Bayes. Sir, it is not within my small capacity to do favours,
but receive 'em; especially from a person that does wear the
honourable title you are pleased to impose, sir, upon this—sweet
sir, your servant.
Smith. Your humble servant, sir.
Johns. But wilt thou do me a favour, now?
Bayes. Ay, sir, what is't?
Johns. Why, to tell him the meaning of thy last play.
Bayes. How, sir, the meaning? Do you mean the plot?
Johns. Ay, ay; anything.
Bayes. Faith, sir, the intrigo's now quite out of my head; but
I have a new one in my pocket that I may say is a virgin; it
has never yet been blown upon. I must tell you one thing: 'tis
all new wit, and, though I say it, a better than my last; and you
know well enough how that took. In fine, it shall read, and
write, and act, and plot, and show, ay, and pit, box, and gallery,
egad, with any play in Europe.[1] This morning is its last
rehearsal, in their habits, and all that, as it is to be acted; and
if you and your friend will do it but the honour to see it in its
virgin attire; though, perhaps, it may blush, I shall not be
ashamed to discover its nakedness unto you. I think it is in
this pocket. [Puts his hand in his pocket.
Johns. Sir, I confess I am not able to answer you in this new
way; but if you please to lead, I shall be glad to follow you, and
I hope my friend will do so too.
Smith. Sir, I have no business so considerable as should keep
me from your company.
Bayes. Yes, here it is. No, cry you mercy: this is my book of
Drama Commonplaces, the mother of many other plays.
Johns. Drama Commonplaces! pray what's that?
Bayes. Why, sir, some certain helps that we men of art have
found it convenient to make use of.
Smith. How, sir, helps for wit?
Bayes. Ay, sir, that's my position. And I do here aver that
no man yet the sun e'er shone upon has parts sufficient to
furnish out a stage, except it were by the help of these my rules.[2]
Johns. What are those rules, I pray?
Bayes. Why, sir, my first rule is the rule of transversion, or
Regula Duplex; changing verse into prose, or prose into verse,
alternativè as you please.
Smith. Well; but how is this done by a rule, sir?
Bayes. Why thus, sir; nothing so easy when understood. I
take a book in my hand, either at home or elsewhere, for that's
all one; if there be any wit in't, as there is no book but has
some, I transverse it; that is, if it be prose, put it into verse
(but that takes up some time), and if it be verse, put it into
prose.
Johns. Methinks, Mr. Bayes, that putting verse into prose
should be called transprosing.
Bayes. By my troth, sir, 'tis a very good notion; and hereafter
it shall be so.
Smith. Well, sir, and what d'ye do with it then?
Bayes. Make it my own. 'Tis so changed that no man can
know it. My next rule is the rule of record, by way of table-book.
Pray observe.
Johns. We hear you, sir; go on.
Bayes. As thus. I come into a coffee-house, or some other
place where witty men resort, I make as if I minded nothing;
do you mark? but as soon as any one speaks, pop I slap it down,
and make that too my own.
Johns. But, Mr. Bayes, are you not sometimes in danger of
their making you restore, by force, what you have gotten thus by
art?
Bayes. No, sir; the world's unmindful: they never take
notice of these things.
Smith. But pray, Mr. Bayes, among all your other rules, have
you no one rule for invention?
Bayes. Yes, sir, that's my third rule that I have here in my
pocket.
Smith. What rule can that be, I wonder?
Bayes. Why, sir, when I have anything to invent, I never
trouble my head about it, as other men do; but presently turn
over this book, and there I have, at one view, all that Persius,
Montaigne, Seneca's Tragedies, Horace, Juvenal, Claudian,
Pliny, Plutarch's Lives, and the rest, have ever thought upon
this subject: and so, in a trice, by leaving out a few words, or
putting in others of my own, the business is done.
Johns. Indeed, Mr. Bayes, this is as sure and compendious a
way of wit as ever I heard of.
Bayes. Sir, if you make the least scruples of the efficacy of
these my rules, do but come to the playhouse, and you shall
judge of 'em by the effects.
Smith. We'll follow you, sir. [Exeunt.
Enter three Players on the stage.
1st Play. Have you your part perfect?
2nd Play. Yes, I have it without book; but I don't understand
how it is to be spoken.
3rd Play. And mine is such a one, as I can't guess for my
life what humour I'm to be in; whether angry, melancholy,
merry, or in love. I don't know what to make on't.
1st Play. Phoo! the author will be here presently, and he'll
tell us all. You must know, this is the new way of writing, and
these hard things please forty times better than the old plain
way. For, look you, sir, the grand design upon the stage is to
keep the auditors in suspense; for to guess presently at the plot,
and the sense, tires them before the end of the first act: now
here, every line surprises you, and brings in new matter. And
then, for scenes, clothes, and dances, we put quite down all that
ever went before us; and those are the things, you know, that
are essential to a play.
2nd Play. Well, I am not of thy mind; but, so it gets us
money, 'tis no great matter.
Enter Bayes, Johnson, and Smith.
Bayes. Come, come in, gentlemen. You're very welcome,
Mr.—a—. Ha' you your part ready?
1st Play. Yes, sir.
Bayes. But do you understand the true humour of it?
1st Play. Ay, sir, pretty well.
Bayes. And Amaryllis, how does she do? does not her armour
become her?
3rd Play. Oh, admirably!
Bayes. I'll tell you now a pretty conceit. What do you think
I'll make 'em call her anon, in this play?
Smith. What, I pray?
Bayes. Why, I make 'em call her Armaryllis, because of her
armour: ha, ha, ha!
Johns. That will be very well indeed.
Bayes. Ay, 'tis a pretty little rogue; but—a—come, let's
sit down. Look you, sirs, the chief hinge of this play, upon
which the whole plot moves and turns, and that causes the
variety of all the several accidents, which, you know, are
the things in nature that make up the grand refinement of
a play, is, that I suppose two kings of the same place; as for
example, at Brentford, for I love to write familiarly. Now the
people having the same relations to 'em both, the same affections,
the same duty, the same obedience, and all that, are
divided among themselves in point of devoir and interest, how
to behave themselves equally between 'em: these kings differing
sometimes in particular; though, in the main, they agree. (I know
not whether I make myself well understood.)
Johns. I did not observe you, sir: pray say that again.
Bayes. Why, look you, sir (nay, I beseech you be a little
curious in taking notice of this, or else you'll never understand
my notion of the thing), the people being embarrass'd by their
equal ties to both, and the sovereigns concern'd in a reciprocal
regard, as well to their own interest, as the good of the people,
make a certain kind of a—you understand me—upon which,
there do arise several disputes, turmoils, heart-burnings, and all
that—in fine, you'll apprehend it better when you see it.
[Exit, to call the Players.
Smith. I find the author will be very much obliged to the
players, if they can make any sense out of this.
Enter Bayes.
Bayes. Now, gentlemen, I would fain ask your opinion of one
thing. I have made a prologue and an epilogue, which may
both serve for either; that is, the prologue for the epilogue, or
the epilogue for the prologue;[3] (do you mark?) nay, they may
both serve too, egad, for any other play as well as this.
Smith. Very well; that's indeed artificial.
Bayes. And I would fain ask your judgments, now, which of
them would do best for the prologue? for, you must know there
is, in nature, but two ways of making very good prologues: the
one is by civility, by insinuation, good language, and all that, to—a—in
a manner, steal your plaudit from the courtesy of the
auditors: the other, by making use of some certain personal
things, which may keep a hank upon such censuring persons, as
cannot otherways, egad, in nature, be hindered from being too
free with their tongues. To which end, my first prologue is,
that I come out in a long black veil, and a great huge hangman
behind me, with a furr'd cap, and his sword drawn; and there
tell 'em plainly, that if out of good-nature, they will not like my
play, egad, I'll e'en kneel down, and he shall cut my head off.
Whereupon they all clapping—a—
Smith. Ay, but suppose they don't.
Bayes. Suppose! sir, you may suppose what you please; I
have nothing to do with your suppose, sir; nor am at all
mortified at it; not at all, sir; egad, not one jot, sir. Suppose,
quoth-a!—ha, ha, ha! [Walks away.
Johns. Phoo! prithee, Bayes, don't mind what he says; he is
a fellow newly come out of the country, he knows nothing of
what's the relish, here, of the town.
Bayes. If I writ, sir, to please the country, I should have
follow'd the old plain way; but I write for some persons of
quality, and peculiar friends of mine, that understand what
flame and power in writing is; and they do me the right, sir, to
approve of what I do.
Johns. Ay, ay, they will clap, I warrant you; never fear it.
Bayes. I'm sure the design's good; that cannot be denied.
And then, for language, egad, I defy 'em all, in nature, to mend
it. Besides, sir, I have printed above a hundred sheets of
paper to insinuate the plot into the boxes;[4] and, withal, have
appointed two or three dozen of my friends to be ready in the
pit, who, I'm sure, will clap, and so the rest, you know, must
follow; and then, pray, sir, what becomes of your suppose? Ha,
ha, ha!
Johns. Nay, if the business be so well laid, it cannot miss.
Bayes. I think so, sir; and therefore would choose this to be
the prologue. For, if I could engage 'em to clap, before they
see the play, you know it would be so much the better; because
then they were engag'd; for let a man write ever so well, there
are, now-a-days, a sort of persons they call critics, that, egad,
have no more wit in them than so many hobby-horses; but
they'll laugh at you, sir, and find fault, and censure things that,
egad, I'm sure, they are not able to do themselves. A sort of
envious persons that emulate the glories of persons of parts,
and think to build their fame by calumniating of persons[5] that,
egad, to my knowledge, of all persons in the world, are, in
nature, the persons that do as much despise all that as—a— In
fine, I'll say no more of 'em.
Johns. Nay, you have said enough of 'em, in all conscience;
I'm sure more than they'll e'er be able to answer.
Bayes. Why, I'll tell you, sir, sincerely and bonâ fide, were it
not for the sake of some ingenious persons and choice female
spirits, that have a value for me, I would see 'em all hang'd,
egad, before I would e'er more set pen to paper, but let 'em
live in ignorance like ingrates.
Johns. Ay, marry! that were a way to be reveng'd of 'em
indeed; and, if I were in your place, now, I would do so.
Bayes. No, sir; there are certain ties upon me that I cannot
be disengag'd from;[6] otherwise, I would. But pray, sir, how do
you like my hangman?
Smith. By my troth, sir, I should like him very well.
Bayes. By how do you like it, sir? (for, I see, you can judge)
would you have it for a prologue, or the epilogue?
Johns. Faith, sir, 'tis so good, let it e'en serve for both.
Bayes. No, no; that won't do. Besides, I have made another.
Johns. What other, sir?
Bayes. Why, sir, my other is Thunder and Lightning.
Johns. That's greater; I'd rather stick to that.
Bayes. Do you think so? I'll tell you then; tho' there have
been many witty prologues written of late, yet, I think, you'll
say this is a non pareillo: I'm sure nobody has hit upon it yet.
For here, sir, I make my prologue to be a dialogue; and as, in
my first, you see, I strive to oblige the auditors by civility, by
good nature, good language, and all that; so, in this, by the
other way, in terrorem, I choose for the persons Thunder and
Lightning. Do you apprehend the conceit?
Johns. Phoo, phoo! then you have it cock-sure. They'll be
hang'd before they'll dare affront an author that has 'em at that
lock.
Bayes. I have made, too, one of the most delicate dainty
similes in the whole world, egad, if I knew but how to apply it.
Smith. Let's hear it, I pray you.