Melbourne Gleanings—Dr.
Bevan—Night at a Bungalow—Cole’s
Book-shop—A Day at Sorrento—White Cruelty to the
Aborigines—Coffee Palaces—Dr. Strong—The
Presbyterian Church in Collins Street—The Late Peter
Lalor—Ballarat—Romance of Gold Mining—Sydney
and Melbourne compared—Australian Rogues—Suburban
Melbourne—Victorian M.P.’s—Victorian
Politics.
The stranger who makes his first
trip to Australia is not a little astonished by the extreme cold
which greets him as he nears his destination. You hear so
much of Australian heat that you are not a little astonished to
find the nearer you get to your journey’s end the colder it
becomes. In the tropics we had all given up warm clothing,
but as we reached Western Australia great-coats by day and
blankets by night came into fashion. People were wrapped up
as if we were on the coast of England rather than of Australia,
and as to sleeping with the ports open, that was quite out of the
question. This is an admirable provision of Nature.
It gives us the advantage of having the body braced up before it
encounters the formidable heat which, according to all accounts,
awaits us on shore. Another thing that strikes a stranger,
as he studies the papers from all parts of the country, is the
extraordinary difference in the weather as recorded in different
localities. For instance, I find at Sydney the weather is
described as delightfully cool, while at Adelaide on the same day
it is recorded as the hottest of the season. In one
district I read how the rain has come down in a perfect deluge,
whilst in another men and vegetables are dying from the want of
water. At a town in Queensland, the heat is so intense that
many are dying daily of sunstrokes, and the insurance agents have
been telegraphed to not to effect any more insurances, whilst in
another locality I read of a heavy fall of snow. The fact
is, it is impossible to realize the size of the Australian
continent, twenty-six times larger than Great Britain and
Ireland, or the various kinds of weather to be met with, till you
are on the continent itself.
A pleasant trip of a day and a half from Adelaide, most of
which time was passed in sight of land, enabled us to reach
Melbourne—marvellous Melbourne, as it has been
called—in time to go on board the Lusitania and bid good-bye
to Miss von Finkelstein, who is, she tells me, wonderfully
delighted with her Australian trip, and intends returning
again. She goes now as far as Port Said, and thence she
makes her way to Jerusalem. I then get into the train, and
after a run of half an hour along a flat district, partly waste
and partly built over with little wooden villas—prettily
painted, each with its tiny garden, which seemed to me to have a
wonderful knack of getting burnt down every night—find
myself landed in the noble thoroughfare, which seems to me to run
from one end of the city to the other, known as Collins Street;
and almost the first person I meet—at any rate, the first
one I recognise—is Dr. Hannay, who is leaving by the next
mail steamer, and who is looking very well, though he tells me he
has been much tried by the great heat of the last
fortnight. The dust and the sun are trying, and I get back
to the ship for dinner.
When next I go on shore it is Sunday morning, and a grateful
breeze awaits me as I make my way along picturesque and stately
Collins Street—a street which would be an ornament to
London itself. The public-houses are closed, the tramcars
have ceased running, and the busy crowds that block up the
footways on the week-day are away. Instead of them there are the
church-goers—well-dressed, sedate, orderly—just as we
may see anywhere in England on the Sabbath. And if I miss
the sound of the church-going bell, I know not that that is an
unmitigated loss—indeed, as far as London is concerned in
that respect, it always seems to me that we may have too much of
a good thing. On my left I pass a handsome Baptist Church,
which was crammed to suffocation when a short time since Rev. Dr.
Maclaren, of Manchester, was preaching. Further on I pass
the fine Scots Church, and on the other side of the crossing is
the noble church of which Dr. Bevan is the popular pastor, and
where I tarry to admire the cool and spacious structure, the
appearance of the people, and the eloquence of the
preacher. It is the premier church of Victoria, and is in
every way worthy of its position. The people rejoice in an
endowment of £3,700 a year, all of which is turned to good
purposes, and they give at the doors as much as £1,500 a
year, to say nothing of pew rents. It is not in Victoria
that you feel doubts as to the power of the Churches to
evangelize the land. Here, as all over the colonies, the
Church of England leads the way, and—as was to be expected
when you remember what an adventurous race of men the Scotch
are—the Presbyterians occupy the second place. The
Wesleyans and the Congregationalists come next, and of the latter body Dr.
Bevan is the leader, and he seems to me to enjoy his position to
the utmost. He is the picture of health and happiness, and,
as I tell him, is to be likened rather to a wealthy archdeacon at
home than to a Congregational minister, as we know him, in a
country where he has to take—thanks to Parliamentary
wisdom—rather a place in the second rank. He and Mrs.
Bevan alike seem to have renewed their youth in this far-off
land. A dealer in portraits of English celebrities,
by-the-bye, tells me that people often ask him if the portrait of
John Bright he displays is not that of the worthy Doctor.
And, indeed, there is a breadth and vigour in the Doctor’s
sermons which naturally suggests to the hearer the fiery
eloquence of John Bright. Standing in his gown, on his
platform pulpit, the Doctor certainly carries all before
him. His audience seems to be wielded at his will, and his
audience is a noble one; men and women to whom the service of the
sanctuary is not a form or conventional observance or symbol of
respectability, but a joy and delight, which reminds one of what
church-going was, in what to sceptical and scientific London
seems a far-off time, when Dr. Watts could write:
At once they sing, at once they pray,
They hear of heaven and learn the way.
What
strikes me as a contrast to congregations I know nearer home is
the power of the audience. The people are in the prime of
life, not decayed and elderly, and the proportion of young men is
great. In the evening they make a grand show in the
gallery—semi-circular, lofty, and airy. And this is,
remember, the summer season, when families rush off to the
seaside, and corresponds to the period when in London our
churches are thin, and when in New York and Washington, and the
other great centres of American life and energy, it is usual for
the pastor to shut up his church, and for the people to give
themselves a Sunday rest—not in the Jewish, but in the
modern acceptation of that term. In the afternoon I enjoyed
the hospitality of one of the Doctor’s deacons, Mr.
Johnson, who has had the honour of making his handsome house the
temporary residence of Mr. Henry Lee, who is away preaching.
In every direction I look I see capacious streets with
handsome houses, all painted white, and broad streets which are
lined for miles with the dwellings of the Melbournites, while as
you wander in wonder, every now and then, beyond the glitter of
the white houses, and the green foliage of the public gardens,
you see a thin silver streak of the blue bay. In the
evening, the Doctor will have me go home with him. We stop late,
for there are people waiting to see the Doctor in his private
vestry; then we catch the last tram to Camberwell—how funny
the old name seems to us on this Australian soil! Then we
are driven home by the Doctor’s Jehu—who, I fancy,
has rather a good time of it, though, as a Roman Catholic, he
holds his master to be a heretic—and we have a welcome
supper in a veritable bungalow, large, and occupying its own
grounds of thirty acres, devoted by the Doctor to farming, on an
interesting, but, I fear, rather unprofitable, scale. At an
early hour on Monday morning—for we have much to talk of
over our cigars, uncommonly fine ones, a present to the
Doctor—I am offered a choice of beds, of course all on the
ground-floor. I resolved to sleep in the one which has
recently been tenanted by Dr. Hannay, of whom everyone in
Melbourne speaks well. As the Doctor shows me to my bed and
shuts down the window, I am idiot enough to say, ‘Any
snakes about here, Doctor?’ ‘Only a few black
ones now and then,’ he replies, in a light and airy
way. But, alas! the Doctor’s words kept me uncommonly
wide awake that night.
One of the sights of Melbourne, the most marvellous I have yet
seen, is that known as ‘Cole’s Book Arcade,’ in
Bourke Street, which is not merely a place for the dissemination of
knowledge, useful or otherwise, but a reading-room as well, into
which thousands enter, pick up a book, take a seat, and read as
long as they like without spending a farthing. Mr. Cole
himself, the owner, is a remarkable man. He hails from
Ashford, in Kent, and had been some time in the colony trying to
make a fortune, but with little success, and now evidently he
has, to borrow an Americanism, ‘struck ile.’ As
a compiler he has done some good work. His aim is to
publish the Library of the Future, to be composed entirely of the
cream of human thought and knowledge. To this scheme he
gives the title of ‘The Federation of the World’s
Library.’ It is to consist of one hundred of the best
books in the world; one book, the best of its kind, is to be on
astronomy, another on geology, another on geography, and so
on. Each book is to be complete of its kind, and highly
condensed. It is easily and perfectly done, he says.
A moderate-sized song-book, he tells us, holds all the best songs
in the world; a moderate-sized wisdom-book—it is a
humiliating reflection—will hold all the wisest sayings in
the world; a moderate-sized book, carefully prepared, of
astronomy, geology, chemistry, botany, or any of the sciences,
will give a clear knowledge of the principles of each. Such
a library,
of 100 volumes of 600 pages each, can be produced to sell at
£10, thus bringing all the most important knowledge and all
the most beautiful thoughts within the reach of every human
being. He calculates that there are a million printed poems
in the world. The 1,000 best are worth the remaining
999,000 all put together. Probably out of the 1,000 best
there are 100 first-class, 300 second-class, and 600
third-class. Amongst the first-class Mr. Cole reckons
Gray’s ‘Elegy,’ Goldsmith’s
‘Deserted Village,’ and Longfellow’s
‘Psalm of Life.’ As a bookseller he
asserts—and I am sorry to write it—that it is read
more, verse for verse, than the whole of Milton’s and
Homer’s poems put together. Mr. Cole tells me that,
with the exception of school books—always in
demand—his principal sales are novels and theological
works. Of the latter he sells most of Talmage. Ward
Beecher does not go down so well. Perhaps the Australians
in this respect resemble some of the members of the Christian
Young Men’s Association. When last in London, Mr.
Cole went to hear the great American lecture at Exeter
Hall. ‘Mr. Beecher ought not to be allowed to lecture
here,’ said someone to him. ‘Why so?’
asked Mr. Cole. ‘Because he is an infidel,’ was
the charitable reply.
And
what a sight Mr. Cole’s shop is, to be sure! especially at
business hours, when it swarms with buyers and readers. It
is three stories high, 200 feet deep, and 40 feet wide. Its
walks are a third of a mile long, and its capacious galleries are
supported by 140 brass pillars. The sign of the
establishment is the rainbow, which is to be seen painted
everywhere. A gorgeous rainbow ornaments the chief entrance
in Bourke Street. Inside daily may be seen hundreds of men,
women, and children, who really seem more numerous than they are
in consequence of the seventy mirrors with which the interior is
decorated. There are twenty miles of boards in the
shelving, and 2,800 large cedar drawers. Altogether there
are 100,000 sorts of books, all well classified, so that the
purchaser can at once secure what he requires, and if he wants a
selection he has probably a million of books to choose
from. New books, music, and stationery occupy the
ground-floor, second-hand books the next floor, and on the top
floor is a fine collection of china, glass, and other house
ornaments and knick-knacks. This flat is entirely devoted
to the sale of goods to beautify the interiors of houses, as
books beautify the mental interiors of their readers. If
you want to get to the top, and you are too tired and weary to
walk, there is a handsomely-decorated lift at your service,
and if you require the solace of music there are free
performances given every afternoon and evening. Mr. Cole,
to his credit be it said, has prohibited, as far as he is
concerned, the sale of Zola’s novels, having struck them
out of his list. I asked one of his employés
to what religious body he belonged. I was amused with this
reply: ‘I don’t know; but he’s a very good
man. I expect he is a Dissenter.’ It is curious
to find people who do not go to Episcopalian churches spoken of
as Dissenters in a land where there is no State Church, and where
all denominations are on an equality; but then this particular
young man had only left the Old Country a year and a half, and
had not got rid of his Old World ideas. As an illustration
of the value of property in Melbourne, Mr. Cole tells me that his
rent is £1,000 a year, that he has a lease of it for
fifteen years, and that the proprietor nevertheless had had an
offer made him for the place of £5,000 a year. All
round Mr. Cole’s premises are what he calls intellect
sharpeners, in the shape of extracts from what wise men have
written in favour of study and reading. This Australian
Cole seems in his way to do much to advance Australia.
One of the few places in Australia to which interesting associations
attach is Sorrento, and it is one of the places most patronised
by the Melbourne public. You leave Melbourne Port at
half-past eleven, and you arrive there at two. As the
steamer returns at half-past three, you have not much time for
exploration, and in my own case I admit that time was curtailed
from perfectly natural causes. As I landed, the
announcement ‘hot dinners’ met my eye, and gave me
quite an appetite. I walked up the cliff, found a
comfortable and airy hotel at the top, and did justice to a good
half-crown dinner. Nor was I singular. I found many
of my travelling companions similarly disposed. One must
dine, and you may as well dine in comfort as not.
Everyone in Melbourne goes to Sorrento. I was in the
former city on one of the days when the heat is tropical, when
the hot wind and the dust are intolerable, when everyone in the
city looks parched and weary; while the wives and mothers and
daughters at home draw down the blinds, fasten all the doors to
keep the hot air out, and sit metaphorically in dust and
ashes. In vain are scanty attire and cooling drinks; in
vain are all the resources of human ingenuity. The only
thing to do is to take the train to Melbourne Port, and then get
on board the steamer for Sorrento, where the temperature is
always twenty degrees lower than in Melbourne. The wind blows
straight from Port Melbourne to the Heads; it has no heated land
to pass over on its way to Sorrento, and arrives there cool and
bracing from its contact with the salt water. On one side
we have the Bay, and on the other side the Southern Ocean, only a
narrow mile of land dividing them. It has a charming
locality all round, picturesque cliffs, and the sea. Traces
of the old settlement are visible still. One of the
original wells sunk in 1803 has been opened for the use of the
public, and the shade of the scrub gives special advantage to
picnic parties, for which the whole picturesque extent of country
round is admirably adapted. It was here came the original
settlers. One of the oldest, just carried to his last long
home, used to tell terrible stories of them. ‘Had you
any trouble with the natives in those days?’ asked an
anxious inquirer. ‘Trouble!’ was the reply;
‘not me, poor things. Why, sir, they were as harmless
as babies. I have seen upwards of a thousand on ’em
at a corroborree on the Meni creek—that was their
camping-ground then. Dear, dear, poor things, they’re
gone now, sir, gone; most on ’em shot off, or put out of
the way somehow else. If there is any questions asked when
we are dead and gone, some of our big squatting swells ull have
some awful
posers to answer.’ Again, added the old man,
‘Take my word for it, sir, the blacks were a harmless,
good-natured lot till the cruelty of the whites made ’em
bad and revengeful, poor things; and who can blame
’em?’ The flour which they used was mixed with
arsenic, and thus they lost in many cases their lives and
lands. In one case it was certain that a native was shot by
a celebrated savant that he might have possession of the
native’s skull. There are few natives left now.
Such humane treatment has somewhat diminished their number.
At all times it was a puzzle what to do with them, as the
following well-authenticated anecdote shows. Two aboriginal
children, separated from babyhood from aboriginal life, were
trained and educated like colonists. In the earlier years
little difference was noted, but as they advanced into boyhood,
some restlessness became apparent. Ultimately, when a
native tribe happened to come near, the children escaped, to
taste once more the charms of savage life. The Australians
employ many of them, and make them useful in many ways, but none
of them rise to anything like a position in the social scale, or
evince any capacity of ever rising to become more than hewers of
wood and drawers of water. I have seen them usefully
engaged at such places as the Point Macleay Mission, in South Australia,
but even there I question whether they earn their own
living. On one occasion I crossed Lake Alexandrina in a
sailing-boat managed by blacks, and I was not
drowned—which, however, does not say much for their
nautical skill, as the lake was as calm as a mill-pond.
But to return to Sorrento. The history of this place
begins with the discovery of the fine harbour of Port Philip by
Lieutenant Murray, a harbour of some forty miles in extent.
The next year it was made the site of a convict settlement under
Governor Collins, who soon had enough of the place, and started
off for Tasmania. Eight convicts were missing within a
month of their arrival. Four were brought back and
punished, one was shot by a constable, and the three others,
oppressed with hunger, after wandering round the western shores
of Port Philip, made fires to attract the attention of their
companions, but without success. Two of them walked back to
surrender themselves into the hands of justice, but were never
heard of after; and for a while the place was left to the
kangaroos and the natives, till there arrived on the scene
Hamilton Hume, a native-born colonist of New South Wales.
In 1834 three gentlemen named Henty established a whaling station
at Portland Bay, and this was the first settlement in Victoria.
At this time, and for some time afterwards, the natives were
easily beguiled. As late as 1835 a John Bateman, of Hobart
Town, landed on the western shore of Port Philip, and entered
into a contract with the natives for 1,000 square miles of
territory for a few blankets to be given them every year.
The Government refused to sanction this iniquitous
transaction. Nevertheless, the natives were despoiled of
their land—Governor Bourke annexed it in the name of his
Majesty. Melbourne, on the Yarra, was named after the
British Premier of that day, and Williamstown, where the grand
boats of the Orient and P. and O. Companies land and embark their
passengers, had the questionable honour of being named after our
Sailor King.
Port Philip was a place rather given to joviality and
adventure. Ladies and children were rare. There was a
marvellous consumption of brandy. Manners, when visible,
were rough. ‘The town,’ writes an old settler,
‘was bad, and the bush was worse.’ When a pious
missionary of those early times, prior to adventuring into the
interior, inquired of a squatter if the Sabbath was kept in the
bush, ‘Oh yes,’ was the prompt reply; ‘a clean
shirt and a shave.’ ‘At the time of my
arrival,’ writes Mr. Westgarth, ‘all Melbourne-bound
passengers
were put out by their respective ship’s boats upon that
part of the northern beach of Port Philip that was nearest to
Melbourne, whence in struggling lines, as best they could, in hot
winds, they trod a bush-path of their own making, which, about a
mile and a half long, brought them to a punt or little boat just
above the Falls—which they crossed for the small charge of
threepence.’ There are people who still maintain that
Melbourne is planted on the wrong site, that Williamstown, with
its healthful level, might have been better, or Geelong; with its
beautiful ready-made harbour, and its direct access to all the
superior capabilities of the West and North-west. The
traveller, as he runs down to Sorrento by an excursion steamer,
may, perhaps, agree with the critics. But, then, Sorrento
would never have had a chance. Now it is a place to spend a
happy day in, and many are the Melbournites who lodge in the
vicinity. I would have tarried there longer, but
steamers—like time and tide—wait for no man.
In one thing Melbourne beats London and all Australia put
together, and that is in the number and excellence of its
coffee-palaces, which are a real boon to the travelling public,
and which may claim to have solved the question how, by
co-operation, to provide homes of comfort and luxury for the great
middle-class of the community. The Federal Coffee-Palace in
Melbourne is a remarkable illustration of what may be done in
this way. Instead of spending three or four pounds a week
at an hotel, and being expected to injure my health for the
benefit of my landlord, I pay half a crown for my bed—it is
true it is high up on the sixth floor, but then I go up and down
by the lift, which is in active operation from seven in the
morning till midnight; I get a good breakfast in a handsome
apartment, served up by attractive young maidens in neat black
dresses, for which I pay one-and-threepence; I can have a good
lunch for a shilling; and my evening meal, with fish or flesh,
costs about the same sum. There is a café attached,
in which I can have a cup of coffee or some light refreshment at
any time; a reading-room, if I require it; a smoking-room, if I
am given to that mild form of self-indulgence; and a
billiard-room, if I require a little exercise after the worry of
the day. As soon as I rise I have a comfortable bath, which
is not an extra, as in England. Nor need I fear being
roasted alive, as half a dozen watchmen perambulate the place all
night. In England we have nothing of this kind. We
have large and grand hotels, but they are utterly beyond the
reach of
persons of moderate means; and it is a question whether, in these
days when it is hard to get a decent servant-girl, something
after the plan of the Federal Palace at Melbourne might not be
started in London and our other big cities, not as a rest for the
comfort and delectation of the weary traveller, but as an
associated home. It is only in that way that the increasing
difficulties connected with houses and servants, and the cost of
living in London, can be met and overcome. The servant-girl
in these coffee-palaces is far superior to her sister who acts
the part of maid-of-all-work in a London suburb. She is
always civil, always well dressed, always ready to oblige.
She knows when her work is over, and that is a great
consideration. She has her day out when she is off duty,
and that keeps her in good temper all the rest of the week.
At all times her appearance and behaviour are respectable.
I have always found her cheerful and pleasant, much given to
devoting her spare time to novel-reading, which helps to keep
alive romance in her heart and preserve her youth. It is
evident she is not over-worked in the coffee-palace; she looks
too well and flourishing. I hope she marries well, and
lives happily ever after. It seems to me that she deserves
a good husband and a good home.
On the
Federal Coffee-Palace money has been spent with a liberal hand;
and it is run by a company, who find it, I believe, a commercial
success. All that is wanted is a little better
management. Melbourne is a city of fine buildings, and the
Federal may vie with any of them as regards external grandeur and
internal accommodation. The freehold alone cost
£48,000, and the building and furniture for 400
sleeping-apartments, to say nothing of the public rooms, must
have cost at least £150,000 more. Its tower, which is
200 feet high, is a landmark from all quarters. The site is
happily chosen, as the Federal is not only close to the terminus
of the railways, but is likewise in close proximity to the
wharves on the Yarra, which are now daily crowded with large and
powerful steam-vessels engaged in inter-colonial and foreign
trade. The Custom House is near at hand, and business-men
and visitors can, by means of the cable tramways in front of the
palace, be speedily conveyed to any of the city suburbs. It
has a post and telegraph-office attached, and the popular firm of
Thomas Cook and Son have an agency in connection with it.
Collins Street, in which it stands, is the centre of trade and
commerce. It is there all the great companies have their
headquarters, the papers are published, and all the wealth and fashion
of the city congregates. The foundations of the new
building, which enclose an area of half an acre, were laid at an
expense of many thousands of pounds. The underground
arrangements are admirable. One apartment is devoted
entirely to pastry-cooks; in another is a freezing-apparatus, in
which meat, poultry, and game may be kept fresh for a month or
more. Another apartment is devoted to grills; and the
kitchens are connected with the floors above them by several
lifts, by which the cooked viands are noiselessly and rapidly
raised to the various sitting-rooms, and the dishes so returned
to the sculleries. As to the entrance, that must be seen to
be appreciated—wide folding-doors open into a grand marble
vestibule, which extends between massive columns into an interior
hall. In the centre is the principal staircase, leading to
the first-class dining-room and the upper stories. The area
above is surrounded by galleries which serve as balconies, where
the lady-visitors and their friends may be seen sitting all day
long gazing on the busy crowd of arrivals and departures
below. You may be almost said to sleep in marble halls, and
the beauty of it is that all this splendour is not for the
benefit of the bloated capitalist, but for the comfort of the
many.
One Sunday I had rather a strange experience. I went to the
Presbyterian Church in Collins Street, where there was a large
congregation to listen to a fine sermon by the reverend minister
on the custom of the primitive Church to have all things in
common—a custom which the orator conclusively showed to the
satisfaction of his hearers, wealthy Scotchmen, with few leanings
towards Socialism in any form, was quite exceptional, and was not
to be dreamed of in these latter days. I had a pair of
gloves, which I laid down in the pew. When half-way out of
the church I recollected that I had left those gloves
behind. I returned to look for them, mentioning the fact to
the gentleman who sat next me. On rushing to where I sat I
found a pair of gloves exactly similar to my own at the back of
the pew, and, concluding that they were what I sought, returned
in triumph. Just as I had got to the door a young man came
and claimed the gloves—and I gave them up—when, to my
amazement, the same gentleman (?) who had sat in the pew with me,
and to whom I had mentioned the loss of my gloves, handed my own
over to me. It is true that the sermon was about having all
things in common, but I object to such a practical
application.
In Melbourne Dr. Strong, who was expelled from the Scotch
church to which I have already referred, is making the
experiment of carrying on a church without a creed.
Apparently the attempt is a successful one. When I attended
the congregation was a large one, and the sermon very
interesting. It is a fine building in which they meet, and
the people seem to be highly respectable, as much so as I have
seen anywhere. Dr. Strong calls his place ‘The
Australian Church.’ It seems to me, as far as I can
make out, that the wish is father to the thought. I see no
evidence in Australia that the people are discontented with the
old ways, or are ready for change. Men immersed in business
and money-making as a rule do not affect heresy; they are mostly
conservative in politics and religion. From what I hear, it
is the personal influence of Dr. Strong that has built the church
and filled it. He is very popular with his people.
They followed him from his old church to his new one, but they
are not fanatics in favour of their new denomination, and I
question whether out of Melbourne there is sufficient population
to be developed into anything worthy to take the somewhat
ambitious title of the Australian Church. The Wesleyans,
the Presbyterians, and the Church of England, have already gone
up and taken possession of the land, and they are organized,
which is half the battle. ‘Our people,’ said a
colonial bishop to me one day, ‘are not likely to be
caught by the Salvation Army.’ The Church has its own
organization, and it is that which keeps the flock from
wandering. As long as they get something in the way of
religious worship they are content. People who belong to
other bodies tell me that the Church of England parsons are poor
preachers, that they are, many of them, men who have failed in
other pulpits, or who have been unable to pass the requisite
examination, or whose characters do not stand high—and
certainly I have seen some queer specimens of the genus.
But then, says the devout worshipper, ‘we go to church to
pray and to worship God. The sermon is not the main thing
with us, as it is amongst the other religious
bodies.’ It may be that he is wrong—I am not
about to contest that matter—but it seems to me that in
Melbourne the better preacher the man is the better does his
church fill; and that if the Church of England, or any other
religious body, seeks to be successful, due care must be taken
that there is life in the pulpit. The stranger would think
Melbourne a very religious city; much more so than London, or any
town or city at home. The public-houses are strictly
closed; the trains do not run till two o’clock. There
is no Sunday newspaper published (in Sydney there are two, and
both pay well). Except for the well-dressed crowds on their way to
their favourite church (they are all churches here—Little
Bethels and Mount Zions are unknown), and the church bell, you
would think such places as Sydney and Melbourne on a Sunday
morning the cities of the dead. Walking along Bourke Street
one Sunday evening—a street always black with pedestrians
at that time—I saw a crowd hanging about the door of a
theatre. I went in and found a place full of real working
men in their working attire, who had come to enjoy a religious
discussion. I got in only at the end, and heard but the
orthodox reply from a gentleman who talked a good deal about
matter and space, and the operations of the one great God, who
had revealed Himself to man in the person of Jesus Christ.
The crowd sat listening patiently till nine o’clock, when
the gas was turned off, and they lit their pipes and went
home. I heard some speaking of the objector, whom I was too
late to hear, as a very clever fellow; but the mass seemed quite
indifferent. I spoke to one or two of the hearers, whose
minds seemed a perfect blank. There was no praying, no
singing, no attempt to attract, no pale youth with a concertina,
no tender maiden to sing a solo. In London the thing would
have been a failure. Here the working man has his beershop
and club, and his penny paper. In Australia he has nothing of the
kind, and he is open to conviction even if it comes to him in a
secularist form.
There has lately passed away a man well known in Victoria as
Peter Lalor. He was an Irishman, and lived to be Speaker of
the Victorian Parliament; but it was as a revolutionist that he
gained his true fame. When the news of the discovery of
gold in Ballarat filled that district with seekers from every
part of the world, Mr. Peter Lalor was one of the first to put in
an appearance. Melbourne and Geelong were almost emptied of
their male inhabitants. Government was at its wit’s
end how to preserve order among the young community. In
1855, the Government promulgated the right of the Crown to the
gold, and issued licenses to the diggers. With a view to
keep back the crowd, the license fee was increased from £1
10s. to £3 a month. This was more than the hardy
gold-diggers could stand. They were not represented in
Parliament, and they took the law into their own hands after
their patience had been exhausted by the insults of the martinets
in office, who were sent to see that they had all the requisite
licenses, and to whom hunting the diggers was a pleasant
sport. The Gold Commissioners, as they were called, were
frequently corrupt, and always insolent and overbearing. At
length matters came to a crisis. A digger got killed in a
house that did not bear a good character, and the landlord was
considered to have been a participator in the murder. The
man was tried with others, and discharged. In their
indignation over the untimely end of a chum, the diggers
subscribed, and had a new trial. It was while holding a
meeting for this purpose that they came into collision with the
police, who were guarding the hotel. The place was burnt
down, and three of the incendiaries were imprisoned.
Another meeting was then held to demand the release of the
prisoners, and at the same time to claim manhood suffrage, and
other political and social reforms. Soon, losing all
confidence in the Government, they began to drill and arm.
Fighting commenced in real earnest under the flag of the Southern
Cross. They were attacked, and amongst the wounded was
their general, the late Speaker, Peter Lalor. The eyes of
the blind were opened. Government, in time, learned to act
rationally, and the result was, Ballarat became the centre of a
law-abiding people—a people, nevertheless, given over to
the worship of the golden calf. ‘I remember
it,’ said a man to me yesterday, as I wandered along its
streets, down which a whirlwind of white dust was unpleasantly
blowing, ‘when there was only one house in the
town; when it was all gum-trees and tents. There,’
said he, pointing to a particular spot at the entrance of the
town—‘is where the Welcome Nugget was found; it was
worth £5,000, and was discovered by a couple of diggers who
had barely been earning their living for months.
There,’ he continued, ‘I had a miner’s right; I
sold it for £50 to the present owner, of whom a syndicate
has been trying to buy it for £40,000. Them was hard
times. I remember when I walked twelve miles to a store,
and could only bring back a pound of butter, and that was a
favour.’ But most of the miners lost their money as
quickly as they made it. ‘In 1860,’ he added,
‘I was ready to go home, but in 1861 I was up a
tree.’
Ballarat has now settled down into a rather humdrum sort of
city, with a population of about 50,000. The diggers are
mostly dead or gone, and few traces of them remain, save in the
turned-up earth outside the town, where there are traces still
remaining of what they called shallow digging. On a hill
just outside, also, it is evident that there has been a good deal
of soil turned up, or turned out, in the search for gold, but no
alluvial deposits exist; gold, if found, is only found in quartz,
and that has to be crushed, and the gold eliminated by machinery
of a very complicated and costly character, to secure which
a company has to be formed, and then the returns, in the shape of
dividends, are generally small. It is unhealthy work, too,
in the mines, and I was not surprised to find that many of the
men had left, and taken to farming instead. Any morning in
the week you will find a lot of agents and brokers in the
Ballarat Mining Exchange, ready to do a little business in the
way of speculation, and that is, perhaps, all that remains to
testify as to what Ballarat was in its golden age. As to
the riotous living of the past, that is a matter of
tradition. The fact is, Ballarat has had its day.
Where the carcase is, there the eagles gather, and little of the
carcase is left in Ballarat. Mount Morgan and Broken Hill
are now names of greater power. Ballarat has an
Episcopalian bishop. The Wesleyans and Presbyterians are
very strong in the town. The Roman Catholics and the
Congregationalists are also in evidence. Somehow or other I
missed the Episcopalian place of worship; but with its schools
and other buildings, with its wood warehouses and stores, I felt
how great had been the change, how sober and quiet had become the
Ballarat of to-day. ‘We shall meet again, sir,’
said my unknown friend, in a tone the honesty of which deeply
affected me—‘we shall meet again, sir, some
day. Let us hope it will be in the right place.’
Of the
romance of Ballarat one gets a good idea from a story which I
found in a newspaper which will certainly interest the general
reader. The history of one of the Ballarat claims, called
the Blacksmith’s Claim because its first owner belonged to
this craft, reads like a page of romance. The blacksmith,
with a party of eight, all novices, sank the shaft in so
irregular and unworkmanlike a manner, that it was absolutely at
the risk of his life that a man made the descent to the
bottom. Without opening out a regular drive they washed all
the stuff within reach, and after realising £12,800 offered
it for sale, but so wet and rotten was the ground, so badly sunk
the shaft, that at first no purchaser could be found. At
last a party of ten plucked up courage and bought all right and
title to the claim and tools for £77. They entered
into possession at noon on Saturday, and long before the sun had
set had in their possession £2,000 worth of gold. By
working day and night in spells till the following Monday they
raised this to £10,000. Then, after the usual
reckless manner of lucky diggers, they left this mine of wealth,
and went on the spree for a week. Their tenants made good
use of the time at their disposal; they opened up two drives; and
before the week was out were the happy possessors of
£14,400, all taken out of the claim. The other party then
returned, and after a week’s work, during which they
realized £9,000, they sold out to a storekeeper for
£100, who put in a gang to work on shares, and these,
labouring in a desultory fashion for a fortnight, took but
£5,000. At the end of that time, one of the party, an
old hand from Van Diemen’s Land, undermined the props, and
next morning on returning to work the men found the whole of the
workings had fallen in. The rest of the party appeared to
have taken this misfortune very calmly, and to have completely
abandoned the claim, for no mention is made of their further
proceedings; but it is related how the author of the mischief
coolly marked out a claim 24 feet square on the top of the ruin,
and working with a hired party, sunk a shaft straight as a die
for the gutter. The first tubful of wash dirt they found
turned out 40 lb. weight of gold, and the next two averaged 10
lb. each, and as Ballarat gold was and is superior to any other
at all times, fetching at least £4 an ounce, those three
bucketfuls of earth were worth £2,880 to their fortunate
possessor. Altogether, out of that small area, hardly
larger than a good-sized room, was taken in a few weeks gold
worth nearly £30,000.
Round Ballarat the country is rather prettier than is the
average of Australian scenery. All the way from Geelong,
situated rather charmingly at the bend of a pretty bay, which is
bound to become a fashionable watering-place, the land rises till
you nearly reach Ballarat, when you go down a slight
incline. The soil is good, and there are many twenty-acre
farms, and the heat is not so great as in Melbourne. Out of
the town there is a fine sheet of water, devoted to boating and
black swans, and there is a botanical garden, in which I own I
was somewhat disappointed, though everyone (perhaps it was for
that very reason) said it was one of the places which I was bound
to go and see, and which would delight me greatly. The
Ballarat people, I was told in the train, were hospitable.
It may be so, but I can bear no testimony on that point, as none
of their hospitality was extended to me. My only experience
of them was at an ordinary at the principal hotel, and there I
was not particularly gratified, as conversation seemed quite out
of the question. Now I come to think of it, that must have
been through fear of the head waiter, who certainly was a very
superior personage indeed, and was much better got up than any of
his guests. Be this as it may, it was with little regret
that I got on board the train and left the Golden City, with its
green foliage, its red-brick houses, its white town-hall, its
awful dust, its broad streets, and its rough pedestrians, far
behind.
Anthony
Trollope tells us that no one who has ever paid Sydney a visit
will leave it without a tear or a regret. I confess I had
no such feeling as I got into a hansom and drove down to the
Liguria—a ship dear to many—which is to be
known no more to Australian friends, as her destination
henceforth is to be South America; but she took me safely to
Melbourne, where I landed, to be more than ever charmed with the
busy city and its people, a city and a people who believe
themselves destined to the leadership of these sunny lands.
Sydney is too old, they say, handsome as it is in parts, and
Brisbane is too hot, to be in the running. As long as
Sydney is faithful to Free Trade she will be a great emporium of
commerce; but the democracy rule in Sydney, and the democracy all
the world over have lost faith in Free Trade. Sydney has
little to boast of besides its unrivalled harbour, lined with
health resorts where wealth, and beauty, and fashion congregate,
and where all the residences are of the most captivating
character—white villas with verandas, rising out of green
lawns shaded by tropical plants, and gorgeous with tropical
flowers, in bloom, at any rate, the greater part of the
year—where the blue waves ever murmur underneath. I
must own, too, that some of the shops in Sydney are far finer
than any to be seen in Melbourne; and the post-office at Sydney
is, perhaps, the noblest building of the kind to be seen
anywhere. A similar remark applies to the Town Hall,
completed after I left. But Melbourne has, in Collins
Street, a unique and stately thoroughfare, such as can be seen
nowhere else—a street as gay of an afternoon as Regent
Street, and as difficult in crossing, owing to its swarming
traffic, almost as Cheapside. Sydney has no such show; and
the Melbourne ladies tell me that it is to that place that the
Sydney drapers come for the latest fashions. It seems to me
that there is a great deal more drinking in Sydney than in
Melbourne. Almost every other house you come to is an
hotel, and it has its bar, where, under the presidency of two or
three rather showy damsels, the drinking goes on all day.
In both cities there is apparently more drinking than in London,
except in the poorest quarters, affected by the beggar, and the
pauper, and the tramp, by depraved men, and women infinitely
worse. But for Melbourne and Sydney a defence may be made
which is not available at home. The population in both
cities is of a very migratory character; a large number of men
spend their time in passing from one colony to another, and in
this way they make many acquaintances, and when
they meet they have a drink. In Sydney the fashion is to
hand you the bottle and let you help yourself. The landlord
finds it to his interest to do so. The customer takes less
than the landlord would give him for his sixpence. The
customer knows that he has the day before him, and that it will
not do to get exhilarated too soon. There are drinks
awaiting him with other friends at other bars and at other hours,
and so he takes as little whisky as he can in his glass.
Superficially, Melbourne seems the more moral town, but so far as
my experience goes all cities are much alike. Chicago
proudly boasts that it is the wickedest city in the world, but I
much doubt its claim to that bad pre-eminence. I only met
one shady character there, and he was an Englishman. That
there are rogues in Melbourne I readily admit. As I was
passing up Bourke Street looking for a place to rest in till my
friend’s carriage, with his lady, was to call for me to
take me to his handsome suburban residence, a well-dressed man
accosted me with an inquiry as to how I had been enjoying myself
since I landed from the Liguria. Having replied, I
said I was going to have a cup of coffee and a cigar in a
handsome café just opposite where we were
standing. After I had been seated a few minutes he made his
appearance to tell me that he was staying at the Melbourne Club,
membership of which is the sign and seal of the most extreme
respectability; that he was going to England in the
Austral (I had told him I was going in that ship to
Adelaide) in consequence of the delicacy of his wife’s
health, and that he wished me to come along with him to introduce
me to a few friends. I went with him, and in a few minutes
was seated in the bar-room of an adjoining hotel, refusing every
offer to have a drink. A man came up to my friend with a
bill, requesting payment, as he was hard up. Accordingly my
gentleman put his hand in his pocket, pulling out three or four
sovereigns. Alas! he was a sovereign short. Could I
lend him one? Unfortunately I could not. ‘Could
I lend him half-a-sovereign?’ I again deplored my inability
to do anything of the kind.
‘It does not matter,’ he said. Turning to
the man he continued, ‘Come over the way and I will get the
money,’ and away he went, telling me he would be back in
five minutes. I waited ten, but it is needless to say I saw
him no more. Leaving the pub, I met a policeman.
‘Have you any rogues about here?’ I asked.
‘I should say we had,’ replied the policeman, with
a grin; ‘why, last month we had one out here from New
York. He said he thought he knew the ropes pretty well, but
he felt like a child out here.’
If this policeman’s tale be true, Melbourne must indeed
be marvellous in more senses than one. To my mind the most
marvellous part of Melbourne is to be found in its suburbs.
Melbourne is fortunate in this respect. All along the
seashore the coast is lined with handsome residences, quite equal
in every respect to those of our London merchant princes.
At one of them, where I spent a couple of happy days, I found
residing in wealth and comfort a son of the well-known and
still-lamented, in Nonconformist and Liberal circles, Mr.
Grimwade, of Ipswich. He calls his place Harleston, the
name of the little sleepy East Anglian town in which he was
born. The colonists love the old English names. In
the aristocratic quarter known as Toorak I spent a pleasant day
with Mr. Murray Smith, the one man whom all the Victorians regard
as the most refined of gentlemen, and most able of
politicians. In London, as some of my readers may remember,
Mr. Murray Smith, as Agent General, was quite as much a social
success as he is at home. He calls his place Repton, in
memory of his old Derbyshire Grammar School. I discovered
the Rev. J. J. Halley, the energetic secretary of the Australian
Congregational Union, living in a pretty villa at Camberwell, which he
ventures to call Irwell, a stream to most Englishmen who have
ever been at Manchester, somewhat dark and malodorous. It
is thus the colonists keep up the tender memories of their
far-off native land. As in New South Wales, so in Victoria,
a good deal of attention is turned to politics. In the
latter colony the Parliament lasts three years, and a general
election was at hand; but the worst of it is, that while the
people are in many quarters determined to have a fight, in
reality there is nothing to fight about. I attended what
was advertised as a monster meeting of the Liberal party, but the
attendance did not consist of more than 400, and the speaking
was, at any rate, not up to the English level, though one speaker
did somehow manage to close with an irrelevant peroration, in
which he invoked the spirit which in England had carried Catholic
emancipation, had removed the Test and Corporation Acts, and was
prepared to do justice to Ireland—and this was in
connection with a meeting called to support the Liberal platform,
the main article of which is protection to native industry and a
stock tax for the farmer, who complains bitterly of the way in
which New South Wales and Queensland beef is poured into the home
market. It seems strange to read of a candidate appealing to the
electors for support as ‘A Liberal and
Protectionist.’ But the fact is, in Victoria everyone
is a Protectionist, and on the vital issues of the past the
community is now at one. A coalition Government is in
office, and it is hard to see how any other can exist. A
nationalist party is now in course of formation, which has for
its object Australian unity, to be accomplished by free
inter-colonial interchange. In the meanwhile the Liberals
seem to have only, to fight about the constitution of the present
Government—their chief complaint being that the Liberal
element in it is not sufficiently strong.
Zeno tells us that a man has two ears and one mouth, that he
may say little and hear much. Australian M.P.’s are
quite of a different way of thinking. Of the late Victorian
Parliament, a critic in The Melbourne Argus writes that
during its existence ‘the worst elements in the Assembly
have had sway instead of the better.’ Of all methods
of blocking business, none is so plausible as that of moving the
adjournment of the House. In nine cases out of ten, a
review says, such motions result in a mere waste of time.
Another nuisance is the habit of speaking often and long, as
every member is entitled to speak once on every question before
the House, and as often as he likes when in Committee. This kind
of obstruction is raised into an art, and is called
‘stonewalling.’ As to indecent language, I find
one M.P. calling a judge of a neighbouring colony ‘a
ruffian and a scoundrel, and a bloody-minded man,’
referring to the Chief Secretary as being ‘as ignorant as a
pig on the subject,’ and, in short, acting as much like an
Irish patriotic M.P. at home as was possible. Again, I
found a gentleman who was afflicted with heart disease, and whom
nothing but a sense of duty kept at his post, is referred to by
an honourable M.P. as follows: ‘But nobody takes any notice
of a dying man. He is going to be wafted
aloft.’ Again, a Mr. Jones, referring to a Mr. Reid,
said: ‘The Hon. Member for Fitzroy with his cavernous mouth
could laugh louder than the rest of the Assembly. That
cavernous mouth of his was the only thing the hon. member had to
connect him with other people. He had a mouth to laugh at a
joke, but no brains to originate one.’ Again, another
M.P. spoke of Sir Graham Berry as ‘that miserable old
counterfeit, that white-haired political rogue, that bandy-legged
old schemer.’ After this it is not surprising to read
how the same orator, in the course of a scene which occurred on
his being called to order, spoke of a fellow M.P. as one who had
tried to diddle a barmaid out of threepence! It really
seems as if Parliamentary institutions had become
effete. In New South Wales the Dibbs Ministry has already
been hurled from office. I have seen alike its rise and
fall, and it is evident that at Sydney, as in Melbourne, the
obstructionists will be strong enough, not to do any good
themselves, but to interfere with anyone wishing to achieve any
good for the colony whatever.
The Trades Political Platform made its appearance at Melbourne
when I was there. It consists of fifteen planks, the chief
of which are the maintenance and extension of protection to local
industries, the extension of the same principle to the farming
and grazing industry by an adequate increase in the duty on
imported cereals and stock, the representation of labour on
public boards and the commission of the peace, an Eight Hours
Legislation Bill (in Victoria the shops are closed at an early
hour by Act of Parliament), the abolition of plural voting, the
introduction of a Bill to prevent criminal and pauper labour in
the community—rather hard this, in a colony where the
pauper desires to work, and, able-bodied as many of her paupers
are, is really qualified for labour—the extension of the
franchise to seamen. Women voters are favoured by the
Liberals, though there is a good deal to be said on the other
side of the question. As it is, the women do
interfere. For instance, amongst the Melbourne candidates
is a gentleman who has unfortunately acquired an undesirable
reputation. The ladies have met, and resolved that he is
not a fit and proper person to represent a respectable
constituency. The gentleman in question sneers at the
meeting as a hole-and-corner one, but I find several ministers of
religion took part in it. Indeed, I think all denominations
were represented with the exception of the clergy of the Church
of England, who are as little inclined to co-operate with other
bodies out here as they are at home. As a further
indication of the political opinion forming in the Australian
colonies, I note that many of the candidates for Parliamentary
election are in favour of a tax on absentees, which, however, is
but a small matter after all, as there is a growing tendency on
the part of wealthy colonists to remain out here rather than
settle in the old country. I question whether in the
colonies there is much chance of the ‘One man one
vote’ being carried. It finds no favour in the Second
Chamber, to which here, as at home, many sober people look as the
bulwark of constitutional freedom. The worst thing I know
about Melbourne is its gambling. The Melbourne Daily
Telegraph, writing of the last grand race—the race
which the ladies make the occasion of the display of all that is
novel or charming in toilettes, estimates the bets
made with the bookmakers between Derby Day and Steeplechase Day
as amounting to £700,000, and calculates that ‘the
stakes, the cost and keep of the horses, the revenues of the
five hundred racing clubs of the colony, the expenditure
of its army of bookmakers, and other forms of expenditure,’
will bring the racing budget for the year up to £800,000
sterling. We in England are bad enough in this respect I
admit, but there is no reason whatever why Australia should
follow a bad example.