tools or instruments which the people use in taking
them. Amongst other means which they use in betraying of these
ostriches, they have a great and large plume of feathers, orderly
compact together upon the end of a staff; in the fore-part bearing the
likeness of the head, neck, and bulk of an ostrich, and in the hinder
part spreading itself out very large, sufficient being holden before him
to hide the most part of the body of a man. With this it seemeth they
stalk, driving them into some strait or neck of land close to the
sea-side; where—spreading long and strong nets, with their dogs, which
they have in readiness at all times—they overthrow them, and make a
common quarry.”
The ostrich, like many other of the feathered tribe, has a great deal of
self-conceit. On fine sunny days, a tame bird may be seen strutting
backward and forward with great majesty, fanning itself with its
quivering, expanded wings, and at every turn seeming to admire its
grace, and the elegance of its shadow. Dr. Shaw says that, though these
birds appear tame and tractable to persons well-known to them, they are
often very fierce and violent toward strangers, whom they would not only
endeavor to push down by running furiously against them, but they would
peck at them with their beaks, and strike with their feet; and so
violent is the blow that can be given, that the Doctor saw a person
whose abdomen had been ripped completely open by a stroke from the claw
of an ostrich.
The cry of the ostrich has been compared to the voice of a lion; but
when fighting they sometimes make a fierce, angry, and hissing noise,
with their throats inflated, and their mouths open. Dr. Shaw often heard
them groan, as if in the greatest agonies, a peculiarity alluded to in
Micah, i. 8., where it is said, “I will make a mourning like the
jaanah (ostrich);” though the word has been improperly translated
owl.
A remarkable illustration of the strength of the ostrich is afforded by
an incident mentioned by Adanson, which took place during his residence
at Podor, a French factory on the southern bank of the river Niger. “Two
ostriches, which had been about two years in the factory, and although
young, were nearly of their full size, were so tame that two little
blacks mounted both together on the back of the largest. No sooner did
he feel their weight, than he began to run as fast as possible, and
carried them several times round the village, as it was impossible to
stop him otherwise than by obstructing his passage. This sight pleased
me so much, that I ordered it to be repeated, and to try their strength,
directed a full grown negro to mount the smallest, and two others the
largest. This burden did not seem at all disproportioned to their
strength. At first, they went a tolerably sharp trot, but when they
became heated a little, they expanded their wings, as though to catch
the wind, and moved with such fleetness, that they scarcely seemed to
touch the ground. Most people have, one time or another, seen a
partridge run, and consequently must know that there is no man whatever
able to keep up with it; and it is easy to imagine that if this bird had
a longer step, its speed would be considerably augmented. The ostrich
moves like the partridge, with this advantage; and I am satisfied that
those I am speaking of, would have distanced the fleetest race-horses
that were ever bred in England. It is true, they would not hold out so
long as a horse, but they would undoubtedly be able to go over the space
in less time. I have frequently beheld this sight, which is capable of
giving one an idea of the prodigious strength of an ostrich, and of
showing what use it might be of, had we but the method of breaking and
managing it, as we do a horse.”
We are much mistaken if there was not an exhibition of ostrich races in
a circus at Paris about two years ago; the birds being ridden by boys,
who managed their feathered steeds with great dexterity.
To have the stomach of an ostrich has become proverbial, and with good
reason; for this bird stands enviably forward in respect to its
wonderful powers of digestion, which are scarcely inferior to its
voracity. Its natural food consists entirely of vegetable substances,
especially grain; and the ostrich is a most destructive enemy to the
crops of the African farmers. But its sense of taste is so obtuse, that
scraps of leather, old nails, bits of tin, buttons, keys, coins, and
pebbles, are devoured with equal relish; in fact, nothing comes amiss.
But in this it doubtless follows an instinct, for these hard bodies
assist, like the gravel in the crops of our domestic poultry, in
grinding down and preparing for digestion its ordinary food. Its
fondness for iron was well-known to our forefathers, and we find
Shakspeare makes Jack Cade say to Iden, in the “Second Part of Henry
VI.,”
“But I’ll make thee eat iron like an ostrich, and swallow my sword like
a great pin.”
An earlier writer, John Skelton, who was poet laureate to Henry the
Seventh, alludes to an idea then prevalent, that the ostrich swallowed
iron for the same purpose that ices are taken in these degenerate
days.
The lines are taken from his poem “The Boke of Phyllyp Sparowe,”
“The estryge that wyll eate
An horshowe so great
In the stede of meate,
Such feruent heat
His stomake doth freat,
He can not well fly
Nor synge tunably.”
But there was another and far less selfish reason ascribed for the
partiality of these birds to iron—a reason so philanthropic, indeed,
that it puts mankind to the blush; for there are few, indeed, who would
convert their interiors into a marine-store shop for the benefit of
their fellow creatures. In a singular book by Thomas Scott, published in
1616, a merchant meets with an ostrich in the desert, in the act of
swallowing a heavy meal of iron, and gazing on him with astonishment,
inquires,
“‘What nourishment can from these mettals grow?’
The ostrich answers: ‘Sir, I do not eate
This iron, as you think I do, for meate;
I only keep it, lay it up in store,
To helpe my needy friends the friendlesse poore,
I often meete (as farre and neere I goe)
Many a foundred horse that wants a shoe,
Serving a master that is monylesse,
Such I relieve and helpe in their distresse.’”
Philomythie, etc.
There was found by Cuvier, in the stomach of an ostrich that died at
Paris, nearly a pound weight of stones, bits of iron and copper, and
pieces of money worn down by constant attrition against each other, as
well as by the action of the stomach itself. In the stomach of one of
these birds which belonged to the Menagerie of George the Fourth, there
were contained some pieces of wood of considerable size, several large
nails, and a hen’s egg entire and uninjured, perhaps taken as a delicacy
from its appetite becoming capricious. In the stomach of another, beside
several large cabbage-stalks, there were masses of bricks of the size of
a man’s fist. Sparrman relates that he saw ostriches at the Cape so tame
that they went loose to and from the farm, but they were so voracious as
to swallow chickens whole, and trample hens to death, that they might
tear them in pieces afterward and devour them; and one great barrel of a
bird was obliged to be killed on account of an awkward habit he had
acquired of trampling sheep to death. But perhaps the most striking
proof of the prowess of an ostrich in the eating way, is that afforded
by Dr. Shaw, who saw one swallow bullet after bullet as fast as they
were pitched, scorching hot from the mould.
In a very amusing article in the eighty-eighth number of “Household
Words,” there are mentioned some of the “wonderful swallows” of an
ostrich, which was not long since in the Zoological Gardens, Regent’s
Park. A carpenter was one day at work in a stable, the side of which was
open to a corner of the cage of the ostrich. A pretty nursery maid
chanced to pass that way, and the carpenter having engaged her in
conversation, ceased his work for a while, and stood smiling and
chatting with his hands behind him, in which he held a gimlet which he
had been using. His back was toward the cage. The ostrich observed the
gimlet, saw that it was nice, and darting forth his head and long neck
between the bars, snapped it out of the carpenter’s hands. The man
turned hastily round, but before he could make an effort to regain his
gimlet, the ostrich gave a toss with his head, the gimlet disappeared,
his neck made a stiff arch for a moment, and the gimlet was safely down.
But the performances of the bird were not to cease with this feat; his
reputation was to have other facts to rest upon. Not long after, he saw
a young gentleman standing near his cage, displaying to a friend a knife
which he had just purchased—it was a many-bladed knife. Directly the
ostrich caught sight of this, he knew that it must be very good indeed.
Watching his opportunity, he made a sudden dart upon it, and caught it
in his beak. The gentleman made a rush at the bars of the cage, but the
ostrich, taking a long stride back, stood out of reach with an insolent
straddle in the middle of his cage, and with one jerk of his neck bolted
the delicious curiosity.
The keepers watched the bird, and examined his cage very narrowly for a
long time; but no traces of his preposterous fancies were ever restored
to sight, neither did the ostrich appear in any degree incommoded.
Three months after these performances, the ostrich, from some unknown
cause or other, got into a bad state of mind with the bars of his cage,
and in a contest which ensued, he broke his back. His death speedily
followed, and a post mortem examination was speedily made, but no
trace whatever either of the gimlet or the many-bladed knife, was
discovered in any part of his wonderful interior.
One of the predecessors of this bird at the Gardens had the ill-luck to
suffer from his taste for such delicacies as gimlets and many-bladed
knives, for he had such difficulty in bolting something of the sort,
that his neck never recovered the unnatural curve it then acquired. His
lady mate regarding this as an outward and visible sign of effeminacy
unworthy of an ostrich, never ceased from that moment to show her
contempt by teasing and worrying him in every possible way, and this
system of hen-pecking persecution was carried to such an extent, that it
was found necessary to separate the pair, without consulting the
authorities of Doctors’ Commons.
Far different was the behavior of a gallant male in the Jardin des
Plantes. He with his spouse had long lived in connubial felicity, when,
unfortunately, the skylight over their heads having been broken, a
triangular piece of glass fell, and was instantly snapped up by the
female, who regarded it as an acceptable offering. Soon after she was
taken ill, and died in great agony. Her body being opened, the throat
and stomach were found dreadfully lacerated by the sharp corners of the
glass. But now comes the pathetic portion of the tale. From the moment
that he found himself bereft of his mate, the survivor had no rest. Day
and night the poor bird was incessantly searching for her, and gradually
wasted away. He was removed from the spot, in the hope that in new
scenes his grief would be forgotten; but no! the
arrow had entered into
his soul; his fruitless, unavailing search after his lost one still
continued, so long as strength enabled him to pursue it, and then,
literally constant unto death, he laid himself down and died.
The feathers of the ostrich, which play such an important part in
adorning the persons of the living, and decorating the funereal
processions of the dead, are distinguished in the trade of the
plumassier by several qualities; those of the male are the whitest and
most beautiful, and the feathers of the back, and above the wings, hold
the first place; next those of the wings, and lastly those of the tail.
The down, varying in length from four to fourteen inches, is merely the
feathers of the other parts of the body, and is black in the males, gray
in the females. The finest white feathers of the female have always
their ends a little grayish, which lessens their lustre and lowers their
price. The feathers are imported from Algiers, Tunis, Alexandria,
Madagascar, and Senegal; the first obtaining the highest price, the last
the lowest.
The first thing is to scour the feathers, which is done by tying them in
bundles, and rubbing them well with the hand in a lather of soap and
water, after which they are rinsed in clean hot water. They are then
bleached by washing first with Spanish white, then are passed quickly
through a weak solution of indigo, and the process is completed by
exposing them to the fumes of sulphur, after which they are hung upon
cords to dry. As much of the beauty of ostrich feathers depends upon
their graceful pliability, they generally require to be scraped with
glass, to render them pliant; and the curly form so admired, is given by
drawing the edge of a blunt knife over the filaments. They are then
dyed. The process of dying black needs no preparation; but for receiving
the other colors it is necessary that they should be bleached by
exposure to the sun and dew; and a bleaching ground presents a very
singular appearance, seeming for all the world as if it was bearing a
luxuriant crop of feathers, ready to be mown; for each feather is stuck
singly in the grass, and left for fifteen days, after which it is ready
to receive the most delicate shades of pink or other color.
By the natives the feathers are little used; but a curious statement is
made by Captain Lyons, to the effect that at all the towns of Sockna,
Hoon, and Wadan, it is customary to keep ostriches tame in stables, and
to take three cuttings of their feathers every two years; and he adds,
that the greater part of the fine feathers sent to Europe are from tame
birds; as the plumage of the wild is generally so ragged and torn, that
not above half a dozen perfect white feathers can be found in each. We
have not been able, however, to verify this assertion.
To all Englishmen the triad of ostrich feathers has a peculiar charm as
the especial crest of the Prince of Wales. Romantic is the history
connected with this well-known badge, which in its adoption was sorely
stained with blood; for at the battle of Cressy no quarter was given,
and nearly forty thousand good men and true, of the best blood of
France, then yielded up their lives. But of all the sad incidents that
occurred that day, there was none more touching than that which marked
the closing scene of the life of the brave old King of Bohemia, whose
crest was the ostrich plume. Barnes, in his “History of Edward the
Third,” thus describes it:—“And first the Marquis Charles, Elect
Emperor, resisted the Prince with great courage, but his banner was
beaten to the ground, his men slain miserably about him, and himself
wounded in three places of his body; wherefore, though not without much
difficulty, he turned his horse and rode out of the field, having cast
away his coat armor that he might not be known. The meanwhile his
father, John, King of Bohemia, who was son to the noble Emperor, Henry
of Luxemburgh, although he was nearly blind with age, when he understood
how the day was like to go, asked his captains what had become of the
Lord Charles his son? They told him that they knew not, but that they
supposed him somewhere in the heat of action. Then the good old King,
resolving by no means to disgrace his former victories and cancel the
glory of his youth by a degenerous old age, said unto them, ‘Gentlemen,
you are my men, my companions and friends in this expedition. I only now
desire this last piece of service from you—that you would bring me
forward so near to these Englishmen, that I may deal among them one good
stroke with my sword.’ They all said they would obey him to the death;
and lest by any extremity they should be separated from him, they all
with one consent tied the reins of their horses one to another, and so
attended their royal master into battle. There this valiant old hero had
his desire, and came boldly up to the Prince of Wales, and gave more
than one, or four or five good strokes, and fought courageously, as also
did all his lords and others about him. But they engaged themselves so
far that there they were all slain, and the next day found dead about
the body of their king, and their horses’ bridles tied together.
“Then were the arms of that noble king (being the ostrich feathers, with
the motto ‘Ich Dien,’ signifying ‘I serve,’) taken and won by the Prince
of Wales, in whose memory they have ever since been called the Prince’s
Arms.”
It appears, however, that the same device had been previously worn by a
former sovereign, “For,” says Guillim, in his “Display of Heraldry,”
“the ostrich feathers in plume were sometimes also the device of King
Stephen, who gave them with this word, ‘Vi nulla Invertitui ordo:
No force alters their fashion;’ alluding to the fold and fall of the
feather; which howsoever the wind may shake it cannot disorder it; as
likewise is the condition of kings and kingdoms well established.”
The death of the blind old King of Bohemia recalls to mind an incident
which occurred at the battle of Waterloo, and which displays, in a
remarkable degree, chivalric bearing. During the heat and fury of the
fight, a very distinguished British cavalry officer, who had lost his
right arm in one of the Peninsular
actions, led on a dragoon regiment
to the charge. In the melée which followed, he found himself opposed
to a powerful French officer, who raised his sword to hew him down; but
suddenly perceiving the helplessness of his antagonist, who made shift
to manage his sword with his left hand, holding the bridle between his
teeth—the gallant Frenchman suddenly paused, brought his sword to the
“salute,” bowed, and galloped on to meet some foe more worthy of his
prowess. The English officer, who survived the battle, made great
exertions to discover who the French officer was, but was never able to
obtain the slightest clue: probably a sabre or a bullet, less merciful
than he, had stretched him on the field.
The great swiftness of the ostrich depends not merely upon the length
and strength of its legs, or the aid it receives from its plumed wings,
but we must take into consideration, in addition, the fact that its
bones, like those of other birds, are permeated by air, and are thus
lighter than those of animals. The feathers, too, are peculiar; instead
of the shaft being, as is commonly the case, unsymmetrically placed as
regards the barbs, it is exactly in the middle, and the barbules are
long and loose. The accessory plume, too, is wanting in the ostrich. In
the emu, on the contrary, the accessory plume equals the original
feather, so that the quill supports two shafts; and in the cassowary,
besides the double feather, there is also a second accessory plume, so
that the quill supports three distinct shafts and vanes.
To Mr. Charles Darwin ornithologists are indebted for the knowledge of
the fact, that there are two distinct species of ostrich inhabiting
South America. The first is the Rhea Americana, a well-known species
abounding over the plains of Northern Patagonia and the Provinces of La
Plata. It has not crossed the Cordillera, but has been seen within the
first range of mountains on the Uspallata plain, elevated between six
and seven thousand feet. These birds, though generally feeding on
vegetable matter, have been seen to go in groups of three and four to
the extensive mud-banks, which are then dry, at Bahia Blanca, for the
purpose of catching small fish, and they will readily take to the water.
Mr. King saw ostriches on several occasions swimming from island to
island at Port Valdes, in Patagonia, and the Bay of San Blas. When
swimming very little of their bodies appear above water; their progress
is slow, and their necks are extended forward. On two occasions Mr.
Darwin saw ostriches swimming across the Santa Cruz River, where it was
about four hundred yards broad and the stream rapid. Mr. Darwin went out
hunting one day at Bahia Blanca, the men riding in a crescent, each
about a quarter of a mile apart from the other. A fine male ostrich
being turned by the headmost riders, tried to escape on one side. The
Guachos pursued at a reckless pace, twisting their horses about with the
most admirable command, and each man whirling the “bolas,” or balls,
round his head. At length the foremost threw them revolving through the
air; in an instant the ostrich rolled over and over, its legs fairly
lashed together by the thong. These balls can be thrown from on
horseback to the distance of eighty yards, and a striking proof of their
effect was afforded at the Falkland Islands, when the Spaniards murdered
all the English, and some of their own countrymen also. A young Spaniard
was running away, when a great tall Indian, Luciano by name, came at
full gallop after him, shouting to him to stop, and saying that he only
wanted to speak to him. The Spaniard distrusting him continued his
flight, and just as he was on the point of reaching the boat, Luciano
threw the balls. They struck him on the legs with such a jerk as to
throw him down and render him for some time insensible. After Luciano
had had his talk, the man was allowed to escape, but his legs were
marked with great wales, as if he had been flogged with a heavy whip.
The second species, to which the name of Rhea Darwinii has been
applied by Mr. Gould, takes the place of the former species—Rhea
Americana, in Southern Patagonia, the part about Rio Negro being neutral
ground. The first notice Mr. Darwin had of this species was in
accidentally hearing the Guachos talking of a very rare bird, the
Avestruz Petise; afterward, when among the Patagonian Indians in the
Straits of Magellan, Mr. Darwin found a half-bred Indian who had lived
some years with this tribe, but had been born in the Northern Provinces.
On being asked if he had ever heard of the Avestruz Petise, he answered
by saying, “Why there are none others in these Southern Countries;” and
afterward many of these birds were seen; their distinctive characters
being that they are light brown, in place of gray, and the bird
altogether smaller than the Rhea Americana.
In the year of grace, 1839, there was brought from New Zealand, by Mr.
Rule, a most hopeless-looking osseous fragment, just the middle of a
thigh-bone, without a scrap of either end remaining. This, which most
persons would have regarded with despair, was placed in the hands of the
great authority in such matters, with a request that he would state to
what creature it had belonged.
After a careful examination, Professor Owen, in a paper read before the
Zoological Society, on the 12th of November, 1839, (and which paper is
one of the most remarkable examples of acute inductive reasoning ever
published,) announced that, “So far as my skill in interpreting an
osseous fragment may be credited, I am willing to risk the reputation
for it on the statement that there has existed, if there does not now
exist, in New Zealand, a Struthious bird, nearly, if not quite equal in
size to the ostrich.”
This announcement created not a little stir in the scientific world; but
as three years passed away without any confirmation of the opinion,
certain wise men looked extra wise, and pronounced that the Professor
for once “had made a mistake.” But a triumphant vindication was at hand,
even from so unpromising a spot as Poverty Bay, in the shape of two
goodly boxes crammed full of bones, which looked as if they were the
remains of some ante-diluvial pic-nic, where the giants of those days
had
been picking the scaffolding of the contents of a Brobdignagian
pie; and the curiosity connected with the said bones was heightened by a
delightfully mysterious history communicated with them by the gentleman
from whom they were sent. For the respectable natives, speaking, of
course, by the card, had informed him that the bones belonged to a
family of extraordinary monsters, one of whom was still in existence in
an inaccessible cavern on the side of a hill near the river Wairoa, and
that, like the lady in the fairy tales, this creature was jealously
guarded by a sort of huge lizard or dragon. Mr. Williams treated these
stories as idle fables, but some time after was a little staggered by a
sort of corroboration of the tale; for happening to speak to an American
about these bones, he was told by him that the bird was still in
existence in the neighborhood of Cloudy Bay, in Cook’s Straits, and that
the natives there had mentioned to an Englishman of a whaling party,
that there was a bird of extraordinary size, to be seen only at night,
on the side of a hill near there. Our countryman, with a companion and a
native guide, went to the spot on murderous thoughts intent, and after
waiting some time, they saw the creature at a little distance, towering
to the height of something like sixteen feet. One of the men was said to
have proposed to go near and take a shot at it, but the other was so
utterly terrified that they contented themselves with looking; and after
a time, the monster took the alarm, and, in almost seven-league boots,
strode away up the side of the mountain.
Professor Owen soon determined that the bones sent to him were portions
of a gigantic bird allied to the ostrich, and the publication of this
announcement, stimulating inquiry in New Zealand, box after box, full of
interesting specimens, found their way to the College of Surgeons, and
proved the existence, at no very remote period in the island of New
Zealand, of at least six different species of Dinornis (as the bird has
been named,) the largest certainly not less than ten feet in height; and
in the eloquent words of the Professor, “without giving the rein to a
too exuberant fancy, we may take a retrospective glance at the scene of
a fair island, offering, by the will of a bountiful Providence, a
well-spread table to a race of animated beings peculiarly adapted to
enjoy it; and we may recall the time when the several species of
Dinornis ranged the lords of its soil—the highest living forms upon
that part of the earth. No terrestrial mammal was there to contest this
sovereignty with the feathered bipeds before the arrival of man.”
But what has become of all these huge birds, for we no longer hear of
able seamen or nervous natives being scared by their apparitions? In all
probability they gradually became exterminated by the earliest colonists
who set foot on this lovely portion of the globe. Conspicuous as to
size, heavy in form, stupid, and unprovided with means of escape or
defense, the Dinornis would easily fall a victim to the destructive arts
of man; and although strong hopes to the contrary have been entertained,
there is good reason to suppose that all the varieties of the race have
been extinct for very many years; consequently the mysterious inhabitant
of the cave, and the apparition that strode up the mountain-side, were
doubtless legends that had descended from generation to generation from
the distant ancestors of the aborigines of the island. There is to be
seen in the museum of the Royal College of Surgeons, in Lincoln’s Inn
Fields, a considerable portion of the skeleton of a Dinornis, mounted by
the side of that of a large ostrich, above which it towers in the same
proportion as its neighbor O’Brien, the Irish giant, towers above all
ordinary men.
Gigantic though these New Zealand birds must have been, they were fully
equalled in size by a race of birds coeval with them in the island of
Madagascar; and it is remarkable that our chief knowledge of the
existence of these is derived from that most fragile and perishable of
their products—their eggs.
In 1850, M. Abadie, captain of a French merchantman, was at Madagascar,
and observed one day, in the hands of a native, an egg of enormous size,
perforated at one extremity, and used as a basin for various domestic
purposes. His curiosity was excited, and he caused search to be made,
which led to the discovery of a second egg of nearly similar size, which
was found perfectly entire in the bed of a torrent, among the débris
of a land slip; and soon after a third egg was found in alluvia of
recent formation, all being in the condition termed sub-fossil or
partially fossilized. These precious remains were transmitted to Paris,
but so carelessly packed, that one was found on their arrival broken to
atoms; the other two being happily sound. Casts of these marvelous eggs
have been transmitted to Professor Owen, and we can only compare them to
huge conoidal cannon-shot. In fact, in these days of cylindrico-conoidal
bullets, they might well pass for such a projectile adapted for a
sixty-eight pounder. Some idea of their dimensions may be formed from
the following facts. The dimensions of the most oval egg (for they
differ somewhat in form) are as nearly as possible thirteen and a half
inches in length by nine in diameter; and to fill it would require the
contents of six ostrich eggs, seventeen of the emu, one hundred and
forty-eight of the hen, or fifty thousand of the humming-bird! Various
fragments of bones were transmitted to Paris with the eggs, and the
comparative anatomists have arrived at the conclusion, that the bird
approached the ostrich in its main characteristics, but was of a less
slender make than it, and was probably about six times bigger than the
largest known bird of that class! To it the term Æpyornis has been
applied; the epithet Maximus being appropriately given to the species
to which the bones examined belonged.
|
|
Ælian. Hist. Animal. lib. xiv. c. 7.
|
|
|
Xenophon, Anabesis, lib. 1, c. 5.
|
———
BY FREDERIKA BREMER.
———
London! great, magnificent, wonderful London! was the thought which
presented itself again and again, during my peregrinations and my visits
to various districts of this immense city, and at the contemplation of
its rich, varied physiognomy. From the city, where trade lives, strives,
and posts its books, speculates and battles for life and death in smoky,
gloomy streets and alleys, to Hampstead, where the country joins the
town, and children ride upon asses over green hills and dales; from the
crowded, noisy Strand, which you can scarcely cross for the throngs of
omnibuses and carriages which are unceasingly driving along it, to the
silent, elegant Belgravia; from the closely built portions of the city,
where human beings live in crowded courts and wretched dens, like moles
in the earth, without pleasure and without light, to the immense,
magnificent parks—justly called the “lungs of London,” where people
wander calmly beneath green trees, or beside the clear little lakes, on
which rare water-birds swim rejoicingly; from Westminster to the Tower,
from St. Paul’s to Pall Mall and Piccadilly, and so on; all along the
Thames, the broad Thames, with its affluent life, with its splendid
bridges, with its steam-boats, swift as arrows, which bow down their
chimneys as they shoot onward under these bridges—what an abundance of
great, characteristic and strong feature is here combined with beautiful
detail!—the splendid palaces, the elegant detached houses, with their
gardens before them, the markets, with their flowing fountains, the
numerous small green inclosures, with their trees and bushes, which are
met with every here and there as a refreshment to the eye of the
wanderers—these, and many other similar objects. And on all hands that
great preponderance of substantial, wealthy, handsome, well-built,
well-arranged houses.
In especial must I remark the way in which London, and, in fact, in
which all English towns go out into, or up into, the country. It is not,
as in many other nations, by the houses becoming smaller, uglier, by
smoky chimneys becoming more numerous, marshes more extensive, the
refuse of the city more perceptible. No! on the contrary, the gardens
become more numerous and more extensive, the houses handsomer and more
open, the streets of the town expand and become rows of beautiful villas
and cottages, stone becomes less rare, flowers more frequent, the gray
is changed into green; one remarks a something “con amore” in the care
which is bestowed upon every dwelling, upon every grass-plot, in the
luxuriant growth of every creeper which is trained up the walls of the
houses and which engarlands their windows; in every iron palisade, which
at once incloses and ornaments every plot of garden ground, and by the
meaning of that English word comfort being above all things made
evident to the mind of the observer.
In the midst of the city itself one does not think so much of this;
other interests have here their life or—death. Because the great,
closely-built city, where human beings live in dense masses, where they
live, so to say, one upon another, in secret or open warfare for bread
or the means of existence—the city becomes always, in a certain
respect, a home of death for humanity.
When God, however, created man, he placed him not in a city, but in a
garden; and people have now begun to be aware of this in England. Men of
high cultivation, and even of high birth, deliver lectures and print
pamphlets on the evils of great cities with their densely-built
habitations, and on the injurious effects which they produce on the
human soul, as well as on physical life. And people are already taking
measures by which, as cities grow, breathing room may grow also, and are
preparing for the inhabitants the means by which, even here, they may
preserve health, cleanliness, and the fresh enjoyments of life.
London, though in cleanliness, fresh air, general regulations, and the
great number of detached houses standing in their gardens, which in this
respect far exceeds most other great towns, has yet not been able to
avoid the curse of the great city: I saw that—I saw behind the
magnificent quarters, behind the stately palaces, streets and markets,
where the luxury and pomp of city and aristocratic life flourished in
their fullest extent, that there were hidden regions, streets and lanes
where might be seen the very opposite of all this—haunts of human
wretchedness, of human tatters both outward and inward. I wished also to
see these with my own eyes; to see St. Giles’s and the dirty quarters
behind Westminster; because I endeavor to see, every where, the best and
the worst, the heaven and the hell of existence in all spheres of life.
I wished to see it also in the life of London; and I saw it.
I began to speak of the city’s bright side when I described the Great
Exhibition with its cheerful life, and I will yet linger a few moments
over this side of London life and over some of its gay scenes—namely,
those which may be enjoyed by all, or by nearly all classes, and which
are therefore properly the people’s pleasures.
Of these, none were more agreeable to me than the promenades in the
great parks—Hyde Park, the Green Park, Regent’s Park, which last,
alone, is several English miles in circumference. On Sundays, one sees
them crowded with well-dressed people, mostly of the working classes;
children tumble
about freely on the green turf, which remains green and
fresh notwithstanding, or feed with bread the beautiful swans or other
aquatic birds which swim about on the river-like winding pieces of
water. There stands also in one corner of St. James’ Park a row of cows,
from which, if the pedestrians choose, they can drink new milk, and thus
taste the pleasures of rural life; neither do other refreshments fail;
but the best refreshment here is, after all, the fresh air, the
wandering beneath green trees, the sight of the pleasure-takers, of the
sports of the children, and the views which are obtained of beautiful
palaces and churches. Queen Victoria may often enjoy from her royal
residence of Buckingham Palace, the cheerful sight of her people thus
wandering for their pleasure. Yes, it is to be feared that she, like
other queens and kings, sees too much of this side of the life of her
people, and thereby comes to forget that there is any other.
London possesses two scenes of popular enjoyment on a great scale, in
its British Museum and its Zoological Gardens. In the former, the glance
is sent over the life of antiquity; in the latter, over that of the
present time in the kingdom of nature; and in both may the Englishman
enjoy a view of England’s power and greatness, because it is the spirit
of England which has compelled Egypt and Greece to remove hither their
gods, their heroic statues: it is England whose courageous sons at this
present moment force their way into the interior of Africa, that
mysterious native land of miracles and of the leviathan; it is an
Englishman who held in his hand snow from the clefts of the remote
Mountains of the Moon; it is England which has aroused that ancient
Nineveh from her thousands of years of sleep in the desert; England
which has caused to arise from their graves, and to stand forth beneath
the sky of England, those witnesses of the life and art of antiquity
which are known under the name of the Nineveh Marbles, those magnificent
but enigmatical figures which are called the Nineveh Bulls, in the
immense wings of which one cannot but admire the fine artistic skill of
the workmanship, and from the beautiful human countenances of which
glances oriental despotism with eyes—such as those with which King
Ahasuerus might have gazed on the beautiful Esther, when she sank
fainting before the power of that glance. They have an extraordinary
expression—these countenances of Nineveh, so magnificent, so strong,
and at the same time, so joyous—a something about them so valiant and
so joyously commanding! It was an expression which surprised me, and
which I could not rightly comprehend. It would be necessary for me to
see them yet again before I could fully satisfy myself whether this
inexpressible, proudly, joyous glance is one of wisdom or of stupidity!
I could almost fancy it might be the latter, when I contemplate the
expression of gentle majesty in the head of the Grecian Jupiter.
Nevertheless, whether it be wisdom or stupidity—these representations
of ancient Nineveh have a real grandeur and originality about them. Were
they then representatives of life there? Was life there thus proud and
joyous, thus unconscious of trouble, care, or death, thus valiant, and
without all arrogance? Had it such eyes? Ah! and yet it has lain buried
in the sand of the desert, lain forgotten there many thousand years. And
now, when they once more look up with those large, magnificent eyes,
they discover another world around them, another Nineveh which cannot
understand what they would say. Thus proudly might Nineveh have looked
when the prophet uttered above her his “wo!” Such a glance does not
accord with the life of earth.
In comparison with these latest discovered but most ancient works of
art, the Egyptian statues fall infinitely short, bearing evidence of a
degraded, sensual humanity, and the same as regarded art. But neither of
these, nor of the Elgin marbles, nor of many other treasures of art in
the British Museum, which testify at the same time to the greatness of
foregone ages, and to the power of the English world conquering
intelligence, shall I say any thing, because time failed me rightly to
observe them, and the Nineveh marbles almost bewitched me by their
contemplation.
It is to me difficult to imagine a greater pleasure than that of
wandering through these halls, or than by a visit to the Zoological
Garden which lies on one side of the Regent’s Park. I would willingly
reside near this park for a time, that I might again and again wander
about in this world of animals from all zones, and listen to all that
they have to relate, ice-bears and lions, turtles and eagles, the
ourang-outang and the rhinoceros! The English Zoological Garden,
although less fortunate in its locality than the Jardin des Plantes in
Paris, is much richer as regards animals. That which at this time
attracted hither most visitors was the new guest of the garden, a
so-called river-horse or hippopotamus, lately brought hither from Upper
Egypt, where it was taken when young. It was yet not full grown, and had
here its own keeper—an Arab—its own house, its own court, its own
reservoir to bathe and swim in! Thus it lived in a really princely
hippopotamus fashion. I saw his highness ascend out of his bath in a
particularly good humor, and he looked to me like an enormous—pig, with
an enormously broad snout. He was very fat, smooth, and gray, and
awkward in his movements, like the elephant. Long-necked giraffes walked
about, feeding from wooden racks in the court adjoining that of the
hippopotamus, and glancing at us across it. One can scarcely imagine a
greater contrast than in these animals.
The eagles sat upon crags placed in a row beneath a lofty transparent
arch of iron work, an arrangement which seemed to me excellent, and
which I hope seemed so to them, in case they could forget that they were
captives. Here they might breathe, here spread out their huge wings, see
the free expanse of heaven, and the sun, and build habitations for
themselves upon the rock. On the contrary, the lions, leopards, and such
like noble beasts of the desert, seemed to me particularly unhappy in
their iron-grated stone vaults; and their perpetual, uneasy walking
backward and forward in their cages—I
could not see that without a
feeling of distress. How beautiful they must be in the desert, or amid
tropical woods, or in the wild caverns of the mountains, those grand,
terrific beasts—how fearfully beautiful! One day I saw these animals
during their feeding time. Two men went round with wooden vessels filled
with pieces of raw meat; these were taken up with a large, iron-pronged
fork, and put, or rather flung, through the iron grating into the dens.
It was terrible to see the savage joy, the fury, with which the food was
received and swallowed down by the beasts. Three pieces of meat were
thrown into one great vault which was at that time empty, a door was
then drawn up at the back of the vault, and three huge yellow lions with
shaggy manes rushed roaring in, and at one spring each possessed himself
of his piece of flesh. One of the lions held his piece between his teeth
for certainly a quarter of an hour, merely growling and gloating over it
in savage joy, whilst his flashing eyes glared upon the spectators, and
his tail was swung from side to side with an expression of defiance. It
was a splendid, but a fearful sight. One of my friends was accustomed
sometimes to visit these animals in company with his little girl, a
beautiful child, with a complexion like milk and cherries. The sight of
her invariably produced great excitement in the lions. They seemed
evidently to show their love to her in a ravenous manner.
The serpents were motionless in their glass house, and lay, half asleep,
curled around the trunks of trees. In the evening, by lamp light, they
become lively, and then, twisting about and flashing forth their snaky
splendors, they present a fine spectacle. The snake-room, with its walls
of glass, behind which the snakes live, reminded me of the old northern
myth of Nastrond, the roof of which was woven of snakes’ backs, the
final home of the ungodly—an unpleasant, but vigorous picture. The most
disagreeable and ugliest of all the snakes, was that little snake which
the beautiful Queen Cleopatra, herself false as a serpent, placed at her
breast; a little, gray, flat-headed snake, which liked to bury itself in
the sand.
The monkey-family lead a sad life; stretch out their hands for nuts or
for bread, with mournful human gestures; contentious, beaten, oppressed,
thrust aside, frightening one another, the stronger the
weaker—mournfully human also.
Sad, also, was the sight of an ourang-outang, spite of all its queer
grimaces, solitary in its house, for it evidently suffered ennui, was
restless, and would go out. It embraced its keeper and kissed him with
real human tenderness. The countenance, so human, yet without any human
intelligence, made a painful impression upon me: so did the friendly,
tame creature here, longing for its fellows, and seeing around it only
human beings. Thou poor animal! Fain would I have seen thee in the
primeval woods of Africa, caressing thy wife in the clear moonlight of
the tropical night, sporting with her among the branches of the trees,
and sleeping upon them, rocked by the warm night wind. There thy
ugliness would have had a sort of picturesque beauty. After the strange
beast-man had climbed hither and thither along the iron railing, seizing
the bars with his hands, and feet—which resembled hands—and also with
his teeth, he took a white, woolen blanket, wrapped it around him in a
very complicated manner, and ended by laying himself down as a human
being might do, in his chilly, desolate room. They say that he will not
live long in this country.[4]
After this, all the more charming was the spectacle presented by the
waterfowl from every zone. Ducks, Swans, and Co., all quite at home
here, swimming in the clear waters, among little green islands on which
they had their little huts. It was most charmingly pretty and complete.
And the mother-duck with her little, lively, golden-yellow flock,
swimming neck and heels after her, or seeking shelter under her wings,
is—at all times—one of the most lovely scenes of natural
life—resembling humanity in a beautiful manner.
Even among the wild beasts I saw a beautiful human trait of maternal
affection. A female leopard had in her cage two young cubs, lively and
playful as puppies. When the man threw the flesh into her cage, she drew
herself back, and let the young ones first seize upon the piece.
Crows from all parts of the world here live together in one
neighborhood, and that the clattering and laughter was loud here did not
surprise me, neither that the European crows so well maintained their
place among their fellows. That which, however, astonished and delighted
me was, the sweet, flute-like, melodious tones of the Australian crow.
In the presence of this crow from Paradise—for originally it must have
come therefrom—it seemed to me that all the other crows ought to have
kept silence with their senseless chattering. But they were nothing but
crows, and they liked better to hear themselves.
Parrots from all lands lived and quarreled together in a large room, and
they there made such a loud screaming, that in order to stand it out one
must have been one of their own relations. Better be among the silent,
dejected, stealthy, hissing, shining snakes, than in company with
parrots. The former might kill the body, but the latter the soul.
Twilight came on, and drove me out of the Zoological Garden each time I
was there, and before I had seen all its treasures. Would that I might
return there yet a third time and remain still longer!
Among the places in London which were much visited at this time by the
millions of strangers who streamed hither, was the Egyptian Hall—a
temple or museum for the remarkable things and curiosities from all
foreign lands, which are traveling through the world, together with
extraordinary men, animals, conjurors and conjuration—a temple of
novelty which ought to be found in every great city, for the support and
refreshment of the spirit of curiosity in the human breast. I saw here a
couple of beautiful dioramas, and these were a glorious and
extraordinary delight.
What is the use of giving one’s self a deal of
trouble to travel through far countries, in the face of danger by land
and sea—to make great efforts to be in time for the railway-train—to
get up in the night to go on board the steam-boat or by diligence—to
eat food which does not agree with one—to lose one’s luggage and all
one’s clothes—to be paying one’s money away all day long—to have an
empty purse and weary body—in a word, to do battle with a thousand
difficulties, when one can—here at the Diorama—sit quietly upon a
bench, listen to music, and for a shilling behold Europe, Asia, or
America pass before one, exhibit their ruins, their rivers, their
capitals, their temples, and beautiful natural scenes before one’s eyes.
Thus it was that I here beheld Egypt and the Nile travel past me: saw
the ancient pyramids and temples with their colossal statues: saw Copts
and Turks reposing beneath the palm-trees, and European tourists smoke
their cigars under the nose of the old gods of the Hindoos: saw Sirius
ascending brilliantly above the Nile: saw the beautiful head of the
Sphinx glancing upward from the desert sand, whilst night rested above
the desert, and Canopus looking down upon it—a sight which I shall
never forget. Beyond this, I allowed the journey from London to Calcutta
to journey past me; by Malta, and the Mediterranean, through the desert
by caravan, with camels, Arabs, and so on to Ceylon and Hindoostan, with
its cities and Hindoo temples. And it is impossible for me to say how
convenient and entertaining I found it all.
Among the luxurious establishments of London, I heard much said of the
clubs; palace-like houses where certain corporate bodies in the
government or the city have their place of meeting arranged for their
own especial accommodation, and where every thing which is most
recherché in food and in wine, and every article of life’s luxury is
provided for the use of these gentlemen. I was shown the Lawyers’, the
Merchants’, and the United-Service Club-Houses, with many others. Men of
all classes, who have good incomes, may here enjoy themselves every day,
without any other danger than that of here forgetting the nobler
business of life and their better self; for these magnificent abodes are
the promoters of selfishness and the desire for self-indulgence; and the
man accustomed to the refined enjoyments of the club not unfrequently
comes to despise the more frugal meal of home, and simple domestic
pleasure. He is afraid of taking an amiable wife, because he might be
prevented from having his delicate club-house dinner; and the man thus
corrupted by luxury, renders himself incapable of life’s best enjoyment.
Ah! he does still worse than that, because the evil which
self-indulgence begets is not negative, is not merely individual!
And now from these halls, where the thirst of pleasure—a beautiful,
false Delilah—seeks to lull men to sleep and rob them of their
strength, and the saloons where self-indulgent women trifle away life in
vanity, and worse still, although they have not their public club-houses
for this purpose, I will pass over at once to scenes which present the
strongest contrast and resemblance to these places—the quarters in
London where the wretched, the poor and the openly criminal of the
community, have also their clubs and places of meeting, the great
revelation of the dark side of life.
I had already seen it many times, even in the rich splendid parts of the
city. I had seen in front of magnificent shops, filled with bread and
confectionery of every kind, women stealing along with pallid
countenances and glances which earnestly demanded what the lips dared
not to ask. I have seen children coming out of the cross streets of the
Strand, children with eyes so beautiful that I could have kissed them,
but clothed in rags and covered with dirt which was revolting, and I
proposed to myself to seethe “nightshade” of London life in its fullest
bloom. The poison-flower of this name, so dangerous to the noblest
feelings of humanity, and thence seizing upon life, grew here in
luxuriance—that I knew—not in nature, but in human life.
And I saw it, saw it in St. Giles’s, and in particular in a part of
Westminster, the whole quarter, streets and lanes, filled with wretched
half-tumble-down houses, windows stopped up with rags, rags hanging
fluttering in the wind outside the houses, as if they were banners;
every thing in tatters, every thing dirty, wretched! And human beings
with traces of the ale-house upon them, traces of every species of vice,
of crime, and want, and misery: pallid-faced women and men, great,
ill-conditioned boys and girls, who—in the middle of the day—idled
about doing nothing: in fact, “the dangerous classes” were here in
vigorous growth. But even into this realm of darkness had the light of
the sun began to penetrate.
Only a few years ago, it was not safe even for the police authorities to
venture into this quarter, and several persons of the better class who
had ventured into houses here were never afterward heard of. Some,
however, ventured in yet again, and came out scathless. Clergymen, “The
Missionaries of the Poor,” dared to come hither without fear, because
they too were poor in every thing but the strength of eternal life—they
dared to come hither; visited the sick and dying, penetrated into every
corner and nook, helping, comforting, admonishing, and bearing away with
them the intelligence of what they had seen and experienced into a
higher class of society. That was the beginning. After that, came men of
respectability, birth, fortune: men—yes, and women also, of high
acquirements, who turned themselves hither both with thought and deed.
Thus real and powerful material means were enlisted in the service of
humanity. A broad street was opened through the densest portion of the
district, through the worst abodes of darkness, and was now in progress
of completion. An old house which had been purchased and converted into
a “Model Boarding-house,” stood close beside the former den of thieves,
whither guests had been inveigled and plundered, if not murdered.
“I expected this summer to have seen many of my countrymen,” lamented a
fat and ugly French
hostess, to one of her wretched neighbors; “but I
have had scarcely any. My room stands empty.”
I did not much wonder at that when I went through this room, up in a
third story, and afterward saw the rooms in the large model eating-house
just by, established by Lord Canning, and where every thing, although in
the highest degree homely, was remarkable for cleanliness and order.
This house was under the management of respectable people—a man and his
wife, with a fixed salary—who had one hundred boarders, all men. Five
or six beds stood in each room. Fresh air, cleanliness, and good order
prevailed every where. I saw also a lodging-house somewhat of this kind,
but for decayed gentlemen. Each of these had—besides a small sum
weekly—a bedroom, together with fuel and the privilege of reading in a
common room. Each cooked his own food by his own fire.
I saw in the eating-room here, as well as in the kitchen, several highly
original countenances, good studies for a Boz or Hogarth, and evidently
still estimable ruins of a better and not insignificant humanity. It
seemed to me that I could observe traces of genius or humor of so high a
degree that something great might have come out of them, if they had not
gone astray or lost their balance. However that might be, still these
figures, with their remarkable noses, seen by the light of the fire,
with their pipes or their tea-cups, each one busied for himself in that
large warm room, produced a peculiar appearance, not unpleasing nor
without interest. They had shelter, companionship, a certain
independence, and a certain comfort, these old gentlemen. They might
wait in peace for the great “flitting day.”
I saw also a newly-erected Ragged-School in this quarter, but the
scholars were evidently yet an uncultivated set of urchins, who had
great need to go to school. Public baths and wash-houses had been also
established here, and these were assiduously visited on Saturdays. Who
does not see in all this the commencement of a better state of
things?—and already has this begun through these means in various parts
of London. In many of the worst and poorest parts of London have model
lodging-houses been established, or are about to be so, together with
public baths and wash-houses.
I visited one of the larger model dwelling-houses, in company with the
good and cheerful Mrs. C——, whose countenance belongs to that class
which ought often to be seen in dark places, because it is like
sunshine. The building, a large, well-constructed block, with
accommodation for twenty families and one hundred and twenty-three
single women, was known by the appellation of Thanksgiving Buildings,
because it had been erected the year after the last visitation of the
cholera in London, and in grateful acknowledgment of its ceasing in a
quarter where, in consequence of the unhealthiness of the houses, it had
been most fatally prevalent. In truth, a beautiful mode of returning
thanks to God: worthy to be considered and imitated.
We visited a few families. The doors of their dwellings had handsome
knockers upon them, and every thing in the interior was arranged with
the same well-considered attention as in Prince Albert’s cottages. The
mistresses of these families, agreeable-looking young women, with many
children, took an especial pleasure in showing us how easily and
abundantly the fresh water flowed forth by merely turning a little tap.
They seemed to place a particular value upon this. The rooms were light,
and in arrangement and number similar to those in the dwellings I have
already described. One of the women, mother of two little children,
lamented that the rent was high, and that she was unable to do any thing
to assist her husband in providing for the family. Formerly, and while
unmarried, and in the employment of a dress-maker, she had been able to
earn seven shillings a-week. She mentioned this with a melancholy
expression; and one could not but—while listening to her—think upon
the deplorable manner in which the education of the poor woman is
circumscribed, and which allows to her hand no other occupation but that
of the seamstress. How easily the woman’s work at home, in manufacture
or art, might be advantageous to the husband and the family!
A bath and washing establishment were in progress of preparation within
the building. The rooms for single women were yet empty: nor were,
indeed, all of them complete; and even when they are finished, I hope
that they may not become occupied, at least by amiable women. Each room
is intended for two occupants, each of whom will pay one shilling per
week as rent: and the rooms are so small and so entirely devoid of
comfort of any kind, that it required an effort to look at them. I could
not help thinking of the magnificent club-houses. Not that I would have
such for women; but, nevertheless, I would have something a little nice,
and with some convenience—yes, and with something attractive in the
neighborhood; this is a mere act of justice which I would demand for
these lonely ones.
The great public wash-houses present a gladdening sight. Hundreds of
women stood here, each one in her little alcove, with her steaming wash
before her, busy and cheerful.
“I can get all my washing done in two hours,” said a woman to me, with
sparkling eyes, beside whom I stood.
“And how frequently is it needful for you to wash?” inquired I.
“Once a week,” replied she. “I have a husband and five little children.”
One may fancy this woman doing her washing at home, drying and ironing
it on the Saturday in the only room in which is the whole family, in
order to have the clothes ready for the Sunday; one may fancy the
husband coming home on the Saturday evening from his week’s work in
order to enjoy rest and refreshment with his family—and finding the
room full of wet clothes, damp, or filled with steam during the ironing
process; the wife, occupied by her work, tired, and perhaps cross, the
children in the way, or else—out of the way, in order to make room for
the wet clothes! If the husband, under such circumstances,
did not
leave home and wife in order to find rest and refreshment at the
ale-house, he must have had the soul of a martyr and hero!
In these new public wash-houses, the wife can do the whole of her
washing and have it ironed and finished in two hours. And it was in the
highest degree interesting to observe the means by which this operation
in all its various departments can be carried on so rapidly and so well,
and at the same time, for so small a payment.
The baths are also much frequented by the lower classes, but that most
generally on the Saturday. And then the numbers are so great, that the
lobbies are crowded with people waiting for their turns. Both these
institutions are of incalculable benefit to the domestic life of the
poor.
What the model dwelling-houses are and may become for the same class,
the following anecdote may suffice to prove.
“On one of my visits to the Metropolitan buildings,” related to me Dr.
S. S., one of the noble men who was foremost in their establishment, “I
saw a woman standing at her open door. She greeted me so pleasantly, and
with so kind an expression, that I was involuntarily compelled to stand
and speak to her. She invited me into her dwelling, a sitting-room and
kitchen, (but which also was a sitting-room,) showed me how prettily
arranged she and her husband had every thing here, the beautiful,
extensive prospect from the window, and how convenient was every thing
within; she showed me their flowers, books, birds, and seemed to be made
most sincerely happy by all these things. I fell into conversation with
her, and by this means became acquainted with her history.
“‘We have been in better circumstances,’ said she; ‘at one time, indeed,
we were very well off. But my husband became surety for a friend in whom
he had as entire faith as in himself. His friend, however, became
bankrupt, and by this means we lost nearly all that we possessed. We
were obliged to sell a part of our furniture, and to remove from our
comfortable dwelling to one much worse, but of a rent which we could
afford. Here, however, new misfortunes met us; every thing began to go
downward with us; we were obliged to sell the greater part of that which
was yet left, and again to remove. We took a house in one of the suburbs
of London, the best that we could get for the low rent which we could
now afford. But it was a gloomy, damp, ugly, and in the highest degree
inconvenient dwelling. When my husband used to come into the gloomy,
chilly room, he became, as it were, struck with numbness. He sat silent,
without taking pleasure in any thing; he could not even open a book, and
reading used formerly to be his greatest delight. ‘It is all over with
us now,’ thought I to myself, ‘and we must sink down into wretched
poverty.’
“‘One day, however, I saw by chance, in the newspaper, an advertisement
of rooms here at a reasonable rate, and I thought, if we could only
manage to get into these rooms, he would perhaps come round again. I
persuaded him therefore to let us go and look at them. These rooms which
we now have, were fortunately still untenanted; and as we could produce
the required certificate of character and respectability, we were
accepted as tenants. My husband had not been long in these cheerful,
excellent rooms, before he again took to his books, and began to work
afresh. ‘Thank God,’ thought I, ‘now are we right again!’
“‘And so it was. My husband now earns good wages, and is promised an
advance in them. Our rent costs but three shillings a week. We are now
again getting on in the world—God be praised!’”
And a hand extended to the sinking—light, air, health, hope to those
who sit in darkness—behold, these are offered by this institution of a
truly Christian community, to the children of desolation. Prepare ye the
way of the Lord!
“If you could remain longer with us,” said the same friend of humanity
to me, “I would take you with me in my walks through the city, and I
would show you, not our palaces and places of magnificence, but our
wretchedness, and that which we do to alleviate it.”
And I have now seen sufficient thereof for me to say, that much is
done, but that still more yet remains to be done. How much may be
conceived from this single fact, that out of the immense population of
the London poor only about fifteen hundred persons can be accommodated
in the model dwelling-house!
In connection with these establishments will I mention two of a similar
design which I visited during my stay in London. One of these is known
under the appellation of “The Dormitory for Thieves.” This was the
undertaking of a single individual, and still depends, in a great
measure, upon the extraordinary courage and clear-headedness of this one
man, together with private assistance which his undertaking has received
from noble-minded women and men.
Mr. Nash was a teacher in a Ragged School. Just opposite the school was
an open shed, beneath which Mr. Nash observed that early in the morning
a number of youths, of from about seventeen to twenty years of age,
assembled, who appeared to have no other place of shelter. Before long
he fell into conversation with them, and learnt that such was the case,
and that these youths spent the greater part of the night, as well as of
the day, on foot for the purposes of theft or plunder. He inquired from
them whether they would be willing to give up this miserable occupation
for something better. All declared that they had no higher wish than to
do so. Mr. Nash then proposed to them that they should pass through a
probatory period of two weeks, during which they should be placed in a
solitary room, and have no other food than bread and water. After this
time of trial, if they passed well through it, he promised to receive
them into the school, and teach them some trade, of which they
themselves should have the choice, and which would thus open to them a
respectable path for the future. The boys willingly entered into the
plan, and, under the oversight of Mr.
Nash, commenced their noviciate
on bread and water; a pound weight of bread each a day, in a solitary
room, but without fastenings. Some of them grew weary in a few days, and
went out again to cheat and to steal, but the greater number persevered,
and with these Mr. Nash commenced the institution called the
“Dormitory,” which soon extended itself, and now contains about fifty
pupils, and at which forty or more candidates present themselves weekly,
young men of from sixteen to thirty years of age, who are desirous of
leaving the paths of vice. The great school for juvenile offenders,
situated a few miles from London, receives only children under fifteen
years of age. I very much regret that my time was too short to allow of
my visiting it.
The house designed for the Dormitory was now building, and Mr. Nash was
therefore compelled from want of room to reject each week many young men
who were desirous of being received on trial. The fifty who had
successfully passed through the heavy probation—a short one, it is
true, but a sufficient trial for young men with hungry stomachs,
unbroken wills, and unaccustomed to discipline—were employed in various
rooms as shoemakers, tailors, carpenters, smiths, printers, and so on.
They scarcely looked up, and were zealously occupied by their work.
Three young men, of from eighteen to twenty, underwent, as best for
them, their trial in an empty room, the doors of which stood open. They
had determined upon pursuing a certain trade, and had firmly resolved
upon amending their course of life. I saw among these young men many
pleasant, hopeful countenances, and some also which it required courage
to admit into an institution for improvement.
But this Mr. Nash has a countenance which is remarkable for great
courage and the most cheerful confidence. And, perhaps, it is precisely
this very courage and this cheerful confidence which are most needed and
of which there is most want in society. Perhaps there would not be found
any thing altogether irremediable in the world if we had only this right
courage, this right trust—in the strength of resurrection!
The fallen youths in this institution are taught not merely a handicraft
trade, but, as a matter of course, first and foremost the principles of
Christianity. Many of them are destined for emigration, and, after
having well passed through their apprenticeship, obtain aid for their
outfit and their voyage, which is in a general way to Australia. For
Australia Felix is a picture which floats before the eye of the
converted youth as the goal and reward of his industry and his good
conduct during his apprenticeship. And the beautiful skies of Australia
seem intended by Providence as a symbol of mercy, to entice home the
prodigal but repentant son of earth.
I hear at this point an objection which is often made.
“You are promoters of crime, inasmuch as you assist the criminal more
than the innocent; inasmuch as the quality of thief becomes a letter of
recommendation to ‘the Dormitory for Thieves,’ and thence to Australia.”
This objection would be just if no protecting, aiding hand were
stretched forth to guiltless and destitute youth. But in England this
objection is overruled by many benevolent institutions. Among these is
the Emigrant’s Home for young persons who can produce certificates of
blameless life, and who wish to emigrate, but have not the means of so
doing. I visited the Home, where young women of the working class and of
good character are received for a time, examined, and afterward enabled
to leave the country and to obtain situations in the English colonies.
Between seven and eight hundred young women had, within rather more than
a year, been sent abroad from this Home, their passage paid, and
services obtained for them in the colonies, mostly in New Zealand and
Australia. In the Ragged Schools also is Australia Felix a land which
stands before the souls of the children as a future home with a brighter
sky and better prospects for them than their native land, and the
sending them thither is a reward for their progress in learning. From
thirteen to fifteen years of age they are sent thither—that is to say,
to the southern part of the continent, where the climate is most
healthy, and where none of the convict population are to be met with;
these, as is well known, being confined to the northern coast. The
children obtain situations in the families of the wealthy colonists,
still remaining in connection with the mother-school which sent them
out; and their letters to the teachers and their friends, about the
country and the people of that new world to which they have removed,
diffuse the utmost pleasure and excite the deepest interest in the old
home. I read some of these letters, printed in small, neat, stitched
pamphlets, which are sold and circulated for a few pence, together with
many other small writings of the same price and form. I read with great
interest these child-like, naïve descriptions, fresh with morning dew,
from the new world. And this led me to a more intimate acquaintance with
the popular folk-literature of England. This subject, however, is too
great to be treated of here, and demands a separate chapter. Merely a
few words in short.
In order that it may actually be an advantage to the child to learn to
read in the school, it is of importance that when it leaves the school
it may find something good to read—something improving for the
understanding, something ennobling for the heart. Rich men’s children
have this in superabundance: the children of the poor have long had, and
still in many countries have—when they leave school—no other reading
of an amusing kind to go to than wretched ballads, rude stories, immoral
tales and pictures, which degrade mind and taste—and they form
themselves accordingly. In England, and in various cultivated countries,
people have begun zealously to provide for the needs of the reading
portion of the lower classes. Societies have been formed both in the
Episcopal church and other religious bodies, for the diffusion of useful
and entertaining reading, designed especially for the youth of the lower
classes who have the wish to read, but who have not the means of
purchasing expensive books. Small
works, illustrated with beautiful
vignettes, circulate in England by thousands, especially narratives,
biographies, and such like, which are calculated to please the most
uneducated as well as the most childish mind. The number of these
writings, and so called “tracts”—which are sold at from one penny to
six-pence each—is immense in England. They circulate over the whole
country, and may be met with in all the book-shops.
In the Ragged Schools, in the Model Boarding-houses, in the Home for
poor emigrants, in the Dormitory for thieves, in many benevolent
institutions, had I seen a copper-plate portrait of a handsome,
middle-aged gentleman, holding a roll of paper in his hand, from which
he seemed about to read. This was the portrait of Lord Ashley, now Earl
of Shaftesbury. It was thus that he stood up, time after time, in
Parliament, with narratives which he had collected and written down from
the life of the working-classes of England, with its neglects and
necessities, its temptations to crime, and its bitterness against
society, especially in the manufacturing districts. It was thus that he
continued to stand forth and to plead, spite of opposition, derision,
reproach, and threats, until he aroused that universal attention and
that universal sympathy for the sufferings of the lower classes of
society, which he made it his mission to search into and to alleviate.
Thus, he became the promoter of important reforms, and of many excellent
institutions for the oppressed and the fallen of the laboring classes.
Thus, he became so well known for his spirit of active human kindness,
that not long since, the thieves of London, to the number of more than a
thousand—if I am not mistaken—sent to Lord Ashley, requesting he would
meet them at a certain place which they named, where they wished to ask
his advice, as to how they might get into some better way of life. Lord
Ashley undertook to meet these thieves. These dangerous classes had laid
aside their fearful aspect for the occasion. They came now as repentant
children to a father, to whose counsel and guidance they would submit
themselves. During this meeting, his lordship wished to give a small sum
of money to an old man, but not having small change with him, produced a
sovereign, and asked if some one would go out and get change for him.
Many hands were stretched forth, and Lord Ashley gave the gold coin to a
boy, who immediately sprang out with it. As he remained a considerable
time away, a general uneasiness spread itself through the assembly; all
looked eagerly toward the door, all were evidently anxious that he
should not abuse the confidence of his lordship; and when, at length, he
returned with the proper amount of change, a general satisfaction showed
itself.
I am sorry not to know more about this conference, nor what advice Lord
Ashley gave to the thieves, because it must have been something beyond
mere theory. The Dormitory, as a preparatory institution, and emigration
to countries where there is plenty of honest labor and labor’s wages,
are good practical means, which Lord Ashley could refer them to.
And it cannot be denied that England, in its extensive and as yet
scantily-peopled colonies, has an excellent mode of assistance and
resource for its dangerous population, and in especial for its
superabundant population. And one cannot but acknowledge that it is the
increasing emigration to these colonies which gives England at this time
freer breathing-room and a more vigorous life.
|
|
The ourang-outang is dead since Miss Bremer’s visit. He died
of inflammation of the lungs; and, with truth it may be said,
much regretted. During his short life in the gardens he had shown
himself docile, and remarkably intelligent.
Trans.
|
———
BY CAROLINE F. ORNE.
———
Weep for the dead! for him in silence sleeping,
O’er whose lone grave the wild winds coldly sweep;
Weep for the dead, yet make but little weeping,
He lies at peace, unbroken is his sleep.
His last fond look of love on thee was resting,
His hands last feeble pressure met thine own;
It was of thee he made his last requesting,
Fell on thy ear his last, sweet, lingering tone.
Weep that ye hear his steps no more returning,
That he in darkness and in stillness lies;
Make not for him a long and bitter mourning,
Calm is the slumber that has sealed his eyes.
But weep for him who far away has wandered,
Whose feet tread painfully some distant strand,
Who sad and long life’s dream has vainly pondered,
Who mourns, deep longing, for his native land.
Faint and afar his heavy burden bearing,
No smile, no word, no look from thee can cheer;
Once all his cares were lighter for thy sharing,
Once all his joys, for thee, were doubly dear.
Oh, weep for him! there is no consolation;
He liveth, but for thee his life is o’er;
Count the slow years with weary annotation,
The mocking years shall bring him back no more.
Sit by thy hearth-stone in the silence grieving,
Take from the past its sweet yet faded flowers;
For thee no tree of hope has spring-time’s leaving,
The song is silent in thy pleasant bowers.
From all thy future him thou must dissever,
Poor broken heart! in vain must thou deplore;
His feet from that far land shall seek thee never,
He shall return no more—to thee no more.
Lillian and Other Poems. By William Mackworth Praed. Now first
Collected. New York: Redfield. 1 vol. 12mo.
Praed, one of the most brilliant, fanciful and peculiar poets of the
century, has met with singular ill-luck in his native land in not
finding either an editor or a public for the chance-offsprings of his
sparkling muse. To Dr. Griswold belongs the credit of rescuing his
pieces from oblivion, of collecting them in a permanent form, and of
introducing them with a preface which presents, with condensed felicity
of expression, the leading incidents of Praed’s life, and the subtle
peculiarities of his genius. Poet, scholar, and politician, Praed was
also a most popular and accomplished man of society, and not a little of
the raciness of his poems consists in their curious combination of the
romantic and the worldly. They suggest one of those modern parlors
opening on one side into a greenhouse, with a strange blending in the
atmosphere of musk and sweet-briar, eau de cologne and lilies. In such
a forced union of the ideal and the conventional we are, of course, all
the more piquantly reminded of their essential contrast. With all this
clever deviltry, however, in the instinctive action of Praed’s mind, he
has still given us some poems which indicate that a stout English heart
beats beneath the embroidered waistcoat of the man of fashion, and will
sometimes gush out in natural tenderness or passion. But his exquisitely
nice perception of the falsehood of cultivated and conventual life,
combined with a laughing charity for its pleasant hypocricies, commonly
interferes with his poetic faith; and he is continually provoking
sentimental readers by raising their serious sympathies only to give the
greater force to the flush of sarcasm which dissolves them. This
peculiarity springs, perhaps, from a deeper source than mere
intellectual mischievousness, and refers to a humorous sadness of mood
which is apt to characterize men who are both poets and wits—who see
things at once in their ideal and conventional relations, and are
fascinated by both. The observing reader will also detect, as a result
of this, a certain fine misanthropy in the poems, but a misanthropy
which is without malice or hatred. His description of the Troubadour, in
his delicious poem of that name, may stand in some degree for his own
portrait:
A wandering troubadour was he;
He bore a name of high degree,
And learned betimes to slay and sue,
As knights of high degree should do.
While vigor nerved his buoyant arm,
And youth was his to cheat and charm;
Being immensely fond of dancing,
And somewhat given to romancing,
He roamed about through towers and towns,
Apostrophizing smiles and frowns,
Singing sweet staves to beads and bonnets,
And dying, day by day, in sonnets.
Flippant and fair, and fool enough,
And careless where he met rebuff,
Poco-curante in all cases
Of furious foes, or pretty faces,
With laughing lip, and jocund eye,
And studied tear and practiced sigh,
And ready sword, and ready verse,
And store of ducats in his purse,
He sinned few crimes, loved many times,
And wrote a hundred thousand rhymes!
Among the best among the many good things in this volume is “The Belle
of the Ball,” “The Vicar,” “The Legend of the Teuful-Haus,” “The Bridal
of Belmont,” and “The Red Fisherman.” We have but space for a
description of Richard Cœur de Lion—a fair specimen of Praed’s dashing
manner:
A ponderous thing was Richard’s can,
And so was Richard’s boot,
And Saracens and liquor ran,
Where’er he set his foot.
So fiddling here, and fighting there,
And murdering time and tune,
With sturdy limb, and listless air,
And gauntleted hand, and jeweled hair,
Half monarch, half buffoon,
He turned away from feast to fray,
From quarreling to quaffing,
So great in prowess and in pranks,
So fierce and funny in the ranks,
That Saladin and Soldan said,
Where’er that mad-cap Richard led,
Alla! he held his breath for dread,
And burst his sides for laughing!
At court, the humor of a king
Is always voted “quite the thing;”
Morals and cloaks are loose or laced
According to the sovereign’s taste,
And belles and bouquets both are dressed
Just as his majesty thinks best.
Of course, in that delightful age,
When Richard ruled the roast,
Cracking of craniums was the rage,
And beauty was the toast.
Ay! all was laugh, and life, and love;
And lips and shrines were kissed;
And vows were ventured in the grove,
And lances in the list;
And boys roamed out in sunny weather
To weave a wreath and rhyme together:
While dames, in silence and in satin,
Lay listening to the soft French-Latin,
And flung their sashes and their sighs
From odor-breathing balconies.
The Howadji in Syria. By George William Curtis. Author of “Nile Notes.”
New York: Harper & Brothers. 1 vol. 12mo.
Mr. Curtis has the finest genius for description among the myriad
tourists of the day. His observation is clear, accurate and
comprehensive, and the picture formed on his own imagination he can
transfer to the imagination of the reader without the omission of a
single detail. But he also has the poetic faculty of seeing not only the
external form and colors of objects, but their inward spirit and
meaning; and this makes his pictures alive with thought and feeling, and
constitutes their peculiar attractiveness. The reader is literally
transported; his eye falls on the page, and at once he is in Cairo or
Jerusalem, not only seeing those places, but experiencing the pure and
perfect luxury of the feelings they awaken in an imaginative mind. It is
this magical power which places Mr. Curtis above all contemporary
writers of travels. He has really caught the spirit of the east. Some
London critics have objected to his book on account of its
characteristic excellence, they being pleased to call his felicity and
sureness of insight by the name of idealization, using the word to
convey a charge of misrepresentation. We believe that he daguerreotypes
both forms and emotions, and is equally true to fact and thought. His
faculty of external observation is none the less accurate, because he
has in addition the genius which most travelers lack.
We do not know whether Mr. Curtis would succeed as well in describing
Western as Eastern life, manners and scenery. In the East he is at home,
even the fanciful fopperies with which he pertinaciously bespangles his
style, aiding the effect of his pictures. It may be that the sensuous
and dreamy atmosphere through which he shows us the forms of Oriental
life is native, not so much to his
own mind, as the scenes he
represents, and that he could vary it with a variation in his subject.
If so, we hope he will not leave a corner of the earth unvisited, for
such a representative faculty would make him the Shakspeare of tourists.
One of the most delightful pictures in the present volume is the
“counterfeit presentment” of Oriental shopping. We quote it as a
specimen of Mr. Curtis’s word-painting. The Howadji enters a bazaar:
“The merchant, gravely courteous, reveals his treasures, little dreaming
that they are inestimable to the eyes that contemplate them. His wares
make poets of his customers, who are sure that the Eastern poets must
have passed their lives in an endless round of shopping.
“Here are silk stuffs from Damascus and Aleppo; cambric from the
district of Nablus, near the well of Jacob; gold and silver threads from
Mount Lebanon; keffie, the Bedouin handkerchiefs, from Mecca, and
fabrics of delicate device from Damascus blend their charm with the
Anatolian carpets of gorgeous tissue. The fruits of Hamas hang
beyond—dried fruits and blades from Celo Syria—pistacchios from
Aleppo, and over them strange Persian rugs.
“The eye feasts upon splendor. The wares are often clumsy, inconvenient,
and unshapely. The coarsest linen is embroidered with the finest gold.
It is a banquet of the crude elements of beauty, unrefined by taste. It
is the pure figment unworked into the picture.
“But the contemplation of these articles, of name and association so
alluring, and the calm curiosity of the soft eyes, that watch you in the
dimness of the bazaar, gradually soothe your mind like sleep, and you
sit by the merchant in pleasant reverie. You buy as long and as much as
you can. Have rhymes, and colors, and fancies prices?
“The courteous merchant asks fabulous sums for his wares, and you
courteously offer a tenth or a twentieth of his demand. He looks
grieved, and smokes. You smoke, and look resigned.
“‘Have the Howadji reflected that this delicate linen (it is coarse
crash) comes from Bagdad, upon camels, over the desert?’
“‘They have, indeed, meditated that fact.’
“‘Are these opulent strangers aware that the sum they mention would
plunge an unhappy merchant into irretrievable ruin?’
“‘The thought severs the heart-strings of the opulent strangers. But are
their resources rivers, whose sands are gold?’
“—And the soft-eyed Arab boy is dispatched for fresh coffee.
“We wear away the day in this delightful traffic. It has been a
rhetorical tilt. We have talked, and lived, and bought poetry, and at
twilight our treasures follow us to the hotel.”
Paris Sketch Book. By William M. Thackeray. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
2 vols. 18mo.
In these volumes the author of Vanity Fair appears as the social critic
of Paris. With an eye that nothing ridiculous or bizarre can elude, he
peers into the shady corners of French life, and transfers its oddities
to his page. His English sense, it is true, is somewhat too constantly
accompanied by his English prejudice; but even where he loses his
fairness he never loses his brilliancy.
Among the many attractions of the book are some capital stories
illustrative of French manners and character. Perhaps the best chapter
is that on Louis the Fourteenth. Its exposition of kingship is
mercilessly satirical and remorselessly just. There is a little wood-cut
in this part of the book, which the revolutionists should distribute in
every country in Europe as an instrument of insurrection. It represents
first the royal robes, then royalty without the robes, then royalty in
the robes. The inference to the eye is irresistible, that the robes and
not the men constitute royalty. The satire is especially directed at
Louis XIV., but it might with more justice be fastened on the present
sovereigns of the continent of Europe.
The Study of Words. By Richard Cheverix French, B. D. New York:
Redfield. 1 vol. 12mo.
This volume has been very popular in England, having passed rapidly
through four editions. The author not only considers words as “fossil
poetry,” but fossil ethics and fossil history. Many of his speculations
are ingenious, tending to impress upon the mind the truth that language
is the incarnation of thought, and that words are things. But in all
that relates to the philosophy of the matter he is very inferior to one
of our writers, the Rev. Dr. Bushnell, of Hartford, who, in his late
theological writings has exhibited extraordinary depth and sentences of
thought in demonstrating both the vitality and the limitations of
language. Mr. French’s work is sketchy and readable, distinguished
rather for the value of its detached remarks than for the
comprehensiveness of its general plan. Its tendency, however, is to
provoke independent thinking on the subject, in which Mr. French’s
“Story of Words” may be disconnected from the languid wordiness of Mr.
French.
The Works of Stephen Olin, D. D., LL. D., late President of the
Wesleyan University. New York: Harper & Brothers. Vols. 1 and 2. 12mo.
An elegant edition, such as the present promises to be, of the works of
so eminent a divine as the late Dr. Olin, is a contribution to
theological and to general literature. The first and second volumes
contain his Sermons, Lectures and Addresses. They are worthy of the
author’s extensive reputation as an accurate and practical thinker, and
are animated throughout with a tolerant but none the less kindling
religious faith. In an age when charity is so common a screen of
indifference, it is a refreshment to read an author whose toleration is
the result of the depth and breadth of his religious feeling, and whose
zeal is as intense as his mind is large. To young men, especially, these
volumes are invaluable as guides in the practical duties of life, and
the formation of a manly Christian character. Dr. Olin possessed, in no
ordinary measure, that wisdom which comes from the union of exalted
sentiment with sturdy sense, and his advice is therefore always elevated
and always practical.
Claret and Olives; from the Garonne to the Rhone: or Notes Social,
Picturesque and Legendary, by the way. By Angus B. Reach. New York: Geo.
P. Putnam. 1 vol. 12mo.
This little volume, one of the series of Putnam’s Semi-Monthly Library,
is altogether the most attractive book on the south of France we have
ever read. It is written in a style of great liveliness and point, is
full of vigorous descriptions of scenery and manners, and some of the
legends are told inimitably. The series of volumes to which it belongs
we cannot too cordially commend to the public. Taking into consideration
the excellence of the type and paper, it is the cheapest collection of
books ever published in the country, the price of each volume being but
twenty-five cents. The cheapness, however, of the series is not so
noteable as the rare taste which guides the selection of
books. The
present volume, “Claret and Olives,” is, in point of style alone, a work
of high literary merit, and we cannot but think that its author will
wake up some fine morning and find himself famous.
The English Family Robinson. The Desert Home, or the Adventures of a
Lost Family in the Wilderness. By Captain Mayne Reid, author of the
“Rifle Rangers.” With Twelve Illustrations, by William Harvey. Boston:
Ticknor, Reed & Fields. 1 vol. 18mo.
This charming volume belongs to a class of works possessing universal
interest. It narrates the trials and experiences of an English family
lost in the great desert in the interior of North America. In this
desert they discover a delightful oasis, and dwell on it for ten years.
The descriptions of their housekeeping and hunting are exceedingly
vivid, while there is just enough variety in the characters of the
family to add a dramatic interest to the narrative. The volume is mostly
devoted to exciting representations of hunting adventures, and we know
of few books better calculated to convey to young persons a knowledge of
natural history. The author evidently writes from personal observation
both of the scenery and animals he describes.
Gaieties and Gravities. By Horace Smith. New York: D. Appleton & Co. 1
vol. 18mo.
Most of the pieces contained in this volume were originally contributed
to the New Monthly Magazine, in the old days of that periodical, when it
was edited by Campbell, the poet. Smith is now widely known as one of
the authors of the “Rejected Addresses,” and as the sole author of
numerous admirable novels; but we doubt if any of his works show his
genius and character in a light at once so amiable and so sparkling as
they are exhibited in the present delightful volume. Full of curious
information, brilliant satire, keen observation, and tingling wit, every
sentence is a stimulant to attention. The essays on “Noses,” “Lips and
Kissing,” “Ugly Women,” “The Eloquence of Eyes,” “The Literary Society
of Houndsditch,” not to mention others, are radiant with fancy and wit.
Thorpe, A Quiet English Town, and Human Life Therein. By William
Mountford. Boston: Ticknor, Reed & Fields. 1 vol. 18mo.
Mr. Mountford is favorably known to thoughtful readers as the author of
“Martyria” and “Euthanasy.” The present volume will add to the
reputation he has already acquired by them, conceived as it is in the
same kindly spirit, and admitting of a greater variety of incidents and
characters. The whole representation of the town is exceedingly
felicitous, combining considerable diversity of topic and subject with a
pervading unity of impression. The most attractive portions of the book
are the religious and philosophical conversations which are naturally
interwoven with its homely incidents—conversations which are
characterized by profound spiritual feeling, pure in tone, sweet in
sentiment, full of original thoughts and suggestions, and expressed in a
style of great clearness and beauty.
Life of Lord Jeffrey; with a Selection from his Correspondence. By Lord
Cockburn. 2 vols. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Grambo & Co.
We have read with great interest this admirable life of Jeffrey, from
the pen of an intimate friend, who has performed his “labor of love,” in
a most admirable and satisfactory manner. The great Edinburgh critic is
presented to us in the character of a most amiable friend, and a
profound, but somewhat timid statesman. He who put forth, through the
“Edinburgh Review,” his fierce and remorseless criticisms of
contemporary literature, is here pictured as the agreeable friend, the
loving husband and father, and the honest censor of what he deemed
pernicious in letters. He stands out from the canvas “a man of gentle
amenities, full of all charity, profoundly impressed with the dignity
and responsibility of his mission.” Every reader of Jeffrey should
purchase these volumes to obtain a fair estimation of the worth and
various ability of the man.
A Treatise on a Box of Instruments, and the Slide Rule: for the use of
Gaugers, Engineers, Seamen, and Students. By Thomas Kentish.
Philadelphia: Henry Carey Baird.
This invaluable little volume is a continuation of a series of useful
works, for which the country is indebted to the enterprise of Mr. Baird;
and we are mistaken if his efforts to extend the knowledge of the useful
do not meet a very ample return. The title of the volume is sufficiently
significant; and we have only to add, that the book is admirably adapted
to fulfill its purpose.
The Waverly Novels. By Sir Walter Scott. Complete in 12 volumes.
Abbotsford edition, vol. 1.—Waverly. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Grambo &
Co.
This beautiful edition of the Waverly Novels, has long been wanted by
American readers, and the beautiful type and paper of this edition
afford a most desired relief to the eye. The publishers announce that
they have now ready, Guy Mannering—The Antiquary—Rob Roy—The Black
Dwarf—Old Mortality—and The Bride of Lammermoor. The price per novel,
in paper, is fifty cents.
Romanism at Home. Letters to the Hon. Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice of
the United States. By Kirwan. New York: Harper & Brothers. 1 vol. 12mo.
These letters are the production of a vigorous and witty
controversialist, who brings the full resources of a firm will, a clear
understanding, and an animated rhetoric, to the task of assailing the
church of Rome. It is a very stimulating book.
Hearts Unveiled; or, “I Knew You Would Like Him.” By Sarah Emery
Saymore. New York: D. Appleton & Co. 1 vol. 12mo.
This is what may be called a didactic novel; a kind of composition which
we find it very difficult to read. It is, however, replete with shrewd
remark, and contains many admirable maxims for the discipline both of
the mind and the heart. The question of woman’s rights is very
elaborately discussed in the volume, and a strong leaning manifested
against the new ideas on that topic.
The Practical Model Calculator. By Oliver Byrne, Civil, Military and
Mechanical Engineer. Philadelphia: Henry Carey Baird (successor to E. L.
Carey.)
This is another of the series of very highly useful works with which we
have been favored from the press of Mr. Baird, and one that will be of
great service to the engineer, mechanic, machinist, naval architect,
miner and millwright. It is prepared with great care and accuracy, and
will be invaluable to all whose business or studies lead them to inform
themselves fully of the subjects upon which it treats.
LIFE OF THACKERAY.
Everybody knows Thackeray, and nobody knows any thing about him. We are
therefore glad to help ourselves and our readers to a little knowledge
of him, derived from a German authority by the Tribune. He was born in
Calcutta in the year 1811, and is now consequently 41 years old. His
father was a high official of the East India Company, which secured him
the entrée of the best society, and a large income. Our author was
born a “gentleman.” He went to school in England—experienced all the
tyranny of a brutal master, and the misery of that system of fagging, a
legalized bullying of the little boys by the larger, which is so
repulsive to every noble and decent feeling, and which the Englishmen so
stoutly defend, as a process which “takes the starch out of pride,” but
which is altogether too unreasonable not to lose temper about in
discussing. Thackeray has revenged himself upon this inhuman and
disgusting system in his Christmas story of “Dr. Birch and his Young
Friends,” and he has a general fling at Boarding Schools in the opening
of “Vanity Fair,” in which he exhorts the reader to trust the promise of
a school prospectus no more than he does the praises of an epitaph. He
left school for the University at Cambridge, where he studied with
Kinglake, the author of Eothen—Eliot Warburton, who wrote “The Crescent
and the Cross,” and was lost with the Amazon, and Richard Moncton
Milnes, a well-known London litterateur, a poet, and biographer of
Keats, and an ornamental liberal member of Parliament.
Meanwhile the elder Thackeray died, and the future historian of Vanity
Fair, launched himself into its midst with an annual income of about a
thousand pounds. He lived according to his whims, drew sharp and clever
caricatures, smoked, lounged, feasted upon books of every kind, and
opened the oyster of the world at leisure. His mother, a woman of great
beauty, and full of talent and tenderness, whose memory is so filially
embalmed in the character of the mother of Arthur Pendennis, married
again, about this time, and the young man, always the object of the
proudest maternal love, came into possession of his paternal
inheritance. He immediately returned from the continent where he had
been staying a little time, and took up his residence in the Temple.
Nascent Jurists and Budding Barristers at Law, who have completed a full
course at Cambridge or Oxford, enjoy the privilege of paying high prices
for comfortable quarters in the Temple, and of eating splendid dinners
in its ancient dining-room. Here Thackeray entered himself as a student
of jurisprudence, and in the character of Warrington in “Pendennis,” he
has developed the career of the students, and the varied life of the
Temple, in some of the best passages he has ever written. Henry Taylor,
the dramatist, author of Philip Van Artevelde, is among the residents of
the Temple, and is mentioned by the German Commentator as the original
of a character in Thackeray’s romance. We are at a loss to determine
which, for if Warrington be so intended, he seems to us to lose the
point. Warrington is a man of power without a career—Taylor, a man of
talent, who has certainly achieved a reputation quite equal to his just
claims. However, the Temple not only furnished our author characters,
but also the necessity of drawing them; for while there, and when
scarcely more than 23 years old, the young man had “fooled away” his
property, and was poor. The days of smoking, lounging, and “loafing”
were evidently ending, and he betook himself to Paris, conceiving, from
his facility in sketching, that he was born for an artist. A brief time
among the Parisian ateliers sufficed to remove this idea. But as his
step-father at this period established a journal in London, called “The
Constitutional,” the artist naturally became its Paris correspondent.
Thus, like Dickens, he commenced his literary career as a journalist. In
Paris, Thackeray met his present wife, an Irish lady of good family, and
married her.
From this time dates his first purely literary effort—the “Yellowplush
Papers,” afterward published as “Jeames’ Diary”—in which his
characteristic tendency is clearly indicated. The step-father’s
“Constitutional” absorbed most of his property, of course, and failed.
The son was obliged to return to England, and to begin work in earnest
for himself. He wrote for Frazer’s Magazine and literary reviews for
“The Times,” in which he ridiculed the early Bulwer style of
romance—the interesting burglars and romance murderers. But the public,
resolved upon enjoying the fascination of crime sentimentally described,
received his strictures coldly. The struggling author turned to the
humorous, sketchy style, to win an ear and gain a penny. Literary
friends, more fairly favored than he, opened their purses to him; but
his wife became insane, and is, at this day, the inmate of an asylum. He
worked industriously with his pen—he wrote the “Great Hoggarty
Diamond,” “The Snob Papers,” the “Irish Sketch Book,” “Journey from
Cornhill to Cairo,” “Our Street,” “Rebecca and Rowena,” “The
Kickleburies on the Rhine,” and smaller papers, under the name of
Michael Angelo Titmarsh; and Chambers’ Cyclopedia commended him, before
he was so universally known, as “a quiet observer.” In all these
sketches his characteristic power shows itself. The two last were
written after the great fame and success of “Vanity Fair;” but they are
only studies for his large pictures—and it may be noted as proof of his
genuine genius, that the completed figures are infinitely superior to
the designs, and it is in completing the picture from the speech, so
that it shall gain in meaning as well as in elaboration and size, that
the true artist is shown. Mr. Thackeray offered the MS. of “Vanity Fair”
to a magazine. The editor declined it. The author published it, and made
his name immortal. It was followed by “Pendennis,” a mellower, riper
fruit, to our fancy; but we have no thought of entering upon a criticism
of the author. His latest public literary work is the course of lectures
upon the wits of Queen Anne’s times, which has been read before literary
and fashionable London, and received with the greatest applause. Copious
abstracts were published in the leading journals, and there is little
doubt that they are quite worthy their author. Mr. Thackeray is now
understood to be engaged in completing a novel of which the scene is
laid among the persons and the times treated in his lectures.
Of Mr. Thackeray’s intention to visit the United States, we hear nothing
said. We think that there could be little doubt of the success of his
lectures here.
Tight Lacing.—In “Dickens’ Household Words,” we find a notice of the
first Evening School for Women opened at Birmingham for the instruction
of young women who labor in the factories during the day. The experiment
has been rewarded with complete success. It is solely under the charge
of ladies, who, with the most praiseworthy assiduity, devote their
evenings to the moral and intellectual culture of these poor sisters of
toil, adding
the force of example—even in matters of dress—to the
wisdom of precept. The following passage is worthy of the attention of
our fair readers.
“As to the matter of dress. There can be nothing but good in telling the
plain fact, that the most earnest and devoted of the ladies have found
it their duty to wear no stays, in order to add the force of example to
their efforts to save the young women who are killing themselves with
tight-lacing alone. One poor scholar died almost suddenly from tight
lacing alone. Another was, presently after, so ill, from the same abuse,
that she could do nothing. A third could not stoop to her desk, and had
to sit at a higher one, which suited the requirements of her
self-imposed pillory. In overlooking those who were writing, we were
struck by the short breathing of several of them. We asked what their
employments were, supposing them to be of some pernicious nature. It was
not so: all were cases of evident tight-lacing. The ugly walling-up of
the figure is a painful contrast to the supple grace of some of the
teachers. The girls see this grace, but will not believe, till convinced
by the feel, that there are no stays to account for it.
“‘And what have you got on?’ said one of the ladies, feeling in like
manner. ‘Why, you are perfectly walled up. How can you bear it?’
“‘Why,’ answered the girl, ‘I have got only six-and-twenty whalebones.’
“The lady obtained some anatomical plates, and formed a class of the
older women, apart from the rest, to whom she displayed the
consequences, in full, of this fatal practice. At the moment, they
appear to disbelieve the facts; but a little time shows that they have
taken the alarm—to what extent, the dress of their daughters, as they
grow up, will probably indicate.
“The number on the books of this school is about one hundred; the
average attendance is about fifty. The eagerness to attend is
remarkable; and the dread of losing their place through non-attendance
is testified in the strongest ways. Many are detained late at their work
on Friday evenings; but they come, if only for a quarter of an hour; or
if prevented, perhaps send a supplicating note that their place may not
be filled up.”
American Literature in England.—America is rising in literary greatness
with startling vigor. The spirit of progressive enlightenment is there
ever present, and the motto blazoned in the intellectual escutcheon of
the nation is, “Excelsior!” We were aware that a republic with a cheap
and unfettered press, and a system of public schools that brings the
means of an education within the limits of the humblest class of
society, must naturally have a co-existent amount of national
intelligence, which other nations with less advantages could not
possess. We have long been admirers of the genius of Cooper, Irving, and
Bryant; but it is only recently that we have been made acquainted with
the weird and subtle efforts of Edgar A. Poe, the remarkable power of
Hawthorne, the playful fancy of Holmes and Saxe, the beautiful melodies
of Morris, and the ingenious heart-picturings of Grace Greenwood, the
sisters Carey, Mrs. Kirkland, and Clara Moreton. The works of these
writers have contributed to increase our already formed admiration of
the remarkable freshness and vigor of intellect that is daily developing
itself in the United States; and it is with a joyous friendliness that
we recognize the growing claims of the young country to a place among
the literary nations of this era.—London Daily News.
Held in his idle moments, with his Readers, Correspondents and Exchanges.
Among the agreeable letters we have received from many of our
subscribers, upon the superior character of our June number, we make
room for the following. The remark of our correspondent upon the value
of newspaper notices we do not agree with, at least not in their
valuelessness, except in cases where they are “paid for” or solicited.
A frank expression of sentiment in regard to “Graham,” we invite, and
try sometimes to provoke a little captiousness—but the 1340 editors
with whom we exchange, will be honest in spite of us, and pronounce
“Graham” a great Magazine; and as these opinions coincide with that of
our correspondent, we must submit.
Cincinnati, May 23, 1852.
George R. Graham, Esq. }
Philadelphia: }
The reception of your Magazine for June, with “new type and paper,” and,
I may add, new attractions in the shape of an increase of “solid
matter,” reminds me of a promise made myself long ago—to write you a
letter expressive of earnest sympathy in your efforts, and hopes of your
ultimate success, in the publication of a journal worthy of our country
and yourself.
From month to month, since you resumed the management of “Graham,” I
have noticed a gradual yet sterling improvement in its pages, until the
June number relieves me from all anxiety as to its future course and
success. I congratulate you, my dear sir.
Now that “Opinions of the Press” are so profuse and so worthless,
(especially to the book-buyer,) I have thought a word of unsought,
unpaid for praise, might not be received unkindly from
A Subscriber.
A Fine Lithograph.—We have received from Messrs. Fetridge & Co., of
Boston, one of the finest specimens of the lithographic art that ever
commanded our attention. It is decidedly a credit to the artists and to
Boston. The subject of the picture is a representation of Miss E.
Kimberly, the celebrated Shaksperian reader and actress, in the
character of Isabella in “The Fatal Marriage.” It is from a
Daguerreotype by Southworth and Harvey, of Boston. Our readers will
recollect that this gifted young lady made her debut as a Shaksperian
reader in this city (Philadelphia) some two and a half years ago. Since
that time she has appeared in various cities, before large and
intelligent audiences, with entire success. Her reputation is fully
established on a remarkably intellectual and correct delineator of the
leading characters in the higher drama. She has now fully adopted the
stage as her profession; for, with the approbation of such a veteran in
histrionic matters as Thomas Barry, Esq., of the Broadway theatre, New
York, (who was her instructor,) there can be no question of her fitness
for the avocation. Her friends are sanguine that she will reach the
highest round in the ladder of histrionic fame. The likeness of her, now
before us, portrays the intensity of sorrow more vividly than the
portrait of any female actress, in character, we ever beheld.
The writer of the following asks us to forgive him for venturing into
the regions poetic, and begs us not to clip his wings. Well, we wont;
and shall say in his defense that there is a very sober and serious vein
of prose in his poesy, which it becomes some delinquents to study.
Clapping our hand upon our pocket, we can say with the wag,—“You’ll
find no change with us;” so, if the following only induces a few of our
subscribers to “do better,” the change will be duly recorded.
“Dear Graham, how ‘heavenly-minded’ you seem,
Slicing your steel through the poet’s young dream,
For you off with his wings, as you say, with a sweep,
And then push him over the dangerous leap;
Where wingless he falls through the phantomy air,
Shrieking his wail o’er the gulf of despair.
“You’re ‘tender to poets,’ God grant it be true,
For what would they be if it wasn’t for you,
Who seem made to carve poets, by slicing away
The parts they need most when upward they stray,
For what, my dear sir, could one do without wings
To carry aloft every lay that he sings.
“There are those, or have been, who need none at all,
For their writings are far too ethereal to fall,
They soar of themselves to the regions on high,
In musical numbers that never can die.
But then there are those, dearest sir, who in song
Soar not thus aloft, but are plodding along.
“Perhaps you will say it is better at once
To slice off their legs, or even their sconce,
Than to be badly bored as you’ve been before:
If so, this will bore you at least one time more;
I know this is bad, your censure’d be just,
But bore you this once, I shall, for I must.
“You say ‘Mr. Reader, we make our best bow,
And stand with our cap in our hand even now;
If you don’t like our rig, don’t turn up your nose,
But suggest us a change, and what’s proper propose.’
The change that I’d wish I will give at a glance—
It’s I wish all subscribers would pay in advance;
Then the two dollar fashion-plates would surely swing clear,
Instead of nine forty-five per month by the year.
“If I bore you much more I shall have to be quick,
For a message has come to me now from the sick,
And wishing your readers with plenty of tin
To knock at your sanctum and walk boldly in,
And fork out the rhino, three dollars apiece,
’Tis the change that I wish you—may it daily increase.
“For nothing I’ve found in this vain world of trouble
Will suit Eds like having their subscription-lists double;
Not only in names, but that each one will pay
In advance for the paper, and take it away.
Now I wish you, dear sir, in all good to increase,
With plenty of readers, and money, and peace.
“Orion.”
Fitzgerald’s City Item.—The other day this beautiful and ably conducted
weekly came to us clothed in a new suit of type, and printed upon white
and firm paper. The Item is now one of the largest, handsomest, and
certainly one of the ablest of our weeklies. All who take an interest in
Business, Literature, the Fine Arts, Music, and the Drama, are
recommended to subscribe to it. On these and kindred subjects, it has
ever been regarded as first-rate authority. Every family, every
gentleman and lady of taste and leisure in the country, should take
Fitzgerald’s City Item. It is furnished at the moderate price of $2 a
year, in advance. Address Fitzgerald & Co., 46 South Third street,
Philadelphia. (Post paid.)
Graham’s Magazine for June is a capital one, as usual. Graham don’t get
out any other kind but the best kind. He’s quiet, don’t brag; but he
does better, by publishing the best Magazine in
Philadelphia.—Perrysburg Star.
Well, yes, brother; we have learned the value of the adage as to “Brag
and Holdfast.” Hence our 112 pages were announced and have been
carried out in every number since January. Our wood-cuts are engravings.
Church, who has just enlarged his excellent Weekly, enlarges also upon
the value of Graham’s wood-cuts.
Wood Engraving.—The beautiful specimens of wood engraving, now
beginning to be seen in many of our modern publications, do, indeed,
indicate a marked improvement in that branch of pictorial embellishment,
over the rough unsightly cuts of a few years back, and at which now the
growing taste of the public eye would hardly glance. Nor can we indulge
these remarks without bestowing upon the printer his own success in
doing full justice to the engraver by clear and beautiful impression,
which surely depends upon him; and when he has the proper material in
ink and paper, our fine publications compare well with those from across
the water.
Our friend Graham has not been relax in his exertions to beautify his
agreeable monthly with fine embellishments in wood, and his numerous
patrons will be much more gratified with the results of Mr. Devereux’s
prolific pencil, than the smoky mezzotints which have so long intruded
upon the pages of magazinedom. We go for good legitimate line
engravings, either steel or wood, and nothing else. One of “Mote’s” gems
is worth a bushel of commonplace truck. We are right glad to see fine
wood specimens interlarded in the pages of Graham. Onward, say we, with
your well-stored monthly, rich in literature, beautiful in
embellishment. A large list is your sure reward. “To him who wills there
is no obstacle.”—Church’s Bizarre.
The New Volume.—The almost universal voice of the American Press, in
the notices of our June number, encourages us to great hopes for the
volume which commences with the present number. The elevated tone of the
work seems to meet with the entire approval of our readers, so far as we
can learn from letters received from all parts of the United States,
giving us ample warrant for a continuance of our efforts to render
“Graham” a Magazine of the very highest order.
If our friends will assist us in extending the circulation of “Graham”
for the next six months in their respective post-towns, we flatter
ourself that we shall open the volume in January next with a reputation
and circulation unequaled by any former volume of this Magazine. A word
to a neighbor may secure his co-operation; and as we send five copies
for six months at half the yearly club rates, the outlay will be but
small for each six months subscriber. Try it, friends!
The Family Friend.—Our friend Godman, of Columbia, S. C., has assumed,
we see, the entire responsibility of the publishing, as well as the
editorial department of his admirable weekly paper. That he may extend
its circulation, with all the rapidity its manifest merits should
insure, is our most sincere wish, and, to aid him, we offer Graham’s
Magazine and The Family Friend, one year, for Four Dollars, in advance.
A FRENCH IDEA.
To keep the mind intently fixed
On number one alone—
To look to no one’s interest,
But push along your own,
With the slightest reference
To how, or what, or when—
Eh bien! c’est la première Idée.
Napoléonienne.
To sneak into a good man’s house,
With sham credentials penned—
To sneak into his heart and trust,
And seem his children’s friend—
To learn his secrets, find out where
He keeps his keys—and then
To bone his spoons—c’est une Idée
Napoléonienne.
Bon Gaultier.
SMOKE NO JOKE!
Transcriber’s Notes:
Archaic spellings and hyphenation have been retained. Punctuation has been corrected
without note. Other errors have been corrected as noted below. For
illustrations, some caption text may be missing or incomplete due to condition of
the originals used for preparation of the ebook.
Page iii, Race. By Bon Gualtier ==> Race. By Bon Gaultier
Page iv, By Bon Gualtier ==> By Bon Gaultier
Page 7, quick retrogade movement ==> quick retrograde movement
Page 11, the unparalled number ==> the unparalleled number
Page 11, a detatched segment ==> a detached segment
Page 24, your poor old kinsnam ==> your poor old kinsman
Page 24, Nothwitstanding ==> Notwithstanding
page 25, of Gaudalupé” is said ==> of Guadalupé” is said
page 25, out to Gaudalupé, ==> out to Guadalupé,
page 26, gates of Gaudalupé ==> gates of Guadalupé
page 26, otter of roses ==> ottar of roses
page 27, Gaudalupé. The building ==> Guadalupé. The building
Page 27, others appying a handful ==> others applying a handful
page 27, tired of Gaudalupé ==> tired of Guadalupé
Page 29, the but-end of a song ==> the butt-end of a song
Page 32, One one side ==> On one side
Page 37, his eyes fixed stedfastly ==> his eyes fixed steadfastly
Page 40, errant of mercy ==> errand of mercy
Page 41, it its true ==> it is true
Page 49, Countess De Salins ==> Countess de Salins
Page 50, came down again to day ==> came down again to-day
Page 51, but cbme and see me ==> but come and see me
Page 51, received intimatioes ==> received intimations
Page 52, will comprohend the passing ==> will comprehend the passing
Page 52, twelve hours te me. ==> twelve hours to me.
Page 55, accuse himself at any moment of feeling like a scoun-
Count de Salins Nor do I comprehend how he could ==>
Count de Salins. Nor do I comprehend how he could
accuse himself at any moment of feeling like a scoun-
Page 57, it was done, Jeneatte ==> it was done, Jeanette
Page 57, Noalles is his confessor ==> Noailles is his confessor
Page 63, Monsieur de Lacey,” he said ==> Monsieur de Lacy,” he said
Page 65, you were the second, Loius ==> you were the second, Louis
Page 67, render him comfotrable. ==> render him comfortable.
Page 68, it is quite honor ==> it is quite an honor
Page 70, stories of Goliah ==> stories of Goliath
Page 76, like to to know ==> like to know
Page 79, in his frendly glance ==> in his friendly glance
Page 83, disappeared frow his lips ==> disappeared from his lips
Page 86, her rose-colored boddice ==> her rose-colored bodice
Page 91, callous protruberances ==> callous protuberances
Page 101, Cops and Turks reposing ==> Copts and Turks reposing
Page 107, district of Nablons ==> district of Nablus
Page 107, Anadolian carpets ==> Anatolian carpets
Page 108, The Bride of Lamermoor ==> The Bride of Lammermoor
Page 111, too etherial to fall ==> too ethereal to fall