Frankfort.
DEAR SIR,
Since my return from Darmstadt,
the weather has been so very bad,
that I have passed the time mostly
at home. That I may obey your injunctions
to write regularly at the stated periods,
I will send you the substance of a
conversation I had within these few days
with a foreigner, a man of letters, with
whom I am in a considerable degree of intimacy.
This gentleman has never been in England,
but he speaks the language a little,
understands it very well, and has studied
many of our best Authors. He said,
that he had found in some English books,
a solidity of reasoning, and a strength of
expression, superior to any thing he had
met with elsewhere;—that the English
history furnished examples of patriotism
and zeal for civil liberty, equal to what
was recorded in the Greek or Roman
story;—that English poetry displayed a
sublimity of thought, and a knowledge of
the human heart, which no writings, ancient
or modern, could surpass; and in
philosophy it was pretty generally allowed,
that the English nation had no rival.—He
then mentioned the improvements made by
Englishmen in medicine and other arts,
their superiority in navigation, commerce,
and manufactures; and even hinted something
in praise of a few English statesmen.
He concluded his panegyric by saying,
that these considerations had given him the
highest idea of the English nation, and had
led him to cultivate the acquaintance of
many Englishmen whom he had occasionally
met on their travels. But he frankly
acknowledged, that his connection with
these had not contributed to support the
idea he had formed of their nation.
As I had heard sentiments of the same
kind insinuated by others, I replied at some
length, observing, that if he had lived in
the most brilliant period of Roman grandeur,
and had accidentally met with a few
Romans in Greece or Asia, and had formed
his opinion of that illustrious commonwealth
from the conduct and conversation
of these travellers, his ideas would, in all
probability, have been very different from
those which the writings of Livy, Cæsar,
Cicero, and Virgil, had given him of the
Roman people:—That the manners and
behaviour of the few English he might
have met abroad, so far from giving him a
just view of the character of the whole
nation, very possibly had led him to false
conclusions with regard to the character of
those very individuals. For that I myself
had known many young Englishmen who,
after having led a dissipated, insignificant
kind of life while on their travels, and
while the natural objects of their ambition
were at a distance, had changed their conduct
entirely upon their return, applied to
business as eagerly as they had formerly
launched into extravagance, and had at
length become very useful members of the
community.
But, continued I, throwing this consideration
out of the question, the real
character of a people can only be discovered
by living among them on a familiar
footing, and for a considerable time. This
is necessary before we can form a just idea
of any nation; but perhaps more so with
respect to the English, than any other: for
in no nation are the education, sentiments,
and pursuits of those who travel, so different
from those of the people who remain at
home.
The first class is composed of a few invalids,
a great many young men raw from
the university, and some idle men of fortune,
void of ambition, and incapable of
application, who, every now and then,
saunter through Europe, because they
know not how to employ their time at
home.
The second class is made up of younger
brothers, who are bred to the army, navy,
the law, and other professions;—all who
follow commerce, are employed in manufactures,
or farming;—and, in one word,
all who, not being born to independent
fortunes, endeavour to remedy that inconveniency
by industry, and the cultivation of
their talents.
England is the only country in Europe
whose inhabitants never leave it in search
of fortune. There are, moderately speaking,
twenty Frenchmen in London for
every Englishman at Paris. By far the
greater part of those Frenchmen travel to
get money, and almost all the English to
spend it. But we should certainly be led
into great errors, by forming an idea of
the character of the French nation from
that of the French fiddlers, dancing-masters,
dentists, and valet-de-chambres to be
met with in England, or other parts of
Europe.
The gentleman acknowledged, that it
would be unfair to decide on the French
character from that of their fiddlers and
dancing-masters; but added, that he did
not perceive that the English could reasonably
complain, should foreigners form
an opinion of their national character from
the men of fortune, rank, and the most
liberal education of their island.
I answered, they certainly would, because
young men of high rank and great fortune
carry a set of ideas along with them from
their infancy, which very often disappoint
the purposes of the best education.—— Let
a child of high rank be brought up with
all the care and attention the most judicious
parents and matters can give;—let him
be told, that personal qualities alone can
make him truly respectable;—that the
fortuitous circumstances of birth and fortune
afford no just foundation for esteem;—that
knowledge and virtue are the true
sources of honour and happiness;—that
idleness produces vice and misery;—that
without application he cannot acquire
knowledge;—and that without knowledge
he will dwindle into insignificance, in spite
of rank and fortune:—— Let these things
be inculcated with all the power of persuasion;
let them be illustrated by example,
and insinuated by fable and allegory;—yet,
do we not daily see the effect
of all this counteracted by the insinuations
of servants and base sycophants, who give
an importance to far different qualities,
and preach a much more agreeable doctrine?——
They make eternal allusions in all their
discourse and behaviour to the great estate
the young spark is one day to have, and the
great man he must be, independent of any
effort of his own. They plainly insinuate,
if they do not directly say it, that study and
application, tho’ proper enough for hospital
boys, is unnecessary, or perhaps unbecoming
a man of fashion. They talk with rapture
of the hounds, hunters, and race-horses of
one great man; of the rich liveries and brilliant
equipage of another; and how much
both are loved and admired for their liberality
to their servants. They tell their young
master, that his rank and estate entitle him
to have finer hounds, horses, liveries and
equipage than either, and to be more liberal
to his servants; and consequently a greater
man in every respect. This kind of poison,
being often poured upon the young
sprouts of fortune and quality, gradually
blasts the vigour of the plants, and renders
all care and cultivation ineffectual.
If we suppose that domestics of another
character could be placed about a boy of
high rank, and every measure taken to inspire
him with other sentiments; he cannot
stir abroad, he cannot go into company
without perceiving his own importance,
and the attention that is paid to him. His
childish pranks are called spirited actions;
his pert speeches are converted into bon
mots; and when reproved or punished by
his parent or master, ten to one but some
obsequious intermeddler will tell him that
he has suffered great injustice.
The youth, improving all this to the purposes
of indolence and vanity, arrives at
length at the comfortable persuasion, that
study or application of any kind would in
him be superfluous;—that he ought only
to seek amusement, for at the blessed age of
twenty-one, distinction, deference, admiration,
and all other good things will be
added unto him.
A young man, on the other hand, who
is born to no such expectations, has no sycophants
around him to pervert his understanding;—when
he behaves improperly, he
instantly sees the marks of disapprobation
on every countenance:—He daily meets
with people who inform him of his faults
without ceremony or circumlocution.—He
perceives that nobody cares for his bad humour
or caprice, and very naturally concludes
that he had best correct his temper.—He
finds that he is apt to be neglected in
company, and that the only remedy for this
inconveniency will be the rendering himself
agreeable.—He loves affluence, distinction,
and admiration, as well as the rich and
great; but becomes fully convinced that he
can never obtain even the shadow of them,
otherwise than by useful and ornamental
acquirements. The truth of those precepts,
which is proved by rhetoric and syllogism
to the boy of fortune, is experimentally
felt by him who has no fortune; and
the difference which this makes, is infinite.
So that the son of a gentleman of moderate
fortune has a probability of knowing
more of the world at the age of sixteen, and
of having a juster notion of people’s sentiments
of him, than a youth of very high
rank at a much more advanced age; for it
is very difficult for any person to find out
that he is despised while he continues to be
flattered.
So far, therefore, from being surprised
that dissipation, weakness and ignorance,
are so prevalent among those who are born
to great fortunes and high rank, we ought
to be astonished to see so great a number of
men of virtue, diligence and genius among
them as there is. And if the number be
proportionably greater in England than in
any other country, which I believe is the
case, this must proceed from the impartial
discipline of our public schools; and the
equitable treatment which boys of the
greatest rank receive from their comrades.
Sometimes the natural, manly sentiments
they acquire from their school companions,
serve as an antidote against the childish, sophistical
notions with which weak or designing
men endeavour to inspire them in
after-life.
The nature of the British constitution
contributes also to form a greater number of
men of talents among the wealthy and the
great, than are to be found in other countries;
because it opens a wider field for ambition
than any other government;—and
ambition excites those exertions which produce
talents.
But, continued I, you must acknowledge
that it would be improper to form a judgment
of the English genius, by samples
taken from men who have greater temptations
to indolence, and fewer spurs to application
than others.
My disputant still contested the point, and
asserted that high birth gave a native dignity
and elevation to the mind;—that distinctions
and honours were originally introduced
into families by eminent abilities
and great virtues;—that when a man of illustrious
birth came into a company, or
even when his name was mentioned, this
naturally raised a recollection of the great
actions and shining qualities of the eminent
person who had first acquired those honours;—that
a consciousness of this must
naturally stimulate the present possessor to
imitate the virtues of his ancestors;—that
his degenerating would subject him to the
highest degree of censure, as the world
could not, without indignation, behold indolence
and vice adorned with the rewards
of activity and virtue.
I might have disputed this assertion, that
honours and titles are always the rewards of
virtue; and could have produced abundance
of instances of the opposite proposition. But
I allowed that they often were so, and that
hereditary honours in a family always ought
to have, and sometimes had, the effect which
he supposed: but these concessions being
made in their fullest extent, still he would
do injustice to the English, by forming a
judgment of their national character from
what he had observed of the temper, manners,
and genius of those Englishmen with
whom he had been acquainted in foreign
countries; because three-fourths of them
were, in all probability, men of fortune,
without having family or high birth to boast
of; so that they had the greatest inducements
to indolence, without possessing the
motives to virtuous exertions, which influence
people of high rank.—For, though
it rarely happened in other countries, it was
very common in England for men of all the
various professions and trades to accumulate
very great fortunes, which, at their death,
falling to their sons, these young men,
without having had a suitable education,
immediately set up for gentlemen, and run
over Europe in the characters of Milords
Anglois, game, purchase pictures, mutilated
statues and mistresses, to the astonishment
of all beholders: And, conscious of
the blot in their escutcheon, they think it is
incumbent on them to wash it out, and
make up for the impurity of their blood,
by plunging deeper into the ocean of extravagance
than is necessary for a man of hereditary
fashion.
Here our conversation ended, and the
gentleman promised that he would abide by
the idea he had formed of the English nation
from the works of Milton, Locke and
Newton, and the characters of Raleigh,
Hambden, and Sidney.