209. A verb is a word which can assert something (usually an
action) concerning a person, place, or thing (§ 14).
Most verbs express action. Some, however, merely express
state or condition. Thus,—
- 1. We jumped for joy.
- Rabbits burrow into the sides of hills.
- 2. While memory lasts, I can never forget you.
- This mountain belongs to the Appalachian range.
A verb-phrase is a group of words that is used as a verb (§ 15).
- The leaves are turning.
- The money has been found.
210. Certain verbs, when used to make verb-phrases, are
called auxiliary (that is, “aiding”) verbs, because they help
other verbs to express action or state of some particular
kind (§ 16).
The auxiliary verbs are is (are, was, were, etc.), may, can,
must, might, shall, will, could, would, should, have, had, do, did.
- I am writing.
- We must go.
- You will fall.
- He has forgotten me.
- We had failed.
- I do see him.
The auxiliary verb may be separated from the rest of the
verb-phrase by other words.
- I have always liked him.
- I shall soon send for you.
- Robert was completely bewildered.
- He has hardly ever spoken to me.
211. Verbs are either transitive or intransitive (§ 99).
Some verbs may be followed by a substantive denoting that which
receives the action or is produced by it. These are called transitive
verbs. All other verbs are called intransitive.
A substantive that completes the meaning of a transitive verb is
called its direct object.
In the following sentences, the first four verbs are transitive
(with objects), the last five are intransitive (without objects):—
- Lightning shattered the oak.
- Clouds darkened the sky.
- Chemists extract radium from pitchblende.
- The orator quoted Tennyson incorrectly.
- Look where he stands and glares!
- The bankrupt absconded.
- The orange sky of evening died away.
- The words differ in a single letter.
212. A verb which is transitive in one of its senses may be intransitive
in another.
| Transitive (with Object) |
Intransitive (without Object) |
| Boys fly kites. |
Birds fly. |
| The pirates sank the ship. |
The stone sank. |
| I closed my eyes. |
School closed yesterday. |
| Tom tore his coat. |
The cloth tore easily. |
213. Many transitive verbs may be used absolutely,—that is, merely
to express action without any indication of the direct object.
| Transitive Verb with Object expressed |
Transitive Verb used absolutely |
| The horses drank water. |
The horses drank from the brook. |
| The farmer plows his fields. |
The farmer plows in the spring. |
| Charles is drawing a picture. |
Charles is drawing. |
There is a sharp contrast between a transitive verb used
absolutely and a real intransitive verb. To the former we can
always add an object; with the latter no object is possible.
214. Is (in its various forms) and several other verbs may
be used to frame sentences in which some word or words in
the predicate describe or define the subject (§ 17).
Such verbs are called copulative (that is, “joining”) verbs.
Is in this use is often called the copula (or “link”).
- Time is money.
- Grant was a tireless worker.
- Macbeth became a tyrant.
- His swans always prove geese.
- The current is sluggish.
- Lions are carnivorous.
- This village looks prosperous.
- The consul’s brow grew stern.
- The queen turned pale.
In the first four examples, the copulative verb (the simple
predicate26) is followed by a predicate nominative (§ 88, 2);
in the last five by a predicate adjective (§ 172, 3).
The copulative verbs are intransitive, since they take no object. Sometimes,
however, they are regarded as a third class distinct both from transitive
and intransitive verbs.
215. The verb is is not always a copula. It is sometimes
emphatic and has the sense of exist.
- I think. Therefore I am. [That is, I exist.]
- Whatever is, is right. [The second is is the copula.]
Most of the other copulative verbs may be used in some
sense in which they cease to be copulative.
- The lawyer proved his case.
- Walnut trees grow slowly.
- Mr. Watson grows peaches.
- The wheel turned slowly on the axle.
- He turned his head and looked at me.
216. Verbs have inflections of tense, person and number, and
mood. They also have the distinction of voice, which is expressed
by the help of verb-phrases.
Tense indicates time; person and number correspond with person
and number in substantives; mood shows the manner in
which the action is expressed; voice indicates whether the
subject acts or is acted upon.
217. The tense of a verb indicates its time.27
Verbs have forms of tense to indicate present, past, or future time.
1. A verb in the present tense refers to present time.
2. A verb in the past tense refers to past time.28
3. A verb in the future tense refers to future time.
The present, the past, and the future are called simple tenses.
| Present Tense |
Past Tense |
Future Tense |
| He lives here. |
He lived here. |
He will live here. |
| The sun shines. |
The sun shone. |
The sun will shine. |
| I know him. |
I knew him. |
I shall know him. |
FORMS OF THE PRESENT AND THE PAST
218. The present and the past tense have special forms of
inflection.
For the moment we will consider the form which the verb
has when its subject is the first personal pronoun I.
In the present tense the verb has its simplest form, without any
inflectional ending.
- I like it.
- I hope for the best.
- I dwell in the wilderness.
- I find him amusing.
219. The past tense is formed in two ways, and a verb is
classed as weak or strong in accordance with the way in which
it forms this tense.
1. Weak verbs form the past tense by adding ed, d, or t to the present.
Examples:
- mend, mended;
- select, selected;
- fill, filled;
- glow, glowed;
- talk, talked;
- revere, revered;
- dwell, dwelt.
2. Strong verbs form the past tense by changing the vowel of the
present, without the addition of an ending.
Examples:
- drink, drank;
- begin, began;
- come, came;
- rise, rose;
- bind, bound;
- cling, clung;
- stick, stuck;
- wear, wore.29
Weak verbs are sometimes called regular, and strong verbs
irregular verbs.
For a list of the strong verbs see pp. 291–297.
Note. The terms strong and weak were first applied to verbs for a somewhat
fanciful reason. The strong verbs were so called because they seemed to
form the past tense out of their own resources, without calling to their assistance
any ending. The weak verbs were so called because they could not form
the past tense without the aid of the ending ed, d, or t.
220. The ending that is written ed is fully pronounced only
when d or t precedes (as,—thread, threaded; attract, attracted).
Otherwise, e is silent, so that the ending becomes, in pronunciation,
d or t (as,—entered, pronounced enter’d; rocked,
pronounced rockt).
In poetry and the solemn style, however, the silent e in the
ending ed is sometimes restored to its ancient rights.
221. Many weak verbs show special irregularities in the
past tense.
1. Make has made in the past, and have has had.
2. Some verbs in -nd and -ld form their past tense by changing
this d to t.
Examples:
- bend, bent;
- send, sent;
- lend, lent;
- rend, rent;
- spend, spent;
- build, built.
3. A few verbs add d or t in the past and also change the
vowel of the present. Thus,—
| sell |
sold |
| tell |
told |
| shoe |
shod |
| say |
said (pronounced sed) |
| hear |
heard (pronounced herd) |
| bring |
brought |
| buy |
bought |
| catch |
caught |
| seek |
sought |
| beseech |
besought |
| teach |
taught |
| methinks |
methought |
Work has an old past tense wrought, common in poetry; its usual past is
worked. For must, would, etc., see p. 299.
4. Some verbs that have a long vowel sound in the present
have in the past a short vowel sound before the ending t.
Examples:
- creep, crept;
- keep, kept;
- sleep, slept;
- sweep, swept;
- weep, wept;
- feel, felt;
- deal, dealt (pronounced delt);
- mean, meant (pronounced ment);
- lose, lost;
- leave, left.30
5. Some verbs in d or t preceded by a long vowel sound have
a short vowel in the past but add no ending.
Examples:
- bleed, bled;
- breed, bred;
- feed, fed;
- speed, sped;
- lead, led;
- read (pronounced reed), read (pronounced red);
- meet, met;
- light, lit (also lighted).
6. Some verbs in d or t have in the past the same form as
in the present.
Examples:
- shed, past shed;
- spread, past spread;
- bet, past bet;
- hit, past hit;
- set, past set;
- put, past put;
- shut, past shut;
- cut, past cut;
- hurt, past hurt;
- cast, past cast.
Note. The verbs in 5 and 6 might appear to be strong verbs, since they
have no ending in the past and some of them change the vowel. They are,
however, all weak verbs. Their lack of ending is due to the fact that the
d or t of the termination has been absorbed in the final d or t of the verb
itself. Thus, the past set was originally settë (dissyllabic), and this form, after
the loss of -ë, became indistinguishable in sound from set, the present.
For lists of irregular weak verbs, see pp. 291–299.
PERSON AND NUMBER—THE PERSONAL ENDINGS
222. A verb must agree with its subject in number and person.
Verbs, like substantives, have two numbers (singular and plural) and
three persons (first, second, and third).
The singular number denotes a single person or thing. The plural
number denotes more than one person or thing.
The first person denotes the speaker; the second person denotes the
person spoken to; the third person denotes the person or thing spoken of.
223. The inflections of person and number in verbs may be
seen by framing sentences with the personal pronouns as subjects.
Thus,—
| Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I walk. |
1. We walk. |
| 2. Thou walk-est. |
2. You walk. |
| 3. He walk-s [old form, walk-eth]. |
3. They walk. |
| Past Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I walked. |
1. We walked. |
| 2. Thou walked-st. |
2. You walked. |
| 3. He walked. |
3. They walked. |
From the sentences it is evident (1) that the person and number
of a verb are usually shown by its subject only, but (2)
that some verb-forms have special endings which denote person
and number.
224. The endings by means of which a verb indicates person and
number are called personal endings.
1. In the present tense a verb has two personal endings, est
for the second person singular and s for the third person singular
(old form eth).
The first person singular and all three persons of the plural
are alike. The simplest form of the verb is used and no personal
ending is added.
2. The past tense has but one personal ending,—est or st in
the second person singular.31
The forms in est or st are confined to poetry and the solemn
style. In ordinary language, the second person plural is used
to address a single person.
The following table shows the personal endings of the present
and the past tense:—
Personal Endings
| Present Tense |
Past Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. [no ending] |
1. [no ending] |
1. [no ending] |
1. [no ending] |
| 2. -est, -st |
2. [no ending] |
2. -est, -st |
2. [no ending] |
| 3. -s [old, -eth] |
3. [no ending] |
3. [no ending] |
3. [no ending] |
Conjugation of the Present and the Past
225. The inflection of a verb is called its conjugation (§ 53).
When we inflect a verb we are said to conjugate it.
Conjugation of the Weak Verb Walk
| Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I walk. |
1. We walk. |
| 2. Thou walkest.32 |
2. You walk. |
| 3. He walks. |
3. They walk. |
| Past Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I walked. |
1. We walked. |
| 2. Thou walkedst. |
2. You walked. |
| 3. He walked. |
3. They walked. |
Conjugation of the Strong Verb Find
| Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I find. |
1. We find. |
| 2. Thou findest. |
2. You find. |
| 3. He finds. |
3. They find. |
| Past Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I found. |
1. We found. |
| 2. Thou foundest. |
2. You found. |
| 3. He found. |
3. They found. |
Conjugation of the Copula
| Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I am. |
1. We are. |
| 2. Thou art. |
2. You are. |
| 3. He is. |
3. They are. |
| Past Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I was. |
1. We were. |
| 2. Thou wast. |
2. You were. |
| 3. He was. |
3. They were. |
Note. The English verb formerly had more personal endings. In Chaucer,
for instance, the typical inflection of the present is:—
| Singular |
Plural |
| 1. I walkë. |
1. We walken (or walkë). |
| 2. Thou walkest. |
2. Ye walken (or walkë). |
| 3. He walketh. |
3. They walken (or walkë). |
The disappearance of all weak final e’s in the fifteenth century (§ 191) reduced
the first person singular and the whole plural to the single form walk. Later,
walks (a dialect form) was substituted for walketh, and still later the second
person singular was replaced in ordinary use by the plural. The result has
been that in modern speech there are only two common forms in the present
tense,—walk and walks. In poetry and the solemn style, however, walkest and
walketh are still in use. The plural in en is frequently adopted by Spenser as
an ancient form (or archaism): as,—“You deemen the spring is come.”
Special Rules of Number and Person
226. When the subject is compound (§ 38), the number of
the verb is determined by the following rules:—
1. A compound subject with and usually takes a verb in the
plural number.
- My brother and sister play tennis.
- The governor and the mayor are cousins.
2. A compound subject with or or nor takes a verb in the
singular number if the substantives are singular.
- Either my brother or my sister is sure to win.
- Neither the governor nor the mayor favors this appointment.
3. A compound subject with and expressing but a single
idea sometimes takes a verb in the singular number.
The sum and substance [= gist] of the matter is this.
Note. This construction is rare in modern English prose. It is for the
most part confined to such idiomatic phrases as end and aim (= purpose), the
long and short of it, etc. The poets, however, use the construction freely (as
in Kipling’s “The tumult and the shouting dies”).
4. If the substantives connected by or or nor differ in number
or person, the verb usually agrees with the nearer.
- Either you or he is to blame.
- Neither you nor he is an Austrian.
- Neither John nor we were at home.
- Neither the mayor nor the aldermen favor this law.
But colloquial usage varies, and such expressions are avoided
by careful writers. The following sentences show how this may
be done:—
- Either you are to blame, or he is.
- One of you two is to blame.
- Neither of you is an Austrian.
- He is not afraid; neither am I.
- Both John and we were away from home.
227. In such expressions as the following, the subject is not
compound, and the verb agrees with its singular subject:—
- The governor with his staff is present.
- John, as well as Mary, is in London.
- Tom, along with his friends Dick and Bob, is taking a sail.
228. Nouns that are plural in form but singular in sense
commonly take a verb in the singular number (§ 84).
- Economics is an important study.
- The gallows has been abolished in Massachusetts.
In some words usage varies. Thus, pains, in the sense of care or effort, is
sometimes regarded as a singular and sometimes as a plural.
Great pains has (or have) been taken about the matter.
229. Collective nouns take sometimes a singular and sometimes
a plural verb.
When the persons or things denoted are thought of as
individuals, the plural should be used. When the collection is
regarded as a unit, the singular should be used.33
- 1. The Senior Class requests the pleasure of your company. [Here the
class is thought of collectively, acting as a unit.]
- 2. The Senior Class are unable to agree upon a president. [Here the
speaker has in mind the individuals of whom the class is composed.]
- 3. The nation welcomes Prince Joseph. [The whole nation unites as a
single individual to welcome a distinguished guest.]
- 4. The American nation are descended from every other nation on
earth. [The separate qualities of the individuals who constitute the
nation are in the speaker’s mind.]
230. A number in the sense of “several” or “many” regularly
takes the plural; the number takes the singular.
- A number of sailors were loitering on the pier.
- The number of tickets is limited.
231. Half, part, portion, and the like, take either the singular
or the plural according to sense.
- Half of a circle is a semicircle.
- Half of the passengers were lost.
232. A verb which has for its subject a relative pronoun is in
the same person and number as the antecedent. For examples,
see § 149.
Errors are especially common in such sentences as,—
- This is one of the strangest sights that ever were seen. [The antecedent
of that is sights (not one); hence the relative (that) is plural, and
accordingly the verb is plural (were, not was).]
- Mr. Winn’s oration was among the most eloquent that have [NOT has]
been delivered in this state for many years.
- This is one of the finest paintings there are in the hall. [For the omission
of the relative, see § 151.]
THE FUTURE TENSE
233. The future tense is a verb-phrase consisting of the auxiliary
verb shall or will followed by the infinitive without to
(§ 29).
The following table shows the form of the future for each of
the three persons (1) in assertions and (2) in questions:—
Future Tense
| Assertions (Declarative) |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I shall fall. |
1. We shall fall. |
| 2. Thou wilt fall. |
2. You will fall. |
| 3. He will fall. |
3. They will fall. |
| Questions (Interrogative) |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. Shall I fall? |
1. Shall we fall? |
| 2. Shalt thou fall? |
2. Shall you fall? |
| 3. Will he fall? |
3. Will they fall? |
234. Common errors are the use of will for shall (1) in the
first person in assertions and questions, and (2) in the second person
in questions.
In the following sentences the first person of the future
tense is correctly formed:—
| I shall [NOT will] drown. |
Shall [NOT will] I drown? |
| I shall [NOT will] fail. |
Shall [NOT will] I fail? |
| We shall [NOT will] sink. |
Shall [NOT will] we sink? |
The verb-phrases with shall express merely the action of the
verb in future time. They do not indicate any willingness or
desire on the part of the subject.
Contrast the following sentences, in which I will or we will
is used:—
- I will go with you.
- I will give you what you ask.
- I will not endure it.
- We will allow you to enter.
- We will have the truth.
Here the verb-phrases with will do not (as in the previous
examples of I shall) express the action of the verb in future
time. They express the present willingness or desire or determination
of the speaker to do something in the future.
Hence such verb-phrases with will in the first person are
not forms of the future tense. They are special verb-phrases
expressing willingness or desire.
235. In the first person shall, not will, is the auxiliary of the future
tense in both assertions and questions. It denotes simple futurity, without
expressing willingness, desire, or determination.
Will in the first person is used in promising, threatening, consenting,
and expressing resolution. It never denotes simple futurity.
I. Simple Futurity (Future Tense)
- I shall be eighteen years old in July. [Not: will be.]
- Hurry, or we shall miss our train. [Not: will miss.]
- We shall be glad to see him. [Not: will be.]
II. Promises, Threats, etc.
- I will subscribe to your fund. [Promise.]
- We will do our best. [Promise.]
- I will discharge you if you are late again. [Threat.]
- We will permit you to go. [Consent.]
- I will have obedience. [Resolution.]
I’ll and we’ll are contractions of I will and we will and can
never stand for I shall and we shall.
- I’ll meet you at noon. [Promise.]
- I’ll never consent. [Resolution.]
- We’ll be revenged on you. [Threat.]
236. When willingness is expressed by an adjective, I shall
is correct; when by an adverb, I will. Thus,—
- I shall be glad to help you.
- I will gladly help you.
Note. Such expressions as I shall be glad, I shall be willing, I shall be
charmed to do this, express willingness not by means of shall but in the adjectives
glad, willing, charmed. To say, “I will be glad to do this,” then, would
be wrong, for it would be to express volition twice. Such a sentence could
only mean “I am determined to be glad to do this.”
On the other hand, in “I will gladly help you,” volition is expressed by the
verb-phrase will help and the adverb merely modifies the phrase by emphasizing
the speaker’s willingness. Hence I will is correct.
237. Will, when emphasized, always expresses determination
on the part of the subject, even in the second and third persons.
- I WILL go, no matter what you say.
- {You WILL | He WILL}
act foolishly, in spite of my advice.
238. In the second person Shall you? not Will you? is the proper
form of the future tense in questions.
Will you? always denotes willingness, consent, or determination, and
never simple futurity.
Note that in questions in the second person, the auxiliary
used is the same as that expected in the answer.
I. Future Tense (Simple Futurity)
- Shall you be disappointed if he does not come? [I shall.]
- Shall you regret his absence? [I shall.]
- Shall you go by boat or by train? [I shall go by boat.]
II. Verb-Phrase denoting Willingness, etc.
- Will you write often? [I will.]
- Will you allow me to help you? [I will.]
- Will you be so kind as to open the window? [I will.]
239. Shall in the second and third persons is not the sign of
the future tense in declarative sentences.
It is used in commanding, promising, threatening, and expressing
resolution, the volition being that of the speaker.
- Thou shalt not kill. [Command.]
- You shall have the hat before Monday. [Promise.]
- You shall pay for this insult! [Threat.]
- She shall not regret her generosity. [Resolution.]
In prophetic language, shall is common in the second and
third persons, even when there is no idea of commanding or
the like.
The sun shall be turned into darkness and the moon into blood.—Joel
ii. 31.
240. In military orders and official communications, custom
permits the more courteous will in the place of shall in the
second and third persons.
- You will immediately report for orders.
- Heads of Departments will submit their estimates before January first.
For shall and will in subordinate clauses, see pp. 130–132.
241. Future time may also be expressed by the present
tense, or by about or going with the infinitive (§ 319).
- We sail for Havana on Tuesday.
- They are about to begin the study of Greek.
COMPLETE OR COMPOUND TENSES
242. Completed action is denoted by special verb-phrases made
by prefixing to the past participle some form of the auxiliary
verb have.
These are called the complete or compound tenses.
There are three complete or compound tenses,—the perfect
(or present perfect), the pluperfect (or past perfect), and the future
perfect.
1. The perfect (or present perfect) tense denotes that the action of
the verb is complete at the time of speaking. It is formed by prefixing
have (hast, has) to the past participle.
- I have learned my lesson.
- He has convinced me.
Note. With several verbs of motion the auxiliary be is sometimes used
instead of have: as,—“My friends are gone” (or “have gone”); “Your time
is come” (or “has come”).
2. The pluperfect (or past perfect) tense denotes that the action was
completed at some point in past time. It is formed by prefixing had
(hadst) to the past participle.
- Before night fell, I had finished the book.
- When Blake had spoken, Allen rose to reply.
3. The future perfect tense denotes that the action will be completed
at some point in future time. It is formed by prefixing the future tense
of have (shall have, etc.) to the past participle.
Before I hear from you again, I shall have landed at Naples.
The future perfect tense is rare except in very formal writing.
243. The forms of the past participle will be studied in
§ 334. Meanwhile, the following practical rule will serve every
purpose:—
The past participle is that verb-form which is used after I have.
Examples:
- [I have] mended,
- tried,
- swept,
- bought,
- broken,
- forgotten,
- found,
- sunk,
- dug.
244. A verb-phrase made by prefixing having to the past
participle is called the perfect participle.
Having reached my destination, I stopped.
A verb-phrase made by prefixing to have to the past participle
is called the perfect infinitive.
I am sorry to have missed you.
245. Three forms of the verb are so important that they
are called the principal parts. These are:—
- (1) the first person singular of the present;
- (2) the first person singular of the past;
- (3) the past participle.
| Present |
Past |
Past Participle |
| (I) walk |
(I) walked |
walked |
| (I) think |
(I) thought |
thought |
| (I) see |
(I) saw |
seen |
| (I) come |
(I) came |
come |
| (I) make |
(I) made |
made |
246. Voice is that property of verbs which indicates whether the
subject acts or is acted upon.
There are two voices, active and passive.
1. A verb is in the active voice when it represents the subject as the
doer of an act.
- Richard shot the bear.
- Mr. Hardy builds carriages.
- Dr. Wilson has cured my father.
2. A verb is in the passive voice when it represents the subject as
the receiver or the product of an action.
- The bear was shot by Richard.
- Carriages are built by Mr. Hardy.
- My father has been cured by Dr. Wilson.
247. The passive voice of a verb is expressed by a verb-phrase made
by prefixing some form of the copula (is, was, etc.) to the past participle.
In the passive voice of the complete tenses, the past participle
been follows the proper form of the auxiliary have (as in the
third example in § 246, 2).
The passive of the infinitive is made by prefixing to be (perfect,
to have been) to the past participle. Thus,—
- Present infinitive passive: to be struck.
- Perfect infinitive passive: to have been struck.
248. The following table gives the conjugation of the verb
strike in the active and passive of the six tenses:—
| Active Voice |
Passive Voice |
| Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
| 1. I strike. |
1. I am struck. |
| 2. Thou strikest. |
2. Thou art struck. |
| 3. He strikes. |
3. He is struck. |
| PLURAL |
| 1. We strike. |
1. We are struck. |
| 2. You strike. |
2. You are struck. |
| 3. They strike. |
3. They are struck. |
| Past Tense |
| SINGULAR |
| 1. I struck. |
1. I was struck. |
| 2. Thou struckest. |
2. Thou wast (or wert) struck. |
| 3. He struck. |
3. He was struck. |
| PLURAL |
| 1. We struck. |
1. We were struck. |
| 2. You struck. |
2. You were struck. |
| 3. They struck. |
3. They were struck. |
| Future Tense |
| SINGULAR |
| 1. I shall strike. |
1. I shall be struck. |
| 2. Thou wilt strike. |
2. Thou wilt be struck. |
| 3. He will strike. |
3. He will be struck. |
| PLURAL |
| 1. We shall strike. |
1. We shall be struck. |
| 2. You will strike. |
2. You will be struck. |
| 3. They will strike. |
3. They will be struck. |
| Perfect (or Present Perfect) Tense |
| SINGULAR |
| 1. I have struck. |
1. I have been struck. |
| 2. Thou hast struck. |
2. Thou hast been struck. |
| 3. He has struck. |
3. He has been struck. |
| PLURAL |
| 1. We have struck. |
1. We have been struck. |
| 2. You have struck. |
2. You have been struck. |
| 3. They have struck. |
3. They have been struck. |
| Pluperfect (or Past Perfect) Tense |
| SINGULAR |
| 1. I had struck. |
1. I had been struck. |
| 2. Thou hadst struck. |
2. Thou hadst been struck. |
| 3. He had struck. |
3. He had been struck. |
| PLURAL |
| 1. We had struck. |
1. We had been struck. |
| 2. You had struck. |
2. You had been struck. |
| 3. They had struck. |
3. They had been struck. |
| Future Perfect Tense |
| SINGULAR |
| 1. I shall have struck. |
1. I shall have been struck. |
| 2. Thou wilt have struck. |
2. Thou wilt have been struck. |
| 3. He will have struck. |
3. He will have been struck. |
| PLURAL |
| 1. We shall have struck. |
1. We shall have been struck. |
| 2. You will have struck. |
2. You will have been struck. |
| 3. They will have struck. |
3. They will have been struck. |
Use of the Passive Voice
249. Any sentence of which the predicate is a transitive
verb followed by an object, may be changed from the active
to the passive form without affecting the sense.
- Active. Richard shot the bear.
- Passive. The bear was shot by Richard.
In this change, (1) bear, the object of the active verb
shot, becomes the subject of the passive verb was shot; and
(2) Richard, the subject of the active verb shot, becomes by
Richard, an adverbial phrase, modifying the passive verb was
shot. Thus we have the rule:—
The object of the active verb becomes the subject of the passive, and
the subject of the active verb becomes in the passive an adverbial phrase
modifying the predicate verb.
| Active Voice |
Passive Voice |
| My cat caught a bird. |
A bird was caught by my cat. |
| Austin thanked Charles. |
Charles was thanked by Austin. |
| The bullet penetrated a tree. |
A tree was penetrated by the bullet. |
| Sargent painted that portrait. |
That portrait was painted by Sargent. |
| The fireman had saved the child. |
The child had been saved by the fireman. |
250. Intransitive verbs are ordinarily used in the active voice
only.
- The bystanders laughed.
- The watchdogs bark.
- Snow is falling.
251. An intransitive verb followed by a preposition is often
used in the passive, the object of the preposition becoming the
subject of the verb.
| Active Voice |
Passive Voice |
| Everybody laughed at him. |
He was laughed at by everybody. |
| The attorney general has not yet passed upon this bill. |
This bill has not yet been passed upon. |
| He has tampered with this lock. |
This lock has been tampered with. |
| The cart ran over me. |
I was run over by the cart. |
Other examples are:
- talk about (= discuss),
- look or inquire into (= investigate),
- look upon (= regard),
- jeer at (= deride),
- reason with,
- object to,
- insist upon,
- act upon.
Note. In this idiom, the preposition is treated like an ending attached to
the verb to make it transitive. In other words, laugh at, pass upon, etc., are
treated as compound verbs, and the object of the preposition is, in effect, the
object of the compound. In the passive, this object becomes the subject and
the preposition (now lacking an object) remains attached to the verb. The
passive construction is well established, but not always graceful.
252. The passive of some verbs of choosing, calling, naming,
making, and thinking may be followed by a predicate nominative
(§ 88, 2).
| Active Voice |
Passive Voice |
| (PREDICATE OBJECTIVE) |
(PREDICATE NOMINATIVE) |
| We elected John president. |
John was elected president. |
| The Roman people called the chief friend. |
The chief was called friend by the Roman people. |
| The herald proclaimed him emperor. |
He was proclaimed emperor by the herald. |
Note. In the active voice, these verbs may take two objects referring to
the same person or thing,—a direct object and a predicate objective (§ 104). In
the passive, the direct object becomes the subject, and the predicate objective
becomes a predicate nominative, agreeing with the subject (§ 88, 2).
Object of the Passive
253. When a verb takes both a direct and an indirect object,
one of the two is often retained after the passive, the other
becoming the subject. Thus,—
1. The indirect object is retained.
| Active Voice |
Passive Voice |
| My aunt gave me this watch. |
This watch was given me by my aunt. |
| We allowed them free choice. |
Free choice was allowed them. |
| He allowed each speaker an hour. |
An hour was allowed each speaker. |
| Congress granted me a pension. |
A pension was granted me. |
Note. The preposition to is often inserted in the passive construction,
especially with a noun; as,—“A small pension was granted to Dr. Johnson.”
2. The direct object is retained.
| Active Voice |
Passive Voice |
| We allowed them their choice. |
They were allowed their choice. |
| He allowed each speaker an hour. |
Each speaker was allowed an hour. |
| They showed me the way. |
I was shown the way. |
| Experience has taught me wisdom. |
I have been taught wisdom by experience. |
The direct object after a passive verb is often called the
retained object.
Note. This construction, though common, is avoided by many careful
writers, except in a few well-established idioms. Its habitual use gives one’s
style a heavy and awkward air. Instead of “He was given permission,” one
may say “He received permission”; instead of “I was given this watch by
my aunt,” either “It was my aunt who gave me this watch” or “This watch
was a present from my aunt.”
254. The verb ask, which may take two direct objects,—one
denoting the person, the other the thing,—sometimes
retains its second object in the passive construction (§ 103).
- Active. We asked him his opinion.
- Passive. He was asked his opinion.
255. In addition to the tense-forms already described, verbs
have so-called progressive forms.
The progressive form of a tense represents the action of the verb as
going on or continuing at the time referred to.
- I ate my dinner.
- I was eating my dinner.
- While I was quietly reading by my fireside, strange things were taking
place in the square.
Both ate and was eating are in the past tense. But ate merely
expresses a past action, whereas was eating describes this action
as continuing or in progress in past time.
256. The progressive form is a verb-phrase made by prefixing to
the present participle some form of the verb to be.
Progressive Form
| Active Voice |
Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I am striking. |
1. We are striking. |
| 2. Thou art striking. |
2. You are striking. |
| 3. He is striking. |
3. They are striking. |
So in the other tenses:
| Past |
I was striking, etc. |
| Future |
I shall be striking, etc. |
| Perfect |
I have been striking, etc. |
| Pluperfect |
I had been striking, etc. |
| Future perfect |
I shall have been striking, etc. |
Passive Voice
| Present |
I am being struck, etc. |
| Past |
I was being struck, etc. |
257. In the passive, the progressive forms are confined to
the present and the past tense.
- He is being helped by his brother. [Present.]
- I am being trained by Arthur Ray. [Present.]
- When I called, tea was being served. [Past.]
258. In subordinate clauses, the verb is (in its various forms)
with its subject is often omitted in progressive phrases.
- While waiting for the train, I bought a newspaper. [That is, While I
was waiting.]
- Though [he was] swimming vigorously, he could not stem the tide.
- When [I am] reading, I like to have the light shine over my left
shoulder.
In parsing, the omitted words should be supplied.
259. For such progressive forms as is building for is being
built, see § 352.
260. The present or the past of a verb in the active voice may be expressed
with emphasis by means of a verb-phrase consisting of do or did
and the infinitive without to.
Such a phrase is called the emphatic form of the present or past tense.
“I do see you” and “I did go” differ from “I see you” and “I went”
merely in emphasis. Hence do see is called the emphatic form of the present
tense of see, and did go the emphatic form of the past tense of go.
261. In questions and in negative statements the emphatic
forms are used without the effect of emphasis.
Did you go? I did not go.
Note. Do often stands for some other verb which has just been used: as,
“Jack swims better than I do,” “You looked as tired as she did.” This idiom
comes from the omission of the infinitive in the verb-phrase:—“Jack swims
better than I do [swim].”
In poetry and older English the verb-phrase with do or did in declarative
sentences often carries no emphasis, but merely takes the place of the present
or past: as,—“The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.”
262. Mood is that property of verbs which shows the manner in
which the action or state is expressed.
Mood (or mode) is derived from the Latin word modus, “manner.”
Compare the following sentences, noting the form of the
verb in each:
- Richard is quiet.
- Is Richard quiet?
- If Richard were quiet, I might study.
- Richard, be quiet.
In the first and second sentences, the form is is used to assert
or question a fact; in the third, the form were expresses a condition
or supposition that is contrary to fact; in the fourth, the
form be expresses a command or request.
The difference in form seen in the verb in these sentences is
called a difference of mood.
263. There are three moods,—the indicative, the imperative, and
the subjunctive.
1. The indicative is the mood of simple assertion or interrogation, but
it is used in other constructions also.
2. The imperative is the mood of command or request.
3. The subjunctive mood is used in certain special constructions of
wish, condition, and the like.
Thus, in the examples in § 262, is is in the indicative, were
in the subjunctive, and be in the imperative mood.
I. INDICATIVE MOOD
264. The ordinary forms of the indicative mood in the active
and the passive voice and in all six tenses,—present, past,
future, perfect (or present perfect), pluperfect (or past perfect),
and future perfect,—may be seen in the table on pp. 108–110.
For the progressive form of the indicative, see § 256; for the
emphatic form, see § 260.
265. The commonest uses of the indicative mood are in statements
or questions as to matters of fact; but it may express
almost any other form of thought. Thus,
- Time and tide wait for no man. [Assertion.]
- How goes the world with you? [Interrogation.]
- How it rains! [Exclamation.]
- If the river rises, the dam will be swept away. [Supposition.]
- I suspect that he has absconded. [Doubt.]
- I hope that John will come soon. [Desire.]
- Though Ellen dislikes algebra, she never shirks. [Concession.]
- You will report for duty immediately. [Command.]
- Will you allow me to use your knife? [Request.]
Note. The indicative and the subjunctive were originally quite distinct
in form, and each had its own set of constructions. But, as our language has
grown simpler in its structure, the forms of these two moods have become
almost identical, and the uses of the indicative have been greatly multiplied
at the expense of the subjunctive. Indeed, there is scarcely any variety of
thought expressed by the subjunctive or the imperative for which the indicative
cannot also be employed. It is therefore impossible to frame any satisfactory
definition of the indicative. Its functions are too varied to be included in
one general statement. The indicative is often described as the mood which
asserts thought as a fact, and the subjunctive as the mood which expresses
thought as supposition (or as mere thought). But the indicative, as well as the
subjunctive, may express supposition, condition, doubt, desire, concession, etc.
Hence the definitions in § 263 are as exact as the facts of the language allow.
All the efforts of grammarians to devise more “accurate” definitions break
down when tested by actual usage.
II. IMPERATIVE MOOD
266. The imperative is the mood of command or request.
- Hurry!
- Lie down.
- Shut the door.
- Have patience.
- Light the lamp.
- Show us the way.
- Wait a moment.
- Come to dinner.
The imperative has both voices, active and passive, but only
one tense,—the present. It has both numbers, the singular and
the plural, but only one person, the second. It has the same
form for both the singular and the plural.
267. 1. The imperative active is the verb in its simplest form.
For examples, see § 266.
The imperative of the verb to be is be. Thus,—
- Be brave.
- Be careful.
- Be sure you are right.
- Be here at noon.
2. The imperative passive is a verb-phrase consisting of be and a
past participle.
- Be trusted rather than feared.
- Study your failures and be instructed by them.
268. The subject of an imperative is seldom expressed unless it is
emphatic.
The subject, when expressed, may precede the imperative:
as,—You sit here.
Note. In older English, the subject often followed the imperative: as,—Go
thou, Go you, Hear ye. This use is now confined to the solemn style and
to poetry.
269. The emphatic form of the imperative consists of the imperative
do, followed by the infinitive without to.
- Do tell me what he said.
- Do stand still.
The form with do is often used when the subject is expressed
as,—Do you remain.
270. Prohibition (or negative command) is commonly expressed
by means of the form with do.
- Do not open a closed door without knocking.
- Do not forget to say “thank you.”
In poetry and the solemn style prohibition is often expressed
by the simple imperative with not.
- Tell me not what too well I know.
- Devise not evil against thy neighbor.
- Seek not to learn my name.
271. Commands are sometimes expressed in the indicative
by means of shall or will (§§ 239–240).
- Thou shalt not steal.
- You will leave the room immediately.
For such expressions as “Forward!” “Off with you!” and the like,
see § 530.
For the imperative in conditions, see § 418.
III: SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD
Forms of the Subjunctive
272. The subjunctive mood is used in certain special constructions
of wish, condition, and the like.
In older English, the subjunctive forms were common in a
variety of uses, as they still are in poetry and the solemn
style. In ordinary prose, however, subjunctive forms are rare,
and in conversation they are hardly ever heard, except in the
case of the copula be.
The subjunctive forms of be are the following:—
Subjunctive Mood
| Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. If I be. |
1. If we be. |
| 2. If thou be. |
2. If you be. |
| 3. If he be. |
3. If they be. |
| Past Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. If I were. |
1. If we were. |
| 2. If thou wert. |
2. If you were. |
| 3. If he were. |
3. If they were. |
| Perfect (or Present Perfect) Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. If I have been. |
1. If we have been. |
| 2. If thou have been. |
2. If you have been. |
| 3. If he have been. |
3. If they have been. |
|
Pluperfect (or Past Perfect) Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. If I had been. |
1. If we had been. |
| 2. If thou hadst been. |
2. If you had been. |
| 3. If he had been. |
3. If they had been. |
If is used in the paradigm because it is in clauses beginning with if that
the subjunctive is commonest in modern English; but if is of course no part
of the subjunctive inflection.
273. In other verbs, the subjunctive active has the same forms
as the indicative, except in the second and third persons singular
of the present and the perfect, which are like the first person:—
| Present |
Perfect |
| 1. If I strike. |
1. If I have struck. |
| 2. If thou strike. |
2. If thou have struck. |
| 3. If he strike. |
3. If he have struck. |
In the passive subjunctive, the subjunctive forms of the copula
(§ 272) are used as auxiliaries:—present, If I be struck; past,
If I were struck; perfect, If I have been struck; pluperfect, If
I had been struck. (See table, p. 304.)
274. Progressive verb-phrases in the subjunctive may be formed
by means of the copula:—present, If I be striking; past, If I
were striking. The present is rare; the past is common.
Uses of the Subjunctive
Subjunctive in Wishes and Exhortations
275. The subjunctive is often used in wishes or prayers.
- Angels and ministers of grace defend us!
- Heaven help him!
- The saints preserve us!
- God bless you!
- Long live the king!
- O that I had listened to him!
- O that we were rid of him!
In the first five examples, the wish is expressed in an independent
sentence. In the last two, the construction is subordinate,—the
that-clause being the object of an unexpressed
“I wish” (§ 407).
276. The subjunctive be is often omitted when it may easily
be supplied.
- Peace [be] to his ashes!
- Honor [be] to his memory!
- Honor [be] to whom honor is due!
277. Wishes are often introduced by may or would.
- May you never want!
- Would that he were safe!
- Would you were with us! [For Would that.]
May and would in such expressions were originally subjunctives; would
stands for I would, that is, I should wish. Want in the first example is an
infinitive without to (§ 311). For wishes expressed by the infinitive, see § 320.
278. Exhortations in the first person plural sometimes take
the subjunctive in elevated or poetical style.
- Hear we the king!
- Join we in a hymn of praise!
Exhortation is ordinarily expressed by let us followed by
the infinitive without to.
- Let us join hands.
- Let us have peace.
- Let’s camp here.
Let is a verb in the imperative mood, us is its object, and the infinitive
(join, have, camp) depends on let.
Subjunctives in Concessions, Conditions, etc.
279. The subjunctive is used after though, although, to express an
admission or concession not as a fact but as a supposition.
- Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him.
- Though he were to beg this on his knees, I should still refuse.
When the concession is stated as an admitted fact, the indicative
is regular.
- Although he is a foreigner, he speaks good English.
- Though he sometimes sings, he is not now in good voice.
280. After if and unless, expressing condition, the subjunctive
may be used in a variety of ways.
- 1. If this be gold, our fortune is made. [It may or may not be gold.]
- 2. If he confess, I shall overlook the offence. [He may or may not
confess.]
- 3. Unless he confess, he cannot be convicted. [He may or may not
confess.]
- 4. If this were gold, our fortune would be made. [It is not gold; hence
our fortune is not made.]
- 5. If he stood before me at this moment, I should tell him my opinion.
[He does not stand before me; hence I do not tell him.]
- 6. If he had confessed, I should have overlooked his fault. [He did
not confess; hence I did not overlook it.]
- 7. Unless he had confessed, he could not have been convicted. [He
did confess; hence he was convicted.]
In conditional clauses, the present subjunctive denotes either
present or future time. It puts the supposed case doubtfully, but
not necessarily as improbable. (See examples 1–3.)
The past subjunctive refers to present time. It implies that
the supposed case is not now a fact. (See examples 4 and 5.)
The pluperfect (or past perfect) subjunctive refers to past time.
It implies that the supposed case was not a fact. (See 6 and 7.)
For details of conditional sentences, see pp. 167–172.
281. Concession or condition may be expressed by the subjunctive
without though or if, the verb preceding the subject, which is
sometimes omitted.
I. Concession
- Try as we may, we cannot swim to that rock.
- Say what he will, he can never convince me.
- Come what will, I’ll stand my ground.
- Be that as it may, my mind is made up.
II. Condition
- Were I asked, I could tell all the facts. [If I were asked, etc.]
- Had I known, I would have written to you. [If I had known, etc.]
- I shall be twenty years old, come Tuesday. [If Tuesday come, etc.]
- I will go, rain or shine. [If it rain, or if it shine, etc.]
- Be he prince or be he pauper, every guest is welcome here.
Note. The subjunctive in these concessive and conditional uses is really
the same as that in exhortations (§ 278). “Try [we] as we may” means literally,
“Let us try as hard as we can,” and this has the force of “However
hard we try” or “Although we try ever so hard.”
282. After as if (as though), the past subjunctive is used.
- He looks as if he were about to speak. [Not: as if he was about to
speak.]
- I act as if I were crazy. [Not: as if I was crazy.]
283. The subjunctive may express not what is or was, but
what would be or would have been, the case.
- It were safer to travel by day. [It would be safer, etc.]
- I had been wiser had I forded the river. [I should have been wiser if
I had.]
This construction is old-fashioned. Modern English commonly uses should
(or would) be, should (or would) have been, instead.
284. The subjunctive is occasionally used after that, lest, before,
until, etc., in subordinate clauses referring to the future
and commonly expressing purpose or expectation.
- Take heed that he escape not. [Purpose.]
- Give him food lest he perish. [Purpose.]
- Let us tarry until he come. [Expectation.]
This construction is confined to poetry and the solemn or
formal style. In ordinary language the indicative or a verb-phrase
with may is used.
- Take heed that he does not escape.
- Give him food in order that he may not perish.
- Let us wait till he comes.
285. The past subjunctive had is common in had rather and
similar phrases.
- I had rather wait a day.
- You had better leave the room.
- He had as lief go as stay.
Note. Had in this construction is sometimes condemned as erroneous or
inelegant; but the idiom is well-established.
Might better, would better, and would rather may be used instead of had
better, etc.; but would better is improper in the first person.
286. The subjunctive forms are often replaced by verb-phrases
containing the auxiliaries may, might, could, would, should.
1. In wishes (§ 277).
- May you live long and prosper!
- May he never repent this act!
- Ah, could I but live a hundred years!
2. In concessions and conditions (§§ 279–280).
- Though {I | you | he} should fail, there would still be hope.
- If {I | you | he} should fail, all would be lost.
3. In sentences expressing not what is or was, but what
would be or would have been, the case (§ 283).
- {I should | You would | He would}
write to Charles if I knew his address.
- It would have been better to telegraph.
4. In subordinate clauses introduced by that, lest, before,
until, etc. (§ 284).
- I will take care that nothing may prevent.
- I took care that nothing {might | should} prevent.
- The general determined to wait until fresh troops should arrive.
USE OF MODAL AUXILIARIES
287. Several auxiliary verbs are used to form verb-phrases indicating
ability, possibility, obligation, or necessity.
Such verb-phrases are called potential phrases, that is, “phrases
of possibility.”
The auxiliary verbs used in potential phrases are:—may, can,
must, might, could, would, and should. They are called modal
auxiliaries and are followed by the infinitive without to.
- We may ask him a few questions.
- I can manage a motor car.
- You must inquire the way.
- He might give you a chance.
- I could show you his house if you would permit me.
- I should enjoy a sea-voyage.
Note. The fact that give, etc., in such phrases as can give, are infinitives
may be seen by comparing “I can strike” with “I am able to strike,” “I may
strike” with “I am permitted to strike,” “I must strike” with “I am obliged
to strike,” and so on. In earlier periods of the language, when the infinitive had
a special ending (-an or -en), the nature of the construction was unmistakable.
288. Potential phrases may be arranged in tables of conjugation,
like that on pp. 108–110. They are often called, collectively,
the potential mood.
Active Voice
| Present Tense |
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I may strike.34 |
1. We may strike. |
| 2. Thou mayst strike. |
2. You may strike. |
| 3. He may strike. |
3. They may strike. |
| Past Tense |
| 1. I might strike.35 |
1. We might strike. |
| 2. Thou mightst strike. |
2. You might strike. |
| 3. He might strike. |
3. They might strike. |
|
Perfect (or Present Perfect) Tense
|
| 1. I may have struck.36 |
1. We may have struck. |
| 2. Thou mayst have struck. |
2. You may have struck. |
| 3. He may have struck. |
3. They may have struck. |
| Pluperfect (or Past Perfect) Tense |
| 1. I might have struck.37 |
1. We might have struck. |
| 2. Thou mightst have struck. |
2. You might have struck. |
| 3. He might have struck. |
3. They might have struck. |
Passive Voice
| Present Tense |
| I may be struck, etc. |
We may be struck, etc. |
| Past Tense |
| I might be struck, etc. |
We might be struck, etc. |
| Perfect (or Present Perfect) Tense |
| I may have been struck, etc. |
We may have been struck, etc. |
| Pluperfect (or Past Perfect) Tense |
| I might have been struck, etc. |
We might have been struck, etc. |
289. Can (past tense, could) regularly indicates that the
subject is able to do something.
- John can ride a bicycle.
- Harry could swim.
290. May (past tense, might) indicates (1) permission, (2)
possibility or doubtful intention, (3) a wish.
- (1) You may borrow my pencil.
- I told him that he might join our party.
- (2) He may accept my offer.
- You might not like it.
- (3) May good fortune attend you!
291. In asking permission, the proper form is “May I?”
not “Can I?” With negatives, however, can is more common
than may, except in questions. Thus,—
- Question. May I (or mayn’t I) play ball this morning?
- Answer. No, you cannot; but you may play this afternoon.
292. Must expresses necessity or obligation.
- We must all die sometime.
- You must wait for the train.
- You must not be discouraged by failure.
Note. Must, though originally a past tense, is in modern English almost
always used as a present. Past necessity may be expressed by had to with
the infinitive: as,—“I had to wait for the train.”
293. Ought with the present infinitive, expresses a present
duty or moral obligation; with the perfect infinitive, a past duty
or obligation. Should is often used in the same sense.
- I ought to write that letter. [Present.]
- You ought not to object. [Present.]
- This roof ought to be mended. [Present.]
- I ought to have known better. [Past.]
- Your dog ought not to have been unleashed. [Past.]
- You should be careful. [Present.]
- The garden should have been weeded yesterday. [Past.]
Note. Ought is really an old past tense of the verb owe, but is now always
a present. Its former meaning may be seen in Dame Quickly’s “You ought
him a thousand pound” (Shakspere, 1 Henry IV, iii. 3. 152).
Had should never be prefixed to ought.
| Correct |
Incorrect |
| You ought to stay at home. |
You had ought to stay at home. |
| We oughtn’t to make so much noise. |
We hadn’t ought to make so much noise. |
| John ought to begin, oughtn’t he? |
John ought to begin, hadn’t he? |
294. Should and ought sometimes express what would certainly
be expected in the case supposed.
- Three weeks
{should | ought to} suffice.
- If the train is on time, he {should | ought to} arrive at six.
295. Would in all three persons sometimes indicates habitual
action in the past.
- I would gaze at the sea for hours at a time.
- Whenever we asked Edward about his adventures, he would begin to
talk of something else.
296. Should is the past tense of shall, and would is the past
tense of will. Hence the rules for should and would are similar
to those for shall and will (§§ 233–239). But there is much
variation, especially in subordinate clauses.
I. IN SIMPLE SENTENCES AND INDEPENDENT CLAUSES
297. Except in certain kinds of subordinate clauses, the
distinction between should and would is practically the same
as that between shall and will.
When the auxiliary verb expresses futurity without any idea
of wishing, consenting, or the like, the forms are as follows:—
Assertions (Declarative)
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. I should fall. |
1. We should fall. |
| 2. Thou wouldst fall. |
2. You would fall. |
| 3. He would fall. |
3. They would fall. |
Questions (Interrogative)
| SINGULAR |
PLURAL |
| 1. Should I fall? |
1. Should we fall? |
| 2. Shouldst thou fall? |
2. Should you fall? |
| 3. Would he fall? |
3. Would they fall? |
298. Common errors are the use of I would for I should in
assertions, and that of Would I? and Would you? for Should
I? and Should you? in questions.
The correct forms are shown in the following sentences.
I. I should (we should) and I would (we would) in assertions:—
- 1. I should break my neck if I fell.
- 2. I should hesitate to try this experiment.
- 3. I shouldn’t wonder if he escaped.
- 4. We should regret any misunderstanding.
- 5. I should wish to examine the plans again before deciding.
- 6. I should be glad to accept any fair offer.
- 7. I would give five dollars for a ticket.
- 8. I would help you if I could.
- 9. I would never agree to such a proposition.
- 10. We would rather die than surrender.
- 11. We would pay our bill to-day if we had the money.
- 12. I would gladly accept any fair offer.
In the first six examples, I (or we) should is correct, because
the auxiliary gives no suggestion of the speaker’s will (or
volition). In the last six, on the contrary, the speaker’s willingness
or desire is plainly expressed by the auxiliary, and I
(or we) would is therefore used.
Note. In such sentences as the fifth,—“I should wish to examine the plans
again before deciding,”—wish expresses volition. Hence “I would wish” is
incorrect, for it expresses volition twice and can mean only “I desire to wish.”
On the same principle we say “I should prefer,” “I should be glad,” etc.
(see § 236).
Sometimes either I would or I should may be used, but with a difference in
meaning. Thus, in the eighth example, “I should help you” might be substituted
for “I would help you.” This change, however, makes the remark sound
less cordial and sympathetic; for I should (unlike I would) gives no hint of
the speaker’s desire to be of service.
II. Should I (or we)? in questions:—
- 1. Should I break my neck if I fell?
- 2. Should I be poisoned if I ate those berries?
- 3. Should I take cold without my overcoat?
- 4. Should I disturb you if I were to practise my music lesson?
- 5. Should we run aground if we missed the channel?
Note. Would I? is confined, for the most part, to questions in which one
repeats the words or thought of another. Thus,—“You would give five dollars
for a ticket.” “Would I? No, I wouldn’t!” In this use it is chiefly colloquial.
III. Should you? and Would you? in questions:—
- 1. Should you drown if the boat were to capsize? [Yes, I should
drown, for I do not know how to swim.]
- 2. Should you despair if this plan were a failure? [No, I should not,
for I have other resources.]
- 3. Should you think that ten yards of velvet would be enough? [Yes,
I should think so.]
- 4. Should you be offended if I were to speak frankly? [No, I should
not be offended.]
- 5. Should you wish to examine the plans again before deciding?
[Yes, I should (see note under I, above).]
- 6. Would you wear a hat or a cap? [I would wear a cap if I were you.]
- 7. Would you study Greek if you were in my place? [Yes, I would.]
- 8. Would you accept my apology if it were offered? [Certainly, I
would accept it gladly.]
- 9. Would you be so kind as to lend me your compasses? [Certainly
I would lend them, if I had not lost them.]
- 10. Would you allow me to use your name as a reference? [I would.]
The choice between should and would in these sentences
corresponds to the form expected in the answer (§ 238).
299. The chief occasions on which Would you? is correct
are:—(1) in asking advice in a matter of doubt, and (2) in
asking consent or permission.
In examples 6 and 7 in § 298, III, the speaker asks advice; in 8, 9,
and 10, he asks consent or permission.
300. Note that the proper forms are I should like, Should I
like? and Should you like?
- I should like to read that book.
- Should I like to go to Rome? Indeed, I should.
- Should you like to receive a copy of our catalogue? [I should like to
receive one.]
Note. Would is very common in these phrases, even among writers of
repute, but it is still contrary to the best usage. The reason for should is the
same as in I should wish (§ 298, I, note).
301. I’d and we’d are contractions of I would and we
would. Hence they can never stand for I should and we
should (§ 235).
302. Should in the second and third persons may be used in
simple declarative sentences and independent clauses to express
the will of the speaker (§ 239).
- If I had my way, you should be prosecuted. [That is: I would take
care that you were prosecuted.]
- If I had the money, you should be paid immediately. [Compare: You
shall be paid.]
- If I were you, she should not regret her generosity. [Compare: She
shall not regret it.]
II. SHOULD AND WOULD IN SUBORDINATE CLAUSES
303. In some kinds of subordinate clauses, the use of should
and would differs considerably from that in simple sentences
and principal clauses.
The following classes require attention:—(1) clauses of purpose
or expectation (§ 304), (2) conditional and concessive
clauses (§ 305), (3) clauses expressing volition not that of
the subject (§ 306), (4) clauses stating something as an idea
(§ 307), (5) indirect discourse (§ 308).
304. In subordinate clauses expressing the purpose or expectation
with which anything is done, shall and should are used
in all three persons.
- Charleton took great pains that {I | you | they} should understand the details of the treaty.
- Scott {is | was} very careful that nothing {shall | should} interfere with his plans.
- They took every precaution lest {I | you | he} should suspect the plot.
- Anderson waited patiently until {I | you | they} should arrive with the horses.
- We strained every nerve to reach the cave before the storm should break.
305. In conditional or concessive clauses expressing a future
supposed case doubtfully, shall and should are used in all three
persons; but will and would are proper when the subject is
thought of as wishing or consenting.
- 1. What would happen if {I | you | he} should not carry out the commander’s instructions?
- 2. If {I | you | he} should miss the steamer, our friends would be alarmed.
- 3. Whoever {shall | should} violate this law {shall | should} pay the penalty. [That is: If anybody shall violate, etc.]
- 4. Whenever {I | you | he} shall find an opportunity, let us try the experiment. [That is: If ever I shall find, etc.]
- 5. He promised to assist you whenever you should need help. [Whenever = if ever.]
- 6. Though {we | you | they} should fail, others would make the attempt. [Concession.]
- 7. Though Evans should disappoint me, I should not lose confidence in him.
- 8. Vernon will do his part if {I | you | they} will coöperate with him.
- 9. If {I | you | he} will only make the effort, success is certain.
- 10. Edmund would reveal the secret if {I | you | they} would assist him in his search for the treasure.
- 11. If we would take pains, our parents would be satisfied.
- 12. Whoever will join us may be sure of a pleasant and profitable journey. [That is: If any one will join us, he may be sure, etc.]
When a future supposed case is admitted or conceded as certain,
will may be used in the second and third persons to denote
mere futurity.
- Though {you | he} will certainly fail, {you | he} may make the attempt.
- Though the ship will not sink for some hours, let us take to the boats.
306. Shall and should are often used in the second and third
persons in subordinate clauses to express volition which is not
that of the subject.
- Templeton insists that you shall accompany him.
- This letter directs where you shall station yourself.
- We gave orders that the gates should be closed.
- My wish is that {you | he} should remain at home.
- The law prescribed when and to whom the tax should be paid.
307. When a clause with that states something, not as a
fact but as an idea to be considered, should is the proper
auxiliary in all three persons.
- I am not surprised that you should find your lesson rather difficult.
[That is: “When I consider the matter, I do not find the idea surprising.”
In “I am not surprised that you find,” etc., the subordinate clause makes
the statement as a fact.]
- It is strange that Tom should neglect his swimming lessons. [Contrast:
It is strange that Tom neglects.]
- That Napoleon should have chafed at captivity is only natural. [Contrast:
That Napoleon chafed.]
308. For shall and will, should and would, in indirect discourse,
see §§ 438–439.
309. The infinitive is a verb-form that has some of the properties
of a noun (§ 28). Its two-sided character comes out clearly
when it is used as the subject of a sentence.
- 1. To hope is our only resource.
- 2. To flatter is not my custom.
- 3. To sleep was an impossibility.
- 4. To surrender seemed disgraceful.
- 5. To choose wisely was my greatest difficulty.
- 6. To scale the wall was the work of a moment.
Each of these infinitives (to hope, to flatter, etc.) is a noun,
for each is the simple subject of a sentence. Besides, an ordinary
noun may be substituted for each infinitive with no change
in meaning; as,—“Hope is our only resource”; “Flattery is
not my custom”; “Sleep was an impossibility.”
But each of these infinitives is also a verb,—for (1) it expresses
action; (2) it may be modified by an adverb, as in
No. 5; (3) it takes an object if it is transitive, as in No. 6.
An infinitive (as the examples show) has regularly no subject
and therefore lacks both number and person. Hence it is not
bound by the general rule for the agreement of a verb with
its subject (§ 222). From this fact it derives its name, infinitive,
which means “unrestricted” or “free from limitations.”38
310. The infinitive is a verb-form which partakes of the nature of a
noun. It expresses action or state in the simplest possible way, without
person or number.
It is commonly preceded by the preposition to, which is called the
sign of the infinitive.
To is not, in strictness, a part of the infinitive, but it may
be so regarded for convenience, since the infinitive, in most of
its uses, is preceded by to.
Note. To sometimes stands for an infinitive in careless speech: as,—“You
may go if you wish to” (that is, “if you wish to go”). Such expressions
are to be avoided. It is better to say, “You may go if you wish.”
311. The infinitive often lacks to, especially in verb-phrases
with the auxiliaries will, shall, may, can, must, might, could,
would, should, do, did. For examples, see pp. 102, 114, 124.
312. The infinitive has two tenses,—the present and the
perfect.
1. The present infinitive is the verb in its simplest form, usually
preceded by to: as,—to live, to teach, to bind, to strike.
2. The perfect infinitive is made by prefixing the infinitive of
the auxiliary verb have to the past participle (§ 243): as,—to
have lived, to have taught, to have bound, to have struck.
313. An infinitive may be modified by an adverb, an adverbial
phrase, or an adverbial clause.
- To write legibly is a valuable accomplishment.
- It would be useless to search longer.
- They allowed him to go in peace. [Adverbial phrase.]
- To dive among those weeds would be folly.
- Theodore promises to come when I send for him. [Adverbial clause.]
No modifier should be inserted between to and the infinitive.
- I beg you to inquire carefully into this matter. [Not: to carefully
inquire.]
- Mr. Harris moved to postpone the question indefinitely. [Not: to
indefinitely postpone.]
- I expect always to be poor. [Not: to always be poor.]
Note. Careless writers pay slight attention to this rule, and some good
writers and speakers defy it, hoping to break it down. But it is unquestionably
still in accord with the best usage.
314. The infinitive may take an object if its meaning allows.
- I long to visit Italy.
- My mother feared to enter the house.
- To launch a boat was impossible.
- To grant your request is a pleasure.
- To give him money is useless. [Money is the direct object of to give,
and him the indirect object.]
315. The infinitive is used in a variety of constructions,—(1)
as a noun, (2) as an adjective modifier or adverbial modifier,
(3) in the so-called infinitive clause.
I. THE INFINITIVE AS NOUN
316. The infinitive is used in various noun constructions,—as
subject, as predicate nominative, as nominative of exclamation,
as appositive, as object of certain prepositions, as modifier.
317. An infinitive with or without a complement or modifiers, may
be used as the subject of a sentence, as a predicate nominative, or as
an appositive.
- To descend was extremely difficult. [Subject.]
- To secure a seat was impossible.
- To sing well requires practice.
- His delight was to travel. [Predicate nominative.]
- The governor’s policy is to wait.
- My wish is to see you immediately.
- To decide was to act. [The first infinitive is the subject, and the second
is a predicate nominative.]
- Both alternatives, to advance and to retreat, seemed equally hazardous.
[Apposition with the subject.]
- My first plan, to tunnel under the wall, proved a failure.
- He has but one aim in life, to succeed. [Apposition with the object.]
- I have written with a definite purpose, to dissuade you.
- I give you three choices,—to buy, to lease, or to build.
318. An infinitive in the predicate is often in apposition
with the expletive subject it.
- It was a pleasure to see him. [Instead of: To see him was a pleasure.]
- It is easy to understand you.
- It will be impossible to forget.
- It proved very difficult to find evidence against him.
In this use the infinitive, though grammatically in apposition with it, is
really the subject of the thought (see § 120, 2).
319. The infinitive may be used as the object of the prepositions
but, except, about.
- There was nothing to do but walk (or to walk).
- He will do anything except resign (or except to resign).
- We are about to object. [An idiom expressing futurity.]
- The train is about to start.
Note. Can but and cannot but are distinct idioms. (1) In “I can but thank
you,” but is an adverb (= only). The sentence means: “I can only thank
you—simply that and nothing more!” (2) In “I cannot but thank you,”
but is a preposition (= except). The idiom is shortened from “I cannot
choose but thank you,”—that is, “I have no choice except to do so,” or, in
other words, “I cannot help it.”
The infinitive after for (now a gross error) was once in good use: as,—
What sweeter music can we bring
Than a carol for to sing.—Herrick.
320. The infinitive may be used as a nominative of exclamation
(§ 88, 4).
- To sleep! perchance to dream!
- To suffer and be silent!
- O to be a boy again! [A wish.]
- O to have lived in the brave days of old!
II. THE INFINITIVE AS A MODIFIER
321. An infinitive may be used as an adjective modifier of a noun or
as an adverbial modifier of an adjective.
In this use the infinitive is said to depend on the word which it
modifies.
| With Nouns (Adjective Modifier) |
With Adjectives (Adverbial Modifier) |
| An opportunity to advance came. |
The men are ready to advance. |
| Determination to win brings success. |
John is eager to win. |
| Willingness to oblige makes friends. |
I shall be glad to oblige you. |
| I wish I had the ability to swim. |
We are all able to swim. |
| His anxiety to please us was laughable. |
He is anxious to please everybody. |
Note. This use is due to the fact that the infinitive with to is really a
prepositional phrase (§ 42). Thus, “determination to win” is equivalent to
“determination for victory,” and “eager to win” to “eager for victory.”
The adjective force of the infinitive comes out clearly in “nothing to eat,”
where to eat is practically synonymous with eatable.
In its adjective use, the present infinitive sometimes shows no distinction
in voice, so that the active and the passive are interchangeable: as,—“a
house to let” or “to be let”; “an axe to grind” or “to be ground.” In such
expressions the active form is usually preferable.
322. The infinitive without to may be used as an adjective
modifier after the direct object of see, hear, feel, and some
other verbs of like meaning.
- I saw the policeman arrest him.
- Hear the sea roar!
- Can you feel the ground tremble?
- Ruth watched the tide come in.
In this use the infinitive is practically equivalent to a participle. Compare
“I heard him shout” with “I heard him shouting.” Hence the substantive
may be regarded as an object, and the infinitive as its modifier. But the
construction closely approaches that of an infinitive clause (§§ 324–325).
323. An infinitive may modify a verb (1) by completing its meaning,
or (2) by expressing the purpose of the action.
I. Complementary Infinitive
- The ship began to roll.
- The rain continued to fall heavily.
- Every boy desires to succeed.
- The officer neglected to watch his men.
- The prisoners attempted to escape.
- You promised to come to-night.
After dare, the complementary infinitive may or may not have to. Thus,—“I
dare not do it”; “Who will dare to speak?”
II. Infinitive of Purpose
- He went to New York to study medicine.
- He opened his lips to speak.
- She closed her eyes to shut out the sight.
- Elsa lifted the cover to see what was inside.
- The conductor signalled to stop the train.
- Harold waited to assist his teacher.
Both the complementary infinitive and the infinitive of purpose
may be regarded as adverbial phrases modifying the verb.
Note. After some verbs the infinitive approaches the construction of a
pure noun and is often regarded as an object. Thus,—“I desire to see you”
(compare “I desire a sight of you”). It is simpler, however, to regard all
such infinitives as complementary and to treat them as adverbial modifiers.
For it is impossible to distinguish the construction of the infinitive after certain
adjectives (as in “I am eager to see you”) from its construction after
such verbs as wish and desire.
III. THE INFINITIVE CLAUSE
324. A peculiar infinitive construction often replaces a that-clause
as the object of a verb. Thus,—
I wished {that he should go. | him to go.}
In the first sentence, the noun clause that he should go is the
object of wished; in the second, this clause is replaced by him to
go, but without any change in meaning. This expression consists
of two parts:—(1) him, a pronoun in the objective case,
which replaces the subject he; and (2) an infinitive to go,
which replaces the predicate should go. Thus it is plain that
him to go is also a noun clause, of which him is the subject,
and to go the predicate. Such an expression is called an
infinitive clause.
325. A kind of clause, consisting of a substantive in the objective
case followed by an infinitive, may be used as the object of certain
verbs.
Such clauses are called infinitive clauses, and the substantive is said
to be the subject of the infinitive.
The subject of an infinitive is in the objective case.
Infinitive clauses are used (1) after verbs of wishing, commanding,
advising, and the like, and (2) after some verbs of believing,
declaring, and perceiving.39 Thus,—
- The colonel commanded them to charge [= that they should charge].
- I believe him to be trustworthy [= that he is trustworthy].
- The judge declared him to be a dangerous man [= that he was, etc.].
After a few verbs the infinitive without to is used in infinitive
clauses.
- Mr. Esmond bade his servant pack a portmanteau and get horses.
[Compare: ordered his servant to pack, etc.]
- What makes him cry? [Compare: What causes him to cry?]
- I let him sleep. [Compare: I allowed him to sleep.]
Note. Ordinarily the infinitive cannot assert and hence has no subject
(§ 309). The infinitive clause is, therefore, a peculiar exception, for him to go
makes an assertion as clearly as that he should go does. That him is really
the subject of to go and not the object of wished is manifest, for I wished
him makes no sense. The object of wished is the whole clause (him to go).
Originally, to be sure, the noun or pronoun in the objective was felt to be
the object of the main verb, and this relation may still be felt in “I ordered
him to go”; but even here the real object of ordered is the clause (as may be
seen in “I ordered the castle to be blown up”). The substantive has come to
be the real subject of the infinitive, and should be so treated in parsing.
326. A predicate pronoun after to be in an infinitive clause is
in the objective case, agreeing with the subject of the infinitive.
Care should be taken not to confuse this construction with
the predicate nominative (§ 88, 2).
| Predicate Pronoun after to be |
Predicate Nominative |
| I believed it to be her. |
I believed that it was she. |
| We know the author to be him. |
We know that the author is he. |
| The author is known to be he. |
| He thought Richard to be me. |
He thought that Richard was I. |
| Richard was thought to be I. |
| We suspected the intruders to be them. |
We suspected that the intruders were they. |
Note the case of the relatives and of the predicate pronouns in
the following sentences:—
- A boy whom I thought to be honest deceived me. [Whom is the subject
of the infinitive to be and is therefore in the objective case.]
- A boy who, I thought, was honest deceived me. [Who is the subject
of was and is therefore nominative. I thought is parenthetical (§ 502).]
- A boy whom I believe to be him just passed me.
- A boy who, I believe, was he, just passed me.
327. An infinitive clause may be the object of the preposition
for. Thus,—
- I wrote for him to come. [The clause him to come is the object of for;
him is the subject of to come.]
- They are waiting on the shore
For the bark to take them home.—Noel.
- I long for him to come back.
328. An infinitive clause with for may be used as a subject,
as a predicate nominative, or as the object of a preposition.
- For us to delay would be fatal to your enterprise. [Compare: Our
delay would be fatal.]
- Our best plan is for the boat to shoot the rapids. [Predicate nominative
agreeing with the subject plan.]
- I see no way out of the difficulty except for them to offer an apology.
[Compare: except the offer of an apology on their part.]
329. Certain words unite in themselves some of the properties
of adjectives with some of the properties of verbs. Such
words are called participles (§ 31). Thus,—
Shattered and sinking, but gallantly returning the enemy’s fire, the
frigate drifted out to sea.
Shattered, sinking, and returning are verb-forms which are in
some respects similar to infinitives: for (1) they express action;
(2) they have no subject to agree with, and hence have neither
person nor number; and (3) one of them takes a direct object.
They differ from infinitives, however, in that they resemble,
not nouns, but adjectives, for they describe the substantive
frigate to which they belong.
Such verb-forms are called participles, because they share (or
participate in) the nature of adjectives.
330. The participle is a verb-form which has no subject, but which
partakes of the nature of an adjective and expresses action or state in
such a way as to describe or limit a substantive.
- Who thundering comes on blackest steed?—Byron.
- Clinging to the horns of the altar, voiceless she stood.—De Quincey.
- Deserted, surrounded, outnumbered, and with everything at stake, he
did not even deign to stand on the defensive.—Macaulay.
- Shrouded in such baleful vapors, the genius of Burns was never seen
in clear azure splendor, enlightening the world.—Carlyle.
FORMS OF PARTICIPLES
331. Verbs have three participles,—the present, the past,
and the perfect.
332. The present participle ends in -ing. It usually describes
an action as taking place at the same time with some other
action.
- Tom came sauntering up the path.
- The beggar shambled down the steps, grumbling.
- Reaching for the flower, I lost my balance.
333. The present participle often refers to time preceding
that denoted by the predicate verb.
- Rising from his chair, he bowed. [That is, when he had risen.]
- Learning that your brother was in trouble, I hastened to his aid.
334. The past participle is always associated with the idea of past
time or completed action.
1. The past participle of a weak verb has the same form as the past
tense.40
| Present Tense |
Past Tense |
Past Participle |
| I mend chairs. |
I mended the chairs. |
The chairs are mended. |
| I sweep the rooms. |
I swept the rooms. |
The rooms are swept. |
| I seek treasure. |
I sought treasure. |
Treasure is sought. |
| I lose money. |
I lost money. |
The money is lost. |
2. The past participle of strong verbs shows a change from the vowel
of the present tense.
All strong verbs had originally the ending en (n) in the past participle,
but this ending has been lost in many verbs.
| Present Tense |
Past Tense |
Past Participle |
| He speaks. |
He spoke. |
(He has) spoken. |
| He draws. |
He drew. |
(He has) drawn. |
| He sings. |
He sang. |
(He has) sung. |
| He wins. |
He won. |
(He has) won. |
The forms show great variety and must be learned by
practice. (See pp. 291–297 for a list.)
335. The perfect participle is made by prefixing having to the
past participle.
- Having mended the watch, I sent it to the owner.
- Having lost his money, James was forced to walk home.
336. The present participle is used in forming the progressive
verb-phrases (§§ 255–259).
The past participle is used in forming the complete tenses
(§§ 242–244) and the passive voice (§ 247).
CONSTRUCTIONS OF PARTICIPLES
337. Since the participle has adjective properties, its constructions
are in the main like those of adjectives.
338. A participle is said to belong to the substantive which it
describes or limits.
- Rupert, missing his companion, stepped to the door. [The present
participle missing belongs to the subject Rupert.]
- Rising, she opened the window. [Rising belongs to she.]
- I heard the rain falling. [Falling belongs to the object rain.]
- Tom’s arm, broken by the blow, hung useless. [The past participle
broken belongs to the subject arm.]
- Having climbed the hill with great difficulty, I stopped to rest. [The
perfect participle having climbed belongs to the subject I.]
339. A participle should not be used without some substantive to
which it may belong.
- Right: Entering the room, we saw a strange sight. [The participle
entering belongs to the pronoun we.]
- Wrong: Entering the room, a strange sight was seen. [Since there is
no substantive to which entering can belong, it has no construction.]
Apparent exceptions are concerning, considering, pending,
generally speaking, etc. The first three may be classed as prepositions
(§ 355), the last as an independent participle.
We fought every day, and, generally speaking, twice every day.—De
Quincey.
Note. The rule in § 339 does not apply to such phrases as on entering,
after investigating, etc., in which the words in -ing are not participles, but
verbal nouns (§ 348). Thus the following sentences are grammatical:—“On
entering the room, a strange sight appeared”; “After investigating the subject,
the plan was adopted.” Such expressions, however, should be used with
caution, since they are sometimes awkward or ambiguous.
340. A participle may be modified by an adverb, an adverbial
phrase, or an adverbial clause.
- Smiling brightly, she extended her hand. [Adverb.]
- He leaped forward, shrieking with all his might. [Adverbial phrase.]
- Laughing until he cried, he sank into a chair. [Adverbial clause.]
341. A participle may take an object if its meaning allows.
- I found the old man mending his net.
- Lifting the box, he moved toward the door.
- Giving me a friendly nod, he passed on. [Here nod is the direct object
of giving, and me is the indirect object.]
The participle, with its modifiers and such other words as are attached to
it, is sometimes called a participial phrase.
342. A participle may be used as a pure adjective.
- A grinning boy confronted me.
- A battered hat hung on the peg.
- Kate was playing with a broken doll.
- We could hear a rushing stream.
- Willing hands make light work.
- He was struck by a spent ball.
343. The past participle is often used as a predicate adjective
expressing state or condition.
This construction is easily confused with the passive of verbs.
The distinction may be seen in the following examples:—
- The rain began to fall heavily, and every time a gust of wind struck
us we were drenched by it.
- When the rain at last ceased, we were drenched [that is, very wet].
In the first sentence, were drenched is the past passive of
the verb drench (compare the active “every time a gust of
wind struck us, it drenched us”). In the second, the participle
drenched expresses mere condition, and is therefore a predicate
adjective. The distinction, however, is not always sharp,
and in cases of doubt the phrase may be taken together as a
passive verb.
Note. The real test is the following. Whenever a person or thing is distinctly
present to the mind as the doer of the action, we have a passive verb-phrase.
Whenever, on the other hand, the participle merely describes condition
with no thought of its being the result of an antecedent act, the construction
is that of a predicate adjective (§ 172, 3).
Nominative Absolute
344. A substantive, with the participle belonging to it, is
often used to make a peculiar form of adverbial modifying
phrase: as,—
The wind failing, we lowered the sail.
Here the wind failing is equivalent to an adverbial phrase (on
the failure of the wind) or an adverbial clause (when the wind
failed). It defines the time of the action.
{The wind failing, | On the failure of the wind, | When the wind failed,} we lowered the sail.
345. A substantive, with a participle, may express the cause, time,
or circumstances of an action.
This is called the absolute construction.
The substantive is in the nominative case and is called a nominative
absolute.
- My knife slipping, I cut myself severely. [The phrase my knife slipping
is equivalent to because my knife slipped: it expresses cause.]
- Two days having elapsed, we again set forward. [The phrase in italics
is equivalent to when two days had elapsed: it expresses time.]
- Evenings he read aloud, his wife sewing by his side. [The phrase expresses
one of the circumstances that attended the reading.]
- This done, proceed to business. [The phrase this done is equivalent to
the clause since (or when) this is done, and indicates cause or time.]
Note. This construction is called absolute (that is, “free” or “loosened”)
because the substantive is not in any one of the constructions (subject, object,
apposition, etc.) which ordinarily attach nouns grammatically to other words
in the sentence. Nevertheless, the whole phrase, though standing apart from
the rest of the sentence, is in meaning an adverbial modifier of some verb.
346. The participle being is sometimes omitted in the absolute
construction.
- Allen once mayor, my chance of advancement would be ruined. [That
is: Allen once being mayor.]
- Peter stood before me, his hands in his pockets.
- His clothing in shreds, he presented a sorry sight.
347. English has a large and important class of verbal nouns
that end in -ing, and that serve as the names of actions.
These are identical in form with present participles, for which
they are frequently mistaken. The distinction, however, is clear,
for the present participle is never used as the name of an action.
Hence no such word in -ing that is a subject or an object,
or stands in any other noun construction, can be a participle.
- While I was travelling in Mexico, I met with an accident. [Participle.]
- Travelling broadens the mind. [Verbal noun, used as subject.]
- He enjoys travelling. [Verbal noun, used as object of a verb.]
- He spends his time in travelling. [Verbal noun, object of a preposition.]
- Tom’s favorite exercise is swimming. [Verbal noun, predicate nominative.]
- This sport, fishing, has been called the contemplative man’s recreation.
[Verbal noun, in apposition with sport.]
That nouns in -ing are real nouns may be proved by putting
ordinary nouns in their place.
| Travelling broadens the mind. |
Travel broadens the mind. |
| Talking is useless. |
Talk is useless. |
| He is afraid of falling. |
He is afraid of a fall. |
348. From nearly every English verb there may be formed a verbal
noun in -ing.
Verbal nouns in -ing have the form of present participles, but the
construction of nouns.
They are often called participial nouns.
Such nouns are freely used, either by themselves or in a
series along with ordinary nouns.
- Mining is a dangerous occupation.
- Painting and sculpture are sister arts.
- The Indians of Massachusetts spent their time in hunting, fishing,
agriculture, and warfare.
- Reading, writing, and arithmetic are jocosely called “the three r’s.”
349. Verbal nouns in -ing have certain properties of the
verb.
1. Verbal nouns in -ing may take a direct or an indirect object if their
meaning allows.
- Digging gold seems to the uninitiated like finding buried treasure.
- Lending him money is useless; it merely fosters his unthrifty habits.
[Here the noun lending, which is the simple subject of the sentence,
takes both a direct object (money) and an indirect object (him), precisely
as the verb lend might do.]
2. A verbal noun in -ing may take an adverbial modifier.
Speaking extemporaneously is good practice. [Here the verbal noun
speaking is the simple subject; but it is modified by the adverb extemporaneously,
precisely as if it were a verb.]
But verbal nouns in -ing, like other nouns, may be modified
by adjectives.
Extemporaneous speaking is good practice.
3. To the verbal nouns being and having, past participles may be
attached, so as to give the effect of voice and tense.
- After being instructed in my duties, I was ordered to wait on the king.
- There were grave doubts expressed as to his having seen the mastodon.
- After having been treated in so harsh a fashion, I had no wish to repeat
the interview.
Such expressions are verbal noun-phrases.
350. Verbal nouns in -ing are similar in some of their constructions
to infinitives used as nouns (p. 135).
| Infinitive as Noun |
Verbal Noun in -ing |
| To swim was difficult. |
Swimming was difficult. |
| My business is to make shoes. |
My business is making shoes. |
| To see is to believe. |
Seeing is believing. |
Nouns in -ing are sometimes called infinitives or gerunds.
351. A noun in -ing may be used as an adjective, or as the
adjective element in a compound noun (§ 64).
- The sleeping car was completely wrecked.
- William has plenty of spending money.
Note. Other examples are:—a working day, an ironing board, drinking
water, smelling salts, marching orders, a walking tour, a swimming race, a
vaulting pole. In such cases it makes little difference whether the two nouns
are taken together as a compound, or whether the first is regarded as an
adjective modifying the second. The difference between this use and that of
the participle is perfectly clear. A “sleeping dog” is a dog that sleeps; a
“sleeping car” is a car for sleeping. Sometimes, indeed, either explanation
is possible. Thus, a “hoisting engine” may be understood either as an “engine
that hoists,” or as an “engine for hoisting.” But it is better to class these
exceptions with the nouns in -ing.
352. When a verbal noun in -ing is preceded by an article or any
other adjective, it cannot take an object.
- {Shooting song-birds | The shooting of song-birds} is forbidden.
- {Launching a ship | The launching of a ship} requires care and skill.
- {Drawing maps | The drawing of maps} is a useful exercise.
- {Eating confectionery constantly | Constant eating of confectionery} is bad for the teeth.
- My business is {driving wells. | the driving of wells.}
Observe that, in each instance, the object (song-birds, ship,
maps, confectionery, wells) is replaced by a prepositional phrase
when an article or other adjective precedes the verbal noun.
Note. In such expressions as “I went a-fishing,” a is a shortened form of
the preposition on, and fishing is a verbal noun used as its object. When a is
omitted we have “I went fishing,” “The house is building,” and the like,
in which the word in -ing seems to be a participle, but is really the object of
the omitted a (= on).
353. The possessive case of a noun or pronoun may be used
to limit a verbal noun in -ing.
- I was sure of its being he. [Not: it.]
- I heard of Allen’s being elected. [Not: Allen.]