In the First Methodist Episcopal Church, Auburn, New York,
On Sunday, June 20th, 1880.
“If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey
the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and that when
they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them, then shall
his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto
the elders of his city, and unto the gates of his place; and they
shall say unto the elders of his city: This our son is stubborn and rebellious;
he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.”—Deut.
xxi. 18-20.
We have had much teaching that has left the
impression on our minds that the soul is the
only source and seat of all the vice in human
life. Because it is written “The imaginations
of the thoughts of the natural heart, are only
evil continually,” total depravity has been
fixed on the spirit nature of man; that is, all the
bad or immoral elements entering into human
life have been attributed to the innate or inborn
ugliness of the soul. Accepting the Scriptural
truth that “the soul that sinneth, it shall die,” we have come to think that sin has its center,
seat, source and circumference in the soul, or
the immaterial nature of man. Hence we readily
admit the fact that influences, good or bad, may
pass over from the soul to the body, but we do
not so readily admit that other fact, equally
true, that influence good or bad may go over
from the body to the soul. The road over
which vicious thoughts and lustful imaginations
pass from the soul to the body is the highway
over which unbridled appetites, unrestrained
passions and unsubdued lusts in the body may
go to the soul, goading it to the wildest conceptions
of vice and lecherous imaginations. The
warm rays of the sun may gender rottenness in
the muddy pool; so also will the effluvia from
the pool poison the sunlight near it. The soul
by its vicious thoughts and imaginations will
entail an immoral tone on the body; so also
will the body react on the soul, by its appetites,
passions and propensities, increasing the viciousness
of the soul by pushing it to courses
of vice not directly and immediately its own.
In our text is found an illustration of this
thought. A father and mother bring their
stubborn and rebellious son to the elders of the
Jewish church. They assign, as the cause of
his stubbornness and rebellion, gluttony and
drunkenness, than which there are no vices
that demoralize the body more, or goad the
soul to greater crimes. Hear it:
“This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he
will not obey our voice, he is a glutton and a
drunkard.” That is, bad conditions of the
physical nature, wrought by gluttony and
drunkenness, have made him stubborn and rebellious.
It will not help the case to say that
his stubbornness and rebellion caused his
gluttony and drunkenness, for if they did, then
his soul must act on the body. His morals
must influence his manners, and therefore his
manners must reflect on his morals; they must
interact, which is just the point we make; that
his appetite and lust fire the temperament or disposition,
and a fiery disposition provokes appetite
and lust to wilder indulgences.
A remarkable fact, in this day of advanced
science and revelation, is that Christians and
moralists in their work of reform have paid so
little attention to the influence of the body on
the soul. Jesus Christ more than any other
teacher or reformer recognized the demoralizing
and debasing influence of bad bodily conditions.
Hence he almost always healed maladies of the
body before he entered his principles upon the
soul. It is true that his many miracles on the
bodies of men were primarily intended to reveal
his divinity; yet divinity in its manifestations
always runs over the whole line of the natural
before passing into the supernatural; therefore
Christ’s miracles on the bodies of men had a
sanitary side to them. The man with the leprosy
was in the poorest condition bodily to hear
favorably any talk about moral sweetness;
hence Christ healed his diseased body, in connection
with his moral teachings. His example
with the blind and hungry and deaf in this respect
ought not to go for nothing with those of
us who seek to save men in our day. Philanthropists
and Christians for the most part have
overlooked the power of a debased body on the
soul. They forget that Paul likens a body that
has sinful habitudes to a thing of death, as
compared with the soul that seeks to live the
new life in Christ Jesus. Therefore good men
have labored to create in themselves and those
whom they seek to reform, certain emotional
conditions of the spirit, by a tenacious adherence
to creeds, or the patient performance of a
set round of religious duties, and all this regardless
of bad physical conditions begotten by
bad habits of eating and drinking. While they
have been struggling to bring their own souls
and the souls of others into holy attitudes, all
the basilar forces of the body have run riot
within, and perhaps beyond, the pale of human
customs and human laws. If you want to
empty a boiler of steam, it will not help you
much by lifting the safety valve if you still
keep water in the boiler and fire in the furnace.
Prayer, Bible reading and Psalm singing will
not help a man much to get rid of his sins, if
he keeps up a set of bodily habits which fire
the body and inflame the soul to continue its
sinning. That you may see the connection
more clearly between vice and victuals, let me
show you how food may damage our bodies
and demoralize our souls.
I am fully aware of the difficulties I encounter
in entering this thought on your minds.
Because religion has been considered as having
little or nothing to do with the body, I shall
encounter the settled opinions of good men to
this effect. Because our popular methods of
eating have the sanction of custom and the defense
of long established habits, I may not
criticise them without losing the favor of those
who are content with things as they are. Because
I shall call in question many indulgences
of appetite hitherto considered sinless, I shall
run the risk of being called a fanatic or fool.
Because I shall preach the New Testament
doctrine of self-denial many will say this is a
hard saying—“who can bear it?” But with
the hope that I may unfold to you a glorious
realm of liberty from the bondage of bodily
propensities, I cheerfully do my duty and leave
the consequences for God to look after.
Very few of us are aware of the great physical
demoralization and spiritual wickedness,
brought on us and our children, by bad habits
of eating, as to the kind of food, the mode of
its preparation, and the manner and times of
taking it. We refuse to think of our indulgences
of appetite as the cause of our physical
ailments and premature death, and much less
will we allow ourselves to believe that these indulgences
have anything to do with forming
our morals or shaping our characters or determining
our eternal destiny.
And yet I aver, without the fear of successful
refutation, that three-fourths of all our bodily
ailments or diseases, and many of our immoral
acts, are the legitimate results of improper
dietetic habits. If these habits do not effect us
directly, they do so indirectly by lowering the
tone of the whole system, physical and moral,
causing us to break down prematurely into
some disease or deviltry, under the pressure of
legitimate toil or immoral provocation. How
is it possible to account for the death of one
half the human family before five years of age,
unless we trace it to the violation of physical
laws in some way connected with the eating
habits alike of parent and child? Many children
enter the world with such a low state of
inherited physical vitality, and so little moral
tone, that they are unable to resist the attacks
of bodily disease or throw it off when on them,
and much less able to throw off moral disease
and rise above their immoral heritage if spared
to pass through childhood to years of maturity.
Such children not only carry in their little
bodies the physical weaknesses of their parents,
but also the specific immoral tendencies found
in the conditions of their parentage. And
more than this, should their endowment of vitality
be sufficient to carry them over the death
line for infants, they are subject to such unnatural
relations to dress and diet that it becomes
a natural impossibility for them to live. In this
way many children die prematurely, not by
the arbitrary edict of God, but by the violation
of law. And if God should save their lives by
special suspension of his laws, more damage
would be done to the moral harmony of the
universe than to let them die. I know it is
a common custom to ascribe all sickness and
death to the direct and arbitrary action of Divine
Providence. That is, if one overeats, or eats
innutritious food, or at improper times, making
himself sickly, so that he becomes an easy prey
to disease, and dies suddenly or at the noon
tide of life, all the good people say—“What a
strange Providence!” As if God had everything
to do with such a death, and the deceased had
little or nothing to do with it. I incline to the
opinion that Divine Providence has little or
nothing to do with such deaths only in so far as
Divine Providence is in the laws of life violated.
The primary cause of all premature deaths is
violated law. God does not arbitrarily kill
anybody. Most of those who die in infancy or
in early life, come to death by the violation of
God’s laws written in their bodies. If these
laws were obeyed in us and in our ancestry,
most of us ought to live beyond three score
years and ten, and drop from this life into the
other in a ripe, mellow old age, just as ripe
fruit drops from its bough in autumn time.
But you ask where is God in the many untimely
deaths that occur? I answer He is present in
his great hearted goodness to help the dying to
an eternal victory over death, if they will only
let Him. He is present to bind up the hearts
that are breaking with sorrow for the departed,
and to make a sudden, untimely, and needless
death a monument of warning to those still
living, thus making the wrath of man to praise
Him. If therefore our children die in infancy,
because we have entailed on them feeble bodies
by our violation of law, God does not kill them,
but they die through violated law, and he in
His goodness takes the little ones to His bosom,
the seat and source of all law. Let us not then
charge our sorrows to the willful enactment of
our Heavenly Father. He taketh no pleasure
in the death of him that dieth. When he gives
life to us, He intends that we shall keep it as
long as possible.
Having given us life, all the forces of His
boundless nature are engaged to maintain it in
us until He is ready to harvest us as the farmer
does the ripened grain. The God of nature and
the God of grace are not in antagonism. “The
one God is in all and over all.” A kingdom
divided against itself cannot stand. If, therefore,
we die this side of three score years and
ten—seventy years—we die untimely. It is
high time that good men were awake to this
fact, and ceased charging over to Divine Providence
what legitimately belongs to ourselves.
“Jesus Christ came to destroy him that hath
the power of death, that is the devil;” and
when the philosophy of Jesus is wrought up
into human lives by obedience to physical laws,
the power of disease and death over our bodies
will be very much broken. The victory over
death can be so far achieved by men in the
body that they need not die until their minds
and hearts have received all the development
in this world that infinite love ordains. That is,
men may so baffle the monster of death by
obedience to law as to keep him at bay until
their souls have taken on such Christly ripeness
that they shall burst and break their bodies,
as the ripening chestnuts break their burrs
under the frosts of autumn. We have, therefore,
no right to ascribe to supernatural agency
any phenomena which can be explained on
natural principles. Disobedience to law brings
penalties. There is nothing that men need to
see more in their efforts at reform than the connection
between their sufferings and their disobedience.
Now, disobedience to the laws of life
brings the penalties, sickness and premature
death. There is no field where our disobedience
manifests itself more frequently and with so
little thought of consequences, as in our false
and unnatural habits of eating and drinking,
which damage the body and demoralize the
soul.
“The Blood is the Life.” This is the declaration
alike of revelation and of science. Evolutionary
processes may induce a variation in
the form or number of the blood corpuscles,
but they can not set aside the law that the
building and rebuilding of all the organs involved
in bodily or mental acts comes from
the blood alone. The physical, mental and
moral natures are so intimately connected that
that which affects one, affects the others. So
that a man’s mental and moral nature, as well
as his physical, can very largely be determined
by the quality of his blood. Now it is a physiological
fact that our blood is made out of the
food we eat. That food which enters the mouth
and is assimilated, makes blood. By the
marvelous processes of digestion and assimilation
our food is transformed into blood; and
the blood passing through the veins and arteries
repairs the waste tissues and forms new ones,
thus building up our bodies and sustaining life.
It follows then that our bodies are made of the
food we eat. Evidently it was the design of
our Creator that the prime object of eating
should be the building up of tissue—muscles,
bones and brains. That this may be a pleasure
to us, He has associated with eating the delights
of appetite. But most of us have so far perverted
the divine order as to make the pleasures
of appetite the chief object of eating. “Give
us something good to eat,” is the great cry of
humanity, and the goodness of food is gauged
by the sensations of the palate and not by the
law of nutrition. Most of us determine the
goodness of our food by the amount of sensual
delight it imparts to the palate, no matter how
much damage it may do beyond to the delicate
and intricate structure of the stomach and
viscera. Hence a vast amount of food enters
the mouth that makes bad blood, blood that in
itself is corrupt, and carries poisonous particles
to every organ in the system, putting us
in splendid condition to be easily provoked to
some outburst of anger, passion or revenge.
My hearers, there is a sure and vital connection
between bad blood and bad morals. Blood
always tells in morals as well as in muscles.
Blood has power throughout the whole realm
of life, whether it be in a human body, in society,
or in the body of a horse on the racecourse.
You ask, what kind of food makes bad blood?
I answer, very much of the flesh of animals, that
forms the staple diet of most of us. Sty-fed
pigs and stall-fed oxen are fattened under the
most unlawful and unhealthful conditions possible;
shut up in the dark, cut off from exercise,
the fat deposited on their bodies is made
up of the waste matter that the life-forces of the
animal have been unable to expel. This waste
fatty matter, surcharged with unexpelled excretions,
is liable to induce disease in all who
consume it. It has established tuberculosis in
captive lions, and in cats and dogs, and in other
carnivora; and it were folly to assume that
mankind, feeding upon such poisonous food,
should wholly escape. Even in the living animal
this effete unexpelled poisonous waste
breeds vermin, such as have been found in pork,
which cannot be destroyed by ordinary cooking
or by the process of digestion, and hence live
and generate in the human body, producing disease
and death. I am not now making a plea
for the absolute disuse of animal food, but
against the bad quality of very much of it, and
also against the inordinate use of that which
may be good in quality. A certain amount of
animal food is useful for our nourishment, especially
in winter time, because of its heat producing
qualities. But meat every day, and at
every meal, is in no way necessary for the
proper sustenance of the human system.
The use of large quantities of animal food,
however free from disease-germs, as a staple
article of diet makes the blood gross, coarse and
corrupt, filling the body with scrofulous elements,
sending poison to every part of the system,
causing it to break out in running sores,
salt-rheum, tetter and the like, producing an
inordinate appetite, throwing every organ of
the body into frictional relations to every other
organ. It is a matter of every-day surprise to
me that any human being will consent to eat
the flesh of pigs. Consider their uncleanness,
their selfish, greedy habits, the vast amount of
corruption that enters into their bodies, their
want of exercise, their impure breathing, their
lack of sudorific glands or emunctories,
through which effete tissues and morbid accumulations
may be expelled; and think, when
you eat pork, of the train of horrid elements
which enter into your body. And your body
thus debased by a low order of animal flesh,
the effect must be to make you take on the disposition
and tendencies of the hog. God’s bill
of fare in the eleventh chapter of Leviticus
excluded from the tables of the Jews the hog
and all water animals except those that had
fins and scales. This bill of fare was given to
the Jews not only for the preservation of their
health, but, as God’s great purpose was moral
reform, He had an eye single to their moral
condition in the matter of their eating. Does
any one doubt that the unhealthy, ugly, and
vicious elements that make up the flesh of most
of the animals we eat, enter our blood, and in
that way affect the disposition or carriage of
the soul? I am confident, if there was less demand
for animal food the quality would be
very much better. Animals would not be subject
to false and unhealthy generation, and
false and hasty methods of growth. They
would come up more in keeping with the laws
of their nature, and come to us with more
healthy and better qualities. As for the hog,
if man would not domesticate him, he could
not propagate his species. He would become
extinct just like the lion, leopard, and hyena,
under the march of civilization. As the blessings
of civilized life reach us, you notice the
carnivorous or flesh-eating animals become
extinct. So it seems to me that with the developments
of civilization there ought to be such
moral refinements in human beings that they
would grow away from their carnivorous tendencies,
and eat such food as tends to develop
the mental and moral faculties, and not the
animal propensities. Among animals you find
that those that live on the flesh of other animals
are the most vicious and destructive, such
as the lion, leopard, and hyena. Those animals
that live on the grains and the higher
order of foods are the best, most beautiful,
and most useful, such as the horse and cow.
If this law obtains among animals, why not
among men? Beyond a doubt it does. If you
want proof of this, study the character and
lives of those who live largely on animal food,
and you will find them very animal-like in all
their relations—restive, impatient, passionate,
ugly in their ways, fiery in their disposition,
easily provoked, readily put out of humor.
And if you could look into their private lives
you would find all their baser qualities having
the fullest sway, stopping, it may be, inside
the fence of human laws and customs, but seldom
considering the claims of a higher and
divine law. I charge, then, very much of our
household misery, domestic woe, and connubial
wretchedness, to unrestrained lust begotten
in the body by the inordinate use of animal
food.
We forget, my hearers, that the great law of
nature, “Like produces like,” is universal.
“Every seed after its kind is the law of all
creation.” There is no exception to this law.
This principle obtains not only in the production
of life, but in the processes of its development.
If my position about the intimacy of
soul and body is true, then, if a man’s body is
made up chiefly of flesh taken from diseased
animals, and his whole physical frame is saturated
with the irritating and exciting condiments
of what is popularly called good food,
the whole bias of his bodily powers will be
toward animalism. All the impressions and
impulses that the soul receives from such a
body are beastly and debasing. Like produces
like in the formation of physical tissue out of
food, as well as in the generation of stock in
the stall. Hence I hold that very much of the
wickedness of mankind is the natural expression
of physical beastliness rather than the outflow
of innate viciousness. A body made up
largely of all manner of nerve-goading, passion-producing,
anger-generating elements,
such as are found in the gross animal dishes
with their stimulating adjuncts, just as surely
drives the soul to sin as a tempest drives a
feather before it.
As modern research has proved that bad or
imperfect food when digested surely makes bad
or imperfect blood, incapable of performing its
appointed work of upbuilding and of reparation,
so has science demonstrated that perfect
food is one of the most potent among remedies
for the relief of many diseased conditions.
Since the blood is the life, and since blood is
merely food emulsified, mingled with certain
digestive fluids and colored by the oxygen with
which it is brought in contact in the lungs—it
is easy to understand how perfect food may
create perfect blood, which shall presently
supplant that which is feeble, that which is
lacking in waste-repairing power, that which
fails to give strength to the muscles or vigor to
the brain, and may thus become the most
effective medicine. A perusal of recent professional
medical literature evinces the great
stress which is now laid upon dietetics in the
treatment of all diseases. The approach to this
high altitude has been gradual, but sure. At
first foods were made the vehicles for drugs;
and cod-liver oil and malt-extracts, which are
only concentrated foods of the hydro-carbon
varieties, were loaded with lime and iron and
strychnine and phosphorous and scores of
other drugs. But perfect results were secured
by the use of these foods without the drug
additions, and so the foods were at last given
the credit which all along belonged to them.
And so it has come to pass that with advanced
medical men, in a vast majority of cases of
sickness, the support of the life-powers by
proper nutrients is the foremost thought, the
best food proving to be the best medicine.
The kind of food a man eats, and the time
and manner of his eating it, are not merely a
question of medicine, but one of the first questions
of morals. The effects of food on the
passions and feelings are thus described by
Prior:
“Observe the various operations
Of food and drink in several nations;
Was ever Tartar fierce and cruel
Upon the strength of water gruel?
But who shall stand his rage and force
When first he rides, then eats, his horse?
Salads and eggs and lighter fare,
Tune the Italian spark’s guitar;
And if I take Don Confrere right,
Pudding and beef make Britons fight.”
If, therefore, our meat has something to do
with our morals, or if our food in some way
affects our faith, it seems to me that many of
our efforts at moral reform ought to be preceded
by instruction in hygiene. In other
words, efforts to make a man genuinely devotional
ought to be prefaced by efforts to correct
bad dietetic habits. A father, by prayer and
precept and flogging, had done his best to reform
his boy, whose staple diet was meat and
sausage and pie and cake at his meals, with
lunch between. The family physician said to
the father, “If you will put a leech back of
each of your boy’s ears once a week for a
month, you will do more to reform him than
your preaching and pounding will do in a
year.” The father asked for the philosophy
of this prescription. “Why,” said the doctor,
“your boy has bad blood, and too much of it;
he must behave badly or he would burst.”
“Then,” said the father, “I’ll change his diet
from beef and pie to hominy and milk.” In
three months thereafter a better boy for his
age could not be found in the neighborhood.
The acrid, biting, evil blood had not become
food for leeches, but it had done its wicked
work and passed away, and a cooler, blander,
purer, safer blood had been supplied from
sweeter, gentler food sources.
In your use of animal food be very particular
as to quality and quantity. Lamb and
mutton are considered the most healthy by the
authorities. Avoid as you would contagion
the use of pork, unless you raise it yourselves,
and feed it with good grain, and not the refuse
of the house or barn, and keep the animals as
clean as you do your pet dogs. Never fry
your meat with hogs’ lard, but stew, bake,
boil, or broil it. Use hogs’ lard in no form for
cooking. Most of it is said to be reeking with
scrofulous elements. Displace it in all your
cooking by milk or butter. If you want to
aid and not hinder the growth of your soul
Godward, if you desire to have pure
thoughts and a pure heart and a pure life, see
that you make your blood out of pure food, or
you will find that your soul will have an enemy
within the castle of its body more treacherous
and deadly than any of its enemies
without.
There is another popular article of food
among us, which has a vital connection with
bodily disorders and bad exhibition of character.
Good in proper quantities and in its
sphere, when made the largest and chief article
of diet, for every meal, the one kind of food
upon which we depend most for building up
the wastes of our bodies, it indirectly does
great damage. I refer to the ordinary fine
flour bread made out of bolted wheat meal.
It is proper to remember that the white flour
from which our bread is chiefly made, and
which is deemed the staff of life, is a purely
artificial product—a selection from that perfect
food combination which exists in wheat. A
competent food chemist has compared the regular
milling processes to one by which the fat
part of an ox should be saved for food, and the
lean part—the albuminous or nitrogenous portion—discarded
and given to the dogs. The
comparison is well based, since the starch of
wheat, which is valued because of its whiteness,
is a carbo-hydrate, chemically allied to
the fat of meat; while the dark nutriment of
wheat, which, because of its color, is discarded
with the bran with which it is found in
contact in nature, is a vegetable nitrogenous
albumen, rich in mineral elements, and almost
identical, chemically, with the lean or muscular
tissue of beef.
The process of bolting or refining takes from
the wheat most of the phosphates and nitrates,
the elements that are chiefly required for
making nerves, muscles, bones, and brains.
The phosphates and nitrates being removed by
bolting, very little remains in the flour except
the starchy carbonates, the heat and fat producing
elements. The use of fine flour bread
as a staple article of food introduces too much
heat and fat-producing elements into the system,
and where there is too much carbon or
heating substance, it tends rather to provoke
the system to unnatural and abnormal action,
and instead of serving as an element to warm
the body, its tendency is to burn or consume,
heating and irritating all the organs, getting
one into that state which is popularly known
as “hot-blooded.”
The fine white flour ordinarily used has two-thirds
of the nitrogenous and mineral nutriment
that God put in the wheat taken out.
Unless these deficiencies are made up by some
other foods, the exclusive use of fine flour
bread will leave the nerves and bones poorly
nourished, producing in some systems nervousness,
dyspepsia, and all the physical ills
that follow these diseases, together with impatience,
fretfulness, and irritability. God intended
that all the nutritive properties He put
in the wheat should stay in it for purposes of
symmetrical nourishment. Fine flour bread
may be used for purposes of producing heat in
the system, but it does not feed hungry nerves
or starving bones.
One reason why children fed chiefly on white
bread feel hungry nearly all the time, and demand
so much food between meals, is found in
the fact that their bodies are insufficiently
nourished. Their bones and nerves not receiving
the nitrates and phosphates they need, are
suffering from hunger.
When children are fed with food that thoroughly
nourishes their whole system, they will
seldom desire to eat between meals and thus retard
the process of digestion and lay the foundation
for dyspepsia and all its kindred evils.
Flour made of all the nutriment of pure
white wheat, unbolted, yet without the shell or
husk or bran, contains all the elements necessary
for the nourishment of the body. The
flour called Graham flour rarely contains these
elements. There is a great deal of bogus stuff
in the market, which has brought the genuine
article into disrepute, and made many thoughtful
people disgusted with everything in that
line. Very much that is called Graham flour is
made up of a mixture of fine bolted flour, and
the woody fibre of the wheat, which has no
nutriment in it at all. This wretched fabrication
has tended to make all whole wheat
products unpopular. The woody bran is
worse than worthless as food, or to mix with
food. You might as well eat the shells of nuts,
or the husks of corn, or the skins of potatoes,
as the silex coats of wheat. To overload the
alimentary canal with such foreign indigestible
matter has no other tendency but to
weaken and debilitate it. Very few millers
trouble themselves to make a perfect whole
wheat flour. I know but one establishment in
the world where wheat and other grains are
treated precisely as they should be, with all
the harmful part removed and the rest made
digestible by harmless methods, and that is the
Health Food Company of New York.[1]
Bread leavened, or unleavened, made out of
what is called the Cold Blast Whole Wheat
Flour, makes more muscle and furnishes more
food for the nerves than any other article of
food given to man except the pure gluten of
wheat. I am not now advocating the views of
the extremists, the Grahamites, neither do I
counsel the disuse of fine flour bread. This
latter should be used in connection with unbolted
flour, but should not be relied on to
furnish you with all the nutritious elements
that your bodies need. There is a golden mean
between the extremes of vegetarianism and exclusive
flesh diet which the common sense of
thoughtful people will find. During the warm
season a diet made up chiefly of fruits, grains,
and vegetables will be most healthful for body
and soul. Instead of the scrofula-breeding
pork or ham for breakfast, use some one of the
great variety of grains, especially oat-meal,
than which there are few better foods for growing
children and hard working adults. Instead
of fried cakes, rich pastry, and candies, use
fruit, of which there is an abundant variety,
ten-fold more nourishing than pies or cakes,
and very cleansing to the blood. Let brown
bread, Johnnie-cake, and corn-meal pudding
supplant fine wheat bread as much as possible.
Eat your meals regularly and slowly, eating
nothing between them. Eat sparingly of meat
at mid-day, and let it be good fresh beef, mutton,
or fish, well cooked. Let the evening meal
be taken not later than six o’clock. Discard
tea and coffee, and make your own coffee with
browned crusts of bread, or burned whole
wheat.[2] Follow these suggestions and you will
find very many of the ills of your body departing
and very many of the troubles you have
in behaving yourselves, vanishing.
Again, we derange our bodies and demoralize
our souls by eating too much. The great
end of life with many of us is to eat. The
American dining-room has become, for the most
part, a place for the indulgence of animalism,
and not for the development of the affections
or social qualities. A distinguished American
physician said: “I am sixty-six years old, and
I have eaten enough food to answer my wants
for 100 years, and yet I am what most people
call a small eater.” The popular habit of using,
inordinately, appetizers in the shape of the
ordinary table condiments, begets a false and
unnatural appetite. The time comes when
honest food palls upon the depraved senses.
The pampered, jaded appetite no longer finds
satisfaction in simple food-flavors; the palate
must be prompted with pungent things. The
cook, who is never a physiologist, responds to
the demand for spurs to appetite, and finds
them in mixtures of spices and peppers and
mustards and acids and essential oils and
chemicals, and multitudes of non-food substances.
With these, and various biting alcohols,
the delicate lining of the stomach is inflamed,
inducing a desire for food which
passes for what it is not, namely, honest
appetite. The palate demands more food than
the stomach can digest or the system assimilate.
Poor nature, anxious to do the best she
can, adapts herself to the unnatural situation,
and forces all the other organs to do the same;
and thus we become accustomed to over-eating
and do not know it.
That all who accustom themselves to a stimulating
diet, to spices and wines and other irritating
things, consume too much food, cannot,
I think, be gainsayed. The amount and kind
of food needed depends upon the individual
habits and the kind of waste to be supplied. A
wholly idle man should thrive well on cucumbers
and water-melons, which are chiefly water;
while the hard-working hod-carrier would
demand several pounds of solid carbon and
nitrogen daily. It is the sedentary, the well-to-do,
the man of leisure, who suffers most
from over-eating; and it behooves him to carefully
avoid all goads and spurs to appetite.
With the simplest flavors he is nearly certain
to over-eat and thus to suffer. With an appetite
stimulated and induced, without corresponding
out-door labor to create a genuine need and
demand for it, digestive failure and assimilative
bankruptcy is only a question of time.
The stomach, overloaded, performs its work
imperfectly, and thus imposes on all the organs
an extra amount of work, which breaks them
down prematurely, causing diseases of every
kind, such as nervous headache, sick headache,
rush of blood to the head, apoplexy, sore
eyes, deafness, erysipelas, neuralgia of the
face, decayed teeth, catarrh, bronchitis, asthma,
nausea, common colic, congestion of the liver,
and a host of other diseases too unpleasant to
mention. In some cases there is a disposition
of too much fatty matter in the system; and
many people suppose that fatness is a sign of
healthfulness, which is false. No one needs
any more fat on his body than is essential to
form cushions for his tendons and muscles; if
too much, there is a depletion of strength.
The crowded and overloaded condition of the
system makes the body take on very many
false manifestations. The irritation produced
in an overcharged system manifests itself in
different forms in different individuals. In some
it produces nervousness, making them rack
the flesh off their bones and keeping them poor;
and in others it produces sluggishness, retaining
defunct matter in the system, making them
corpulent. As I have said, our highly-seasoned
foods create morbid and abnormal appetites.
As a consequence we eat too much and too
often, the system being borne down by overwork
in its digestive department, there comes
a demand for stimulating drinks and medicines
to take off the depression and to keep up tone;
and to make ourselves feel good, after having
made ourselves feel bad, by improper eating,
some of us resort to tea and coffee, and others
to alcohol, and then the excitement produced
demands a sedative, and some of us smoke and
others chew a poisonous weed called tobacco.
Thus the poor body, subject to these revulsions
of unnatural action in overwork and stimulation
and sedation, is goaded to abnormities
and unnatural action, sending up to the soul
no other influences but those which drive it to
moral madness and vicious deeds.
Now, vice is a morbid exhibition of the will.
The will is represented through the physical
organ, the brain, and the brain is straightway
affected by the condition of the body and the
state of the blood. The will is that power of
the mind by which we put forth volitions and
perform actions. If the pressure of bad blood
is on the brain, that same pressure is on the
will; hence a sick man or a diseased man will
do a great many bad things through the power
of bad blood on the will. Vice, then, is both
the result and cause of physical derangement.
Hence that vice of vices, drunkenness.
Drunkenness may be caused by bad physical
conditions, brought about by bad habits of
eating. Would it not be well for us to look
into bad table habits for one of the reasons
why so many of our young men become drunkards?
May there not be some cause working
in the flesh of our youths, driving them to intemperance?
May it not be possible that kind
fathers and mothers for years have been filling
up the awful gap of 40,000 dead drunkards
annually by feeding their children upon stimulating,
highly-seasoned, innutritious foods?
There is no doubt in my mind that every man
is a glutton before he is a drunkard. If nature’s
laws are violated, a man’s sensations will
be all abnormal, and the mainsprings of his
life will be befouled, and the result will be
irregular and vicious expressions of all the
appetites, both for food and drink. I am,
therefore, confident that the widespread appetite
for intoxicating liquors is largely due to
the false relations that the American people
hold to their food. We cannot hope much
from moral suasion and legal enactments so
long as we overlook the physical condition of
the drunkard. If you would cure disease or
vice effectually, you must shut off that which
nourishes them, instead of putting all your
force in efforts to antidote them. “Let the
wicked forsake his way,” and then turn unto
the Lord, and he will have mercy on him, and
to our God, and he will abundantly pardon
him. There are 200,000 drunkards in the
United States, 40,000 of whom go annually to
premature graves. There are 20,000 prostitutes,
whose average life in their profession is
four years. Do you believe this vast army of
immortals go willingly to ruin? There are
causes lying back of mere perversities of soul
in the common every-day dietetic habits of
these forlorn ones.
Eating and drinking are always associated
with the bar and brothel, and if you will take
notice, the eating is always of that kind of food
which goes straight for the animal nature, and
wakes up in a man everything that is beastly.
The whole tendency of the food furnished at
the popular bar-room restaurant is to stir the
baser elements in humanity and keep up the
demand for alcoholic stimulants. No wonder
the drinking saloons can afford to give what
they call a “free lunch.” Care is taken to
furnish such food as fires the appetite for strong
drink, and the rum-seller gets his pay for his
“free lunch” through the sale of the whisky
that must inevitably follow it. Those who,
living on highly stimulating foods, but do not
drink strong drinks, will find that the bias of
their bodily powers, instead of being toward
mental and spiritual spheres, will be toward
animal indulgences, dragging the mind and
soul into servitude to the flesh, and where there
are any moral aspirations, making the conflict
between the higher and lower nature so intense
that a vast amount of moral force is wasted in
self-conflict that ought to go into the world’s
redemptive agencies for saving the lost.
I am confident that the American habit of
eating sumptuous and late suppers, whether at
our homes or church fairs or festivals, is damaging
the physical, mental, and moral health
of our nation more than any other one thing of
its kind; more damaging, because it has the
appearance of innocency, and the sanction of
our fathers and mothers and some of our pastors.
Furthermore, the habit of eating hurriedly,
or hastily, is preying upon the vital and moral
forces of many of us. A meal eaten hastily or
nervously, under the pressure of intense mental
activity or nervous tension, or great weariness,
begins its work of nutrition under the
greatest possible disadvantage. All our meals
should be eaten calmly and deliberately, so as
to thoroughly masticate the food, and not impose
on the stomach and viscera the legitimate
work of the teeth. In the interest of health to
soul as well as body I enter an earnest plea for
more time for eating, and especially at noon,
when most hard working people take their
principal meal. Clerks, business men, and
school teachers, mechanics, laborers, and our
children who attend the public schools, need
more time at noon to properly dispose of the
chief meal of the day. No better investment
could be made to secure the best possible physical,
intellectual, financial, and moral returns
than for all classes of people to take two hours
at mid-day for resting and eating dinner. Selfish
greed demands otherwise, and makes a
show of gain; but the loss is sure to come in
due time to all parties concerned.
My friends, when will we fast-living, fast-eating,
fast-working, and fast-dying Americans
learn the great lesson, that life is a
unit, that the Divine Trinity in us, namely,
the physical, intellectual, and spiritual, is one
life, with different phases of expression; and
whatever mars one mars the whole, and whatever
builds up one most surely builds up
the others? All our powers are many members
in one body, with an inter-dependence
which is eternal. Slight your body, and you
smite your soul and enervate the mind. Corrupt
the mind, and you debase both body and
soul. When will those who profess to be God’s
children by the adoption of the Holy Ghost,
catch the Spirit of His great Apostle Paul,
who, more than any other sacred writer, maintained
the sanctity of the human body and its
subservience to the mind and soul. Hear him:
“I beseech you, brethren, by the mercies of
God that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice,
holy, acceptable unto God, which is your
reasonable service, and be not conformed to
this world, but be ye transformed by the renewing
of your minds, that ye may prove what is
that good and acceptable and perfect will of
God.” I admit the power of the Holy Ghost
in the work of regeneration, but is there not
something for us to do, in keeping our bodies
under, “lest we become cast-aways?”
I do not say that all human evils and ills
have their primary origin in physical habits,
but I do say that the great mass of impulsions
from the excited, inflamed, over-stimulated
body toward the soul, are in the interests of
sin. The economy of salvation orders otherwise.
By the Gospel the body may become
the temple of the Holy Ghost. By the law of
self-denial of the New Testament, our bodies,
with all their fiery elements, may be made an
inspiration to our souls. It is not the purpose
of God that a life-time warfare shall be kept
up between the body and the soul. There
ought to come to every true Christian a day of
final victory over his bodily powers, in which
they will cease their rebellion, and come into
the sweetest union with the soul in its great
work of developing a likeness to Christ.
Why are we called upon to present the body
a living sacrifice to God, if its powers are not
to be sanctified to holy purposes? Why should
we spend all our life waiting for the adoption
of our whole nature, to wit, the redemption of
the body, as well as the soul.
Our fondest dreams for the progress of humanity
must be based in a newly created body
by strict obedience to the laws of God, written
on every fibre, tissue, muscle, and bone. We
cannot develop the human brain and heart to
the possibilities that God has put in them,
while they are the tenants of bodies the laws
of which are violated in the commonest habits
of every-day life.
Regeneration does a mighty work for us;
but generation has also much to do with our
highest and best development. The sins of the
fathers must cease, so that the sons may be
spared their terrible visitations; the accumulated
virtues of parents must roll over on their
children in purer, stronger, and better bodies
until by a blessed economy the whole race shall
be exalted to heirship with Christ through
loving obedience to all the laws of physical as
well as moral life.
Why may we not now, under the laws of
redemption, begin to build a new heaven and a
new earth, new souls and new bodies. If our
souls are redeemed and renewed by obedience
and faith, why not secure also the redemption
of our bodies? I know it is slow work to
teach the subtle but mighty elements of self-restraint.
I know the flesh lusteth against the
spirit. Yet I thank God who giveth us the
victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.