August 16, 1916.
It is now three months since I finished the six preceding Letters,
written in response to an urgent call from America; nor did I then
anticipate any renewal of my work. But while a French translation of the
six Letters has been passing through the Press, an appeal has been made
to me from France to add an Epilogue, or supplementary Letter, briefly
recapitulating the outstanding facts or events which in those three
months have marked the British share in the war, and played their part
in the immense transformation of the general outlook which has taken
place during those months. Not an easy task! One thinks first of one's
own inadequacy; and then remembers, as before, that one is a unit in a
nation under orders. I must therefore do what I can. And perhaps other
readers, also, of this little book, in America and England, as they look
back over the ever-changing scene of the war, will not find this renewed
attempt to summarise Britain's part in it as it has developed up to the
present date (August 16, 1916) unwelcome. The outstanding facts of the
last three months, as I see them, are, for Great Britain:—
1. The immense increase in the output of British Munitions of War;
2. The Naval Battle of Jutland;
3. The Allied offensive on the Somme.
The first and third of these events are, of course, so far as the latter
concerns Great Britain, the natural and logical outcome of that
"England's Effort" of which I tried—how imperfectly!—to give a
connected account three months ago.
At that time the ever-mounting British effort, though it had reached
colossal dimensions, though everybody aware of it was full of a
steadily growing confidence as to its final result, had still to be
tested by those greater actions to which it was meant to lead. After the
local failures at the Dardanelles, and in Mesopotamia, Great Britain was
again, for a time, everywhere on the defensive, though it was a very
vigorous and active defensive; and the magnificent stand made by the
French at Verdun was not only covering France herself with glory, and
kindling the hearts of all who love her throughout the world, but under
its shield the new armies of Great Britain were still being steadily
perfected, and wonderfully armed; time was being given to Russia for
reorganisation and re-equipment, and time was all she wanted; while
Germany, vainly dashing her strength in men and guns against the heights
of Verdun, in the hope of provoking her enemies on the Western front to
a premature offensive, doomed to exhaustion before it had achieved its
end, was met by the iron resolve of both the French and British
Governments, advised by the French and British Commanders in the field,
to begin that offensive only at their own time and place, when the
initiative was theirs, and everything was ready.
But the scene has greatly altered. Let me take Munitions first. In
February, it will be remembered by those who have read the preceding
Letters, I was a visitor, by the kindness of the Ministry of Munitions,
then in Mr. Lloyd George's hands, to a portion of the munitions
field—in the Midlands, on the Tyne, and on the Clyde. At that moment,
Great Britain, as far as armament was concerned, was in the mid-stream
of a gigantic movement which had begun in the summer of 1915, set going
by the kindling energy of Mr. Lloyd George, and seconded by the roused
strength of a nation which was not the industrial pioneer of the whole
modern world for nothing, however keenly others, during the last
half-century, have pressed upon—or in some regions passed—her.
Everywhere I found new workshops already filled with workers, a large
proportion of them women, already turning out a mass of shell which
would have seemed incredible to soldiers and civilians alike during the
first months of the war; while the tale of howitzers, trench-mortars,
machine-guns, and the rest, was running up week by week, in the vast
extensions already added to the other works. But everywhere, too, I saw
huge, empty workshops, waiting for their machines, or just setting them
up; and everywhere the air was full of rumours of the new industrial
forces—above all, of the armies of women—that were to be brought to
bear. New towns were being built for them; their workplaces and their
tools were being got ready for them, as in that vast filling factory—or
rather town—on the Clyde which I described in my third Letter. But in
many quarters they were not yet there; only one heard, as it were, the
tramp of their advancing feet.
But to-day! Those great empty workshops that I saw in February, in the
making, or the furnishing, are now full of workers and machines; and
thousands like them all over the country. Last night (Aug. 15), the new
Minister of Munitions, Mr. Montagu, who, a few weeks ago, succeeded Mr.
Lloyd George, now Minister for War, rendered an account of his
department up to date, which amazed even the House of Commons, and will
surely stir the minds of men throughout the British Empire with a just
and reasonable pride. The "effete" and "degenerate" nation has roused
herself indeed!
Here is the bare résumé of the Minister's statement:—
Ammunition.—The British output of ammunition at the
beginning of the war was intended for an army of 200,000
men.
Naturally, the output rose steadily throughout the first
year of war.
But—the same output which in 1914-15 took 12 months to
produce could now be produced—
| As to 18-pounder ammunition, | in 3 weeks |
| " Field howitzer" | in 2 weeks |
| " Medium gun and howitzer ammunition, | in 11 days |
| " Heavy shell, | in 4 days |
We are sending over to France every week as much as the
whole pre-war stock of land service ammunition in the
country.
As to guns, I would ask my readers to turn back to the second and
third chapters in this little book, which show something of the human
side and the daily detail of this great business, and then to look at
this summary:—
Every month, now, we are turning out nearly twice as many
big guns as were in existence for land service—i.e., not
naval guns—when the Ministry of Munitions came into being
(June, 1915).
Between June, 1915, and June, 1916, the monthly output of
heavy guns has increased 6-fold—and the present output
will soon be doubled.
For every 100 eighteen-pounders turned out in the first 10
months of the war, we are now turning out 500.
We are producing 18 times as many machine-guns.
Of rifles—the most difficult of all war material to
produce quickly in large quantities—our weekly home
production is now 3 times as great as it was a year ago. We
are supplying our Army overseas with rifles and machine-guns
entirely from home sources.
Of small-arms ammunition our output is 3 times as great as
a year ago.
We are producing 66 times as much high explosive as at the
beginning of 1915; and our output of bombs is 33 times as
great as it was last year.
At the same time, what is Great Britain doing for her Allies?
The loss of her Northern Provinces, absorbed by the German
invasion, has deprived France of three-quarters of her
steel. We are now sending to France one-third of the whole
British production of shell-steel.
We are also supplying the Allies with the constituents of
high explosive in very large quantities, prepared by our
National factories.
We are sending to the Allies millions of tons of coal and
coke every month, large quantities of machinery, and 20 per
cent. of our whole production of machine tools
(indispensable to shell manufacture).
We are supplying Russia with millions of pairs of Army
boots.
And in the matter of ammunition, we have not only enormously increased
the quantity produced—we have greatly improved its quality. The
testimony of the French experts—themselves masters in these arts of
death—as conveyed through M. Thomas, is emphatic. The new British heavy
guns are "admirably made"—"most accurate"—"most efficient."
Meanwhile a whole series of chemical problems with regard to high
explosives have been undertaken and solved by Lord Moulton's department.
If it was ever true that science was neglected by the War Office, it is
certainly true no longer; and the soldiers at the front, who have to
make practical use of what our scientific chemists and our explosive
factories at home are producing, are entirely satisfied.
For that, as Mr. Montagu points out, is the sole and supreme test. How
has the vast activity of the new Ministry of Munitions—an activity
which the nation owes—let me repeat it—to the initiative, the
compelling energy, of Mr. Lloyd George—affected our armies in the
field?
The final answer to that question is not yet. The Somme offensive is
still hammering at the German gates; I shall presently give an outline
of its course from its opening on July 1st down to the present. But
meanwhile what can be said is this.
The expenditure of ammunition which enabled us to sweep through the
German first lines, in the opening days of this July, almost with ease,
was colossal beyond all precedent. The total amount of heavy guns and
ammunition manufactured by Great Britain in the first ten months of the
war, from August, 1914, to June 1, 1915, would not have kept the British
bombardment on the Somme going for a single day. That gives some idea
of it.
Can we keep it up? The German papers have been consoling themselves with
the reflection that so huge an effort must have exhausted our supplies.
On the contrary, says Mr. Montagu. The output of the factories, week by
week, now covers the expenditure in the field. No fear now, that as at
Loos, as at Neuve Chapelle, and as on a thousand other smaller
occasions, British success in the field should be crippled and stopped
by shortage of gun and shell!
By whom has this result been brought about? By that army of British
workmen—and workwomen—which Mr. Lloyd George in little more than one
short year has mobilised throughout the country. The Ministry of
Munitions is now employing three millions and a half of workers—(a
year ago it was not much more than a million and a half)—of whom
400,000 are women; and the staff of the Ministry has grown from
3,000—the figure given in my earlier letters—to 5,000, just as that
army of women, which has sprung as it were out of the earth at the call
of the nation, has almost doubled since I wrote in April last. Well may
the new Minister say that our toilers in factory and forge have had some
share in the glorious recent victories of Russia, Italy, and France! Our
men and our women have contributed to the re-equipment of those gallant
armies of Russia, which, a month or six weeks earlier than they were
expected to move, have broken up the Austrian front, and will soon be
once more in Western Poland, perhaps in East Prussia! The Italian Army
has drawn from our workshops and learnt from our experiments. The
Serbian Army has been re-formed and re-fitted.
Let us sum up. The Germans, with years of preparation behind them, made
this war a war of machines. England, in that as in other matters, was
taken by surprise. But our old and proud nation, which for generations
led the machine industry of the world, as soon as it realised the
challenge—and we were slow to realise it!—met it with an impatient and
a fierce energy which is every month attaining a greater momentum and a
more wonderful result. The apparently endless supply of munitions which
now feeds the British front, and the comparative lightness of the
human cost at which the incredibly strong network of the German trenches
on their whole first line system was battered into ruin, during the last
days of June and the first days of July, 1916:—it is to effects like
these that all that vast industrial effort throughout Great Britain, of
which I saw and described a fragment three months ago, has now steadily
and irresistibly brought us.
This then is perhaps the first point to notice in the landscape of the
war, as we look back on the last three months. For on it everything
else, Naval and Military, depends:—on the incredibly heightened output
of British workshops, in all branches of war material, which has been
attained since the summer of last year. In it, as I have just said, we
see an effect of a great cause—i.e., of the "effort" made by Great
Britain, since the war broke out, to bring her military strength in men
and munitions to a point, sufficient, in combination with the strength
of her Allies, for victory over the Central Powers, who after long and
deliberate preparation had wantonly broken the European peace. The
"effort" was for us a new one, provoked by Germany, and it will have
far-reaching civil consequences when the war is over.
In the great Naval victory now known as the Battle of Jutland, on the
other hand, we have a fresh demonstration on a greater scale than ever
before, of that old, that root fact, without which indeed the success of
the Allied effort in other directions would be impossible—i.e., the
overwhelming strength of the British Navy, and its mastery of the Sea.
In a few earlier pages of this book, I have described a visit which the
British Admiralty allowed me to make in February last to a portion of
the Fleet, then resting in a northern harbour. On that occasion, at the
Vice-Admiral's luncheon-table, there sat beside me on my right, a tall
spare man with the intent face of one to whom life has been a great arid
strenuous adventure, accepted in no boyish mood, but rather in the
spirit of the scientific explorer, pushing endlessly from one problem to
the next, and passionate for all experience that either unveils the
world, or tests himself. We talked of the war, and my projected journey.
"I envy you!" he said, his face lighting up. "I would give anything to
see our Army in the field." My neighbour was Rear-Admiral Sir Robert
Arbuthnot, commanding the First Cruiser Squadron, who went down with his
flagship H.M.S. Defence, in the Battle of Jutland, on the 31st of May
last, while passing between the British and German fleets, under a very
heavy fire. "It is probable," said Admiral Jellicoe's despatch, "that
Sir Robert Arbuthnot, during his engagement with the enemy's light
cruisers, and in his desire to complete their destruction, was not aware
of the approach of the enemy's heavy ships, owing to the mist, until he
found himself in close proximity to the main fleet, and before he could
withdraw his ships, they were caught under a heavy fire and disabled."
So, between the fleets of Germany and England, amid the mists of the May
evening, and the storm and smoke of battle, my courteous neighbour of
three months before found, with all his shipmates, that grave in the
"unharvested sea" which England never forgets to honour, and from which
no sailor shrinks. At the same luncheon-table were two other Admirals
and many junior Officers, who took part in the same great action; and
looking back upon it, and upon the notes which I embodied in my first
Letter, I see more vividly than ever how every act and thought of those
brave and practised men, among whom I passed those few—to me—memorable
hours, were conditioned by an intense expectation, that trained
prevision of what must come, which, in a special degree, both stirs and
steadies the mind of the modern sailor.
But one thing perhaps they had not foreseen—that by a combination of
mishaps in the first reporting of the battle, the great action, which
has really demonstrated, once and for all, the invincible supremacy of
Great Britain at sea, which has reduced the German Fleet to months of
impotence, put the invasion of these islands finally out of the
question, and enabled the British blockade to be drawn round Germany
with a yet closer and sterner hand, was made to appear, in the first
announcements of it, almost a defeat. The news of our losses—our heavy
losses—came first—came almost alone. The Admiralty, with the stern
conscience of the British official mind, announced them as they came
in—bluntly—with little or no qualification. A shock of alarm went
through England! For what had we paid so sore a price? Was the return
adequate, and not only to our safety, but to our prestige?
There were a few hours when both Great Britain—outside the handful of
men who knew—and her friends throughout the world, hung on the answer.
Meanwhile the German lie, which converted a defeat for Germany into a
"victory," got at least twenty-four hours' start, and the Imperial
Chancellor made quick and sturdy use of it when he extracted a War Loan
of £600,000,000 from a deluded and jubilant Reichstag. Then the news
came in from one quarter after another of the six-mile battle-line, from
one unit after another of the greatest sea-battle Britain had ever
fought, and by the 3rd or 4th of June, England, drawing half-ironic
breath over her own momentary misgiving, had realised the
truth—first—that the German Fleet on the 31st had only escaped total
destruction by the narrowest margin, and by the help of mist and
darkness; secondly—that its losses were, relatively far greater, and
in all probability, absolutely, greater than our own; thirdly—that
after the British battle-fleet had severed the German navy from its
base, the latter had been just able, under cover of darkness, to break
round the British ships, and fly hard to shelter, pursued by our
submarines and destroyers through the night, till it arrived at
Wilhelmshaven a battered and broken host, incapable at least for months
to come of any offensive action against Great Britain or her Allies.
Impossible henceforth—for months to come—to send a German squadron
sufficiently strong to harass Russia in the Baltic! Impossible to
interfere successfully with the passage of Britain's new armies across
the seas! Impossible to dream any longer of invading English coasts! The
British Fleet holds the North Sea more strongly than it has ever held
it; and behind the barbed wire defences of Wilhelmshaven or Heligoland
the German Fleet has been nursing its wounds.
Some ten weeks have passed, and as these results have become plain to
all the world, the German lie, or what remained of it, has begun to
droop, even in the country of its birth. "Do not let us suppose," says
Captain Persius—the most honest of German naval critics, in a recent
article—"that we have shaken the sea-power of England. That would be
foolishness." While Mr. Balfour, the most measured, the most veracious
of men, speaking only a few days ago to the representatives of the
Dominion Parliaments, who have been visiting England, says quietly—"the
growth of our Navy, since the outbreak of war, which has gone on, and
which at this moment is still going on, is something of which I do not
believe the general public has the slightest conception."
For the general public has, indeed, but vague ideas of what is happening
day by day and week by week in the great shipyards of the Clyde, the
Tyne, and the Mersey. But there, all the same, the workmen—and
workwomen—of Great Britain—(for women are taking an ever-increasing
share in the lighter tasks of naval engineering)—are adding
incessantly to the sea-power of this country, acquiescing in a
Government control, a loosening of trade custom, a dilution and
simplification of skilled labour, which could not have been dreamt of
before the war. At the same time they are meeting the appeal of
Ministers to give up or postpone the holidays they have so richly
earned, for the sake of their sons and brothers in the trenches, with a
dogged "aye, aye!" in which there is a note of profound understanding,
of invincible and personal determination, but rarely heard in the early
days of the war.
So much for the Workshops and the Navy. Now before I turn to the New
Armies and the Somme offensive, let us look for a moment at the present
facts of British War Finance. By April last, the date of my sixth
Letter, we had raised 2,380 millions sterling, for the purposes of the
war; we had lent 500 millions to our Allies, and we were spending about
5 millions a day on the war. According to a statement recently made by
the Chancellor of the Exchequer (August 10), by March next our debt will
have risen to 3,440 millions sterling, 1,060 millions more than it stood
at in March last; our advances to our Allies will have increased to 800
millions, while our daily war expenditure remains about the same.
Mr. McKenna's tone in announcing these figures was extraordinarily
cheerful. "We have every reason," he said, amid the applause of the
House of Commons—"to be proud of the manner in which British credit has
stood the strain." The truth is that by March next, at the present rate
of expenditure, our total indebtedness (deducting the advances to our
Allies) will almost exactly equal "one year's national income," i.e.,
the aggregate of the income of every person in the country. But if a man
having an income of £5,000 a year, were to owe a total of £5,000, we
should not consider his position very serious. "We shall collect a
revenue in one year equal to 20 per cent. of the whole debt (i.e., 522
millions sterling), and we shall be able to pay, out of existing
taxation, the interest on the debt, and a considerable sinking-fund,
and shall still have left a large margin for the reduction of
taxation"—words which left a comfortable echo in the ears of the
nation. Meanwhile British trade—based on British sea-power—has shown
extraordinary buoyancy, the exports steadily increasing; so that the
nation, in the final words of the Chancellor, feels "no doubt whatever
that we shall be able to maintain our credit to the end of the war, no
matter how long it may last."
But do not let it be supposed that this huge revenue is being raised
without sacrifice, without effort. It means—for the present—as I
have already pointed out, the absorption by the State of five shillings
in the pound from the income of every citizen, above a moderate minimum,
and of a lesser but still heavy tax from those below that minimum; it
means new and increased taxation in many directions; and, as a
consequence, heavy increases in the cost of living; it means sharply
diminished spending for large sections of our population, and serious
pinching for our professional and middle classes.
But the nation, as a whole, makes no lament. We look our taxes in the
face, and we are beginning to learn how to save. We have our hearts
fixed on the future; and we have counted the cost.
The money then is no difficulty. Our resisting power, our prosperity
even, under the blows of war, have been unexpectedly great.
But what are we getting for our money?
In the case of the Navy, the whole later course of the war, no less than
the Battle of Jutland, has shown what the British Navy means to the
cause of the Allies. It is as I have said, the root fact in the war; and
in the end, it will be the determining fact; although, of itself, it
cannot defeat Germany as we must defeat her; at any rate in any
reasonable time.
Then as to the Army. Take first of all the administrative side. To
what—in the last four months—has come that wonderful system of
organisation and supply I tried to sketch in my fourth Letter, largely
in the words of some of the chief actors in it?
Within the last fortnight, a skilled observer has been reporting to the
British public his impressions of the "Army behind the Lines" in France,
as I saw a portion of it last February, in the great British supply
bases and hospital camps, on the lines of communication, and throughout
the immense and varied activities covered by the British motor
transport.
"The Germans," says this recent eye-witness, "have persisted that, even
if we could find the men, we could not make the machine, which they have
been perfecting for forty years and more. But it is here!—operating
with perfect smoothness; a machine, which in its mere mass and
intricacy, almost staggers the imagination. One cannot speak of the
details of the system for fear of saying something which should not be
told; but it is stupendous in its proportion, dealing as it does with
the methodical handling of the men in their hundreds of thousands, of
all their equipment and supplies, food, miscellaneous baggage and
ammunition, and with the endless trains of guns—guns—guns, and shells,
by millions upon millions, all brought from England, and all here in
their place, or moved from place to place with the rhythm of clock-work.
One cannot convey any idea of it, nor grasp it in its entirety; but day
by day the immensity of it grows on one, and one realises how trivial
beside it has been anything that British military organisation has had
to do in the past. That is the real miracle; not the mere millions of
men, nor even their bravery, but this huge frictionless machine of which
they are a part—this thing which Great Britain has put together here in
the last twenty months."
But just as in March my thoughts pressed eagerly forward, from the sight
allowed me of the machine, to its uses on the battle-front, to that line
of living and fighting men for which it exists—so now.
Only, since I stood upon the hill near Poperinghe on March 2nd, that
line of men has been indefinitely strengthened; and the main scene of
battle is no longer the Ypres salient. Looking southward from the old
windmill, whose supports sheltered us on that cold spring afternoon, I
knew that, past Bailleul, and past Neuve Chapelle, I was looking
straight toward Albert and the Somme, and I knew too that it was there
that the British were taking over a new portion of the line,—so that we
might be of some increased support—all that was then allowed us by
the Allied Command!—to that incredible defence of Verdun, which was in
all our minds and hearts.
But what I could not know was that in that misty distance was
hidden—four months away—a future movement, at which no one then
guessed, outside the higher brains of the Army. The days went on. The
tide of battle ebbed and flowed round Verdun. The Crown Prince hewed and
hacked his way, with enormous loss to Germany, to points within three
and four miles of the coveted town—fortress no longer. But there France
stopped him—like the beast of prey that has caught its claws in the
iron network it is trying to batter down, and cannot release them; and
there he is still. Meanwhile, in June, seven to eight weeks before the
expected moment, Brusiloff's attack broke loose, and the Austrian front
began to crumble; just in time to bring the Italians welcome aid in the
Trentino.
And still from the Somme to the Yser, the Anglo-French forces waited;
and still across the Channel poured British soldiers and British guns.
In industrial England, the Whitsuntide holidays had been given up; and
there were at any rate some people who knew that there would be no
August holidays either. Leave and letters had been stopped. But there
had been apparent signs, wrongly interpreted, before. The great Allied
attack on the West—was it ready, at last?
Then—with the 27th of June, along the whole British battle-front of 90
miles, there sprang up a violent and continuous bombardment varied by
incessant raids on the enemy lines. Those who witnessed that bombardment
can hardly find words in which to describe it. "It was an extraordinary
and a terrible spectacle," says a correspondent. "Within the dreadful
zone the woods are leafless, château and farm and village, alike, mere
heaps of ruins." Ah! ce beau pays de France—with all its rich and
ancient civilisation—it is not French hearts alone that bleed for you!
But it was the voice of deliverance, of vengeance, that was speaking in
the guns which crashed incessantly day and night, while shells of all
calibres rained—so many to the second—from every yard of the British
front, on the German lines. The correspondents with the British
Headquarters could only speculate with held breath, as to what was
happening under that ghastly veil of smoke and fire on the horizon, and
what our infantry would find when the artillery work was done, and the
attack was launched.
The 1st of July dawned, a beautiful summer morning, with light mists
dispersing under the sun. Precisely to the moment, at 7.30 A.M., the
Allied artillery lifted their guns, creating a dense barrage of fire
between the German front and its support trenches, while the British and
French infantry sprang over their parapets and rushed to the attack of
the German first line; the British on a front of some twenty-five miles,
the French, on about ten miles, on both sides of the Somme. The English
journalists, who, watch in hand, saw our men go, "knowing what it was
they were going to, marvelled for the fiftieth time at the way in which
British manhood has proved itself, in this most terrible of all wars."
But though it was a grand, it was an anxious moment for those who had
trained and shaped the New Armies of Britain. How would they bear
themselves, these hundreds of thousands of British and Imperial
volunteers, men, some of them, with the shortest possible training
compatible with efficiency—against the famous troops of Germany—beside
the veteran, the illustrious army of France?
Four hours after the fighting began, Sir Douglas Haig telegraphed:
"Attack launched north of River Somme this morning at 7.30 A.M. In
conjunction with French, British troops have broken into German forward
system of defences, on front of sixteen miles. Fighting is continuing.
French attack on our immediate right proceeding equally satisfactorily."
Twelve hours later, on the same day, when the summer night had fallen on
the terrible battle-field, the British Commander-in-Chief added:—"Heavy
fighting has continued all day between the rivers Somme and Ancre. On
the right of our attack we have captured the German labyrinth of
trenches on a front of seven miles to a depth of 1,000 yards, and have
stormed and occupied the strongly fortified villages of Montauban and
Mametz. In the centre on a front of four miles we have gained many
strong points. North of the Ancre Valley the battle has been equally
violent, and in this area we have been unable to retain portions of the
ground gained in our first attacks, while other portions remain in our
possession.... Up to date, 2,000 German prisoners have passed through
our collecting stations. The large number of the enemy dead on the
battle-field indicate that the German losses have been very severe."
So much for the first day's news. On the following day Fricourt was
captured; and the prisoners went up to 3,500, together with a quantity
of war material. Meanwhile the French on the right had done brilliantly,
capturing five villages, and 6,000 prisoners. The attack was well begun.
And the New Armies?—"Kitchener's Men"? "Whatever we have imagined of
our New Armies," says an eye-witness of the first day's battle, "they
are better than we can have ever dared to hope. Nothing has in any case
stopped them, except being killed." And a neutral who saw the attack on
Mametz told the same eye-witness that he had seen most of the fighting
in the world in recent years, and that he "did not believe a more
gallant feat was ever performed in war." The story of the British
advance was written "in the dead upon the ground, and in the positions
as they stand." "Nothing which the Japanese did in the Russian War" was
more entirely heroic.
But let me carry on the story.
On Tuesday, July 11th, Sir Douglas Haig reported: "After ten days and
nights of continuous fighting our troops have completed the methodical
capture of the whole of the enemy's first system of defence on a front
of 14,000 yards.
"This system of defence consisted of numerous and continuous lines of
foretrenches, support trenches and reserve trenches, extending to
various depths of from 2,000 to 4,000 yards, and included five strongly
fortified villages, numerous heavily wired and intrenched woods, and a
large number of immensely strong redoubts."
The villages captured were Fricourt, Mametz, Montauban, La Boiselle, and
Contalmaison—the latter captured on July 10th, after particularly
fierce fighting. Every observer dwells on "the immense strength of the
German defences." "All the little villages and woods, each eminence and
hollow, have been converted into a fortress as formidable as the
character of the ground makes possible." The German has omitted nothing
"that could protect him against such a day as this."
Yet steadily, methodically, with many a pause for consolidation of the
ground gained, and for the bringing up of the heavy guns, the British
advance goes forward—toward Bapaume and Lille; while the French press
brilliantly on toward Péronne—both movements aimed at the vital German
communications through France and Belgium. Every step of ground, as the
Allies gain it, "is wrecked with mines, torn with shell, and watered
with the blood of brave men." The wood-fighting, amid the stripped and
gaunt trunks rising from labyrinths of wire, is specially terrible; and
below the ground everywhere are the deep pits and dugouts, which have
not only sheltered the enemy from our fire, but concealed the
machine-guns, which often when our men have passed over, emerge and take
them in the rear. The German machine-guns seem to be endless; they are
skilfully concealed, and worked with the utmost ability and courage.
But nothing daunts the troops attacking day and night, in the name of
patriotism, of liberty, of civilisation. Men from Yorkshire and
Lancashire, from Northumberland, Westmoreland and Cumberland, the heart
of England's sturdy north; men from Sussex and Kent, from Somerset and
Devon; the Scotch regiments; the Ulster Division, once the Ulster
Volunteers; the men of Munster and Connaught; the town-lads of
Manchester; the youths of Cockney London:—all their names are in the
great story. "There were no stragglers—none!" says an officer,
describing in a kind of wonder one of the fierce wood-attacks. And these
are not the seasoned troops of a Continental Army. They belong to
regiments and corps which did not exist, except in name, eighteen months
ago; they are units from the four-million army that Great Britain raised
for this struggle, before she passed her Military Service Law. The "Old
Army," the Expeditionary Force, which the nation owed to the organising
genius of Lord Haldane and his General Staff, has passed away, passed
into history, with the retreat from Mons, the first victory of Ypres,
the saving of the Channel ports; but its spirit remains, and its
traditions are firmly planted in the new attackers. I think of the men I
saw in March, during that long and weary wait; of the desire—and the
patience—in their eyes.
And of patience they and the nations behind them will still have ample
need. Since surprise on the Somme front was no longer possible, the
great advance has gone surely indeed, but more slowly. On July 14,
after delay caused by extraordinarily heavy rains, the German second
line was breached, and their trenches carried, on a front of four miles
and held against counter attacks. Longueval, the wood of
Bazentin-le-Grand, and the village, Bazentin-le-Petit, were attacked and
captured with an élan that nothing could resist. "The enemy losses in
guns," said the British Headquarters, "are now over 100. We have not
lost one." On July 17, Ovillers was cleared, Waterlot Farm taken, and
1,500 more yards of the German line. The British had by now taken 11,000
prisoners, to a somewhat larger number taken by the French, 17 heavy
guns, 37 field-guns, 30 trench howitzers, and 66 machine-guns. On
Saturday night, July 22-23, the greater part of Pozières, on the high
ground toward Bapaume, was taken. "Shortly after midnight," wrote the
official correspondent at Headquarters with the Australian Imperial
Forces in France, "on the 23rd, by a splendid night attack, the
Australians took the greater portion of Pozières." The previous
bombardment had been magnificent. "I had never before seen such a
spectacle. A large sector of the horizon was lit up not by single
flashes, but by a continuous band of quivering light." And under the
protection of the guns, the Anzacs swept forward, passing over trenches,
so entirely obliterated by shell-fire that they were often not
recognised as trenches at all, till they were in the heart of the
village. Then for two days they fought from house to house, and trench
to trench; till on July 27th came the news—"The whole of the village of
Pozières is now in our hands." And the Times correspondent writes "our
establishment at Pozières will probably be regarded historically as
closing the second phase of the battle of the Somme."
Since then (I write on August 16) three weeks have passed. The German
Third Line has been entered at the Bois de Foureaux, the whole of
Delville Wood has been carried; and in the combined advance of July
30th, the French swept on to Maurepas on the north of the Somme, and are
closely threatening both Combles and Péronne, while we are attacking
Thiepval on the left of our line and Guillemont on the right, and
pushing forward, north of Pozières, toward Bapaume. The whole of the
great advance has been a thrust up-hill from the valley floors of the
Ancre and the Somme toward a low ridge running roughly east and west and
commanding an important stretch of country and vital communications
beyond. "It has in just four weeks of effort," writes Mr.
Belloc—"accounted for some thirty thousand unwounded or slightly
wounded prisoners; for much more than 100 guns; for a belt of territory
over five miles in its extreme breadth, and—what is much more important
than any of these numerical and local calculations—it has proved itself
capable of continuous effort against all the concentration which the
enemy has been able to bring against it."
But it has done yet more than this. It has welded the French and English
Alliance—the wills and minds of the two nations—more closely than ever
before; and it has tested the British war-machine—the new Armies and
the new arms—as they have never yet been tested in this war. The result
has set the heart of England aflame; even while we ponder those long,
long casualty lists which represent the bitter price that British
fathers and mothers, British wives and daughters have paid, and must
still pay, for the only victory which will set up once again the reign
of law and humanity in Europe. What the future has in store we cannot
see yet in detail; but the inevitable end is clear at last. The
man-power of Germany is failing, and with it the insolent confidence of
her military caste; the man-power of the Allies, and the gun-power of
the Allies, are rising steadily. Russia is well launched on her return
way to Warsaw, to Cracow, to East Prussia. Italy, after the fall of
Gorizia, is on the march for Trieste. The Turks are fleeing across the
desert of Sinai; and the Allies at Salonika are taking the first steps
toward Sofia.
But it is in the "holy spirit of man" itself that the secret of the
future lies. On the Somme battle-fields, thousands and thousands of
young lives have been again laid down, that England—that France—may
live. Here is a letter, written the day before his death in action, on
July 1st, the opening day of the offensive, by a young English
Officer.[C] One must read it, if one can, dry-eyed. Not tears, but a
steeled will, a purer heart, are what it asks of those for whom the
writer died:—
"I am writing this letter to you just before going into
action to-morrow morning about dawn.
"I am about to take part in the biggest battle that has yet
been fought in France, and one which ought to help to end
the war very quickly.
"I never felt more confident or cheerful in my life before,
and would not miss the attack for anything on earth. The men
are in splendid form, and every officer and man is more
happy and cheerful than I have ever seen them.
"I have just been playing a rag game of football in which
the umpire had a revolver and a whistle.
"My idea in writing this letter is in case I am one of the
'costs,' and get killed. I do not expect to be; but such
things have happened, and are always possible.
"It is impossible to fear death out here, when one is no
longer an individual, but a member of a regiment and of an
army. To be killed means nothing to me, and it is only you
who suffer for it; you really pay the cost.
"I have been looking at the stars, and thinking what an
immense distance they are away. What an insignificant thing
the loss of, say, forty years of life is compared with them!
It seems scarcely worth talking about. Well, good-bye, you
darlings. Try not to worry about it, and remember that we
shall meet again really quite soon.
"This letter is going to be posted if...."
The letter was posted. But its message of Death is also a message of
Victory.
MARY A. WARD.