“There! I have finished
my sketch of the sloping field, and the misty strip of woodland
above, in its autumn dress, by putting you in in the foreground,
the only living thing in my misty-autumn picture; though, after
all, you don’t look much more than a brown spot on the
green, with your brown hat and skirt and your old brown
book. I am much obliged to it for keeping you still so long
this misty morning. What is there in it?”
“Sketches,” I answered. “Misty
sketches like this of yours.” And I stretched out my
hand for my cousin’s drawing, while she looked over my
shoulder down on to the volume on my knee and uttered an
exclamation of surprise when her eye fell on nothing but black
letters on a damp spotted yellow page.
“‘Treating of the four complexions, into which men
are bound during their sojourn in their earthly
houses,’” she read aloud; “what does it
mean? Let me look on. ‘Of those that draw their
complexion from the dark and melancholy earth. Of those who
take their complexion from the friendly air. Of those who
are complexioned after the manner of fire. Of those who
partake of the nature of the subtle and yielding water;’
who writes this queer stuff; is it sense or
nonsense?” I held up the book that she might read the
faded gilt letters on its wormeaten leather back. “Letters of Jacob Böhme to John Schauffman
and others,” she read. “Oh!”—rather
a doubtful “oh!” it was, as if the name did not
settle the question about sense or nonsense as completely as she
had expected it would.
“This is rather a rare book I flatter myself,” I
went on. “I bought it at a book-stall because it
looked so odd and old, and found to my great joy that it was a
miscellaneous collection of Jacob Böhme’s letters, on
all sorts of subjects; the four that I have been reading this
morning about the four different temperaments, or, as he calls
it, complexions into which men may be divided, come in oddly
enough among much more mystical and transcendental matter.
They are, as I said, misty sketches of character, but I think
they show that the dreamy old cobbler knew something about his
fellow-men.”
K. “What are Jacob Böhme’s
writings like?”
“Oh, I can’t tell you that, I can only tell you
what it makes one feel like to read them. Something, as we
should feel, you and I, if we climbed up to that peak above the
wood there, and looked down on the mist in the valley now the sun
is gilding it. We should have a vague feeling of having got
up on to a height, and perceived something glorious; but we
should not be able to give much account of what we had seen when
we came down.”
K. “But I hope you will be able to give me
an account of what you have been reading to-day. I want you
to explain to me about the four complexions as we walk
home.”
“Well, I will try; these four letters have something in
them that one can get hold of and venture to put into fresh
words. You must remember, to begin with, that Böhme
still held to there being only four elements—earth, air,
fire, and water—and thought that everything, our bodies
included, was made up of various proportions of these elemental
substances—the soul, a pure indivisible essence, he thinks
of as living imprisoned in these compound bodies. Shadowed
and clouded and hindered in its work by the material form that
shuts it in from the true fount of being; individualizing it and
debasing it at the same time. Character, according to him,
depends upon the element that preponderates in the composition of
our bodies; our souls work through it and are more or less
free. His theory of the causes of differences of character
may be ever so foolish, yet I think the classification he draws
from it is interesting, and does somehow or other help us to
understand ourselves and our fellow-creatures a little
better.”
K. “Let me see, he divides people into
earth, air, fire, and water people. What sort of character
does he suppose the earth element colours the soul
with?”
“You are quite right to use the word colour,
Böhme thinks of the complexion, or, as we should say, the
humour of a person, as of an independent atmosphere
through which the soul works, but which is no part of it.
He speaks of souls shut up in the dark and melancholy earth
element; these are the silent, sensitive, brooding people, who
find it very difficult either to give out or receive impressions
to or from their fellow-creatures. They are shut up, and as
the earth (so at least Böhme says) draws a great deal more
heat and light from the sun than it ever gives back, and darkly
absorbs and stores up heat within itself, so these earth men and
women, separated from their fellows, have the power of drawing
great enlightenment and deep warmth of love direct from
the spiritual source of light and love. Religious
enthusiasts are all of this class; Böhme was an earth person
himself, he says so; so was Dante and John Bunyan, and all the
other people one reads of who have had terrible experiences in the depths
of their own souls and ecstatic visions to comfort them.
Böhme says that the very best and the very worst people are
those shut in by the earth. They are the most
individual, the most thoroughly separated; if conquering
this hindrance, they re-absorb the Divine into themselves by
direct vision; they rise to heights of wisdom, love, and
self-sacrifice that no other souls can reach; but if by pride and
self-will they cut themselves from spiritual influences, they
remain solitary, dark, hungry, always striving vainly to extract
the light and warmth they want from some one or two of their
fellow-creatures, and being constantly disappointed, because, not
having the power of ray-ing out love, they can rarely attract
it. They are eaten up by a sad dark egotism. If they
have a great deal of intellect they throw themselves vehemently
into some one pursuit or study, and become great but never
happy.”
K. “I am thankful to say I don’t know
any earth people.”
“Nor do I, pure earth, but I think I have come across
one or two with a touch of earth in their temperaments. The
air folk are much more common. They are the eager
inquisitive people, who want to get into everything and
understand everything, just as the air pervades and permeates all
creation. Great lovers of knowledge and scientific
observers must always be air people. Böhme thinks that
in spite of their not being generally very spiritual, they have
the best chance of getting to heaven, because of all classes they
have most sympathy and are least shut up in themselves, getting
everywhere, like their element the air: they get into the souls
of others and understand them and live in them. Their
influence is of a very peculiar kind; not being very individual,
they don’t impress the people round them with a strong
sense of their personality; they are not loved passionately, and
they don’t love passionately, but people turn to them to be
understood and helped, and they are always benevolently ready to
understand and help. They are satisfied that their
influence should be breathed like the air, without being more
recognized than the air: Shakespeare was, I expect, a typical
air man. He had been everywhere, into all sorts of
souls, peering about, and understanding them all, and how little
any one seems to have known about himself! He was separated
as little as possible from the universal fount of
Being.”
K. “Socrates was an air man too I
suppose? Your air people would be all
philosophers.”
“More or less lovers of knowledge they must be; but
remember that temperament does not affect the quality of the soul
itself, it is only more or less of a hindrance. The
peculiar faults of air people are, as you will imagine,
fickleness and coldness; their sympathy partakes of the nature of
curiosity, and they easily adapt themselves to changes of
circumstance; they can as easily live in one person as in
another, and the love of knowledge in little souls would
degenerate into restless curiosity and fussiness.”
K. “Would not Goethe be as good a type of
the air temperament as Shakespeare? He certainly had the
besetting faults of the complexion, fickleness and
coldness.”
“Yes, but the great influence he exercised over his
contemporaries, points to his drawing something too from the fire
nature.”
K. “Those complexioned after the manner of
the fire are, I suppose, the warm-hearted, affectionate
souls?”
“Not at all; Böhme would not have consented to lay
hold of such an obvious analogy. He dives deeper into fire
characteristics than to think chiefly of its warmth. It is above
all a consuming element; it takes substances of all kinds and
transmutes them into itself, a greedy devourer, reckless of the
value of what it takes, intent only on increasing and maintaining
itself. The fire people are the ambitious conquerors and
rulers of the world, who by the strength and attractive warmth of
their own natures force others to bend to them and become
absorbed in their projects. They are in reality as great
egotists as the earth people, only they don’t keep their
egotism at smouldering fever heat in their own hearts; they let
it blaze forth into a living flame, which draws weaker natures to
be consumed in it, or at least forces them to live only in its
heat and light. Napoleon Bonaparte, I think, might stand
for a typical fire man. In women the fire nature shows
rather differently: pure fire women have acted very conspicuous
parts in the world’s history, and generally very disastrous
ones, they are the women who inspire great passions and feel very
little themselves. They draw others to them for the sake of
homage to add to their own light. Madame de Chevreuse and
Madame de Longueville must have been pure fire women, I should
say. Don’t suppose, however, that the fire, more than
any other temperament, secures greatness or real superiority; it
enables those who follow its complexion to impress themselves
more on other people than the air spirits can, but their
influence may be only temporary, and it may be very disagreeable,
and in the end repelling. Don’t you know people, both
men and women, who have a mysterious way of making their will
felt, and who always count for something in whatever society they
are in as long as they are present, but who leave no permanent
impression? Those I suppose would be, according to
Böhme, stupid souls acting through the fire
temperament. The influence of the air souls, inconspicuous
as it is,
is more permanent. Like the air it nourishes and changes
without destroying; air people give more than they take.
Fire people take more than they give.”
K. “And now what are the water
followers? I hope we are coming to some amiable, pleasant
people at last, for you have not described anything very
attractive yet.”
“I am afraid you will like the water complexion least of
all, and be obliged to acknowledge too that ‘the subtle and
yielding water’ has more followers than any of the other
elements. The water element has a sort of resemblance to
the air element; it mimics it without having its power.
Water people are that large majority of mankind who have too weak
a hold on life to be anything very distinctive of
themselves. They simulate living and thinking, rather than
really think and live. Just as water receives impressions
in itself that it cannot clasp and hold, that seem to be part of
it and are not. They are easily influenced by
others—by air people for example; but they only
image their thoughts in themselves. They look like
them when they are with them, and when the influence is removed
they are empty like a lake when a veil of clouds is drawn over
the sky. The distinctive mark of water people is that they
are self-conscious, they are always thinking of
themselves, because they live a sort of double
life—occupied not only with what they are doing but with
the thought that they actually are doing it. Unconsciously
they are continually acting a part. They have notions about
themselves and act up to them. They see themselves in
different lights, and everything else as it concerns
themselves. Seeing not the real thing, but the thing
reflected in themselves. You must know such people, though
they are difficult to describe, and I cannot just now think of
any historical typical water person to help out my
description. Perhaps Napoleon the Third would do. I
think he must be what Böhme meant by ‘those who
partake of the nature of the subtle and yielding nature;’
and, by the way, Böhme does not describe the water people as
really yielding; on the contrary, he says they are very
persistent. In a slow, obstinate way, by seeming to yield
and always returning to the point from which they had been
diverging (always finding their own level) they have more power
than the followers of any of the other elements.”
K. “Is there nothing good about these poor
water creatures? Have they no redeeming
qualities?”
“Oh yes! The water temperament conduces to
industry and perseverance. Water men and women are very
good imitators, not actors, and do most of the second-rate work
in the world. They are not un-sympathizing. Like air
people, they take in easily the thoughts and lives of others,
only they are always conscious of taking them in; they
don’t lose themselves in others, as it is possible for the
air followers to do. While they sympathize, they think how
nice it is to be sympathetic; or, if they are women, perhaps the
thought is how interesting I look while I am listening to this
sad story.”
K. “Come now, I believe you have some
particular water person in your mind, for you are getting
satirical. It is well we are nearly home. What I
can’t understand is, why all the four complexions have so
much that is disagreeable in them. In which class would
Böhme put really good and noble people?”
“They might come into any one of the four classes.
You must remember that according to Böhme the temperament is
an outer material atmosphere surrounding the soul, and of
necessity partly evil, because it is material; the pure soul has
to work through it, and conquer it, according to
Böhme.”