About the middle of January 1762, a gentleman
was sent for to the house of one Parsons, the officiating
parish clerk of St. Sepulchre's, in Cock
Lane, near West Smithfield, to be witness to the
noises, and other extraordinary circumstances, attending
the supposed presence of a spirit, that, for
two years preceding, had been heard in the night,
to the great terror of the family. This knocking
and scratching was always heard under the bed
where the children lay; the eldest was about
twelve years of age. To find out the cause, Mr.
Parsons, the parish-clerk, ordered the wainscot to
be taken down; which was accordingly done:
but the noise, instead of ceasing, as he hoped, became
more violent than ever. The children were
afterwards removed into the two-pair of stairs
room, where the same noise followed, and was frequently
heard all night.
From these circumstances it was apprehended
that the house was haunted; and the other child declared,
that she, some time ago, had seen the apparition
of a woman, surrounded, as it were, with a
blazing light. About two years prior to which, a
publican in the neighbourhood, bringing a pot of
beer into the house, about eleven o'clock at night,
was so frightened that he let the beer fall, upon
seeing on the stairs, as he was looking up, a bright
shining figure of a woman, by which he saw
through a window into the charity-school, and
saw the dial in the school. The figure passed by
him, and beckoned him to follow; but he was too
much terrified to obey its directions: he ran home,
and was very sick. Soon after, Mr. Parsons himself,
having occasion to go into another room, saw
the same appearance. Both these happened
within the space of an hour.
To throw some light upon this very mysterious
affair, we shall begin with the narrative of
Mr. Brown, of Amen Corner, published January
23d, 1762; the substance of which is as follows—
That in 1759, one Mr. K—— employed an agent
to carry a letter to a young gentlewoman of a reputable
family in Norfolk, and to bring her up to
London in a post-chaise, if she would be willing
to come. That she did come; but Mr. K——
being at Greenwich, she followed him there directly,
and was received by him, after a journey
of one hundred miles performed in one day, with
much tenderness. After some short stay at Greenwich,
where it was thought necessary that she
should make a will in his favour, she was removed
to a lodging near the Mansion-House; from thence
to lodgings, behind St. Sepulchre's church; and,
lastly, to a house in Bartlett Court, in the parish
of Clerkenwell. Here, in 1760, she was taken ill
of the small-pox; and, on or about the 31st of
January, her sister, who lived reputably in Pall-Mall,
was first made acquainted with her illness,
and place of residence. Being greatly concerned
thus to hear of her, she went immediately, and
found her in a fair way of doing well; next day she
sent, and received a favourable account of her;
but, on the morning following, word was brought
that her sister was dead. She died February 2d,
1760; and was buried, in two or three days after,
at the church of St. John, Clerkenwell. Her sister,
attending her funeral, was surprised at not
seeing a plate upon the coffin, and expressed that
surprise to Mr. Brown after the funeral was over;
lamenting, at the same time, she had not been permitted
to see her sister's corpse, the coffin being
screwed down before she came. She added, that
K—— had married one of her sisters, and had
ruined the other, who was buried by the name of ——,
as appears by the parish register. By the
will already mentioned, K—— availed himself of
her fortune, to the prejudice of her brother and
sisters, who all lived in perfect harmony until this
unhappy affair happened.
Such is the account given by Mr. Brown, of
Amen Corner. A worthy clergyman, however,
who attended her several times, and who administered
to her the last comforts of his function,
declares, that the small-pox with which she was
seized, was of the confluent sort; and that the
gentleman of the faculty, who attended her, had
pronounced her irrecoverable some days before
her death.
It was, however, the ghost of this person, that
Parsons declared had taken possession of his girl,
a child about twelve years old, who lay with the
deceased in the absence of her supposed husband,
when he was in the country at a wedding; and
then it was, that the knocking was first heard, to
the great terror of this child, she frequently crying
out that she might not be taken away. Soon after,
this woman died, whose apparition was now supposed
to appear to this same child; and, in answer
to the question put to her, What was the occasion
of the first knocking, &c. before she died? answered,
that it was the spirit of her sister, the first
wife of Mr. K——, who was husband to them
both.
Having now sufficiently prepared the reader,
we shall proceed in our narrative. The gentleman
already said to have been sent for, attended, and
found the child in bed; and, the spirit being at
hand, several questions were put to it by the father,
which, to avoid repetition, we shall relate
hereafter. The gentleman not caring to pronounce
too hastily upon what appeared to him extraordinary,
got some friends together, among whom were
two or three clergymen, about twenty other
persons, and two negroes, who sat up another
night.
They first thoroughly examined the bed, bed-clothes,
&c.; and, being satisfied that there was
no visible appearance of deceit, the child with its
sister was put into bed, which was found to shake
extremely by the gentleman who had placed himself
at the foot of it. Among others, the following
questions were asked—
Whether her disturbance was occasioned by any
ill-treatment from Mr. K——?—Yes.
Whether she was brought to an untimely end
by poison?—Yes.
In what was the poison administered, beer or
purl?—Purl.
How long before her death?—Three hours.
Is the person called Carrots, able to give information
about the poison?—Yes.
Whether she was K——'s wife's sister?—Yes.
Whether she was married to K——?—No.
Whether any other person than K—— was
concerned in the poisoning?—No.
Whether she could visibly appear to any one?—Yes.
Whether she would do so?—Yes.
Whether she could go out of that house?—Yes.
Whether she would follow the child everywhere?—Yes.
Whether she was pleased at being asked questions?—Yes.
Whether it eased her mind?—Yes. (Here a
mysterious noise, compared to the fluttering of
wings round the room, was heard.)
How long before her death had she told Carrots
(her servant) that she was poisoned?—One hour.
(Here Carrots, who was admitted to be one of the
company on Tuesday night, asserted that the deceased
had not told her so, she being at that time
speechless.)
How long did Carrots live with her?—Three or
four days. (Carrots attested the truth of this.)
Whether, if the accused should be taken up, he
would confess?—Yes.
Whether she should be at ease in her mind, if
the man was hanged?—Yes.
How long it would be before he would be executed?—Three
years.
How many clergymen were in the room?—Three.
How many negroes?—Two.
Whether she could distinguish the person of any
one in the room?—Yes.
Whether the colour of a watch held up by one of
the clergymen was white, yellow, blue, or black?—Black.
(The watch was in a black shagreen case.)
At what time she would depart in the morning?—At
four o'clock.
Accordingly, at this hour the noise removed to
the Wheat-sheaf, a public-house at the distance of
a few doors, in the bed-chamber of the landlord
and landlady, to the great affright and terror of
them both. Such was the manner of interrogating
the spirit: the answer was given by knocking or
scratching. An affirmative was one knock; a
negative, two. Displeasure was expressed by
scratching.
Nothing more occurred till the following morning,
when the knocking began about seven o'clock.
But, notwithstanding some extraordinary answers
to the several questions proposed, it was still a
matter of doubt whether the whole was not a piece
of imposition; and it was resolved to remove the
child elsewhere. Accordingly, instead of its being
carried home, it was conveyed to a house in Crown-and-Cushion
Court, at the upper end of Cow Lane,
near Smithfield, where two clergymen, several gentlemen,
and some ladies, assembled in the evening.
About eleven o'clock the knocking began; when
a gentleman in the room, speaking angrily to the
girl, and hinting that he suspected it was some
trick of her's, the child was uneasy, and cried:
on which the knocking was heard louder, and much
faster than before; but no answer could be obtained
to any question while that gentleman staid
in the room.
After he was gone, the noise ceased: and nothing
was heard till a little after twelve o'clock,
when the child was seized with a trembling and
shivering; in which manner she had always been
affected, on the departure as well as the approach
of the ghost. Upon this, one of the company
asked, whether it would return again, and at what
time? Answer was made in the usual manner by
knocks, that it would return again before seven in
the morning; and then a noise, like the fluttering
of wings, was heard; after which all was quiet till
between six and seven on Friday morning, when
the knocking began again.
A little before seven, two clergymen came, when
the fluttering noise was repeated, which in this
strange affair was considered as a mark of the spirit's
being pleased. Then several questions, particularly
one, by a gentlewoman who was an acquaintance
of the deceased, who came out of mere
curiosity, and had been to see her some time
before she died: the question was, How many days
it was before her death, that this gentlewoman
came to see her? The answer given was three
knocks, signifying three days; which was exactly
right. Another question was, Whether some of
the then company had not a relation that had
been buried in the same vault where she lay? To
which it replied by one knock, Yes. They asked,
severally, if it was their relation? To all of which,
except the last, she answered by two knocks,
meaning No; but to the last person she gave one
knock, which was right. These two circumstances
greatly alarmed all the company.
Near twenty persons sat up in the room: but it
was not till about six o'clock in the morning that
the first alarm was given, which coming spontaneously,
as well as suddenly, a good deal struck the
imagination of the auditors. The scratches were
compared to that of a cat upon a cane chair. The
child now appeared to be in a sound sleep, and
nothing further could be obtained. It had been
observed, in conversation, by a person who expressed
himself pretty warmly on the subject, that
the whole was an imposture, and more to the same
purpose; which gave rise to some sharp altercation
among the company—some believing, and others
disbelieving the reality of the apparition. This dispute
was no sooner begun, than the spirit was gone;
and no more knocking and scratching was to be
heard.
About seven o'clock the girl seemed to awake
in a violent fit of crying and tears. Upon being
asked the occasion, and assured that nothing of
harm should happen to her, she declared that her
tears were the effect of her imagination at what
would become of her daddy, who must needs be
ruined and undone, if this matter should be supposed
to be an imposture. She was told, that the
company had looked upon her as in a sound sleep
when the above dispute happened. To which she
replied, "Aye, but not so sound but that I could
hear all you said."
On the Sunday night following, the girl lay at a
house opposite the school-house in Cock Lane; at
which place a person of distinction, two clergymen,
and several other persons, were present. Between
ten and eleven o'clock the knocking began: the
principal questions and answers were the same as
those already mentioned; but among some new
ones of little consequence, was the following?—Will
you attend the girl at any place whither she
may be appointed to be carried, by authority?
Answered in the affirmative. At eleven o'clock,
eleven distinct knocks were heard; and at twelve,
when being asked if it was going away, and when
it would return again, seven knocks were given.
Accordingly, when St. Sepulchre's clock struck
seven, on Monday morning, this invisible agent
knocked the same number of times. Some few
questions were asked at this meeting, much to the
same purport as those above inserted, and answered
in the same manner. Every person was put out
of the room, who could be supposed to have the
least connexion with the girl: her hands were
laid over the bed-clothes, and the bed narrowly
looked under, &c. but no discovery was made.
On the night of the 1st of February, many gentlemen,
eminent for their rank and character, were,
by the invitation of the Reverend Mr. Aldrich, of
Clerkenwell, assembled at his house, for the examination
of the noises supposed to be made by a
departed spirit for the detection of some enormous
crime.
About ten at night, the gentlemen met in the
chamber, in which the girl supposed to be disturbed
by a spirit had, with proper caution, been
put to bed by several ladies. They sat with her
rather more than an hour; and, hearing nothing,
went down stairs, when they interrogated the father
of the girl, who denied, in the strongest terms, any
knowledge or belief of fraud.
The supposed spirit had before publicly promised,
by an affirmative knock, that it would attend
one of the gentlemen into the vault under the
church of St. John, Clerkenwell, where the body
was deposited; and give a token of her presence
there, by a knock upon her coffin: it was, therefore,
determined to make this trial of the existence
or veracity of the supposed spirit.
While they were inquiring and deliberating,
they were summoned into the girl's chamber by
the ladies who remained near her bed, and who
heard knocks and scratches. When the gentlemen
entered, the girl declared that she felt the
spirit like a mouse upon her back, and was required
to hold her hands out of bed. From that time,
though the spirit was very solemnly required to
manifest its existence, by appearance, by impression
on the hand or body of any person present,
by scratches, knocks, or any other agency, no
evidence of any preternatural power was exhibited.
The spirit was then very seriously advertised,
that the person to whom the promise was made, of
striking the coffin, was then about to visit the
vault, and that the performance of the promise
was then claimed. The company, at one o'clock,
went into the church; and that gentleman, to
whom the promise was made, went, with one
more, into the vault. The spirit was very solemnly
required to perform its promise, but nothing more
than silence ensued: the person supposed to be
accused by the spirit then went down, with several
others, but no effect was perceived. Upon their
return, they examined the girl, but could draw no
confession from her. Between two and three,
she desired, and was permitted, to go home with
her father.
No doubt now remained of the fallacy of this
spirit. It was supposed that the girl was practised
in the art of ventriloquism, an art better known
now than formerly; but it was soon after discovered
that there was not so much ingenuity in the
fraud.
A bed was slung like a hammock, in the middle
of a room, at a gentleman's house, where
the girl was sent. The servants were ordered to
watch her narrowly; and, about a quarter of an
hour before bed-time, she was observed to conceal
something under her clothes. Information of this
being given to the gentlemen attending, they were
of opinion, that a connivance at the beginning of
the scene would be the most likely means of leading
them to a full discovery of the fact. In the
morning, about six o'clock, the knockings came,
and answered to questions as usual, but in so
different a sound, that it was very apparent this
method of operating was a fresh contrivance.
When the knockings, which continued for near
half an hour, were over, she was several times
asked, if she had any wood or other thing in the
bed, against which she could strike? which she
obstinately denied. Two maid-servants being then
ordered to take her out of bed, a piece of board
was found in it, which, as was observed, she had
conveyed there the night before.
Soon after, a trial came on before Lord Mansfield,
in the Court of King's Bench, Guildhall, by
a special jury, on an indictment against Richard
Parsons, and Elizabeth his wife, Mary Fraser, a
clergyman, and a reputable tradesman, for a conspiracy
in the Cock-Lane ghost affair, to injure
the character, &c. of Mr. William Kent; when
they were all found guilty. The trial lasted
about twelve hours.