"You will excuse me if I do not strictly confine myself to narration, but now
and then interpose such reflections as may offer while I am writing."—Newton.
"Each was a giant heap of mouldering clay;
There slept the warriors, women, friends, and foes;
There, side by side, the rival chieftains lay,
And mighty tribes swept from the face of day."
Flint.
More than three weeks ago I found myself, one bright
morning at sunrise, before the city of St. Louis on descending
the Illinois; and in that venerable little city have I ever
since been a dweller. A series of those vexatious delays,
ever occurring to balk the designs of the tourist, have detained
me longer than could have been anticipated. Not
the [115] most inconsiderable of these preventives to locomotion
in this bustling, swapping, chaffering little city,
strange as it may seem, has been the difficulty of procuring,
at a conscionable outlay of dollars and cents, a suitable
steed for a protracted jaunt. But, thanks to the civility
or selfism of a friend, this difficulty is at an end, and I have
at length succeeded in securing the reversion of a tough,
spirited little bay, which, by considerate usage and bountiful
foddering, may serve to bear me, with the requisite
quantum of speed and safety, over the prairies. A few
days, therefore, when the last touch of acclimation shall
have taken its leave, and "I'm over the border and awa'."
The city of San' Louis, now hoary with a century's years,
was one of those early settlements planted by the Canadian
French up and down the great valley, from the Northern
Lakes to the Gulf, while the English colonists of Plymouth
and Jamestown were wringing out a wretched subsistence
along the sterile shores of the Atlantic, wearied out by
constant warfare with the thirty Indian tribes within their
borders. Attracted by the beauty of the country, the fertility
of its soil, the boundless variety of its products,
the exhaustless mineral treasures beneath its surface, and
the facility of the trade in the furs of the Northwest, a
flood of Canadian emigration opened southward after the
discoveries of La Salle, and the little villages of Cahokia,
Kaskaskia, Prairie du Po, Prairie du Rocher, St. Phillipe,
St. Ferdinand, Peoria, Fort Chartres, Vuide Poche, Petites
Cotes, now St. Charles, Pain Court, now St. Louis, and
others, successively sprang up in [116] the howling waste.
Over nearly all this territory have the Gaul, the Spaniard,
the Briton, and the Anglo-American held rule, and a
dash of the national idiosyncrasy of each may be detected.
Especially true is this of St. Louis. There is an antiquated,
venerable air about its narrow streets and the
ungainly edifices of one portion of it; the steep-roofed
stone cottage of the Frenchman, and the tall stuccoed-dwelling
of the Don, not often beheld. A mellowing
touch of time, which few American cities can boast, has
passed over it, rendering it a spot of peculiar interest to
one with the slightest spirit of the antiquary, in a country
where all else is new. The modern section of the city, with
its regular streets and lofty edifices, which, within the past
fifteen years, has arisen under the active hand of the northern
emigrant, presents a striking contrast to the old.
The site of St. Louis is elevated and salubrious, lying
for some miles along the Mississippi upon two broad plateaux
or steppes swelling up gently from the water's edge.
Along the first of these, based upon an exhaustless bed of
limestone, which furnishes material for building, are situated
the lower and central portions of the city, while that
above sweeps away in an extensive prairie of stunted black-jack
oaks to the west. The latter section is already laid out
into streets and building-lots; elegant structures are rapidly
going up, and, at no distant day, this is destined to become
the most courtly and beautiful portion of the city. It is at
a pleasant remove from the dust and bustle of the landing,
[117] while its elevation affords a fine view of the harbour
and opposite shore. Yet, with all its improvements of the
past few years, St. Louis remains emphatically "a little
French city." There is about it a cheerful village air, a
certain rus in rube, to which the grenadier preciseness of
most of our cities is the antipodes. There are but few of
those endless, rectilinear avenues, cutting each other into
broad squares of lofty granite blocks, so characteristic of
the older cities of the North and East, or of those cities of
tramontane origin so rapidly rising within the boundaries
of the valley. There yet remains much in St. Louis
to remind one of its village days; and a stern eschewal
of mathematical, angular exactitude is everywhere beheld.
Until within a few years there was no such thing
as a row of houses; all were disjoined and at a considerable
distance from each other; and every edifice, however central,
could boast its humble stoop, its front-door plat, bedecked
with shrubbery and flowers, and protected from the inroads
of intruding man or beast by its own tall stoccade. All
this is now confined to the southern or French section of
the city; a right Rip Van Winkle-looking region, where each
little steep-roofed cottage yet presents its broad piazza, and
the cosey settee before the door beneath the tree shade, with
the fleshy old burghers soberly luxuriating on an evening
pipe, their dark-eyed, brunette daughters at their side.
There is a delightful air of "old-fashioned comfortableness"
in all this, that reminds us of nothing we have seen in our
own country, but much of the antiquated villages of which
we have [118] been told in the land beyond the waters.
Among those remnants of a former generation which are
yet to be seen in St. Louis are the venerable mansions of
Auguste and Pierre Chouteau, who were among the founders
of the city.100 These extensive mansions stand upon
the principal street, and originally occupied, with their
grounds, each of them an entire square, enclosed by lofty
walls of heavy masonry, with loopholes and watch-towers
for defence. The march of improvement has encroached
upon the premises of these ancient edifices somewhat; yet
they are still inhabited by the posterity of their builders,
and remain, with their massive walls of stone, monuments
of an earlier era.
The site upon which stands St. Louis was selected in
1763 by M. Laclede, a partner of a mercantile association
at New-Orleans, to whom D'Abbadie, Director-general of
the province of Louisiana, had granted the exclusive privilege
of the commerce in furs and peltries with the Indian
tribes of the Upper Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. By
the treaty of that year France had ceded all her possessions
east of the Mississippi to Great Britain, and there was on
the western shore only the small village of Ste. Genevieve.
This was subsequently deemed too distant from the mouth
of the Mississippi to be a suitable depôt and post for the
fur-trade; and Laclede, having surveyed all the neighbouring
region, fixed upon the spot where St. Louis now stands
as a more eligible site. Whether this site was selected by
the flight of birds, by consultation of the entrails of beasts,
or the voice of an oracle; whether by accident [119] or design,
tradition averreth not. Yet sure is it, that under the
concurrence of all these omens, a more favourable selection
could not have been made than this has proved. It is related,
however, that when the founder of the city first planted
foot upon the shore, the imprint of a human foot, naked
and of gigantic dimensions, was found enstamped upon the
solid limestone rock, and continued in regular succession
as if of a man advancing from the water's edge to the plateau
above.101 By a more superstitious age this circumstance
would have been deemed an omen, and, as such,
commemorated in the chronicles of the city. On the 15th
of February, 1764, Colonel Auguste Chouteau, with a number
of persons from Ste. Genevieve, Cahokia, and Fort
Chartres, arrived at the spot, and commenced a settlement
by felling a splendid grove of forest-trees which then reared
itself upon the bank, and erecting a building where the
market-house now stands. The town was then laid off,
and named in honour of Louis XV., the reigning monarch
of France, though the settlers were desirous of giving it the
name of its founder: to this Laclede would not consent.
He died at the post of Arkansas in 1778; Colonel Chouteau
followed him in the month of February of 1829, just sixty-four
years from the founding of the city. He had been a
constant resident, had seen the spot merge from the wilderness,
and had become one of its most opulent citizens.
For many years St. Louis was called "Pain [120] Court,"
from the scarcity of provisions, which circumstance at one
period almost induced the settlers to abandon their design.
In 1765 Fort Chartres was delivered to Great Britain, and
the commandant, St. Ange, with his troops, only twenty-two
in number, proceeded to St. Louis; and assuming the
government, the place was ever after considered the capital
of the province.102 Under the administration of St. Ange,
which is said to have been mild and patriarchal, the common
field was laid open, and each settler became a cultivator of
the soil. This field comprised several thousand acres, lying
upon the second steppe mentioned, and has recently been
divided into lots and sold to the highest bidder. Three
years after the arrival of St. Ange, Spanish troops under
command of Don Rious took possession of the province
agreeable to treaty;103 but, owing to the dissatisfaction of
the inhabitants, no official authority was exercised until 1770.
Thirty years afterward the province was retroceded to France,
and from that nation to the United States. In the spring
of 1778 an attack was made upon the village by a large body
of the northern Indians, at the instigation of the English.
They were repulsed with a loss of about twenty of the settlers,
and the year was commemorated as "L'annee du grand
coup."104 In the spring of 1785, the Mississippi rose thirty
feet above the highest water-mark previously known, and
the American Bottom was inundated. This year was remembered
as "L'annee des grandes eaux."
At that period commerce with New-Orleans, for [121]
the purpose of obtaining merchandise for the fur trade, was
carried on exclusively by keel-boats and barges, which in
the spring started upon their voyage of more than a thousand
miles, and in the fall of the year slowly returned against
the current. This mode of transportation was expensive,
tedious, and unsafe; and it was rendered yet more hazardous
from the murders and robberies of a large band
of free-booters, under two chiefs, Culburt and Magilbray,
who stationed themselves at a place called Cotton Wood
Creek, on the Mississippi, and captured the ascending
boats. This band was dispersed by a little fleet of ten
barges, which, armed with swivels, ascended the river in
company. This year was remembered as "L'annee des
bateaux."105 All the inconvenience of this method of transportation
continued to be experienced until the introduction
of steam upon the Western waters; and the first boat
of this kind which made its appearance at the port of St.
Louis was the "General Pike," in 1814. This boat was
commanded by Captain Jacob Reed, and, at the time of
its arrival, a large body of a neighbouring Indian tribe
chanced to have an encampment in the suburbs of the city.
Their astonishment, and even terror, at first sight of the evolutions
of the steamer, are said to have been indescribable.
They viewed it as nothing less than a living thing; a monster
of tremendous power, commissioned by the "Great
Spirit" for their extermination, and their humiliation was
proportional to their terror. Great opposition was raised
against steamers by the boatmen, some thousands of whom,
by their introduction, would [122] be thrown out of employment;
but this feeling gradually passed away, and now vessels
propelled by steam perform in a few days a voyage
which formerly required as many months. A trip to the city,
as New-Orleans, par excellence, was styled, then demanded
weeks of prior preparation, and a man put his house and
household in order before setting out: now it is an ordinary
jaunt of pleasure. The same dislike manifested by the
old French habitans to the introduction of the steamer or
smoke-boat, "bateau à vapeur," as they termed it, has betrayed
itself at every advance of modern improvement.
Erected, as St. Louis was, with no design of a city, its houses
were originally huddled together with a view to nothing but
convenience; and its streets were laid out too narrow and
too irregular for the bustle and throng of mercantile operations.
In endeavouring to correct this early error, by removing
a few of the old houses and projecting balconies,
great opposition has been encountered. Some degree of
uniformity in the three principal streets parallel to the river
has, however, by this method been attained. Water-street
is well built up with a series of lofty limestone warehouses;
but an irretrievable error has been committed in arranging
them at so short a distance from the water. On some accounts
this proximity to the river may be convenient; but
for the sake of a broad arena for commerce; for the sake of
a fresh and salubrious circulation of air from the water;
for the sake of scenic beauty, or a noble promenade for
pleasure, there should have been no encroachment upon
the precincts [123] of the "eternal river." In view of the
miserable plan of St. Louis, if it may claim anything of
the kind, and the irregular manner and singular taste with
which it has been built, the regret has more than once been
expressed, that, like Detroit,106 a conflagration had not
swept it in its earlier days, and given place to an arrangement
at once more consistent with elegance and convenience.
From the river bank to the elevated ground sweeping off
in the rear of the city to the west is a distance of several
hundred yards, and the height above the level of the
water cannot be far from an hundred feet. The ascent is
easy, however, and a noble view is obtained, from the cupola
of the courthouse on its summit, of the Mississippi and the
city below, of the broad American Bottom, with its bluffs
in the distance, and a beautiful extent of natural scenery in
the rear. Along the brow of this eminence once stood a
line of military works, erected for the defence of the old
town in 1780 by Don Francois de Cruzat, lieutenant governor
"de la partie occidentale des Illinois," as the ancient
chronicles style the region west of the Mississippi.107 These
fortifications consisted of several circular towers of stone,
forty feet in diameter and half as many in altitude, planted
at intervals in a line of stoccade, besides a small fort, embracing
four demilunes and a parapet of mason-work. For
many years these old works were in a dismantled and deserted
state, excepting the fort, in one building of which
was held [124] the court, and another superseded the
necessity of a prison. Almost every vestige is now swept
away. The great earthquakes of 1811 essentially assisted
in toppling the old ruins to the ground. The whole city
was powerfully shaken, and has since been subject to
occasional shocks.108
It is in the northern suburbs of the city that are to be
seen those singular ancient mounds for which St. Louis is
so celebrated; and which, with others in the vicinity, form,
as it were, a connecting link between those of the north,
commencing in the lake counties of Western New-York, and
those of the south, extending deep within the boundaries
of Mexico, forming an unbroken line from one extremity
of the great valley to the other. Their position at St. Louis
is, as usual, a commanding one, upon the second bank, of
which I have spoken, and looking proudly down upon the
Mississippi, along which the line is parallel. They stand
isolated, or distinct from each other, in groups; and the
outline is generally that of a rectangular pyramid, truncated
nearly one half. The first collection originally consisted
of ten tumuli, arranged as three sides of a square area of
about four acres, and the open flank to the west was guarded
by five other small circular earth-heaps, isolated, and forming
the segment of a circle around [125] the opening. This
group is now almost completely destroyed by the grading
of streets and the erection of edifices, and the eastern border
may alone be traced. North of the first collection of
tumuli is a second, four or five in number, and forming two
sides of a square. Among these is one of a very beautiful
form, consisting of three stages, and called the "Falling
Garden." Its elevation above the level of the second plateau
is about four feet, and the area is ample for a dwelling
and yard; from the second it descends to the first plateau
along the river by three regular gradations, the first with
a descent of two feet, the second of ten, and the lower one of
five, each stage presenting a beautiful site for a house. For
this purpose, however, they can never be appropriated, as
one of the principal streets of the city is destined to pass
directly through the spot, the grading for which is already
commenced. The third group of mounds is situated a few
hundred yards above the second, and consists of about a
dozen eminences. A series extends along the west side of
the street, through grounds attached to a classic edifice of
brick, which occupies the principal one; while opposite rise
several of a larger size, upon one of which is situated the
residence of General Ashley, and upon another the reservoir
which supplies the city with water, raised from the Mississippi
by a steam force-pump upon its banks. Both are beautiful
spots, imbowered in forest-trees; and the former, from
its size and structure, is supposed to have been a citadel
or place of defence. [126] In excavating the earth of this
mound, large quantities of human remains, pottery, half-burned
wood, &c., &c., were thrown up; furnishing conclusive
evidence, were any requisite farther than regularity of
outline and relative position, of the artificial origin of these
earth-heaps. About six hundred yards above this group,
and linked with it by several inconsiderable mounds, is
situated one completely isolated, and larger than any yet
described. It is upward of thirty feet in height, about one
hundred and fifty feet long, and upon the summit five feet
wide. The form is oblong, resembling an immense grave;
and a broad terrace or apron, after a descent of a few feet,
spreads out itself on the side looking down upon the river.
From the extensive view of the surrounding region and of
the Mississippi commanded by the site of this mound, as
well as its altitude, it is supposed to have been intended
as a vidette or watch-tower by its builders. Upon its summit,
not many years ago, was buried an Indian chief. He
was a member of a deputation from a distant tribe to the
agency in St. Louis; but, dying while there, his remains,
agreeable to the custom of his tribe, were deposited on the
most commanding spot that could be found. This custom
accounts for the circumstance urged against the antiquity
and artificial origin of these works, that the relics exhumed
are found near the surface, and were deposited by the present
race. But the distinction between the remains found near
the surface and those in the depths of the soil is too palpable
and too [127] notorious to require argument. From
the Big Mound, as it is called, a cordon of tumuli stretch
away to the northwest for several miles along the bluffs
parallel with the river, a noble view of which they command.
They are most of them ten or twelve feet high; many clothed
with forest-trees, and all of them supposed to be tombs.
In removing two of them upon the grounds of Col. O'Fallon,109
immense quantities of bones were exhumed. Similar
mounds are to be found in almost every county in the
state, and those in the vicinity of St. Louis are remarkable
only for their magnitude and the regularity of their relative
positions. It is evident, from these monuments of a
former generation, that the natural advantages of the site
upon which St. Louis now stands were not unappreciated
long before it was pressed by the first European footstep.
It is a circumstance which has often elicited remark from
those who, as tourists, have visited St. Louis, that so little
interest should be manifested by its citizens for those mysterious
and venerable monuments of another race by which
on every side it is environed. When we consider the complete
absence of everything in the character of a public
square or promenade in the city, one would suppose that
individual taste and municipal authority would not have
failed to avail themselves of the moral interest attached to
these mounds and the beauty of their site, to have formed in
their vicinity one of the most attractive spots in the West.
These ancient tumuli could, at no considerable expense,
have been [128] enclosed and ornamented with shrubbery,
and walks, and flowers, and thus preserved for coming generations.
As it is, they are passing rapidly away; man and
beast, as well as the elements, are busy with them, and in a
few years they will quite have disappeared. The practical
utility of which they are available appears the only circumstance
which has attracted attention to them. One has
already become a public reservoir, and measures are in
progress for applying the larger mound to a similar use,
the first being insufficient for the growth of the city. It
need not be said that such indifference of feeling to the
only relics of a by-gone race which our land can boast,
is not well in the citizens of St. Louis, and should exist no
longer; nor need allusion be made to that eagerness of
interest which the distant traveller, the man of literary
taste and poetic fancy, or the devotee of abstruse science,
never fails to betray for these mysterious monuments of the
past, when, in his tour of the Far West, he visits St. Louis;
many a one, too, who has looked upon the century-mossed
ruins of Europe, and to whose eye the castled crags of the
Rhine are not unfamiliar. And surely, to the imaginative
mind, there is an interest which attaches to these venerable
beacons of departed time, enveloped as they are in mystery
inscrutable; and from their origin, pointing, as they do,
down the dim shadowy vista of ages of which the ken of man
telleth not, there is an interest which hallows them even as
the hoary piles of old Egypt are hallowed, and which feudal
Europe, with all her [129] time-sustained battlements, can
never boast. It is the mystery, the impenetrable mystery
veiling these aged sepulchres, which gives them an interest
for the traveller's eye. They are landmarks in the lapse
of ages, beneath whose shadows generations have mouldered,
and around whose summits a gone eternity plays! The
ruined tower, the moss-grown abbey, the damp-stained dungeon,
the sunken arch, the fairy and delicate fragments of
the shattered peristyle of a classic land, or the beautiful
frescoes of Herculaneum and Pompeii—around them time
has indeed flung the silvery mantle of eld while he has
swept them with decay; but their years may be enumerated,
and the circumstances, the authors, and the purposes of
their origin, together with the incidents of their ruin, are
chronicled on History's page for coming generations. But
who shall tell the era of the origin of these venerable earth-heaps,
the race of their builders, the purpose of their erection,
the thousand circumstances attending their rise, history,
desertion? Why now so lone and desolate? Where are
the multitudes that once swarmed the prairie at their
base, and vainly busied themselves in rearing piles which
should exist the wonder of the men of other lands, and
the sole monument of their own memory long after they
themselves were dust? Has war, or famine, or pestilence
brooded over these beautiful plains? or has the fiat of
Omnipotence gone forth that as a race their inhabitants
should exist no longer, and the death-angel been commissioned
to sweep them from off the face of [130] the
earth as if with destruction's besom? We ask: the inquiry
is vain; we are answered not! Their mighty creations
and the tombs of myriads heave up themselves in solemn
grandeur before us; but from the depths of the dusky
earth-heap comes forth no voice to tell us its origin, or
object, or story!
"Ye mouldering relics of a race departed,
Your names have perished; not a trace remains,
Save where the grassgrown mound its summit rears
From the green bosom of your native plains."
Ages since—long ere the first son of the Old World had
pressed the fresh soil of the New; long before the bright
region beyond the blue wave had been the object of the
philosopher's revery by day and the enthusiast's vision by
night—in the deep stillness and solitude of an unpeopled
land, these vast mausoleums rose as now they rise, in lonely
grandeur from the plain, and looked down, even as now
they look, upon the giant flood rolling its dark waters at
their base, hurrying past them to the deep. So has it
been with the massive tombs of Egypt, amid the sands
and barrenness of the desert. For ages untold have the
gloomy pyramids been reflected by the inundations of the
Nile; an hundred generations, they tell us, have arisen
from the cradle and reposed beneath their shadows, and,
like autumn leaves, have dropped into the grave; but from
the deep midnight of by-gone centuries comes forth no
daring spirit to claim these kingly sepulchres as his own!
And shall the dusky piles on the plains of distant Egypt
affect so deeply our reverence for the [131] departed, and
these mighty monuments, reposing in dark sublimity upon
our own magnificent prairies veiled in mystery more inscrutable
than they, call forth no solitary throb? Is there
no hallowing interest associated with these aged relics,
these tombs, and temples, and towers of another race, to
elicit emotion? Are they indeed to us no more than the
dull clods we tread upon? Why, then, does the wanderer
from the far land gaze upon them with wonder and veneration?
Why linger fondly around them, and meditate
upon the power which reared them and is departed? Why
does the poet, the man of genius and fancy, or the philosopher
of mind and nature, seat himself at their base, and,
with strange and undefined emotions, pause and ponder
amid the loneliness which slumbers around? And surely,
if the far traveller, as he wanders through this Western
Valley, may linger around these aged piles and meditate
upon a power departed, a race obliterated, an influence
swept from the earth for ever, and dwell with melancholy
emotions upon the destiny of man, is it not meet that those
into whose keeping they seem by Providence consigned
should regard them with interest and emotion? that they
should gather up and preserve every incident relevant to
their origin, design, or history which may be attained,
and avail themselves of every measure which may give
to them perpetuity, and hand them down, undisturbed in
form or character, to other generations?
The most plausible, and, indeed, the only plausible argument
urged by those who deny the artificial [132] origin of
the ancient mounds, is their immense size. There are, say
they, "many mounds in the West that exactly correspond
in shape with these supposed antiquities, and yet, from
their size, most evidently were not made by man;" and they
add that "it would be well to calculate upon the ordinary
labour of excavating canals, how many hands, with spades,
wheelbarrows, and other necessary implements, it would
take to throw up mounds like the largest of these within
any given time."110 We are told that in the territory of
Wisconsin and in northern Illinois exist mounds to which
these are molehills. Of those, Mount Joliet, Mount Charles,
Sinsinewa, and the Blue Mounds vary from one to four
hundred feet in height; while west of the Arkansas exists
a range of earth-heaps ten or twelve miles in extent, and
two hundred feet high: there also, it might be added, are
the Mamelle Mountains, estimated at one thousand feet.111
The adjacent country is prairie; farms exist on the summits
of the mounds, which from their declivity are almost inaccessible,
and springs gush out from their sides. With but
one exception I profess to know nothing of these mounds
from personal observation; and, consequently, can hazard
no opinion of their character. The fact of the "gushing
springs," it is true, [133] savours not much of artificialness;
and in this respect, at least, do these mounds differ
from those claimed as of artificial origin. The earth-heaps
of which I have been speaking can boast no "springs of
water gushing from their sides;" if they could, the fact
would be far from corroborating the theory maintained.
The analogy between these mounds is admitted to be
strong, though there exist diversities; and were there none,
even Bishop Butler says that we are not to infer a thing
true upon slight presumption, since "there may be
probabilities on both sides of a question." From what has
been advanced relative to the character of the mounds
spoken of, it is believed that the probabilities strongly preponderate
in favour of their artificial origin, even admitting
their perfect analogy to those "from whose sides gush
the springs." But more anon.
St. Louis.