TO R. W. EMERSON[42]
(AT CONCORD).
Fire Island Beach,
Thursday morning, July 25, 1850.
Dear Friend,—I am writing this at the house of
Smith Oakes, within one mile of the wreck. He is the
one who rendered most assistance, William H. Channing
came down with me, but I have not seen Arthur
Fuller, nor Greeley, nor Marcus Spring. Spring and
Charles Sumner were here yesterday, but left soon.
Mr. Oakes and wife tell me (all the survivors came, or
were brought, directly to their house) that the ship
struck at ten minutes after four A. M., and all hands,
being mostly in their nightclothes, made haste to the
forecastle, the water coming in at once. There they
remained; the passengers in the forecastle, the crew
above it, doing what they could. Every wave lifted the
forecastle roof and washed over those within. The first
man got ashore at nine; many from nine to noon. At
flood-tide, about half past three o'clock, when the ship
broke up entirely, they came out of the forecastle, and
Margaret sat with her back to the foremast, with her
hands on her knees, her husband and child already
drowned. A great wave came and washed her aft.
The steward (?) had just before taken her child and
started for shore. Both were drowned.
The broken desk, in a bag, containing no very valuable
papers; a large black leather trunk, with an upper
and under compartment, the upper holding books and
papers; a carpetbag, probably Ossoli's, and one of
his shoes (?) are all the Ossoli effects known to have
been found. Four bodies remain to be found: the two
Ossolis, Horace Sumner, and a sailor. I have visited
the child's grave. Its body will probably be taken
away to-day. The wreck is to be sold at auction, excepting
the hull, to-day.
The mortar would not go off. Mrs. Hasty, the captain's
wife, told Mrs. Oakes that she and Margaret
divided their money, and tied up the halves in handkerchiefs
around their persons; that Margaret took sixty
or seventy dollars. Mrs. Hasty, who can tell all about
Margaret up to eleven o'clock on Friday, is said to be
going to Portland, New England, to-day. She and
Mrs. Fuller must, and probably will, come together.
The cook, the last to leave, and the steward (?) will
know the rest. I shall try to see them. In the meanwhile
I shall do what I can to recover property and
obtain particulars hereabouts. William H. Channing—did
I write it?—has come with me. Arthur Fuller[43]
has this moment reached the house. He reached the
beach last night. We got here yesterday noon. A good
part of the wreck still holds together where she struck,
and something may come ashore with her fragments.
The last body was found on Tuesday, three miles
west. Mrs. Oakes dried the papers which were in the
trunk, and she says they appeared to be of various
kinds. "Would they cover that table?" (a small round
one). "They would if spread out. Some were tied up."
There were twenty or thirty books "in the same half
of the trunk. Another smaller trunk, empty, came
ashore, but there was no mark on it." She speaks of
Paulina as if she might have been a sort of nurse to
the child. I expect to go to Patchogue, whence the pilferers
must have chiefly come, and advertise, etc.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (IN MILTON).
Concord August 9, 1850.
Mr. Blake,—I received your letter just as I was
rushing to Fire Island beach to recover what remained
of Margaret Fuller, and read it on the way. That event
and its train, as much as anything, have prevented my
answering it before. It is wisest to speak when you are
spoken to. I will now endeavor to reply, at the risk of
having nothing to say.
I find that actual events, notwithstanding the singular
prominence which we all allow them, are far less real
than the creations of my imagination. They are truly
visionary and insignificant,—all that we commonly
call life and death,—and affect me less than my dreams.
This petty stream which from time to time swells and
carries away the mills and bridges of our habitual life,
and that mightier stream or ocean on which we securely
float,—what makes the difference between them? I
have in my pocket a button which I ripped off the coat
of the Marquis of Ossoli, on the seashore, the other
day. Held up, it intercepts the light,—an actual button,—and
yet all the life it is connected with is less
substantial to me, and interests me less, than my faintest
dream. Our thoughts are the epochs in our lives: all
else is but as a journal of the winds that blew while we
were here.
I say to myself, Do a little more of that work which
you have confessed to be good. You are neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied with yourself, without reason. Have
you not a thinking faculty of inestimable value? If
there is an experiment which you would like to try, try it.
Do not entertain doubts if they are not agreeable to
you. Remember that you need not eat unless you are
hungry. Do not read the newspapers. Improve every
opportunity to be melancholy. As for health, consider
yourself well. Do not engage to find things as you
think they are. Do what nobody else can do for you.
Omit to do anything else. It is not easy to make our
lives respectable by any course of activity. We must
repeatedly withdraw into our shells of thought, like the
tortoise, somewhat helplessly; yet there is more than
philosophy in that.
Do not waste any reverence on my attitude. I merely
manage to sit up where I have dropped. I am sure that
my acquaintances mistake me. They ask my advice
on high matters, but they do not know even how poorly
on 't I am for hats and shoes. I have hardly a shift.
Just as shabby as I am in my outward apparel, ay, and
more lamentably shabby, am I in my inward substance.
If I should turn myself inside out, my rags and meanness
would indeed appear. I am something to him that
made me, undoubtedly, but not much to any other that
he has made.
Would it not be worth while to discover nature in
Milton? be native to the universe? I, too, love Concord
best, but I am glad when I discover, in oceans
and wildernesses far away, the material of a million
Concords: indeed, I am lost, unless I discover them.
I see less difference between a city and a swamp than
formerly. It is a swamp, however, too dismal and
dreary even for me, and I should be glad if there were
fewer owls, and frogs, and mosquitoes in it. I prefer
ever a more cultivated place, free from miasma and
crocodiles. I am so sophisticated, and I will take my
choice.
As for missing friends,—what if we do miss one
another? have we not agreed on a rendezvous? While
each wanders his own way through the wood, without
anxiety, ay, with serene joy, though it be on his hands
and knees, over rocks and fallen trees, he cannot but
be in the right way. There is no wrong way to him.
How can he be said to miss his friend, whom the fruits
still nourish and the elements sustain? A man who
missed his friend at a turn, went on buoyantly, dividing
the friendly air, and humming a tune to himself,
ever and anon kneeling with delight to study each little
lichen in his path, and scarcely made three miles a day
for friendship. As for conforming outwardly, and living
your own life inwardly, I do not think much of that.
Let not your right hand know what your left hand does
in that line of business. It will prove a failure. Just
as successfully can you walk against a sharp steel edge
which divides you cleanly right and left. Do you wish
to try your ability to resist distension? It is a greater
strain than any soul can long endure. When you get
God to pulling one way, and the devil the other, each
having his feet well braced,—to say nothing of the
conscience sawing transversely,—almost any timber
will give way.
I do not dare invite you earnestly to come to Concord,
because I know too well that the berries are not
thick in my fields, and we should have to take it out
in viewing the landscape. But come, on every account,
and we will see—one another.
No letters of the year 1851 have been found by me.
On the 27th of December, 1850, Mr. Cabot wrote to
say that the Boston Society of Natural History, of which
he was secretary, had elected Thoreau a corresponding
member, "with all the honores, privilegia, etc., ad gradum
tuum pertinentia, without the formality of paying
any entrance fee, or annual subscription. Your duties
in return are to advance the interests of the Society by
communications or otherwise, as shall seem good."
This is believed to be the only learned body which
honored itself by electing Thoreau. The immediate
occasion of this election was the present, by Thoreau,
to the Society, of a fine specimen of the American goshawk,
caught or shot by Jacob Farmer, which Mr.
Cabot acknowledged, December 18, 1849, saying: "It
was first described by Wilson; lately Audubon has
identified it with the European goshawk, thereby committing
a very flagrant blunder. It is usually a very
rare species with us. The European bird is used in
hawking; and doubtless ours would be equally game.
If Mr. Farmer skins him now, he will have to take second
cut; for his skin is already off and stuffed,—his
remains dissected, measured, and deposited in alcohol."
TO T. W. HIGGINSON (AT BOSTON).
Concord, April 2-3, 1852.
Dear Sir,—I do not see that I can refuse to read
another lecture, but what makes me hesitate is the fear
that I have not another available which will entertain
a large audience, though I have thoughts to offer which
I think will be quite as worthy of their attention. However,
I will try; for the prospect of earning a few dollars
is alluring. As far as I can foresee, my subject
would be "Reality" rather transcendentally treated.
It lies still in "Walden, or Life in the Woods." Since
you are kind enough to undertake the arrangements, I
will leave it to you to name an evening of next week,
decide on the most suitable room, and advertise,—if
this is not taking you too literally at your word.
If you still think it worth the while to attend to this,
will you let me know as soon as may be what evening
will be most convenient? I certainly do not feel
prepared to offer myself as a lecturer to the Boston
public, and hardly know whether more to dread a small
audience or a large one. Nevertheless, I will repress this
squeamishness, and propose no alteration in your arrangements.
I shall be glad to accept your invitation
to tea.
This lecture was given, says Colonel Higginson, "at
the Mechanics' Apprentices Library in Boston, with
the snow outside, and the young boys rustling their
newspapers among the Alcotts and Blakes." Or, possibly,
this remark may apply to a former lecture in the
same year, which was that in which Thoreau first lectured
habitually away from Concord. He commenced
by accepting an invitation to speak at Leyden Hall, in
Plymouth, where his friends the Watsons had organized
Sunday services, that the Transcendentalists and
Abolitionists might have a chance to be heard at a time
when they were generally excluded from the popular
"Lyceum courses" throughout New England. Mr.
B. M. Watson says:—
"I have found two letters from Thoreau in answer
to my invitation in 1852 to address our congregation at
Leyden Hall on Sunday mornings,—an enterprise I
undertook about that time. I find among the distinguished
men who addressed us the names of Thoreau,
Emerson, Ellery Channing, Alcott, Higginson, Remond,
S. Johnson, F. J. Appleton, Edmund Quincy, Garrison,
Phillips, J. P. Lesley, Shackford, W. F. Channing,
N. H. Whiting, Adin Ballou, Abby K. Foster and her
husband, J. T. Sargent, T. T. Stone, Jones Very,
Wasson, Hurlbut, F. W. Holland, and Scherb; so you
may depend we had some fun."
These letters were mere notes. The first, dated February
17, 1852, says: "I have not yet seen Mr. Channing,
though I believe he is in town,—having decided
to come to Plymouth myself,—but I will let him know
that he is expected. Mr. Daniel Foster wishes me to
say that he accepts your invitation, and that he would
like to come Sunday after next. I will take the Saturday
afternoon train. I shall be glad to get a winter
view of Plymouth Harbor, and see where your garden
lies under the snow."
The second letter follows:—
TO MARSTON WATSON (AT PLYMOUTH).
Concord, December 31, 1852.
Mr. Watson,—I would be glad to visit Plymouth
again, but at present I have nothing to read which is
not severely heathenish, or at least secular,—which
the dictionary defines as "relating to affairs of the
present world, not holy,"—though not necessarily unholy;
nor have I any leisure to prepare it. My writing
at present is profane, yet in a good sense, and, as it
were, sacredly, I may say; for, finding the air of the
temple too close, I sat outside. Don't think I say this
to get off; no, no! It will not do to read such things to
hungry ears. "If they ask for bread, will you give
them a stone?" When I have something of the right
kind, depend upon it I will let you know.
Up to 1848, when he was invited to lecture before
the Salem Lyceum by Nathaniel Hawthorne, then its
secretary, Thoreau seems to have spoken publicly very
little except in Concord; nor did he extend the circuit
of his lectures much until his two books had made him
known as a thinker. There was little to attract a popular
audience in his manner or his matter; but it was
the era of lectures, and if one could once gain admission
to the circle of "lyceum lecturers," it did not so
much matter what he said; a lecture was a lecture, as
a sermon was a sermon, good, bad, or indifferent. But
it was common to exclude the antislavery speakers
from the lyceums, even those of more eloquence than
Thoreau; this led to invitations from the small band
of reformers scattered about New England and New
York, so that the most unlikely of platform speakers
(Ellery Channing, for example) sometimes gave lectures
at Plymouth, Greenfield, Newburyport, or elsewhere.
The present fashion of parlor lectures had not
come in; yet at Worcester Thoreau's friends early organized
for him something of that kind, as his letters
to Mr. Blake show. In default of an audience of numbers,
Thoreau fell into the habit of lecturing in his
letters to this friend; the most marked instance being
the thoughtful essay on Love and Chastity which
makes the bulk of his epistle dated September, 1852.
Like most of his serious writing, this was made up
from his daily journal, and hardly comes under the
head of "familiar letters;" the didactic purpose is
rather too apparent. Yet it cannot be spared from any
collection of his epistles,—none of which flowed more
directly from the quickened moral nature of the man.
TO SOPHIA THOREAU (AT BANGOR).
Concord, July 13, 1852.
Dear Sophia,—I am a miserable letter-writer, but
perhaps if I should say this at length and with sufficient
emphasis and regret it would make a letter. I am
sorry that nothing transpires here of much moment; or,
I should rather say, that I am so slackened and rusty,
like the telegraph wire this season, that no wind that
blows can extract music from me.
I am not on the trail of any elephants or mastodons,
but have succeeded in trapping only a few ridiculous
mice, which cannot feed my imagination. I have become
sadly scientific. I would rather come upon the
vast valley-like "spoor" only of some celestial beast
which this world's woods can no longer sustain, than
spring my net over a bushel of moles. You must do
better in those woods where you are. You must have
some adventures to relate and repeat for years to come,
which will eclipse even mother's voyage to Goldsborough
and Sissiboo.
They say that Mr. Pierce, the presidential candidate,
was in town last 5th of July, visiting Hawthorne, whose
college chum he was; and that Hawthorne is writing a
life of him, for electioneering purposes.
Concord is just as idiotic as ever in relation to the
spirits and their knockings. Most people here believe
in a spiritual world which no respectable junk bottle,
which had not met with a slip, would condescend to
contain even a portion of for a moment,—whose atmosphere
would extinguish a candle let down into it, like
a well that wants airing; in spirits which the very bullfrogs
in our meadows would blackball. Their evil genius
is seeing how low it can degrade them. The hooting
of owls, the croaking of frogs, is celestial wisdom
in comparison. If I could be brought to believe in the
things which they believe, I should make haste to get
rid of my certificate of stock in this and the next world's
enterprises, and buy a share in the first Immediate
Annihilation Company that offered. I would exchange
my immortality for a glass of small beer this hot
weather. Where are the heathen? Was there ever any
superstition before? And yet I suppose there may be a
vessel this very moment setting sail from the coast of
North America to that of Africa with a missionary on
board! Consider the dawn and the sunrise,—the rainbow
and the evening,—the words of Christ and the
aspiration of all the saints! Hear music! see, smell,
taste, feel, hear,—anything,—and then hear these
idiots, inspired by the cracking of a restless board,
humbly asking, "Please, Spirit, if you cannot answer
by knocks, answer by tips of the table." ! ! ! ! ! ! !
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, July 21, 1852.
Mr. Blake,—I am too stupidly well these days to
write to you. My life is almost altogether outward,—all
shell and no tender kernel; so that I fear the report
of it would be only a nut for you to crack, with no
meat in it for you to eat. Moreover, you have not
cornered me up, and I enjoy such large liberty in writing
to you, that I feel as vague as the air. However, I
rejoice to hear that you have attended so patiently to
anything which I have said heretofore, and have detected
any truth in it. It encourages me to say more,—not
in this letter, I fear, but in some book which
I may write one day. I am glad to know that I am as
much to any mortal as a persistent and consistent scarecrow
is to a farmer,—such a bundle of straw in a
man's clothing as I am, with a few bits of tin to sparkle
in the sun dangling about me, as if I were hard at work
there in the field. However, if this kind of life saves
any man's corn,—why, he is the gainer. I am not
afraid that you will flatter me as long as you know
what I am, as well as what I think, or aim to be, and
distinguish between these two, for then it will commonly
happen that if you praise the last you will condemn
the first.
I remember that walk to Asnebumskit very well,—a
fit place to go to on a Sunday; one of the true temples
of the earth. A temple, you know, was anciently "an
open place without a roof," whose walls served merely
to shut out the world and direct the mind toward
heaven; but a modern meeting-house shuts out the
heavens, while it crowds the world into still closer quarters.
Best of all is it when, as on a mountain-top, you
have for all walls your own elevation and deeps of surrounding
ether. The partridge-berries, watered with
mountain dews which are gathered there, are more
memorable to me than the words which I last heard
from the pulpit at least; and for my part, I would rather
look toward Rutland than Jerusalem. Rutland,—modern
town,—land of ruts,—trivial and worn,—not
too sacred,—with no holy sepulchre, but profane
green fields and dusty roads, and opportunity to live
as holy a life as you can,—where the sacredness, if
there is any, is all in yourself and not in the place.
I fear that your Worcester people do not often
enough go to the hilltops, though, as I am told, the
springs lie nearer to the surface on your hills than in your
valleys. They have the reputation of being Free-Soilers.[44]
Do they insist on a free atmosphere, too, that is,
on freedom for the head or brain as well as the feet?
If I were consciously to join any party, it would be
that which is the most free to entertain thought.
All the world complain nowadays of a press of trivial
duties and engagements, which prevents their employing
themselves on some higher ground they know of;
but, undoubtedly, if they were made of the right stuff
to work on that higher ground, provided they were released
from all those engagements, they would now at
once fulfill the superior engagement, and neglect all the
rest, as naturally as they breathe. They would never
be caught saying that they had no time for this, when
the dullest man knows that this is all that he has time
for. No man who acts from a sense of duty ever puts
the lesser duty above the greater. No man has the
desire and the ability to work on high things, but he
has also the ability to build himself a high staging.
As for passing through any great and glorious experience,
and rising above it, as an eagle might fly athwart
the evening sky to rise into still brighter and fairer regions
of the heavens, I cannot say that I ever sailed so
creditably; but my bark ever seemed thwarted by some
side wind, and went off over the edge, and now only
occasionally tacks back toward the centre of that sea
again. I have outgrown nothing good, but, I do not
fear to say, fallen behind by whole continents of virtue,
which should have been passed as islands in my course;
but I trust—what else can I trust? that, with a stiff
wind, some Friday, when I have thrown some of my
cargo overboard, I may make up for all that distance
lost.
Perchance the time will come when we shall not be
content to go back and forth upon a raft to some
huge Homeric or Shakespearean Indiaman that lies
upon the reef, but build a bark out of that wreck and
others that are buried in the sands of this desolate
island, and such new timber as may be required, in
which to sail away to whole new worlds of light and
life, where our friends are.
Write again. There is one respect in which you did
not finish your letter: you did not write it with ink, and
it is not so good, therefore, against or for you in the
eye of the law, nor in the eye of
H. D. T.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
September, 1852.
Mr. Blake,—Here come the sentences which I
promised you. You may keep them, if you will regard
and use them as the disconnected fragments of what I
may find to be a completer essay, on looking over my
journal, at last, and may claim again.
I send you the thoughts on Chastity and Sensuality
with diffidence and shame, not knowing how far I
speak to the condition of men generally, or how far
I betray my peculiar defects. Pray enlighten me on
this point if you can.
LOVE.
What the essential difference between man and
woman is, that they should be thus attracted to one
another, no one has satisfactorily answered. Perhaps
we must acknowledge the justness of the distinction
which assigns to man the sphere of wisdom, and to
woman that of love, though neither belongs exclusively
to either. Man is continually saying to woman, Why
will you not be more wise? Woman is continually saying
to man, Why will you not be more loving? It is
not in their wills to be wise or to be loving; but, unless
each is both wise and loving, there can be neither
wisdom nor love.
All transcendent goodness is one, though appreciated
in different ways, or by different senses. In beauty we
see it, in music we hear it, in fragrance we scent it, in
the palatable the pure palate tastes it, and in rare
health the whole body feels it. The variety is in the
surface or manifestation; but the radical identity we
fail to express. The lover sees in the glance of his
beloved the same beauty that in the sunset paints the
western skies. It is the same daimon, here lurking under
a human eyelid, and there under the closing eyelids of
the day. Here, in small compass, is the ancient and
natural beauty of evening and morning. What loving
astronomer has ever fathomed the ethereal depths of
the eye?
The maiden conceals a fairer flower and sweeter
fruit than any calyx in the field; and, if she goes with
averted face, confiding in her purity and high resolves,
she will make the heavens retrospective, and all nature
humbly confess its queen.
Under the influence of this sentiment, man is a
string of an æolian harp, which vibrates with the
zephyrs of the eternal morning.
There is at first thought something trivial in the
commonness of love. So many Indian youths and
maidens along these banks have in ages past yielded
to the influence of this great civilizer. Nevertheless,
this generation is not disgusted nor discouraged, for
love is no individual's experience; and though we are
imperfect mediums, it does not partake of our imperfection;
though we are finite, it is infinite and eternal;
and the same divine influence broods over these banks,
whatever race may inhabit them, and perchance still
would, even if the human race did not dwell here.
Perhaps an instinct survives through the intensest
actual love, which prevents entire abandonment and
devotion, and makes the most ardent lover a little
reserved. It is the anticipation of change. For the
most ardent lover is not the less practically wise, and
seeks a love which will last forever.
Considering how few poetical friendships there are,
it is remarkable that so many are married. It would
seem as if men yielded too easy an obedience to nature
without consulting their genius. One may be drunk
with love without being any nearer to finding his mate.
There is more of good nature than of good sense at
the bottom of most marriages. But the good nature
must have the counsel of the good spirit or Intelligence.
If common sense had been consulted, how
many marriages would never have taken place; if uncommon
or divine sense, how few marriages such as
we witness would ever have taken place!
Our love may be ascending or descending. What is
its character, if it may be said of it,—
"We must respect the souls above,
But only those below we love."
Love is a severe critic. Hate can pardon more than
love. They who aspire to love worthily, subject themselves
to an ordeal more rigid than any other.
Is your friend such a one that an increase of worth
on your part will surely make her more your friend?
Is she retained—is she attracted by more nobleness in
you,—by more of that virtue which is peculiarly yours;
or is she indifferent and blind to that? Is she to be
flattered and won by your meeting her on any other
than the ascending path? Then duty requires that you
separate from her.
Love must be as much a light as a flame.
Where there is not discernment, the behavior even
of the purest soul may in effect amount to coarseness.
A man of fine perceptions is more truly feminine
than a merely sentimental woman. The heart is blind;
but love is not blind. None of the gods is so discriminating.
In love and friendship the imagination is as much
exercised as the heart; and if either is outraged the
other will be estranged. It is commonly the imagination
which is wounded first, rather than the heart,—it
is so much the more sensitive.
Comparatively, we can excuse any offense against the
heart, but not against the imagination. The imagination
knows—nothing escapes its glance from out its
eyry—and it controls the breast. My heart may still
yearn toward the valley, but my imagination will not
permit me to jump off the precipice that debars me
from it, for it is wounded, its wings are clipt, and it
cannot fly, even descendingly. Our "blundering
hearts!" some poet says. The imagination never forgets;
it is a re-membering. It is not foundationless,
but most reasonable, and it alone uses all the knowledge
of the intellect.
Love is the profoundest of secrets. Divulged, even to
the beloved, it is no longer Love. As if it were merely
I that loved you. When love ceases, then it is divulged.
In our intercourse with one we love, we wish to have
answered those questions at the end of which we do
not raise our voice; against which we put no interrogation-mark,—answered
with the same unfailing, universal
aim toward every point of the compass.
I require that thou knowest everything without being
told anything. I parted from my beloved because there
was one thing which I had to tell her. She questioned
me. She should have known all by sympathy. That I
had to tell it her was the difference between us,—the
misunderstanding.
A lover never hears anything that he is told, for that
is commonly either false or stale; but he hears things
taking place, as the sentinels heard Trenck[45]
mining
in the ground, and thought it was moles.
The relation may be profaned in many ways. The
parties may not regard it with equal sacredness. What
if the lover should learn that his beloved dealt in incantations
and philters! What if he should hear that
she consulted a clairvoyant! The spell would be instantly
broken.
If to chaffer and higgle are bad in trade, they are
much worse in Love. It demands directness as of an
arrow.
There is danger that we lose sight of what our friend
is absolutely, while considering what she is to us alone.
The lover wants no partiality. He says, Be so kind
as to be just.
Canst thou love with thy mind,
And reason with thy heart?
Canst thou be kind,
And from thy darling part?
Canst thou range earth, sea, and air,
And so meet me everywhere?
Through all events I will pursue thee,
Through all persons I will woo thee.
I need thy hate as much as thy love. Thou wilt not
repel me entirely when thou repellest what is evil
in me.
Indeed, indeed, I cannot tell,
Though I ponder on it well,
Which were easier to state,
All my love or all my hate.
Surely, surely, thou wilt trust me
When I say thou doth disgust me.
O, I hate thee with a hate
That would fain annihilate;
Yet, sometimes, against my will,
My dear Friend, I love thee still.
It were treason to our love,
And a sin to God above,
One iota to abate
Of a pure, impartial hate.
It is not enough that we are truthful; we must cherish
and carry out high purposes to be truthful about.
It must be rare, indeed, that we meet with one to
whom we are prepared to be quite ideally related, as
she to us. We should have no reserve; we should give
the whole of ourselves to that society; we should have
no duty aside from that. One who could bear to be so
wonderfully and beautifully exaggerated every day. I
would take my friend out of her low self and set her
higher, infinitely higher, and there know her. But,
commonly, men are as much afraid of love as of hate.
They have lower engagements. They have near ends
to serve. They have not imagination enough to be thus
employed about a human being, but must be coopering
a barrel, forsooth.
What a difference, whether, in all your walks, you
meet only strangers, or in one house is one who knows
you, and whom you know. To have a brother or a
sister! To have a gold mine on your farm! To find
diamonds in the gravel heaps before your door! How
rare these things are! To share the day with you,—to
people the earth. Whether to have a god or a goddess
for companion in your walks, or to walk alone with
hinds and villains and carles. Would not a friend enhance
the beauty of the landscape as much as a deer or
hare? Everything would acknowledge and serve such a
relation; the corn in the field, and the cranberries in
the meadow. The flowers would bloom, and the birds
sing, with a new impulse. There would be more fair
days in the year.
The object of love expands and grows before us
to eternity, until it includes all that is lovely, and we
become all that can love.
CHASTITY AND SENSUALITY.
The subject of sex is a remarkable one, since, though
its phenomena concern us so much, both directly and
indirectly, and, sooner or later, it occupies the thoughts
of all, yet all mankind, as it were, agree to be silent
about it, at least the sexes commonly one to another.
One of the most interesting of all human facts is veiled
more completely than any mystery. It is treated with
such secrecy and awe as surely do not go to any religion.
I believe that it is unusual even for the most
intimate friends to communicate the pleasures and anxieties
connected with this fact,—much as the external
affair of love, its comings and goings, are bruited. The
Shakers do not exaggerate it so much by their manner
of speaking of it as all mankind by their manner of
keeping silence about it. Not that men should speak
on this or any subject without having anything worthy
to say; but it is plain that the education of man has
hardly commenced,—there is so little genuine intercommunication.
In a pure society, the subject of marriage would not
be so often avoided,—from shame and not from reverence,
winked out of sight, and hinted at only; but
treated naturally and simply,—perhaps simply avoided,
like the kindred mysteries. If it cannot be spoken of
for shame, how can it be acted of? But, doubtless,
there is far more purity, as well as more impurity, than
is apparent.
Men commonly couple with their idea of marriage a
slight degree at least of sensuality; but every lover, the
world over, believes in its inconceivable purity.
If it is the result of a pure love, there can be nothing
sensual in marriage. Chastity is something positive,
not negative. It is the virtue of the married especially.
All lusts or base pleasures must give place to loftier
delights. They who meet as superior beings cannot
perform the deeds of inferior ones. The deeds of love
are less questionable than any action of an individual
can be, for, it being founded on the rarest mutual
respect, the parties incessantly stimulate each other to
a loftier and purer life, and the act in which they are
associated must be pure and noble indeed, for innocence
and purity can have no equal. In this relation
we deal with one whom we respect more religiously
even than we respect our better selves, and we shall
necessarily conduct as in the presence of God. What
presence can be more awful to the lover than the presence
of his beloved?
If you seek the warmth even of affection from a
similar motive to that from which cats and dogs and
slothful persons hug the fire,—because your temperature
is low through sloth,—you are on the downward
road, and it is but to plunge yet deeper into sloth.
Better the cold affection of the sun, reflected from fields
of ice and snow, or his warmth in some still, wintry
dell. The warmth of celestial love does not relax, but
nerves and braces its enjoyer. Warm your body by
healthful exercise, not by cowering over a stove. Warm
your spirit by performing independently noble deeds,
not by ignobly seeking the sympathy of your fellows
who are no better than yourself. A man's social and
spiritual discipline must answer to his corporeal. He
must lean on a friend who has a hard breast, as he
would lie on a hard bed. He must drink cold water
for his only beverage. So he must not hear sweetened
and colored words, but pure and refreshing truths. He
must daily bathe in truth cold as spring water, not
warmed by the sympathy of friends.
Can love be in aught allied to dissipation? Let us
love by refusing, not accepting one another. Love and
lust are far asunder. The one is good, the other bad.
When the affectionate sympathize by their higher natures,
there is love; but there is danger that they will
sympathize by their lower natures, and then there is
lust. It is not necessary that this be deliberate, hardly
even conscious; but, in the close contact of affection,
there is danger that we may stain and pollute one
another; for we cannot embrace but with an entire
embrace.
We must love our friend so much that she shall be
associated with our purest and holiest thoughts alone.
When there is impurity, we have "descended to meet,"
though we knew it not.
The luxury of affection,—there's the danger. There
must be some nerve and heroism in our love, as of a
winter morning. In the religion of all nations a purity
is hinted at, which, I fear, men never attain to. We
may love and not elevate one another. The love that
takes us as it finds us degrades us. What watch we
must keep over the fairest and purest of our affections,
lest there be some taint about them! May we so love
as never to have occasion to repent of our love!
There is to be attributed to sensuality the loss to
language of how many pregnant symbols! Flowers,
which, by their infinite hues and fragrance, celebrate
the marriage of the plants, are intended for a symbol
of the open and unsuspected beauty of all true marriage,
when man's flowering season arrives.
Virginity, too, is a budding flower, and by an impure
marriage the virgin is deflowered. Whoever loves
flowers, loves virgins and chastity. Love and lust are
as far asunder as a flower-garden is from a brothel.
J. Biberg, in the "Amoenitates Botanicae," edited by
Linnæus, observes (I translate from the Latin): "The
organs of generation, which, in the animal kingdom,
are for the most part concealed by nature, as if they
were to be ashamed of, in the vegetable kingdom are
exposed to the eyes of all; and, when the nuptials of
plants are celebrated, it is wonderful what delight they
afford to the beholder, refreshing the senses with the
most agreeable color and the sweetest odor; and, at
the same time, bees and other insects, not to mention
the hummingbird, extract honey from their nectaries,
and gather wax from their effete pollen." Linnæus
himself calls the calyx the thalamus, or bridal chamber;
and the corolla the aulaeum, or tapestry of it, and proceeds
to explain thus every part of the flower.
Who knows but evil spirits might corrupt the flowers
themselves, rob them of their fragrance and their fair
hues, and turn their marriage into a secret shame and
defilement? Already they are of various qualities, and
there is one whose nuptials fill the lowlands in June
with the odor of carrion.
The intercourse of the sexes, I have dreamed, is incredibly
beautiful, too fair to be remembered. I have
had thoughts about it, but they are among the most
fleeting and irrecoverable in my experience. It is
strange that men will talk of miracles, revelation, inspiration,
and the like, as things past, while love remains.
A true marriage will differ in no wise from illumination.
In all perception of the truth there is a divine
ecstasy, an inexpressible delirium of joy, as when a
youth embraces his betrothed virgin. The ultimate
delights of a true marriage are one with this.
No wonder that, out of such a union, not as end, but
as accompaniment, comes the undying race of man.
The womb is a most fertile soil.
Some have asked if the stock of men could not be
improved,—if they could not be bred as cattle. Let
Love be purified, and all the rest will follow. A pure
love is thus, indeed, the panacea for all the ills of the
world.
The only excuse for reproduction is improvement.
Nature abhors repetition. Beasts merely propagate
their kind; but the offspring of noble men and women
will be superior to themselves, as their aspirations are.
By their fruits ye shall know them.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, February 27, 1853.
Mr. Blake,—I have not answered your letter before,
because I have been almost constantly in the fields
surveying of late. It is long since I have spent many
days so profitably in a pecuniary sense; so unprofitably,
it seems to me, in a more important sense. I have
earned just a dollar a day for seventy-six days past;
for, though I charge at a higher rate for the days which
are seen to be spent, yet so many more are spent than
appears. This is instead of lecturing, which has not
offered, to pay for that book which I printed.[46]
I have
not only cheap hours, but cheap weeks and months;
that is, weeks which are bought at the rate I have named.
Not that they are quite lost to me, or make me very
melancholy, alas! for I too often take a cheap satisfaction
in so spending them,—weeks of pasturing and
browsing, like beeves and deer,—which give me animal
health, it may be, but create a tough skin over the soul
and intellectual part. Yet, if men should offer my body
a maintenance for the work of my head alone, I feel
that it would be a dangerous temptation.
As to whether what you speak of as the "world's
way" (which for the most part is my way), or that
which is shown me, is the better, the former is imposture,
the latter is truth. I have the coldest confidence
in the last. There is only such hesitation as the appetites
feel in following the aspirations. The clod hesitates
because it is inert, wants animation. The one is the
way of death, the other of life everlasting. My hours
are not "cheap in such a way that I doubt whether the
world's way would not have been better," but cheap
in such a way that I doubt whether the world's way,
which I have adopted for the time, could be worse.
The whole enterprise of this nation, which is not an
upward, but a westward one, toward Oregon, California,
Japan, etc., is totally devoid of interest to me,
whether performed on foot, or by a Pacific railroad. It
is not illustrated by a thought; it is not warmed by a
sentiment; there is nothing in it which one should lay
down his life for, nor even his gloves,—hardly which
one should take up a newspaper for. It is perfectly
heathenish,—a filibustering toward heaven by the great
western route. No; they may go their way to their
manifest destiny, which I trust is not mine. May my
seventy-six dollars, whenever I get them, help to carry
me in the other direction! I see them on their winding
way, but no music is wafted from their host,—only
the rattling of change in their pockets. I would rather
be a captive knight, and let them all pass by, than be
free only to go whither they are bound. What end do
they propose to themselves beyond Japan? What aims
more lofty have they than the prairie dogs?
As it respects these things, I have not changed an
opinion one iota from the first. As the stars looked
to me when I was a shepherd in Assyria, they look to
me now, a New-Englander. The higher the mountain
on which you stand, the less change in the prospect
from year to year, from age to age. Above a certain
height there is no change. I am a Switzer on the edge
of the glacier, with his advantages and disadvantages,
goitre, or what not. (You may suspect it to be some
kind of swelling at any rate.) I have had but one spiritual
birth (excuse the word), and now whether it rains
or snows, whether I laugh or cry, fall farther below or
approach nearer to my standard; whether Pierce or
Scott is elected,—not a new scintillation of light flashes
on me, but ever and anon, though with longer intervals,
the same surprising and everlastingly new light dawns
to me, with only such variations as in the coming of the
natural day, with which, indeed, it is often coincident.
As to how to preserve potatoes from rotting, your
opinion may change from year to year; but as to how
to preserve your soul from rotting, I have nothing to
learn, but something to practice.
Thus I declaim against them; but I in my folly am
the world I condemn.
I very rarely, indeed, if ever, "feel any itching to be
what is called useful to my fellow-men." Sometimes—it
may be when my thoughts for want of employment
fall into a beaten path or humdrum—I have dreamed
idly of stopping a man's horse that was running away;
but, perchance, I wished that he might run, in order
that I might stop him;—or of putting out a fire; but
then, of course, it must have got well a-going. Now, to
tell the truth, I do not dream much of acting upon horses
before they run, or of preventing fires which are not
yet kindled. What a foul subject is this of doing good!
instead of minding one's life, which should be his business;
doing good as a dead carcass, which is only fit
for manure, instead of as a living man,—instead of
taking care to flourish, and smell and taste sweet, and
refresh all mankind to the extent of our capacity and
quality. People will sometimes try to persuade you that
you have done something from that motive, as if you
did not already know enough about it. If I ever did a
man any good, in their sense, of course it was something
exceptional and insignificant compared with the
good or evil which I am constantly doing by being what
I am. As if you were to preach to ice to shape itself
into burning-glasses, which are sometimes useful, and
so the peculiar properties of ice be lost. Ice that merely
performs the office of a burning-glass does not do its
duty.
The problem of life becomes, one cannot say by how
many degrees, more complicated as our material wealth
is increased,—whether that needle they tell of was a
gateway or not,—since the problem is not merely nor
mainly to get life for our bodies, but by this or a similar
discipline to get life for our souls; by cultivating
the lowland farm on right principles, that is, with this
view, to turn it into an upland farm. You have so
many more talents to account for. If I accomplish as
much more in spiritual work as I am richer in worldly
goods, then I am just as worthy, or worth just as much,
as I was before, and no more. I see that, in my own
case, money might be of great service to me, but probably
it would not be; for the difficulty now is, that I do
not improve my opportunities, and therefore I am not
prepared to have my opportunities increased. Now, I
warn you, if it be as you say, you have got to put on
the pack of an upland farmer in good earnest the coming
spring, the lowland farm being cared for; ay, you
must be selecting your seeds forthwith, and doing what
winter work you can; and, while others are raising
potatoes and Baldwin apples for you, you must be
raising apples of the Hesperides for them. (Only hear
how he preaches!) No man can suspect that he is the
proprietor of an upland farm,—upland in the sense
that it will produce nobler crops, and better repay cultivation
in the long run,—but he will be perfectly sure
that he ought to cultivate it.
Though we are desirous to earn our bread, we need
not be anxious to satisfy men for it,—though we shall
take care to pay them,—but God, who alone gave it
to us. Men may in effect put us in the debtors' jail for
that matter, simply for paying our whole debt to God,
which includes our debt to them, and though we have
His receipt for it,—for His paper is dishonored. The
cashier will tell you that He has no stock in his bank.
How prompt we are to satisfy the hunger and thirst
of our bodies; how slow to satisfy the hunger and
thirst of our souls! Indeed, we would-be practical
folks cannot use this word without blushing because
of our infidelity, having starved this substance almost
to a shadow. We feel it to be as absurd as if a man
were to break forth into a eulogy on his dog, who
has n't any. An ordinary man will work every day for
a year at shoveling dirt to support his body, or a family
of bodies; but he is an extraordinary man who will
work a whole day in a year for the support of his
soul. Even the priests, the men of God, so called, for
the most part confess that they work for the support of
the body. But he alone is the truly enterprising and
practical man who succeeds in maintaining his soul
here. Have not we our everlasting life to get? and is
not that the only excuse at last for eating, drinking,
sleeping, or even carrying an umbrella when it rains?
A man might as well devote himself to raising pork as
to fattening the bodies, or temporal part merely, of the
whole human family. If we made the true distinction we
should almost all of us be seen to be in the almshouse
for souls.
I am much indebted to you because you look so
steadily at the better side, or rather the true centre of
me (for our true centre may, and perhaps oftenest
does, lie entirely aside from us, and we are in fact eccentric),
and, as I have elsewhere said, "give me an
opportunity to live." You speak as if the image or
idea which I see were reflected from me to you; and I
see it again reflected from you to me, because we stand
at the right angle to one another; and so it goes zigzag
to what successive reflecting surfaces, before it is all
dissipated or absorbed by the more unreflecting, or
differently reflecting,—who knows? Or, perhaps, what
you see directly, you refer to me. What a little shelf is
required, by which we may impinge upon another, and
build there our eyry in the clouds, and all the heavens
we see above us we refer to the crags around and beneath
us. Some piece of mica, as it were, in the face
or eyes of one, as on the Delectable Mountains, slanted
at the right angle, reflects the heavens to us. But, in
the slow geological upheavals and depressions, these
mutual angles are disturbed, these suns set, and new
ones rise to us. That ideal which I worshiped was a
greater stranger to the mica than to me. It was not
the hero I admired, but the reflection from his epaulet
or helmet. It is nothing (for us) permanently inherent
in another, but his attitude or relation to what we
prize, that we admire. The meanest man may glitter
with micacious particles to his fellow's eye. These are
the spangles that adorn a man. The highest union,—the
only un-ion (don't laugh), or central oneness, is the
coincidence of visual rays. Our club-room was an
apartment in a constellation where our visual rays met
(and there was no debate about the restaurant). The
way between us is over the mount.
Your words make me think of a man of my acquaintance
whom I occasionally meet, whom you, too,
appear to have met, one Myself, as he is called. Yet,
why not call him Yourself? If you have met with him
and know him, it is all I have done; and surely, where
there is a mutual acquaintance, the my and thy make
a distinction without a difference.
I do not wonder that you do not like my Canada
story. It concerns me but little, and probably is not
worth the time it took to tell it. Yet I had absolutely
no design whatever in my mind, but simply to report
what I saw. I have inserted all of myself that was implicated,
or made the excursion. It has come to an end,
at any rate; they will print no more, but return me my
MS. when it is but little more than half done, as well
as another I had sent them, because the editor[47]
requires
the liberty to omit the heresies without consulting me,—a
privilege California is not rich enough to bid for.
I thank you again and again for attending to me;
that is to say, I am glad that you hear me and that
you also are glad. Hold fast to your most indefinite,
waking dream. The very green dust on the walls is an
organized vegetable; the atmosphere has its fauna and
flora floating in it; and shall we think that dreams are
but dust and ashes, are always disintegrated and crumbling
thoughts, and not dust-like thoughts trooping to
their standard with music,—systems beginning to be
organized? These expectations,—these are roots, these
are nuts, which even the poorest man has in his bin,
and roasts or cracks them occasionally in winter evenings,—which
even the poor debtor retains with his bed
and his pig, i. e., his idleness and sensuality. Men go
to the opera because they hear there a faint expression
in sound of this news which is never quite distinctly
proclaimed. Suppose a man were to sell the hue, the
least amount of coloring matter in the superficies of his
thought, for a farm,—were to exchange an absolute
and infinite value for a relative and finite one,—to
gain the whole world and lose his own soul!
Do not wait as long as I have before you write. If
you will look at another star, I will try to supply my
side of the triangle.
Tell Mr. Brown that I remember him, and trust
that he remembers me.
P. S.—Excuse this rather flippant preaching, which
does not cost me enough; and do not think that I
mean you always, though your letter requested the subjects.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, April 10, 1853.
Mr. Blake,—Another singular kind of spiritual
football,—really nameless, handleless, homeless, like
myself,—a mere arena for thoughts and feelings; definite
enough outwardly, indefinite more than enough
inwardly. But I do not know why we should be styled
"misters" or "masters:" we come so near to being
anything or nothing, and seeing that we are mastered,
and not wholly sorry to be mastered, by the least phenomenon.
It seems to me that we are the mere creatures
of thought,—one of the lowest forms of intellectual
life, we men,—as the sunfish is of animal life.
As yet our thoughts have acquired no definiteness nor
solidity; they are purely molluscous, not vertebrate;
and the height of our existence is to float upward in
an ocean where the sun shines,—appearing only like
a vast soup or chowder to the eyes of the immortal
navigators. It is wonderful that I can be here, and
you there, and that we can correspond, and do many
other things, when, in fact, there is so little of us, either
or both, anywhere. In a few minutes, I expect, this
slight film or dash of vapor that I am will be what is
called asleep,—resting! forsooth from what? Hard
work? and thought? The hard work of the dandelion
down, which floats over the meadow all day; the hard
work of a pismire that labors to raise a hillock all day,
and even by moonlight. Suddenly I can come forward
into the utmost apparent distinctness, and speak with
a sort of emphasis to you; and the next moment I am
so faint an entity, and make so slight an impression,
that nobody can find the traces of me. I try to hunt
myself up, and find the little of me that is discoverable
is falling asleep, and then I assist and tuck it up. It is
getting late. How can I starve or feed? Can I be said
to sleep? There is not enough of me even for that. If
you hear a noise,—'t ain't I,—'t ain't I,—as the dog
says with a tin kettle tied to his tail. I read of something
happening to another the other day: how happens it
that nothing ever happens to me? A dandelion down
that never alights,—settles,—blown off by a boy to
see if his mother wanted him,—some divine boy in
the upper pastures.
Well, if there really is another such a meteor sojourning
in these spaces, I would like to ask you if you know
whose estate this is that we are on? For my part I
enjoy it well enough, what with the wild apples and the
scenery; but I should n't wonder if the owner set his
dog on me next. I could remember something not
much to the purpose, probably; but if I stick to what
I do know, then—
It is worth the while to live respectably unto ourselves.
We can possibly get along with a neighbor, even
with a bedfellow, whom we respect but very little; but
as soon as it comes to this, that we do not respect ourselves,
then we do not get along at all, no matter how
much money we are paid for halting. There are old
heads in the world who cannot help me by their example
or advice to live worthily and satisfactorily to
myself; but I believe that it is in my power to elevate
myself this very hour above the common level of my
life. It is better to have your head in the clouds, and
know where you are, if indeed you cannot get it above
them, than to breathe the clearer atmosphere below
them, and think that you are in paradise.
Once you were in Milton[48]
doubting what to do. To
live a better life,—this surely can be done. Dot and
carry one. Wait not for a clear sight, for that you are
to get. What you see clearly you may omit to do.
Milton and Worcester? It is all Blake, Blake. Never
mind the rats in the wall; the cat will take care of
them. All that men have said or are is a very faint
rumor, and it is not worth the while to remember or
refer to that. If you are to meet God, will you refer to
anybody out of that court? How shall men know how
I succeed, unless they are in at the life? I did not see
the Times reporter there.
Is it not delightful to provide one's self with the
necessaries of life,—to collect dry wood for the fire
when the weather grows cool, or fruits when we grow
hungry?—not till then. And then we have all the
time left for thought!
Of what use were it, pray, to get a little wood to
burn, to warm your body this cold weather, if there
were not a divine fire kindled at the same time to warm
your spirit?
"Unless above himself he can
Erect himself, how poor a thing is man!"
I cuddle up by my stove, and there I get up another
fire which warms fire itself. Life is so short that it is
not wise to take roundabout ways, nor can we spend
much time in waiting. Is it absolutely necessary, then,
that we should do as we are doing? Are we chiefly
under obligations to the devil, like Tom Walker?
Though it is late to leave off this wrong way, it will
seem early the moment we begin in the right way; instead
of mid-afternoon, it will be early morning with
us. We have not got half-way to dawn yet.
As for the lectures, I feel that I have something to
say, especially on Traveling, Vagueness, and Poverty;
but I cannot come now. I will wait till I am fuller, and
have fewer engagements. Your suggestions will help
me much to write them when I am ready. I am going
to Haverhill[49]
to-morrow, surveying, for a week or more.
You met me on my last errand thither.
I trust that you realize what an exaggerator I am,—that
I lay myself out to exaggerate whenever I have an
opportunity,—pile Pelion upon Ossa, to reach heaven
so. Expect no trivial truth from me, unless I am on
the witness-stand. I will come as near to lying as you
can drive a coach and four. If it is n't thus and so with
me, it is with something. I am not particular whether
I get the shells or meat, in view of the latter's worth.
I see that I have not at all answered your letter, but
there is time enough for that.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, December 19, 1853.
Mr. Blake,—My debt has accumulated so that I
should have answered your last letter at once, if I had
not been the subject of what is called a press of engagements,
having a lecture to write for last Wednesday,
and surveying more than usual besides. It has
been a kind of running fight with me,—the enemy not
always behind me I trust.
True, a man cannot lift himself by his own waistbands,
because he cannot get out of himself; but he
can expand himself (which is better, there being no up
nor down in nature), and so split his waistbands, being
already within himself.
You speak of doing and being, and the vanity, real
or apparent, of much doing. The suckers—I think it
is they—make nests in our river in the spring of more
than a cart-load of small stones, amid which to deposit
their ova. The other day I opened a muskrat's house.
It was made of weeds, five feet broad at base, and
three feet high, and far and low within it was a little
cavity, only a foot in diameter, where the rat dwelt.
It may seem trivial, this piling up of weeds, but so the
race of muskrats is preserved. We must heap up a
great pile of doing, for a small diameter of being. Is
it not imperative on us that we do something, if we
only work in a treadmill? And, indeed, some sort of
revolving is necessary to produce a centre and nucleus
of being. What exercise is to the body, employment is
to the mind and morals. Consider what an amount of
drudgery must be performed,—how much humdrum
and prosaic labor goes to any work of the least value.
There are so many layers of mere white lime in every
shell to that thin inner one so beautifully tinted. Let
not the shellfish think to build his house of that alone;
and pray, what are its tints to him? Is it not his
smooth, close-fitting shirt merely, whose tints are not to
him, being in the dark, but only when he is gone or
dead, and his shell is heaved up to light, a wreck upon
the beach, do they appear. With him, too, it is a Song
of the Shirt, "Work,—work,—work!" And the
work is not merely a police in the gross sense, but in
the higher sense a discipline. If it is surely the means
to the highest end we know, can any work be humble
or disgusting? Will it not rather be elevating as a
ladder, the means by which we are translated?
How admirably the artist is made to accomplish his
self-culture by devotion to his art! The wood-sawyer,
through his effort to do his work well, becomes not
merely a better wood-sawyer, but measurably a better
man. Few are the men that can work on their navels,—only
some Brahmins that I have heard of. To the
painter is given some paint and canvas instead; to
the Irishman a hog, typical of himself. In a thousand
apparently humble ways men busy themselves to make
some right take the place of some wrong,—if it is only
to make a better paste blacking,—and they are themselves
so much the better morally for it.
You say that you do not succeed much. Does it
concern you enough that you do not? Do you work
hard enough at it? Do you get the benefit of discipline
out of it? If so, persevere. Is it a more serious thing
than to walk a thousand miles in a thousand successive
hours? Do you get any corns by it? Do you ever think
of hanging yourself on account of failure?
If you are going into that line,—going to besiege
the city of God,—you must not only be strong in engines,
but prepared with provisions to starve out the
garrison. An Irishman came to see me to-day, who is
endeavoring to get his family out to this New World.
He rises at half past four, milks twenty-eight cows
(which has swollen the joints of his fingers), and eats
his breakfast, without any milk in his tea or coffee,
before six; and so on, day after day, for six and a half
dollars a month; and thus he keeps his virtue in him,
if he does not add to it; and he regards me as a gentleman
able to assist him; but if I ever get to be a
gentleman, it will be by working after my fashion
harder than he does. If my joints are not swollen, it
must be because I deal with the teats of celestial cows
before breakfast (and the milker in this case is always
allowed some of the milk for his breakfast), to say
nothing of the flocks and herds of Admetus afterward.
It is the art of mankind to polish the world, and
every one who works is scrubbing in some part.
If the work is high and far,
You must not only aim aright,
But draw the bow with all your might.
You must qualify yourself to use a bow which no humbler
archer can bend.
Who shall know it for a bow? It is not of yew tree.
It is straighter than a ray of light; flexibility is not
known for one of its qualities.
December 22.
So far I had got when I was called off to survey.
Pray read the life of Haydon the painter, if you have
not. It is a small revelation for these latter days; a
great satisfaction to know that he has lived, though he
is now dead. Have you met with the letter of a Turkish
cadi at the end of Layard's "Ancient Babylon"?
that also is refreshing, and a capital comment on the
whole book which precedes it,—the Oriental genius
speaking through him.
Those Brahmins "put it through." They come off,
or rather stand still, conquerors, with some withered
arms or legs at least to show; and they are said to have
cultivated the faculty of abstraction to a degree unknown
to Europeans. If we cannot sing of faith and
triumph, we will sing our despair. We will be that
kind of bird. There are day owls, and there are night
owls, and each is beautiful and even musical while
about its business.
Might you not find some positive work to do with
your back to Church and State, letting your back do
all the rejection of them? Can you not go upon your
pilgrimage, Peter, along the winding mountain path
whither you face? A step more will make those funereal
church bells over your shoulder sound far and sweet as
a natural sound.
Why not make a very large mud pie and bake it in the
sun! Only put no Church nor State into it, nor upset
any other pepper-box that way. Dig out a woodchuck,—for
that has nothing to do with rotting institutions.
Go ahead.
Whether a man spends his day in an ecstasy or
despondency, he must do some work to show for it,
even as there are flesh and bones to show for him. We
are superior to the joy we experience.
Your last two letters, methinks, have more nerve and
will in them than usual, as if you had erected yourself
more. Why are not they good work, if you only had a
hundred correspondents to tax you?
Make your failure tragical by the earnestness and
steadfastness of your endeavor, and then it will not
differ from success. Prove it to be the inevitable fate
of mortals,—of one mortal,—if you can.
You said that you were writing on Immortality. I
wish you would communicate to me what you know
about that. You are sure to live while that is your
theme.
Thus I write on some text which a sentence of your
letters may have furnished.
I think of coming to see you as soon as I get a new
coat, if I have money enough left. I will write to you
again about it.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, January 21, 1854.
Mr. Blake,—My coat is at last done, and my
mother and sister allow that I am so far in a condition
to go abroad. I feel as if I had gone abroad the
moment I put it on. It is, as usual, a production
strange to me, the wearer,—invented by some Count
D'Orsay; and the maker of it was not acquainted with
any of my real depressions or elevations. He only
measured a peg to hang it on, and might have made the
loop big enough to go over my head. It requires a not
quite innocent indifference, not to say insolence, to
wear it. Ah! the process by which we get our coats is
not what it should be. Though the Church declares
it righteous, and its priest pardons me, my own good
genius tells me that it is hasty, and coarse, and false.
I expect a time when, or rather an integrity by which,
a man will get his coat as honestly and as perfectly
fitting as a tree its bark. Now our garments are typical
of our conformity to the ways of the world, i. e., of
the devil, and to some extent react on us and poison
us, like that shirt which Hercules put on.
I think to come and see you next week, on Monday,
if nothing hinders. I have just returned from court at
Cambridge, whither I was called as a witness, having
surveyed a water-privilege, about which there is a dispute,
since you were here.
Ah! what foreign countries there are, greater in extent
than the United States or Russia, and with no more souls
to a square mile, stretching away on every side from
every human being with whom you have no sympathy.
Their humanity affects me as simply monstrous. Rocks,
earth, brute beasts, comparatively are not so strange to
me. When I sit in the parlors and kitchens of some
with whom my business brings me—I was going
to say in contact—(business, like misery, makes
strange bedfellows), I feel a sort of awe, and as forlorn
as if I were cast away on a desolate shore. I think of
Riley's Narrative[50]
and his sufferings. You, who soared
like a merlin with your mate through the realms of
æther, in the presence of the unlike, drop at once to
earth, a mere amorphous squab, divested of your air-inflated
pinions. (By the way, excuse this writing, for
I am using the stub of the last feather I chance to possess.)
You travel on, however, through this dark and
desert world; you see in the distance an intelligent and
sympathizing lineament; stars come forth in the dark,
and oases appear in the desert.
But (to return to the subject of coats), we are well-nigh
smothered under yet more fatal coats, which do
not fit us, our whole lives long. Consider the cloak
that our employment or station is; how rarely men
treat each other for what in their true and naked characters
they are; how we use and tolerate pretension;
how the judge is clothed with dignity which does not
belong to him, and the trembling witness with humility
that does not belong to him, and the criminal, perchance,
with shame or impudence which no more belong
to him. It does not matter so much, then, what is the
fashion of the cloak with which we cloak these cloaks.
Change the coat; put the judge in the criminal-box,
and the criminal on the bench, and you might think
that you had changed the men.
No doubt the thinnest of all cloaks is conscious
deception or lies; it is sleazy and frays out; it is not
close-woven like cloth; but its meshes are a coarse network.
A man can afford to lie only at the intersection
of the threads; but truth puts in the filling, and makes
a consistent stuff.
I mean merely to suggest how much the station
affects the demeanor and self-respectability of the parties,
and that the difference between the judge's coat
of cloth and the criminal's is insignificant compared
with, or only partially significant of, the difference
between the coats which their respective stations permit
them to wear. What airs the judge may put on over
his coat which the criminal may not! The judge's
opinion (sententia) of the criminal sentences him, and
is read by the clerk of the court, and published to the
world, and executed by the sheriff; but the criminal's
opinion of the judge has the weight of a sentence, and
is published and executed only in the supreme court
of the universe,—a court not of common pleas. How
much juster is the one than the other? Men are continually
sentencing each other; but, whether we be
judges or criminals, the sentence is ineffectual unless
we continue ourselves.
I am glad to hear that I do not always limit your
vision when you look this way; that you sometimes see
the light through me; that I am here and there windows,
and not all dead wall. Might not the community
sometimes petition a man to remove himself as a
nuisance, a darkener of the day, a too large mote?
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, August 8, 1854.
Mr. Blake,—Methinks I have spent a rather unprofitable
summer thus far. I have been too much
with the world, as the poet might say.[51]
The completest
performance of the highest duties it imposes would
yield me but little satisfaction. Better the neglect of all
such, because your life passed on a level where it was
impossible to recognize them. Latterly, I have heard
the very flies buzz too distinctly, and have accused myself
because I did not still this superficial din. We
must not be too easily distracted by the crying of children
or of dynasties. The Irishman erects his sty, and
gets drunk, and jabbers more and more under my
eaves, and I am responsible for all that filth and folly.
I find it, as ever, very unprofitable to have much to do
with men. It is sowing the wind, but not reaping even
the whirlwind; only reaping an unprofitable calm and
stagnation. Our conversation is a smooth, and civil,
and never-ending speculation merely. I take up the
thread of it again in the morning, with very much such
courage as the invalid takes his prescribed Seidlitz
powders. Shall I help you to some of the mackerel?
It would be more respectable if men, as has been said
before, instead of being such pigmy desperates, were
Giant Despairs. Emerson says that his life is so unprofitable
and shabby for the most part, that he is driven
to all sorts of resources, and, among the rest, to men.
I tell him that we differ only in our resources. Mine is
to get away from men. They very rarely affect me as
grand or beautiful; but I know that there is a sunrise
and a sunset every day. In the summer, this world is
a mere watering-place,—a Saratoga,—drinking so
many tumblers of Congress water; and in the winter,
is it any better, with its oratorios? I have seen more
men than usual, lately; and, well as I was acquainted
with one, I am surprised to find what vulgar fellows
they are. They do a little business commonly each day,
in order to pay their board, and then they congregate
in sitting-rooms and feebly fabulate and paddle in the
social slush; and when I think that they have sufficiently
relaxed, and am prepared to see them steal
away to their shrines, they go unashamed to their beds,
and take on a new layer of sloth. They may be single,
or have families in their faineancy. I do not meet men
who can have nothing to do with me because they have
so much to do with themselves. However, I trust that
a very few cherish purposes which they never declare.
Only think, for a moment, of a man about his affairs!
How we should respect him! How glorious he would
appear! Not working for any corporation, its agent, or
president, but fulfilling the end of his being! A man
about his business would be the cynosure of all eyes.
The other evening I was determined that I would
silence this shallow din; that I would walk in various
directions and see if there was not to be found any
depth of silence around. As Bonaparte sent out his
horsemen in the Red Sea on all sides to find shallow
water, so I sent forth my mounted thoughts to find
deep water. I left the village and paddled up the river
to Fair Haven Pond. As the sun went down, I saw a
solitary boatman disporting on the smooth lake. The
falling dews seemed to strain and purify the air, and I
was smoothed with an infinite stillness. I got the world,
as it were, by the nape of the neck, and held it under
in the tide of its own events, till it was drowned, and
then I let it go down-stream like a dead dog. Vast
hollow chambers of silence stretched away on every
side, and my being expanded in proportion, and filled
them. Then first could I appreciate sound, and find it
musical.[52]
But now for your news. Tell us of the year. Have
you fought the good fight? What is the state of your
crops? Will your harvest answer well to the seed-time,
and are you cheered by the prospect of stretching cornfields?
Is there any blight on your fields, any murrain
in your herds? Have you tried the size and quality of
your potatoes? It does one good to see their balls dangling
in the lowlands. Have you got your meadow hay
before the fall rains shall have set in? Is there enough
in your barns to keep your cattle over? Are you killing
weeds nowadays? or have you earned leisure to go
a-fishing? Did you plant any Giant Regrets last spring,
such as I saw advertised? It is not a new species, but
the result of cultivation and a fertile soil. They are
excellent for sauce. How is it with your marrow
squashes for winter use? Is there likely to be a sufficiency
of fall feed in your neighborhood? What is the
state of the springs? I read that in your county there
is more water on the hills than in the valleys. Do you
find it easy to get all the help you require? Work early
and late, and let your men and teams rest at noon. Be
careful not to drink too much sweetened water, while
at your hoeing, this hot weather. You can bear the
heat much better for it.
TO MARSTON WATSON (AT PLYMOUTH).
Concord, September 19, 1854.
Dear Sir,—I am glad to hear from you and the
Plymouth men again. The world still holds together
between Concord and Plymouth, it seems. I should
like to be with you while Mr. Alcott is there, but I
cannot come next Sunday. I will come Sunday after
next, that is, October 1st, if that will do; and look
out for you at the depot. I do not like to promise
more than one discourse. Is there a good precedent for
two?
The first of Thoreau's many lecturing visits to
Worcester, the home of his friend Blake, was in April,
1849, and from that time onward he must have read
lectures there at least annually, until his last illness,
in 1861-62. By 1854, the lecturing habit, in several
places besides Concord, had become established; and
there was a constant interchange of visits and excursions
with his friends at Worcester, Plymouth, New
Bedford, etc. Soon after the publication of "Walden,"
in the summer of 1854, Thoreau wrote these notes to
Mr. Blake, touching on various matters of friendly
interest.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, September 21, 1854.
Blake,—I have just read your letter, but do not
mean now to answer it, solely for want of time to say
what I wish. I directed a copy of "Walden" to you
at Ticknor's, on the day of its publication, and it
should have reached you before. I am encouraged to
know that it interests you as it now stands,—a printed
book,—for you apply a very severe test to it,—you
make the highest demand on me. As for the excursion
you speak of, I should like it right well,—indeed I
thought of proposing the same thing to you and Brown,
some months ago. Perhaps it would have been better
if I had done so then; for in that case I should have
been able to enter into it with that infinite margin to
my views,—spotless of all engagements,—which I
think so necessary. As it is, I have agreed to go a-lecturing
to Plymouth, Sunday after next (October 1) and
to Philadelphia in November, and thereafter to the
West, if they shall want me; and, as I have prepared
nothing in that shape, I feel as if my hours were spoken
for. However, I think that, after having been to Plymouth,
I may take a day or two—if that date will suit
you and Brown. At any rate I will write to you then.
Concord, October 5, 1854.
After I wrote to you, Mr. Watson postponed my
going to Plymouth one week, i. e., till next Sunday;
and now he wishes me to carry my instruments and
survey his grounds, to which he has been adding. Since
I want a little money, though I contemplate but a short
excursion, I do not feel at liberty to decline this work.
I do not know exactly how long it will detain me,—but
there is plenty of time yet, and I will write to you
again—perhaps from Plymouth.
There is a Mr. Thomas Cholmondeley (pronounced
Chumly), a young English author, staying at our house
at present, who asks me to teach him botany—i. e.,
anything which I know; and also to make an excursion
to some mountain with him. He is a well-behaved person,
and possibly I may propose his taking that run
to Wachusett with us—if it will be agreeable to you.
Nay, if I do not hear any objection from you, I will
consider myself at liberty to invite him.
Concord, Saturday P. M., October 14, 1854.
I have just returned from Plymouth, where I have
been detained surveying much longer than I expected.
What do you say to visiting Wachusett next Thursday?
I will start at 7¼ A. M. unless there is a prospect of a
stormy day, go by cars to Westminster, and thence on
foot five or six miles to the mountain-top, where I may
engage to meet you, at (or before) 12 M. If the weather
is unfavorable, I will try again, on Friday,—and again
on Monday. If a storm comes on after starting, I will
seek you at the tavern at Princeton centre, as soon as
circumstances will permit. I shall expect an answer at
once, to clinch the bargain.
The year 1854 was a memorable one in Thoreau's
life, for it brought out his most successful book, "Walden,"
and introduced him to the notice of the world,
which had paid small attention to his first book, the
"Week," published five years earlier. This year also
made him acquainted with two friends to whom he
wrote much, and who loved to visit and stroll with him
around Concord, or in more distant places,—Thomas
Cholmondeley, an Englishman from Shropshire, and
Daniel Ricketson, a New Bedford Quaker, of liberal
mind and cultivated tastes,—an author and poet, and
fond of corresponding with poets, as he did with the
Howitts and William Barnes of England, and with
Bryant, Emerson, Channing, and Thoreau, in America.
Few of the letters to Cholmondeley are yet found, being
buried temporarily in the mass of family papers at
Condover Hall, an old Elizabethan mansion near
Shrewsbury, which Thomas Cholmondeley inherited,
and which remains in his family's possession since his
own death at Florence in 1864. But the letters of the
Englishman, recently printed in the Atlantic Monthly
(December, 1893), show how sincere was the attachment
of this ideal friend to the Concord recluse, and
how well he read that character which the rest of England,
and a good part of America, have been so slow
to recognize for what it really was.
Thomas Cholmondeley was the eldest son of Rev.
Charles Cowper Cholmondeley, rector of Overleigh,
Cheshire, and of a sister to Reginald Heber, the celebrated
bishop of Calcutta. He was born in 1823, and
brought up at Hodnet, in Shropshire, where his father,
a cousin of Lord Delamere, had succeeded his brother-in-law
as rector, on the departure of Bishop Heber for
India, in 1823. The son was educated at Oriel College,
Oxford,—a friend, and perhaps pupil of Arthur
Hugh Clough, who gave him letters to Emerson in
1854. Years before, after leaving Oxford, he had gone
with some relatives to New Zealand, and before coming
to New England he had published a book, "Ultima
Thule," describing that Australasian colony of
England, where he lived for part of a year. He had
previously studied in Germany, and traveled on the
Continent. He landed in America the first time in
August, 1854, and soon after went to Concord, where,
at the suggestion of Emerson, he became an inmate
of Mrs. Thoreau's family. This made him intimate
with Henry Thoreau for a month or two, and also
brought him into acquaintance with Ellery Channing,
then living across the main street of Concord, in the
west end of the village, and furnishing to Thoreau a
landing-place for his boat under the willows at the foot
of Channing's small garden. Alcott was not then in
Concord, but Cholmondeley made his acquaintance in
Boston, and admired his character and manners.[53]
Thoreau's Boat-landing, Concord River
With Channing and Thoreau the young Englishman
visited their nearest mountain, Wachusett, and in some
of their walks the artist Rowse, who had made the
first portrait of Thoreau, joined, for he was then in
Concord, late in 1854, engraving the fine head of Daniel
Webster from a painting by Ames, and this engraving
he gave both to Thoreau and to Cholmondeley. In
December the Englishman, whose patriotism was
roused by the delays and calamities of England in her
Crimean war, resolved to go home and raise a company,
as he did, first spending some weeks in lodgings at
Boston (Orange Street) in order to hear Theodore
Parker preach and visit Harvard College, of which I
was then a student, in the senior class. He visited me
and my classmate, Edwin Morton, and called on some
of the Cambridge friends of Clough. In January, 1855,
he sailed for England, and there received the letter of
Thoreau printed on pages 249-251.
The acquaintance with Mr. Ricketson began by letter
before Cholmondeley reached Concord, but Thoreau
did not visit him until December, 1854. Mr. Ricketson
says, "In the summer of 1854 I purchased, in
New Bedford, a copy of 'Walden.' I had never heard
of its author, but in this admirable and most original
book I found so many observations on plants, birds,
and natural objects generally in which I was also interested,
that I felt at once I had found a congenial
spirit. During this season I was rebuilding a house in
the country, three miles from New Bedford, and had
erected a small building which was called my 'shanty;'
and my family being then in my city house, I made
this building my temporary home. From it I addressed
my first letter to the author of 'Walden.' In reply he
wrote, 'I had duly received your very kind and frank
letter, but delayed to answer it thus long because I
have little skill as a correspondent, and wished to send
you something more than my thanks. I was gratified
by your prompt and hearty acceptance of my book.
Yours is the only word of greeting I am likely to receive
from a dweller in the woods like myself,—from
where the whip-poor-will and cuckoo are heard, and
there are better than moral clouds drifting over, and
real breezes blow.' From that year until his death in
1862 we exchanged visits annually, and letters more
frequently. He was much interested in the botany of
our region, finding here many marine plants he had
not before seen. When our friendship began, the admirers
of his only two published books were few;
most prominent among them were Emerson, Alcott,
and Channing of Concord, Messrs. Blake and T.
Brown of Worcester, Mr. Marston Watson of Plymouth,
and myself. Many accused him of being an imitator
of Emerson; others thought him unsocial, impracticable,
and ascetic. Now he was none of these; a more original
man never lived, nor one more thoroughly personifying
civility; no man could hold a finer relationship
with his family than he."
In reply to Mr. Ricketson's first letter (August 12,
1854) above mentioned, Thoreau sent, after six weeks'
delay, the reply of October 1, the beginning of which
was just quoted. Continuing, Thoreau said:—
"Your account excites in me a desire to see the
Middleborough ponds, of which I had already heard
somewhat; as also some very beautiful ponds on the
Cape, in Harwich, I think, near which I once passed.
I have sometimes also thought of visiting that remnant
of our Indians still living near you. But then, you
know, there is nothing like one's native fields and lakes.
The best news you send me is, not that Nature with
you is so fair and genial, but that there is one there
who likes her so well. That proves all that was
asserted.
"Homer, of course, you include in your list of lovers
of Nature; and, by the way, let me mention here—for
this is 'my thunder' lately—William Gilpin's long
series of books on the Picturesque, with their illustrations.
If it chances that you have not met with these,
I cannot just now frame a better wish than that you
may one day derive as much pleasure from the inspection
of them as I have.
"Much as you have told me of yourself, you have
still, I think, a little the advantage of me in this correspondence,
for I have told you still more in my book.
You have therefore the broadest mark to fire at.
"A young English author, Thomas Cholmondeley,
is just now waiting for me to take a walk with him;
therefore excuse this very barren note from
"Yours, hastily at last."
Between the letter just quoted and Thoreau's next,
of December 19, 1854, a letter is obviously missing.
Mr. Ricketson had answered (October 12), the first
letter, and on December 14 had written again to convey
an invitation from Mr. Mitchell that Thoreau
should lecture at New Bedford, the 26th, on his way
to Nantucket for the 28th. Probably Thoreau had
replied to the letter of October 12, and to the invitation
to bring Cholmondeley with him in the pleasant
October season. In this reply he had said something
which called forth from Ricketson an expression of
sympathy, as well as the December invitation; for
Thoreau thus replied to the letter of December 14:—
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, December 19, 1854.
Dear Sir,—I wish to thank you for your sympathy.
I had counted on seeing you when I came to
New Bedford, though I did not know exactly how near
to it you permanently dwelt; therefore I gladly accept
your invitation to stop at your house. I am going to
lecture at Nantucket the 28th, and as I suppose I must
improve the earliest opportunity to get there from New
Bedford, I will endeavor to come on Monday, that I
may see yourself and New Bedford before my lecture.
I should like right well to see your ponds, but that is
hardly to be thought of at present. I fear that it is
impossible for me to combine such things with the
business of lecturing. You cannot serve God and
Mammon. However, perhaps I shall have time to see
something of your country. I am aware that you
have not so much snow as we; there has been excellent
sleighing here since the 5th inst.
Mr. Cholmondeley has left us, so that I shall come
alone. Will you be so kind as to warn Mr. Mitchell
that I accept at once his invitation to lecture on the
26th of this month, for I do not know that he has got
my letter. Excuse this short note.[54]
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, December 19, 1854.
Mr. Blake,—I suppose you have heard of my
truly providential meeting with Mr. [T.] Brown; providential
because it saved me from the suspicion that
my words had fallen altogether on stony ground, when
it turned out that there was some Worcester soil there.
You will allow me to consider that I correspond with
him through you.
I confess that I am a very bad correspondent, so far
as promptness of reply is concerned; but then I am
sure to answer sooner or later. The longer I have forgotten
you, the more I remember you. For the most
part I have not been idle since I saw you. How does
the world go with you? or rather, how do you get
along without it? I have not yet learned to live, that
I can see, and I fear that I shall not very soon. I find,
however, that in the long run things correspond to my
original idea,—that they correspond to nothing else so
much; and thus a man may really be a true prophet
without any great exertion. The day is never so dark,
nor the night even, but that the laws at least of light
still prevail, and so may make it light in our minds if
they are open to the truth. There is considerable
danger that a man will be crazy between dinner and
supper; but it will not directly answer any good purpose
that I know of, and it is just as easy to be sane.
We have got to know what both life and death are, before
we can begin to live after our own fashion. Let us
be learning our a-b-c's as soon as possible. I never yet
knew the sun to be knocked down and rolled through
a mud-puddle; he comes out honor-bright from behind
every storm. Let us then take sides with the sun, seeing
we have so much leisure. Let us not put all we
prize into a football to be kicked, when a bladder will
do as well.
When an Indian is burned, his body may be broiled,
it may be no more than a beefsteak. What of that?
They may broil his heart, but they do not therefore
broil his courage,—his principles. Be of good courage!
That is the main thing.
If a man were to place himself in an attitude to bear
manfully the greatest evil that can be inflicted on him,
he would find suddenly that there was no such evil to
bear; his brave back would go a-begging. When Atlas
got his back made up, that was all that was required.
(In this case a priv., not pleon., and τλῆμι.) The world
rests on principles. The wise gods will never make
underpinning of a man. But as long as he crouches,
and skulks, and shirks his work, every creature that has
weight will be treading on his toes, and crushing him;
he will himself tread with one foot on the other foot.
The monster is never just there where we think he
is. What is truly monstrous is our cowardice and sloth.
Have no idle disciplines like the Catholic Church
and others; have only positive and fruitful ones. Do
what you know you ought to do. Why should we ever
go abroad, even across the way, to ask a neighbor's
advice? There is a nearer neighbor within us incessantly
telling us how we should behave. But we wait
for the neighbor without to tell us of some false, easier
way.
They have a census-table in which they put down
the number of the insane. Do you believe that they
put them all down there? Why, in every one of these
houses there is at least one man fighting or squabbling
a good part of his time with a dozen pet demons of his
own breeding and cherishing, which are relentlessly
gnawing at his vitals; and if perchance he resolve at
length that he will courageously combat them, he says,
"Ay! ay! I will attend to you after dinner!" And,
when that time comes, he concludes that he is good for
another stage, and reads a column or two about the
Eastern War! Pray, to be in earnest, where is Sevastopol?
Who is Menchikoff? and Nicholas behind there?
who the Allies? Did not we fight a little (little enough
to be sure, but just enough to make it interesting) at
Alma, at Balaclava, at Inkermann? We love to fight
far from home. Ah! the Minié musket is the king of
weapons. Well, let us get one then.
I just put another stick into my stove,—a pretty
large mass of white oak. How many men will do
enough this cold winter to pay for the fuel that will be
required to warm them? I suppose I have burned up
a pretty good-sized tree to-night,—and for what? I
settled with Mr. Tarbell for it the other day; but that
was n't the final settlement. I got off cheaply from him.
At last, one will say, "Let us see, how much wood did
you burn, sir?" And I shall shudder to think that the
next question will be, "What did you do while you
were warm?" Do we think the ashes will pay for it?
that God is an ash-man? It is a fact that we have got
to render an account for the deeds done in the body.
Who knows but we shall be better the next year than
we have been the past? At any rate, I wish you a
really new year,—commencing from the instant you
read this,—and happy or unhappy, according to your
deserts.
TO HARRISON BLAKE.
Concord, December 22, 1854.
Mr. Blake,—I will lecture for your Lyceum on
the 4th of January next; and I hope that I shall have
time for that good day out of doors. Mr. Cholmondeley
is in Boston, yet perhaps I may invite him to
accompany me. I have engaged to lecture at New
Bedford on the 26th inst., stopping with Daniel Ricketson,
three miles out of town; and at Nantucket on
the 28th, so that I shall be gone all next week. They
say there is some danger of being weather-bound at
Nantucket; but I see that others run the same risk.
You had better acknowledge the receipt of this at any
rate, though you should write nothing else; otherwise
I shall not know whether you get it; but perhaps you
will not wait till you have seen me, to answer my letter
(of December 19). I will tell you what I think of lecturing
when I see you. Did you see the notice of "Walden"
in the last Anti-Slavery Standard? You will not
be surprised if I tell you that it reminded me of you.
On the Christmas Day that Thoreau reached New
Bedford, he had left home in the forenoon, as usual in
his Cambridge visits, spent some time at Harvard College,
and gone on by the train in the afternoon, which
accounted for his delay. His host, who then saw him
for the first time, says:—
"I had expected him at noon, but as he did not
arrive, I had given him up for the day. In the latter
part of the afternoon I was clearing off the snow from
my front steps, when, looking up, I saw a man walking
up the carriage-road, bearing a portmanteau in one
hand and an umbrella in the other. He was dressed
in a long overcoat of dark color, and wore a dark soft
hat. I had no suspicion it was Thoreau, and rather
supposed it was a peddler of small wares."
This was a common mistake to make. When Thoreau
ran the gantlet of the Cape Cod villages,—"feeling
as strange," he says, "as if he were in a town in
China,"—one of the old fishermen could not believe
that he had not something to sell. Being finally satisfied
that it was not a peddler with his pack, the old
man said, "Wal, it makes no odds what 't is you carry,
so long as you carry Truth along with ye." Mr. Ricketson
came to the same conclusion about his visitor,
and in the early September of 1855 returned the visit.
On the 4th of January, 1855, Ricketson wrote, saying,
"Your visit, short as it was, gave us all at Brooklawn
much satisfaction;" adding that he might visit
Concord late in January, when he expected to be in
Boston. Thoreau replied:—
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, January 6, 1855.
Mr. Ricketson,—I am pleased to hear from the
shanty, whose inside and occupant I have seen. I had
a very pleasant time at Brooklawn, as you know, and
thereafter at Nantucket. I was obliged to pay the usual
tribute to the sea, but it was more than made up to
me by the hospitality of the Nantucketers. Tell Arthur
that I can now compare notes with him; for though I
went neither before nor behind the mast, since we
had n't any, I went with my head hanging over the
side all the way.
In spite of all my experience, I persisted in reading
to the Nantucket people the lecture which I read at
New Bedford, and I found them to be the very audience
for me. I got home Friday night, after being lost
in the fog off Hyannis.[55]
I have not yet found a new
jackknife, but I had a glorious skating with Channing
the other day, on the skates found long ago.
Mr. Cholmondeley sailed for England direct, in the
America, on the 3d, after spending a night with me.
He thinks even to go to the East and enlist. Last night
I returned from lecturing in Worcester.
I shall be glad to see you when you come to Boston,
as will also my mother and sister, who know something
about you as an abolitionist. Come directly to our
house. Please remember me to Mrs. Ricketson, and
also to the young folks.
After writing that he expected to be at the anti-slavery
meetings in Boston, January 24 and 25, ill
health and a snow-storm detained Ricketson at Brooklawn,
whereupon Thoreau wrote:—
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, February 1, 1855.
Dear Sir,—I supposed, as I did not see you on the
24th or 25th, that some track or other was obstructed;
but the solid earth still holds together between New
Bedford and Concord, and I trust that as this time you
stayed away, you may live to come another day.
I did not go to Boston, for with regard to that place
I sympathize with one of my neighbors, an old man,
who has not been there since the last war, when he was
compelled to go. No, I have a real genius for staying
at home.
I have been looking of late at Bewick's tail-pieces in
the "Birds,"—all they have of him at Harvard. Why
will he be a little vulgar at times? Yesterday I made
an excursion up our river,—skated some thirty miles
in a few hours, if you will believe it. So with reading
and writing and skating the night comes round
again.
The early part of 1855 was spent by Thomas
Cholmondeley in a tiresome passage to England, whence
he wrote (January 27) to say to Thoreau that he had
reached Shropshire, and been commissioned captain in
the local militia, in preparation for service at Sevastopol,
but reminding his Concord friend of a half promise
to visit England some day. To this Thoreau
made answer thus:—
TO THOMAS CHOLMONDELEY (AT HODNET).
Concord, Mass., February 7, 1855.
Dear Cholmondeley,—I am glad to hear that you
have arrived safely at Hodnet, and that there is a solid
piece of ground of that name which can support a man
better than a floating plank, in that to me as yet purely
historical England. But have I not seen you with my
own eyes, a piece of England herself, and was not your
letter come out to me thence? I have now reason to
believe that Salop is as real a place as Concord; with
at least as good an underpinning of granite, floating on
liquid fire. I congratulate you on having arrived safely
at that floating isle, after your disagreeable passage in
the steamer America. So are we not all making a passage,
agreeable or disagreeable, in the steamer Earth,
trusting to arrive at last at some less undulating Salop
and brother's house?
I cannot say that I am surprised to hear that you
have joined the militia, after what I have heard from
your lips; but I am glad to doubt if there will be occasion
for your volunteering into the line. Perhaps I am
thinking of the saying that it "is always darkest just
before day." I believe it is only necessary that England
be fully awakened to a sense of her position, in order
that she may right herself, especially as the weather
will soon cease to be her foe. I wish I could believe
that the cause in which you are embarked is the cause
of the people of England. However, I have no sympathy
with the idleness that would contrast this fighting
with the teachings of the pulpit; for, perchance,
more true virtue is being practiced at Sevastopol than
in many years of peace. It is a pity that we seem to
require a war, from time to time, to assure us that there
is any manhood still left in man.
I was much pleased with [J. J. G.] Wilkinson's vigorous
and telling assault on Allopathy, though he substitutes
another and perhaps no stronger thy for that.
Something as good on the whole conduct of the war
would be of service. Cannot Carlyle supply it? We
will not require him to provide the remedy. Every man
to his trade. As you know, I am not in any sense a
politician. You, who live in that snug and compact
isle, may dream of a glorious commonwealth, but I have
some doubts whether I and the new king of the Sandwich
Islands shall pull together. When I think of the
gold-diggers and the Mormons, the slaves and the slaveholders
and the flibustiers, I naturally dream of a glorious
private life. No, I am not patriotic; I shall not
meddle with the Gem of the Antilles. General Quitman[56]
cannot count on my aid, alas for him! nor can
General Pierce.[57]
I still take my daily walk, or skate over Concord
fields or meadows, and on the whole have more to do
with nature than with man. We have not had much
snow this winter, but have had some remarkably cold
weather, the mercury, February 6, not rising above 6°
below zero during the day, and the next morning falling
to 26°. Some ice is still thirty inches thick about us.
A rise in the river has made uncommonly good skating,
which I have improved to the extent of some thirty
miles a day, fifteen out and fifteen in.
Emerson is off westward, enlightening the Hamiltonians
[in Canada] and others, mingling his thunder with
that of Niagara. Channing still sits warming his five
wits—his sixth, you know, is always limber—over
that stove, with the dog down cellar. Lowell has just
been appointed Professor of Belles-Lettres in Harvard
University, in place of Longfellow, resigned, and will
go very soon to spend another year in Europe, before
taking his seat.
I am from time to time congratulating myself on my
general want of success as a lecturer; apparent want of
success, but is it not a real triumph? I do my work
clean as I go along, and they will not be likely to want
me anywhere again. So there is no danger of my
repeating myself, and getting to a barrel of sermons,
which you must upset, and begin again with.
My father and mother and sister all desire to be
remembered to you, and trust that you will never come
within range of Russian bullets. Of course, I would
rather think of you as settled down there in Shropshire,
in the camp of the English people, making acquaintance
with your men, striking at the root of the evil,
perhaps assaulting that rampart of cotton bags that
you tell of. But it makes no odds where a man goes or
stays, if he is only about his business.
Let me hear from you, wherever you are, and believe
me yours ever in the good fight, whether before Sevastopol
or under the wreken.
While Cholmondeley's first letter from England was
on its way to Concord, Thoreau was one day making
his occasional call at the Harvard College Library
(where he found and was allowed to take away volumes
relating to his manifold studies), when it occurred
to him to call at my student-chamber in Holworthy
Hall, and there leave a copy of his "Week." I had
never met him, and was then out; the occasion of his
call was a review of his two books that had come out a
few weeks earlier in the Harvard Magazine, of which
I was an editor and might be supposed to have had
some share in the criticism. The volume was left with
my classmate Lyman, accompanied by a message that
it was intended for the critic in the Magazine. Accordingly,
I gave it to Edwin Morton, who was the
reviewer, and notified Thoreau by letter of that fact,
and of my hope to see him soon in Cambridge or Concord.[58]
To this he replied in a few days as below:—
TO F. B. SANBORN (AT HAMPTON FALLS, N. H.).
Concord, February 2, 1855.
Dear Sir,—I fear that you did not get the note
which I left with the Librarian for you, and so will
thank you again for your politeness. I was sorry that
I was obliged to go into Boston almost immediately.
However, I shall be glad to see you whenever you come
to Concord, and I will suggest nothing to discourage
your coming, so far as I am concerned; trusting that
you know what it is to take a partridge on the wing.
You tell me that the author of the criticism is Mr.
Morton. I had heard as much,—and indeed guessed
more. I have latterly found Concord nearer to Cambridge
than I believed I should, when I was leaving
my Alma Mater; and hence you will not be surprised
if even I feel some interest in the success of the Harvard
Magazine.
Believe me yours truly,
Henry D. Thoreau.
At this time I was under engagement with Mr.
Emerson and others in Concord to take charge of a
small school there in March; and did so without again
seeing the author of "Walden" in Cambridge. Soon
after my settlement at Concord, in the house of Mr.
Channing, just opposite Thoreau's, he made an evening
call on me and my sister (April 11, 1855), but I
had already met him more than once at Mr. Emerson's,
and was even beginning to take walks with him, as
frequently happened in the next six years. In the following
summer I began to dine daily at his mother's
table, and thus saw him almost every day for three
years.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, June 27, 1855.
Mr. Blake,—I have been sick and good for nothing
but to lie on my back and wait for something to
turn up, for two or three months. This has compelled
me to postpone several things, among them writing to
you, to whom I am so deeply in debt, and inviting you
and Brown to Concord,—not having brains adequate
to such an exertion. I should feel a little less ashamed
if I could give any name to my disorder,—but I cannot,
and our doctor cannot help me to it,—and I
will not take the name of any disease in vain. However,
there is one consolation in being sick; and that
is the possibility that you may recover to a better
state than you were ever in before. I expected in the
winter to be deep in the woods of Maine in my
canoe, long before this; but I am so far from this
that I can only take a languid walk in Concord
streets.
I do not know how the mistake arose about the Cape
Cod excursion. The nearest I have come to that with
anybody is this: About a month ago Channing proposed
to me to go to Truro on Cape Cod with him,
and board there a while,—but I declined. For a week
past, however, I have been a little inclined to go there
and sit on the seashore a week or more; but I do not
venture to propose myself as the companion of him or
of any peripatetic man. Not that I should not rejoice
to have you and Brown or C. sitting there also. I am
not sure that C. really wishes to go now; and as I go
simply for the medicine of it, I should not think it
worth the while to notify him when I am about to take
my bitters. Since I began this, or within five minutes,
I have begun to think that I will start for Truro next
Saturday morning, the 30th. I do not know at what
hour the packet leaves Boston, nor exactly what kind
of accommodation I shall find at Truro.
I should be singularly favored if you and Brown
were there at the same time; and though you speak of
the 20th of July, I will be so bold as to suggest your
coming to Concord Friday night (when, by the way,
Garrison and Phillips hold forth here), and going to
the Cape with me. Though we take short walks together
there, we can have long talks, and you and
Brown will have time enough for your own excursions
besides.
I received a letter from Cholmondeley last winter,
which I should like to show you, as well as his book.[59]
He said that he had "accepted the offer of a captaincy
in the Salop Militia," and was hoping to take an active
part in the war before long.
I thank you again and again for the encouragement
your letters are to me. But I must stop this writing, or
I shall have to pay for it.
North Truro, July 8, 1855.
There being no packet, I did not leave Boston till
last Thursday, though I came down on Wednesday, and
Channing with me. There is no public house here; but
we are boarding in a little house attached to the Highland
Lighthouse with Mr. James Small, the keeper.
It is true the table is not so clean as could be desired,
but I have found it much superior in that respect to
a Provincetown hotel. They are what are called "good
livers." Our host has another larger and very good
house, within a quarter of a mile, unoccupied, where
he says he can accommodate several more. He is a
very good man to deal with,—has often been the representative
of the town, and is perhaps the most intelligent
man in it. I shall probably stay here as much as
ten days longer. Board $3.50 per week. So you and
Brown had better come down forthwith. You will find
either the schooner Melrose or another, or both, leaving
Commerce Street, or else T Wharf, at 9 A. M. (it commonly
means 10), Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays,—if
not other days. We left about 10 A. M., and
reached Provincetown at 5 P. M.,—a very good run.
A stage runs up the Cape every morning but Sunday,
starting at 4½ A. M., and reaches the post-office in North
Truro, seven miles from Provincetown, and one from
the lighthouse, about 6 o'clock. If you arrive at P.
before night, you can walk over, and leave your baggage
to be sent. You can also come by cars from Boston
to Yarmouth, and thence by stage forty miles more,—through
every day, but it costs much more, and is
not so pleasant. Come by all means, for it is the best
place to see the ocean in the States.... I hope I shall
be worth meeting.
July 14.
You say that you hope I will excuse your frequent
writing. I trust you will excuse my infrequent and curt
writing until I am able to resume my old habits, which
for three months I have been compelled to abandon.
Methinks I am beginning to be better. I think to
leave the Cape next Wednesday, and so shall not see
you here; but I shall be glad to meet you in Concord,
though I may not be able to go before the mast,
in a boating excursion. This is an admirable place
for coolness and sea-bathing and retirement. You must
come prepared for cool weather and fogs.
P. S.—There is no mail up till Monday morning.
During the spring and early summer of 1855, Thoreau
was much occupied with his home duties, or was
ill,—the earlier approaches of that disease of which he
languished, taking medical advice in 1860-61. This
must have prevented an earlier visit to Concord by his
friend Ricketson than September, 1855, and I find no
letters intervening, although there must have been one
or two, to arrange the visit. He reached Concord about
September 20, and found me living in the lower stories
of Channing's house, while the owner chiefly occupied
the attic, where, no doubt, as in the old Hunt house,
Ricketson smoked with him. They went together to
call on Edmund Hosmer, and it was at the sight of this
old house that Ricketson formed the plan of occupying
a chamber there. It stood a half-mile down the river,
a little below where the Assabet runs into the main
channel. Writing to Thoreau, Sunday, September 23,
Ricketson said:—
"How charmingly you, Channing, and I dovetailed
together! Few men smoke such pipes as we did,—the
real Calumet; the tobacco that we smoked was free
labor produce. I haven't lost sight of Solon Hosmer,
the wisest-looking man in Concord, and a real feelosofer.
I want you to see him, and tell him not to take
down the old house where the feelosofers met. I think
I should like to have the large chamber for an occasional
sojourn in Concord. It can be easily tinkered up
so as to be a comfortable roost for a feelosofer,—a few
old chairs, a table, bed, etc., would be all-sufficient;
then you and Channing could come over in your punt
and rusticate."
The "punt" was Thoreau's boat, in which he sometimes
set up a small mast and sail, and which he kept
at the foot of Channing's garden, where, that summer,
my heavy four-oared boat also lay, when my pupils
were not rowing in it. In his letter to Blake of September
26, Thoreau described Ricketson, and the next
day he answered Ricketson's letter. Cholmondeley in
the meantime, the war being not yet over, was making
his way to the Crimea through southern Europe.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, September 26, 1855.
Mr. Blake,—The other day I thought that my
health must be better,—that I gave at last a sign of
vitality,—because I experienced a slight chagrin. But
I do not see how strength is to be got into my legs
again. These months of feebleness have yielded few,
if any, thoughts, though they have not passed without
serenity, such as our sluggish Musketaquid suggests.
I hope that the harvest is to come. I trust that you
have at least warped up the stream a little daily, holding
fast by your anchors at night, since I saw you, and
have kept my place for me while I have been absent.
Mr. Ricketson of New Bedford has just made me a
visit of a day and a half, and I have had a quite good
time with him. He and Channing have got on particularly
well together. He is a man of very simple tastes,
notwithstanding his wealth; a lover of nature; but,
above all, singularly frank and plain-spoken. I think
that you might enjoy meeting him.
Sincerity is a great but rare virtue, and we pardon
to it much complaining, and the betrayal of many
weaknesses. R. says of himself, that he sometimes
thinks that he has all the infirmities of genius without
the genius; is wretched without a hair pillow, etc.; expresses
a great and awful uncertainty with regard to
"God," "Death," his "immortality;" says, "If I only
knew," etc. He loves Cowper's "Task" better than
anything else; and thereafter perhaps, Thomson, Gray,
and even Howitt. He has evidently suffered for want of
sympathizing companions. He says that he sympathizes
with much in my books, but much in them is naught
to him,—"namby-pamby,"—"stuff,"—"mystical."
Why will not I, having common sense, write in plain
English always; teach men in detail how to live a
simpler life, etc.; not go off into ——? But I say
that I have no scheme about it,—no designs on men
at all; and, if I had, my mode would be to tempt
them with the fruit, and not with the manure. To what
end do I lead a simple life at all, pray? That I may
teach others to simplify their lives?—and so all our
lives be simplified merely, like an algebraic formula?
Or not, rather, that I may make use of the ground I
have cleared, to live more worthily and profitably? I
would fain lay the most stress forever on that which is
the most important,—imports the most to me,—though
it were only (what it is likely to be) a vibration
in the air. As a preacher, I should be prompted to tell
men, not so much how to get their wheat bread cheaper,
as of the bread of life compared with which that is
bran. Let a man only taste these loaves, and he becomes
a skillful economist at once. He'll not waste
much time in earning those. Don't spend your time in
drilling soldiers, who may turn out hirelings after all,
but give to undrilled peasantry a country to fight for.
The schools begin with what they call the elements,
and where do they end?
I was glad to hear the other day that Higginson and
—— were gone to Ktaadn; it must be so much better
to go to than a Woman's Rights or Abolition Convention;
better still, to the delectable primitive mounts
within you, which you have dreamed of from your
youth up, and seen, perhaps, in the horizon, but never
climbed.
But how do you do? Is the air sweet to you? Do
you find anything at which you can work, accomplishing
something solid from day to day? Have you put sloth
and doubt behind, considerably?—had one redeeming
dream this summer? I dreamed, last night, that I could
vault over any height it pleased me. That was something;
and I contemplated myself with a slight satisfaction
in the morning for it.
Methinks I will write to you. Methinks you will be
glad to hear. We will stand on solid foundations to
one another,—I a column planted on this shore, you
on that. We meet the same sun in his rising. We
were built slowly, and have come to our bearing. We
will not mutually fall over that we may meet, but will
grandly and eternally guard the straits. Methinks I see
an inscription on you, which the architect made, the
stucco being worn off to it. The name of that ambitious
worldly king is crumbling away. I see it toward
sunset in favorable lights. Each must read for the other,
as might a sailer-by. Be sure you are star-y-pointing
still. How is it on your side? I will not require an
answer until you think I have paid my debts to you.
I have just got a letter from Ricketson, urging me
to come to New Bedford, which possibly I may do.
He says I can wear my old clothes there.
Let me be remembered in your quiet house.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, September 27, 1855.
Friend Ricketson,—I am sorry that you were
obliged to leave Concord without seeing more of it,—its
river and woods, and various pleasant walks, and
its worthies. I assure you that I am none the worse
for my walk with you, but on all accounts the better.
Methinks I am regaining my health; but I would like
to know first what it was that ailed me.
I have not yet conveyed your message to Mr. Hosmer,[60]
but will not fail to do so. That idea of occupying
the old house is a good one,—quite feasible,—and
you could bring your hair pillow with you. It is an inn in
Concord which I had not thought of,—a philosopher's
inn. That large chamber might make a man's idea
expand proportionately. It would be well to have an
interest in some old chamber in a deserted house in
every part of the country which attracted us. There
would be no such place to receive one's guests as that.
If old furniture is fashionable, why not go the whole
house at once? I shall endeavor to make Mr. Hosmer
believe that the old house is the chief attraction of his
farm, and that it is his duty to preserve it by all honest
appliances. You might take a lease of it in perpetuo,
and done with it.
I am so wedded to my way of spending a day,—require
such broad margins of leisure, and such a complete
wardrobe of old clothes,—that I am ill fitted for
going abroad. Pleasant is it sometimes to sit at home,
on a single egg all day, in your own nest, though it
may prove at last to be an egg of chalk. The old coat
that I wear is Concord; it is my morning robe and
study gown, my working dress and suit of ceremony, and
my nightgown after all. Cleave to the simplest ever.
Home,—home,—home. Cars sound like cares to me.
I am accustomed to think very long of going anywhere,—am
slow to move. I hope to hear a response
of the oracle first. However, I think that I will try
the effect of your talisman on the iron horse next Saturday,
and dismount at Tarkiln Hill. Perhaps your sea
air will be good for me. I conveyed your invitation to
Channing, but he apparently will not come.
Excuse my not writing earlier; but I had not decided.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, October 12, 1855.
Mr. Ricketson,—I fear that you had a lonely and
disagreeable ride back to New Bedford through the
Carver woods and so on,—perhaps in the rain, too,
and I am in part answerable for it. I feel very much
in debt to you and your family for the pleasant days
I spent at Brooklawn. Tell Arthur and Walton[61]
that
the shells which they gave me are spread out, and
make quite a show to inland eyes. Methinks I still
hear the strains of the piano, the violin, and the flageolet
blended together. Excuse me for the noise which
I believe drove you to take refuge in the shanty. That
shanty is indeed a favorable place to expand in, which
I fear I did not enough improve.
On my way through Boston I inquired for Gilpin's
works at Little, Brown & Co.'s, Munroe's, Ticknor's,
and Burnham's. They have not got them. They told
me at Little, Brown & Co.'s that his works (not complete),
in twelve vols., 8vo, were imported and sold in
this country five or six years ago for about fifteen dollars.
Their terms for importing are ten per cent on
the cost. I copied from the "London Catalogue of
Books, 1846-51," at their shop, the following list of
Gilpin's Works:—
| Gilpin (Wm.), Dialogues on Various Subjects. 8vo. 9s. |
Cadell. |
| —— Essays on Picturesque Subjects. 8vo. 15s. |
Cadell. |
| —— Exposition of the New Testament. 2 vols. 8vo. 16s. |
Longman. |
| —— Forest Scenery, by Sir T. D. Lauder. 2 vols. 8vo. 18s. |
Smith & E. |
| —— Lectures on the Catechism. 12mo. 3s. 6d. |
Longman. |
| —— Lives of the Reformers. 2 vols. 12mo. 8s. |
Rivington. |
| —— Sermons Illustrative and Practical. 8vo. 12s. |
Hatchard. |
| —— Sermons to Country Congregations. 4 vols. 8vo. £1 16s. |
Longman. |
| —— Tour in Cambridge, Norfolk, etc. 8vo. 18s. |
Cadell. |
| —— Tour of the River Wye. 12mo. 4s. With plates. 8vo. 17s. |
Cadell. |
| Gilpin (W. S. (?)), Hints on Landscape Gardening. Royal 8vo. £1. |
Cadell. |
Beside these, I remember to have read one volume
on "Prints;" his "Southern Tour" (1775); "Lakes
of Cumberland," two vols.; "Highlands of Scotland
and West of England," two vols.—N. B. There must
be plates in every volume.
I still see an image of those Middleborough ponds
in my mind's eye,—broad shallow lakes, with an
iron mine at the bottom,—comparatively unvexed by
sails,—only by Tom Smith and his squaw Sepit's
"sharper." I find my map of the State to be the best
I have seen of that district. It is a question whether
the islands of Long Pond or Great Quitticus offer the
greatest attractions to a Lord of the Isles. That plant
which I found on the shore of Long Pond chances to
be a rare and beautiful flower,—the Sabbatia chloroides,—referred
to Plymouth.
In a Description of Middleborough in the Hist. Coll.,
vol. iii, 1810, signed Nehemiah Bennet, Middleborough,
1793, it is said: "There is on the easterly shore
of Assawampsitt Pond, on the shore of Betty's Neck,
two rocks which have curious marks thereon (supposed
to be done by the Indians), which appear like the steppings
of a person with naked feet which settled into
the rocks; likewise the prints of a hand on several
places, with a number of other marks; also there is a
rock on a high hill a little to the eastward of the old
stone fishing wear, where there is the print of a person's
hand in said rock."
It would be well to look at those rocks again more
carefully; also at the rock on the hill.
I should think that you would like to explore Snipatuit
Pond in Rochester,—it is so large and near.
It is an interesting fact that the alewives used to
ascend to it,—if they do not still,—both from Mattapoisett
and through Great Quitticus.
There will be no trouble about the chamber in the
old house, though, as I told you, Mr. Hosmer may expect
some compensation for it. He says, "Give my
respects to Mr. Ricketson, and tell him that I cannot
be at a large expense to preserve an antiquity or curiosity.
Nature must do its work." "But," says I, "he
asks you only not to assist nature."
It was on October 1 that Thoreau made this visit to
New Bedford, spending the best part of a week with
his friends there. They sailed about the bay and visited
the ponds in Middleborough, and on Saturday, October
6, he parted with Ricketson at Plymouth, and returned
home. At that time Ricketson proposed to
return Thoreau's visit before October 20, but, in a note
now lost, Thoreau sent him word that Channing had
left Concord, "perhaps for the winter." The visit
was then given up,—which accounts for the tone of
Thoreau's next letter, of October 16.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, October 16, 1855.
Friend Ricketson,—I have got both your letters
at once. You must not think Concord so barren a
place when Channing[62]
is away. There are the river
and fields left yet; and I, though ordinarily a man of
business, should have some afternoons and evenings to
spend with you, I trust,—that is, if you could stand
so much of me. If you can spend your time profitably
here, or without ennui, having an occasional ramble or
tête-à-tête with one of the natives, it will give me pleasure
to have you in the neighborhood. You see I am
preparing you for our awful unsocial ways,—keeping
in our dens a good part of the day,—sucking our claws
perhaps. But then we make a religion of it, and that
you cannot but respect.
If you know the taste of your own heart, and like it,
come to Concord, and I'll warrant you enough here
to season the dish with,—aye, even though Channing
and Emerson and I were all away. We might paddle
quietly up the river. Then there are one or two more
ponds to be seen, etc.
I should very much enjoy further rambling with you
in your vicinity, but must postpone it for the present.
To tell the truth, I am planning to get seriously to
work after these long months of inefficiency and idleness.
I do not know whether you are haunted by any
such demon which puts you on the alert to pluck the
fruit of each day as it passes, and store it safely in
your bin. True, it is well to live abandonedly from
time to time; but to our working hours that must be
as the spile to the bung. So for a long season I must
enjoy only a low slanting gleam in my mind's eye from
the Middleborough ponds far away.
Methinks I am getting a little more strength into
those knees of mine; and, for my part, I believe that
God does delight in the strength of a man's legs.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, December 9, 1855.
Mr. Blake,—Thank you! thank you for going
a-wooding with me,—and enjoying it,—for being
warmed by my wood fire. I have indeed enjoyed it
much alone. I see how I might enjoy it yet more with
company,—how we might help each other to live.
And to be admitted to Nature's hearth costs nothing.
None is excluded, but excludes himself. You have only
to push aside the curtain.
I am glad to hear that you were there too. There
are many more such voyages, and longer ones, to be
made on that river, for it is the water of life. The
Ganges is nothing to it. Observe its reflections,—no
idea but is familiar to it. That river, though to dull
eyes it seems terrestrial wholly, flows through Elysium.
What powers bathe in it invisible to villagers! Talk of
its shallowness,—that hay-carts can be driven through
it at midsummer; its depth passeth my understanding.
If, forgetting the allurements of the world, I could
drink deeply enough of it; if, cast adrift from the shore,
I could with complete integrity float on it, I should
never be seen on the Mill-Dam again.[63]
If there is any
depth in me, there is a corresponding depth in it. It
is the cold blood of the gods. I paddle and bathe in
their artery.
I do not want a stick of wood for so trivial a use as
to burn even, but they get it overnight, and carve and
gild it that it may please my eye. What persevering
lovers they are! What infinite pains to attract and delight
us! They will supply us with fagots wrapped in
the daintiest packages, and freight paid; sweet-scented
woods, and bursting into flower, and resounding as if
Orpheus had just left them,—these shall be our fuel,
and we still prefer to chaffer with the wood-merchant!
The jug we found still stands draining bottom up on
the bank, on the sunny side of the house. That river,—who
shall say exactly whence it came, and whither
it goes? Does aught that flows come from a higher
source? Many things drift downward on its surface
which would enrich a man. If you could only be on
the alert all day, and every day! And the nights are
as long as the days.
Do you not think you could contrive thus to get
woody fibre enough to bake your wheaten bread with?
Would you not perchance have tasted the sweet crust
of another kind of bread in the meanwhile, which ever
hangs ready baked on the bread-fruit trees of the
world?
Talk of burning your smoke after the wood has been
consumed! There is a far more important and warming
heat, commonly lost, which precedes the burning
of the wood. It is the smoke of industry, which is incense.
I had been so thoroughly warmed in body and
spirit, that when at length my fuel was housed, I came
near selling it to the ash-man, as if I had extracted all
its heat.
You should have been here to help me get in my
boat. The last time I used it, November 27th, paddling
up the Assabet, I saw a great round pine log
sunk deep in the water, and with labor got it aboard.
When I was floating this home so gently, it occurred
to me why I had found it. It was to make wheels with
to roll my boat into winter quarters upon. So I sawed
off two thick rollers from one end, pierced them for
wheels, and then of a joist which I had found drifting
on the river in the summer I made an axletree, and on
this I rolled my boat out.
Miss Mary Emerson[64]
is here,—the youngest person
in Concord, though about eighty,—and the most apprehensive
of a genuine thought; earnest to know of
your inner life; most stimulating society; and exceedingly
witty withal. She says they called her old when
she was young, and she has never grown any older.
I wish you could see her.
My books[65]
did not arrive till November 30th, the
cargo of the Asia having been complete when they
reached Liverpool. I have arranged them in a case
which I made in the meanwhile, partly of river boards.
I have not dipped far into the new ones yet. One is
splendidly bound and illuminated. They are in English,
French, Latin, Greek, and Sanscrit. I have not
made out the significance of this godsend yet.
Farewell, and bright dreams to you!
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, December 25, 1855.
Friend Ricketson,—Though you have not shown
your face here, I trust that you did not interpret my
last note to my disadvantage. I remember that, among
other things, I wished to break it to you, that, owing to
engagements, I should not be able to show you so much
attention as I could wish, or as you had shown to me.
How we did scour over the country! I hope your horse
will live as long as one which I hear just died in the
south of France at the age of forty. Yet I had no doubt
you would get quite enough of me. Do not give it up
so easily. The old house is still empty, and Hosmer is
easy to treat with.
Channing was here about ten days ago. I told him
of my visit to you, and that he too must go and see
you and your country.[66]
This may have suggested his
writing to you.
That island lodge, especially for some weeks in a
summer, and new explorations in your vicinity, are
certainly very alluring; but such are my engagements to
myself, that I dare not promise to wend your way, but
will for the present only heartily thank you for your
kind and generous offer. When my vacation comes,
then look out.
My legs have grown considerably stronger, and that
is all that ails me.
But I wish now above all to inform you,—though I
suppose you will not be particularly interested,—that
Cholmondeley has gone to the Crimea, "a complete
soldier," with a design, when he returns, if he ever returns,
to buy a cottage in the South of England, and
tempt me over; but that, before going, he busied himself
in buying, and has caused to be forwarded to me
by Chapman, a royal gift, in the shape of twenty-one
distinct works (one in nine volumes,—forty-four volumes
in all), almost exclusively relating to ancient
Hindoo literature, and scarcely one of them to be
bought in America.[67]
I am familiar with many of them,
and know how to prize them. I send you information
of this as I might of the birth of a child.
Please remember me to all your family.
On the date of Thoreau's letter of December 25,
1855, another event occurred, of some note in these
annals of friendship. Channing, from his Dorchester
abode, suddenly showed himself at Ricketson's door.
"I had just written his name when old Ranger announced
him.... He arrived on Christmas day" (as
Thoreau had done the year before) "and his first
salutation on meeting me at the front door of my house
was, 'That's your shanty,' pointing towards it. He is
engaged with the editor of the N. B. Mercury, and
boards in town, but whereabout I have not yet [February
26, 1856] discovered. He usually spends Saturday
and a part of Sunday with me." In replying to this
information, Thoreau gives that admirable character of
his poet neighbor which has often been quoted.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, March 5, 1856.
Friend Ricketson,—I have been out of town,
else I should have acknowledged your letter before.
Though not in the best mood for writing, I will say
what I can now. You plainly have a rare, though a
cheap, resource in your shanty. Perhaps the time will
come when every country-seat will have one,—when
every country-seat will be one. I would advise you to
see that shanty business out, though you go shanty-mad.
Work your vein till it is exhausted, or conducts
you to a broader one; so that Channing shall stand
before your shanty, and say, "That is your house."
This has indeed been a grand winter for me, and
for all of us. I am not considering how much I have
enjoyed it. What matters it how happy or unhappy
we have been, if we have minded our business and
advanced our affairs? I have made it a part of my
business to wade in the snow and take the measure of
the ice. The ice on one of our ponds was just two feet
thick on the first of March; and I have to-day been
surveying a wood-lot, where I sank about two feet at
every step.
It is high time that you, fanned by the warm breezes
of the Gulf Stream, had begun to "lay" for even the
Concord hens have, though one wonders where they
find the raw material of egg-shell here. Beware how
you put off your laying to any later spring, else your
cackling will not have the inspiring early spring sound.
I was surprised to hear the other day that Channing
was in New Bedford. When he was here last (in December,
I think), he said, like himself, in answer to my
inquiry where he lived, "that he did not know the
name of the place;" so it has remained in a degree of
obscurity to me. As you have made it certain to me
that he is in New Bedford, perhaps I can return the
favor by putting you on the track to his boarding-house
there. Mrs. Arnold told Mrs. Emerson where it was;
and the latter thinks, though she may be mistaken,
that it was at a Mrs. Lindsay's.
I am rejoiced to hear that you are getting on so
bravely with him and his verses. He and I, as you
know, have been old cronies,[68]
—
"Fed the same flock, by fountain, shade, and rill,
Together both, ere the high lawns appeared
Under the opening eyelids of the morn,
We drove afield, and both together heared," etc.
"But O, the heavy change," now he is gone. The
Channing you have seen and described is the real
Simon Pure. You have seen him. Many a good ramble
may you have together! You will see in him still
more of the same kind to attract and to puzzle you.
How to serve him most effectually has long been a problem
with his friends. Perhaps it is left for you to solve
it. I suspect that the most that you or any one can
do for him is to appreciate his genius,—to buy and
read, and cause others to buy and read, his poems. That
is the hand which he has put forth to the world,—take
hold of that. Review them if you can,—perhaps
take the risk of publishing something more which he
may write. Your knowledge of Cowper will help you
to know Channing. He will accept sympathy and aid,
but he will not bear questioning, unless the aspects of
the sky are particularly auspicious. He will ever be
"reserved and enigmatic," and you must deal with
him at arm's length.
I have no secrets to tell you concerning him, and
do not wish to call obvious excellences and defects by
far-fetched names. I think I have already spoken to
you more, and more to the purpose, on this theme,
than I am likely to write now; nor need I suggest
how witty and poetic he is, and what an inexhaustible
fund of good fellowship you will find in him.
As for visiting you in April, though I am inclined
enough to take some more rambles in your neighborhood,
especially by the seaside, I dare not engage myself,
nor allow you to expect me. The truth is, I have
my enterprises now as ever, at which I tug with ridiculous
feebleness, but admirable perseverance, and cannot
say when I shall be sufficiently fancy-free for such an
excursion.
You have done well to write a lecture on Cowper.
In the expectation of getting you to read it here, I
applied to the curators of our Lyceum;[69]
but, alas, our
Lyceum has been a failure this winter for want of
funds. It ceased some weeks since, with a debt, they
tell me, to be carried over to the next year's account.
Only one more lecture is to be read by a Signor Somebody,
an Italian, paid for by private subscription, as
a deed of charity to the lecturer. They are not rich
enough to offer you your expenses even, though probably
a month or two ago they would have been glad
of the chance.
However, the old house has not failed yet. That
offers you lodging for an indefinite time after you get
into it; and in the meanwhile I offer you bed and
board in my father's house,—always excepting hair
pillows and new-fangled bedding.
Remember me to your family.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, March 13, 1856.
Mr. Blake,—It is high time I sent you a word. I
have not heard from Harrisburg since offering to go
there, and have not been invited to lecture anywhere
else the past winter. So you see I am fast growing
rich. This is quite right, for such is my relation to the
lecture-goers, I should be surprised and alarmed if
there were any great call for me. I confess that I am
considerably alarmed even when I hear that an individual
wishes to meet me, for my experience teaches
me that we shall thus only be made certain of a mutual
strangeness, which otherwise we might never have been
aware of.
I have not yet recovered strength enough for such a
walk as you propose, though pretty well again for circumscribed
rambles and chamber work. Even now, I
am probably the greatest walker in Concord,—to its
disgrace be it said. I remember our walks and talks
and sailing in the past with great satisfaction, and trust
that we shall have more of them ere long,—have more
woodings-up,—for even in the spring we must still seek
"fuel to maintain our fires."
As you suggest, we would fain value one another for
what we are absolutely, rather than relatively. How
will this do for a symbol of sympathy?
As for compliments, even the stars praise me, and I
praise them. They and I sometimes belong to a mutual
admiration society. Is it not so with you? I know
you of old. Are you not tough and earnest to be talked
at, praised, or blamed? Must you go out of the room
because you are the subject of conversation? Where
will you go to, pray? Shall we look into the "Letter
Writer" to see what compliments are admissible? I
am not afraid of praise, for I have practiced it on
myself. As for my deserts, I never took an account of
that stock, and in this connection care not whether I
am deserving or not. When I hear praise coming, do I
not elevate and arch myself to hear it like the sky, and
as impersonally? Think I appropriate any of it to my
weak legs? No. Praise away till all is blue.
I see by the newspapers that the season for making
sugar is at hand. Now is the time, whether you be
rock, or white maple, or hickory. I trust that you have
prepared a store of sap-tubs and sumach spouts, and
invested largely in kettles. Early the first frosty morning,
tap your maples,—the sap will not run in summer,
you know. It matters not how little juice you get,
if you get all you can, and boil it down. I made just
one crystal of sugar once, one twentieth of an inch
cube, out of a pumpkin, and it sufficed. Though the
yield be no greater than that, this is not less the season
for it, and it will be not the less sweet, nay, it will be
infinitely the sweeter.
Shall, then, the maple yield sugar, and not man?
Shall the farmer be thus active, and surely have so
much sugar to show for it, before this very March is
gone,—while I read the newspaper? While he works
in his sugar-camp let me work in mine,—for sweetness
is in me, and to sugar it shall come,—it shall not
all go to leaves and wood. Am I not a sugar maple
man, then? Boil down the sweet sap which the spring
causes to flow within you. Stop not at syrup,—go on
to sugar, though you present the world with but a
single crystal,—a crystal not made from trees in your
yard, but from the new life that stirs in your pores.
Cheerfully skim your kettle, and watch it set and
crystallize, making a holiday of it if you will. Heaven
will be propitious to you as to him.
Say to the farmer: There is your crop; here is mine.
Mine is a sugar to sweeten sugar with. If you will listen
to me, I will sweeten your whole load,—your whole life.
Then will the callers ask, Where is Blake? He is in
his sugar-camp on the mountainside. Let the world
await him. Then will the little boys bless you, and the
great boys too, for such sugar is the origin of many
condiments,—Blakians in the shops of Worcester, of
new form, with their mottoes wrapped up in them.
Shall men taste only the sweetness of the maple and
the cane the coming year?
A walk over the crust to Asnebumskit, standing
there in its inviting simplicity, is tempting to think of,—making
a fire on the snow under some rock! The very
poverty of outward nature implies an inward wealth in
the walker. What a Golconda is he conversant with,
thawing his fingers over such a blaze! But—but—
Have you read the new poem, "The Angel in the
House"? Perhaps you will find it good for you.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, May 21, 1856.
Mr. Blake,—I have not for a long time been putting
such thoughts together as I should like to read to
the company you speak of. I have enough of that sort
to say, or even read, but not time now to arrange it.
Something I have prepared might prove for their entertainment
or refreshment perchance; but I would not
like to have a hat carried round for it. I have just
been reading some papers to see if they would do for
your company; but though I thought pretty well of
them as long as I read them to myself, when I got an
auditor to try them on, I felt that they would not answer.
How could I let you drum up a company to hear
them? In fine, what I have is either too scattered or
loosely arranged, or too light, or else is too scientific
and matter-of-fact (I run a good deal into that of late)
for so hungry a company.
I am still a learner, not a teacher, feeding somewhat
omnivorously, browsing both stalk and leaves; but I
shall perhaps be enabled to speak with the more precision
and authority by and by,—if philosophy and
sentiment are not buried under a multitude of details.
I do not refuse, but accept your invitation, only
changing the time. I consider myself invited to Worcester
once for all, and many thanks to the inviter. As
for the Harvard excursion,[70]
will you let me suggest
another? Do you and Brown come to Concord on
Saturday, if the weather promises well, and spend the
Sunday here on the river or hills, or both. So we shall
save some of our money (which is of next importance
to our souls), and lose—I do not know what. You
say you talked of coming here before; now do it. I do
not propose this because I think that I am worth your
spending time with, but because I hope that we may
prove flint and steel to one another. It is at most only
an hour's ride farther, and you can at any rate do what
you please when you get here.
Then we will see if we have any apology to offer for
our existence. So come to Concord,—come to Concord,—come
to Concord! or—your suit shall be defaulted.
As for the dispute about solitude and society, any
comparison is impertinent. It is an idling down on
the plane at the base of a mountain, instead of climbing
steadily to its top. Of course you will be glad of
all the society you can get to go up with. Will you go
to glory with me? is the burden of the song. I love
society so much that I swallowed it all at a gulp,—that
is, all that came in my way. It is not that we love
to be alone, but that we love to soar, and when we do
soar, the company grows thinner and thinner till there
is none at all. It is either the Tribune[71]
on the plain,
a sermon on the mount, or a very private ecstasy still
higher up. We are not the less to aim at the summits,
though the multitude does not ascend them. Use all
the society that will abet you. But perhaps I do not
enter into the spirit of your talk.
In the spring of 1856, Mr. Alcott, then living in
Walpole, N. H., visited Concord, and while there suggested
to Thoreau that the upper valley of the Connecticut,
in which Walpole lies, was good walking-ground,
and that he would be glad to see him there. When
autumn began to hover in the distance, Thoreau recalled
this invitation, and sent the letter below.
TO BRONSON ALCOTT (AT WALPOLE, N. H.).
Concord, September 1, 1856.
Mr. Alcott,—I remember that, in the spring, you
invited me to visit you. I feel inclined to spend a day
or two with you and on your hills at this season, returning,
perhaps, by way of Brattleboro. What if I
should take the cars for Walpole next Friday morning?
Are you at home? And will it be convenient and
agreeable to you to see me then? I will await an
answer.
I am but poor company, and it will not be worth the
while to put yourself out on my account; yet from time
to time I have some thoughts which would be the better
for an airing. I also wish to get some hints from
September on the Connecticut to help me understand
that season on the Concord; to snuff the musty fragrance
of the decaying year in the primitive woods.
There is considerable cellar-room in my nature for
such stores; a whole row of bins waiting to be filled,
before I can celebrate my Thanksgiving. Mould is the
richest of soils, yet I am not mould. It will always be
found that one flourishing institution exists and battens
on another mouldering one. The Present itself is parasitic
to this extent.
Your fellow-traveler,
Henry D. Thoreau.
As fortune would have it, Mr. Alcott was then making
his arrangements for a conversational tour in the
vicinity of New York; but he renewed the invitation
for himself, while repeating it in the name of Mrs.
Alcott and his daughters. Thoreau made the visit, I
believe, and some weeks later, at the suggestion of Mr.
Alcott, he was asked by Marcus Spring of New York
to give lectures and survey their estate for a community
at Perth Amboy, N. J., in which Mr. Spring
and his friends, the Birneys, Welds, Grimkés, etc., had
united for social and educational purposes. It was a
colony of radical opinions and old-fashioned culture;
the Grimkés having been bred in Charleston, S. C.,
which they left by reason of their opposition to negro
slavery, and the elder Birney having held slaves in
Alabama until his conscience bade him emancipate
them, after which he, too, could have no secure home
among slaveholders. He was the first presidential candidate
of the voting Abolitionists, as Lincoln was the
last; and his friend, Theodore Weld, who married Miss
Grimké, had been one of the early apostles of emancipation
in Ohio. Their circle at Eagleswood appealed
to Thoreau's sense of humor, and is described by him
in a letter soon to be given.
In June, 1856, Thoreau made a long visit at Brooklawn.
In August, Mr. Ricketson, who had proposed a
summer visit to Concord, found himself prevented by
feeble health, and received the two following letters
from Thoreau:—
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, September 2, 1856.
Friend Ricketson,—My father and mother regret
that your indisposition is likely to prevent your coming
to Concord at present. It is as well that you do not, if
you depend on seeing me, for I expect to go to New
Hampshire the latter part of the week. I shall be glad
to see you afterward, if you are prepared for and can
endure my unsocial habits.
I would suggest that you have one or two of the teeth
which you can best spare extracted at once, for the
sake of your general, no less than particular health.
This is the advice of one who has had quite his share
of toothache in this world. I am a trifle stouter than
when I saw you last, yet far, far short of my best estate.
I thank you for two newspapers which you have sent
me; am glad to see that you have studied out the history
of the ponds, got the Indian names straightened,—which
means made more crooked,—etc., etc. I remember
them with great satisfaction. They are all the
more interesting to me for the lean and sandy soil that
surrounds them. Heaven is not one of your fertile
Ohio bottoms, you may depend on it. Ah, the Middleborough
ponds!—Great Platte lakes. Remember me
to the perch in them. I trust that I may have some
better craft than that oarless pumpkin-seed[72]
the next
time I navigate them.
From the size of your family I infer that Mrs. Ricketson
and your daughters have returned from Franconia.
Please remember me to them, and also to Arthur and
Walton; and tell the latter that if, in the course of his
fishing, he should chance to come across the shell of a
terrapin, and will save it for me, I shall be exceedingly
obliged to him.
Channing dropped in on us the other day, but soon
dropped out again.
Concord, September 23, 1856.
Friend Ricketson,—I have returned from New
Hampshire, and find myself in statu quo. My journey
proved one of business purely. As you suspected, I saw
Alcott, and I spoke to him of you, and your good will
toward him; so now you may consider yourself introduced.
He would be glad to hear from you about a
conversation in New Bedford. He was about setting
out on a conversing tour to Fitchburg, Worcester, and,
three or four weeks hence, Waterbury, Ct., New York,
Newport (?) or Providence (?). You may be sure that
you will not have occasion to repent of any exertions
which you may make to secure an audience for him. I
send you one of his programmes, lest he should not
have done so himself.
You propose to me teaching the following winter. I
find that I cannot entertain the idea. It would require
such a revolution of all my habits, I think, and would
sap the very foundations of me. I am engaged to Concord
and my own private pursuits by 10,000 ties, and
it would be suicide to rend them. If I were weaker,
and not somewhat stronger, physically, I should be
more tempted. I am so busy that I cannot even think
of visiting you. The days are not long enough, or I am
not strong enough to do the work of the day, before
bedtime.
Excuse my paper. It chances to be the best I have.
In October, 1856, Mr. Spring, whom Mr. Alcott was
then visiting, wrote to Thoreau inviting him to come
to Eagleswood, give lectures, and survey two hundred
acres of land belonging to the community, laying out
streets and making a map of the proposed village.
Thoreau accepted the proposal, and soon after wrote
the following letter, which Miss Thoreau submitted to
Mr. Emerson for publication, with other letters, in the
volume of 1865; but he returned it, inscribed, "Not
printable at present." The lapse of time has removed
this objection.
TO SOPHIA THOREAU.
[Direct] Eagleswood, Perth Amboy, N. J.,
Saturday eve, November 1, 1856.
Dear Sophia,—I have hardly had time and repose
enough to write to you before. I spent the afternoon
of Friday (it seems some months ago) in Worcester,
but failed to see [Harrison] Blake, he having "gone to
the horse-race" in Boston; to atone for which I have
just received a letter from him, asking me to stop at
Worcester and lecture on my return. I called on
[Theo.] Brown and [T. W.] Higginson; in the evening
came by way of Norwich to New York in the steamer
Commonwealth, and, though it was so windy inland,
had a perfectly smooth passage, and about as good a
sleep as usually at home. Reached New York about
seven A. M., too late for the John Potter (there was n't
any Jonas), so I spent the forenoon there, called on
Greeley (who was not in), met [F. A. T.] Bellew in
Broadway and walked into his workshop, read at the
Astor Library, etc. I arrived here, about thirty miles
from New York, about five P. M. Saturday, in company
with Miss E. Peabody, who was returning in the same
covered wagon from the Landing to Eagleswood, which
last place she has just left for the winter.
This is a queer place. There is one large long stone
building, which cost some forty thousand dollars, in
which I do not know exactly who or how many work
(one or two familiar places and more familiar names
have turned up), a few shops and offices, an old farmhouse,
and Mr. Spring's perfectly private residence,
within twenty rods of the main building. The city of
Perth Amboy is about as big as Concord, and Eagleswood
is one and a quarter miles southwest of it, on the
Bay side. The central fact here is evidently Mr. [Theodore]
Weld's school, recently established, around which
various other things revolve. Saturday evening I went to
the schoolroom, hall, or what not, to see the children and
their teachers and patrons dance. Mr. Weld, a kind-looking
man with a long white beard, danced with
them, and Mr. [E. J.] Cutler, his assistant (lately from
Cambridge, who is acquainted with Sanborn), Mr.
Spring, and others. This Saturday evening dance is a
regular thing, and it is thought something strange if
you don't attend. They take it for granted that you
want society!
Sunday forenoon I attended a sort of Quaker meeting
at the same place (the Quaker aspect and spirit
prevail here,—Mrs. Spring says, "Does thee not?"),
where it was expected that the Spirit would move me
(I having been previously spoken to about it); and it,
or something else, did,—an inch or so. I said just
enough to set them a little by the ears and make it
lively. I had excused myself by saying that I could
not adapt myself to a particular audience; for all the
speaking and lecturing here have reference to the children,
who are far the greater part of the audience, and
they are not so bright as New England children. Imagine
them sitting close to the wall, all around a hall,
with old Quaker-looking men and women here and
there. There sat Mrs. Weld [Grimké] and her sister,
two elderly gray-headed ladies, the former in extreme
Bloomer costume, which was what you may call remarkable;
Mr. Arnold Buffum, with broad face and a
great white beard, looking like a pier-head made of the
cork-tree with the bark on, as if he could buffet a considerable
wave; James G. Birney, formerly candidate
for the presidency, with another particularly white head
and beard; Edward Palmer, the anti-money man (for
whom communities were made), with his ample beard
somewhat grayish. Some of them, I suspect, are very
worthy people. Of course you are wondering to what
extent all these make one family, and to what extent
twenty. Mrs. Kirkland[73]
(and this a name only to me)
I saw. She has just bought a lot here. They all know
more about your neighbors and acquaintances than
you suspected.
On Monday evening I read the moose story to the
children, to their satisfaction. Ever since I have been
constantly engaged in surveying Eagleswood,—through
woods, salt marshes, and along the shore, dodging the
tide, through bushes, mud, and beggar-ticks, having no
time to look up or think where I am. (It takes ten or
fifteen minutes before each meal to pick the beggar-ticks
out of my clothes; burs and the rest are left,
and rents mended at the first convenient opportunity.)
I shall be engaged perhaps as much longer. Mr. Spring
wants me to help him about setting out an orchard and
vineyard, Mr. Birney asks me to survey a small piece
for him, and Mr. Alcott, who has just come down here
for the third Sunday, says that Greeley (I left my
name for him) invites him and me to go to his home
with him next Saturday morning and spend the Sunday.
It seems a twelvemonth since I was not here, but I
hope to get settled deep into my den again ere long.
The hardest thing to find here is solitude—and Concord.
I am at Mr. Spring's house. Both he and she
and their family are quite agreeable.
I want you to write to me immediately (just left off
to talk French with the servant man), and let father
and mother put in a word. To them and to Aunts,
love from
Henry.
The date of this visit to Eagleswood is worthy of
note, because in that November Thoreau made the
acquaintance of the late Walt Whitman, in whom he
ever after took a deep interest. Accompanied by Mr.
Alcott, he called on Whitman, then living at Brooklyn;
and I remember the calm enthusiasm with which they
both spoke of Whitman upon their return to Concord.
"Three men," said Emerson, in his funeral eulogy of
Thoreau, "have of late years strongly impressed Mr.
Thoreau,—John Brown, his Indian guide in Maine,
Joe Polis, and a third person, not known to this audience."
This last was Whitman, who has since become
well known to a larger audience.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Eagleswood, N. J., November 19, 1856.
Mr. Blake,—I have been here much longer than I
expected, but have deferred answering you, because I
could not foresee when I should return. I do not know
yet within three or four days. This uncertainty makes
it impossible for me to appoint a day to meet you, until
it should be too late to hear from you again. I think,
therefore, that I must go straight home. I feel some
objection to reading that "What shall it profit" lecture
again in Worcester; but if you are quite sure that it
will be worth the while (it is a grave consideration), I
will even make an independent journey from Concord
for that purpose. I have read three of my old lectures
(that included) to the Eagleswood people, and, unexpectedly,
with rare success,—i. e., I was aware that
what I was saying was silently taken in by their ears.
You must excuse me if I write mainly a business
letter now, for I am sold for the time,—am merely
Thoreau the surveyor here,—and solitude is scarcely
obtainable in these parts.
Alcott has been here three times, and, Saturday before
last, I went with him and Greeley, by invitation
of the last, to G.'s farm, thirty-six miles north of New
York. The next day A. and I heard Beecher preach;
and what was more, we visited Whitman the next
morning (A. had already seen him), and were much
interested and provoked. He is apparently the greatest
democrat the world has seen. Kings and aristocracy
go by the board at once, as they have long deserved to.
A remarkably strong though coarse nature, of a sweet
disposition, and much prized by his friends. Though
peculiar and rough in his exterior, his skin (all over (?))
red, he is essentially a gentleman. I am still somewhat
in a quandary about him,—feel that he is essentially
strange to me, at any rate; but I am surprised by the
sight of him. He is very broad, but, as I have said,
not fine. He said that I misapprehended him. I am
not quite sure that I do. He told us that he loved to
ride up and down Broadway all day on an omnibus,
sitting beside the driver, listening to the roar of the
carts, and sometimes gesticulating and declaiming Homer
at the top of his voice. He has long been an editor
and writer for the newspapers,—was editor of the
New Orleans Crescent once; but now has no employment
but to read and write in the forenoon, and walk
in the afternoon, like all the rest of the scribbling
gentry.
I shall probably be in Concord next week; so you
can direct to me there.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, December 6, 1853.
Mr. Blake,—I trust that you got a note from me
at Eagleswood, about a fortnight ago. I passed through
Worcester on the morning of the 25th of November,
and spent several hours (from 3.30 to 6.20) in the
travelers' room at the depot, as in a dream, it now
seems. As the first Harlem train unexpectedly connected
with the first from Fitchburg, I did not spend
the forenoon with you as I had anticipated, on account
of baggage, etc. If it had been a seasonable hour, I
should have seen you,—i. e., if you had not gone to a
horse-race. But think of making a call at half past
three in the morning! (would it not have implied a
three-o'clock-in-the-morning courage in both you and
me?) as it were, ignoring the fact that mankind are
really not at home,—are not out, but so deeply in
that they cannot be seen,—nearly half their hours at
this season of the year.
I walked up and down the main street, at half past
five, in the dark, and paused long in front of Brown's
store, trying to distinguish its features; considering
whether I might safely leave his Putnam in the door-handle,
but concluded not to risk it. Meanwhile
a watchman (?) seemed to be watching me, and I
moved off. Took another turn around there, and had
the very earliest offer of the Transcript[74]
from an urchin
behind, whom I actually could not see, it was so
dark. So I withdrew, wondering if you and B. would
know if I had been there. You little dream who is
occupying Worcester when you are all asleep. Several
things occurred there that night which I will venture to
say were not put into the Transcript. A cat caught a
mouse at the depot, and gave it to her kitten to play
with. So that world-famous tragedy goes on by night
as well as by day, and nature is emphatically wrong.
Also I saw a young Irishman kneel before his mother,
as if in prayer, while she wiped a cinder out of his eye
with her tongue; and I found that it was never too
late (or early?) to learn something. These things transpired
while you and B. were, to all practical purposes,
nowhere, and good for nothing,—not even for society,—not
for horse-races,—nor the taking back of a
Putnam's Magazine. It is true, I might have recalled
you to life, but it would have been a cruel act,
considering the kind of life you would have come
back to.
However, I would fain write to you now by broad
daylight, and report to you some of my life, such as it
is, and recall you to your life, which is not always lived
by you, even by daylight. Blake! Brown! are you
awake? are you aware what an ever-glorious morning
this is,—what long-expected, never-to-be-repeated opportunity
is now offered to get life and knowledge?
For my part, I am trying to wake up,—to wring
slumber out of my pores; for, generally, I take events
as unconcernedly as a fence-post,—absorb wet and
cold like it, and am pleasantly tickled with lichens
slowly spreading over me. Could I not be content,
then, to be a cedar post, which lasts twenty-five years?
Would I not rather be that than the farmer that set it?
or he that preaches to the farmer? and go to the
heaven of posts at last? I think I should like that as
well as any would like it. But I should not care if I
sprouted into a living tree, put forth leaves and flowers,
and bore fruit.
I am grateful for what I am and have. My thanksgiving
is perpetual. It is surprising how contented one
can be with nothing definite,—only a sense of existence.
Well, anything for variety. I am ready to try this for
the next ten thousand years, and exhaust it. How
sweet to think of! my extremities well charred, and
my intellectual part too, so that there is no danger of
worm or rot for a long while. My breath is sweet to
me. O how I laugh when I think of my vague, indefinite
riches. No run on my bank can drain it, for my
wealth is not possession but enjoyment.
What are all these years made for? and now another
winter comes, so much like the last? Can't we satisfy
the beggars once for all?
Have you got in your wood for this winter? What
else have you got in? Of what use a great fire on the
hearth, and a confounded little fire in the heart? Are
you prepared to make a decisive campaign,—to pay
for your costly tuition,—to pay for the suns of past
summers,—for happiness and unhappiness lavished
upon you?
Does not Time go by swifter than the swiftest
equine trotter or racker?
Stir up Brown. Remind him of his duties, which
outrun the date and span of Worcester's years past
and to come. Tell him to be sure that he is on the
main street, however narrow it may be, and to have a
lit sign, visible by night as well as by day.
Are they not patient waiters,—they who wait for
us? But even they shall not be losers.
December 7.
That Walt Whitman, of whom I wrote to you, is the
most interesting fact to me at present. I have just read
his second edition (which he gave me), and it has done
me more good than any reading for a long time. Perhaps
I remember best the poem of Walt Whitman, an
American, and the Sun-Down Poem. There are two
or three pieces in the book which are disagreeable, to
say the least; simply sensual. He does not celebrate
love at all. It is as if the beasts spoke. I think that
men have not been ashamed of themselves without
reason. No doubt there have always been dens where
such deeds were unblushingly recited, and it is no merit
to compete with their inhabitants. But even on this
side he has spoken more truth than any American or
modern that I know. I have found his poem exhilarating,
encouraging. As for its sensuality,—and it may
turn out to be less sensual than it appears,—I do not
so much wish that those parts were not written, as that
men and women were so pure that they could read
them without harm, that is, without understanding
them. One woman told me that no woman could read
it,—as if a man could read what a woman could not.
Of course Walt Whitman can communicate to us no
experience, and if we are shocked, whose experience is
it that we are reminded of?
On the whole, it sounds to me very brave and American,
after whatever deductions. I do not believe that
all the sermons, so called, that have been preached in
this land put together are equal to it for preaching.
We ought to rejoice greatly in him. He occasionally
suggests something a little more than human. You
can't confound him with the other inhabitants of Brooklyn
or New York. How they must shudder when they
read him! He is awfully good.
To be sure I sometimes feel a little imposed on. By
his heartiness and broad generalities he puts me into a
liberal frame of mind prepared to see wonders,—as it
were, sets me upon a hill or in the midst of a plain,—stirs
me well up, and then—throws in a thousand of
brick. Though rude, and sometimes ineffectual, it is a
great primitive poem,—an alarum or trumpet-note
ringing through the American camp. Wonderfully like
the Orientals, too, considering that when I asked him
if he had read them, he answered, "No: tell me about
them."
I did not get far in conversation with him,—two
more being present,—and among the few things which
I chanced to say, I remember that one was, in answer
to him as representing America, that I did not think
much of America or of politics, and so on, which may
have been somewhat of a damper to him.
Since I have seen him, I find that I am not disturbed
by any brag or egoism in his book. He may turn out
the least of a braggart of all, having a better right to
be confident.
He is a great fellow.
There is in Alcott's diary an account of this interview
with Whitman, and the Sunday morning in Ward
Beecher's Brooklyn church, from which a few passages
may be taken. Hardly any person met by either of
these Concord friends in their later years made so deep
an impression on both as did this then almost unknown
poet and thinker, concerning whom Cholmondeley
wrote to Thoreau in 1857: "Is there actually such a
man as Whitman? Has any one seen or handled him?
His is a tongue 'not understanded' of the English
people. I find the gentleman altogether left out of the
book. It is the first book I have ever seen which I
should call a 'new book.'"
Mr. Alcott writes under date of November 7, 1856,
in New York: "Henry Thoreau arrives from Eagleswood,
and sees Swinton, a wise young Scotchman, and
Walt Whitman's friend, at my room (15 Laight Street),—Thoreau
declining to accompany me to Mrs. Botta's
parlors, as invited by her. He sleeps here. (November
8.) We find Greeley at the Harlem station, and ride
with him to his farm, where we pass the day, and return
to sleep in the city,—Greeley coming in with us; Alice
Cary, the authoress, accompanying us also. (Sunday,
November 9.) We cross the ferry to Brooklyn, and
hear Ward Beecher at the Plymouth Church. It was a
spectacle,—and himself the preacher, if preacher there
be anywhere now in pulpits. His auditors had to weep,
had to laugh, under his potent magnetism, while his
doctrine of justice to all men, bond and free, was grand.
House, entries, aisles, galleries, all were crowded. Thoreau
called it pagan, but I pronounced it good, very
good,—the best I had witnessed for many a day, and
hopeful for the coming time. At dinner at Mrs. Manning's.
Miss M. S. was there, curious to see Thoreau.
After dinner we called on Walt Whitman (Thoreau and
I), but finding him out, we got all we could from his
mother, a stately, sensible matron, believing absolutely
in Walter, and telling us how good he was, and how
wise when a boy; and how his four brothers and two
sisters loved him, and still take counsel of the great
man he has grown to be. We engaged to call again early
in the morning, when she said Walt would be glad to
see us. (Monday, 10th.) Mrs. Tyndale of Philadelphia
goes with us to see Walt,—Walt the satyr, the Bacchus,
the very god Pan. We sat with him for two hours, and
much to our delight; he promising to call on us at the
International at ten in the morning to-morrow, and
there have the rest of it." Whitman failed to call at
his hour the next day.
TO B. B. WILEY (AT CHICAGO).
Concord, December 12, 1856.
Mr. Wiley,[75]
—It is refreshing to hear of your earnest
purpose with respect to your culture, and I can send
you no better wish than that you may not be thwarted
by the cares and temptations of life. Depend on it, now
is the accepted time, and probably you will never find
yourself better disposed or freer to attend to your culture
than at this moment. When They who inspire us
with the idea are ready, shall not we be ready also?
I do not remember anything which Confucius has
said directly respecting man's "origin, purpose, and
destiny." He was more practical than that. He is full
of wisdom applied to human relations,—to the private
life,—the family,—government, etc. It is remarkable
that, according to his own account, the sum and substance
of his teaching is, as you know, to do as you
would be done by.
He also said (I translate from the French), "Conduct
yourself suitably towards the persons of your family,
then you will be able to instruct and to direct a
nation of men."
"To nourish one's self with a little rice, to drink
water, to have only his bended arm to support his head,
is a state which has also its satisfaction. To be rich
and honored by iniquitous means is for me as the floating
cloud which passes."
"As soon as a child is born he must respect its faculties:
the knowledge which will come to it by and by
does not resemble at all its present state. If it arrive
at the age of forty or fifty years without having learned
anything, it is no more worthy of any respect." This
last, I think, will speak to your condition.
But at this rate I might fill many letters.
Our acquaintance with the ancient Hindoos is not
at all personal. The full names that can be relied upon
are very shadowy. It is, however, tangible works that
we know. The best I think of are the Bhagvat Geeta
(an episode in an ancient heroic poem called the Mahabarat),
the Vedas, the Vishnu Purana, the Institutes of
Menu, etc.
I cannot say that Swedenborg has been directly and
practically valuable to me, for I have not been a reader
of him, except to a slight extent; but I have the highest
regard for him, and trust that I shall read his works
in some world or other. He had a wonderful knowledge
of our interior and spiritual life, though his illuminations
are occasionally blurred by trivialities. He
comes nearer to answering, or attempting to answer,
literally, your questions concerning man's origin, purpose,
and destiny, than any of the worthies I have
referred to. But I think that that is not altogether a
recommendation; since such an answer to these questions
cannot be discovered any more than perpetual
motion, for which no reward is now offered. The noblest
man it is, methinks, that knows, and by his life
suggests, the most about these things. Crack away at
these nuts, however, as long as you can,—the very
exercise will ennoble you, and you may get something
better than the answer you expect.
TO B. B. WILEY (AT CHICAGO).
Concord, April 26, 1857.
Mr. Wiley,—I see that you are turning a broad
furrow among the books, but I trust that some very
private journal all the while holds its own through
their midst. Books can only reveal us to ourselves, and
as often as they do us this service we lay them aside.
I should say, read Goethe's autobiography, by all
means, also Gibbon's, Haydon the painter's, and our
Franklin's of course; perhaps also Alfieri's, Benvenuto
Cellini's, and De Quincey's "Confessions of an Opium-Eater,"—since
you like autobiography. I think you
must read Coleridge again, and further, skipping all
his theology, i. e., if you value precise definitions and a
discriminating use of language. By the way, read De
Quincey's Reminiscences of Coleridge and Wordsworth.
How shall we account for our pursuits, if they are
original? We get the language with which to describe
our various lives out of a common mint. If others have
their losses which they are busy repairing, so have I
mine, and their hound and horse may perhaps be the
symbols of some of them.[76]
But also I have lost, or am
in danger of losing, a far finer and more ethereal treasure
which commonly no loss, of which they are conscious,
will symbolize. This I answer hastily and with
some hesitation, according as I now understand my
words....
Methinks a certain polygamy with its troubles is the
fate of almost all men. They are married to two wives:
their genius (a celestial muse), and also to some fair
daughter of the earth. Unless these two were fast
friends before marriage, and so are afterward, there
will be but little peace in the house.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, December 31, 1856.
Mr. Blake,—I think it will not be worth the while
for me to come to Worcester to lecture at all this year.
It will be better to wait till I am—perhaps unfortunately—more
in that line. My writing has not taken
the shape of lectures, and therefore I should be obliged
to read one of three or four old lectures, the best of
which I have read to some of your auditors before. I
carried that one which I call "Walking, or the Wild,"
to Amherst, N. H., the evening of that cold Thursday,[77]
and I am to read another at Fitchburg, February 3.
I am simply their hired man. This will probably be
the extent of my lecturing hereabouts.
I must depend on meeting Mr. Wasson some other
time.
Perhaps it always costs me more than it comes to
to lecture before a promiscuous audience. It is an
irreparable injury done to my modesty even,—I become
so indurated.
O solitude! obscurity! meanness! I never triumph
so as when I have the least success in my neighbor's
eyes. The lecturer gets fifty dollars a night; but what
becomes of his winter? What consolation will it be
hereafter to have fifty thousand dollars for living in
the world? I should like not to exchange any of my
life for money.
These, you may think, are reasons for not lecturing,
when you have no great opportunity. It is even so,
perhaps. I could lecture on dry oak leaves; I could,
but who could hear me? If I were to try it on any
large audience, I fear it would be no gain to them, and
a positive loss to me. I should have behaved rudely
toward my rustling friends.[78]
I am surveying, instead of lecturing, at present. Let
me have a skimming from your "pan of unwrinkled
cream."
The proposition about Mr. Alcott in Thoreau's letter
of September 23, 1856, to Mr. Ricketson took effect in
the spring of 1857, and early in April he went to visit
the Ricketsons in New Bedford, going down from Walpole,
and there met his younger friends Channing and
Thoreau. Anticipating Mr. Alcott's visit, Thoreau
wrote thus:—
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, March 28, 1857.
Friend Ricketson,—If it chances to be perfectly
agreeable and convenient to you, I will make you a
visit next week (say Wednesday or Thursday), and we
will have some more rides to Assawampset and the
seashore. Have you got a boat on the former yet?
Who knows but we may camp out on the island? I
propose this now, because it will be more novel to me
at this season, and I should like to see your early birds,
etc.
Your historical papers have all come safely to hand,
and I thank you for them. I see that they will be indispensable
mémoires pour servir. By the way, have you
read Church's "History of Philip's War," and looked
up the localities? It should make part of a chapter.
I had a long letter from Cholmondeley lately, which
I should like to show you,
I will expect an answer to this straightway,—but be
sure you let your own convenience and inclinations rule
it. Please remember me to your family.
He was welcomed, of course, and went down April 2,
as indicated in the letter of the day before. But he had
not been informed that Alcott was already there, writing
in his Diary of April 1, this sketch of Brooklawn and
its occupants:—
"A neat country residence, surrounded by wild pastures
and low woods,—the little stream Acushnet flowing
east of the house, and into Fairhaven Bay. The
hamlet of Acushnet at the 'Head of the River' lies
within half a mile of Ricketson's house. His tastes are
pastoral, simple even to wildness; and he passes a good
part of his day in the fields and woods,—or in his
rude 'Shanty' near his house, where he writes and reads
his favorite authors, Cowper having the first place. He
is in easy circumstances, and has the manners of an
English gentleman,—frank, hospitable, and with positive
persuasions of his own; mercurial, perhaps, and
wayward a little sometimes, but full of kindness and
sensibility to suffering."
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, April 1, 1857.
Dear Ricketson,—I got your note of welcome
night before last. Channing is not here; at least I have
not seen nor heard of him, but depend on meeting him
in New Bedford. I expect, if the weather is favorable,
to take the 4.30 train from Boston to-morrow, Thursday,
P. M., for I hear of no noon train, and shall be
glad to find your wagon at Tarkiln Hill, for I see it
will be rather late for going across lots.
Alcott was here last week, and will probably visit
New Bedford within a week or two.
I have seen all the spring signs you mention, and a
few more, even here. Nay, I heard one frog peep
nearly a week ago,—methinks the very first one in all
this region. I wish that there were a few more signs of
spring in myself; however, I take it that there are as
many within us as we think we hear without us. I am
decent for a steady pace, but not yet for a race. I have
a little cold at present, and you speak of rheumatism
about the head and shoulders. Your frost is not quite
out. I suppose that the earth itself has a little cold and
rheumatism about these times; but all these things
together produce a very fair general result. In a concert,
you know, we must sing our parts feebly sometimes,
that we may not injure the general effect. I
should n't wonder if my two-year-old invalidity had
been a positively charming feature to some amateurs
favorably located. Why not a blasted man as well as
a blasted tree, on your lawn?
If you should happen not to see me by the train
named, do not go again, but wait at home for me, or
a note from
Yours,
Henry D. Thoreau.
On that Thursday, April 2, Alcott wrote in his
Diary, "Henry Thoreau comes to tea, also Ellery
Channing, and we talk till into the evening late."
This visit of Thoreau was his longest, lasting until
April 15, and it was during the fortnight that he sang
"Tom Bowling" and danced with vigor in the Brooklawn
drawing-room, a scene which Alcott loved to describe.
Sophia Thoreau, writing in 1862, said: "I have
so often witnessed the like that I can easily imagine
how it was, and I remember that Henry gave me some
account. I recollect he said that he did not scruple to
tread on Mr. Alcott's toes."
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, April 17, 1857.
Mr. Blake,—I returned from New Bedford night
before last. I met Alcott there, and learned from him
that probably you had gone to Concord. I am very
sorry that I missed you. I had expected you earlier,
and at last thought that I should get back before you
came; but I ought to have notified you of my absence.
However, it would have been too late, after I had made
up my mind to go. I hope you lost nothing by going
a little round.
I took out the celtis seeds at your request, at the
time we spoke of them, and left them in the chamber
on some shelf or other. If you have found them, very
well; if you have not found them, very well; but tell
Hale[79]
of it, if you see him. My mother says that you
and Brown and Rogers and Wasson (titles left behind)
talk of coming down on me some day. Do not fail to
come, one and all, and within a week or two, if possible;
else I may be gone again. Give me a short
notice, and then come and spend a day on Concord
River,—or say that you will come if it is fair, unless
you are confident of bringing fair weather with you.
Come and be Concord, as I have been Worcestered.
Perhaps you came nearer to me for not finding me
at home; for trains of thought the more connect when
trains of cars do not. If I had actually met you, you
would have gone again; but now I have not yet dismissed
you. I hear what you say about personal relations
with joy. It is as if you had said: "I value the
best and finest part of you, and not the worst. I can
even endure your very near and real approach, and
prefer it to a shake of the hand." This intercourse is
not subject to time or distance.
I have a very long new and faithful letter from
Cholmondeley which I wish to show you. He speaks
of sending me more books!!
If I were with you now, I could tell you much of
Ricketson, and my visit to New Bedford; but I do
not know how it will be by and by. I should like to
have you meet R., who is the frankest man I know.
Alcott and he get along very well together. Channing
has returned to Concord with me,—probably for a
short visit only.
Consider this a business letter, which you know
counts nothing in the game we play. Remember me
particularly to Brown.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, June 6, 1857, 3 P. M.
Mr. Blake,—I have just got your note, but I am
sorry to say that I this very morning sent a note to
Channing, stating that I would go with him to Cape
Cod next week on an excursion which we have been
talking of for some time. If there were time to communicate
with you, I should ask you to come to Concord
on Monday, before I go; but as it is, I must wait
till I come back, which I think will be about ten days
hence. I do not like this delay, but there seems to be
a fate in it. Perhaps Mr. Wasson will be well enough to
come by that time. I will notify you of my return, and
shall depend on seeing you all.
June 23d. I returned from Cape Cod last evening,
and now take the first opportunity to invite you men
of Worcester to this quiet Mediterranean shore. Can
you come this week on Friday, or next Monday? I
mention the earliest days on which I suppose you can
be ready. If more convenient, name some other time
within ten days. I shall be rejoiced to see you, and to
act the part of skipper in the contemplated voyage. I
have just got another letter from Cholmondeley, which
may interest you somewhat.
TO MARSTON WATSON (AT PLYMOUTH).
Concord, August 17, 1857.
Mr. Watson,—I am much indebted to you for
your glowing communication of July 20th. I had that
very day left Concord for the wilds of Maine; but when
I returned, August 8th, two out of the six worms remained
nearly, if not quite, as bright as at first, I was
assured. In their best estate they had excited the
admiration of many of the inhabitants of Concord. It
was a singular coincidence that I should find these
worms awaiting me, for my mind was full of a phosphorescence
which I had seen in the woods. I have
waited to learn something more about them before
acknowledging the receipt of them. I have frequently
met with glow-worms in my night walks, but am not
sure they were the same kind with these. Dr. Harris
once described to me a larger kind than I had found,
"nearly as big as your little finger;" but he does not
name them in his report.
The only authorities on Glow-worms which I chance
to have (and I am pretty well provided) are Kirby and
Spence (the fullest), Knapp ("Journal of a Naturalist"),
"The Library of Entertaining Knowledge" (Rennie), a
French work, etc., etc.; but there is no minute, scientific
description of any of these. This is apparently a
female of the genus Lampyris; but Kirby and Spence
say that there are nearly two hundred species of this
genus alone. The one commonly referred to by English
writers is the Lampyris noctiluca; but judging from
Kirby and Spence's description, and from the description
and plate in the French work, this is not that one,
for, besides other differences, both say that the light
proceeds from the abdomen. Perhaps the worms exhibited
by Durkee (whose statement to the Boston
Society of Natural History, second July meeting, in the
Traveller of August 12, 1857, I send you) were the same
with these. I do not see how they could be the L.
noctiluca, as he states.
I expect to go to Cambridge before long, and if I get
any more light on this subject I will inform you. The
two worms are still alive.
I shall be glad to receive the drosera at any time, if
you chance to come across it. I am looking over
Loudon's "Arboretum," which we have added to our
library, and it occurs to me that it was written expressly
for you, and that you cannot avoid placing it
on your own shelves.
I should have been glad to see the whale, and might
perhaps have done so, if I had not at that time been
seeing "the elephant" (or moose) in the Maine woods.
I have been associating for about a month with one
Joseph Polis, the chief man of the Penobscot tribe of
Indians, and have learned a great deal from him, which
I should like to tell you some time.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, August 18, 1857.
Dear Sir,—Your Wilson Flagg[80]
seems a serious
person, and it is encouraging to hear of a contemporary
who recognizes Nature so squarely, and selects such a
theme as "Barns." (I would rather "Mount Auburn"
were omitted.) But he is not alert enough. He wants
stirring up with a pole. He should practice turning a
series of somersets rapidly or jump up and see how
many times he can strike his feet together before coming
down. Let him make the earth turn round now the
other way, and whet his wits on it, whichever way it
goes, as on a grindstone; in short, see how many ideas
he can entertain at once.
His style, as I remember, is singularly vague (I refer
to the book), and, before I got to the end of the sentences,
I was off the track. If you indulge in long periods,
you must be sure to have a snapper at the end. As for
style of writing, if one has anything to say, it drops
from him simply and directly, as a stone falls to the
ground. There are no two ways about it, but down it
comes, and he may stick in the points and stops wherever
he can get a chance. New ideas come into this
world somewhat like falling meteors, with a flash and
an explosion, and perhaps somebody's castle-roof perforated.
To try to polish the stone in its descent, to
give it a peculiar turn, and make it whistle a tune, perchance,
would be of no use, if it were possible. Your
polished stuff turns out not to be meteoric, but of this
earth. However, there is plenty of time, and Nature is
an admirable schoolmistress.
Speaking of correspondence, you ask me if I "cannot
turn over a new leaf in that line." I certainly could
if I were to receive it; but just then I looked up and
saw that your page was dated "May 10," though mailed
in August, and it occurred to me that I had seen you
since that date this year. Looking again, it appeared
that your note was written in '56!! However, it was a
new leaf to me, and I turned it over with as much
interest as if it had been written the day before. Perhaps
you kept it so long in order that the manuscript
and subject-matter might be more in keeping with the
old-fashioned paper on which it was written.
I traveled the length of Cape Cod on foot, soon after
you were here, and, within a few days, have returned
from the wilds of Maine, where I have made a journey
of three hundred and twenty-five miles with a canoe
and an Indian, and a single white companion,—Edward
Hoar, Esq., of this town, lately from California,—traversing
the head waters of the Kennebec, Penobscot,
and St. John.
Can't you extract any advantage out of that depression
of spirits you refer to? It suggests to me cider-mills,
wine-presses, etc., etc. All kinds of pressure or
power should be used and made to turn some kind of
machinery.
Channing was just leaving Concord for Plymouth
when I arrived, but said he should be here again in
two or three days.
Please remember me to your family, and say that I
have at length learned to sing "Tom Bowlin" according
to the notes.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, September 9, 1857.
Friend Ricketson,—I thank you for your kind
invitation to visit you, but I have taken so many vacations
this year,—at New Bedford, Cape Cod, and
Maine,—that any more relaxation—call it rather dissipation—will
cover me with shame and disgrace. I
have not earned what I have already enjoyed. As some
heads cannot carry much wine, so it would seem that
I cannot bear so much society as you can. I have an
immense appetite for solitude, like an infant for sleep,
and if I don't get enough of it this year, I shall cry all
the next.
My mother's house is full at present; but if it were
not, I would have no right to invite you hither, while
entertaining such designs as I have hinted at. However,
if you care to storm the town, I will engage to
take some afternoon walks with you,—retiring into
profoundest solitude the most sacred part of the day.
Ricketson had written to invite Thoreau to visit him
again, saying among other things, "Walton's small
sailboat is now on Assawampset Pond." After visiting
Concord that autumn, he proposed another visit in December,
saying (December 11, 1857), "I long to see
your long beard. Channing says it is terrible to behold,
but improves you mightily." This fixes the date, late
in that year, when Thoreau first wore his full beard, as
shown in his latest portraits.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, August 18, 1857.
Mr. Blake,—Fifteenthly. It seems to me that you
need some absorbing pursuit. It does not matter much
what it is, so it be honest. Such employment will be
favorable to your development in more characteristic
and important directions. You know there must be
impulse enough for steerageway, though it be not
toward your port, to prevent your drifting helplessly on
to rocks or shoals. Some sails are set for this purpose
only. There is the large fleet of scholars and men of
science, for instance, always to be seen standing off
and on every coast, and saved thus from running on
to reefs, who will at last run into their proper haven,
we trust.
It is a pity you were not here with Brown and Wiley.
I think that in this case, for a rarity, the more the
merrier.
You perceived that I did not entertain the idea of
our going together to Maine on such an excursion as I
had planned. The more I thought of it, the more imprudent
it appeared to me. I did think to have written
you before going, though not to propose your going
also; but I went at last very suddenly, and could only
have written a business letter, if I had tried, when
there was no business to be accomplished. I have now
returned, and think I have had a quite profitable journey,
chiefly from associating with an intelligent Indian.
My companion, Edward Hoar, also found his account
in it, though he suffered considerably from being obliged
to carry unusual loads over wet and rough "carries,"—in
one instance five miles through a swamp, where the
water was frequently up to our knees, and the fallen
timber higher than our heads. He went over the ground
three times, not being able to carry all his load at once.
This prevented his ascending Ktaadn. Our best nights
were those when it rained the hardest, on account of
the mosquitoes. I speak of these things, which were
not unexpected, merely to account for my not inviting
you.
Having returned, I flatter myself that the world appears
in some respects a little larger, and not, as usual,
smaller and shallower, for having extended my range.
I have made a short excursion into the new world
which the Indian dwells in, or is. He begins where we
leave off. It is worth the while to detect new faculties
in man,—he is so much the more divine; and anything
that fairly excites our admiration expands us. The
Indian, who can find his way so wonderfully in the
woods, possesses so much intelligence which the white
man does not,—and it increases my own capacity, as
well as faith, to observe it. I rejoice to find that intelligence
flows in other channels than I knew. It redeems
for me portions of what seemed brutish before.
It is a great satisfaction to find that your oldest convictions
are permanent. With regard to essentials, I
have never had occasion to change my mind. The aspect
of the world varies from year to year, as the landscape
is differently clothed, but I find that the truth is
still true, and I never regret any emphasis which it may
have inspired. Ktaadn is there still, but much more
surely my old conviction is there, resting with more
than mountain breadth and weight on the world, the
source still of fertilizing streams, and affording glorious
views from its summit, if I can get up to it again. As
the mountains still stand on the plain, and far more
unchangeable and permanent,—stand still grouped
around, farther or nearer to my maturer eye, the ideas
which I have entertained,—the everlasting teats from
which we draw our nourishment.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, November 16, 1857.
Mr. Blake,—You have got the start again. It was
I that owed you a letter or two, if I mistake not.
They make a great ado nowadays about hard times;[81]
but I think that the community generally, ministers
and all, take a wrong view of the matter, though some
of the ministers preaching according to a formula may
pretend to take a right one. This general failure, both
private and public, is rather occasion for rejoicing, as
reminding us whom we have at the helm,—that justice
is always done. If our merchants did not most of
them fail, and the banks too, my faith in the old laws
of the world would be staggered. The statement that
ninety-six in a hundred doing such business surely
break down is perhaps the sweetest fact that statistics
have revealed,—exhilarating as the fragrance of sallows
in spring. Does it not say somewhere, "The Lord
reigneth, let the earth rejoice"? If thousands are
thrown out of employment, it suggests that they were
not well employed. Why don't they take the hint? It
is not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What
are you industrious about?
The merchants and company have long laughed at
transcendentalism, higher laws, etc., crying, "None of
your moonshine," as if they were anchored to something
not only definite, but sure and permanent. If
there was any institution which was presumed to rest
on a solid and secure basis, and more than any other
represented this boasted common sense, prudence, and
practical talent, it was the bank; and now those very
banks are found to be mere reeds shaken by the wind.
Scarcely one in the land has kept its promise.... It
would seem as if you only need live forty years in any
age of this world, to see its most promising government
become the government of Kansas, and banks nowhere.
Not merely the Brook Farm and Fourierite communities,
but now the community generally has failed. But
there is the moonshine still, serene, beneficent, and unchanged.
Hard times, I say, have this value, among
others, that they show us what such promises are
worth,—where the sure banks are. I heard some Mr.
Eliot praised the other day because he had paid some
of his debts, though it took nearly all he had (why, I've
done as much as that myself many times, and a little
more), and then gone to board. What if he has? I
hope he's got a good boarding-place, and can pay for
it. It's not everybody that can. However, in my
opinion, it is cheaper to keep house,—i. e., if you
don't keep too big a one.
Men will tell you sometimes that "money's hard."
That shows it was not made to eat, I say. Only think
of a man in this new world, in his log cabin, in the
midst of a corn and potato patch, with a sheepfold on
one side, talking about money being hard! So are
flints hard; there is no alloy in them. What has that
got to do with his raising his food, cutting his wood (or
breaking it), keeping indoors when it rains, and, if
need be, spinning and weaving his clothes? Some of
those who sank with the steamer the other day found
out that money was heavy too. Think of a man's priding
himself on this kind of wealth, as if it greatly enriched
him. As if one struggling in mid-ocean with a
bag of gold on his back should gasp out, "I am worth
a hundred thousand dollars." I see them struggling
just as ineffectually on dry land, nay, even more hopelessly,
for, in the former case, rather than sink, they
will finally let the bag go; but in the latter they are
pretty sure to hold and go down with it. I see them
swimming about in their greatcoats, collecting their
rents, really getting their dues, drinking bitter draughts
which only increase their thirst, becoming more and
more water-logged, till finally they sink plumb down
to the bottom. But enough of this.
Have you ever read Ruskin's books? If not, I would
recommend [you] to try the second and third volumes
(not parts) of his "Modern Painters." I am now
reading the fourth, and have read most of his other books
lately. They are singularly good and encouraging,
though not without crudeness and bigotry. The themes
in the volumes referred to are Infinity, Beauty, Imagination,
Love of Nature, etc.,—all treated in a very living
manner. I am rather surprised by them. It is remarkable
that these things should be said with reference to
painting chiefly, rather than literature. The "Seven
Lamps of Architecture," too, is made of good stuff;
but, as I remember, there is too much about art in it
for me and the Hottentots. We want to know about
matters and things in general. Our house is as yet a
hut.
You must have been enriched by your solitary walk
over the mountains. I suppose that I feel the same awe
when on their summits that many do on entering a
church. To see what kind of earth that is on which
you have a house and garden somewhere, perchance!
It is equal to the lapse of many years. You must ascend
a mountain to learn your relation to matter, and
so to your own body, for it is at home there, though
you are not. It might have been composed there, and
will have no farther to go to return to dust there, than
in your garden; but your spirit inevitably comes away,
and brings your body with it, if it lives. Just as awful
really, and as glorious, is your garden. See how I can
play with my fingers! They are the funniest companions
I have ever found. Where did they come from?
What strange control I have over them! Who am I?
What are they?—those little peaks—call them Madison,
Jefferson, Lafayette. What is the matter? My
fingers, do I say? Why, ere long, they may form the
topmost crystal of Mount Washington. I go up there
to see my body's cousins. There are some fingers, toes,
bowels, etc., that I take an interest in, and therefore
I am interested in all their relations.
Let me suggest a theme for you: to state to yourself
precisely and completely what that walk over the
mountains amounted to for you,—returning to this
essay again and again, until you are satisfied that all
that was important in your experience is in it. Give
this good reason to yourself for having gone over the
mountains, for mankind is ever going over a mountain.
Don't suppose that you can tell it precisely the first
dozen times you try, but at 'em again, especially where,
after a sufficient pause, you suspect that you are touching
the heart or summit of the matter, reiterate your
blows there, and account for the mountain to yourself.
Not that the story need be long, but it will take a long
while to make it short. It did not take very long to
get over the mountain, you thought; but have you got
over it indeed? If you have been to the top of Mount
Washington, let me ask, what did you find there?
That is the way they prove witnesses, you know. Going
up there and being blown on is nothing. We never
do much climbing while we are there, but we eat our
luncheon, etc., very much as at home. It is after we
get home that we really go over the mountain, if ever.
What did the mountain say? What did the mountain
do?
I keep a mountain anchored off eastward a little
way, which I ascend in my dreams both awake and
asleep. Its broad base spreads over a village or two,
which does not know it; neither does it know them, nor
do I when I ascend it. I can see its general outline as
plainly now in my mind as that of Wachusett. I do
not invent in the least, but state exactly what I see. I
find that I go up it when I am light-footed and earnest.
It ever smokes like an altar with its sacrifice. I am not
aware that a single villager frequents it or knows of it.
I keep this mountain to ride instead of a horse.
Do you not mistake about seeing Moosehead Lake
from Mount Washington? That must be about one
hundred and twenty miles distant, or nearly twice as
far as the Atlantic, which last some doubt if they can
see thence. Was it not Umbagog?
Dr. Solger[82]
has been lecturing in the vestry in this
town on Geography, to Sanborn's scholars, for several
months past, at five P. M. Emerson and Alcott have
been to hear him. I was surprised when the former
asked me, the other day, if I was not going to hear Dr.
Solger. What, to be sitting in a meeting-house cellar
at that time of day, when you might possibly be outdoors!
I never thought of such a thing. What was the
sun made for? If he does not prize daylight, I do.
Let him lecture to owls and dormice. He must be a
wonderful lecturer indeed who can keep me indoors at
such an hour, when the night is coming in which no
man can walk.
Are you in want of amusement nowadays? Then
play a little at the game of getting a living. There
never was anything equal to it. Do it temperately,
though, and don't sweat. Don't let this secret out, for
I have a design against the Opera. Opera!! Pass
along the exclamations, devil.[83]
Now is the time to become conversant with your
wood-pile (this comes under Work for the Month), and
be sure you put some warmth into it by your mode of
getting it. Do not consent to be passively warmed. An
intense degree of that is the hotness that is threatened.
But a positive warmth within can withstand the fiery
furnace, as the vital heat of a living man can withstand
the heat that cooks meat.
After returning from the last of his three expeditions
to the Maine woods (in 1846, 1853, and 1857), Thoreau
was appealed to by his friend Higginson, then
living in Worcester, for information concerning a proposed
excursion from Worcester into Maine and Canada,
then but little visited by tourists, who now go
there in droves. He replied in this long letter, with its
minute instructions and historical references. The Arnold
mentioned is General Benedict Arnold, who in
1775-76 made a toilsome march through the Maine
forest with a small New England army for the conquest
of Canada, while young John Thoreau, Henry's
grandfather, was establishing himself as a merchant in
Boston (not yet evacuated by British troops), previous
to his marriage with Jane Burns.
TO T. W. HIGGINSON (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, January 28, 1858.
Dear Sir,—It would be perfectly practicable to go
to the Madawaska the way you propose. As for the route
to Quebec, I do not find the Sugar Loaf Mountains on
my maps. The most direct and regular way, as you
know, is substantially Montresor's and Arnold's and
the younger John Smith's—by the Chaudière; but
this is less wild. If your object is to see the St. Lawrence
River below Quebec, you will probably strike it
at the Rivière du Loup. (Vide Hodge's account of his
excursion thither via the Allegash,—I believe it is the
second Report on the Geology of the Public Lands of
Maine and Massachusetts in '37.) I think that our
Indian last summer, when we talked of going to the
St. Lawrence, named another route, near the Madawaska,—perhaps
the St. Francis,—which would save
the long portage which Hodge made.
I do not know whether you think of ascending the
St. Lawrence in a canoe; but if you should, you might
be delayed not only by the current, but by the waves,
which frequently run too high for a canoe on such a
mighty stream. It would be a grand excursion to go
to Quebec by the Chaudière, descend the St. Lawrence
to the Rivière du Loup, and return by the Madawaska
and St. John to Fredericton, or farther,—almost all
the way down-stream—a very important consideration.
I went to Moosehead in company with a party of
four who were going a-hunting down the Allegash and
St. John, and thence by some other stream over into
the Restigouche, and down that to the Bay of Chaleur,—to
be gone six weeks. Our northern terminus
was an island in Heron Lake on the Allegash. (Vide
Colton's railroad and township map of Maine.)
The Indian proposed that we should return to Bangor
by the St. John and Great Schoodic Lake, which we
had thought of ourselves; and he showed us on the map
where we should be each night. It was then noon,
and the next day night, continuing down the Allegash,
we should have been at the Madawaska settlements,
having made only one or two portages; and thereafter,
on the St. John there would be but one or two more
falls, with short carries; and if there was not too much
wind, we could go down that stream one hundred
miles a day. It is settled all the way below Madawaska.
He knew the route well. He even said that this was
easier, and would take but little more time, though
much farther, than the route we decided on,—i. e.,
by Webster Stream, the East Branch, and main Penobscot
to Oldtown; but he may have wanted a longer
job. We preferred the latter, not only because it was
shorter, but because, as he said, it was wilder.
We went about three hundred and twenty-five miles
with the canoe (including sixty miles of stage between
Bangor and Oldtown); were out twelve nights, and
spent about $40 apiece,—which was more than was
necessary. We paid the Indian, who was a very good
one, $1.50 per day and 50 cents a week for his canoe.
This is enough in ordinary seasons. I had formerly
paid $2 for an Indian and for white batteau-men.
If you go to Madawaska in a leisurely manner, supposing
no delay on account of rain or the violence
of the wind, you may reach Mt. Kineo by noon, and
have the afternoon to explore it. The next day you
may get to the head of the lake before noon, make the
portage of two and a half miles over a wooden railroad,
and drop down the Penobscot half a dozen miles.
The third morning you will perhaps walk half a mile
about Pine Stream Falls, while the Indian runs down,—cross
the head of Chesuncook, reach the junction of
the Caucomgomock and Umbazookskus by noon, and
ascend the latter to Umbazookskus Lake that night.
If it is low water, you may have to walk and carry a
little on the Umbazookskus before entering the lake.
The fourth morning you will make the carry of two
miles to Mud Pond (Allegash water),—and a very
wet carry it is,—and reach Chamberlain Lake by
noon, and Heron Lake, perhaps, that night, after a
couple of very short carries at the outlet of Chamberlain.
At the end of two days more you will probably
be at Madawaska. Of course the Indian can paddle
twice as far in a day as he commonly does.
Perhaps you would like a few more details. We
used (three of us) exactly twenty-six pounds of hard
bread, fourteen pounds of pork, three pounds of coffee,
twelve pounds of sugar (and could have used more),
besides a little tea, Indian meal, and rice,—and plenty
of berries and moose-meat. This was faring very
luxuriously. I had not formerly carried coffee, sugar,
or rice. But for solid food, I decide that it is not worth
the while to carry anything but hard bread and pork,
whatever your tastes and habits may be. These wear
best, and you have no time nor dishes in which to cook
anything else. Of course you will take a little Indian
meal to fry fish in; and half a dozen lemons also, if
you have sugar, will be very refreshing,—for the water
is warm.[84]
To save time, the sugar, coffee, tea, salt, etc., should
be in separate water-tight bags, labeled, and tied with a
leathern string; and all the provisions and blankets
should be put into two large india-rubber bags, if you
can find them water-tight. Ours were not. A four-quart
tin pail makes a good kettle for all purposes, and tin
plates are portable and convenient. Don't forget an
india-rubber knapsack, with a large flap,—plenty of
dish-cloths, old newspapers, strings, and twenty-five feet
of strong cord. Of india-rubber clothing, the most you
can wear, if any, is a very light coat,—and that you
cannot work in. I could be more particular,—but perhaps
have been too much so already.
TO MARSTON WATSON (AT PLYMOUTH).
Concord, April 25, 1858.
Dear Sir,—Your unexpected gift of pear trees
reached me yesterday in good condition, and I spent
the afternoon in giving them a good setting out; but I
fear that this cold weather may hurt them. However,
I am inclined to think they are insured, since you have
looked on them. It makes one's mouth water to read
their names only. From what I hear of the extent of
your bounty, if a reasonable part of the trees succeed,
this transplanting will make a new era for Concord to
date from.
Mine must be a lucky star, for day before yesterday
I received a box of mayflowers from Brattleboro, and
yesterday morning your pear trees, and at evening a
hummingbird's nest from Worcester. This looks like
fairy housekeeping.
I discovered two new plants in Concord last winter,
the Labrador tea (Ledum latifolium), and yew (Taxis
baccata).
By the way, in January I communicated with Dr.
Durkee, whose report on glow-worms I sent you, and
it appeared, as I expected, that he (and by his account
Agassiz, Gould, Jackson, and others to whom he showed
them) did not consider them a distinct species, but a
variety of the common, or Lampyris noctiluca, some of
which you got in Lincoln. Durkee, at least, has never
seen the last. I told him that I had no doubt about
their being a distinct species. His, however, were luminous
throughout every part of the body, as those which
you sent me were not, while I had them.
Is nature as full of vigor to your eyes as ever, or do
you detect some falling off at last? Is the mystery of
the hog's bristle cleared up, and with it that of our
life? It is the question, to the exclusion of every other
interest.
I am sorry to hear of the burning of your woods, but,
thank Heaven, your great ponds and your sea cannot
be burnt. I love to think of your warm, sandy wood-roads,
and your breezy island out in the sea. What a
prospect you can get every morning from the hilltop
east of your house![85]
I think that even the heathen that
I am could say, or sing, or dance, morning prayers
there of some kind.
Please remember me to Mrs. Watson, and to the rest
of your family who are helping the sun shine yonder.
Of his habits in mountain-climbing, Channing says:[86]
"He ascended such hills as Monadnoc by his own path;
would lay down his map on the summit and draw a
line to the point he proposed to visit below,—perhaps
forty miles away on the landscape, and set off bravely
to make the 'short-cut.' The lowland people wondered
to see him scaling the heights as if he had lost his way,
or at his jumping over their cow-yard fences,—asking
if he had fallen from the clouds. In a walk like this he
always carried his umbrella; and on this Monadnoc
trip, when about a mile from the station [in Troy, N. H.],
a torrent of rain came down; without the umbrella his
books, blankets, maps, and provisions would all have
been spoiled, or the morning lost by delay. On the
mountain there being a thick, soaking fog, the first object
was to camp and make tea. He spent five nights
in camp, having built another hut, to get varied views.
Flowers, birds, lichens, and the rocks were carefully
examined, all parts of the mountain were visited, and
as accurate a map as could be made by pocket compass
was carefully sketched and drawn out, in the five days
spent there,—with notes of the striking aerial phenomena,
incidents of travel and natural history. The
outlook across the valley over to Wachusett, with its
thunder-storms and battles in the cloud; the farmers'
back-yards in Jaffrey, where the family cotton can be
seen bleaching on the grass, but no trace of the pigmy
family; the dry, soft air all night, the lack of dew in
the morning; the want of water,—a pint being a good
deal,—these, and similar things make up some part of
such an excursion."
The Monadnock excursion above mentioned began
June 3d, and continued three days. It inspired Thoreau
to take a longer mountain tour with his neighbor and
friend Edward Hoar, to which these letters relate, giving
the ways and means of the journey,—a memorable
one to all concerned.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, June 29, 1858, 8 A. M.
Mr. Blake,—Edward Hoar and I propose to start
for the White Mountains in a covered wagon, with one
horse, on the morning of Thursday the 1st of July, intending
to explore the mountain-tops botanically, and
camp on them at least several times. Will you take a
seat in the wagon with us? Mr. Hoar prefers to hire
the horse and wagon himself. Let us hear by express,
as soon as you can, whether you will join us here by
the earliest train on Thursday morning, or Wednesday
night. Bring your map of the mountains, and as much
provision for the road as you can,—hard bread, sugar,
tea, meat, etc.,—for we intend to live like gipsies; also,
a blanket and some thick clothes for the mountain-top.
July 1st. Last Monday evening Mr. Edward Hoar
said that he thought of going to the White Mountains.
I remarked casually that I should like to go well enough
if I could afford it. Whereupon he declared that if I
would go with him, he would hire a horse and wagon,
so that the ride would cost me nothing, and we would
explore the mountain-tops botanically, camping on them
many nights. The next morning I suggested you and
Brown's accompanying us in another wagon, and we
could all camp and cook, gipsy-like, along the way,—or,
perhaps, if the horse could draw us, you would like
to bear half the expense of the horse and wagon, and
take a seat with us. He liked either proposition, but
said that if you would take a seat with us, he would
prefer to hire the horse and wagon himself. You could
contribute something else if you pleased. Supposing
that Brown would be confined, I wrote to you accordingly,
by express on Tuesday morning, via Boston, stating
that we should start to-day, suggesting provision,
thick clothes, etc., and asking for an answer; but I have
not received one. I have just heard that you may be
at Sterling, and now write to say that we shall still be
glad if you will join us at Senter Harbor, where we
expect to be next Monday morning. In any case, will
you please direct a letter to us there at once?
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, June 30, 1858.
Friend Ricketson,—I am on the point of starting
for the White Mountains in a wagon with my neighbor
Edward Hoar, and I write to you now rather to apologize
for not writing, than to answer worthily your three
notes. I thank you heartily for them. You will not
care for a little delay in acknowledging them, since
your date shows that you can afford to wait. Indeed,
my head has been so full of company, etc., that I could
not reply to you fitly before, nor can I now.
As for preaching to men these days in the Walden
strain, is it of any consequence to preach to an audience
of men who can fail, or who can be revived? There
are few beside. Is it any success to interest these parties?
If a man has speculated and failed, he will probably
do these things again, in spite of you or me. I
confess that it is rare that I rise to sentiment in my relations
to men,—ordinarily to a mere patient, or may
be wholesome, good-will. I can imagine something
more, but the truth compels me to regard the ideal and
the actual as two things.
Channing has come, and as suddenly gone, and left
a short poem, "Near Home," published (?) or printed
by Munroe, which I have hardly had time to glance
at. As you may guess, I learn nothing of you from
him.
You already foresee my answer to your invitation to
make you a summer visit: I am bound for the mountains.
But I trust that you have vanquished, ere this,
those dusky demons that seem to lurk around the Head
of the River.[87]
You know that this warfare is nothing
but a kind of nightmare, and it is our thoughts alone
which give those unworthies any body or existence.
I made an excursion with Blake, of Worcester, to
Monadnock, a few weeks since. We took our blankets
and food, spent two nights on the mountain, and did
not go into a house.
Alcott has been very busy for a long time repairing
an old shell of a house, and I have seen very little of
him.[88]
I have looked more at the houses which birds
build. Watson made us all very generous presents from
his nursery in the spring. Especially did he remember
Alcott.
Excuse me for not writing any more at present, and
remember me to your family.
In explanation of the next letter (October 31, 1858),
it may be said that Ricketson had formed a plan for
visiting Europe, which he gave up, and had recommended
an "English Australian" who proposed to see
Concord. In Thoreau's reply, he mentions Mr. Hoar,
who was not only his companion in later journeys, but,
while in college or the Harvard Law School, had assisted
Thoreau in that accidental forest fire, mentioned
in the Journal, which brought both the young men into
much disrepute among the Concord farmers and owners
of wood-lots. At the date of the letter, Channing
was flitting between New Bedford and Concord, and
soon returned to spend the rest of his days in Thoreau's
town, where he died, December 23, 1901, the last survivor
of the group of friends to whom these letters
relate.
In July, 1858, as mentioned in this letter to Mr.
Ricketson, Thoreau journeyed from Concord to the
White Mountains, first visited with his brother John in
1839. His later companion was Edward Hoar, a botanist
and lover of nature, who had been a magistrate in
California, and in boyhood a comrade of Thoreau in
shooting excursions on the Concord meadows. They
journeyed in a wagon and Thoreau disliked the loss
of independence in choice of camping-places involved
in the care of a horse. He complained also of the
magnificent inns ("mountain houses") that had sprung
up in the passes and on the plateaus since his first visit.
"Give me," he said, "a spruce house made in the
rain," such as he and Channing afterward (1860) made
on Monadnock in his last trip to that mountain. The
chief exploit in the White Mountain trip was a visit to
Tuckerman's Ravine on Mt. Washington, of which Mr.
Hoar, some years before his death (in 1893), gave me
an account, containing the true anecdote of Thoreau's
finding the arnica plant when he needed it.
On their way to this rather inaccessible chasm, Thoreau
and his comrade went first to what was then but
a small tavern on the "tip-top" of Mt. Washington.
It was a foggy day; and when the landlord was asked
if he could furnish a guide to Tuckerman's Ravine, he
replied, "Yes, my brother is the guide; but if he went
to-day he could never find his way back in this fog."
"Well," said Thoreau, "if we cannot have a guide we
will find it ourselves;" and he at once produced a map
he had made the day before at a roadside inn, where
he had found a wall map of the mountain region, and
climbed on a table to copy that portion he needed.
With this map and his pocket compass he "struck a
bee-line," said Mr. Hoar, for the ravine, and soon
came to it, about a mile away. They went safely down
the steep stairs into the chasm, where they found the
midsummer iceberg they wished to see. But as they
walked down the bed of the Peabody River, flowing
from this ravine, over boulders five or six feet high, the
heavy packs on their shoulders weighed them down,
and finally, Thoreau's foot slipping, he fell and sprained
his ankle. He rose, but had not limped five steps from
the place where he fell, when he said, "Here is the
arnica, anyhow,"—reached out his hand and plucked
the Arnica mollis, which he had not before found anywhere.
Before reaching the mountains they had marked
in their botany books forty-six species of plants they
hoped to find there, and before they came away they
had found forty-two of them.
When they reached their camping-place, farther down,
Thoreau was so lame he could not move about, and
lay there in the camp several days, eating the pork and
other supplies they had in their packs, Mr. Hoar going
each day to the inn at the mountain summit. This
camp was in a thicket of dwarf firs at the foot of the
ravine, where, just before his accident, by carelessness
in lighting a fire, some acres of the mountain woodland
had been set on fire; but this proved to be the signal
for which Thoreau had told his Worcester friends to
watch, if they wished to join him on the mountain. "I
had told Blake," says Thoreau in his Journal, "to look
out for a smoke and a white tent. We had made a
smoke sure enough. We slept five in the tent that night,
and found it quite warm." Mr. Hoar added: "In this
journey Thoreau insisted on our carrying heavy packs,
and rather despised persons who complained of the
burden. He was chagrined, in the Maine woods, to
find his Indian, Joe Polis (whom, on the whole, he admired),
excited and tremulous at sight of a moose, so
that he could scarcely load his gun properly. Joe, who
was a good Catholic, wanted us to stop traveling on
Sunday and hold a meeting; and when we insisted on
going forward, the Indian withdrew into the woods to
say his prayers,—then came back and picked up the
breakfast things, and we paddled on. As to Thoreau's
courage and manliness, nobody who had seen him
among the Penobscot rocks and rapids—the Indian
trusting his life and his canoe to Henry's skill, promptitude,
and nerve—would ever doubt it."
Channing says:[89]
"In his later journeys, if his companion
was footsore or loitered, he steadily pursued his
road. Once, when a follower was done up with headache
and incapable of motion, hoping his associate
would comfort him and perhaps afford him a sip of
tea, he said, 'There are people who are sick in that
way every morning, and go about their affairs,' and then
marched off about his. In such limits, so inevitable,
was he compacted.... This tone of mind grew out
of no insensibility; or, if he sometimes looked coldly
on the suffering of more tender natures, he sympathized
with their afflictions, but could do nothing to admire
them. He would not injure a plant unnecessarily. At
the time of the John Brown tragedy, Thoreau was
driven sick. So the country's misfortunes in the Union
war acted on his feelings with great force: he used to
say he 'could never recover while the war lasted.'"
Hawthorne had an experience somewhat similar,
though he, too, was of stern stuff when need was, and
had much of the old Salem sea-captains in his sensitive
nature.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, October 31, 1858.
Friend Ricketson,—I have not seen anything of
your English author yet. Edward Hoar, my companion
in Maine and at the White Mountains, his sister Elizabeth,
and a Miss Prichard, another neighbor of ours,
went to Europe in the Niagara on the 6th. I told them
to look out for you under the Yardley Oak, but it
seems they will not find you there.
I had a pleasant time in Tuckerman's Ravine at the
White Mountains in July, entertaining four beside myself
under my little tent through some soaking rains;
and more recently I have taken an interesting walk
with Channing about Cape Ann. We were obliged to
"dipper it" a good way, on account of the scarcity of
fresh water, for we got most of our meals by the shore.
Channing is understood to be here for the winter, but
I rarely see him.
I should be pleased to see your face here in the
course of the Indian summer, which may still be expected,
if any authority can tell us when that phenomenon
does occur. We would like to hear the story of
your travels; for if you have not been fairly intoxicated
with Europe, you have been half-seas-over, and so can
probably tell more about it.
This alludes to the fact that Ricketson got as far as
Halifax in his attempt at Europe; and in his reply
(November 3, 1858) he gave Thoreau an account of
his short voyage, on which the next letter comments.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, November 6, 1858.
Friend Ricketson,—I was much pleased with your
lively and lifelike account of your voyage. You were
more than repaid for your trouble after all. The coast
of Nova Scotia, which you sailed along from Windsor
westward, is particularly interesting to the historian of
this country, having been settled earlier than Plymouth.
Your "Isle of Haut" is properly "Isle Haute," or
the High Island of Champlain's map. There is another
off the coast of Maine. By the way, the American
elk of American authors (Cervus Canadensis) is a
distinct animal from the moose (Cervus alces), though
the latter is called elk by many.
You drew a very vivid portrait of the Australian,—short
and stout, with a pipe in his mouth, and his
book inspired by beer, Pot First, Pot Second, etc. I
suspect that he must be potbellied withal. Methinks I
see the smoke going up from him as from a cottage on
the moor. If he does not quench his genius with his
beer, it may burst into a clear flame at last. However,
perhaps he intentionally adopts the low style.
What do you mean by that ado about smoking, and
my "purer tastes"? I should like his pipe as well as
his beer at least. Neither of them is so bad as to be
"highly connected," which you say he is, unfortunately.
No! I expect nothing but pleasure in "smoke from
your pipe."
You and the Australian must have put your heads
together when you concocted those titles,—with pipes
in your mouths over a pot of beer. I suppose that your
chapters are, Whiff the First, Whiff the Second, etc.
But of course it is a more modest expression for "Fire
from my Genius."
You must have been very busy since you came back,
or before you sailed, to have brought out your History,
of whose publication I had not heard. I suppose that
I have read it in the Mercury. Yet I am curious to
see how it looks in a volume, with your name on the
title-page.
I am more curious still about the poems. Pray put
some sketches into the book: your shanty for frontispiece;
Arthur and Walton's boat (if you can) running
for Cuttyhunk in a tremendous gale; not forgetting
"Be honest boys," etc., near by; the Middleborough
ponds with a certain island looming in the distance;
the Quaker meeting-house, and the Brady house, if
you like; the villagers catching smelts with dip-nets in
the twilight, at the Head of the River, etc., etc. Let it
be a local and villageous book as much as possible.
Let some one make a characteristic selection of mottoes
from your shanty walls, and sprinkle them in an
irregular manner, at all angles, over the fly-leaves and
margins, as a man stamps his name in a hurry; and
also canes, pipes, and jackknives, of all your patterns,
about the frontispiece. I can think of plenty of devices
for tail-pieces. Indeed, I should like to see a hair pillow,
accurately drawn, for one; a cat, with a bell on,
for another; the old horse, with his age printed in the
hollow of his back; half a cocoanut-shell by a spring;
a sheet of blotted paper; a settle occupied by a settler
at full length, etc., etc., etc. Call all the arts to your
aid.
Don't wait for the Indian summer, but bring it with
you.
P. S.—Let me ask a favor. I am trying to write
something about the autumnal tints, and I wish to
know how much our trees differ from English and
European ones in this respect. Will you observe, or
learn for me, what English or European trees, if any,
still retain their leaves in Mr. Arnold's garden (the gardener
will supply the true names); and also if the foliage
of any (and what) European or foreign trees there
have been brilliant the past month. If you will do this
you will greatly oblige me. I return the newspaper
with this.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, November 22, 1858.
Friend Ricketson,—I thank you for your "History."[90]
Though I have not yet read it again, I have
looked far enough to see that I like the homeliness of
it; that is, the good, old-fashioned way of writing, as if
you actually lived where you wrote. A man's interest
in a single bluebird is worth more than a complete but
dry list of the fauna and flora of a town. It is also a
considerable advantage to be able to say at any time,
"If D. R. is not here, here is his book." Alcott being
here, and inquiring after you (whom he has been expecting),
I lent the book to him almost immediately.
He talks of going West the latter part of this week.
Channing is here again, as I am told, but I have not
seen him.
I thank you also for the account of the trees. It was
to my purpose, and I hope you got something out of it
too. I suppose that the cold weather prevented your
coming here. Suppose you try a winter walk on skates.
Please remember me to your family.
Late in November, 1858, Cholmondeley, who had
not written for a year and six months, suddenly notified
Thoreau from Montreal that he was in Canada, and
would visit Concord the next week. Accordingly he
arrived early in December, and urged his friend to go
with him to the West Indies. John Thoreau, the father,
was then in his last illness, and for that and other reasons
Thoreau could not accept the invitation; but he
detained Cholmondeley in Concord some days, and
took him to New Bedford, December 8th, having first
written this note to Mr. Ricketson:—
"Thomas Cholmondeley, my English acquaintance,
is here, on his way to the West Indies. He wants to
see New Bedford, a whaling town. I tell him I would
like to introduce him to you there,—thinking more of
his seeing you than New Bedford. So we propose to
come your way to-morrow. Excuse this short notice,
for the time is short. If on any account it is inconvenient
to see us, you will treat us accordingly."
Of this visit and his English visitor, Mr. Ricketson
wrote in his journal the next day:—
"We were all much pleased with Mr. Cholmondeley.
He is a tall spare man, thirty-five years of age, of fair
and fresh complexion, blue eyes, light-brown and fine
hair, nose small and Roman, beard light and worn full,
with a mustache. A man of fine culture and refinement
of manners, educated at Oriel College, Oxford, of an
old Cheshire family by his father, a clergyman. He
wore a black velvet sack coat, and lighter-colored
trousers,—a sort of genteel traveling suit; perhaps a
cap, but by no means a fashionable 'castor.' He reminded
me of our dear friend, George William Curtis."
Few greater compliments could this diarist give than to
compare a visitor to Curtis, the lamented.
Mr. Cholmondeley left Concord for the South, going
as far as to Virginia, in December and January; then
came back to Concord the 20th of January, 1859, and
after a few days returned to Canada, and thence to
England by way of Jamaica. He was in London when
Theodore Parker reached there from Santa Cruz, in
June, and called on him, with offers of service; but
does not seem to have heard of Parker's death till I
wrote him in May, 1861. At my parting with him in
Concord, he gave me money with which to buy grapes
for the invalid father of Thoreau,—an instance of his
constant consideration for others; the Thoreaus hardly
affording such luxuries as hothouse grapes for the sick.
Sophia Thoreau, who perhaps was more appreciative
of him than her more stoical brother, said after his
death, "We have always had the truest regard for him,
as a person of rare integrity, great benevolence, and the
sincerest friendliness." This well describes the man
whose every-day guise was literally set down by Mr.
Ricketson.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, January 1, 1859.
Mr. Blake,—It may interest you to hear that
Cholmondeley has been this way again, via Montreal
and Lake Huron, going to the West Indies, or rather
to Weiss-nicht-wo, whither he urges me to accompany
him. He is rather more demonstrative than before,
and, on the whole, what would be called "a good fellow,"—is
a man of principle, and quite reliable, but
very peculiar. I have been to New Bedford with him,
to show him a whaling town and Ricketson. I was
glad to hear that you had called on R. How did you
like him? I suspect that you did not see one another
fairly.
I have lately got back to that glorious society called
Solitude, where we meet our friends continually, and
can imagine the outside world also to be peopled. Yet
some of my acquaintance would fain hustle me into the
almshouse for the sake of society, as if I were pining for
that diet, when I seem to myself a most befriended
man, and find constant employment. However, they
do not believe a word I say. They have got a club, the
handle of which is in the Parker House at Boston, and
with this they beat me from time to time, expecting to
make me tender or minced meat, so fit for a club to
dine off.
"Hercules with his club
The Dragon did drub;
But More of More Hall
With nothing at all,
He slew the Dragon of Wantley."
Ah! that More of More Hall knew what fair play was.
Channing, who wrote to me about it once, brandishing
the club vigorously (being set on by another, probably),
says now, seriously, that he is sorry to find by my
letters that I am "absorbed in politics," and adds,
begging my pardon for his plainness, "Beware of an
extraneous life!" and so he does his duty, and washes
his hands of me. I tell him that it is as if he should
say to the sloth, that fellow that creeps so slowly along
a tree, and cries ai from time to time, "Beware of
dancing!"
The doctors are all agreed that I am suffering for
want of society. Was never a case like it. First, I did
not know that I was suffering at all. Secondly, as an
Irishman might say, I had thought it was indigestion
of the society I got.
As for the Parker House, I went there once, when
the Club[91]
was away, but I found it hard to see through
the cigar smoke, and men were deposited about in
chairs over the marble floor, as thick as legs of bacon
in a smoke-house. It was all smoke, and no salt, Attic
or other. The only room in Boston which I visit with
alacrity is the Gentlemen's Room at the Fitchburg Depot,
where I wait for the cars, sometimes for two hours,
in order to get out of town. It is a paradise to the
Parker House, for no smoking is allowed, and there is
far more retirement. A large and respectable club of
us hire it (Town and Country Club), and I am pretty
sure to find some one there whose face is set the same
way as my own.
My last essay, on which I am still engaged, is called
"Autumnal Tints." I do not know how readable (i. e.,
by me to others) it will be.
I met Mr. James the other night at Emerson's, at an
Alcottian conversation, at which, however, Alcott did
not talk much, being disturbed by James's opposition.
The latter is a hearty man enough, with whom you can
differ very satisfactorily, on account of both his doctrines
and his good temper. He utters quasi philanthropic
dogmas in a metaphysic dress; but they are for
all practical purposes very crude. He charges society
with all the crime committed, and praises the criminal
for committing it. But I think that all the remedies
he suggests out of his head—for he goes no farther,
hearty as he is—would leave us about where we are
now. For, of course, it is not by a gift of turkeys on
Thanksgiving Day that he proposes to convert the criminal,
but by a true sympathy with each one,—with him,
among the rest, who lyingly tells the world from the
gallows that he has never been treated kindly by a single
mortal since he was born. But it is not so easy a thing
to sympathize with another, though you may have the
best disposition to do it. There is Dobson over the hill.
Have not you and I and all the world been trying, ever
since he was born, to sympathize with him? (as doubtless
he with us), and yet we have got no farther than
to send him to the house of correction once at least;
and he, on the other hand, as I hear, has sent us to
another place several times. This is the real state of
things, as I understand it, at least so far as James's
remedies go. We are now, alas! exercising what charity
we actually have, and new laws would not give us
any more. But, perchance, we might make some improvements
in the house of correction. You and I are
Dobson; what will James do for us?
Have you found at last in your wanderings a place
where the solitude is sweet?
What mountain are you camping on nowadays?
Though I had a good time at the mountains, I confess
that the journey did not bear any fruit that I know of.
I did not expect it would. The mode of it was not
simple and adventurous enough. You must first have
made an infinite demand, and not unreasonably, but
after a corresponding outlay, have an all-absorbing
purpose, and at the same time that your feet bear you
hither and thither, travel much more in imagination.
To let the mountains slide,—live at home like a
traveler. It should not be in vain that these things are
shown us from day to day. Is not each withered leaf
that I see in my walks something which I have traveled
to find?—traveled, who can tell how far? What a
fool he must be who thinks that his El Dorado is anywhere
but where he lives!
We are always, methinks, in some kind of ravine,
though our bodies may walk the smooth streets of
Worcester. Our souls (I use this word for want of a
better) are ever perched on its rocky sides, overlooking
that lowland. (What a more than Tuckerman's
Ravine is the body itself, in which the "soul" is encamped,
when you come to look into it! However,
eagles always have chosen such places for their
eyries.)
Thus is it ever with your fair cities of the plain.
Their streets may be paved with silver and gold, and
six carriages roll abreast in them, but the real homes of
the citizens are in the Tuckerman's Ravines which ray
out from that centre into the mountains round about,
one from each man, woman, and child. The masters
of life have so ordered it. That is their beau-ideal of a
country-seat. There is no danger of being tuckered out
before you get to it.
So we live in Worcester and in Concord, each man
taking his exercise regularly in his ravine, like a lion
in his cage, and sometimes spraining his ankle there.
We have very few clear days, and a great many small
plagues which keep us busy. Sometimes, I suppose,
you hear a neighbor halloo (Brown, maybe) and think
it is a bear. Nevertheless, on the whole, we think it
very grand and exhilarating, this ravine life. It is a
capital advantage withal, living so high, the excellent
drainage of that city of God. Routine is but a shallow
and insignificant sort of ravine, such as the ruts are,
the conduits of puddles. But these ravines are the source
of mighty streams, precipitous, icy, savage, as they are,
haunted by bears and loup-cerviers; there are born not
only Sacos and Amazons, but prophets who will redeem
the world. The at last smooth and fertilizing water at
which nations drink and navies supply themselves begins
with melted glaciers, and burst thunder-spouts.
Let us pray that, if we are not flowing through some
Mississippi valley which we fertilize,—and it is not
likely we are,—we may know ourselves shut in between
grim and mighty mountain walls amid the clouds, falling
a thousand feet in a mile, through dwarfed fir and
spruce, over the rocky insteps of slides, being exercised
in our minds, and so developed.
Concord, January 19, 1859.
Mr. Blake,—If I could have given a favorable
report as to the skating, I should have answered you
earlier. About a week before you wrote there was good
skating; there is now none. As for the lecture, I shall
be glad to come. I cannot now say when, but I will let
you know, I think within a week or ten days at most,
and will then leave you a week clear to make the
arrangements in. I will bring something else than
"What shall it profit a Man?" My father is very sick,
and has been for a long time, so that there is the more
need of me at home. This occurs to me, even when
contemplating so short an excursion as to Worcester.
I want very much to see or hear your account of
your adventures in the Ravine,[92]
and I trust I shall do
so when I come to Worcester. Cholmondeley has been
here again, returning from Virginia (for he went no
farther south) to Canada; and will go thence to Europe,
he thinks, in the spring, and never ramble any more.
(January 29.) I am expecting daily that my father
will die, therefore I cannot leave home at present. I
will write you again within ten days.
The death of John Thoreau (who was born October
8, 1787) occurred February 3d, and Thoreau gave his
lecture on "Autumnal Tints" at Worcester, February
22, 1859. Mrs. Thoreau survived all her children except
Sophia, and died in 1872.
At his fathers death, Thoreau sent a newspaper announcement
of it to Ricketson, who had already seen it
mentioned by Channing in the Mercury. Ricketson at
once wrote, to pay his tribute to the character of the
elder Thoreau, saying: "I have rarely met a man who
inspired me with more respect. I remember with pleasure
a ramble I took with him about Concord some two
or three years ago, at a time when you were away from
home; on which occasion I was much impressed with
his good sense, his fine social nature, and his genuine
hospitality." Of this remark Thoreau took notice in his
interesting reply.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, 12th February, 1859.
Friend Ricketson,—I thank you for your kind letter.
I sent you the notice of my father's death as much
because you knew him as because you knew me. I can
hardly realize that he is dead. He had been sick about
two years, and at last declined rather rapidly, though
steadily. Till within a week or ten days before he died
he was hoping to see another spring, but he then discovered
that this was a vain expectation, and, thinking
that he was dying, he took his leave of us several times
within a week before his departure. Once or twice he
expressed a slight impatience at the delay. He was
quite conscious to the last, and his death was so easy
that, though we had all been sitting around the bed for
an hour or more expecting that event (as we had sat
before), he was gone at last, almost before we were
aware of it.
I am glad to read what you say of his social nature.
I think I may say that he was wholly unpretending;
and there was this peculiarity in his aim, that though
he had pecuniary difficulties to contend with the greater
part of his life, he always studied how to make a good
article, pencil or other (for he practiced various arts),
and was never satisfied with what he had produced.
Nor was he ever disposed in the least to put off a poor
one for the sake of pecuniary gain,—as if he labored
for a higher end.
Though he was not very old, and was not a native
of Concord, I think that he was, on the whole, more
identified with Concord street than any man now alive,
having come here when he was about twelve years old,
and set up for himself as a merchant here, at the age
of twenty-one, fifty years ago. As I sat in a circle the
other evening with my mother and sister, my mother's
two sisters, and my father's two sisters, it occurred to
me that my father, though seventy-one, belonged to
the youngest four of the eight who recently composed
our family.
How swiftly at last, but unnoticed, a generation
passes away! Three years ago I was called with my
father to be a witness to the signing of our neighbor
Mr. Frost's will. Mr. Samuel Hoar, who was there
writing it, also signed it. I was lately required to go to
Cambridge to testify to the genuineness of the will,
being the only one of the four who could be there, and
now I am the only one alive.
My mother and sister thank you heartily for your
sympathy. The latter, in particular, agrees with you
in thinking that it is communion with still living and
healthy nature alone which can restore to sane and
cheerful views. I thank you for your invitation to New
Bedford, but I feel somewhat confined here for the
present.
I did not know but we should see you the day after
Alger was here. It is not too late for a winter walk in
Concord. It does me good to hear of spring birds, and
singing ones too,—for spring seems far away from
Concord yet. I am going to Worcester to read a parlor
lecture on the 22d, and shall see Blake and Brown.
What if you were to meet me there, or go with me
from here? You would see them to good advantage.
Cholmondeley has been here again, after going as far
south as Virginia, and left for Canada about three
weeks ago. He is a good soul, and I am afraid I did
not sufficiently recognize him.
Please remember me to Mrs. Ricketson, and to the
rest of your family.
A long silence had passed on Thoreau's part before he
wrote again to Ricketson,—nearly two years, in fact,—and
his friend complained of it. He had followed
the public utterances of Thoreau with entire sympathy,
although much in advance, in 1859-60, of public
opinion respecting John Brown and slavery, and he had
sent him letters and complimentary verses. Finally, he
almost implored Thoreau to renew the bond of friendship.
This will explain the tenor of Thoreau's reply.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON, (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, November 4, 1860.
Friend Ricketson,—I thank you for the verses.
They are quite too good to apply to me. However, I
know what a poet's license is, and will not get in the
way.
But what do you mean by that prose? Why will you
waste so many regards on me, and not know what to
think of my silence? Infer from it what you might
from the silence of a dense pine wood. It is its natural
condition, except when the winds blow, and the jays
scream, and the chickadee winds up his clock. My
silence is just as inhuman as that, and no more. You
know that I never promised to correspond with you,
and so, when I do, I do more than I promised.
Such are my pursuits and habits that I rarely go
abroad; and it is quite a habit with me to decline invitations
to do so. Not that I could not enjoy such visits,
if I were not otherwise occupied. I have enjoyed very
much my visits to you, and my rides in your neighborhood,
and am sorry that I cannot enjoy such things
oftener; but life is short, and there are other things
also to be done. I admit that you are more social than
I am and far more attentive to "the common courtesies
of life;" but this is partly for the reason that you
have fewer or less exacting private pursuits.
Not to have written a note for a year is with me a
very venial offense. I think that I do not correspond
with any one so often as once in six months.
I have a faint recollection of your invitation referred
to; but I suppose that I had no new nor particular reason
for declining, and so made no new statement. I
have felt that you would be glad to see me almost
whenever I got ready to come; but I only offer myself
as a rare visitor, and a still rarer correspondent.
I am very busy, after my fashion, little as there is to
show for it, and feel as if I could not spend many days
nor dollars in traveling; for the shortest visit must have
a fair margin to it, and the days thus affect the weeks,
you know. Nevertheless, we cannot forego these luxuries
altogether. You must not regard me as a regular
diet, but at most only as acorns, which, too, are not to
be despised,—which, at least, we love to think are
edible in a bracing walk. We have got along pretty
well together in several directions, though we are such
strangers in others.
I hardly know what to say in answer to your letter.
Some are accustomed to write many letters, others very
few. I am one of the last. At any rate, we are pretty
sure, if we write at all, to send those thoughts which
we cherish, to that one who, we believe, will most religiously
attend to them.
This life is not for complaint, but for satisfaction. I
do not feel addressed by this letter of yours. It suggests
only misunderstanding. Intercourse may be good;
but of what use are complaints and apologies? Any
complaint I have to make is too serious to be uttered,
for the evil cannot be mended.
Turn over a new leaf.
My outdoor harvest this fall has been one Canada
lynx, a fierce-looking fellow, which, it seems, we have
hereabouts; eleven barrels of apples from trees of my
own planting; and a large crop of white oak acorns,
which I did not raise.
Please remember me to your family. I have a very
pleasant recollection of your fireside, and I trust that
I shall revisit it;—also of your shanty and the surrounding
regions.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, September 26, 1859.
Mr. Blake,—I am not sure that I am in a fit mood
to write to you, for I feel and think rather too much like
a business man, having some very irksome affairs to attend
to these months and years on account of my family.[93]
This is the way I am serving King Admetus, confound
him! If it were not for my relations, I would let the
wolves prey on his flocks to their bellies' content. Such
fellows you have to deal with! herdsmen of some other
king, or of the same, who tell no tale, but in the sense
of counting their flocks, and then lie drunk under a
hedge. How is your grist ground? Not by some murmuring
stream, while you lie dreaming on the bank;
but, it seems, you must take hold with your hands, and
shove the wheel round. You can't depend on streams,
poor feeble things! You can't depend on worlds, left
to themselves; but you've got to oil them and goad
them along. In short, you've got to carry on two farms
at once,—the farm on the earth and the farm in your
mind. Those Crimean and Italian battles were mere
boys' play,—they are the scrapes into which truants
get. But what a battle a man must fight everywhere
to maintain his standing army of thoughts, and march
with them in orderly array through the always hostile
country! How many enemies there are to sane thinking!
Every soldier has succumbed to them before he
enlists for those other battles. Men may sit in chambers,
seemingly safe and sound, and yet despair, and
turn out at last only hollowness and dust within, like a
Dead Sea apple. A standing army of numerous, brave,
and well-disciplined thoughts, and you at the head of
them, marching straight to your goal,—how to bring
this about is the problem, and Scott's Tactics will not
help you to it. Think of a poor fellow begirt only with
a sword-belt, and no such staff of athletic thoughts! his
brains rattling as he walks and talks! These are your
prætorian guard. It is easy enough to maintain a family,
or a state, but it is hard to maintain these children
of your brain (or say, rather, these guests that
trust to enjoy your hospitality), they make such great
demands; and yet, he who does only the former, and
loses the power to think originally, or as only he ever
can, fails miserably. Keep up the fires of thought, and
all will go well.
Zouaves?—pish! How you can overrun a country,
climb any rampart, and carry any fortress, with an
army of alert thoughts!—thoughts that send their bullets
home to heaven's door,—with which you can take
the whole world, without paying for it, or robbing anybody.
See, the conquering hero comes! You fail in
your thoughts, or you prevail in your thoughts only.
Provided you think well, the heavens falling, or the
earth gaping, will be the music for you to march by.
No foe can ever see you, or you him; you cannot so
much as think of him. Swords have no edges, bullets
no penetration, for such a contest. In your mind must
be a liquor which will dissolve the world whenever it is
dropt in it. There is no universal solvent but this, and
all things together cannot saturate it. It will hold the
universe in solution, and yet be as translucent as ever.
The vast machine may indeed roll over our toes, and
we not know it, but it would rebound and be staved to
pieces like an empty barrel, if it should strike fair and
square on the smallest and least angular of a man's
thoughts.
You seem not to have taken Cape Cod the right way.
I think that you should have persevered in walking on
the beach and on the bank, even to the land's end, however
soft, and so, by long knocking at Ocean's gate,
have gained admittance at last,—better, if separately,
and in a storm, not knowing where you would sleep by
night, or eat by day. Then you should have given a
day to the sand behind Provincetown, and ascended
the hills there, and been blown on considerably. I hope
that you like to remember the journey better than you
did to make it.
I have been confined at home all this year, but I am
not aware that I have grown any rustier than was to be
expected. One while I explored the bottom of the river
pretty extensively. I have engaged to read a lecture to
Parker's society on the 9th of October next.
I am off—a-barberrying.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, October 31, 1859.
Mr. Blake,—I spoke to my townsmen last evening
on "The Character of Captain Brown, now in the
Clutches of the Slaveholder." I should like to speak to
any company at Worcester who may wish to hear me;
and will come if only my expenses are paid. I think
we should express ourselves at once, while Brown is
alive. The sooner the better. Perhaps Higginson may
like to have a meeting. Wednesday evening would
be a good time. The people here are deeply interested
in the matter. Let me have an answer as soon as
may be.
P. S.—I may be engaged toward the end of the
week.
Henry D. Thoreau.
This address on John Brown was one of the first
public utterances in favor of that hero; it was made up
mainly from the entries in Thoreau's journals, since I
had introduced Brown to him, and he to Emerson, in
March, 1857; and especially from those pages that
Thoreau had written after the news of Brown's capture
in Virginia had reached him. It was first given in the
vestry of the old parish church in Concord (where, in
1774, the Provincial Congress of Massachusetts had
met to prepare for armed resistance to British tyranny);
was repeated at Worcester the same week, and before a
great audience in Boston, the following Sunday,—after
which it was published in the newspapers, and had a
wide reading. Mr. Alcott in his diary mentions it under
date of Sunday, October 30, thus: "Thoreau reads a
paper on John Brown, his virtues, spirit, and deeds, this
evening, and to the delight of his company,—the best
that could be gathered at short notice,—and among
them Emerson. (November 4.) Thoreau calls and reports
about the reading of his lecture on Brown at
Boston and Worcester. He has been the first to speak
and celebrate the hero's courage and magnanimity; it
is these that he discerns and praises. The men have
much in common,—the sturdy manliness, straightforwardness,
and independence. (November 5.) Ricketson
from New Bedford arrives; he and Thoreau take
supper with us. Thoreau talks freely and enthusiastically
about Brown,—denouncing the Union, the President,
the States, and Virginia particularly; wishes to
publish his late speech, and has seen Boston publishers,
but failed to find any to print it for him." It was soon
after published, along with Emerson's two speeches in
favor of Brown, by a new Boston publishing house
(Thayer & Eldridge), in a volume called "Echoes
of Harper's Ferry," edited by the late James Redpath,
Brown's first biographer. In the following summer,
Thoreau sent a second paper on Brown (written soon
after his execution) to be read at a commemoration of
the martyr, beside his grave among the Adirondack
Mountains. This is mentioned in his letter to Sophia
Thoreau, July 8, 1860. He took an active part in arranging
for the funeral service in honor of Brown, at
Concord, the day of his death, December 2, 1859.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, May 20, 1860.
Mr. Blake,—I must endeavor to pay some of my
debts to you. To begin where we left off, then.
The presumption is that we are always the same;
our opportunities, and Nature herself, fluctuating. Look
at mankind. No great difference between two, apparently;
perhaps the same height, and breadth, and
weight; and yet, to the man who sits most east, this life
is a weariness, routine, dust and ashes, and he drowns
his imaginary cares (!) (a sort of friction among his
vital organs) in a bowl. But to the man who sits most
west, his contemporary (!), it is a field for all noble endeavors,
an elysium, the dwelling-place of heroes and
demigods. The former complains that he has a thousand
affairs to attend to; but he does not realize that
his affairs (though they may be a thousand) and he
are one.
Men and boys are learning all kinds of trades but
how to make men of themselves. They learn to make
houses; but they are not so well housed, they are not
so contented in their houses, as the woodchucks in their
holes. What is the use of a house if you haven't got a
tolerable planet to put it on?—if you cannot tolerate
the planet it is on? Grade the ground first. If a man
believes and expects great things of himself, it makes
no odds where you put him, or what you show him (of
course you cannot put him anywhere, nor show him
anything), he will be surrounded by grandeur. He is
in the condition of a healthy and hungry man, who
says to himself,—How sweet this crust is! If he despairs
of himself, then Tophet is his dwelling-place, and
he is in the condition of a sick man who is disgusted
with the fruits of finest flavor.
Whether he sleeps or wakes,—whether he runs or
walks,—whether he uses a microscope or a telescope,
or his naked eye,—a man never discovers anything,
never overtakes anything, or leaves anything behind,
but himself. Whatever he says or does, he merely reports
himself. If he is in love, he loves; if he is in
heaven, he enjoys; if he is in hell, he suffers. It is his
condition that determines his locality.
The principal, the only, thing a man makes, is his
condition of fate. Though commonly he does not know
it, nor put up a sign to this effect, "My own destiny
made and mended here." (Not yours.) He is a master
workman in the business. He works twenty-four hours
a day at it, and gets it done. Whatever else he neglects
or botches, no man was ever known to neglect this
work. A great many pretend to make shoes chiefly,
and would scout the idea that they make the hard
times which they experience.
Each reaching and aspiration is an instinct with
which all nature consists and coöperates, and therefore
it is not in vain. But alas! each relaxing and desperation
is an instinct too. To be active, well, happy, implies
rare courage. To be ready to fight in a duel or a
battle implies desperation, or that you hold your life
cheap.
If you take this life to be simply what old religious
folks pretend (I mean the effete, gone to seed in a
drought, mere human galls stung by the devil once),
then all your joy and serenity is reduced to grinning
and bearing it. The fact is, you have got to take the
world on your shoulders like Atlas, and "put along"
with it. You will do this for an idea's sake, and your
success will be in proportion to your devotion to ideas.
It may make your back ache occasionally, but you will
have the satisfaction of hanging it or twirling it to suit
yourself. Cowards suffer, heroes enjoy. After a long
day's walk with it, pitch it into a hollow place, sit down
and eat your luncheon. Unexpectedly, by some immortal
thoughts, you will be compensated. The bank
whereon you sit will be a fragrant and flowery one, and
your world in the hollow a sleek and light gazelle.
Where is the "unexplored land" but in our own
untried enterprises? To an adventurous spirit any
place—London, New York, Worcester, or his own
yard—is "unexplored land," to seek which Frémont
and Kane travel so far. To a sluggish and defeated
spirit even the Great Basin and the Polaris are trivial
places. If they can get there (and, indeed, they are
there now), they will want to sleep, and give it up, just
as they always do. These are the regions of the Known
and of the Unknown. What is the use of going right
over the old track again? There is an adder in the
path which your own feet have worn. You must make
tracks into the Unknown. That is what you have your
board and clothes for. Why do you ever mend your
clothes, unless that, wearing them, you may mend your
ways? Let us sing.
TO SOPHIA THOREAU (AT CAMPTON, N. H.).
Concord, July 8, 1860.
Dear Sophia,—Mother reminds me that I must
write to you, if only a few lines, though I have sprained
my thumb, so that it is questionable whether I can
write legibly, if at all. I can't "bear on" much. What
is worse, I believe that I have sprained my brain too—that
is, it sympathizes with my thumb. But that is no
excuse, I suppose, for writing a letter in such a case is
like sending a newspaper, only a hint to let you know
that "all is well,"—but my thumb.
I hope that you begin to derive some benefit from
that more mountainous air which you are breathing.
Have you had a distinct view of the Franconia Notch
Mountains (blue peaks in the northern horizon)?
which I told you you could get from the road in Campton,
probably from some other points nearer. Such a
view of the mountains is more memorable than any
other. Have you been to Squam Lake or overlooked
it? I should think that you could make an excursion
to some mountain in that direction from which you
could see the lake and mountains generally. Is there
no friend of N. P. Rogers who can tell you where the
"lions" are?
Of course I did not go to North Elba,[94]
but I sent
some reminiscences of last fall. I hear that John Brown,
Jr., has now come to Boston for a few days. Mr. Sanborn's
case, it is said, will come on after some murder
cases have been disposed of here.
I have just been invited formally to be present at
the annual picnic of Theodore Parker's society (that
was), at Waverley, next Wednesday, and to make some
remarks. But that is wholly out of my line. I do not
go to picnics, even in Concord, you know.
Mother and Aunt Sophia rode to Acton in time yesterday.
I suppose that you have heard that Mr. Hawthorne
has come home. I went to meet him the other
evening and found that he has not altered, except that
he was looking quite brown after his voyage. He is as
simple and childlike as ever.
I believe that I have fairly scared the kittens away,
at last, by my pretended fierceness, which was. I will
consider my thumb—and your eyes.
Henry.
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, August 3, 1860.
Mr. Blake,—I some time ago asked Channing if
he would not spend a week with me on Monadnock;
but he did not answer decidedly. Lately he has talked
of an excursion somewhere, but I said that now I must
wait till my sister returned from Plymouth, N. H.
She has returned,—and accordingly, on receiving your
note this morning, I made known its contents to Channing,
in order to see how far I was engaged with him.
The result is that he decides to go to Monadnock to-morrow
morning;[95]
so I must defer making an excursion
with you and Brown to another season. Perhaps
you will call as you pass the mountain. I send this by
the earliest mail.
P. S.—That was a very insufficient visit which you
made here the last time. My mother is better, though
far from well; and if you should chance along here
any time after your journey, I trust that we shall all
do better.
The mention by Thoreau of John Brown and my
"case" recalls to me an incident of those excited days
which followed the attack by Brown on slavery in Virginia.
The day after Brown's death, but before the
execution of his comrades, I received a message from
the late Dr. David Thayer of Boston, implying, as I
thought, that a son of Brown was at his house, whither
I hurried to meet him. Instead, I found young F. J.
Merriam of Boston, who had escaped with Owen Brown
from Harper's Ferry, and was now in Boston to raise
another party against the slaveholders. He was unfit
to lead or even join in such a desperate undertaking,
and we insisted he should return to safety in Canada,—a
large reward being offered for his seizure. He
agreed to go back to Canada that night by the Fitchburg
Railroad; but in his hot-headed way he took the
wrong train, which ran no farther than Concord,—and
found himself in the early evening at my house,
where my sister received him, but insisted that I should
not see him, lest I might be questioned about my guest.
While he had supper and went to bed, I posted down
to Mr. Emerson's and engaged his horse and covered
wagon, to be ready at sunrise,—he asking no questions.
In the same way I engaged Mr. Thoreau to drive his
friend's horse to South Acton the next morning, and
there put on board the first Canadian train a Mr. Lockwood,
whom he would find at my house. Thoreau
readily consented, asked no questions, walked to the
Emerson stable the next morning, found the horse
ready, drove him to my door, and took up Merriam,
under the name of Lockwood,—neither knowing who
the other was. Merriam was so flighty that, though he
had agreed to go to Montreal, and knew that his life
might depend on getting there early, he declared he
must see Mr. Emerson, to lay before him his plan for invading
the South, and consult him about some moral
questions that troubled his mind. His companion listened
gravely,—and hurried the horse towards Acton.
Merriam grew more positive and suspicious,—"Perhaps
you are Mr. Emerson; you look somewhat like
him."[96]
"No, I am not," said Thoreau, and drove steadily
away from Concord. "Well, then, I am going back,"
said the youth, and flung himself out of the wagon.
How Thoreau got him in again, he never told me; but
I suspected some judicious force, accompanying the
grave persuasive speech natural to our friend. At any
rate, he took his man to Acton, saw him safe on the
train, and reported to me that "Mr. Lockwood had
taken passage for Canada," where he arrived that
night. Nothing more passed between us until, more
than two years after, he inquired one day, in his last
illness, who my fugitive was. Merriam was then out of
danger in that way, and had been for months a soldier
in the Union army, where he died. I therefore said
that "Lockwood" was the grandson of his mother's
old friend, Francis Jackson, and had escaped from
Maryland. In return he gave me the odd incidents of
their drive, and mentioned that he had spoken of the
affair to his mother only since his illness. So reticent
and practically useful could he be; as Channing says,
"He made no useless professions, never asked one of
those questions which destroy all relation; but he was
on the spot at the time, he meant friendship, and meant
nothing else, and stood by it without the slightest
abatement."
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, November 4, 1860.
Mr. Blake,—I am glad to hear any particulars of
your excursion. As for myself, I looked out for you
somewhat on that Monday, when, it appears, you
passed Monadnock; turned my glass upon several parties
that were ascending the mountain half a mile on
one side of us. In short, I came as near to seeing you
as you to seeing me. I have no doubt that we should
have had a good time if you had come, for I had, all
ready, two good spruce houses, in which you could
stand up, complete in all respects, half a mile apart,
and you and B. could have lodged by yourselves in one,
if not with us.
We made an excellent beginning of our mountain
life.[97]
You may remember that the Saturday previous
was a stormy day. Well, we went up in the rain,—wet
through,—and found ourselves in a cloud there at
mid-afternoon, in no situation to look about for the
best place for a camp. So I proceeded at once, through
the cloud, to that memorable stone, "chunk yard," in
which we made our humble camp once, and there, after
putting our packs under a rock, having a good hatchet,
I proceeded to build a substantial house, which Channing
declared the handsomest he ever saw. (He never
camped out before, and was, no doubt, prejudiced in
its favor.) This was done about dark, and by that time
we were nearly as wet as if we had stood in a hogshead
of water. We then built a fire before the door, directly
on the site of our little camp of two years ago, and it
took a long time to burn through its remains to the
earth beneath. Standing before this, and turning round
slowly, like meat that is roasting, we were as dry, if
not drier, than ever, after a few hours, and so at last
we "turned in."
This was a great deal better than going up there in
fair weather, and having no adventure (not knowing
how to appreciate either fair weather or foul) but dull,
commonplace sleep in a useless house, and before a
comparatively useless fire,—such as we get every night.
Of course we thanked our stars, when we saw them,
which was about midnight, that they had seemingly
withdrawn for a season. We had the mountain all to
ourselves that afternoon and night. There was nobody
going up that day to engrave his name on the summit,
nor to gather blueberries. The genius of the mountains
saw us starting from Concord, and it said, There
come two of our folks. Let us get ready for them. Get
up a serious storm, that will send a-packing these holiday
guests. (They may have their say another time.)
Let us receive them with true mountain hospitality,—kill
the fatted cloud. Let them know the value of a
spruce roof, and of a fire of dead spruce stumps. Every
bush dripped tears of joy at our advent. Fire did its
best, and received our thanks. What could fire have
done in fair weather? Spruce roof got its share of our
blessings. And then, such a view of the wet rocks,
with the wet lichens on them, as we had the next morning,
but did not get again!
We and the mountain had a sound season, as the
saying is. How glad we were to be wet, in order that
we might be dried! How glad we were of the storm
which made our house seem like a new home to us!
This day's experience was indeed lucky, for we did not
have a thunder-shower during all our stay. Perhaps
our host reserved this attention in order to tempt us to
come again.
Our next house was more substantial still. One side
was rock, good for durability; the floor the same; and
the roof which I made would have upheld a horse. I
stood on it to do the shingling.
I noticed, when I was at the White Mountains last,
several nuisances which render traveling thereabouts
unpleasant. The chief of these was the mountain
houses. I might have supposed that the main attraction
of that region, even to citizens, lay in its wildness
and unlikeness to the city, and yet they make it as
much like the city as they can afford to. I heard that
the Crawford House was lighted with gas, and had a
large saloon, with its band of music, for dancing. But
give me a spruce house made in the rain.
From the Summit of Monadnock
An old Concord farmer tells me that he ascended
Monadnock once, and danced on the top. How did that
happen? Why, he being up there, a party of young
men and women came up, bringing boards and a fiddler;
and, having laid down the boards, they made a
level floor, on which they danced to the music of the
fiddle. I suppose the tune was "Excelsior." This reminds
me of the fellow who climbed to the top of a
very high spire, stood upright on the ball, and hurrahed
for—what? Why, for Harrison and Tyler. That's
the kind of sound which most ambitious people emit
when they culminate. They are wont to be singularly
frivolous in the thin atmosphere; they can't contain
themselves, though our comfort and their safety require
it; it takes the pressure of many atmospheres to do
this; and hence they helplessly evaporate there. It
would seem that as they ascend, they breathe shorter
and shorter, and, at each expiration, some of their wits
leave them, till, when they reach the pinnacle, they are
so light-headed as to be fit only to show how the wind
sits. I suspect that Emerson's criticism called "Monadnoc"
was inspired, not by remembering the inhabitants
of New Hampshire as they are in the valleys,
so much as by meeting some of them on the mountain-top.
After several nights' experience, Channing came to
the conclusion that he was "lying outdoors," and inquired
what was the largest beast that might nibble his
legs there. I fear that he did not improve all the night,
as he might have done, to sleep. I had asked him to
go and spend a week there. We spent five nights, being
gone six days, for C. suggested that six working days
made a week, and I saw that he was ready to decamp.
However, he found his account in it as well as I.
We were seen to go up in the rain, grim and silent,
like two genii of the storm, by Fassett's men or boys;
but we were never identified afterward, though we
were the subject of some conversation which we overheard.
Five hundred persons at least came on to the
mountain while we were there, but not one found our
camp. We saw one party of three ladies and two gentlemen
spread their blankets and spend the night on
the top, and heard them converse; but they did not
know that they had neighbors who were comparatively
old settlers. We spared them the chagrin which that
knowledge would have caused them, and let them print
their story in a newspaper accordingly.
Yes, to meet men on an honest and simple footing,
meet with rebuffs, suffer from sore feet, as you did,—ay,
and from a sore heart, as perhaps you also did,—all
that is excellent. What a pity that that young prince[98]
could not enjoy a little of the legitimate experience of
traveling—be dealt with simply and truly, though
rudely. He might have been invited to some hospitable
house in the country, had his bowl of bread and milk
set before him, with a clean pinafore; been told that
there were the punt and the fishing-rod, and he could
amuse himself as he chose; might have swung a few
birches, dug out a woodchuck, and had a regular good
time, and finally been sent to bed with the boys,—and
so never have been introduced to Mr. Everett at all. I
have no doubt that this would have been a far more
memorable and valuable experience than he got.
The snow-clad summit of Mt. Washington must
have been a very interesting sight from Wachusett.
How wholesome winter is, seen far or near; how good,
above all mere sentimental, warm-blooded, short-lived,
soft-hearted, moral goodness, commonly so called. Give
me the goodness which has forgotten its own deeds,—which
God has seen to be good, and let be. None of
your just made perfect,—pickled eels! All that will
save them will be their picturesqueness, as with blasted
trees. Whatever is, and is not ashamed to be, is good.
I value no moral goodness or greatness unless it is good
or great, even as that snowy peak is. Pray, how could
thirty feet of bowels improve it? Nature is goodness
crystallized. You looked into the land of promise.
Whatever beauty we behold, the more it is distant,
serene, and cold, the purer and more durable it is. It
is better to warm ourselves with ice than with fire.
Tell Brown that he sent me more than the price of
the book, viz., a word from himself, for which I am
greatly his debtor.
Thoreau began to be more seriously ill than he had
been for some years, early in December, 1860. He exposed
himself unduly in one of his walks, while counting
the rings on stumps of trees, amid snow. He
ceased much of his small activity of letter-writing; but,
in addressing Ricketson the next spring, he took the
unusual pains of writing him a letter of some length
which he never sent. It was found among his papers
after death,—the first draft of it, which ran as follows,
but was left a fragment:—
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, March 19, 1861.
Friend R,—Your letter reached me in due time, but
I had already heard the bluebirds. They were here on
the 26th of February at least,—but not yet do the larks
sing or the flickers call, with us. The bluebirds come
again, as does the same spring, but it does not find the
same mortals here to greet it. You remember Minott's
cottage on the hillside,—well, it finds some change
there, for instance. The little gray hip-roofed cottage
was occupied at the beginning of February, this year,
by George Minott and his sister Mary, respectively 78
and 80 years old, and Miss Potter, 74. These had been
its permanent occupants for many years. Minott had
been on his last legs for some time,—at last off his
legs, expecting weekly to take his departure,—a burden
to himself and friends,—yet dry and natural as
ever. His sister took care of him, and supported herself
and family with her needle, as usual. He lately
willed his little property to her, as a slight compensation
for her care. Feb. 13 their sister, 86 or 87, who
lived across the way, died. Miss Minott had taken
cold in visiting her, and was so sick that she could not
go to her funeral. She herself died of lung fever[99]
on
the 18th (which was said to be the same disease that
her sister had),—having just willed her property back
to George, and added her own mite to it. Miss Potter,
too, had now become ill,—too ill to attend the funeral,—and
she died of the same disease on the 23d. All
departed as gently as the sun goes down, leaving
George alone.
I called to see him the other day,—the 27th of February,
a remarkably pleasant spring day,—and as I
was climbing the sunny slope to his strangely deserted
house, I heard the first bluebirds upon the elm that
hangs over it. They had come as usual, though some
who used to hear them were gone. Even Minott had
not heard them, though the door was open,—for he
was thinking of other things. Perhaps there will be a
time when the bluebirds themselves will not return any
more.
I hear that George, a few days after this, called out
to his niece, who had come to take care of him, and
was in the next room, to know if she did not feel
lonely? "Yes, I do," said she. "So do I," added he.
He said he was like an old oak, all shattered and decaying.
"I am sure, Uncle," said his niece, "you are
not much like an oak!" "I mean," said he, "that I
am like an oak or any other tree, inasmuch as I cannot
stir from where I am."
Either this topic was too pathetic for Thoreau to
finish the letter, or perchance he thought it not likely
to interest his friend; for he threw aside this draft for
three days, and then, with the same beginning, wrote
a very different letter. The Minotts were old familiar
acquaintance, and related to that Captain Minott whom
Thoreau's grandmother married as a second husband.
George was his "old man of Verona," who had not
left Concord for more than forty years, except to stray
over the town bounds in hunting or wood-ranging; and
Mary was the "tailoress" who for years made Thoreau's
garments.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, March 22, 1861.
Friend Ricketson,—The bluebird was here the
26th of February, at least, which is one day earlier than
you date; but I have not heard of larks nor pigeon
woodpeckers. To tell the truth, I am not on the alert
for the signs of spring, not having had any winter yet.
I took a severe cold about the 3d of December, which
at length resulted in a kind of bronchitis, so that I have
been confined to the house ever since, excepting a very
few experimental trips as far as the post-office in some
particularly fine noons. My health otherwise has not
been affected in the least, nor my spirits. I have simply
been imprisoned for so long, and it has not prevented
my doing a good deal of reading and the like.
Channing has looked after me very faithfully; says
he has made a study of my case, and knows me better
than I know myself, etc., etc. Of course, if I knew how
it began, I should know better how it would end. I
trust that when warm weather comes I shall begin to
pick up my crumbs. I thank you for your invitation
to come to New Bedford, and will bear it in mind; but
at present my health will not permit my leaving home.
The day I received your letter, Blake and Brown
arrived here, having walked from Worcester in two
days, though Alcott, who happened in soon after, could
not understand what pleasure they found in walking
across the country in this season, when the ways were
so unsettled. I had a solid talk with them for a day
and a half—though my pipes were not in good order—and
they went their way again.
You may be interested to hear that Alcott is at present,
perhaps, the most successful man in the town.
He had his second annual exhibition of all the schools
in the town, at the Town Hall last Saturday; at which
all the masters and misses did themselves great credit,
as I hear, and of course reflected some on their teachers
and parents. They were making their little speeches
from one till six o'clock P. M., to a large audience, which
patiently listened to the end. In the meanwhile, the
children made Mr. Alcott an unexpected present of a
fine edition of "Pilgrim's Progress" and Herbert's
Poems, which, of course, overcame all parties. I inclose
an order of exercises.[100]
We had, last night, an old-fashioned northeast snow-storm,
far worse than anything in the winter; and the
drifts are now very high above the fences. The inhabitants
are pretty much confined to their houses, as I was
already. All houses are one color, white, with the snow
plastered over them, and you cannot tell whether they
have blinds or not. Our pump has another pump, its
ghost, as thick as itself, sticking to one side of it. The
town has sent out teams of eight oxen each, to break
out the roads; and the train due from Boston at 8½
A. M. has not arrived yet (4 P. M.). All the passing has
been a train from above at 12 M., which also was due
at 8½ A. M. Where are the bluebirds now, think you?
I suppose that you have not so much snow at New Bedford,
if any.
TO PARKER PILLSBURY (AT CONCORD N. H.).
Concord, April 10, 1861.
Friend Pillsbury,—I am sorry to say that I have
not a copy of "Walden" which I can spare; and know
of none, unless possibly Ticknor & Fields may have
one. I send, nevertheless, a copy of "The Week," the
price of which is one dollar and twenty-five cents,
which you can pay at your convenience.
As for your friend, my prospective reader, I hope he
ignores Fort Sumter, and "Old Abe," and all that; for
that is just the most fatal, and, indeed, the only fatal
weapon you can direct against evil, ever; for, as long
as you know of it, you are particeps criminis. What
business have you, if you are an "angel of light," to
be pondering over the deeds of darkness, reading the
New York Herald, and the like?
I do not so much regret the present condition of
things in this country (provided I regret it at all), as I
do that I ever heard of it. I know one or two, who
have this year, for the first time, read a President's
Message; but they do not see that this implies a fall in
themselves, rather than a rise in the President. Blessed
were the days before you read a President's Message.
Blessed are the young, for they do not read the President's
Message. Blessed are they who never read a
newspaper, for they shall see Nature, and, through her,
God.
But, alas! I have heard of Sumter and Pickens, and
even of Buchanan (though I did not read his Message).
I also read the New York Tribune; but then, I am
reading Herodotus and Strabo, and Blodget's "Climatology,"
and "Six Years in the Desert of North
America," as hard as I can, to counterbalance it.
By the way, Alcott is at present our most popular
and successful man, and has just published a volume
in size, in the shape of the Annual School Report,
which I presume he has sent to you.
Yours, for remembering all good things,
Henry D. Thoreau.
Parker Pillsbury, to whom this letter went, was an
old friend of the Thoreau family, with whom he became
intimate in the antislavery agitation, wherein
they took part, while he was a famous orator, celebrated
by Emerson in one of his essays. Mr. Pillsbury
visited Thoreau in his last illness, when he could
scarcely speak above a whisper, and, having made to
him some remark concerning the future life, Thoreau
replied, "My friend, one world at a time." His petulant
words in this letter concerning national affairs
would hardly have been said a few days later, when,
at the call of Abraham Lincoln, the people rose to protect
their government, and every President's Message
became of thrilling interest, even to Thoreau.
Arrangements were now making for the invalid,
about whose health his friends had been anxious for
some years, to travel for a better climate than the New
England spring affords, and early in May Thoreau set
out for the upper Mississippi. He thus missed the last
letter sent to him by his English friend Cholmondeley,
which I answered, then forwarded to him at Redwing,
in Minnesota. It is of interest enough to be given here.
T. CHOLMONDELEY TO THOREAU (IN MINNESOTA).
Shrewsbury [England], April 23, 1861.
My dear Thoreau,—It is now some time since I
wrote to you or heard from you, but do not suppose
that I have forgotten you, or shall ever cease to cherish
in my mind those days at dear old Concord. The last
I heard about you all was from Morton,[101]
who was in
England about a year ago; and I hope that he has
got over his difficulties and is now in his own country
again. I think he has seen rather more of English
country life than most Yankee tourists; and appeared
to find it curious, though I fear he was dulled by our
ways; for he was too full of ceremony and compliments
and bows, which is a mistake here; though very
well in Spain. I am afraid he was rather on pins and
needles; but he made a splendid speech at a volunteer
supper, and indeed the very best, some said, ever heard
in this part of the country.
We are here in a state of alarm and apprehension,
the world being so troubled in East and West and everywhere.
Last year the harvest was bad and scanty.
This year our trade is beginning to feel the events in
America. In reply to the northern tariff, of course we
are going to smuggle as much as we can. The supply
of cotton being such a necessity to us, we must work
up India and South Africa a little better. There is war
even in old New Zealand, but not in the same island
where my people are! Besides, we are certainly on the
eve of a continental blaze, so we are making merry and
living while we can; not being sure where we shall be
this time a year.
Give my affectionate regards to your father, mother,
and sister, and to Mr. Emerson and his family, and
to Channing, Sanborn, Ricketson, Blake, and Morton
and Alcott and Parker. A thought arises in my mind
whether I may not be enumerating some dead men!
Perhaps Parker is!
These rumors of wars make me wish that we had
got done with this brutal stupidity of war altogether;
and I believe, Thoreau, that the human race will at
last get rid of it, though perhaps not in a creditable
way; but such powers will be brought to bear that it
will become monstrous even to the French. Dundonald
declared to the last that he possessed secrets which
from their tremendous character would make war impossible.
So peace may be begotten from the machinations
of evil.
Have you heard of any good books lately? I think
"Burnt Njal" good, and believe it to be genuine.
"Hast thou not heard" (says Steinrora to Thangbrand)
"how Thor challenged Christ to single combat, and
how he did not dare to fight with Thor?" When Gunnar
brandishes his sword, three swords are seen in air.
The account of Ospah and Brodir and Brian's battle
is the only historical account of that engagement, which
the Irish talk so much of; for I place little trust in
O'Halloran's authority, though the outline is the same
in both.
Darwin's "Origin of Species" may be fanciful, but
it is a move in the right direction. Emerson's "Conduct
of Life" has done me good; but it will not go
down in England for a generation or so. But these are
some of them already a year or two old. The book of
the season is Du Chaillu's "Central Africa," with accounts
of the Gorilla, of which you are aware that you
have had a skeleton at Boston for many years. There
is also one in the British Museum; but they have now
several stuffed specimens at the Geographical Society's
rooms in Town. I suppose you will have seen Sir Emerson
Tennent's "Ceylon," which is perhaps as complete
a book as ever was published; and a better monument
to a governor's residence in a great province was never
made.
We have been lately astonished by a foreign Hamlet,
a supposed impossibility; but Mr. Fechter does real
wonders. No doubt he will visit America, and then
you may see the best actor in the world. He has carried
out Goethe's idea of Hamlet as given in the "Wilhelm
Meister," showing him forth as a fair-haired and
fat man. I suppose you are not got fat yet?
Yours ever truly,
Thos. Cholmondeley.[102]
TO HARRISON BLAKE (AT WORCESTER).
Concord, May 3, 1861.
Mr. Blake,—I am still as much an invalid as when
you and Brown were here, if not more of one, and at
this rate there is danger that the cold weather may
come again, before I get over my bronchitis. The doctor
accordingly tells me that I must "clear out" to the
West Indies, or elsewhere,—he does not seem to care
much where. But I decide against the West Indies, on
account of their muggy heat in the summer, and the
South of Europe, on account of the expense of time and
money, and have at last concluded that it will be most
expedient for me to try the air of Minnesota, say somewhere
about St. Paul's. I am only waiting to be well
enough to start. Hope to get off within a week or ten
days.
The inland air may help me at once, or it may not.
At any rate, I am so much of an invalid that I shall
have to study my comfort in traveling to a remarkable
degree,—stopping to rest, etc., etc., if need be. I think
to get a through ticket to Chicago, with liberty to stop
frequently on the way, making my first stop of consequence
at Niagara Falls, several days or a week, at a
private boarding-house; then a night or day at Detroit;
and as much at Chicago as my health may require. At
Chicago I can decide at what point (Fulton, Dunleith,
or another) to strike the Mississippi, and take a boat
to St. Paul's.
I trust to find a private boarding-house in one or
various agreeable places in that region, and spend my
time there. I expect, and shall be prepared, to be gone
three months; and I would like to return by a different
route,—perhaps Mackinaw and Montreal.
I have thought of finding a companion, of course,
yet not seriously, because I had no right to offer myself
as a companion to anybody, having such a peculiarly
private and all-absorbing but miserable business
as my health, and not altogether his, to attend to,
causing me to stop here and go there, etc., etc., unaccountably.
Nevertheless, I have just now decided to let you
know of my intention, thinking it barely possible that
you might like to make a part or the whole of this
journey at the same time, and that perhaps your own
health may be such as to be benefited by it.
Pray let me know if such a statement offers any
temptations to you. I write in great haste for the mail,
and must omit all the moral.
TO F. B. SANBORN (AT CONCORD).
Redwing, Minnesota, June 26, 1861.
Mr. Sanborn,—I was very glad to find awaiting
me, on my arrival here on Sunday afternoon, a letter
from you. I have performed this journey in a very
dead and alive manner, but nothing has come so near
waking me up as the receipt of letters from Concord.
I read yours, and one from my sister (and Horace
Mann, his four), near the top of a remarkable isolated
bluff here, called Barn Bluff, or the Grange, or Redwing
Bluff, some four hundred and fifty feet high, and
half a mile long,—a bit of the main bluff or bank
standing alone. The top, as you know, rises to the
general level of the surrounding country, the river having
eaten out so much. Yet the valley just above and
below this (we are at the head of Lake Pepin) must be
three or four miles wide.
I am not even so well informed as to the progress of
the war as you suppose. I have seen but one Eastern
paper (that, by the way, was the Tribune) for five
weeks. I have not taken much pains to get them; but,
necessarily, I have not seen any paper at all for more
than a week at a time. The people of Minnesota have
seemed to me more cold,—to feel less implicated in
this war than the people of Massachusetts. It is apparent
that Massachusetts, for one State at least, is
doing much more than her share in carrying it on.
However, I have dealt partly with those of Southern
birth, and have seen but little way beneath the surface.
I was glad to be told yesterday that there was a good
deal of weeping here at Redwing the other day, when
the volunteers stationed at Fort Snelling followed the
regulars to the seat of the war. They do not weep
when their children go up the river to occupy the deserted
forts, though they may have to fight the Indians
there.
I do not even know what the attitude of England is
at present.
The grand feature hereabouts is, of course, the Mississippi
River. Too much can hardly be said of its
grandeur, and of the beauty of this portion of it (from
Dunleith, and probably from Rock Island to this place).
St. Paul is a dozen miles below the Falls of St. Anthony,
or near the head of uninterrupted navigation on
the main stream, about two thousand miles from its
mouth. There is not a "rip" below that, and the river
is almost as wide in the upper as the lower part of its
course. Steamers go up the Sauk Rapids, above the
Falls, near a hundred miles farther, and then you are
fairly in the pine woods and lumbering country. Thus
it flows from the pine to the palm.
The lumber, as you know, is sawed chiefly at the
Falls of St. Anthony (what is not rafted in the log to
ports far below), having given rise to the towns of St.
Anthony, Minneapolis, etc., etc. In coming up the
river from Dunleith, you meet with great rafts of sawed
lumber and of logs, twenty rods or more in length, by
five or six wide, floating down, all from the pine region
above the Falls. An old Maine lumberer, who has followed
the same business here, tells me that the sources
of the Mississippi were comparatively free from rocks
and rapids, making easy work for them; but he thought
that the timber was more knotty here than in Maine.
It has chanced that about half the men whom I have
spoken with in Minnesota, whether travelers or settlers,
were from Massachusetts.
After spending some three weeks in and about St.
Paul, St. Anthony, and Minneapolis, we made an excursion
in a steamer, some three hundred or more miles
up the Minnesota (St. Peter's) River, to Redwood, or
the Lower Sioux Agency, in order to see the plains, and
the Sioux, who were to receive their annual payment
there. This is eminently the river of Minnesota (for she
shares the Mississippi with Wisconsin), and it is of incalculable
value to her. It flows through a very fertile
country destined to be famous for its wheat; but it is
a remarkably winding stream, so that Redwood is only
half as far from its mouth by land as by water. There
was not a straight reach a mile in length as far as we
went,—generally you could not see a quarter of a mile
of water, and the boat was steadily turning this way or
that. At the greater bends, as the Traverse des Sioux,
some of the passengers were landed, and walked across
to be taken in on the other side. Two or three times
you could have thrown a stone across the neck of the
isthmus, while it was from one to three miles around
it. It was a very novel kind of navigation to me. The
boat was perhaps the largest that had been up so high,
and the water was rather low (it had been about fifteen
feet higher). In making a short turn, we repeatedly
and designedly ran square into the steep and soft bank,
taking in a cart-load of earth,—this being more effectual
than the rudder to fetch us about again; or the
deeper water was so narrow and close to the shore, that
we were obliged to run into and break down at least
fifty trees which overhung the water, when we did not
cut them off, repeatedly losing a part of our outworks,
though the most exposed had been taken in. I could
pluck almost any plant on the bank from the boat.
We very frequently got aground, and then drew ourselves
along with a windlass and a cable fastened to a
tree, or we swung round in the current, and completely
blocked up and blockaded the river, one end of the
boat resting on each shore. And yet we would haul
ourselves round again with the windlass and cable in
an hour or two, though the boat was about one hundred
and sixty feet long, and drew some three feet of
water, or, often, water and sand. It was one consolation
to know that in such a case we were all the while
damming the river, and so raising it. We once ran
fairly on to a concealed rock, with a shock that aroused
all the passengers, and rested there, and the mate went
below with a lamp, expecting to find a hole, but he
did not. Snags and sawyers were so common that I
forgot to mention them. The sound of the boat rumbling
over one was the ordinary music. However, as
long as the boiler did not burst, we knew that no serious
accident was likely to happen. Yet this was a
singularly navigable river, more so than the Mississippi
above the Falls, and it is owing to its very crookedness.
Ditch it straight, and it would not only be
very swift, but soon run out. It was from ten to fifteen
rods wide near the mouth, and from eight to ten or
twelve at Redwood. Though the current was swift, I
did not see a "rip" on it, and only three or four rocks.
For three months in the year I am told that it can be
navigated by small steamers about twice as far as we
went, or to its source in Big Stone Lake; and a former
Indian agent told me that at high water it was thought
that such a steamer might pass into the Red River.
In short, this river proved so very long and navigable,
that I was reminded of the last letter or two in the voyage
of the Baron la Hontan (written near the end of
the seventeenth century, I think), in which he states,
that, after reaching the Mississippi (by the Illinois or
Wisconsin), the limit of previous exploration westward,
he voyaged up it with his Indians, and at length turned
up a great river coming in from the west, which he
called "La Rivière Longue;" and he relates various
improbable things about the country and its inhabitants,
so that this letter has been regarded as pure fiction, or,
more properly speaking, a lie. But I am somewhat inclined
now to reconsider the matter.
The Governor of Minnesota (Ramsay), the superintendent
of Indian affairs in this quarter, and the newly
appointed Indian agent were on board; also a German
band from St. Paul, a small cannon for salutes, and the
money for the Indians (ay, and the gamblers, it was
said, who were to bring it back in another boat). There
were about one hundred passengers, chiefly from St.
Paul, and more or less recently from the northeastern
States; also half a dozen young educated Englishmen.
Chancing to speak with one who sat next to me, when
the voyage was nearly half over, I found that he was
the son of the Rev. Samuel May,[103]
and a classmate of
yours, and had been looking for us at St. Anthony.
The last of the little settlements on the river was
New Ulm, about one hundred miles this side of Redwood.
It consists wholly of Germans. We left them
one hundred barrels of salt, which will be worth something
more when the water is lowest than at present.
Redwood is a mere locality,—scarcely an Indian
village,—where there is a store, and some houses have
been built for them. We were now fairly on the great
plains, and looking south; and, after walking that way
three miles, could see no tree in that horizon. The buffalo
were said to be feeding within twenty-five or thirty
miles.
A regular council was held with the Indians, who
had come in on their ponies, and speeches were made
on both sides through an interpreter, quite in the
described mode,—the Indians, as usual, having the
advantage in point of truth and earnestness, and therefore
of eloquence. The most prominent chief was named
Little Crow. They were quite dissatisfied with the white
man's treatment of them, and probably have reason to
be so. This council was to be continued for two or three
days,—the payment to be made the second day; and
another payment to other bands a little higher up, on
the Yellow Medicine (a tributary of the Minnesota), a
few days thereafter.
In the afternoon, the half-naked Indians performed
a dance, at the request of the Governor, for our amusement
and their own benefit; and then we took leave of
them, and of the officials who had come to treat with
them.
Excuse these pencil marks, but my inkstand is unscrewable,
and I can only direct my letter at the bar.
I could tell you more, and perhaps more interesting
things, if I had time. I am considerably better than
when I left home, but still far from well.
Our faces are already set toward home. Will you
please let my sister know that we shall probably start
for Milwaukee and Mackinaw in a day or two (or as
soon as we hear from home) via Prairie du Chien, and
not La Crosse.
I am glad to hear that you have written Cholmondeley,[104]
as it relieves me of some responsibility.
The tour described in this long letter was the first
and last that Thoreau ever made west of the Mohawk
Valley, though his friend Channing had early visited
the great prairies, and lived in log cabins of Illinois,
or sailed on the chain of great lakes, by which Thoreau
made a part of this journey. It was proposed that
Channing should accompany him this time, as he had
in the tour through Lower Canada, and along Cape
Cod, as well as in the journeys through the Berkshire
and Catskill mountains, and down the Hudson; but
some misunderstanding or temporary inconvenience
prevented. The actual comrade was young Horace
Mann, eldest son of the school-reformer and statesman
of that name,—a silent, earnest, devoted naturalist,
who died early. The place where his party met the
Indians—only a few months before the Minnesota
massacre of 1862—was in the county of Redwood, in
the southwest of the State, where now is a thriving village
of 1500 people, and no buffaloes within five hundred
miles. Red Wing, whence the letter was written,
is below St. Paul, on the Mississippi, and was even then
a considerable town,—now a city of 7000 people.
The Civil War had lately begun, and the whole North
was in the first flush of its uprising in defense of the
Union,—for which Thoreau, in spite of his earlier
defiance of government (for its alliance with slavery),
was as zealous as any soldier. He returned in July,
little benefited by the journey, of which he did not take
his usual sufficiency of notes, and to which there is
little allusion in his books. Nor does it seem that he
visited on the way his correspondent since January,
1856,—C. H. Greene, of Rochester, Michigan, who
had never seen him in Concord. The opinion of
Thoreau himself concerning this journey will be found
in his next letter to Daniel Ricketson.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, August 15, 1861.
Friend Ricketson,—When your last letter was
written I was away in the far Northwest, in search of
health. My cold turned to bronchitis, which made me
a close prisoner almost up to the moment of my starting
on that journey, early in May. As I had an incessant
cough, my doctor told me that I must "clear out,"—to
the West Indies, or elsewhere,—so I selected Minnesota.
I returned a few weeks ago, after a good deal of steady
traveling, considerably, yet not essentially, better; my
cough still continuing. If I don't mend very quickly, I
shall be obliged to go to another climate again very soon.
My ordinary pursuits, both indoors and out, have
been for the most part omitted, or seriously interrupted,—walking,
boating, scribbling, etc. Indeed, I
have been sick so long that I have almost forgotten
what it is to be well; and yet I feel that it is in all
respects only my envelope. Channing and Emerson
are as well as usual; but Alcott, I am sorry to say, has
for some time been more or less confined by a lameness,
perhaps of a neuralgic character, occasioned by carrying
too great a weight on his back while gardening.
On returning home, I found various letters awaiting
me; among others, one from Cholmondeley, and one
from yourself.
Of course I am sufficiently surprised to hear of your
conversion;[105]
yet I scarcely know what to say about it,
unless that, judging by your account, it appears to me
a change which concerns yourself peculiarly, and will
not make you more valuable to mankind. However,
perhaps I must see you before I can judge.
Remembering your numerous invitations, I write this
short note now, chiefly to say that, if you are to be at
home, and it will be quite agreeable to you, I will pay
you a visit next week, and take such rides or sauntering
walks with you as an invalid may.
The visit was made, and we owe to it the preservation
of the latest portraiture of Thoreau, who, at his
friend's urgency, sat to a photographer in New Bedford;
and thus we have the full-bearded likeness of
August, 1861; from which, also, and from personal
recollection, Mr. Walton Ricketson made the fine profile
medallion reproduced in photogravure for this
volume.
TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW BEDFORD).
Concord, October 14, 1861.
Friend Ricketson,—I think that, on the whole,
my health is better than when you were here; but my
faith in the doctors has not increased. I thank you all
for your invitation to come to New Bedford, but I suspect
that it must still be warmer here than there; that,
indeed, New Bedford is warmer than Concord only in
the winter, and so I abide by Concord.
September was pleasanter and much better for me
than August, and October has thus far been quite tolerable.
Instead of riding on horseback, I ride in a
wagon about every other day. My neighbor, Mr. E. R.
Hoar, has two horses, and he, being away for the most
part this fall, has generously offered me the use of one
of them; and, as I notice, the dog throws himself in,
and does scouting duty.
I am glad to hear that you no longer chew, but eschew,
sugar-plums. One of the worst effects of sickness
is, that it may get one into the habit of taking a
little something—his bitters, or sweets, as if for his
bodily good—from time to time, when he does not
need it. However, there is no danger of this if you do
not dose even when you are sick.
I went with a Mr. Rodman, a young man of your
town, here the other day, or week, looking at farms for
sale, and rumor says that he is inclined to buy a particular
one. Channing says that he received his book,
but has not got any of yours.
It is easy to talk, but hard to write.
From the worst of all correspondents,
Henry D. Thoreau.
No later letter than this was written by Thoreau's
own hand; for he was occupied all the winter of 1861-62,
when he could write, in preparing his manuscripts
for the press. Nothing appeared before his death, but
in June, 1862, Mr. Fields, then editing the Atlantic,
printed "Walking,"—the first of three essays which
came out in that magazine the same year. Nothing of
Thoreau's had been accepted for the Atlantic since 1858,
when he withdrew the rest of "Chesuncook," then coming
out in its pages, because the editor (Mr. Lowell) had
made alterations in the manuscript. In April, just before
his death, the Atlantic printed a short and characteristic
sketch of Thoreau by Bronson Alcott, and in
August, Emerson's funeral oration, given in the parish
church of Concord. During the last six months of his
illness, his sister and his friends wrote letters for him,
as will be seen by the two that follow.
SOPHIA THOREAU TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW
BEDFORD).
Concord, December 19, 1861.
Mr. Ricketson:
Dear Sir,—Thank you for your friendly interest in
my dear brother. I wish that I could report more favorably
in regard to his health. Soon after your visit to
Concord, Henry commenced riding, and almost every
day he introduced me to some of his familiar haunts,
far away in the thick woods, or by the ponds; all very
new and delightful to me. The air and exercise which
he enjoyed during the fine autumn days were a benefit
to him; he seemed stronger, had a good appetite, and
was able to attend somewhat to his writing; but since
the cold weather has come, his cough has increased,
and he is able to go out but seldom. Just now he is
suffering from an attack of pleurisy, which confines him
wholly to the house. His spirits do not fail him; he
continues in his usual serene mood, which is very pleasant
for his friends as well as himself. I am hoping for
a short winter and early spring, that the invalid may
again be out of doors.
I am sorry to hear of your indisposition, and trust
that you will be well again soon. It would give me
pleasure to see some of your newspaper articles, since
you possess a hopeful spirit. My patience is nearly exhausted.
The times look very dark. I think the next
soldier who is shot for sleeping on his post should be
Gen. McClellan. Why does he not do something in
the way of fighting? I despair of ever living under the
reign of Sumner or Phillips.
BRONSON ALCOTT TO DANIEL RICKETSON (AT NEW
BEDFORD).
Concord, January 10, 1862.
Dear Friend,—You have not been informed of
Henry's condition this winter, and will be sorry to hear
that he grows feebler day by day, and is evidently failing
and fading from our sight. He gets some sleep,
has a pretty good appetite, reads at intervals, takes
notes of his readings, and likes to see his friends, conversing,
however, with difficulty, as his voice partakes
of his general debility. We had thought this oldest inhabitant
of our Planet would have chosen to stay and
see it fairly dismissed into the Chaos (out of which he
has brought such precious jewels,—gifts to friends, to
mankind generally, diadems for fame to coming followers,
forgetful of his own claims to the honors) before
he chose simply to withdraw from the spaces and times
he has adorned with the truth of his genius. But the
masterly work is nearly done for us here. And our
woods and fields are sorrowing, though not in sombre,
but in robes of white, so becoming to the piety and
probity they have known so long, and soon are to miss.
There has been none such since Pliny, and it will be
long before there comes his like; the most sagacious
and wonderful Worthy of his time, and a marvel to
coming ones.
I write at the suggestion of his sister, who thought
his friends would like to be informed of his condition
to the latest date.
Ever yours and respectfully,
A. Bronson Alcott.
The last letter of Henry Thoreau, written by the
hand of his sister, was sent to Myron Benton, a young
literary man then living in Dutchess County, New York,
who had written a grateful letter to the author of
"Walden" (January 6, 1862), though quite unacquainted
with him. Mr. Benton said that the news of
Thoreau's illness had affected him as if it were that
"of a personal friend whom I had known a long time,"
and added: "The secret of the influence by which
your writings charm me is altogether as intangible,
though real, as the attraction of Nature herself. I read
and reread your books with ever fresh delight. Nor is
it pleasure alone; there is a singular spiritual healthiness
with which they seem imbued,—the expression of
a soul essentially sound, so free from any morbid tendency."
After mentioning that his own home was in a
pleasant valley, once the hunting-ground of the Indians,
Mr. Benton said:—
"I was in hope to read something more from your
pen in Mr. Conway's Dial,[106]
but only recognized that
fine pair of Walden twinlets. Of your two books, I
perhaps prefer the 'Week'—but after all, 'Walden'
is but little less a favorite. In the former, I like especially
those little snatches of poetry interspersed
throughout. I would like to ask what progress you
have made in a work some way connected with natural
history,—I think it was on Botany,—which Mr.
Emerson told me something about in a short interview
I had with him two years ago at Poughkeepsie....
If you should feel perfectly able at any time to
drop me a few lines, I would like much to know what
your state of health is, and if there is, as I cannot but
hope, a prospect of your speedy recovery."
Two months and more passed before Thoreau replied;
but his habit of performing every duty, whether
of business or courtesy, would not excuse him from an
answer, which was this:—
TO MYRON B. BENTON (AT LEEDSVILLE, N. Y.).
Concord, March 21, 1862.
Dear Sir,—I thank you for your very kind letter,
which, ever since I received it, I have intended to answer
before I died, however briefly. I am encouraged
to know, that, so far as you are concerned, I have not
written my books in vain. I was particularly gratified,
some years ago, when one of my friends and neighbors
said, "I wish you would write another book,—write
it for me." He is actually more familiar with what I
have written than I am myself.
The verses you refer to in Conway's Dial were written
by F. B. Sanborn of this town. I never wrote for
that journal.
I am pleased when you say that in the "Week" you
like especially "those little snatches of poetry interspersed
through the book," for these, I suppose, are
the least attractive to most readers. I have not been
engaged in any particular work on Botany, or the like,
though, if I were to live, I should have much to report
on Natural History generally.
You ask particularly after my health. I suppose that
I have not many months to live; but, of course, I know
nothing about it. I may add that I am enjoying existence
as much as ever, and regret nothing.
Yours truly,
Henry D. Thoreau,
bySophia E. Thoreau.
He died May 6, 1862; his mother died March 12,
1872, and his sister Sophia, October, 1876. With the
death of his aunt, Maria Thoreau, nearly twenty years
after her beloved nephew, the last person of the name
in America (or perhaps in England) passed away.