"I believe in him because he is so sincere."
You've heard that, haven't you? I
never could understand why a sensible person
would use such logic.
Sincerity is no evidence of truth. The
Hindu mother is sincere who throws her
babe to the crocodiles, but her sincerity is
no proof that by this sacrifice she is sure
of her salvation.
The Christian Scientist is sincere in the
belief that medicines do not cure diseases.
The doctor is equally sincere that medicines
will cure disease.
The Theosophist is sincere, the Atheist,
the Agnostic, the Christian, the Pagan, the
Mohammedan, the Buddhist, the Sun-worshipper,
the Republican, the Democrat,
the Progressive, the Prohibitionist, the
Brewer, all these are sincere in their beliefs.
And as these beliefs are different, it is
common sense to say that no one creed,
sect, belief, branch, dogma or system, is all
truth.
It is true every channel or avenue we
meet in life's travel has some truth, but it is
not for you or me to assume that we are
the sole possessors of wisdom and the real
discoverers of all truth.
We must not take the conclusions we
arrive at and expect to force the world to
accept without protest our rules for conduct,
our methods for living, our practices
for morals, or our beliefs, for their guide.
Converts to new doctrines, new issues,
new cults and to the old ones, too, are made
largely because the ambassadors or proselyters
seem so fervid and sincere in expounding
what they claim is the definite truth.
The believers in a cult or code of ethics
are auto hypnotized, their visions are
narrowed.
By focusing their thought on their special
belief they bring together sophistry, arguments,
examples and so-called proof that
gives them facility in arguing the case or
expounding their doctrine.
You can make no gain to try to argue
with a Christian Scientist. You ask for
concrete rules, definite answers and other
proofs than their flat statements, and you
are told you have not the understanding,
that your attitude is not in the right plane,
and that the truth cannot be shown you.
You are told to have faith, belief, to
eliminate antagonism, and to study "Science
and Health" and you will receive the divine
spirit and see the light.
The Scientist is sincere; he shows you
"Science and Health" with a lot of testimonials
in the back to prove that Christian
Science cures disease. Every patent medicine,
every science, every system of healing
has testimonials by the hundreds.
Scientists say there is no disease, no
material, that we are only spirit or soul, or
thought; that we are not matter but mind.
That health is truth and disease is error.
They deny disease yet "Science and Health"
and the midweek experience meetings have
testimonials of disease cured by Christian
Science.
There is much truth in Christian Science.
People are helped by it, people are sincere
in their belief in it, but that Christian
Science is all truth, all powerful, all right,
all sufficient, cannot be proven.
What about the people who have gone
hence before Christian Science was ever
heard of?
The theological religion today, the practices
and beliefs, differ from the vogue of
fifty years ago.
If the Protestant religion be all truth
what became of our religious ancestors who
died before Martin Luther found the truth?
I have no quarrel with the Christian
Scientist, the Protestant, the Roman Catholic,
the Buddhist, or the Mohammedan. I
must be generous and broad enough to say
others have the right to think and be
sincere. All sciences have truth, but no
science, sect, cult, dogma, or creed is ALL
truth.
Sincerity may be satisfaction and necessary
for the possessors of that sincerity,
but that your sincerity in your belief must
be accepted by me as proof that I should
believe as you do, is, I believe, the place
where I have the undoubted right to say,
"I reserve the right to my own conclusions
and I am unjust to myself if I force myself
to accept your viewpoint without full belief
myself that you are right."
So, then, because a person is sincere in a
belief that is contrary to your conscientious
belief, do not be disturbed or swerved from
common sense analysis or convinced against
your better judgment.
No one possesses all the truth. It is for
you and me to do our plain duty as we see
it, to do the best we can each day in act
and thought and word.
We can pretty much agree on the simple
essential truths which are proven. That
is, being honest, truthful, kind, lovable,
sympathetic, cheerful, doing good, helping
one another and doing things worth while.
If we agree on these things and do useful
work and think helpful thoughts, we are
doing our duty.
Theories, arguments and studying too
deeply on bootless systems, codes, beliefs,
cults, isms, or doctrines, is a waste of time.
When we can here and now derive
definite benefits from doing the simple and
helpful things and acting and thinking the
simple practical cheer thoughts, it is not
necessary or good for us to waste time on
spiritualism or theoretical beliefs that cannot
be proved to our own selves satisfactorily.
We are asked to believe these strange,
impractical, unnatural beliefs, because of
the sincerity of others. It's better to do,
and to be the thing we can ourselves
measure, understand and sincerely believe.
There are hundreds of strange beliefs and
spiritual systems, each claiming to be all
powerful, all right. If any one is all truth
then all the others are all wrong.
The bigot who assumes he is the sole
possessor of truth, the cult, sect, ism, or
science that claims to possess all truth, and
the exact rules for the world to obey, should
be classed with those other misguided men
and religions which burned human beings
who dared to doubt their right to the
possession of all truth.
God never gave his approval to any one
man-made religious sect.
God is the universal good power; man
often tries to interpret God's idea to his
own selfish narrow vision.